ReportWire

Tag: teamsters

  • Three Dozen U.S. Ports In Peril of Longshoremen’s Strike

    Three Dozen U.S. Ports In Peril of Longshoremen’s Strike

    [ad_1]

    Credit: Danny Cornelissen, Attribution, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Shirleen Guerra (The Center Square)

    About 45,000 dockworkers are expected to strike for higher wages across three dozen East and Gulf coast ports at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.

    There is potential for increased consumer costs on a wide range of goods just five weeks before Election Day, and 12 weeks before Christmas.

    Negotiations have been tense since June. The disagreement is between the International Longshore Association and Warehouse Union, which represents port workers across the country, and the U.S. Maritime Alliance, which represents terminal operators and ocean carriers.

    RELATED: Lawmakers Investigate Soros ‘Shortcut’ to Buying Radio Stations Before Election

    Wages of East and Gulf coast workers are a base wage of $39 an hour after six years. The union is asking for a 77% pay raise increase over six years. It is also asking for more restrictions and bans on the automation of cranes, gates, and container movements used to load or unload cargo.

    North America’s largest union of maritime workers has 85,000 longshoremen from the Atlantic and Gulf coasts, according to its website. 

    The strike would impact 36 U.S. ports handling about one-half of U.S. ocean imports. Included are Boston, New York, New Jersey and Philadelphia.

    While negotiations have remained stagnant, both parties have continued to push out updates on the situations.

    “Despite additional attempts by USMX to engage with the ILA and resume bargaining, we have been unable to schedule a meeting to continue negotiations on a new Master Contract,” the Maritime Alliance said in a release. “We remain prepared to bargain at any time, but both sides must come to the table if we are going to reach a deal, and there is no indication that the ILA is interested in negotiating at this time.”

    The alliance filed an “unfair labor practice” charge against the union on Wednesday.

    The union said the employer is “continuing its weak publicity campaign designed to fool the American public that they care for the longshore workers who help earn them billions of dollars,” a press said after the filing.

    The union continued that this was “another publicity stunt by the employer group, and countered that foreign-owned companies, represented by USMX, that set up shop at American ports, earn billions of dollars in revenues and profits, take those profits out of country, and fail to adequately compensate the ILA longshore workforce for their labor are engaging in a real ‘unfair labor practice’ and have been getting away with for decades.”

    RELATED: Waste of the Day: Walz Campaign Donors Received $15 Billion in State Business

    The union also stated that the 85,000 members would honor its century-plus pledge and continue to handle all military cargo at all ports despite the strike.

    “If no agreement is reached, it could result in delays and dire impacts on supply chains, our economy, and the American consumer,” the union said.

    That was the sentiment behind the letter Republican lawmakers sent to President Joe Biden urging the administration “to utilize every authority at its disposal to ensure the continuing flow of goods.”

    Elizabeth H. Shuler, president of The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, or AFL-CIO, responded in a letter opposing injunction to prevent a possible strike.

    “Averting a strike is the responsibility of the employers who refuse to offer ILA members a contract that reflects the dignity and value of their labor,” the letter reads in part. “The fight for a fair contract for longshoremen is the entire labor movement’s fight. We stand united with the 45,000 ILA members who work hard every day to keep our nation’s economy moving. Please call on USMX to make a fair offer to settle this contract before October 1.”

    One way the strike could end is for the president to call on the Taft-Hartley Act. Biden cites collective bargaining as the reason he does not believe in the 1947 measure.

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Teamsters president says he hasn’t endorsed Kamala Harris yet because “you don’t hire someone unless you give them an interview”

    Teamsters president says he hasn’t endorsed Kamala Harris yet because “you don’t hire someone unless you give them an interview”

    [ad_1]

    Sean O’Brien, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, said Sunday he hasn’t endorsed in the 2024 presidential race yet because he hasn’t yet met with Vice President Kamala Harris, and “you don’t hire someone unless you give them an interview.”

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters is one of the 10 largest unions in the United States with 1.3 million members and the only in the group of 10 that hasn’t endorsed Harris, the Democratic nominee. 

    The Teamsters have historically endorsed a presidential candidate after both the Democratic and Republican conventions, but O’Brien said this election cycle is different. O’Brien already turned heads when he spoke at the Republican National Convention in July, the first leader in the organization’s 121-year history to address the RNC. 

    “This time, under our leadership, we brought every single candidate to the table in front of our rank and file members and our general executive board, and we’re waiting on Vice President Harris to commit to come meet with us,” O’Brien said on “Face the Nation.”

    O’Brien said the Teamsters, unlike other major unions, have a split in political affiliation, which heightens the need for sit-down conversations with all presidential candidates. Teamsters met with Harris’ GOP opponent, former President Donald Trump, as well President Biden earlier this year.

    “Half of our members are Republicans, half of our members are Democrats. So we have to serve all of our membership equally,” O’Brien said. “And you know, this is our opportunity to ask her (Harris) about Teamster specific issues and also labor issues. So until we have that meeting, you know, obviously we will wait to make that determination.”

    The Harris-Walz campaign said before the DNC that Harris has agreed to a roundtable with the Teamsters.

    1725205287468.png
    Teamsters president Sean O’Brien on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Sept. 1, 2024.

    CBS News


    “VP has received and gladly accepted an invitation by IBT leadership to participate in a candidate roundtable to discuss her record of fighting for Teamsters and their families and to highlight her vision for the future. The campaign looks forward to scheduling the roundtable in the near future,” a campaign spokesperson said.

    At the RNC in July, O’Brien delivered an anti- big business keynote speech.

    O’Brien’s speech displayed the visible shift within the GOP since Trump’s election in 2016, moving from a corporate, Wall Street-focused message toward a more worker-friendly tone.

    “Today, the Teamsters are here to say we are not beholden to anyone or any party,” O’Brien said during the July speech. “We will create an agenda and work with a bipartisan coalition, ready to accomplish something real for the American worker. And I don’t care about getting criticized.”

    O’Brien said on “Face the Nation” that he asked to speak at both the Republican and Democratic National Conventions, but that only the RNC responded. United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain addressed the DNC in August, as well as several other union leaders. 

    “Whenever I get an opportunity to highlight the American worker, especially the Teamster worker, I’m going to take any and all venue,” O’Brien said Sunday.  “We asked both conventions, respectively, at the same time, and the Republican National Convention immediately responded to us… I was hopeful that the Democrats would do the same, but they didn’t.”

    When asked if he appeared at the RNC because he feels Trump has been more pro-labor than past Republican nominees, O’Brien said, “no, not at all,” although Trump gave O’Brien a standing ovation and O’Brien called him a “tough SOB” in his speech. O’Brien on Sunday  insisted the purpose of the speech was to highlight American workers and not to signal an endorsement in any one direction.

    “It wasn’t an endorsement for any and all Republicans. It was strictly a message about how important and how valuable we are, and to let the people know that fight us every day that we’re not going away,” O’Brien said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UAW President Shawn Fain on members of his union voting Republican, support for Kamala Harris

    UAW President Shawn Fain on members of his union voting Republican, support for Kamala Harris

    [ad_1]

    UAW President Shawn Fain on members of his union voting Republican, support for Kamala Harris – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Shawn Fain, president of the United Auto Workers union, joined CBS News to discuss members of his union voting for GOP candidates, the lack of a presidential endorsement so far from the Teamsters and his support for the Harris-Walz campaign.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘The company hires these people to basically lie to them’: Trucking company hires union busters to obstruct Florida drivers’ effort to unionize

    ‘The company hires these people to basically lie to them’: Trucking company hires union busters to obstruct Florida drivers’ effort to unionize

    [ad_1]

    Trucking company MBM Logistics, affiliated with logistics companies DHL Express and VMW Express, has hired two out-of-state “union avoidance” professionals to discourage its drivers in Orlando and other Florida cities from joining forces with the Teamsters.

    According to a report recently filed with the U.S. Department of Labor, the company last month entered into an agreement with the anti-union labor relations firm Action Resources to “communicate” with drivers in Orlando, Gainesville, Lakeland, Daytona Beach, and Palm Bay, Florida about “their rights to unionize and refrain from unionizing.”

    The Teamsters labor union (formally known as the International Brotherhood of the Teamsters) represents about 1.3 million workers, including tens of thousands of people in Florida who work at places like UPS, Walt Disney World and in the public sector.

    Action Resources, a labor relations firm based in Nevada, prides itself on helping employers in “fending off an organizing campaign.” Records show the firm enlisted two anti-union consultants (also known as “persuaders”) for the job. Both persuaders — Gustavo Flores and Fernando Rivera — have been hired to disrupt organizing campaigns with the Teamsters in the past.

    Flores, based out of California, belongs to a family of anti-union persuaders, including at least one former Teamsters official who was allegedly ousted from his union. The Californian also runs his own union avoidance firm out on the West Coast, and his services — pulling workers into meetings, passing out anti-union literature — don’t come cheap.

    A contract filed with the U.S. labor department in early August shows MBM Logistics agreed to pay Action Resources a daily rate of $3,750 per consultant for onsite “employee relations consulting services,” plus “all reasonable expenses,” including travel costs and meals. Services performed off-site will similarly be billed at a rate of $375 an hour, according to the agreement.

    The timing of the agreement is notable. Signed by representatives of both parties, the agreement is dated July 19, 2024 — the very same day that MBM Logistics filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board for a union election, after a majority of their 115 delivery drivers demonstrated support for unionizing with the Teamsters Local 385.

    Under a federal rule finalized last year, an employer is required to file a petition for a union election if they are presented with evidence that a majority of employees want to unionize. The employer has the opportunity to then voluntarily recognize the union, or otherwise file a petition for a union election.

    Walt Howard, president of Teamsters Local 385 in Orlando, told Orlando Weekly over the phone that local drivers contacted the union in the hopes of addressing issues they were experiencing on the job such as lack of job security, insufficient pay, and poor or nonexistent benefits.

    Jose Faneitty, a new organizer for the local who’s been in close contact with the workers, confirmed Howard’s account. He said that workers have also reported unsafe vans — one worker shared that his vehicle’s windshield literally flew off while he was driving one day on the Florida Turnpike — and said benefits like healthcare are “so expensive, nobody can basically afford them.”

    Faneitty specifically recalled one pregnant worker he spoke to who said she felt pressured to keep working as her pregnancy progressed, because the company didn’t offer maternity leave. Another driver, according to Faneitty, had a death in the family. After requesting time off to go to the funeral, however, the driver was told that if he left to attend it, he would be fired. 

    “I don’t even work for the company and I want to quit,” Faneitty quipped.

    Both Howard and Faneitty said drivers for MBM Logistics are also concerned about what they perceive as a lack of transparency from their employer, especially when it comes to pay.

    click to enlarge UPS Teamsters (from left to right: Walt Howard, John Gregory, and April Hope) organize a practice picket outside of a UPS warehouse in Orlando. July 13, 2023. - photo by McKenna Schueler

    photo by McKenna Schueler

    UPS Teamsters (from left to right: Walt Howard, John Gregory, and April Hope) organize a practice picket outside of a UPS warehouse in Orlando. July 13, 2023.

    The company has been cited for wage theft in the past, reaching a settlement with the Berger Montague law firm in 2021 over a wage-and-hour lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The law firm reached a $292,000 settlement with MBM Logistics and DHL Express on behalf of over 300 hourly drivers who the firm says were not paid for all hours worked, including overtime pay.

    MBM Logistics, registered with the state as MBM Delivery and Logistics LLC, is a service provider for DHL Express, a logistics company that employs over 7,300 workers who are unionized with the Teamsters. It also recently settled a racial discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of employees.

    MBM Logistics itself has a muted presence online. However, the company’s controller, Amir Danesh — who signed MBM’s agreement with the anti-union firm — is affiliated with VMW Express, a regional carrier based in Virginia with clients that include DHL and UPS.

    Danesh’s name also appears on a permit agreement that MBM Logistics has with the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, a governmental entity and operator of the Orlando International Airport that has entered into publicly funded contracts with union-busting employers in the past. The permit agreement essentially allows for the company to conduct business and make money from their use of the airport’s property.

    Orlando Weekly reached out to Danesh and MBM for comment on the new agreement with Action Resources via email, but did not receive a response ahead of publication.

    Brother of a former Teamster, now busting the Teamsters

    Flores, one of the two union avoidance professionals hired to turn local drivers off the idea of organizing, has a messy history of alleged labor violations that some Teamsters, and members of other labor unions, know well.

    Last year, Flores’ firm — GNE Consulting — led a union-busting effort at the private equity-owned Aspire Bakeries in California that was so aggressive the National Labor Relations Board ordered a re-do union election.

    Workers in that case narrowly voted against unionizing with the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers union both times, after Flores’ union-busting outfit was accused by the union of multiple violations of federal labor law, including unlawful intimidation tactics, harassment and surveillance.

    Gustavo’s brother Carlos — a former Teamster who later joined the union avoidance industry — reportedly threatened undocumented workers at the Long Island-based Tate’s Bakeshop who were trying to unionize a few years ago up north. As reported by Gothamist, Carlos allegedly told the workers he would look into their immigration documents and have them deported if they voted in favor of the union.

    Both Carlos and Gustavo also appear to be related to Abraham “Abe” Flores, another union avoidance professional from California who is allegedly a former Teamsters official who was kicked out of the union.

    “He got terminated because of the use of political campaign funds for his reelection,” Teamsters Local 135 organizer Vance Smith told Orlando Weekly in December, after facing off with the Flores family and Wildine Pierre (a consultant based near Orlando) during an organizing drive in Indiana.

    According to federal records, Gustavo has in the past also been hired to bust organizing efforts among employees of the Hershey Company (targeting production and maintenance workers), Portillo’s Hot Dogs, Williams-Sonoma and La Maestra Community Health Centers, a federally qualified health center that serves low-income and immigrant communities in San Diego, among others.

    His partner on the new job here in Orlando — Fernando Rivera — also has a history of targeting Teamsters’ union drives. According to Vice, Rivera was hired by Amazon in 2022 to obstruct organizing efforts by contracted Amazon delivery drivers, who ultimately voted to join the union anyway.

    As Vice reported at the time, Amazon’s hiring of anti-union consultants was notable due to the fact that Amazon had repeatedly argued that these drivers were contracted drivers technically employed by a third-party company, not Amazon itself.

    The Teamsters claimed this was just Amazon’s way of evading responsibility for recognizing the drivers’ union — and said the company’s hiring of so-called “union busters” was proof of the ruse. Amazon has spent millions of dollars on anti-union consultants, including several that are reportedly based in Central Florida.

    The more you know

    Under federal law, anti-union consultants — also known as “persuaders” — are required to file reports known as LM-20s with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Labor Management Services when they enter into agreements with employers.

    When filled out correctly, these reports offer a basic snapshot of what these consultants are being hired to do and how much they’re being paid for it.

    According to the Economic Policy Institute, companies spend hundreds of millions of dollars on anti-union persuaders each year, although due to lackluster enforcement of reporting requirements, not all of it is publicly reported. Employers, by law, must also file reports, known as LM-10s, detailing how much they’ve spent on this persuader activity.

    It’s common for employers to report spending thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of dollars on persuaders. As HuffPost reported in their five-part series on the union-busting industry last summer, it’s also not uncommon for former union officials who are spurned or ousted from office to later switch sides and make bank as professional union busters.

    Joseph Brock, a self-described “unabashed liberal union buster” who may or may not work out of Apollo Beach, Florida, is one of them. Then there’s the Flores brothers, former Unite Here organizer-turned-union-buster Lupe Cruz, and David Grima, who formerly served as president of a United Auto Workers local before he was ousted from his post for alleged internal election misconduct.

    A spokesperson for the Teamsters told HuffPost last year that this kind of switch by a former union official “really brings into question what their [the persuaders’] values were, if they ever had any to begin with.”

    Sometimes, persuaders will even use pseudonyms to hide their real identities from workers, or (unlawfully) report inaccurate or incomplete information in reports submitted to OLMS.

    Once they’re hired on, persuaders will spread the employer’s anti-union message by, at times, training managers or supervisors (who aren’t eligible to join the union) to talk down the union without breaking federal law.

    Action Resources, a Nevada-based labor relations firm prides itself on helping employers in “fending off an organizing campaign”

    tweet this

    They are also known to hold one-on-one or so-called “captive audience” meetings with workers during work hours, featuring presentations on what they depict as the “truth about unions.” Workers for companies like Amazon, Trader Joe’s and Chipotle have described such meetings as manipulative, and several states — not including Florida — have even moved to ban them.

    Faneitty, the local Teamsters organizer, said that a language barrier for drivers here makes it easier for the employer to exploit and take advantage of them. Many drivers, he explained, came from other countries, and don’t know their legal rights as workers under U.S. law. As The Intercept has reported, the union avoidance industry has been diversifying itself in order to accommodate such changes in unionizing workforces.

    Common messages from persuaders, who may depict themselves as a neutral third party, include that union staffers offer false promises or will force workers to go on strike whenever they feel like it. Another common talking point is that unions only serve to stuff the pockets of politicians and union leaders with members’ dues.

    “The company hires these people to basically lie to them,” Faneitty said, with distaste. One driver he reached out to said he’d walked out of one of the company’s recent captive-audience meetings because he was pro-union and “because he got tired of hearing the lies.”

    A Barnes & Noble College Bookstore worker up in New Jersey told Orlando Weekly last year that a persuader hired through an Orlando-based firm subjected one of their Black co-workers to a comparison of union membership to “chattel slavery.”

    Brothers Gustavo and Carlos Flores also found themselves in trouble for things they said during a counter-campaign they were hired to lead against a unionization effort at Alstyle Apparel in California in 2005.

    Their conduct during the job was flagged in a complaint filed with the federal labor board, which later wrote in their decision that, according to multiple workers, Gus described “potential consequences” of unionizing that included “stymied bargaining and strikes with resultant plant closure and or job loss, drawing on recent, widespread grocery store strikes as illustrative examples.”

    Flores reportedly shared a similar message with Colectivo Coffee workers who unionized their own shop in Milwaukee a few years ago, and was paid $29,104 to do so. Before their IBEW contract, that could’ve been a year’s pay for some Colectivo workers.

    Threatening job loss as a result of unionization is illegal under the National Labor Relations Act. So is firing workers, demoting them, or giving them less hours for supporting organizing efforts or for engaging in lawful strikes.

    Former President Donald Trump doesn’t know this, apparently, and is now facing his own labor complaint over it. The United Auto Workers union, which has repeatedly called Trump a “scab,” filed a complaint against the Republican presidential nominee Tuesday, after Trump voiced support for (illegally) firing striking workers on X.

    Trump has crossed a picket line before — during the filming of his show The Apprentice — and Trump-owned hotels have in the past also hired their own union busters, paying them hundreds of thousands of dollars in an effort to keep the hotels union-free. Even so, the former president has been courting the Teamsters in his bid to return to the White House.

    Action Resources did not respond to a request from Orlando Weekly for an explanation of the work they’ve been hired to do in Florida, nor did the Teamsters international union, when asked for comment on the DHL Express service provider’s agreement with the firm. More than 1,300 DHL workers in Kentucky officially joined the Teamsters this week.

    Faneitty, the local organizer, however, expressed frustration over the company’s hiring of professional union busters to trash-talk the union. Persuaders “build a narrative,” said Faneitty, that organizing collectively to better people’s working conditions isn’t the answer to their problems. “It’s discouraging,” he said, that the law “allows them to hire these people.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Union has 4-word response after suspension of some driverless cars in CA

    Union has 4-word response after suspension of some driverless cars in CA

    [ad_1]

    A local Teamsters union in California said the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) responded “too little, too late” in deciding to suspend permits for some driverless vehicles.

    The California DMV announced the “immediate” suspension of General Motors’ Cruise autonomous vehicle testing permits on Tuesday, writing in a press release that it determined based on the driverless vehicles’ performance that they “are not safe for the public’s operation” and that their manufacturer “misrepresented any information related to safety of the autonomous technology of its vehicles.”

    Teamsters Western Region International Vice President and Secretary-Treasurer Peter Finn of Teamsters Local 856 said in a press release that the DMV’s decision “is a step in the right direction, but it’s too little, too late.” Finn added that the Northern California labor union “will not be appeased by baby steps or half-measures.”

    A driverless car from General Motors’ Cruise division is photographed driving through traffic in the Mission Bay neighborhood of San Francisco, California, on May 21, 2019. The California DMV issued an immediate suspension of Cruise driverless vehicle testing permits on Tuesday.
    Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

    The union also expressed disappointment that the California DMV said Cruise could later apply to have its driverless permits reinstated, though the state agency “will not approve until the company has fulfilled the requirements to the department’s satisfaction.”

    Finn said in the Teamsters release that regulators “should have enough foresight and operational savvy to know that the responsible thing to do is to make sure that automated driving systems are safe before they are introduced to the general public – not after they are introduced, and certainly not after driverless cars have caused traffic jams, injuries, and obstructions to first responders.”

    Newsweek reached out to the California DMV for comment via email on Tuesday.

    The Teamsters rallied outside Cruise’s San Francisco headquarters earlier Tuesday to push for “real regulation” of driverless vehicles, including Cruise’s robotaxis. At the rally, which was streamed live on Facebook, participants cited a recent National Highway Traffic Safety Administration probe into Cruise about pedestrian-related safety concerns. This review followed an earlier agreement that Cruise would reduce its number of operational driverless vehicles in San Francisco while a couple of crashes were investigated, according to the Associated Press.

    California’s Public Utilities Commission granted approval in August to Cruise and another driverless car company, Waymo LLC, to begin charging riders for transportation regardless of time of day in San Francisco. Prior to that decision, Cruise was allowed to charge people for driverless rides in the city between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. or offer rides for free at any time of day. In order to charge passengers during the daytime, Cruise previously needed to have a safety driver accompanying passengers in its autonomous vehicles.

    In a Tuesday post on X, formerly Twitter, Cruise acknowledged the California DMV’s Tuesday decision and said it “will be pausing” driverless vehicle operations in San Francisco. While the company said its vehicles are created and used to “save lives,” the company statement acknowledged one recent crash it said the California DMV is investigating. The crash involved a human driver striking a pedestrian, who then fell in a Cruise driverless vehicle’s path, the company said.

    “The AV braked aggressively before impact and because it detected a collision, it attempted to pull over to avoid further safety issues,” the statement said. “When the AV tried to pull over, it continued before coming to a final stop, pulling the pedestrian forward.” The company said it shared information on the incident with state and federal authorities, communicated with local police and has been “in close contact with regulators to answer questions.”

    “Our teams are currently doing an analysis to identify potential enhancements to the AV’s response to this kind of extremely rare event,” the statement added.