ReportWire

Tag: Tariffs

  • Trump heads to a UK state visit where trade and tech talks will mix with royal pomp

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump will arrive in the United Kingdom on Tuesday for a state visit during which the British government hopes a multibillion-dollar technology deal will show the trans-Atlantic bond remains strong despite differences over Ukraine, the Middle East and the future of the Western alliance.State visits in Britain blend 21st-century diplomacy with royal pageantry. Trump’s two-day trip comes complete with horse-drawn carriages, military honor guards and a glittering banquet inside a 1,000-year-old castle — all tailored to a president with a fondness for gilded splendor.King Charles III will host Trump at Windsor Castle on Wednesday before talks the next day with Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Chequers, the British leader’s rural retreat.Starmer’s office said the visit will demonstrate that “the U.K.-U.S. relationship is the strongest in the world, built on 250 years of history” — after that awkward rupture in 1776 — and bound by shared values of “belief in the rule of law and open markets.” There was no mention of Trump’s market-crimping fondness for sweeping tariffs.The White House expects the two countries will strengthen their relationship during the trip and celebrate the upcoming 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States, according to a senior White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity. It was unclear how the U.K. was planning to mark that chapter in their shared history.“The trip to the U.K. is going to be incredible,” Trump told reporters Sunday. He said Windsor Castle is “supposed to be amazing” and added: “It’s going to be very exciting.”Trump’s second state visitTrump is the first U.S. president to get a second state visit to the U.K.The unprecedented nature of the invitation, along with the expectation of lavish pomp and pageantry, holds dual appeal to Trump. The president has glowingly praised the king’s late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, and spoken about how his own Scotland-born mother loved the queen and the monarchy.Trump, as he left the White House on Tuesday, noted that during his past state visit he was hosted at Buckingham Palace.“I don’t want to say one is better than the other, but they say Windsor Castle is the ultimate,” Trump said.He also called the king “an elegant gentleman” and said “he represents the country so well.”The president is also royally flattered by exceptional attention and has embraced the grandeur of his office in his second term. He has adorned the normally more austere Oval Office with gold accents, is constructing an expansive ballroom at the White House and has sought to refurbish other Washington buildings to his liking.Foreign officials have shown they’re attuned to his tastes. During a visit to the Middle East this year, leaders of Saudi Arabia and Qatar didn’t just roll out a red carpet but dispatched fighter jets to escort Trump’s plane.Starmer has already shown he’s adept at charming Trump. Visiting Washington in February, he noted the president’s Oval Office decorating choices and decision to display a bust of Winston Churchill. During Trump’s private trip to Scotland in July, Starmer visited and praised Trump’s golf courses.Efforts to woo the president make some members of Starmer’s Labour Party uneasy, and Trump will not address Parliament during his visit, like French President Emmanuel Macron did in July. Lawmakers will be on their annual autumn recess, sparing the government an awkward decision.The itinerary in Windsor and at Chequers, both well outside London, also keeps Trump away from a planned mass protest against his visit.“This visit is really important to Keir Starmer to show that he’s a statesman,” said Leslie Vinjamuri, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. “But it’s such a double-edged sword, because he’s going to be a statesman alongside a U.S. president that is not popular in Europe.”Troubles for StarmerPreparations for the visit have been ruffled by political turmoil in Starmer’s center-left government. Last week, Starmer sacked Britain’s ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, over his past friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.Mandelson had good relations with the Trump administration and played a key role in securing a U.K.-U.S. trade agreement in May. His firing has put Epstein back in British headlines as Trump tries to swerve questions about his own relationship with the disgraced financier.Mandelson’s exit came just a week after Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner quit over a tax error on a home purchase. A senior Starmer aide, Paul Ovenden quit Monday over tasteless text messages he sent years ago. Fourteen months after winning a landslide election victory, Starmer’s position at the helm of the Labour Party is fragile and his poll ratings are in the dumps.But he has found a somewhat unexpected supporter in Trump, who has said Starmer is a friend, despite being “slightly more liberal than I am.”Starmer’s government has cultivated that warmth and tried to use it to get favorable trade terms with the U.S., the U.K.’s largest single economic partner, accounting for 18% of total British trade.The May trade agreement reduces U.S. tariffs on Britain’s key auto and aerospace industries. But a final deal has not been reached over other sectors, including pharmaceuticals, steel and aluminum.As he left the White House on Tuesday, Trump said U.K. officials wanted to continue trade negotiations during his visit.“They’d like to see if they can get a little bit better deal, so we’ll talk to them” he said.Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are expected to be among the business leaders in the U.S. delegation. Trump and Starmer are set to sign a technology partnership – which Mandelson was key to striking – accompanied by major investments in nuclear power, life sciences and Artificial Intelligence data centers.The leaders are also expected to sign nuclear energy deals, expand cooperation on defense technology and explore ways to bolster ties between their financial hubs, according to the White House official.Ukraine on the agendaStarmer has also tried to use his influence to maintain U.S. support for Ukraine, with limited results. Trump has expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin but has not made good on threats to impose new sanctions on Russia for shunning peace negotiations.Last week’s Russian drone incursion into NATO member Poland drew strong condemnation from European NATO allies, and pledges of more planes and troops for the bloc’s eastern flank. Trump played down the incident’s severity, musing that it “ could have been a mistake.”Starmer also departs from Trump over Israel’s war in Gaza, and has said the U.K. will formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations later this month.Vinjamuri said Starmer “has kept the United States speaking the right language” on Ukraine, but has had little impact on Trump’s actions.“On China, on India, on Israel and Gaza and Hamas, and on Vladimir Putin – on the really big important things – the U.K. hasn’t had a huge amount of influence,” she said.

    President Donald Trump will arrive in the United Kingdom on Tuesday for a state visit during which the British government hopes a multibillion-dollar technology deal will show the trans-Atlantic bond remains strong despite differences over Ukraine, the Middle East and the future of the Western alliance.

    State visits in Britain blend 21st-century diplomacy with royal pageantry. Trump’s two-day trip comes complete with horse-drawn carriages, military honor guards and a glittering banquet inside a 1,000-year-old castle — all tailored to a president with a fondness for gilded splendor.

    King Charles III will host Trump at Windsor Castle on Wednesday before talks the next day with Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Chequers, the British leader’s rural retreat.

    Starmer’s office said the visit will demonstrate that “the U.K.-U.S. relationship is the strongest in the world, built on 250 years of history” — after that awkward rupture in 1776 — and bound by shared values of “belief in the rule of law and open markets.” There was no mention of Trump’s market-crimping fondness for sweeping tariffs.

    The White House expects the two countries will strengthen their relationship during the trip and celebrate the upcoming 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States, according to a senior White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity. It was unclear how the U.K. was planning to mark that chapter in their shared history.

    “The trip to the U.K. is going to be incredible,” Trump told reporters Sunday. He said Windsor Castle is “supposed to be amazing” and added: “It’s going to be very exciting.”

    Trump’s second state visit

    Trump is the first U.S. president to get a second state visit to the U.K.

    The unprecedented nature of the invitation, along with the expectation of lavish pomp and pageantry, holds dual appeal to Trump. The president has glowingly praised the king’s late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, and spoken about how his own Scotland-born mother loved the queen and the monarchy.

    Trump, as he left the White House on Tuesday, noted that during his past state visit he was hosted at Buckingham Palace.

    “I don’t want to say one is better than the other, but they say Windsor Castle is the ultimate,” Trump said.

    He also called the king “an elegant gentleman” and said “he represents the country so well.”

    The president is also royally flattered by exceptional attention and has embraced the grandeur of his office in his second term. He has adorned the normally more austere Oval Office with gold accents, is constructing an expansive ballroom at the White House and has sought to refurbish other Washington buildings to his liking.

    Foreign officials have shown they’re attuned to his tastes. During a visit to the Middle East this year, leaders of Saudi Arabia and Qatar didn’t just roll out a red carpet but dispatched fighter jets to escort Trump’s plane.

    Starmer has already shown he’s adept at charming Trump. Visiting Washington in February, he noted the president’s Oval Office decorating choices and decision to display a bust of Winston Churchill. During Trump’s private trip to Scotland in July, Starmer visited and praised Trump’s golf courses.

    Efforts to woo the president make some members of Starmer’s Labour Party uneasy, and Trump will not address Parliament during his visit, like French President Emmanuel Macron did in July. Lawmakers will be on their annual autumn recess, sparing the government an awkward decision.

    The itinerary in Windsor and at Chequers, both well outside London, also keeps Trump away from a planned mass protest against his visit.

    “This visit is really important to Keir Starmer to show that he’s a statesman,” said Leslie Vinjamuri, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. “But it’s such a double-edged sword, because he’s going to be a statesman alongside a U.S. president that is not popular in Europe.”

    Troubles for Starmer

    Preparations for the visit have been ruffled by political turmoil in Starmer’s center-left government. Last week, Starmer sacked Britain’s ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, over his past friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Mandelson had good relations with the Trump administration and played a key role in securing a U.K.-U.S. trade agreement in May. His firing has put Epstein back in British headlines as Trump tries to swerve questions about his own relationship with the disgraced financier.

    Mandelson’s exit came just a week after Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner quit over a tax error on a home purchase. A senior Starmer aide, Paul Ovenden quit Monday over tasteless text messages he sent years ago. Fourteen months after winning a landslide election victory, Starmer’s position at the helm of the Labour Party is fragile and his poll ratings are in the dumps.

    But he has found a somewhat unexpected supporter in Trump, who has said Starmer is a friend, despite being “slightly more liberal than I am.”

    Starmer’s government has cultivated that warmth and tried to use it to get favorable trade terms with the U.S., the U.K.’s largest single economic partner, accounting for 18% of total British trade.

    The May trade agreement reduces U.S. tariffs on Britain’s key auto and aerospace industries. But a final deal has not been reached over other sectors, including pharmaceuticals, steel and aluminum.

    As he left the White House on Tuesday, Trump said U.K. officials wanted to continue trade negotiations during his visit.

    “They’d like to see if they can get a little bit better deal, so we’ll talk to them” he said.

    Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are expected to be among the business leaders in the U.S. delegation. Trump and Starmer are set to sign a technology partnership – which Mandelson was key to striking – accompanied by major investments in nuclear power, life sciences and Artificial Intelligence data centers.

    The leaders are also expected to sign nuclear energy deals, expand cooperation on defense technology and explore ways to bolster ties between their financial hubs, according to the White House official.

    Ukraine on the agenda

    Starmer has also tried to use his influence to maintain U.S. support for Ukraine, with limited results. Trump has expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin but has not made good on threats to impose new sanctions on Russia for shunning peace negotiations.

    Last week’s Russian drone incursion into NATO member Poland drew strong condemnation from European NATO allies, and pledges of more planes and troops for the bloc’s eastern flank. Trump played down the incident’s severity, musing that it “ could have been a mistake.”

    Starmer also departs from Trump over Israel’s war in Gaza, and has said the U.K. will formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations later this month.

    Vinjamuri said Starmer “has kept the United States speaking the right language” on Ukraine, but has had little impact on Trump’s actions.

    “On China, on India, on Israel and Gaza and Hamas, and on Vladimir Putin – on the really big important things – the U.K. hasn’t had a huge amount of influence,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Trump Regrets ICE’s Raid on a Korean Plant in Georgia

    [ad_1]

    This image from video provided by ICE shows manufacturing-plant employees waiting to have their legs shackled at the Hyundai Motor Group’s electric-vehicle plant on September 4.
    Photo: Corey Bullard/AP

    Here’s something I sure didn’t have on my bingo card: Donald Trump expressing regret over a major immigration raid. For the most part, his administration has gloried in the many excesses of its mass-deportation program, apparently on the theory that aggressive enforcement tactics and even cruelty would help move things along as anyone not legally in the country would self-deport instead of finding themselves in a brutal ICE detention facility or an even more brutal rent-a-prison overseas.

    But an immigration raid on September 4 at an EV battery plant in Georgia, which was supervised by the elite Homeland Security Investigations arm of ICE, has caused some real buyer’s remorse for the 47th president. The 475 arrests for immigration violations included 317 South Korean citizens sent to oversee the building of the plant, and their government was not at all happy with their treatment. The busts (mostly for visa overstays) disrupted U.S.–South Korean diplomatic relations, including sensitive negotiations over tariffs, and appear to have traumatized the workers involved, as the Los Angeles Times reported:

    Throughout the day, people described federal agents taking cellphones from workers and putting them in long lines … Some workers hid for hours to avoid capture in air ducts or remote areas of the sprawling property. The Department of Justice said some hid in a nearby sewage pond.

    Collectively, the detained South Koreans chose to go home even after they were offered a temporary respite from deportation. Indeed, the South Korean government is investigating the possibility that the raid violated international human-rights agreements. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau has “expressed deep regret” for the raid in a meeting with South Korean diplomats. And most remarkably, the president himself backtracked in a Sunday Truth Social post:

    This was a very wordy way for Trump to admit that two of his biggest priorities are in conflict. The ultimate prize at the end of the rainbow for his Liberation Day tariff initiative is to push the world’s manufacturers into relocating facilities to the U.S. That isn’t going to happen if the people they send over to set up said facilities are being rounded up by ICE and put in cages. In retrospect, it’s rather surprising the administration didn’t foresee this problem and at least provide some coordination between their economic-policy folks and the zealous deporters of DHS and ICE. And you have to wonder if anyone on the immigration side of the policy table got chewed out for blowing up U.S.–South Korean relations, making other countries nervous, and forcing the president to semi-apologize. Are there limits to Stephen Miller’s power after all?

    This isn’t just an embarrassment for the administration, to be clear. The EV-battery plant was very necessary for a Hyundai EV-manufacturing plant next door. Together these facilities represented the largest economic development project in Georgia history and the crown jewel of Brian Kemp’s governorship. To add insult to injury, DHS pressed Georgia state troopers into service during the battery-plant bust, presumably as part of routine state cooperation with federal immigration-enforcement efforts. Kemp, whose relationship with the president is famously fraught but recently peaceful, couldn’t have been happy. Beyond that, though, someone needs to make the Trump administration aware that attracting foreign direct investment is one of the favorite economic-development tools of virtually every Republican governor; for some, it’s all they know how to do, other than cutting taxes, to create wealth.

    It will be fascinating to see if the incident puts a bit of a damper on the nativist strain of America First politics and policy and maybe keeps a few people out of ICE-detention hell.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • China says Nvidia violated antitrust regulations | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Trade tensions between China and the U.S. regarding semiconductors just got even more strained.

    On Monday, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation ruled that semiconductor giant Nvidia was in violation of the country’s antitrust regulations, as first reported by Bloomberg. The ruling was in reference to Nvidia’s 2020 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies, a computer networking supplier, for $7 billion.

    An Nvidia spokesperson supplied the following statement, “We comply with the law in all respects. We will continue to cooperate with all relevant government agencies as they evaluate the impact of export controls on competition in the commercial markets.”

    China didn’t announce any consequences tied to its findings and will continue to investigate. Still, the ruling is likely to cast a pall over ongoing tariff negotiations between the U.S. and China, currently taking place in Madrid. While these trade discussions aren’t specifically about semiconductors, the question of Chinese access to Nvidia chips is a major point of contention between the two regimes.

    The outgoing Biden administration announced its AI Diffusion Rule back in January that was meant to restrict U.S.-made AI chips to many countries, with further restrictions specifically for China and other adversaries.

    While the U.S. Department of Commerce formally repealed Biden’s AI rule in May, the future of AI chip exports to China remains in flux. The Trump administration slapped licensing agreements on chips heading to China in April. A few months later, in July, these companies were given the green light to start selling these chips again.

    Just a few weeks after that the country struck a deal requiring companies selling chips to China to give the U.S. a 15% cut of the revenue made on those sales. China has discouraged firms from buying Nvidia chips and, as of a recent earnings call, none of the company’s chips have made it through the new export process.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    [ad_2]

    Rebecca Szkutak

    Source link

  • Inflation fears drive falling consumer sentiment in September

    [ad_1]

    New data shows Americans are feeling increasingly concerned about the state of the economy. A survey reveals that consumer sentiment fell in September for the second consecutive month. CBS News senior business and technology correspondent Jo Ling Kent has more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Americans are feeling a lot worse about the state of the economy

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — American consumers are downbeat about the economy, according to preliminary results of a monthly survey conducted by the University of Michigan.

    The index measuring consumer sentiment fell unexpectedly this month to 55.4 from 58.2 in August as inflation is on the rise and job prospects are worsening. September’s reading also represents a 21% decline compared to a year ago, well before President Donald Trump took office and raised tariffs on practically everything the country imports.

    In addition to inflation and the labor market, tariffs also remain a concern for consumers, Joanne Hsu, the survey’s director, noted.

    “Trade policy remains highly salient to consumers, with about 60% of consumers providing unprompted comments about tariffs during interviews,” Hsu, said in a statement, noting that the same thing happened in the previous month.

    Economists polled by FactSet had been anticipating a minor improvement in consumer sentiment from August. Despite sentiment that’s near historic lows in a survey that goes back to the early 1950s, consumers are still feeling slightly better about the economy now compared to April and May during Trump’s initial rollout of so-called “reciprocal” tariffs, according to prior readings.

    The survey also spotlights what appears to be an increasingly bifurcated economy between income classes, where higher-income Americans continue to spend relatively freely and are feeling more optimistic about the state of the economy, while lower and middle-income Americans are cutting back and are more worried.

    Whiffs of stagflation

    While the economy is nowhere close to where it was in the 1970s and 1980s, when the nation’s annual inflation rate and unemployment rate both hit double-digit levels, recent employment and inflation data have led to mounting concerns of stagflation – when the economy slows significantly while inflation accelerates.

    Consumer prices rose 0.4% last month, bringing the annual inflation rate to 2.9%, according to Consumer Price Index data released Thursday. Meanwhile, there’s a laundry list of recent data pointing to a weakening labor market.

    For example, first-time applications for unemployment benefits surged last week to their highest level in four years. Also for the first time in four years, there are more people looking for work than there are jobs available for them.

    To top it off, the August employment report showed employers hired just 22,000 new workers and the unemployment rate rose to 4.3%, the highest level since 2021. The labor force snapshot also revealed that the US economy lost 13,000 workers in June, marking the first month since 2020 when employers laid off more workers than they hired.

    “Economic sentiment declined more than expected in September largely because Americans are fearful of losing their jobs,” Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, said in a statement on Friday.

    This string of data has essentially guaranteed the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at its monetary policy meeting next week after having held rates steady for close to a year. Traders are also now betting on cuts at the subsequent two meetings this year, which has helped push stocks to record highs.

    This story has been updated with additional developments and context.

    [ad_2]

    Elisabeth Buchwald and CNN

    Source link

  • Tariff-fueled price hikes have arrived — and hitting these items first

    [ad_1]

    For much of 2025, the Trump administration’s wide-ranging tariffs defied forecasts that the import duties would drive up inflation. But that reprieve appears to be over, with economic data this week showing the tariffs are now pushing prices higher. 

    The Consumer Price Index in August rose at a rate of 2.9% from a year ago, accelerating from the previous month as President Trump’s tariffs filtered through the economy. Heavily imported goods saw some of the steepest price hikes last month, the data show. The increase represents the fastest rate of inflation since January, when Mr. Trump was inaugurated for his second term. 

    Although the tariffs were first announced in April on what Mr. Trump called “Liberation Day,” their implementation was largely delayed as the administration negotiated new trade deals with multiple nations over the ensuing months. That gave U.S. companies time to prepare for the new import duties, which are paid by U.S. businesses directly to the federal government.

    Facing the prospect of sharply higher tariffs, some American companies scrambled to stock up on the imported goods and parts they use in their business, postponing the need to raise customer prices. Others absorbed the levies instead of passing them along to consumers. 

    But many companies are now pulling back from those strategies, economic data shows. According to the Federal Reserve’s latest “Beige Book” survey, which includes responses from businesses, economists and other sources, tariff-related price hikes were visible across the U.S. in August. 

    Beth Hammack, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, recently told CBS News that some companies facing a hit to their profit margins have no choice but to start passing on tariff-related costs to consumers. 

    Among the companies to say they are raising prices for some goods as tariffs take effect are home improvement giant Home Depot, retailer Macy’s and camera maker Nikon.

    “The pass-through from tariffs is gradual because some businesses may have held on to a greater share of the costs and may have shared a greater burden of tariffs,” said EY-Parthenon chief economist Gregory Daco. “But there is a limit to how long and how much of that they can do — so there may be more of a push to pass those costs onto consumers.” 

    The White House said inflation remains low and that Mr. Trump’s policies are boosting the economy. 

    “Since President Trump took office, CPI is tracking at a 2.3% annualized rate, consistent with low and stable inflation,” White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. 

    Leavitt also noted that data on producer prices out this week point to a decline in wholesale inflation. “As the Trump economic agenda continues to take effect, the trillions of dollars in private sector and foreign investments, historic tax cuts, massive deregulation and energy dominance that the president is spearheading will fuel an economic boom,” she added.

    Tariff-fueled price hikes

    Many types of goods that rely heavily on imports saw significant price hikes last month, the latest CPI report shows. 

    Coffee, for instance, is largely imported because there are only a handful of places in the U.S. where the beans can be grown, such as Hawaii and Puerto Rico. About 80% of unroasted coffee imports are sourced from Latin America, primarily from Brazil, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

    Products from Brazil that are shipped to the U.S. now face a 50% tariff, according to the White House. Once those import taxes kicked in, U.S. consumers in August shelled out 21% more for beans than a year earlier, according to CPI data. 

    Other products that are heavily imported and that, as of August, are seeing large price increases compared with a year ago include:

    • Audio equipment: +12% 
    • Household furniture: +10% 
    • Bananas: +6.6%
    • Women’s dresses: +6.2%
    • Watches: +5.6%
    • Motor vehicle parts: +3.4%

    Strain on consumers

    Prices are edging higher as worker wages are growing more slowly, straining lower-income households. 

    “It’s troubling that so many basic necessities now cost more. Food, gas, clothing and shelter all had big cost jumps in August,” Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, said in an email.  “And this is only the beginning of the price hikes. The situation will worsen in the coming months as more costs are passed along to American consumers.”

    Clara Moore, 44, a public-sector researcher who lives in Newark, New Jersey, told CBS MoneyWatch she is seeing prices “rising all over the place.” Her grocery bill has risen to about $250 per haul, from roughly $175 one year ago, she said.

    Some economists think tariffs are likely to continue pushing inflation higher throughout the rest of the year, putting more financial pressure on families. As a result, many consumers will spend with more restraint, according to Daco. 

    “They are more cautious when it comes to their outlays. They haven’t stopped spending, but they’ll be more judicious from one month to the next. They’ll adjust their spending according to what they need and what’s affordable,” he said. 

    Moore said she’s had to cut back her spending on discretionary goods in order to afford the basics. 

    “I’m in the process of cutting out all of my streaming. I stopped ordering anything from Amazon — any impulse buying I have cut out,” she said.

    Ryan Sweet, Oxford Economics’ chief U.S. economist, said consumers should expect to pick up about two-thirds of the cost of new U.S. tariffs on foreign goods. 

    “You’ll have a few of these increases spread out with each passing month, and you’ll see more of the tariffs passed on to consumers,” he said. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court to tackle two major cases challenging Trump’s tariffs

    [ad_1]



    Supreme Court to tackle two major cases challenging Trump’s tariffs – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    The Supreme Court is set to take up two cases that challenge President Trump’s sweeping tariff policy. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson breaks it down.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Supreme Court Will Hear Our Case Challenging Trump’s Tariffs – and Two Other Related Cases

    [ad_1]

    NA

    Today, the Supreme Court decided to review V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump, our case challenging President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. The case was filed by the Liberty Justice Center and myself on behalf of five small businesses harmed by the tariffs. It is consolidated with a similar suit filed by twelve state governments, led by the state of Oregon. Both challenge massive tariffs Trump has imposed using his supposed authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA), and both will now be heard on the same accelerated schedule. The Supreme Court also decided to hear Learning Resources v. Trump, a case challenging many of the same tariffs, filed by two importers in a different federal court.

    We, the twelve states, and the Learning Resources plaintiffs all prevailed in the lower courts, and I hope the Supreme Court will also recognize the IEEPA tariffs are illegal for a variety of reasons. Fundamentally, these cases come down to whether the president has virtually unlimited power to impose taxes in the form of tariffs on the American people, much like an absolute monarch. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately denied the executive the kind of unbridled tax authority claimed by power-grabbing English kings, like Charles I.

    The Court’s order is short. For convenience, I reprint it here in full:

    LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., ET AL. V. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. [24-1287]
    TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC., ET AL. [25-250]

    The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 24-1287 is granted. The motion to expedite and the petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 25-250 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Respondents in No. 24-1287 and petitioners in No. 25-250 shall file an opening brief on the merits on or before Friday, September 19, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support or in support of neither party shall be filed on or before Tuesday, September 23, 2025. Petitioners in No. 24-1287 and respondents in No. 25-250 shall file response briefs on the merits on or before Monday, October 20, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support shall be filed on or before Friday, October 24, 2025. A reply brief shall be filed by Thursday, October 30, 2025. The cases will be set for argument in the first week of the November 2025 argument session.

    The Liberty Justice Center has issued a statement about the order, which I reprint below. No one will be surprised that I agree with it! Here it is:

    Today, the Supreme Court granted the government’s expedited request for Supreme Court review (writ of certiorari) in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump, agreeing to review whether the Trump Administration’s “Liberation Day” tariffs exceed the President’s legal and constitutional authority. Given the importance of the issues and the need for a prompt resolution, the Liberty Justice Center agreed to the government’s request.

    The Liberty Justice Center, along with legal scholar Ilya Somin, filed this case on April 14 in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) on behalf of five American small businesses harmed by the tariffs. The CIT held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, does not give the President unlimited unilateral authority to impose tariffs on the American people whenever he wants, at whatever level he wants, for whatever countries and products he wants, and for as long as he wants.

    The government appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where the Liberty Justice Center was joined by leading appellate lawyers and constitutional scholars, Judge Michael W. McConnell and Neal Katyal. And on August 29, in a 7–4 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the CIT’s decision, holding that IEEPA does not authorize the President’s so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs. The Supreme Court will now decide whether to affirm those rulings.

    Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the Supreme Court has now set this case on an expedited schedule, with oral argument to take place the first week of November.

    “We are confident that the Supreme Court, like the CIT and the Federal Circuit, will recognize that the President does not have unilateral tariff power under IEEPA,” said Jeffrey Schwab, Senior Counsel and Director of Litigation at the Liberty Justice Center. “Congress, not the President alone, has the constitutional power to impose tariffs.”

    The issues in the case are covered in much greater detail in our various legal filings (see the Liberty Justice Center site for a compilation), and in my earlier writings about this litigation.

    [ad_2]

    Ilya Somin

    Source link

  • The U.S. is losing thousands of manufacturing jobs, analysis finds

    [ad_1]

    Manufacturers in the U.S. are cutting thousands of jobs even as President Trump pushes economic policies that he says will revitalize the industry. 

    Employers shed 12,000 manufacturing jobs in August, while payrolls in the sector have shrunk by 42,000 since April, according to a new analysis from the Center for American Progress (CAP) that draws on government labor data. 

    The nonpartisan policy institute attributes that decline to the Trump administration’s steep new tariffs; hardline stance on immigration; and the Republican-backed “big, beautiful bill,” a tax and spending package enacted by Mr. Trump in July that CAP says hurts renewable energy companies by phasing out certain tax credits.

    For all of 2025, manufacturing employment in the U.S. has sunk by a total of 33,000 jobs, according to Labor Department figures. Most of those job losses have been among companies that make durable goods, such as cars, household appliances and electronics. The drop comes as hiring overall has slowed sharply in recent months, with employers adding only 22,000 jobs in August, well below forecasts. 

    The number of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. has declined for the past six decades, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. In 1960, manufacturing represented about 34% of total employment, while the number of jobs in the sector peaked in 1970 at 19.5 million. As of August this year, 12.7 million Americans were employed in manufacturing, while the industry lost 87,000 jobs in 2024, data shows. 

    Uncertainty hurting businesses

    When Mr. Trump in April announced a range of levies on dozens of other countries, the White House said tariffs would protect American workers by reducing the U.S. trade deficit with its economic partners and spurring employers to move manufacturing jobs to the U.S.

    For now, however, confusion over the scale and scope of U.S. tariffs has put manufacturers on the defensive, increasing their costs and discouraging them from hiring, economist Sara Estrep, one of the authors of the CAP report, told CBS MoneyWatch.

    “Companies are uncertain about what’s happening,” she said. “Everything has been changing on a day-to-day basis, so it’s not clear what production should look like. That’s why they aren’t hiring.”

    In August, for example, farm equipment giant John Deere cited tariffs in announcing that its sales and operating profits had dipped from a year ago. In an earnings call, an executive with the company noted that it had racked up roughly $300 million in tariff-related costs, including on steel and aluminum imports. John Deere also announced it was laying off more than 200 workers at plants in Illinois and Iowa, according to AgWeb, a trade publication. 

    Automakers pointed partly to tariffs in announcing nearly 5,000 job cuts in July, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, while it noted that the retail sector has also stepped up layoffs and store closures because of economic uncertainty.

    Another factor fueling uncertainty for manufacturers are the ongoing legal challenges to the Trump tariffs, making it hard to plan and invest for the future, according to experts. 

    A federal appeals court in August ruled that Mr. Trump unlawfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to impose sweeping tariffs on U.S. trade partners. Mr. Trump on September 3 asked the Supreme Court to review the lower court’s decision before it takes effect in October. 

    The outcome of the case leaves many manufacturers in doubt about how to proceed, making them reluctant to expand their workforce as they seek to control costs, Daco told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    “The slowdown is symptomatic of an environment where purchasing managers are all under stress, and they are being squeezed by higher costs of goods and reduced demand,” said EY-Parthenon chief economist Gregory Daco. “And so in that squeeze, they are having to find ways to offset the higher costs, and one of the avenues to do that is to streamline their operations and make sure that they only have the essential talent on hand.” 

    The White House did not respond to several requests for comment on CAP’s findings. The Office of the United States Trade Representative and National Association of Manufacturers, a trade group, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

    Immigration effect

    The Trump administration’s crackdown on U.S. immigrants is also weighing on hiring in manufacturing, said Daniel Altman, an economist and author of the High Yield Economics newsletter. 

    “Immigration has been an important source of employment in manufacturing for some industries, and if you take away some of their labor supply, that’s just gives them more incentive to pursue automation and other forms of capital intensive manufacturing,” he told CBS MoneyWatch.

    The government stepped up its campaign last week when Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents detained 475 immigrants, most of them Korean, at a Hyundai plant in Georgia because they were suspected of living and working in the U.S. illegally. 

    Border patrol agents have also conducted raids targeting immigrants working in retail, according to CBS News. In sectors like farming, food processing and construction, undocumented immigrants make up to 20% of the workforce, according to Goldman Sachs

    White House “border czar” Tom Homan on Sunday said the White House will expand such efforts.

    “We’re going to do more worksite enforcement operations,” Homan told CNN. “No one hires an illegal alien out of the goodness of their heart. They hire them because they can work them harder, pay them less, undercut the competition that hires U.S. citizen employees.” 

    Other long-term factors that go beyond the Trump administration’s policies are also contributing to the ongoing contraction in manufacturing jobs. During the pandemic, manufacturers invested heavily in technologies to automate their operations, Altman noted.

    “We’ve seen a lot of automation, which mean companies do not need as many workers to provide the same output,” he told CBS MoneyWatch. “Output per worker has been increasing, and when we see that kind of increase in labor productivity, it usually means workers have access to more capital, or better technology or both, and that’s what you’d expect with automation.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s Policies Are Shutting Out Americans From the Coolest New Gadgets

    [ad_1]

    Tech companies big and small now struggle to tantalize you with tech without telling you how much it will cost, or—hell—whether you can even buy it. The still-ongoing IFA 2025 tech conference in Berlin proved how merely shipping tech to the U.S. is more tenuous than at any time in the last few decades. From what I saw and heard both on the floor and off, it became clear that the era of plentiful, affordable, and cool shit will melt away in favor of an epoch of dull and ever-more expensive tech.

    IFA’s timing lands early in September for tech companies to have the chance to promote their products before the holiday rush. It’s a big conference for European- and Asian-based companies, especially those that focus on smart home tech. For us journalists, IFA is also an opportunity to dive into the weird and wacky products that may or may not float to the U.S. from across the pond.

    This year, the annual conference took a different tenor. IFA came months after U.S. tariffs had been causing havoc with pricing on existing products. Future devices won’t just be more expensive; more and more companies indicated they were holding off shipping to the U.S. or were writing off Uncle Sam altogether until things change. It was as if every public relations professional’s toothy smile hid a single word—tariff—whispered but never fully uttered through their teeth.

    U.S. policies are leaving us guessing on price and availability

    The TCL QM9K TV is a month away from launch, and still the company did not want to tell us its price. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    Some international tech giants bearing truly unique products are being barred completely from the States. DJI, the company most known for making drones, has found itself soft-banned from importing gear to the U.S. There’s a long and fraught history with DJI and the U.S. market, but the end result is Americans locked out of an entire line of products. At IFA, DJI had its new Osmo 360 camera proudly displayed. You can go to the DJI store page now, and it currently says “Out of Stock” if you’re checking in from the U.S. DJI has in-store availability slated for the rest of this year, but people in the U.S. won’t be able to easily buy it. At least Insta360 and its Antigravity A1 360-degree camera drone are still getting a U.S. launch.

    Some tech companies have managed to cajole President Donald “I’m not a dictator” Trump by heaping praise and gaudy 24K gold statues on the capricious commander in chief. Those companies that haven’t kissed the ring find themselves on the outside. At IFA, we checked out several new products from Roborock, including a new robo lawnmower and a washing machine/dryer combo with a doggy door for a robovac. Neither are coming to the U.S. in the immediate future, the company told us. The U.S. has easily the highest demand for lawnmowers in the world.

    Dji Osmo 360
    You can’t buy the DJI Osmo 360 camera in the U.S., as much as you may want to. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    Over and over again, I asked companies about U.S. pricing and availability, and was told they didn’t have those details available, at least not yet. Companies like Anker, Mova, and Dreame crafted their own blend of robotic suits for robovacs to help them climb stairs. The Eufy MarsWalker, Dreame CyberX, and Mova Zeus 60 should be around sometime next year. No, of course, there’s no suggested price. Want more wacky gadgets? Too bad. SwitchBot’s Kata Friends, an AI-powered family “pet” that looks like a teddy bear filled with several sensors, still doesn’t have a price or availability for U.S. consumers. The company simply wouldn’t suggest when its products will ever come to the U.S.

    That’s not to say it was the case with all tech on the show floor. There are plenty of new gadgets, like these long-lasting Bose headphones, the updated Withings ScanWatch 2, Anker’s Prime power banks, and the massive Nebula X1 Pro will come to the U.S. Companies are more hesitant than ever to even mention prices. TCL’s new QM9K TV should be available “later this month,” but the company refused to provide an idea about price, which is perhaps the most important element of a renowned budget TV brand.

    The PC market looked dire at IFA 2025

    Lenovo Legion Go 2
    The new Legion Go 2 is $350 more expensive than the starting price of the original Legion Go. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    Unlike with CES, companies don’t have to come to IFA if they hope to make a splash. It’s not a sure sign there are internal or external struggles. But in conversations with companies, it’s clear the only answer they have to Trump’s tariffs is to delay release or obfuscate pricing. Asus launched several laptops at IFA 2024. The company told Gizmodo it was skipping the 2025 show. That wasn’t entirely true, though. Asus’ gaming-centric brand—Republic of Gamers—took up a corner booth space in the back of one of the halls with two Asus ROG Xbox Ally X handhelds on display. The company still refused to say how much it would cost. There’s a reason customers should be concerned.

    Handhelds are one of the fastest-growing and most innovative markets for both gaming and PCs. At IFA, one company promised a handheld-laptop hybrid with a stereoscopic 3D display akin to the Nintendo 3DS. While we saw more handhelds at CES 2025, the situation post-tariffs is far more tenuous. Lenovo’s Legion Go 2 was all set to hit a home run with its OLED display. Then we saw the price. Lenovo said the handheld PC would start at $1,050. Things are worse when you look at the true costs. A version of the handheld with the higher-end processor, the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, starts at $1,350. The original Legion Go demanded $700 at launch late in 2023.

    Acer Swift 16 Air Hands On 1
    Want to know how much the Acer Swift 16 Air will cost? So do we. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    Few people want to spend over $1,000 for a device with only marginal performance gains. It does not bode well for the Xbox Ally X, which contains the same Ryzen Z2 Extreme chip. We were also hoping to see Acer finally drop details on its Nitro Blaze 7 and Nitro Blaze 11 handhelds. While the handheld has already been on sale in various countries in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East, Acer told me it had “no updates for U.S. on handhelds.” Acer was also unwilling to share any pricing for its upcoming laptops, like the ultra-light Swift 16 Air.

    Tech companies may be taking a wait-and-see strategy, but there’s no sign Trump will end his love affair with import taxes, at least for those U.S. firms unwilling to give up a stake in their company—like Intel has—or go Nvidia’s route and be stuck agreeing to ever-more unfavorable demands. Trump’s fascistic tendencies naturally lean on the industry, but those who can’t or (increasingly rarely) won’t give themselves to Trump will simply have to avoid the U.S. and its many gadget-hungry consumers. Nobody knows how this will all shake out, but U.S. users better get used to holding onto their aging gear for far longer.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Barr

    Source link

  • MAGAnomics Isn’t Working

    [ad_1]

    A dismal jobs report affirms earlier warnings about the economic impact of Donald Trump’s tariffs, immigration restrictions, and DOGE-led firings.

    [ad_2]

    John Cassidy

    Source link

  • Trump Tariffs Take Toll on Texas Tabletop Game Industry

    [ad_1]

    The tariff policy by President Donald Trump is putting independent tabletop gamer companies in Texas in a difficult position: raise prices or lose customers.

    Houston’s Danny Ayoub of Mega Moth Studios has a very simple dream: to produce a more affordable and accessible version of Magic: The Gathering. The collectible card battle game is fantastically popular, but also fantastically expensive. A single commander deck for the latest set, Edge of Eternities, runs between $42 and $59, and you need two if you and a partner are just starting out. Add in the cost of booster packs to augment your deck ($13 each) and Magic becomes a very costly hobby.

    By contrast, X: Seekers of Fortune will come with three decks. Ayoub wanted to combine his love of Magic’s artwork, mechanics, and lore with the simplicity of playing gin rummy with his parents growing up. All the extras of Magic are there, such as deep mechanics, keywords, and fantasy characters, but self-contained rather than sprawling.

    “I played Magic: The Gathering for 20 years, and it just became difficult to keep up with economically and in terms of time,” Ayoub said in a phone interview. “I loved playing but never felt like I could get family and friends into it because of those hurdles.”

    Ayoub and his co-creator, Woodlands-based Joel Watts, designed X and launched a successful Kickstarter campaign to develop the game. Crowdfunding is the heart of the indie tabletop gaming world. Kickstarter reports that in 2024, $270 million in backing capital went to gaming projects, and 83 percent of that specifically went to tabletop games.

    Mega Moth Studios more than doubled its goal when the campaign ended in June 2024. Then, Trump won re-election, partially on his promise to institute sweeping tariffs against imports as a form of economic warfare. In April, Trump announced massive tariffs, particularly against Asian countries like China.

    China is where boxes of X are sitting, waiting to be delivered to backers. The tariff rate from China is currently 34 percent, though Trump has threatened as high as 200 percent. Between the price hike and the instability, Mega Moth has been struggling to get its game stateside.

    “It’s going to increase the cost substantially,” said Ayoub. “When you add cost that does nothing for the consumer, that’s rough. We had this ambition to make the game extremely inexpensive compared to Magic, $35 as opposed to, say, $65. We’re going to have to charge at least $40. That came late in the project. Up to the election, this wasn’t being factored in.”

    The game’s backers have been very understanding, Ayoub said. They’re willing to pay the extra amount, but he worries about X’s market viability once it’s widely available. The whole selling point of X is that it’s less of an investment than Magic. Take that away, and it has far less chance of success.

    “When you look at people tightening their belts because of the tariffs, toys and game are the first thing to go,” said Ayoub. “There’s no way for us to project how much this game is going to cost us to bring into the state. As new entrepreneurs launching the American dream, it felt like the people who run the system decided to make it impossible for people to live that dream.”

    Why Domestic Manufacturing Isn’t the Answer

    The stated purpose of the tariffs is to force American companies to do more manufacturing at home. For small, independent companies making new games, that’s not economically feasible.

    Mathue Ryann is the founder of Envy Born, a maker of small tabletop games in Fort Worth. They specialize in travel-size games like Hercules and the 12 Labors and Sirens. Most of their products cost just $14.99, perfect for a family on vacation looking for a new game.

    Like Mega Moth, Envy Born uses the crowdfunding model to generate initial buzz and a fanbase, then sells the products once a market hold is established. Also, like Mega Moth, Ryann had to tell backers on Hercules there would be a tariff fee to account for the price hike caused by the Trump Administration.

    “No one is happy, but they understand,” said Ryann in a phone interview. “I haven’t increased the price for stuff in stock, but I’m getting low on some of them. When I import them again, I might have to revisit the price. If I go outside a certain price point, they lose their value.”

    It seems like the easiest way to avoid the price hike would be to use domestic game-making services. There are a few companies available, such as Delano in Battle Creek, Michigan; Cartamundi in Dallas; and Shuffled Ink in Orlando, Florida. Between these three companies, a game maker can get boxes, books, cards, and more.

    Just not at a price that the market will handle. Ayoub said that the lowest price he could get for a 2,000 unit run of X would result in an MSRP of $88 to make a profit, making it almost as expensive as Magic. Ryann also said that he explored domestic manufacturing, but every quote would have priced him above $15 a game. Some components couldn’t even be made stateside.

    “The manufacturing infrastructure for board games just doesn’t exist in the U.S.,” said Ryann. “There are some that can do just cards and paper, but miniatures and dice? That just doesn’t exist. I know some manufacturers are trying to move to America, but even then, they’ll just be importing materials from China. The stuff you make stateside is way more expensive.”

    Ayoub’s day job is as a supply chain expert in one of the largest supply chain companies in the country. He says that many Americans simply don’t understand that manufacturing can’t just turn on a dime. When he and Watts started Mega Moth, the goal was to use domestic manufacturing specifically because Ayoub spends his days negotiating the headaches of international trade.

    He quickly ran into problems. According to him, American manufacturing is badly behind. Not only do we have fewer facilities, the ones we have are less efficient and technologically advanced. This is another reason that the price per unit skyrockets when trying to make things at home.

    “If America was truly competitive, why make it anywhere else?” he said. “People think we’re just trying to save a few pennies while exploiting workers. That’s not true in our industry. China has very twenty-first century facilities. That’s just not available in the U.S. The U.S. has had 30-plus years of decoupling the consumer from manufacturing. We can’t make what we want at home, and American wages haven’t kept up to be able to afford it.”

    What Happens Now?

    The giants of the industry like Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro will likely be fine. Ordering millions of units and having market domination means they can raise prices less and hold onto space on store shelves. If the Trump tariffs continue, they may be able to afford rebuilding (or in some cases just building) the domestic manufacturing sector for games.

    However, independent game makers don’t have these resources. They are fans of the hobby with an idea largely funding their dream through other fans and word of mouth. Even a small increase in manufacturing or import costs can derail these entrepreneurs before they even get off the ground.

    An industry implosion hasn’t happened in the indie scene yet thanks to a few factors. The mercurial nature of the tariffs changes rates monthly. Kickstarter backers currently seem willing to foot the extra cost, and companies are still stocked with games they bought at pre-tariffs rates.

    Ryann says he’s seen a few independent game makers go out of business. He doesn’t think it’s the tariffs’ fault yet, but he’s braced for when the bill comes due.

    “Some of the companies were using the tariffs as an excuse, and this was just the final coffin, but it is a legitimate concern,” he said. “The prices are just going to go up for most things. I wish there was a threshold or some kind of exemption for small business under a certain gross like in Europe.”

    [ad_2]

    Jef Rouner

    Source link

  • The Government’s Cert Petition to the Supreme Court in Our Tariff Case – and Our Response

    [ad_1]

    NA

    Earlier this week, the Trump administration filed a petition for certiorari urging the Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit decision in the case challenging the president’s massive “Liberation Day” tariffs, brought by the Liberty Justice Center and myself on behalf of five small businesses harmed by the tariffs (we were later joined by leading constitutional law scholars and Supreme Court litigators Neal Katyal and Michael McConnell). The government also submitted a motion for expedited review.

    Today, we submitted a response to the petition, in which we agree the Supreme Court should hear the case and resolve it quickly, so as to put an end to the harm caused by the illegal tariffs as quickly as possible. We previously prevailed in the Court of International Trade, and on appeal in the Federal Circuit, and I hope the Supreme Court – should it take the case – will rule the same way.

    Our case is consolidated with one filed by twelve state governments, led by the state of Oregon. Both challenge massive tariffs Trump has imposed under his supposed authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA).

    By now, this litigation has generated thousands of pages of briefs and other filings, and 176 pages of judicial opinions (if I have the count right). But underneath all the legalese, the central issue at stake is actually a simple one: Does our constitutional system give one man – the president – the power to impose any tariffs he wants, in any amount, on any nation, at any time, for any reason? If the answer is “no,” then the IEEPA tariffs are illegal.

    And the answer should indeed be “no,” because the Framers of the Constitution carefully avoided giving the executive the kind of unbridled tax authority claimed by power-grabbing English monarchs, like Charles I. The president cannot wield monarchical power, and letting him do so is an affront to the rule of law.

    We have presented an assortment of more detailed reasons why “no” is the right answer to the central question raised by this case: the fact that IEEPA doesn’t even mention tariffs and has never previously been used to impose them, that there is no “unusual and extraordinary threat” of the kind required to invoke IEEPA, the major questions doctrine, the constitutional nondelegation doctrine, and more. These points are covered in much greater detail in our various legal filings (see the Liberty Justice Center site for a compilation), and in some of my earlier writings about the litigation.

    If the Supreme Court takes the case, there may well be many additional briefs, and other filings. Such materials are important. But it is also essential to remember the deeper principle underlying all the details: the president is not a king, and our Constitution does not grant him monarchical power.

    [ad_2]

    Ilya Somin

    Source link

  • The Trump administration flubbed a detail on its Japan trade deal so it apologized and agreed to refund overcharged tariffs

    [ad_1]

    Japan’s Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s signing of an order to implement lower tariffs on automobiles and other Japanese imports as a step that addressed uncertainty for key industries.

    The reduction to 15% from the previous 25% was agreed between the two sides on July 22.

    “Tariff negotiations between Japan and the United States was the top priority for the government and we have put all our effort into achieving an agreement in a best possible way as soon as possible,” Ishiba said Friday. “The way it was achieved … is just excellent.”

    The step on tariffs comes as the Japanese prime minister faces pressure from right-wing rivals within his party to resign over its July election loss.

    In Washington, Japan’s top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa and his U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also signed a joint statement, confirming a $550 billion Japanese investment in U.S. projects.

    Akazawa said Trump’s order brings down tariffs on automobiles and auto parts to 15% and that there will be no stacking on the existing rate, and so-called reciprocal tariffs on most other goods are also set at the same rate without stacking. He said aircraft and aircraft parts will be excluded from reciprocal tariffs.

    The two allies agreed on the deal in July but Japanese officials discovered days later the preliminary deal had added 15% on existing rates and objected. Washington acknowledged the mistake and agreed to fix and to refund any excess import duties paid.

    Akazawa said he expected the order to take effect within two weeks.

    Ishiba said Akazawa carried the prime minister’s letter to Trump, stating his wish to build “a golden era of Japan-U.S. relations” together, and inviting the president to visit Japan.

    He welcomed the deal as a result of his consistent push for investment instead of tariffs and stressed that “it is important to implement the agreement faithfully and promptly.”

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Mari Yamaguchi, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Job growth stalls: US economy added just 22,000 jobs in August and unemployment rose to highest level since 2021

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — The US job market is stalling out.

    Job growth slowed to a crawl in August, and the unemployment rate rose to its highest level in nearly four years, indicating the US labor market is growing stagnant.

    The economy added just 22,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate rose to 4.3% from 4.2%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    August’s job report also included a downward revision to June, which showed the US economy lost 13,000 jobs that month. It’s the first negative employment month since December 2020, and it brings to an end what was the second-longest period of employment expansion on record.

    “The Great American jobs machine has stalled,” Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FwdBonds, wrote in commentary issued Friday.

    July’s job gains were revised up slightly to 79,000 from 73,000, according to the report.

    Economists were expecting that the economy added 76,500 jobs last month and that the unemployment rate rose to 4.3%, according to FactSet.

    The Dow rose 119 points, or 0.26%, Friday morning. The S&P 500 rose 0.41% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained 0.63%, after the weaker-than-expected jobs data boosted expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in September to stimulate the economy.

    Uncertainty stymies hiring

    Through August, monthly job gains average 74,750, BLS data shows. Excluding the pandemic, that’s the slowest average monthly gain for that January to August time frame since 2010, when the United States was still licking its wounds from the Great Recession.

    “The addition of just 22,000 jobs in August, along with net downward revisions of previous months, shows an economy straining under the immense economic uncertainty and significant policy changes of 2025,” Laura Ullrich, Indeed’s director of economic research for North America, wrote Friday.

    Uncertainty has swelled since the beginning of the year in large part around how President Donald Trump’s sweeping policies on tariffs, immigration and federal spending would shake out through the economy.

    Hiring efforts, already stymied in part by still-high interest rates, have been largely shelved due to the unknowns.

    “They don’t know where things are going, whether it’s through tariffs or other dynamics – interest rates still aren’t coming down – so I think a lot of companies are just saying, ‘not now,’” Ron Hetrick, senior labor economist at employment analytics company Lightcast, told CNN in an interview. “I think there’s somebody probably out there who’d like to hire, but not in this environment.”

    “They’re waiting for more certainty to occur,” he said.

    Narrow job growth means fewer opportunities

    The low-hire, low-fire environment is leaving workers and job hunters with few opportunities.

    And more workers are seeking those opportunities, as labor market re-entrants helped to lift the unemployment rate last month.

    The labor force, which shrank for three months in a row, increased by 436,000 people in August, according to BLS data. The labor force participation rate moved higher as well, ticking up to 62.3% from 62.2%.

    While the majority of those labor force gains were from those classified as employed, the increase in those unemployed was largely attributed to those who re-entered the labor market and are searching for jobs.

    “In fact, the median time looking for work slipped to a three-month low, a bright spot in a generally weak jobs report,” Jennifer Timmerman, senior investment strategy analyst at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, wrote in a note to investors Friday.

    A low-churn labor market puts the US labor market — and the broader economy — at greater risk, economists warn.

    The limited job gains also are coming from practically a single source, exacerbating those concerns.

    The US job market is being propped up primarily by ongoing employment gains in the health care industry. That sector, which has attributed for the lion’s share of overall job growth this year, added 46,800 jobs in August.

    That sector, however, accounts for just 15% of total employment, meaning many people are left on the sidelines.

    “For 85% of workers, they’re not seeing a lot of the jobs added,” Kory Kantenga, LinkedIn’s head of economics Americas, told CNN this week.

    And wage gains are increasingly growing softer. The annual growth rate of average hourly earnings slowed to 3.7% in August, from 3.9% in July.

    Without broader-based employment growth, the labor market is more vulnerable to shocks, he said.

    “If anything happens to that industry, you could easily see job growth fall off a cliff.”

    Warning signs have been flashing for months that the job market has been losing steam. That became starkly clearer in July, when weak job growth and larger-than-typical downward revisions spurred the unprecedented firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer by President Donald Trump who claimed, without evidence, that the disappointing data must have been “rigged.”

    Other labor market data released so far this week further confirmed that the labor market has cooled down considerably: Private-sector hiring slowed sharply; initial jobless claims hit a nearly three-month high; layoff announcements picked up; and, for the first time in four years, the number of available jobs was lower than the number of job seekers.

    [ad_2]

    Alicia Wallace and CNN

    Source link

  • Daymond John on Navigating Supply Chain and Tariff Issues | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Daymond John is an original Shark Tank shark (the 17th season premieres September 24), the visionary CEO behind the iconic global fashion brand FUBU, the founder of The Shark Group, a philanthropist and so much more.

    Following his fired-up talk at Entrepeneur‘s Level Up conference in Las Vegas, we caught up with the man to get a quick hit of inspiration and advice to shake off the end-of-summer blues and get back into the mindset of drive and success.

    What questions should founders ask themselves before launching/fundraising?
    Start with the hard questions. Why am I the right person to solve this problem? Do I really know my numbers, my market and my customer? And am I willing to eat, sleep and breathe this business when the cameras are off and no one’s clapping? Too many people want to raise money just because it looks sexy. But if you can’t show proof that you’ve tested, hustled and gotten traction — even on a small scale — you’re not ready to take someone else’s cash.

    Related: The Most Important Part of Starting a Business: Daymond John

    Shameless plug: my book, Power of Broke, is also my philosophy. Don’t think you need millions to get started. In many cases, being limited by capital is an entrepreneur’s true competitive advantage. Some of the best businesses were born from taking small, affordable next steps — selling one product, testing one ad, talking to one customer.

    Why is a founder’s personal brand important, and what is your advice for developing it in a way that bolsters your business?
    Your personal brand is your reputation. It’s what people say about you when you leave the room. Today, people don’t just buy your product — they buy into you. That doesn’t mean you’ve got to be loud on social media or try to be someone you’re not. It means you’ve got to stand for something. Be authentic, be consistent and tell your story. FUBU worked because it wasn’t just clothes — it was me, my community, my mission.

    But also use what is in front of you. When I started FUBU, it was me and my friends, a sewing machine and ambition. We didn’t know anything about manufacturing and infrastructure. It’s different today, and for the better. There are companies to help inform and teach entrepreneurs of all ages about how to make their products more turnkey by working with companies that understand exactly how to do it.

    Related: These Are the 3 Things That Make Daymond John Want to Give You Money

    What are some of the biggest issues entrepreneurs are facing today?
    From what I’ve seen from my companies and companies I’ve invested in, the biggest issue has been supply chain uncertainty. Some of these recent tariffs caused some companies to go from profitable to unprofitable overnight. Plus, the back-and-forth on what tariffs are still in play causes confusion and makes everything slow down.

    That’s why I’ve been working with Alibaba.com and why I’m headed to its annual event, CoCreate. They’ve created this community and platform of vendors to allow entrepreneurs to cut through the noise and find solutions. We need more events like this to better highlight that there are answers to entrepreneurs’ questions. You just need to know where to go to find them.

    What are the keys to staying energized and engaged when constantly working your butt off?
    Look, being an entrepreneur is like running a marathon at a sprinter’s pace. You’ve got to pace yourself, because burnout is real. For me, it comes down to a few things: I protect my health, I surround myself with the right people, and I remember my “why.” The late nights and early mornings don’t feel as heavy when you’re chasing a mission bigger than yourself. And you’ve got to celebrate the small wins along the way — because if you’re always waiting for the big exit, you’ll never feel satisfied. But everyone has to find their own system that works for them.

    Daymond John is an original Shark Tank shark (the 17th season premieres September 24), the visionary CEO behind the iconic global fashion brand FUBU, the founder of The Shark Group, a philanthropist and so much more.

    Following his fired-up talk at Entrepeneur‘s Level Up conference in Las Vegas, we caught up with the man to get a quick hit of inspiration and advice to shake off the end-of-summer blues and get back into the mindset of drive and success.

    What questions should founders ask themselves before launching/fundraising?
    Start with the hard questions. Why am I the right person to solve this problem? Do I really know my numbers, my market and my customer? And am I willing to eat, sleep and breathe this business when the cameras are off and no one’s clapping? Too many people want to raise money just because it looks sexy. But if you can’t show proof that you’ve tested, hustled and gotten traction — even on a small scale — you’re not ready to take someone else’s cash.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Bova

    Source link

  • 8/1: CBS Morning News

    [ad_1]



    8/1: CBS Morning News – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    Trump boosts Canada tariff to 35% as U.S. announces new levies across the globe; Family of Virginia Giuffre presses Trump to release Epstein files to the public.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Polis releases report detailing impacts of Trump’s tariffs on Colorado

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — While costs have crept up for consumers, President Donald Trump’s tariffs haven’t yet led to the large price spikes many Coloradans feared. That has created a lot of confusion about the impact on consumers, so Denver7 is getting answers.

    On Thursday, Gov. Jared Polis released a new report showing the impact Trump’s tariffs could have on Colorado’s economy. The report said the tariffs “will likely lead to worse economic outcomes for both the U.S. and Colorado.”

    “One thing that’s clear: Everyone loses a trade war,” Polis said. “Everyone loses a tariff war. It’s a race to the bottom.”

    • Read the full report below

    The governor’s report said Colorado’s effective tariff rate, which is the actual average cost of taxes (tariffs) paid on imports, is higher than it has been in over 100 years.

    “Today, Coloradans are paying seven times more in tariff taxes than one year ago,” Polis said.

    According to the governor, the effective rate skyrocketed from 3% to 21%.
     
    Polis and the state’s top economic experts said the tariffs are bad news for Colorado businesses and families. 

    “When businesses face high tariffs and the associated uncertainty and confusion, they have difficult choices,” said Jeff Kraft, the deputy director of the governor’s Office of Economic Development and International Trade. “Companies are forced to either pass costs on to consumers, which raises prices and can reduce revenue and obviously hurts the consumer, or they have to shift funds to cover the cost of the tariffs internally. If they do that, it can lead to significant reductions in research and development, reduced employment, job cuts and over time.”

    KMGH-TV

    Colorado Gov. Jared Polis holds a press conference with officials from his economic team.

    After calling around, Denver7 learned many local companies haven’t yet passed those costs on to consumers. In a social media post last month, Trump said it was mostly companies and foreign governments picking up the tab.

    “It has been proven that even at this late stage, Tariffs have not caused Inflation, or any other problems for America, other than massive amounts of CASH pouring into our Treasury’s coffers,” Trump wrote.
     
    Denver7 asked Zac Rogers, a professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, to weigh in on the tariffs and the impact on consumers.

    “I think it’s been a slow creep,” Rogers said.

    Rogers said costs from the tariffs are being spread around the supply chain, with different entities, such as suppliers and wholesalers, picking up some of the costs. By the time a product reaches the consumer, it’s not as expensive as it otherwise would have been.

    “So, consumers are certainly seeing prices go up, but we’re not getting hit with the full 25%, 40%, 50% [tariff],” he said.
     
    Rogers told Denver7 many companies stockpiled inventory ahead of the tariffs, which is also keeping prices down. However, that will change.
     
    “My guess, and based on all the people we talk to when we do our index, is that in the holiday season, we will see prices go up,” Rogers said. “50% tariffs on India, 50% tariffs on Brazil, 25% Japan, that’s not all going to be passed to consumers. But a portion of it will absolutely be passed to consumers, and it will be a bit of a game for retailers to figure out how much will consumers absorb, and how much do we have to absorb?”

    The governor’s report said key Colorado industries, such as aerospace, agriculture, construction, energy, and goods-focused businesses, are among the most vulnerable to tariffs.

    “Businesses that are hit with tariffs have to drive up costs for consumers, raise prices, might lay people off,” Polis said, adding that the analysis showed tariff escalation could push the state into a recession and cost the state budget as much as $800 million in lost revenue within two years.

    The governor said he believes Trump has exceeded his authority on tariffs and wants Congress to “show a spine.”

    “Congress absolutely can more limit the authority of the president,” Polis said. “They can do that in the spending bills that they’re considering going through right now. They can restrict the ability of any president to unilaterally impose tariffs, particularly under the circumstances that President Trump cited emergency authority. Congress can do that as part of the appropriations bills that are going through Congress now, and I would encourage Congress to include that language that prevents a president unilaterally from starting and escalating these kinds of trade wars that damage our economy.”

    Polis said the U.S. Supreme Court could ultimately decide whether the president overstepped his authority. On Wednesday, Trump urged the SCOTUS justices to overturn a lower court’s decision, which found his administration acted unlawfully by relying on emergency powers to impose many of the tariffs.

    “I’m very hopeful that that case will limit the president’s power in that area, but it doesn’t end the trade war, it doesn’t end the president’s apparent affinity for these huge tax increases,” Polis said. “Although it would be a major step forward for our economy and for Colorado.”

    Polis said his team would also provide additional analysis if there are significant updates to the tariffs.

    brandon image bar.jpg

    Denver7

    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Brandon Richard

    Denver7 politics reporter Brandon Richard closely follows developments at the State Capitol and in Washington, and digs deeper to find how legislation affects Coloradans in every community. If you’d like to get in touch with Brandon, fill out the form below to send him an email.

    [ad_2]

    Brandon Richard

    Source link

  • With court’s tariff ruling, businesses could soon be owed refunds. Here’s what to know.

    [ad_1]

    American businesses could be owed tens of billions of dollars in refunds for tariffs they paid on foreign goods.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection has collected more than $200 billion in tariff revenue from American businesses of all sizes through August 24, according to agency data. Of that, more than $70 billion comes from payments of country-based tariffs that a federal appeals court recently ruled President Trump lacked the authority to impose. 

    More than 60 countries and the European Union began facing tariff rates of 10% or higher on exports to the U.S. since Aug. 7. A 10% universal duty on all U.S. imports has been in effect since April 5

    Industry-specific tariffs, such as steel and aluminum levies, are unaffected by Friday’s ruling. 

    The court on Friday ruled that President Trump unlawfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to impose sweeping tariffs of up to 145% on dozens of U.S. trade partners. Mr. Trump on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to review the federal appeals court’s decision before it takes effect on Oct. 14.

    Mr. Trump’s appeal means that, for now, there’s no guarantee businesses will receive refunds. That spells more uncertainty for enterprises struggling to balance raising prices to cover the cost of levies against potentially turning away customers, according to supply chain experts.

    “From the supply chain perspective, we are seeing a lot of uncertainty, which has been the case since April 2,” Scott Pruneau, CEO of ITS Logistics, told CBS MoneyWatch. “No one knows how to price their goods, because you can’t whipsaw your customers on pricing.” 

    If the court’s decision stands, the U.S. government could have to return billions in tariff revenue it has collected from businesses. 

    “It’d be very challenging”

    But even if the Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs, businesses could still face hurdles in collecting refunds for the levies they’ve already paid the U.S. government, experts told CBS MoneyWatch. For one, there is no guarantee that whatever kind of refund system the government sets up would be automatic or that the process will be simple.

    “There’s been speculation that if ultimately, the Supreme Court overturns the tariffs, then Customs could just issue refunds, but I don’t know that it’s going to happen that way,” Felicia Pullam, former executive director of the Office of Trade Relations at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the current senior director for geo-commerce at APCO, a global advisory firm, told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    “The easiest way would be for Customs to put a process in place and issue refunds, rather than make companies go and apply,” she added. 

    Ultimately, however, if refunds are owed, it would be up to the Trump administration to decide how to administer them. “It’d be very challenging, but I am confident CBP could handle it.” 

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.

    Requests for refunds

    Ted Murphy, co-leader of Sidley Austin’s global arbitration, trade and advocacy practice, told CBS MoneyWatch that if the Supreme Court affirms the federal circuit court’s ruling that Trump’s reliance on IEEPA to impose country-based tariffs was illegal, the government would have to cease collecting tariffs from companies. 

    When it comes to recouping levies that have already been paid, there are three ways refunds could be administered, Murphy said.

    Most simply, the government could provide automatic refunds to businesses for levy amounts paid. “The government has that information, so it could happen automatically,” Murphy told CBS MoneyWatch. “I don’t think that’s particularly likely, but it is an option.”

    The government could instead decide that only the plaintiffs who filed suit against the tariffs are entitled to refunds, and require additional parties seeking refunds to bring similar legal actions. “In that case, you’d see tens and tens of thousands of people filing complaints at the Court of International Trade,” he said. 

    But the most likely repayment option in Murphy’s view would be that the government agrees to refund duties paid by parties who submit requests for reimbursement.

    Historical precedent for refunds 

    There’s precedent for the government reimbursing businesses for tariff payments that were later deemed unlawful. In 1998, the Supreme Court struck down a harbor maintenance tax assessed on exports, which had been imposed by the Reagan administration. The government then owed companies more than a billion dollars in refunds, which it required companies to apply for in order to receive.  

    Dan Anthony, president of Trade Partnership Worldwide, a trade consultancy, echoed Murphy, saying that it is hard to predict how the government might choose to process refunds, should the Supreme Court determine they are owed.

    “It’s up to the administration to decide, and that’s where it gets very complicated and speculative,” he told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    Technically speaking, issuing refunds wouldn’t be hard. “Theoretically, the government could quite quickly figure out who paid what, and refund it to the payer,” he said. “But the government could also make it very difficult and force people to make requests.”

    That would create work for companies, but also for the government, which would then have to review requests for refunds from thousands of companies. “That’s infinitely more work for the government, but it’s pretty clear the government does not want to give money back, so if you make it a difficult process, then a number of importers are probably not going to pursue it,” Anthony said. 

    Large refunds to businesses could weigh on the Treasury’s finances, TD Securities analysts noted in a report Thursday. “Treasury would likely step up bill supply even further to obtain the extra funds, creating little disruption in longer-dated yields, but potentially pressuring funding spreads,” TD Securities analysts said. 

    The Trump administration could also turn to other emergency powers to replace the IEEPA tariffs in order to maintain the U.S.’ effective tariff rate, the analysts noted. 

    Neither the White House nor the Treasury immediately responded to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tariff instability and a break with China is hitting American companies hard, and homegrown manufacturer John Deere is no exception

    [ad_1]

    John Deere is the kind of homegrown, domestic manufacturer President Donald Trump claims to support, yet his tariffs and hostility toward China are threatening its bottom line.

    The Moline, Ill.–based tractor and agriculture machinery manufacturer boasted a record profit just two years ago, but since then its luck has turned. That’s partly because of instability related to tariffs and an economic fight with China. Last month, the company said it would lay off 238 production employees in Illinois and Iowa, citing “decreased demand and lower order volumes.”

    In Q3, the company’s net profit fell by a quarter compared with the same time last year, and its worldwide net sales and revenues fell by 9% to $3.9 billion, down from $5.8 billion last year. The company also lowered its guidance for its annual net profit through the end of the year. 

    On the company’s most recent earnings call, investor relations director Josh Beale said there were “pockets of optimism” across John Deere’s business, but added customers may be feeling the sting of tariffs and instability.

    “Given challenging industry fundamentals and evolving global trade environment and ever-changing interest rate expectations, our customers are operating in increasingly dynamic markets, which naturally drives caution as they consider capital purchases,” Beale said.

    Agriculture is an industry in constant flux. Elevated crop prices mean farmers can consider buying new tractors and equipment, but in challenging times they may buy used equipment or hold off on a big purchase. New tractors can cost tens of thousands of dollars depending on their capabilities, and many farmers rely on credit for these purchases. Prices are low for the two main American crops: corn and soybeans. Corn is selling for 50% less than its price in 2022, while prices for soybeans are down 40%, the New York Times reported

    John Deere’s customers, apart from the confusion of tariffs, are also facing headwinds from an economic battle with China. In response to Trump’s tariff escalations, the world’s second-biggest economy retaliated with tariffs on U.S. soybeans; last year, China imported $13 billion worth—or about equal to the market cap of John Deere competitor Kubota. Soybean imports to China are down by 51% this year, and the country hasn’t made any advanced soybean purchases for the upcoming harvest, the NYT reported.

    If John Deere customers make fewer equipment purchases, the cutback will hit the company’s domestic manufacturing, which makes up 80% of its U.S. sales and a quarter of its international sales.

    John Deere did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

    Still, there may be a silver lining to Trump’s policies for John Deere. The company could benefit from bonus depreciation changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed in July, which gives farmers a tax break on equipment purchases.

    Because of its robust domestic manufacturing, the company may also be more immune to tariffs on foreign imports than competitors Kubota, Fendt, and Mahindra, which manufacture more of their products internationally.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

    Source link