ReportWire

Tag: Sports business

  • What are the NFL’s gambling rules at the Super Bowl?

    What are the NFL’s gambling rules at the Super Bowl?

    [ad_1]

    The NFL’s rules on gambling have generated widespread criticism and questions leading up to the Super Bowl in Las Vegas, as the league aims to balance its sportsbook partnerships and policies preventing players from betting on games.

    Gambling was a major topic of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell’s annual Super Bowl news conference Monday, when he said the “integrity of the league” was the top priority.

    “We want to make sure that when people are watching NFL games, they know the action on the field is genuine and without any outside influence, ” Goodell said.

    With the marquee sports event days away in the U.S. betting hub, it’s worth revisiting the NFL’s policies for its players and how the league’s stance has changed over time.

    NFL rules on sports betting

    The league has long maintained that players are not allowed to bet on NFL events. Its 2023 gambling policy states that players can never place, solicit or facilitate a bet — either directly or through a third party — on “any NFL game, practice, or other event, such as the Combine or Draft.”

    Players are also not allowed to participate in anyone else’s NFL betting activities, such as asking someone to place an NFL-related bet on their behalf or allowing another person to use their account to place an NFL-related bet.

    Additionally, players may not enter a sportsbook during the NFL season (from the Hall of Fame Game through the Super Bowl) “except to access an area outside of a sportsbook,” the rules state. For example, a player can pass through a sportsbook “where necessary” to get to a separate part of an entertainment, casino or hotel complex.

    At the Super Bowl, the Kansas City Chiefs and San Francisco 49ers are both staying in Lake Las Vegas, about 25 miles east of the Strip.

    GO DEEPER

    Why the Chiefs and 49ers are staying in Lake Las Vegas, not on The Strip

    The league’s rules are also particular about when and where players may gamble.

    Players are prohibited from gambling in team or league facilities (such as practice facilities, stadiums and offices) or while traveling with their teams (such as on a team plane or in a team hotel) to participate in an NFL game or in-season team activity.

    Can NFL players bet on other sports?

    Players are allowed to bet on sports other than the NFL in states where betting is legal, subject to the NFL’s rules on entering a sportsbook and betting from the workplace.

    For example, a player may not place a bet from an NFL facility even if the bet is not on an NFL game. Detroit Lions receiver Jameson Williams and Tennessee Titans offensive tackle Nicholas Petit-Frere were disciplined this season for violating the rule. They originally received six-game suspensions, but the league updated its gambling policy in September, reducing the penalty from six games to four.

    Betting on non-NFL events in the workplace or while working now carries a two-game suspension for the first violation, six games for a second offense and at least one year for a third offense.

    What are the gambling rules for the Super Bowl?

    Members of the two Super Bowl teams, the Chiefs and 49ers, are prohibited from participating in any form of gambling, including casino games and betting on any sport.

    Players on the other 30 teams may engage in “legal gambling” — but not on the NFL, and they cannot go in a sportsbook until the Super Bowl is over, the league said.

    Jeff Miller, the NFL executive vice president of communications, public affairs and policy, said last week: “The rules are no different for the participating teams’ players and other personnel as they would be for any other game: When on business, there is no gambling, whether it be sports gambling or otherwise.

    “And any player, coach, personnel, yours truly, who would be caught or identified gambling at a casino would be eligible for the disciplinary process, and that would be addressed in the normal course of discipline as we would any player or other personnel who there was evidence that was violating the rules around gambling.”

    NFL’s disciplinary process for gambling violations

    Violations of the NFL’s gambling policy are decided by Goodell or his designee on a case-by-case basis, according to the 2023 rules.

    “Discipline may include, without limitation, a fine, suspension, termination of employment and/or banishment from the NFL for life,” the rules state.

    Below are the baseline suspensions for violations of the gambling policy, “with possible upward or downward adjustments,” according to the rules, which note: “Nothing in this policy precludes the commissioner from imposing more discipline for other types of prohibited conduct.”

    • Betting on NFL: Indefinite suspension, minimum of one year or minimum of two years if a player bets on an NFL game involving his team
    • Actual or attempted game fixing: Permanent banishment from the NFL
    • Inside information and tipping: Indefinite suspension, minimum of one year
    • Third-party or proxy betting: Indefinite suspension, minimum of one year
    • Betting (other than NFL) in the workplace or while working:
      • First violation: Two-game suspension without pay
      • Second violation: Six-game suspension without pay
      • Third violation: Suspension without pay for at least one year

    How has the NFL’s stance on gambling changed?

    The Athletic’s Mike Jones explained in a recent article how the NFL’s complicated relationship with sports betting has evolved:

    Since the legalization of sports gambling, the NFL has worked hard to walk a tightrope when it comes to partnering with companies such as Caesars, FanDuel and DraftKings and also ensuring that players avoid activities that would compromise the integrity of the game. The league has yet to release figures on how much revenue partnerships with gambling companies generate, but according to the American Gaming Association (AGA), the NFL brings in $2.3 billion per year in income because of those deals.

    League officials long frowned upon betting on NFL games and worried that involvement would lead to player involvement and questions about the temptation to fix games. But once the Supreme Court in 2018 overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, they felt the need to evolve as well.

    “The relationship that the league has with sports gambling changed for one specific reason, and that is because the world changed,” Miller said on the league’s efforts to promote responsible sports betting practices. “The Supreme Court overturned (the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act) back in 2018, five years and some odd months ago. As a result, we had to rethink how we engage with legalized sports gambling, and that’s what we’ve done. … And we’ll continue to look at and examine how we do that in the hopes that we can be the best we can to protect the integrity of the game in a world where the rules changed.”

    Required reading

    (Photo: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • New ESPN, Fox, Warner Bros. streaming venture won’t solve much — at least not yet

    New ESPN, Fox, Warner Bros. streaming venture won’t solve much — at least not yet

    [ad_1]

    LAS VEGAS — One day, the brilliant TV executives are all going to unite and put their programming under one roof. It will solve all your sports viewing problems. They will call it cable.

    This new ESPN, Fox, Warner Bros. Discovery venture is not it. At least not yet.

    There is still significance to three of the biggest brands in sports teaming up this fall to give fans another option. The Great Rebundling is upon us, but it is far from solved.

    For the consumer, you won’t need this venture-to-be-named later and, my initial bet is most of you will go with that option. The service will be owned equally by the three sides, but each partner will receive the same fee as they earn from cable or YouTubeTV, according to sources with knowledge of the agreement. Just ESPN, the singular network, receives around $12 per month from cable subscribers.

    So what does that mean for you? The estimated price for the new venture when you add ESPN, Fox and WBD Sports together likely will be around $40 to $50 per month. There probably are some sports fans who would like to save a little money with this arrangement, but it is hard to believe there are a lot.

    You already can watch nearly everything that this trio offers through places like YouTube TV for around $70 and change per month. If you want this option, it is already available, with even more channels to boot.

    After a year of talks between the three sides, there is weight in seeing these superpowers come together, and it is very understandable why they did it. It is no-risk, all-reward for them. This “sports skinny bundle” — as the cool media kids like to call it — is worth a go.

    Fox Sports moves into the sports subscription space for the first time with this baby step. They have been the ones to watch their competitors pour billions into subscription streaming as they stood on the sidelines patiently biding their time. Their executives have thought rebundling is the way to go, so this gives them an initial shot.

    ESPN has been planning to go direct-to-consumer with its entire product by 2025 with the possibility of 2024. Now, it will start this fall with tag-team partners.

    This new arrangement doesn’t deter ESPN’s previous plans. The network still intends to have a stand-alone ESPN direct-to-consumer product by next year. Plus, it still could forge ahead with an equity partnership with the NFL or other leagues and/or digital players.

    WBD Sports has an always-underrated menu of rights to bring to the new product, from the NBA and MLB playoffs to March Madness.


    The new sports streaming venture is a step toward rebundling sports rights, but an incomplete one. Sunday’s Super Bowl on CBS, for instance, would not be on the platform. (Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

    But the reason these entities don’t have anything complete here just yet is the exclusion of other major players — like CBS, for example.

    This “sports skinny bundle” is a little too skinny to include Patrick Mahomes, Christian McCaffrey and Taylor Swift this weekend, as CBS has the Super Bowl this year. More problematic when you compare this new product to YouTube: If you want to watch March Madness, the CBS games will not be on it. It will not be one-stop shopping.

    The significance of this deal could increase down the road, as the names on the press release suggested. The quotes were from the top — Disney’s Bob Iger, Fox’s Lachlan Murdoch and WBD’s David Zaslav.

    However, if they want to fight the nearly unlimited pockets of Amazon, Apple or Netflix, if those digital behemoths become even more serious about sports rights, Iger, Murdoch and Zaslav could have a stronger hand as a trio.

    The new entity will have its own CEO, and it is said it will operate independently. His or her bosses, though, will still be Iger, Murdoch and Zaslav, so how independent will it be? Where could it lead in the future? Will they be able to get along? If the questions can be answered positively, it could lead to something even bigger.

    For you, the fan, maybe this new CEO will find a way to put everything you want to watch under one simple service. Until then, this venture won’t change that much for most of you.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Andrew Marchand: Sports media is my passion, and I can’t wait for what’s next

    (Photo of Fox Sports’ Michael Strahan interviewing the San Francisco 49ers’ Christian McCaffrey after last month’s NFC Championship Game: Kevin Sabitus / Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Will the Super Bowl ever be behind a streaming paywall? Here’s what it’d take

    Will the Super Bowl ever be behind a streaming paywall? Here’s what it’d take

    [ad_1]

    The year is 2045. Fourth week in February. After a grueling 21-week regular season and five rounds of playoffs, the Super Bowl matchup is set: Buffalo Bills versus London Jaguars. The NFL is anticipating 130 million viewers will stream the game on Netflix, which serves as the exclusive home of the Super Bowl following a multibillion-dollar deal the company signed with the league in 2040.

    Those who don’t have a subscription to the streaming service can pay $149 for a one-month trial that includes access to the game through one of Netflix’s 10 Megacast Super Bowl feeds. One popular Megacast option will be the Legends Room, where retired players Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen and C.J. Stroud interact live with viewers while watching the game. Adam Amin, Greg Olsen and Laura Rutledge will call the game on Netflix’s main NFL channel.

    Sound far-fetched? Maybe it would have been 10 years ago. While a thought exercise on the NFL making the Super Bowl a pay-per-view event is nothing new, what is new is the era we are living in. Last month’s first-ever exclusive, live-streamed NFL playoff game on Peacock felt like a seismic moment.

    Peacock paid $110 million to air the Kansas City Chiefs’ 26-7 win over the Miami Dolphins in the AFC wild-card round, an attempt to add to its tally of 30 million subscribers. Antenna, a research firm that tracks streaming data, estimated that Peacock had 2.8 million sign-ups over a three-day window around the wild-card game, which averaged 23 million viewers. It was the single biggest subscriber acquisition moment ever measured by Antenna.

    Is the Super Bowl behind a paywall an inevitability in the next 40 years or so?

    “Given the rate of cord-cutting is over 7 percent, or five million homes gone every year, the odds are very good that the Super Bowl will be on a streaming platform in ‘our’ lifetime,” said Michael Nathanson, the co-founder and senior managing director of research firm MoffettNathanson, which provides trends in media, communications and technology to institutional investors.

    NFL officials have repeatedly stated that the league is committed to broadcast television and the broad distribution of games. Hans Schroeder, the NFL’s executive vice president of media distribution, told reporters last month, including The Athletic, that “you can’t reach 190 million people throughout the course of the year without having very broad distribution of your content, and that’s always been a bedrock for us. … Every one of our games is on broadcast television, at least in their market, and probably 90 percent of our games are on broadcast as their core platform. For us, it remains really important.”

    Sean McManus, the longtime chairman of CBS Sports, who is retiring from his post later this year, noted that such a conversation can’t happen until after this current set of NFL media rights expires. The league’s media rights agreements with CBS, NBC, Fox, ESPN and Amazon are worth about $110 billion and run through the 2033 season.

    GO DEEPER

    Super Bowl LVIII projections: Chiefs meet 49ers in rematch of 2020 game

    “There’s no immediate worry,” McManus said. “(NFL commissioner) Roger Goodell has been very upfront that broad distribution is part of the reason the NFL is successful as it is. Yes, the NFL expanded with some games on Peacock, including a playoff game. … But when you have 56 million people watching the AFC Championship Game (on CBS), that’s a great success story. I can’t speak for Netflix, Amazon or Apple whether it makes business sense for them to pay hundreds of millions for a playoff game, but I do know linear television is extremely important to the success of the NFL.”

    Along with McManus, David Levy, the former president of Turner Sports and now the co-CEO of Horizon Sports & Experiences, a sports marketing agency and consultancy, also believes that the Super Bowl will remain on broadcast, free-to-air television for years to come.

    “Broadcast and free-to-air is still the largest reach vehicle,” Levy said. “You’re always building your next generation of fans, and they want the place to get the largest reach. Thirty years from now? I can’t answer that because I don’t know who will be the commissioner of the NFL and who would be owning these teams.”

    Levy was very positive about the NFL product appearing on streaming services. But he noted an important point: Any streaming service airing the Super Bowl exclusively would need its own production capabilities and enough of a proof of concept with production elements where the NFL would feel confident to put its most important property in their hands. That’s not something Netflix or Apple have at the moment.

    “Everyone expects to turn on network television and see a Super Bowl,” said Tracy Wolfson, the NFL sideline reporter who is calling Sunday’s game for CBS. “I think you alienate those that cannot watch it. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see more playoff games there, but I think when it comes to the Super Bowl, it is how many eyeballs and making sure it is available for all to watch.”

    Kansas City Chiefs


    A Super Bowl behind a streaming paywall seems far-fetched. But 10 years ago, it was hard to imagine a Chiefs-Dolphins playoff game on something called Peacock. (Jamie Squire / Getty Images)

    William Mao, a senior vice president of global media rights at Octagon, a sports and entertainment agency, believes we are not likely in the next 20 to 25 years to see a Super Bowl airing exclusively on a streaming service in the U.S. if free-to-air TV penetration (remains larger than any single subscription video-on-demand base. He said his answer would change only when (or if) a paywall streamer has the subscriber reach capacity near to the free-to-air penetration of today.

    “So long as the Super Bowl continues to be the most-watched live TV broadcast by a wide margin, it will remain available on free-to-air in some shape or form,” Mao predicted. “The aggregation of 100 million-plus viewers on a single broadcast remains too big of an advertising draw to exclusively paywall, and all signs point to the continued upswing in Super Bowl ratings and ad rates via its current distribution.

    “Could there come a point in the future where something else knocks the Super Bowl off the top perch? Sure, never say never. But right now the gap between the first and second most-watched broadcasts in America is over 60 million viewers. So why would the NFL upset its own dominant and extremely lucrative standing?”

    Mao pointed out that the Super Bowl is unique because it draws in tons of casual viewers. People watch the game for a variety of reasons, including the commercials and halftime music acts. He wondered if top music performers would continue to perform the halftime show at little cost if the broadcast was behind a paywall and not guaranteed to reach the same-sized audience. There would also be some folks in Congress with an interest if the NFL headed down this road.

    This discussion feels much more relevant in 2024 because of the Peacock game. We don’t know how many new subscribers will stick with Peacock long-term, and the game was not 100 percent exclusively streaming because it appeared on free-to-air television in Kansas City and Miami. But the NFL placed one of its premium inventory games behind a paywall.

    “The Peacock number was solid, and the broadcast provided an informative reference point for future NFL games that get similarly distributed,” Mao said. “For example, will a 40 percent lesser ad load become the norm for streamer games? But there are still many moves between shifting one of many wild-card games to a streamer versus moving the biggest game of the year. In my view, the Super Bowl should be one of the last things to go exclusively behind a paywall in the NFL’s portfolio.”

    It’s not easy to come up with a price point for a Super Bowl behind a paywall. Is there a ceiling for what is far and away the most popular communal TV experience for Americans every year (as well as close to nine million Canadians)? Going back to the hypothetical lede of this article: Say Netflix got 30 million new signups for a Super Bowl experience at $149. That’s nearly $4.5 billion. That doesn’t include advertising revenue. There would be a ton of subscriber churn post-Super Bowl, for sure, but there would also be those who stay with the product and then pay for the annual subscription.

    “I don’t think the question is about a single-game price point,” Mao said. “If the Super Bowl were to have an exclusive streaming future, it would first more likely be as part of a set of broader rights.”

    When I posed the pricing point question to Nathanson, he said it was hard to figure out a definitive number.

    “That’s a good question,” Nathanson said. “How many people paid $6 for a wild-card game pay-per-view on Peacock? It would obviously be multiples (more than that).”

    We are unlikely to see the NFL head down this road in the short- or medium-term. But ask yourself if, back in 2014, you imagined that you would ever have to pay to watch an NFL playoff game.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Behind the scenes with the NFL on CBS: How stats and graphics get to your TV


    • Major sports outlets always send a small army to the Super Bowl site. Las Vegas has amplified that. Here are the coverage plans for CBS Sports, DraftKings/VSiN, ESPN, NBC Sports and NFL Network.

    • The challenge for the CBS Sports production team for Super Bowl LVIII, if Taylor Swift makes it to the game to watch Travis Kelce and the Chiefs take on the San Francisco 49ers, is navigating how often you incorporate images of the singer into the broadcast. I talked to previous Super Bowl producers about it.

    • In case you missed it, here’s a deep dive on how Greg Olsen should approach the 2024 NFL season.

    • If interested in how a beat reporter approaches covering a team in the Super Bowl, I did a 40-minute podcast with Nate Taylor, who covers the Chiefs for The Athletic. Tim Kawakami, The Athletic’s Bay Area columnist who has written on the 49ers for years, will be the guest Tuesday.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Why the Chiefs are the NFL’s blueprint and the 49ers are an outlier: Sando’s Pick Six

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    As Super Bowl week begins for Chiefs and 49ers, 10 compelling stories to follow

    (Photo of a promotional display for Super Bowl LVIII on CBS outside of the Bellagio hotel in Las Vegas: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift at the Super Bowl would be a ‘gift from the gods’ for CBS’ broadcast

    Taylor Swift at the Super Bowl would be a ‘gift from the gods’ for CBS’ broadcast

    [ad_1]

    Fred Gaudelli has been the lead producer of the Super Bowl television broadcast on seven different occasions. If you are into Roman numerals, Gaudelli has produced Super Bowls XXXVII, XL, XLIII, XLVI, XLIX, LII, and LVI. He has been in the production truck for some of the most exciting NFL title games in history, including Super Bowl XLIX in 2015, which featured New England Patriots rookie cornerback Malcolm Butler intercepting Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson at the goal line with 20 seconds left to seal New England’s 28-24 come-from-behind win over Seattle. That game averaged 114.4 million viewers, which ranked as the most-viewed Super Bowl in U.S. television history before last year’s Super Bowl took the title.

    During his 33 seasons as the lead producer for an NFL prime-time TV game, which included stops at ABC, ESPN, NBC, and Amazon Prime Video, Gaudelli has produced innumerable NFL games with famous people in the stands. How would he feel about the prospect of Taylor Swift attending Super Bowl LVIII in Las Vegas on Feb. 11 if he were producing the game?

    “I would consider it a gift from the gods,” said Gaudelli.

    Gaudelli, because he lives on Planet Earth, knows that Swift crosses over into popular culture and that means the potential for more eyeballs on the product. (If you are a Swift hater, this piece is going to be a cruel summer for you, and it’s best to bail out now.)

    The challenge for the CBS Sports production team for Super Bowl LVIII, if Swift does make it to the game to watch boyfriend Travis Kelce and the Kansas City Chiefs take on the San Francisco 49ers — is navigating how often you incorporate images of the singer into the broadcast.

    The good news for the crew — led by producer Jim Rikhoff, director Mike Arnold and replay producer Ryan Galvin — is that they’ve had the Chiefs plenty this year, including the divisional-round game in Buffalo and AFC Championship Game in Baltimore, both of which Swift attended. It would be editorial dereliction not to show Swift during the game, but at the same time, how much do you show her?

    Then there is a new question: How much does the Super Bowl, a game that includes millions of people who are first-time football viewers for that season, impact your decisions on showing her?

    “Let’s go to the last Super Bowl I did,” Gaudelli said of the Los Angeles Rams’ win over the Cincinnati Bengals on Feb. 13, 2022. “We had (Rams quarterback) Matthew Stafford, his wife and kids. We had (Bengals quarterback) Joe Burrow’s parents and girlfriend. We had (Rams wide receiver) Cooper Kupp’s wife. We had (Rams offensive lineman) Andrew Whitworth’s wife and kids. We had (Bengals wide receiver) Ja’Marr Chase’s mom and dad. You have these shots set up because they’re part of the story of the game and because there’s five times as many people (watching) as you would get for a normal game. Right off the bat, you’re already thinking about who’s at the game, and in L.A. we had celebrities like LeBron James and Jay-Z. (Director) Drew Esocoff was cutting those shots during the game. So when Stafford threw a touchdown pass, there’s a shot of Stafford’s wife. Burrow is on the ground writhing in pain? You see his mom and dad and his girlfriend with the ultimate look of concern.

    “Now you have Taylor Swift, who also is someone that has a direct connection to the game because she’s a significant other of one of the stars of a team. Maybe you don’t show her for every Kelce sequence, but she’s going to be part of sequences when he makes a play.”

    The airtime Swift has gotten so far during NFL games is much less than some think. New York Times writer Benjamin Hoffman wrote a great piece this week that chronicled “the dissonance between how many times Swift has been shown versus how many times people seem to think she was shown.” He reported Swift was on-screen for a duration of less than 32 seconds in most games, with a high of 1 minute and 16 seconds for Peacock’s coverage of the Chiefs against the Miami Dolphins on Jan. 13.

    “You can’t help but put her on the air,” said Tracy Wolfson, who will be on the Chiefs’ sideline for the Super Bowl. “I can’t tell you the amount of dads who have come up to me and said, ‘My daughter is now watching football because of Taylor Swift.’ I mean, why wouldn’t you take advantage or capitalize on it? It’s great for the NFL and it’s great for ratings.”

    Fox’s broadcast of the Chiefs’ game against the Chicago Bears on Sept. 24 set the template for Swift coverage because the network had to figure out everything on the fly. Lead producer Richie Zyontz said that his crew had no official word from the NFL or the Chiefs that Swift would be in attendance. (That changed in later weeks; Rikhoff knew the night before the Chiefs-Bills game Swift would be there.) They had to figure out the camera operators to use for the shots as well as how many to use.

    “We were in uncharted waters having been the first to deal with the situation,” Zyontz said this week, reflecting on that game. “Moderation came to mind immediately. As the season progressed there were too many knee-jerk reaction shots, yet those were the shots that were talked about and written about on Monday. For the Super Bowl, there will be millions of new viewers because of her. Hopefully, good judgment will prevail. But for those who complain, come on, it’s a few seconds at a time, a few times a game. Is that really egregious?”


    “You can’t help but put her on the air,” Tracy Wolfson, who will be working the Chiefs’ sideline at the Super Bowl for the CBS broadcast, says of Taylor Swift. (Jason Hanna / Getty Images)

    The Super Bowl will be very different. If Swift is at the game, the Chiefs and the NFL will know what suite Swift will be sitting in at the stadium. So there will be no issues for the CBS broadcast production in finding her. CBS will put a request in to interview the singer. (If there is a prop bet on Swift being interviewed on camera, I’d bet no.) Gaudelli said a production’s best shot would be to go through the Chiefs who would relay the request to her through Kelce. You’d also make the ask to see if she wanted to do something off-camera.

    “We didn’t put that request in during the season because we didn’t think it rose to that level at that point,” said Gaudelli, who now serves as executive producer for NBC’s NFL coverage. “But, yeah, I think you put that in for the Super Bowl. You would try to get her on the pregame show.”

    Expect some guaranteed visuals in the postgame. If the Chiefs win, there will be a CBS camera operator following Kelce, for certain.

    “As a producer and director, he’s one of the main guys you want to see at the end of the game because he’s a major part of his dynasty if they win,” Gaudelli said. “So where he is, she will be. You don’t really have to go hunting too far. You’re going to be looking for number 87.”

    One person who is watching all of this with total amusement is Ian Eagle, the CBS broadcaster who was the first NFL national broadcaster to acknowledge the Swift-Kelce connection. On a Kelce touchdown call during Kansas City’s 17-9 win over Jacksonville on Sept. 17, Eagle cheekily tossed in a “Kelce finds a blank space for the score” line, referencing a Swift song title.

    “Back in September, there were some stories popping up linking Travis to Taylor, but it wasn’t getting major coverage at that point,” Eagle said. “When Kelce scored a touchdown in Jacksonville, I tossed in, ‘He finds a Blank Space for the score’ as a lark. I thought it was a cute throwaway line, not imagining for a moment it would blow up. I learned about the power of Swift in a hurry, and all of these months later the interest has grown exponentially with this Chiefs run. The NFL was already immense. But the relationship has somehow created even more buzz for the league. I’m just happy for those two crazy kids.”

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    How Taylor Swift could get to the Super Bowl from her Eras Tour

    (Top photo of Taylor Swift and her boyfriend: Patrick Smith / Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Saudi Arabia deal close to host WTA Finals — and other tennis events may follow

    Saudi Arabia deal close to host WTA Finals — and other tennis events may follow

    [ad_1]

    Barring another last-minute pivot, the women’s professional tennis tour is preparing to announce that the season-ending WTA Tour Finals will take place in Saudi Arabia, marking the latest step in the country’s huge investment in elite sport.

    WTA Tour chief executive Steve Simon has been holding talks with Saudi officials for the past year and if a deal is agreed, the 2024 finals will take place there at the end of the season, according to several of the sport’s top officials. The WTA has been here before, though, as recently as last summer, when it was close to a deal with Saudi Arabia but pivoted at the last minute amid public pressure.

    In a statement on Thursday, a WTA spokesperson said the process is ongoing, with the intention of a final decision and announcement later this month.

    “As everyone knows, we are working through a process to select a host venue for the WTA Finals,” they said. “There has been no final decision and we will continue to engage with players through the ongoing process.”

    The Athletic has contacted Saudi representatives for comment.

    One top tennis official, who asked to remain anonymous because he is not authorized to speak for the WTA, called the potential deal with Saudi Arabia “the worst kept secret in the sport.” The WTA is said to have reached the point where it is fully confident in Saudi Arabia’s ability to produce a top-level event but remains concerned about the ancillary criticism that will come with taking its signature event to a country that does not grant women equal rights.

    The deal for the WTA Finals would represent the latest step in Saudi Arabia’s efforts to become a major destination for international sports. It could also signal the beginning of the country landing more big tennis events.

    Saudi Arabia has been seeking to acquire a top tournament since at least the middle of 2023. While it remains unclear whether that will happen, several top tennis events are beginning the process of searching for new host sites. Leading tennis officials expect Saudi Arabia to be a significant player in the process given its hunger for sports events and the need among the top organizations in tennis for new sources of investment.

    The International Tennis Federation, which organizes the Davis Cup international team competition for men and the Billie Jean King Cup for women, will soon begin searching for new sites for the final rounds of those events for the coming years. 

    The Billie Jean King Cup is in its final year in Seville, Spain. King, who owns 49 per cent of the event with her wife and business partner, has already thrown her support behind bringing the WTA Finals to Saudi Arabia, arguing that engagement with the government there is the best way to bring about change. 

    In soccer, Saudi’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) purchased the Premier League team Newcastle United in 2021 and some of the biggest names in soccer have moved to clubs in the Saudi Pro League, including Cristiano Ronaldo and Karim Benzema. Saudi Arabia is also set to host the 2034 World Cup.


    Cristiano Ronaldo joined Saudi Arabian club Al Nassr last year (Khalid Alhaj/MB Media/Getty Images)

    In golf, Saudi Arabia pledged to spend $2billion on a new competition, LIV Golf — again attracting some of the sport’s biggest names to take part — and the country has become the home of elite boxing in recent years. Formula 1 has held races in the city of Jeddah since 2021 and there has also been considerable Saudi investment in Formula E. You can read more about the Saudi takeover of sport here.

    Saudi Arabia hosted the ATP Tour’s Next Gen Finals — which pits the best young male players against one another — in November and exhibition matches between Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic and Aryna Sabalenka and Ons Jabeur the following month.

    As the tennis world gathered in Melbourne for the Australian Open two weeks ago, Rafael Nadal announced a deal to become an ambassador for Saudi Arabia’s tennis federation. The move caught the tennis establishment off guard since Nadal has a well-established reputation for avoiding political controversy. 

    While Djokovic played the recent exhibition match and voiced his support for further Saudi investment in the sport, he has stopped short of pursuing a deeper relationship with the country.


    Djokovic has backed tennis in Saudi Arabia (Wang Haizhou/Xinhua via Getty Images)

    For months, there have been discussions between the WTA and the International Tennis Federation about the need to bring the tour-ending finals and the Billie Jean King Cup Finals — which is the World Cup of women’s tennis that happens the following week — closer together and perhaps even to the same location. That would make it easier and more likely for the top eight players, who qualify for the elite tour championship, to play in the international team competition, though it is not clear whether a single market could support both events. 


    Tennis legend Billie Jean King (Matt McNulty/Getty Images for ITF)

    The ATP Tour, which organises men’s elite tennis, has a deal for its finals event with Turin, Italy, that expires in 2025. The ATP and WTA have been working more closely than ever to find ways to grow their operations since tournaments that feature both men and women are the most popular. The idea of the tours one day combining their season-ending championships has also been discussed, though not in a definitive way.

    The WTA was close to an agreement last summer to bring its event to Saudi Arabia as it scrambled to find a site to replace Shenzhen, China, which terminated its 10-year deal with the tour in response to the tour’s decision to boycott China for 18 months over the country’s refusal to investigate whether a former top government official sexually assaulted the former doubles player Peng Shuai. 

    The tour baulked at the last minute and chose to hold the championship in Cancun, Mexico, for one year amid pushback on social media from two of the biggest names in the sport — Chris Evert and Martina Navratilova.

    The former on-court rivals, who are now close friends, renewed their public resistance last week, penning a joint essay in The Washington Post arguing that a deal with Saudi Arabia would represent a step backwards for women and women’s sports. 


    Chris Evert and Martina Navratilova, united in wanting tennis to stay out of Saudi Arabia (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    Saudi Arabia has passed a series of reforms in recent years aimed at making women a more substantial part of public life, including allowing them to drive, own businesses, and socialize in public with men. But it has maintained other restrictions. Women cannot marry without the permission of a male guardian and must obey their husbands if those men do not want to allow them to practice the rights the government has granted. 

    In addition, like other countries in the region, Saudi Arabia criminalizes homosexuality, though that has not prevented the WTA from holding tournaments in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

    “We fully appreciate the importance of respecting diverse cultures and religions,” Evert and Navratilova wrote. “It is because of this, and not despite it, that we oppose the awarding of the tour’s crown jewel tournament to Riyadh. The WTA’s values sit in stark contrast to those of the proposed host.”

    But unlike last summer, when Saudi Arabia stayed largely silent as critics of the plan to bring a major tournament there pilloried the country in the press, Saudi Arabia met the criticism head-on this week, a move that tennis executives saw as an attempt to buck up its potential partner. 

    Princess Reema Bandar Al Saud, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States, released a blistering response to Evert and Navratilova, accusing them of having “turned their back on the same women they have inspired and it is beyond disappointing.”

    go-deeper

    Bandar Al Saud criticized Evert, Navratilova and other voices from overseas who write off Saudi women as voiceless victims and the voiceless.

    “Perfection cannot be the price for admission,” Bandar Al Saud wrote. “For a tennis tournament or any other once-closed space that our women want to enter.”

    Discomfort and resistance to an event in Saudi Arabia have waned among female players in recent months. Several top stars, including the world No 1 Iga Swiatek, noted the difficulties faced by women in the region but seem resigned to eventually playing there.

    “I definitely don’t support the situation there,” the U.S. Open champion Coco Gauff said at the Australian Open, “but if we do decide to go there, I hope that we’re able to make change and improve the quality and engage in the local communities and make a difference.”

    (Top photo: Robert Prange/Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Messi’s first Barcelona contract, signed on napkin, to be sold at auction

    Messi’s first Barcelona contract, signed on napkin, to be sold at auction

    [ad_1]

    The napkin upon which Lionel Messi’s first Barcelona agreement was informally written will be sold at auction.

    Bonhams — a privately owned, London-based international auction house — will run the auction between March 18-27, with a starting price of £300,000 ($381k), on behalf of Argentine player agent Horacio Gaggioli.

    The agreement was reached on December 14, 2000, with Barcelona director Carles Rexach desperate for the club to sign Messi, then aged 13.

    Messi had impressed during his two-week trial with Barcelona in September 2000, but the club was initially reluctant to sign such a young, non-European player.

    Rexach became concerned that the Catalan club would miss out on the signing of Messi, who had returned to his home city of Rosario in Argentina.

    Gaggioli told The Athletic last year that he had informed Rexach in December 2000 that if they could not commit to signing Messi — the teenager would be offered to other clubs, including Real Madrid.

    Rexach invited Gaggioli to dinner in Barcelona to make a final decision over Messi, but there was one problem: Rexach did not have time to draw up or print out a contract but needed the relevant signatures on a document that would later become legally binding.

    His solution was to take a napkin and write down contractual words which would then be signed by the relevant parties, to signal a legal commitment.

    GO DEEPER

    Messi, Rosario and Newell’s: The love between a superstar, his hometown and boyhood club

    The napkin read: “In Barcelona, on December 14, 2000, and in the presence of the gentleman (the agent, Josep Maria) Minguella and Horacio (Gaggioli), Carles Rexach, technical secretary of FCB, commits under his responsibility, despite the opinion of others who are against signing Lionel Messi, as long as the agreed fees are maintained.”

    Rexach signed the napkin along with football agents, Minguella — who had worked on multiple Barca deals in the past, including Diego Maradona — and Gaggioli.

    “This is one of the most thrilling items I have ever handled,” Ian Ehling, head of fine books and manuscripts at Bonhams New York said. “Yes, it’s a paper napkin, but it’s the famous napkin that was at the inception of Lionel Messi’s career.

    “It changed the life of Messi, the future of FC Barcelona, and was instrumental in giving some of the most glorious moments of football to billions of fans around the globe.”

    Messi made his Barcelona debut in 2004 and scored 672 goals for the club in 778 appearances before leaving in 2021 (Lluis Gene/AFP via Getty Images)


    Messi made his Barcelona debut in 2004 and scored 672 goals for the club in 778 appearances before leaving in 2021 (Lluis Gene/AFP via Getty Images)

    Commenting on the event years later, Gaggioli called it a “marvellous moment”.

    “That napkin broke the deadlock,” he added.

    “My lawyers looked at it. The napkin had everything: my name, his name, the date. It’s notarised. It was a legal document.

    “It’ll be a part of me for the rest of my life. The napkin will always be at my side. I live in Andorra and I’ve kept the napkin in a safe inside a bank.”

    On Wednesday, Minguella told Catalunya Radio that the napkin had been in his office for years and that he had offered Barcelona the chance to display it in the club’s museum.

    He claims he did not receive a response from Barcelona and that he will now ask lawyers to discover who is the legal owner of the napkin and how anyone can prove that they legally own it to put it for sale.

    Minguella has insisted he does not wish to profit from the napkin, but that he would prefer to see it in Barcelona’s museum or that if it is sold, for the money to go to the club’s foundation.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Lionel Messi: The evolution of the greatest footballer of all time

    (Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images)



    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Peacock's wild-card game likely just the start of the NFL's playoff streaming era

    Peacock's wild-card game likely just the start of the NFL's playoff streaming era

    [ad_1]

    The only place a reverse happens in the NFL is on the field. The league rarely moves backward when it comes to increasing its media rights coffers. If you were to place a wager on whether Saturday’s first-ever exclusive, live-streamed NFL playoff game is going to be repeated in the future, you’d be wise to bet big on the same thing happening during the 2024 postseason.

    Hans Schroeder, the NFL’s executive vice president of media distribution, nearly said as much during a conference call with reporters three days before the game.

    “As it relates to the wild-card game exclusively, we’re excited to continue the conversation,” said Schroeder. “This is a deal for this year, but it’s an NFL playoff game. I expect there will be a lot of interest in it. We’re excited to continue the conversation with NBC with what we do this year and seeing where those opportunities are for next year.”

    No matter politicians sending out social media posts, no matter current players with concerns, and no matter the totally legit fan complaints for having to pay extra for an NFL playoff game, the league as an entity has one objective — to continue as an ATM for its owners. It was a money grab for the present and the future, and in many ways, the viewership for the game is irrelevant to whether the NFL continues to sell playoff games to streamers.

    Peacock paid $110 million to air the Kansas City Chiefs’ 26-7 win over the Miami Dolphins on Saturday night in the AFC wild-card round, an attempt to add to its current tally of 30 million subscribers. The strategy for Peacock, as it is for other streamers that air sports, is to use the exclusivity of a major live sporting event to drive mass audience aggregation. It is a strategy that has historically worked for linear entities, and Peacock is sticking with its strategy despite $2.8 billion in losses in 2023. (Peacock’s hope is $2.8 billion represents peak losses.)

    But the game turned out to be a massive viewership success. Viewership across Peacock, NBC stations in Miami and Kansas City and on mobile with NFL+, according to Nielsen custom fast national data, was 23 million viewers. That is the most-streamed NFL game ever in the U.S. based on average audience. The Dolphins-Chiefs game peaked at an average of 24.6 million viewers in the second quarter, including out-of-home viewership. The 23 million viewership average tops last year’s least-watched playoff game (Los Angeles Chargers at Jacksonville Jaguars, which averaged 20.61 million viewers on NBC) by a couple of million viewers. (For broader context, last year’s six wild-card games across Fox, CBS, NBC and ABC/ESPN/ESPN2 averaged 28.8 million viewers.)

    Daniel Cohen, the executive vice president of global media rights consulting at Octagon, told The Athletic that subscriber churn and piracy are the two biggest challenges facing subscription video-on-demand growth in the U.S. That’s one of the questions that will be answered in a couple of months: How many people signed up to watch the game, and then how many of those new subscribers canceled after the game? (The cheapest option to purchase the game was $5.99 for a one-month premium plan.) Peacock was atop the iPhone and iPad charts on Saturday night as far as downloaded apps.

    NBC naturally pushed the Peacock offering throughout the fourth quarter of the Houston Texans’ blowout of the Cleveland Browns earlier Saturday, including showing Taylor Swift walking in the bowels of Arrowhead Stadium. The “Football Night In America” crew also hawked the Peacock game, and that group provided bonus coverage at the start of the game on NBC with Ahmed Fareed, Devin McCourty and Chris Simms providing play-by-play on a split screen of the game.


    An average of 23 million people watched the Dolphins-Chiefs wild-card game Saturday night, which streamed exclusively on Peacock outside the Miami and Kansas City markets. (David Eulitt / Getty Images)

    Rick Cordella, the president of NBC Sports, said before the game that the company’s two big goals were to have a great production and deliver a clean experience to the users across America. There were no widespread reports of major streaming issues, so that goes down as a win for Peacock. (Peacock can’t control so-called last-mile issues, which involve local cable and internet companies or personal devices.) How you processed the game probably depends on your thoughts of Mike Tirico and Jason Garrett and whether you thought the payment was worth it if you were new to Peacock. Tirico is always a pro. Garrett’s energy was miles better than Dungy last year, though there are plenty of better NFL analysts. If you were a neutral fan and not rooting for Miami or Kansas City, the game wasn’t very memorable.

    Peacock’s first exclusive NFL game, which saw the Buffalo Bills defeat the Chargers on Dec. 23, averaged 7.3 million viewers and peaked at an average of 8.4 million viewers from 10:45-11 p.m. ET during the NFL’s first-ever commercial-free fourth quarter. The Chiefs-Dolphins playoff game also went commercial-free in the fourth quarter based on sponsorship from AWS, Geico and Hotels.com. As Anthony Crupi of Sportico wisely noted, “Comcast is more invested in the long-term growth of Peacock than the immediate adrenaline spike that comes with an extra $18 million to $20 million in commercial cash.”

    NBC first started streaming “Sunday Night Football” on the internet in 2008, and they were the first NFL partner in the U.S. to stream the Super Bowl (in 2012). Peacock would be a natural fit for doing this again.

    “We’ve been on Peacock for several years now, and we’re excited with the plan NBC came back with and came to us all the way last spring,” Schroeder said. “We’re excited with the continued growth that we’re seeing across our digital distribution, certainly with ‘Thursday Night Football’ on Amazon, where their weekly viewership numbers are approaching last year on television with Fox and NFL Network.”

    Schroeder was careful to say that the NFL remains committed to broadcast television. That is true, though Saturday night did feel like a seismic moment, a line crossed.

    “That still continues to be the broadest possible reach,” Schroeder said. “You can’t reach 190 million people throughout the course of the year without having very broad distribution of your content, and that’s always been a bedrock for us and I think a real differentiator for us versus other sports. Every one of our games is on broadcast television, at least in their market, and probably 90 percent of our games (are) on broadcast as their core platform. For us, it remains really important. We see the continued evolution in the media landscape, and we want to be where our fans are. We know they’re increasingly, especially younger fans, on different screens.”

    Your potential dislike of this is understandable, but the NFL does not go backward. Bet big this happens again next January.


    There was an unexpected hire from ESPN last week — Nick Kyrgios will be a guest commentator for ESPN’s coverage of the 2024 Australian Open. The 28-year-old Wimbledon finalist in 2022 is one of the most popular and polarizing figures in the sport. He missed all four majors in 2023 because of wrist, knee and foot injuries and said recently his playing career is close to the end.

    How did the Australian player and the U.S. home of tennis get together? Mark Gross, the senior vice president, production and remote events for ESPN, said Stuart Duguid, who represents Kyrgios, reached out to ESPN to gauge their interest in his client working the Australian Open.

    “The deal came together fairly quickly because of the interest from both sides,” Gross said. “The plan is to have Nick on the air in prime time East Coast time. We certainly believe Nick will be very good on the air, and we want to make sure the largest portion of our audience will see and hear him (instead of having him on the air in the overnight hours).”

    Gross said Kyrgios will handle a mix of matches and studio work depending on the day and the schedule. For now, the deal is only for the Australian Open, but ESPN is certainly open to exploring things down the road. He and John McEnroe called the Stefanos Tsitsipas-Zizou Bergs match Sunday night for ESPN and early returns were he was excellent.

    “For now, it’s just the Australian Open, but we’ll certainly be open to talking to Nick and Stuart about opportunities moving forward,” Gross said. “In fairness to Nick and tennis fans, we hope Nick gets on the court soon so we can cover his matches.”

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Nick Kyrgios exclusive interview: ‘I feel more respected in the U.S. than Australia’


    — Pretty cool note that Noah Eagle called the Texans-Browns game on NBC while his father, Ian Eagle, called the same game for Westwood One Audio.

    — ESPN said “Sunday NFL Countdown” had its most-watched regular season since 2019 and its second-best since 2016, averaging 1.335 million viewers per show. Viewership was up 8 percent.

    — Former U.S. national team star Ali Krieger joined CBS Sports’ soccer coverage as a studio analyst.

    — ESPN’s full slate of college football bowls this season averaged 4.6 million viewers across 40 total games, up 5 percent year-over-year.

    — The partnership between the NFL and ESPN could soon grow more intertwined with the league in advanced talks to acquire an equity stake in the sports network.

    — Fun to see Fox NFL Sunday analyst Jimmy Johnson amp it up.


    Some things I read over the past couple of weeks that were interesting to me (there are paywall here):

    Bryan Curtis of The Ringer examines the last two weeks at ESPN.

    • An Iowa paperboy disappeared 41 years ago. His mother is still on the case. By Thomas Lake of CNN.

    • It was the Patriot Way, until it wasn’t. By Seth Wickersham, Wright Thompson and Don Van Natta Jr. of ESPN.

    • ESPN used fake names to secure Emmys for ‘College GameDay’ stars. By Katie Strang of The Athletic.

    • The Whale Who Went AWOL. By Ferris Jabr for The New York Times Magazine.

    Great piece by Jeff Pearlman: V.J. Lovero and the bygone age of the sports photographer.

    • A rising star at celebrity trials like O.J. Simpson’s. Then a quiet, mysterious death. By Harriet Ryan of the L.A. Times.

    • A stroke took Charlie Manuel’s words away. Baseball is giving them back. By Matt Gelb of The Athletic.

    • NBC Sports producer Annie Koeblitz and NFL writer Peter King produced a beautifully shot feature on Niners linebackers coach Johnny Holland, who is battling a rare form cancer.

    • Perry High School Principal Dan Marburger, wounded in Jan. 4 shootings, passes away. By The Des Moines Register staff.

    • Tom Shales, Pulitzer-winning TV critic of fine-tuned wit, dies at 79. By Adam Bernstein and Brian Murphy of The Washington Post.

    • A filmmaker was producing a documentary series on the Iran hostage crisis. Then her father went missing overseas. By Lucy Sexton and Joe Sexton for The Atavist.

    • China Failed to Sway Taiwan’s Election. What Happens Now? By Damien Cave of The New York Times.

    • He spent his life building a $1 million stereo. The real cost was unfathomable. By Geoff Edgers of The Washington Post.


    Episode 361 of the Sports Media Podcast features Karen Brodkin, the co-head of WME Sports and an EVP at its parent company, Endeavor, and Hillary Mandel, an executive vice president and head of media for the Americas for IMG, an Endeavor company. Brodkin and Mandel have worked as advisors on an endless amount of media deals, from individual team deals to league deals. They recently served as consultants for the NCAA for its $920 million, eight-year agreement with ESPN.

    In this podcast, Brodkin and Mandel explain their jobs and the skill sets needed for it; the use of research in evaluating deal points; the current economic environment for sports media rights; why the NCAA ultimately opted not to separate the women’s basketball tournament in the deal away from its other championships; why women’s college sports is on the rise; the Pac-12 falling apart; Peacock’s playoff deal with the NFL and what it means for consumers heading forward and more.

    You can subscribe to this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, Spotify, and more.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    What happens next for Pat McAfee and ESPN? Where things stand between the star and network

    (Top photo of the Peacock sign on display Saturday at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City: Scott Winters / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • After years of American growth, has F1's U.S. fandom plateaued?

    After years of American growth, has F1's U.S. fandom plateaued?

    [ad_1]

    As Donny Osmond sang the opening notes of “Star-Spangled Banner,” wearing a Las Vegas Grand Prix letterman jacket, the Sphere illuminated red, white and blue against the night sky.

    Formula One was minutes away from its third race of the year in the United States, following Miami and Austin. As Osmond’s voice built to a crescendo, the sport’s powerbrokers stood proudly at the front of the starting grid, the 20 cars and hundreds of VIP guests behind them.

    Not long ago, the sport’s future in the United States had looked bleak; even one race a year seemed a stretch for a market that F1 had tried repeatedly and failed to crack. Now it was about to race down the Las Vegas Strip.

    “I couldn’t fully understand when I went to NFL and NBA games, seeing how passionate the Americans are about sport, how they hadn’t yet caught the bug,” Lewis Hamilton, the seven-time world champion, said.

    “It’s been really, really amazing to see a large portion of the country is now speaking about it.”

    F1 has rocketed in the United States over the last five years. It has three American races, an American driver and an American team. For the city of Las Vegas to invest so heavily — and tolerate so much disruption — to host a grand prix is indicative of F1’s heightened relevance.

    But as F1 bet big on America for 2023 and beyond, there were signs that growth has plateaued.


    Prior to Liberty Media’s acquisition of F1 in 2017, the sport’s history in the United States had not been an especially happy one. It made repeated attempts to capture the sports-mad market, establishing races in Watkins Glen, N.Y., Phoenix, Long Beach, Calif., and even the parking lot of Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. Each time, it failed to take hold. Fans were passionate but small in number, never reaching heights that could be sustained. Even races at the heart of American motorsport, the Indianapolis Motor Speedway between 2000-07, couldn’t offer the long-term home F1 craved.

    And when F1 appeared to secure that footing from 2012, with its first permanent U.S. facility at the Circuit of The Americas (COTA) in Austin, Texas, uncertainty grew with funding cuts and dropping attendance. By the mid-2010s, an America-free F1 calendar was a very real prospect.

    From 2017, things quickly changed. Liberty, an American company that also owns MLB’s Atlanta Braves, placed a fresh focus on growth. Netflix’s “Drive to Survive” fueled a renewed hunger for F1 in the United States. When the Austin race returned in 2021 after two years away due to Covid-19, COTA drew a record crowd of 400,000 amid the height of Hamilton’s title fight against Max Verstappen. That grew to 440,000 in 2022.


    The three U.S. races now have solid foundations and their own identities and are locked in for the long term. (Mark Thompson / Getty Images)

    “Even just going to your son’s football practice or your nephew’s baseball game, people are actually talking about F1 now in the stands, as if it’s another American sport,” said Renee Wilm, the CEO of the Las Vegas Grand Prix.

    “Five or 10 years ago, I don’t know that your average sports fan in America could have named three drivers in F1,” added Tom Garfinkel, the CEO of the Miami Dolphins and managing partner of the Miami Grand Prix.

    “What’s most exciting about it to me is there are a lot of young people in the United States falling in love with the sport. That’s very positive for the future of the sport in America.”

    But Wilm said F1 had to maintain a balance, “creating that newfound loyalty between our new fans while also continuing to embrace our legacy fans. Because I don’t want our legacy fans to get lost in this new narrative that we’re building around North America.”

    Las Vegas in particular, the first race to be promoted and organized by F1 itself, drew criticism for high ticket prices that effectively limited access to the wealthy. Fans who attended Thursday night’s sessions were left with a sour taste when they were forced to leave before the delayed second practice had begun, in some cases spending over $1,000 on a ticket to see only eight minutes of action. They received a $200 merchandise voucher as compensation.


    While attendance at live events stayed relatively strong in 2023, American TV ratings tumbled a bit. According to ESPN, which broadcasts the races, 2023 ended as the second most-watched F1 season on U.S. TV, drawing in an average of 1.1 million viewers over the 22 races. While that’s almost double the 554,000 average recorded in 2018, the final season before “Drive to Survive” debuted in spring 2019, it marked a 9.1 percent drop from 2022.

    The US Grand Prix at COTA also recorded a small fall in the attendance, from 440,000 to 432,000. Miami reported an increase from 240,000 to 270,000 over its weekend after increasing its capacity, claiming both races sold out. It plans another small rise for the 2024 race as a result. Las Vegas reported a crowd of 315,000 over four days, including the opening ceremony.

    A plausible explanation for that apparent drop in interest was the lack of competition at the front of the grid. Verstappen’s record-breaking domination, winning 19 out of 22 races, while spectacular, was an understandable source of frustration for fans. Those who fell in love with F1 through 2021, a championship that went down to the final lap of the final race, haven’t experienced anything close to that since.

    By emphasizing driver personalities over the details of what happened on the track, “Drive to Survive” helped American fans connect with a European-heavy sport in a way that doesn’t rely on fantastic racing action. It has also led to more diverse F1 fan demographics, far younger and more female than ever before. A 2021 global survey of F1 fans reported that more than 18 percent of respondents were women, up from 10 percent in 2017.

    “We have, more than ever, fans of the drivers themselves and the personalities, all the way down the grid,” said Bobby Epstein, COTA’s chairman.

    But no matter how invested fans are in the people, they still want a good sporting show. “We have to continue to work on making sure we’re having close racing,” said Hamilton, once Verstappen’s title rival. “Because I think you’ve seen the social engagement drop a huge amount this year. It’s obviously heavily impacted (by) competition. People want to see that.”

    LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - NOVEMBER 18: A general view of the national anthem prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Las Vegas at Las Vegas Strip Circuit on November 18, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Alex Bierens de Haan/Getty Images for Heineken)


    The Las Vegas Grand Prix capped off a banner year for F1 in the U.S. (Alex Bierens de Haan / Getty Images for Heineken)

    Domination is commonplace in F1. Between 2014-20, Hamilton won six titles in seven years for Mercedes. Before that, Sebastian Vettel won four straight championships for Red Bull. In the early 2000s, Michael Schumacher and Ferrari swept five straight years.

    But what sets Verstappen’s domination apart (along with the record-breaking numbers) is that it was not supposed to be possible.

    F1 has made big changes to its rulebook in recent years to create closer competition between teams, including the $145 million cost cap introduced in 2021 and the car design changes for 2022. While there was intense competition through the rest of the grid — six teams finished a race in the top three last year, and Mercedes and Ferrari’s battle for second went down to the final race — Verstappen’s strength gave each weekend an air of inevitability.

    Toto Wolff, Mercedes’ team principal, thought F1’s viewership numbers were still “strong” and pointed to most races being sold out. But he acknowledged the importance of competition at the front to stop fans turning away, and said the onus was on Red Bull’s rivals to make it happen.

    “If the spectacle is not good, our fans are going to follow us less,” Wolff said. “Of course, there is the risk that people are going to say, ‘Well, I know the result anyway,’ like it happened to us with Lewis. We’ve just got to do a better job.”

    Red Bull doesn’t expect to have a clear run for too long. Its chief, Christian Horner, warned the team already has “diminishing returns” with its car design going into 2024, and said its 2023 success will not be repeated in our lifetimes.

    “History dictates that with stable regulations, there will be convergence,” Horner said. “And we’re acutely aware of that.”


    Even if Mercedes, Ferrari and others make the gains to create an open, compelling championship fight, replicating the staggering rise in interest since Liberty’s takeover will be difficult. It was growth borne of a unique set of conditions: “Drive to Survive” was new and novel. Covid-19 kept everyone indoors, allowing curious fans to binge the show and get hungry for the real thing. When fans could finally return to the races, F1 delivered one of the closest title battles in its history.

    “We’re already at a good point, so a plateau would be great,” said Epstein. “A rise above (each) year would be even better. But I don’t think you’re going to see the meteoric growth continue until you have a couple more ingredients. I think one would be, certainly, a track battle with an American driver vying for first.”

    Americans love a winner. And while there is now an American driver on the grid in Williams Racing’s Logan Sargeant, he scored just one point last year and finished 21st in the championship. An American has not won an F1 grand prix since Mario Andretti at the 1978 Dutch Grand Prix.

    To have a leading American fighting for podiums, wins and championships could be a big evolutionary moment for F1. While the personality-led fandom has worked so far, marrying that with success on the track could be a major breakthrough.

    MIAMI GARDENS, FL - MAY 08: Fans occupy the track near the podium after the first running of the Crypto.com Miami Grand Prix on May 8, 2022 at the Miami International Autodrome in Miami Gardens, Florida. (Photo by David J. Griffin/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)


    The Miami GP in May marked the start of Max Verstappen’s record streak of 10 straight victories. (David J. Griffin / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

    “Americans — and maybe it’s like that anywhere, but more so in this sport — you’re going to root for your guy to win,” said Epstein. “You don’t build the same excitement and passion around not being competitive, simply because he’s from this country.”

    Garfinkel was less certain what a winning American would do for F1. “It would certainly be a great thing, (but) I don’t know that it’s paramount to the success or the fandom,” he said. “The fandom has grown substantially without that, and there’s a lot of compelling stories.”

    One thing he thought could spike interest in the U.S. would be a greater manufacturer presence. In 2026, Ford will return to F1 in a new partnership with Red Bull, whose power units will carry the blue oval badge. GM’s Cadillac also plans to build its own engine starting in 2028. “It’s certainly great that those companies are investing in F1 and see the value,” Garfinkel said.

    Cadillac’s F1 plan hinges on another legendary name in American motorsports. Michael Andretti — Mario’s son — plans to form an all-American F1 team, joining the grid in either 2025 or 2026 with at least one American driver. Andretti’s entry bid has already been approved by the FIA, but requires a green light from F1 to go ahead. Thus far, the reception from F1 and the existing 10 teams has been lukewarm. They claim expansion could destabilize the current grid, and also question whether Andretti would boost F1 in America, given Haas already races under the American flag.


    The buzz of the Las Vegas race, even after a rough start, gave F1 the mainstream reach it has long coveted with coverage in Vogue, a skit on Jimmy Kimmel, and even a story in The New York Times’ wedding section. The race itself drew an average of 1.3 million viewers on ESPN — 130,000 more than Austin — despite the 1 a.m. Eastern start time.

    Zak Brown, McLaren’s CEO, said F1 has “a lot of room for growth” in the United States. He believes Las Vegas works globally and said the upcoming Apple film starring Brad Pitt, which is being filmed at grand prix weekends, should “have a big impact” in North America.

    “I don’t see any reasons why the sport can’t just go from strength to strength,” Brown said. “If you look at the size of our TV ratings compared to the major sports in North America, there’s a lot of room for growth. So I’m quite bullish on Formula One globally, and specifically in North America.”

    Hamilton is heavily involved in the writing and production of the Pitt movie, and F1 helped by setting up an 11th garage for the fictional team while allowing the car to complete laps during the race weekend.

    “We do have to continue to grow, and I think the movie particularly is going to help do that,” Hamilton said.

    A dip in TV ratings and a leveling off of grand prix attendance is far removed from F1’s previous boom-and-bust relationship with the United States. All three races have solid foundations and their own identities and are locked in for the long term: COTA until 2026, Miami until 2031, and Las Vegas for the next decade.

    “If F1 wants to grow in the United States, you have to invest in it, which (Liberty is) doing,” Garfinkel said. “I would expect that investment to continue, which means I would expect (the growth) to continue.”

    (Lead image: Getty; Dan Istitene-F1, Mark Thompson, Clive Rose / Getty Images; Design: John Bradford / The Athletic)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • ESPN used fake names to secure Emmys for 'College GameDay' stars

    ESPN used fake names to secure Emmys for 'College GameDay' stars

    [ad_1]

    In March 2023, Shelley Smith, who worked 26 years as an on-air reporter for ESPN, received a call from Stephanie Druley, then the network’s head of studio and event production. Druley said she wanted to talk about something “serious” that needed to stay between the two of them, Smith recalled. She then told Smith that Smith needed to return two sports Emmy statuettes that she had been given more than a decade earlier.

    That request was one of many ESPN made of some of its biggest stars last year after the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS), the organization that administers the Emmys, uncovered a scheme that the network used to acquire more than 30 of the coveted statuettes for on-air talent ineligible to receive them. Since at least 2010, ESPN inserted fake names in Emmy entries, then took the awards won by some of those imaginary individuals, had them re-engraved and gave them to on-air personalities.

    Kirk Herbstreit, Lee Corso, Chris Fowler, Desmond Howard and Samantha Ponder, among others, were given the ill-gotten Emmys, according to a source briefed on the matter, who was granted anonymity because the individual is not authorized to discuss it publicly. There is no evidence that the on-air individuals were aware the Emmys given to them were improperly obtained.

    “I think it was really crummy what they did to me and others,” said Smith, who worked at ESPN from 1997 until her contract expired last July.

    The fraud was discovered by NATAS, which prompted an investigation by that organization and later by ESPN. Those probes resulted in sanctions beyond the return of the trophies. While it is not known who orchestrated the scheme, Craig Lazarus, vice president and executive producer of original content and features, and Lee Fitting, a senior vice president of production who oversaw “College GameDay” and other properties, were among the ESPN employees NATAS ruled ineligible from future participation in the Emmys.

    In a statement, ESPN said: “Some members of our team were clearly wrong in submitting certain names that may go back to 1997 in Emmy categories where they were not eligible for recognition or statuettes. This was a misguided attempt to recognize on-air individuals who were important members of our production team. Once current leadership was made aware, we apologized to NATAS for violating guidelines and worked closely with them to completely overhaul our submission process to safeguard against anything like this happening again.

    “We brought in outside counsel to conduct a full and thorough investigation and individuals found to be responsible were disciplined by ESPN.”

    Adam Sharp, of NATAS, said in an email: “NATAS identified a number of fictitious credits submitted by ESPN to multiple Sports Emmys competitions. When brought to the attention of ESPN senior management, the network took steps to take responsibility for the actions of its personnel, to investigate thoroughly, and to course correct. These steps have included the return by ESPN of statuettes issued to fictitious individuals and commitments to implement further internal accountability and procedural changes at the network.”

    An ESPN spokesperson said Lazarus declined to comment, and Lazarus didn’t respond to an email seeking comment. Fitting was let go by ESPN in August after 25 years at the company. He did not respond to voice and text messages.

    The nexus of the scheme was “College GameDay,” the show that Fitting helped turn into a cultural phenomenon and a revenue machine. From 2008-18, it nabbed eight Emmys for outstanding weekly studio show. But on-air talent was, until 2023, prohibited by NATAS guidelines from being included in a credit list in that category. Hosts, analysts and reporters on “College GameDay” could win individual awards, such as outstanding host, studio analyst or emerging on-air talent, and they could win for an individual feature. But they were not eligible to take home a trophy for a win by the show. That rule was meant to prevent front-facing talent from winning two awards for the same work (termed “double-dipping” in the NATAS rulebook).

    ESPN circumvented the rule by inserting fake names into the credit list it submitted to NATAS for “College GameDay.” The Athletic reviewed the credit lists for the years the show won: 2010, 2011, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. In each one of those seven years, names similar to the names of on-air personalities – and with identical initials – were listed all under the title of “associate producers.”

    Kirk Henry (Kirk Herbstreit), Lee Clark (Lee Corso), Dirk Howard (Desmond Howard), and Tim Richard (Tom Rinaldi) appeared in all seven years. Steven Ponder (Sam Ponder) and Gene Wilson (Gene Wojciechowski) appeared in five from 2014-18. Chris Fulton (Chris Fowler) appeared in 2010, 2011, 2014 and 2015. Shelley Saunders (Shelley Smith) appeared in the 2010 credit list. Smith was also given an Emmy for the show’s win in 2008, though it is unclear how that statuette was obtained; Shelley Saunders was not listed in the 2008 credit list viewed by The Athletic. However, networks are allowed to modify a credit list after a show is announced as a winner.

    While reviewing the 2010 and 2011 credit lists, The Athletic found three additional names that could not be verified that also closely resemble the names of “College GameDay” talent: Erik Andrews (Erin Andrews) in 2011; Wendy Nickson (Wendi Nix) and Jenn Brownsmith (Jenn Brown) in 2010. Nix confirmed that she was given an Emmy around 2010 and said she had no idea it was improperly obtained; it just arrived in the mail one day. She was not contacted about returning it before or after she left ESPN in August 2023. Brown, who left ESPN in 2013, confirmed she also was given one and didn’t know it was ill-gotten. She said: “This is all news to me and kind of unfortunate because you’ve got people who believe they rightfully had one. There are rules for a reason … it’s unfortunate (those were) abused and for so many years, too.” Brown said she has not been contacted by ESPN about returning it. Andrews, who left ESPN in 2012, declined to comment through a spokesperson.

    When asked why people at the network would scheme to secure trophies for on-air talent, one person involved in the ESPN Emmy submission process in recent years said: “You have to remember that those personalities are so important, and they have egos.” Smith, for one, pushed back at that and remarked how some executives lined their office shelves with statuettes. One executive interviewed during ESPN’s probe said that some company leaders were obsessed with the Emmys, using the numbers of wins each year to prove their dominance over competitors: “It’s very important to the people who go (to the ceremony) and the old-school television guys.” Additionally, many at ESPN thought the rule preventing on-air personalities from getting statuettes for a win by the show was stupid. They may have just decided to do something about it, the rules be damned.

    NATAS strengthened its credit verification process in 2022, and sometime in that year ESPN was asked to verify certain names. The network eventually admitted they were bogus. In its 2022 transparency report, NATAS referenced the scheme: During credit vetting, Sports Administration identified one network’s use of fabricated identities in association with one or more submissions. The matter was referred to counsel and remains pending.

    Fake names appeared in ESPN’s Emmy submission for “College GameDay” as recently as 2020 – a year the show did not win – but were not in the 2022 entry. (The Athletic does not have access to the show’s 2021 credit list.)

    “College GameDay” on-air-personalities may not have been the only ones to have been given statuettes they were ineligible to receive. In November 2023, Linda Cohn, a “SportsCenter” anchor since 1992, posted a photo on Instagram of four Emmy awards and wrote: “My Fab 4. The latest delivered today. Still grateful.” In the foreground of the photo is an Emmy for outstanding daily studio show from 2023. Because of the rule change, Cohn was eligible to receive that award. She is listed under “host” in the credit list and that word is engraved on the statuette’s base. As for the three Emmys in the background of the photo, one reads:

    STUDIO SHOWS
    ESPN SPORTSCENTER
    LINDA COHN

    The two others read:

    OUTSTANDING STUDIO SHOW – DAILY
    “SPORTSCENTER”
    ESPN
    LINDA COHN

    Under NATAS rules, Cohn was ineligible to receive a statuette as an on-air personality for any “SportsCenter” wins in the category of daily studio show before 2023, and NATAS confirmed Cohn has won only one Emmy. Cohn referred all questions to an ESPN spokesperson.

    According to a recent version of the Emmys rulebook, credit fabrication can result in a disqualification and the required return of trophies. According to NATAS, 37 ill-gotten trophies have been returned thus far. Smith gave back the 2008 award but not the one from 2010, which she had gifted to a relative. Wojciechowski, who exited ESPN last summer, declined an interview request. Rinaldi, who left ESPN for Fox in 2020, was contacted on Wednesday but said he did not have time to talk. He then didn’t respond to multiple text messages.

    Fitting, Lazarus and Drew Gallagher, a coordinating producer on “College GameDay,” were ruled ineligible from future Emmy participation. Druley was not ruled ineligible for future Emmys; she won a 2023 Emmy as an executive producer for “Monday Night Football.” But she was replaced on an Emmy steering committee by another ESPN executive.

    Gallagher and Druley declined to comment through an ESPN spokesperson.

    The names of Lazarus, Fitting and Gallagher were absent from the credit lists published in the program for the 44th Annual Sports Emmys ceremony, held on May 22, 2023 in New York. A year earlier, Lazarus’ name had appeared in various show credits, as an executive producer eight times and as a supervising producer once. Fitting was listed as an executive producer nominee six times. Drew Gallagher was listed as a coordinating producer twice. One year later, they were not listed at all.

    “College GameDay’s” credit list for the 2023 awards also did not include credits for executive producers, senior coordinating producers or coordinating producers. “Among the sanctions resulting from the investigation was a one-year disqualification from statuette eligibility for the senior leadership of ‘College GameDay,’” NATAS said in an email.

    Shortly after Smith’s call with Druley last March, a courier arrived at her California home, wrapped the 2008 statuette in a white plastic bag and took it away. But Smith still has the Emmy she won in 2018 for a story for the program “E:60.”

    “I was happy to win the (2018) one,” Smith said. “But the other times (the trophy) would just show up and I wouldn’t even know I was supposed to get one.”

    (Illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic, photos: Cooper Neill, Ronald Martinez, Michael Buckner / Getty Images; headshot photos: Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Why Manchester City are being sued by Superdry

    Why Manchester City are being sued by Superdry

    [ad_1]

    Manchester City’s players wore modified training gear for their pre-match warm-up on Sunday following a High Court trademark infringement claim from fashion brand Superdry.

    It emerged last week that City are being sued for damages over the use of the words Super Dry — a type of beer sold by one of their main sponsors, Asahi — on their training kit.

    Some immediate implications have become apparent: up until Wednesday, January 3, the day Superdry’s claim was first reported by Law360, City’s players have worn bibs, sweatshirts and coats that bear the words ‘Asahi Super “Dry”’ in training and before matches.

    Since the middle of last week, however, and including for the warm-up before their FA Cup match with Huddersfield Town on Sunday, the players’ clothing has been changed to ‘Asahi 0.0%’.


    City wore training tops without the ‘Super “Dry”’ branding at the weekend (Clive Brunskill/Getty Images)

    But with Superdry, the UK-based clothing brand, also seeking an injunction and financial damages, and even the option to ‘destroy’ City’s ‘Super “Dry”’-branded training gear, there will be more developments to come.

    Here, The Athletic explains what we know so far and what could come next.


    What does Superdry want and why?

    Superdry alleged City “benefit unfairly” from “riding on the coattails of… well-known Superdry registrations” and argues its own brand could be “tarnished” by poor quality clothing items sold by City.

    It also claims there is potential for its brand to be affected by “negative perceptions or preconceptions of Manchester City Football Club in the minds of e.g. supporters of rival football clubs” and says the club’s use of Super “Dry” branding could do “damage to the reputation of Superdry”.

    Superdry submitted that “the appearance of the (training) kit is liable to deceive a substantial number of members of the UK public into believing that the (training) kit is clothing designed or sold by (Superdry)”.

    As a result, the brand is seeking financial reparations from City. It is “presently unable to quantify the exact financial value of this claim”, according to the court documents, but intends those damages to “include… any unfair profits made by the infringer by reason of the infringement”.

    The value of City’s training kit sponsorship with Asahi was not made available publicly, although it was reported the club’s previous partner, OKX, paid $20million (£18.5m) for the 2022-23 season and therefore speculated that the new agreement would fall in a similar bracket.


    City’s players wearing the Super “Dry” training gear at the end of December (Alex Livesey/Getty Images)

    Superdry claims City have “profited very substantially” from the sponsorship deal related to the branding on the training kit and that they have “engaged in… infringing activities knowingly and/or with reasonable grounds for knowing that Superdry was a well-known clothing brand” that had not given its permission.

    In November 2023, Asahi won an award from marketing agency The Drum for a campaign which set out, according to an article on The Drum’s website, to “elevate the status of the training kit and instil it with the same level of pride and symbolism as the first kit and away kit”.

    Following acceptance of the award, Asahi said the campaign — which featured Kevin De Bruyne and John Stones, among others — was City’s most-engaged-with piece of sponsorship content of the season up until that point, achieving 19.87million views and 428,000 interactions across social media.

    Superdry also asked the court to stop City from using or selling any items emblazoned with the phrase ‘Super “Dry”’ and for the club to transfer to the company all such items, or to “destroy or modify” them.

    What else is in the court documents?

    In documents submitted on December 15 — and seen by The Athletic — Superdry sets out to highlight its popularity as a brand, highlighting its 98 UK stores, several well-followed social media pages and awards won, as well as listing celebrities such as David Beckham, Neymar Jr and Kylie Jenner to have worn its clothing.

    It also cited collaborations with rock bands Metallica, the Sex Pistols, Iron Maiden and Motley Crue.

    City players Julian Alvarez, Jack Grealish, Erling Haaland, Kyle Walker and Oscar Bobb are also shown wearing training gear emblazoned with Asahi’s ‘Super “Dry”’ branding, specifically ‘Super “Dry” Asahi 0.0%’.

    Superdry argues some of the photos demonstrate that not all of that wording will always be visible due to “various factors such as the viewing angle and the physical posture of the wearer”. One of the photos does show Haaland inadvertently covering much of the “Asahi” logo on his training shirt.

    The brand also provides examples of its own clothing where the words ‘Super’ and ‘Dry’ are stacked on top of each other, as was the case on City’s Asahi clothing.

    City already appear to have made changes to their training gear. Last Wednesday, the club posted a picture of women’s team striker Khadija Shaw in training wearing a half-zip bearing the words “Asahi 0.0%”. On Thursday, there were further images of the male players wearing clothing with the same branding.

    The last time the ‘Super “Dry”’-branded items were publicly visible was during the Premier League match against Sheffield United on December 30.

    City have not commented and it is not clear when they were made aware of the claim against them.

    What are the implications for City?

    City announced in July that beer brand Asahi Super “Dry” would feature on both the men’s and women’s training gear throughout 2023-24.

    In a statement at the time, they said: “Since the start of the partnership, the Asahi Super Dry brand has been integrated across a number of different areas, including the rebrand of the Asahi Super Dry Tunnel Club and wider installation of cutting-edge technology throughout the Etihad Stadium to provide City fans with the unique Japanese super dry taste.”

    This claim relates only to training apparel rather than City’s tunnel club hospitality offering.

    Although the Super “Dry” brand itself belongs to Asahi — and is trademarked in relation to beer advertising rather than clothing — City find themselves in the middle of the claim because they own and were selling the product bearing the disputed wording.

    There is no set date for any further court hearings and it is unknown when there will be a resolution.

    Superdry, Asahi and Manchester City all declined to comment.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Blingy, binky and beside the point: How football mouth guards became fashion statements

    (Top photos: Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • 'He's our leader. He's our therapist': Curt Menefee is 'Fox NFL Sunday' host, unsung hero

    'He's our leader. He's our therapist': Curt Menefee is 'Fox NFL Sunday' host, unsung hero

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — Terry Bradshaw spills a cup of coffee, but Curt Menefee doesn’t flinch. Menefee leans toward a tray not visible on television for some tissue to help clean up as Bradshaw continues to make a point about the Cincinnati Bengals.

    Howie Long helps with the cleanup, and Bradshaw keeps talking. Jimmy Johnson listens intently.

    Menefee then ribs Bradshaw about needing another cup of coffee, and Johnson uses coffee as a transition to talk about the Baltimore Ravens and Seattle Seahawks.

    “So Terry spills coffee on live TV … now, how do you react?” Menefee said shortly after while sitting in a dressing room at Fox Studios. “Instead of going into panic mode, we made it part of the show, and we laughed it off and had some fun with it.”

    It’s a funny moment in the studio. And Menefee, the longtime sports personality for Fox Sports, would tell you he has one of the most fun jobs in the world as the host of “Fox NFL Sunday.”


    Curt Menefee (left) with Terry Bradshaw on the “Fox NFL Sunday” set. (Courtesy of Lily Ro Photography / Fox Sports)

    It might be coffee one day. The next day, Johnson might get fired up talking about a coaching situation, or Long might have a passionate discussion about the Raiders, a franchise he played with for 13 seasons. Michael Strahan is as busy as anyone on the show with his multiple television jobs. He can be funny, or he can be dialed in and serious when discussing football. If the show had a script, it would go off-script most of the time.

    But someone has to keep the show flowing. That’s where Menefee steps in.

    His colleagues call him a friend, therapist and a point guard of sorts on the show. Menefee, 58, is in his 18th season as host of a show that’s all about football but might be best known for the wacky moments that make viewers laugh.

    Menefee is not just the host; he’s the straightforward personality in an NFL comedy troupe.

    “People never go, ‘You did a great job of breaking on the Cover 2.’ It’s, ‘I love it when you guys bust each other’s chops,’” Menefee said. “That’s something that people will remember from the show more than anything else: (Bradshaw) spilled coffee, and you guys laughed it off and talked about it getting on his suit.”

    To understand Menefee’s importance, think about the cast. There’s Bradshaw, the four-time Super Bowl champion and Hall of Fame quarterback from the Pittsburgh Steelers dynasty of the 1970s. There’s Long, a Hall of Fame defensive lineman who won a Super Bowl with the Los Angeles Raiders. There’s Strahan, a Hall of Fame defensive end and the NFL record holder for most single-season sacks (22.5, tied with the Steelers’ T.J. Watt) who won a Super Bowl with the New York Giants. And there’s Johnson, a Hall of Fame coach who won two Super Bowls with the Dallas Cowboys and also a national college football championship at the University of Miami.


    Curt Menefee (left) with the “Fox NFL Sunday” cast: Terry Bradshaw, Jimmy Johnson, Michael Strahan and Howie Long. (Courtesy of Lily Ro Photography / Fox Sports)

    Someone relatively new to the mix is Rob Gronkowski, who won four Super Bowls as a tight end with the New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers and likely is headed to the Hall of Fame. Add in the ever-energetic NFL insider Jay Glazer, and that’s a lot of personality on set with the potential for television chaos. Someone might go on a rant with no one knowing the direction.

    Menefee has learned how to let everyone have their time while also making sure the show stays on schedule.

    “People have no idea what he does for us,” Glazer said. “He’s our leader. He’s our therapist. There are six of us on the show, so there’s 19 personalities — and Bradshaw and I got 12. For Curt to be able to keep us in check like this … you know, we’re family.”


    The coffee spilling is just a microcosm of what Menefee means to the show. Glazer and Bradshaw both have publicly discussed some of their mental health struggles. Glazer said Menefee takes the time to check on them and has been a confidant when times are tough. When he’s dealing with a possible anxiety attack, Glazer said it is Menefee who often is the first to stop what he’s doing to help.

    That’s because Menefee has built genuine friendships with the crew. There are offseason vacations. Glazer was Menefee’s best man at his wedding 10 years ago. Their spouses know each other, too.

    Menefee said he’s one of the “rare” guests able to spend two days fishing at Johnson’s home in the offseason because Johnson usually only gives visitors one day. Additionally, Menefee watches college football with Bradshaw and Johnson every Saturday, where there’s bonding and where Menefee picks up insight into how they’re thinking about the NFL that might be useful on the show.

    “I get to spend time with my best friends in life. That’s not a job,” Menefee said. “It’s just fun time. It’s just an extension of the blessings that I’ve been given and the joy that I’m able to have in life to be able to do this and call it my job. I know that not many people get to say that.”

    The friendship is the foundation of what makes the show go. It allows Menefee to know when to let someone keep talking and also when to use nonverbal communication to tell someone to wrap up his point. Menefee gauges what’s working on the fly. He does all of this with show producer Bill Richards speaking to him in his earpiece.

    What makes the show so much fun is the unpredictability — but it also can be stressful if someone can’t maintain order. The show isn’t rehearsed, so Menefee will react to a Bradshaw rant or a Johnson monologue on the fly. Controlling the room is an important skill to make sure segments don’t run long and sponsor reads aren’t forgotten.

    Emphasis on “controlling the room.”

    “I’m not ripping the guys, but if this kindergarten class is going crazy, I need a teacher to say, ‘Now we’re going to commercial,’” Richards said. “We can just let it go and these guys can go for an hour, we’d never take a commercial, and we’d all get fired. Curt keeping the train on the tracks, I can’t tell you how important that is.”

    It also helps that Menefee has been on live television since he was 19 years old, going back to his time as a student at Coe College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. He’s been trained to stay ready for anything.

    Menefee took over as the full-time host of “Fox NFL Sunday” in 2007 after James Brown left for CBS. Long said he admired how Menefee handled being the “bullpen guy” as Fox first experimented with using Joe Buck to host and also call games. Menefee taking over meant the show didn’t have to travel to where Buck was working.

    For nearly two decades, it’s worked. And friendships have formed in the process.


    Curt Menefee (far right) with Jimmy Johnson and Jay Glazer at the Empire State Building in November. (Noam Galai / Getty Images for Empire State Realty Trust)

    Menefee’s preparation is meticulous. The Santa Barbara, Calif., resident is up by 5:30 a.m. every day for meditation with his wife, Viollette, and to work out. The early start also allows Menefee to call or text various sources around the NFL on the East Coast who want to communicate early in their day.

    Menefee likes to keep football to a minimum on Mondays so that Viollette has a day with him without the pressures of work. By Tuesday, he’s communicating with Richards about the vision for Sunday’s show. The rundown for the show is usually set by Thursday, which is when Menefee begins focusing on teams and stats that will be important for Sunday.

    Friday is spent with a lot of texts and phone calls to people around the league. On Saturday, he drives from his home in Santa Barbara roughly 100 miles to a hotel room in Los Angeles for his weekly tradition of watching college football with Bradshaw and Johnson at their hotel around noon. Menefee likes to be back in his room by 5 p.m. to work on some of the written parts of the show, and he prefers to be in bed by 8 p.m. He’s then up by 4 a.m. for meditation and to arrive at the Fox studio by 5 a.m. for show preparation.

    Menefee jokes that his football career ended in middle school, but he’s not viewed as a football outsider by his friends on set. They recognize the work he does, including visiting multiple training camps in the offseason and maintaining relationships and insight across the league to help the show’s growth.

    He knows the sport and can juggle halftime highlights in multiple markets. He also can help someone with a bit of information on the fly.

    “If I was in a pro football game show and I had to phone a friend for some kind of information, Curt would be the guy to call,” Long said. “Curt is so good with a lot of big personalities on the show. We’re not a rehearsal show. To be honest, I think that’s part of the reason why we’re successful, because what you’re seeing is genuine, authentic reactions to a first-time conversation.”

    For all of the praise Menefee receives, he’s admittedly his own worst critic. He used to obsess over stumbling over a word or a mispronunciation. He said those things don’t bother him anymore, because, in regular conversation, those things happen.

    His focus in after-show conversations with Richards is on the flow of the show. What worked for each segment? What didn’t? For Menefee, it’s more the big picture.

    “Did I get Terry in soon enough? Did I wrap him up quick enough?” Menefee said. “Did I transition from this being serious to this being lighthearted or vice versa? I don’t think I’ve ever done a perfect show. I’m still striving, still trying to get there. I haven’t gotten there yet.”

    “The best point guard is going to take a couple of shots, and those are the ones you might think about on the way out,” Richards said. “But he’s a great shooter, so he’s making most of them, so nobody cares. Curt’s mistakes aren’t something I spend a lot of time on, because there’s not a lot (of them).”

    Glazer’s friendship with Menefee dates back to the 1990s when both were working in New York and Glazer asked Menefee to co-host a show, “Unnecessary Roughness” on the MSG Network. He believes Menefee is great to work with as a friend but added that Menefee can be “very, very, very hard on himself” after a show.

    “I always tell him we kind of go as you go,” Glazer said. “So, you may think something wasn’t good, but the rest of us don’t see it. So, don’t put that in our heads. Our show is imperfect. We’re off the cuff. I’ll just say to him, ‘Hey, bro, you beat up on yourself, but the rest of us don’t see what you’re upset about. So, don’t bring it out. Let’s you and I just talk it up.’

    “Then we talk it out, and then he’s like, ‘You’re right.’”

    Therapist. Point guard. Perfectionist. The adult in the room. There are a lot of ways Menefee is described. His main focus, though, is making sure his friends look good on air.

    He’s become a celebrity in his own right. The show was inducted into the National Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame in 2019 — so technically, Menefee is a Hall of Famer like his panelists.

    But if his friends are shining on air and the viewers continue to come back, he’s happy.

    “The No. 1 goal is for people to leave the show feeling like they had a good time, that they enjoyed it, because entertainment is the first thing,” Menefee said. “The second thing is that they get some information out of it.”

    Spoken like the adult in the room.

    (Top photo: Noam Galai / Getty Images for Empire State Realty Trust)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • NCAA signs lucrative TV deal for championships, but women’s college hoops stays in bundle

    NCAA signs lucrative TV deal for championships, but women’s college hoops stays in bundle

    [ad_1]

    The NCAA on Thursday said it had reached an eight-year agreement with ESPN worth $115 million annually to televise 40 college sports championships each year, including the marquee Division I women’s basketball tournament that many people within college sports had hoped would be primed for even bigger returns given a wave of recent popularity.

    The $920 million deal ended several years of speculation and debate about how the NCAA could capitalize on an influx of fans in women’s sports, including basketball. Powerful teams like South Carolina and UConn and star players like Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Sabrina Ionescu have created higher expectations for a sport that has earned much less money than men’s college basketball and college football, counterparts that have received far higher investments from universities and media companies for nearly a century.

    The NCAA’s current contract with ESPN, which was extended in 2011 and runs through the end of this season, brings in $34 million per year and includes 29 championships. A report in 2021, commissioned because of complaints about glaring differences between the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, suggested that the women’s tournament could earn at least $81 million in the first year of a new deal — if it were sold on its own and not as part of a package deal — although that estimate was met with some skepticism by industry experts for its ambitions.

    Ultimately, the NCAA and ESPN agreed to keep the bundle and valued the women’s basketball tournament at about $65 million per year under its portion of the agreement.

    NCAA president Charlie Baker acknowledged in an interview that selling women’s basketball on its own was not viable given the realities of the market.

    “We said from the beginning that we wanted the best deal that we could get for all of our championships,” Baker told The Athletic. “There was a lot of informal conversation that took place with many other potential participants in this negotiation, but the one who constantly engaged and the one I would argue was the most enthusiastic in a significant way throughout the course of this was ESPN.

    “The way they handled the negotiations demonstrated that this was really important to them, that it continued to be part of their portfolio. They will be a terrific partner, I think, going forward here.”


    Last year’s NCAA women’s basketball title game, won by LSU and coach Kim Mulkey, smashed viewership records. (Kirby Lee / USA Today)

    The new contract does not include the highly lucrative Division I men’s basketball tournament; Paramount Global and Warner Bros. Discovery pay nearly $900 million per year to broadcast that event on CBS and the Turner cable networks in a long-term deal that runs through 2032. The new NCAA-ESPN contract also expires in 2032, which will give the NCAA more flexibility in its next media rights negotiations, Baker said. (The NCAA does not control the rights to Football Bowl Subdivision postseason games, and the College Football Playoff handles its own negotiations and controls its own revenue.)

    The new contract is set to begin Sept. 1 and includes guarantees that the national championship games in women’s basketball, women’s volleyball and women’s gymnastics will be broadcast on ABC each year.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    What does the NCAA’s new media rights agreement mean for women’s college basketball?

    A number of prominent women’s basketball coaches, including South Carolina coach Dawn Staley, had advocated for the NCAA to spin off the championship into a stand-alone media deal, like the arrangement used for the men’s basketball tournament.

    Last season, the women’s title game aired for the first time on ABC and drew 9.9 million viewers — and featured the most people to ever watch a men’s or women’s college event on ESPN+. Overall viewership growth was up 55 percent, and the sport’s stars — players and coaches — became household names. Many in and around women’s basketball expected this deal to reflect the recent significant growth in the sport by pulling it out of a package it shares with dozens of other sports.

    “It should happen,” Staley said in March. “We’re at that place where we’re in high demand. I do believe women’s basketball can stand on its own and be a huge revenue-producing sport that could do, to a certain extent, what men’s basketball has done for all those other sports, all those other Olympic sports and women’s basketball.

    “It’s slowly building up to that because there’s proof in the numbers.”

    The NCAA’s media advisers at Endeavor’s WME and IMG Sports said their financial modeling valued the women’s basketball tournament at $65 million annually, which makes up more than half of the value of the new $115 million contract. Hillary Mandel, EVP and head of Americas for media at IMG, and Karen Brodkin, EVP and co-head of WME Sports, said they began the process of preparing for the NCAA’s negotiations by assessing the opportunities in the market both for individual sports and for the 40-sport bundle.

    “In the end, you’ve got to find the deal that matches your goals and objectives and not unbundle because everybody’s saying to you: ‘Unbundle! Unbundle! Hey, it’s the cool thing to do!’” Mandel said. “Let’s just not get lost in the sauce of that conversation.”

    The two sides began engaging in serious negotiations in late October, Brodkin said, and completed the deal during ESPN’s exclusive negotiating window, meaning the NCAA did not take its championship bundle to the open market for a potential bidding war. She said ESPN’s financial investment, its existing infrastructure and the “overwhelming amount of production” the network has committed to on both linear and streaming platforms made it the best opportunity for the NCAA. More than 2,300 hours of championships will air on ESPN’s linear and digital platforms annually as part of the contract, and 10 sports will have their selection shows broadcast.

    “Retaining exclusivity was very important to us in a world of fragmentation,” ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro said.

    Thursday’s news serves as yet another inflection point for women’s college basketball — though reactions are expected to be mixed. The tournament itself is valued at more than 10 times its previous valuation of $6 million to $7 million annually under the current contract, but its singular value was not fully tested. Still, the increased revenue and new $65 million valuation for the women’s basketball tournament set the stage for future change for the sport.

    The NCAA will explore the idea of rewarding women’s basketball teams’ NCAA Tournament success with revenue distribution units, Baker said, a system used on the men’s side of the sport to reward conferences and universities for performing in the tournament. The Division I board of directors finance committee began discussions on that front in 2023 and will talk with its member universities more this year, the NCAA said.

    “The tournament has grown dramatically because of the hard work of so many student-athletes and coaches and schools and folks at the NCAA and ESPN,” Baker said. “Hopefully, we’ll be able to figure out a way to make it happen.”

    Currently, only men’s NCAA Tournament teams earn units by advancing in the bracket. Each team that earns a bid to the tournament earns a unit for its conference, with more units up for grabs based on wins in the tournament. Total revenue earned from tournament units goes to the conference of the team that earned it and is distributed to universities over a six-year period, and it comes from a portion of the revenue that the tournament itself brings in annually. The women’s tournament has, in the past, not brought in enough revenue to justify setting aside money for a unit system.

    Women’s college basketball reached a big moment during the 2021 NCAA Tournament when the inequities in treatment between the men and women became obvious to the public. Though those within the game had known for years that the NCAA had favored men’s basketball to the detriment of other sports, a TikTok post from then-Oregon center Sedona Prince prompted far more widespread outrage and momentum for change.

    @sedonerrr

    it’s 2021 and we are still fighting for bits and pieces of equality. #ncaa #inequality #fightforchange

    ♬ original sound – Sedona Prince

    Prince’s tweet racked up 12.3 million views as the college star pointed out basic inequities, highlighting key differences between the women’s tournament and men’s in food provided to teams, access to weight rooms and even swag bags. Players and coaches were also vocal about other areas that showed how the athletes were treated differently, such as having 68 teams in the men’s bracket versus 64 in the women’s and the usage of “March Madness” branding only for the men’s tournament.

    Within one week of Prince’s tweet, the NCAA had hired the law firm Kaplan, Hecker & Fink LLP to conduct an independent equity review of the NCAA. In August 2021, the firm released its 117-page review — known colloquially as the “Kaplan report” — of the NCAA’s gender equity within basketball championships. The Kaplan report recommended that the NCAA spin off the women’s basketball tournament separately from other sports, suggesting a higher valuation, and it said the NCAA had created differences in the tournaments by having different people working to organize them without properly conferring about whether they were comparable.

    Baker and the NCAA’s media rights advisers said they evaluated all possible options, including going to the open market and trying to sell a stand-alone women’s basketball tournament package, but they opted against it.

    “If the market had demonstrated to us and to Endeavor that it would be worth our while to do that, we absolutely would have gone that way,” Baker said.

    Multiple industry experts told The Athletic over the past year that it would make the most sense for the NCAA to keep the women’s tournament with ESPN, a partner that broadcasts so much of the sport’s regular season that would be incentivized to cover the sport in the lead-up to the marquee postseason event. Brodkin said there would be no option better than one offering to triple their current deal in addition to increasing the investment in production, marketing and storytelling while putting more games on ABC.

    “Unbundling for unbundling’s sake — you’d have to go through the exercise of who and how is someone going to do more than that?” Brodkin said.

    Last season, the women’s title game aired on ABC for the first time, and ESPN announced in October that it would be broadcast on ABC again this season — though not in the prime-time slot. There could be more women’s sporting events put on ABC or in better windows moving forward as both sides agreed to meet regularly to consider changes to maximize visibility for events that demand it.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    NCAA secured media rights deal for women’s college basketball … but now the real work begins

    (Top photo: C. Morgan Engel / NCAA Photos via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Six teams, one draft and a lot of Ikea furniture: How the PWHL was made in six months

    Six teams, one draft and a lot of Ikea furniture: How the PWHL was made in six months

    [ad_1]

    TORONTO — The line began at the gates of Mattamy Athletic Centre and stretched a full city block. Women’s hockey fans, after decades of waiting for a best-on-best league, were happy to wait a little longer for the doors to open for the first-ever Professional Women’s Hockey League game.

    The line was dotted with reminders of the past. There was a Natalie Spooner Toronto Furies jersey from her time in the Canadian Women’s Hockey League. Several Toronto Six jerseys representing the Premier Hockey Federation and some from the Professional Women’s Hockey Players Association exhibition stops. The people wearing those jerseys from previous eras of women’s professional hockey were on their way into the old Maple Leaf Gardens to celebrate something new: the inaugural game of the PWHL between Toronto and New York.

    Later, inside the arena, two young girls were locked in. Ella Shelton was on the ice, and the girls — who wore matching Shelton jerseys and waved homemade signs — wanted her attention. Not long before New York left the ice, Shelton finally locked in on them and flipped them a puck.

    She made their day. Less than an hour later, she made history.

    The Team Canada defender from Ingersoll, Ont., scored the first-ever PWHL goal less than 11 minutes into the game. The puck and her stick are headed for the Hockey Hall of Fame.

    “We’ve come a long way as women’s players and we’re very excited to be a part of that historical moment,” Shelton said after the game.

    “I hope that young girls look up and go, ‘I want to do that one day and be just like her and play in this league.’”

    New York ultimately won the game 4-0 — starting goalie Corinne Schroeder’s stick is Hall of Fame-bound, too. The game, between two teams featuring the best players in the world, was a long time coming. The league itself came together in a six-month sprint — a whirlwind of logistics, decision-making and, occasionally, compromises.

    How do you build a pro sports league in just half a year? The Athletic talked to the people behind the scenes — from the league-builders to the players and staff — to find out.


    Kendall Coyne Schofield gave birth to her son on July 1. If he’d been born any sooner, the landscape of women’s professional hockey might look much different than it does today.

    “If Drew came earlier I don’t know if we’d be here,” Brianne Jenner said with a laugh. “She was that integral.”

    Instead, Coyne Schofield had her son the day before the PWHL and the players’ union ratified a landmark collective bargaining agreement on July 2 — a document that Coyne Schofield “was an engine” behind, according to Jenner, and spent her second and third trimesters negotiating.

    There were definitely late nights, early mornings, constant emails, constant phone calls,” Coyne Schofield said. “Every sentence, every word, every letter was so important to all of us.”

    The players’ union was officially formed in February 2023, months before Mark and Kimbra Walter purchased the PHF, the league ceased operations, and a new women’s pro hockey league was announced in its place. CBA negotiations began shortly after between future league leadership — including Stan Kasten, Billie Jean King and Ilana Kloss — and a player-led bargaining committee that included Coyne Schofield, Jenner, Hilary Knight, Sarah Nurse and Liz Knox.

    GO DEEPER

    Will a new women’s hockey league succeed where others have failed?

    According to Kasten, it was Mark Walter, billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers and PWHL owner, who really wanted the players to organize and have a collective bargaining agreement “so that the problems we’re trying to fix are memorialized.” Starting with a CBA — which had never been done in a major women’s professional sports league — was part of the players’ long-term vision for the league, too.

    “So often what we’ve seen in other professional women’s sports leagues is they start off with a league and they’re told, ‘These are the conditions in which you’re going to participate and you don’t have another option, and be grateful for what you have and go play,’” Coyne Schofield said. “We didn’t want to be like that. We wanted to start with our voices at the table and work to build this together.”


    Monday afternoon’s game at Mattamy Athletic Centre was a sellout. (Mark Blinch / Getty Images)

    And while the process was highly collaborative, it still took around six months to finalize, given they were drafting a document from scratch. Some weeks, the two sides breezed through multiple items. Other times, the process would stall. There were some contentious moments, of course, but also funny ones. Coyne Schofield recalled that when players asked for meals to be provided after games and training, they were met with surprise.

    “They were like, yeah, obviously, you have to eat,” she said, laughing. “But that hadn’t been obvious to date.”

    The eight-year CBA is over 40 pages, with 30 articles covering everything from player salaries and player-related expenses; benefits; player movement; travel; and safety and working conditions. Specific items covered in the document range from league-minimum salaries to meals, hotel accommodations, per diem, housing, relocation expenses, health insurance, pregnancy benefits, parental leave, a 401(k) program, nursing accommodations and more.

    “If we weren’t working with people on the other side that had the best intentions for this league and for these players, the CBA wouldn’t look how it looks,” said Coyne Schofield.


    League leaders gave themselves roughly six months.

    The announcement of the PHF acquisition and the Walters’ plans for a new women’s league came on June 30. While they had considered a potential league start in 2024-25, PWHL leaders ultimately decided on a January 2024 puck drop — even though launching a single expansion franchise in professional sports usually takes two to three years from conception to play.

    “We owed it to the athletes to get on the ice and to have a league,” said Royce Cohen, who leads business strategy for the Dodgers and was tapped to help with the PWHL“And we felt confident that we were going to be able to deliver an improved product.”

    The work truly began on July 1, 2023, though Cohen says they did some league-building during the CBA and acquisition talks — examining markets and venues and discussing a marketing strategy.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    PWHL season previews: How do the teams stack up heading into the first season?

    The first item on the to-do list was to finalize the original six markets. Discussions had begun in May, and the league spent time looking at everything from population figures to youth hockey participation, women’s hockey history and existing infrastructure across 20 potential markets. Facilities were a major part of the process, as the league had certain standards of professionalism — and availability — it needed to meet.

    A women’s pro hockey arena shouldn’t be too big to fill, but it also shouldn’t be so small as to put a ceiling on ticket revenue. You need adequate locker rooms for players. Training facilities. Prime ice-time windows — gone are the days of 10 p.m. practices. Venues, whether training or game facilities, need to be “appropriate for professional/international hockey,” according to the CBA.

    Eventually, the league landed on Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, Minnesota, Boston and New York. That wasn’t the original “original six,” either. According to multiple PWHL sources, the league looked at Pittsburgh, Washington, D.C., and London, Ont., among others.

    The original six markets were announced in August. Venues weren’t announced until three months later. The delay, Cohen said, was due to signing agreements with the venues — not choosing them. Once the markets were finalized, the league hired six general managers, who then hired their own coaches and team staff. The league also built out its business staff. Some were hired from the PHF or PWHPA. Others came from places like the WNBA, MLB and other professional sports leagues.

    The league put together the plan for the Sept. 18 draft in just three weeks, starting at the end of August. The inaugural schedule was released on Nov. 30, barely one month before the start of the season.

    There have been some hiccups, of course. The league’s merchandise was criticized for its high price point and lack of inclusive sizing. All six teams are starting the season without team nicknames or logos. Instead, teams will play with their market names printed diagonally across their jerseys. According to Amy Scheer, the PWHL’s senior vice president of business operations, team branding was too important to fit into the league’s tight schedule.

    “There are decisions you can make that are fast and if you make an error in your judgment on that decision, it’s easy to walk back, or you can learn from it and move on,” said Scheer, who assumed her role on Oct. 31. “From the team name perspective, it was just better off slowing the process down.”

    “(When) you challenge yourself to do something in six months, you really find out what is necessary versus ‘nice to have,’” added Cohen. “We anticipate that people expect a more traditional sort of nickname and mascot and all that fun stuff, which we have been and we will continue to work on prioritizing where it goes in the list of things to do.”


    PWHL general managers had just over three months to build their teams — through free agency, the draft and two waiver periods. For Danielle Marmer, the first order of business was convincing Hilary Knight to sign with Boston.

    The GM and future Hockey Hall of Fame forward had conversations when PWHL free agency officially opened on Sept. 1. Marmer, she said, could tell Knight wanted to be in Boston, but Marmer needed to sell her on the environment that she, as the first general manager of the Boston franchise, was going to create.

    So, Marmer painted a picture of the sports town Knight spent five years in at the start of her professional career — and of why it would be the perfect place in which to, eventually, finish it off.

    “If you want to be an elite athlete, you want to do it in Boston,” she told Knight. “The superstars in Boston are the athletes and this is a market that is exciting to be in.

    “Think about your legacy and where you are in your career right now,” she added. “Where do you want to finish it out?”


    Billie Jean King and Jayna Hefford took part in the ceremonial puck drop at the first-ever PWHL game on Monday in Toronto. (Mark Blinch / Getty Images)

    Knight signed a three-year deal with Boston, along with defender Megan Keller and goalie Aerin Frankel. Initially, Marmer didn’t think she would sign a goalie as one of her first three free-agent contracts. And in the days leading up to free agency, the scuttlebutt was that if any goalies were signed it would likely be Ann-Renée Desbiens — and only Desbiens. With so much talent at the position, the thought was that teams would simply wait for the draft.

    That was Marmer’s thought until she did more digging. Even though the top goalies in the sport are all excellent, there was, of course, still a ranking within them. Marmer, after spending last season working for the Boston Bruins who have two elite goalies in Linus Ullmark and Jeremy Swayman, didn’t want to be outside the top tier at a critical position. Waiting until the draft was too much of a risk.

    “I wanted to make sure I had a lock in each position,” she said. “I was very excited with what I got to start with.”

    The question after free agency was how to build around those foundational pieces through the 15-round draft on Sept. 18.

    The plan was to balance the best available players with positional need and to ensure the team wasn’t getting caught up in positional runs. For example, if there was a run on defenders, they would get in only if the right player was still on the board. If there was a drop-off to the next tier of players, the team would take advantage of the focus on defense and grab a top forward.

    “If you’re just following each run, you’re never going to head,” she said. “So it was like, let’s take what they give us, let’s be totally prepared, and totally flexible.”

    Boston’s draft began with the easy selection of Swiss star Alina Müller as the No. 3 pick. It was no secret that Minnesota was going to take Taylor Heise at No. 1 but Toronto taking Jocelyne Larocque at No. 2 was the best-case scenario for Marmer, she said.

    Marmer got in on the run on defenders in the second round, selecting Sophie Jaques, the offensive right-shot defender from Ohio State University. One of the team’s biggest debates came in the third round. There, Marmer hoped to get one of Hannah Brandt or Loren Gabel. When Jamie Lee Rattray was still on the board — they believed she’d be taken by Ottawa by then — Marmer swerved to take the Canadian Swiss army knife forward, at the behest of coach Courtney Kessel.

    “We thought when we picked Rattray that we were going to miss out on Gabel and Brandt,” Marmer said.

    Boston ended up with all three, along with other stellar picks like Theresa Schafzahl (Round 7), Taylor Girard (Round 9), Emma Söderberg (Round 10), Sophie Shirley (Round 11) and Shiann Darkangelo (Round 12).

    That draft class is a big reason why Boston has widely been viewed as the team to beat this season. They are deep, with a ton of top talent at every position and a GM with a vision for not just her team on the ice, but the environment she’s hoping to create off it. Marmer signed all of her draft picks heading into training camp and didn’t invite too many players to camp. She felt comfortable with the work they did in the draft and wanted players to feel confident and settled heading into the season. And she wanted the focus of training camp to be on preparing for the season — not as much about tryouts.

    “The team that comes together the quickest is going to be the most successful this season,” she said. “The decision to sign them was to show them we believe in them. Have players figure out what kind of apartment they can go look for, how much they’re making, make sure they’re not in the middle of training camp and trying to build their Ikea bed.”


    For many PWHL players, the start of the league required major changes.

    Some, like Toronto captain Blayre Turnbull, moved across the country. Ottawa’s Akane Shiga made the move from Japan to play in Canada’s capital city.

    For Kali Flanagan, joining the PWHL came with an unexpected departure.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    McIndoe: How to choose a bandwagon for the PWHL’s original six teams

    Flanagan, 28, had spent her entire hockey career in Boston, moving up the youth hockey ranks to a stellar career at Boston College and a defender of the year award while playing for the PHF’s Boston Pride in 2023. So it came as a bit of a surprise when Toronto stepped up in the sixth round of the PWHL Draft to select her.

    “My initial reaction was, ‘Oh my God, a new adventure,’” Flanagan said“I couldn’t have been more excited.”

    In October, Flanagan signed a two-year contract with Toronto — which wasn’t announced until Nov. 10 by the league — moved out of her shared apartment with his sister, Kristine, and started apartment hunting in a new city — and country — for the first time.


    Ella Shelton scored the first-ever PWHL goal — and the puck and her stick are now headed for the Hockey Hall of Fame. (John E. Sokolowski / USA Today)

    Her new Toronto teammates were a big help, she said, pointing her in the direction of good neighborhoods and recommending spots to eat. Renata Fast, one of Toronto’s foundational free-agent signings, helped connect Flanagan — and other teammates — to a realtor who was a “huge” help.

    Michael Ouzas, who played professional hockey with Fast’s husband, viewed apartments for Flanagan while she was still in Boston and FaceTimed her to show her the spaces. With his help, she found a spot quickly and moved in November, two weeks before the start of training camp, and “spent a lot of time building Ikea furniture.”

    The timing allowed Flanagan to find a home and get settled, versus living in a hotel while trying to earn a spot on the roster. That was by design from Kingsbury, who wanted the athletes they knew would be on Toronto’s first roster to have peace of mind and a level of comfort in a new place before the start of training camp.

    “It definitely helped,” Flanagan said. “I just think this team and staff and the environment that they’ve created for us so far has been amazing. It feels like a really special atmosphere.”

    On Monday afternoon, fans got their first glimpse of a league that was built quickly, but with the goal of longevity.

    The puzzle pieces have been put together. Now it’s time to see what the PWHL can really be.

    —With files from Sean Gentille

    To get more stories like this delivered to your feed, follow our women’s hockey coverage.

    (Illustration: Eamonn Dalton / The Athletic. Photos of Stan Kasten, Hilary Knight and Kendall Coyne Schofield: Jayne Kamin-Oncea, Justin Berl, Chase Agnello-Dean / NHLI via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • How to fix tennis

    How to fix tennis

    [ad_1]

    Tennis is doing what it does every 10-15 years or so — having a reckoning with its endless schedule, its nonsensical governing structure, and a competitive format that even devout fans struggle to understand.

    The sport is played across the world, with countries on every continent except Antarctica producing top players. No major sport integrates men and women more successfully, or has come as close to pay equality, though there is work to be done on those fronts. Nearly every day of the year, an enticing professional match unfolds somewhere on the planet.

    And yet, the nearly unanimous opinion of everyone involved in the game — its leaders, its players, tournament organizers, sponsors, media executives, coaches — is that professional tennis is broken, a structural mess that exhausts its players, cannibalizes its business with dueling events and exists in a constant state of civil war among its alphabet soup of governing bodies. There are seven of them, or maybe nine or 10, depending on who is doing the counting.

    “Such an amazing sport and so screwed up,” said Pam Shriver, the former star player who is now a commentator and a coach.


    Marketa Vondrousova celebrates winning Wimbledon (Glyn Kirk/AFP via Getty Images)

    “I can’t even get quoted about it anymore without using bad language,” said another former player who has been involved in tennis for decades. She was right. She couldn’t.

    Phil de Picciotto, the chief executive and founder of Octagon, the sports marketing firm with deep roots in professional tennis, has been in conference rooms filled with leaders of the sport trying to fix it on and off for more than 30 years. What often happens, he said, is that everyone gravitates toward one of two opposite poles.

    At one end are those who favor developing the most players, which requires giving as many people as possible an opportunity to progress with tournaments all the time all over the world. At the other end is the Grand Slams – singular events that target the elite of the elite and attract the most casual of sports fans.

    “Both are really important,” de Picciotto said. “People can adopt both of those bookends and they do. The battleground becomes everything in between.”

    As the 2024 tennis season gets underway in Australia, what might make this reckoning different from all the previous reckonings is the near unanimity on what tennis needs to fix itself. Ask nearly anyone involved in nearly any facet of the sport how to fix it, which we did, and the same answer almost always comes back: a clearly defined, premium tennis tour built around the game’s most valuable legacy events and its best players that is easy to follow, includes both men and women and doesn’t overtax stars.

    Even those who have to be against that commonly prescribed solution because there is a chance it might harm their investments — namely the owners of small and mid-sized tournaments — essentially agree this is what tennis needs. They are sports executives and they understand that nearly every other successful sport uses some version of that same formula.

    No one knows exactly how to manage all the details. What jobs and events to eliminate. How to unwind all the conflicting contracts. The algorithm to divvy up the loot from a combined premium tour so that the lesser competitions that are essential for the sport’s development don’t become extinct remains a work in progress — and probably always will be.


    Djokovic now plays fewer tournaments (Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)

    Tennis has tried to create versions of this before, only to have the plans fall apart due to battles over territory, power and money. This time, veterans of the sport say, it feels different, a result of both desire and necessity, as leaders face a combination of internal and external pressure to change or be changed.

    Fixing everything in tennis in one fell swoop may be beyond anyone’s reach, but smart, experienced people like John Morris, who represents several top players for his company, 72 Sports Group, and is a longtime tennis executive, say establishing a premier tour would represent a significant start.

    “If this can happen,” Morris said, “a lot of the things that need to be corrected can be corrected.”


    How we got here

    The tennis world comes together each year at Wimbledon, the oldest and most prestigious tournament in the sport.

    As the tennis unfolds on the grass courts, the sport’s movers and shakers, including leaders of the tours, the four Grand Slams, the International Tennis Federation, and scores of media executives, agents and corporate leaders, cut deals over glasses of Champagne and catered lunches, cocktail hours and dinners inside the corporate suites at the All England Lawn Tennis Club and the stately homes on the hilly streets nearby.

    This is where, in early July, word began to circulate that Andrea Gaudenzi, the former player who is the chairman of the men’s circuit, the ATP Tour, was on the verge of a big one. Gaudenzi was closing in on a deal with Saudi Arabia to deliver a top tournament to the kingdom as soon as January 2025.

    Saudi Arabia had upended golf the previous year by launching a rival tour. Gaudenzi wanted to do everything in his power to prevent that from happening in tennis.

    Inviting the Saudis into the clubby upper echelon of the game by allowing them to launch a major new event seemed like the best strategy. A top Saudi event at the start of the year would likely doom the series of small and mid-sized tournaments in Australia and New Zealand during those weeks, but they weren’t Gaudenzi’s priority. Placating the Saudis was.


    Tournaments like Madrid, where Sabalenka won this year, would be part of a premier tour (Julian Finney/Getty Images)

    Then word of the deal made its way to Craig Tiley, the leader of Tennis Australia. Tiley and Tennis Australia’s other leaders were staying in a handsome brick home on a quiet block between the All England Club and Wimbledon Village. From his perch a few streets from the tournament, Tiley, a South African who played professionally before becoming a top college coach in the U.S. and evolving into a leading tennis executive, swung into action.

    If Gaudenzi was going to treat key events of Tennis Australia’s annual “summer of tennis” as collateral damage, Tiley, who declined to be interviewed for this story, was going right back at him.

    Long recognized as among the most innovative minds in tennis, Tiley began working the phones and the power centers at Wimbledon to get the leaders of the other three Grand Slams to support his effort to cleave the top tournaments from men’s and women’s tours, known as the “Masters” and “1,000s” to launch the premium tennis circuit that so many in the game craved.

    Through the summer and fall, Tiley’s push for a tennis tour that resembled Formula One continued to gain momentum, especially within the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), the nascent players group that Novak Djokovic co-founded three years ago. A formal proposal is expected in the coming weeks.


    Why now is different

    “We are closer than we ever have been,” said one longtime industry executive involved with the discussions, both this year and in the past. Like several others, he requested anonymity because he was not authorized to reveal details of internal discussions.

    He then explained why he was optimistic that change was on the way.

    “You have external forces in the form of Saudi Arabia and the PTPA that you didn’t have before.”

    Let’s unpack that.

    LIV Golf changed everything.

    When Saudi Arabia launched its quest last year to upend professional golf by paying top players hundreds of millions of dollars to compete on a new rival tour, leaders of the organizations that have controlled professional tennis for the last half-century knew their supremacy could soon be under threat.

    Tennis players receive roughly a quarter of the sport’s revenues, compared with about 50 per cent in major team sports. It would not take much for a deep-pocketed investor to offer the best ones a higher-paying, less demanding alternative.


    Buenos Aires, where Alcaraz won, could end up outside the top tour (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)

    Also, during the past three years, the PTPA has grown into something the sport has never had — a viable and well-financed independent platform for players to attack the status quo.

    The men’s and women’s tours, the WTA and the ATP, have largely treated the PTPA as an outside agitator. In October, Steve Simon, the chief executive of the WTA Tour, refused to allow a PTPA representative to take part in a meeting between him and the top 20 players, more than half of whom are members of the PTPA.

    The Grand Slams took another tack, using the PTPA to work with players to try to meet their workplace needs. That has helped establish a respectful management-labor dynamic and a level of trust in the Grand Slams as they work to change the competitive structure of the sport.

    “A players association is here now and they understand that as something that needs to be accepted,” Vasek Pospisil, a veteran player from Canada and a founding member of the PTPA, said of the Grand Slams. “They want the players to have a seat at the table.”

    It also helps that the Grand Slams share more money with the players than the regular tour events.

    Finally, the Grand Slams learned in 2022 that they don’t need the tours. The tours withheld rankings points from Wimbledon last year when the All England Club and the Lawn Tennis Association, which oversees tennis in Great Britain, refused to allow players from Belarus and Russia to participate as a punishment for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    The rest of the players came anyway. Stadiums were packed. Television ratings remained sky-high. No one really cared whether players received ranking points.


    What would tennis look like under the new framework?

    The details are still being worked out, but the broad outline is built around a premier tour for top-level players — say, roughly the top 100.

    They would play at least the 14 biggest tournaments on the schedule: the Grand Slams, the 10-12 biggest and most successful tour events, and the two tour finals. They could drop down and play a few smaller tournaments, but anything that happens in those tournaments is separate from the main tour.

    The premier events would include Wimbledon, the U.S., Australian and French Opens; mixed events in Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, Rome, Toronto/Montreal, and Cincinnati; men’s tournaments in Monte Carlo, Paris and Shanghai; Women’s events in Dubai, Doha and Beijing. Other top candidates for inclusion would include events in Washington D.C., Tokyo, and possibly the men’s event in Beijing, since they are world capitals.

    All the other events would be part of a developmental tour, with players outside the top 100 competing to make the premier tour. Higher-ranked players who need matches or want to collect an appearance fee could play in a few of those events each year, but the results would not count toward the premier tour standings and rankings.


    A Saudi masters would put tournaments such as Auckland under threat (Michael Bradley/AFP via Getty Images)

    The tour would be managed by a board with representatives of the Grand Slams, the other big tournaments, and representatives of the ATP and the WTA. The players would sit on the labor side of the negotiating table and collectively bargain for their share of the revenues as they do in other successful sports.

    It’s unclear how the International Tennis Federation, which controls international team competitions like the Davis Cup, the Billie Jean King Cup and the Olympic tournaments, would fit into this structure, if at all. That said, the ITF is reexamining the format of its competitions right now and needs to get its own house in order first.


    Why does a premier tour have so much support?

    Everyone in tennis believes the season is too long and disparate. It is.

    It lasts 11 months and is impossible to manage, with the seven different governing bodies constantly fighting with one another about the schedule. It is also too complicated for lay fans to keep track of.

    “It’s like having a calendar with seven different discussions in seven different rooms,” Gaudenzi said in November during a meeting with a small group of journalists in Italy. “I’m trying to convince everybody we’re managing one product. We’re all part of the same book. We might write different chapters, but we’re part of the same book and we can’t sell different chapters in different bookstores.”

    Selling just one “book”, to use Gaudenzi’s metaphor, would make the sport simpler to follow and likely drive up the price for media rights and sponsorships. Right now, tournaments and the different governing bodies compete with one another. That drives down prices since buyers can play one off against the other. Bundling a collection of premier tournaments, selling them together and partnering with networks dedicated to exploiting all the content the sport produces instead of just the final rounds would likely drive up investment substantially.

    That would be a boon to organizers of the top tournaments and to players. They want to play less, earn more money and eliminate any incentive to play every week.

    “Right now the system is structured so that if I don’t play every week I can’t get to the ranking I need,” Pospisil said. “To go up the rankings, you’ve got to play non-stop.”

    Raemon Sluiter, a veteran coach, said the birth of Elina Svitolina’s first child last year gave the star from Ukraine an advantage — before she returned, she finally had the opportunity to practice for more than two months straight, far longer than the usual gruelling schedule permits. Top tennis players generally enjoy an off-season that lasts about two weeks, which isn’t enough time to make any significant changes. A slimmed-down tour could make a big difference.


    The winners

    “It is very good to be a 1,000 event right now,” said a top executive at a company that owns one.

    Indeed, the biggest tournaments in tennis outside the Grand Slams are the belles of the ball at the moment. Tiley and the Grand Slams want them for their premier tour. The ATP and the WTA want to maintain their associations with these historic tour stops, such as Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid and Rome, so they aren’t relegated to operating the tennis minor leagues.

    Also, consider a tennis investor like Ben Navarro, who recently purchased the Cincinnati Masters for roughly $300million. If Cincinnati lands a spot on the premier tour, his event is now a part of the same circuit and business operation as Wimbledon rather than, say, Delray Beach. Not bad.

    The same goes for CVC Capital Partners, the private equity firm that bought a 20 per cent stake in the WTA Tour in 2023 for $150million. If the WTA can negotiate an ownership stake and a seat on the board in the premier tour, CVC is now in business with the biggest events in the sport.


    The losers — but perhaps not so much

    The small and medium-sized tournaments, competitions in places like Dallas, Basel, and Buenos Aires, are going to have a hard time swallowing the prospect of relegation to the minor leagues. They have spent millions of dollars on license agreements to be a part of the ATP and the WTA. Also, there is a question of whether narrowing the scope of big-time tennis to a premier tour is good for the long-term health of the professional game.

    “The big difference between tennis and nearly every other sport is that tennis events are tied to participation,” said the owner of a mid-sized tournament. “F1 is a spectacle. You can’t grow a global participation sport with 14 tournaments around the world.”

    That line of thinking, however, relies on the premise that interest will automatically diminish in the small and mid-sized tournaments with the advent of a premier tour, rather than understanding the appeal of a cohesive system built around promotion and relegation.

    “There isn’t really a tour right now,” said John Morris, the industry veteran at the helm of 72 Sports. “It’s a circus made up of individual promoters and I say that with all due respect.”

    Morris said the small- and mid-sized tournaments might be more appealing than they are now if the sport organized them into regional circuits, with players competing to make the premier tour for the following season and coveted spots throughout the season in the Grand Slams and other top events.

    In other words, whoever wins in Estoril, Portugal, Charleston, S.C. or Auckland could have new import, in addition to the limited star attractions they now enjoy. Play well for six weeks on lower-tier tours and receive a wild card entry into, say, the French Open.

    Most importantly, Morris said, players outside the top 100 wouldn’t go broke funding their travel around the world since they would largely play within their regions on a circuit with far more cohesion and perhaps even a minimum salary. Prize money would not necessarily have to rise all that much because the costs for players would fall.

    “Finding a one-size-fits-all solution that fixes everything all at once is difficult,” Pospisil said. “As for lower-tier tournaments, I don’t think it would be worse. Maybe this results in a much bigger place for them.”

    (Top photo: Getty Images; design: Sean Reilly)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Highlighting the NFL's best touchdown celebrations of the 2023 season

    Highlighting the NFL's best touchdown celebrations of the 2023 season

    [ad_1]

    Scoring touchdowns during each offensive possession is the unspoken goal for every NFL team. For decades, celebrations have been the norm in accompanying touchdowns. It goes back all the way to the 1960s with Homer Jones and his touchdown spike.

    Touchdown celebrations have become a choreographed production for some teams. Think back to the 1980s when Washington’s “Fun Bunch” made enemies after its group of players participated in a jumping high-five after a score. And think recently when the Seattle Seahawks did their best New Edition and *NSYNC impersonations, or when the Minnesota Vikings decided to play a game of Duck, Duck, Goose in the end zone.

    GO DEEPER

    The NFL’s most memorable TD celebrations: Deion Sanders’ high-step, the Ickey Shuffle, more

    The 2023 NFL season has had its share of memorable touchdown celebrations. Each team has had its moment. Some moments, however, have been bigger than others. The Athletic’s team of Jason Jones, Matt Barrows and Vic Tafur got together to reminisce over the season and discuss the best touchdown celebration for each team.


    AFC East

    Buffalo Bills

    “Stone Cold” Steve Austin would be proud of Stefon Diggs’ beer celebration during Week 4 as the Bills faced Miami.

    After scoring against the Dolphins, Diggs ran to the fans, grabbed a couple of beers and smashed them together. It was an act similar to what the legendary pro wrestler did in the WWE.


    Stefon Diggs celebrates in WWE “Stone Cold” Steve Austin fashion against the Miami Dolphins. (Timothy T Ludwig / Getty Images)

    Miami Dolphins

    The Dolphins could be the subject of a celebration piece by themselves. Tyreek Hill, Jaylen Waddle, Raheem Mostert and the crew have provided several memorable celebrations.

    During a Week 6 game against Carolina, Hill’s 41-yard touchdown reception, coupled with the use of a photographer’s phone, resulted in a backflip, as well as a unique selfie. It also ended up with the photographer being disciplined.

    New England Patriots

    The Patriots haven’t had a lot of opportunities to celebrate on offense this season. After one of their biggest touchdowns of 2023 — Mike Gesicki’s game-winning touchdown catch late to beat Buffalo in Week 7 — multiple players did the Griddy.

    While some executed the dance, others still are unsure exactly what Mac Jones was doing. On top of that, former Patriot Rob Gronkowski, a fun-loving player in his day, criticized the team for being so happy about a regular-season win.

    New York Jets

    The end zone and the Jets haven’t been acquainted most of the season, but their most dramatic touchdown celebration might have come Week 1 against Buffalo.

    Xavier Gipson used a 65-yard punt return to beat the Bills in overtime. He was mobbed by teammates and overcome with emotion for the win on the same night Aaron Rodgers left the game with an Achilles injury.

    AFC West

    Denver Broncos

    This team does a lot of ball spinning and chest bumping. Two years ago, Jerry Jeudy was even fined for his bow-and-arrow celebration against Washington and thought about doing it again but had second thoughts in a game against Dallas.

    Now, he just rides his horse around every time he scores.

    Kansas City Chiefs

    There hasn’t been a potato sack race like the one in 2017 or anything that cool this season. And no, we aren’t picking Taylor Swift’s touchdown dance with Patrick Mahomes’ wife, Brittany, from the Week 7 win over the Chargers.

    Jerick McKinnon got a lift in after a touchdown during Week 14 against Buffalo. The bench-press celebration capped what was McKinnon’s first rushing touchdown of the season.

    Las Vegas Raiders

    It took the Christmas spirit — or, maybe, the Grinch spirit — to overtake the Raiders after a season of boring touchdown celebrations. Jack Jones picked off Patrick Mahomes on Christmas morning, and after staring down the Kansas City quarterback while running in for a touchdown, he offered the ball to a young Chiefs fan in the front row of the stands. When the excited fan reached for the ball, Jones pulled it back and merrily scampered off.

    Los Angeles Chargers

    There haven’t been a lot of reasons to choreograph for a Chargers team sitting at the bottom of the AFC West. Gerald Everett, however, did find a time to do his best Ray Lewis impersonation during Week 12 — against Baltimore, of all teams.

    Austin Ekeler actually celebrated a first down with his team trailing Las Vegas by 42 points. But that doesn’t count.

    AFC North

    Baltimore Ravens

    The Ravens do a lot because they’re actually throwing talented receivers the ball this season.

    There was Odell Beckham Jr.’s Michael Jackson tribute, but top honors should go to Zay Flowers — who did two in one game. We didn’t hate the bouquet throw, but we definitely liked the penalty kick more.

    Cincinnati Bengals

    Joe Mixon proved that there are some Dillon Brooks fans out there.

    Against Jacksonville in Week 13, Mixon scored on a 6-yard run to tie the game 7-7. That score — and Mixon’s dance, made popular by Brooks, the Houston Rockets small forward brought with him from his time with the Memphis Grizzlies — was important, as the Bengals needed overtime to beat the Jaguars 34-31.

    Cleveland Browns

    It’s always fun when the big fellas up front get to celebrate. It’s even better when a player comes home to celebrate.

    Browns offensive tackle Dawand Jones sustained a season-ending knee injury early in December, but during an October road matchup against the Indianapolis Colts, Jones had the chance to deliver his own celebration after a Kareem Hunt touchdown run. Jones, who attended Ben Davis High School in Indianapolis, was handed the ball, and the 6-foot-8, 374-pound lineman gave the Lucas Oil Stadium crowd a show with a spike and a dance.

    Pittsburgh Steelers

    It’s been a tough year for the Steelers wide receivers. And yet, they’re the ones on the team going out of their way to celebrate touchdowns.

    We have to give George Pickens some love for his Week 2 performance against the Browns. Pickens took a pass from Kenny Pickett and raced 71 yards for a touchdown. He then celebrated with the Acrisure Stadium crowd by taking a victory lap.

    AFC South

    Houston Texans

    C.J. Stroud was more than three months from being born when the film “Baby Boy” was released. Clearly someone had him watch the movie as he acted out one of the best scenes when Jody (played by Tyrese Gibson) and his friend Sweet Pea (Omar Gooding) tried to find out who stole Jody’s bicycle.

    Stroud lined up his teammates and pretended to punch George Fant, who fell out as part of the revenge scene reenactment.

    Indianapolis Colts

    Fans were denied seeing what Colts tight end Kylen Granson would have done to celebrate his first career touchdown during Week 2, as his 4-yard, second-quarter catch needed an official review before being ruled a score.

    But because Gardner Minshew dancing or Zack Moss dunking aren’t exactly unique reactions, Granson gets the nod for thinking outside of the box. He took to Instagram to celebrate his first score, treating the football like a newborn child for a photo shoot.

    Jacksonville Jaguars

    Christian Kirk gets props for pretending to be an Amazon delivery man in Week 7. But during Week 4, the defense got to have fun with the celebration.

    After cornerback Darious Williams’ pick six against Atlanta, the defense reenacted the movie “Toy Story.” The defenders were the toys who were active but fell to the ground once Andy (Williams) walked into the room. Wide receiver Zay Jones said the celebration was his idea.

    Tennessee Titans

    With all respect to the Titans’ touchdowns this year, the team’s best celebration of the season wasn’t even after a score.

    It happened in a Week 4 game after the Titans defense forced a turnover against Cincinnati. The defense had a sack fumble and a recovery, then lined up for its version of a drumline — similar to a scene from the film “Drumline,” starring Nick Cannon.

    NFC East

    Dallas Cowboys

    Let’s be clear: Salvation Army kettles are for coins and bills, not food items. But we’re fans of the Cowboys’ move to stash a few turkey legs in one of the oversized end zone kettles late in a Thanksgiving romp over the Washington Commanders.

    After Dak Prescott hooked up with KaVontae Turpin on a 34-yard touchdown, Turpin hopped into one of the kettles to retrieve the prizes. Then he, Prescott and Jake Ferguson got a head start on their Thanksgiving meals.

    New York Giants

    No one is quite sure what you call it — maybe not even Tommy DeVito — but the Giants quarterback has MetLife Stadium, Northern New Jersey and the entire tri-state area doing his touchdown celebration.

    DeVito started his old-school hand gesture — pinching his fingers together and shaking the wrist — in Week 11, and it’s caught fire since. “I kind of thought it was just the old Italians,” DeVito said. “When they talk, they start doing (the hand gesture). It’s just a little credit to them.” Could there be a more perfect gesture for the DeVito-led G-men?

    Philadelphia Eagles

    A.J. Brown and DeVonta Smith are taking their talents to South Philly. That was the message after Brown scored a 4-yard touchdown against the Cowboys in Week 9. The two receivers took on the roles of former Miami Heat teammates Dwyane Wade and LeBron James with Smith tossing the ball in the air for the bigger Brown to slam.


    A.J. Brown celebrates with a post-touchdown dunk with DeVonta Smith (6) against the Dallas Cowboys. (Mitchell Leff / Getty Images)

    Note: No crossbars were harmed in the making of this celebration. Brown stopped short of doing a LeBron-like dunk over the bar, an act that was banned in 2014.

    Washington Commanders

    After running back Brian Robinson scored a 15-yard touchdown in Week 4 against Philadelphia, he hopped to his feet and flapped his arms in wobbly fashion, a dig at Philly’s “Fly Eagles Fly” chant.

    Or maybe it was a comment on the Eagles’ rickety defense, which had eight missed tackles that day — including one on Robinson’s touchdown run.

    NFC West

    Arizona Cardinals

    You’d expect a guy nicknamed “Hollywood” to be a bit of a showman. Marquise Brown didn’t disappoint after catching a 25-yard touchdown pass from Josh Dobbs against the Bengals in Week 5.

    After the score, he leaped into the first row of seats and celebrated with fans.

    Los Angeles Rams

    It might not win an Oscar for Most Original Score, but there seemed to be something behind Puka Nacua’s and Cooper Kupp’s leaping chest bump following Nacua’s 70-yard touchdown against the Browns in Week 13.

    It was very similar to the celebrations Kupp used to have with a former teammate — current Houston Texan receiver Robert Woods. Nacua happens to wear the same No. 17 Woods once had in L.A., and the celebration was tantamount to a proclamation that there’s a new receiver duo in town.

    San Francisco 49ers

    Christian McCaffrey was in the midst of what would become a 17-game scoring streak when he took a shovel pass into the end zone from 13 yards out in Week 6 against Cleveland, then spun the ball in the corner of the end zone. The 49ers tailback was on such a hot streak that George Kittle bent over at the waist and pretended to warm his hands over the spinning football.

    Kittle also retrieved the ball, something he usually does after anyone scores, though he said at some point he stopped doing it for McCaffrey. “He scores way too much,” Kittle said.

    Seattle Seahawks

    Maybe there are better trash talkers in the NFL, but no one is a better trash signer than DK Metcalf.

    The Seahawks wideout, who is learning American Sign Language, dissed longtime rival Ahkello Witherspoon by signing “44 is my son” following a Week 11 touchdown against the Rams. After a 31-yard score against the 49ers, he signed, “I’m a dog: w-o-o-f,” which are lyrics from a 2016 Migos song.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    ‘He has the swag with it’: DK Metcalf’s sign language a ‘hot topic’ in Deaf community

    NFC North

    Chicago Bears

    The Bears have had their share of fun this season. Jaylon Johnson brought back Randy Moss’ controversial fake mooning against Moss’ old team, Minnesota, in Week 12. D’Onta Foreman and Khari Blasingame re-enacted a viral video from a slapboxing match during a win over the Raiders.

    But their best celebration came from tight end Cole Kmet during Week 4 against Denver. He scored a touchdown, and then had a fan in the end zone pretend to throw him a pitch, which Kmet hit for a home run that another fan tried to catch at the wall behind the end zone.

    Detroit Lions

    Amon-Ra St. Brown nearly brought a “Key & Peele” skit to life Week 1 with his hip thrust celebration. Detroit’s safe-for-work celebration of the season, however, came against the Raiders during Week 8 on Monday night.

    Running back Jahmyr Gibbs scored and took his leap into the stands to a new level. He actually got all the way into the stands and celebrated. He also had to be very careful climbing out the stands, as the wall was not a short climb like Green Bay’s Lambeau Field.

    Green Bay Packers

    The celebration that followed Malik Heath’s first-ever touchdown stands out because it was so spontaneous, so pure.

    After Heath made a late-game catch at the pylon against the Giants in Week 14, he crashed into down judge Tom Stephan, taking him to the ground. That led to a couple of uncertain seconds while Stephan got to his feet. The Packers trailed 21-16 at the time, and everyone was waiting on whether it was ruled a touchdown — including Heath, an undrafted rookie whose helmet was knocked off after crashing into the official.

    When Stephan finally signaled touchdown, Heath and the Packers went bonkers, and Heath ran the length of the end zone toward the Green Bay sideline.


    Malik Heath (18) scored his first NFL touchdown against the New York Giants on Dec. 11. (Jim McIsaac / Getty Images)

    Minnesota Vikings

    The Vikings might take first prize for their keg stand celebration that followed Mekhi Blackmon’s fumble recovery late in a Week 14 game against the Raiders. His teammates hoisted Blackmon upside down into the air, and defensive lineman Harrison Phillips even pantomimed pumping the keg.

    No, it technically wasn’t a touchdown celebration, but there were no touchdowns in that game. The score was 0-0 at the time, and Minnesota ultimately won 3-0, the lowest-scoring game since 2007.

    NFC South

    Atlanta Falcons

    Jonnu Smith ran a long way, 60 yards, for a touchdown in Week 9 against Minnesota. When the tight end finally got to the end zone and tried to stop, he slipped on his back.

    No worries, Smith played it off with his first-ever snow angel in Atlanta.

    Carolina Panthers

    The Panthers don’t score much, but when their No. 1 draft pick got his first touchdown, they … threw the ball in the stands?

    In Carolina’s season opener against Atlanta, quarterback Bryce Young threw a 4-yard touchdown pass to tight end Hayden Hurst, who hurled the ball toward the Mercedes-Benz Stadium crowd after scoring. Important note: The Panthers later got the ball back for Young.

    New Orleans Saints

    Is the best Saints celebration of the year a Jimmy Graham pump fake?

    We mentioned earlier the banning of the crossbar dunking celebration in 2014. Graham was the first person to get penalized for that back in August 2014, as the league fined him $30,000 for dunking twice in a preseason game against the Titans.

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers

    The Buccaneers don’t get points for originality, but if it’s not broke, don’t fix it.

    The Buccaneers broke out their annual row-the-boat celebration last month against the Titans. Ironically, the first time they did it was in 2018 — against their current quarterback, Baker Mayfield, when they stopped him at the 1-yard line to beat the Browns.


    This series is part of a partnership with Las Vegas.

    The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.

    (Top photos of DK Metcalf, Stefon Diggs and Tyreek Hill: Michael Owens, Peter Nicholls and Megan Briggs / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Golf with a purpose: How The Park dared to be different

    Golf with a purpose: How The Park dared to be different

    [ad_1]

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — It’s lunchtime on a mid-November Saturday afternoon and the word of the day is eclectic. I’ve just finished my morning round at The Park with a three-putt for par on the forgiving 18th hole, and I saddle up at the cabana, the bar/small bites stand strategically located at the front of the property.

    A foursome that was a few holes ahead of me is heading off to their vehicles — while allowing for their anonymity, let’s just say they can be members anywhere they want to be in the golf-rich West Palm Beach/Jupiter area. Making the turn to the back nine are the bros wanting to chase down their transfusions with High Noons. Though they represent very different ends of the Saturday golfer spectrum, you recognize both groups as what a golfer “looks” like.

    But the cabana occupies a prime spot on the property, and not just for its distance to No. 10 on the main course. Over at the start of the par-3 course (a collection of wedge-and-putt holes lit up at night) are three 20-somethings with a handful of clubs to share. And at the walk-on putting course, a few children share the green complex with another group of 20-somethings — three guys, three women and two putters.

    Oh, and that building behind the putting course? That’s The Path, where students from local schools — one of which is just on the other end of the driving range — come in the afternoon for free tutoring, academic enrichment and golf lessons. Everything here is ultimately to the benefit of the more than 60 kids from five local schools who come here at least a couple of days a week.

    When a group of local leaders took over a failed municipal course and raised $50 million for it — and recruited Gil Hanse, one of the leading working architects in the world, to build a new course in its place — they had designs well beyond a top-100 golf course.

    They wanted change, to use golf to help and to be a vehicle that would support the community surrounding the course, which is far from as affluent as the larger area.

    “We define success as saving two to three families,” Dave Andrews, director of The Path, says. “If we can just take three or four families and give them the world. We’ve had families that have come to us that are homeless and are battling things that we can never solve. But we’re helping.”


    If it’s easy to imagine a future when someone can say they came to The Park to putt and sip a cocktail with their friends, graduated to The Lit 9 and eventually made a tee time to play the big course, that’s because that’s the dream of many a golf industry professional. Recreational golf’s post-COVID-19 moment continues unabated, and the more pathways that exist to make that first 18-hole, par-72 round not so intimidating, the better. But it will not be everyone’s journey, and that’s just fine.

    “The par 3 gives you the enjoyment and intangibles of the game. That’s perfectly fine,” The Park general manager Brian Conley says. “Too many times setting those finish lines are the barriers.”

    But for those who do — and for those who are on the hunt for the next cool new course — The Park is a tremendous option. It stands out especially in this area, where so much golf is played with a housing development to the left and water to the right. There’s no water at all on the course designed by Hanse and partner Jim Wagner, who were attracted to the project by the community aspect of it. (The two waived their fee, The Fried Egg reported.)


    The Park’s wide fairways are forgiving, but if you miss left on No. 1, it’s trouble.

    Instead, what they created is a big ballpark, with generous fairways and enough waste management areas to keep your attention. The rolling topography is also distinctly un-Florida-like, and it’s used to great effect. The par-3 seventh plays slightly uphill to a reverse redan green. The dogleg par-4 12th features a blind shot into the green. The three-hole stretch from 15 to 17 is very scoreable with a par 5 the average player has a chance to reach in two, a driveable par 4 and a par 3 that features the kind of striking greenside bunkers fans of Hanse’s other work (including Streamsong Black, another Florida property) will recognize. But it remains challenging enough — a playing partner and I watched on-line tee shots on the 17th pushed 10 yards right of the green by a gust of wind.

    The Park is just a great golf course, and when you consider that it’s municipal — with a variable pricing model that makes it very reasonable for locals — the value is sensational.

    “If you play well, you’ll score well,” Conley says. “If you play bad, you’ll know you play bad but not be embarrassed.”

    You know they have something in that those who belong to the area’s many private clubs are still making the journey over, as well as the chance The Park will host a future iteration of “The Match,” the popular made-for-TV golf special.

    All from a piece of land a golf course closed in 2018 because it was losing too much money for the city.

    West Palm Beach was approached multiple times with different opportunities for what to do with the shuttered West Palm Beach Golf Course, all centered on the idea of a private company coming in, revitalizing the land and running it for the city.


    The Park has captured attention since its opening earlier this year.

    Seth Waugh, now the CEO of the PGA of America, and a group of residents had the vision — “Create a first-class facility with world-class resources and give the community of West Palm access to it while still being operated at a very high level,” Conley says — and then were able to secure the $50 million-plus in donations to make it a reality.

    The city bought in — it’s a 50-year, $1-a-year lease — and while Hanse and his team were going to work, so was Andrews. The Path, which is being supported by an endowment and any profits from the course, was a blank slate when he arrived, and Andrews spent months in the community, trying to figure out where the need was. Over time, it became clear.

    “The Path was created to be the most authentic, inviting and welcoming program to identify the next generation of leaders,” Andrews says. “We not only grow the game and introduce these kids to golf but also are pouring into them as a mentor and educationally tutoring them and helping them with homework.”

    There are 63 students from 50 families across five local schools who come into the center, which is staffed with paid teachers who provide academic help and enrichment with art and STEM classes. Being above the readiness tests is a priority for elementary school-aged kids, and high schoolers are looking at internship opportunities in the golf industry.

    There’s also golf — half of their time on the property each day is spent with a club in their hands. The aim is to introduce the sport as a fun activity and let any passion develop organically. Kids asking for a new glove or a club for Christmas count as wins.

    What’s next? They don’t know. Everything is still so new that it all seems possible, as long as they continue to get the foundation right. That’s a good place to be, and it’s because The Park was daring in its origin story.

    (Photos courtesy of The Park)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • MLB rule changes for 2024 include shorter pitch clock

    MLB rule changes for 2024 include shorter pitch clock

    [ad_1]

    A tighter, 18-second pitch clock with runners on base … a new, wider runner’s lane between home and first base … one fewer mound visit.

    All those rule changes are coming to Major League Baseball in 2024, as part of a series of tweaks and changes announced by MLB on Thursday. The Athletic initially reported on many of these proposals in early November from the general managers’ meetings. They were formally approved by the competition committee Thursday. The most notable changes are these:

    The pitch clock: With runners on base, pitchers will have 18 seconds between pitches, down from 20 this year. MLB proposed the change after seeing the average time of a nine-inning game grow by more than seven minutes, from 2 hours, 36 minutes in April to 2:44 in September.

    The runner’s lane: After years of complaints, MLB will widen the dirt area along the first-base line by 6 inches next season. Runners argued for years that the current runner’s lane forced them to zig-zag between fair and foul territory on their way to first base. This change is intended to allow runners to take a more direct route from home to first, without having to risk being called out for interference.

    Fewer mound visits: The number of mound visits will shrink from five per team, per game to four, although teams that have used their allotment will get one extra visit in the ninth inning, as in the past. Mound visits did increase slightly in 2023, because teams began using them as a way to avoid pitch-clock violations. But MLB says mound visits continue to rank, in surveys, among fans’ least popular events in a game. And teams used more than four visits in only about 2 percent of all games this year. One other subtle change: To help tighten the pace of games, catchers now will be allowed to call for a mound visit to avoid a clock violation but will not actually have to go through the formality of going to the mound.

    GO DEEPER

    Whole new ballgame: MLB’s new rules changed everything

    There were three other tweaks to pace-of-game rules:

    • MLB will shave 15 seconds off the time relievers have to warm up if they’re late leaving the bullpen after a mid-inning pitching change. They will now have two minutes to complete warming up, from the time they leave the bullpen, instead of the previous 2:15.
    • After a foul ball, the pitch clock will start when the pitcher has the ball and all fielders have made it back to their positions. The language in the previous rule required the clock to pause until the pitcher was back on the mound, which allowed pitchers to stall by taking their time in returning to the mound.
    • Also, any pitcher who warms up at the start of an inning now will be required to face at least one hitter. That change comes in response to an increase in the number of times in which a pitching change took place after a pitcher had warmed up before the start of an inning — mostly after the announcement of a pinch hitter. Now, the pitcher must remain in the game for at least one more hitter, even if the batting team has made a lineup switch. According to MLB, there were 24 occasions this season — plus two in the World Series — in which a pitcher warmed up between innings but departed without facing a hitter in that inning.

    Three other proposed changes will not be implemented (yet). After players voiced their objection, MLB withdrew a proposal that would have required the umpire to restart the pitch clock immediately after a batter called timeout. There are now no plans to move forward with that change, according to major-league sources familiar with those discussions.

    However, a proposed change that would tighten the language around fielders blocking bases is still under discussion — and could still be implemented for 2024.

    Also still being discussed is a rule that would require all pitchers to work from the stretch with any runner on base. Starters have objected to that proposal because they prefer to work from the windup with a runner on third. And relievers have concerns as more and more have adopted a “hybrid” delivery — part-windup, part-stretch — as a strategy to control the running game.

    The changes announced Thursday all will take effect next year, starting in spring training. MLB has projected that they could tighten the time of the average game by about five minutes. The changes follow more than a month and a half of discussion, in which MLB and the competition committee surveyed players, managers, coaches, front offices and owners on how each idea would affect the game.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    MLB Player Poll 2023: Their thoughts on new rules, expansion teams and Shohei Ohtani

    (Photo: Brace Hemmelgarn / Minnesota Twins / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Spirit, Lyon owner Kang buys London City Lionesses

    Spirit, Lyon owner Kang buys London City Lionesses

    [ad_1]

    On Friday, Michele Kang announced she has acquired London City Lionesses FC, an independent club competing in the FA Women’s Championship. The English club is another “foundational block” in her vision to grow her global multi-club organization, following her agreement earlier this year to take over OL Feminine and ownership of the Washington Spirit.

    “As you can imagine, if you’re trying to build a preeminent women’s football organization, you have to be where the center of gravity is,” Kang told The Athletic ahead of Friday’s announcement. “England is definitely one of them. I’ve been looking for an opportunity to land, and London City Lionesses being the only independent team, it was a no-brainer.”

    Rather than having to convince a men’s club to allow Kang to split their women’s team apart from the club structure, Kang’s immediately able to jump into the second level of women’s football in England, with an eye on the WSL.

    “Clearly, our goal is to get promoted,” Kang said with a smile.

    That independent structure only happened because LCL’s founder Diane Culligan stepped in to help Millwall FC a few years ago, as they struggled to finish the season on the women’s side of operations. Culligan had already established herself in the youth game independently.

    While a standalone women’s team model is the norm in the U.S. and other countries, that’s not the case in England, with many teams attached to top-tier men’s clubs.

    “I think it’s fair to say that my ideas and the people that were running the club at the time were not compatible, and that’s when we decided to part ways,” Culligan said. “Hence London City Lionesses was born, and we’ve gone from there. The only truly independent women’s professional women’s football club in the UK, if we’re talking about a professional game.”


    LCL plays at Princes Park in Dartford (James Fearn – The FA/The FA via Getty Images)

    The Lionesses are currently ninth on the Championship standings, though in the previous two seasons they finished second and third. Their head coach is Carolina Morace and home matches are played at Princes Park in Dartford, 18 miles southeast of central London.

    “It’s the middle of the season, we’re going to do everything we can to complete the season as successfully as possible,” Kang said. “We are going to figure out where we can surgically add some help here, in terms of resources, without disrupting what they’re doing.”

    As has always been her plan, the Lionesses will retain their branding and identity even with the acquisition — similar to how Lyon and the Spirit operate. Adding another team also means another point of justification for greater centralized resources across the multi-club organization. “I can do the kind of investment at scale that men’s teams can afford to do,” Kang said.

    In May, Kang told The Athletic that her goal was to add three to five additional teams by the end of 2023. While the Lionesses are the only team she’s added this year, conversations are ongoing across the world on prospective teams.

    “We have some conversations going on in Asia; that’s certainly going to be the first part of next year,” Kang said. “We’ll try to pick up where we left off.” She’s still targeting other European countries, South America, as well as Mexico — which she noted on Friday. Kang also said that they have initiated conversations in Africa already.

    In the case of London City, Kang wants to balance closing out the 2023-2024 season with a long-term strategy, not just of promotion, but becoming a top team in the WSL, and then winning it. The timing is promising from a business perspective, with the top divisions moving to an independent structure outside of the Football Association and under NewCo in November. The Lionesses have to earn promotion to earn this reward first, but Kang has shown in the past she’s willing to invest for such a result.

    “The NewCo model for BWSL and BWC is a great example of how women’s sports will be uplifted in England and globally,” Kang said. “We need more investment focused solely on the female game so that the resources are uncompromised.”

    There’s also one massive example for Kang to consider regarding the potential of coming into a lower division: Wrexham. There’s already been in-depth storytelling around a Championship club promoted to the WSL, with Liverpool producing a 90-minute documentary about their move to the WSL. But it’s hard to ignore the way “Welcome to Wrexham” has driven eyeballs and engagement to the lower divisions of English football here in the U.S., and also immensely benefited the team’s new ownership.

    Asked if it was on her mind, she couldn’t help but laugh before answering, “Absolutely. That’s what we’re here for, and we’re absolutely going to write another chapter.”

    (Photo: Brad Smith/ISI Photos/Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Aldridge: 'For the District?' Yeah, right; Ted Leonsis will take Wizards, Capitals angst across the river

    Aldridge: 'For the District?' Yeah, right; Ted Leonsis will take Wizards, Capitals angst across the river

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — The Prince of Potomac Yard spoke of water.

    “When I first came to this site,” Ted Leonsis said Wednesday, “and stood on top of the roof of the building next door, and looked over, we forget the power of having two rivers flow right into this community. And, iconic real estate is incredibly important. We have access — you can see the Washington Monument from here, Washington, D.C., the border’s one-and-a-half miles from here.”

    That must be cool! So nice that the billionaire owner of the Wizards and Capitals will have a swank view of the Potomac and Anacostia confluence from his soon-to-be floor-wide offices in Alexandria, where he will center his entertainment and sports empire. It would be unfair to say he literally will be looking down upon the people who are financing his JerryWorld, his BallmerVille, in Crystal City, or National Landing, or whatever name they prefer for their community across the river. But it will be a swell view.

    It is, nonetheless, a view for one, for an audience of one. Which, in the end, is how anyone who cares about and loves the District of Columbia should view this seemingly imminent departure of the Wizards and Capitals for Virginia.

    Some of us are old enough to remember the “done deal” between Jack Kent Cooke and Virginia state representatives from a generation ago on that very same property for a new football stadium that came apart like cotton candy. So, maybe, the Virginia General Assembly will raise objections to this new project that will be too great to overcome. Maybe NIMBYs in Alexandria will make their voices loud and annoying enough to force reconsideration.

    But, I doubt it.

    “Hold me accountable,” Leonsis said Wednesday. OK.

    This is about one man’s grandiosity, and readiness to leave when the city that has provided him so much over the last decades needed someone with his voice and influence to say, post-COVID, and post-Jan. 6, and which is grappling with crime outbursts throughout the city that have so many ill at ease, “You know what? Some things may be bad here right now. But I’m blessed enough to be financially secure enough to ride it out with you. I want to be part of the solution. So, I’ll be slightly less rich. I’m staying.”

    Don’t tell me rich men don’t do this. That’s precisely what Abe Pollin did, when he built what is now called Capital One Arena downtown, transforming the city, in 1997 — mostly with his own money.

    By contrast, Leonsis went for the bucks. Which, as I’ve said and written dozens of times over the years, owners of pro sports teams are perfectly within their rights to do. They can play wherever they want their teams to play. They can make whatever deals line their pockets, and allow them to create the kind of multi-use “entertainment districts” that will bring the well-heeled and well-connected to their new playgrounds. No one doubts that Virginia will build Leonsis a state-ahead-of-the-art arena to be envied and admired.

    But, it will be hard to take at face value any future talk from Leonsis about his love of the District.

    Because he knows how the Wizards, no matter their current lot, mean to generations of basketball fans in D.C. I am well aware that the Wizards were once the Bullets, who once played in Baltimore — and, before that, Chicago. I am well aware of the history of franchise roulette, in many cities, with many teams. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt, deeply, when your team leaves town. When the Senators left, first, for Minnesota — and then, when the team that replaced them left for Texas, it hurt this city, badly. Some of us then followed the Orioles, because they were the closest team. We did not love them.

    And when the then-Redskins left for Landover, Md. even though it was just a few miles from the D.C. line, it felt awful. It still does.

    Add this to the ledger.

    Because Leonsis knows, more than anyone, that the crowds who come to Wizards games, and have come to them for the last 25 years, are among the most diverse in the NBA – racially, economically, socially. Maybe Atlanta has similar types of crowds for Hawks games. Most of the league’s buildings, these days, are again full, post-COVID. But, in the main, their fan bases are very White and very rich. That hasn’t been the case here since I started covering the team, then playing at Capital Centre in Landover, in the late ’80s. Wizards crowds look like the District — at least how it used to look. They will not do so when the team moves across the river.

    (I’m not mentioning the Capitals’ crowds because the Caps regularly sold out Capital One. Caps fans have represented for nearly two decades. I can’t then imagine they won’t continue to do so in Virginia.)

    Every owner swears that his or her fanbase will follow the team “just down the road” to the new place. The Warriors swore that light rail and express transportation would mean most of their middle-class fans would come from Oakland, across San Francisco Bay, and follow the team to the new Chase Center in downtown San Francisco.

    They did not.

    To be sure, Chase is full — but not with the people who filled what is now called Oakland Arena for three decades. You have to pay for a $2 billion arena; you don’t do so with $15 tickets. You do it with six-figure suites and five-figure courtside seats. As John Salley, who won four championships back in the day playing for the Pistons, Bulls and Lakers, noted when the Pistons moved from downtown Detroit 31 miles north to the Palace of Auburn Hills in the late ’80s: “We used to play in front of the auto workers. Now we play in front of the executives.”

    It will be impossible to forget what now feels like appropriation of the city’s culture, by nicknaming Washington’s G-League team the Capital City Go-Go, and centering D.C. at every opportunity – plastering “For the District” and “The District of Columbia” on your Twitter feeds and the jerseys of Wizards players, or hawking this year’s alternate jerseys with breathless history about the city’s Boundary Stones, or slapping “D.C.” on caps and garments — only to walk away from all of that, for the sweetheart deal across the river, your Braves New World.

    And if there is any truth to the reporting that Leonsis was irritated by teenage kids performing … Go-Go music, outside of Capital One? Well, it’s hard to know how to process that. Buskers? That’s an issue?? Good Lord.

    (After this was initially published, I was informed that Leonsis’ issue is not with the street musicians who perform in front of Capital One on event nights, but there’s a concern about one person in particular who has been aggressive with passersby, both in front of the arena and other businesses nearby.)

    If you’re not from here, you may not understand why a Wizards/Capitals move to Virginia is especially difficult for D.C. residents to accept. It’s just four miles away from Capital One, Leonsis said Wednesday.

    It feels like the Grand Canyon, psychically.

    First, traffic. The dance of putting a 20,000-seat arena, practice facility, and new restaurants/entertainment venues into an area surrounded by Reagan National Airport, Amazon II and a large, busy mall, with many incoming and surrounding roads that are currently one- or two-laners, is daunting. Sources involved with the discussions said Wednesday that significant improvements to the roads surrounding the proposed site, along with increased light- and heavy-rail services, are part of the deal. It will be, nonetheless, a much longer commute for many — if they opt to come.

    Will fans who’ve taken a 30-45-minute Metro ride from the Maryland suburbs to Gallery Place downtown be willing to add another 20-30 minutes of riding time round trip to get to and from Alexandria? For 7 p.m. starts for Wizards or Caps games?

    Second … well, put it like this. The way that many Virginia residents feel about coming into the District for a night out, when they have One Loudoun or Reston Town Center available, closer-in? District residents feel the same way about going out to Alexandria for a night out, when we have Penn Quarter or Columbia Heights or NoMa to patronize. You don’t feel safe coming up here? Many of us don’t feel safe going out there. You have your reasons. We have ours.

    It just feels like, again, the District’s been kicked in the stomach – blamed, because COVID cut the number of offices operating downtown down like a scythe, leaving restaurants and bars with fewer patrons for lunch or dinner. Make no mistake, though: Mayor Muriel Bowser takes a Big L here. Her job was to prevent something like this from happening, because you can’t replace the Caps and Wizards, and the energy they’ve brought to downtown. I know it was difficult to find the kind of money needed to keep Leonsis from wanderlust. That, however, is the job. They cannot leave on your watch. They are leaving on hers.

    I don’t doubt that the decision was difficult, maybe even painful, for Leonsis. It would have been thus helpful to him to express what he was feeling Wednesday to reporters who asked to speak with him after the press conference, rather than rebuff them. And he and his team have ideas for how to transform Capital One, now freed from having to cross off dozens of potential days on the calendar every year for Wizards and Capitals games, to keep the building busy more often than not. Ice shows. Concerts. Activities in tandem with the D.C. Convention Center, and/or Events D.C. The return of the Mystics to Capital One, after playing at the Entertainment and Sports Arena in Southeast. (Speaking of which: what exactly does Leonsis plan to do, now, with ESA, about which he spoke so grandly, just a few years ago?)

    But, nothing replaces a sports team in a city’s soul. Nothing.

    You know one of the big reasons I came to The Athletic in 2018? I was in San Francisco in the spring of that year, watching the Capitals play the Penguins in the Eastern Conference semifinals, in my hotel room, while covering the Warriors and Rockets. If you’re from D.C., you knew, whether you Rocked the Red on the regular or not, how big a pain in the butt the Penguins were to the Caps for a decade, how desperately Alex Ovechkin and Nicklas Bäckström wanted, needed, to beat Sidney Crosby and the Pens. It was Town Business.

    So when Evgeny Kuznetsov scored on that breakaway overtime goal to seal the series over the Penguins, and the broadcast cut to the cheering crowds outside of Capital One, in Penn Quarter, deliriously happy, and young, and diverse, having finally slain the beast, it did something to me. I said to myself, in that hotel room, “look at how happy the city is. That is awesome. I’d like to be a part of chronicling that.”

    And I was, as I witnessed first-hand the Nationals winning the World Series, and the Mystics winning the WNBA title behind “Playoff Emma,” within weeks of one another in 2019. And the joy that those franchises brought to my hometown was immeasurable, and forever.

    I love this city, my city. And my city was wounded, grievously so, Wednesday morning, when men and women on the other side of the river toasted their good fortune, their deal well done, and didn’t seem to give a damn about the pain left behind.

    (Photo of Ted Leonsis and Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin: Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Nick Kyrgios exclusive interview: 'I feel more respected in the U.S. than Australia'

    Nick Kyrgios exclusive interview: 'I feel more respected in the U.S. than Australia'

    [ad_1]

    Nick Kyrgios is having a filtered coffee over ice at a Venice breakfast joint.

    No food for him, though. He’s not a big breakfast guy anyway, and he is going on a hike in the mountains above Malibu later and doesn’t want to feel full. He’s been in Los Angeles for a month, doing some commentary at The Tennis Channel, filming interviews with a handful of other renegade athletes and celebrities for a new “video podcast”. 

    Here in southern California, he can walk the streets of Venice, or along the promenade by the beach in Santa Monica, or show up at an LA Lakers NBA game without the hassles of his Australian homeland.

    “I don’t really go days here without people coming up, say hello, stuff like that,” he says, “but then, you know, they let you go about your business.”

    He also has another big project cooking — a deal with OnlyFans, the subscription social-media platform best known for featuring self-made pornography now trying to broaden its appeal by signing joint ventures with bold-face names who want to make money from their content rather than just sharing it on Instagram. He promises he has no plans to become a porn star, though he flashes a devilish grin when his manager shows one picture with the back of his shorts pulled down slightly.

    “Behind the scenes,” he explains. “Relationship stuff.” 

    Anything missing from this portfolio? Like, maybe, tennis? 

    Not for Kyrgios. And not for another few more months, at least. His latest ailment in a year filled with them is ligament damage to his right wrist that required surgery in October. Nearly two months later, he still greets you with a left-handed fist bump rather than a righty handshake. Cranking 130mph serves and pasting lines with that nasty, whipping, curling forehand seems a ways away. 

    Kyrgios being Kyrgios — the sport’s most enigmatic and beguiling player, a “tennis genius” in the words of Goran Ivanisevic, Novak Djokovic’s coach and himself a Wimbledon finalist (and winner) — he’s actually totally OK with that. Has been for quite a while, in fact.  

    “I played a full year last year, no injuries; had great results, had a great year,” Kyrgios says, wearing basketball shorts and a hoodie with a picture of Kobe Bryant and Nipsey Hussle on it. “I barely played this year, two surgeries, and now still, I would probably say they’re both equally as fine, which is crazy. Most tennis players would be like, ‘This was just depressing’. People would be struggling, they would be like, ‘What do I do? Who’s my identity?’. This year, it’s been equally as enjoyable as last year. That’s just my personality and how different it is. That’s the crazy thing.”

    This is not how the plot was being drawn up 12 months ago after a startling season.

    That campaign included the men’s doubles title at the Australian Open, the singles final at Wimbledon, the singles title at the Citi Open in Washington, D.C., and the quarter-finals of Indian Wells and the U.S. Open. 

    Most importantly, he was happy, newly in love, and seemed to have put his years of depression, self-abuse and heavy drinking behind him as he became one of the biggest attractions in the sport, a tennis spectacle drawing fans that had never been interested in tennis before. He’d even befriended Novak Djokovic, his polar opposite and one of his biggest critics.

    His behavior could still veer toward the boorish. A thrown racket nearly careened into a ball boy. Chair umpires penalized him for any number of offenses and he sometimes engaged in jawing matches. But he had also figured out how to use his tempestuousness strategically in the psychological warfare with opponents that is so much a part of the game.

    He drove Stefanos Tsitsipas mad during the third round of Wimbledon, pushing Tsitsipas to go head-hunting instead of focusing on winning points and games. Kyrgios won in four rowdy sets. Tsitispas called Kyrgios a bully. Kyrgios called Tsitsipas “soft”.

    The drama was irresistible. As the new season dawned, a dialed-in Kyrgios figured to be the most dangerous player in the game and a magic bullet for a sport looking to appeal to new and younger audiences.


    Kyrgios’ relationship with Djokovic has improved (Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

    Didn’t happen. Injuries. Burnout. Kyrgios played just one match this year, a straight-sets loss in Stuttgart in June to Wu Yibing. 

    Maybe this was Kyrgios’ body psychosomatically shutting down after a 2022 season that had left him mentally depleted and wondering how the all-time greats such as Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer had survived on the tennis treadmill for so many years.

    “I just don’t think I could do three seasons like that in a row. I wouldn’t be able to play anymore,” he said. “I was spent after I got home after the U.S. Open, I was cooked. I was so mentally fried. I was just so tired. Physically, I felt fine but just mentally, I was over it. So maybe this year is a counterbalance.”

    Kyrgios’ left knee began swelling in the weeks leading up to the Australian Open. He withdrew before his first match and had surgery to remove a cyst and repair a tear in the lateral meniscus. The recovery, which was expected to take eight weeks, took longer than expected. 

    Then, while training for Wimbledon in Mallorca, Spain, a pain in his right wrist, which has come and gone ever since a 2015 fall during a match against Grigor Dimitrov, grew intense. He dropped his racket, and hasn’t played since, pulling out of Wimbledon before his first match. He wasn’t exactly heartbroken, having told reporters the weekend before the tournament began that he had been dreading his return to the grind of his pro tennis existence, all those months on the road far from home and the intense scrutiny that left him depleted.

    Doctors initially advised rest and physical therapy. Further examination revealed ligament damage that required what his agent, Stuart Duguid, described as a “minor procedure” eight weeks ago, with a recovery expected to stretch through the first months of 2024.

    Kyrgios said he hasn’t played since dropping his racket on that Spanish practice court in the spring. 

    “It’s been a minute,” he says, but he has no doubt his innate sense for the game has not gone away. “I still feel like if you put a racket in my hand it wouldn’t feel foreign at all.” 

    With a long layoff and a blank schedule looming, Duguid asked Kyrgios if he had given any thought to what he wanted to do after his playing days were over. Kyrgios, who has done his share of sparring with the media, said he and his manager Daniel Horsfall, also a close friend, had discussed his desire to do television work — commentary, an interview show, finding ways to share the story of his unlikely rise and at times tortured existence at the top of the tennis world. 

    “Why are you waiting?” Duguid asked Kyrgios. “Why not start to dip your toe in that world now?”

    It was a line of thinking that Kyrgios said was very un-Australian and part of the reason he sometimes prefers America to his native land.  

    “I feel more respected here,” he says, adding that Australians “don’t expect athletes to do anything else but play their sport, which is really weird. I definitely see myself coming back at some stage and playing at a high level again. But because of how intense last year was for me, this was a year to just balance it out”.

    Indeed, last month Kyrgios was behind a desk at The Tennis Channel’s Santa Monica studios providing analysis of the ATP Tour Finals in Turin, Italy. 

    “Total pro,” Ken Solomon, the chief executive at The Tennis Channel said of Kyrgios. “On time. Actually, early. Well dressed. Did his homework, and gave insights that you can only get from a player at that level who knew the competition in a way few others do.”

    Kyrgios does not disagree. He is a fan of the commentary work of Jim Courier, the former world No 1 and Tennis Channel star. Others, not so much.

    “Sometimes it’s hard to watch these old heads kind of break down the game all the time for new fans. It’s like some of the stuff they say doesn’t make sense. Jim Courier is really good, the way he articulates things, but some of these other people, I’m just like, ‘What are you talking about?’. Like, ‘How do you know?’.”

    He holds in special contempt people who argue that stars of previous eras, even all-time greats such as Pete Sampras, could survive at the top of the hyper-athletic, modern power game.

    “The game was so slow back then,” he says. “I’ve watched Boris Becker and I’m not saying they weren’t good in their time, but to say that they would be just as good now, it’s absurd,” he says. “A big serve back then was like 197 to 200 (km per hour — about 122mph). People like me, we serve 220 consistently, to corners. It’s a whole different ball game.”

    Now Kyrgios is rolling…

    “I’m not saying they wouldn’t have found their way,” he says of the old-timers. “But serve and volley, to do it all the time now, you need to be serving 220, because if you serve anything less than 220, bro, Djokovic eats you alive. He eats you alive. Bro, Lleyton Hewitt destroyed Sampras one year at the U.S. Open. That was the first prototype of someone who could return serve. (Note to Kyrgios, Andre Agassi had a pretty good service return, too.) 

    “He made Sampras look like sh*t. And what would Djokovic do to someone like Sampras? It would be a cleanup. If Hewitt was doing it, Djokovic would destroy him. He would eat him alive.”

    More recently he’s been filming a series of episodes of an interview show called Good Trouble. Naomi Osaka, Frances Tiafoe, boxing’s Mike Tyson, celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay and Jay Shetty, the author and podcaster, have sat with him for an initial season that Duguid says will drop on YouTube early next year and hopefully attract a distribution partner for a second season.

    “It’s full-on — 30 minutes of one-on-one intimacy talking about their struggles and making it through that,” Kyrgios says. “That’s my project.” It’s part of an ongoing effort to get people to know him beyond the artifice they see on the tennis court. He recalls a recent interview with Piers Morgan, when the British broadcaster admitted to Kyrgios that, before meeting him, he hated him. “I was like, ‘You didn’t even know me at all’. Crazy.”


    Kyrgios is sure he will play again (Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

    Then there is the OnlyFans deal he’s been gathering content for.

    (He and Horsfall are at first somewhat horrified that I need them to explain just what OnlyFans is. But they do not hold it against me. “I love that,” he tells me.)

    “Everyone initially will think that maybe Nick’s getting into the porn industry,” Horsfall says. “Then they’ll find out, well, actually, it’s just (going) behind the scenes.”

    This is where his followers will get the most intimate look into his soul, his struggles with mental health, and his relationship with Costeen Hatzi, a social media influencer in her own right and interior designer.

    There’s Nick in the gym, at home with Hatzi, on a hike, giving wellness tips.

    Keily Blair, OnlyFans’ chief executive, said in a statement that Kyrgios, like her company, was “a disruptor, so it’s great to see him joining our platform, finding new ways to share his content and express himself. We can’t wait to see what he has in store for his fans”. 

    Kyrgios said he plans to ask followers what they want to see from him and then deliver on that.

    At this point, it’s probably worth noting that there are an awful lot of people who would really like to see Kyrgios play more tennis. There are not a lot of players who hit trick shots through the legs mid-rally to throw off an opponent’s rhythm. Few have more pure talent and can make a tennis ball dance the way Kyrgios can. 

    But tennis can get complicated for Kyrgios. He will play again, he says, but he is not shy about sharing the view that the 11-month tennis season is an exhausting slog no elite athlete should be subject to. If Saudi Arabia, or some other deep-pocketed investor, ever tried to organize a barnstorming league for the top 16 players that required far less of his time and energy, he is there for it.  

    “I would have been the first one to jump off,” he says. “I would have gone. I would have just let the ATP ship sink.” 

    He doesn’t understand how just a moderately talented NBA player such as Kyle Kuzma of the Washington Wizards could sign a four-year contract this summer worth $100million — nearly as much as Roger Federer earned in prize money ($130m) during his entire career.

    “He’s not even a top 50 player,” Kyrgios said of Kuzma. 

    He is firmly against merging the men’s and women’s tours. “If we’re merging, you merge the draws, you merge everything,” he says.

    He even has some issues with equal prize money at the Grand Slams, since the women play best-of-three-sets matches while the men play best-of-five. “I played for four hours at the A.O. (Australian Open), then (Elina) Svitolina played for like 40 minutes and we both got paid the same,” he says.

    He says he loves watching Coco Gauff, Serena Williams, Osaka. They and a select few others, such as Iga Swiatek, would be valuable assets for such a barnstorming male/female tennis show if it ever happened. “But why is tennis the only sport that deals with this stuff?” he asks. “If the WNBA said, ‘Let’s merge’, the NBA would ridicule them.”

    Add it to the list of things that make the life of a professional tennis player excessively complex to Kyrgios.

    If playing tennis for a living was as simple as going out on the court and playing and competing and having fun, he’d be back on the tour in a heartbeat. There are few things better than pulling off a trick shot or hitting a clean winner against the best players in the world and hearing the roars of a packed stadium descend over him.

    But because of his talent and the spectacles that his matches often become, he attracts an outsized degree of attention whenever he competes. 

    Fans love to celebrate his show and his victories. A few consecutive wins whet the Australian nation’s appetite for the moment when he puts it all together and delivers on the promise of his skills. However, when he loses his temper or falls in matches, critics revert to the narrative of so much talent wasted on an unserious mind. He then picks up his phone, heads down the rabbit hole of social media commentary, and tennis becomes misery once more. 

    “I’m just acting all the time,” Kyrgios says. “It’s exhausting.”

    He will be back. He’s sure of it. “Somewhere next year” is the target, he says. 

    Still a year and a half shy of turning 30, he should have several good seasons left if he can get healthy. He will not set a deadline like he did earlier this year with his knee and rush to meet it, though. The knee never got to where he needed it to, and maybe that ended up putting more stress on his wrist. 

    He has spoken with Osaka, another player who has struggled with mental health and who gave birth to her first child in July, about her time away from the sport. He has watched her plot her comeback and taken notes. 

    Like Osaka, Kyrgios wants to spend enough time on the practice court to regain his confidence. Then he will set himself to the work of getting mentally prepared to commit to the tennis life and all the ambivalence it stirs in him. 

    “It’s like, are you ready to go on a four-month trip?” he said. “I won’t come back until I’m ready to do something like that.”

    (Top photos: Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link