ReportWire

Tag: Tax

  • Las Vegas Casinos Push for Urgent Gambling Tax Fix

    Casino operators in Las Vegas have voiced their concerns over a looming change in federal tax law that they say will hit gamblers’ wallets, suppress high-end play, and harm Nevada’s whole tourism-based economy. With January 1, 2026, fast approaching, casino leaders, professional gamblers, and state lawmakers are asking Congress to reinstate a long-standing deduction that allows players to write off gambling losses dollar-for-dollar against winnings.

    High-Volume Players Are Most Affected

    The issue stems from a clause hidden in the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” which reduces the deduction from 100% to 90%. At first sight, it may seem like a minor tweak. But on the casino floor, where betting amounts can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, it means that gamblers may pay tax on money they never actually kept.

    Currently, a gambler who loses $100,000 and eventually wins the same amount owes no taxes since the losses cancel out the gains. However, under the new tax code, only $90,000 of the losses can be deducted, leaving $10,000 to be taxed as if it were profit. High-volume gamblers call that a deal-breaker, while casinos worry the measure will scare off big spenders.

    The Nevada Resort Association has echoed that sentiment, calling the deduction a basic matter of fairness. Taxing net gains, not gross swings, has been standard federal practice for decades. The organization argues that taxing gambling differently punishes players for the volatility that is inherent to the activity.

    This Change Could Lead to Significant Setbacks

    Nevada Congresswoman Dina Titus has been one of the rallying forces behind the push to reverse these changes. Earlier in the year, she introduced the FAIR BET Act and has been pushing the House Ways and Means Committee to move quickly. However, the bill has faced some setbacks despite its broad bipartisan support, leaving its future uncertain.

    The change unfairly burdens professional gamblers and casual players alike and will inevitably drive players toward offshore and unregulated markets.

    Dina Titus, Nevada Congresswoman

    Casino executives say the urgency is real. Derek Stevens, who owns Circa and two other downtown properties, warned that the uncertainty has already affected bookings. He noted that high-limit sports bettors are hesitant to commit to future wagers on major 2026 events, unwilling to risk getting tangled in tax complications if the law remains unchanged.

    No one wants to pay tax on phantom income. This will impact every casual and leisure slot player who hits a jackpot.

    Derek Stevens, Circa Resort & Casino owner

    Professional poker players are another outspoken group, claiming that the new tax rules could make it almost impossible for many players to operate legally in the United States. Leading casino operators share these concerns. MGM Resorts International, the largest employer in Nevada, argued that the change would hurt guests, employees, and the broader economy.

    Deyan Dimitrov

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    Technical Assessment: Bullish in the Intermediate-Term

    Source link

  • IRS considers plans for major new tax credit for millions

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Treasury Department are seeking public feedback on how to implement a new federal tax credit scholarship program created under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which aims to expand school choice and help students cover education-related costs.

    The credit will apply to donations made to scholarship-granting organizations that support elementary and secondary students from low- and middle-income households.

    Under the OBBBA, the tax credit scholarship program is designed primarily to help K–12 students pay for private school tuition, though it also covers a range of other educational expenses. States will decide individually whether to participate in the program.

    This is a developing story. More to follow.

    Source link

  • What is the CRA’s Voluntary Disclosures Program? – MoneySense

    Tax owing still applies but “to be fair to all, the CRA grants a higher level of relief to those who are correcting an error before being contacted than those who are correcting errors after being prompted by communications from the CRA or any other authority of administration.”

    How to quality for the VDP

    There are five primary conditions for the VDP. The disclosure must:

    1. Be voluntary
    2. Include information that relates to a tax year/reporting period that is at least one year/reporting period past the due date
    3. Involve the application of a penalty or interest
    4. Include all known errors or omissions
    5. Include a payment or a request for a payment arrangement

    Recent changes to the VDP

    New guidelines began on October 1, 2025 that impact disclosures related to income tax, sales tax, withholding tax, excise duties, and several other taxes. 

    The application form has been simplified. The four page Form RC199, Voluntary Disclosures Program (VDP) Application can be completed by a taxpayer or their authorized representative. It contains a brief description of the facts relating to the omission or error. 

    The filer must also address the payment of any tax owing, if applicable, or request a payment arrangement to be discussed with a CRA collections officer. 

    Eligibility has also been expanded; if a CRA communication about a potential non-compliance issue prompts the disclosure, it may still be accepted. This differs from past practice. As a result, a CRA education letter about ineligible deductions or unreported income may not prevent a taxpayer from benefitting from the VDP.

    What are the relief provisions?

    There are two tiers of relief that can apply to taxpayers submitting a VDP application:

    1. General relief. This is meant for those who come forward voluntarily without a nudge from CRA. All of the penalties can be waived by CRA, and 75% of the interest on the balance owing. 
    2. Partial relief. An application that is prompted by CRA can still benefit from a full waiver of penalties. However, only 25% of the resulting interest is waived if a CRA communication is what leads to the VDP application. 

    What to do if you have made a tax filing mistake

    If you have unreported income, overstated deductions, or overlooked elections, among other tax filing errors, you should seek to rectify those mistakes as soon as you can. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    An unprompted VDP application can be less painful from an interest perspective and help you sleep better at night if you are aware of an oversight. Although you can file a VDP application on your own, if you do your own taxes, consider getting professional input for a situation like this.

    Leave your question for Jason Heath

    Read more from Ask a Planner:



    About Jason Heath, CFP


    About Jason Heath, CFP

    Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • How This Startup Landed a $300 Million Valuation After Pivoting to ChatGPT

    Like many early adopters, Benjamin Alarie was working with artificial intelligence well before it hit the mainstream. A business law professor at the University of Toronto, he founded the legal tech startup Blue J in 2015 with hopes of applying predictive AI to tax law.

    But only a few years later, generative artificial intelligence—the segment of AI best exemplified by ChatGPT, Claude and other text-generating chatbots—was finally taking off. Users were buying in, private capital was flowing and what had once been a powerful but unflashy software segment was suddenly the center of a consumer-facing boom.

    By then, Alarie told VentureBeat in a recent profile, Blue J had hit a ceiling, with revenue leveling off at around $2 million a year. So he made a high-stakes gamble and went all-in on the emerging genAI trend.

    “Large language models seemed like a very promising direction,” Alarie says of his pivot. Blue J’s earlier tech, predictive machine learning, couldn’t answer every question users asked of it—“Which was really the holy grail,” the Blue J chief executive explains—leading customers to abandon the tool when it let them down.

    Says Alarie: “I had this conviction that if we continued down that path, we weren’t going to be able to address our number one limitation.”

    Yet the generative AI boom offered a way out. After giving his team six months to get him a new product, and then honing the resulting system’s outputs over the last few years, Alarie says that by now he’s cut Blue J’s response time down from a minute and a half to just seconds, and more than quadrupled its net promoter score from 20 to over 80.

    He also credits a partnership with software giant OpenAI, which gives Blue J early access to cutting-edge artificial intelligence models in exchange for real-world feedback.

    It’s all paid off for the company. VentureBeat reports that Blue J’s $122 million Series D, announced this summer, secured the legal tech startup a valuation over $300 million. More than 3,500 different organizations are reportedly on the firm’s client list, including several Fortune 500 companies.

    “What once took tax professionals 15 hours of manual research to do can now be completed in about 15 seconds,” Alarie told VentureBeat. “That value proposition—we can take hours of work and turn it into seconds of work—that is driving a lot of this.”

    Brian Contreras

    Source link