ReportWire

Tag: stake.us

  • Drake Accused of Manipulating Streaming Play Counts With Bots in New Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Drake’s relationship with the online “social casino” Stake.us is facing fresh legal scrutiny. The rapper has been named in a federal lawsuit that claims he helped promote an illegal real-money online casino and used it to quietly move money tied to a scheme aimed at artificially boosting music streaming numbers.

    Plaintiffs LaShawnna Ridley and Tiffany Hines filed a class action lawsuit last week in a federal court in Virginia against Stake.us’s parent company, Sweepsteaks Limited, as well as Drake, online streamer Adin Ross, and George Nguyen, an alleged facilitator of the botting scheme.

    The lawsuit claims the defendants misrepresented Stake while being paid to promote it, inflicting “harm on consumers across the Commonwealth who have lost real money chasing gambling wins on the Stake platform.”

    It also accuses Drake, Ross, and Nguyen of transferring “money between and among themselves, using Stake’s ‘Tipping’ program.”

    The plaintiffs allege the conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and Virginia consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs are asking for at least $5 million, along with refunds for users, the return of profits they say were improperly earned, court orders to stop the alleged conduct, and additional damages under federal law.

    “Stake.us preys on consumers in Virginia and nationwide who are lured into real money gambling, exposing consumers to substantial risks of gambling addictions and jeopardizing their and their families’ financial well-being,” the lawsuit claims.

    A major crux of the case centers on how Stake.us operates. The company describes itself as a social casino where users can buy what it calls “Gold Coins” to play digital casino games like slots and poker. Those coins cannot be redeemed for cash, but users also receive “Stake Cash” through bundled purchases of Gold Coins, daily login bonuses, and promotions.

    Once users meet certain conditions, like wagering their Stake Cash several times, it can be redeemed for real money. The lawsuit argues this structure makes Stake.us indistinguishable from real-money online gambling, which is illegal in Virginia and many other states.

    The complaint also alleges Drake and Ross were paid by Stake to promote the site and participated in livestreams showing them gambling with large sums of money provided by the company itself.

    “In other words, though Drake and Ross purported to be gambling with their own Stake Cash, it was in fact provided to them by the house,” the lawsuit reads.

    Drake signed an endorsement deal with Stake in 2022 that was reportedly worth $100 million per year. Drake later publicly complained about issues withdrawing money from the platform, though an Instagram post from October indicated that the beef may have since been squashed.

    Beyond the gambling allegations, the lawsuit further claims Drake, Ross, and Nguyen transferred proceeds among themselves via Stake’s tipping feature and used that money to fund bots that artificially boosted Drake’s music streaming numbers on platforms like Spotify.

    This is not the first lawsuit challenging Drake’s relationship with Stake.us. A separate complaint filed in October in Missouri also names Drake and Ross as defendants and similarly accuses them of misrepresenting Stake.us’s alleged gambling operations.

    Stake.us and representatives for Drake did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s requests for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Gil

    Source link

  • Los Angeles Sues Stake.us as Pushback Against Sweepstakes Continues

    [ad_1]

    The city of Los Angeles has launched a legal complaint against Stake.us, alleging that its sweepstakes products are illegal gambling in disguise. The city has likewise launched complaints against several content suppliers, accusing them of enabling illegal operations.

    LA Says Stake.us Offered Illegal Gambling

    Stake.us, which is the US-facing social casino subsidiary of the global crypto iGaming brand Stake.com, has found itself under fire amid America’s continued crackdown on sweepstakes operators.

    Sweepstakes leverage a dual-currency system that allows customers to play for free and therefore claim that their products do not constitute gambling. Unfortunately for the industry, regulators, commercial gaming stakeholders and tribal entities alike have spurned the sweeps model, slamming it as illegal gambling. As a result, the biggest sweepstakes companies have found it increasingly difficult to navigate the US space, with some opting to exit certain states.

    California, in particular, has sought to usher in a complete ban on sweepstakes. In the meantime, in its complaint against Stake.us, Los Angeles has critiqued the operator for presenting itself as “America’s Social Casino” while offering dangerous, unlicensed gambling.

    The complaint alleged that Stake.us has been misleading local players, jeopardizing their financial and mental health, and exposing them to problem gambling risk. The city furthermore emphasized that Stake.us’ online nature makes it easily accessible 24/7, making it even more dangerous.

    The complaint further asserted that Stake.us’s unlicensed gaming operations are depriving Californians of money that they could otherwise use for rents, food, tuition, medication, etc.

    Providers Also Under Fire

    Los Angeles’s complaint seeks to force Stake.us to shut down. In addition to that, the city hopes to force the sweepstakes operator to refund all player losses.

    The People therefore bring this action to stop the Stake Illegal Gambling Scheme from continuing to prey on Californians, recover all funds lost by Californians, and impose civil penalties on Defendants to deter future misconduct.

    Complaint excerpt

    Stake.us isn’t the only company to find itself in hot water. LA has directed some of its ire toward casino content suppliers, such as Evolution, Pragmatic Play, and Hacksaw Gaming, alleging that they are accomplices who have been enabling and supporting illegal gambling.

    [ad_2]

    Fiona Simmons

    Source link