ReportWire

Tag: Tennis

  • Skysports (Sky Sports)

    [ad_1]

    Make sure the URL in the address bar contains no capital letters or spaces and please check your bookmarks.

    Popular Links

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • In the US Open’s qualifying tournament, the smaller sportswear brands can shine

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Tennis apparel sponsorship is a big business. It is also one that, among the top players, is dominated by a small group of industry titans.

    Brands like Nike, Adidas and Asics provide the outfits for most of the top 100, with their recognizable logos splashed across the shirts and skirts of Grand Slam favorites.

    But if one looks beyond that upper echelon and into the U.S. Open’s qualifying tournament – where lower-ranked players compete for spots in the main draw – there’s a world of local startups and small clothing businesses making their way into the booming tennis business.

    For many players in the qualifying tournament, their apparel sponsors are companies local to their home country. These companies often specifically seek out their countrymen.

    “It’s key to sponsor and help our Swiss players,” said Laura Tolub, the chief operating officer of Fourteen Company. Fourteen is a small sportswear brand based in Geneva, Switzerland, that sponsors a couple of Swiss players in the qualifying draw. “It doesn’t mean we’re only sponsoring Swiss players, but it’s important to us to … be there for them.”

    That country connection is often important on the player’s side, too. Swiss player Marc-Andrea Hüsler, ranked 228th, won his second round qualifying match Thursday afternoon in Fourteen apparel.

    “It’s a Swiss brand, so I wanted to do something with the Swiss if possible,” he said about his decision to join the brand two years ago. “They were new and they were building up.”

    They’ve built into a tight-knit community, according to Tolub.

    “(Some players) want to have the feeling they are part of a family, which Fourteen is,” she said. “It’s more of a family than a big brand.”

    Arianne Hartono went a similar route. She is sponsored by The Indian Maharadja, a Dutch company known for its hockey clothing and based out of Nieuwkuijk, a small town of about 5,000 people.

    “They were a very small startup, like three, four years ago,” Hartono said. “They approached me through social media, they just came at me and said, ‘Hey, we’re a small company, we want to start coming into tennis.’”

    She agreed, and their spiral logo was on full display as the Dutch player, ranked 158th, made her way into the third round of the qualifying tournament with a tight victory Thursday afternoon.

    Other qualifiers look for the right fit beyond country lines. Argentine Marco Trungelliti, ranked No. 183rd, found one with personal ties.

    His match clothes are made by a small upstart in Mexico called Lega, an apparel brand that’s run by “a friend of a friend,” who the Argentine said he has become quite close with through their time working together. His shirts have been getting attention from keen-eyed fans – at the French Open, his top had a large Eiffel Tower design, and now in the U.S. Open’s qualifying rounds, it’s a Statue of Liberty.

    “It’s a complete new run,” he said of the New York City shirt, which was designed and manufactured by Lega specifically for his U.S. Open matches.

    “I’m not a designer at all, but I had some opinions in there,” he said after winning his second round qualifying match. “But this one was completely on (the Lega designer), and I loved it.”

    ___

    More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, aka Sincaraz, rule men’s tennis as the 2025 US Open arrives

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — OK, sure, maybe it wouldn’t be rational to say there’s no point in actually holding the full U.S. Open and instead just fast-forwarding to the inevitable matchup for the men’s championship between Jannik Sinner — assuming he’s healthy — and Carlos Alcaraz on Sept. 7.

    Seems reasonable, though.

    “We know,” Novak Djokovic acknowledged, “they’re the dominant force right now.”

    When singles action begins Sunday at Flushing Meadows, a change from the usual Monday start, there are cases to be made for various players to make their way to the women’s final. The top three in the rankings — No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, No. 2 Iga Swiatek and No. 3 Coco Gauff — have won the past three U.S. Open titles, for example. Other past major champions such as Naomi Osaka or Elena Rybakina have performed well lately; maybe a new face will emerge.

    When it comes to the men, there really is just one name that matters in this post-Big Three era, and that name is “Sincaraz,” the silly, made-up, “Fedal”-style mashup of the guys who are ranked No. 1 (Sinner) and No. 2 (Alcaraz) and have claimed seven Grand Slam trophies in a row and nine of the last 12.

    Djokovic took the other three in that span.

    There is nothing quite like it in the women’s game at the moment. The past five Slams were won by five players: Swiatek (Wimbledon in July), Gauff (French Open in June), Madison Keys (Australian Open in January), Sabalenka (last year’s U.S. Open) and Barbora Krejcikova (last year’s Wimbledon).

    “Sinner and Alcaraz,” said Marcos Giron, an American who has been ranked 37th and faced both, “are bringing a ridiculous level, week in and week out.”

    Look at the ATP rankings, which either could lead after the U.S. Open. Look at the titles. Look at the past two Grand Slam finals, with Alcaraz erasing a two-set deficit and saving three championship points to win the French Open in June, before Sinner won in four sets at Wimbledon in July. Look at the most recent Masters 1000 tournament, the Cincinnati Open, where Sinner didn’t drop a set en route to Monday’s final but quit because he was feeling ill, ceding the trophy to Alcaraz.

    That ended Sinner’s 26-match winning streak on hard courts; Alcaraz was responsible for the previous defeat, too. Alcaraz collected his tour-leading sixth trophy this season and has won 39 of his most recent 41 contests.

    Since Sinner returned in May from a three-month doping ban, Cincinnati was the fourth event both entered — and they met to decide the title in all four.

    They hit the ball as hard as anyone. Sinner’s returns rival Djokovic’s for best in the game. Alcaraz’s drop shots are unrivaled. The athleticism displayed by both is remarkable. Alcaraz might be the fastest guy around. Sinner’s long limbs reach everything.

    What sets them apart from others?

    “Their confidence. Their ball-striking. Their movement is basically perfect,” said Sam Querrey, a former player who made it to Wimbledon’s semifinals and the U.S. Open’s quarterfinals. “It seems like they hit the ball with just a little extra force when they need to.”

    It leaves other elite players such as Ben Shelton, the 22-year-old American who is ranked No. 6, so-close-yet-so-far at majors.

    Shelton’s 2025 Grand Slam resume includes losses to Sinner at the Australian Open, to Alcaraz at the French Open and to Sinner at Wimbledon.

    “Frustrating,” Shelton said. “Two very different players and challenges.”

    The sample size is, admittedly, small, but these two are producing the sort of riveting points and thrill-a-minute matches that Roger Federer vs. Rafael Nadal, or Nadal vs. Djokovic, used to.

    “The rivalry is real. It’s there,” said Darren Cahill, one of Sinner’s two coaches. “And hopefully it’s going to be there and real for the next 10 or 12 years.”

    Not sure? Head to YouTube and check out Alcaraz vs. Sinner, whether at Roland-Garros this year or at the U.S. Open in 2022 or pretty much any of their 14 showdowns ( Alcaraz leads 9-5 ).

    “You have to earn every point, every game. He makes you suffer (from) the first point of the match until the last ball,” said Alcaraz, a 22-year-old from Spain. “It’s really tough to find holes in his game.”

    Sinner’s take?

    “We try,” the 24-year-old from Italy said of their matchups, “to push ourselves to the limits.”

    ___

    Howard Fendrich has been the AP’s tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here: https://apnews.com/author/howard-fendrich. More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At the US Open, tennis stars shine under dark sky-friendly outdoor lights

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — When the court lights flicker on at the U.S. Open, tennis stars shine under illumination designed to cut light pollution.

    The wedge-shaped lamps around the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center in Flushing Meadows direct light onto the players without spewing it into the surrounding skies.

    The stadium complex is the only professional sports venue certified by a group that’s trying to preserve the night sky around the world. Across North America and Canada, schools and local parks have also swapped out their lights on baseball fields, running tracks and other recreation grounds to preserve their view of the stars and protect local wildlife.

    Night lights can disrupt bird migration and confuse nocturnal critters like frogs and fireflies. Lights on sports fields are especially bright and cool, and often cast their glare into neighborhoods.

    In renovations over the past decade, the U.S. Tennis Association swapped metal halide bulbs for shielded LED lights. The complex’s 17 tournament courts — including Arthur Ashe Stadium — and five practice courts were approved as dark sky-friendly last year.

    USTA officials wanted the best lighting possible on their courts, which also happened to be friendly to dark skies. Their lighting company suggested striking a balance that would satisfy crowds and TV crews while cutting down spillover into the surrounding environment.

    “This is an international event that has an impact on the community,” said the USTA’s managing director of capital projects and engineering Chuck Jettmar. “Let’s minimize that and make sure that everybody’s happy with it.”

    U.S. Open qualifying matches this week were punctuated by players grunting, crickets chirping and audiences cheering. Rows of lights stood like sentries above, adorned with flat visors that guided the glow onto the action.

    The lights at Flushing Meadows glow at a quarter of their brightness when the courts are rented for play during the year. They’re approved by DarkSky International, a nonprofit that gives similar designations to cities and national parks. The group widened its focus to include sports arenas in recent years and has certified over 30 venues since 2019 — including high school football fields and youth soccer fields.

    “We live in a world where we need to engage with one another in the nighttime environment, and that’s OK,” said DarkSky spokesperson Drew Reagan. “That’s a beautiful thing and there’s a way to do that responsibly.”

    The organization typically approves proposals at sports fields before any light fixtures are installed or replaced. Once construction is complete, a representative measures the glow and glare against a set of guidelines that benefit the night.

    Renovating a field with dark skies in mind can cost about 5% to 10% more than traditional sports lighting, according to James Brigagliano, who runs DarkSky’s outdoor sports lighting program. Venues may require a few extra fixtures since the light shining from them is more targeted.

    Most arenas make the change during scheduled maintenance and renovation, working with sports lighting company Musco. The company lights over 3,000 venues a year including college football stadiums, tennis courts and rail yards.

    At Superstition Shadows Park in Apache Junction, Arizona, kids play T-ball and baseball in the evenings, when the darkness offers a brief respite from the summer heat. The city’s parks and recreation department replaced its already-aging lights with shielded, dark sky-friendly fixtures last year with federal and local government funding.

    People venture to Apache Junction partly because “they can get out of the city and still see stars,” said the city’s parks and recreation director Liz Langenbach. The city is at the edge of the Phoenix metro area, bordered by rolling mountains and sweeping deserts.

    “The choices we make on lighting, I think, affect all of that,” Langenbach said.

    At Université Sainte-Anne in Canada, students run on a new track and soccer field outfitted with lights that DarkSky approved last year. Researchers at the university study native, nocturnal animals like the northern saw-whet owl.

    The lights are “good for everyone,” said university spokesperson Rachelle LeBlanc. “For tourism, for our students, for our neighbors, for the animals that we share our campus with.”

    Night lights harm the surrounding environment no matter how shielded they are. DarkSky-approved fields still allow a small fraction of their light to be pointed up since it’s necessary to keep track of flying balls.

    “You can have the absolute best, most carefully designed stadium lighting in the world, and you’re still creating light pollution,” said Travis Longcore, an urban light pollution expert at the University of California, Los Angeles.

    The U.S. Open courts are side-by-side with bright lights from Manhattan and Queens — so they can only darken a slice of the sky. But DarkSky says every light fixture makes a difference, and one professional arena can influence others.

    “I’m not saying we as humans have to turn all the lights off,” said Longcore. “I think you have to make improvements from where you are.”

    ___

    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Errani and Vavassori win revamped US Open mixed doubles to defend their title

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori weren’t even sure they would get to defend their U.S. Open mixed doubles title. Organizers revamped the tournament because they wanted singles superstars, not doubles specialists.

    They not only made it back to New York, they made it back to the top.

    The Italians beat No. 3 seeds Iga Swiatek and Casper Ruud 6-3, 5-7 (10-6) on Wednesday night, winning four matches over two days to earn $1 million— a huge raise over their earnings in New York last year in a format that looked nothing like this one.

    Errani and Vavassori were among the many critics of the changes to the event that shut out every other traditional doubles pairing, but had nothing but smiles — and plenty of hugs — after building a quick lead in the match tiebreaker and holding on in front of a large crowd inside Arthur Ashe Stadium.

    “I think it was important for us to play,” Vavassori said. “Like, I have to say the initiative was also important because it was really a statement that doubles can become something better. The stadium was packed. The people were enjoying it. If something doesn’t work — like, we showed today that it’s working. Like, the people were going crazy.”

    It was a setting rarely enjoyed by doubles players and what U.S. Open organizers sought when they overhauled their tournament, moving it to well before singles play starts Sunday in hopes that tennis’ best-known players would play.

    Many of them did. But in the end, the event belonged to the doubles duo.

    Eight teams in the 16-team field qualified by their players’ combined singles rankings, with the remaining teams given wild cards. Errani doubted the Italians were going to get one.

    They eventually did and became the first repeat mixed doubles champions in Flushing Meadows since Bethanie Mattek-Sands and Jamie Murray in 2018-19. Both repeatedly said they were representing the many doubles players who never had the chance to come to New York with them this year.

    “I think this one is also for them,” Errani said.

    The event drew past U.S. Open singles champions Carlos Alcaraz, Emma Raducanu, Novak Djokovic, Naomi Osaka and Daniil Medvedev, all of whom lost on the first day. Even without them, almost all the seats were full for the three matches Wednesday night in Arthur Ashe Stadium, with the roof closed after it rained most of the afternoon.

    Ruud acknowledged that the U.S. Tennis Association took a bold risk with its changes, with critics saying it turned the championship, with shortened sets to 4 games in the first three rounds, into a glorified exhibition, rather than the two-week, 32-event of the past. But even players who specialize in doubles agreed that the event got way more attention than they are accustomed to.

    “Any time you get a full crowd like this, how can we keep that going?” Christian Harrison said after he and Danielle Collins lost 4-2, 4-2 to Errani and Vavassori in the semis. “I mean, unreal night. I won’t forget this night.”

    Swiatek and Ruud edged the top-seeded team of Jessica Pegula and Jack Draper 3-5, 5-3 (10-8) in the other semifinal, battling back from an 8-4 deficit in the match tiebreaker.

    The No. 2-ranked Swiatek, a six-time Grand Slam singles champion, and Ruud, who has reached three major singles finals, then played well in the final.

    But they couldn’t match the doubles prowess of the Italians, who won a second major title together at this year’s French Open. Vavassori, with his height and constant movement around the net, was a hard target to pass even for Swiatek and Ruud, two accurate ball strikers from the baseline.

    “I think in doubles we showed it’s very important know how to play doubles,” Errani said. “In doubles it’s not just serving good, hitting good, returning good. There are many other things that are not easy.”

    Errani is one of the most accomplished women’s doubles players ever, having won a career Grand Slam with former partner Roberta Vinci, along with the 2024 Olympic gold medal with Jasmine Paolini — who was in the crowd cheering after pulling out of this event after losing to Swiatek on Monday night in the Cincinnati final.

    Swiatek opted to stay in and shared $400,000 with Ruud — double what Errani and Vavassori earned for winning last year.

    ___

    More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Hyped Revival of Mixed Doubles

    [ad_1]

    Last year, after Carlos Alcaraz beat Miomir Kecmanović in the fourth round of the Australian Open, Jim Courier asked Alcaraz, in an on-court interview, who his favorite players were. “Well, I’m a huge fan of tennis,” Alcaraz began. He reeled off a few names: Daniil Medvedev, Novak Djokovic, Jannik Sinner. Courier pressed him: What about the women? “Well, I watch W.T.A. as well,” Alcaraz said. “Uhhhhh,” he said, and ran his hand through his thick dark hair. He laughed, nervously, as the crowd murmured. “No, I mean, when I can obviously. Uh, when I turn the TV on, if it is W.T.A., A.T.P., whatever, I like to watch it, obviously.”

    Afterward, Alcaraz was criticized for his failure to name a single female tennis player, but I didn’t think much of it. With a few notable exceptions, most men’s-tennis stars are not outspoken champions of gender equality, and, besides, I’d have trouble naming my own children if I were pressured to do it in front of fifteen thousand people, not to mention TV cameras. If anything, the expectation that Alcaraz should be watching women’s tennis at all spoke to the relative egalitarianism of the sport he plays. How often is Anthony Edwards asked to account for his W.N.B.A. viewing habits? Then I checked X, and saw that Alcaraz had subsequently confessed that he’d been too nervous to give his real answer, the young English player Emma Raducanu. Why? Because, he said, he was “shy with girls.” Wait, I thought, is that a real quote? It was not, though it was getting passed around as though it were.

    I had the same reaction in late June, when I read that Raducanu and Alcaraz would be teaming up in a bid to compete in the “reimagined and elevated” mixed-doubles championship at the U.S. Open this summer. This isn’t real, is it? This time, though, it was, and I should have seen it coming. In February, the United States Tennis Association, which hosts the U.S. Open, had announced that the mixed-doubles tournament would be held on August 19th and 20th, in the midst of what’s known as Fan Week, during the qualifying tournament before the traditional start of the main draw. The participants would be decided by a new formula. Instead of the usual thirty-two teams, there would be sixteen—the top eight with the best combined singles rankings, along with eight wild cards. Given the framing of the tournament’s reinvention, there was little doubt that most, if not all, of those wild cards, which are chosen at the discretion of the tournament, would include the most famous singles players, too. The point, clearly, was to draw as much attention as possible. And no one, short of a comeback from Serena Williams, would draw more attention than the puppyish five-time Slam winner Alcaraz and Raducanu, a telegenic Brit who rocketed to fame when she won the U.S. Open as a qualifier four years ago. But to what end?

    The fact that men and women can compete seriously against one another in legitimate competition has always been part of the recreational appeal of tennis—and part of what makes it unique as a spectator sport. The first mixed-doubles Grand Slam title was awarded in 1892, at the tournament now known as the U.S. Open. The winners were an American man, Clarence Hobart, and an Irish woman, Mabel Cahill. Cahill also won the singles and women’s-doubles titles—and, around the same time, published a book called “Her Playthings: Men,” which was panned. For the next century, it was standard for many of the game’s best players—from Suzanne Lenglen to Rod Laver, from Martina Navratilova to Martina Hingis—to play mixed doubles, in addition to singles and doubles. A Grand Slam was a Grand Slam.

    But, as the sport became more physically taxing and as the rewards for solo success began to vastly exceed those for doubles, fewer and fewer top athletes played doubles seriously, particularly on the men’s tour, where the matches during majors were longer—best-of-five sets instead of best-of-three—and the financial incentives to focus on singles were generally even more skewed. And even fewer played with a partner of a different gender. As the sport became more star-focussed, singles matches took on far greater weight. A Grand Slam wasn’t a Grand Slam after all. It became routine for top players to pull out of doubles matches if they went deep into the singles draw. Doubles grew to be dominated by specialists, especially among men. (There have been some top women, most notably the biggest American star, Coco Gauff, who is a former world No. 1 in doubles, but they almost always focus on singles in the long run.) Talent, people said, was draining out of the doubles discipline; still, the level of the game remained high, and many fans are devoted to it. Doubles fans relish the quicker pace of the game’s points, the ping-ponging net play, the extreme angles and masterful spins that players deploy on their shots; and they understand the tactical nuances and complex chemistries of teamwork. But mixed doubles, specifically, have become an afterthought at Grand Slams. The matches are shoehorned into the tournaments, often on outer courts and at odd times. Last year, the U.S. Open mixed-doubles final, which was won by Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, was played on a Thursday, in front of a half-empty crowd. They split a prize of two hundred thousand dollars. The winners of the singles tournaments got $3.6 million.

    This year, the mixed-doubles champions will split a million dollars. The runners-up will get four hundred thousand. The matches will be played on show courts and broadcast on ESPN. In terms of buzz, the strategy is already a success. Even people who don’t follow doubles, including me, are talking about it. The tournament will be able to sell tickets, satisfy its television partners, and goose interest as never before. Fans want to see stars, and this approach offers a high concentration of them, in a novel situation. It will probably be quite fun. It’s easy to justify the changes: the tournament could bring in new fans, introduce more people to mixed doubles, encourage more tennis participation, and highlight the complementary qualities of men’s and women’s tennis being played on the same stage. Doubles players, who are already facing reduced opportunities as the tours put more resources into singles, may suffer for it. But there is no rule that an organization has to prop up the least successful and least lucrative part of its enterprise. The new format is good for business.

    But what is it? A tennis tournament is an entertainment vehicle, but it’s also an athletic competition, not a popularity contest. Attention can be converted to money, but it’s not the equivalent of value. A popularity contest is an exhibition, and that’s what this looks like. To persuade top players to play, the tournament has insured that matches won’t interfere with their ambitions in the singles tournament—that’s why it’s now a two-day event. The scoring format of matches has been changed to make that shortened time frame possible: sets are first to four games, with a possible third set replaced by a ten-point tiebreak. Throughout the past two months, the tournament has turned the process of determining the field into its own kind of reality show, periodically announcing who’s put their names forward, who’s in, who’s out. Fourteen of the sixteen teams have been chosen so far—with some shuffling owing to injuries—and some of them are delightful. Venus Williams and Reilly Opelka should have a wild card into the Super Bowl, as far as I’m concerned. But only one pairing—the defending champions, Errani and Vavassori—has extensive success together. The world’s top female doubles player, Taylor Townsend, is playing, but her inclusion probably has more to do with her teammate, Ben Shelton, who happens to be an American in the singles Top Ten. The second-ranked woman in doubles, Kateřina Siniaková—who was just overtaken by Townsend for the No. 1 spot—put in a bid to play alongside the No. 1 men’s-doubles player, Marcelo Arévalo, but so far, at least, they’re not included in the contest. “When two world No. 1s in doubles don’t get into the tournament, there’s probably nothing more to say about it,” Siniaková said to a Czech reporter.

    Last year, Siniaková, playing alongside Tomáš Macháč, won an Olympic gold medal; they crushed Medvedev and Mirra Andreeva, who are among the fourteen pairs so far confirmed to play at the U.S. Open, as it happens. Siniaková and Arévalo may still have a chance, as injuries and absences continue to shake up the pairings. Navarro, who’d been paired up with Sinner, is among those who have withdrawn, which is probably just as well; the two players had never spoken before their respective management teams submitted their names together. And Sinner is still alive in the Cincinnati Open, which will play its final less than a day before mixed-doubles play is set to start at the U.S. Open. (So, for that matter, is Alcaraz.) It may be that the combined talent of the best singles players is superior to a longtime doubles team. But nevertheless it would be interesting to watch them try. That’s not what’s happening here.

    Instead, the U.S. Open is giving us a reality dating series—really. (This is another thing I had to fact-check.) It’s called “Game, Set, Matchmaker,” and, in it, an ice skater turned Pilates instructor will go on dates with seven men around the grounds of the U.S. Open. More mixed doubles! And more of what young people want, which is, apparently, derivatives of the show “Love Island.” That brings us back to Raducanu and Alcaraz, who have been rumored to be dating for years, mostly on the basis, it seems, of knowing each other’s names. The U.S. Open, understandably but cynically, used them to lead the competition’s hype video. Never mind that Alcaraz’s advancement to the final in Cincinnati on Monday will make it difficult—or perhaps impossible—for him to play in New York on Tuesday. Or that neither Alcaraz nor Raducanu has played much doubles at all, let alone together. “I know Emma since a really long time ago,” Alcaraz explained, of their pairing. Raducanu spoke of a “genuine connection.” I would be surprised if their management teams weren’t involved. Raducanu once replied to some kind words from Alcaraz after she had had surgery; that post, too, turned out to be fake. The two were once spotted saying hello, at a distance, in the warmup area of the Madrid Open, and recently did an event together for Evian, which sponsors them both. They were promoting artisanal water. The tabloids, meanwhile, have been shipping them for months. ♦

    [ad_2]

    Louisa Thomas

    Source link

  • West Indies v England scorecard

    West Indies v England scorecard

    [ad_1]

    Latest score from Antigua as England begin their three-match ODI series against West Indies, with Liam Livingstone standing in as captain.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former tennis pro creates first wheelchair tennis club in the Twin Cities

    Former tennis pro creates first wheelchair tennis club in the Twin Cities

    [ad_1]

    MINNETONKA, Minn. — A former three-time Grand Slam tennis pro is working to grow the game in the Twin Citities, and is being recognized on a national stage for her efforts.

    Felicia Raschiatore is the tennis manager at Williston Fitness Center in Minnetonka. She’s been coaching for 38 years, and teaches tennis players of all genders, ages and levels.

    “I’m living the dream,” said Raschiatore, “I should say that more often.”

    Part of her dream is growing the game, so this past summer she created the first wheelchair tennis club in the Twin Cities.

    “If I see a niche or a vacancy that something could be added, let’s see if we could do it, and then let’s do it, so more people can play tennis,” said Raschiatore.

    It’s giving Kate Aquila an opportunity to relearn something she loves.

    “I’m never happier than when I’m out on the tennis court,” said Aquila, “I have been playing tennis since I was a little kid, but I came to wheelchair tennis after my spinal cord injury, so kind of revisiting the game in a different way.”

    Joining this wheelchair tennis club has given Susan Banal a chance to re-discover something about herself.

    “All aspects have been transformative for me in my life at this time,” said Banal, “It’s taught me that I still have that competitive nature, athleticism. I still have that in me inspite of an injury.”

    Creating this club got Raschiatore recognized. She received the ‘Champions of Equality’ honor at this year’s US Open back in August in New York, where she got to spend time with tennis legend, Billie Jean King 

    “It’s inspiring to go to those things and be recognized. It just gives you a little juice to come back and do an even better job,” said Raschiatore.

    Her players are not surprised by this recognition.

    “It’s just fantastic having someone like her leading the way,” said Aquila. 

    The goal is to grow this club in numbers. They play indoors and outdoors, so they can play year-round, and want more players to join them.

    To learn more about joining, tap here or call 952-939-8370.

    [ad_2]

    Marielle Mohs

    Source link

  • Danielle Collins postpones tennis retirement plans, will play WTA Tour 2025

    Danielle Collins postpones tennis retirement plans, will play WTA Tour 2025

    [ad_1]

    World No. 9 Danielle Collins has postponed her plan to retire from tennis at the end of the 2024 season, and will play on the WTA Tour in 2025.

    Collins, 30, has taken advice on her “personal fertility journey” since her last match, which was a defeat to Australian qualifier Olivia Gadecki at the Guadalajara Open in Mexico. The American, who planned her retirement around starting a family while managing her endometriosis, which can impact fertility, said in a statement posted on Instagram: “I’ve recently been seeing a handful of specialists to better understand what my best path forward is to achieve my ultimate dream, starting a family.

    “Dealing with endometriosis and fertility is a massive challenge for many women and something that I am actively traversing, but I am fully confident in the team I am working with. It is just going to take longer than I thought.

    “So, the DANIMAL story has not reached its conclusion. I will be back on tour in 2025,” she said.

    After reaching the quarterfinals at the 2024 Paris Olympics, where she retired with an abdominal injury against world No. 1 Iga Swiatek, Collins lost four consecutive matches in her comeback. After a surprise reverse to compatriot Caroline Dolehide at the U.S. Open, Collins said in a news conference that her life away from tennis was impinging on her ability to execute on court.

    “I have honestly just had so many distractions away from the court,” she said. “Just going through life’s challenges and coping with it.”

    Up until that rough summer, Collins had played one of the best seasons of her career, returning to the WTA top 10 and winning 15 matches in a row between March and May, which brought titles at the Miami and Charleston Opens. But that too brought struggle, as she repeatedly fended off questions about why she would retire when she was playing so well.

    “I’ve loved what I’ve done and the opportunity and the doors it’s opened, but it’s not easy, and I am a homebody,” she told The Athletic in Miami in March, before she won that title against then-world No. 4 Elena Rybakina.

    For now, she’s back to tennis. Collins is currently in the U.S. squad for the Billie Jean King Cup Finals in Malaga, Spain, which will take place from November 13 – 20.

    GO DEEPER

    Danielle Collins is on fire. She’s quitting tennis at the end of the year anyway.

    Analysis: How will Collins manage her unexpected return?

    Analysis from tennis writer Charlie Eccleshare

    For those present at what appeared to be Collins’ final news conference at a Grand Slam, back at the U.S. Open in August, this news comes as a big surprise. Back then, Collins was exhausted, feeling unwell and looking fully ready to say farewell to professional tennis. She finished by tailing off and saying: “Yeah, sorry, I’m a little bit out of gas. I got a little tired.”

    A U-turn at that point seemed unlikely, but here we are, and Collins’ approach and results next year will be fascinating. Her excellent form in the early part of 2024 seemed to be inspired in part by the liberation of knowing that she wouldn’t be doing this for much longer. Next year will she be reenergised by doing something she thought was going to be in her past, or might she struggle for motivation having already made peace with retirement?

    The most important thing is the “fertility journey” that Collins referenced in her social media post. A challenge that so many women face, Collins’ openness will inspire a lot of people, and everyone in tennis and beyond will be hoping that she can can stay healthy and find the motivation and energy that left her on that sad Tuesday in New York earlier this year.

    (Top photo: Shi Tang / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Jannik Sinner doping case: WADA seeks ban of up to two years in appeal

    Jannik Sinner doping case: WADA seeks ban of up to two years in appeal

    [ad_1]

    The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has announced that it will appeal against the “no fault or negligence” finding in Jannik Sinner’s anti-doping case.

    WADA is seeking a “period of ineligibility of one or two years,” in which the world No. 1 tennis player and two-time Grand Slam champion would be barred from competing in the sport at all levels. Sinner won the U.S. Open in New York just three weeks ago.

    Sinner, who is currently playing at the China Open in Beijing, said he was “surprised” by WADA’s decision.

    “Obviously I’m very disappointed and also surprised of this appeal, to be honest, because we had three hearings. All three hearings came out very positively for me,” he told reporters after beating Roman Safiullin to reach the last eight in Beijing.

    “We always talk about the same thing. Maybe they just want to make sure that everything is in the right position.”

    In a further statement, a “disappointed” Sinner added that there had been “three separate hearings in each case confirming my innocence” in the case.

    “Several months of interviews and investigations culminated in three senior judges scrutinising every detail through a formal hearing,” the statement continued.

    “They issued an in-depth judgement explaining why they determined me not at fault, with clear evidence provided and my cooperation throughout.

    “On the back of such a robust process both the ITIA and the Italian anti-doping authority accepted it and waived their rights to appeal.”

    Sinner added that the need for a “thorough investigation” was understandable and that he would “cooperate fully” in the investigation, but questioned why the process needed to be reopened.

    Sinner tested positive for clostebol, a banned anabolic steroid, on two occasions: March 10, in-competition at the BNP Paribas Open held in Indian Wells, Calif, and March 18, out of competition.

    An independent tribunal convened by the ITIA and conducted by Sports Resolutions ruled that Sinner bore “no fault or negligence” for those positive tests in a hearing on August 15, but still found Sinner to have committed two anti-doping violations, for which he was stripped of his ranking points, prize money, and results from that event.

    It accepted the Italian world No.1’s explanation that Sinner’s physiotherapist, Umberto Ferrara, had brought an over-the-counter healing spray containing clostebol to Indian Wells. His trainer, physiotherapist, Giacomo Naldi, cut his hand, and then used the spray on that cut. Naldi then conducted massages on Sinner, which led to transdermal contamination with the clostebol from the healing spray.

    Sinner parted company with Naldi and Ferrara on the eve of the U.S. Open.

    WADA is now challenging the decision that Sinner was not at fault for his violation. In a statement released today Saturday September 28, it said: “The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) confirms that on Thursday 26 September, it lodged an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in the case of Italian tennis player, Jannik Sinner, who was found by an independent tribunal of the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) to bear no fault or negligence having twice tested positive for clostebol, a prohibited substance, in March 2024.

    “It is WADA’s view that the finding of “no fault or negligence” was not correct under the applicable rules. WADA is seeking a period of ineligibility of between one and two years. WADA is not seeking a disqualification of any results, save that which has already been imposed by the tribunal of first instance.”

    GO DEEPER

    World No 1 Jannik Sinner penalised after twice testing positive for banned substance

    In response, the ITIA issued its own statement.

    “The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) acknowledges the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) decision to appeal the ruling of No Fault or Negligence in the case of Italian tennis player Jannik Sinner, issued by an independent tribunal appointed by Sport Resolutions on 19 August 2024. Under the terms of the World Anti-Doping Code, WADA has the final right to appeal all such decisions,” an ITIA spokesperson said.

    “Having reached an agreed set of facts following a thorough investigative process, the case was referred to a tribunal entirely independent of the ITIA to determine level of fault and therefore sanction because of the unique set of circumstances, and lack of comparable precedent.

    “The process was run according to World Anti-Doping Code guidelines; however, the ITIA acknowledges and respects WADA’s right to appeal the independent tribunal’s decision in the Court of Arbitration for Sport.”


    Jannik Sinner won the U.S. Open in the immediate aftermath of the ITIA ruling on his anti-doping case. (Al Bello / Getty Images)

    In the ITIA’s full decision, Professor David Cowan said that “even if the administration had been intentional, the minute amounts likely to have been administered would not have had […] any relevant doping, or performance enhancing, effect upon the player.”

    A positive test for clostebol carries a mandatory provisional suspension from tennis, but two further independent tribunals upheld Sinner’s appeals against those suspensions, which were active between April 4 and April 5 and April 17 and April 20. The success of those appeals meant that the two positive tests, and the attached suspensions, were not made public until the conclusion of the ITIA’s investigation into Sinner’s case. This drew allegations of double standards from some of Sinner’s tennis peers, but is in line with ITIA protocol.

    In a statement released at the conclusion of the investigation, Sinner said: “I will now put this very challenging and hugely unfortunate period behind me.” The best men’s tennis player in the world will have to resume it now.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    What players’ reaction to Sinner’s doping case says about their trust in their sport

    ‘The news that Sinner will have been fearing’

    Analysis from Charlie Eccleshare, tennis writer

    Sinner emerged from months of uncertainty to win the U.S. Open three weeks ago. Now he has been put back under investigation, and the renewed scrutiny of the initial ITIA ruling that will come with it.

    It wasn’t as though the world No. 1 necessarily appeared liberated in New York — his post-match press conference after the final was as much subdued as it was celebratory — but there was an air of Sinner having temporarily closed a chapter behind him.

    The prospect of a WADA appeal was always there however, and Saturday morning brought the news that Sinner will have been fearing. He was able to compartmentalize pretty well during the five months from being told of the positive test to it becoming public in August. He even won the Cincinnati Open two days before the full decision in his case was released.

    But in his post-final press conference in New York, he acknowledged that his demeanor and personality had changed during the investigation.

    “Obviously, it was very difficult to enjoy certain moments,” he said.

    “Even the way I behaved or how I entered the court in some tournaments was no longer the same as before.”


    Jannik Sinner answered numerous questions about his case at his pre-tournament press conference and throughout the U.S. Open. (Jamie Squire / Getty Images)

    This decision from WADA, and the attached seeking of a ban of up to two years, will be another big challenge of his mentality.

    When the independent tribunal convened by the ITIA ruled that Sinner bore “no fault or negligence” — the key term that WADA is challenging — numerous players, some of them high-profile, expressed a view that the swiftness of his case pointed to double standards in the sport.

    In the higher echelons of tennis there will surely be dismay at the world’s best male player facing a doping investigation, as WADA’s appeal will now be referred to CAS.

    (Top photo: Kena Betancur / AFP via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • The Laver Cup wants to be the Ryder Cup of tennis. Do its stars need that pressure?

    The Laver Cup wants to be the Ryder Cup of tennis. Do its stars need that pressure?

    [ad_1]

    BERLIN — “Vamoooooos,” a roar, and the ball skied in celebration.

    Carlos Alcaraz did what he normally does when he wins a tennis match — except this time he was dressed all in blue, playing on a black court, and about to be mobbed by Alexander Zverev, Stefanos Tsitsipas, and Daniil Medvedev, men whose dreams of Grand Slam titles he has spent most of his career dashing.

    In dismantling U.S. Open finalist Taylor Fritz, 6-2, 7-5, Alcaraz clinched the 2024 Laver Cup for Team Europe, securing a 13-11 victory over Team World here in the German capital.

    Not 36 hours earlier, he used a press conference at the same event to express fears about there being too much tennis, having suffered a shock defeat to Botic van de Zandschulp in the third round of the U.S. Open, in what was the Spaniard’s 50th singles match of 2024, in late August.

    “Probably, they are going to kill us in some way,” he said.

    “Sometimes, you don’t want to go to a tournament,” he added.

    “Sometimes, I don’t feel motivated at all. As I’ve said many, many times, I play my best tennis when I smile and enjoy it on court. That’s the best option,” he continued.


    Carlos Alcaraz won eight of Team Europe’s 13 points. (Gerald Matzka / Getty Images for Laver Cup)

    In Berlin, he was feeling himself, evidently liberated by the atmosphere, the support of being part of a team — and freedom from the stresses of tennis that truly counts for something, whether it’s a major title, an Olympic medal, or the ranking points that move players up and down the sport.

    But the Laver Cup has designs on being more than this, aiming to emulate the history and prestige of golf’s Ryder Cup, whose 90-year history far outstrips that of an event founded in 2017, and thus far is best known for being the stage on which co-founder Roger Federer orchestrated his exit from the sport he defined.

    The event wants prestige, but players love its freedom. Seven years after its inception, the Laver Cup finds itself at an inflection point.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    How the fight to improve the tennis calendar risks destroying its soul


    When the Laver Cup arrives in San Francisco next September for its 2025 edition, the two team captains — John McEnroe (World) and Bjorn Borg (Europe) — will have been replaced by Andre Agassi and Yannick Noah. Rafael Nadal is expected to have followed the competition’s co-founder Federer into retirement. An event initially so defined by star power will have to search for new shine.

    Its founders are bullish about the competition’s place in tennis. Tony Godsick is Federer’s long-term agent and fellow co-founder of Team8, the sports and entertainment company that oversaw the foundation of the event.

    “We’ll never get rid of that gap,” Godsick says of organisers’ designs on matching the Ryder Cup, as he takes The Athletic on a tour of Berlin’s Uber Arena. “We invest in the brand for the players, for the sponsors, for the fans, for the media.”

    Godsick also offered his own opinion on its place in the tennis calendar at a press conference on Friday: “There could be too many other tennis events, per se, but this one is working. We have sold-out crowds. Every player loves to play. We have the biggest captains, the best sponsors. Everything is working.

    “So the question is: Is there too much Laver Cup? No. I think there is not enough Laver Cup, probably.”

    Everything about the competition is bombastic, which at times can jar a little. At one point at the launch event on Thursday night, guests were told the Laver Cup is “one of the most popular sporting events in the world”. Borg, winner of 11 Grand Slam titles, describes it as “the best event”.


    Bjorn Borg will relinquish his captaincy of Team Europe to Yannick Noah. (Clive Brunskill / Getty Images for Laver Cup)

    In its courtship of stars and pitting of a selection of the world’s top players against each other, it largely pulls off its dance between a glitzy tennis pageant and a serious competition tied to the most important competitions in the sport.

    The black court and vibrant red and blue team colours help give it a distinct feel, and the luxury sponsors and slick, high-end production values are very much in line with co-founder Federer’s image. He was in Berlin for the event and his presence and aura can be felt everywhere — but the competition can no longer rely on it for the actual playing of tennis.

    Players who are normally rivals get to hang out properly and actually get to know each other a bit better away from the pressure of tour life. They clearly enjoy the atmosphere a lot, learning from each other and their distinguished team captains, and are well looked after. Players are encouraged to bring their families along and Federer insists that everything is done to ensure their needs are met. Stringers, physios, hotels — everything has to be delivered to his exacting standards. The players are given appearance fees, and members of the winning team receive $250,000 (£187,000) each.

    This helps with getting the top three players from both geographical groups, who are directly invited (the tournament then works down the list if players ranked higher say no) with three more team members selected as “captain’s picks”. In this year’s case, six of the world’s top 10 and nine of the world’s top 20 made the trip. One of those was debutant Alcaraz, who McEnroe points to as inheriting the star power of Federer and Nadal (the latter was down to play, before pulling out with injury).

    The system thereby creates singles matchups that could be pulled from the latter stages of Grand Slam tournaments — Medvedev against Frances Tiafoe, Alcaraz against Ben Shelton, Zverev against Fritz — with none of the pressure such meetings carry.

    Not that the event sees it that way.


    Frances Tiafoe claimed victory over Daniil Medvedev in a match tiebreak. (Francisco Macia / Quality Sport Images via Getty Images)

    “We do not hear that there is less pressure,” said chief executive Steve Zacks earlier this week. “It’s a different kind of pressure. But they take it very seriously. And they feel like they’ve got people supporting them.”

    “The peer pressure, having great players on each team, having the legends of the game as your coaches … You’re going to try hard, period,” Godsick told reporters.

    The players competing in the Laver Cup definitely care. Of course they do — they are professional athletes and competitive beasts; put them all together in a game of minigolf and they’d take it extremely seriously. But the event’s lack of accumulated pressure from the rest of the tennis calendar feels germane in the context of Alcaraz’s comments.

    Perhaps being not quite so serious is no bad thing.


    The players involved say that the change in atmosphere is marked.

    “The players talk in a more friendly way,” said Team Europe’s Casper Ruud in an interview with The Athletic. “Here, you can actually get to know your competitors. Daniil (Medvedev) is a father and we can talk about his family, his daughter, how it is to be a father. Sometimes I forget that athletes we’re just normal people as well.”

    Rivals become team-mates, spending proper time with their colleagues rather than rolling on to yet another tournament as a sole trader in search of ranking points.

    That extends to the on-court format, with the other players sitting courtside for matches and able to offer advice between points and energy during them. It’s fascinating seeing their interactions in a sport that so often isolates them (and in the social media age, makes for compelling content).

    Dimitrov was especially active on Team Europe, even offering tips on where to serve on certain points. His suggestion to Medvedev for the first point of the super tiebreak against Tiafoe paid off, with the Russian listening and winning the point. After that match, he and Medvedev stayed on court, talking tactics. After one high-octane point against Tabilo, Dimitrov high-fived his teammates, the big screen caught a glimpse of Federer smiling, and the whole place went wild. Alcaraz and Tiafoe enjoyed working the crowd even more than usual.

    It’s hard to imagine that freedom under the pressure of a Grand Slam match — or even something on a par with the Ryder Cup.

    For Fritz, fresh from his first U.S. Open final, it was a relief not to go straight back into the grind of tour-level competition.

    “It would be easy to have almost an emotional comedown — especially as an American,” he said. “You don’t get that here. You’ve got the team to pump you up.”

    His compatriot and team-mate Shelton, who has spoken in the past about his love of the college tennis environment in the United States that formed him as a player, sees the event as a welcome throwback.


    Ben Shelton is particularly fond of the on-court energy for its ties to the college tennis atmosphere in which he developed. (Francisco Macia / Quality Sport Images via Getty Images)

    “I think a lot of the banter and the things that we enjoy in the locker room and cheering for our teammates on the court are similar to college,” he said. “I think that you always play better when you’re playing for something bigger than yourself.”

    At this summer’s Olympics in Paris, Alcaraz and women’s world No 1 Iga Swiatek, did not feel this way. Both broke down in tears after defeats — Swiatek in the semifinals against Zheng Qinwen and Alcaraz in the gold medal match against Novak Djokovic — and referred to the pressure of playing for something bigger than themselves, meaning their country.

    How much that pressure would grow if the Laver Cup were to gain more of the sporting prestige it wants is another tricky dance to negotiate.

    The Davis Cup — the men’s team tennis event that currently has the most prestige — is in a complicated place of its own, with changes to its format and location lessening the appeal. The women’s equivalent, the Billie Jean King Cup, also loses top players because of its proximity to the season-ending WTA Finals. Tsitsipas said he appreciates the consistency of the Laver Cup in this regard — the money likely helps, too.

    These advantages don’t convince everyone — the world No 1, Jannik Sinner, has never played in the annual event, and Djokovic has appeared just twice.


    The Laver Cup’s future will rest on how it negotiates its desire to be prestigious while maintaining the difference and freedom that the players on whose star power it relies clearly relish.

    At the pre-event press conference, the players enjoyed having a laugh with one another, teasing the 21-year-old Alcaraz about how green he is and Dimitrov’s recent striptease with Djokovic in a charity match. For Team World, Tiafoe was particularly in his element.

    “It suits me a lot, suits my personality. Get to relax a bit. It definitely helps,” he said in an interview ahead of the event.

    Fritz and Zverev were asked at the pre-tournament press conference if they were, as the senior players, the de facto team leaders. Both instantly demurred and said the team captains were in charge — in part it seemed because they were quite enjoying a week where it wasn’t them having to make decisions.

    The fans enjoy it too. With the 17,000-capacity Uber Arena either sold out or close to for the five sessions, it was the highest-grossing event at the venue since it opened in 2008. The fan area outside was always busy and the dedicated practice court was packed whenever the bigger names, such as Alcaraz, used it.


    The jumbo tennis balls that have become a feature of crowds were out in force for the players. (Ronny Hartmann / AFP via Getty Images)

    The challenge, as the Davis Cup has found out, is ensuring that, as well as those attending, the event appeals to a sizeable proportion of the wider tennis, and broader sporting, public.

    The event is looking at bringing in younger players, and Godsick mentioned the possibility of an NCAA Laver Cup, which would pit the best European college players against their best counterparts from the rest of the world. Everywhere, including Saudi Arabia, is in consideration for hosting future editions, but there are no immediate plans to create a joint men’s and women’s event, with the feeling that the Hopman Cup has cornered that part of the market for now.

    Even though the Laver Cup is starting to make memories — Nadal and Federer holding hands during the latter’s farewell in 2022, the pair coming back onto the court with Zverev and giving him a sweary pep talk in 2019, Kyle Edmund absolutely losing his mind in the dressing room a year earlier and chest-bumping everyone in sight — there is no shortcut to history and prestige.

    Only through time, doing it year-in and year-out, will the Laver Cup be able to acquire the status it clearly wants, even if the tournament’s current calling card is freedom from the sameness and existential angst of the tennis tours.

    The next seven years will be interesting.

    (Top photos: Getty Images; design: Kelsea Pietersen)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Jannik Sinner wins U.S. Open men’s final with straight sets win over Taylor Fritz weeks after doping exoneration

    Jannik Sinner wins U.S. Open men’s final with straight sets win over Taylor Fritz weeks after doping exoneration

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Open sees record attendance numbers


    U.S. Open sees record attendance numbers

    00:53

    Jannik Sinner beat Taylor Fritz 6-3, 6-4, 7-5 with a relentless baseline game to win the U.S. Open men’s championship on Sunday, less than three weeks after being exonerated in a doping case.

    The No. 1-ranked Sinner, a 23-year-old from Italy, won the second Grand Slam trophy of his nascent career — the other was at the Australian Open in January — and prevented No. 12 Fritz from ending a major title drought for American men that has lasted 21 years.

    Andy Roddick’s triumph at Flushing Meadows in 2003 was the last Slam title for a man from the United States. The last before Fritz, a 26-year-old from California, to even contest a final at one of the four biggest tournaments in tennis also was Roddick, who lost to Roger Federer at Wimbledon in 2009.

    2024 US Open - Final Day
    Jannik Sinner of Italy celebrates after defeating Taylor Fritz of the United States to win the men’s singles final on Day 14 of the 2024 U.S. Open at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center on September 08, 2024, in New York City.

    Getty Images


    Sinner extended his current winning streak to 11 matches and improved to 55-5 with a tour-high six titles in 2024. That includes a 35-2 mark on hard courts, the surface used at both the Australian Open and U.S. Open, and he is the first man since Guillermo Vilas in 1977 to win his first two Grand Slam trophies in the same season, something such greats as Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Federer never accomplished.

    Less than a week before competition began at Flushing Meadows, the world found out that Sinner had tested positive twice for anabolic steroids in March but was cleared because his use was ruled unintentional — the banned substance entered his system via a massage from a team member he later fired.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula to win the US Open for her third Grand Slam title

    Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula to win the US Open for her third Grand Slam title

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Aryna Sabalenka left the U.S. Open in tears 12 months ago as the runner-up. She exited in the semifinals each of the two years before that. This time, Sabalenka was in a joking mood after winning her first championship at Flushing Meadows and the third Grand Slam title of her career.

    Sabalenka, the No. 2 seed, got past No. 6 Jessica Pegula 7-5, 7-5 in a rollicking final under a closed retractable roof at Arthur Ashe Stadium on Saturday, adding this triumph to the two she earned at the Australian Open each of the past two seasons, also on hard courts.

    “So many times, I thought I was so close to get a U.S. Open title. It’s been a dream of mine. Finally, I got this beautiful trophy. It means a lot,” said Sabalenka, a 26-year-old from Belarus, who is on a 12-match winning streak.

    “I remember,” she said, “all those tough losses in the past here.”

    That includes in the semifinals in both 2021, against Leylah Fernandez, and 2022, against No. 1 Iga Swiatek.

    Most poignant, of course, was last year, when Sabalenka was rattled by the Ashe crowd, blew a set advantage and was defeated by Coco Gauff. Like Gauff, Pegula is an American, but the spectators were far more generous toward Sabalenka on Saturday, applauding her best efforts and even obliging when she waved her arms to ask for extra noise.

    Afterward, Sabalenka thanked the fans for cheering for her — which probably (wink, wink) was unrelated to her kidding offer of “Drinks on me” after an earlier victory.

    Pegula, a native New Yorker whose parents own the NFL’s Buffalo Bills and NHL’s Buffalo Sabres, was participating in a major final for the first time at age 30. She’s won 15 of her past 17 matches over the past month; both losses came against Sabalenka.

    “I know how tough it is to lose in the final, but you’re showing some amazing tennis, and I’m more than sure that one day, you’re going to get one,” Sabalenka told Pegula during the on-court ceremony, then paused and added with a chuckle: “I mean, not (just) one. Maybe more. But let’s start from one Grand Slam.”

    To Pegula’s credit, she did not fold after Sabalenka reeled off five consecutive games to grab the opening set and move ahead 3-0 in the second. In the next game, Pegula dropped a point and showed her frustration by whacking a ball off the video wall behind the baseline, dislodging a little square panel.

    Maybe that released some tension, because suddenly Pegula asserted herself, using her own five-game run to go up 5-3. But when she served at 5-4 with a chance to force a third set, Pegula let Sabalenka level the second with a break.

    “Was able to find some good tennis, just wasn’t quite able to sustain it,” Pegula said. “She played some big tennis in big moments.”

    Indeed, that began a three-game surge for Sabalenka, who soon was collapsing to the court, dropping her racket and covering her face with both arms.

    “Everyone is like, ‘Congrats! Amazing tournament!’” Pegula said. “I’m like, ‘Eh, whatever.’”

    Sabalenka is as demonstrative as anyone, her body language usually a spot-on barometer of whether things are going well — or not — for her. But as she sputtered at the start Saturday, it was tough to read what she was thinking against Pegula, who eliminated Swiatek in the quarterfinals.

    Even while down an early break and being a point from trailing 3-1, Sabalenka reacted to mistakes by calmly turning her back and taking deep breathing as star athletes from other sports such as Stephen Curry, Lewis Hamilton and Noah Lyles looked on from the stands.

    Once Sabalenka got going, once her booming strokes — her forehands were the fastest of the past two weeks, speedier than any woman’s or man’s — were calibrated just so, it became apparent the outcome would be determined by what she did.

    By the close, the statistics made that obvious: Sabalenka finished with far more winners than Pegula, 40-17, and also more unforced errors, 34-22. Sabalenka controlled most exchanges, with Pegula mainly stuck responding as best she could.

    “She’s super powerful. Goes for her shots. She’s definitely not going to give you anything,” Pegula said. “I was happy I was able to fight back and give myself a chance, but in the end it wasn’t enough.”

    There was one moment of clear anger from Sabalenka. It came at 5-all in the first set, when she double-faulted to face a break point, then leaned forward and cracked her racket against the court four times while holding the handle with both fists.

    Seemed to work. She saved that break point, wound up taking that game, then broke Pegula to own the opening set.

    A year ago, Sabalenka blew that lead against Gauff. The year before, Sabalenka blew that lead against Swiatek.

    Didn’t let it happen again.

    “In that second set, honestly, I was just praying there,” said Sabalenka, who collected a $3.6 million winner’s check. “I was literally standing there and praying.”

    ___

    AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula in two sets to win the U.S. Open

    Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula in two sets to win the U.S. Open

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Open women’s final: What to expect


    What to expect from the U.S. Open women’s final

    04:04

    Aryna Sabalenka got past Jessica Pegula 7-5, 7-5 in a rollicking U.S. Open women’s final Saturday to win her first championship at Flushing Meadows and third Grand Slam title of her career.

    Sabalenka, a 26-year-old from Belarus, adds this trophy to the two she earned at the Australian Open each of the past two seasons, also on hard courts. And the victory allowed her to leave Arthur Ashe Stadium in a far better mood than when she was the runner-up to Coco Gauff at the 2023 U.S. Open.

    2024 US Open - Day 13
    NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 07: Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus celebrates after defeating Jessica Pegula of the United States to win the Women’s Singles Final on Day Thirteen of the 2024 US Open at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center on September 07, 2024 in the Flushing neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City.

    / Getty Images


    Pegula, a native New Yorker whose parents own the NFL’s Buffalo Bills and NHL’s Buffalo Sabres, was participating in a major final for the first time. She’s won 15 of her past 17 matches over the past month but both losses came against Sabalenka in tournament finals.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Taylor Fritz becomes first American in a U.S. Open final since 2006 after beating Frances Tiafoe

    Taylor Fritz becomes first American in a U.S. Open final since 2006 after beating Frances Tiafoe

    [ad_1]

    When Taylor Fritz, a 26-year-old from California, and Frances Tiafoe, a 26-year-old from Maryland, strode under the Arthur Ashe Stadium lights Friday night for the first U.S. Open semifinal matching two American men in 19 years, the crowd might have been forgiven for not knowing which to support.

    There was a burst of clapping right before the initial point, a curtain-raiser befitting the show about to unfold. Once the contest got going, maybe the momentum shifts made it tough to choose between a pair of close pals who’ve known each other since they were playing tournaments for kids younger than 14.

    In the end, the roars were for Fritz, who surged with a six-game run against a fading Tiafoe to come out on top 4-6, 7-5, 4-6, 6-4, 6-1 and reach his first Grand Slam final.

    “It’s the reason why I do what I do,” Fritz told the fans, his voice cracking during a post-match interview. “It’s the reason why I work so hard.”

    APTOPIX U.S. Open Tennis
    Taylor Fritz, of the United States, reacts after defeating Frances Tiafoe, of the United States, during the men’s singles semifinals of the U.S. Open tennis championships, Friday, Sept. 6, 2024, in New York.

    Seth Wenig / AP


    The No. 12-seeded Fritz’s seventh victory in eight professional meetings against No. 20 Tiafoeearned a showdown against No. 1 Jannik Sinner for the championship on Sunday.

    “He was overwhelming from the baseline so much … and I just tried to tell myself to stay in it and fight,” said Fritz, who was two games from losing in the fourth set. “I told myself that if I didn’t give it absolutely everything I had — to just stick with it and see if his level might drop a little bit — then I was going to regret it for a long time.”

    He will be the first U.S. man to appear in a major final since Andy Roddick lost to Roger Federer at Wimbledon in 2009 — and the first in New York since Roddick lost to Federer there in 2006. If he can get past Sinner, Fritz would become the first American man to win any Slam trophy since Roddick got his 21 years ago at the U.S. Open.

    “It’s a dream come true. I’m in the final. So I’m going to come out and give everything I can possibly give,” Fritz said. “I can’t wait.”

    U.S. Open Tennis
    Taylor Fritz, of the United States, hugs Frances Tiafoe, of the United States, after winning the men’s singles semifinals of the U.S. Open tennis championships, Friday, Sept. 6, 2024, in New York.

    Kirsty Wigglesworth / AP


    From 4-all in the fourth set, he seized control. Tiafoe’s mind and legs betrayed him, as he cramped up, at least in part, because of what he said were nerves related to thinking the finish line was near and he was headed to play for the title.

    “I felt like my body shut down on me,” said Tiafoe, who fell to 7-14 in five-setters. “I got ahead of myself.”

    After his double-fault handed over a break to make it 4-0 in the fifth, more than three hours into the proceedings, Tiafoe chucked his racket. Fritz repaid the favor by double-faulting to end the next game, but broke right back and soon it was over. They met at the net for an embrace.

    “Sometimes,” Tiafoe said, “it’s not meant to be.”

    Sinner, a 23-year-old from Italy exonerated in a doping case less than three weeks ago, finished off a 7-5, 7-6 (3), 6-2 victory over No. 25 Jack Draper on Friday that featured simultaneous treatment of both competitors by trainers deep in the 1 1/2-hour second set.

    “It was a very physical match, as we see,” said Sinner, who won the Australian Open in January. “I just tried to stay there mentally.”

    U.S. Open Tennis
    Jannik Sinner, of Italy, reacts after defeating Jack Draper, of Great Britain, during the men’s singles semifinal of the U.S. Open tennis championships, Friday, Sept. 6, 2024, in New York.

    Julia Nikhinson / AP


    He got his left wrist massaged after falling during a point he managed to win; Draper needed medical attention after vomiting twice in a game with the temperature in the high 70s and the humidity above 60%. During that break in the action, a vacuum was used to clear the ground behind the baseline and finish the cleaning job Draper, a 22-year-old from Britain, tried to do himself by wiping his, um, mess with a towel.

    There was none of that sort of drama away from the actual play in Tiafoe vs. Fritz.

    “Ultimately,” Tiafoe said, “it was a great night, to have two Americans battling.”

    The respective guest boxes seemed to reflect the players’ contrasting personalities. The excitable Tiafoe would mark a key moment by shaking a raised fist or gritting his teeth or wagging his racket or nodding while strutting to the sideline, and his entourage — including coach David Witt, who worked with Venus Williams for many years, as well as Jessica Pegula, the American in the U.S. Open women’s final Saturday against Aryna Sabalenka — stood and got noisy, point after point after point.

    The group in the more mild-mannered Fritz’s corner was more selective in its celebrations.

    Fritz had never been past the quarterfinals at one of his sport’s four most prestigious events until now, but this journey included wins over a trio of guys with a combined six Slam runner-up showings: Casper Ruud, Alexander Zverev and Matteo Berrettini.

    Fritz started well Friday, smacking serves at up to 135 mph, before Tiafoe gathered himself and grabbed five games in a row. In the next set, Fritz was pretty much perfect, winning 24 of 25 service points and going 8 for 8 at the net. Tiafoe regrouped quickly, breaking to begin the third, which turned out to be enough for that set, because he never allowed Fritz so much as one break chance.

    Tiafoe appeared to lose steam after losing one particular 31-stroke point — the longest of the match, he called it “definitely an intense rally” — midway through the fourth, then gave away that set’s last game by double-faulting twice and netting a drop shot.

    “This one’s going to hurt really, really bad,” Tiafoe said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How much prize money do U.S. Open winners get?

    How much prize money do U.S. Open winners get?

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Open winners will take home hefty paychecks this year, distributed from a record purse of $75 million for the final Grand Slam tennis tournament of the season. The total pot is 15% bigger than it was in 2023. 

    The checks awarded to the men’s and women’s singles draw champions could go to American players. 

    Though it’s unclear who the winners will be, two American women — Emma Navarro and Jessica Pegula — reached the semifinals, and Pegula won her match, earning a place in the finals. Navarro and Pegula happen to have fathers who are billionaires. On the men’s side, another American could also take home the trophy — and first-place check — for the first time since Andy Roddick won the tournament in 2003. Americans Taylor Fritz and Frances Tiafoe will face off in one of two semifinal matches on Friday. 

    The winners of the women’s and men’s singles draws will each earn equivalent $3.6 million checks — a 20% bump from the $3 million winners earned in 2023. The finalists in each event, or runners-up, will get $1.8 million this year, according to official figures from the Queens, New York, tournament. All four semifinalists in both singles draws will get $1 million a piece. Notably, this year marks the 50th anniversary of male and female players earning equal prize money at the tournament. 

    U.S. Open winners earn more than Wimbledon champions, who each took home £2.7 million, or just over $3.4 million, a substantial bump of nearly 15% from 2023, according to official prize money figures released by the grass court tournament.

    At the U.S. Open, men’s and women’s singles players who make it as far as the round of 128, also known as first-round main-draw losers, earn prize money too. The payout breakdown is as follows:

    • Round of 16: $325,000
    • Round of 32: $215,000
    • Round of 64: $140,000
    • Round of 128: $100,000

    Doubles players earn significantly less. The champion women’s and men’s doubles teams each get $750,000, to be split between the two players. Second-place teams get $375,000 each. The winners of the mixed doubles event take home $200,000, while the second-place team gets a $100,000 check. 

    The women’s finals take place on Saturday, Sept. 7, while the men’s championship match will be played on Sunday. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Karolina Muchova returns to US Open semifinals for second straight year by beating Haddad Maia

    Karolina Muchova returns to US Open semifinals for second straight year by beating Haddad Maia

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Karolina Muchova is back in the U.S. Open semifinals for the second straight year, punctuating her return from wrist surgery by beating No. 22 Beatriz Haddad Maia 6-1, 6-4 on Wednesday.

    Muchova lost to eventual champion Coco Gauff in the 2023 semis in Flushing Meadows, then missed nearly 10 months because of a wrist injury she suffered during the tournament.

    The Czech returned to action in June just before Wimbledon, and a little more than two months later she is into her fourth career Grand Slam semifinal.

    “Game-wise, I think every match here I feel better on court and that for sure helps,” Muchova said. “More matches and getting through that experience on the court again, that helps a lot as well to be more confident and feel my shots.”

    Muchova will face top-seeded Iga Swiatek or No. 6 Jessica Pegula on Thursday in the semifinals. Australian Open champion Aryna Sabalenka, the No. 2 seed, faces first-time Grand Slam semifinalist Emma Navarro in the other semi.

    Muchova dominated the first set, racing to a 5-0 lead and finishing it off in 35 minutes. Then it became a test in the second, with both players struggling physically on a sunny afternoon.

    Muchova left the court at one point for what she said was a needed trip to the bathroom, while Haddad Maia appeared to be pointing to her chest and trying to breathe deeply midway through the set before burying her head in a towel as trainers attended to her.

    Muchova has had to get used to dealing with pain.

    She had just made her second major semifinal of 2023, having lost to Swiatek in the French Open final, when she had to stop playing following the U.S. Open. When she finally got back to the tour this year, it left time for only 11 matches before returning to Flushing Meadows.

    That was enough time for Muchova to rediscover her game. She hasn’t dropped a set in her five matches and finished off this one with an ace down the middle.

    Muchova, who missed most of the first half of the 2022 season because of back, abdominal and ankle problems, said she didn’t like to talk about her injuries.

    “I’ve been through a lot of them,” the 28-year-old said. “Yeah, this last one, the wrist surgery, was one of the worst ones that I had. Now looking back, I’m, like, ‘Oh, it actually flew by, the time, and I feel strong again.’”

    Many fans hadn’t even taken their seats at Arthur Ashe Stadium when Muchova broke Haddad Maia in a 14-point game to take a 2-0 lead. The Brazilian faced that same deficit in her third-round match against Anna Kalinskaya but won the next game to start a turnaround, helped in part by a video review that gave her a point.

    The U.S. Tennis Association acknowledged the next day that Haddad Maia’s shot was illegal, but the chair umpire wasn’t given the relevant replay that would have shown that.

    Muchova wouldn’t allow a turnaround this time, denying Haddad Maia what would have been the second major semifinal of her career. She got to that stage in the French Open last year, but said she had trouble concentrating Wednesday.

    “I didn’t put pressure on me because of her. It was me and myself, it was my ghosts inside my mind and I know all the tennis players have that,” Haddad Maia said. “Today was like an inner fight. I couldn’t manage that.”

    The men’s quarterfinal matchups later Wednesday included No. 1 Jannik Sinner against No. 5 Daniil Medvedev, and No. 10 Alex de Minaur facing No. 25 Jack Draper.

    ___

    AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Open sees record attendance numbers

    U.S. Open sees record attendance numbers

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Open sees record attendance numbers – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Tennis fans are flocking to Queens, New York, in record numbers to grab seats at the 2024 U.S. Open tournament. The tournament last week saw more than 75,000 fans on average per day.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Open’s “Honey Deuce” is a $10 million cocktail

    U.S. Open’s “Honey Deuce” is a $10 million cocktail

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Open moves to quarterfinal rounds


    U.S. Open tennis quarterfinals getting underway

    02:29

    For vodka maker Grey Goose, the U.S. Open’s signature cocktail — the “Honey Deuce” — is a clear winner. 

    The drink is expected to generate more than $10 million in sales this year — enough to cover the prize money for both the women’s and men’s singles champions. Last year, the tournament served up more than 450,000 Honey Deuces despite the $22 price — steep, but not outside the lines for cocktails at many New York City establishments.

    This year, the drink runs $23 and is sold across concession stands at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center in Queens, New York, where the annual tennis tournament is held. 

    To date, more than 2.2 million Honey Deuce cocktails have been sold, according to Grey Goose. It is served in a collectible, acrylic cup, which has even been likened to a fashion accessory. It’s named after the term that refers to a game being tied at 40-40. 

    So what exactly is in a Honey Deuce? The vodka drink, created by restaurateur Nick Mautone, mixes Grey Goose vodka with raspberry liqueur and lemonade. As a garnish, it also features honeydew melon balls, presented on a toothpick, in a nod to tennis balls.

    TODAY - Season 72

    Nathan Congleton/NBC via Getty Images


    Other tennis tournaments also have their own signature drinks, but it’s not clear that they’re as lucrative as the Honey Deuce. Wimbledon’s traditional Pimm’s Cup cocktail has been served at the London tournament since 1971, while at the French Open in Paris fans sip on champagne. 

    This year, however, French Open tournament officials banned booze in the stands after fans became too rowdy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Karolina Muchova’s U.S. Open run, and a blessing for women’s tennis

    Karolina Muchova’s U.S. Open run, and a blessing for women’s tennis

    [ad_1]

    Follow live coverage of Day 8 at the 2024 US Open

    NEW YORK — Karolina Muchova already had shot of the tournament sewn up when she produced an early contender for the best performance of the U.S. Open so far.

    Muchova’s 6-3, 7-6(5) win over Naomi Osaka last Thursday night was a masterclass of variety and shotmaking. In one service game in the second set, Muchova held to love thanks to two volley winners, an ace, and a devilish slice that a discomfited Osaka could only flub into the net.

    Osaka wasn’t at her best, but rallied in the second set, and briefly threatened to overpower her opponent. As a packed Arthur Ashe stadium illustrated, she remains one of the biggest draws in tennis despite her status as a wildcard entrant. A similarly rammed Louis Armstrong Stadium watched her overpower No. 10 seed Jelena Ostapenko Tuesday, and at the French Open in late spring, her encounter with world No. 1 and eventual champion Iga Swiatek electrified a dreary first week.

    There was disappointment, still. Osaka said her “heart dies” when she loses, and her team had trailered the American hard-court swing as the moment that her return to tennis would explode.

    GO DEEPER

    Naomi Osaka and the gravity of a superstar at the U.S. Open

    Saturday, Muchova stormed into the last 16, dismantling Anastasia Potapova 6-4, 6-2, in another display of textured tennis. And then on Monday, she took on the women’s story of the year, Italy’s Jasmine Paolini. Paolini had reached two consecutive Grand Slam finals, playing a confident, smiling brand of tennis that leaned into her stature rather than trying to play around it.

    Muchova beat her 6-3, 6-3, flowing through the court again. After putting in one contender for the best performance of the tournament, now she has another. And despite their contrasting fortunes this year in New York, the return of Muchova and Osaka is a huge win for women’s tennis. Especially if they can stay fit.


    Both players have been on the comeback trail this year. Muchova finally ended a nine-month absence after surgery on a serious wrist injury, and Osaka returned to the tour earlier this year after announcing her pregnancy 19 months ago. With the WTA Tour in an interesting place, as Swiatek dominates Roland Garros, Aryna Sabalenka does the same in Melbourne, and the other two Grand Slams stay more open, the top of women’s tennis welcomes back two more contenders.

    Muchova is a quarterfinalist or better at all four Grand Slams, but her ridiculously high ceiling has been lowered because of terrible luck with injuries.

    The current world No. 52, a 28-year-old from the Czech Republic, is a tennis player’s player. Seven-time Grand Slam champion Justine Henin told The Athletic in June that because of her variety and imagination, Muchova is one of her favourite players to watch. Osaka expressed similar sentiments after seeing it up close Thursday.


    Karolina Muchova’s deft touch is a hallmark of her tennis (Robert Prange / Getty Images)

    “She’s very athletic. She has a lot of variety,” Osaka said. “I enjoy watching her play and also playing her, even though sometimes it doesn’t go my way.”

    Dissecting her own game, Muchova told The Athletic in an interview ahead of Wimbledon, “It’s who I am and how I like to play, what fills me up on the court. It’s just me. I wouldn’t like to play any other way — even though sometimes it’s too much. I enjoy it and I spoke with my team and we try to improve these things and I’ll try to keep on going this way.”

    On Thursday, she said that she just enjoys playing this way. “It’s fun,” she said.

    For those not so familiar with Muchova’s game, Thursday night offered a crash course. She rushed the net and volleyed far more often, and far more efficiently, than the vast majority of players on the tour are able to do. Muchova ended the match winning 13 out of 19 (68 per cent) points at the net, and she served and volleyed in clutch moments. She was accomplished from the baseline too, nicking the first break of the match in the seventh game with a feathered drop shot, and then wrapping up the set with two thunderous forehand return winners when Osaka next served.


    Muchova and Osaka’s second-round match electrified the U.S. Open after a slumbering start (Luke Hales / Getty Images)

    In the second set, Muchova hit some outrageous volley winners on the stretch, and dug in when Osaka served to take the match into a decider. Come the tiebreak, her relentless retrieval, and use of slice to disrupt Osaka’s rhythm, earned a horrible error on match point to bring proceedings to an end.

    Now into the last 16, Muchova has come from a place that no tennis player wants to go. After that surgery in February, on the area of the body tennis players most dread becoming damaged, Muchova worried she might not play the sport again. Initially, she couldn’t get out of bed or brush her teeth, but gradually her strength returned and her mood improved. Going to regular concerts at home in the Czech Republic helped, where seeing English rock band Nothing But Thieves was a highlight.

    She returned to the tour at Eastbourne, the British seaside grass-court tune-up, but withdrew after two matches to protect her wrist. She then lost to Paula Badosa in the first round of Wimbledon, in straight sets. Badosa, another player who has been cruelly affected by injuries, said her biggest advice to Muchova was to “have patience”.

    “Maybe, to another player, I would say something different, but she’s so talented. Her level will come back.”

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Welcome to Eastbourne, the tennis postcard by the sea with an uncertain future

    So it’s proved. Less than two months on, Muchova has thrillingly knocked out a two-time champion out of the U.S. Open, and then a two-time Grand Slam finalist. She moves into the quarterfinals to face either Caroline Wozniacki or Beatriz Haddad Maia, neither of whom will be looking forward to seeing Muchova across the net.


    As an unseeded player, the Czech will be a dangerous factor in tournament draws even before she improves her ranking (Luke Hales / Getty Images)

    For Osaka, as she memorably puts it, the results haven’t been resulting during her comeback. Flashes of her top level, however, are a testament to what Badosa said to Muchova about patience, and the need for time and match reps to raise the floor to match the incredible ceiling. “She’s an amazing player, and I’m really happy to see her back,” Muchova said after her win.

    The challenge now for both players is to put together a run of good performances, and to improve their rankings (from No. 52 for Muchova, and No. 88 for Osaka) so they’re not playing opponents the calibre of each other so early in tournaments. Osaka hasn’t been beyond the quarterfinal of an event since beginning her comeback on New Year’s Eve, while Muchova, only a few WTA matches into her return, has always been able to turn it on against elite players without that translating into titles. Per Opta, of the nine active WTA players to have beaten five former world No. 1s at Grand Slams, Muchova is the only one not to have won a major or Masters 1000 title.

    Whether Muchova, or indeed Osaka, goes on to win big tournaments soon is not so much the issue. Their playing on the tour at all is a victory for tennis, because the sport benefits so much when they do.

    (Top photo: Charly Triballeau / AFP via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link