ReportWire

Tag: terrorism

  • Opinion | The Hamas Rule of Terror in Gaza

    [ad_1]

    Hamas has returned only nine of the 28 dead Israeli hostages it promised President Trump. Perhaps the terrorists are busy dealing with the corpses of the Palestinians they have been executing since the cease-fire. Where are the protests now from those in the West who claimed to speak for Gazans?

    “Death to Zionism. Death to all collaborators,” the National Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) wrote in an online post Sunday, echoing Hamas’s usual excuse for killing its rivals and dissenters. SJP led the 2024 campus protests in the U.S. and received fawning press coverage for its humanitarian concern.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    The Editorial Board

    Source link

  • After Israeli Withdrawal, Hamas Launches Violent Crackdown on Rivals in Gaza

    [ad_1]

    A U.S.-brokered cease-fire has hit pause on the war between Hamas and Israel. In its place, a fight between Hamas and other armed Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip is now under way.

    As Israeli troops pulled back last week to facilitate a deal that freed the living hostages still held in Gaza, Hamas surged security forces in behind them—a public assertion of authority intended to make clear the group remains the enclave’s governing power.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Benoit Faucon

    Source link

  • Israel, Hamas Trade Accusations of Cease-Fire Violations

    [ad_1]

    TEL AVIV—Israel and Hamas on Tuesday accused each other of violating the cease-fire that was part of the deal that released all 20 living hostages from Gaza, with Israel reducing the humanitarian aid promised under the agreement to increase pressure on Hamas to return more bodies of deceased hostages.

    Israelis celebrated the return of the living hostages on Monday, in what for many marked an end to the two-year Gaza war. But the families of the deceased hostages who are supposed to be returned to Israel as part of President Trump’s 20-point plan for peace said they were angered that only four of 28 bodies had been returned.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2] Anat Peled
    Source link

  • Frozen in Time Since Hamas Attacked, a Kibbutz Awaits Hostages Living and Dead

    [ad_1]

    NIR OZ, Israel—Inside the bomb shelter of a small house in this kibbutz near the Gaza border, a heart is scrawled on the wall around the letters “AA,” short for Ariel and Arbel.

    Above it is a note written by one of them, a former hostage, to the other, her fiancé still in captivity: “I will wait for you, I love you more.”

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Feliz Solomon

    Source link

  • Trump May Send Tomahawks to Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    President Trump threatened to send long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, should Russian President Vladimir Putin continue to decline his efforts to negotiate a peace deal in the region.

    “I might say, look, if this war’s not going to get settled, I’m going to send them Tomahawks,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Sunday as he flew overseas to Tel Aviv, where he is set to take part in a ceremony for a landmark peace deal between Israel and Hamas.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Natalie Andrews

    Source link

  • Israel Prepares to Receive Its Last Living Hostages Held by Hamas

    [ad_1]

    Israeli authorities were preparing to receive the last hostages still alive in Gaza, after Hamas told mediators it had 20 living captives in its custody and was ready to begin setting them free.

    The message, which the militant group sent to Israel through intermediaries, marked the first time Hamas has confirmed the number of hostages it holds. It also addressed uncertainty about whether Hamas, in its battered and fragmented state, could quickly assemble all the living hostages and pointed to a possibly accelerated timetable for their release.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2] Summer Said
    Source link

  • A Coordinated Squeeze Play Forced Hamas to Accept a Deal It Didn’t Want

    [ad_1]

    SHARM EL-SHEIKH—When Hamas leader Khalil Al-Hayya first saw President Trump’s plan for peace in Gaza, which demanded his group disarm with few concrete steps to make sure Israel would end the war, his immediate reaction was no.

    The plan, heavily amended by Israel and presented to Hamas by the Qatari prime minister and Egypt’s spy chief, looked nothing like what Hayya had been led to expect, officials familiar with the discussions said. Hayya, who less than a month earlier had been a target of Israel’s audacious attack on Hamas in Qatar, told his visitors the group would keep its Israeli hostages until it had enforceable guarantees the war would end.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2] Jared Malsin
    Source link

  • Israel Rejects Freeing From Prison the Most Popular Palestinian Leader

    [ad_1]

    RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — The most popular and potentially unifying Palestinian leader — Marwan Barghouti — is not among the prisoners Israel intends to free in exchange for hostages held by Hamas under the new Gaza ceasefire deal.

    Israel has also rejected freeing other high-profile prisoners whose release Hamas has long sought, though it was not immediately clear if a list of around 250 prisoners issued Friday on the Israeli government’s official website was final.

    Senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk told the Al Jazeera TV network that the group insists on the release of Barghouti and other high-profile figures and that it was in discussions with mediators.

    Israel views Barghouti as a terrorist leader. He is serving multiple life sentences after being convicted in 2004 in connection with attacks in Israel that killed five people.

    But some experts say Israel fears Barghouti for another reason: An advocate of a two-state solution even as he backed armed resistance to occupation, Barghouti could be a powerful rallying figure for Palestinians. Some Palestinians view him as their own Nelson Mandela, the South African anti-apartheid activist who became his country’s first Black president.

    With the ceasefire and Israeli troop pullback in Gaza that came into effect Friday, Hamas is to release about 20 living Israeli hostages by Monday. Israel is to free some 250 Palestinians serving prison sentences, as well as around 1,700 people seized from Gaza the past two years and held without charge.

    The releases have powerful resonance on both sides. Israelis see the prisoners as terrorists, some of them involved in suicide bombings. Many Palestinians view the thousands held by Israel as political prisoners or freedom fighters resisting decades of military occupation.


    Many to be released were jailed 2 decades ago

    Most of those on the Israeli prisoner list are members of Hamas and the Fatah faction arrested in the 2000s. Many of them were convicted of involvement in shootings, bombings or other attacks that killed or attempted to kill Israeli civilians, settlers and soldiers. After their release, more than half will be sent to Gaza or into exile outside the Palestinian territories, according to the list.

    The 2000s saw the eruption of the Second Intifada, a Palestinian uprising fueled by anger over continued occupation despite years of peace talks. The uprising turned bloody, with Palestinian armed groups carrying out attacks that killed hundreds of Israelis, and the Israeli military killing several thousand Palestinians.

    One prisoner who will be freed is Iyad Abu al-Rub, an Islamic Jihad commander convicted of orchestrating suicide bombings in Israel from 2003-2005 that killed 13 people.

    The oldest and longest imprisoned to be released is 64-year-old Samir Abu Naama, a Fatah member who was arrested from the West Bank in 1986 and convicted on charges of planting explosives. The youngest is Mohammed Abu Qatish, who was 16 when he was arrested in 2022 and convicted of an attempted stabbing.


    Hamas has long sought Barghouti’s freedom

    Hamas leaders have in the past demanded that Israel release Barghouti, a leader of the militant group’s main political rival, Fatah, as part of any deal to end the fighting in Gaza. But Israel has refused in previous exchanges.

    Israel fears history could repeat itself after it released senior Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in a 2011 exchange. The long-serving prisoner was one of the main architects of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the latest war in Gaza, and he went on to lead the militant group before being killed by Israeli forces last year.

    One of the few consensus figures in Palestinian politics, Barghouti, 66, is widely seen as a potential successor to President Mahmoud Abbas, the aging and unpopular leader of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority that runs pockets of the West Bank. Polls consistently show Barghouti is the most popular Palestinian leader.

    Barghouti was born in the West Bank village of Kobar in 1959. While studying history and politics at Bir Zeit University, he helped spearhead student protests against the Israeli occupation. He emerged as an organizer in the first Palestinian uprising, which erupted in December 1987.

    Israel eventually deported him to Jordan. He returned to the West Bank in the 1990s as part of interim peace agreements that created the Palestinian Authority and were meant to pave the way for a state.

    After the Second Intifada broke out, Israel accused Barghouti – then head of Fatah in the West Bank — of being the leader of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a loose collection of Fatah-linked armed groups that carried out attacks on Israelis.

    Barghouti never commented on his links to the Brigades. While he expressed hopes for a Palestinian state and Israel side by side in peace, he said Palestinians had a right to fight back in the face of growing Israeli settlements and the military’s violence against Palestinians.

    “I am not a terrorist, but neither am I a pacifist,” he wrote in a 2002 editorial in The Washington Post.

    Soon after, he was arrested by Israel. At trial he opted not to defend himself because he didn’t recognize the court’s authority. He was convicted of murder for involvement in several Brigades’ attacks and given five life sentences, while acquitted over other attacks.


    A unifying figure throughout his imprisonment

    Barghouti showed he could build bridges across Palestinian divisions even as he reached out to Israelis, said Mouin Rabbani, non-resident fellow at Democracy for the Arab World Now and co-editor of Jadaliyya, an online magazine focusing on the Middle East.

    Barghouti is “seen as a credible national leader, someone who can lead the Palestinians in a way Abbas as consistently failed to,” he said.

    Israel is “keen to avoid” that, since its policy for years has been to keep Palestinians divided and Abbas’ administration weak, Rabbani said, adding that Abbas also feels threatened by any Barghouti release.

    Barghouti is not connected to the corruption that has plagued Abbas’ Palestinian Authority and turned many against it, said Eyal Zisser, the vice rector of Tel Aviv University and an expert in Arab-Israeli relations.

    His popularity could strengthen Palestinian institutions, a terrifying thought for Israel’s right-wing government, which opposes any steps toward statehood, Zisser said.

    Barghouti was last seen in August, when Israel’s far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, posted a video of himself admonishing Barghouti inside a prison, saying Israel will confront anyone who acts against the country and “wipe them out.”

    Keath reported from Cairo, and Frankel from Jerusalem. Associated Press correspondent Bassem Mroue contributed from Beirut.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Opinion | The Peace Deal Proves That Netanyahu’s Critics Were Wrong

    [ad_1]

    They kept insisting the prime minister was prolonging the war for political reasons.

    [ad_2]

    Elliot Kaufman

    Source link

  • The Constitution does not allow the president to unilaterally blow suspected drug smugglers to smithereens

    [ad_1]

    Somewhere off the coast of Venezuela, a speedboat with 11 people on board is blown to smithereens. Vice President J.D. Vance announces that “killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military.”

    When challenged that killing citizens without due process is a war crime, the vice president responded that he “didn’t give a shit.”

    Sometimes in fits of anger, loud voices will say they don’t care about niceties such as due process—they just want to kill bad guys. For a brief moment, all of us may share that anger and may even embrace revenge or retribution.

    But over 20,000 people are murdered in the U.S. each year, and yet somehow we find a way to a dispassionate dispensation of justice that includes legal representation for the accused and jury trial. 

    Why? Because sometimes the accused is actually not guilty.

    As passions subside, a civilized people should ask: To be clear, the people bombed to smithereens were guilty, right?

    If anyone gave a you-know-what about justice, perhaps those in charge of deciding whom to kill might let us know their names, present proof of their guilt, and show evidence of their crimes.

    The administration has maintained that the people blown to smithereens were members of Tren de Aragua and therefore narcoterrorists.

    Certainly, then, if we know they belong to a particular gang, then someone must surely have known their names before they were blown to smithereens?

    At the very least, the government should explain how the gang came to be labelled as terrorists. U.S. law defines a terrorist as someone who uses “premeditated, politically motivated violence…against non-combatants.” Since the U.S. policy is now to blow people to smithereens if they are suspected of being in a terrorist gang, then maybe someone could take the time to explain the evidence of their terrorism?

    Critics of this whole terrorist labelling charade, such as Matthew Petti at Reason, explain that: “In practice, that means that a ‘terrorist’ is whoever the executive branch decides to label one.”

    While no law dictates such, once people are labelled as terrorists, they appear to no longer be eligible for any sort of due process.

    The blow-them-to-smithereens crowd, at this point, will loudly voice their opinion that people in international waters whom we label as terrorists deserve no due process. Vice President Vance asserts: “There are people who are bringing—literal terrorists—who are bringing deadly drugs into our country.”

    Which, of course, raises the questions:

    1. Who labelled them and with what evidence?
    2. What are their names, and what specifically shows their membership and guilt? 

    The blow-them-to-smithereens crowd also conveniently ignores the fact that death is generally not the penalty for drug smuggling.

    The mindless trolls that occupy much of the internet whine that such questions show weakness or commiseration with drug pushers who are killing our kids. A ludicrous assertion to most sentient humans, but one I fear requires a response.

    International law and norms have always granted due process to individuals on the high seas not actively involved in combat. U.S. maritime laws explain in detail the level of force and the escalation of force allowed in the interdiction of drugs.

    Hundreds of ships are stopped and searched. The blow-them-to-smithereens crowd might stop to ponder that a good percentage of the ships searched actually turn out not to be drug smugglers.

    Coast Guard statistics show that about one in four interdictions finds no drugs. So far, the administration has blown up four boats suspected of drug smuggling. Statistically speaking, there’s a good chance that one of these boats may not have had any drugs on board.

    If the U.S. policy is to blow all suspected ships to smithereens, should that policy really be extolled as “the highest and best use of our military?”

    Jake Romm puts the dilemma of whom to designate as a terrorist into sharp relief: “The hollowness and malleability of the term [terrorism] means that it can be applied to groups regardless of their actual conduct and regardless of their actual ideology. It admits only a circular definition…that a terrorist is someone who carries out terrorist acts, and a terrorist act is violence carried out by a terrorist. Conversely, if someone is killed, it is because they are a terrorist, because to be a terrorist means to be killable.”

    Few independent legal scholars argue the strikes are legal. Even John Yoo—a former deputy assistant attorney general under President George W. Bush, who infamously authored the Bush administration’s legal justification for “enhanced interrogation techniques”—has criticized the Trump administration’s justification for the strikes, saying: “There has to be a line between crime and war. We can’t just consider anything that harms the country to be a matter for the military. Because that could potentially include every crime.”

    Jon Duffy, a retired Navy Captain, eloquently summarizes our current moment: “A republic that allows its leaders to kill without law, to wage war without strategy, and to deploy troops without limit is a republic in deep peril. Congress will not stop it. The courts will not stop it. That leaves those sworn not to a man, but to the Constitution.”

    Congress must not allow the executive branch to become judge, jury, and executioner. President Thomas Jefferson understood the framers’ intention that the president defer to Congress on matters of offensive war. That’s why Jefferson, when faced with the belligerence of the Barbary pirates in 1801, recognized that he was “unauthorized by the Constitution, without the sanction of Congress, to go beyond the line of defense.”

    Jefferson wanted the authority to act offensively against the pirates, but he respected the intentional checks placed on the executive within the Constitution. Only after Congress passed an “Act for the Protection of Commerce and Seamen of the United States, against the Tripolitan Cruisers” in February 1802, did he order offensive naval operations. If the Trump administration wants to use military power, it should seek authorization from Congress. And Congress must have the courage as the people’s representatives to reassert its constitutional duty to decide matters of war and peace.

    This article is based on a speech Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) gave on the Senate floor Wednesday while introducing a War Powers Act resolution, which he cosponsored. 

    [ad_2]

    Rand Paul

    Source link

  • Opinion | Free Gaza’s Palestinians from Hamas

    [ad_1]

    Trump’s peace plan is a path to freedom and stability for the strip’s oppressed residents.

    [ad_2]

    Moumen Al-Natour

    Source link

  • For Israel’s Hostage Families, Another Anxious Wait for Their Loved Ones to Be Released  

    [ad_1]

    TEL AVIV—For two minutes on Monday, Dalia Cusnir allowed herself to hope for the first time in months.

    Negotiators, including President Trump’s envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, were trickling into Egypt this week to try to seal a deal that would end the war in Gaza and bring home Israeli hostages still held there by Hamas. One of them is her brother-in-law, Eitan Horn.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Feliz Solomon

    Source link

  • Opinion | The Oct. 7 Warning for the U.S. on China

    [ad_1]

    Hamas’s shock troops poured across Israel’s border two years ago, kidnapping, raping and killing civilian men, women and children. Israel’s bitter experience offers lessons America should learn before our own moment of reckoning.

    The most important is that the hypothetical war can actually happen. Even if we’re intellectually prepared, there’s a risk that years of relative peace has lulled us into a false sense of security. The Israeli defense establishment never truly believed Hamas would launch a full-scale invasion. They viewed Gaza as a chronic but manageable problem—one for diplomats and intelligence officers, distant from the daily concerns of citizens. Israeli politicians and generals also spoke of open conflict with the Iran-led Islamist axis much like their American counterparts speak of China and a Taiwan crisis—the pacing threat and the most likely test, yes, but ultimately a question for tomorrow. Then tomorrow came.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Mike Gallagher

    Source link

  • Opinion | Is Qatar Finally Ready to Split With Hamas?

    [ad_1]

    Amit Segal writes that “change is afoot,” as Doha is finally pressing Hamas to accept the Gaza peace deal President Trump has put on the table (“ Why Qatar Changed Course on Hamas,” op-ed, Oct. 1). Qatari support for the proposal is a positive development, but the U.S. should be cautious it isn’t fleeting. Doha has played double games before, and unless it sustains its pressure on Hamas, this may prove to be another one.

    Qatar’s next move will be telling. Hamas agreed in part on Friday to the Trump administration’s proposal for Gaza, essentially saying, “Yes, but,” with the apparent intention of stalling the plan’s roll out. If talks drag on, will Doha increase the pressure on its longtime client, or back new conditions that Hamas demands and side with terrorists as it did on Oct. 7, 2023?

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • U.K. Government Asked Pro-Palestinian Supporters Not to March on Oct. 7. They Did Anyway.

    [ad_1]

    LONDON—After last week’s terrorist attack on a synagogue in Manchester, the U.K. government is struggling over how to manage near daily pro-Palestinian protests that officials say have fueled a rise in antisemitism and left many British Jews feeling alienated in their own country.

    On Tuesday—the second anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks that marked the largest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust—pro-Palestinian protests were held in university campuses across the country, despite an unusual request from Prime Minister Keir Starmer for the protests to be called off given it was the anniversary of the attack.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Max Colchester

    Source link

  • The Sticking Points to a Gaza Hostage Deal

    [ad_1]

    SHARM EL SHEIKH, Egypt—This week will show whether President Trump’s optimism about a deal to end the war in Gaza can survive the realities that have undermined many past attempts.

    Negotiators were arriving Tuesday in the Red Sea resort town of Sharm El Sheikh for talks on the first step in Trump’s 20-point plan to end the war—a deal to free all the remaining Israeli hostages held by Hamas in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Summer Said

    Source link

  • Israeli who was captured on Oct. 7 pleads for return of other hostages:

    [ad_1]

    Jerusalem — Early on the morning of Oct. 7, 2023, Ohad Ben Ami heard the alarm go off in his community of Kibbutz Be’eri. He and his wife ran into their home’s safe room, where they quickly realized that something unusual was happening.

    On his phone, Ben Ami could see that alarms were sounding at other, nearby kibbutzim. There were also reports of airborne attacks. He shut the phone off to avoid panicking.

    About 15 minutes later, he heard people outside.

    “Then I understand that it is very severe, and it’s not only missile attack. It’s something much more complicated,” Ben Ami said.

    He started receiving messages from neighbors who told him that attackers had entered their houses. So he crawled from his safe room to try to secure the doors to his home. Then, he was shot.

    As he retreated to his safe room, attackers followed him. They easily opened the door behind him, which was only meant to protect those inside from projectiles or flames and could not be locked.

    When they entered, Ben Ami’s wife was hidden, so Ben Ami told them he was alone.

    “I was sure I’m going to be dead,” he said.

    Former Israeli hostage Ohad Ben Ami stands at his house in Kibbutz Be’eri, from which he was kidnapped during the Hamas-led terrorist attack on Oct. 7, 2023, nearly two years later, on Oct. 5, 2025.

    Amir Levy/Getty


    But unlike many of his neighbors that day at Kibbutz Be’eri, Ben Ami wasn’t killed. Loaded into the back seat of a car, he was taken to Gaza, where he would spend 491 days in captivity.

    “In my mind, I’m down there”

    During his time as a hostage, Ben Ami was moved from apartment to apartment. Many did not have running water or functioning toilets.

    “The conditions were very, very bad. Very bad. All the time, the IDF [Israeli military] is bombing. So we are very afraid to die from our bombs,” Ben Ami said.

    Sometimes he was held with other hostages, including — for a time — his wife Raz Ben Ami, who had been captured as well. She was freed in the first hostage and prisoner exchange deal between Israel and Hamas later in 2023.

    SWITZERLAND-ISRAEL-PALESTINIANS-CONFLICT-MISSING-RIGHTS

    Former Hamas hostage Aviva Siegel (L) comforts her daughter Elan Tiv next to former hostage Raz Ben Ami, during a visit to the 55th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 29, 2024.

    FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty


    Ben Ami was moved below ground, into the Hamas tunnel network, where he said there was no light, very little food, and the sanitary conditions were extremely poor.

    He was put into an area with two other hostages, Elkaha Bohbot and Bar Kuperstein. Three more Israeli captives joined them, but the amount of food they received did not increase.

    “All the time, we are hungry. We are very nervous. We try to struggle and to get used to the situation,” he said.

    The group began to lose weight, trying to divide very limited food among them. But despite the dire conditions, Ben Ami managed to keep going.

    “They [Hamas] let us see television 15 minutes once in a month … so we saw that the people in Israel are fighting for us,” he said. “They [Hamas] told us that our government don’t want us back. The army, Israeli army, is looking to kill us. The Israeli government won’t pay the price. And our families are quiet. But when we saw on the TV that all of Israel go out… this give us hope. Give us a lot of hope to proceed and be strong.”

    In February this year, Ben Ami was released as part of the last hostage and prisoner exchange deal, but his companions were not.

    Israel Palestinians

    Israeli Ohad Ben Ami, who was held hostage by Hamas in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023, waves to the crowd as he is escorted by Hamas members before being handed over to the Red Cross in Deir al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip, Feb. 8, 2025.

    Jehad Alshrafi/AP


    “When I think of the five of my friends and all the 48 hostages that are still down there, I’m very, very worried for them,” Ben Ami said. “I love my country, and I love the people, but our government is disconnected. And until now, I have the feeling of insult. I feel that they abandoned me.”

    As negotiations are underway in Egypt on a deal that could potentially see the release of all the remaining hostages, Ben Ami says he’s hopeful.

    “I speak and I talk — but in my mind, I’m down there. So until they come back, all the 48, I cannot live. I’m still a hostage. I’m a free man, but not in my soul,” he said. “I ask all the sides to go to the middle and then … to shake hands and finish it and bring (home) all the hostages. To give our nation the time to recover, and also the Palestinians. They also need to recover from all this thing that happened.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From Oct 7 captivity to freedom: President Trump saved me — and I believe he can free the remaining hostages

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Two years ago, on Oct. 7, 2023, I was kidnapped from my home in Kibbutz Be’eri in my pajamas by Hamas terrorists. My wife, Raz, and I were ripped from our lives and dragged into Gaza. I was released in February 2025 after 491 days in captivity, but 48 hostages remain in Hamas’ hands. My nightmare is not over. It won’t be over until they all come home.

    And now, finally, there is hope. President Donald Trump has brought forth a historic deal to bring all 48 hostages home — the living and the deceased — to end this war, to end this suffering for our people. After so much pain, we finally have a real chance.

    But with that hope comes fear. We have seen opportunities collapse before. The deal has not been signed yet. I know what is at stake. I know what those hostages are enduring right now because I lived it.

    FREED AMERICAN-ISRAELI HOSTAGE DETAILS STARVATION AND ABUSE BY HAMAS AS FAMILIES PUSH TRUMP FOR DEAL

    President Donald Trump meets with freed Israeli hostages Ohad Ben Ami and his wife, Raz, along with families of hostages still held by Hamas terrorists in Gaza on Sept. 2025. (The White House)

    Two years have passed since Hamas terrorists invaded our homes, murdered hundreds of innocent people, and kidnapped men, women, children and the elderly. That Shabbat morning started like any other. By the end of the day, Raz and I were hostages.

    When Raz was released in November 2023, I thought maybe my turn would come soon. Instead, I was taken to the tunnels — 30 meters underground, in total darkness, with no air, barely any food or water, no medical care. This became my life for over a year.

    Ohad Ben Ami kidnapping

    The moment Ohad Ben Ami was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists from his home in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. (The Hostages Families Forum)

    I wasn’t alone down there. I was held with five other hostages: Elkana Bohbot, Maksym Harkin, Segev Kalfon, Yosef Ohana, and Bar Kupershtein. They became like sons to me, and I became a father figure to them. We needed each other to survive. The six of us shared a cell meant for three. We dug with our bare hands in the dirt to make places to sleep. Every request from our captors required hours of discussion among ourselves because the consequences were severe. Ask for pita bread and get refused? They would beat us. Forbid us from asking for anything for two weeks. So we deliberated carefully, everyone had a voice, and we voted.

    I was afraid for my life every single day. Hamas told us clearly: if the IDF gets close, they will shoot us at point-blank range. Once, a terrorist forced me to decide which hostages would get a bullet in the head and which in the knee. For hours, they made us beg for our lives, shaking and crying. On day 270, terrorists stormed in and beat us for three days straight. One guard told me, “I hate you. If they order me to kill you, I won’t use a gun. I’ll use a knife.” As time passed, we started to lose hope. That’s when survival becomes almost impossible. What gave me strength was seeing our people back home fighting for us.

    Ohad Ben Ami release

    Hamas terrorists guard Ohad Ben Ami on a stage before handing him over to a Red Cross team in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza, on February 8, 2025, as part of the fifth hostage-prisoner exchange of a fragile ceasefire.  (Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

    I was released in February 2025. I had lost 77 pounds. In those first days of freedom, everything felt unreal. But one moment stands out: I had the profound honor of meeting President Trump, the man who saved me, who made it possible for me to be reunited with my wife and daughters. He expressed his unwavering commitment to bring all the hostages home. I thank him for my freedom and for never giving up on those still in captivity. If anyone deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, it is him, for everything he has done for us and for continuing to fight to make sure all the hostages come back home.

    But freedom doesn’t mean the nightmare is over. I still wake up at night and touch the walls, checking that they’re not concrete, that I’m not in the tunnels. But then I remember — they are still there. When I open the refrigerator and take out food, I think about how they have nothing.

    Ohad Ben Ami

    Ohad Ben Ami is reunited with his family, including daughters Ella and Yuli, after being held 491 days by Hamas terrorists in Gaza before his Feb. 8, 2025, release. (GPO)

    In a cruel propaganda video released by Hamas months ago, Elkana and Yosef spoke directly to me, begging me to do everything I can to get them out of hell. Until all 48 hostages come out — the living and the deceased — I cannot continue with my life.

    SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER

    Since my release, I have witnessed many negotiations come and go. This time it must happen. The world must make sure this deal comes to fruition. I know better than anyone the cost of every additional day in captivity. They won’t make it in there for much longer. My friends won’t make it there for much longer. I lived through 491 days of Hamas’ cruelty. I know exactly what every additional hour means for those still underground.

    The release of all 48 hostages must come first. The world is watching. Every day matters. Every hour counts.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After Two Years of War, Israel Is Stronger—and More Isolated—Than Ever

    [ad_1]

    The war in Gaza has spurred a global backlash that threatens Israel’s long-term prospects.

    [ad_2]

    Yaroslav Trofimov

    Source link

  • Stephen Miller leads GOP charge equating Democrats to ‘domestic terrorists’

    [ad_1]

    President Trump rocked American politics at the outset of his first campaign when he first labeled his rivals as enemies of the American people. But the rhetoric of his top confidantes has grown more extreme in recent days.

    Stephen Miller, the president’s deputy chief of staff, declared over the weekend that “a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country” is fueling an historic national schism, “shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general.”

    “The only remedy,” Miller said, “is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.”

    It was a maxim from an unelected presidential advisor who is already unleashing the federal government in unprecedented ways, overseeing the federalization of police forces and a sweeping deportation campaign challenging basic tenets of civil liberty.

    Miller’s rhetoric comes amid a federal crackdown on Portland, Ore., where he says the president has unchecked authority to protect federal lives and property — and as another controversial Trump advisor harnesses an ongoing government shutdown as pretext for the mass firing of federal workers.

    Russ Vought, the president’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, plays the grim reaper in an AI video shared by the president, featuring him roving Washington for bureaucrats to cut from the deep state during the shutdown.

    His goal, Trump has said, is to specifically target Democrats.

    As of Monday afternoon, it was unclear exactly how many federal workers or what federal agencies would be targeted.

    “We don’t want to see people laid off, but unfortunately, if this shutdown continues layoffs are going to be an unfortunate consequence of that,” White House press secretary Karoline Levitt said during a news briefing.

    ‘A nation of Constitutional law’

    Karin Immergut, a federal judge appointed by Trump, said this weekend that the administration’s justification for deploying California National Guard troops in Portland was “simply untethered to the facts.”

    “This country has a longstanding and foundational tradition of resistance to government overreach, especially in the form of military intrusion into civil affairs,” Immergut wrote, chiding the Trump administration for attempting to circumvent a prior order from her against a federal deployment to the city.

    “This historical tradition boils down to a simple proposition,” she added: “This is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.”

    The administration is expected to appeal the judge’s decision, Leavitt said, while calling the judge’s ruling “untethered in reality and in the law.”

    “We’re very confident in the president’s legal authority to do this, and we are very confident we will win on the merits of the law,” Leavitt said.

    If the courts were to side with the administration, Leavitt said local leaders — most of whom are Democrats — should not be concerned about the possibility of long-term plans to have their cities occupied by the military.

    “Why should they be concerned about the federal government offering help to make their cities a safer place?” Leavitt said. “They should be concerned about the fact that people in their cities right now are being gunned down every single night and the president, all he is trying to do, is fix it.”

    Moments later, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that he does not believe it is necessary yet, he would be willing to invoke the Insurrection Act “if courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up.”

    “Sure, I’d do that,” Trump said. “We have to make sure that our cities are safe.”

    The Insurrection Act gives the president sweeping emergency power to deploy military forces within the United States if the president deems it is needed to quell civil unrest. The last time this occurred was in 1992, when California Gov. Pete Wilson asked President George H.W. Bush to send federal troops to help stop the Los Angeles riots that occurred after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King.

    Subsequent posts from Miller on social media over the weekend escalated the stakes to existential heights, accusing Democrats of allying themselves with “domestic terrorists” seeking to overturn the will of the people reflected in Trump’s election win last year.

    On Monday, in an interview with CNN, Miller suggested that the administration would continue working to sidestep Immergut’s orders.

    “The administration will abide by the ruling insofar as it affects the covered parties,” he said, “but there are also many options the president has to deploy federal resources under the U.S. military to Portland.”

    Other Republicans have used similar rhetoric since the slaying of Charlie Kirk, a conservative youth activist, in Utah last month.

    Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) wrote that posts from California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office have reached “the threshold of domestic terrorism,” after the Democratic governor referred to Miller on social media as a fascist. And Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) said Monday that Democrats demanding an extension of healthcare benefits as a condition for reopening the government were equivalent to terrorists.

    “I don’t negotiate with terrorists,” Fine told Newsmax, “and what we’re learned in whether it’s dealing with Muslim terrorists or Democrats, you’ve gotta stand and you’ve gotta do the right thing.”

    Investigating donor networks

    Republicans’ keenness to label Democrats as terrorists comes two weeks after Trump signed an executive order declaring a left-wing antifascist movement, known as antifa, as a “domestic terrorist organization” — a designation that does not exist under U.S. law.

    The order, which opened a new front in Trump’s battle against his political foes, also threatened to investigate and prosecute individuals who funded “any and all illegal operations — especially those involving terrorist actions — conducted by antifa or any person claiming to act on behalf of antifa.”

    Leavitt told reporters Monday the administration is “aggressively” looking into who is financially backing these operations.

    Trump has floated the possibility of going after people such as George Soros, a billionaire who has supported many left-leaning causes around the world.

    “If you look at Soros, he is at the top of everything,” Trump said during an Oval Office appearance last month.

    The White House has not yet made public any details about a formal investigation into a donors, but Leavitt said the administration’s efforts are under way.

    “We will continue to get to the bottom of who is funding these organizations and this organized anarchy against our country and our government,” Leavitt said. “We are committed to uncovering it.”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner, Ana Ceballos

    Source link