ReportWire

Tag: Technology

  • France will investigate Musk’s Grok chatbot after Holocaust denial claims

    [ad_1]

    PARIS (AP) — France’s government is taking action against billionaire Elon Musk ‘s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok after it generated French-language posts that questioned the use of gas chambers at Auschwitz, officials said.

    Grok, built by Musk’s company xAI and integrated into his social media platform X, wrote in a widely shared post in French that gas chambers at the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp were designed for “disinfection with Zyklon B against typhus” rather than for mass murder — language long associated with Holocaust denial.

    The Auschwitz Memorial highlighted the exchange on X, saying that the response distorted historical fact and violated the platform’s rules.

    In later posts on its X account, the chatbot acknowledged that its earlier reply to an X user was wrong, said it had been deleted and pointed to historical evidence that Auschwitz’s gas chambers using Zyklon B were used to murder more than 1 million people. The follow-ups were not accompanied by any clarification from X.

    In tests run by The Associated Press on Friday, its responses to questions about Auschwitz appeared to give historically accurate information.

    Grok has a history of making antisemitic comments. Earlier this year, Musk’s company took down posts from the chatbot that appeared to praise Adolf Hitler after complaints about antisemitic content.

    The Paris prosecutor’s office confirmed to The Associated Press on Friday that the Holocaust-denial comments have been added to an existing cybercrime investigation into X. The case was opened earlier this year after French officials raised concerns that the platform’s algorithm could be used for foreign interference.

    Prosecutors said that Grok’s remarks are now part of the investigation, and that “the functioning of the AI will be examined.”

    France has one of Europe’s toughest Holocaust denial laws. Contesting the reality or genocidal nature of Nazi crimes can be prosecuted as a crime, alongside other forms of incitement to racial hatred.

    Several French ministers, including Industry Minister Roland Lescure, have also reported Grok’s posts to the Paris prosecutor under a provision that requires public officials to flag possible crimes. In a government statement, they described the AI-generated content as “manifestly illicit,” saying it could amount to racially motivated defamation and the denial of crimes against humanity.

    French authorities referred the posts to a national police platform for illegal online content and alerted France’s digital regulator over suspected breaches of the European Union’s Digital Services Act.

    The case adds to pressure from Brussels. This week, the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, said that the bloc is in contact with X about Grok and called some of the chatbot’s output “appalling,” saying it runs against Europe’s fundamental rights and values.

    Two French rights groups, the Ligue des droits de l’Homme and SOS Racisme, have filed a criminal complaint accusing Grok and X of contesting crimes against humanity.

    X and its AI unit, xAI, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Frustrations grow in Russia over cellphone internet outages that disrupt daily life

    [ad_1]

    TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — When Russians look back at 2025, they might remember it as the year when the government took even tighter control of the internet.

    Credit cards that won’t buy a ticket on public transport. ATMs that don’t connect to a network. Messaging apps that are down. Cellphones that don’t receive texts or data after a trip abroad. Mothers of diabetic children even complain with alarm that they can’t monitor their kids’ blood glucose levels during outages.

    The cellphone internet shutdowns, ostensibly to thwart Ukrainian drone attacks, have hit dozens of Russian regions for months. Popular messaging apps also are restricted, with the government promoting a state-controlled app seen by critics as a possible surveillance tool.

    Although broadband and Wi-Fi internet access remain unaffected, Russians contacted by The Associated Press described digital disruptions to their daily lives. All spoke on condition of not being fully identified for their own safety.

    Blackouts and ‘white lists’ are part of Russian strategy

    Widespread cellphone internet shutdowns began in May and persisted through summer and into the fall. In November, 57 Russian regions on average reported daily disruptions to cellphone links, according to Na Svyazi, an activist group monitoring shutdowns.

    Authorities say these outages are designed to prevent Ukrainian drones from tapping mobile networks for navigation.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said they are “absolutely justified and necessary,” but analyst Kateryna Stepanenko of the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War said they haven’t been effective in curbing the intensity of Ukraine’s drone attacks, “given the amount of strikes we’ve seen in recent months on Russian oil refineries.”

    In many regions, only a handful of government-approved Russian websites and online services — designated as being on “white lists” — are available during connectivity blackouts.

    What’s available on the “white lists” varies by provider and includes official websites, email and social media platforms, two online markets, and the Russian search engine Yandex and its services. One provider offers access to a banking app, but others don’t. Authorities have promised to expand the lists.

    Marina, who lives in the Pacific coast city of Vladivostok, described her anxiety when she discovered only one app for a government-controlled bank was working during a mobile internet outage and she wondered what this meant for the future.

    “For me, this is the scariest thing,” she said. “The loss of information, the loss of freedom, essentially, is the most depressing thing for me.”

    In the Volga River city of Ulyanovsk, about 700 kilometers (435 miles) east of Moscow, one resident described how his credit card didn’t work when he tapped it on the payment terminal on a tram during an outage. He wasn’t carrying enough cash.

    Families with diabetic children say they can’t monitor their children’s glucose levels via special apps when they are at school and cellphone internet is down. Mothers in social media posts explain that children often can miss the moment when their blood sugar levels change, requiring an intervention, and special apps allowed parents to see that remotely and warn them. Connection outages disrupt that.

    Authorities have tried touting the joys of reconnecting with a technology-free lifestyle.

    Internet regulatory agency Roskomnadzor posted a cartoon on social media showing two views of a young man: one in a dark apartment staring at his phone and another strolling happily in a park, carrying a cup of coffee and a book.

    Going offline “doesn’t mean losing touch. Sometimes it means getting in touch with yourself,” the cartoon advised.

    But the post mostly drew angry and sarcastic comments.

    Restrictions set on SIM cards

    One recent anti-drone restriction sets 24-hour “cooling periods” during which data and texts are blocked from SIM cards that were carried abroad or have been inactive for 72 hours. The owner can unblock it via a link received by text message.

    Unblocking becomes impossible, however, if a SIM card is used in internet-connected appliances or equipment without interfaces for receiving text messages, like portable Wi-Fi routers, cars or meter boxes.

    Lawmaker Andrei Svintsov noted that Russia has many electricity meters with SIM cards that transmit readings once a month.

    “Does this mean they’ll all die? All the heating boilers will shut down, and all the Chinese cars will stop working? This is a massive problem, and I don’t know if the government is even aware of it,” he said.

    Messaging apps are targeted

    Other restrictions targeted two popular messaging apps: WhatsApp, with about 96 million monthly users in October, and Telegram, with 91 million, according to media monitoring group Mediascope.

    Authorities began restricting calls on these apps in August, supposedly to stop phone scams, and are throttling them in some parts of Russia. Yelena, in the southern city of Krasnodar, recalled a time in October when Telegram wasn’t available at all, affecting the work of her and her colleagues.

    Neither app is on the government “white list.”

    On the list is Russian messaging service MAX. Authorities actively promote it and since September the service is required to be preinstalled on all smartphones in Russia. Critics see it as a surveillance tool as MAX openly declares it will share user data with authorities upon request. Experts also say it doesn’t use end-to-end encryption.

    State institutions, officials and businesses are being encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Marina, the Vladivostok resident, said her employers are insisting on people using MAX, to little enthusiasm. She said she doesn’t plan to install it, and neither do others contacted by the AP.

    MAX developers boast of about 50 million users registering on the platform that it says provides messaging and other services.

    Mediascope said MAX had about 48 million monthly users in October, but only 18.9 million average daily users, which is far less than the average daily totals of 81 million for WhatsApp and 68 million for Telegram.

    Russians shrug at restrictions

    Denis Volkov, director of the Levada Center, Russia’s top independent pollster, said many Russians regard the restrictions the same way they feel about the weather: Ultimately, you can do nothing about it.

    The authorities’ strategy appears to be to make it difficult for average users to access “alternative content” so that they eventually stop seeking it, Volkov said. Those “who are not that interested will pick simpler channels and ways” to navigate the internet, he said.

    That sentiment was echoed by the Ulyanovsk resident who said he uses a virtual private network to access some of the blocked websites and platforms, but VPNs also are routinely blocked, so he must install a new one every few months.

    His tight circle of friends trade recommendations on VPNs, but he believes most people won’t make that much effort.

    Mikhail Klimarev, executive director of the Internet Protection Society activist group, says the internet is tied to too many economic activities to shut it totally.

    “Groceries are being shipped to stores — this is being done via internet, the ordering, the processing, and so on,” he said. “A truck is on the road, it is connected to an information system, maps, navigation, all of it.”

    But he forecasts more stifling of websites, VPNs and platforms including totally blocking messenger apps Telegram and WhatsApp and possibly other, unexpected measures.

    “Honestly, I’m watching it all with raised eyebrows. They seem to have come up with everything already, and they’re still coming up with something more,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Waymo moves toward expanding service across Bay Area, Sacramento, SoCal

    [ad_1]

    The Mountain View-based autonomous vehicle company Waymo is making big strides towards expanding its service across the state of California. 

    The company is now one step closer to operating its driverless taxis across most of the Bay Area and a big stretch of Southern California.

    In California, Waymo already operates autonomous vehicles for customers around Los Angeles, in San Francisco, through the Peninsula, and all the way to San Jose.

    The California Department of Motor Vehicles updated its website showing that the department has approved additional areas across the state of operation for Waymo’s driverless testing and deployment, including a large swath of Southern California and much of the Bay Area, plus Sacramento.

    In Northern California, the expanded area stretches north past Santa Rosa and all the way east to Sacramento, including cities in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Santa Cruz, Solano, Yolo, and Sacramento County.

    In Southern California, the expanded area extends north to Santa Clarita and Thousand Oaks, all the way past San Diego to the southernmost part of the west side of the state.

    The areas included in these maps are what the state calls operational design domains (or ODDs). The ODDs approved for Waymo apply to both its Jaguar I-Pace and Zeekr RT vehicle models.

    But don’t expect to see Waymos on the road across the Bay Area just yet. The company needs approval from the California Public Utilities Commission to start charging riders and collecting fares for these expanded areas of operation.

    A Waymo spokesperson told NBC Bay Area in a statement on Saturday: “We appreciate the DMV’s approval of our expanded fully autonomous operations.”

    The company noted that the next place in California where it plans to launch its autonomous vehicle service for customers is San Diego, where it expects to welcome its first riders in mid-2026.

    NBC Bay Area has reached out to the California DMV and California CPUC for comment and is awaiting a response.

    Local leaders from the Wine Country to Oakland are keeping an eye on these changes. Multiple elected officials said they’d been contacted by Waymo to talk about autonomous vehicles possibly expanding to their city.

    Oakland District 7 City Council Member Ken Houston said his office had been contacted by Waymo, but he hasn’t spoken with the company yet.

    Houston said he thinks Waymo coming to Oakland “would be a great asset.”

    But he thinks 2026 will be a bit too early to start Waymo service there because the city will be doing major road improvements and encampment abatement then.

    Houston said that 2027 onward could be a better time to bring in the autonomous vehicles.

    Like many leaders we spoke with, Houston said he still has questions for Waymo, too.

    “How’s it going to bring jobs? How is it going to bring vitality to our city? What is it going to do? How are they going to be a partner to the city?” Houston said.

    Oakland’s District 5 City Council Member Noel Gallo thinks Waymos are on the horizon for Oakland.

    “It’s another opportunity for Oakland to join the future,” Gallo said, pointing out the growing list of cities across the country where Waymo is now operating.

    Gallo said he’s spoken with Waymo representatives and has taken a ride on a Waymo.

    “There are some processes and policies we have to go through, but I am in complete support of Waymo coming to Oakland,” Gallo said.

    Oakland’s District 3 Council Member Carroll Fife said Waymo representatives have reached out to her as well.

    Fife said, “I am in the process of doing my due diligence with my constituents and various stakeholders on Waymo’s potential presence in Oakland.”

    Further north in Santa Rosa, Councilmember Jeff Okrepkie said that Waymo also reached out to him and other elected leaders to discuss their plans for the area.

    “My understanding is that there’s infrastructure needed to expand it,” Okrepkie said.

    “I personally welcome it,” he continued, “I think it would be great.”

    Okrepkie said he’s had good experiences so far traveling in Waymo driverless taxis in Arizona.

    [ad_2]

    Alyssa Goard

    Source link

  • Keeping Thanksgiving costs down with some help from AI

    [ad_1]

    Thanksgiving costs are down from last year, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation, but budgets remain tight for many this season. “CBS Saturday Morning” has some ways to save on your feast this year, including how to use AI to cut costs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These 40 Tempting Tech Gifts All Cost Less Than $100

    [ad_1]

    Gift shopping on a budget is stressful. Prices sometimes soar around the holidays, making it tough to find genuine bargains. To help, we spent countless hours testing all manner of gizmos and gadgets to bring you expert advice on what is worth buying. These gifts are sure to bring a smile to your loved ones’ faces without breaking the bank too badly, though we know $100 isn’t exactly cheap, either.

    For more ideas, the WIRED 101 is full of things (sometimes expensive) that are sure to impress. If you don’t mind spending more, check out our Best Tech Gifts guide, and if money is tight, we’ve also made a list of the Best Gifts Under $25. For giftees with a particular passion, you can find tailored options, like gifts for audiophiles, coffee fans, book lovers, and more.

    Updated November 2025: We’ve added several new gadgets.

    [ad_2]

    Simon Hill

    Source link

  • Bubble fears ease but investors still waiting for AI to live up to its promise

    [ad_1]

    Fears about the artificial intelligence boom turning into an overblown bubble have diminished for now, thanks to a stellar earnings report from Nvidia that illustrated why its indispensable chips transformed it into the world’s most valuable company.

    But that doesn’t mean the specter of an AI bubble won’t return in the months and years ahead as Big Tech gears up to spend trillions of dollars more on a technology the industry’s leaders believe will determine the winners and losers during the next wave of innovation.

    For now, at least, Nvidia has eased worries that the AI craze propelling the stock market and much of the economy for the past year is on the verge of a massive collapse.

    If anything, Nvidia’s quarterly report indicated that AI spending is picking up even more momentum. The highlights, released late Wednesday, included quarterly revenue of $57 billion, a 62% increase from the same time last year. That sales growth was an acceleration from the 56% increase in year-over-year revenue from the May-July quarter.

    What’s more, Nvidia forecast revenue of $65 billion for the current quarter covering November-January, which would be a 65% year-over-year increase.

    Given Nvidia’s forecasts, “it is very hard to see how this stock does not keep moving higher from here,” according to analysts at UBS led by Timothy Arcuri. The UBS analyst also said the “AI infrastructure tide is still rising so fast that all boats will be lifted.”

    Nvidia’s numbers are viewed through a window that extends far beyond the Santa Clara, California, company’s headquarters because its products are needed by a wide range of companies — including Big Tech peers like Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta Platforms — to build data centers that are becoming known as AI factories.

    “AI spending isn’t just holding up, it’s accelerating. That’s exactly what the market needed to see,” said Jake Behan, head of capital markets for investment firm Direxion.

    The numbers initially lifted Nvidia’s stock price by as much as 5% in Thursday’s trading, while other tech stocks tied to the AI spending frenzy also got a boost. But Nvidia’s shares and other tech stocks reversed course later in the session as investors found other issues besides AI, such as the government’s latest jobs report and the future direction of interest rates.

    Even with a 3% drop in its stock price amid the broader market decline, Nvidia remains valued at $4.4 trillion, more than 10 times its valuation three years ago when OpenAI released its ChatGPT chatbot, triggering the biggest technological shift since Apple released the iPhone in 2007.

    Nvidia’s rapid rise has turned its CEO Jensen Huang into the chief evangelist for the AI revolution and he sought to use his bully pulpit during a late Wednesday conference call with industry analysts to make a case that the spending to make technology with humanlike intelligence is just beginning.

    “There’s been a lot of talk about an AI bubble. From our vantage point, we see something very different,” Huang insisted while celebrating “depth and breadth” of Nvidia’s growth.

    Huang is hardly a lone voice in the wilderness. A recent report from Gartner Inc. estimates that worldwide spending on AI will rise to more than $2 trillion next year, a 37% increase from the nearly $1.5 trillion that the research firm expects to be spent this year.

    But it remains to be seen if all that money pouring into AI will actually produce all the profits and productivity that proponents have been promising. That leaves the question unanswered if all the real spending that’s happening will be worth it.

    The most recent survey of global fund managers by Bank of America showed a record percentage of investors saying companies are “overinvesting.”

    Big Tech is already so profitable that many of the most successful finance their spending sprees with their ongoing stream of revenue and cash hoards in their bank accounts. But some companies, such as Meta Platforms and Oracle, are relying more heavily on debt to fund their AI ambitions — a strategy that has raised enough alarms among investors that their stock prices have plunged more dramatically than their peers in recent weeks.

    Both Meta and Oracle have suffered more than 20% declines in their stock prices since late October.

    But other Big Tech powerhouses leading the way in AI remain just behind Nvidia and iPhone maker Apple in the rankings of the most valuable companies. Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon boast market values currently ranging from $2.3 trillion to $3.6 trillion.

    “It is true that valuations are high and that there is some froth in the market, however, the spending on AI is real,” said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for money manager Northlight Asset Management. “Whether or not the spending turns out to be overdone won’t be known for many years.”

    AP Business Writer Stan Choe in New York contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about Trump’s draft proposal to curtail state AI regulations

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence in a draft executive order obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, as some in Congress also consider whether to temporarily block states from regulating AI.

    Trump and some Republicans argue that the limited regulations already enacted by states, and others that might follow, will dampen innovation and growth for the technology.

    Critics from both political parties — as well as civil liberties and consumer rights groups — worry that banning state regulation would amount to a favor for big AI companies who enjoy little to no oversight.

    While the draft executive order could change, here’s what to know about states’ AI regulations and what Trump is proposing.

    What state-level regulations exist and why

    Four states — Colorado, California, Utah and Texas — have passed laws that set some rules for AI across the private sector, according to the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

    Those laws include limiting the collection of certain personal information and requiring more transparency from companies.

    The laws are in response to AI that already pervades everyday life. The technology helps make consequential decisions for Americans, including who gets a job interview, an apartment lease, a home loan and even certain medical care. But research has shown that it can make mistakes in those decisions, including by prioritizing a particular gender or race.

    “It’s not a matter of AI makes mistakes and humans never do,” said Calli Schroeder, director of the AI & Human Rights Program at the public interest group EPIC.

    “With a human, I can say, ‘Hey, explain, how did you come to that conclusion, what factors did you consider?’” she continued. “With an AI, I can’t ask any of that, and I can’t find that out. And frankly, half the time the programmers of the AI couldn’t answer that question.”

    States’ more ambitious AI regulation proposals require private companies to provide transparency and assess the possible risks of discrimination from their AI programs.

    Beyond those more sweeping rules, many states have regulated parts of AI: barring the use of deepfakes in elections and to create nonconsensual porn, for example, or putting rules in place around the government’s own use of AI.

    What Trump and some Republicans want to do

    The draft executive order would direct federal agencies to identify burdensome state AI regulations and pressure states to not enact them, including by withholding federal funding or challenging the state laws in court.

    It would also begin a process to develop a lighter-touch regulatory framework for the whole country that would override state AI laws.

    Trump’s argument is that the patchwork of regulations across 50 states impedes AI companies’ growth, and allows China to catch up to the U.S. in the AI race. The president has also said state regulations are producing “Woke AI.”

    The draft executive order that was leaked could change and should not be taken as final, said a senior Trump administration official who requested anonymity to describe internal White House discussions.

    The official said the tentative plan is for Trump to sign the order Friday.

    Separately, House Republican leadership is already discussing a proposal to temporarily block states from regulating AI, the chamber’s majority leader, Steve Scalise, told Punchbowl News this week.

    It’s yet unclear what that proposal would look like, or which AI regulations it would override.

    TechNet, which advocates for tech companies including Google and Amazon, has previously argued that pausing state regulations would benefit smaller AI companies still getting on their feet and allow time for lawmakers develop a country-wide regulatory framework that “balances innovation with accountability.”

    Why attempts at federal regulation have failed

    Some Republicans in Congress have previously tried and failed to ban states from regulating AI.

    Part of the challenge is that opposition is coming from their party’s own ranks.

    Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, said a federal law barring state regulation of AI was “Not acceptable” in a post on X this week.

    DeSantis argued that the move would be a “subsidy to Big Tech” and would stop states from protecting against a list of things, including “predatory applications that target children” and “online censorship of political speech.”

    A federal ban on states regulating AI is also unpopular, said Cody Venzke, senior policy council at the ACLU’s National Political Advocacy Department.

    “The American people do not want AI to be discriminatory, to be unsafe, to be hallucinatory,” he said. “So I don’t think anyone is interested in winning the AI race if it means AI that is not trustworthy.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • OpenAI and Taiwan’s Foxconn to partner in AI hardware design and manufacturing in the US

    [ad_1]

    TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — OpenAI and Taiwan electronics giant Foxconn have agreed to a partnership to design and manufacture key equipment for artificial intelligence data centers in the U.S. as part of ambitious plans to fortify American AI infrastructure.

    Foxconn, which makes AI servers for Nvidia and assembles Apple products including the iPhone, will be co-designing and developing AI data center racks with OpenAI under the agreement, the companies said in separate statements on Thursday and Friday.

    The products Foxconn will manufacture in its U.S. facilities include cabling, networking and power systems for AI data centers, the companies said. OpenAI will have “early access” to evaluate and potentially to purchase them.

    Foxconn has factories in the U.S., including in Wisconsin, Ohio and Texas. The initial agreement does not include financial obligations or purchase commitments, the statements said.

    The Taiwan contract manufacturer, formally known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., has been moving to diversify its business, developing electric vehicles and acquiring other electronics companies to build out its product offerings.

    A sleek Model A EV made by the group’s automaking affiliate Foxtron was on display at Friday’s event.

    “This year, Model A. ‘A’,’ for affordable,” said Jun Seki, chief strategy officer for Foxconn’s EV business.

    The tie-up with OpenAI can also help Taiwan, a self-governed island claimed by China, to build up its own computing resources, said Alexis Bjorlin, a Nvidia vice president.

    “This allows Taiwan’s domain knowledge and key technology data to remain local and ensure data security,” she said.

    “This partnership is a step toward ensuring the core technologies of the AI era are built here,” Sam Altman, CEO of San Francisco-based OpenAI, said in the statement. “We believe this work will strengthen U.S. leadership and help ensure the benefits of AI are widely shared.”

    OpenAI has committed $1.4 trillion to building AI infrastructure. It recently entered into multi-billion partnerships with Nvidia and AMD to expand the extensive computing power needed to support its AI models and services. It is also partnering with US chipmaker Broadcom in designing and making its own AI chips.

    But its massive spending plans have worried investors, raising questions over its ability to recoup its investments and remain profitable. Altman said this month that OpenAI, a startup founded in 2015 and maker of ChatGPT, is expected to reach more than $20 billion in annualized revenue this year, growing to “hundreds of billions by 2030.”

    Foxconn’s Taiwan-listed share price has risen 25% so far this year, along with the surge in prices for many tech companies benefiting from the craze for AI.

    The Taiwan company’s net profit in the July-September quarter rose 17% from a year earlier to just over 57.6 billion new Taiwan dollars ($1.8 billion), with revenue from its cloud and networking business, including AI servers, contributing the most business.

    “We believe the importance of the AI industry is increasing significantly,” Liu said during Foxconn’s earnings call this month.

    “I am very optimistic about the development of AI next year, and expect our cooperation with major clients and partners to become even closer,” said Liu.

    ___

    Chan reported from Hong Kong

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Frustrations Grow in Russia Over Cellphone Internet Outages That Disrupt Daily Life

    [ad_1]

    TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — When Russians look back at 2025, they might remember it as the year when the government took even tighter control of the internet.

    Credit cards that won’t buy a ticket on public transport. ATMs that don’t connect to a network. Messaging apps that are down. Cellphones that don’t receive texts or data after a trip abroad. Mothers of diabetic children even complain with alarm that they can’t monitor their kids’ blood glucose levels during outages.

    The cellphone internet shutdowns, ostensibly to thwart Ukrainian drone attacks, have hit dozens of Russian regions for months. Popular messaging apps also are restricted, with the government promoting a state-controlled app seen by critics as a possible surveillance tool.

    Although broadband and Wi-Fi internet access remain unaffected, Russians contacted by The Associated Press described digital disruptions to their daily lives. All spoke on condition of not being fully identified for their own safety.


    Blackouts and ‘white lists’ are part of Russian strategy

    Widespread cellphone internet shutdowns began in May and persisted through summer and into the fall. In November, 57 Russian regions on average reported daily disruptions to cellphone links, according to Na Svyazi, an activist group monitoring shutdowns.

    Authorities say these outages are designed to prevent Ukrainian drones from tapping mobile networks for navigation.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said they are “absolutely justified and necessary,” but analyst Kateryna Stepanenko of the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War said they haven’t been effective in curbing the intensity of Ukraine’s drone attacks, “given the amount of strikes we’ve seen in recent months on Russian oil refineries.”

    In many regions, only a handful of government-approved Russian websites and online services — designated as being on “white lists” — are available during connectivity blackouts.

    What’s available on the “white lists” varies by provider and includes official websites, email and social media platforms, two online markets, and the Russian search engine Yandex and its services. One provider offers access to a banking app, but others don’t. Authorities have promised to expand the lists.

    Marina, who lives in the Pacific coast city of Vladivostok, described her anxiety when she discovered only one app for a government-controlled bank was working during a mobile internet outage and she wondered what this meant for the future.

    “For me, this is the scariest thing,” she said. “The loss of information, the loss of freedom, essentially, is the most depressing thing for me.”

    In the Volga River city of Ulyanovsk, about 700 kilometers (435 miles) east of Moscow, one resident described how his credit card didn’t work when he tapped it on the payment terminal on a tram during an outage. He wasn’t carrying enough cash.

    Families with diabetic children say they can’t monitor their children’s glucose levels via special apps when they are at school and cellphone internet is down. Mothers in social media posts explain that children often can miss the moment when their blood sugar levels change, requiring an intervention, and special apps allowed parents to see that remotely and warn them. Connection outages disrupt that.

    Authorities have tried touting the joys of reconnecting with a technology-free lifestyle.

    Internet regulatory agency Roskomnadzor posted a cartoon on social media showing two views of a young man: one in a dark apartment staring at his phone and another strolling happily in a park, carrying a cup of coffee and a book.

    Going offline “doesn’t mean losing touch. Sometimes it means getting in touch with yourself,” the cartoon advised.

    But the post mostly drew angry and sarcastic comments.


    Restrictions set on SIM cards

    One recent anti-drone restriction sets 24-hour “cooling periods” during which data and texts are blocked from SIM cards that were carried abroad or have been inactive for 72 hours. The owner can unblock it via a link received by text message.

    Unblocking becomes impossible, however, if a SIM card is used in internet-connected appliances or equipment without interfaces for receiving text messages, like portable Wi-Fi routers, cars or meter boxes.

    Lawmaker Andrei Svintsov noted that Russia has many electricity meters with SIM cards that transmit readings once a month.

    “Does this mean they’ll all die? All the heating boilers will shut down, and all the Chinese cars will stop working? This is a massive problem, and I don’t know if the government is even aware of it,” he said.


    Messaging apps are targeted

    Other restrictions targeted two popular messaging apps: WhatsApp, with about 96 million monthly users in October, and Telegram, with 91 million, according to media monitoring group Mediascope.

    Authorities began restricting calls on these apps in August, supposedly to stop phone scams, and are throttling them in some parts of Russia. Yelena, in the southern city of Krasnodar, recalled a time in October when Telegram wasn’t available at all, affecting the work of her and her colleagues.

    Neither app is on the government “white list.”

    On the list is Russian messaging service MAX. Authorities actively promote it and since September the service is required to be preinstalled on all smartphones in Russia. Critics see it as a surveillance tool as MAX openly declares it will share user data with authorities upon request. Experts also say it doesn’t use end-to-end encryption.

    State institutions, officials and businesses are being encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Marina, the Vladivostok resident, said her employers are insisting on people using MAX, to little enthusiasm. She said she doesn’t plan to install it, and neither do others contacted by the AP.

    MAX developers boast of about 50 million users registering on the platform that it says provides messaging and other services.

    Mediascope said MAX had about 48 million monthly users in October, but only 18.9 million average daily users, which is far less than the average daily totals of 81 million for WhatsApp and 68 million for Telegram.


    Russians shrug at restrictions

    Denis Volkov, director of the Levada Center, Russia’s top independent pollster, said many Russians regard the restrictions the same way they feel about the weather: Ultimately, you can do nothing about it.

    The authorities’ strategy appears to be to make it difficult for average users to access “alternative content” so that they eventually stop seeking it, Volkov said. Those “who are not that interested will pick simpler channels and ways” to navigate the internet, he said.

    That sentiment was echoed by the Ulyanovsk resident who said he uses a virtual private network to access some of the blocked websites and platforms, but VPNs also are routinely blocked, so he must install a new one every few months.

    His tight circle of friends trade recommendations on VPNs, but he believes most people won’t make that much effort.

    Mikhail Klimarev, executive director of the Internet Protection Society activist group, says the internet is tied to too many economic activities to shut it totally.

    “Groceries are being shipped to stores — this is being done via internet, the ordering, the processing, and so on,” he said. “A truck is on the road, it is connected to an information system, maps, navigation, all of it.”

    But he forecasts more stifling of websites, VPNs and platforms including totally blocking messenger apps Telegram and WhatsApp and possibly other, unexpected measures.

    “Honestly, I’m watching it all with raised eyebrows. They seem to have come up with everything already, and they’re still coming up with something more,” he said.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Mercedes F1 team principal Toto Wolff sells 15% stake to CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz

    [ad_1]

    LAS VEGAS — Mercedes team principal and part-owner Toto Wolff has sold 15% of his shareholding of the Formula 1 team to George Kurtz, the CEO and founder of cybersecurity company CrowdStrike.

    Mercedes said the deal makes Kurtz a co-owner of the team that is valued at $6 billion. Wolff was one of three equal owners alongside Mercedes-Benz and INEOS.

    The deal was announced ahead of Saturday night’s Las Vegas Grand Prix, where Mercedes driver George Russell is the defending race winner.

    Kurtz will become technology advisor to Mercedes, as well as join the team’s strategic steering committee alongside Wolff, Mercedes-Benz chairman Ola Kallenius, and INEOS founder and chairman Sir Jim Ratcliffe.

    Wolff will continue as team principal and CEO.

    “George’s background is unusual in its breadth — he’s a racer, a loyal sporting ambassador for Mercedes-AMG, and an exceptional entrepreneur,” Wolff said. “He understands both the demands of racing and the realities of building and scaling technology businesses. That combination brings specific insight that is increasingly relevant to the future of Formula 1.”

    CrowdStrike became a global partner of Mercedes’ F1 team in 2019, but Kurtz’s purchase into the ownership group was his personally.

    “Winning in racing and cybersecurity requires speed, precision, and innovation. Milliseconds matter. Execution counts. Data wins,” said Kurtz. “Technology is reshaping competitive advantage and human capability everywhere, including motorsport. I’m excited to help the team securely accelerate forward.”

    Kurtz is considered a racer and has dabbled in sports car racing since 2016. He has class wins in the 24 Hours of Le Mans LMP2 Pro-Am, Twelve Hours of Sebring, Petit Le Mans, Six Hours of the Glen, and he is the two-time winner of both the Indianapolis 8 Hour and 24 Hours of Spa in a Mercedes-AMG GT3.

    Kurtz won the 2023 SRO GT World Challenge America Team & Drivers’ Championship, the 2023 Mercedes-AMG Customer Racing Championship Driver Category, and the 2023-24 Asia Le Mans LMP2 Championship.

    ___

    AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivian CEO’s $4.6B Pay Plan Mirrors Elon Musk’s—But Tesla’s Playbook Is Hard to Repeat

    [ad_1]

    RJ Scaringe’s award plan echoes Tesla’s model but arrives amid layoffs, missed earnings and a tougher EV climate. PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

    Earlier this month, electric carmaker Rivian unveiled a $4.6 billion compensation plan for its founder and CEO, RJ Scaringe—a package that has drawn comparisons to Tesla’s $1 trillion deal for Elon Musk. Like Musk’s award, Rivian’s plan hinges on a series of highly ambitious performance targets over the next decade, including lifting Rivian’s stock price to $140 (it currently trades around $15). In a softening EV market, and without the financial momentum or investor fervor that once buoyed Tesla, those targets appear particularly steep.

    In an SEC filing, Rivian’s board said the package is designed to retain Scaringe as the company enters a “critical next phase” and prepares to launch production of its new electric SUV, the R2. The compensation plan doubles his annual base salary from $1 million to $2 million and gives him the right to buy up to 22 million shares across 11 tranches if Rivian’s stock hits specific price milestones. Scaringe can acquire an additional 14.5 million shares if Rivian meets profit and cash-flow targets before 2032. He can exercise his first tranche at $40 per share. Scaringe currently owns about 1 percent of Rivian. If the plan vests fully, he could add roughly 3 percent more.

    Unlike Musk’s plan, Scaringe’s award does not require a shareholder vote, because it was issued under an already approved 2021 incentive program. Rivian’s board ultimately deemed the original performance goals as unrealistic, including a target that envisioned the stock hitting $295.

    The Tesla story is hard to replicate

    Much of Scaringe’s windfall hinges on the success of the new $45,000 R2 SUV and the smaller R3, which is expected to be priced in the mid-$30,000 range and has already generated significant consumer interest.

    Rivian faces a very different landscape than Tesla did during its early ascent. Tesla benefited from low interest rates, abundant capital, and an early-adopter boom in EV enthusiasm. Musk also rode a wave of unique tailwinds—from meme-stock mania to rapid early profitability and a cult-like following—that helped him meet some of the lofty targets in his famously controversial 2018 pay package.

    And a successful EV business is far from enough. Since reaching profitability in 2019, Tesla’s high stock price has been increasingly buoyed by optimism on its non-vehicle products, such as software and robotics.

    Rivian’s non-EV prospect is less clear and appears to be reliant on external partnerships. Earlier this year, the company formed a joint venture with Volkswagen Group to develop a scalable “software-defined vehicle” architecture, with winter testing of a reference vehicle planned for early 2026. This technology underpins the upcoming R2 and R3 lines, which Rivian hopes will move the company into more affordable, higher-volume segments.

    But Rivian’s financial picture remains strained. The company recently missed Wall Street earnings expectations, laid off 4.5 percent of its workforce in October, settled a $250 million lawsuit over R1 price hikes, and restructured top leadership. Although Scaringe is well-liked by Rivian owners, he lacks the cult-of-personality advantage Musk enjoys. Meanwhile, Rivian faces the same nationwide cooling in EV demand—exacerbated by cuts in EV tax credits—that is weighing on every major automaker.

    Rivian CEO’s $4.6B Pay Plan Mirrors Elon Musk’s—But Tesla’s Playbook Is Hard to Repeat

    [ad_2]

    Abigail Bassett

    Source link

  • France moves against Musk’s Grok chatbot after Holocaust denial claims

    [ad_1]

    PARIS — France’s government is taking action against artificial intelligence chatbot Grok, which was launched by a company owned by billionaire Elon Musk, after it generated French-language posts that questioned the use of gas chambers at Auschwitz and listed Jewish public figures, officials said.

    Grok, built by Musk company xAI and integrated into his social media platform X, said in a widely shared post in French that gas chambers at the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp were designed for “disinfection with Zyklon B against typhus” rather than for mass murder — language long associated with Holocaust denial.

    The Auschwitz Memorial highlighted the exchange on X, and said that the response distorted historical fact and violated the platform’s rules.

    As of this week, Grok’s responses to questions about Auschwitz appear to give historically accurate information.

    Grok has a history of making antisemitic comments. Earlier this year, Musk’s company took down posts from the chatbot that appeared to praise Adolf Hitler after complaints about antisemitic content.

    The Paris prosecutor’s office confirmed to The Associated Press on Friday that the Holocaust-denial comments have been added to an existing cybercrime investigation into X. The case was opened earlier this year after French officials raised concerns that the platform’s algorithm could be used for foreign interference.

    Prosecutors said that Grok’s remarks are now part of the investigation, and that “the functioning of the AI will be examined.”

    France has one of Europe’s toughest Holocaust denial laws. Contesting the reality or genocidal nature of Nazi crimes can be prosecuted as a crime, alongside other forms of incitement to racial hatred.

    Several French ministers, including Industry Minister Roland Lescure, have also reported Grok’s posts to the Paris prosecutor under a provision that requires public officials to flag possible crimes. In a government statement, they described the AI-generated content as “manifestly illicit,” saying it could amount to racially motivated defamation and the denial of crimes against humanity.

    French authorities referred the posts to a national police platform for illegal online content and alerted France’s digital regulator over suspected breaches of the European Union’s Digital Services Act.

    The case adds to pressure from Brussels. This week, the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, said that the bloc is in contact with X about Grok and called some of the chatbot’s output “appalling,” saying it runs against Europe’s fundamental rights and values.

    Two French rights groups, the Ligue des droits de l’Homme and SOS Racisme, have filed a criminal complaint accusing Grok and X of contesting crimes against humanity.

    X and its AI unit, xAI, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside the AI Bubble

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Intelligencer; Photo: Getty Images

    On Wednesday evening, Nvidia, the chip firm at the center of the world, reported its quarterly earnings. It was by any measure a blowout for the world’s largest company: the company made 65 percent more profits than in the same quarter last year, sales were even higher than analysts expected, and leadership is forecasting at least $500 billion in AI chip sales by the end of 2026. Permanently pumped CEO Jensen Huang bragged that the company was “sold out” before going oracular: “We’ve entered the virtuous cycle of AI. The AI ecosystem is scaling fast — with more new foundation model makers, more AI startups, across more industries, and in more countries. AI is going everywhere, doing everything, all at once.”

    Things couldn’t be going much better for Nvidia, which is one of the few large companies making serious profits that are primarily and unambiguously attributable to AI. The response from investors, though, was strange. The next morning, the stock popped a few percent but remained below recent highs, and ended the day slightly down. For many analysts and industry watchers, this wasn’t a story about the greatest quarter for the greatest company of all time. It was merely a relief. The “AI trade” was still alive, and the party could continue; more broadly, the anomalous sector propping up economic indicators would, for at least another quarter, and maybe even a bunch of quarters, continue to do so. It was, above all, an assurance and occasion to talk about it. You know. The bubble.

    In late 2025, AI bubble talk isn’t just for outsiders, skeptics, and short-sellers. Increasingly, it’s the frame through which the industry’s most important figures, and biggest boosters, talk about their technology, their companies, and the industry around them. “When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth,” OpenAI’s Sam Altman told a group of reporters in August. “Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes.” Mark Zuckerberg, while suggesting there were “compelling arguments” that AI could be an “outlier,” drew parallels to bubbles past. “I do think there’s definitely a possibility, at least empirically, based on past large infrastructure buildouts and how they led to bubbles, that something like that would happen here,” he said on the ACCESS podcast in September.

    There’s some transparent positioning here, of course — both Altman and Zuckerberg were implying that their companies were unique and would be fine either way — but inside-the-bubble bubble talk has since morphed into an odd strain of conventional wisdom, a premise from which high-level conversations about AI now proceed, or at least a possibility that has to be acknowledged. Google CEO Sundar Pichai invoked the dotcom crash. “I expect AI to be the same. So I think it’s both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this,” he said this month. In the event of a major correction, he said, “I think no company is going to be immune, including us.” The CEO of Google DeepMind, Demis Hassabis, emphasized Google’s particular strength but conceded on Hard Fork that there are “some parts of the AI industry that are probably in a bubble.” Jeff Bezos has said that while AI is “real,” and “is going to change every industry,” it’s also showing signs of an “industrial bubble.”

    Against the backdrop of all this hedging and narrower speculation about markets, the remaining practitioners of wide-open AI CEO futurism — that is, tech leaders still speaking the way most of them did as recently as last year – suddenly sound like outliers. At the Saudi Investment Forum, onstage with Huang, Elon Musk confidently stated that AI, with humanoid robots, will “eliminate poverty” and “make everyone wealthy.” In the future, he added on X, the “most likely outcome is that AI and robots make everyone wealthy. In fact, far wealthier than the richest person on Earth.” For the last few years, the public has been left to interpret competitively extreme visions of the future floated by strangely cavalier tech executives, who agreed on little but the inevitability of total change: mass unemployment; luxurious post-scarcity; human obsolescence; hyper-accelerated scientific progress; and, perhaps, total annihilation. Now, markets are concerned with narrower questions, with more specific answers, and more immediate consequences: How many GPUs has Nvidia sold? How many can it make? (Or, rather, how many can Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company manufacture for it?) There are plenty of theories about how generative AI might diffuse into the economy and change the world, and as more people use it, and companies start to deploy it, a few of them are snapping into focus (buy a drink for any young programmers in your life). But after years of boosterish warnings about the extraordinary and esoteric risks posed by mysterious and profound technology — we’re creating software so powerful even we can’t control it — tech executives are instead trying to get out in front of a profound non-technological risk that may be manifesting much sooner: that if they lose even a little bit of momentum, they might end up tanking the American economy.

    If Huang’s everything, everywhere, “all at once” line was a reference to the 2022 absurdist multiverse movie, it’s a funny one: the film opens with its protagonist shuffling through a pile of papers, anxiously preparing for a financial audit (and features a villain who “got bored one day” and decided to collapse the entirety of creation into a bagel-shaped singularity). As the AI boom has sprawled into a larger and more complicated financial story, scrutiny of the businesses behind the models has become as intense as scrutiny of the models themselves. To raise money and finance data center deals, OpenAI, which is both the leading consumer AI company and one of the industry’s most aggressive and, let’s say, inventive dealmakers, has manifested some truly dizzying arrangements, many of which involve Nvidia, a circular deal innovator in its own right. Take CoreWeave, a crypto-mining company that pivoted to AI data centers in 2022. CoreWeave rents access to Nvidia chips to firms that need them for AI inference and training. OpenAI is a CoreWeave customer, but also a Coreweave investor. Nvidia is a CoreWeave vendor — it supplies the GPUs – but also an investor and, somehow, a customer. Coreweave also loses a lot of money, and its stock price has, after peaking in July, collapsed.

    Lately, the deals are getting more brazen and less convoluted. In September, Nvidia announced it would invest $100 billion in OpenAI, which OpenAI said it would use to build data centers full of Nvidia hardware. This month, alongside Microsoft — OpenAI’s biggest early investor and primary partner — Nvidia announced the companies would invest up to $15 billion in OpenAI competitor Anthropic in exchange for a $30 billion commitment from the company to buy computing capacity from Microsoft, powered, naturally, by Nvidia hardware. Altman’s moments of candor about a possible bubble have been scattered between more defensive messaging from the company, which may be losing as much as $12 billion per quarter. In a recent podcast interview, investor Brad Gerstner asked Altman, “How can a company with $13 billion in revenues make $1.4 trillion of spend commitments?” Altman shot back: “If you want to sell your shares, I’ll find you a buyer. Enough.”

    That insiders seem to agree that we could be in a massive bubble is, counterintuitively, not very useful: whether or not they mean it, and whether or not they’re right, their incentives as leaders of mega-scale startups and public tech companies are such that raising, spending, and committing as much money as possible for as long as possible is probably the rational, self-interested choice either way. Anxious, skeptical, or merely satisfied investors looking for excuses to pull back or harvest gains don’t have to look hard, and there’s evidence some are; before its earnings report, Peter Thiel’s investment firm unloaded its position in Nvidia, and Softbank cashed out of the chipmaker at around the same time. Similarly, OpenAI’s ability to send public companies’ stocks soaring by announcing massive “commitments” seems to be fading — Oracle’s recent $300 billion valuation bump, based on some shockingly optimistic guidance it offered investors in September, has since gone negative.

    But focusing on the flagrant circularity of AI financing can feed the impression that the risks are contained within Silicon Valley. The bigger problem is the ways in which they’re already not. If it exists, you might call it a load-bearing bubble. In the first half of 2025, “investment in information processing equipment and software” — a sort of informal, private stimulus package — accounted for 92 percent of GDP growth for the United States, while AI-related tech stocks account for nearly all recent growth in the S&P 500. Early funding for companies like OpenAI came from venture capitalists and incumbent tech giants, while Google and Meta pushed into AI with their own massive revenue and cash, but multi-hundred-billion-dollar commitments mean they’re getting more creative, both in how they raise money and how they distribute risk. Companies like Meta are funding data centers with “special purpose vehicles,” which may sound familiar if you were reading the financial news in 2008, and with massive corporate bond sales. As the investor Paul Kedrosky has argued, the AI boom has traits, at least, of every major financial bubble in modern history: a narrative-driven tech bubble, a credit bubble, a real estate bubble, and an infrastructure bubble. To tie it all together, you’ve got OpenAI’s CFO floating, then frantically backtracking on, the idea of a government backstop for financing AI expansion, almost instantly elevating the prospect of an AI bailout into fodder for conservative and progressive lawmakers.

    Huang has two typical responses to all this. One speaks for itself: look at all those GPUs we’re selling. The other is more direct. “There’s been a lot of talk about an AI bubble. From our vantage point,” he said after earnings, “we see something very different.” In other words: No it’s not. The “virtuous cycle” is just beginning, and the accelerating potential of the most versatile technology the world has ever seen will one day expose complaints about incremental model updates and hand-wringing about data center deals as short-sighted and insignificant. Huang is still able to speak with authority and tell a story that, for investors, still has juice.

    For everyone else, though, neither side of this wildly polarized, high-stakes bet sounds ideal. If this really is a bubble, and it deflates even a little, it could send the American economy into a serious slump, with consequences for almost everyone, getting rid of plenty of jobs the old-fashioned way. If it doesn’t — and Huang’s sanitized visions of mass automation rapidly start to spread across the economy, justifying all that CapEx, and all those strange deals, and then some — well, aren’t we getting laid off anyway?

    [ad_2]

    John Herrman

    Source link

  • One Tech Tip: Annoyed by junk calls to your iPhone? Try the new iOS 26 call screen feature

    [ad_1]

    LONDON (AP) — iPhone users have a new tool to combat the scourge of nuisance phone calls: a virtual gatekeeper that can screen incoming calls from unknown numbers.

    It’s among the bevy of new features that Apple rolled out with last month’s release of iOS 26. The screening feature has been getting attention because of the ever-increasing amount of robocalls and spam calls that leave many phone users feeling harassed.

    Here’s a run-through of the new function:

    How to activate call screening

    First, you’ll need to update your iPhone’s operating system to iOS 26, which is available to the iPhone 11 and newer models.

    To switch call screening on, go into Settings–Apps—Phone. Scroll down and you’ll find a new option: Screen Unknown Callers.

    You’ll be presented with three choices. The Never option lets any unknown call ring through, while Silence sends all unidentified numbers directly to voicemail. What you want to tap is the middle option: Ask Reason for Calling.

    If the option isn’t there, try restarting your phone.

    I still couldn’t find it after updating to iOS 26, but, after some online sleuthing, I checked my region and language settings because I saw some online commenters reporting they had to match. It turns out my region was still set to Hong Kong, where I lived years ago. I switched it to the United Kingdom, which seemed to do the trick and gave me the updated menu.

    How it works

    Call screening introduces a layer between you and new callers.

    When someone who’s not in your contacts list dials your number, a Siri-style voice will ask them to give their name and the purpose of their call.

    At the same time, you’ll get a notification that the call is being screened. When the caller responds, the answers will be transcribed and the conversation will pop up in speech bubbles.

    You can then answer the call.

    Don’t want to answer? Send a reply by tapping one of the pre-written messages, such as “I’ll call you later” or “Send more information,” which the AI voice will read out to the caller.

    Or you can type out your own message for the computer-generated voice to read out.

    If you don’t respond right away, the phone will continue to ring while you decide what to do.

    Teething troubles

    In theory, call screening is a handy third way between the nuclear option of silencing all unknown callers — including legitimate ones — or letting them all through.

    But it doesn’t always work perfectly, according to Associated Press colleagues and anecdotal reports from social media users.

    One AP colleague said she was impressed with how seamlessly it worked. Another said it’s handy for screening out cold callers who found his number from marketing databases.

    “However, it’s not great when delivery drivers try to call me and then just hang up,” he added.

    Some internet users have similar complaints, complaining that important calls that they were expecting from their auto mechanic or plumber didn’t make it through. Perhaps the callers assumed it was an answering machine and didn’t seem to realize they had to stay on the line and interact with it.

    I encountered a different issue the first time it kicked in for me, when an unknown caller — whether mistakenly or not — threw me off by giving my name instead of theirs. So I answered because I assumed it was someone I knew, forgetting that I could tap out a reply asking them again for their name.

    The caller turned out to be someone who had obtained my name and number and was trying to get me to do a survey. I had to make my excuses and hang up.

    If you don’t like call screening, you can turn it off at any time.

    As for Android

    Apple is catching up with Google, which introduced a similar automatic call screening feature years ago for Pixel users in the United States.

    Last month, the company announced the feature is rolling out to users in three more countries: Australia, Canada and Ireland.

    If it’s not already on, go to your Phone app’s Settings and look for Call Screen.

    Google’s version is even more automated. When someone you don’t know calls, the phone will ask who it is and why they’re calling. It will hang up if it determines that it’s a junk call, but let calls it deems to be legit ring through.

    Google warns that not all spam calls and robocalls can be detected, nor will it always fully understand and transcribe what a caller says.

    Samsung, too, lets users of its Galaxy Android phones screen calls by using its AI assistant Bixby’s text call function, which works in a similar way.

    ____

    Is there a tech topic that you think needs explaining? Write to us at [email protected] with your suggestions for future editions of One Tech Tip.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • One Tech Tip: Keeping up with your Halloween trick-or-treaters with these tricks

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — For little ghosts, witches, KPop Demon Hunters and superheroes, Halloween is one of the most exciting nights of the year. But it’s also one of the busiest for parents as they try to keep track of their trick-or-treaters, give out candy and watch over their homes.

    Fortunately, there are some tech tricks out there that can help families stay safe this Halloween, and have a little more fun too.

    Keeping tabs on your kids

    If your children are outfitted with Apple or Google-branded smart phones or watches or tracking tags, you can use the Find My or Family Link apps to keep tabs on them as they embark on their candy journeys. But don’t think of these apps as basic. Because branded peripherals — like Apple Air Tags or Pixel smartwatches — are built to be used with Apple and Google platforms, their tracking platforms can be more reliable than some third-party services.

    One trick I discovered last Halloween is that I can set up a geofence with Find My. This gave my kids a little more freedom to navigate a set trick-or-treating area while I struggled to keep up with them. If anyone broke from the pack and left the designated area, I would get a notification. Here’s how to set it up:

    Go to the Find My app on your iPhone. Scroll and tap on the name of the person or device you want to be notified about. Below notifications, tap “Add,” then “Notify me.” Continue through the menu options until you get to a location option. Choose “New Location” and you will be given the option to set a location radius. Then you will be asked how often you wish to be notified if the tracked individual leaves the area.

    Next is a critical step if you wish to set a recurring notification. Unless it’s an air tag, your child must give a one-time authorization to the request. They will receive an alert asking for approval when they arrive at or leave the location you chose for the first time.

    Google users have a similar geofencing option. First, you need to set up a new Family Location in the Family Link app. Then select your child in the main menu of the app and tap Family Locations, add the place you just created and select how often you’d like to be notified when they enter or exit the area.

    Spookier doorbells

    If you have a smart doorbell installed on your front door, you can have a little extra fun with visiting trick-or-treaters by adding spooky messages and specialized chimes.

    For Ring doorbell users, head to your app and go to Menu-Devices. Select your doorbell. Then tap Smart Responses-Quick Replies-Quick Reply Message. You may need to toggle on Quick Replies if you hadn’t before, but you will see a list of Halloween-themed replies. Ours is set to “I’ll be right there to eat… I mean greet you!”

    For those with Eufy Doorbells, navigate to your app and select your doorbell. A Voice Response list should include selectable Halloween-themed effects and chimes. You can also take advantage of a message recording function in more recent doorbell models to create your own, hopefully scary, response.

    Nest and Google home users should be able to use their app to select a Halloween setting under Doorbell Themes (Google was updating Nest in October so your menu may be different from mine).

    One unrelated tip for smart doorbell users, you may want to lower your motion sensitivity just for Halloween. If your device isn’t hardwired, the extra motion from trick-or-treaters could drain your doorbell’s batteries quickly (as I discovered). You can also avoid a flood of notifications if you do so.

    Don’t forget the lights

    Smart phones have flashlights, sure, but they’re not the brightest nor are they the best option if you’re carrying jackets, candy baskets, water bottles or costume parts. Instead, give yourself or your children more portable lumens so they can see (and be seen) easily in the dark.

    There are plenty of options for all budget ranges, but I’m partial to lights that you can clip onto jackets or costumes to keep your hands free.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nvidia earnings clear lofty hurdle set by analysts amid fears about an AI bubble

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Nvidia’s sales of the computing chips powering the artificial intelligence craze surged beyond the lofty bar set by stock market analysts in a performance that may ease recent jitters about a Big Tech boom turning into a bust that topples the world’s most valuable company.

    The results announced late Wednesday provided a pulse check on the frenzied spending on AI technology that has been fueling both the stock market and much of the overall economy since OpenAI released its ChatGPT three years ago.

    Nvidia has been by far the biggest beneficiary of the run-up because its processors have become indispensable for building the AI factories that are needed to enable what’s supposed to be the most dramatic shift in technology since Apple released the iPhone in 2007.

    But in the past few weeks, there has been a rising tide of sentiment that the high expectations for AI may have become far too frothy, setting the stage for a jarring comedown that could be just as dramatic as the ascent that transformed Nvidia from a company worth less than $400 billion three years ago to one worth $4.5 trillion at the end of Wednesday’s trading.

    Nvidia’s report for its fiscal third quarter covering the August-October period elicited a sigh of relief among those fretting about a worst-case scenario and could help reverse the recent downturn in the stock market.

    “The market should belt out a heavy sigh, given the skittishness we have been experiencing,” said Sean O’Hara, president of the investment firm Pacer ETFs.

    The company’s stock price gained more than 5% in Wednesday’s extended trading after the numbers came out. If the shares trade similarly Thursday, it could result in a one-day gain of about $230 billion in stockholder wealth.

    Nvidia earned $31.9 billion, or $1.30 per share, a 65% increase from the same time last year, while revenue climbed 62% to $57 billion. Analysts polled by FactSet Research had forecast earnings of $1.26 per share on revenue of $54.9 billion. What’s more, the Santa Clara, California, company predicted its revenue for the current quarter covering November-January will come in at about $65 billion, nearly $3 billion above analysts’ projections, in an indication that demand for its AI chips remains feverish.

    The incoming orders for Nvidia’s top-of-the-line Blackwell chip are “off the charts,” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in a prepared statement that described the current market conditions as “a virtuous cycle.” In a conference call, Nvidia Chief Financial Officer Collette Kress said that by the end of next year the company will have sold about $500 billion in chips designed for AI factories within a 24-month span Kress also predicts trillions of dollars more will be spent by the end of the 2020s.

    In a conference call preamble that has become like a State of the AI Market address, Huang seized the moment to push back against the skeptics who doubt his thesis that technology is at tipping point that will transform the world. “There’s been a lot of talk about an AI bubble. From our vantage point, we see something very different,” Huang insisted while celebrating “depth and breadth” of Nvidia’s growth.

    The upbeat results, optimistic commentary and ensuring reaction reflects the pivotal role that Nvidia is playing in the future direction of the economy — a position that Huang has leveraged to forge close ties with President Donald Trump, even as the White House wages a trade war that has inhibited the company’s ability to sell its chips in China’s fertile market.

    Trump is increasingly counting on the tech sector and the development of artificial intelligence to deliver on his economic agenda. For all of Trump’s claims that his tariffs are generating new investments, much of that foreign capital is going to data centers for AI’s computing demands or the power facilities needed to run those data centers.

    “Saying this is the most important stock in the world is an understatement,” Jay Woods, chief market strategist of investment bank Freedom Capital Markets, said of Nvidia.

    The boom has been a boon for more than just Nvidia, which became the first company to eclipse a market value of $5 trillion a few weeks ago, before the recent bubble worries resulted in a more than 10% decline. As OpenAI and other Big Tech powerhouses snap up Nvidia’s chips to build their AI factories and invest in other services connected to the technology, their fortunes have also been soaring. Apple, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Amazon all boast market values in the $2 trillion to $4 trillion range.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • OpenAI and Taiwan’s Foxconn to partner in AI hardware design and manufacturing in the US

    [ad_1]

    TAIPEI, Taiwan — OpenAI and Taiwan electronics giant Foxconn have agreed to a partnership to design and manufacture key equipment for artificial intelligence data centers in the U.S. as part of ambitious plans to fortify American AI infrastructure.

    Foxconn, which makes AI servers for Nvidia and assembles Apple products including the iPhone, will be co-designing and developing AI data center racks with OpenAI under the agreement, the companies said in separate statements on Thursday and Friday.

    The products Foxconn will manufacture in its U.S. facilities include cabling, networking and power systems for AI data centers, the companies said. OpenAI will have “early access” to evaluate and potentially to purchase them.

    Foxconn has factories in the U.S., including in Ohio and Texas. The initial agreement does not include financial obligations or purchase commitments, the statements said.

    The Taiwan contract manufacturer has been moving to diversity its business, developing electric vehicles and acquiring other electronics companies to build out its product offerings.

    “This partnership is a step toward ensuring the core technologies of the AI era are built here,” Sam Altman, CEO of San Francisco-based OpenAI, said in the statement. “We believe this work will strengthen U.S. leadership and help ensure the benefits of AI are widely shared.”

    OpenAI has committed $1.4 trillion to building AI infrastructure. It recently entered into multi-billion partnerships with Nvidia and AMD to expand the extensive computing power needed to support its AI models and services. It is also partnering with US chipmaker Broadcom in designing and making its own AI chips.

    But its massive spending plans have worried investors, raising questions over its ability to recoup its investments and remain profitable. Altman said this month that OpenAI, a startup founded in 2015 and maker of ChatGPT, is expected to reach more than $20 billion in annualized revenue this year, growing to “hundreds of billions by 2030.”

    Foxconn’s Taiwan-listed share price has risen 25% so far this year, along with the surge in prices for many tech companies benefiting from the craze for AI.

    The Taiwan company’s net profit in the July-September quarter rose 17% from a year earlier to just over 57.6 billion new Taiwan dollars ($1.8 billion), with revenue from its cloud and networking business, including AI servers, contributing the most business.

    “We believe the importance of the AI ​​industry is increasing significantly,” Liu said during Foxconn’s earnings call this month.

    “I am very optimistic about the development of AI ​next year, and expect our cooperation with major clients and partners to become even closer,” said Liu.

    ___

    Chan reported from Hong Kong

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s SpaceX drives $13 billion economic impact in South Texas

    [ad_1]

    BROWNSVILLE, Texas — A recent report indicates that SpaceX is generating immense economic growth in South Texas, where the company recently established its rocket launching facility.

    According to an impact study released by Cameron County, the company’s Starbase headquarters have added over $13 billion to the South Texas economy over the past two years.

    The growth comes after Elon Musk officially moved his company’s headquarters in 2024 from California to Starbase, a corporate community that was incorporated by Cameron County residents in a nearly unanimous vote this May.

    The move has supported 24,000 direct and indirect jobs across the region in the past two years, according to the report. In 2024, the complex employed 3,400 people. This year an additional 900 jobs were reported, and county officials said they expect this growth to continue. According to the Rio Grande Guardian, Commissioner Tino Villarreal said by next year the facility is expected to employ up to 8,000 people.

    “While Starbase operates close to the coast, every city in Cameron County and the Rio Grande Valley shares in the benefits — stronger schools, more tourism, and new high-paying job opportunities,” Judge Eddie Treviño Jr. said in a statement. “As SpaceX expands their production capabilities, bringing high-paying manufacturing and engineering jobs directly to Starbase, we will continue to see a new age of growth for all of South Texas happening right here in Cameron County.”

    In the report, SpaceX said it has also generated more than $305 million in indirect tax revenue over the past two years. In 2024, the company said it did business with over 350 suppliers, putting $147 million into the regional supply chain.

    [ad_2]

    Laura Baker

    Source link

  • What to Know About Trump’s Draft Proposal to Curtail State AI Regulations

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence in a draft executive order obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, as some in Congress also consider whether to temporarily block states from regulating AI.

    Trump and some Republicans argue that the limited regulations already enacted by states, and others that might follow, will dampen innovation and growth for the technology.

    Critics from both political parties — as well as civil liberties and consumer rights groups — worry that banning state regulation would amount to a favor for big AI companies who enjoy little to no oversight.

    While the draft executive order could change, here’s what to know about states’ AI regulations and what Trump is proposing.


    What state-level regulations exist and why

    Four states — Colorado, California, Utah and Texas — have passed laws that set some rules for AI across the private sector, according to the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

    Those laws include limiting the collection of certain personal information and requiring more transparency from companies.

    The laws are in response to AI that already pervades everyday life. The technology helps make consequential decisions for Americans, including who gets a job interview, an apartment lease, a home loan and even certain medical care. But research has shown that it can make mistakes in those decisions, including by prioritizing a particular gender or race.

    “It’s not a matter of AI makes mistakes and humans never do,” said Calli Schroeder, director of the AI & Human Rights Program at the public interest group EPIC.

    “With a human, I can say, ‘Hey, explain, how did you come to that conclusion, what factors did you consider?’” she continued. “With an AI, I can’t ask any of that, and I can’t find that out. And frankly, half the time the programmers of the AI couldn’t answer that question.”

    States’ more ambitious AI regulation proposals require private companies to provide transparency and assess the possible risks of discrimination from their AI programs.

    Beyond those more sweeping rules, many states have regulated parts of AI: barring the use of deepfakes in elections and to create nonconsensual porn, for example, or putting rules in place around the government’s own use of AI.


    What Trump and some Republicans want to do

    The draft executive order would direct federal agencies to identify burdensome state AI regulations and pressure states to not enact them, including by withholding federal funding or challenging the state laws in court.

    It would also begin a process to develop a lighter-touch regulatory framework for the whole country that would override state AI laws.

    Trump’s argument is that the patchwork of regulations across 50 states impedes AI companies’ growth, and allows China to catch up to the U.S. in the AI race. The president has also said state regulations are producing “Woke AI.”

    The draft executive order that was leaked could change and should not be taken as final, said a senior Trump administration official who requested anonymity to describe internal White House discussions.

    The official said the tentative plan is for Trump to sign the order Friday.

    Separately, House Republican leadership is already discussing a proposal to temporarily block states from regulating AI, the chamber’s majority leader, Steve Scalise, told Punchbowl News this week.

    It’s yet unclear what that proposal would look like, or which AI regulations it would override.

    TechNet, which advocates for tech companies including Google and Amazon, has previously argued that pausing state regulations would benefit smaller AI companies still getting on their feet and allow time for lawmakers develop a country-wide regulatory framework that “balances innovation with accountability.”


    Why attempts at federal regulation have failed

    Some Republicans in Congress have previously tried and failed to ban states from regulating AI.

    Part of the challenge is that opposition is coming from their party’s own ranks.

    Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, said a federal law barring state regulation of AI was “Not acceptable” in a post on X this week.

    DeSantis argued that the move would be a “subsidy to Big Tech” and would stop states from protecting against a list of things, including “predatory applications that target children” and “online censorship of political speech.”

    A federal ban on states regulating AI is also unpopular, said Cody Venzke, senior policy council at the ACLU’s National Political Advocacy Department.

    “The American people do not want AI to be discriminatory, to be unsafe, to be hallucinatory,” he said. “So I don’t think anyone is interested in winning the AI race if it means AI that is not trustworthy.”

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • One Tech Tip: Do’s and don’ts of using AI to help with schoolwork

    [ad_1]

    The rapid rise of ChatGPT and other generative AI systems has disrupted education, transforming how students learn and study.

    Students everywhere have turned to chatbots to help with their homework, but artificial intelligence’s capabilities have blurred the lines about what it should — and shouldn’t — be used for.

    The technology’s widespread adoption in many other parts of life also adds to the confusion about what constitutes academic dishonesty.

    Here are some do’s and don’ts on using AI for schoolwork:

    Don’t just copy and paste

    Chatbots are so good at answering questions with detailed written responses that it’s tempting to just take their work and pass it off as your own.

    But in case it isn’t already obvious, AI should not be used as a substitute for putting in the work. And it can’t replace our ability to think critically.

    You wouldn’t copy and paste information from a textbook or someone else’s essay and pass it off as your own. The same principle applies to chatbot replies.

    “AI can help you understand concepts or generate ideas, but it should never replace your own thinking and effort,” the University of Chicago says in its guidance on using generative AI. “Always produce original work, and use AI tools for guidance and clarity, not for doing the work for you.”

    So don’t shy away from putting pen to paper — or your fingers to the keyboard — to do your own writing.

    “If you use an AI chatbot to write for you — whether explanations, summaries, topic ideas, or even initial outlines — you will learn less and perform more poorly on subsequent exams and attempts to use that knowledge,” Yale University’s Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning says.

    Do use AI as a study aid

    Experts say AI shines when it’s used like a tutor or a study buddy. So try using a chatbot to explain difficult concepts or brainstorm ideas, such as essay topics.

    California high school English teacher Casey Cuny advises his students to use ChatGPT to quiz themselves ahead of tests.

    He tells them to upload class notes, study guides and any other materials used in class, such as slideshows, to the chatbot, and then tell it which textbook and chapter the test will focus on.

    Then, students should prompt the chatbot to: “Quiz me one question at a time based on all the material cited, and after that create a teaching plan for everything I got wrong.”

    Cuny posts AI guidance in the form of a traffic light on a classroom screen. Green-lighted uses include brainstorming, asking for feedback on a presentation or doing research. Red lighted, or prohibited AI use: Asking an AI tool to write a thesis statement, a rough draft or revise an essay. A yellow light is when a student is unsure if AI use is allowed, in which case he tells them to come and ask him.

    Or try using ChatGPT’s voice dictation function, said Sohan Choudhury, CEO of Flint, an AI-powered education platform.

    “I’ll just brain dump exactly what I get, what I don’t get” about a subject, he said. “I can go on a ramble for five minutes about exactly what I do and don’t understand about a topic. I can throw random analogies at it, and I know it’s going to be able to give me something back to me tailored based on that.”

    Do check your school’s AI policy

    As AI has shaken up the academic world, educators have been forced to set out their policies on the technology.

    In the U.S., about two dozen states have state-level AI guidance for schools, but it’s unevenly applied.

    It’s worth checking what your school, college or university says about AI. Some might have a broad institutionwide policy.

    The University of Toronto’s stance is that “students are not allowed to use generative AI in a course unless the instructor explicitly permits it” and students should check course descriptions for do’s and don’ts.

    Many others don’t have a blanket rule.

    The State University of New York at Buffalo “has no universal policy,” according to its online guidance for instructors. “Instructors have the academic freedom to determine what tools students can and cannot use in pursuit of meeting course learning objectives. This includes artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT.”

    Don’t hide AI use from teachers

    AI is not the educational bogeyman it used to be.

    There’s growing understanding that AI is here to stay and the next generation of workers will have to learn how to use the technology, which has the potential to disrupt many industries and occupations.

    So students shouldn’t shy away from discussing its use with teachers, because transparency prevents misunderstandings, said Choudhury.

    “Two years ago, many teachers were just blanket against it. Like, don’t bring AI up in this class at all, period, end of story,” he said. But three years after ChatGPT’s debut, “many teachers understand that the kids are using it. So they’re much more open to having a conversation as opposed to setting a blanket policy.”

    Teachers say they’re aware that students are wary of asking if AI use is allowed for fear they’ll be flagged as cheaters. But clarity is key because it’s so easy to cross a line without knowing it, says Rebekah Fitzsimmons, chair of the AI faculty advising committee at Carnegie Mellon University’s Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy.

    “Often, students don’t realize when they’re crossing a line between a tool that is helping them fix content that they’ve created and when it is generating content for them,” says Fitzsimmons, who helped draft detailed new guidelines for students and faculty that strive to create clarity.

    The University of Chicago says students should cite AI if it was used to come up with ideas, summarize texts, or help with drafting a paper.

    “Acknowledge this in your work when appropriate,” the university says. “Just as you would cite a book or a website, giving credit to AI where applicable helps maintain transparency.”

    And don’t forget ethics

    Educators want students to use AI in a way that’s consistent with their school’s values and principles.

    The University of Florida says students should familiarize themselves with the school’s honor code and academic integrity policies “to ensure your use of AI aligns with ethical standards.”

    Oxford University says AI tools must be used “responsibly and ethically” and in line with its academic standards.

    “You should always use AI tools with integrity, honesty, and transparency, and maintain a critical approach to using any output generated by these tools,” it says.

    ____

    Is there a tech topic that you think needs explaining? Write to us at [email protected] with your suggestions for future editions of One Tech Tip.

    [ad_2]

    Source link