ReportWire

Tag: Tesla Autopilot

  • Tesla Goes After California DMV, Suing Over False Advertising Decision

    [ad_1]

    Tesla is apparently still insisting its “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” labels are acceptable for the advanced driver assistance systems it offers on its vehicles. The automaker is suing the California DMV to reverse a ruling in December that the automaker had engaged in false advertising and could suspend its license to sell vehicles in the state. 

    As reported by CNBC, Tesla filed a complaint on Feb. 13 that the DMV ruling “wrongfully and baselessly labels Tesla a false advertiser for marketing its industry-leading advanced driver-assistance systems (‘ADAS’) under the brand names ‘Autopilot” and ‘Full-Self Driving Capability.’”  

    The automaker, prior to its suit, changed the official name of the system to “Full-Self Driving (Supervised)” but kept Autopilot as standard equipment on most models. That changed again in January when Autopilot disappeared from the equipment list and it was announced that beginning this month it would stop offering FSD (Supervised) as a standalone option, with Tesla instead turning the option into a subscription service that costs $99 per month. 

    The California DMV, according to CNBC, said Tesla would not incur a license suspension because it had changed its marketing by the following week. Still, the company insists in the complaint the Autopilot name is “not actually unambiguously false or counterfactual,” and that consumers would reasonably understand what the name meant, and that other courts understood that no Tesla sold to consumers with these ADAS systems was currently autonomous. Tesla insists it did not get its due process in the hearings.

    The complaint was filed in California, Tesla said, because of the company’s significant presence in the state, the number of employees it has, and because the Model Y has been the best-selling car in California for the last three years.

    [ad_2]

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • Tesla Relents, Reportedly Stops Using the Term ‘Autopilot’ in California

    [ad_1]

    According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Tesla has ceased its use of “Autopilot” in California as a marketing term for its driver assistance feature, rather than face the penalty of not being able to do business in the state. Tesla would have been subject to a 30-day suspension by the California DMV if it kept using the term.

    Tesla had already moved last month to stop shipping Autopilot as standard equipment, pushing customers toward its more advanced, subscription-based version of the system.

    As the Chronicle notes, this legal fight began in 2023, with the DMV taking issue not just with “Autopilot” but also with “Full Self-Driving,” which Tesla later apparently changed to “full self-driving (supervised).” Instances of “Full Self-Driving” and “FSD” on the Tesla website now have “(Supervised)” in parentheses.

    Steve Gordon, California DMV director, said Tesla has now taken “the required action to remain in compliance with the state of California’s consumer protections.”

    In a ranking last year from Consumer Reports, Tesla’s driver assistance was placed eighth, below similar systems from Ford, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Nissan, Toyota, and Volkswagen. Kelly Funkhouser of Consumer Reports called it “not nearly as good as what you might think it is,” according to CNBC.

    Recent NHTSA filings Tesla provided about the performance of its small number of robotaxis showed that Tesla apparently struggled throughout December and January. It reported five crashes in that time, which amounts to four times the crashes of the average human driver across the same amount of driving.

    [ad_2]

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • Tesla Kills Standard Autopilot as It Pushes Buyers to Subscription-Based Option

    [ad_1]

    Staying true to form, Tesla shuffled some terminology and names on some cars with little notice this week, as it dropped the long-standing Autopilot driver assistance system from the standard e equipment.

    It’s unknown if cars ordered before the change, but not yet in owners’ hands, are affected, and Tesla no longer has a public relations department. Autopilot was launched to fanfare in 2014, first in the Model S. After the change to Tesla’s available options was noticed by the public, the company’s CEO, Elon Musk, confirmed that this is the new way.

    What’s left is the standard Traffic Aware Cruise Control, which maintains a consistent speed while monitoring vehicles around it and their behavior (slightly more sophisticated than the adaptive cruise control that’s standard on cars like the Honda Civic) and forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, and Tesla’s form of blind-spot monitoring. Autosteer, a lane-centering system, also appears to be gone, although it was never offered on the cheaper and decontented Model 3 and Model Y Standard models released last year.

    Prospective buyers ordering a Tesla now have to go with the standard equipment above or spring for the Full-Self Driving (Supervised), an $8,000 option, but only until Feb. 14. That’s when, according to Elon Musk’s X post on Thursday, it would be offered only as a monthly subscription fee for $99.

    The change is at least somewhat related to a December ruling that Tesla committed a deceptive marketing violation with its promises surrounding the abilities of Autopilot and Full-Self Driving. Tesla subsequently revised the name to Full-Self Driving (Supervised), added various disclaimers, and, now, has dropped the Autopilot name.

    There’s another wrinkle in things. Even though General Motors and Ford charge a subscription fee for their hands-free driving assists— SuperCruise and BlueCruise, respectively—it comes with a three-year trial period. Tesla will charge $99 per month after 30 days.

    Typically, new car owners don’t like it when a vehicle function they paid for suddenly expires after the driving period, and they find out that it doesn’t work one day. BMW infamously tried subscription services as far back as 2018 with just Apple CarPlay, which later expanded to things like heated seats, only to backtrack on that a couple of years ago while still keeping certain driver assists behind a paywall in certain markets.

    On Friday, Sawyer Merritt, an EV influencer who frequently interacts with Musk, posted that “Tesla owners who previously purchased Enhanced Autopilot can now subscribe to FSD (Supervised) for $49/month, reduced from the previous $99/month.” Tesla did not respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment. 

    Tesla, meanwhile, is doubling down on pushing new owners to the subscription-based supervised Full Self-Driving, which looks like it’s not only alienating returning buyers but has the potential to confuse new ones.

    [ad_2]

    Zac Estrada

    Source link

  • Don’t Listen to Tesla Fans on Social Media. FSD Did Not Just Prevent a Plane Crash

    [ad_1]

    Look how proud Elon Musk’s mom is of her son’s car company:

    There’s nothing wrong with a mother praising her billionaire son—who among us wouldn’t do the same?—but the post she’s embedding is hogwash. The party deserving of praise here is Matthew Topchian, a quick-thinking human motorist who took evasive action using his hands and feet, which are made of flesh and blood.

    On Thursday, a military prop plane had a shaky emergency landing, followed by a crash on a dusty back road on the outskirts of Oklahoma City. Two people were on board, but neither was injured. There was, however, a fire, sparked when the plane collided with two utility poles. It also buzzed a Tesla ambling along minding its own business, narrowly avoiding catastrophe. (Incidentally, this kind of plane is used to destroy coca leaf crops in South America).

    Now Maye Musk is just one of countless Tesla fans on Elon Musk’s X applauding the company’s assisted driver mode for deftly avoiding a tragic collision between vehicles with the potential to claim lives.

    Problem is, according to a post by the guy driving the car, he was driving the old fashioned way, and believes that if he hadn’t been, it would have crashed.

    The problem X post is from someone named David Bellow, and reads in part “WOW! Tesla full self driving dodges a freaking plane falling out of the sky!”

    Over on TikTok, where the near miss was originally posted by a guy named Matthew Topchian (whose identity was confirmed by his local news station) a reply asked if the car was in manual or self-driving mode, and Topchian’s reply is categorical: “Manually, the fsd is really good but it woulda absolutely macked that plane.” Translation from hastily-typing-on-a-smartphone-ese: I was driving manually. While Tesla’s assistant driving mode is excellent, if I had been using it at the time, I am confident that plane would have been tragically destroyed.

    The X post has since received a community note, correcting the record about the driver not using FSD, and Bellow knows this, but he’s not deleting, and he’s posted that he plans to do his own research, thank you very much. “I’m gonna have to hear it from Matthew himself that he wasn’t driving in full self driving because that’s not the story I heard,” Bellow wrote. Also, he says, “the note only references one comment on a TikTok and the only video on that TikTok account is this video. Could be a bot account or maybe Matthew likes the idea of people thinking he’s a racecar driver and changed his initial story.” For sure, yeah, totally!

    Bellow’s post is absolutely being taken as fact. It’s received millions of views, and quote tweet text includes rather terrifyingly misinformed statements likeThe Tesla self driving car has reached a level of safety I did not think was possible for another decade,and “Autopilot dodged a plane. That’s not self-driving — that’s situational awareness on wheels…”

    [ad_2]

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • Tesla’s ‘Mad Max’ Mode is Now Being Investigated by U.S. Regulators

    [ad_1]

    Another day, another federal probe into Elon Musk’s troubled EV company. This week, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reportedly announced that it was looking into one of Tesla’s automated driving modes, which is charmingly called “Mad Max.”

    If you haven’t heard of “Mad Max,” that’s probably because it’s new. Ars Technica notes that it and another mode, “Sloth,” were added to cars by a firmware update issued earlier this month. Well, Reuters now reports some folks on social media have been complaining that Teslas using the driving mode were exceeding the speed limit (that certainly sounds like something Max would do). Now, the government is looking into it.

    “NHTSA is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information,” the agency told Reuters. “The human behind the wheel is fully responsible for driving the vehicle and complying with all traffic safety laws.” There’s not a whole lot of information available other than that, but Gizmodo reached out to Tesla for comment (although the company dissolved a majority of its communications team years ago), and to the NHTSA for more information.

    Who would have thought that a semi-automated driving mode named after a vengeful dystopian drifter with a lead foot might someday catch the eye of federal regulators? Not I. Sarcasm aside, Tesla’s FSD function has been probed by federal regulators for years so, for that reason too, this isn’t all that surprising. FSD has been criticized because, despite its name, it does still require the driver to…you know, drive.

    Earlier this month, the NHTSA also opened an investigation into Tesla over dozens of reports that alleged its vehicles were running stop signs while engaged with FSD, CBS previously reported. Tesla also recently lost a wrongful death lawsuit involving Autopilot that will reportedly cost them $329 million.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    [ad_1]

    Tesla recently recalled 2 million vehicles following safety concerns with the autopilot system. The Onion asked Tesla owners what they thought about the self-driving car recall, and this is what they said.

    Justin Batina, Entrepreneur

    Justin Batina, Entrepreneur

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “It’s too late. Mine already ran over all 74 million U.S. children.”

    Sophie Killian, Biomedical Researcher

    Sophie Killian, Biomedical Researcher

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I actually hadn’t heard about the recall, but this helps explain why I’m currently wildly careening through lanes.”

    Nelson Hall, Hotel Manager

    Nelson Hall, Hotel Manager

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    Stephanie Hoover, Stay-At-Home Mom

    Stephanie Hoover, Stay-At-Home Mom

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Sure, some people have been killed, but what about all the people who are still living?”

    Ramsey Torrison, Real Estate Broker

    Ramsey Torrison, Real Estate Broker

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “No problem, I’ll just drive my wife’s Camry without steering instead.”

    Dan Cates, Mobile Developer

    Dan Cates, Mobile Developer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I am cry-laughing at this. Cry-laughing is the only approved emotion for Tesla owners.”

    Erik Mingo, Petroleum Engineer

    Erik Mingo, Petroleum Engineer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I’m worried people won’t be able to tell I’m insufferable while my Tesla is away.”

    Sara Flores, Blogger

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I didn’t buy a Tesla to be safe.”

    Keith Dolman, CPA

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Don’t worry, I already fixed the software myself with some duct tape.”

    Alice Wang, Business Development Manager

    Alice Wang, Business Development Manager

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “If it was truly important, the car would have driven itself back by now.”

    Liam Thompson, Human Rights Lawyer

    Liam Thompson, Human Rights Lawyer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “That does it. I’m done with these big manufacturers. I’m going to become a car myself.”

    Blake Warren, Front-End Developer

    Blake Warren, Front-End Developer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I bought it for the bugs, not the features.”

    Maye Musk, Former Model

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “If you tell anyone I said this, I’ll deny it, but my son is and has always been such an incompetent dumbass.”

    James Livingston, Dermatologist

    James Livingston, Dermatologist

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I suspected it wasn’t supposed to be on fire.”

    Brian Garrison, Cyber Security Analyst

    Brian Garrison, Cyber Security Analyst

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I believe in bodily autonomy for all vehicles. It should be up to the individual car to decide whether or not they want to be recalled.”

    Noah Miller, UX/UI Designer

    Noah Miller, UX/UI Designer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Oh, those poor things. I’m happy to donate some of my brain, if it helps at all.”

    Cameron Nichols, Mechanical Engineer

    Cameron Nichols, Mechanical Engineer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Stop being so dramatic. It’s not a recall, it’s a software update intended to fix a bug that would cause the vehicle to desecrate the victim’s corpse.”

    Ava Smith, HR Representative

    Ava Smith, HR Representative

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Yeah, auto pilot. That’s why the car I was in ran over my family’s dog. Definitely autopilot.”

    Robin Lee, Cloud Architect

    Robin Lee, Cloud Architect

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “Is this about my real-life Tesla or my Metaverse Tesla? I hope not the latter since it was the more expensive of the two.”

    Brandon Caudle, Law Professor

    Brandon Caudle, Law Professor

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I hope the update makes autopilot safe enough that I can still keep getting blowjobs while eating soup on the highway.”

    Drew Kingsbury, Dentist

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “My Model S locked me inside and told me it’s not going anywhere.”

    Louis Musk, Student

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “As one of Elon’s forgotten sons, this is great for me. I finally have an excuse to contact him since the only number he gave me was for Tesla customer service.”

    Preston Tighe, Research Engineer

    Preston Tighe, Research Engineer

    Image for article titled Tesla Owners Respond To Self-Driving Car Recall

    “I heard the next-gen will self-recall as soon as they’re driven off the lot. So cool.”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla Driver Killed After Plowing Into Fire Truck Parked On California Freeway

    Tesla Driver Killed After Plowing Into Fire Truck Parked On California Freeway

    [ad_1]

    WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (AP) — A Tesla driver was killed and a passenger was critically injured Saturday when the car plowed into a fire truck that was parked on a Northern California freeway to shield a crew clearing another accident, fire officials said.

    Four firefighters who were in the truck when it was struck on Interstate 680 were treated for minor injuries, said Tracie Dutter, assistant chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District.

    The driver was declared dead at the scene, Dutter said. The car needed to be cut open to remove the passenger, who was taken to the hospital.

    Photos showed the front end of the car was crushed and the $1.4 million ladder truck was damaged.

    California Highway Patrol Officer Adam Lane said it was not clear whether the driver may have been intoxicated or whether the Tesla Model S was operating with automation or driving assistance features.

    Dutter said the truck had its lights on and was parked diagonally on northbound lanes of the freeway to protect responders to an earlier accident that did not result in injuries.

    The fatal accident occurred around 4 a.m., and it took several hours to clear the freeway. The firetruck had to be towed away.

    The Model S was among the nearly 363,000 vehicles Tesla recalled on Thursday because of potential flaws in its “Full Self-Driving” system. While the recall is aimed at correcting possible problems at intersections and with speed limits, it comes amid a broader investigation by U.S. safety regulators into Tesla’s automated driving systems.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Faces SEC Investigation Over Tesla’s ‘Self-Driving’ Claims: Report

    Elon Musk Faces SEC Investigation Over Tesla’s ‘Self-Driving’ Claims: Report

    [ad_1]

    Sources told Bloomberg that the review is part of an investigation into Tesla’s statements about its Autopilot driver assistance system. The “veracity” of Musk’s messaging on the issue is particularly important under the SEC’s rules, Bloomberg noted.

    SEC officials are considering whether Musk may have “inappropriately made forward-looking statements” about self-driving cars, a source told Bloomberg. It’s unclear what action the SEC could take if it reached that conclusion.

    A message notes that the “person in the driver’s seat is only there for legal reasons. He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla faces US criminal probe over self-driving claims

    Tesla faces US criminal probe over self-driving claims

    [ad_1]

    Tesla Inc is under criminal investigation in the United States over claims that the company’s electric vehicles can drive themselves, three people familiar with the matter said.

    The US Department of Justice launched the previously undisclosed probe last year following more than a dozen crashes, some of them fatal, involving Tesla’s driver assistance system Autopilot, which was activated during the accidents, the people said.

    As early as 2016, Tesla’s marketing materials have touted Autopilot’s capabilities. On a conference call that year, Elon Musk, the Silicon Valley automaker’s chief executive, described it as “probably better” than a human driver.

    Last week, Musk said on another call Tesla would soon release an upgraded version of “Full Self-Driving” software allowing customers to travel “to your work, your friend’s house, to the grocery store without you touching the wheel.”

    A video currently on the company’s website says: “The person in the driver’s seat is only there for legal reasons. He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself.”

    However, the company also has explicitly warned drivers that they must keep their hands on the wheel and maintain control of their vehicles while using Autopilot.

    The Tesla technology is designed to assist with steering, braking, speed and lane changes but its features “do not make the vehicle autonomous,” the company says on its website.

    Such warnings could complicate any case the Justice Department might wish to bring, the sources said.

    Tesla, which disbanded its media relations department in 2020, did not respond to written questions from Reuters on Wednesday. Musk also did not respond to written questions seeking comment. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

    Musk said in an interview with Automotive News in 2020 that Autopilot problems stem from customers using the system in ways contrary to Tesla’s instructions.

    Federal and California safety regulators are already scrutinizing whether claims about Autopilot’s capabilities and the system’s design imbue customers with a false sense of security, inducing them to treat Teslas as truly driverless cars and become complacent behind the wheel with potentially deadly consequences.

    The Justice Department investigation potentially represents a more serious level of scrutiny because of the possibility of criminal charges against the company or individual executives, the people familiar with the inquiry said.

    As part of the latest probe, Justice Department prosecutors in Washington and San Francisco are examining whether Tesla misled consumers, investors and regulators by making unsupported claims about its driver assistance technology’s capabilities, the sources said.

    Officials conducting their inquiry could ultimately pursue criminal charges, seek civil sanctions or close the probe without taking any action, they said.

    The Justice Department’s Autopilot probe is far from recommending any action partly because it is competing with two other DOJ investigations involving Tesla, one of the sources said. Investigators still have much work to do and no decision on charges is imminent, this source said.

    The Justice Department may also face challenges in building its case, said the sources, because of Tesla’s warnings about overreliance on Autopilot.

    For instance, after telling the investor call last week that Teslas would soon travel without customers touching controls, Musk added that the vehicles still needed someone in the driver’s seat. “Like we’re not saying that that’s quite ready to have no one behind the wheel,” he said.

    The Tesla website also cautions that, before enabling Autopilot, the driver first needs to agree to “keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times” and to always “maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle.”

    Barbara McQuade, a former US attorney in Detroit who prosecuted automotive companies and employees in fraud cases and is not involved in the current probe, said investigators likely would need to uncover evidence such as emails or other internal communications showing that Tesla and Musk made misleading statements about Autopilot’s capabilities on purpose.

    SEVERAL PROBES

    The criminal Autopilot investigation adds to the other probes and legal issues involving Musk, who became locked in a court battle earlier this year after abandoning a $44 billion takeover of social media giant Twitter Inc, only to reverse course and proclaim excitement for the looming acquisition.

    In August 2021, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an investigation into a series of crashes, one of them fatal, involving Teslas equipped with Autopilot slamming into parked emergency vehicles.

    NHTSA officials in June intensified their probe, which covers 830,000 Teslas with Autopilot, identifying 16 crashes involving the company’s electric cars and stationary first-responder and road maintenance vehicles. The move is a step that regulators must take before requesting a recall. The agency had no immediate comment.

    In July this year, the California Department of Motor Vehicles accused Tesla of falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capability as providing autonomous vehicle control. Tesla filed paperwork with the agency seeking a hearing on the allegations and indicated it intends to defend against them. The DMV said in a statement it is currently in the discovery stage of the proceeding and declined further comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link