ReportWire

Tag: tax cut

  • Lawmakers urged to ‘opt out’ of federal mandates

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Unions, advocates for low-income workers and other groups urged state lawmakers on Thursday to permanently “opt out” of several new federal laws enacted as part of President Donald Trump’s tax cut and policy bill, warning of the impact on the state’s coffers.

    The Legislature’s Revenue Committee is considering a proposal by Gov. Maura Healey that would delay implementation of what she described as the five “most costliest” changes in federal tax code created by Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act until next year.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 =68:D=2E:@? H@F=5 2==@H E96 DE2E6 😕 E96 7FEFC6 E@ “2FE@>2E:42==J” 56=2J 3J FA E@ @?6 J62C :>A=6>6?E2E:@? @7 2?J 7656C2= E2I A@=:4J 492?86D E92E 6I4665 2 Sa_ >:==:@? :>A24E @? DE2E6 C6G6?F6 4@==64E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmqFE =2H>2<6CD 2C6 36:?8 FC865 E@ 8@ 7FCE96C E92? w62=6J’D AC@A@D2= 3J A6C>2?6?E=J @AE:?8 @FE @7 E96 ?6H E2I CF=6D – 2 AC@46DD D 2?5 D6CG:46D]k^Am

    kAm“(6 FC86 J@F E@ 4@>A=6E6=J @AE @FE @7 E96 E2I 492?86D C2E96C E92? ;FDE 56=2J:?8 E96>[” !9:?62D q2I2?52==[ A@=:4J 5:C64E@C 7@C E96 |2DD249FD6EED qF586E 2?5 !@=:4J r6?E6C[ 2 =67E=62?:?8 E9:?< E2?<[ E@=5 E96 A2?6= %9FCD52J 5FC:?8 2 962C:?8 @? E96 3:==]k^Am

    kAm“|2DD249FD6EED 92D 2? @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ 36EE6C AC@E64E @FC 7:?2?4:2= D64FC:EJ 2?5 C6;64E E96 :?6BF:E23=6 2?5 :?67764E:G6 A@=:4:6D 36:?8 E9CFDE FA@? FD 3J E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[” q2I2?52== D2:5]k^Am

    kAm|2I !286[ AC6D:56?E @7 E96 |2DD249FD6EED %62496CD pDD@4:2E:@?[ E@=5 E96 A2?6= E92E E96 “F?H:D6 %CF>A E2I 4FED” H@F=5 >62? =6DD >@?6J 7@C D49@@=D 2?5 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED 2=C625J DECF88=:?8 2>:5 C:D:?8 4@DED] w6 DF886DE65 E96C6 2C6 @E96C C62D@?D 7@C C6;64E:?8 E96 E2I 492?86D]k^Am

    kAm“v@:?8 2=@?8 H:E9 E96D6 %CF>A#6AF3=:42? E2I 4FED 😀 8@:?8 2=@?8 H:E9 %CF>A’D AC@8C2> @7 AF?:D9:?8 DE2E6D 2?5 H62<6?:?8 :?G6DE>6?ED 😕 E96 AF3=:4 D64E@C[ 2?5 A:EE:?8 FD 282:?DE @?6 2?@E96C 😕 2? 2E>@DA96C6 @7 2FDE6C:EJ[” 96 D2:5 😕 C6>2C2?J DE2E6D 2C6 564@FA=:?8]”k^Am

    kAmuC2?< r2==292?[ AC6D:56?E @7 E96 |2DD249FD6EED qF:=5:?8 %C256D r@F?4:=[ 2=D@ 42==65 @? =2H>2<6CD E@ C6HC:E6 w62=6J’D 3:== E@ A6C>2?6?E=J @AE @FE @7 E96 ?6H E2I =2HD[ H9:49 96 D2:5 H@F=5 >62? =6DD >@?6J 7@C AF3=:4=J 7F?565 4@?DECF4E:@? AC@;64ED E92E 36?67:E F?:@?:K65 H@C<6CD]k^Am

    kAm“&?=6DD H6 24E E@ 564@FA=6 7C@> E96 ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:== 24E[ DE2E6 286?4:6D[ >F?:4:A2=:E:6D[ 9@DA:E2=D[ F?:G6CD:E:6D 2?5 @E96CD H:== 36 7@C465 E@ 4FE 324< @C 6=:>:?2E6 DA6?5:?8 @? 4C:E:42= :?7C2DECF4EFC6 H96C6 @FC >6>36CD 62C?65 E96:C =:G:?8 @? 2 52JE@52J 32D:D[” 96 E@=5 E96 A2?6=]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 9:D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:==[ E96 46?E6CA:646 @7 9:D 64@?@>:4 286?52[ :?E@ =2H @? yF=J c 27E6C :E A2DD65 3@E9 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6 😕 2 =2C86=J A2CE:D2? G@E6]k^Am

    kAm|6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 #6AD] $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 {@C: %C292?[ G@E65 😕 F?:D@? 282:?DE E96 Sb]d EC:==:@? DA6?5:?8 3:==]k^Am

    kAms:776C6?E A2E9k^Am

    kAmw62=6J 2?5 @E96C s6>@4C2E:4 DE2E6 =6256CD H2C? E96 ?6H =2H H:== 7@C46 E96 DE2E6 E@ 4FE 36?67:ED 7@C E6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 =@H:?4@>6 |65:42:5 C64:A:6?ED 2?5 5:D>2?E=6 7@@5 :?D64FC:EJ AC@8C2>D E92E 92G6 D66? 56>2?5 DFC86 😕 E96 H2<6 @7 E96 A2?56>:4] %96 DE2E6 😀 2=C625J E2<:?8 2 Sb]f 3:==:@? 9:E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAmu:?2?46 $64C6E2CJ |2EE96H v@CK<@H:4K E@=5 E96 u:?2?46 r@>>:EE66 @? %9FCD52J E92E E96 8@G6C?@C’D AC@A@D2= “DEC:<6D 2 32=2?46” 36EH66? E96 ?665 E@ @77D6E E96 :>>65:2E6 :>A24E @7 E96 ?6H 7656C2= E2I =2HD H9:=6 6?DFC:?8 |2DD249FD6EED 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 E2IA2J6CD 36?67:E 7C@> E96 492?86D]k^Am

    kAm“|2?J DE2E6D 2C6 724:?8 D:>:=2C D:EF2E:@?D 2?5 92G6 49@D6? E@ D:>A=J 564@FA=6 4@>A=6E6=J 7C@> E96 7656C2= 492?86D[ :?4=F5:?8 |2:?6[ }6H *@C<[ #9@56 xD=2?5 2?5 @E96CD[” 96 E@=5 E96 A2?6=] “(6 92G6 49@D6? 2 5:776C6?E A2E9]”k^Am

    kAmv@CK<@H:4K D2:5 E96 7656C2= E2I 4FED 2C6 AC@;64E65 E@ C65F46 DE2E6 C6G6?F6 3J >@C6 E92? Scca >:==:@? 😕 E96 7:D42= J62C E92E 3682? 😕 yF=J[ “=62G:?8 2 =2C86 82A E@ 7:== 😕 2? 2=C625J E:89E 3F586E]” %92E’D 3642FD6 |2DD249FD6EED 2FE@>2E:42==J 25;FDED :ED 4@CA@C2E6 E2I 4@56D E@ 7656C2= 492?86D]k^Am

    kAmp>@?8 E96 E2I C6=:67 AC@G:D:@?D w62=6J H2?ED E@ 56=2J 😀 @?6 E92E H@F=5 6?23=6 3FD:?6DD6D E@ 7F==J 565F4E 5@>6DE:4 C6D62C49 2?5 6IA6C:>6?E2= 4@DED H:E9:? E96 J62C E92E E9@D6 6IA6?D6D 2C6 :?4FCC65]k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 A=2?[ 3FD:?6DD6D H:== DE:== 36 23=6 E@ “FE:=:K6” E96 492?86 @? E96:C A2J>6?ED 7@C E2I J62C a_ae[ 3FE E96 DE2E6 H:== 2G@:5 =@D:?8 Sagg >:==:@? 😕 E96 ?6IE 7:D42= J62C[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Healey seeks to delay federal tax cuts

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Democratic Gov. Maura Healey is seeking to blunt the impact to state coffers from changes to the federal tax code under President Donald Trump’s new tax cuts and policy law, but business groups say the move would hurt Massachusetts’ competitiveness.

    Healey has filed legislation that would delay implementation of what she described as the five “most costliest” changes in federal tax code created by Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act until next year.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmp?@E96C AC@G:D:@? @7 E96 AC@A@D2=[ H9:49 C6BF:C6D =68:D=2E:G6 2AAC@G2=[ H@F=5 2==@H E96 DE2E6 😕 E96 7FEFC6 E@ “2FE@>2E:42==J” 56=2J 3J FA E@ @?6 J62C :>A=6>6?E2E:@? @7 2?J 7656C2= E2I A@=:4J 492?86D E92E 6I4665 2 Sa_ >:==:@? :>A24E @? DE2E6 C6G6?F6 4@==64E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 =6EE6C E@ =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD[ w62=6J D2:5 E96 AC@A@D2= 😀 2 “E9@F89E7F=[ A92D65:? 2AAC@249” E@ :>A=6>6?E:?8 7656C2= E2I C67@C>D 2E E96 DE2E6 =6G6= “E92E H:== 6?DFC6 @FC 4FCC6?E 7:D42= C62C a_ae 3F586E – 2?5 E96 4C:E:42= D6CG:46D :E AC@G:56D – C6>2:?D :?E24E” H9:=6 2=D@ AC@G:5:?8 E2I C6=:67]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 2AAC@249 H:== 2==@H |2DD249FD6EED E@ DAC625 E96 E2I C6G6?F6 :>A24E @7 E96 ~qqqp AC@G:D:@?D @G6C >F=E:A=6 7:D42= J62CD H9:=6 36?67:4:2C:6D H:== :>>65:2E6=J D66 E96 E2I 36?67:E @7 ~qqqp 2E E96 7656C2= =6G6= 2?5 C62=:K6 E96 7F== 36?67:ED 2E E96 DE2E6 =6G6= 😕 @?6 E@ EH@ J62CD[” w62=6J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAmp>@?8 E96 E2I C6=:67 AC@G:D:@?D w62=6J H2?ED E@ 56=2J 😀 @?6 E92E H@F=5 6?23=6 3FD:?6DD6D E@ 7F==J 565F4E 5@>6DE:4 C6D62C49 2?5 6IA6C:>6?E2= 4@DED H:E9:? E96 J62C E92E E9@D6 6IA6?D6D 2C6 :?4FCC65]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J D2:5 F?56C 96C A=2?[ 3FD:?6DD6D H:== DE:== 36 23=6 E@ “FE:=:K6” E96 492?86 @? E96:C A2J>6?ED 7@C E2I J62C a_ae 3FE E96 DE2E6 H:== 2G@:5 =@D:?8 Sagg >:==:@? 😕 E96 ?6IE 7:D42= J62C]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J[ H9@ 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 7:=6 96C AC6=:>:?2CJ 3F586E ?6IE H66<[ D2:5 D96 C64@8?:K6D >2?J 3FD:?6DD6D “DE2?5 E@ 36?67:E 7C@> E96 ?6H E2I CF=6D[ 2?5 |2DD249FD6EED[ 😕 86?6C2=[ H:== 36 😕 2 36EE6C 4@>A6E:E:G6 A@D:E:@? 4@>A2C65 E@ @FC 4@>A6E:E@C DE2E6D :7 E96D6 AC@G:D:@?D 2C6 2==@H65 E@ E2<6 67764E]”k^Am

    kAmqFE D96 D2:5 96C A=2? “32=2?46D E92E 8@2= 282:?DE E96 C62=:EJ E92E @FC 23:=:EJ E@ 56=:G6C E96 AC@8C2>D 2?5 D6CG:46D A2:5 7@C E9C@F89 E96 3F586E E92E @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D[ D49@@=D[ H@C<6CD 2?5 >@DE GF=?6C23=6 C6D:56?ED C6=J @? H@F=5 36 2E C:D< :7 E96 C6G6?F6 :>A24ED 2C6 ?@E >:E:82E65]”k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 9:D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:==[ E96 46?E6CA:646 @7 9:D 64@?@>:4 286?52[ :?E@ =2H 😕 yF=J 27E6C :E A2DD65 3@E9 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6 😕 2 =2C86=J A2CE:D2? G@E6]k^Am

    kAm|6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 &]$] #6AD] $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 {@C: %C292?[ G@E65 😕 F?:D@? 282:?DE E96 Sb]d EC:==:@? DA6?5:?8 3:==]k^Am

    kAmqFE w62=6J D2:5 E96 E:>:?8 @7 E96 E2I 4FED 8@:?8 :?E@ 67764E E9:D J62C F?56C E96 3:== 8:G6D q624@? w:==’D 3F586E HC:E6CD =:EE=6 E:>6 E@ A=2? 7@C E96 6DE:>2E65 Scca >:==:@? 7:D42= :>A24E @7 E96 7656C2= E2I A@=:4J 492?86D @? E96 DE2E6’D @A6C2E:?8 C6G6?F6D]k^Am

    kAm“p?5 H6 2C6 ?@E 2=@?6[” D96 HC@E6] “$E2E6D 2C@F?5 E96 4@F?ECJ 2C6 724:?8 2?5 92G6 >256 D:>:=2C 49@:46D 23@FE :7 2?5 H96? E@ :>A=6>6?E ~qqqp E2I 492?86D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Hernando County Commission Chairman Brian Hawkins Delivers State of the County Address Highlighting Major Tax Cuts, Low Debt, and Landmark Fiscal Reforms

    [ad_1]

    Hernando County Achieves One of Florida’s Largest Tax Reductions While Strengthening Long-Term Infrastructure and Safety Investments.

    Hernando County Chairman Brian Hawkins Announces Historic Tax Cuts: Millage Set at 3% Below Rollback Rate

    In his State of the County address today, Hernando County Commission Chairman Brian Hawkins unveiled a comprehensive fiscal strategy delivering significant taxpayer relief while securing the county’s long-term future. Highlighting a debt ratio of less than 3%-one of the lowest in Florida-Hawkins announced landmark reforms that prioritize infrastructure, public safety, and conservation.

    A True Tax Cut: 3% Below Rollback Chairman Hawkins underscored the Board’s decisive vote to set the maximum millage at 3% below the rollback rate. By going below the rollback-the rate needed to generate the same revenue as the previous year-the Board has enacted a true reduction in tax burden, projected to be one of the most aggressive tax cuts in the state this year.

    “We didn’t just hold the line; we pushed it back,” said Chairman Hawkins. “At a moment when families are feeling the pressure of inflation, Hernando County is actively reducing its revenue intake to keep money in the pockets of the people who earned it.”

    Ending Wasteful Budgeting Habits Hawkins also announced the elimination of a decade-old policy requiring a blanket 20% contingency reserve on capital projects. This reform unlocks tens of millions of dollars previously frozen by “lazy budgeting.”

    “We have modernized a broken system,” Hawkins stated. “By tying project contingencies to actual engineering data rather than arbitrary percentages, we have freed up millions for real needs: roads, parks, and safety.”

    Strategic Investments & Stability Leveraging the county’s strong credit and low debt, Hawkins outlined an aggressive investment plan:

    Infrastructure: Long-term road and utility projects supported by responsible bonding.

    Public Safety: Enhanced capabilities for the Sheriff, Fire, and Emergency Services.

    Conservation & Tourism: Strategic use of stabilized bed tax revenues to preserve the Hernando Beach Tower and protect coastal preserves.

    “We are lowering taxes, reducing debt, modernizing outdated systems, and investing in a future that works for every resident,” Hawkins concluded. “The state of Hernando County is strong-and getting stronger.”

    MEDIA CONTACT: Office of Commissioner Brian Hawkins Hernando County Board of County Commissioners Phone: (352) 587-3000 Email: bhawkins@hernandocounty.us Website: www.hernandocounty.us

    Source: BOCC

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rep. Burgess Owens hosts roundtable: How no tax on tips, overtime will benefit Utahns

    [ad_1]

    Utah Rep. Burgess Owens and fellow Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., joined with a number of local stakeholders Friday to discuss how Utahns will benefit from the Working Families Tax Cut Act.

    Part of the discussion, held at MACU offices in Sandy, focused on ways the legislation will benefit Utahns, including no tax on tips and no tax on overtime provisions, as well as a boost in support for school choice. Stakeholders involved in the roundtable included think tank members, members of business associations and leaders of private school systems.

    According to Owens, who is Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee chairman, the legislation is the largest tax cut in the history of the U.S.

    “The real benefit of this bill is that it impacts everyone,” said Melva Sine, the CEO and president of the Utah Restaurant Association.

    “It gives us all more discretionary income so that we can enjoy the services, whether it’s a private school, whether it’s going out and enjoying your favorite restaurant more often, whatever that might be, this provides discretionary income for us all to enjoy using the services and the things that are available in our communities,” she added.

    Rep. Burgess Owens, R-Utah, visits the Utah State Correctional Facility in Salt Lake City on Monday, Aug. 4, 2025. | Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

    What Rep. Burgess Owens said about the Working Families Tax Cut Act

    “This act, which was passed recently, is a true miracle,” Owens said. “We’re recognizing the folks who made our country what it is. It’s our working class, middle class. It’s those who go out every single day, and they dream big, and all they want is just an opportunity to not only work hard, but hold on to what they have.”

    Pointing out that this is the largest tax cut in the country’s history, Owens said it will amount to $5 trillion over the next 10 years and is equal to an average of 15% tax cuts for Americans.

    The congressman also highlighted the new investment accounts for newborns included in the legislation, sharing how this will help contribute to fiscal responsibility education.

    Owens also said that this legislation is Congress recognizing that what they do is “truly at the front edge of our country’s freedom, our culture, our ability to educate our kids, ability to let them go out and have a good career, build their families, dream big, and a place of safety.”

    How no tax on tips will impact Utahns

    During the roundtable, Owens asked Sine to share how the no tax on tips provision will affect Utahns, specifically restaurant workers.

    Open Restaurants _sg_05.JPG

    Server Brennan Feller prepares curbside pickup orders at Market Street Grill in Cottonwood Heights on Tuesday, April 28, 2020. | Steve Griffin, Deseret News

    Sine shared that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of restaurant workers in Utah dropped from 111,000 to 63,000. There are now 123,000 restaurant employees in Utah, but they are still working on building that number.

    “Anything that can come along that can help incentivize these people to want to work, because our industry is an industry of work, you have to love work, you have to love hard work, you have to love people, and so this bill has helped us to entertain and create more job opportunities,” Sine said.

    She added that not only will this help incentivize people to join the industry, it will also help tipped employees to make more money.

    Walberg, who is Education and Workforce Committee chairman, said that when he goes to restaurants, he will write on the receipt, “I love no tax on tips,” which will lead to a discussion with the waiter or waitress about the provision.

    “It was more than just the money for them, it was the fact that they were appreciated to be tipped, but also they could make more. They could choose how to make more, and they wouldn’t be just the hourly employee in some of their minds. They were entrepreneurs. They were independent workers,” the congressman said.

    How no tax on overtime will impact Utahns

    Casey Hill, state director for the National Federation of Independent Businesses in Utah, was asked to share how the no tax on overtime provision of the bill will impact Utah’s businesses and employees.

    “If you think about the individuals who are typically earning or working overtime, those are typically some of your highest-producing, hardest-working individuals, and to further incentivize them to work and to engage more, take more of their hard-earned dollars home is significant for our employers,” Hill said.

    He said that 99% of the state’s employers have less than 500 employees, making Utah a “small business driven state,” meaning that “anything that impacts in a positive way small businesses will impact Utah in a significantly positive way.”

    This tax relief will go directly to individuals, allowing them to reinvest that into the economy in a number of ways.

    Hill also pointed out that many people talked about how giving tax dollars back to citizens is a loss of revenue for the state or federal government. He said that in most cases that revenue actually goes up because spending and investing increases.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Report: Mass. taxpayers to get big tax cut in 2026

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts taxpayers will receive a big break next year under President Donald Trump’s recently enacted spending package, according to a new report.

    The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank, estimates that Bay Staters will see their taxes cut by an average of $5,139 in 2026 under Trump’s so-called One Big Beautiful Bill – the third-largest reduction in the nation following Wyoming and Washington state.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 E2I H2E495@8 8C@FA AC@;64ED E9@D6 4FED H:== 5C@A D=:89E=J E@ 2? 2G6C286 @7 Sc[fad 😕 a_af[ Sc[eae 😕 a_ag 2?5 Sc[_`b 😕 a_ah 2D D@>6 >62DFC6D 😕 E96 >2DD:G6 E2I 2?5 A@=:4J 3:== 6IA:C6[ 367@C6 :?4C62D:?8 E@ Sc[dgc 😕 a_bd] %9@D6 4FED C2?86 7C@> :?4C62D65 DE2?52C5 565F4E:@?D E@ C2:D:?8 E96 42A @? DE2E6 2?5 =@42= E2I 565F4E:@?D[ E96 8C@FA D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@;64E65 E2I 4FED G2CJ 3J 4@F?EJ[ H:E9 |:55=6D6I r@F?EJ 6IA64E65 E@ D66 E96 =2C86DE 2G6C286 564C62D6 – Sf[_gd ?6IE J62C[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD D2:5] x? tDD6I r@F?EJ[ E96 2G6C286 E2I 4FE ?6IE J62C H:== 36 Sc[hee[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H =2H 😀 2=D@ 6IA64E65 E@ 4C62E6 2E =62DE af[h_h ;@3D 😕 |2DD249FD6EED[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?]k^Am

    kAm}2E:@?H:56[ E96 2G6C286 E2I 4FE 7@C a_ae H:== 36 Sb[fda 3642FD6 @7 %CF>A’D DA6?5:?8 A24<286[ H9:49 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 4C62E6 ?62C=J ` >:==:@? ;@3D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 9:D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:==[ E96 46?E6CA:646 @7 9:D 64@?@>:4 286?52[ :?E@ =2H @? yF=J c 27E6C :E A2DD65 3@E9 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6 😕 2 =2C86=J A2CE:D2? G@E6]k^Am

    kAm|6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 #6AD] $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 {@C: %C292?[ G@E65 282:?DE E96 DA6?5:?8 3:==]k^Am

    kAmv@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 2?5 @E96C DE2E6 =6256CD H2C? E96 3:==’D AC@G:D:@?D 4@F=5 7@C46 E96 DE2E6 E@ 4FE 36?67:ED 7@C E6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 =@H:?4@>6 |65:42:5 C64:A:6?ED 2?5 5:D>2?E=6 7@@5 :?D64FC:EJ AC@8C2>D E92E 92G6 D66? 56>2?5 DFC86 😕 E96 H2<6 @7 E96 A2?56>:4]k^Am

    kAm%96J D2J E96 =68:D=2E:@?’D Shb_ 3:==:@? 4FE E@ 7656C2= |65:42:5 7F?5:?8 H:== 7@C46 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C DE2E6D E@ >2<6 4@CC6DA@?5:?8 4FED E@ E96:C AC@8C2>D @C A:4< FA 2 8C62E6C D92C6 @7 @3=:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm%96 3:==’D A92D6@FE @7 |65:42:5 AC@G:56C E2I6D 2?5 5:C64E A2J>6?ED[ H9:49 DE2E6D FD6 E@ 96=A 7F?5 E96:C D92C6 @7 AC@8C2> 4@DED[ H@F=5 2=D@ 9FCE[ @77:4:2=D D2J]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A’D 3:== H@F=5 2=D@ 7@C46 DE2E6D E@ A:4< FA 2 =2C86C A@CE:@? @7 4@DED 7@C E96 7656C2==J 7F?565 “7@@5 DE2>A” AC@8C2>[ H9:49 DE2E6 =6256CD 2?5 25G@42E6D D2J H:== 9FCE ?665J 72>:=:6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 E96 492?86D 4@F=5 4@DE |2DD249FD6EED FA E@ Sf`_ >:==:@? 2 J62C[ H9:49 E96 DE2E6 42??@E 277@C5]k^Am

    kAmqFE E2IA2J6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C DE2E6D 2C6 6IA64E65 E@ 36?67:E 7C@> 2 AC@G:D:@? @7 E96 =2H E92E C2:D6D E96 42A @? DE2E6 2?5 =@42= E2I 565F4E:@?D @G6C E96 ?6IE 7:G6 J62CD E@ Sc_[___ 7@C E9@D6 >2<:?8 =6DD E92? Sd__[___ A6C J62C[ 6IA2?565 49:=5 E2I 4C65:E 2?5 DE2?52C5 565F4E:@?D[ 2?5 2 C65F4E:@? 😕 E96 E2I @? E:AD 2?5 @G6CE:>6 A2J[ 2>@?8 @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 (9:E6 w@FD6 E@FE65 E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?’D C6A@CE 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E[ 42==:?8 E96 ?6H =2H E96 >@DE D:8?:7:42?E =68:D=2E:G6 492?86D E@ 7656C2= E2I A@=:4J D:?46 E96 a_`f %2I rFED 2?5 y@3D p4E[ H9:49 H2D A2DD65 😕 %CF>A’D 7:CDE AC6D:56?4J]k^Am

    kAm“!C6D:56?E %CF>A’D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:== 😀 E96 =2C86DE[ >@DE 4@?D6BF6?E:2= E2I 4FE @? E96 >:55=6 4=2DD 6G6C] }@H[ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@? – E96 =625:?8 ?@?A2CE:D2? E2I A@=:4J ?@?AC@7:E – 4@?7:C>D E92E[” (9:E6 w@FD6 56AFEJ AC6DD D64C6E2CJ p??2 z6==J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “q6EH66? =@H6C :?7=2E:@?[ >2DD:G6 :?G6DE>6?ED[ 2?5 9:DE@C:4 E2I 4FED[ 2== p>6C:42?D 2C6 C62A:?8 E96 36?67:ED @7 E96 %CF>A t4@?@>J – 2?5 E96 v@=56? p86 92D ;FDE 368F?]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Is Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill the biggest tax cut ever?

    [ad_1]

    Vice President JD Vance hit the road Aug. 21 to promote President Donald Trump’s legislative accomplishment, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill.

    The law permanently extended tax cuts from a 2017 law Trump signed, which would have expired at the end of 2025 had Congress not reauthorized them. The law also included some new tax cuts, including for tips, overtime and Americans 65 and older.

    Speaking in Peachtree City near Atlanta, Vance said, “We had the biggest tax cut for families that this country has ever seen.”

    The tax cuts were significant, but they weren’t the biggest in U.S. history — which was a phrase Trump has often used to inaccurately describe his 2017 tax cut law. The 2025 tax cuts rank either third-biggest since 1980 or tied for seventh, depending on the yardstick.

    At the same time, many Americans could see relatively modest changes to the taxes they owe starting in 2026, because the 2025 law mostly extended existing tax cuts.

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    The White House did not provide a response before publication.

    Comparing historical tax cut laws

    We examined the tax revenue decreases from major laws passed since 1980. (On balance, most tax laws prior to 1980 either raised taxes or cut them modestly.)

    Tax bill dollar amounts tend to rise over time because of inflation, so we looked at tax cuts as a percentage of gross domestic product, which evens out the differences over time. And because some early laws have tax cut data available only for the first five or six years of the law’s life, we compared laws by looking at the cumulative tax savings during a law’s first five years in effect.

    We found that the law with the biggest tax savings was 1981 legislation passed by the Democratic Congress and signed by President Ronald Reagan, who won office promising large tax cuts. That law cut taxes by 3.5% of the nation’s cumulative five-year GDP.

    A 2012 bill passed by the Republican Congress and signed by President Barack Obama ranked second. That bill, which cut taxes by 1.7% of GDP, extended the tax cuts passed in 2003 under President George W. Bush.

    Based on current projections, Trump’s 2025 law ranks third at 1.4% of GDP when factoring in Trump’s 2017 cuts. 

    Trump’s 2017 law ranks fourth at 1%, tied with a 2010 law Obama signed that extended Bush’s 2001 tax cuts. Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts ranked sixth and seventh, with 0.7% and 0.5, respectively. 

    If considering only new tax cuts and not the reupped 2017 tax cuts, then Trump’s 2025 law would tie for seventh at 0.5% of GDP.

     

    Joseph Rosenberg, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, told PolitiFact that it’s legitimate to measure the scale of the cuts in the 2025 tax law either way. 

    What will ordinary Americans see in their taxes starting in 2026?

    There could be a disconnect between the historical scale of Trump’s 2025 bill and the impact that ordinary Americans will notice when filing 2026 taxes.

    Because Americans are already paying the lower rates that began in 2017 and that the 2025 law extended, they won’t necessarily notice a sizable reduction in taxes owed. 

    “For most families, they are going to see a child tax credit that increases by a maximum of $200 per child — from $2,000 to $2,200,” said Margot Crandall-Hollick, principal research associate at the Tax Policy Center. “Some are going to pay a little less because of the tips and overtime provisions and a slightly higher standard deduction.” 

    The law preserves a more generous standard deduction that had been set to expire and increases it slightly to $15,750 for single filers and $31,500 for joint filers in 2025, to be indexed to inflation annually.

    At the same time, Crandall-Hollick said, some families, especially those with lower incomes, will  pay higher taxes because of the expiration of health insurance premium tax credits, which were not extended by the Big Beautiful Bill.

    Our ruling

    Vance said, “We had the biggest tax cut for families that this country has ever seen.”

    When factoring in the One Big Beautiful Bill’s extension of 2017 tax cuts, then the tax savings from Trump’s 2025 law rank third among tax cut laws since 1980, following bills signed in 1981 by Reagan in 1981 and in 2012 by Obama.

    However, the bottom-line impact on Americans’ tax liability starting in 2026 won’t be as dramatic as the historical tables suggest. Americans are already paying the lower tax rates that began in 2017 and the 2025 law saved from expiration.

    The primary reductions taxpayers will see from the 2025 law will be from new, more limited tax breaks, such as for income from tips and overtime and for Americans 65 and older.

    The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link