ReportWire

Tag: startups

  • The AI-Powered Patent Check That Is Reducing Risk for Startups and Their Lawyers

    AI is changing patent work in the same way spreadsheets changed accounting. The busy-work shrinks, and expert judgment matters more. That shift is good news for founders, investors, and, most crucially, attorneys who want to deliver earlier, more precise answers about, “Can we ship this without stepping on someone else’s patent?” 

    Why AI patent work matters now 

    In fast cycles, teams commit to features, designs, and markets long before the full extent of legal risk is known. Traditional patent searching is thorough but slow and expensive when used as the first step for every idea. AI, however, flips the order. It makes a quick, inexpensive first pass possible at the start, so attorneys can focus time where it counts. 

    What’s an early FTO check  

    Freedom to operate (FTO) is about risk. “Are there patents out there that our product might infringe?” A pre-FTO or triage pass is a fast screen—minutes, not weeks—that scans the landscape and highlights likely collisions. It’s not a legal opinion. It’s a map that says, “Pay attention here,” so counsel can dive deep efficiently. 

    What’s changed about the patent process 

    Modern AI can read and understand any sort of document fast and reliably, break it into claim-like elements—such as features, methods, and signals—and match those against huge patent corpora to surface the closest neighbors. AI is great at recall and ranking. The lawyer is great at boundaries and remedies—deciding if a claim overlaps, proposing a design-around, or advising to avoid jurisdiction. 

    The attorney angle and advantage 

    AI doesn’t replace legal judgment; it routes work to it sooner. That means attorneys can offer productized, fixed-fee “front-door” services without guessing. Think of it as a standard intake: 

    1. Triage: This is fast and low cost. Run the idea through a pre-FTO screen; get a ranked list of potential conflicts with plain-language notes. 
    2. Counsel review: This can be flat or fixed. An attorney interprets the overlaps, tests claim boundaries, and recommends changes (“Use method B, not A; file here, avoid there”). 
    3. Formal opinion: This is customized. Where warranted, the full FTO or targeted non-infringement analysis in specific jurisdictions. 

    Clients get speed and clarity while attorneys spend time on judgment, not on stitching together PDFs and queries. 

    Ultimately, tools make all the difference. For example, Evalify, a Nobody Studios portfolio company led and co-founded by William Carbone and Nick Sgobba, is one of the next-gen tools making that front door workable. Teams upload a short product brief or even a presentation deck. The system maps it to relevant patents and returns a preliminary FTO score with the closest references and a readable rationale in minutes. Attorneys then take that packet as the starting point for review, strategy, and, when needed, formal opinions. It’s the intake layer, not the last word. 

    Guardrails that make this safe 

    • Privilege and confidentiality: Matter data is isolated, logs are auditable, and default settings avoid cross-matter training, unless a client explicitly opts in. 
    • Explainability: This is every reference link to why it was flagged. No black-box magic is required to justify the next steps. 
    • Right tool, right moment: Pre-FTO is for early decisions. It doesn’t replace patentability searches, litigation strategy, or full clearance opinions. 

    It’s a win-win for the whole startup ecosystem 

    • Founders and product leaders can add deck-to-pre-FTO to their idea checklist before locking the roadmap. This equals cleaner calls, earlier. 
    • Investors can ask portfolio companies for a triage pass at the proposal stage. This reduces avoidable risk and speeds de-risking. 
    • Attorneys and firms can now offer a clear entry product—priced, scoped, and fast. They’ll use AI to widen the top of the funnel and reserve expert time for what they do best. 

    The future of patent work 

    AI won’t practice law, and it definitely won’t replace attorneys. However, it will make the front end of patent risk faster, cheaper, and easier to understand. It will also do this at a more predictable, if not fixed, cost. Firms that produce this intake—and founders who make it a habit—will move faster with fewer surprises. That’s not disruption for disruption’s sake. It’s simply better timing for everyone. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    Peter Economy

    Source link

  • 7 Side Hustles That Let You Start Earning Extra Cash Right Away

    Side hustles are a great way to supplement your income, but sometimes you need money in a hurry. Many side hustles that require you to find and build a customer base or an audience can take a while to monetize. 

    But there are several side gigs, particularly in the service economy, that let you start building your bank account quickly. And, depending on where you live, you could raise a good amount of money in a short time, because there’s an abundance of demand.

    Here are a few side hustle ideas that will put cash in your pocket quickly.

    Rideshare 

    The beauty of side hustles with services like Lyft and Uber is you’re entirely in charge of your schedule—and the more time you have available to drive, the better the chances of getting a big check. (The income isn’t bad either, averaging just over $21 per hour for rideshare jobs, according to ZipRecruiter.) You can work around your 9-5 job, if that’s a factor, or just make yourself available for riders when you have a free moment. It can take a few days to a couple weeks to get approved as a new driver.

    Delivery driver

    Don’t want to ferry people near and far, but you’ve still got a car and free time? Signing up to do side gigs for a delivery service like DoorDash, GrubHub, Instacart, or Deliveroo can be a quick and easy way to make some extra cash. You’ll generally earn a flat fee per delivery as well as tips, though payments and payment methods vary from company to company. Getting signed up can take anywhere from a few hours to a couple of weeks.

    Repairs

    If you have the skills and tools, there are always people nearby who need things repaired or taken care of that are looking to avoid the sometimes ridiculously high costs charged by full-time home service companies. Promote your work on sites like TaskRabbit or Thumbtack to find work—and monitor your neighborhood or town’s Facebook resident page. Calls for help go up regularly on those.

    Childcare

    This might be the fastest way to pick up extra cash. Parents want someone who is mature enough to handle any emergencies that might arise when it comes to their children. The best way to find work is via personal connections with people in your neighborhood and town. There are also plenty of services for people that might be new to town or don’t know anyone who might make a good sitter. Sittercity, Care and SitterTree are all worth checking out and pay rates of up to $23 per hour.

    Yard care

    Yard work, for some people, is a burden, but because they want to keep up with the Jones (or live in fear of a nastygram from the HOA), they’re often eager to hire someone to take care of things for them. Whether it’s mowing the lawn and weeding, raking fall leaves or cleaning out the gutters, there’s an incredible amount of demand for this side hustle. Your neighborhood Facebook page is a good place to start advertising your services and to keep an eye out for people looking for help. Nextdoor is another good place to look for gigs.

    Dog walker

    If you prefer the company of four legged companions when you take a stroll, consider making a side hustle out of it. Sites like Rover let you advertise your services as a pet walker or doggy day care hub. You can set your own schedule and offer whichever services you feel qualified for. A study by NetCredit put the average income of folks who take this side hustle to be $24.84 per hour.

    Crafting

    Making homemade jewelry or candles or even something like a bath bomb is a good creative outlet. Of course, you can set up a digital storefront to sell online. (Etsy is one of the go-to spots to set up a store to sell those wares to a huge built-in customer base. Listing an item costs 20 cents and there’s a 6.5 percent transaction fee on the sale price. Etsy can also help advertise your goods beyond its site, for another cut of the sale price.) For quick cash, though, consider selling your goods at farmer’s markets, neighborhood markets or collectives in your town. Facebook Events is a great place to learn when those will be taking place nearby.

    Chris Morris

    Source link

  • How the Shutdown Threatens to Disrupt IPO Market Momentum

    A U.S. government shutdown threatens to stall the IPO market’s long-awaited comeback, just as strong investor demand and successful debuts had breathed life back into new listings.

    The U.S. government shut down much of its operations on Wednesday as deep partisan divisions prevented Congress and the White House from reaching a funding deal.

    With the Securities and Exchange Commission running only essential functions on a skeleton staff, the agency will stop processing IPO paperwork, leaving companies primed for Wall Street debuts such as actress Jennifer Garner’s baby food company Once Upon a Farm and electric-aircraft maker Beta Technologies in limbo.

    The fall window has been gathering momentum, with a wave of successful debuts, raising hopes that 2025 could be a breakout year for IPOs after high interest rates and volatility stalled the market for nearly three years.

    “A shutdown grinds the SEC to a halt, which means no prospectus reviews, no comments cleared and no green lights for going public,” said Michael Ashley Schulman, partner and CIO at Running Point Capital Advisors.

    “It’s bureaucratic purgatory at the worst possible time, just as the IPO market was beginning to thaw from a deep freeze,” Schulman added.

    U.S. IPOs have raised $52.94 billion from 263 listings as of September 29, the highest since 2021, according to Dealogic. The largest listings of the year included LNG giant Venture Global, buy-now-pay-later lender Klarna , and AI cloud firm CoreWeave.

    In addition to Once Upon a Farm and Beta Technologies, life insurer Ethos Technologies was also among the biggest companies to file for an IPO recently. Representatives for the three companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

    The pipeline for the rest of 2025 and going into 2026 features several other high-profile would-be issuers, including medical supplies giant Medline, SoftBank-backed PayPay, and corporate travel management platform Navan.

    “Already this is shifting timelines back for deals that were on the fence,” said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, a provider of IPO-focused research and ETFs.

    “If it lasts more than a week, the IPO market will grind down to a halt, cutting short the rebound we were expecting.”

    U.S. IPO market rebounds in 2025

    Temporary Setback

    While government shutdowns are typically short-lived, the longest in history — 35 days spanning December 2018 to January 2019 — occurred under President Donald Trump’s previous administration.

    At the time, the IPO market came to a virtual standstill. But a few companies sidestepped the SEC by locking in their IPO prices weeks in advance, allowing them to proceed with listings despite the shutdown.

    While the shutdown lasts, the IPO freeze could ripple across Wall Street, delaying deals for banks and limiting listing fees for exchanges.

    Still, as with 2019, listings are likely to bounce back, said some market watchers. Strong investor demand, hefty inflows into IPO-themed funds and the best after-market performance in years will continue to lure companies to the market, said Lukas Muehlbauer, research analyst at IPO research firm IPOX.

    A weeks-long shutdown could potentially dampen market sentiment and spur volatility, but the fall window was generally the strongest for IPOs and would likely shrug off a shutdown blip, according to Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial.

    “IPO activity should be pretty solid and dominate any near-term hiccups around a shutdown,” Saglimbene added.

    A bar chart showing the US government shutdowns since 1976 and their duration.
    Three of the four longest U.S. government shutdowns happened since 1996.

    Reporting by Manya Saini and Niket Nishant in Bengaluru; editing by Michelle Price and Krishna Chandra Eluri.

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Marissa Mayer Is Dissolving Her Sunshine Startup Lab

    Sunshine, the consumer AI startup founded by former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer in 2018, has seen brighter days.

    The small startup is shutting down, and its assets are being sold to a new entity incorporated by Mayer called Dazzle, according to an email viewed by WIRED. Mayer sent the email to Sunshine shareholders on September 17, informing them that Dazzle has officially incorporated and is ready to acquire Sunshine’s holdings.

    The deal requires approval from shareholders, including Sunshine cofounder Enrique Muñoz Torres, Norwest Venture Partners, Felicis Partners, Ron Conway’s SV Angel, the PR firm Archetype Agency, and others. As of Sunday afternoon, 99 percent of shareholders had signed, according to sources close to the situation. Mayer is the company’s largest shareholder and investor.

    The email did not elaborate on what Dazzle’s purpose will be, but sources tell WIRED that Mayer is eyeing a new kind of AI personal assistant. Sunshine’s roughly 15 employees are expecting to find new roles at Dazzle, sources say.

    “After careful consideration, Sunshine’s management, and 99.99% of its shareholders, determined the strongest path forward for the company was to sell to Dazzle AI, a new company already incorporated and with committed funding,” Mayer said through a spokesperson. “As Sunshine’s largest investor, shareholder, and CEO, Marissa is proud of what the team built and looks forward to carrying that momentum into new opportunities around Dazzle.”

    Mayer founded Sunshine, originally called Lumi Labs, in 2018 after her five-year turnaround attempt at Yahoo. Prior to becoming CEO of Yahoo, Mayer had a storied career at Google, where she was employee number 20. Mayer designed the interface for Google Search and helped develop Google Maps and Google AdWords.

    The idea for Sunshine’s first product, an app for managing contacts, stemmed from Mayer’s own experience tapping into her deep network of Silicon Valley luminaries as she was trying to launch her company. That app, Sunshine Contacts, launched in 2020. By that point, the startup had raised $20 million in venture capital funding, in addition to Mayer’s personal contributions.

    Early on, the Sunshine app was plagued by complaints that it potentially violated user privacy. The app, which used AI to identify and merge duplicate people in your phone’s contacts list, was also pulling in information from Whitepages to automatically add home addresses to contacts.

    In 2024, Sunshine launched a photo sharing app called Shine. Like Sunshine Contacts, Shine was widely viewed as a flop.

    Lauren Goode, Zoë Schiffer

    Source link

  • Oklo Director Sold 50,000 Shares of Nuclear Start-Up Before Selloff

    Oklo Director Sold 50,000 Shares of Nuclear Start-Up Before Selloff

    Source link

  • Why One VC Thinks Quantum Is a Bigger Unlock Than AGI

    Depending on how you think about it, there’s half a dozen or more approaches to the hardware. And I became excited that within the hardware approach, the neutral atom approach was high potential. So we backed [Thompson’s] company called Logiqal.

    What happens if you’re right?

    I’m a venture investor, and we believe in convexity—taking risks on things that most likely won’t work, but if they do work could be 500x in value.

    It’s a real earth-moving innovation if there’s a chance that quantum computers find the path toward success. You unlock these thinking engines, these computational engines that can run the future of material sciences, the future of pharmaceutical innovation, the future of logistics, the future of financial markets in ways that we’ve never seen before.

    You can see a future where you could create pharmaceutical advancements that could elongate life 20 to 30 years. You could see changes in material sciences where we could invent new products. It could help us get to Mars! That is what quantum computing unlocks.

    The way you talk about quantum computing sounds a lot like how many AI enthusiasts talk about artificial general intelligence.

    In many ways, quantum is today where AI was back in 2015, which is a lot of really big research and science projects and starting to have practical applications rather than just pure research.

    You mentioned that it’s hard to fake being a quantum expert. I would posit that it is not as hard to fake being an AI expert. How do you decide who to back?

    There are so many companies that are being built and born in AI that when you extrapolate them 5, 10 years will not have a true genuine moat outside of brand or speed. Brand and speed are rarely strong enough moats to build a generational company.

    I’ll give you an example. BrightAI creates stickers that are roughly this big [she makes a circle with her fist]. The company puts a sticker on every telephone pole, on every HVAC system, on every water line system, and then observes it for long periods of time, 5, 10, 15, 20 years [and flags potential issues]. That’s a pretty good moat. You’re not ripping all those stickers off.

    For the most part, the value in AI accrues to the incumbents. Penny, my cofounder, is on the board of Microsoft. If you think about it, Microsoft and Google—Google has 3 billion users. Microsoft has a billion users. They can launch a product that is OK, not excellent, and they still have a pricing power, a distribution power. And so we very much think about the world where when the elephants dance. Don’t be an ant.

    How do you use AI?

    For everything. There’s nothing you don’t use AI for, nothing. From every question, I mean, today I probably used it 25 times.

    It’s replaced Google for you?

    Everything. Everything. Deep research, sourcing. Today I was looking up what jobs are declining fastest in the world. Truly, I would say it’s not a dozen times a day. It’s dozens of times a day.


    This is an edition of the Model Behavior newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.

    Zoë Schiffer

    Source link

  • Nvidia Spends Nearly a Billion on AI Startup to Hire CEO | Entrepreneur

    Nvidia has paid nearly a billion dollars to bring in fresh talent and technology from an AI hardware startup.

    According to a CNBC report on Thursday, Nvidia spent more than $900 million in cash and stock to hire Rochan Sankar, the CEO of AI chip startup Enfabrica, as well as several other employees at the company. Additionally, as part of the deal, Nvidia is allowed to license Enfabrica technology. The deal closed last week, and Sankar has already begun working at Nvidia, per CNBC‘s sources.

    Enfabrica’s chips use special software to keep data center speeds up, but costs down. The startup’s standout feature is a system that incorporates cheaper memory costs, which noticeably reduces the cost of operating AI.

    Related: Nvidia’s CEO Says It No Longer Matters If You Never Learned to Code: ‘There’s a New Programming Language’

    The deal, which involves bringing in new talent, is similar to those conducted recently by Google and Meta. In June, Meta invested $14.3 billion in AI data training startup Scale AI. The deal involved former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang leaving the startup to join Meta’s superintelligence team.

    Meanwhile, in July, Google signed a $2.4 billion agreement with AI coding startup Windsurf to hire the startup’s CEO, Varun Mohan, as well as other employees. Google also obtained a nonexclusive license to Windsurf’s technology.

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. Photo by Chesnot/Getty Images

    The advantage of trading money for new talent is that tech giants can circumvent the complex regulatory hurdles that come with acquisitions — and still poach top talent from other companies.

    Nvidia first began its involvement with Enfabrica in 2023, as one of the backers in a $125 million Series B funding round for the startup. Enfabrica was last valued at around $600 million in November, following a $115 million Series C round, according to PitchBook.

    Nvidia has also made or considered a few other high-profile deals lately. Earlier this week, the AI chipmaker announced that it would be investing $5 billion into Intel to develop advanced technology, a deal that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang called “an incredible investment.” On Friday, Nvidia signed a letter of intent to evaluate a $500 million investment in self-driving car startup Wayve.

    Nvidia is the world’s most valuable company, a spot it claimed in June. One month later, Nvidia became the world’s first company to exceed $4 trillion in market value. The AI chipmaker is worth $4.32 trillion at the time of writing.

    Related: Nvidia CEO Warns That ‘Some Jobs’ Will Disappear As the AI Chipmaker’s Earnings Beat Estimates

    Nvidia has paid nearly a billion dollars to bring in fresh talent and technology from an AI hardware startup.

    According to a CNBC report on Thursday, Nvidia spent more than $900 million in cash and stock to hire Rochan Sankar, the CEO of AI chip startup Enfabrica, as well as several other employees at the company. Additionally, as part of the deal, Nvidia is allowed to license Enfabrica technology. The deal closed last week, and Sankar has already begun working at Nvidia, per CNBC‘s sources.

    Enfabrica’s chips use special software to keep data center speeds up, but costs down. The startup’s standout feature is a system that incorporates cheaper memory costs, which noticeably reduces the cost of operating AI.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Sherin Shibu

    Source link

  • US Tech Giants Race to Spend Billions in UK AI Push

    Microsoft and Nvidia have unveiled plans to invest up to $45 billion dollars into the UK economy, in a move that will bolster the building of more data centers as well as research and development into artificial intelligence.

    The investment comes as US President Donald Trump travels to Britain, where he is expected to announce a US-UK tech deal alongside UK prime minister Keir Starmer.

    As part of the agreement, Microsoft has committed to invest $30 billion in AI infrastructure over the next four years. The company claims this is the largest financial commitment it has ever made in the UK and will make up more than two thirds of the total investment announced into the UK this week, timed to Trump’s visit.

    “We are focused on British pounds, not empty tech promises,” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s vice chair and president, told journalists in a virtual briefing ahead of the announcement today. “We will be good for every cent of this investment.” Half of the money will go to capital expansion— “all new money, all new investments,” Smith claimed—whereas the other half will go to efforts like a partnership with the data center business Nscale, to finance and use its facilities.

    Nvidia, for its part, has pledged to spend up to $15 billion on AI-related R&D efforts in the UK. The chipmaker will not invest directly into building out the infrastructure, instead acting through its partners CoreWeave and Nscale.

    This announcement comes alongside a new joint venture from Nvidia, Nscale, and OpenAI today, which plans to “strengthen the UK’s sovereign compute capabilities” through an AI infrastructure partnership called Stargate UK. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang traveled with Trump to the UK during his state visit this week.

    “Stargate UK ensures OpenAI’s world-leading AI models can run on local computing power in the UK, for the UK,” said OpenAI in a statement. OpenAI will provide up to 8,000 GPUs in the first quarter of 2026 with the potential to scale to 31,000 GPUs over time. As part of the agreement, OpenAI says Nscale is set to significantly expand its capacity across a number of sites in the UK, including Cobalt Park in Newcastle, which will be part of a newly designated AI Growth Zone in the North East.

    “This historic commitment from Nscale shows how the UK can build the future of AI, together with our partners from the US,” Nscale CEO Josh Payne said in a statement. “It’s only by building world-class AI infrastructure that we will stay competitive in the global race.”

    When asked to characterize Microsoft’s relationship with Nscale, Smith said simply, “we write the check, and they spend the money.”

    Smith was quick to claim that the company did not get a request from the Trump administration to make an investment announcement. “We have had many conversations with the UK government, including with folks at Number 10, as you would expect, and those have been going on for months,” he said.

    Natasha Bernal

    Source link

  • Here Are the Top 50 Mistakes I’ve Seen Kill New Companies | Entrepreneur

    I’ve seen many startups succeed, and many fail. I’ve consulted for and invested in lots of them. My previous startup, Anchor, navigated its own challenges and missteps; we were fortunate to survive them, and ultimately Spotify acquired the company in 2019.

    Over the years, I’ve come to think of startups as a game of Minesweeper. Remember that game from early PCs? You’d start with a grid of clickable squares, with cartoon mines hidden throughout. Your job was to take a few guesses, gain some information about where the mines were, and logic your way through finding them all. Similarly, startup founders start with an empty board. And although nobody can know their locations, the mines are guaranteed to be there — and certain types of mines are common to every kind of business. A founder can save a lot of time, money, and energy if they know how to avoid these pitfalls from the very start.

    After many years of navigating mines, I’ve identified the 50 most common ones. (I share lessons like this regularly in my newsletter — which you can find at my website, zaxis.page.) To be clear, this list is far from exhaustive. And while there are certainly exceptions, it can be a great shortcut for anyone leading a new initiative, at any sized company.

    Related: The Path to Success Is Filled With Mistakes. Do These Four Things to Tap Into Their Growth Potential.

    Ready to find your mines? Here they are.

    1. Thinking you have all the answers

    My favorite piece of advice for startup founders: You’ll be 90% wrong about your assumptions. The problem is that you don’t know which 90%. Therefore, do everything you can to challenge your convictions, and be willing to shed them or tweak them as needed. Rapid iteration and an open mind are two necessary ingredients for a successful startup journey.

    2. Ignoring the impact of compounding

    Meaningful long-term change takes time, be it learning new skills, obtaining new customers, or establishing a brand. The most underrated way to drive improvement is through incremental steps that compound over time. Einstein apocryphally called compound interest the “eighth wonder of the world.” Tiny changes each day multiply to astronomical gains, so long as you’re consistent and committed.

    3. Disregarding the law of funnels

    Any action a user or customer needs to take is considered the top of a “conversion funnel.” The goal is to get them to the bottom. One of the easiest ways to lose someone along that journey (a phenomenon known as churn) is to require them to go through too many steps. I call this the “Law of Funnels.” It states: “The more steps a user has to go through to do something, the less likely they are to complete it.”

    4. Hiring based on experience

    Startups have very little time and resources to focus on the wrong thing, but it’s impossible to predict what they will need to focus on. So don’t waste energy and precious hires on what a person has done in the past. It’s 97% irrelevant to what they will be doing in the future. Instead of hiring for relevant experience, hire people who are adaptable and good problem-solvers.

    5. Focusing on scaling too early (see fig. 1)

    Many startups overengineer and future-proof in the early days, which is almost certain to result in a tremendous waste of energy. At the start of the journey, there are very few knowns (see mistake No. 1). But one thing that is known is that there is a fundamental difference between the friction that prevents a product from taking off and the friction that prevents it from scaling.

    Related: Failed Startups Made These 7 Marketing Mistakes — Are You Making Them, Too?

    6. Wearing too many hats

    In my favorite brainteaser of all time, 100 prisoners wear different colored hats and strategize ways to identify their own hat colors. A startup often has far fewer than 100 employees, but often has far more than 100 hats. Context-switching carries a real cost, and early-stage employees who fail to delegate responsibility often end up performing all tasks poorly. Find people you can trust to take some of those hats off your head, and bring them in early.

    7. Comparing your work-in-progress to others’ finished works

    One of the easiest ways to get discouraged while running the startup marathon is to compare your rough drafts and works-in-progress to polished success stories. All difficult tasks (be they entrepreneurial, creative, educational, etc.) require iteration and more iteration, revision and more revision. The mistakes along the way are countless, sure, but they are also priceless. Comparing a work-in-progress to the finished products we see every day is not only demotivating — it’s also disingenuous. It’s comparing a sapling to a fully grown tree.

    8. Trying to solve unbounded problems

    To be solved effectively and efficiently, problems must be segmented and bounded. First, split your intractable problems into small, digestible challenges with a single goal in mind for each. Second, ensure that their solution is bounded to a finite solution space. Not realizing this is almost always a recipe for wasted resources and disappointing outcomes.

    9. Being frightened of incumbents

    Founders are often scared to take on powerful incumbents, believing those paths to be dead ends. This is a mistake. Taking on a monopoly is often a missed opportunity with enormous upside, and with lower costs than you think. There are four main reasons: Monopolies have already proven the industry is viable and lucrative. They refuse to cannibalize their own dominance. They’ve institutionalized their inefficiencies. And perhaps most importantly, they have the most to lose from making mistakes. Startups, by contrast, have the most to gain.

    10. Fearing the pivot

    For most startups, there are only two viable outcomes. In the unlikely case, they will be a big success. In the more likely scenario, they will fail. Don’t stick to early product or strategy decisions that raise the likelihood of the latter. If your startup fails, the value of all your decisions will be zero — so do everything you can to maximize the likelihood of success. If that requires pivoting from what you know and are comfortable with, so be it.

    Related: I Have Helped Founders Raise Millions. Here Are 7 Fundraising Mistakes I See Many Startups Making — And What You Need To Do Instead.

    11. Thinking you need to be first

    Passionate and creative thinkers often believe that in order to succeed, they need to be the first mover. This is wrong. Being the first mover is often a tremendous disadvantage. What matters is not being first but having consumers think you were first, all while benefitting from the courses charted by your forerunners.

    12. Catering too much to existing users (see fig. 2)

    Your existing users or customers are critically important; you wouldn’t have a business without them. But focusing too much on their needs necessarily comes at the expense of the audience you haven’t yet reached, and for whom you’re still struggling to showcase value. Catering to those who have reached the bottom of your funnel prevents you from serving the needs of those higher in the funnel, whose needs have not yet been served. This is the push and pull of product development, and there is a flip side to it. That’s the next mistake…

    13. Catering too much to potential users (see fig. 2)

    The danger outlined in mistake No. 12 swings the other way too. Neglecting to serve the needs of your existing users runs the risk of causing unnecessary churn. The cost of retaining customers you have already converted is substantially lower than the cost of obtaining new ones. Don’t be overly protective of the users you have, but don’t be overly dismissive either.

    14. Not understanding employee motivation

    Your employees are motivated by different things, and failing to recognize their different styles often leads to poor management as well as to employee dissatisfaction. I categorized people into a “Climber, Hiker, Runner” framework: Climbers are driven by the prospect of unlocking future opportunities. Hikers prefer to take on new challenges and learn new things. And Runners are happy when they can dive deep into what they’re good at. Approaching motivation this way has made me a better manager, and has helped me identify effective ways to keep employees happy.

    15. Focusing too much on short-term gains

    Successfully growing a startup is a marathon (see mistake No. 2). Short-term wins offer little beyond dopamine hits and the stroking of egos. In long-term success stories, accomplishing tough goals takes time but yields meaningful and lasting benefits. While it takes many short-term wins to get to the finish line, don’t miss the forest for the trees. Those incremental achievements are not the true goal. They are the means to an end.

    Related: 7 Common Mistakes to Avoid When Scaling Your Business

    16. Putting off hard conversations

    Your life is divided into two parts: that which occurs before you have the awkward, unpleasant, or emotionally taxing conversation you’re putting off, and that which occurs after. Which would you rather extend? If it’s the latter, why not do everything in your power to cross the boundary right now?

    17. Failing to recognize power laws

    Power laws govern everything you do. Most of the work you put into your startup will yield little clear benefit. Most of the success you see will come from a handful of bets. Internalizing this phenomenon leads to better decision making, less emotional turbulence, and healthier, more sustainable businesses.

    18. Overprotecting your idea

    Have a brilliant idea and an NDA preventing anyone from peeking at it? You’re likely not doing yourself any favors. Truly successful companies win with superior execution, not superior ideas (see mistake No. 11). And by overprotecting your idea from being prodded and challenged, you’re weakening its probability of ever coming to fruition. Often, those individuals who frighten you as potential competitors are those whose feedback is most valuable. And if you fear them stealing the idea, be comforted in knowing that there is no shortage of great ideas in the world. There is, however, a dire shortage of people who know what to do with them.

    19. Keeping interactions inside the office

    Whether in person or remote, the value of having your team “break the ice” cannot be overstated. I mean that in two ways. First, it’s of course good for your colleagues to get to know one another (and hopefully like one another), which leads to happier employees and higher productivity. Second, when people let loose, it “breaks the ice” of the day-to-day mayhem of startup life — or what I like to call “a necessary thawing period.”

    20. Getting too comfortable (see fig. 3)

    There is a big difference between being at a local minimum and being at a global one. Yet from a day-to-day vantage point, they look the same. Any change in any direction means more work, more stress, and more risk. We must zoom out and look at the entirety of our options. Sometimes the best paths or strategies lie just beyond a hill we’re scared to climb.

    Related: I Made These 3 Big Mistakes When Starting a Business — Here’s What I Learned From Them

    21. Not putting things in perspective

    When lost in the hustle and bustle of the early stages of a company, it’s important to remember that most stressful things don’t actually matter in the long term. They will do little to affect the eventual outcome, but they will heavily drain you in the near term. Please take regular moments to stop yourself, look at your small stressors, and ask if this really matters in life. It probably doesn’t.

    22. Not quantifying goals

    Goals without metrics are unbounded (see mistake No. 8). This makes them harder to achieve — and how will you know when you do achieve them? How will you hold yourself accountable when you’ve veered too far off course? Particularly when working as part of a team, quantifiable and measurable goals are of paramount importance to achieve any level of alignment.

    23. Waiting to find a technical cofounder

    Nearly everything I’ve needed to learn to become a technical cofounder, I taught myself (with the guidance of great mentors). You live in an age of wonders, where anyone can learn anything with incredible efficiency. Do not allow the search for a technical cofounder to prevent you from pursuing your dream. Become the technical cofounder yourself.

    For instance: Are you interested in AI but think you’ll never understand how it works? Think again.

    24. Looking for complicated answers when there may be simple ones

    Often, problems that seem intractable have elegant and simple solutions. We are trained to look for complexity, and to value those perspectives that overcomplicate the world. Ignore that instinct! The greatest insights I had as a founder came from light-bulb moments when I realized things were simpler than I’d assumed, not more complicated.

    25. Assuming there is only one path to success (see fig. 4)

    While other people’s success stories can motivate and inspire you, they can also be dangerous. Everyone’s path is unique, and often meandering. Anyone who says that your journey to success must follow a single trajectory has never built a company of their own; they’ve merely studied other people’s.

    Related: Business Owners: Are You Making These 10 Mistakes?

    26. Not filtering out high-frequency noise

    Most day-to-day problems are just noise. Sometimes it’s angry employees or customers. Sometimes it’s a deal gone bad or failing servers. Successful leaders adopt what I call a low-pass mentality. Just as low-pass filters in engineering absorb short-term shocks by filtering out the high-frequency ups and downs, a startup founder must filter out the noise and focus on solving long-term, systemic issues that will have a high impact.

    27. Putting your eggs in one basket

    As shown in mistake No. 1, you’ll be wrong about pretty much all your assumptions. So why risk your business on a single bet? Of course, it’s important to have convictions — but that doesn’t preclude you from simultaneously having other convictions, particularly at the very early stages. If the primary goal of a startup is to reach product-market fit quickly (see mistake No. 5), the risk of being wrong about your one big bet would be extremely costly.

    28. Putting your eggs in too many baskets

    Just as it is dangerous to wear too many hats (see mistake No. 6), it is similarly dangerous to tackle too many strategies at once. Successful leaders prioritize ruthlessly; that means tackling “critical” tasks before ones that are only “very important.” It means committing to seeing through strategies before expending energy on other ones. And it means rallying the whole team around a single milestone or goal, rather than splitting their attention and making everyone worse off because of it.

    29. Underinvesting in long-term relationships

    Most of the key turning points in my business career came through the strength of relationships fostered over many years. Small decisions to help others, to build trust, and to keep in touch can have a tremendous impact on your future in unpredictable ways. The worst-case scenario? Some wasted social energy. The best-case scenario? You open doors you never knew were there.

    30. Failing to recognize recurring patterns

    Despite all the unpredictable noise in business, there is an often-overlooked consistency between market cycles and the players within them. While it’s dangerous to place too much emphasis on individual success stories (see mistake No. 25), it is even more dangerous to overlook the cyclical nature of market dynamics. Human psychology is notoriously predictable — and notoriously forgetful.

    Related: How to Turn Your Mistakes Into Opportunities

    31. Not talking to other founders

    As a founder myself, I overlooked the learned experience of other founders. There is so much guidance buried in their success stories. There is even more to take away from their failures. As I said at the top of this article, startups are like a game of Minesweeper. You can tackle a blank board and start clicking away, or you can put aside your ego and get help from those who have played that board before. If you choose the latter, the likelihood of success can skyrocket.

    32. Focusing on vanity metrics

    There is a reason they are called vanity metrics. Hitting them is the kind of short-term gain I advised you to disregard in mistake No. 15. Why achieve goals that look good but aren’t strategically important? Why care about the number of users if those users are a poor fit and don’t stick around? Why focus on time spent using your product if that number is only high because your product is hard to use (see mistake No. 3)? Identify your desired outcomes, and then find the metrics that actually map to those outcomes.

    33. Misunderstanding the CAP principle

    In computer science, there is a fundamental limitation on how database systems can be built. One can never achieve more than two of the following three goals: consistency, availability, and partition tolerance (or “CAP”). The same is true of companies, which will inevitably see a decline in one of these as they invest in the other two. For instance, when ensuring all teams can talk to each other (availability) and that there is always an individual who can be the “source of truth” for others (consistency), your ability to manage when an employee leaves or communication channels go offline (partition tolerance) drops considerably.

    34. Never setting arbitrary deadlines

    Arbitrary deadlines are a tool. Like most tools, they can be good or bad, depending on who’s using them and for what. Yet while there are many times a team needs the space to think, build, and iterate without undue pressure, there are just as many instances that benefit from the structure and direction provided by arbitrary deadlines. Importantly, arbitrary deadlines should be recognized as arbitrary, and they should be adjusted if needed. But that doesn’t diminish their power in aligning a team and incentivizing productivity. In the right circumstances, I’ve seen them work wonders.

    35. Ignoring uncertainty principles

    Early-stage entrepreneurship, as in quantum physics, presents an inescapable tradeoff. Resources (time, money, etc.) can be spent on investing in a specific strategy or on keeping open optionality; they cannot do both. I call this phenomenon the Startup Uncertainty Principle. It shows that the more you focus on the present, the less you’re able to prep for the future. And the more you prep for the future, the less effective you’ll be now. Companies that attempt to do both at once are fighting a losing battle.

    Related: Common Mistakes First-Time Entrepreneurs Make and How to Stop Them

    36. Not prioritizing low-hanging fruit

    As shown in mistake No. 28, successful companies prioritize ruthlessly. When companies spread themselves and their employees too thin, they hurt productivity and morale. Of course, there is value in investing in longer-term projects with higher costs and higher rewards. Yet it is also critical to regularly prioritize easy wins and short-term opportunities that move the needle incrementally. In addition to laying the foundation for compounding improvements (see mistake No. 2), it will also reengage your teammates and keep morale high.

    37. Overlooking unexplored markets

    As founders and dollars race to build in competitive, high-growth markets, opportunities often exist in “hidden layers” of industry. Companies that focus there can ride waves of market growth while avoiding fierce competition, by turning potential competitors into actual customers. Some of the most valuable companies in the world have taken this approach (including the two most valuable) and it has paid dividends (literally).

    38. Not relying on proven technology

    New technological solutions to longstanding problems can be attractive. But the hidden downsides can surface much too late — often when you’re already dependent. New technologies can break, can go out of business, can have unexpected side effects. By contrast, longstanding problems tend to have proven longstanding solutions. While not as exciting to use, they work, and that’s what matters most.

    39. Sugarcoating bad news

    Managers sometimes believe that when things get hard — and they inevitably will, many times over — bad news is better delivered indirectly or with a positive spin. This is an innate human desire. But employees are smart. Being disingenuous about the state of the business or the rationale for business decisions will hurt your company over the long term. This applies to everything from layoffs to pivots to cutting perks. Your employees will see through the euphemisms, rendering your sugarcoating fruitless, and they will respect you less for your lack of directness.

    40. Ignoring entropy

    It’s a law of the universe that everything trends toward disorder. Knowledge and control are no different. No matter what, eventually you’ll be wrong. Your convictions will need to adapt as the world in which they exist evolves. The stable parts of your business will suffer from unexpected market dynamics, new competition, and shifting consumer attitudes. Those who succeed in the long term embrace entropy as a fact of life, and they know that they cannot hold anything too sacred for too long.

    Related: 10 Mistakes I Made While Selling My First Startup (and How You Can Avoid Them)

    41. Forgetting your only advantage

    With limited time and limited resources, only so much can get done. A startup has every disadvantage relative to more well-funded incumbents, and only one advantage: speed. Leverage this. Big players are slow to move and slow to turn, like giant cruise ships. Startups are small and nimble sailboats that can race faster and turn on a dime when it matters.

    42. Treating money like it isn’t fungible

    A dollar is a dollar is a dollar. Every single dollar spent—no matter how it’s accounted for — is money not spent on something else. This is all the more reason to prioritize ruthlessly (see mistake No. 28). Resources have a habit of disappearing faster than you’d expect.

    43. Not explicitly deciding how to balance productivity and alignment (see fig. 5)

    Companies that overinvest in aligning their team members do so at the expense of productivity. Those that focus on productivity do so at the expense of alignment. The optimal balance depends on the company, its size, and its unique journey. But the important takeaway is that you are making this trade-off whether you explicitly choose the balance or not — so you might as well choose it.

    44. Only talking to people you know

    The “birthday paradox” shows that if you put 23 people in a room together, there is a 50% chance two will share the same birthday. By the same mathematical logic, if any conversation has even a 0.3% chance of being life-changing, then putting a few dozen people in a room together is virtually guaranteed to lead to some life-changing conversations. The takeaway? Meet more people. (Here’s a good way to do that.)

    45. Working only from home

    Startup stress can seep across any boundaries you’ve set. To drive both productivity and better mental health, don’t work exclusively from where you sleep and spend time with family. I say “exclusively” because I have seen startups achieve great success in a fully remote setup. Still, the early days of startups rely critically on serendipitous conversations and ideations — and that can only happen when employees are colocated. Get the team together now and then.

    Related: 5 Marketing Mistakes Startups Must Avoid in Order to Survive

    46. Working only from an office

    Most founders I know get their best ideas when they’re not at work. There’s something about the change of scenery, the connections between unrelated neurons, and the exposure of a problem or challenge to a new environment. Whereas mistake No. 45 showcases why it’s important to sometimes bring your team together, this one recognizes that it’s equally important to take them out of their comfort zones and get them to interact in brand-new places and brand-new ways.

    47. Forgetting to revisit whatever motivates you

    When things get difficult (and they will), it’s important to reflect on the things that helped motivate you to start in the first place. Have it readily accessible—be it a movie or a podcast episode or a book or a soundtrack — and revisit it when you feel the morale drop. For me in my Anchor days, it was Daft Punk’s Random Access Memories. To this day, if I need a jump-start in motivational energy, I just put on that album and get to work.

    48. Not taking pictures

    You’re going to miss the early days. You’ll wish they were better documented. If things end up working out, you’ll look at those moments in time and say, “Wow, look how far we’ve come.” And if things don’t, you’ll say, “Wow, look how hard we worked. If I did that, I can handle anything.”

    49. Assuming you have product-market fit

    Product-market fit is the elusive transition point at which you realize who your customers are and what value you’re providing for them. Hardly anyone reaches this point without considerable effort, and the easiest way for a brand-new enterprise to fail is to assume they have reached this point when they have not. There are only two ways — talking to customers and looking at data — that can verify the milestone has been hit. Once there, things get considerably easier.

    50. Thinking there are only 50 startup mistakes

    I suppose I’m guilty of this one right now. No list of startup advice is exhaustive. Every new entrepreneurial journey is bound to uncover unique challenges. Yet that’s also part of the fun of the startup journey: You never know what’ll happen next.

    A version of this article originally appeared on Nir Zicherman’s newsletter, Z-Axis.

    Nir Zicherman

    Source link

  • Startup Behind Goldman Sachs’ First ‘A.I. Employee’ Valued at $10B After Peter Thiel Funding

    Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund led Cognition’s latest $400 million funding round. Photo by Nordin Catic/Getty Images for The Cambridge Union

    Cognition AI, the San Francisco-based startup known for its A.I. software engineer Devin used by Goldman Sachs, has more than doubled its valuation to $10.2 billion after raising more than $400 million in a round led by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund. The deal, announced yesterday (Sept. 8), also drew participation from existing backers including angel investor Elad Gil, Lux Capital, 8VC, Neo, Definition Capital and Swish VC. The fresh financing marks a stark increase from the $4 billion valuation Cognition received earlier this year.

    Cognition was launched in 2023 by Scott Wu, Steven Hao and Walden Yang. Wu, the company’s CEO, previously co-founded Lunchbox, an A.I. networking platform. The founding team also includes alumni of Scale AI, Google DeepMind and self-driving software maker Waymo, as well as a number of elite coders who medaled at the International Olympiad in Informatics, a global programming competition.

    Cognition’s flagship product is Devin, an A.I. software engineer. The company also made waves through acquisitions, most notably when it snapped up software firm Windsurf just days after Google hired away much of its leadership. While OpenAI had reportedly pursued Windsurf before complications with its partner Microsoft, Google in July struck a multibillion-dollar licensing deal for Windsurf’s technology and acqui-hired several top staffers. Cognition then acquired what remained of the company: its team, intellectual property and product.

    Even before the Windsurf deal, Cognition’s annual recurring revenue (ARR) had climbed rapidly—from $1 million in September 2024 to $73 million by this June, Wu said in a press release. Since the acquisition, ARR has more than doubled. “We’ll continue to invest significantly in both Devin and Windsurf, and our customers are already seeing how powerful the combination is together,” Wu added, noting that clients include Goldman Sachs, Dell and Palantir.

    Looking ahead, Cognition plans to expand the ways its users can leverage the combined power of Devin and Windsurf. “We’re looking forward to enabling engineers [to] manage an army of agents to build technology faster,” said Jeff Wang, Windsurf’s interim CEO since former leader Varun Mohan departed for Google, in a LinkedIn post. “It’s been quite an eventful last few months, and now it’s time to show what we’re made of.”

    Startup Behind Goldman Sachs’ First ‘A.I. Employee’ Valued at $10B After Peter Thiel Funding

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • ‘We Live the Brand’: Why Mark Wahlberg and Harry Arnett Built a Company That Embodies Relentless Ambition | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Municipal CEO Harry Arnett met his future co-founder in a setting familiar to many business leaders: the golf course. They bonded quickly over shared experiences — raising kids, navigating careers — and from that connection, a friendship grew. At first glance, it sounds like a typical entrepreneurial origin story.

    But in Arnett’s case, the partner by his side wasn’t another executive. It was Oscar-nominated actor and Boston icon Mark Wahlberg.

    Related: John and Hank Green Built a Company That Gives Away 100% of Its Profits — Here’s How

    Purpose over products

    “When Mark and I first discussed starting a brand, it wasn’t about the products,” Arnett tells Entrepreneur. “It was about how we could equip modern consumers with what they need to achieve their goals.”

    They, along with film and television producer Stephen Levinson, identified a major white space at the intersection of fitness and fashion. Arnett formerly served as executive vice president at Callaway Golf, where he noticed a shift in how consumers engaged with brands.

    “They were starting to seek direct relationships with brands they liked, primarily through digital media,” he explains. As EVP, he focused on revitalizing Callaway by reconnecting with consumers in a fresh, dynamic way — a strategy he calls the centerpiece of his community-building efforts.

    After years of back-and-forth, the duo finally launched Municipal in 2019.

    “The idea for Municipal was something I’ve wanted to do for a long time,” Wahlberg tells Entrepreneur. “It wasn’t about just attaching my name to someone else’s idea, which is often what celebrity-led brands are. Municipal is different — this is a real partnership from the ground up.”

    The launch meant Arnett had to leave Callaway. “For me, that was an aha moment,” he says. “A chance to step away from a comfortable, familiar career and start over in pursuit of the best version of myself.”

    That mentality became the ethos of Municipal, a company founded on helping modern consumers pursue excellence in all aspects of life.

    “Municipal is about creating the best products in the world for workouts, athletic pursuits and everything in between, from the office to an active weekend,” Arnett explains. “It might sound like we’re trying to be everything to everyone, but when people see our product, they get it immediately — no one makes gear like we do.”

    Related: Restaurants Are Throwing Away Billions of Gallons of Water — This Startup Said Enough

    Building tomorrow’s leaders

    Contrary to standard practices, where brands are encouraged to hone in on a focus area, Arnett positions Municipal as more than just another activewear company, calling that label too “one-dimensional.”

    He envisions the brand inspiring a drive to succeed in any arena — athletics, academics or beyond. A key part of this approach is Municipal’s Next Gen Brand Immersion, a free, week-long program that gives young people an inside look at every aspect of building a modern, purpose-driven brand — from product design and marketing to finance and operations.

    “Too often, young people are fed the myth of overnight success and shortcuts,” Arnett says. “From our experience, those are fantasies. We saw an opportunity to use our platform to celebrate ambition, hard work, and self-belief in a way that feels ‘cool’ for kids.”

    The idea for the program didn’t originate with Arnett or Wahlberg, but with Arnett’s youngest daughter, Kerris, who has shown a keen interest in Municipal.

    “We’ve been talking about the brand since day one, and she got really passionate about it,” Arnett shares. “She said it would be amazing if more kids her age could experience these kinds of things firsthand, instead of just reading about them. I told her, ‘Karis, that’s a big idea.’”

    Building on his daughter’s suggestion, Arnett sought to replicate what brands like Nike have done with sports camps — creating a talent pipeline for Municipal while connecting the company with the next generation of potential entrepreneurs and gaining insights into the preferences of the highly coveted Gen Z audience.

    The effort culminated in a week-long, hands-on program giving ambitious 18- to 24-year-olds a real look at what it takes to build a modern, purpose-driven brand. Participants work directly with Municipal’s team across product design, marketing and operations, gaining experience in creating, launching and promoting a real collection.

    The students even designed a capsule — featuring a hoodie, pants, shorts, t-shirt and hat — that Municipal will release and help market.

    “It’s a way to engage with this group beyond just selling the best gear in the world,” Arnett explains. “These 25 students are leaders in their schools and have become rabid Municipal fans. They’ll tell their friends, and even when they go off to college, they’ll maintain a connection with us. The possibilities for extending that relationship feel practically endless.”

    Leo Zevin

    Source link

  • We Built a 7-Figure Business Without a Single Investor — Here’s Why Saying No to VC Was Our Smartest Move | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    You’ve heard this story before: a couple of college kids launch a startup from their dorm room. Surrounded by engineers, finance majors and future founders, venture capital wasn’t just common — it was expected. So when my co-founder and I launched Prepory, our college admissions coaching company, we assumed we’d need funding to be taken seriously.

    We entered a pitch competition and came in second. No check. We reached out to investors. No bites. We had a choice: give up or keep building.

    We kept building.

    What started as a one-person operation helping students in our local community has grown into a seven-figure, global company with nearly 100 team members. We’ve supported over 14,000 students, partnered with school districts and institutions in multiple countries and built one of the most trusted brands in college admissions — all without a single outside investor.

    Here’s why we said no to VC, and why bootstrapping was the smartest decision we never planned to make.

    The pressure to raise

    In elite academic circles, starting a business often goes hand in hand with chasing venture capital. I pictured the high-stakes pitch rooms, the dramatic investor meetings — scenes straight out of The Social Network. But after our early efforts fell flat, we stopped trying to win someone else’s approval and turned our focus inward.

    We obsessed over our product, our client experience and our outcomes — not “scale.”

    One month before our one-year mark, we hit $100,000 in revenue. It wasn’t a headline-grabbing number by Silicon Valley standards, but it proved something more important: we didn’t need permission to grow. We just needed to execute.

    Related: Most Startups Ignore This One Asset That Makes or Breaks Their Success

    What bootstrapping taught us

    In hindsight, bootstrapping didn’t just work — it shaped the business in ways VC money never could.

    Every dollar mattered, which meant we tested fast and paid close attention to what customers wanted. Client feedback shaped everything. We pivoted early on from a B2C model to B2B — realizing that one school contract could bring the same revenue as ten individual clients. That insight wasn’t born from a boardroom; it was born from necessity.

    Bootstrapping also made me a better leader. I didn’t start by managing dozens of people. I started with one, then five, then ten. That kind of slow, intentional growth gave me room to develop as a leader — learning how to listen, communicate clearly and lead with clarity and care. There was no pressure to scale overnight, so we could prioritize culture, values and quality.

    The hidden cost of raising too soon

    VC can be a powerful accelerator — but if you raise too early, it can also be a trap.

    Many founders take funding before they’ve found product-market fit. They shift their focus from solving customer problems to pleasing investors. Instead of building a strong foundation, they’re stuck managing burn rates and expectations. Teams get stretched. Quality suffers.

    We built slowly. That meant we stayed close to our mission and recruited talent who were energized by the opportunity to build something meaningful. Today, we outperform companies twice our size because we’ve built a team that shows up with purpose — and we’ve stayed aligned with what matters most: helping students reach their full potential.

    Related: How to Scale a Business Without Wasting Millions (Or Collapsing Under Your Own Growth)

    Should you bootstrap?

    Ask yourself this: What do you actually need the money for?

    If you’re building a product that truly requires upfront investment — hardware, tech or time-sensitive development — funding may make sense. But if you’re starting a service-based business, you might not need capital to get traction.

    Bootstrapping requires resilience, patience and a tolerance for delayed gratification. But it gives you full ownership of your company, your vision and your decisions. Today, we have the freedom to invest in growth on our own terms.

    People still ask if we’d raise money now. My answer? Not unless we have a strategic reason to. Not because I’m anti-VC, but because we no longer need it.

    Bootstrapping gave us something far more valuable than capital: it taught us how to build a resilient, values-driven, adaptable business. And if we ever decide to raise, we’ll do it from a position of strength — not survival.

    You’ve heard this story before: a couple of college kids launch a startup from their dorm room. Surrounded by engineers, finance majors and future founders, venture capital wasn’t just common — it was expected. So when my co-founder and I launched Prepory, our college admissions coaching company, we assumed we’d need funding to be taken seriously.

    We entered a pitch competition and came in second. No check. We reached out to investors. No bites. We had a choice: give up or keep building.

    We kept building.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Daniel Santos

    Source link

  • Paris-Based Mistral AI Seeks $14B Valuation as Europe Charts Its Own A.I. Path

    CEO Arthur Mensch is steering Mistral away from the AGI hype and toward Europe’s A.I. sovereignty. Photo by Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images

    Paris-based Mistral AI is on track for a new funding round that would value the A.I. startup at 12 billion euros ($14 billion), Bloomberg reports. The investment, expected to total around 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion), would solidify the company’s position at the center of Europe’s sovereign A.I. strategy and bring it closer to its goal of challenging dominant U.S. rivals.

    Founded in 2023, Mistral has already raised some 1.1 billion euros ($1.3 billion) over the past two years. Its upcoming valuation would more than double the 5.8 billion euros ($6.8 billion) figure it reached last June following a 468 million euro ($550 million) round that drew backers such as Andreessen Horowitz, Salesforce and Nvidia.

    Mistral did not respond to requests for comment from Observer.

    For now, the startup still pales in size compared to its Silicon Valley competitors. Anthropic closed a round earlier this month at a staggering $183 billion valuation, while OpenAI is reportedly eyeing $500 billion. Still, Mistral is eager to compete. Its products include an A.I. assistant called “Le Chat,” designed for European customers and positioned as an alternative to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude chatbots.

    Mistral was co-founded by Arthur Mensch, a former researcher at Google DeepMind, along with former Meta researchers Timothée Lacroix and Guillaume Lample. Mistral has tried to distinguish itself by emphasizing open access. It has released several open-source language models. Unlike American A.I. giants, Mistral has also rejected pursuing AGI. Mensch, who serves as CEO, has said his firm is more focused on ensuring U.S. startups don’t dominate how the technology shapes global culture.

    Mistral is central to Europe’s A.I. playbook

    Mistral is part of a broader surge in European A.I. investment. In 2024, venture capital rounds involving A.I. and machine learning companies based in Europe were estimated to have reached 13.2 billion euros ($15.5 billion), up 20 percent from 2023, according to data from Pitchbook.

    Mistral is part of a broader surge in European A.I. investment. In 2024, venture capital rounds involving A.I. and machine learning companies across the continent were expected to reach 13.2 billion euros ($15.5 billion), a 20 percent increase from the year before, according to PitchBook.

    As one of Europe’s leading startups, Mistral is central to the region’s goal of building an A.I. ecosystem independent of technology from America or China. Earlier this year, the company partnered with Nvidia to launch a European A.I. platform that will allow companies to develop applications and strengthen domestic infrastructure. French President Emmanuel Macron hailed the initiative as “a game changer, because it will increase our sovereignty and it will allow us to do much more.”

    Mistral’s rapid ascent is tied to broader efforts to bolster A.I. across Europe and France. Its Nvidia partnership followed Macron’s announcement at Paris’ global A.I. summit in February, where he pledged more than 100 billion euros ($117 billion) to support France’s A.I. industry. European players must move quickly, Macron stressed at the time: “We are committed to going faster and faster.”

    Paris-Based Mistral AI Seeks $14B Valuation as Europe Charts Its Own A.I. Path

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • Connection at Scale: Designing Belonging in the Age of Loneliness

    The Camp Social founder shares how intentional design turns strangers into friends and proves belonging can be built. Courtesy Camp Social

    This Q&A is part of Observer’s Expert Insights series, where industry leaders, innovators and strategists distill years of experience into direct, practical takeaways and deliver clarity on the issues shaping their industries. At a time when loneliness is being called a public health crisis and nearly half of U.S. adults say they struggle to make friends, Liv Schreiber is proving that connection can be designed. And that joy is contagious when done right. As founder and CEO of Camp Social, a fast-growing community and events platform, Schreiber has built a business around something most of us crave but rarely prioritize: real human connection.

    Her approach is anything but ordinary. Camp Social doesn’t rely on contrived icebreakers or staged exclusivity. Instead, it invites people to show up solo and leave with a sense of belonging, whether through group hikes, paddleboarding sessions, yoga flows or roundtable dinners. Ninety-nine percent of attendees come alone, and 100 percent leave with new friends. For Schreiber, the formula is simple but intentional: create an atmosphere that’s warm, energetic and safe enough for people to drop their guard.

    From navigating intergenerational friendships to balancing the reach of digital platforms with the depth of offline experiences, Schreiber’s work is a reminder that social connection is a skill—and a business—worth cultivating.

    What key ingredients make people feel safe and open at social events?

    It starts with making people feel comfortable being themselves in a new environment. That means creating an atmosphere that’s warm, low-pressure, and welcoming, like freshman year of college, where everyone’s somehow in the same boat. At Camp Social, we do this through small details: encouraging people to come solo (99 percent arrive solo and 100 percent leave as friends), bonding over fun activities like paddleboarding, yoga and hikes instead of cringey group icebreakers, shared meals at roundtables, uplifting music, leadership staff and I demonstrating how excited we are to have our campers with us.

    The goal is to make it easy for people to talk, laugh and connect, without overthinking it, feeling like they’re at home, not visiting.

    A group of women around a picnic table A group of women around a picnic table
    Strangers arrive solo, but leave as friends. Courtesy Camp Social

    How do you curate a crowd without making it feel curated?

    I focus on vibe over visuals. It’s not about everyone dressing the same or looking the same. In fact, our wide range of ages and diversity are something I’m most proud of. We attract the vibe we put out: we want people who are kind, open, enthusiastic. 

    People you’d want next to you at a campfire or a dance party. It’s less about exclusivity and more about creating a room full of people who make each other feel good and come in with open, positive, excited attitudes.

    What has building Camp Social taught you about female friendship, and what are we still getting wrong?

    We’ve been taught that friendships should feel effortless, but real connection takes intentionality. Camp Social has shown me that most women want deeper friendships; they just don’t always have the time or space in their day-to-day lives. So we created a space where you don’t have to play it cool or play a game at all. You can show up, be yourself, and know that everyone else is looking to connect, too. It’s instant.

    How do you balance digital reach with offline authenticity?

    Social media gets people in the door, but what makes them stay is how they feel once they’re there. The offline experience majorly exceeds the online hype. That’s how it should always be. The American Psychiatric Association’s 2023 poll found 30 percent of adults experience loneliness at least once a week, and 10 percent feel lonely every single day, with adults 18 to 34 most affected. We need to feel joy and community in real life!

    Thoughtful moments, epic goodies, good conversation, unexpected fun, that’s what keeps it real. When people leave saying, “I feel like I just made 100 new best friends,” that’s the win. And that’s what builds real community, not just a following. I’m uninterested in catfishing.

    What advice would you give someone who’s moved to New York and doesn’t know how to make friends?

    First of all, you’re not alone. A lot of people feel that way (1 in 2 adults in the U.S.), that’s why I started my businesses. Most people are just waiting for someone else to make the first move. So be the one who reaches out. Say yes to things. Invite someone for coffee, even if it feels awkward. You don’t need a million friends, you just need one incredible person. And if you don’t know where to start, that’s literally why we built Camp Social. You have to be a villager to have a village, so make sure you feed the flame once it starts.

    A group of women dancing A group of women dancing
    Connection takes center stage when the setting is safe, joyful and real. Courtesy Camp Social

    The Camp Social audience is anyone young at heart. What is so special about intergenerational friendships, and how should you go about making intergenerational connections

    Intergenerational friendships are the secret sauce no one’s talking about! They stretch your perspective and bring a kind of grounding that same-age friendships sometimes can’t. Having a friend who’s 20 years older than you reminds you that things you’re stressing about might not matter in the long run, and having a younger friend keeps you curious and plugged in.

     A 2023 Journal of Social and Personal Relationships study found that adults with meaningful intergenerational relationships reported higher levels of life satisfaction, emotional regulation and even cognitive function. Another survey by Generations United revealed that 92 percent of Americans believe intergenerational relationships reduce loneliness, and only 26 percent say they have them regularly. That gap says everything. We need Camp Social.

    What’s special is that both people bring something valuable to the table: stories, wisdom, humor, new references, new ways of thinking. It’s like finding prequels and sequels of your favorite book that you didn’t know you needed.

    People must drop the assumption that friendship has to look a certain way. Stay open to connection in unexpected places, a coworker, a neighbor, someone at your gym or your mom’s best friend. Friendship is about shared energy and a mutual willingness to show up for each other.

    Some of the most meaningful connections I’ve seen at Camp Social have been between people with totally different backgrounds, careers, and ages. That’s the beauty of it: we’re all just humans looking for people who get us. If you’re lucky, sometimes, that person who gets you isn’t in your age bracket. That’s the beauty.

    Camp Social has grown quickly in a notoriously hard-to-scale space: human connection. What strategies have been most effective in translating something so personal into a sustainable, growing business?

    Camp Social grew fast because I never treated it like an “event.” It feels like family, and I treat my campers and staff like family. We have created moments—charcuterie boards and firepits at sunset, letters-to-themselves stations and friendship bracelets, dance parties at dinner, customization of individual schedules and outdoor movie nights—that made women feel seen and part of something bigger than themselves. Word of mouth is our best growth channel. Every camper has become a brand evangelist because they weren’t just attending, they were belonging. 

    That intimacy scales when you build systems around it—surveys, bunk assignments, diligently trained staff who are an extension of me—so that every woman still feels like she got a personalized, magical experience, even at a 1000-person scale. The number of attendees and popularity don’t and will never matter to me. It’s the quality of experience that I’m responsible for.

    Women kayaking on a lake at a Camp Social eventWomen kayaking on a lake at a Camp Social event
    From paddleboards to roundtables, every activity is designed for belonging. Courtesy Camp Social

    Have you faced moments when scaling threatened to dilute the “magic” of Camp Social? How did you protect the integrity of the experience while growing?

    Of course there were moments where I worried, but I just created what I wanted to experience and removed what would stress me as a consumer. To protect the “magic,” I doubled down on small touches—welcome notes, intentionally curated bunkmate pairings, surprise activations that feel intimate and are only brands that I actually use and love. Saying no to what doesn’t align, no matter the dollar offer. 

    The bigger we got, the more important it became to weave in micro-moments of intimacy and say no to the big guys that don’t align. Every human touch point matters, and scaling didn’t mean diluting. It meant more designing for intimacy at scale. It is a responsibility I’m grateful for. 

    Are there lessons from Camp Social that could translate into corporate or workplace culture? How can companies make teams feel more connected and creative?

    Camp Social proved something I think every company should pay attention to: connection fuels creativity. People do their best work and stay longer when they feel emotionally safe and socially plugged in—without being attached to work 24/7. Provide communal meals that aren’t “networking” but true bonding. Activities that the company can offer for employees in their downtime or during lunch. Camp Social is proof that when you build infrastructure around belonging—and back it with intentional leaders and staff, productivity and retention follow.

    A group of woman hold hands at the shore of a lake, running toward the waterA group of woman hold hands at the shore of a lake, running toward the water
    A loneliness antidote: creating spaces where community grows naturally. Courtesy Camp Social

    In your view, what’s the future of community-driven brands? Where do you see this space heading in the next five years, and how will Camp Social evolve to meet it?

    We’re in a loneliness epidemic, but also a renaissance of community. The future belongs to brands that don’t just sell a product—they create belonging. In five years, I see community-driven brands blending IRL and digital seamlessly, offering memberships, products, retreats and always-on touchpoints that extend beyond one-off transactions. For Camp Social, that means scaling into memberships, global retreats and digital platforms where the magic of connection continues year-round. It’s not just camp. It’s a lifestyle. I’m glad the business world is finally listening. 

    Connection at Scale: Designing Belonging in the Age of Loneliness

    Liv Schreiber

    Source link

  • I Turned My Hobby Into a Global Startup for Writers — Here’s the Playbook | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Since childhood, I’ve been a bookworm. My all-time favorite books include a mix of non-fiction and finance. However, this didn’t stop me from transforming my biggest hobby into My Passion, the top-2 e-book platform globally.

    The platform already has over 1,000 books, and every two weeks we release another 2–3 bestsellers. For entrepreneurs wondering if their passion could become their next startup, here’s exactly how I did it — and the framework that can work for you too.

    Related: AI Won’t Wait for Your Strategy — Why Should Your Leadership?

    Define your ‘Why’

    86% of people who started a hobby-based business report higher job satisfaction. But here’s what they don’t tell you: satisfaction doesn’t equal success, and most hobby businesses never scale beyond side hustles.

    Don’t quit your job just because you read how Zuckerberg started Facebook as a hobby project for Harvard students, or how Boeing turned his love of aircraft into a billion-dollar company. Instead, consider WHY you truly desire to launch your startup.

    Here’s how I discovered mine.

    For me, reading was more than just entertainment. This is what shaped my worldview.

    Books showed me the world beyond survival — I read about Van Gogh, artists and creators who transcended their environment. This sparked the belief that my background doesn’t define me — a mantra I carry to this day.

    I didn’t just want to open a bookstore, launch an app or write a book for money. My goal was to empower writers globally. Ultimately, storytelling became the DNA of my startup, Holywater, which unlocks people’s potential by combining their imagination with AI capabilities, from books to streaming and AI-powered series.

    Now, writers worldwide share stories and gain recognition through My Passion. Moreover, books evolve into My Drama’s vertical series with a global reach. We are also developing the PYSHY (WRITE) contest with Vivat Publishing, which creates real earning opportunities for writers.

    We got 444 submissions, 3 were picked for publication and 1 was adapted for a top-performing vertical series.

    You can simply monetize your hobby, for example, by selling your books, paintings or clay crafts. Or you can turn it into a global startup. Your why and scale make all the difference.

    Connect your passion with a real-world solution

    Your passion must translate into value for others, not just personal satisfaction. The reason 42% of startups fail is misreading market demand. Simply put, founders spent money and time launching a product that no one needed.

    Identify what other people’s problems or needs you can solve by turning your hobby into a startup. Consider how successful founders made this connection. Etsy transformed the love of handmade crafts into a global marketplace for unique goods. AeroPress turned one coffee enthusiast’s quest for the perfect brew into a portable solution for coffee lovers worldwide. These founders connected their passions with unmet market needs, creating products that solved real problems and resonated with millions.

    Through my reading journey, I realized a fundamental gap: people love stories, but they lack the tools and support to tell them well. Writer’s block, pacing issues and structural gaps limit creativity, and working on a book alone is exhausting. After all, professional storytellers have entire teams of editors, plot consultants and visual artists.

    Launching My Passion together with Anatolii Kasianov, we applied AI to democratize storytelling support, giving every writer access to plot development, visual elements, structure recommendations and pacing advice. Support that was previously only available to well-known authors is now available to all creators.

    Start with a small community

    Ask yourself: Is this hobby large enough to involve other people? Your passion requires a community to become a sustainable business.

    Many great businesses started as small communities that later scaled. For instance, Reddit began as a platform for niche interests and grew into a global discussion hub, and Duolingo was a small beta community of language learners testing early lessons. Nowadays, you can easily build a community on social media and get feedback there. It’s a great chance to get like-minded people together and test out your idea.

    The beauty of starting small is that it allows you to validate demand without massive investment. You can quickly discover whether others share your passion and face similar challenges.

    Related: How a Side Hustle Led to a $1 Million+ Passive Income Stream

    Don’t let your passion turn into a nightmare

    Understand the stakes and pressure that come with monetising your hobby. When your livelihood depends on what once brought you pure joy, the dynamic changes completely. Deadlines replace spontaneity. Market demands can override creative instincts. Financial pressure can drain the original magic. The result: burnout, which affects more than half of founders.

    What keeps me going? Again, books. Not for market research, but for myself. Besides, I have other passions. For example, I meditate every day and share insights on LinkedIn. It is extremely important for startup founders not to get stuck only in work, especially if their hobby and startup are now combined.

    The line between hobby and business disappears when your work helps others experience the same transformation that once changed you. When writers tell us our platform helped them overcome creative blocks they’d struggled with for years, I know we’ve moved beyond monetizing a hobby — we’re scaling transformation.

    Your greatest obsession might just be your greatest business opportunity, but only if you can preserve what made you fall in love with it in the first place.

    Bogdan Nesvit

    Source link

  • Your Startup Seems On Track — But An Invisible Growth Blocker Says Otherwise | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As a founder, your focus is growth — more users, more features, more market share. But sometimes the biggest thing standing in your way isn’t your business model, marketing or funding. It’s your tech team.

    Not because they’re doing something wrong — but because they’ve taken you as far as they can.

    And when you finally bring in a new team or vendor, it’s a stress test. For the business, it means facing hard questions about control. For the new team, it means diving into someone else’s legacy code. And for you, the founder, there’s one phrase no one ever wants to hear:

    “Honestly, it might be easier to rebuild this from scratch.”

    But here’s the thing — you don’t need a fire to smell the smoke.

    Related: The Top 2 Mistakes Founders Make That Hinder the Growth of Their Companies

    The calm before the stall

    Sometimes, founders realize something’s off when everything starts breaking — delivery delays, ballooning budgets or a tech stack that feels five years old. But just as often, things look fine on the surface.

    Code is getting shipped. Deadlines are met. Users are active, maybe even paying. On paper, it all looks “on track.”

    But under the hood, your product may already be maxed out. Not because of bugs — but because the team that built it wasn’t thinking far enough ahead.

    This is the silent stall: when your product stops being a launchpad and becomes a ceiling. It still works, but it can’t grow.

    No scalable tech foundation

    Most growth plans boil down to a simple idea: make it work, then scale. But can your architecture, tools and infrastructure handle that scale?

    If your tech partner lacks a long-term mindset, they’ll deliver what you ask for — but not what you’ll need next. That means you’ll constantly be in maintenance mode, fixing things that should’ve been built right the first time.

    And growth adds pressure fast: more users, more data, more complexity. What works for a few thousand users might fall apart at scale — or cost you exponentially more to run.

    A good tech partner doesn’t treat scalability as an upgrade. They design for it from day one. Modular systems, clean infrastructure and smart trade-offs aren’t technical luxuries — they’re what make future features (and funding rounds) possible.

    Because rebuilding later costs more. In time, money and momentum you won’t get back.

    An incomplete team

    Here’s something that trips up a lot of startups: assuming developers alone can carry the product.

    Developers are essential, of course. But building a successful digital product takes more than code. You also need:

    • Business analysts to map user and market needs into features
    • UX and UI designers to shape user experience
    • Solution architects to plan scalable systems

    If your current vendor only supplies engineers, you’re not working with a product partner — you’re working with a contractor. That might be fine early on, but over time, it’s a limitation.

    Without the right roles in place, your product gets built in a vacuum. There’s no one translating strategy into functionality or guiding decisions with the bigger picture in mind.

    A complete product team is cross-functional by design. The best vendors can pull in the right expertise when needed — not weeks later, but immediately.

    No plan for what’s next

    Plenty of teams are great at delivering today’s requirements. But what about tomorrow’s?

    If your tech partner isn’t helping you plan for monetization, scale or the next fundraising round, you’re not set up for sustainable growth.

    Think about how much future planning touches:

    • Payment systems
    • Onboarding flows
    • App store requirements
    • Subscription models
    • Analytics and data tracking

    Miss these pieces early, and you’ll end up rebuilding later — right when you should be scaling. Investors notice too. They expect clean data, thoughtful UX and systems that support growth, not just usage.

    A strong tech partner will challenge assumptions and help you anticipate what comes after this version. Because scaling isn’t just more code — it’s pricing, performance, infrastructure and go-to-market timing all working together.

    If your team isn’t thinking that far ahead, it’s time to find one that is.

    Related: 6 Unconventional Habits That Actually Help Entrepreneurs Find Work-Life Sanity

    Final thoughts

    Not all stalled products fail loudly. Sometimes the most dangerous moment is when everything seems fine — but nothing’s moving forward.

    You don’t need a crisis to justify a change. You need a vision that your current team can grow into — not just keep afloat.

    Yes, switching vendors takes time, effort and sometimes cleanup. But it also gives you a reset — a chance to align your product with where your business is actually going.

    If you’ve hit a ceiling, don’t wait until it becomes a wall. Find a partner who can build what’s next, not just maintain what’s now.

    As a founder, your focus is growth — more users, more features, more market share. But sometimes the biggest thing standing in your way isn’t your business model, marketing or funding. It’s your tech team.

    Not because they’re doing something wrong — but because they’ve taken you as far as they can.

    And when you finally bring in a new team or vendor, it’s a stress test. For the business, it means facing hard questions about control. For the new team, it means diving into someone else’s legacy code. And for you, the founder, there’s one phrase no one ever wants to hear:

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Ilia Kiselevich

    Source link

  • What I Learned About Growth From Founders Who Started Small | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Starting a business with limited resources is a road many solopreneurs find familiar — myself included. I’ve observed many small business owners turning modest startups into success stories, but it doesn’t happen overnight. They turn their humble ideas into successful ventures with resilience, creativity, smart technology use and a never-accept-defeat attitude.

    For this article, I’ll draw on my personal experiences and the stories of five founders who started small. These practical lessons apply to your entrepreneurship journey as well.

    Related: Boost Your Solopreneur Business with These 3 Proven Tips

    Start by solving authentic problems

    Sara Blakely launched Spanx in 2000 when she was under 30 years old and had $5,000 to her name. But her self-employment journey started with a simple notion: her personal frustration with not finding comfortable, flattering undergarments to wear. Even though her idea, which later turned out to be worth $1 billion, was rejected by multiple manufacturers, her conviction kept her persistent until she finally found someone willing to take a chance on her.

    Her story tells me that entrepreneurs must start with a problem they’re actually familiar with and deeply understand. Authenticity resonates with your core audience; it builds trust from day one. When your product stems from your own experiences and frustrations, you create an immediate connection with your would-be buyers, leading to strong word-of-mouth.

    Turn setbacks into stepping stones

    Calling himself a lousy employee, Mark Cuban admits that keeping a steady job was difficult for him. But Cuban never quit on himself and ultimately founded and sold MicroSolutions for $6 million. What I learn from his example is that setbacks are inevitable — and necessary. What matters is how quickly you bounce back from failure and what lessons you learn from your past mistakes.

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics states that 20% of small businesses shut down in a year or so. But successful solopreneurs treat these setbacks as experiments. When you start treating obstacles as stepping stones, you can easily adapt after failure and launch a working product.

    Launch small and use what you have

    Fubu’s founder, Daymond John, started this fashion brand in the 1990s by sewing hats and shirts in his mother’s living room. He didn’t have big budgets or state-of-the-art facilities. But he relied on grassroots marketing and community support to end up selling $6 billion worth of products by 2024, turning a kitchen-based hustle into a global fashion powerhouse.

    John’s story tells me that a lack of capital shouldn’t hold solopreneurs back. Instead, they should fall back on their skills, their immediate network and whatever resources are available at hand. Grit and creativity often outweigh money. This lesson speaks to me personally, since I built Selzy with a minimal viable product while relying on customer feedback for improvement.

    Related: Building Your Business With Limited Resources? Here’s the Mindset You Need to Succeed.

    Embrace digital-first and lean growth

    Automation, social media and efficient scaling. That’s how anyone can launch on budgets under $10,000. Technology lets small businesses thrive and expand into other markets. You can use email marketing tools to reach out to potential leads and advertise your business. Syed Balkhi’s WPForms is a great example here. Balkhi’s WordPress tutorial blog led to the creation of a $1 billion software company, and he did all that without raising a single dollar of his own.

    That’s how many modern-day solopreneurs are scaling past six figures. Technology allows founders to go global earlier than was possible a decade ago. Smart customer segmentation and personalized communication help them drive more engagement. And with the right tools, even small teams working remotely can achieve impressive growth with fewer resources.

    Turn your mistakes into learning opportunities

    Sophia Amoruso’s example teaches us to fuel our future successes with past failure. When her startup, Nasty Gal, became shaky after turning into a $100-million brand, she simply pivoted and launched another brand, Girlboss, a platform focused on redefining success for a new generation of women.

    Solopreneurs must always be ready to reinvent and adapt to changing consumer demands to position their business for long-term relevancy and success. Accepting that my idea didn’t work helps you thrive in a competitive industry.

    Related: How to Turn Your Mistakes Into Opportunities

    Put all these real-life lessons into action

    Growth is about your vision, resilience and continuous learning — the sign of a solopreneur who is ready to bend to fluctuating market standards and customer expectations. In fact, my experience with digital marketing and AI-powered growth tells me that these principles are universally applicable.

    Starting small isn’t a limitation for future-ready solopreneurs; it’s an opportunity to build strong foundations. It’s not how big you start (some of the world’s biggest brands were started by their founders in garages), but you keep learning and moving forward. I’ve tasted defeat and I’ve met setbacks — I recommend adaptability.

    Starting a business with limited resources is a road many solopreneurs find familiar — myself included. I’ve observed many small business owners turning modest startups into success stories, but it doesn’t happen overnight. They turn their humble ideas into successful ventures with resilience, creativity, smart technology use and a never-accept-defeat attitude.

    For this article, I’ll draw on my personal experiences and the stories of five founders who started small. These practical lessons apply to your entrepreneurship journey as well.

    Related: Boost Your Solopreneur Business with These 3 Proven Tips

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Dmitry Solovyev

    Source link

  • Why Did a $10 Billion Startup Let Me Vibe-Code for Them—and Why Did I Love It?

    Sitting a few feet away was Simon Last, one of Notion’s three cofounders. He is gangly and shy, an engineer who has relinquished management responsibilities to focus on being a “super IC”—an individual contributor. He stood to shake my hand, and I awkwardly thanked him for letting me vibe-code. Simon returned to his laptop, where he was monitoring an AI as it coded for him. Later, he would tell me that using AI coding apps was like managing a bunch of interns.

    Since 2022, the Notion app has had an AI assistant to help users draft their notes. Now the company is refashioning this as an “agent,” a type of AI that will work autonomously in the background on your behalf while you tackle other tasks. To pull this off, human engineers need to write lots of code.

    They open up Cursor and select which of several AI models they’d like to tap into. Most engineers I chatted with during my visit preferred Claude, or they used the Claude Code app directly. After choosing their fighter, the engineers ask their AI to draft code to build a new thing or fix a feature. The human programmer then debugs and tests the output as needed—though the AIs help with this too—before moving the code to production.

    At its foundational core, generative AI is enormously expensive. The theoretical savings come in the currency of time, which is to say, if AI helped Notion’s cofounder and CEO Ivan Zhao finish his tasks earlier than expected, he could mosey down to the jazz club on the ground floor of his Market Street office building and bliss out for a while. Ivan likes jazz music. In reality, he fills the time by working more. The fantasy of the four-day workweek will remain just that.

    My workweek at Notion was just two days, the ultimate code sprint. (In exchange for full access to their lair, I agreed to identify rank-and-file engineers by first name only.) My first assignment was to fix the way a chart called a mermaid diagram appears in the Notion app. Two engineers, Quinn and Modi, told me that these diagrams exist as SVG files in Notion and, despite being called scalable vector graphics, can’t be scaled up or zoomed into like a JPEG file. As a result, the text within mermaid diagrams on Notion is often unreadable.

    Quinn slid his laptop toward me. He had the Cursor app open and at the ready, running Claude. For funsies, he scrolled through part of Notion’s code base. “So, the Notion code base? Has a lot of files. You probably, even as an engineer, wouldn’t even know where to go,” he said, politely referring to me as an engineer. “But we’re going to ignore all that. We’re just going to ask the AI on the sidebar to do that.”

    His vibe-coding strategy, Quinn explained, was often to ask the AI: Hey, why is this thing the way it is? The question forces the AI to do a bit of its own research first, and the answer helps inform the prompt that we, the human engineers, would write. After “thinking,” Cursor informed us, via streaming lines of text, that Notion’s mermaid diagrams are static images that, among other things, lack click handlers and aren’t integrated with a full-screen infrastructure. Sure.

    Lauren Goode

    Source link

  • The Key to Building Effective Corporate-Startup Partnerships | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Too many corporate-startup partnerships fall apart despite everyone starting out with good intentions. Big companies say they want to work with startups. Startups jump at the opportunity to scale their ideas. But a year later, both sides often walk away disappointed and empty-handed.

    It doesn’t have to be this way. When done right, these partnerships can unlock enormous value that pays off many times over for both sides. But the key word here is partnership. Too often, corporations treat these relationships as transactions, not collaborations. And startups, for their part, don’t always know how to navigate the maze of corporate expectations and politics.

    That may help explain why a 2024 survey of over 800 health-tech decision-makers found that just 15% of corporate-startup collaborations succeed — barely up from 13% five years earlier.

    Here’s what I’ve learned about making corporate partnerships actually work.

    Related: Startups & Corporates: A Symbiotic Relationship

    Don’t go silent after the kickoff

    One of the biggest mistakes I see corporations make is treating the startup business partnership like a box to check. They kick off the project, then walk away and expect the startup to deliver magic. I can tell you: That almost never works.

    Startups thrive on feedback, iteration and course correction. If you leave them alone for months, you risk missing key opportunities to adjust — or worse, ending up with something that doesn’t fit your needs.

    As a startup, don’t be shy about pushing for regular check-ins. Insist on ongoing conversations, even if it feels like you’re nagging. I’ve worked with startups that were afraid to “bother” their corporate sponsor, only to find out months later that they’d gone down the wrong path.

    If you’re not talking, you’re headed for trouble.

    Watch for the “not invented here” syndrome

    Here’s a common attitude trap: Big companies love to say they’re open to outside innovation, but when it comes down to it, I’ve seen many struggle to embrace something they didn’t invent themselves.

    When corporate teams subconsciously (or even consciously) resist integrating the startup’s work because it feels foreign, or simply because of an ego reflex, the “not invented here” mindset is getting in the way of innovation.

    Startups need to pay attention to this dynamic early. Ask yourself: Is your partner genuinely committed to bringing your innovation inside? Do you see them involving their internal teams? Are they championing your work internally?

    If not, that’s a red flag. A partnership where the big company never really intended to adopt your solution is just window dressing and will probably end up being a waste of your time.

    Related: When It Comes to Corporate Partnerships, Remember These 5 Relationship Tricks

    Don’t let your corporation partnership get buried in bureaucracy

    Let’s be honest: Corporations can be slow and bureaucratic. Startups … aren’t.

    I’ve seen great startups get bogged down in legal reviews, compliance checklists and approval processes, draining resources and killing momentum. If you bring all the corporate bureaucracy to a startup, they will fail. Trying to find that balance is really important.

    As a startup, you need to be honest about what your team can handle. If there are just ten of you and the corporate partner is bogging you down in demands like you’re a big vendor with endless resources, speak up. Don’t be afraid to push back and set clear limits. Whether it’s about timelines, resources or anything else, be clear on what you can deliver.

    On the corporate side, the best partnerships happen when the company makes an effort to adapt. Simplify processes and give the startup breathing room to operate. Again, startups beware: If you’re not seeing that kind of flexibility, think carefully about how much you’re willing to tolerate.

    This is even more important as corporate interest in startups grows. In 2023, corporate-backed deals already accounted for 19% of global venture funding, and the numbers are growing. This shows just how much big companies rely on these partnerships to drive innovation and how much is at stake if they fail.

    Redefine what success looks like

    One of the most important mindset shifts for both sides is understanding that success isn’t always about launching a blockbuster product right away.

    In some of the best startup partnerships I’ve been a part of, the immediate result wasn’t a shiny new thing on the market. What we learned from a project often helped us to solve a problem elsewhere. So — it was successful.

    It was learning. It was building capabilities. It was solving problems elsewhere, sometimes in surprising and unforeseen ways, by using what we discovered together.

    I like to say: Don’t measure the partnership just by the end product. Measure it by the progress it enables. By the degree of innovation it brings to your company. That is the kind of mindset that keeps both parties motivated.

    Creating this win-win relationship is important. You can apply that to intellectual property, licensing and credit, for example. Too many partnerships fail because one side tries to squeeze too much value out of the other. The result is that in the end, nobody wins.

    Startups should make sure their corporate partner values the knowledge and connections that come out of the collaboration, beyond the deliverable itself. These expectations need to be managed from the very beginning in open conversations.

    Related: Making Startup-Corporate Partnerships Succeed: The How-To

    What you should take away

    If you’re a startup thinking about partnering with a big company, here’s my best advice:

    • Speak up! Insist on regular meetings as part of the process from day one.

    • Be honest about your capacity and set realistic expectations.

    • Remember: Success is much more than a glossy product launch.

    These partnerships can be transformational. They can open doors you’d never reach on your own — but only if you go in with the right mindset and a true partner.

    If you treat it like an actual collaboration, not just a deal, you’ll unlock opportunities others might miss.

    Too many corporate-startup partnerships fall apart despite everyone starting out with good intentions. Big companies say they want to work with startups. Startups jump at the opportunity to scale their ideas. But a year later, both sides often walk away disappointed and empty-handed.

    It doesn’t have to be this way. When done right, these partnerships can unlock enormous value that pays off many times over for both sides. But the key word here is partnership. Too often, corporations treat these relationships as transactions, not collaborations. And startups, for their part, don’t always know how to navigate the maze of corporate expectations and politics.

    That may help explain why a 2024 survey of over 800 health-tech decision-makers found that just 15% of corporate-startup collaborations succeed — barely up from 13% five years earlier.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Anantha Desikan

    Source link

  • Inside Mastercard’s Q3 acquisition, innovation strategy

    Inside Mastercard’s Q3 acquisition, innovation strategy

    Two acquisitions and several new products are supporting Mastercard’s ongoing innovation efforts.  “All that we’re doing on strengthening our product solutions and our acquisitions … is going to be the way for us to win,” Chief Executive Michael Miebach said during Mastercard’s Q3 earnings call today.  Mastercard has announced these recent deals:  On Oct. 1: […]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link