ReportWire

Tag: Tariffs

  • President Trump says he’s ending trade talks with Canada over TV ad

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump said late Thursday that he was ending “all trade negotiations” with Canada because of a television ad opposing U.S. tariffs that he said misstated the facts and called “egregious behavior” aimed at influencing U.S. court decisions.The post on Trump’s social media site came after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he aims to double his country’s exports to countries outside the U.S. because of the threat posed by Trump’s tariffs. Trump’s call for an abrupt end to negotiations could further inflame trade tensions that already have been building between the two neighboring countries for months.Related video above: Earlier this month, Trump explained why a deal with Canada is complicatedTrump posted, “The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.”“The ad was for $75,000. They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts,” Trump wrote on his social media site. “TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”Carney’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The prime minister was set to leave Friday morning for a summit in Asia, while Trump is set to do the same Friday evening.Earlier Thursday night, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute posted on X that an ad created by the government of Ontario “misrepresents the ‘Presidential Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade’ dated April 25, 1987.” It added that Ontario did not receive foundation permission “to use and edit the remarks.”The foundation said it is “reviewing legal options in this matter” and invited the public to watch the unedited video of Reagan’s address.Carney met with Trump earlier this month to try to ease trade tensions, as the two countries and Mexico prepare for a review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement — a trade deal Trump negotiated in his first term, but has since soured on.More than three-quarters of Canadian exports go to the U.S., and nearly $3.6 billion Canadian (US$2.7 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border daily.Trump said earlier this week that he had seen the ad on television and said that it showed that his tariffs were having an impact.“I saw an ad last night from Canada. If I was Canada, I’d take that same ad also,” he said then.In his own post on X last week, Doug Ford, the premier of Ontario, posted a link to the ad and the message: “It’s official: Ontario’s new advertising campaign in the U.S. has launched.”He continued, “Using every tool we have, we’ll never stop making the case against American tariffs on Canada. The way to prosperity is by working together.”A spokesperson for Ford didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday night. But Ford previously got Trump’s attention with an electricity surcharge to U.S. states. Trump responded by doubling steel and aluminum tariffs.The president has moved to impose steep U.S. tariffs on many goods from Canada. In April, Canada’s government imposed retaliatory levies on certain U.S. goods — but it carved out exemptions for some automakers to bring specific numbers of vehicles into the country, known as remission quotas.Trump’s tariffs have especially hurt Canada’s auto sector, much of which is based in Ontario. This month, Stellantis said it would move a production line from Ontario to Illinois

    President Donald Trump said late Thursday that he was ending “all trade negotiations” with Canada because of a television ad opposing U.S. tariffs that he said misstated the facts and called “egregious behavior” aimed at influencing U.S. court decisions.

    The post on Trump’s social media site came after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he aims to double his country’s exports to countries outside the U.S. because of the threat posed by Trump’s tariffs. Trump’s call for an abrupt end to negotiations could further inflame trade tensions that already have been building between the two neighboring countries for months.

    Related video above: Earlier this month, Trump explained why a deal with Canada is complicated

    Trump posted, “The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.”

    “The ad was for $75,000. They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts,” Trump wrote on his social media site. “TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”

    Carney’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The prime minister was set to leave Friday morning for a summit in Asia, while Trump is set to do the same Friday evening.

    Earlier Thursday night, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute posted on X that an ad created by the government of Ontario “misrepresents the ‘Presidential Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade’ dated April 25, 1987.” It added that Ontario did not receive foundation permission “to use and edit the remarks.”

    The foundation said it is “reviewing legal options in this matter” and invited the public to watch the unedited video of Reagan’s address.

    Carney met with Trump earlier this month to try to ease trade tensions, as the two countries and Mexico prepare for a review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement — a trade deal Trump negotiated in his first term, but has since soured on.

    More than three-quarters of Canadian exports go to the U.S., and nearly $3.6 billion Canadian (US$2.7 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border daily.

    Trump said earlier this week that he had seen the ad on television and said that it showed that his tariffs were having an impact.

    “I saw an ad last night from Canada. If I was Canada, I’d take that same ad also,” he said then.

    In his own post on X last week, Doug Ford, the premier of Ontario, posted a link to the ad and the message: “It’s official: Ontario’s new advertising campaign in the U.S. has launched.”

    He continued, “Using every tool we have, we’ll never stop making the case against American tariffs on Canada. The way to prosperity is by working together.”

    A spokesperson for Ford didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday night. But Ford previously got Trump’s attention with an electricity surcharge to U.S. states. Trump responded by doubling steel and aluminum tariffs.

    The president has moved to impose steep U.S. tariffs on many goods from Canada. In April, Canada’s government imposed retaliatory levies on certain U.S. goods — but it carved out exemptions for some automakers to bring specific numbers of vehicles into the country, known as remission quotas.

    Trump’s tariffs have especially hurt Canada’s auto sector, much of which is based in Ontario. This month, Stellantis said it would move a production line from Ontario to Illinois

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US to Probe China’s Compliance With 2020 Trade Deal, New York Times Reports

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. is preparing to investigate China’s adherence to the terms of a trade deal signed during President Donald Trump’s first term, the New York Times reported on Thursday citing a person familiar. The Section 301 probe could be announced as early as Friday, the Times reported, and could result in additional tariffs between the U.S. and China during a period of heightened trade tensions before a meeting next week between Trump and China’s Xi Jinping.Trade tensions between the U.S. and China, the world’s two biggest economies, flared in recent weeks after months of relative calm. Trump imposed additional duties of 100% on China that are due to take effect on November 1 after China announced export controls on nearly all rare earths.

    (Reporting by Jasper Ward and Andrea Shalal; Writing by Caitlin Webber)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Tariffs And Visas Add To The Cannabis Industry’s Misery

    [ad_1]

    Tariffs And Visa Add To The Cannabis Industry’s Misery, squeezing profits, talent, and innovation nationwide.

    The U.S. legal cannabis industry has been suffering over the last two years under an indecisive federal government — and now it’s getting squeezed from two unexpected angles: Tariffs and Visas add to the cannabis industry’s misery. For businesses and workers alike, what once looked like a budding success story is showing greater turbulence.

    The first punch comes via international trade policy. Many cannabis-adjacent businesses — from vape cartridge manufacturers to packaging suppliers and cultivation equipment importers — rely heavily on overseas inputs, especially from China. Recent U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods — in some cases raising rates to 30–50% or more — have forced costs up, and the ripple is hitting weed-industry players hard.

    RELATED: The VFW Stands Up For Marijuana

    According to one industry analysis, the cost to produce a typical vape unit is rising by a few cents apiece because of tariffs on hardware and packaging. With thousands of units produced monthly, it adds up quickly. Some companies are absorbing the hit, but others expect the increases to eventually land on consumers — or push buyers back into illicit markets.

    What makes this especially tough for cannabis businesses: margins are already razor-thin, regulatory burdens are high, and the domestic supply chain just isn’t built out. Switching suppliers takes time; finding U.S.-based manufacturers meeting regulatory compliance is even harder.

    Now consider the human side of the workforce. The immigration and “visa” side of the equation rarely gets front-page attention in cannabis, but it’s quietly important. The federal government still classifies cannabis (marijuana) as a Schedule I controlled substance, despite many states legalizing it. That creates complications for foreign nationals trying to work in or invest in cannabis-related businesses.

    For example, non-U.S. citizens on visas or applying for visas risk denial or revocation if they have past cannabis use, or if they’re working or investing in the cannabis industry—even when it’s legal in the state. This means companies would otherwise recruit international talent, or rely on global investment, may find restrictions.

    RELATED: Cannabis Mogul Appointed Ambassador To Middle East Country

    At the same time, broader visa policy changes are making the environment more uncertain. Recent shifts on H-1B visas, fees, and work permits are complicating cross-border mobility for skilled workers.

    The combination of higher input costs and a more restrictive workforce/immigration pipeline is a double whammy for cannabis entrepreneurs. It means:

    • Higher retail prices or slimmer margins
    • Supply chain disruption (imports delayed, domestic alternatives still catching up)
    • Caution around hiring international talent or tapping global investment due to immigration uncertainty
    • Potential slowdown in growth or innovation as more resources are diverted to coping

    For millennial cannabis consumers and industry watchers: yes, you might start seeing slightly steeper prices or less product innovation. And for workers and founders: borders, visas, and trade policy are no longer side conversations — they’re central to whether the business thrives.

    In short: the cannabis boom isn’t immune to macroeconomics and immigration policy. If anything, it’s among the more vulnerable sectors, since it straddles imports, regulation, and workforce mobility all at once.

    [ad_2]

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • USTR Greer, Treasury’s Bessent Heading to Malaysia for Talks With Chinese Counterparts

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said he and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will head to Malaysia on Wednesday to meet with Chinese officials about what he called “incredibly aggressive” measures by Beijing to curb exports of rare earth minerals.

    Bessent told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” program that there was still a spot on the schedule for President Donald Trump to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, but it would be a mutual decision if the meeting took place.

    Greer said China’s measures violated a commitment their officials had made months ago to keep supplying rare earths needed for high technology, but there was still a “good landing zone” for the U.S. and China to trade in a more balanced way.

    (Reporting by Andrea Shalal And Susan Heavey; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • CBP Has Processed Nearly 24 Million Parcels That Would Have Been Duty-Free Since US Ended De Minimis Exemption

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -U.S. Customs and Border Protection has processed nearly 24 million packages that would have received duty-free treatment since President Donald Trump ended the de minimis exemption on August 29, an agency spokesperson said on Tuesday.

    Nearly 1.4 billion packages entered U.S. under the de minimis exemption for packages valued below $800 in 2024, according to CBP data. 

    Data from the U.N.’s Universal Postal Union showed that on August 29, total postal shipments to the U.S. had fallen 81%.

    That led to severe disruptions in global mail shipment to U.S. shoppers and small businesses. Large delivery firms like United Parcel Service and FedEx also felt the crunch after formerly booming direct-to-consumer e-commerce shipments from Chinese e-commerce firms Shein and Temu dropped.

    (Reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • U.S. Official Made Clear That Decision on Colombia Tariffs Is Trump’s-Colombia Gov’t

    [ad_1]

    BOGOTA (Reuters) -A meeting on Monday night between Colombia President Gustavo Petro, U.S. charge d’affaires John McNamara and Colombia’s recalled ambassador to the U.S. Daniel Garcia-Pena was a first step toward healing a bilateral impasse, Colombia’s foreign ministry said early on Tuesday.

    McNamara made clear that whether the U.S. imposes higher tariffs on Colombia, as threatened by President Donald Trump over the weekend, is Trump’s exclusive decision, the ministry added in a statement.

    (Reporting by Julia Symmes Cobb)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Canada Offers Tariff Relief to Some Steel, Aluminum Products From US, China

    [ad_1]

    OTTAWA (Reuters) -Canada offered tariff relief on some steel and aluminum products imported from the U.S. and China, a government document showed, in efforts to help domestic businesses battered by a trade war on two fronts.

    Prime Minister Mark Carney is negotiating with U.S. President Donald Trump, who imposed tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. His team also met with Chinese counterparts last week in an effort to secure relief on Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural goods.

    Canada’s economy has come under strain as the impact of tariffs on Canadian exports to the U.S. and China has taken a toll. Carney has rolled back many of the retaliatory tariffs his predecessor imposed on U.S. imports as he tries to strike a deal with Trump.

    In an amendment to the surtax remission order of 2024 on Chinese imports, the Ministry of Finance granted remission on some steel and aluminum varieties imported from China that are not produced in Canada, a document issued on Friday showed.

    The order came into effect on October 15 and more details regarding the remission order will be published on November 5, the ministry’s communication to the industry showed. 

    The ministry also exempted from tariffs some U.S. steel and aluminum products primarily linked to public health, national security, manufacturing, agriculture and food packaging, the document said. 

    “The remission process is to protect people who are in the downstream sector … to deal with exceptional circumstances,” Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said in remarks to reporters on Monday.

    He said these were a group of very specific products that are needed to enter Canada to maintain the supply chains and will not impact much in terms of how much counter-tariffs are being collected.

    (Reporting by Promit Mukherjee and Divya Rajagopal; Editing by Mark Porter)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Australia’s Albanese to Discuss Rare Earths, Security in First Trump Summit

    [ad_1]

    SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will hold his first summit with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday, targeting a bigger U.S. commitment to Australia’s critical minerals sector as China tightens control over global supply.

    The centre-left Australian leader also expects to discuss nuclear submarines, trade and Indo Pacific stability with his security ally, his office said. Albanese has travelled to Washington with his minister for resources, but not the foreign and defence ministers.

    The Trump Administration is reviewing the A$368 billion($239.46 billion) AUKUS treaty that will see Australia buy U.S. nuclear-powered submarines in 2032 before building a new submarine class with Britain. Australian officials have said they are confident AUKUS will proceed, with Defence Minister Richard Marles last week saying he knew when the review would conclude.

    “Australia and the United States have stood shoulder-to-shoulder in every major conflict for over a century,” Albanese, re-elected in May for a second term, said in a statement on Sunday.

    ‘COOPERATIVE, PROFESSIONAL, HOPEFULLY WARM’ RELATIONSHIP

    Ahead of Monday’s meeting between the two leaders, Australian officials have emphasised Canberra is paying its way under AUKUS, contributing $2 billion this year to boost production rates at U.S. submarine shipyards, and preparing to maintain U.S. Virginia-class submarines at its Indian Ocean naval base from 2027.

    The delay of 10 months in an official meeting since Trump took office has caused some anxiety in Australia as the Pentagon urged Canberra to lift defence spending. The two leaders met briefly on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York last month.

    Australia is willing to sell shares in its planned strategic reserve of critical minerals to allies including Britain, Reuters reported last month, as Western governments scramble to end their reliance on China for rare earths and minor metals.

    Top U.S. officials last week condemned Beijing’s expansion of rare earth export controls as a threat to global supply chains. China is the world’s biggest producer of the materials that are vital materials for products ranging from electric vehicles to aircraft engines and military radars.

    Resource-rich Australia, wanting to extract and process rare earths, put preferential access to its strategic reserve on the table in U.S. trade negotiations in April.

    Michael Fullilove, executive director of the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney, said the “mood music is good” for the summit, and “the outstanding bilateral issues are not terribly serious.

    “The most important thing is for Mr Albanese to establish a cooperative, professional and hopefully warm relationship with the president,” he said.

    MAINTAINING STABLE ECONOMIC TIES WITH CHINA

    The United States has a large trade surplus with Australia, which is among the countries with the lowest U.S. tariff.

    Australia’s biggest trade partner is China, with exports of iron ore and coal long underpinning its national budget, despite efforts by Albanese’s government to diversify export markets after Beijing’s $20 billion boycott of Australian agriculture and coal from 2020 to 2023.

    Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who held talks with Trump’s economic adviser Kevin Hassett on critical minerals, told reporters in Washington on Friday that Canberra wanted to do more with the United States, while maintaining a stable economic relationship with China.

    “We know that American companies desperately need critical minerals, and Australia is very well placed to service that need,” he said.

    ($1 = 1.5368 Australian dollars)

    (Reporting by Kirsty Needham in Sydney; Editing by Kate Mayberry)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • 10/19: Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan

    [ad_1]

    This week on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly and Republican Sen. Katie Britt discuss the government shutdown as an impasse in Congress nears the three-week mark, and weigh in on the Trump administration’s strikes on alleged drug boats. Plus, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde joins.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • South Korea Sees Higher Chance of US Trade Deal by APEC Summit

    [ad_1]

    SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korea has a higher chance of reaching a trade deal with the U.S. by the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in South Korea later this month, the country’s chief policy advisor said on Sunday.

    While the two sides have made concrete progress in most issues, they need to iron out a couple of remaining issues, advisor Kim Yong-beom told reporters, after returning from a trip to Washington where he met with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

    Kim said the U.S. understands the impact South Korea’s $350 billion financial package would have on Seoul’s foreign exchange market and that the deal must be “within South Korea’s tolerance.”

    (Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Trump signs proclamation imposing tariffs on truck and bus imports

    [ad_1]

    Washington — President Trump on Friday signed a proclamation to impose 25% tariffs on the imports of all medium- and heavy-duty trucks, as well as the parts to make those trucks, and 10% tariffs on all imported buses, such as school buses and city buses.  

    The president said last month he would impose a 25% tariff rate on all medium- and heavy-duty trucks imported into the U.S., as he seeks to protect U.S. companies from foreign competitors. The tariffs on parts are also meant to discourage vehicle manufacturers from using only foreign materials.

    The 25% tariff on all truck imports will apply to all Class 3 to Class 8 vehicles, senior administration officials said on a call with reporters ahead of the signing, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The Trump administration will also provide a credit for vehicle manufacturers who import some parts into the U.S. so they can make the vehicle in the U.S., in order to offset the tariffs, one of the senior administration officials said. 

    “The idea here is we want to incentivize domestic manufacturing of vehicles, and one way to do that is to say, ‘Alright, we understand that not 100% of a vehicle can be used with goods that are already here in the United States,’” the official said. “And so, for the parts that do need to be imported, we are essentially allowing a credit so that they can offset any tariff liability that they would accrue because they’re importing parts just to manufacture in the United States.”

    The credit will depend on what portion of the vehicle’s parts are imported. 

    “So we’ve designed this program to allow automakers who are building things here, like the president wants, that are making their vehicles here with American labor, paying American workers good-paying wages, they are able to continue to be cost competitive and expand production here,” a second official said. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Exclusive-WTO Chief Urges US, China to De-Escalate Trade War, or Risk Long-Term Hit to Global Growth

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The head of the World Trade Organization said she is urging the U.S. and China to de-escalate trade tensions, warning that a decoupling by the world’s two largest economies could reduce global economic output by 7% over the longer term.

    WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala told Reuters in an interview the global trade body was extremely concerned about the latest spike in U.S.-China trade tensions and had spoken with officials from both countries to encourage more dialogue.

    “We’re obviously worried at any escalation of U.S.-China tensions,” she said, noting the two sides had backed away from their first tariff escalation earlier this year, averting more serious consequences and she hoped that would happen again.

    “Similarly, we are really hoping that the two sides will come together and they will de-escalate, because any U.S.-China tensions and U.S.-China decoupling (would) have implications not just for the two biggest economies in the world, but also for the rest of the world,” she said.

    Both sides, Okonjo-Iweala said, understand the importance of good relations, given the implications for the global economy and other countries.

    Any kind of decoupling that divides the world into two trading blocs would result in “significant global GDP losses in the longer term – up to 7% global GDP losses and double-digit welfare losses for developing countries,” she said.

    ESCALATING TENSIONS REMAIN ‘SERIOUS RISK’

    The WTO last week sharply lowered its 2026 forecast for global merchandise trade volume growth to 0.5% from its previous estimate of 1.8% growth in August, citing expected delayed impacts from U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs. It raised its forecast for global goods trade growth to 2.4% for 2025.

    Those forecasts were issued before the relative calm of recent months was shattered last week when China imposed new export controls on rare earth metals needed for the technology sector, and Trump responded by imposing new 100% duties on Chinese imports starting next month.

    Okonjo-Iweala said she told officials from the Group of 20 major economies on Wednesday evening that there could be no global financial stability without global trade stability.

    “Pressures on the system have not eased and may intensify,” she told the group. “The full effects of recent tariffs are still to be felt. Trade diversion is fueling protectionist sentiment elsewhere. And escalating tensions between the United States and China remain a serious risk.”

    Okonjo-Iweala said most WTO members had refrained from joining in the tariff war, and 72% of global trade was still following WTO rules despite a series of bilateral trade deals signed by the U.S. with other countries.

    The rules-based multilateral system was proving resilient despite the most severe policy shock in eight decades, she said.

    But Okonjo-Iweala said organizations like the WTO should use the current multilateralism crisis to undertake long-sought reforms and make the global trade body more flexible and efficient, and able to take advantage of new trade opportunities in digital trade, services and green trade.

    “There’s absolutely no doubt that there are global problems that cannot be solved by any one country alone, and you will need global cooperation to do it, and that’s where multilateralism will still be very, very relevant,” she said. “But to make sure that the organizations are really appreciated, we have to reform, and at the WTO, we are ready to work on this.”

    Okonjo-Iweala said she had a good meeting on Wednesday with Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Joseph Barloon, who was confirmed last week as the U.S. ambassador to the WTO.

    She said she was very appreciative that the U.S. had removed the WTO from its list of planned spending cuts to international organizations, and efforts were underway to settle U.S. arrears to the trade body.

    (Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Paul Simao)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • US, Brazil Say They Aim for Trump-Lula Meeting as Soon as Possible

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. and Brazilian officials held trade talks on Thursday that the two sides called positive and agreed to work to schedule a meeting between President Donald Trump and his counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva “at the earliest possible occasion”.

    In a joint statement, the delegations said they would “conduct discussions on multiple fronts in the immediate future and establish a working path forward,” though no timeline was given for the proposed Trump-Lula meeting.

    The talks in Washington, which included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira, marks the latest diplomatic contact between the two countries in recent weeks after months of a frozen relationship.

    “This is an auspicious start to a negotiation process in which we will work to normalize and open new paths for bilateral relations,” Vieira told journalists in Washington.

    Trump increased tariffs on U.S. imports of most Brazilian goods to 50% from 10% in early August, linking the move to what he called a “witch hunt” against former President Jair Bolsonaro.

    Bolsonaro ended up being convicted in September by a Supreme Court panel to more than 27 years in prison for plotting a coup after he lost the 2022 election to Lula.

    Last week, Trump and Lula held a phone call, following a brief encounter at the United Nations in September, after which both said they came away with positive impressions.

    During the call, they agreed to meet in person, raising hopes for a thaw in bilateral relations that are at their lowest point in decades.

    Thursday’s talks were “great”, with a productive tone and focused on technical issues, Vieira said. The meeting lasted about an hour and included a 20-minute one-on-one session with Rubio, he added.

    (Reporting by Kanishka Singh and Ismail Shakil in Washington, Lisandra Paraguassu in Brasilia and Andre Romani in Sao Paulo; editing by Costas Pitas and Natalia Siniawski)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • California restaurant owner says tariffs, inflation leave him

    [ad_1]

    Inglewood, California — One family’s legacy, an Italian restaurant called Sunday Gravy that’s been operating for decades, is now “barely breaking even,” owner Sol Bashirian says, as tariffs and inflation are eating into its profits.

    “It’s just the reality of where the food industry is at,” Bashirian told CBS News, noting he’s spending thousands of dollars more each month on imported ingredients.

    His family has been in business in Inglewood, California, just south of Los Angeles, for decades, and has seen a 30% bump in sales since last year. But the family’s legacy could go stale.

    “My dad put an offer together, and grabbed all his savings and bought this place. And here we are now, almost 50 years later,” Bashirian said.

    Financial analyst R.J. Hottovy with Placer.ai — a real estate software company that advises restaurants across the U.S. — says eateries that cater to lower- and middle-income consumers are hurting financially, and so are their customers.

    “That group is facing cost pressures on a number of fronts, not just food, but other things like rent and inflation,” Hottovy said.

    A report released earlier this month by the cloud-based management company Toast shows that 48% of the restaurants surveyed plan to raise menu prices if costs continue to rise. 

    The National Restaurant Association says menu prices would need to increase by 30.3% just to maintain a thin profit margin of 5% under the current economic conditions.

    “It sounds easy, but there is a process behind it,” Bashirian said. “It’s reprinting a menu, and the printing costs associated with that.”

    Bashirian says the sticker shock of a price hike could “absolutely” drive away customers from even coming to the restaurant.

    “It’s pasta, and pasta is not supposed to be crazy expensive,” Bashirian said.

    For now, Sunday Gravy is adding a 5% surcharge on the bill to offset tariffs. Under California law, restaurant owners are allowed to add an extra fee if it’s “clearly and conspicuously displayed” on menus.

    “There is price fatigue,” Hottovy said. “I think consumers have been paying higher prices for many years. And there is a breaking point for a lot of these consumers.”

    The National Restaurant Association is pushing for imported food and beverages to be exempt from the Trump administration’s tariffs, arguing that hikes could cost the industry billions this year alone.

    “It would allow us to at least have an attempt at a fighting chance, and flourishing and continuing on,” Bashirian said of the possibility of receiving relief from tariffs. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Restaurant owner says he’s “barely breaking even” amid tariffs, inflation

    [ad_1]

    One family’s legacy, an Italian restaurant called Sunday Gravy that’s been operating for decades, is now “barely breaking even,” owner Sol Bashirian says, as tariffs and inflation are eating into its profits. Elise Preston reports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Canadian PM Carney Says He Expects to Meet Senior Chinese Leadership Soon

    [ad_1]

    OTTAWA (Reuters) -Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday told reporters he expected to meet senior Chinese leaders in the coming month and said Canada was restarting a broad engagement with Beijing.

    (Reporting by David Ljunggren and Promit Mukherjee)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Furniture Tariffs? Why Business Owners in North Carolina Are Bracing for a Rough Ride

    [ad_1]

    President Trump wants to make U.S. furniture great again with a series of tariffs that took effect Tuesday. Trump announced these tariffs partially to revitalize North Carolina’s home furnishing industry, he said on Truth Social. There is now a 10 percent tariff on softwood lumber, and a 25 percent tariff on kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and upholstered furniture. On January 1, 2026, the tariffs will increase to 50 percent on cabinets and 30 percent on upholstered furniture. 

    North Carolina’s High Point Market, the largest home furniture trade show in the world, brings together U.S. and global furniture designers twice a year. Many businesses in the state now focus on high-end, customizable furniture, while lower to middle-end upholstered furniture is largely produced in Mississippi.

    While the long-term economic impact of the tariffs is hard to predict, the short-term effects are already being felt by manufacturers. Typically, U.S. furniture plants receive component parts from different countries. Those components are subject to the tariff duties, even if the final product is made in America. 

    For example, a recliner might have a powered motor, which wouldn’t be made in the U.S. Tools also cost more. Michael Rozell, a furniture designer and owner of Granville, Ohio-based Wooden Objex, says prices on essential materials are rising rapidly, sometimes by thousands of dollars.

    “It’s a very scary, weird time, and people who are just bouncing around, smiling all happy are not paying attention,” says Rozell, adding that an order he placed for tools from Canada more than six weeks ago still hasn’t arrived. “It made it to the Customs depot, and Customs would not release it to the United States because the tariffs were so confusing.”

    Alex Shuford, CEO of North Carolina-based manufacturer Rock House Farm, says his company’s tariff bill in 2024 was $300,000, but that this year’s will be well over $3 million. “Next year, if this continues, we’ll be pushing $6 or $7 million,” he says.

    John Hart, who runs Lewisville, Texas-based design company Arteriors and imports 97 percent of the furniture he sells, has been looking to move his operations out of Southeast Asia. The region has been hit hard by Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, and he says he’s looked at other regions that have more favorable trade relationships with the U.S. But navigating that switch to other countries means dealing with a new set of rules and regulations, depending on where he sources his products. 

    There was a furniture boom during the pandemic, as American consumers stuck at home decided to get new couches, tables, and other items, but in recent years, demand has dried up. U.S. furniture manufacturing has a common historical cycle, according to John Joe Schlichtmann, a professor of urban sociology at DePaul University, whose 2022 book “Showroom City” focuses on High Point’s deindustrialization and reinvention.

    What tariffs won’t solve, Schlichtmann notes, is a lack of skilled labor. Young people in the area aren’t interested in furniture manufacturing, likely because the industry follows cheaper labor and is known for its historical volatility. 

    “You have community colleges in the region that are teaching furniture skills, but they’re going to have to really be injected with investment,” Schlictmann says. “It’s going to require a scalpel, and not a mallet, to make that happen.”

    Trump isn’t new to High Point Market. Back in 2007, he visited the market for his Trump Homes brand, an imprint of Lexington Home Brands that manufactures 20 miles outside of High Point. But Trump Homes’ factories were not always U.S. based. In 2010, his crystal bearing line was made in Slovenia. After Lexington chose to discontinue its partnership with Trump in 2011, he teamed up with Dorya, a Turkish luxury furniture company, whose production process was based in Izmir, Turkey.

    Though these tariffs might intend to encourage American furniture manufacturing, Rozell says buyers at High Point Market were hesitant when he was there in April, asking for 20 percent discounts on his wholesale prices. He says if the administration wanted to help, they would invest the tariff revenue back into the industry, to bring back infrastructure and labor.

    “Most people would love to have their products say ‘made in America,’” Rozell said. “Everyone loves this country. It’s the greatest place on earth, but the reality is, it’s so expensive here.”

    [ad_2]

    Ben Butler

    Source link

  • Rare Earths Tensions Rise as US and China Trade Barbs

    [ad_1]

    BEIJING (Reuters) -Chinese state media on Thursday issued a seven-point rebuttal to U.S. calls for Beijing to wind back its rare earth controls, as both sides struggle to move beyond a volley of barbs and accusations of blindsiding the other. 

    U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Wednesday called China’s new rare earth export restrictions “a global supply-chain power grab,” and suggested Beijing could stave off President Donald Trump’s threat to reimpose triple-digit tariffs on Chinese goods by shelving the measures set to take effect on November 8. 

    Beijing maintains it not only notified Washington before announcing the new licensing regime, but that the controls are also consistent with measures long in place in other major economies. 

    The U.S. and China have been embroiled in a war of words since a September telephone call between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, with each accusing the other of stoking tensions weeks ahead of an expected meeting between the two men. 

    Beijing attributes the ramped-up rhetoric to the U.S. Commerce Department’s surprise expansion of its “Entity List” in late September to include companies in China and elsewhere that use subsidiaries to bypass export restrictions on chipmaking equipment and other high-tech goods. 

    Washington pins the start to China’s critical minerals move, which Trump described as “shocking.”

    “The United States has long overstated national security concerns and abused controls, adopting discriminatory practices against China,” read one of seven infographics published by People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the governing Communist Party. The poster added that Washington maintains a control list over 3,000 items long, compared to the 900 on Beijing’s catalogue.

    “Implementing such export controls is consistent with international practice,” the first poster said, reiterating Beijing’s stance on the measures since their announcement.

    Washington has had similar rules since the 1950s, and has been using them in recent years to stop foreign semiconductor companies selling chips to China if they are made using U.S. technology.

    “Washington should not be surprised by China’s ‘tit-for-tat’,” read an editorial in the Global Times, a People’s Daily-owned tabloid, which has often been first to report on China’s next steps in trade disagreements.

    “The sudden shift in the trade atmosphere caught many by surprise, yet that’s not surprising,” the editorial continued.

    “The direct trigger for this round of tension was Washington’s breach of promises – an all-too familiar pattern.”

    (Reporting by Joe Cash; Editing by Stephen Coates)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • China reacts to latest Trump trade threat over cooking oil

    [ad_1]

    China said that its position on trade wars remains consistent and clear—that they have no winners and are in no one’s interests—as it responded to U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest threat over soybean purchases and cooking oil.

    Lin Jian, spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, gave Beijing’s response at a regular press briefing on Wednesday.

    He said the U.S. and China “should resolve differences through dialogue and consultation based on equality, mutual respect, and mutual benefit,” according to the Chinese state-run Global Times publication.

    Trump on Tuesday accused China in a post on Truth Social of “purposefully not buying our Soybeans, and causing difficulty for our Soybean Farmers, is an Economically Hostile Act.”

    “We are considering terminating business with China having to do with Cooking Oil, and other elements of Trade, as retribution. As an example, we can easily produce Cooking Oil ourselves, we don’t need to purchase it from China,” Trump said.

    The U.S.-China trade war has reignited after Beijing imposed a new set of restrictions on rare earth exports, which the Trump administration says broke earlier tariff-cutting agreements between the two sides.

    Trump said he would impose a 100 percent tariff on China as a consequence, triggering a sell-off in global markets eyeing the potential economic fallout.

    This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Reporter’s Notebook: Trump’s new tariffs

    [ad_1]

    Imported furniture, kitchen cabinets and lumber will now be subject to new tariffs. The duties, which range from 10% to an ultimate level of 50% on some goods, are part of President Trump’s effort to boost domestic manufacturing. But economists warn they will raise housing and furniture costs as well as the costs of renovations, slowing construction work. “CBS Evening News” co-anchor John Dickerson explains.

    [ad_2]

    Source link