ReportWire

Tag: Tariffs

  • AbbVie reaches deal with Trump administration on drug prices in exchange for tariff relief

    North Chicago-based AbbVie has become the latest drugmaker to reach a deal with the Trump administration on drug prices in exchange for being exempted from tariffs and future price mandates, the company announced Monday evening.

    Under the voluntary agreement, AbbVie will offer “low prices” in Medicaid, a state and federally funded health insurance program for people with low incomes and disabilities, the company said in a news release. AbbVie will also invest $100 billion in U.S.-based research, development and building, including for manufacturing, over the next decade, according to the release.

    It will also sell more medications directly to consumers through TrumpRx. TrumpRx is to be an online platform that will allow people to buy medications directly from manufacturers, according to the Associated Press.

    The deal “was enabled by the Trump administration providing exemption from tariffs and future price mandates,” AbbVie said in its news release.

    “AbbVie is following President Trump’s call to action by reaching this agreement, allowing us to collectively move beyond policies that harm American innovation,” said Robert A. Michael, chairman and CEO at AbbVie in the news release.

    AbbVie plans to offer medications including Humira, Alphagan, Synthroid and Combigan on TrumpRx.

    In recent months, the Trump administration has announced more than a dozen similar deals with drugmakers, including Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi.

    The agreements follow an executive order issued by Trump in May that sought to bring most-favored-nation pricing on medications to Americans. Most-favored-nation pricing refers to lower prices charged for the same medications in other economically-comparable countries. Throughout last year, Trump threatened to impose large tariffs on pharmaceutical companies.

    Earlier on Monday, AbbVie announced plans to expand its U.S. manufacturing by acquiring a facility in Arizona. The company also announced last year that it would construct a new $195 million facility near its headquarters in North Chicago.

    AbbVie spun off from Abbott Laboratories in 2013 and has about 29,000 employees in the U.S. The company is known for medications including Humira, which is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and other conditions, as well as the drugs Skyrizi, which treats plaque psoriasis, and Rinvoq for rheumatoid arthritis.

    Lisa Schencker

    Source link

  • Trump slaps 25% tariffs on any countries that do business with Iran

    President Trump said Monday he’s imposing 25% tariffs on goods from all countries that do business with Iran — a sweeping measure as the Trump administration heaps pressure on the Iranian government amid nationwide anti-regime protests.

    Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social that the new tariffs will apply to “any and all business being done with the United States of America.” He said the tariffs would take effect immediately.

    It’s not clear which countries will face the new tariffs. But Iran does billions of dollars’ worth of business with one of the U.S.’s largest trading partners — China — and with the United Arab Emirates, an American ally in the Gulf region. 

    As of 2022, the world’s largest buyer of Iranian goods was China, which imported some $22.4 billion in goods from Iran, according to World Bank figures. China secretly imports Iranian oil despite tight U.S. sanctions designed to choke Iran’s petroleum industry, a CBS News investigation revealed last year

    China is also the U.S.’s third-largest trading partner, with Americans buying $438.9 billion worth of Chinese goods in 2024, according to the Census Bureau.

    Meanwhile, Iran imported around $18 billion in goods from the United Arab Emirates in 2022. The country is one of the U.S.’s key security partners in the area, with thousands of U.S. forces stationed there.

    Very little trade takes place between Iran and the U.S., due to years of intense sanctions levied on Iran due to the country’s nuclear program. But the sanctions on countries that do business with Iran represent a new effort to it from the global economy. 

    The new tariffs come as Iran is swept by its largest wave of protests in years, fueled in part by the country’s spiraling economy. More than 500 people have been reported dead in the protests, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency

    Mr. Trump has repeatedly pledged to intervene if Iran’s regime starts cracking down by killing protesters, and he has been briefed on options for military strikes in Iran, a senior U.S. official told CBS News.

    “The military is looking at it, and we’re looking at some very strong options,” the president told reporters Sunday evening. “We’ll make a determination.”

    Source link

  • Brazil’s Bolsonaro Authorized to Go to Hospital for Tests After Fall

    BRASILIA, Jan 7 (Reuters) – ‌Brazil’s ​Supreme ‌Court Justice Alexandre de ​Moraes authorized former President ‍Jair Bolsonaro to ​leave prison ​and ⁠be taken to a hospital for tests after he fell and hit his ‌head, a court decision ​showed on ‌Wednesday.

    Moraes authorized ‍Bolsonaro to ⁠go to the DF Star Hospital in Brasilia on January 7 to undergo a ​CT scan, an MRI, and an electroencephalogram.

    On Tuesday, Moraes had denied an earlier request for Bolsonaro to leave prison, arguing there was no need for him to ​be immediately taken to hospital.

    (Reporting by Ricardo Brito; Writing by ​Isabel Teles; Editing by Gabriel Araujo)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Letters: Fix Our Forests disguises logging as fire safety

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    Fix Our Forests offers
    logging as fire safety

    Re: “Legislation would worsen California wildfire threat” (Page A8, Dec. 28).

    The Fix Our Forests Act isn’t about environmental safety; rather, it is a blatant attempt at expanding the logging industry under the cover of wildfire prevention. Congress is rushing to pass a bill that dramatically expands backcountry logging while weakening environmental review and public input, allowing projects up to 15 square miles to bypass the National Environmental Policy Act.

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • 107% tariffs on Italian pasta no longer set to take effect

    (CNN) — The United States Commerce Department is poised to significantly reduce the tariffs set to take effect on over a dozen Italian pasta makers’ products later this year.

    Most products from the European Union are already subject to tariffs of at least 15%. The pasta-specific tariffs, initially proposed in October at 92%, would have subject Italian pasta to a total rate of 107%. The newly announced rates would put the levies between 24% and 29%.

    The final rates, set to be announced on March 12 the Commerce Department said in a post-preliminary report published Wednesday, stem from an investigation some producers sold pasta at unfairly low prices. The decision to recommend lower rates before then results from an “evaluation of additional comments received following a preliminary determination,” a Commerce official told CNN.

    “Italian pasta makers have addressed many of Commerce’s concerns raised in the preliminary determination, and reflects Commerce’s commitment to a fair, transparent process,” the official added.

    The potential tariffs, which impact 13 Italian pasta makers, are due to an antidumping complaint two American companies filed with the US Commerce Department last July. In the complaint, two Midwestern companies, 8th Avenue Food & Provisions and Winland Foods, alleged that several Italian companies underpriced pasta that was shipped to the United States.

    The preliminary investigation published by the Commerce Department in September stated that two companies, La Molisana and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, made sales to the United States “at less than normal value.” It also said both were “uncooperative” during the investigation and provided “incomplete and unreliable” data.

    The two companies accounted for the largest volume of pasta sales to the United States, according to the department. Neither immediately responded to CNN’s request for comment.

    “The redetermination of the tariffs is a sign of the recognition by US authorities of our companies’ willingness to cooperate,” the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on Thursday.

    Elisabeth Buchwald and CNN

    Source link

  • U.S. reduces proposed tariffs on Italian pasta, Italy’s foreign ministry says


    The U.S. has rolled back proposed steep tariffs on Italian-made pasta, Italy’s foreign ministry said Thursday. 

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has sharply reduced a proposed duty on 13 Italian pasta makers, cutting the rate from as high as 92% to as little as 2.26%, Italy’s foreign ministry said Jan. 1. The duties would have been imposed on top of existing 15% tariffs on most imports from the European Union.

    The Trump administration had proposed the antidumping levies after a review found that Italian pasta producers, including Barilla, La Molisana and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, sold products at artificially low prices that undercut U.S. manufacturers. 

    Had the higher duties taken effect, U.S. shoppers could have faced steeply higher prices for Italian-made pasta, and some Italian producers might have stopped shipping to U.S. retailers, experts told CBS News. 

    “The recalculation of the duties is a sign that U.S. authorities recognize our companies’ genuine willingness to cooperate,” the foreign ministry said.

    La Molisana pasta imports will be tariffed at a rate of 2.26%, the foreign ministry said, while Garofalo will face nearly 14% tariffs, and 11 additional pasta brands will be subject to a 9% import duty.

    The White House did not immediately respond to CBS News’ request for comment on the tariff rollbacks. 

    Source link

  • Trump administration delays tariff increases on furniture and kitchen cabinets by a year

    The Trump administration said on Wednesday it is postponing tariff increases on imported upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets and vanities by a year, citing ongoing negotiations with trading partners.

    Without the delay, the U.S. was set to double its tariff rate on kitchen cabinets and vanities produced outside the U.S. to 50% starting Jan. 1. The import duty on upholstered furniture — including sofas and armchairs — was set to rise to 30% from 25% on the first day of 2026.

    The postponement follows a November rollback by the Trump administration of tariffs on imported foods such as beef, coffee and bananas, as affordability concerns have weighed on consumer sentiment about the U.S. economy. Furniture prices have been outpacing inflation, with living room, kitchen and dining room furniture rising 4.6% in November from a year earlier, compared with a 2.7% annual increase in the overall Consumer Price Index.

    According to the Dec. 31 White House announcement, the tariff rate on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets and vanities will remain at 25%. 

    “The United States continues to engage in productive negotiations with trade partners to address trade reciprocity and national security concerns with respect to imports of wood products,” the White House said in its statement. 

    “The United States will therefore delay the increase in tariff rates for upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities that was set to take place on January 1, 2026, under the September 29, 2025, Proclamation for an additional year,” it added.

    When President Trump announced the furniture tariffs in September, he wrote on social media that his goal was to help revive U.S. furniture manufacturing in North Carolina. Between 1999 to 2009, North Carolina’s furniture industry lost half of its jobs due to increased competition from Asia, according to a 2020 study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

    Source link

  • Trump Issues First Second-Term Vetoes for Colorado Water Project and Florida Tribal Measure

    WASHINGTON, Dec 30 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump vetoed a major ‌drinking ​water project in Colorado, drawing immediate ‌condemnation from Colorado Republican lawmaker Lauren Boebert, a former loyal MAGA ally who also ​recently challenged Trump over the Jeffrey Epstein files.

    The White House announced Trump’s veto of the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit (AVC) ‍Act, which was approved unanimously by both ​the House of Representatives and the Senate, and a second measure affecting a Florida project, late on Tuesday. ​They were the ⁠first two vetoes of Trump’s second term.

    The veto of the Colorado project came after Trump’s vow to retaliate against the state for keeping his ally Tina Peters in prison, despite his attempt to pardon her earlier in the month, and Boebert’s action to force the release of the government’s files on the late convicted sexual ‌offender Epstein.

    Peters, a former Colorado county clerk, is serving a nine-year prison term after being convicted on state ​charges ‌for illegally tampering with voting ‍machines in the ⁠2020 presidential election. Trump’s pardon covers only federal charges and the state has refused to release Peters.

    Boebert, who sponsored the bill, condemned Trump’s veto of what she called a “completely non-controversial, bipartisan bill” in a statement on X, adding her hope is that “this veto has nothing to do with political retaliation for calling out corruption and demanding accountability.”

    The bill was aimed at funding a decades-long project to bring safe drinking water to 39 communities in Colorado’s Eastern Plains, where the groundwater is high ​in salt, and wells sometimes unleash radioactivity into the water supply.

    In his letter to Congress, Trump said he vetoed the measure to prevent “American taxpayers from funding expensive and unreliable policies.”

    It was not immediately clear if the Republican leaders in Congress would allow a vote to override Trump’s veto.

    Boebert was one of four Republican lawmakers, along with Marjorie Taylor Greene, who played a key role in forcing the release of Justice Department files on Epstein. Trump had fought the release of the files for months before ending his opposition.

    The White House said Trump had also vetoed a measure to spend $14 million to protect an area known as Osceola Camp within the Everglades National Park that is inhabited by ​members of the Miccosukee tribe of Native Americans, which has fought Trump’s makeshift immigrant detention center “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Everglades. A federal judge has now ordered the detention center to be shut down.

    Trump said the tribe was never authorized to inhabit the Osceola Camp area, and his administration would not ​support projects for special interests, especially those “unaligned” with his immigration policies.    

    (Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Kanishka Singh; Editing by Caitlin Webber and Lincoln Feast.)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Reuters

    Source link

  • What the media didn’t tell you in 2025

    This week, editors Peter SudermanKatherine Mangu-Ward, and Matt Welch are joined by Reason senior editor Robby Soave to share the stories they believe didn’t receive sufficient media attention in 2025. Each panelist selected a story from 2025 in the categories of politics, private industry, global affairs, and culture that deserves a closer look as we head into 2026.

     

    0:00—Political stories that deserved more attention

    11:14—The year’s underreported economic stories

    25:56—Global stories the media overlooked in 2025

    37:19—Cultural moments that flew under the radar

     

    Mentioned in This Podcast

    The Trump Admin Wants Western Union and MoneyGram To Report on Immigrants,” by Matthew Petti

    Treasury Department Surveillance at the Southern Border Faces Fourth Amendment Challenges,” by Tosin Akintola

    Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance,” by Joe Lancaster

    Banks Are Narcing on You Because Congress Forces Them To,” by Nicholas Anthony

    How Trump’s Travel Crackdown Is Hurting Americans at Home and Abroad,” by Matt Welch

    Nepal’s Socialist Government Banned Social Media, So Activists Plotted a Revolution—on Discord,” by Matthew Petti

    Biden Strengthened the Refugee Resettlement System. Will Trump Undo It? by Fiona Harrigan

    Worldwide Refugee Population Hits All-Time High, U.S. Intake Reaches All-Time Low,” by Matt Welch

    Peter Suderman

    Source link

  • Major Bourbon Maker Shutters for 2026

    Jim Beam, the largest bourbon producer in the U.S., announced this week that it plans to close its flagship Kentucky facility for all of 2026. It will reopen after it has the “opportunity to invest in site enhancements,” according to a statement.

    The move is striking, though not uncommon to the spirits industry as of late. The country’s distillers have faced headwinds and uncertainty due to Trump’s trade tariffs and a shrinking number of people drinking alcohol. 

    In the past year alone the sector has reported a fall in sales of roughly five percent, according to the New York Times

    The Downward Spiral

    Bourbon saw a spike in sales from $1.4 billion in 2004 to around $5.2 billion in 2024, based on data from the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States. A particular surge in demand during the pandemic drove distilleries to expand and overproduce.

    Now, that response is catching up to them. The Kentucky Distillers’ Association trade body said in October that over 16 million barrels of bourbon were stored in warehouses in the state, which is a record high. According to The Guardian, the KDA said distillers would face a “crushing” $75 million in taxes on those barrels.

    “It’s a sad day for bourbon, to be honest with you,” Fred Minnick, a whiskey expert and the author of Bottom Shelf: How a Forgotten Brand of Bourbon Saved One Man’s Life, told The NYT. “For this to happen is a real punch in the gut.”

    Some Sites Remain Open 

    Jim Beam said two of its other Kentucky distilleries will continue operations, one of which makes subsidiary brands like Knob Creek, Booker’s, and Basil Hayden. Production will also carry on at its Maker’s Mark distillery, and its bottling facility and visitor center at the flagship location in Clermont will remain open.

    Ava Levinson

    Source link

  • Trump administration says China’s chip policies are unfair but will delay tariffs to 2027

    Trump administration trade officials said China should be punished for employing unfair tactics to dominate the semiconductor industry, but will wait 18 months to impose tariffs.

    A U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) investigation concluded China’s targeting of semiconductors “for dominance is unreasonable and burdens or restricts US commerce and thus is actionable,” the agency said in a public notice posted Tuesday.

    The current tariff level of zero will be increased “in 18 months on June 23, 2027 to a rate to be announced not fewer than 30 days prior to that date,” USTR said.

    The public notice comes after a year-long investigation into China’s approach to the chip industry, undertaken through Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. Under that law, the U.S. president may impose country-based tariffs at a rate of his choosing if the U.S. Trade Representative finds that another country is engaging in unfair foreign trade practices.

    “For decades, China has targeted the semiconductor industry for dominance and has employed increasingly aggressive and sweeping non-market policies and practices in pursuing dominance of the sector,” the public notice said.

    Opposition from Beijing

    Beijing said Wednesday it “firmly opposes” the move and accused Washington of abusing tariffs to “unreasonably suppress Chinese industries”.

    This “disrupts the stability of the global supply chain, hinders the development of all countries’ semiconductor industries and harms others while hurting itself,” foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian.

    “We urge the United States to quickly correct its erroneous practices,” Lin said at a regular press briefing.

    USTR officials launched the probe in December 2024 in the final weeks of Joe Biden’s presidency, extending the initiative when President Trump took office in January.

    Mr. Trump has been a prolific purveyor of tariffs, unveiling sector-specific levies on steel, autos and other items as well as broader measures to achieve a variety of policy objectives.

    The White House has jousted with Beijing but reached a broad truce with China after a major escalation in the spring.

    The USTR’s probe concluded that China’s policies have included “massive and persistent” state support of private actors and “wage-suppressing labor practices.”

    The USTR did not respond to an AFP query on the reason for the 18-month timeframe on tariffs.

    Source link

  • U.S. GDP grew at a blistering 4.3% pace in the third quarter

    The U.S. economy grew at a blistering 4.3% annual pace in the third quarter, marking the strongest growth in two years, according to new government data released Tuesday.

    That growth in U.S. GDP — the nation’s output of goods and services — far outpaced the forecast for 3% growth, according to economists polled by financial data firm FactSet. The third-quarter figure, released by the Commerce Department, reflects an uptick from the second quarter’s annualized growth of 3.8%.

    An acceleration in consumer spending, along with an upswing in exports and government outlays, helped propel economic growth, the Commerce Department said. And despite widespread pessimism about the economy, consumers are continuing to open their wallets, government data shows.

    “While worries surrounding the jobs market, tariffs and inflation continue to swirl, the economy continues to defy its doubters by chugging higher,” said Bret Kenwell, U.S. investment and options analyst at eToro, in a Tuesday email. 

    Exports grew at an 8.8% rate, while imports, which subtract from GDP, fell another 4.7%.

    At the same time, inflation ticked higher from the previous quarter, with Tuesday’s data showing that the personal consumption expenditures index, or PCE, rose at a 2.8% annual pace last quarter, compared with 2.1% in the second quarter. 

    Core PCE, which excludes the more volatile food and energy categories, grew 2.9%, up from 2.6% in the previous quarter. Both are above the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate of 2%.

    The economy has shown resilience this year. Inflation has remained stubborn, though not as severe as economists initially feared after President Trump unveiled tariffs earlier this year. Some retailers have cushioned the impact by absorbing the added costs, while others have passed them on to consumers through higher prices.

    The labor market remains a weak spot, with employment numbers showing a slowdown in hiring during the second half of 2025. In November, the unemployment rate rose to 4.6%, the highest since 2021.

    Tuesday’s report, which was delayed due to the government shutdown, is the first of three estimates the government will make of GDP growth for the third quarter of the year.

    Source link

  • Jim Beam to pause production at its main distillery on Jan. 1

    The maker of Jim Beam bourbon whiskey said it plans to pause production at its main distillery in Kentucky starting Jan. 1. 

    Jim Beam, which is owned by a U.S. subsidiary of Japan’s Suntory Holdings, said in an email to CBS News that its distillery in Clermont, Kentucky, will temporarily halt production “while we take the opportunity to invest in site enhancements.” The company plans to keep its James B. Beam campus open for visitors during that time, the company added.

    Jim Beam will continue to distill at its Fred B. Noe craft distillery in Clermont and Booker Noe distillery in Boston, Kentucky.

    The pause comes amid several challenges in the wine and spirits industry. Americans overall are drinking less, with Gallup finding that the share of U.S. adults who consume alcohol has fallen to 54%, near a 90-year low. 

    Exports of U.S.-produced spirits fell 9% in the second quarter, partly due to the impact of the Trump administration’s tariffs, according to an October report from the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, a trade group. Exports to Canada were particularly hard hit, declining by 85% during the period, after Canadian retailers pulled U.S. spirits from shelves in retaliation for President Trump’s tariffs, the group noted. 

    Through August, whiskey distillers had produced 55 million fewer proof gallons this year than a year ago, a decline of 28%, according to the Lexington Herald-Leader. A proof gallon is one U.S. gallon of liquid that is 50% proof alcohol.

    Whiskey connoisseurs may not have to worry about supplies running low. Kentucky warehouses now hold a record 16.1 million barrels of aging bourbon, according to the Kentucky Distillers’ Association. The total — reported in October — marks the highest level since the repeal of Prohibition and reflects a 27% increase from 2024, the group said.

    The surge in bourbon supplies is partly due to an increase in the number of distillers located in Kentucky, the group said. But the industry is also witnessing a dip in demand due to uncertainty over tariffs, declining exports and shifts in drinking habits, it added.

    Bourbon, a type of whiskey, must adhere to U.S. distilling laws to be labeled as such. For instance, the liquor must be aged in new, charred oak containers and the grain recipe must be at least 51% corn, according to whiskey tourism site Bourbon Country.

    Source link

  • The Biggest Threat to the 2026 Economy Is Still Donald Trump

    The escalating trade war with China is currently on something of a hiatus. In October, the Trump Administration eased tensions by reversing its decision to expand the list of Chinese companies restricted from access to advanced U.S. technology. Earlier this month, Trump said he would allow Nvidia to export to China some high-grade computer chips, with the U.S. government collecting twenty-five per cent of the revenues. Wall Street seems to be tacitly assuming that the détente will last beyond Trump’s trip to China scheduled for April, but who really knows? If the government in Beijing doesn’t agree to the concessions that he wants, he could easily revert to a more coercive stance.

    Even if the economy can endure another year of the Tariff Man, there are other issues that could have a big political effect. They include jobs, prices, and health-care costs. Since April, growth in employment has averaged just forty thousand jobs a month. Last year, the figure was more than four times larger. Moreover, Powell said the Fed thinks the official monthly payroll figures are overestimating the actual numbers by about sixty thousand. If that’s right, the economy has been shedding twenty thousand jobs a month. Even going by the official figures, the number of people working in manufacturing, the sector which is supposed to be the primary beneficiary of Trump’s tariffs, has fallen by sixty-three thousand this year. Other industries that have recently displayed weak hiring are information and finance, which employ a lot of white-collar workers. This has provoked fears that A.I. is eliminating jobs. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll, seventy-one per cent of respondents said they were concerned that A.I. will be “putting too many people of out of work permanently.”

    Trump can’t be blamed for A.I., although the executive order that he issued two weeks ago in an effort to prevent states from regulating the potentially transformative new technology demonstrated how beholden he is to the Silicon Valley tech barons.

    He is more directly responsible for stubbornly high prices. His tariffs have helped raise the prices of many imported goods, including grocery staples such as coffee and bananas, and his mass deportations may be producing a labor shortage in some service industries, such as restaurants and hospitality, where there were almost a million job openings in the fall. When firms are struggling to find the workers they need, they have to offer higher wages, which raises their costs.

    As the midterms approach, Democrats will surely heed Barack Obama’s advice to focus on affordability, jobs, and health care. With Congress having adjourned without addressing the year-end expiry of enhanced subsidies for health-insurance policies purchased through Obamacare exchanges, some twenty-two million Americans will be affected. Going into 2026, many of them could face much higher premiums, more than double in some instances. With Republicans divided, and Trump still doing little more than publicly bashing Obamacare, there is no assurance of any resolution.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s presence in the White House is accentuating another big threat to the economy, which comes from financial fragility. Over the past three years, the S. & P. 500 has risen by more than seventy-five per cent, and the Nasdaq has more than doubled. Relative to earnings, stocks are trading at very high levels, historically speaking, and investors are borrowing record amounts of money to buy these stocks. On the basis of optimistic assumptions for revenues and profits, A.I.-related companies are raising enormous sums of money, in many cases from one another. And despite the revenues from Trump’s tariffs, the U.S. government is running a budget deficit of close to six per cent of G.D.P.

    Whether one categorizes this situation as a financial boom or a bubble is largely a matter of terminology. The key point is that the financial system is vulnerable to unexpected disruptions, and, as the Bank of England recently noted, the risks are rising. Conceivably, a shock could emerge from the A.I. complex, or from the private-credit sector—where hedge funds, private-equity firms, and other non-bank lenders have been expanding their lending very rapidly—or from Trump himself, as he moves to extend his power over the Fed, an institution whose independence many investors, here and abroad, regard as the primary guarantor of financial stability. Powell’s term as Fed chair ends in May, and Trump is set to announce a replacement early in the New Year. Kevin Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council at the White House, and frequently appears on television defending Trump’s policies, is the favorite to get the job—despite rumblings on Wall Street that he would be too much of a patsy.

    John Cassidy

    Source link

  • President Trump delivers year-end address to the nation | Special Report

    President Trump delivered a prime-time address from the White House on Wednesday night, touting the administration’s actions during the first 11 months of his second term and outlining his goals for the next three years. CBS News’ Norah O’Donnell anchors a special report.

    Source link

  • In his national address, President Trump claimed he’s bringing prices down. Here’s what the data shows.

    After nearly two months without new consumer price data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its latest report Thursday, providing a glimpse at energy costs, food prices and other everyday expenses.

    According to the consumer price index, inflation slowed in November, with prices rising 0.2% over the 0.3% observed in September. (BLS could not collect October data because of the government shutdown.)

    Still, inflation remains stubbornly high. Compared with a year ago, consumer costs are up about 2.7%.

    Thursday’s report came just a day after President Donald Trump delivered a prime-time address from the White House in which he largely discussed affordability concerns, from housing costs to grocery prices, saying the U.S. is “poised for an economic boom.”

    “The last administration and their allies in Congress looted our treasury for trillions of dollars, driving up prices and everything at levels never seen before. I am bringing those high prices down and bringing them down very fast.”

    In truth, of the 11 everyday costs tracked month to month by the consumer price index, only five have decreased since January.

    Here’s a closer look at the president’s claims and how prices are changing, or not, during his second term in office.

    To see the average U.S. price of a specific good, click on the drop-down arrow below and select the item you wish to view.

    Eggs

    In the wake of all-time highs set earlier this year, egg prices have collapsed in recent months.

    That downward trend continued in November, with the price dropping a whopping 63 cents from September and settling at $2.86 per dozen. It’s the first time since June 2024 that the average nationwide price for a dozen large Grade A eggs registered below the $3 mark.

    This steep drop-off in prices is a result of a declining number of bird flu cases in commercial and backyard flocks. In the first two months of 2025, tens of millions of birds were affected by highly pathogenic avian influenza across 39 states, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. With entire flocks culled to prevent the spread of the virus, the egg supply was strained, leading to shortages in stores and record costs for consumers.

    Following another spike in cases in the early fall, the number of new infections appears to be subsiding again, with less than 2 million U.S. birds affected in the past two months. More notably, zero outbreaks among egg-laying chickens have been reported in November and December.

    Consequently, costs are “falling rapidly” as highlighted by Trump in his prime-time address earlier this week.

    “The price of eggs is down 82% since March, and everything else is falling rapidly. And it’s not done yet, but boy are we making progress. Nobody can believe what’s going on.”

    While egg prices have dropped considerably from March’s record high of $6.23 per dozen, the difference of roughly $3.37 from March to November represents a 54% decrease — not the 82% cited by the president.

    In a statement given to the Tribune, a White House official clarified that he was referring to wholesale costs, not retail prices.

    Milk

    The cost of milk also saw a measurable decrease from the previous month, falling 13 cents.

    A gallon of fresh, fortified whole milk is now priced at $4.00 — that’s 2.5% less than it was in December 2024, before Trump took office.

    Bread

    The average price of white bread fell in November to $1.79 per pound, marking a three-year low for the pantry staple. Time for bread pudding, anyone?

    Bananas

    The cost of bananas fell slightly from September’s all-time highs, dropping just a fraction of a cent to $0.66 per pound in November.

    Recent price inflation is likely a byproduct of the president’s trade war, with tariffs imposed on the country’s top banana suppliers like Guatemala, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras and Mexico — all of which are currently subject to an import tax of at least 10%.

    But in mid-November, Trump took action to combat rising grocery costs, announcing that some agricultural products would be exempt from tariffs due to “current domestic demand for certain products” and “current domestic capacity to produce certain products.”

    Both fresh and dried bananas were among the listed exemptions, indicating that lower prices may be around the corner.

    Oranges

    No data on orange prices was available for November.

    However, in September, the cost of navel oranges was listed at $1.80 per pound, less than a cent shy of record highs and nearly 18% more than they were at the start of the Trump administration.

    Drastically low domestic orange production combined with steep tariffs on foreign growers have been helping to push costs skyward. But, as with bananas, oranges are now exempt from most reciprocal tariffs.

    Tomatoes

    As of November, the cost of field-grown tomatoes was $1.83 per pound. That price is 8 cents lower than the previous month of data and down roughly 12% since Trump took power.

    The change is somewhat abnormal given the growing season, as prices typically rise in the fall and peak in the early winter months, and could be attributable to the Trump administration’s recent course reversal on many of its tomato tariffs.

    Chicken

    The cost of fresh, whole chicken fell for a fourth consecutive month, to $2.04 per pound — its lowest price in a year.

    Rising feed costs and the effects of bird flu on the poultry supply chain have driven persistently higher prices, but with the number of cases dropping again, we could see lower prices in the new year.

    Still, the average cost is only about 2 cents less than it was when President Joe Biden left the White House.

    Ground beef

    Ground beef is getting more expensive.

    After shoppers saw some relief in September from climbing costs, the price of ground beef jumped another 18 cents.

    Rising costs can be attributed to a confluence of factors. The U.S. cattle inventory is the lowest it’s been in almost 75 years, and severe drought in parts of the country has further reduced the feed supply, per the USDA. Additionally, steep tariff rates on top beef importers also played a part in higher prices stateside, but as of Nov. 13 high-quality cuts, processed beef and live cattle are exempt from most countries’ levies.

    Still, since the change of administrations, ground beef costs have ballooned by 18% — translating to $1 per pound price increases at the grocery store.

    As of November, a pound of 100% ground beef chuck would set you back about $6.50.

    Electricity

    Electric costs have also been steadily rising.

    At approximately 19 cents per kilowatt-hour, the current price of electricity is a fraction of a cent off August’s high. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average American household uses 899 kWh every four weeks, translating to a monthly bill of about $170.

    Thankfully, the White House appears to be working to mitigate mounting costs. In his presidential address, Trump claimed that within the next 12 months his administration will have opened 1,600 new electrical generating plants.

    “Prices on electricity and everything else will fall dramatically,” Trump said.

    For many Americans, relief is needed. Since last December, the average price of electricity per kilowatt-hour has increased more than 7%.

    Gasoline

    Declining gas prices were another highlight of Trump’s Wednesday night remarks.

    The cost of gasoline has tumbled from the record-setting prices Americans saw three summers ago under Biden, and just last month, the price at the pump dropped more than 10 cents per gallon.

    “On day one I declared a national energy emergency,” Trump said. “Gasoline is now under $2.50 a gallon in much of the country. In some states, it by the way, just hit $1.99 a gallon.”

    According to the latest CPI data, the average nationwide cost for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline is $3.23. And though prices are noticeably lower than they were two to three years ago, that average remains higher than it was just a year ago and up nearly 3% during the Trump presidency.

    Prices in Chicago, meanwhile, are about the same month-over-month, costing an average of $3.29 per gallon, according to EIA data.

    Natural gas

    Bucking its previous downward trend, piped utility gas, or natural gas, is another expense that’s climbing. The nationwide cost jumped 3 cents in November, landing at $1.64 per therm.

    On average, Americans are paying close to 8% more to heat their homes, ovens and stovetops than when Biden left office. Year-over-year, that gap is even more drastic: a roughly 10% change or difference of 15 cents per therm.

    Claire Malon

    Source link

  • Small businesses face their own affordability crunch because of tariffs and health insurance costs

    Some small business owners say they are facing their own affordability crisis because of higher tariff, health insurance and energy costs.

    Shirley Modlin, who owns 3D Design and Manufacturing in Powhatan, Virginia, told CBS News that rising operational expenses are making it tough for her to offer raises and health insurance for her 10 workers. 

    Modlin, whose company makes metal parts for the automotive, pharmaceutical, beverage and other industries, said uncertainty over where U.S. tariff rates will settle makes it hard to forecast her costs. 

    “It’s the end of the year and my employees are expecting some kind of raise, but I don’t know how much I can give them because I don’t know what kind of impact the tariffs are going to continue to have on me,” Modlin told CBS News.  

    “I feel like I am in a balancing act, and if I don’t raise prices and my costs are going up, that squeezes my margins harder,” she added.

    U.S. importers currently face an average effective tariff rate of 16.8%, the highest level since the 1930s, according to the Yale Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research center. 

    Small business importers paid roughly $25,000 more per month on average due to the Trump administration’s tariffs between April and September, compared to the same period in 2024, according to a new analysis from the Center for American Progress (CAP), a nonpartisan policy research institute.

    “What should be a season of giving has become a season of paying for America’s 36 million small businesses,” Sen. Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said at a press conference on Tuesday held by the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. “They are paying more for affordable health care, more for electricity and more for just about everything, thanks to Trump’s tariffs.”

    The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of Mr. Trump’s country-based tariffs soon. If they are struck down, however, he has other tools he can employ to implement similar levies, according to legal experts. 

    Who’s to blame?

    A spokesperson for the Republican members of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship blamed small businesses’ challenges on Democrats.

    “Four years of Democrat control of Washington created a historic affordability crisis for small businesses as inflation soared and an unprecedented $1.8 trillion in new regulations were created,” the spokesperson told CBS News. “In just 11 months, Republicans have begun to undo the damage by passing the largest tax cut in history to complement the $907 billion regulatory rollback being undertaken by the Trump administration. 

    “The results speak for themselves as we just witnessed a record number of holiday shoppers, core inflation fell to the lowest level in five years, and hardworking Americans’ real wages will increase by $1,000,” the spokesperson added. 

    Spokespersons for the White House and Small Business Administration didn’t respond to a request for comment on the affordability concerns cited by some small businesses. 

    Shirley and David Modlin, the owners of 3D Design and Manufacturing of Powhatan, Virginia, said their costs have jumped because of tariffs and other factors. 

    Courtesy of Shirley Modlin


    Another major concern for Modlin and her workers is that enhanced tax credits for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are set to expire at the end of 2025, which experts have said would sharply drive up premiums for more than 20 million Americans

    An October CAP analysis found that 4.4 million small business owners and self-employed Americans will see their health insurance costs rise by an average of $1,500 if the ACA subsidies are allowed to expire. 

    In 2024, Modlin offered employees a $350 monthly stipend to help offset health plan costs. Now, she said she’s trying to decide whether to increase that monthly payment or offer raises. She can’t afford to do both, said Modlin, expressing concern about losing some of her machinists to larger competitors. 

    “I’ve interviewed job candidates who have said they need a better health insurance benefit,” she said. “The rest of our benefits are good, but I just can’t keep up with the cost of insurance.”

    Julie Robbins, CEO of Earthquaker Devices, an Akron, Ohio-based maker of guitar pedals and other musical effects products, said the 35-person company’s costs have soared about 30% this year because of the sharply higher U.S. tariffs on imports.

    d63-0862.jpg

    Jamie Stillman and Julie Robbins, owners of Earthquaker Devices, said they are raising prices for the Akron, Ohio, company’s guitar pedals next year because of higher tariff costs.

    Dan Price


    She and her husband, with whom she runs the business, purchase thousands of components sourced from more than a dozen countries to manufacture pedals in Ohio. The company has paid an additional $60,000 in tariffs this year, a figure that could rise to at least $180,000 in 2026, Robbins said at the Senate small business event held earlier this week.

    Robbins said Earthquaker plans to modestly hike its prices starting in January, noting that the company’s suppliers have lifted their own prices. She acknowledges that such increases could scare away some customers. 

    “You can’t calculate how demand will suffer from a price rise, so we try to avoid that whenever possible,” Robbins told CBS News. 

    In November, 34% of small businesses raised their average selling prices, an unusually sharp jump from previous months, according to Bank of America analysts, citing recent data from the National Federation of Independent Business. 

    “This suggests businesses are passing on tariff and inflation-related costs” to consumers, Bank of America said in a report

    Source link

  • Deep Dive: Investors cautiously confident on China outlook amid trade war 2.0

    Deep Dive- Investors cautiously confident on China outlook amid trade war 2.0

    Source link

  • Year of the Lies: Trump’s statements about tariffs

    In November, all of Randy Richards’ soybeans remained in storage on the land he farms just outside of Hope, North Dakota.

    In 2024 and 2023 and many years before, that was not the case. Richards would have sold at least half of his soybeans to a local grain elevator and then, his crop might have ended up transported by train to the Pacific northwest and shipped to China, along with at least half of North Dakota’s soybeans.

    What was typical for Richards and other farmers blew up in 2025 with Trump’s tariff strategy and subsequent trade war.

    Richards, one of the family members who runs Richards & Judisch Farms, rents land to grow soybeans, corn and other crops. A third-generation, 71-year-old farmer, Richards has worked the land since he was a young child.

    Randy Richards, right, and his grandson. (Photo courtesy of Richards family)

    In January, when Trump took office, soybean prices in the Northern Plains, which includes North Dakota, stood at $9.50 per bushel, said Shawn Arita, a North Dakota State University agribusiness expert and former U.S. Department of Agriculture economist. After Trump levied tariffs on China — the largest market for U.S. soybeans — soybean prices tanked, crashing below $8.50 per bushel in the Northern Plains in early September. 

    Today, soybean prices are $10.10 per bushel, Arita said. It costs U.S. farmers more than $12 per bushel, on average, to grow them.

    China retaliated against Trump’s tariffs and bought soybeans from Argentina and Brazil instead. That was particularly painful because farmers have long relied on international trade: Roughly 20% of all U.S. agricultural production is exported.

    “Those sales are often what make the difference between profit and loss at the farm level,” Faith Parum, an American Farm Bureau Federation economist, wrote in October. Parum wrote that soybean markets became “the clearest signal of stress in U.S. agricultural trade.”

    Soybean farmers across the Midwest found themselves in limbo. 

    As of November, “Most all of my neighbors that I know of in my area here in Hope, their soybeans are in their bins,” Richards said. “Nobody sold any because the price isn’t very good.”

    Ian Sheldon, an Ohio State University agricultural trade expert, said when China stopped importing U.S. soybeans in May, it put downward pressure on U.S. soybean prices. 

    Trump has falsely said tariffs are paid by foreign countries, including in his inaugural speech, when he said the U.S. will “tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens” and “massive amounts of money (will pour) into our treasury coming from foreign sources.”

    His insistence that foreign governments are paying the tariffs is not how it works. U.S. businesses pay import taxes to the federal government. In the past, foreign companies sometimes lowered their prices to absorb some of the tariffs. But studies showed that during the first Trump administration, tariffs “were passed almost entirely through to US firms or final consumers,” the Tax Foundation concluded

    We asked the White House for evidence that foreign countries are paying the tariffs rather than U.S. importers.

    Spokesperson Kush Desai said, “The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by the foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world’s biggest and best consumer market. If Americans were solely paying the price of tariffs, foreign countries would not have rushed to the table to strike trade deals to reduce their tariff rates and industry titans would not have committed to investing trillions in American manufacturing.”

    In the lead-up to April 2 — what Trump called “Liberation Day,” when he rolled out “reciprocal” tariffs with countries that have trade imbalances with the U.S. — Trump appealed directly to U.S. farmers.

    “To the Great Farmers of the United States: Get ready to start making a lot of agricultural product to be sold INSIDE of the United States,” he wrote March 3 on Truth Social. “Tariffs will go on external product on April 2nd. Have fun!” 

    The next day, Caleb Ragland, American Soybean Association president and a Kentucky soy farmer, said, “Tariffs are not something to take lightly and ‘have fun’ with.” Ragland said he voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024.

    Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in April on CNBC that because of the tariffs, “I expect most countries to start to really examine their trade policy towards the United States of America, and stop picking on us.” 

    Instead, China stopped purchasing U.S. soybeans in May and didn’t resume until October.

    A few days after “Liberation Day,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on CNN, “We are unleashing a new golden age, and we will see an economy that will benefit not just every corner of America, but our farmers and our ranchers and the people that have been left behind for far too long by both Republicans and Democrats.”

    Farm groups didn’t see it that way. They pleaded with Trump to secure a trade deal with China and with congressional leaders to “educate the White House on production agriculture.” 

    American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall said on “Liberation Day” that Trump’s tariffs would drive up supply costs, and retaliatory tariffs from other nations would put American farmers at a disadvantage in the global market. He said tariffs threaten farmers’ competitiveness in the short term and also could cause long-term losses in market share. 

    Trump’s tariffs are not solely responsible for farmers’ challenges. In recent years, they have faced rising costs for essential items such as fertilizer. And in North Dakota, where Richards farms, June storms significantly damaged crops and farm buildings.

    As his soybeans sit in storage, Richards said he and other farmers are “waiting and hoping and praying” that agreements Trump said have been negotiated will improve the outlook.

    Richards farms land less than a mile from the city of Hope, home to about 300 people. Sometimes in tough times, he said he tells people, “I live just beyond Hope.” 

    “There is always hope in Hope. It’s really being strained now.”

    Economists: U.S. companies and consumers pay first

    Besides the soybean price crash, Richards has felt the tariff pinch in other ways.

    Every purchase this year was more expensive, he said. The bearing for his combine used to harvest crops. The steel shovels for his digger. The new tire for a tractor.

    Other farmers are feeling the strain. Farm production expenses are expected to rise by $12 billion this year compared with last year, the American Soybean Association wrote in December.

    “Farmers are facing elevated prices for land, machinery, seeds, pesticides and fertilizers,” the association wrote.

    Virtually all economists, citing years of data, say much of the cost of tariffs is passed on to consumers through higher prices.

    According to the Budget Lab at Yale, the effect of this year’s U.S. tariffs and foreign retaliation placed a 16.8% overall average effective tariff rate on consumers, the highest in 90 years.

    The tariffs represent a $1,700 loss for the average U.S. household, the lab said. Researchers arrived at the figure based on a projected 1.2% increase in consumer prices from tariffs and assuming that it is passed on to consumers. 

    Uncertainty looms for farmers

    Farmers paid close attention in October, when Trump said he had struck a trade deal with China. 

    The White House said China would suspend retaliatory tariffs. China also agreed to purchase at least 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans during the last two months of 2025 and at least 25 million metric tons in each of 2026, 2027 and 2028. CNBC News reported Dec. 9, citing NBC News analysis, that China’s purchases have fallen well short of the 2025 goal. 

    Before the 2018 trade war, Arita said, China purchased 30 to 36 million metric tons a year.

    After Trump’s announcement, soybean futures climbed above $11.50 per bushel — the highest level in more than a year — reflecting improved export prospects, Arita said. Futures prices are not a guarantee that farmers will receive that amount, though. 

    “Our Farmers will be very happy!” Trump wrote. “In fact, as I said once before during my first Administration, Farmers should immediately go out and buy more land and larger tractors.”

    The president’s comments, Richards said, are “as far from the truth as you can get.” 

    Many farmers are struggling with cash flow, based on land rent payments and rising input costs. 

    A November survey of agricultural economists by the publication Farm Journal found that 41% said farmers are delaying decisions because of uncertainty. 

    Jackson Takach, chief economist for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, known as Farmer Mac, told Farm Journal the economic stress is highest in parts of the country where soybeans are farmers’ No. 1 crop.

    When the Trump administration said Dec. 8 it will provide $12 billion in relief funding to farmers, officials blamed former President Joe Biden and not the current administration’s tariffs.

    Rollins told reporters, “There is almost zero evidence, if any evidence” that farms’ economic challenges have “anything to do with these trade renegotiations.”

    Scott Lincicome, a Cato Institute international trade expert, said Rollins is “totally wrong.”

    “Chinese purchases of soybeans effectively stopped when Trump’s trade wars started,” he said. The combination of lower U.S. crop prices as a result of tariffs and increased costs to farmers from tariffs on things they purchase caused what Lincicome called a “government-grown” crisis.

    The federal relief will cover only a fraction of the losses. North Dakota State University’s Agricultural Risk Policy Center estimated crop losses at $44 billion.

    The U.S. government said it expects to pay farmers by the end of February. 

    Richards wishes it wasn’t necessary.

    “Do I want a government check?” Richards said. “Hell no. I want my money to come from the market, coming from somebody giving me a fair price for my product.”

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this article.

    Source link

  • Trump Unsure Whether Impact of Economic Policies Will be Felt in Time for Midterms

    U.S. President Donald Trump expressed uncertainty about whether Republicans would keep control of the House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections because some of his economic policies have yet to take full effect, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday.

    Trump, in an interview conducted on Friday, told the Journal, “I can’t tell you. I don’t know when all of this money is going to kick in,” when asked about the whether Republicans would lose the House in November.

    The White House did not immediately respond to Reuters’ request for comment.

    The president has argued that his economic policies, including his imposition of widespread tariffs on imports, are creating jobs, boosting the stock market and attracting increased investment into the United States.

    After campaigning last year on promises to tame inflation, Trump has in recent weeks alternated between dismissing affordability problems as a hoax, blaming President Joe Biden for them, and promising his economic policies will benefit Americans next year.

    “I think by the time we have to talk about the election, which is in another few months, I think our prices are in good shape,” Trump said in the interview.

    Last month the president rolled back tariffs on more than 200 food products in the face of growing angst among American consumers about the high cost of groceries.

    The president did not say whether he would lower tariffs on additional goods, the Journal reported.

    Trump’s overall approval rating edged up to 41 percent in a new Reuters/Ipsos poll but the approval rating on his performance on the cost of living was just 31 percent.

    Democrats have won a string of victories in state and local elections in Virginia, New Jersey and New York City, where growing voter concerns about affordability, including high food prices, were a key topic.

    Officials have said Trump will hit the road in the new year to campaign for Republican candidates and emphasize his economic policy successes. Trump has said his tax cuts and tariffs on foreign goods will put more money in the pockets of American families.

    Reporting by Anusha Shah in Bengaluru; Editing by Christopher Cushing

    Reuters

    Source link