ReportWire

Tag: Termination

  • Judge blocks Trump administration move to cut $600 million in HIV funding from states

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge on Thursday blocked a Trump administration order slashing $600 million in federal grant funding for HIV programs in California and three other states, finding merit in the states’ argument that the move was politically motivated by disagreements over unrelated state sanctuary policies.

    U.S. District Judge Manish Shah, an Obama appointee in Illinois, found that California, Colorado, Illinois and Minnesota were likely to succeed in arguing that President Trump and other administration officials targeted the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funding for termination “based on arbitrary, capricious, or unconstitutional rationales.”

    Namely, Shah wrote that while Trump administration officials said the programs were cut for breaking with CDC priorities, other “recent statements” by officials “plausibly suggest that the reason for the direction is hostility to what the federal government calls ‘sanctuary jurisdictions’ or ‘sanctuary cities.’”

    Shah found that the states had shown they would “suffer irreparable harm” from the cuts, and that the public interest would not be harmed by temporarily halting them — and as a result granted the states a temporary restraining order halting the administration’s action for 14 days while the litigation continues.

    Shah wrote that while he may not have jurisdiction to block a simple grant termination, he did have jurisdiction to halt an administration directive to terminate funding based on unconstitutional grounds.

    “More factual development is necessary and it may be that the only government action at issue is termination of grants for which I have no jurisdiction to review,” Shah wrote. “But as discussed, plaintiffs have made a sufficient showing that defendants issued internal guidance to terminate public-health grants for unlawful reasons; that guidance is enjoined as the parties develop a record.”

    The cuts targeted a slate of programs aimed at tracking and curtailing HIV and other disease outbreaks, including one of California’s main early-warning systems for HIV outbreaks, state and local officials said. Some were oriented toward serving the LGBTQ+ community. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta’s office said California faced “the largest share” of the cuts.

    The White House said the cuts were to programs that “promote DEI and radical gender ideology,” while federal health officials said the programs in question did not reflect the CDC’s “priorities.”

    Bonta cheered Shah’s order in a statement, saying he and his fellow attorneys general who sued are “confident that the facts and the law favor a permanent block of these reckless and illegal funding cuts.”

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Rector

    Source link

  • What to do when you get laid off – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Statutory vs. common-law severance

    In every province and territory, there are statutory minimum payments that you are entitled to receive as an employee whose employment is terminated. This is called termination pay. This generally applies after three months of continuous employment and is meant to provide a safety net after you are let go without cause. Termination pay is generally a certain number of weeks of salary per year of service up to a maximum. 

    Beyond this minimum payment, employers may also offer severance pay. This compensation is beyond the statutory minimum and based on common-law entitlements—basically, what you might get if you went to court. Both employees and employers prefer non-litigious solutions to a termination, and so may agree on a payment that is somewhere in between the statutory minimum termination pay and the common-law severance amount. 

    Severance pay is not a specific formula, because the potential entitlement can be based on things like someone’s length of service, the type of position they hold, their age, and other factors.

    When an employer offers a severance package, the employee is not obligated to take it. They can seek advice from an employment lawyer to understand the offer and whether they should be asking for any variations.

    Should you take a lump sum or salary continuance?

    Some employers offer a lump-sum severance payment that is payable all at once, while others offer salary continuance where payroll deposits continue for the duration of the severance. 

    If you have the option to receive a lump sum, you may be eligible to defer some or all of it to a subsequent calendar year. This may be advantageous, especially if it is late in the year, to avoid having a large payment taxed at a high tax rate. Due to Canada’s progressive tax system, you may pay less tax to have the payment deferred and taxed in a subsequent year than added to your current year’s income.

    If you have registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) room, you might choose to direct some or all of the payment to your RRSP. In this case, it will be deposited pre-tax, so that the gross amount goes directly into your RRSP. That means you will not get a large tax refund when you file your tax return, as you would were you employed the whole time. It is as if you received the tax refund up-front since no tax was withheld from the income deposited to the RRSP in the first place.

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    New EI rules can help

    When an employee is terminated, they are generally eligible to collect Employment Insurance (EI) benefits. The federal government introduced a temporary change to EI for new claims in March 2025 in response to the U.S. government’s tariffs on several foreign countries, including Canada. The temporary measure was meant to end on October 11, 2025, but has been extended to April 11, 2026. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    There is typically a one-week waiting period after salary continuance ends. For lump-sum separation earnings like severance pay, vacation pay, or sick-leave credits, there is normally a further delay to apply. But under the temporary EI measures, a terminated employee can apply for EI benefits immediately.

    Regular EI benefits are generally capped at 45 weeks, but under the temporary measures, a recipient may be entitled to an additional 20 weeks if they are a long-tenured worker. To be considered a long-tenured worker, the applicants must have met two conditions:

    • Received fewer than 36 weeks of regular or fishing benefits in the three years before the start of a claim
    • Paid at least 30% of the annual maximum EI premiums for at least seven of the 10 years before the year that a claim starts (the EI maximum for 2025 is $695 per week)

    Are you still entitled to benefits?

    If you had benefits like life, disability, or medical insurance, a termination will generally end this coverage. Life insurance is often extended based on the number of weeks of salary you are paid out. Disability insurance generally ends on your last day of work. 

    Some group life insurance policies allow you to convert your coverage to a personal policy. This may be advisable if your health is poor, as you may be able to maintain it without having to provide health information to the insurer. 

    You can purchase your own life insurance policy from an insurer, and this may be preferable if your health is good. Disability insurance is more complicated to replace, because if you are not working, you do not have an income to replace. 

    Although the loss of medical coverage may be worrisome, it may not be necessary to replace it. Health insurance is not meant to create a windfall where you receive more back from the insurance company than you pay in premiums. To the contrary, the insurer makes a profit when the average policyholder pays more in premiums than they receive back in reimbursements. As a result, rushing to replace coverage may not be advantageous compared to just paying for health-care costs out of pocket when your coverage ends. 

    Dealing with pensions and group RRSPs

    If you have a defined benefit (DB) pension, you may have the option to take a lump-sum payout, some or all of which may be eligible to transfer on a tax-deferred basis to a locked-in retirement account (LIRA). When you forgo your future monthly pension, you need to invest the proceeds to produce a retirement income. Not all pensions allow you to take a commuted value transfer, however, and some limit the option based on your age (e.g., only under age 55). 

    When interest rates are lower, the lump sums paid out are higher; when interest rates are higher, the payouts are lower. Those best suited to consider a lump sum are investors with a high risk tolerance or a short life expectancy. 

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Shannon O’Brien fired as state’s top cannabis regulator, ending year-long suspension and months of uncertainty – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Shannon O’Brien fired as state’s top cannabis regulator, ending year-long suspension and months of uncertainty – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    [ad_1]





    Shannon O’Brien fired as state’s top cannabis regulator, ending year-long suspension and months of uncertainty – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news




























    skip to Main Content

    [ad_2]

    AggregatedNews

    Source link

  • Mayor Karen Bass vetoes ballot proposal to let police chief fire problem officers

    Mayor Karen Bass vetoes ballot proposal to let police chief fire problem officers

    [ad_1]

    Mayor Karen Bass has vetoed a proposed ballot measure to rework the disciplinary process at the Los Angeles Police Department — a step that could result in its removal from the Nov. 5 ballot.

    In her veto letter to the City Council, Bass said the proposal, which would have allowed the police chief to fire officers accused of committing serious misconduct, “risks creating bureaucratic confusion” within the LAPD.

    Bass said the proposal, which also would have reworked the composition of the department’s three-member disciplinary panels, provided “ambiguous direction” and “gaps in guidance.”

    “I look forward to working with each of you to do a thorough and comprehensive review with officers, the department, and other stakeholders to ensure fairness for all,” she wrote. “The current system remains until this collaborative review is complete and can be placed before the voters.”

    Bass issued her veto during the council’s summer recess, when meetings are canceled for three weeks. The deadline for reworking the language of the ballot proposal has already passed, City Clerk Holly Wolcott said.

    “If the council does not override the veto or take any action, the measure will be pulled from the ballot,” Wolcott said in an email.

    The council’s next meeting is scheduled for July 30. Whether it can muster 10 votes to override the mayor’s veto is unclear.

    By issuing the veto, Bass effectively sided with top LAPD brass, who warned last month that the proposal would create a two-tier disciplinary system, with some offenses resulting in termination by the chief and others heading to a disciplinary panel known as a Board of Rights.

    The mayor’s appointees on the Board of Police Commissioners also criticized the ballot proposal, saying they felt excluded from the deliberations. At least one commissioner voiced concern about the proposal’s creation of a binding arbitration process to resolve cases where an officer files an appeal of his or her termination.

    Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez expressed similar worries, arguing that binding arbitration would lead to more lenient outcomes for officers accused of serious wrongdoing. Soto-Martínez, who voted against the proposal last month, had also argued that the range of offenses that would lead to termination by the police chief was too narrow.

    An aide to Soto-Martínez said Tuesday that his boss supports the veto.

    Councilmember Tim McOsker, who spearheaded the ballot proposal, said he is “deeply disappointed” with the mayor’s action, arguing that it threatens the most significant reform of the LAPD’s disciplinary system in more than two decades.

    If the council fails to override the veto, the next opportunity for major reform would not occur until the 2026 election, McOsker said.

    “What this veto would do is put us back in the status quo for at least two years,” he said in an interview.

    McOsker said he is still looking at the options for responding to the mayor’s veto. During the council’s deliberations last month, four council members — Soto-Martínez, Nithya Raman, Eunisses Hernandez and Curren Price — backed a proposal to seek additional changes to the ballot measure.

    Soto-Martínez took aim at the decision to let a police chief fire officers for some offenses but not others, saying it would create “ambiguity” in the disciplinary system.

    That proposal was defeated on a 9 to 4 vote. Had it passed, it would have effectively killed the ballot measure for this year’s election, since the deadline had passed for making extensive changes.

    The proposal vetoed by Bass had been billed as a way to undo some of changes brought by Charter Amendment C, a ballot measure approved by voters in 2017, which paved the way for all-civilian disciplinary panels at the LAPD.

    The ballot proposal would have reworked the system, ensuring that each panel would have have two civilian members and one commanding officer.

    Representatives of the Los Angeles Police Protective League, which represents about 8,800 rank-and-file officers, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Last month, the union issued a statement saying the ballot proposal struck “the right balance” on disciplinary issues, ensuring that officers who are terminated by a chief have access to an appeal process with binding arbitration.

    [ad_2]

    David Zahniser, Libor Jany

    Source link

  • Terminating an Employee? Don’t Make These Legal Mistakes | Entrepreneur

    Terminating an Employee? Don’t Make These Legal Mistakes | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Insubordination. IP disclosure. Misconduct. Breach of restrictive covenant.

    All of these are legitimate reasons to fire someone, but what do HR managers and business owners need to know about the legal technicalities surrounding employment termination?

    Components of a legal termination

    To avoid legal issues post-termination, it’s important to understand the main components of a lawful employment termination.

    • Make sure you identify any required paperwork to provide to the employee under state or local law. For example, in California, employees must be provided a certain form of Notice of Change in Employment Relationship as well as a pamphlet about unemployment benefits at the time of termination.
    • Check your state’s termination paycheck rules. You might have to pay your employee on the date of termination or within a certain time thereafter, despite your normal payroll cycle.
    • Identify any legal risks in connection with the termination. For example, is the employee a member of a protected class? Have they been a whistleblower?
    • If the termination is for performance or other “cause” termination, have you documented the performance issues? Has there been progressive discipline of some sort, or will this be a surprise to the employee? These are important questions because firings for performance should not be a surprise to the employee; an employee should be on notice of the performance issues and be given a chance to improve. This protects the company if the employee alleges wrongful termination. It also helps with morale; employees won’t want to stay if they think they may be terminated out of the blue.
    • Always have a witness in a termination meeting, which may benefit the company in the event of litigation. In most cases, the witness should not be a lawyer. This is to prevent that lawyer from becoming a witness in the lawsuit, which could present an issue for attorney-client privilege reasons.

    Related: How to Fire an Employee: 4 Ways to Make the Process Kinder

    What not to say during a termination

    While there’s no guidebook for all of the things to say — and not to say — during a termination, there are some guidelines that an HR manager or business owner should heed.

    Termination discussions should be short. Less is more in this case.

    Don’t ramble on about the reasons for the termination. Don’t talk about other employees; if the termination is a layoff, don’t explain whose employment status is safe or why. Don’t get into an argument or long exchange. Be respectful but firm.

    The gray areas of legal termination

    A broader, more objective view

    HR and legal professionals can have a broader, more objective view of terminations that are important to the company, which can help to mitigate risk. For example, a hiring manager might opt for layoffs or otherwise terminate some employees because those employees are having a harder time adapting to new software. However, this can often end up in terminating mostly older employees. It’s important to think about whether there’s an age discrimination issue. It’s also worth considering whether the manager needs to be counseled on how to better train these employees.

    High-risk termination situations

    It behooves HR managers and business owners to protect themselves from getting into high-risk termination situations. Therefore, it’s important to have policies in place for documenting employment issues and progressive discipline; this can serve as a written record to support termination. This is especially helpful in situations where an employee in a protected class or situation is to be terminated. For example, you need to terminate an employee who is going on maternity leave. If their performance issues are documented, and if there was a process of progressive discipline, a company will be better prepared for an employment claim.

    Effective and legal use of severance agreements

    Severance agreements can be invaluable in terms of mitigating the risk of lawsuits, but the law around them changes rapidly. Don’t reuse forms, and do be sure to work with a lawyer who knows current employment law at both the state and federal levels.

    Related: 11 Tips for Firing an Employee

    Repercussions of unlawful termination

    Failure to comply with final paycheck laws can lead to wage claims and penalties.

    Failure to comply with proper paperwork required by state and local law can lead to fines.

    Failure to document employment performance issues and engage in progressive discipline can make the company vulnerable to wrongful termination lawsuits. For example, if someone who just asked for a disability accommodation has been terminated, but the HR manager claims it’s for performance reasons, a jury is unlikely to believe the manager if those performance problems weren’t previously documented.

    Failure to identify whether there are risks to termination can lead to making nonoptimal termination decisions. If you see that there is a high chance of an employee bringing a wrongful termination claim, you can better prepare in terms of offering severance or perhaps delaying termination while establishing a better documentation process.

    The bottom line

    As a business owner or HR manager, it’s inevitable that you will have to terminate employees. Keeping these considerations in mind can help to protect you and your company in the long run.

    [ad_2]

    Mital Makadia

    Source link