ReportWire

Tag: Standard time

  • Daylight Saving Time Should Be a Thing Of The Past, Many Doctors Say

    Daylight Saving Time Should Be a Thing Of The Past, Many Doctors Say

    A switch to Daylight Saving Time is not good for us.

    That’s what an increasing number of medical doctors are saying, basing this on what they say is scientific evidence that the annual switch in hours extracts a heavy toll on the human body.  Of course, many of us already knew that.

    “Quite honestly, there is no benefit,” said Dr. Jairo Hernando Barrantes Perez, assistant professor of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. “It is better for your body to keep the same circadian rhythm year round.”

    Many people say just pick one or the other — standard time or Daylight Saving Time — and stick to that year round. But sleep researchers disagree.

    Perez said those in the field of study support a permanent change to standard time because it aligns more with humans’ circadian rhythm. He’s a member of The American Academy of Sleep Medicine which has adopted this stance alongside other organizations, such as the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms.

    Dr. Kristin Eckel-Mahan, sleep researcher with UTHealth Houston, said the switch is particularly detrimental to those with a later chronotype, usually night owls who prefer staying up into the late night hours.

    Adolescents typically fall into the category of having a natural inclination to go to bed later, more than middle or elementary school-aged children, she said. However, those with this chronotype can vary in age from individual to individual.

    “For night owls who are already sort of habitually staying up late looking at tablets, TV or some type of stimulation that involves blue light, melatonin [sleep hormone] is already not secreting normally,” Eckel-Mahan said. “It’s delayed substantially—an hour more than it used to be—and they have a really hard time getting up in the morning because it’s even darker.”

    Since 2007, residents in the United States have set their clocks an hour ahead in mid-March and prepared to lose an hour of sleep — marking the annual switch to daylight saving time.

    This transition from standard time in the fall has existed for many years despite debate on when and for how long. However, in recent years, there’s been a growing push by lawmakers to abolish it altogether and adopt daylight saving time year round, permanently.

    In 2022, The U.S. Senate passed the Sunshine Protection Act, which would have ended the biannual switch and implemented perennial daylight saving time. The legislation stalled, but it was reintroduced the following year.

    Texas, along with 47 other states, abides by the transition. Arizona—excluding the Navajo Nation—and Hawaii do not participate in the switch. Individual states cannot choose to adopt permanent daylight saving time, but they can opt to eliminate any clock change. According to reports, nearly a dozen states have considered such legislation.

    According to Perez, the initial reason to implement daylight saving time in the U.S. was to save on electrical energy. But now, this energy is widely accessible, and research has shown that energy expenditures in most countries that switch clocks do not change significantly.

    “Unfortunately, this has been a political and economic issue for years,” Perez said. “It might’ve been better for the part of the country where the morning is too dark and too dangerous to be outside.”

    “Now, multiple arguments go back and forth, but if you look at how much energy or how much money you’re saving, it’s not doing much,” he added. “If you take into account the costs of taking care of the health complications and the extra police that are deployed [some studies indicate crime and motor vehicle accidents rise during the switch], the benefit gets voided.”

    The biannual switch can disrupt individuals’ sleep patterns, increase symptoms related to anxiety and depression, and affect moods and hormone production. Research indicates that the transition in the spring particularly increases the risks for heart attacks and strokes.

    Although it typically takes one to two weeks for someone to adjust, Eckel-Mahan added that evidence when evaluating individuals’ cortisol levels—a hormone related to stress that assists with getting up and remaining awake—indicates that some people never fully adjust to daylight saving time because their internal body clock is misaligned with the solar clock.

    “Some people adjust better than others, that is true,” Eckel-Mahan said. “But, not everybody is capable.”

    According to Eckel-Mahan, studies have also shown that humans have a slightly longer circadian period than 24 hours, but the solar clock keeps individuals on a 24-hour schedule. This means that the phase delay in the fall aligns more with the body’s natural rhythms.

    She said that those struggling with the transition can adhere to the solar clock, limit their exposure to blue light late at night, soak up as much sunlight during the daylight hours and avoid eating and exercising close to bedtime to help ease the change.

    According to Perez, those most affected by the transition include women of reproductive ages and children. He pointed out that the research evaluating the uptick in heart attacks in the days after switching to daylight saving time showcases that they are occurring in women more than they are men.

    Perez said researchers have seen that kids are very sensitive to the change and may sleep through the first few hours of school, disrupting their academic and social performance. He added that it is common for people to experience circadian misalignment and “social jet lag.” According to the National Institutes of Health, circadian misalignment is the inappropriate timing of sleeping, waking and feeding patterns or other central and peripheral rhythms.

    Perez cautioned those who are sleep-deprived and want to overcompensate by over-caffeinating that an increase in the consumption of coffee or energy drinks could lead to experiencing high blood pressure, higher cortisol levels or a heightened risk of cardiovascular problems.

    He also advised people who may opt to take melatonin to be aware and not overdose on the hormone, “I have patients that come to me, and they’re taking 20 milligrams. That’s way too much.”

    Instead, Perez recommends one to three milligrams, five milligrams maximum and the lowest dosages for children as their brains are not prepared for anything higher.

    Perez has been a part of the Public Safety Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for three years. He says despite advocating against the transition to year-long daylight saving time since joining, support for this stance hasn’t garnered traction.

    “Unfortunately, it hasn’t taken off or gained enough weight in Congress to pass a law to abolish it,” Perez said. “We were close a couple years ago, and we are trying to move forward this year again to do it, but people have to be aware that the benefit that was present 200 years ago is not present any longer.”

    “We weren’t aware of circadian rhythm then. We didn’t have as much information as we do nowadays,” he added. “We weren’t aware because we were not keeping statistics as close as we are nowadays. So now, we have evidence that it doesn’t help as much. It’s just a lack of knowledge from the general public.”

    Faith Bugenhagen

    Source link

  • Get Ready for the Most Wonderful Day of the Year

    Get Ready for the Most Wonderful Day of the Year

    This weekend, I’ll be waking up to one of my favorite days of the year: a government-sanctioned 25-hour Sunday. Forget birthdays, forget my anniversary; heck, forget the magic of Christmas. On Sunday, I’ll get to do a bit of time traveling as most of the United States transitions out of daylight saving time back into glorious, glorious standard time.

    I may be a standard-time stan, but I’m no monster. I feel for the die-hard fans of DST. With the push of a button, or the turn of a dial, most Americans will be cleaving an hour of brightness out of their afternoons, at a time of year when days are already fast-dimming. Leaving work to a dusky sky is a bummer; a pre-dinner stroll cut short by darkness can really be the pits.

    But if we all put aside our differences for just a moment, we can celebrate the fact that this weekend, nearly all Americans—regardless of where they sit on the DST love-hate spectrum—will be blessed with a 25-hour day, and that freaking rocks. If we must live in a dumb world where the dumb clocks shift twice a dumb year, let’s at least come together on the objective greatness of falling back.

    I don’t want to minimize the nuisance of the time shift. Toggling back and forth twice a year is an absolute pain, and many Americans cheered when the Senate unanimously passed a proposal earlier this year to move the entire U.S. to permanent daylight saving time. But Katy Milkman, a behavioral scientist at the University of Pennsylvania and the host of the podcast Choiceology—who, by the way, loathes the end of DST—told me we can all reframe the autumn clock change “as a windfall.” Sunday will contain a freebie hour to do whatever we like. Rafael Pelayo, a sleep specialist at Stanford, will be spending his at the farmers’ market; Ken Carter, a psychologist and self-described morning person at Emory University, told me he might chill with an extra cup of coffee and his cats. I’m planning to split my minutes between a nap and Paper Girls (the graphic novel, not the show).

    An hour isn’t enough time to learn a new language or cure cancer, or even to watch the entire season finale of The Rings of Power. But a little wiggle room could help kick-start a new habit, such as a gym routine, Milkman said, especially if you make a plan, tell a friend, and stick to it. Above all, she said, “do something to bring you joy.”

    Falling back, to me, is its own joy: It recoups a springtime loss, and resets the clocks to the time that’s always suited me best. It’s wicked hard to fall asleep when the light lingers past 8 or 9 p.m. I also struggle to get out of bed without a hefty dose of morning light, which has been scarce in the past few weeks. Going out for my prework run has meant a lot of stumbling around and using my phone as a crummy flashlight. If and, God willing, when we ditch the status quo, I maintain that permanent standard time >>>> permanent daylight saving time. (So maybe it’s not terrible that the DST-forever bill is now stalled in the House.)

    And I gotta say, the science (pushes glasses up nose) largely backs me and my fellow standardians up. Several organizations, including the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, have for years wanted to do away with DST for good. “Standard time is a more natural cycle,” Pelayo told me. “In nature we fall asleep to darkness and we wake up to light.” When people spend most of their year out of sync with these rhythms, “it reduces sleep duration and quality,” says Carleara Weiss, a behavioral-sleep-medicine expert at the University at Buffalo. The onset of DST has been linked to a bump in heart attacks and strokes, and Denise Rodriguez Esquivel, a psychologist at the University of Arizona College of Medicine, told me that our bodies may never fully adjust to DST. We’re just off-kilter for eight months.

    For years, some researchers have argued that perma-DST would cut down on other societal woes: crime, traffic accidents, energy costs, even deer collisions. But research on the matter has produced mixed or contested results, showing that several of those benefits are modest or perhaps even nonexistent. And although sticking with DST might boost late-afternoon commerce, people might hate the shift more than they think. In the 1970s, the U.S. did a trial run of year-round DST … and it flopped. (Most of Arizona, where Rodriguez Esquivel lives, exists in permanent standard time; she told me it’s “really nice.”)

    Returning to the proper state of things won’t be without its troubles. Next week will have its missed meetings, fumbled phone calls, and general grumpiness. Although springing forward is usually tougher, “fallback blues,” Weiss told me, are absolutely a thing. The change-up may be extra hard on parents of very young kids, overnight workers, and people who don’t have a safe place to sleep. “It’s a very confusing time for our brain,” Rodriguez Esquivel told me. “Just be kind to yourself.” That’s why I’ll be having two breakfasts on Sunday: one when my body says it’s time, and one when the clock does. Carter told me it doesn’t hurt to be extra accommodating of others, too. “I try to keep quiet this time of year,” he said. “It doesn’t annoy me very much. But I’m secretly amused by people like you.”

    Realistically, many of us will just end up snoozing right through the bonus hour. Which is totally fine. I’m considering that plan, too. The only losers in that scenario will, alas, be my cats. They do not follow the clock changes, legislation be damned; a 25-hour day is to them a scourge if it means that I sleep in, and breakfast arrives a full hour late. In that event, they, unlike me, will eat when the clock decrees, and not a minute sooner.

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link