ReportWire

Tag: steve jobs

  • Steve Jobs’ childhood belongings, early Apple products up for auction to mark company’s 50th anniversary

    A collection of Steve Jobs’ earliest Apple products and personal memorabilia are up for auction to mark the tech company’s 50th anniversary. 

    RR Auction, the Boston-based auction house managing the sales, is now accepting bids on 191 items that include vintage Apple computers, original documents from the company’s nascent days and a sizable group of Jobs’ childhood belongings, including a set of bowties and Bob Dylan 8-track tapes. Sales opened Tuesday.

    One of the auction’s focal points is the inaugural check issued by Apple Computer, Inc., the company’s original name, on March 16, 1976, according to RR Auction. Signed by Jobs and his Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, the $500 Wells Fargo Bank note was written out to Howard Cantin, who designed the Apple-1 computer’s printed circuit board. As the auction house notes, the check predates the company’s official founding by 16 days.

    “As the first financial instrument ever drawn on the Apple Computer Company’s original account, it is the foundational document that financed the creation of Apple’s very first product and brought forth the personal computing revolution,” reads a description of the item on the RR Auction website.

    The check gleaned the Apple anniversary auction’s second-highest bid, $32,000, within 24 hours of its opening. But the auction house said it expects the final price will reach $500,000 or higher. The earliest prototype motherboard for the Apple-1 computer had pulled the highest bid, at $55,000, although the auction house estimated it would ultimately sell for at least half a million dollars.

    The earliest known Apple-1 prototype motherboard.

    RR Auction


    Those relics are accompanied by a range of Apple’s earliest products, including a functional Lisa-1 computer, the retro desktop model that preceded the company’s Macintosh era, and a first-generation iPhone, which was jailbroken by the teen hacker Geohot.

    Jobs’ childhood collection was given to RR Auction by his’ stepbrother, John Chovanec, according to the auction house. In addition to his bowties and 8-tracks, the group of artifacts also features the wooden desk from Jobs’ bedroom at the Los Altos, California, property now known as the site of the “Apple garage,” where he and Wozniak assembled the brand’s first computers in 1976.

    With it are a number of other miscellaneous items that Jobs once owned, like a heat sink and ribbon cable for his personal Apple-1, a series of car repair manuals annotated by hand, and a brief message to his father written on an old Apple business card. There are also Apple marketing posters dating back to the 70s and 80s.

    The auction is accepting bids through Jan. 29.

    Source link

  • The Communication Rule Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos Always Followed—and Most People Ignore

    Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos talked, so people listened. 

    Customers don’t care about “speeds and feeds,” Jobs would remind his teams at Apple. “People don’t just want to buy computers. They want to know what they can do with them.” 

    Jobs instinctively understood the key to effective presentations: Put the audience at the center of the story. Your listener will care about your ideas if you talk about what they care about. 

    In my communication classes at Harvard Executive Education, I introduce “audience-centric” communication as a system where the speaker puts the listener first. If you’re watching a boring PowerPoint, there’s a good chance the speaker is too focused on the information they want to get across rather than the content you’re most interested in. 

    Don’t be the boring speaker. Follow these four principles of audience-centric communication. 

    1. Start with the audience and work backward. 

    “Our fundamental approach is to start with customers and work backwards,” Jeff Bezos wrote in his 2009 Amazon shareholder letter. The principle of working backwards has stuck at Amazon ever since. 

    When I was researching my book, The Bezos Blueprint, I learned that nearly every major product or feature Amazon released—from Kindle to Prime—started life as a press release. The press release exercise will change the flow and the content of your presentations. When most people prepare presentations, they create slides, add data, and decide what they want to say. Does this sound familiar? 

    Carmine Gallo

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs Said Without This Experience, There ‘Would Have Been No Apple’

    In case you aren’t as old as me (who is), blue boxes were devices that could produce the tones used by telephones to switch long distance calls. Use a blue box, make long distance calls for free. (Calling my girlfriend when I was a freshman in college cost .45 cents a minute at a time the minimum wage was $2.65. You do the math.)

    Jobs and Woz sold approximately $6,000 worth of blue boxes before they were nearly caught by police, but that wasn’t the real lesson they learned.

    As Jobs tells the story:

    It was the magic of the fact that two teenagers could build this box for $100 worth of parts and control hundreds of billions of dollars of infrastructure in the entire telephone network in the whole world, [all] from Los Altos and Cupertino, California.

    Experiences like that taught us the power of ideas: the power of understanding that if you could build this box, you could control telephone infrastructure around the world. That’s a powerful thing. 

    If we wouldn’t have made blue boxes, there would have been no Apple, because we wouldn’t have had the confidence that we could build something and make it work, because it took us six months of discovery to figure out how to build this…

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs Said This is When Great Bosses Say ‘I,’ Not ‘We’

    Imagine you’re standing in front of your team. You would never say “my company.” You say, “Our company.” You would never say, “My sales are up 30 percent.” You say, “Our sales are up 30 percent.”

    You’re all in it together — and you definitely want your team to think you’re all in it together — so you always say, “we,” not “I.”

    But not to Steve Jobs. Here’s John Rossman in his book Think Like Amazon:

    Steve Jobs told employees a short story when they were promoted to vice president at Apple. Jobs would tell the VP that if the garbage in his office was not being emptied, Jobs would naturally demand an explanation from the janitor.

    “Well, the lock on the door was changed,” the janitor could reasonably respond. “And I couldn’t get a key.”

    The janitor’s response is reasonable. It’s an understandable excuse. The janitor can’t do his job without a key. As a janitor, he’s allowed to have excuses.

    “When you’re the janitor, reasons matter, “Jobs told his newly minted VPs. “Somewhere between the janitor and the CEO, reasons stop mattering

    “In other words, when the employee becomes a vice president, he or she must vacate all excuses for failure. A vice president is responsible for any mistakes that happen, and it doesn’t matter what you say.”

    Rossman calls embracing that level of responsibility owning your dependencies: taking absolute responsibility for every possible dependency under your purview.

    You need supplies to complete an order, and the shipment from your supplier is delayed? You should have made sure commitments were clear, and put contingencies and redundancies in place. The delayed shipment may be the supplier’s fault, but making sure critical parts are on hand is your responsibility. 

    There’s a quote often credited to Ignatius: “Pray as if God will take care of all; act as if all is up to you.” When you’re in charge, the same premise applies to personal responsibility.

    Many people feel success or failure is caused by external forces, and especially by other people. If they succeed, other people helped them or supported them, other people were “with” them. If they fail, other people let them down, didn’t believe in them, didn’t help them. Other people were “against” them.

    To an extent that is, of course, true. No one ever does anything worthwhile on their own. 

    But great leaders don’t totally rely on others. Great leaders shoot for the best, and plan for the worst. They set clear expectations. They communicate, a lot. They follow up. They mentor and guide and train. They lead and work through others… but they accept final responsibility.

    Why? Because the only thing they know they can control is themselves. They act as if success or failure is totally within their control. If they succeed, they caused it. If they fail, they caused it.

    As Jobs would say, “Reasons stop mattering.” You’re in charge. You’re responsible.

    When things go well, even if you did all the work? Stick to “we” and “our.”

    When things go wrong, say “I” and “my.”

    Because when you’re in charge, it really is up to you.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The final deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, December 12, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs Hypes Up ‘Toy Story’ and Pixar in Unearthed Interview

    The original Toy Story turned 30 years old earlier this week, and to mark the occasion, the Steve Jobs Archive released a never-before-seen interview where the late Apple co-founder (and majority shareholder) talks about Pixar’s then-upcoming debut feature.

    In the 22-minute interview, which took place a full year after the film’s release, Jobs discussed helping foster an environment where Pixar staff could thrive and have them “work together as peers.” To him, Pixar is the only place that could hire the “very best” workers from the Hollywood and Silicon Valley cultures and be successful. “[We’re] a very hot place to be right now,” he bragged, mentioning the studio’s growing headcount and the need to keep quality consistent across staff and work.

    He also talks about adopting a Silicon Valley-like model of employee retention, while saying it in a very Disney-like fashion, saying Pixar should be a company “nobody will ever want to leave. We don’t take anybody for granted, because if they don’t want to be here, then they should probably leave anyway, whether or not they’d have a contract.”

    During the interview, Jobs noted Pixar was doing so well at the time that it became the first non-internal studio Disney approached for animation—a collaboration he spoke highly of. With access to resources and guidance that Disney wasn’t sharing with its peers (or selling), Pixar adopted Disney’s methodology of “editing your film before you make it,” refining that and other techniques for itself. The relationship with Disney was going so well back then, Jobs openly speculated about whether the studio would reteam with Disney after its initial three-picture deal ended—he mentions the second project, codenamed “Bugs,” which would later be A Bug Life—or pursue other partners.

    Funnily enough, he was proven correct about Toy Story’s impact when he speculated its shelf life would last 60 years. At the time, he attributed that to its story, but it’s also because Pixar has made it a recurring franchise, with Toy Story 3 arriving a year before his death. (He even marketed it during an iPhone OS 4 event.) The series’ next installment, Toy Story 5comes out June 19, 2026.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Tim Cook’s Retirement Looms as His $4T Reinvention of Apple Defines His Legacy

    Tim Cook’s looming retirement caps a 14-year run defined by record growth and disciplined execution. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

    Apple CEO Tim Cook is poised to retire as early as next year after 14 years at the helm, according to a Financial Times report last week citing multiple anonymous company insiders. Rumblings about Cook’s exit come amid accelerated succession planning by the board and senior executives, the report says.

    Some observers suggest Cook, 65, may not step away entirely, but could transition into a role as chairman of the board. Others, including Bloomberg editor Mark Gurman, believe the leak from unnamed insiders may be an intentional effort to prepare the market for a major leadership shift. Most experts don’t expect any changes before Apple’s next earnings release in January, but say a handoff could occur ahead of its mid-2026 developer conference and product launches.

    What’s clear is that Cook, who succeeded Apple co-founder Steve Jobs in 2011, is nearing the end of his run as Apple’s longest-serving CEO, putting renewed attention on both his legacy and the question of who comes next.

    Tim Cook’s unparalleled legacy

    Apple’s growth under Cook has been staggering. The company’s market capitalization stood at $350 billion when he took over 14 years ago. Today, it’s approaching $4 trillion—more than an elevenfold increase. For comparison, the S&P 500 rose just over 460 percent in the same period.

    Just a year into the job, Cook restructured Apple’s leadership team, dismissing senior vice president of retail John Browett and accepting the resignation of Scott Forstall, then senior vice president of iOS. He redistributed many of their responsibilities to existing leaders in an effort to ease internal tensions.

    Cook has overseen the release of 48 iPhone variants—from the iconic iPhone 4 in 2011 to the bold iPhone 17 Pro this September—while steering the launch of major new product lines including the MacBook Pro, Apple Watch, AirPods and Apple Vision Pro. Under his leadership, Apple also introduced the M-series silicon chips, a multiyear transition that reshaped the performance and energy efficiency of the Mac lineup and reasserted Apple’s dominance in hardware design.

    Beyond devices, Cook supercharged Apple’s services business, expanding the App Store ecosystem and launching new offerings such as Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple Fitness+ and Apple Pay. These services have grown into a multibillion-dollar pillar of Apple’s business, helping the company diversify its revenue streams and build one of the most powerful subscription ecosystems in the world.

    Cook has turned Apple into “the most valuable business in the world while keeping its products central to everyday life,” Natalie Andreas, communication management professor at the University of Texas, told Observer.

    Still, Apple faces criticism for lagging behind rivals in the artificial intelligence arms race, even as its Apple Intelligence features roll out slowly. Many of the capabilities remain in beta. Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that Apple has shelved plans for a more affordable, lighter Vision Pro headset (codenamed N100) and is instead diverting resources toward building A.I.-powered smart glasses that directly target Meta’s Ray-Ban-style devices.

    “Whoever takes the reins will face big challenges in artificial intelligence, immersive technologies like the Vision Pro, and increasing global regulation,” Andreas said.

    Tim Cook’s successor

    John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering and a direct report to Cook, is widely viewed as the leading candidate for the top job.

    Ternus has been at Apple for more than two decades. He joined the product design team in 2001 after working as a mechanical engineer at Virtual Research Systems. In 2013, Ternus was promoted to vice president of hardware engineering under Dan Riccio, overseeing development across the iPad, Mac, and AirPods product lines. By 2020, he had taken on responsibility for the iPhone hardware, and in January 2021, he succeeded Riccio as senior vice president of hardware engineering. In late 2022, his purview expanded further when he was put in charge of Apple Watch hardware.

    Under his leadership, Ternus has played a pivotal role in some of Apple’s most ambitious hardware efforts, including the transition of Mac computers to Apple Silicon. He has also regularly appeared at major Apple events, presenting new iMacs, MacBook Pros, redesigned iPads and other flagship devices.

    Ternus is “one of the few leaders inside the company who blends engineering depth with the same person-first philosophy Apple was built on,” Steven Athwal, founder and CEO of The Big Phone Store, a refurbished tech gadget company, told Observer.

    “He’s charismatic and well-regarded by Apple loyalists and trusted by Cook,” Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman has written.“Apple probably needs more of a technologist than a sales or operations person.”

    Ternus has also begun taking a more public, outward-facing role. He has appeared at high-profile product launches and greeted customers, including during the iPhone 17 launch in London. At 50 years old, he is about the same age Tim Cook was when he became CEO — a symbolic point often raised in succession discussions.

    Tim Cook’s Retirement Looms as His $4T Reinvention of Apple Defines His Legacy

    Rachel Curry

    Source link

  • Apple is ramping up succession plans for CEO Tim Cook and may tap this hardware exec to take over, report says | Fortune

    Apple’s board of directors and senior executives have been accelerating succession plans for Tim Cook, sources told the Financial Times.

    After serving as CEO for 14 years, Cook may step down as early as next year, the report said.

    Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, 50-year-old John Ternus, is widely seen as the most likely successor, but no final decisions have been made yet, sources told the FT.

    The engineer joined Apple’s product design team in 2001 and has overseen hardware engineering for most major products the tech company has launched ever since, according to Ternus’ LinkedIn profile.

    He has also played a prominent role during Apple’s most recent keynotes, introducing products like the new iPhone Air. Ternus had been rumored to be Cook’s potential successor, according to previous reports

    The company is unlikely to name a new CEO before its next earnings report in late January, and an early-year announcement would allow a new leadership team time to settle in before its annual events, the FT said. 

    The succession preparations have been long-planned and are not related to the company’s current performance, which is expecting strong end-of-year sales, people close to Apple told the FT.

    Apple did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment and declined to provide a comment to the FT.

    The $4 trillion company is expecting year-on-year revenue growth of 10% to 12% for its holiday quarter ending in December, fueled by the release of the iPhone 17 model in September.

    Ternus would take the helm of the tech giant at an important time in its evolution. Although Apple has seen sales success with iPhones and new products like Airpods over the past couple of decades, it has struggled to break into AI and keep up with rivals.

    Instead, Apple has even spending significantly less in AI investments compared to Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft

    Apple has been criticized by analysts this year for not having a clear AI strategy. And despite approving a multibillion-dollar budget to run its own models via the cloud in 2026, it was reported in June that Apple is even considering using models from OpenAI and Anthropic to power its updated version of Siri, rather than using technology the company has built in-house. 

    Its AI-enabled Siri, originally slated for 2025, will be delayed until 2026 or later due to a series of technical challenges, the company announced earlier this year.

    Apple has also lost a number of senior AI team members since January, many of whom have joined Meta’s AI and Superintelligence Labs during talent poaching wars this year. The exodus of Apple’s AI execs included Ruoming Pang, former head of Apple’s foundation models and core generative AI team, who joined Meta with a compensation package reportedly worth $200 million.

    The company is also dealing with increased competition from one of its most influential former employees.

    In May, Sam Altman’s OpenAI acquired startup io for about $6.5 billion, bringing in former Apple chief designer Jony Ive to build AI devices. The 58-year-old designer was instrumental in creating the iPhone, iPod, and iPad. 

    Cook, Apple’s former operations chief, turned 65 this month. He has grown the company’s market capitalization to $4 trillion from $350 billion in 2011, when he took over the CEO role from company co-founder Steve Jobs.

    Under Cook, Apple became the first publicly traded company to reach $1 trillion in market capitalization in 2018—then it became the first company to reach $3 trillion in market cap in 2022.

    But more recently, its stock price has been lagging behind Big Tech rivals Alphabet, Nvidia, and Microsoft, though Apple is trading close to an all-time high after strong earnings were reported in October.

    Apple has also dealt with tariff complications as U.S.-China trade tensions have disrupted its supply chain.

    Cook has previously said he’d prefer an internal candidate to replace him, adding that the company has “very detailed succession plans.”

    “I really want the person to come from within Apple,” Cook told singer Dua Lipa last year on her podcast At Your Service.

    Nino Paoli

    Source link

  • The Day Steve Jobs Created the Original Mac Calculator Design in 10 Minutes

    As Andy Hertzfeld describes on folklore.org, early Apple employee Chris Espinoza drew a calculator for the Macintosh. He showed it to Steve Jobs.

    Jobs’s response? “Well,” he said, “it’s a start, but basically it stinks. The background color is too dark, some lines are the wrong thickness, and the buttons are too big.”

    Espinoza went back from the drawing board, giving Jobs a new version each of the next few days and incorporating his suggestions. But Jobs kept finding problems. So Espinoza took a new approach, creating “the Steve Jobs Roll Your Own Calculator Construction Set” to let Jobs change line thicknesses, button sizes, background patterns, etc. himself

    Within minutes, Jobs had settled on a design he liked, one that remained the standard Macintosh calculator design for 17 years.

    Why did that approach work? For one thing, it allowed Jobs to make changes in real-time. That’s an approach Jobs clearly preferred; he wanted to touch, feel, and use potential products. That’s why iPhone screens are glass rather than plastic; one day of carrying a prototype in his pocket, and seeing the resulting scratches, was enough for Jobs to insist iPhone screens be made of gorilla glass.)

    For another, it ensured Jobs was invested in the choices we made. We all tend to prefer our ideas, our creations… things we see as “ours.”

    The same approach has worked for me. When I worked in manufacturing, one of our sayings was, “Engineers ask you what you need, then give you what they think you need.”

    It happened all the time. We would ask for a specific equipment modification, and what we got back was something very different. What they gave us was usually “better” from a theoretical engineering perspective, but what really mattered was whether the modifications helped us increase throughput.

    And they rarely did, until we changed our approach. We came up with an idea that would let us adjust multiple conveyor guides together instead of individually. We asked the engineer to draw it up, we took his specs and used brackets, clamps, etc. to mock it up on the machine where the finished product would eventually be installed.

    And then we asked him to evaluate it: not on the drawing board, not in his office, but in the real world.

    He played with it, and played with it, and couldn’t make it work. It was slower. Less accurate. Less stable. Less everything we needed it to be.

    But instead of walking away in a huff, he grabbed a piece of paper and sketchd a quick diagram.

    “Think this will work better?” he asked. “It looks great,” we said, since his diagram looked a lot like what we had originally asked for.

    From then on, that’s what we did. We came up with ideas, the engineer drew them up, and we would create rough prototypes so he, and we, could try them out. Sometimes the result was him giving us what we asked for. Sometimes — a lot of times — he found an even better way.

    The “fault” in the original approach wasn’t all his. We knew what we wanted but sometimes struggled to describe it. Creating a semi-working prototype helped us not only determine what we really needed, but just as importantly, to be able to describe it.

    Try it. The next time you have an idea, let the people who will actually use it give it a try: not in a conference room, not as a discussion, but in as real-world a setting as you can create. If you have a new idea for a sales approach, let people test it first. If you have a new idea for a cost-cutting measure, let people test it in a limited fashion

    Not only will you see whether it works, you’ll also give them the opportunity to suggest ways to make your idea work even better.

    Because the people who actually do a job are the best people to decide how that job can be done well.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • What Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs Knew That ChatGPT Doesn’t

    When private equity titan Blackstone brought in a CEO to lead a newly acquired real estate company, hiring executives thought they had found the perfect leader with impressive credentials, technical expertise, and years of experience. Two years later, that leader was gone. 

    The experience was an aha! moment for Blackstone’s head of talent, Courtney della Cava. In the past, private equity firms hired for hard skills that are easily quantifiable on a person’s resume. However, relying solely on a job candidate’s past success “set us back,” she says.

    “The hard truth is, there’s nothing soft about soft skills,” says della Cava. “We’re realizing that success and failure hinge primarily on these skills.” 

    Communication skills give you an edge.

    While the term “soft skills” covers everything from creativity to problem-solving, executives surveyed for LinkedIn identified one skill that matters most: communication. According to the survey, “People-to-people collaboration is going to come into the center for company growth. For leaders, you’ve got to start with communicating clearly, compassionately, and empathetically with your teams.” 

    As a founder or business owner juggling multiple roles, including head of talent and CEO, modeling effective communication throughout your organization starts with you. Yes, invest in AI platforms and tools that make you faster, more flexible, and more efficient. Just remember, in the AI age, your ability to persuade, communicate, and connect is your ultimate competitive advantage. 

    The founders’ communication advantage 

    It’s no coincidence that each of the visionary founders I’ve written books about—Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs among them—shared a similar superpower. They could distill complex ideas into language that inspired investors, attracted customers, and motivated teams. 

    For example, when Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997 to save the company he founded, he faced a brutal reality. Apple was on the brink of bankruptcy. Jobs kept the team focused on the future, such as streamlining the number of products they offered. Equally as important, Jobs changed the way the company talked about those products.  

    “Speeds and feeds” were out, Jobs announced. Customers don’t care about specs. They want to know what the product can do for them.  

    While Jobs simplified language, Jeff Bezos unveiled creative analogies to frame his company in people’s minds. When I was writing The Bezos Blueprint, I learned that Bezos didn’t start with a name, but with an idea. He searched for an analogy, a comparison: Earth’s biggest river—the Amazon—Earth’s biggest bookstore. It didn’t hurt that Amazon started with an A and would appear on the first pages of phonebooks. Bezos didn’t have ChatGPT in 1994, but if he did, it’s unlikely that it would have suggested Amazon as the name for Bezos’s idea. AI tools look at what’s been done, not at what’s new and novel.  

    Few founders are adept at using simple language and creating novel comparisons to make their ideas or products stand out. If you do it well and sharpen those skills, you’ll get attention and a competitive advantage in a world drowning in digital noise and confusion. 

    AI can’t inspire investors to write a check, entice top talent to join your team, or persuade your customers to buy your product or service. Yes, AI can make you more efficient, but it’ll do the same for your competitors. A founder who makes people believe will always have an advantage. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Carmine Gallo

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs, Perseverance, and Why Science Says Sometimes You ‘Just Shut Up and Dig the (Gosh Darned) Hole’

    Steve Jobs saw mental toughness as a key to success. According to Jobs:  

    I’m convinced that about half of what separates successful entrepreneurs from the non-successful ones is pure perseverance. It is so hard. You pour so much of your life into this thing.

    There are such rough moments… that most people give up. I don’t blame them. It’s really tough.

    Makes sense. Perseverance, the ability to push through failure and adversity and stick to your long-term passions and goals, is often what allows “ordinary” people to accomplish extraordinary things. Sometimes, the people who win are the people to give up on themselves.

    But why do some people quit when others keep going? More importantly, why are you and I sometimes able to stay the course, yet other times not?

    Researchers who conducted a study published in Wilderness and Environmental Medicine followed over than 200 participants of 155-mile, multistage, desert ultra-marathons and established a causal link between the participants’ coping strategies and whether they finished the races.

    Some used what the researchers called “adaptive coping strategies.” Instead of seeing suffering as happening them, they decided to see their extreme discomfort as a challenge, as something they chose. (Which, of course, they had.) Or finding ways to ignore or distract themselves from the pain. 

    On the flip side, some participants fell prey to “maladaptive coping strategies.” Like feeling scared by the discomfort and pain they experienced. Or seeing a certain level of pain as a clear signal to stop. (Which, to be fair, seems like a reasonable response.) 

    The bottom line? A single occurrence of a maladaptive coping strategy tripled the chances a participant would drop out of a race. We can all relate to that; sometimes one weak moment is enough to unleash an avalanche of negativity, uncertainty, and despair.

    And so we quit.

    Clearly reframing a setback or roadblock as a challenge — as just another problem to solve — can help you stay the course. So can embracing the small-world rule.

    And then there’s this. In a recent Outside magazine article, Dr. Kevin Alschuler, the lead author of the study cited above, recommends a surprising coping strategy.

    “A patient and I will talk through their options, and it’s option A or option B,” Alschuler writes. “And they want option C.” 

    Except sometimes option C doesn’t exist. “Ultra-athletes,” Alschuler says, “all seem to do a really good job of saying, ‘Well, option C is off the table, and what’s in front of me is either A or B.’”

    Searching for option C is normal. To overcome challenges, you need to think outside the box. You need to seek creative solutions. You need to never stop trying to find a way.

    That’s what I did that when I built a deck in the dune. I got tired of digging through all the roots and vines and debris, and started thinking about options. I could rent equipment. I could hire people. I could… I could do a lot of things, but none were feasible. 

    Worst of all, trying — and then failing, over and over again — to figure out an easier way made the original task seem even more insurmountable. I wasn’t just defeated by the task; I was defeated by my inability to work the problem and find an easier way.

    And I almost gave up.

    But then I remembered what my dad had told me when I was twelve or so and we were digging footers by hand for a sunroom addition. I was griping, and complaining, and groaning… until finally my dad said, “Sometimes you need to just shut up and dig the (gosh darned) hole.”

    The same was true for the dune deck. To paraphrase Ryan Holiday, the way was already in front of me: I could just keep digging. Like most things, success was just a matter of time and effort. Option B, quitting, wasn’t an option if I wanted to build the deck. Option A, keeping my head down and doing the work, would eventually allow me to level the area.

    So I accepted that fact and went back to digging. And even though it turned out I had about 20 more hours of digging ahead of me, I felt a lot lighter inside.

    Because sometimes the way isn’t option C, or D, or Z. Sometimes, the only way is option A or B.

    Or just option A.

    And when you accept that, staying the course actually gets easier, not harder — because then you won’t focus on what you don’t have, or can’t control.

    You just settle in.

    And do what you need to do.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • 5 Famous Founders Who Failed—Then Built Billion-Dollar Companies

    Starting a business doesn’t always go so smoothly. More than 20 percent of businesses fail in their first year, with nearly 50 percent closing their doors in the first five years, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. And while those numbers aren’t as bad as the oft-cited myth that half of all startups close their doors in the first year, there’s still a significant chance of failure.

    For some founders, the failure of a startup is a one-and-done thing. The thought of taking that sort of risk again, both financially and emotionally, is too daunting. Failure doesn’t make you persona non grata in the funding world, though. In some cases, it can be considered a good thing to venture capitalists. In fact, some of the most successful entrepreneurs in history have stumbled or flopped before, they went on to launch businesses that had a much greater degree of success.

    Here’s a look at five founders who didn’t get things quite right in their first run at entrepreneurship.

    Reid Hoffman

    Before finding success with LinkedIn, Hoffman tried launching another sort of social media site in 1997. SocialNet was basically a Facebook/Match mashup before either of those sites existed. It was designed as a place to meet and make friends online (and, should you want, to date them). There weren’t as many people using the Internet then, though, and the technology was too rudimentary to foster those connections. It shut down in 2000—and Hoffman refunded all of the capital the company’s investors put into it. After joining the founding team atPayPal, he founded LinkedIn in 2002, eventually taking it public in 2011 before it was acquired by Microsoft for $26.2 billion in 2016.

    Steve Jobs

    Steve Jobs experienced failure in a way that’s much different than the other founders in this list. Apple was a hit from the start, but nine years after he co-founded the company, he was famously forced out in 1985 following a power struggle with John Scully. He went on to found NeXT, a tech company focused on workstations for higher education facilities. It flopped – and Apple bought the company in 1997 and brought Jobs back as CEO of Apple. The failures of NeXT and his ejection from Apple had given him a new perspective, though, which helped him shape the company into the $3.67 trillion powerhouse it is today.

    “I didn’t see it then, but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me,” Jobs told graduates at Stanford University in 2005. “The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again, less sure about everything. It freed me to enter one of the most creative periods of my life.”

    Bill Gates and Paul Allen

    Four years before Gates and Allen launched Microsoft, the duo teamed up on another company. Traf-O-Data was meant to take the raw data from traffic counters along a state or city’s roads and automatically create reports for traffic engineers. (The duo used a computer at the University of Washington to do so.) “We ended up being okay successful, not seriously successful,” Gates later said in a 1993 interview with the Museum of American History. The State of Washington eventually offered free processing of the data for cities, which put an end to Traf-O-Data, but Allen and Gates both said the experience they gained with that company was critical when they decided to launch Microsoft.

    Travis Kalanick

    The third time was definitely the charm for Uber founder Kalanick. His first company, in the early 2000s, was Scour, a peer-to-peer file-sharing company. Before long, though, Scour faced a $250 billion copyright infringement suit from the entertainment industry and filed for bankruptcy. Next up was Red Swoosh, a content delivery network. That company struggled, but was eventually acquired in 2007 by Akamai Technologies. Two years later, Kalanick co-founded Uber, which revolutionized the transportation industry. Kalanick was forced out as CEO in 2017 after a series of workplace scandals revolving around a toxic work environment. These days, Kalanick is onto another venture, having acquired CloudKitchens, which provides commercial kitchen space to food delivery companies. He serves as CEO.

    Chris Morris

    Source link

  • The US Mint is honoring Steve Jobs by putting him on a $1 Innovation coin

    Ever since since 2018, the United States Mint has issued special $1 coins every year to honor American innovation and the “pioneering efforts of individuals or groups.” The Mint has just revealed the designs for 2026 $1 Innovation coins, and one of them features Apple co-founder and former CEO Steve Jobs. It features a young Jobs sitting cross-legged in front of a quintessential California landscape with rolling hills and oak trees. “His posture and expression, as he is captured in a moment of reflection, show how this environment inspired his vision to transform complex technology into something as intuitive and organic as nature itself,” the announcement reads.

    Under the project, the US Mint showcases innovations and innovators from different states, the District of Columbia and the five US territories. It works with the governor and other officials of each state or region to determine the best design to represent the people and inventions being featured. Jobs, of course, represents California, where he was born and from where he ran Apple, which became one of the biggest companies in the world under his leadership.

    In addition to Jobs’ design, the Mint is also issuing $1 coins featuring Iowa’s Dr. Norman Borlaug, who led initiatives to develop more resilient crops, and an aerial view of the Cray-1 supercomputer in Wisconsin. Finally, the design honoring mobile refrigeration, which represents Minnesota, features a 1940s-era truck with an early front-mounted refrigeration unit.

    Mariella Moon

    Source link

  • Ex-Apple CEO John Sculley Says This Company Is Apple’s First ‘Real Competitor’ in Years

    Former Apple CEO John Sculley, who famously led the company from 1983 to 1993, believes that ChatGPT creator OpenAI is Apple’s “first real competitor in many, many decades.” 

    Speaking on a panel at Zeta Live, an annual event hosted by Zeta Global, a marketing technology firm that he cofounded in 2007, Sculley said that he has “huge admiration for the way Tim Cook has run Apple,” but that “AI has not been a particular strength of theirs.”

    Sculley explained that in the 80s, Steve Jobs saw personal computing as a medium for empowering office workers with tools that provide rapid access to knowledge. Now, he says, AI agents that can autonomously carry out workflows are handling “more and more of the heavy lifting” that knowledge workers for decades have done in tandem with personal computers.” 

    Where Apple’s personal computing revolution imbued workers with intelligence, Scully said, agentic AI is the intelligence, capable of doing the work previously entrusted to well-trained humans. “It completely changes the way we do business models,” he added. 

    Going forward, Sculley anticipates more companies moving to subscription-based business models, because instead of selling tools that enhance worker productivity, companies will be selling access to solutions that operate on their own, with very little human interaction. In this “agentic era,” he said, a model in which customers pay for a solution for as long as they need it makes more economic sense. 

    This waning dependence on individual apps could be a challenge for Apple, which has built a massive app-based ecosystem. The company recently said that the App Store “facilitated $406 billion in developer billings and sales in 2024.” 

    Acknowledging rumors that Cook is planning to retire soon, Sculley said that whoever becomes the next Apple CEO will need to position the company for an era in which “we don’t need a lot of apps, it could all be done with smart agents working across workflow automation.” 

    It appears OpenAI is already positioning itself for such an era. At the company’s DevDay conference on October 6, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the introduction of apps within ChatGPT, with early adopters including Figma, Booking.com, and Canva. As Sculley said, this new feature enables consumers to offload some of the “heavy lifting” of using apps to AI. 

    Another OpenAI-shaped challenge for Apple? Going up against their beloved former head designer, Jony Ive. In May OpenAI announced that it had acquired Ive’s hardware company, io, for $6.4 billion in order to collaborate on an Ive-designed, OpenAI-powered physical device. “If there’s anyone who’s probably going to be able to bring that dimension to the LLM,” said Sculley, “it’s probably going to be Jony Ive working with Sam Altman.” 

    OpenAI has been on a dealmaking tear recently. This morning, the company announced a deal with chipmaker Broadcom to develop and deploy 10 gigawatts of OpenAI-designed AI accelerator hardware. That deal builds on other recent agreements with fellow chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD that cumulatively have secured over 30 gigawatts of compute capacity just in 2025. 

    Ben Sherry

    Source link

  • 6 Years Before He Died, Steve Jobs Nailed the Difference Between Those Who Succeed From Those Who Only Dream

    In his last few years, Steve Jobs became even more of what he’d always been: a relentless visionary. As his health declined, his focus sharpened to inspire entrepreneurs to build what matters, cut the noise, and inspire others to leave their mark. It was like he stepped into a higher calling: to teach the world how to lead a meaningful life.

    What is truly important

    As Jobs said in his famous 2005 Stanford commencement address, “Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure — these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.”

    Knowing his time was almost up made Jobs see life with startling focus. He zeroed in on what mattered most, and pushed others to do the same. His message was simple but powerful: Don’t wait to live your purpose. Life’s too short for anything less.

    He added, “You’ve got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle.”

    Find what you love. Love what you do

    Jobs’s words hit hard for most of us because they’re real. He understood something most of us spend a lifetime avoiding — that we don’t have forever. When you really sit with that, a lot of the things we keep chasing after no longer matter. Neither do the need to impress, the fear of failing, or the worry about what other people think — it all fades. What’s left are the things that actually matter: the people you love, the work that gives you meaning, and the courage to follow your gut.

    That’s what made Jobs different. He lived with urgency and clarity because he knew time was limited. That awareness didn’t make him fearful — it made him even more focused to his last dying breath.

    And maybe that’s the lesson for us. We don’t need a crisis or a diagnosis to wake us up. We just need to remember that life is short and none of us are guaranteed tomorrow. So stop waiting for the perfect time or permission to do what you’re here to do. Start now. Follow your purpose while you still can.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Marcel Schwantes

    Source link

  • 14 Years After His Death, Steve Jobs’ Most Enduring Idea Isn’t the iPhone

    It goes without saying that Steve Jobs will always be known as the father of the iPhone. Eighteen years later, his introduction of what would become the most successful consumer product of all time is still—I would argue—the greatest tech keynote ever delivered. It is, after all, the only time I’ve seen a tech CEO prank call a Starbucks and order 4,000 lattes.

    The iPhone transformed everything from how we communicate to how we work to how we capture the moments we care about. But, 14 years after Jobs passed away at age 56, you can make the case that the iPhone isn’t his most enduring idea. That distinction, I think, belongs to another of his revolutionary ideas: the Apple Store.

    There are many reasons I say that, but the only one that matters is that the iPhone, as revolutionary as it was, would have never been possible without the Apple Store.

    That might sound strange. One is a piece of technology, the other is a retail space. But the Apple Store is the reason people understood—and trusted—Apple enough to buy the iPhone in the first place. It’s the most powerful expression of Jobs’ obsession with controlling every part of the customer experience. And it’s the one part of Apple’s ecosystem that has only grown more important with time.

    When the first two Apple Stores opened in May 2001, most people thought Jobs was crazy. Gateway had just shut down its stores after losing millions. Dell’s direct-to-consumer model was thriving online. Why, critics asked, would anyone need a physical store to sell computers?

    Jobs had a simple answer: because no one else could tell Apple’s story the way Apple could.

    Before the Apple Store, buying a Mac meant walking into a store like CompUSA, where the computers were shoved in a corner next to fax machines and discount printers. No one was explaining why a Mac was different. No one was showing how it worked. Apple had great products, but no way to tell the story.

    Selling Macs in its own retail stores changed that. The design was intentional: wide tables instead of shelves, clean glass and light wood instead of clutter and chaos. It felt more like a showroom than a computer shop—everything was meant to be touched. You could play with a Mac, edit a photo, make a video, and see what Apple meant when it said, “It just works.”

    That experience did something no ad campaign ever could. It built trust. It made people feel like Apple wasn’t just selling them a computer—it was inviting them into a way of thinking about technology.

    By the time the iPod came along later that year, the Apple Store was already doing exactly what Jobs envisioned. It was making complicated technology feel simple and accessible, and giving people a reason to believe that Apple could make something better.

    And when the iPhone arrived in 2007, the world was ready.

    The iPhone was radical, but what made it believable was everything that came before it. If you were going to ask people to pay $500 for a smartphone, you needed a space that made it make sense. The Apple Store did that. It was the place where you could pick up Apple’s vision of the future and hold it in your hand.

    More importantly, it let Apple control how that future was introduced. Carriers might have sold the majority of iPhones, but the Apple Store was where people fell in love with them. It was where they learned to use them, where they came for help, and where they came back for their next one.

    Even today, Apple Stores are still the company’s most effective marketing tool. They are, quite literally, the physical embodiment of the brand—every one of them a giant glowing billboard. You don’t walk past an Apple Store and wonder what the company stands for. You feel it.

    That feeling has real financial weight. Before the pandemic, Apple Stores generated more revenue per square foot than any other retailer—about $5,500 per square foot, according to eMarketer data—more than Tiffany & Co., more than Lululemon, more than any luxury brand on the planet. The number has fluctuated over the years, but the point remains: no one has ever been more successful at physical retail on this scale.

    In 2023, Apple’s direct-to-consumer business—its stores and website—accounted for roughly 37 percent of the company’s total sales, according to Apple’s SEC filings. That’s tens of billions of dollars sold directly, without a middleman. For iPhones, the carriers still dominate overall sales, but Apple Stores aren’t about volume; they’re about experience and control.

    Jobs understood that better than anyone. He once said that Apple exists at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts. The Apple Store was the intersection of technology and theater. It gave the company a stage to perform its story—every day, in cities all over the world. It continues to be the perfect place to expose more people to Apple’s products, and—more importantly—its brand.

    It’s also the part of his vision that’s aged the best. The iPhone is now in its 17th generation. Macs and iPads have gone through dozens of redesigns. The Apple Store has evolved, but it’s still very much the place Apple prefers to tell its story.

    When you walk into an Apple Store today, you’re walking into the company’s ideal for how technology should feel, and that comes directly from Jobs. He believed the experience should be human, warm, and a little bit magical. Every clean line, every Genius Bar conversation, every moment you pick up a product and instantly get it—that’s Jobs’ philosophy in physical form.

    That’s what makes it his most enduring legacy. Sure, the iPhone changed the world. But it was the Apple Store that made it possible. It taught people to expect beauty and simplicity from technology. It taught them to trust Apple. And it gave the company a direct connection to its customers that no competitor has ever matched.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Jason Aten

    Source link

  • Duolingo’s CEO Calls This Mindset the Secret to Success. Science and Steve Jobs Agree

    Each year language learning platform Duolingo welcomes a new group of recent grads to the company. This year CEO Luis von Ahn took to LinkedIn to offer them five key pieces of advice pieces of it to be exact. 

    Most of his points were sensible, if hardly groundbreaking. “Don’t be a jerk,” he instructed. In a world awash in bullies and bros, I personally hope every new hire heeds this call. 

    But one point struck me as quietly profound. To be successful, von Ahn writes, “you don’t have to be the most brilliant person. You just have to show up and keep going until luck finds you.” 

    While this might sound simple, it actually encapsulates a whole lot of science on the relationship between luck, hard work, and success. Research (and Steve Jobs) agree with Duolingo’s von Ahn that shifting how you think about effort and chance will make you more successful. 

    How to be successful at Duolingo  

    “I recently asked a founder friend what it takes to build a successful company. His answer: ‘65 percent luck, 35 percent hard work for about two decades,’” von Ahn writes in the post. “That matches my experience.” 

    It also matches the experience of other successful founders such as Mark Cuban who admit that luck plays an outsized role in life. That might sound discouraging at first. Most of us think of luck as something we can’t control after all. 

    But look closely at von Ahn’s advice and you’ll see a hint that might not be the case. “Keep going until luck finds you,” he suggests. Which implies that we manufacture some of our own luck through perseverance and determination

    Turns out that research shows he’s right. It’s true that we are all given a mix of challenges and advantages in life that we don’t control. Don’t get me wrong, some people start with a huge leg up over others. But studies suggest that our mindset actually plays a bigger part in luck than most people acknowledge. 

    You can make your own luck 

    A classic experiment to illustrate this conclusion recruited volunteers for a seemingly tedious task — look through a newspaper and count how many pictures it contained. Then report how long it took you. But there was a hidden trick to this experiment. On the second page the researchers had inserted a box that read something like, “Stop reading now, there are 67 pictures in this paper.” 

    Some people noticed it and spent seconds on the task. Some people didn’t and kept flipping through for many minutes. What set one group apart from the other? A couple of things. 

    Those that noticed the short cut were much more likely to consider themselves to be lucky people. They were also much more observant and cognitively flexible. Rather than single-mindedly trudging through the pages, they scanned for opportunities. And when they spotted one, they jumped on it. 

    The researchers concluded these facts were connected. Luck isn’t just blind chance. It’s also created by behavioral factors that we can control. Being more curious, open, and willing to change course all help make you a luckier person

    Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn’s serendipity mindset 

    Entrepreneur Jason Roberts captured this idea with the concept of “luck surface” area. The more you put yourself out there — by meeting people, writing about your work, talking about your ideas, and generally just plugging along — the more likely you are to connect with opportunities. 

    Researchers at USC Marshall School of Business frame the same basic idea as a “serendipity mindset.” This is the ability to notice, understand, and respond decisively to lucky breaks and chance encounters. Steve Jobs was a famous master of the serendipity mindset. He never let a previous plan get in the way of seizing a good opportunity.

    “A lot of [what it means to be smart] is the ability to zoom out,” he explained in a talk way back in 1982. “And while other people are trying to figure out how to get from point A to point B reading these stupid little maps, you could just see it in front of you. You can see the whole thing.”

    Jobs might have had a natural knack for the serendipity mindset, but the USC experts who came up with the term insist anyone can learn it.

    In his advice for newcomers to Duolingo, Von Ahn gets the same idea in even simpler language. Some of us think luck is out of our control. But that’s not entirely true. If you just keep showing up in more places, for more hours, and keep your eyes open, luck will find you. And that will make you more successful. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Jessica Stillman

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    Steve Jobs made the first iPhone call publicly by prank-calling Starbucks. He humorously ordered…

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs Knew the Moment the Future Had Arrived. It’s Calling Again

    Steve Jobs Knew the Moment the Future Had Arrived. It’s Calling Again

    Steve Jobs is 28 years old, and seems a little nervous as he starts his speech to a group of designers gathered under a large tent in Aspen, Colorado. He fiddles with his bow tie and soon removes his suit jacket, dropping it to the floor when he finds no other place to set it down. It is 1983, and he’s about to ask designers for their help in improving the look of the coming wave of personal computers. But first he will tell them that those computers will shatter the lives they have led to date.

    “How many of you are 36 years … older than 36?” he asks. That’s how old the computer is, he says. But even the younger people in the room, including himself, are sort of “precomputer,” members of the television generation. A distinct new generation, he says, is emerging: “In their lifetimes, the computer will be the predominant medium of communication.”

    Quite a statement at the time, considering that very few of the audience, according to Jobs’ impromptu polling, owns a personal computer or has even seen one. Jobs tells the designers that they not only will soon use one, but it will be indispensable, and deeply woven into the fabric of their lives.

    The video of this speech is the centerpiece of an online exhibit called The Objects of Our Life, presented by the Steve Jobs Archive, the ambitious history project devoted to telling the story of Apple’s fabled cofounder. When the exhibit went live earlier this month—after the discovery of a long-forgotten VHS tape in Jobs’ personal collection—I found it not only a compelling reminder of the late CEO, but pertinent to our own time, when another new technology is arriving with equal promise and peril.

    The occasion of the speech was the annual Aspen International Design Conference. The theme of that year’s event was “The Future Isn’t What It Used to Be,” making Jobs the perfect speaker. While much of the talk is about his views on making products beautiful, the underlying message is straight out of that Bob Dylan tune: Something is happening and you don’t know what it is. He told his audience things that seemed preposterous: that in a few years more computers would be shipped than cars, and that people would spend more time with those computers than they spend riding in those cars. He told them that computers would become connected with each other, and everyone would use something called electronic mail, which he had to describe because it was such a strange concept then. Computers, he insisted, would become the dominant medium of communication. His goal was to make all that happen, to get to the point “where people are using these things and they go, ‘Wasn’t this the way it always was?’”

    Jobs’ vision seemed to sway his audience, which gave him a standing ovation. Before he left Aspen that week, Jobs was asked to donate an object that would be placed in a time capsule that would commemorate the event. It was to be dug up in 2000. Jobs unhooked the mouse from the Lisa Computer he had brought to demo, and it was sealed in the capsule, along with an 8-track tape of the Moody Blues and a six-pack of beer.

    The speech itself is kind of a time capsule. Jobs was right when he said one day we would not be able to imagine what life was like before these new tools he was ushering into the mainstream. Those of us still around who are, in Jobs’ term, “born precomputer” often astound young people by describing how we did our work (manual typewriters! carbon copies!), communicated with each other (phone booths!), and entertained ourselves (three TV channels! Bonanza!) before computers became our virtual appendages.

    Steven Levy

    Source link

  • Apple Updates Its Chess App for the First Time Since 2012

    Apple Updates Its Chess App for the First Time Since 2012

    Photo: Yuri A (Shutterstock)

    As Apple eulogized its commitment to purportedly non-invasive AI during its annual developer conference, the iPhone maker neglected to disclose a critical update that’s coming to the next evolution of its Mac operating system — macOS Sequoia.

    Alongside an iPhone mirroring feature and Safari AI summaries, early users of macOS 15 beta say they’ve spotted the first upgrade to Apple’s Mac Chess game since 2012.

    As 9to5Mac first reported, Apple last updated the Chess app a dozen years ago, back when it still named its Mac operating system releases after big cats. With OS X Mountain Lion, Apple added Game Center support to Chess, along with a glossy background and some other small additions laid out in an ancient AppleInsider post. The app’s 2012 upgrade looked like this, per AppleInsider.

    Image for article titled Apple Updates Its Chess App for the First Time Since 2012

    Screenshot: AppleInsider

    The following year, Apple said it ran out of big cats and started naming Mac updates after “inspiring” places in California. In the years since, Apple kept its built-in Chess app around but neglected to update it until now.

    Image for article titled Apple Updates Its Chess App for the First Time Since 2012

    Screenshot: 9to5Mac

    The latest version of Chess for Mac features shinier and more realistic-looking pieces as well as a textured, gradient background. However, 9to5Mac reports that the revamped game includes fewer themes. The update specifically punts a rather gritty-looking grass theme option, though it’s technically possible that Apple has other changes coming to the app before macOS Sequoia exits beta and sees a wider release.

    Harri Weber

    Source link

  • Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Steve Jobs, buys Malibu estate for $94 million

    Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Steve Jobs, buys Malibu estate for $94 million

    Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple visionary Steve Jobs, just paid $94 million for an oceanfront estate in Malibu’s Paradise Cove, The Times has confirmed.

    The billionaire businesswoman has been on a Malibu spending spree over the last decade, amassing a compound spanning multiple parcels in one of the most affluent enclaves in the country.

    Real estate records show that Jobs has spent around $80 million on three adjacent properties since 2015. Her latest acquisition is the biggest home sale in Southern California so far this year and the priciest since last May, when Jay-Z and Beyoncé dropped $200 million on a minimalist mansion just up the street.

    The blockbuster deal was a quiet one, completed off-market. As a result, there aren’t many photos of the property, but records show the parcel spans roughly four acres and holds an L-shaped home built in the 1950s.

    Spanning four acres, the long, slender property overlooks the ocean and beach from Malibu’s Paradise Cove.

    (Google Earth)

    The house has four bedrooms and four bathrooms across 3,399 square feet, opening out to a lawn overlooking the cliffs and beach below. It will probably be razed as Jobs continues building her compound.

    The billionaire philanthropist broke into the Malibu market in 2015, spending $44 million on a double-parcel property and demolishing the 13,000-square-foot home it held. She bought the house next door two years later for $16.5 million, and in 2021 she added an adjacent five-bedroom cottage for $17.5 million.

    In 2018, the Real Deal reported that the mansion she was building was among the many homes damaged in the Woolsey fire.

    Over the last decade, Paradise Cove has emerged as the most valuable stretch of coast in California and one of the priciest pockets in the country. WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum paid $87 million for a three-acre spread there in 2021. Later that year, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen broke the state price record when he dropped $177 million on a sprawling estate between Paradise Cove and Escondido Beach — before the record was broken again by Jay-Z and Beyoncé.

    In 2016, a triple-wide trailer in Paradise Cove Mobile Home Park traded hands for $5.3 million.

    A native of New Jersey, Jobs manages the Steve Jobs Trust and founded the Emerson Collective, which doles out grants and investments in education, immigration reform and environmental causes. Forbes puts her net worth at $14.3 billion.

    Jack Flemming

    Source link