ReportWire

Tag: Submersible

  • Submersible discovers unexploded Nazi bombs teeming with marine life:

    [ad_1]

    Marine life is thriving on unexploded Nazi bombs sitting at the bottom of a German bay, a submersible has discovered, even capturing footage of starfishes creeping across a huge chunk of TNT.

    The discovery, which was revealed in a study published Thursday, was “one of those rare but remarkable eureka moments,” marine biologist Andrey Vedenin told AFP.

    The waters off Germany’s coast are estimated to be littered with 1.6 million tons of unexploded munitions left behind from both world wars.

    In October last year, a team of German scientists went to a previously uncharted dump site in the Baltic Sea’s Luebeck Bay and sent an unmanned submersible 20 meters down to the seafloor.

    They were surprised when footage from the sub revealed 10 Nazi-era cruise missiles. Then they were stunned when they saw animals covering the surface of the bombs.

    There were roughly 40,000 animals per square meter — mostly marine worms — living on the munitions, the scientists wrote in the journal Communications Earth & Environment.

    This handout photograph provided by DeepSea Monitoring Group and taken on October 2024 with an unmanned submersible shows starfish (Asterias rubens) on top of a chunk of TNT, part of an unexploded Nazi-era cruise missile, at the bottom Luebeck Bay in the German waters of the Baltic Sea.

    ANDREY VEDENIN/DeepSea Monitoring Group/AFP via Getty Images


    “Despite the potential negative effects of the toxic munition compounds, published underwater images show dense populations of algae, hydroids, mussels, and other epifauna on the munition objects, including mines, torpedo heads, bombs, and wooden crates,” the study concludes.

    They also counted three species of fish, a crab, sea anemones, a jellyfish relative called hydroids and plenty of starfishes.

    While animals covered the hard casing of the bombs, they mostly avoided the yellow explosive material — except for one instance.

    The researchers were baffled to see that more than 40 starfishes had piled on to an exposed chunk of TNT.

    “It looked really weird,” said Vedenin, a scientist at Germany’s Carl von Ossietzky University and the study’s lead author.

    Exactly why the starfishes were there was unclear, but Vedenin theorized they could be eating bacterial film collecting on the corroding TNT.

    Life on deadly weapons

    The explosive chemicals are highly toxic, but the animals appeared to have found a way to live near it.

    Other than the death-wish starfishes, they did not seem to be behaving strangely.

    “The crabs were just sitting and picking something with their claws,” Vedenin said.

    To find out what kind of bombs they were dealing with, he went online and found a manual from the Nazi air force Luftwaffe describing how to handle and store V-1 flying bombs. The cruise missile exactly matched the 10 bombs from the footage.

    Vedenin said “there is some irony” in the discovery that these “things that are meant to kill everything are now attracting so much life.”

    Marine Life-Explosives

    This image provided by Andrey Vedenin shows sea creatures living on dumped World War II explosives in the Baltic Sea. 

    Andrey Vedenin / AP


    He compared it to how animals such as deer now thrive in radioactive areas abandoned by humans near the site of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

    Hard surfaces on the seafloor are important for marine life that want more than mud and sand.

    Animals once flocked to huge boulders that littered the Baltic Sea, however humans removed the stones to build infrastructure such as roads at the start of the 20th century.

    So when the Nazi bombs are eventually cleared from the bay, the researchers called for more stones — or concrete structures — to be put in place to continue supporting the sea life.

    The scientists also plan to return to the spot next month to set up a time-lapse camera to watch what the starfishes do next.

    Marine life also thriving in shipwrecks

    It’s the latest example of wildlife flourishing in polluted sites. Previous research has shown shipwrecks and former weapons complexes teeming with biodiversity.  

    Studies like these are a testament to how nature takes advantage of human leftovers, flipping the script to survive, said marine conservation biologist David Johnston with Duke University. He recently mapped sunken World War I ships that have become habitats for wildlife along the Potomac River in Maryland.

    “I think it’s a really cool testimony to the strength of life,” Johnston told the Associated Press.

    A 2023 paper published in BioScience found that shipwrecks provide important ecological resources for a wide variety of organisms, from tiny microbes to large marine creatures.

    “Small fish and mobile crustaceans often find shelter in the crevices of the sunken material, and larger baitfish and predators use shipwrecks as feeding grounds and rest stops as they swim from one place to another,” according to NOAA, which helped conduct the study. 

    This year, a cargo ship lying at the bottom of the sea off the Belgian coast has been filled with a stash of rare flat oysters in a bid to help boost other marine species.  

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Doomed Titan sub’s window was “on the path of failure” and its hull showed signs of flaws, engineers testify

    Doomed Titan sub’s window was “on the path of failure” and its hull showed signs of flaws, engineers testify

    [ad_1]

    The carbon fiber hull of the experimental submersible that imploded en route to the wreckage of the Titanic had imperfections dating to the manufacturing process and behaved differently after a loud bang was heard on one of the dives the year before the tragedy, an engineer with the National Transportation Safety Board said Wednesday. Meanwhile, another engineer testified that the sub’s window was “consistent with something on the path of failure.”

    Engineer Don Kramer told a Coast Guard panel there were wrinkles, porosity and voids in the carbon fiber used for the pressure hull of OceanGate’s Titan submersible. Two different types of sensors on Titan recorded the “loud acoustic event” that earlier witnesses testified about hearing on a dive on July 15, 2022, he said.

    Hull pieces recovered after the tragedy showed substantial delamination of the layers of carbon fiber, which were bonded to create the hull of the experimental submersible, he said.

    OceanGate co-founder Stockton Rush was among the five people who died when the Titan submersible imploded in June 2023.

    Kramer’s statements were followed by testimony from William Kohnen, a longtime submersibles expert and key member of the Marine Technology Society. Kohnen emerged as a critic of OceanGate in the aftermath of the implosion and has described the disaster as preventable.

    On Wednesday, Kohnen pushed back at the idea the Titan could not have been thoroughly tested before use because of its experimental nature. He also said OceanGate’s operations raised concerns among many people in the industry.

    Kohnen said “I don’t think many people ever told Stockton no.” He described Rush as not receptive to outside scrutiny.

    “This is not something where we don’t want you to do it. We want you to do it right,” Kohnen said.

    The Coast Guard opened a public hearing earlier this month that is part of a high level investigation into the cause of the implosion. Some of the testimony has focused on the submersible’s carbon fiber construction, which was unusual. Other testimony focused on the troubled nature of the company.

    Another Wednesday witness, Bart Kemper of Kemper Engineering Services of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, testified about his review of the OceanGate submersible’s development. He expressed particular concern about the sub’s window.

    “This is consistent with something on the path of failure,” Kemper said.

    Coast Guard officials noted at the start of the hearing that the submersible had not been independently reviewed, as is standard practice. That and Titan’s unusual design subjected it to scrutiny in the undersea exploration community.

    Earlier in the hearing, former OceanGate operations director David Lochridge said he frequently clashed with Rush and felt the company was committed only to making money.

    Lochridge and other previous witnesses painted a picture of a company that was impatient to get its unconventionally designed craft into the water. The accident set off a worldwide debate about the future of private undersea exploration.

    “Nothing unexpected about this”  

    On Tuesday, submersible pilot and designer Karl Stanley of the Roatan Institute of Deepsea Exploration testified to provide perspective about deep-sea submersible operations and safety. He said he felt the implosion ultimately stemmed from Rush’s desire to leave his mark on history.

    “There was nothing unexpected about this. This was expected by everyone who had access to a little bit of information,” Stanley said.

    Titanic Tourist Sub
    This June 2023 United States Coast Guard still frame from video provided by Pelagic Research Services, shows remains of the Titan submersible, center, on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean. 

    U.S. Coast Guard Video courtesy Pelagic Research Services via AP


    The hearing is expected to run through Friday and include several more witnesses, some of whom were closely connected to the company.

    The co-founder of the company told the Coast Guard panel Monday that he hoped a silver lining of the disaster is that it will inspire a renewed interest in exploration, including the deepest waters of the world’s oceans. Businessman Guillermo Sohnlein, who helped found OceanGate with Rush, ultimately left the company before the Titan disaster.

    OceanGate, based in Washington state, suspended its operations after the implosion. The company has no full-time employees currently, but has been represented by an attorney during the hearing.

    During the submersible’s final dive on June 18, 2023, the crew lost contact after an exchange of texts about Titan’s depth and weight as it descended. The support ship Polar Prince then sent repeated messages asking if Titan could still see the ship on its onboard display.

    One of the last messages from Titan’s crew to Polar Prince before the submersible imploded stated, “all good here,” according to a visual re-creation presented earlier in the hearing.

    When the submersible was reported overdue, rescuers rushed ships, planes and other equipment to an area about 435 miles south of St. John’s, Newfoundland. Wreckage of the Titan was subsequently found on the ocean floor about 330 yards off the bow of the Titanic, Coast Guard officials said. No one on board survived.

    In addition to Rush, the implosion also killed veteran Titanic explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet; two members of a prominent Pakistani family, Shahzada Dawood and his 19-year-old son Suleman Dawood; and British adventurer Hamish Harding.

    Last month, Nargeolet’s family filed a $50 million wrongful death lawsuit against OceanGate. Known as “Mr. Titanic,” Nargeolet participated in 37 dives to the Titanic site, the most of any diver in the world, according to the lawsuit. 


    Victims’ families demand answers in wake of Titan sub implosion

    03:22

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US Coast Guard says investigation into Titan submersible

    US Coast Guard says investigation into Titan submersible

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Coast Guard continues to investigate the factors that led to the implosion of the Titan submersible while on a descent to view the wreckage of the Titanic, killing all five people aboard.

    Tuesday marks one year since the Titan sub, which was owned and operated by OceanGate Expeditions, lost contact with the Polar Prince, a Canadian research vessel, about one hour and 45 minutes into its voyage in the North Atlantic.

    On Friday, the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation said in an update that its investigation is a “complex and ongoing effort” that will take longer than initially projected.

    “We are working closely with our domestic and international partners to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the incident,” board chair Jason Neubauer said in a statement.

    The Marine Board of Investigation said several factors, including the need to contract two salvage missions to secure vital information, have led to necessary delays and extended the original 12-month timeline for the investigation.

    “We’re grateful for the international and interagency cooperation which has been vital in recovering, preserving and forensically testing evidence from a remote offshore region and extreme depth,” Neubauer said. “The MBI is committed to ensuring that we fully understand the factors that led to this tragedy in order to prevent similar occurrences in the future.”

    Titanic-Tourist Sub
    This photo provided by OceanGate Expeditions shows a submersible vessel named Titan was used to visit the wreckage site of the Titanic. 

    OceanGate Expeditions via AP


    After the Titan sub lost contact with the Polar Prince, a massive international search and rescue effort was launched over several days because of the limited amount of oxygen that would be aboard the sub if it had become trapped beneath the surface.

    However, on June 22, 2023, the Coast Guard announced that the sub had experienced a “catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber,” during its descent. It confirmed that the Titan’s debris was located about 900 nautical miles east of Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

    Those who died in the implosion were OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, his 19-year-old son Suleman, billionaire adventurer Hamish Harding and French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet.

    OceanGate suspended all operations in early July 2023. The company, which charged $250,000 per person for a voyage aboard the Titan, had been warned of potential safety problems for years.

    In October, the Coast Guard announced it recovered “additional presumed human remains” and what is believed to be the last of the debris from the Titan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A year after Titan sub implosion, an Ohio billionaire says he wants to make his own voyage to Titanic wreckage

    A year after Titan sub implosion, an Ohio billionaire says he wants to make his own voyage to Titanic wreckage

    [ad_1]

    Five people boarded OceanGate’s Titan submersible last summer to dive down to see the wreckage of the Titanic, but less than two hours later, the vessel imploded, killing all on board. Now, a billionaire from Ohio wants to make his own attempt – an idea he had just days after the Titan met its fatal end.

    Patrick Lahey, co-founder and president of Tritan Submarines, is no stranger to deep-dive expeditions. He was the second Canadian to visit the bottom of the Mariana Trench nearly 36,000 feet under the ocean’s surface. He told the Wall Street Journal that he’d spent years working to make submersibles safe for deep dives, making sure his company’s vessels were certifiably safe. Then when last year’s implosion happened – killing the vessel’s overseer and captain – there were concerns that nobody would trust such expeditions again. 

    But a few days after the incident, Lahey told The Wall Street Journal that he got a call from a client who seemed determined to build a safe, reliable submersible. 

    “He called me up and said, ‘You know, what we need to do is build a sub that can dive to [Titanic-level depths] repeatedly and safely and demonstrate to the world that you guys can do that,” he said, “and that Titan was a contraption.” 

    Thus, the relationship between Lahey and Ohio real estate mogul Larry Connor was born. 

    Connor, based in Dayton and leader of luxury apartment building investor the Connor Group, is worth about $2 billion, according to Forbes. Like Lahey, Connor also has an interest in the unknown. According to Forbes, he ventured to the Marian Trench in 2021 and also went to the International Space Station in 2022. 

    He told The Journal that he’s hoping to show people that “while the ocean is extremely powerful, it can be wonderful and enjoyable and really kind of life-changing if you go about it the right way.” 

    “Patrick has been thinking about and designing this for over a decade. But we didn’t have the materials and technology,” he told the outlet, saying that he and Lahey plan to take a sub down to the Titanic wreckage in a two-person submersible known as the Triton 4000/2 Abyssal Explorer

    According to the Triton website, the vessel is a “high-performance, flexible platform designed specifically for professional applications.” The company says it can dive to 4,000 meters below the sea and that “the world’s deepest diving acrylic sub” is commercially certified for dives over 13,000 feet. 

    The remains of the Titanic are about 12,500 feet underwater, giving the sub just enough certified range to reach it. The imploded Titan sub was not made of acrylic, and only had a certified range of up to 1,300 meters, according to CBS News partner BBC.  

    The pair has not yet said when their voyage will occur. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Coast Guard Finds Further Evidence From Titan Submersible Implosion

    U.S. Coast Guard Finds Further Evidence From Titan Submersible Implosion

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Coast Guard has found more debris and evidence from the Titan submersible that went missing and imploded in June, according to a statement from the service released Tuesday.

    The Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigations, working with marine safety engineers, recovered the material on Oct. 4 in a follow-up operation to the initial recovery mission in June, the statement said.

    “The recovered evidence was successfully transferred to a U.S. port for cataloging and analysis,” the statement read. “Additional presumed human remains were carefully recovered from within Titan’s debris and transported for analysis by U.S. medical professionals.”

    The submersible was carrying four passengers who had paid $250,000 to go on a deep-sea expedition led by the private company OceanGate to see the wreckage of the Titanic in June. The fifth person aboard was OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, who was piloting the vessel.

    On June 18, the 21-foot submersible went missing about 300 miles off the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, prompting an intensive search. The Coast Guard, with the help of other groups and international teams, used planes, ships and remotely operated vehicles to try to locate the craft.

    After a frantic search that lasted days, the Coast Guard announced that an ROV had identified a debris field in the search area and five major pieces of debris that appeared to be from the submersible were found.

    The Coast Guard and OceanGate said the passengers were believed to have died when the submersible imploded hours after its launch. Later in June, the Coast Guard confirmed that it had recovered debris and evidence presumed to be the human remains of the Titan’s five occupants, which was sent for formal analysis and testing by medical professionals.

    “The MBI is coordinating with [the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board] and other international investigative agencies to schedule a joint evidence review of recovered Titan debris,” read Tuesday’s statement from the Coast Guard. “This review session will help determine the next steps for necessary forensic testing.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New book highlights need for deep sea exploration and humans’ threat to the ocean

    New book highlights need for deep sea exploration and humans’ threat to the ocean

    [ad_1]

    New book highlights need for deep sea exploration and humans’ threat to the ocean – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Author Susan Casey joins “CBS Mornings” to discuss her new book, “The Underworld: Journeys to the Depths of the Ocean.” She talks about why it’s so important to expand exploration and studies of the deep sea, and her experiences diving in a submersible.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deep Sea Experts Wonder How The Titan Sub Was Ever A Real Thing

    Deep Sea Experts Wonder How The Titan Sub Was Ever A Real Thing

    [ad_1]

    Samantha Joye, an oceanographer and microbiologist, has traveled to the deep sea in submersibles dozens of times.

    But for all her passion and experience in the ocean, she would have never stepped foot in the Titan, the experimental sub that imploded last month during a dive to view the wreckage of the Titanic, killing all five people on board.

    “As someone who dives in subs for a living, I would not dive in any vehicle that is not DNV GL certified,” said Joye, a professor at the University of Georgia, referring to the international safety society that certifies manned submersibles. “And I would not dive in a vehicle fabricated from titanium/carbon fiber. Seriously…OMG.”

    Stockton Rush, the CEO and founder of OceanGate, violated numerous established norms and safety standards in developing the Titan. And he wasn’t shy about it.

    “I’d like to be remembered as an innovator,” he said during a YouTube interview in 2021. “I think it was Gen. [Douglas] MacArthur who said, ‘You’re remembered for the rules you break.’ I’ve broken some rules to make this. I think I’ve broken them with logic and good engineering behind me. The carbon fiber and titanium — there’s a rule you don’t do that. Well, I did.”

    The hulls of most deep-ocean subs are engineered from solid materials such as titanium, steel and acrylic, which can withstand repeated trips to extreme depths. Though carbon fiber is a go-to material in the aerospace industry, it is known to crack, fray and delaminate over time when exposed to such pressure — signs of which David Lochridge, OceanGate’s director of marine operations and chief pilot, observed in the Titan’s hull in early 2018, The New Yorker’s Ben Taub reported. Lochridge flagged the defects in a report to Rush and others at the company and was promptly fired.

    Though many details about what exactly happened to the Titan remain unclear, Rush’s antipathy toward well-established rules and safety standards ultimately ended in tragedy. As Rush piloted the vessel, it experienced a catastrophic implosion on a June 18 dive, which experts speculate was likely the result of faulty engineering.

    For 60 years, the small community of engineers, scientists and explorers involved in deep ocean submergence operated with a near-perfect safety record: zero fatalities and no major accidents. They hoped to keep it that way through rigorous certification and safety protocols for all manned underwater vehicles.

    Many had long seen OceanGate for what it would ultimately become: a threat to that stellar record.

    “The certification protocols that all other deep submergence vehicles, except [the Titan], that carry passengers, especially paying passengers — all over the world, in tropical waters, deep coral reefs, other wreck sites — the safety record is the gold standard,” James Cameron, the film director and deep-sea explorer, told ABC News following the Titan’s disappearance. “Not only no fatalities, but no major incidents requiring all of these assets to converge to a site.”

    A deadly implosion was always in the back of the community’s mind, said Cameron, who helped design the Deepsea Challenger submersible and in 2012 piloted it to the Challenger Deep, the deepest known point of any ocean on Earth.

    “That’s the nightmare that we’ve all lived with,” he said.

    This undated photo shows OceanGate’s Titan submersible during a descent.

    Becky Kagan Schott / Ocean Gate /Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

    ‘If You Go In, You Have To Come Back’

    On a dive day, Bruce Strickrott wakes up early — around 3 a.m. — to begin a longstanding routine. He lies in bed and runs through the day’s mission in his head — the geography of the site, the target locations, scientific goals, the backgrounds of other crew members and any potential environmental challenges.

    He calls it a “personal pre-dive” to get “dialed in” for the day’s work.

    Few people have more experience in the deep ocean than Strickrott, manager and chief pilot of Alvin, the Navy-owned, three-person deep-sea submersible that is most famous for exploring the wreckage of the Titanic in 1986.

    Since joining the Alvin group in 1996, Strickrott has been laser-focused on safety — a philosophy that he says is rooted in years of witnessing firsthand how the experience of traveling to the deep sea changes and inspires people. He calls himself a “zealot” for manned exploration of the world’s oceans.

    “You have a visceral experience of being in a place that would kill you but being completely comfortable there, such that you can have this awakening, as I call it,” he said. “You can’t describe it. It’s very difficult, even with images. It’s not until you take people there and you basically are given the opportunity to share it with them. It becomes a personal mission to do it well, because you want them to walk away feeling like, ‘Holy cow, I just — I won’t be able to forget that.’”

    “In order to enable that for others, you have to make sure it’s safe.”

    Bruce Strickrott, the manager and chief pilot of Alvin, stands in front of the submersible during a recent expedition. He has piloted about 400 dives in the historic vessel.
    Bruce Strickrott, the manager and chief pilot of Alvin, stands in front of the submersible during a recent expedition. He has piloted about 400 dives in the historic vessel.

    For Alvin, which is operated by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in Massachusetts, that involves routine inspections, recertifications and Navy audits. Every few years, the sub is completely disassembled, evaluated and put back together. It has undergone numerous upgrades over the last decade to allow it to dive deeper, and it’s now capable of accessing 99% of the ocean floor.

    The sub’s systems, including life support and propulsion, also feature numerous redundancies to allow for its operator to continue to maneuver and surface the vehicle if a component were to fail. For example, there are multiple ways to release the heavy weights that carry the sub to the seafloor and are dropped when it returns to the surface.

    But day-to-day, it is the crew of Alvin pilots and engineers that forms the front-line of safety. Prior to each dive, they meticulously test and check all components and systems. If an issue — a “Delta,” as Strickrott calls it — is discovered, the crew either fixes and rechecks the device or the dive is called off.

    “During the pre-dive checks, as a pilot, there’s a lot of work to do,” Strickrott said. “You get very good at it. It becomes routine. But you have to force yourself to do them as if this is the first time. You have to dial your attention. You choose to be attentive, to look for things.”

    Strickrott likes to remind his crew of times when Alvin members did just that. In the mid-2000s, for example, the Alvin team had procured new windows for the sub that had been pressure tested and appeared flawless. After a couple of dives with one of the new windows installed, the Alvin launch coordinator was looking the sub over ahead of another launch when he noticed “the most tiny, little Delta — this little image on the inner surface,” Strickrott said.

    “He flagged it. And when we looked at it, we agreed and we delayed the dive and we pulled the window,” he said. “It turned out it was a material flaw that had started.”

    Strickrott said the deformation would not have led to a catastrophic failure but would have gotten progressively worse with each dive. The incident ultimately led to several changes, including how the crew polishes the sub’s viewports.

    “This is a really good example where a personally applied standard — nobody forced him to do that, he just felt obligated to because of his responsibility — made a difference,” he said.

    Strickrott said he and others have spent decades fostering a culture on the Alvin team that is invested in a hierarchy of priorities: safety of the sub crew and other Alvin support personnel, safety of the vessel and, finally, the mission. He subscribes to the idea that there are three things that can get you in trouble: ignorance, arrogance and complacency.

    “Whatever it takes to get home safely, you do it,” he said. “If you look at every day as an opportunity to dive … and you think, ‘We’d love to be in the water today, but we don’t have to.’ There isn’t anything pressuring us to go in the water except for one thing: If you go in, you have to come back.”

    Alvin, a three-person deep-sea submersible, began operating in 1964.
    Alvin, a three-person deep-sea submersible, began operating in 1964.

    Luis Lamar /Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

    On his office wall in Woods Hole, Strickrott has an undated quote from George Broderson, an early Alvin crew chief and mechanic, that appears in Victoria Kaharl’s 1990 book, “Water Baby: The Story of Alvin.”

    “As deck senior, bo’s’un, honcho, crew chief, whatever… I attempt to keep the crew happy. So long as they get a kind word, they put out their best effort. I take the check-off list and I sign it. That means I have to trust each individual plus the fact that I double-check it anyway. Makes it a little bit more safe… It’s not exactly dangerous, but it can become hairy. It takes a combined effort to launch and recover the submarine. And the sun beats down, the hours go on.

    You prepare the sub for a dive and you know when it’s all through, you’re going to have to postdive the sub because it cannot stand not being taken care of.”

    Strickrott sees his role as helping further a legacy that many before him helped build.

    “We’ve got 58 years of history and a legacy to uphold for people like this guy,” he said. “I think the other part of our responsibility — safety — is to live up to what those guys did. It sounds like a bunch of gobbledegook, but this is how I feel. And I’ve come to feel this way for a long time.”

    Alvin's crew in Boston on May 12, 1966, after the submersible recovered a lost hydrogen bomb off the coast of Spain. From left are pilot Marvin J. McCamis, crew chief George Broderson and pilot Valentine P. Wilson.
    Alvin’s crew in Boston on May 12, 1966, after the submersible recovered a lost hydrogen bomb off the coast of Spain. From left are pilot Marvin J. McCamis, crew chief George Broderson and pilot Valentine P. Wilson.

    Worst Fears Come True

    Unlike Alvin, the Titan was never classed or certified by an independent organization. Its main dive target, the wreckage of the Titanic, which sank in 1912, is located in international waters, meaning the sub was not subject to any government’s laws or regulations. Its one viewport was certified for only 1,300 meters, only one-third of the depth of the Titanic’s resting place.

    In 2018, 38 expert members of the Marine Technology Society, a leading industry group, sent OceanGate a letter voicing their deep concern about the Titan and the company’s planned excursions to the famous shipwreck.

    “Our apprehension is that the current experimental approach adopted by OceanGate could result in negative outcomes (from minor to catastrophic) that would have serious consequences for everyone in the industry,” the group wrote. The letter touted the industry’s stellar safety record and pleaded with OceanGate to adhere to established standards. “Our members are all aware of how important and precious this standing is and deeply concerned that a single negative event could undo this.”

    Rush dismissed this and other experts’ safety concerns, including from some of his own employees, repeatedly arguing that regulation stymies innovation.

    When deep sea explorer Rob McCallum emailed Rush in 2018 to warn that he was putting himself and others at risk, Rush fired back that he was “tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation.”

    “We have heard the baseless cries of ‘you are going to kill someone’ way too often,” he wrote, according to emails first obtained by the BBC. “I take this as a serious personal insult.”

    In a now-deleted 2019 blog post titled “Why Isn’t Titan Classed?,” OceanGate wrote that “bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation” and compared what it was doing to SpaceX, billionaire Elon Musk’s rocket and spacecraft manufacturer, which at the time, unlike OceanGate, was advancing its rocket capabilities without passengers on board. Many liftoffs ended in fiery explosions.

    Experts HuffPost spoke with dismissed the comparison as patently false, pointing out that SpaceX vehicles are subject to myriad U.S. regulations, particularly the vehicles that have carried people.

    “I will never understand how this ‘adventure’ was sold to paying customers,” Joye said. “I know people participating had to sign a waiver, but I don’t believe that they truly understood the risk they were taking. The Titan should have had ‘Experimental Prototype’ plastered all over it in 100-point type.”

    Stockton Rush (left), the CEO and co-founder of OceanGate, died aboard the Titan submersible when it imploded last month.
    Stockton Rush (left), the CEO and co-founder of OceanGate, died aboard the Titan submersible when it imploded last month.

    Wilfredo Lee/Associated Press

    Rush’s cavalier attitude was perhaps on fullest display during an interview last year with CBS journalist David Pogue.

    “At some point, safety just is pure waste,” he said. “I mean, if you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed. Don’t get in your car. Don’t do anything.”

    Experts say Titan’s fate only further confirms the importance of strong safety protocols when operating in the unforgiving deep sea.

    “There’s an industry standard for a reason,” said Erik Cordes, a deep sea ecologist and professor at Temple University. “You can’t skimp around the certification process just to advance the technology. That’s not a good enough reason when you’re actually putting people on the bottom of the ocean.” (I dove aboard Alvin with Joye off the Atlantic coast in 2018. Strickrott was the expedition leader on the two-week expedition. Cordes was the chief scientist.)

    Strickrott was one of the experts who signed on to the letter of concern to OceanGate in 2018 in his personal capacity. In his interview with HuffPost, he mostly steered away from discussing the Titan accident or criticizing OceanGate but said he’s followed updates closely and sees the incident as an opportunity to both reflect on what the Alvin team does well and explore what it can do better.

    “I think it’s important for us to try to get away from the finger-pointing. There were mistakes made, but there were people that died,” he said. “I think it’s a renewed dedication to keep at it and keep doing it right.”

    An Eye Toward The Future

    The Titan’s highly controversial design and lack of third-party certification stands in stark contrast to Alvin and virtually every other submersible operating in the deep sea. Yet its demise has tarnished a decades-long safety record and thrust the entire industry into the spotlight, with some calling for more stringent regulations.

    The U.S. Coast Guard last month launched an investigation to determine the cause of the implosion, if “an act of misconduct, incompetence, negligence, unskillfulness, or willful violation of law” contributed to the disaster, and whether new laws or regulations are warranted to prevent future disasters.

    The Titan incident may have brought public scrutiny to the industry, but it hasn’t rattled Cordes’ confidence in the field.

    “I think there is a really important place for manned exploration,” he said. “I don’t think you can do everything with [remotely operated vehicles]. It’s just not the same.”

    Samantha Joye and Erik Cordes hug after an Alvin dive to a methane seep in 2018.
    Samantha Joye and Erik Cordes hug after an Alvin dive to a methane seep in 2018.

    Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Geological Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    “I have no fear that this is going to have a major negative on deep-sea vehicles,” he said. “I think in some ways it might reinvigorate interest.”

    Strickrott fiercely disagrees with the idea that safety standards stifle innovation. He acknowledged that the certification process can be time consuming, even frustrating, but said the end result is worth it.

    “One of the things we get is we are not relying on ourselves for these really important things,” he said. “We’re getting a second opinion from a group of subject matter experts.”

    “The alternative to doing it well is pretty awful,” he added. “In fact, it means the end to all those things you care about.”

    Though the scientific value of deep sea exploration is obvious, Strickrott says it offers something much more profound for those fortunate enough to travel to the deep.

    “What you’re experiencing is something I think people take for granted in their daily lives, which is that humans have reached a point in their evolution where we modify the world around us. One way we do that is through technology,” he said. “I think it’s a reflection of what the power of being human really is.”

    In the decades-old quote that adorns Strickrott’s office wall, Broderson reflected on the struggles of keeping Alvin in the water and the magnitude of the work:

    “Yeah, the thing has a grip on us. You don’t want to yell quits because you know that you can lick whatever it is, and in doing so, you put yourself in a special class, you know you’ve done something important. Basically we’re an adventure outfit. Takes some of the sting out of the long hours.”

    The human brain is wired for adventure, Strickrott said. It’s part of who we are. It’s why NASA has planned new missions to the moon and set its sights on eventually reaching Mars, he said.

    “If people are thinking this is the death knell for exploring the bottom of the ocean — first of all, I don’t,” Strickrott said. “My God, there’s so much left. There are generations of opportunities. We really want people to be inspired and to consider this.”

    “We’re supposed to do these wacky things,” he added. “Whenever people ask, ‘Should we stop?’ I always remind them that that is a good way to limit our ability to learn things.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • OceanGate, owner of Titan sub, suspends operations

    OceanGate, owner of Titan sub, suspends operations

    [ad_1]

    OceanGate, owner of Titan sub, suspends operations – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    OceanGate, the owner of the Titan submersible that imploded last month while on an expedition near the wreckage of the Titanic, killing all five people aboard, has suspended operations.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 6/28: CBS Evening News

    6/28: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    6/28: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Smoke from Canadian wildfires causes air quality issues for millions in U.S.; Debris recovered from Titan sub implosion

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debris recovered from Titan sub implosion

    Debris recovered from Titan sub implosion

    [ad_1]

    Debris recovered from Titan sub implosion – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Debris from the Titan submersible which imploded last week near the wreckage of the Titanic, killing all five people aboard, has been recovered, the U.S. Coast Guard reported Wednesday.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • See photos of recovered Titan sub debris after

    See photos of recovered Titan sub debris after

    [ad_1]

    Pieces of debris from the sub that officials say imploded while carrying five people to the wreckage of the Titanic last week have arrived back on land. Photos from the Canadian Press and Reuters news agency show crews unloading large pieces of the Titan submersible in Newfoundland.

    The debris arrived in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Wednesday, the U.S. Coast Guard said in a statement

    The agency also said “presumed human remains” recovered from the sub’s wreckage would undergo analysis by American medical professionals.

    Evidence recovered from the sea floor for the U.S.-led investigation into the implosion would be transported to a U.S. port for analysis and testing, the Coast Guard said.

    Debris from the Titan submersible, recovered from the ocean floor near the wreck of the Titanic, is unloaded from the ship Horizon Arctic at the Canadian coast guard pier in St. John's, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.
    Debris from the Titan submersible, recovered from the ocean floor near the wreck of the Titanic, is unloaded from the ship Horizon Arctic at the Canadian coast guard pier in St. John’s, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.

    Paul Daly/The Canadian Press via AP


    “The evidence will provide investigators from several international jurisdictions with critical insights into the cause of this tragedy,” Coast Guard Capt. Jason Neubauer, the chief investigator, said in the statement. “There is still a substantial amount of work to be done to understand the factors that led to the catastrophic loss of the TITAN and help ensure a similar tragedy does not occur again.”

    The emergence of images of the Titan comes about a week after the Coast Guard announced an underwater robot had discovered debris from the sub about 1,600 feet from the bow of the Titanic at the bottom of the Atlantic. The Coast Guard said the debris was “consistent with a catastrophic implosion of the vessel.”

    Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, his 19-year-old son Suleman, billionaire adventurer Hamish Harding, French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet and OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush were on the sub and died in the disaster.

    Debris from the Titan submersible, recovered from the ocean floor near the wreck of the Titanic, is unloaded from the ship Horizon Arctic at the Canadian coast guard pier in St. John's, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.
    Debris from the Titan submersible, recovered from the ocean floor near the wreck of the Titanic, is unloaded from the ship Horizon Arctic at the Canadian coast guard pier in St. John’s, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.

    Paul Daly/The Canadian Press via AP


    The debris field was found last Thursday by a deep-sea robot, also known as a remotely operated vehicle or ROV, from Pelagic Research Services, according to the company. On Wednesday, the company announced workers had completed “off-shore operations.”

    “They have been working around the clock now for ten days, through the physical and mental challenges of this operation, and are anxious to finish the mission and return to their loved ones,” the company said in a statement on social media.

    The company said it couldn’t comment on the investigation looking into what caused the implosion that will involve Canada, France and the U.K.

    “It’s an opportunity to learn from the incident and then work with our international partners worldwide … to prevent a similar occurrence,” Neubauer told reporters Sunday.

    The discovery of the debris followed a massive search effort for the sub. The Titan lost contact with a Canadian research vessel June 18 about an hour and 45 minutes into its dive to the wreckage of the famed ocean liner that sank on its maiden voyage in 1912.

    A salvaged piece of the Titan submersible from OceanGate Expeditions is seen being offloaded from the Horizon Arctic ship in St. John's, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.
    A salvaged piece of the Titan submersible from OceanGate Expeditions is seen being offloaded from the Horizon Arctic ship in St. John’s, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.

    Reuters/David Hiscock


    Planes and vessels from several countries, including the U.S., focused on the search area approximately 900 nautical miles from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, for days before the debris field was located.

    After the Coast Guard revealed the sub had imploded, a U.S. Navy official told CBS News the Navy detected “an acoustic anomaly consistent with an implosion” shortly after the sub lost contact with the surface. The information was relayed to the Coast Guard, which used it to narrow the search area, the official said.

    Aliza Chasan contributed reporting.

    Salvaged pieces of the Titan submersible from OceanGate Expeditions are seen in St. John's, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.
    Salvaged pieces of the Titan submersible from OceanGate Expeditions are seen in St. John’s, Newfoundland, June 28, 2023.

    Reuters/David Hiscock


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Coast Guard launches investigation into Titan sub implosion

    Coast Guard launches investigation into Titan sub implosion

    [ad_1]

    Coast Guard launches investigation into Titan sub implosion – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The U.S. Coast Guard has launched an investigation into the Titan submersible, which imploded with five people on board while attempting a dive to the wreckage of the Titanic. Roxana Saberi has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Titan sub passengers signed waivers covering death. Could their families still sue OceanGate?

    Titan sub passengers signed waivers covering death. Could their families still sue OceanGate?

    [ad_1]

    As the operator of a tourist submersible designed to dive 4,000 meters below the sea’s surface, OceanGate asked its customers to sign liability waivers before stepping inside the 21-foot vessel — paperwork that outlined their risks in stark terms, including the possibility of death, emotional trauma or physical injury. 

    That waiver could play a critical role in whether the families of the passengers who died last week on an expedition to explore the wreckage of the Titanic have legal grounds to sue OceanGate, according to legal experts.

    The company’s liability waiver was highlighted by CBS News correspondent David Pogue, who traveled on the sub last year and who noted that the document alludes to the risk of death three times as well as to other dangers. The waiver also described the vessel itself, which highlights some of the issues with the sub that experts had warned about in the years prior to its doomed voyage.

    “This operation will be conducted inside an experimental submersible vessel that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body, and may be constructed of materials that have not been widely used in human-occupied submersibles,” the waiver stated.

    Passengers also waived the right to take action for “personal injury, property damage or any other loss” that they experienced on the trip, according to The Associated Press. 

    Such waivers are common for recreational activities that carry risks, such as scuba diving or sky diving. Generally, these legal documents shield the company’s owner of liability if their customers accept the risks and dangers related to the activity and are subsequently injured. 

    The families and representatives of the four passengers on the Titan —  British businessman Hamish Harding; Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood and his teenage son; and French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet — didn’t immediately return requests for comment. OceanGate’s CEO, Stockton Rush, was also on the vessel. The company declined to comment.

    International waters

    Complicating the question of liability is that the incident occurred in international waters, noted Craig Goldenfarb, founder of law firm Goldlaw and an attorney who practices maritime and admiralty law. As a result, a section of OceanGate’s waiver known as the “choice of law” provision becomes especially important, he noted.

    “The choice of law provision gives jurisdiction to a country in case any litigation ensues from the contract,”  Goldenfarb said.  

    The waiver reviewed by the AP found that any disputes would be governed by the laws of the Bahamas, where OceanGate is registered. The Bahamas, whose legal system is based on English Common Law, is considered a business-friendly jurisdiction, but whether the families have grounds to sue may depend on its laws governing liability waivers. 


    Investigators search for answers following Titan sub implosion

    03:51

    It’s important to note that waivers in general aren’t ironclad, Goldenfarb noted. For instance, if the waiver is signed by someone who can’t understand the waiver due to a disability or other issue, such as a language gap, and then who is injured, their families may be able to sue because the victim wasn’t properly informed of the risk.

    Waivers can also be rejected by judges if there is evidence of gross negligence, attorneys noted. 

    “You can waive liability standard for negligence but not gross negligence,” said Patrick Luff, founding partner of Luff Law Firm and a former law school professor. “Gross negligence will vary, but it’s generally something like, ‘acting despite your knowledge of extreme risk’.”

    “Experimental submersible”

    The OceanGate waiver’s terms that outlined the risks of diving in the sub showed that the passengers had been informed, meaning that their families wouldn’t be able to sue simply because the vessel was an “experimental submersible” or hadn’t been certified by an industry group, some legal experts said.

    “If that information had been hidden, then of course that would be actionable,” noted John Uustal, founding partner of Kelley | Uustal Trial Attorneys, in an email to CBS MoneyWatch. “It seems to me this kind of verification of informed consent is entirely appropriate, and in general they are legally valid.”

    The section of the legal document that waived the passengers’ right to take action for injury or loss could also “insulate the company from any responsibility for its own misconduct, even when egregious,” Uustal noted.

    Even so, Uustal said he would advise the passengers’ families to closely review the waiver for issues that weren’t covered or disclosed.

    “I would suggest looking closely at the exact language of any release terms and see if there is any misconduct that was not covered,” he said. “That may provide grounds for a lawsuit, if indeed there was such misconduct.”


    CBS News’ David Pogue on “catastrophic implosion” of Titanic submersible

    05:28

    But as the investigation into the Titan’s failure emerges, with a deep-sea robot searching this weekend for debris from the sub, additional legal issues could come to light as more is learned about how and why the vessel imploded, Goldenfarb said.

    “If one of the component parts failed, then you would be suing the manufacturer of a component part instead of suing OceanGate,” Goldenfarb said. “There may be areas of liability that nobody is aware of yet.”

    —With reporting by Irina Ivanova and The Associated Press.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pornhub Releases Graphic Illustrating Depth Of Submersible Compared With 10-Inch Cock

    Pornhub Releases Graphic Illustrating Depth Of Submersible Compared With 10-Inch Cock

    [ad_1]

    MONTREAL—Posting the helpful explainer to their social media to educate the online public, Pornhub released a graphic Thursday illustrating the depth of the OceanGate submersible compared to a 10-inch cock. “The OceanGate submersible was designed to make it 152,790 inches deeper than this veiny, throbbing member,” said Pornhub PR representative Jennifer Collins, explaining that it would take over 15,000 large cocks stacked on top of each other to reach the Titanic wreckage. “Sure, this 10-inch cock is really big, but as we can see, it’s utterly dwarfed by the vast depth of the ocean. Unfortunately, all the cocks would likely implode before reaching the diving distance of the OceanGate sub. Even the most rock-hard of monster dongs would be unable to withstand the pressure of the ocean at that depth.” At press time, Pornhub released a second infographic comparing the depth of the submersible with a flaccid 6-inch cock.

    [ad_2]

    Source link