ReportWire

Tag: speed

  • Sisters on the slopes: These 3 Olympic skiing hopefuls are competitive siblings

    [ad_1]

    The recipe for the Masuga Sisters, *** trio of Olympic hopefuls, fearless, fast, and *** lot of fun. Don’t let the glitzy photo shoot fool you. No matter what it is, we are going for the win. The Masuga Sisters are fierce competitors, even without their skis. The game of spoons is banned in our household because we. In the Christmas tree over it and they come by it honestly. Allie absorbs the bumps of moguls with ease. Lauren, she’s flat out fast in the downhill, and Sam, Sam defies gravity high above the slopes. The air gets underneath your skis. It picks you up by all that surface area and you actually feel it rotate you over and take you away from the ski jump. It’s it’s incredible. It feels really cool. Their flight on and above the snow in pursuit of gold takes them far from the starting gate and from each other. Usually I’m stalking them on the app and seeing the live results. I’m like, Lauren’s on course. Sam’s about to jump. I’m like, oh my gosh, but I think all of us just appreciate it so much because we’re all so excited for each other. We just want to see each other succeed. I think it’s hard tracking your two sisters. Their mother has resorted to *** spreadsheet to keep tabs on all three. And my mom just learned how to color code incredible work she’s doing. So when you get to the travel, it’s like travel, travel, travel, travel, travel. All of us traveling all across the world, you’re like, oh my gosh, I, I don’t know how she keeps track of it and figures out how to watch everyone the same amount of times. Now the hope is the tracking will get. In February, *** family reunion in Milan. It’s been the dream. That was the first, the original dream, and it still is, and I just can’t wait. And how about this? There is another Masuga and you guessed it right. Their brother Daniel is also in the ski business and they say he is fast. On the road to Milan Cortina, I’m Jason Newton.

    Sisters on the slopes: These 3 Olympic skiing hopefuls are competitive siblings

    Updated: 11:34 AM EST Nov 24, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    The Macuga sisters from Park City, Utah, are Olympic hopefuls in skiing, each excelling in different disciplines while maintaining a strong family bond and competitive spirit.Alli Macuga, an Olympic moguls hopeful, said, “No matter what it is, we are going for the win.” The Macuga sisters are fierce competitors, even without their skis. Alli Macuga’s sister, Sam Macuga, said, “Yeah, the game of spoons is banned in our house because we threw our cousin into the Christmas tree over it.”Alli Macuga absorbs the bumps of moguls with ease, Lauren Macuga is known for her speed in downhill skiing, and Sam Macuga defies gravity with her ski jumps. Sam Macuga described the sensation of ski jumping:”The air gets under your skis. It picks you up by all that surface area, and you actually feel it rotate you over and take you away from the ski jump. Wow. It’s incredible. It feels like, really cool.”Despite competing in different events, the sisters support each other from afar. Alli Macuga said, “Usually, I’m stalking them on the FIS app and seeing the live results. I’m like, Lauren’s on course, Sam’s about to jump. I’m like, oh my gosh. But I think all of us just appreciate it so much because we’re all so excited for each other. We want to see each other succeed.”Their mother has devised a spreadsheet to keep track of their competitions. Lauren Macuga said her mom just learned how to color-code her calendar to keep it all straight. “I don’t know how she keeps track of it and figures out how to watch everyone the same amount of time,” she said.The sisters hope to all make it to Milan in February for the Olympics. Lauren Macuga expressed her excitement, saying, “That’s just, it’s been the dream. That was the first, the original dream. And it still is. And I, you know, I just can’t wait.”Adding to the family’s skiing legacy, their brother Daniel is also a skier and is known for his speed. The sisters credit youth sports programs in Park City for allowing them to try out and find their sport at little to no cost.

    The Macuga sisters from Park City, Utah, are Olympic hopefuls in skiing, each excelling in different disciplines while maintaining a strong family bond and competitive spirit.

    Alli Macuga, an Olympic moguls hopeful, said, “No matter what it is, we are going for the win.” The Macuga sisters are fierce competitors, even without their skis.

    Alli Macuga’s sister, Sam Macuga, said, “Yeah, the game of spoons is banned in our house because we threw our cousin into the Christmas tree over it.”

    Alli Macuga absorbs the bumps of moguls with ease, Lauren Macuga is known for her speed in downhill skiing, and Sam Macuga defies gravity with her ski jumps. Sam Macuga described the sensation of ski jumping:

    “The air gets under your skis. It picks you up by all that surface area, and you actually feel it rotate you over and take you away from the ski jump. Wow. It’s incredible. It feels like, really cool.”

    U.S. skier Lauren Macuga, U.S. skier Sam Macuga, and U.S. skier Alli Macuga talk on stage during the Team USA Media Summit ahead of the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Milano Cortina 2026 at the Javits Center, in New York City on Oct. 28, 2025.

    CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images

    U.S. skier Lauren Macuga, U.S. skier Sam Macuga, and U.S. skier Alli Macuga talk on stage during the Team USA Media Summit ahead of the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Milano Cortina 2026 at the Javits Center, in New York City on Oct. 28, 2025.

    Despite competing in different events, the sisters support each other from afar. Alli Macuga said, “Usually, I’m stalking them on the FIS app and seeing the live results. I’m like, Lauren’s on course, Sam’s about to jump. I’m like, oh my gosh. But I think all of us just appreciate it so much because we’re all so excited for each other. We want to see each other succeed.”

    Their mother has devised a spreadsheet to keep track of their competitions. Lauren Macuga said her mom just learned how to color-code her calendar to keep it all straight. “I don’t know how she keeps track of it and figures out how to watch everyone the same amount of time,” she said.

    The sisters hope to all make it to Milan in February for the Olympics. Lauren Macuga expressed her excitement, saying, “That’s just, it’s been the dream. That was the first, the original dream. And it still is. And I, you know, I just can’t wait.”

    Adding to the family’s skiing legacy, their brother Daniel is also a skier and is known for his speed. The sisters credit youth sports programs in Park City for allowing them to try out and find their sport at little to no cost.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI Isn’t Inherently Good or Bad. Leaders Must Decide to Use It Responsibly

    [ad_1]

    AI has rapidly evolved from an emerging innovation to an everyday companion, becoming an integral part of how work gets done. It is already reducing friction in countless tasks, helping people work faster and access information that once required hours of searching. This acceleration boosts productivity, frees up valuable time, and reduces workers’ cognitive load. Thus, it allows them to spend less time on administrative tasks and more time focusing on high-value projects. 

    However, AI use also carries risks. Without intention or oversight, it can spread misinformation and encourage intellectual complacency. The temptation to accept outputs at face value can sideline human judgment. Worse still, relying too heavily on AI can lead to what researchers call “cognitive offloading.” These are subtle, often unnoticed changes in our thinking patterns, where the ease of delegation to AI replaces active mental engagement. If left unchecked, this may reduce creativity, critical reasoning skills, and independent thought, and it’s happening faster than anyone could have imagined. 

    What recent data reveals 

    Recent research from OpenAI and Anthropic provides a more nuanced view of AI adoption than headlines might suggest. Despite the hype around AI transforming the workplace, the majority of ChatGPT use is personal, not professional. According to OpenAI’s study of more than 1.58 million ChatGPT conversations, 70 percent of interactions are non-work related. People are using AI for everything from daily tasks to practical advice. It has become a go-to resource for information unrelated to work. 

    OpenAI categorizes AI interactions into three modes: asking—seeking information or advice, doing—producing tangible output like a summary, and expressing—personal reflection or leisure. The study found that workplace use of AI is more targeted, with professionals primarily turning to it for “doing” tasks such as drafting or editing content, coding, and handling administrative work.  

    More than half of all work-related prompts focus on generating a specific output rather than seeking insights. Anthropic’s data supports this trend. More than three-quarters of enterprise use of Claude via API is automation-focused. This means organizations use AI to complete tasks from start to finish with minimal human involvement. 

    These findings raise an important question for leaders as they plan their AI stacks. Will the tools enhance work or simply help check items off to-do lists faster?  

    Doing is more than simply getting things done 

    In a culture that prizes productivity, AI can feel like a cheat code. However, speed isn’t the only metric that matters. People seem to recognize this in their personal use of the tool. The study found that “asking” messages were twice as likely to be personal than professional in nature. When users are engaged and invested in the outcome, they see a difference between getting things done and truly doing the work. 

    “Doing,” in this context, means staying engaged by thinking through problems and collaborating with others. It’s the kind of work that builds intuition and drives better long-term outcomes. By contrast, handing off tasks to AI without participating may save time now, but it may lead to stagnating skills and weakening strategic thinking muscles. 

    Powerful though they may be, AI tools are best used as support rather than authorities. They can help people spot gaps in logic, sharpen perspectives, and interrogate their point of view. Leaders must be mindful of this when building AI roadmaps. If you want teams to build better products or serve customers more effectively, you can’t foster a culture where AI becomes a crutch or where AI investments are made simply to say they have been.  

    Instead, you should model what it looks like to partner with AI. Use its output as a starting point for sharper thinking and solving specific problems. As AI becomes integrated into work environments, leaders are responsible to ensure that it enhances, rather than erodes, teams’ ability to reason and grow. That starts with thoughtful governance, outcomes-focused application, and the understanding that the goal should be better, more efficient work—not AI for its own sake. 

    Striking the right balance  

    Now is the time for leaders to take a clear-eyed look at how AI is truly being used and how to apply it responsibly. The technology—like all others—is not inherently good or bad. It’s a tool, and its impact depends on how we choose to use it. 

    AI doesn’t need to be feared, nor should it be blindly celebrated. Like any transformative tool, it calls for balancing excitement, skepticism, experimentation, and caution. The more people rely on AI both personally and professionally, the more important it becomes that they can think critically about the things they see and do. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Louise K. Allen

    Source link

  • Every Keanu Reeves Movie Performance, Ranked

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Emily Denniston/Vulture and photos courtesy of the studios

    This article was originally published in 2019. It has been updated to include films that Keanu Reeves has made since then. Whoa.

    Keanu Reeves has been a movie star for more than 40 years, but it seems like only in the past decade that journalists and critics have come to acknowledge the significance of his onscreen achievements. He’s had hits throughout his career, ranging from teen comedies (Bill & Ted’s) to action franchises (The Matrix, John Wick), yet a large part of the press has always treated these successes as bizarre anomalies. And that’s because we as a society have never been able to understand fully what Reeves does that makes his films so special.

    In part, this disconnect is the lingering cultural memory of Reeves as Theodore Logan. No matter if he’s in Speed or Bram Stoker’s Dracula or Something’s Gotta Give, he still possesses the fresh-faced openness that was forever personified by Ted’s favorite expression: “Whoa!” That wide-eyed exclamation has been Reeves’s official trademark ever since, and its eternal adolescent naïveté has kept him from being properly judged on the merits of his work.

    Some of that critical reassessment has been provided, quite eloquently, by Vulture’s own Angelica Jade Bastién, who has argued for Reeves’s greatness as an action star and his importance to The Matrix (and 21st-century blockbusters in general). Two of her observations are worth quoting in full, and they both have to do with how he has reshaped big-screen machismo. In 2017, she wrote, “What makes Reeves different from other action stars is this vulnerable, open relationship with the camera — it adds a through-line of loneliness that shapes all his greatest action-movie characters, from naïve hotshots like Johnny Utah to exuberant ‘chosen ones’ like Neo to weathered professionals like John Wick.” In the same piece, Bastién noted: “By and large, Hollywood action heroes revere a troubling brand of American masculinity that leaves no room for displays of authentic emotion. Throughout Reeves’s career, he has shied away from this. His characters are often led into new worlds by women of far greater skill and experience … There is a sincerity he brings to his characters that make them human, even when their prowess makes them seem nearly supernatural.”

    In other words, the femininity of his beauty — not to mention his slightly odd cadence when delivering dialogue, as if he’s an alien still learning how Earthlings speak — has made him seem bizarre to audiences who have come to expect their leading men to act and carry themselves in a particular way. Critics have had a difficult time taking him seriously because it was never quite clear if what he was doing — or what was seemingly “missing” from his acting approach — was intentional or a failing.

    This is not to say that Reeves hasn’t made mistakes. While putting together this ranking of his every film role, we noticed that there was an alarmingly copious number of duds — either because he chose bad material or the filmmakers didn’t quite know what to do with him. But it’s clear that his many memorable performances weren’t all just flukes. From Dangerous Liaisons to Man of Tai Chi — or River’s Edge to Knock Knock — he’s been on a journey to grow as an actor while not losing that elemental intimacy he has with the viewer. With Good Fortune now in theaters, we revisit those performances — from worst to best.

    The nadir of the ’90s cyberpunk genre, and a movie so bad, with Reeves so stranded, that it’s actually a bit of a surprise the Wachowskis were able to forget about it and still cast him as Neo. Dumber than a box of rocks, it’s a movie about technology and the internet — based on a William Gibson story! — that seems to have been made by people who had never turned on a computer before. Seriously, watch this shit:

    This movie exists in many ways because of its stunt casting: James Spader as a dogged detective and Keanu as the serial killer obsessed with him. Wait, shouldn’t those roles be switched? Get it? There would come a time in his career when Keanu could have maybe handled this character, but here, still with his floppy Ted Logan hair, he just looks ridiculous. The hackneyed screenplay does him no favors, either. Disturbingly, Reeves claims that he was forced to do this movie because his assistant forged his signature on a contract. He received the fifth of his seven Razzie nominations for this film. (He has yet to win and hasn’t been nominated in 17 years. In fact, it’s another sign of how lame the Razzies are that he got a “Redeemer” award in 2015, as if he needed to “redeem” anything to those people.)

    It’s a testament to how cloying and clunky Sweet November is that its two leads (Reeves and Charlize Theron) are, today, the pinnacle of action-movie cool — thanks to the same filmmaker, Atomic Blonde and John Wick’s David Leitch — yet so inert and waxen here. This is a career low point for both actors, preying on their weak spots. Watching it now, you can see there’s an undeniable discomfort on their faces: If being a movie star means doing junk like this, what’s the point? They’d eventually figure it all out.

    As far as premises for thrillers go, this isn’t the worst idea: A team of scientists are wiped out — with their murder pinned on poor Keanu — because they’ve figured out how to transform water into fuel. (Hey, Science, it has been 23 years. Why haven’t you solved this yet?) Sadly, this turns into a by-the-numbers chase flick with Reeves as Richard Kimble, trying to prove his innocence while on the run. He hadn’t quite figured out how to give a project like this much oomph yet, so it just mostly lies around, making you wish you were watching The Fugitive instead.

    In 2013, Reeves made his directorial debut with a Hong Kong–style action film. We’ll get into that one later, because it’s a ton better than this jumbled mess, a mishmash of fantasy and swordplay that mostly just gives viewers a headache. Also: This has to be the worst wig of Keanu’s career, yes?

    Gus Van Sant’s famously terrible adaptation of Tom Robbins’s novel never gets the tone even close to right, and all sorts of amazing actors are stranded and flailing around. Reeves gets some of the worst of it: Why cast one of the most famously chill actors on the planet and have him keep hyperventilating?

    In the wake of John Wick’s success, Keanu has had the opportunity to sleepwalk through some lesser sci-fi actioners, and this one is particularly sleepy. The idea of a neuroscientist (Reeves) who tries to clone his family after they die in an accident could have been a Pet Sematary update, but the movie insists on an Evil Corporation plot that we’ve seen a million times before. John Wick has allowed Reeves to cash more random checks than he might have ten years ago. Here’s one of them.

    As far as we know, the only movie taken directly from a Soundgarden lyric — unless we’re missing a superhero named “Spoonman” — is this pseudo-romantic comedy that attempts to be cut from the Tarantino cloth but ends up making you think everyone onscreen desperately needs a haircut and a shave. Reeves can tap into that slacker vibe if asked to, but he requires much better material than this.

    To state the obvious, it would not fly today for Keanu Reeves to play Prince Siddhartha, a monk who would become the Buddha. But questions of cultural appropriation aside, you can understand what drew The Last Emperor director Bernardo Bertolucci to cast this supremely placid man as an iconic noble figure. Unfortunately, Little Buddha never rises above a well-meaning, simplistic depiction of the roots of a worldwide religion, and the effects have aged even more poorly. Nonetheless, Reeves is quite accomplished at being very still.

    Quick anecdote: We saw this Kenneth Branagh adaptation of the Bard during its original theatrical run, and when Reeves’s villainous Don John came onscreen and declared, “I am not of many words,” the audience clapped sarcastically. That memory stuck because it encapsulates viewers’ inability in the early ’90s to see him as anything other than a dim SoCal kid. Unfortunately, his performance in Much Ado About Nothing doesn’t do much to prove his haters wrong. As an actor, he simply didn’t have the gravitas yet to pull off this fiendish role, so this version is more radiant and alive when he’s not onscreen. It is probably just as well his character doesn’t have many words.

    GIFs are a cheap way to critique a performance. After all, acting is a complicated, arduous discipline that shouldn’t be reduced to easy laughs drawn from a few seconds of film played on a loop. Then again …

    This really does sum up Reeves’s unsubstantial performance as Jonathan Harker, whose new client is definitely up to no good. Bram Stoker’s Dracula is a wonder of old-school special effects and operatic passion — and it is a movie in which Reeves seems wholly ill at ease, never quite latching onto the story’s macabre period vibe. We suspect if he could revisit this role now, he’d be far more commanding and engaged. But in 1992, he was still too much Ted and not enough anything else. And Reeves knew it: A couple years later, when asked to name his most difficult role to that point, he said, “My failure in Dracula. Totally. Completely. The accent wasn’t that bad, though.” Well …

    One of the perks of being a superstar is that you can sometimes just phone in an amusing cameo in some bizarro art-house offering. How else to explain Reeves’s appearance in this stylish, empty, increasingly surreal psychological thriller from Drive director Nicolas Winding Refn? He plays Hank, a scumbag motel manager whose main job is to add some local color to this portrait of the cutthroat L.A. fashion scene. If you’ve been waiting to hear Keanu deliver skeezy lines like “Why, did she send you out for tampons, too?!” and “Real Lolita shit … real Lolita shit,” The Neon Demon is the film for you. He’s barely in it, and we wouldn’t blame him if he doesn’t even remember it.

    Reeves reunites with his Speed co-star for a movie that features a lot fewer out-of-control buses. In The Lake House, Sandra Bullock plays a doctor who owns a lake house with the strangest magical power: She can send and receive letters from the house’s owner from two years prior, a dashing architect (Reeves). This American remake of the South Korean drama Il Mare is romantic goo that’s relatively easy to resist, and its ruminations on fate, love, destiny, and luck are all pretty standard for the genre. As for those hoping to enjoy the actors’ rekindled chemistry, spoiler alert: They’re not onscreen that much together.

    You have to be careful not to cast Reeves as too passive a character; he’s so naturally calm that if he just sits and reacts to everything, and never steps up, your movie never really gets going. That’s the case in this heist movie about an innocent man (Reeves) who goes to jail for a crime he didn’t commit, then plans a scam with an inmate he meets there (James Caan). The movie wants to be a little quirkier than it is, and Reeves never quite snaps to. The film just idles on the runway.

    Following her acclaimed A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, filmmaker Ana Lily Amirpour plops us in the middle of a desert hellscape in which a young woman (Suki Waterhouse) must battle to stay alive. The Bad Batch is less accomplished than A Girl, in large part because style outpaces substance — it’s a movie in which clever flourishes and indulgent choices rule all. Look no further than Reeves’s performance as the Dream, a cult leader who oversees the only semblance of civilization in this post-apocalyptic world. It’s less a character than an attitude, and Reeves struggles to make the shtick fly. He’s too goofy a villain for us to really feel the full measure of his monstrousness.

    Reeves isn’t the first guy you’d think of to head up a Bad News Bears–style inspirational sports movie, and he doesn’t pull it off, playing a gambler who becomes the coach of an inner-city baseball team and learns to love, or something. It’s as straightforward and predictable an underdog sports movie as you’ll find, and it serves as a reminder that Reeves’s specific set of skills can’t be applied to just any old generic leading-man role. The best part about the film? A 14-year-old Michael B. Jordan.

    Filmmaker David Ayer has made smart, tough L.A. thrillers like Training Day (which he wrote) and End of Watch (which he wrote and directed). Unfortunately, this effort with Reeves never stops being a mélange of cop-drama clichés, casting the actor as Ludlow, an LAPD detective who’s starting to lose his moral compass. This requires Reeves to be a hard-ass, which never feels particularly convincing. Street Kings is bland, forgettable pulp — Reeves doesn’t enliven it, getting buried along with the rest of a fine ensemble that includes Forest Whitaker, Hugh Laurie, and a pre-Captain America Chris Evans.

    In post-Matrix mode, Reeves tries to launch another franchise in a DC Comics adaptation about a man who can see spirits on Earth and is doomed to atone for a suicide attempt by straddling the divide twixt Heaven and Hell. That’s not the worst idea, and at times Constantine looks terrific, but the movie doesn’t have enough wit or charm to play with Reeves’s persona the way the Wachowskis did.

    Reeves’s alienlike beauty and off-kilter line readings made him an obvious choice to play Klaatu, an extraterrestrial who assumes human form when he arrives on our planet. This remake of the 1950s sci-fi classic doesn’t have a particularly urgent reason to exist — its pro-environment message is timely but awkwardly fashioned atop an action-blockbuster template — and the actor alone can’t make this Day particularly memorable. Still, there are signs of the confident post-Matrix star he had become, which would be rewarded in a few years with John Wick.

    Reeves flirts with Michael Douglas territory in this Eli Roth erotic thriller that’s not especially good but is interesting as an acting exercise. He plays Evan, a contented family man with the house to himself while his wife and kids are out of town. Conveniently, two beautiful young strangers (Ana de Armas, Lorenza Izzo) come by late one stormy night, inviting themselves in and quickly seducing him. Is this his wildest sexual fantasy come to life? Or something far more ominous? It’s fun to watch Reeves be a basic married suburban dude who slowly realizes that he’s entered Hell, but Knock Knock’s knowing trashiness only takes this cautionary tale so far.

    Very few people bought tickets in 1997 for The Devil’s Advocate to see Keanu Reeves: Hotshot Attorney. Obviously, this horror thriller’s chief appeal was witnessing Al Pacino go over the top as Satan himself, who just so happens to be a New York lawyer. Nonetheless, it’s Reeves’s Kevin Lomax who’s actually the film’s main character; recently moved to Manhattan with his wife (Reeves’s future Sweet November co-star, Charlize Theron), he’s the new hire at a prestigious law firm who only later learns what nefarious motives have brought him there. Reeves is forced to play the wunderkind who gets in over his head, and it’s not entirely convincing — and that goes double for his southern accent.

    “You are like some stray dog I never should have fed.” That’s how Rupert’s older hippie pal, Carla (Amy Madigan), affectionately refers to him, and because this teen dropout is played by Keanu Reeves, you understand what she means. In this forgotten early chapter in Reeves’s career, Rupert and Carla decide to ditch their going-nowhere Rust Belt existence by taking his dad (Fred Ward) hostage and collecting a handsome ransom. The Prince of Pennsylvania is a thoroughly contrived and mediocre comedy, featuring Reeves with an incredibly unfortunate haircut. (Squint and he looks like the front man for the Red Hot Chili Peppers.) Still, you can see signs of the soulfulness and vulnerability he’d later harness in better projects. He’s very much a big puppy looking for a home.

    Every hip young ’90s actor had to get his Jack Kerouac on at some point, so it would seem churlish to deny Reeves his opportunity. He plays the best pal/drinking buddy of Thomas Jane’s Neal Cassady, and he looks like he’s enjoying doing the Kerouac pose. Other actors have done so more indulgently. And even though he’s heavier than he’s ever been in a movie, he looks great.

    Keanu isn’t quite as bad in this as it seemed at the time. He’s miscast as a tortured war veteran who finds love by posing as the husband of a pregnant woman, but he doesn’t overdo it either: If someone’s not right for a part, you’d rather them not push it, and Keanu doesn’t. Plus, come on, this movie looks fantastic: Who doesn’t want to hang around these vineyards? Not necessarily worth a rewatch, but not the disaster many consider it.

    The other movie where Keanu Reeves plays a former quarterback, The Replacements is an adequate Sunday-afternoon-on-cable sports comedy. He plays Shane, the stereotypical next-big-thing whose career capsized after a disastrous bowl game — but fear not, because he’s going to get a second chance at gridiron glory once the pros go on strike and the greedy owners decide to hire scabs to replace them. Reeves has never been particularly great at playing regular guys — his talent is that he seems different, more special, than you or me — but he ably portrays a good man who’s had to live with disappointment. The Replacements pushes all the predictable buttons, but Reeves makes it a little more enjoyable than it would be otherwise.

    A very minor but sporadically charming bauble about a radio soap-opera scriptwriter (Peter Falk) who begins chronicling an affair between a woman (Barbara Hershey) and her not-related-by-blood nephew on his show — and ultimately begins manipulating it. Tune in Tomorrow is light and silly and harmless, and Reeves shows up on time to set and looks extremely eager to impress. He blends into the background quietly, which is probably enough.

    This Lawrence Kasdan comedy — the first film after an incredible four-picture run of Body Heat, The Big Chill, Silverado, and The Accidental Tourist — is mostly forgotten today, and for good reason: It’s a farce that mostly features actors screaming at each other and calling it “comedy.” But Reeves hits the right notes as a stoned hit man, and it’s amusing just to watch him share the screen with partner William Hurt. This could have been the world’s strangest comedy team!

    This Rob Lowe hockey comedy is … well, a Rob Lowe hockey comedy, but we had to include it because a 21-year-old Reeves plays a dim-bulb, good-hearted hockey player with a French Canadian accent that’s so incredible that you really just have to see it. Imagine if this were the only role Keanu Reeves ever had? It’s sort of amazing. “AH-NEE-MAL!”

    An oddly curdled comedy about two wedding guests (Reeves and Winona Ryder) who have terrible attitudes about everything but end up bonding over their universal disdain for the planet and everyone on it. That sounds like a chore to watch, and at times it is, but the pairing of Reeves and Ryder has enough nostalgic Gen-X spark to it that you go along with them anyway. With almost any other actors you might run screaming away, but somehow, in spite of everything, you find them both likable.

    The first film from 20th Century Women and Beginners’ Mike Mills, this mild but clever coming-of-age comedy adaptation of a Walter Kirn novel has Mills’s trademark good cheer and emotional honesty. Reeves plays the eponymous thumbsucker’s dentist — it’s funny to see Keanu play someone named “Dr. Perry Lyman” — who has the exact right attitude about both orthodontics and life. It’s a lived-in, funny performance, and a sign that Keanu, with the right director, could be a more than capable supporting character actor.

    Aziz Ansari’s feature directorial debut is a mixed bag, but the one thing that’s absolutely right about it is the casting of Reeves as Gabriel, a just-okay angel who wants to do more than the menial task he’s been given of stopping dumb humans from texting while driving. And so he interferes in the life of Ansari’s struggling film editor, hoping to give him a reason to keep living. That plan goes badly, resulting in Gabriel being banished to Earth to reside among us mortals. Reeves has the perfect little twinkle in his eye as this well-meaning angel, but the actor is especially endearing once Gabriel has to get used to being a flesh-and-blood person. Watching Reeves dig on cheeseburgers and fall in love with dancing is to be reminded how giddily kid-like he can be even now at 61. We mere mortals are so lucky to have him around.

    This Nancy Meyers romantic comedy was well timed in Reeves’s career. A month after the final Matrix film hit theaters, Something’s Gotta Give arrived, offering us a very different Keanu — not the intense, sci-fi action hero but rather a charming, low-key love interest who’s just the supporting player. He plays Julian Mercer, a doctor administering to shameless womanizer Harry Sanborn (Jack Nicholson), who’s dating a much younger woman (Amanda Peet), who just so happens to be the daughter of a celebrated playwright, Erica (Diane Keaton). We know who will eventually end up with whom in Something’s Gotta Give, but Reeves proves to be a great romantic foil, wooing Erica with a grown-up sexiness the actor didn’t possess in his younger years. We’re still not sure Meyers got the ending right: Erica should have stuck with him instead of Harry.

    This is the only movie that Reeves has directed, and what does it tell us about him? Well, it tells us he has watched a ton of Hong Kong action movies and always wanted to make one himself. And it’s pretty good! It’s technically proficient, it has a straightforward narrative, it has some excellent long-take action sequences (as we see in John Wick, Keanu isn’t a quick-cut guy; he likes to show his work), and it has a perfectly decent Keanu performance. We wouldn’t call him a visionary director by any stretch of the imagination. But we’d watch another one of these, definitely.

    Le Chevalier Raphael Danceny is merely a pawn in a cruel game being played by Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont, so it makes some sense that the young man who played him, Keanu Reeves, is himself a little outclassed by the actors around him. This Oscar-winning drama is led by Glenn Close and John Malkovich, who have the wit and bite to give this 18th-century tale of thwarted love and bruised pride some real zest. By comparison, Danceny is practically a boy, unschooled in the art of manipulation, and Reeves provides the character with the appropriate youthful naïveté. He’s not a standout in Dangerous Liaisons, but he acquits himself well — especially near the end, when his blade fells Valmont, leaving him as one of the unlikely survivors in the film’s ruthless battle.

    In this incredible showcase for Robin Wright, who plays a woman navigating a constrictive, difficult life with more grace and intelligence than anyone realizes, Reeves shows up late in a role that he’s played before: the younger guy who’s the perfect fit for an older woman figuring herself out. He hits the right notes and never overstays his welcome. As a romantic lead, less is more for Reeves.

    If you were an uptight suburban dad, like Steve Martin is in Ron Howard’s ensemble comedy, your nightmare would be that your beloved daughter gets involved with a doofus like Tod. Nicely played by Keanu Reeves, the character is the embodiment of every slacker screwup who’s going to just stumble through life, knocking over everything and everyone in his path. But as it turns out, he’s a lot kinder and mature than at first glance. Released six months after Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Parenthood showed mainstream audiences a more grown-up Reeves, and he’s enormously appealing — never more so than when advising a young kid that it’s okay to masturbate: “I told him that’s what little dudes do.”

    A very lovely and sad movie that’s nearly forgotten today, Permanent Record, directed by novelist Marisa Silver, features Reeves as the best friend of a teenager who commits suicide and, along with the rest of their friends, has to pick up the pieces. For all of Reeves’s trademark reserve, there is very little restraint here: His character is devastated, and Reeves, impressively, hits every note of that grief convincingly. You see this guy and you understand why everyone wanted to make him a star. This is a very different Reeves from now, but it’s not necessarily a worse one.

    Just as Reeves’s reputation has grown over time, so too has the reputation of this loopy, philosophical crime thriller. Do people love Point Break ironically now, enjoying its over-the-top depiction of men seeking a spiritual connection with the world around them? Or do they genuinely appreciate the seriousness that director Kathryn Bigelow brought to her study of lonely souls looking for that next big rush — whether through surfing or robbing banks? The power of Reeves’s performance is that it works both ways. If you want to snicker at his melodramatic turn, fine — but if you want to marvel at the rapport his Johnny Utah forms with Patrick Swayze (Bodhi), who only feels alive when he’s living life to the extreme, then Point Break has room for you on the bandwagon.

    Before there was Beavis and Butt-Head, before there was Wayne and Garth, there were these guys: two Valley bozos who loved to shred and goof off. As Theodore Logan, Keanu Reeves found the perfect vessel for his serene silliness, playing well off Alex Winter’s equally clueless Bill. But note that Bill and Ted aren’t jerks — watch Excellent Adventure now and you’ll be struck by how incredibly sunny its humor is. Later in his career, Reeves would show off a darker, more brooding side, but here in Excellent Adventure (and its less-great sequel Bogus Journey) he makes blissful stupidity endearing.

    This Sam Raimi film, with a Billy Bob Thornton script inspired by his mother, fizzled at the box office, despite a top-shelf cast: It’s probably not even the first film called The Gift you think of when we bring it up. But, gotta say, Reeves is outstanding in it, playing an abusive husband and all-around sonuvabitch who, nevertheless, might be unfairly accused of murder, a fact only a psychic (Cate Blanchett) understands. Reeves is full-on trailer trash here, but he brings something new and unexpected to it: a sort of bewildered malevolence, as if he’s moved by forces outside of his control. More of this, please.

    Gus Van Sant’s landmark drama is chiefly remembered for River Phoenix’s nakedly anguished performance as Mike, a spiritually adrift gay hustler. (Phoenix’s death two years after My Own Private Idaho’s release only makes the portrayal more heartbreaking.) But his performance doesn’t work without a doubles partner, which is where Reeves comes in. Playing Scott, a fellow hustler and Mike’s best friend, Reeves adeptly encapsulates the mind-set of a young man content to just float through life. Unlike Mike, he knows he has a fat inheritance in his future — and unlike Mike, he’s not gay, unable to share his buddy’s romantic feelings. Phoenix deservedly earned most of the accolades, but Reeves is terrific as an unobtainable object of affection — inviting, enticing but unknowable.

    Years later, we still contend that Speed is a stupid idea for a movie that, despite all logic (or maybe because of the utter insanity of its premise), ended up being a total hoot. What’s clear is that the film simply couldn’t have worked if Reeves hadn’t approached the story with straight-faced sincerity: His L.A. cop Jack Traven is a ramrod-serious lawman who is going to do whatever it takes to save those bus passengers. Part of the pleasure of Speed is how it constantly juxtaposes the life-or-death stakes with the high-concept inanity — Stay above 50 mph or the bus will explode! — and that internal tension is expressed wonderfully by Reeves, who invests so intently in the ludicrousness that the movie is equally thrilling and knowingly goofy. And it goes without saying that he has dynamite chemistry with Sandra Bullock. Strictly speaking, you probably shouldn’t flirt this much when you’re sitting on top of a bomb — but it’s awfully appealing when they get their happy ending.

    This film’s casting director said she cast Reeves as one of the dead-end kids who learn about a murder and do nothing “because of the way he held his body … his shoes were untied, and what he was wearing looked like a young person growing into being a man.” This was very much who the early Reeves was, and River’s Edge might be his darkest film. His vacancy here is not Zen cool … it’s just vacant, intellectually, ethically, morally, emotionally. Only in that void could Reeves be this terrifying. This is definitely a performance, but it never feels like acting. His magnetism was almost mystical.

    If they hadn’t killed his dog, none of this would have happened. Firmly part of the “middle-aged movie stars playing mournful badasses” subgenre that’s sprung up since Taken, the John Wick saga provides Reeves with an opportunity to be stripped-down but not serene. He’s a lethal assassin who swore to his dead wife that he’d put down his arms — but, lucky for us, he reneges on that promise after he’s pushed too far. Whereas in his previous hits there was something detached about Reeves, here’s he locked in in such a way that it’s both delightful and a little unnerving. The 2014 original was gleefully over-the-top already, and the sequels have only amped up the spectacle, but his genuine fury and weariness felt new, exciting, a revelation. Turns out Keanu Reeves is frighteningly convincing as a guy who can kill many, many people.

    In hindsight, it seems odd that Keanu Reeves and Richard Linklater have only worked together once — their laid-back vibes would seemingly make them well suited for one another. But it makes sense that the one film they’ve made together is this Philip K. Dick adaptation, which utilizes interpolated rotoscoping to tell the story of a drug cop (Reeves) who’s hiding his own addiction while living in a nightmarish police state. That wavy, floating style of animation nicely complements A Scanner Darkly’s sense of jittery paranoia, but it deftly mimics Reeves’s performance, which seems to be drifting along on its own wavelength. If in the Matrix films, he manages to defeat the dark forces, in this film they’re too powerful, leading to a pretty mournful finale.

    “They had written something that I had never seen, but in a way, something that I’d always hoped for — as an actor, as a fan of science fiction.” That’s how Reeves described the sensation of reading the screenplay for The Matrix, which had been dreamed up by two up-and-coming filmmakers, Lana and Lilly Wachowski. Five years after Speed, he found his next great project, which would become the defining role of his career. Neo is the missing link between Ted’s Zen-like stillness and John Wick’s lethal efficiency, giving us a hero’s journey for the 21st century that took from Luke Skywalker and anime with equal aplomb. Never before had the actor been such a formidable onscreen presence — deadly serious but still loose and limber. Even when the sequels succumbed to philosophical ramblings and overblown CGI, Reeves commanded the frame. We always knew that he seemed like a cool, left-of-center guy. The Matrix films gave him an opportunity to flex those muscles in a true blockbuster.

    Grierson & Leitch write about the movies regularly and host a podcast on film. Follow them on Twitter or visit their site.

    Or almost every film role; we’ve omitted some of his most obscure limited-release films, movies that went straight to VOD or streaming, documentaries, cameos, and voice-only roles. (Apologies to Toy Story 4’s Duke Caboom and Shadow the Hedgehog.)

    [ad_2]

    Tim Grierson,Will Leitch

    Source link

  • Bicyclist fatally hit by car in Elk Grove, officials ay

    [ad_1]

    A 39-year-old Sacramento man was fatally hit by a car Friday morning in Elk Grove, officials said. The Elk Grove Police Department was dispatched around 2:33 a.m. to a reported crash on Calvine Road between Bader Road and Bradshaw Road.A man was sitting on his bicycle in the road when he was hit by a White Toyota traveling eastbound on Calvine Road. The driver then stopped and remained on scene. Upon arrival, officers found the man deceased, the police department said. The driver is cooperating with investigators and did not show any signs of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Speed was not a factor in the crash, police said. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    A 39-year-old Sacramento man was fatally hit by a car Friday morning in Elk Grove, officials said.

    The Elk Grove Police Department was dispatched around 2:33 a.m. to a reported crash on Calvine Road between Bader Road and Bradshaw Road.

    A man was sitting on his bicycle in the road when he was hit by a White Toyota traveling eastbound on Calvine Road. The driver then stopped and remained on scene. Upon arrival, officers found the man deceased, the police department said.

    The driver is cooperating with investigators and did not show any signs of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Speed was not a factor in the crash, police said.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    There were once supersonic passenger planes that could reach speeds of up to 1,354 mph. In…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California wildfires are spreading and intensifying faster, putting more people in danger

    California wildfires are spreading and intensifying faster, putting more people in danger

    [ad_1]

    Just from what they’ve experienced over the years, California residents may suspect that wildfires have gotten more extreme amid a warmer and more drought-prone climate.

    A new paper in the journal Science puts that sentiment to the test, with startling findings: California fires spread almost four times faster in 2020 than they had in 2001.

    The study, authored by scientists from the University of Colorado, UC Merced and UCLA, also found that across the West, fires grew 250% more quickly in 2020 than they did in 2001.

    “People are pretty good at putting out all fires,” said Park Williams, a UCLA professor and co-author of the study, but “the faster the fire, the more easily it can escape control.”

    Although intuitive, the relationship between the speed at which a fire spreads and the damage it causes to structures and land was difficult to quantify until recent developments in satellite technology, he said.

    Now, scientists can plot “trends in the daily growth rates,” he said. Using daily fire spread imagery for some 60,000 fires from 2001 to 2020, they were able to determine a relationship between damage and speed, Williams said.

    “During this 20-year study period, fires in the U.S. did indeed on average begin moving faster,” he said. The 3% of fires with the fastest daily growth rates made up around 90 percent of property loss in the two decades studied.

    “In California more than most places in the U.S., people are being confronted with the changes in fire behavior,” Williams said.

    Many Californians live in close proximity to flammable vegetation and are put increasingly in harm’s way.

    The study gave several possible explanations for the increase in fire speed.

    “Fires may be growing faster due to warming trends, vegetation transitions to more flammable fuels, or the co-occurrence of high winds with increasing human-related ignitions,” the study posited.

    Recent wildfires in California have caused death and destruction and brought the home insurance industry to the brink of crisis. With the 2024 fire season ending, all eyes will be on next year.

    [ad_2]

    Terry Castleman

    Source link

  • 1 juvenile dead, 2 hospitalized when driver overturns car, crashes into tree in St. Mary’s Co. – WTOP News

    1 juvenile dead, 2 hospitalized when driver overturns car, crashes into tree in St. Mary’s Co. – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A juvenile is dead and two other juveniles were sent to the hospital with life-threatening injuries after the car they were in overturned and struck a tree in St. Mary’s County, Maryland, early Saturday morning.

    A juvenile is dead and two other juveniles were sent to the hospital with life-threatening injuries after the car they were in overturned and struck a tree in St. Mary’s County, Maryland, early Saturday morning.

    Ashley Nicole Nolan, 27, of Leonardtown, was driving a 2008 Honda Odyssey north on Point Lookout Road near the intersection with Chingville Road when she “failed to negotiate a turn,” the St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office said in a news release.

    The car then left the road and “overturned several times” before striking a tree, the sheriff’s office said.

    Three juveniles in the car were “not correctly restrained” in the car, the sheriff’s office said.

    One of the juveniles was transported to MedStar St. Mary’s Hospital where they were pronounced dead. The two other juveniles were ejected from the car and were transported with life-threatening injuries to local trauma centers, the sheriff’s office said.

    Nolan was transported to MedStar St. Mary’s Hospital with minor injures.

    The sheriff’s office said they believe that alcohol and speed contributed to the crash.

    “No day should ever begin with news like this,” said Sheriff Steve Hall in the release. “It is both difficult to process and to believe. Based on the preliminary investigative information, decisions were made that have caused the loss of the innocent and marred the lives of families in our communities forever.”

    The sheriff’s office asks anyone who may have witnessed the collision or the events leading up to the crash to email Cpl. Dale Reppel at Dale.Reppel@stmaryscountymd.gov or call 240-496-6694.

    See a map of the crash location below:

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Valerie Bonk

    Source link

  • Driver sped at 104 mph in Malibu crash that killed 4 Pepperdine students, D.A. says

    Driver sped at 104 mph in Malibu crash that killed 4 Pepperdine students, D.A. says

    [ad_1]

    The driver accused of killing four Pepperdine students in a Malibu crash last week was charged with murder, with prosecutors saying he was speeding at 104 mph before the fatal collision.

    Fraser Michael Bohm, 22, faces four counts of malice murder and four counts of gross vehicular manslaughter, L.A. County Dist. Atty. George Gascón said during a Wednesday news conference, adding that the charges stem from Bohm’s “complete disregard for the life of others.”

    “When you are driving at 104 mph in [a] 45-mph [zone], the only conclusion is you have a complete disregard for life,” Gascón said.

    The four people killed — Niamh Rolston, Peyton Stewart, Asha Weir and Deslyn Williams — were sisters in the Alpha Phi sorority and seniors at Pepperdine University. Authorities believe they were standing near several parked vehicles in the 21600 block of Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu when Bohm’s speeding BMW barreled into the cars and then struck the women shortly before 9 p.m. Oct. 17.

    Bohm was arrested on suspicion of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence following the crash, Los Angeles County sheriff’s Sgt. Maria Navarro said. But he was released hours later. In a news release at the time, the Sheriff’s Department said he was “released to allow detectives time to gather the evidence needed to secure the strongest criminal filing and conviction.”

    Bohm was re-arrested Tuesday night and booked on suspicion of four counts of murder. In the intervening days between arrests, investigators collected additional evidence — including toxicology results, search warrants and speed analyses — before submitting the case to the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office on Monday.

    Investigators determined that Bohm was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crash, but the onboard computer of his car shows he was traveling at 104 mph before he lost control in the deadly collision, according to law enforcement sources not authorized to discuss the case publicly. It was that data, along with statements by Bohm that he was familiar with the stretch of PCH and that he was aware of the posted 45-mph speed limit, that led to the charges against him, sources say.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Winton, Jeremy Childs

    Source link

  • Reducing speed limit in Hāwera CBD to 30km/h proposed in South Taranaki Speed Management Plan – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Reducing speed limit in Hāwera CBD to 30km/h proposed in South Taranaki Speed Management Plan – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    A proposal to reduce the speed limit in the Hāwera CBD to 30km/h is part of the South Taranaki District Council’s Speed Management Plan. Photo / Bevan Conley

    Reducing the speed limit in the Hāwera CBD to 30km/h and reducing 70km/h roads to 60km/h are among the key proposals in South Taranaki District Council’s 2024-2034 Speed Management Plan.

    South Taranaki Mayor Phil Nixon said Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency required councils to develop 10-year speed management plans every three years.

    “Over the last 12 months, we reduced speed limits outside our schools,” Nixon said.

    USDA Certified Organic Tinctures and salves

    “Over the next three years, we’d like to focus on delivering safe and appropriate speed limits around marae, the Hāwera CBD, beach communities and on some of our 70km/h roads.”

    Advertisement

    Advertise with NZME.

    The key proposals for the next three years were to reduce the speed limit in the Hāwera CBD and in beach communities such as Ōhawe and Waiinu, reduce 70km/h roads to 60km/h and introduce a 60km/h speed limit outside all marae.

    Nixon said speed management was about achieving safe and appropriate speeds to reflect the road’s function, design, safety and use.

    “As a road controlling authority, we want everyone to be able to get home safely every time and to feel comfortable choosing from a range of travel options, be it driving, walking, biking or scootering.”

    The council encouraged residents and road users to have their say on the speed on rural roads and in townships.

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Eating Fast Is Bad for You—Right?

    Eating Fast Is Bad for You—Right?

    [ad_1]

    For as long as I have been feeding myself—which, for the record, is several decades now—I have been feeding myself fast. I bite big, in rapid succession; my chews are hasty and few. In the time it takes others to get through a third of their meal, mine is already gone. You could reasonably call my approach to eating pneumatic, reminiscent of a suction-feeding fish or a Roomba run amok.

    Where my vacuuming mouth goes, advice to constrain it follows. Internet writers have declared slowness akin to slimness; self-described “foodies” lament that there’s “nothing worse” than watching a guest inhale a painstakingly prepared meal. There are even children’s songs that warn against the perils of eating too fast. My family and friends—most of whom have long since learned to avoid “splitting” entrees with me—often comment on my speed. “Slow down,” one of my aunts fretted at a recent meal. “Don’t you know that eating fast is bad for you?”

    I do, or at least I have heard. Over the decades, a multitude of studies have found that people who eat faster are more likely to consume more calories and carry more weight; they’re also more likely to have high blood pressure and diabetes. “The data are very robust,” says Kathleen Melanson of the University of Rhode Island; the evidence holds up when researchers look across geographies, genders, and age. The findings have even prompted researchers to conduct eating-speed interventions, and design devices—vibrating forks and wearable tech—that they hope will slow diners down.

    But the widespread mantra of go slower probably isn’t as definitive or universal as it at first seems. Fast eaters like me aren’t necessarily doomed to metabolic misfortune; many of us can probably safely and happily keep hoovering our meals. Most studies examining eating speed rely on population-level observations taken at single points in time, rather than extended clinical trials that track people assigned to eat fast or slow; they can speak to associations between pace and certain aspects of health, but not to cause and effect. And not all of them actually agree on whether protracted eating boosts satisfaction or leads people to eat less. Even among experts, “there is no consensus about the benefits of eating slow,” says Tany E. Garcidueñas-Fimbres, a nutrition researcher at Universitat Rovira i Virgili, in Spain, who has studied eating rates.

    The idea that eating too fast could raise certain health risks absolutely does make sense. The key, experts told me, is the potential mismatch between the rate at which we consume nutrients and the rate at which we perceive and process them. Our brain doesn’t register fullness until it’s received a series of cues from the digestive tract: chewing in the mouth, swallowing down the throat; distension in the stomach, transit into the small intestine. Flood the gastrointestinal tract with a ton of food at once, and those signals might struggle to keep pace—making it easier to wolf down more food than the gut is asking for. Fast eating may also inundate the blood with sugar, risking insulin resistance—a common precursor to diabetes, says Michio Shimabukuro, a metabolism researcher at Fukushima Medical University, in Japan.

    The big asterisk here is that a lot of these ideas are still theoretical, says Janine Higgins, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, who’s studied eating pace. Research that merely demonstrates an association between fast eating and higher food intake cannot prove which observation led to the other, if there’s a causal link at all. Some other factor—stress, an underlying medical condition, even diet composition—could be driving both. “The good science is just completely lacking,” says Susan Roberts, a nutrition researcher at Tufts University.

    Scientists don’t even have universal definitions of what “slow” or “fast” eating is, or how to measure it. Studies over the years have used total meal time, chew speed, and other metrics—but all have their drawbacks. Articles sometimes point to a cutoff of 20 minutes per meal, claiming that’s how long the body takes to feel full. But Matthew Hayes, a nutritional neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania, criticized that as an oversimplification: Satisfaction signals start trickling into the brain almost immediately when we eat, and fullness thresholds vary among people and circumstances. Studies that ask volunteers to rate their own speeds have issues too: People often compare themselves with friends and family, who won’t represent the population at large. Eating rate can also fluctuate over a lifetime or even a day, depending on hunger, stress, time constraints, the pace of present company, even the tempo of background music.

    In an evolutionary sense, all of us humans eat absurdly fast. We eat “orders of magnitude quicker” than our primate relatives, just over one hour a day compared with their almost 12, says Adam van Casteren, a feeding ecologist at the University of Manchester, in England. That’s thanks largely to how we treat our food: Fire, tools such as knives, and, more recently, chemical processing have softened nature’s raw ingredients, liberating us from “the prison of mastication,” as van Casteren puts it. Modern Western diets have taken that pattern to an extreme. They’re chock-full of ultra-processed foods, so soft and sugar- and fat-laden that they can be gulped down with nary a chew—which could be one of the factors that drive faster eating and chronic metabolic ills.

    In plenty of circumstances, slowing down will come with perks, not least because it could curb the risk of choking or excess gas. It could also temper blood-sugar spikes in people with diets heavy in processed foods—which whiz through the digestive tract, Roberts told me, though the healthier move would probably be eating fewer of those foods to begin with. And some studies focused on people with high BMI, including Melanson’s, have shown that eating slower can aid weight loss. But, she cautioned, those results won’t necessarily apply to everyone.

    The main impact of leisurely eating may not even be about chewing rates or bite size per se, but about helping people eat more mindfully. “A lot of us are distracted when we eat,” says Fatima Cody Stanford, an obesity-medicine physician at Massachusetts General Hospital. “And so we are missing our hunger and satiety cues.” In countries such as the United States, people also have to wrestle with the immense pressure “to be done with lunch really fast,” Herman Pontzer, an anthropologist at Duke University, told me. Couple that with the fast foods we tend to reach for, and maybe it’s no shock that people don’t feel satisfied as they scarf down their meals.

    The point here isn’t to demonize slow eating; in the grand scheme of things, it seems a pretty healthful thing to do. At the same time, that doesn’t mean that “eat slow” should be a blanket command. For people already eating a lot of high-fiber foods—which the body naturally processes ploddingly—Roberts doesn’t think sluggish chewing has much to add. The extolling of slow eating is, at best, “a half truth,” Hayes told me, that’s become easy to exploit.

    I do feel self-conscious when I’m the first person at the table to finish by a mile, and I don’t enjoy the stares and the comments about my “big appetite.” Certain super-slow eaters might get teased for making others wait, but they’re generally not getting chastised for ruining their health. When I asked experts if it was harmful to eat too slowly, several of them told me they’d never even considered it—and that the answer was probably no.

    Still, for the most part, I’m happy to be the Usain Bolt of chewing. My hot foods stay hot, and my cold foods stay cold. I’ve intermittently tried slow eating over the years, deploying some of the usual tricks: smaller utensils, tinier bites, crunchier foods. I even, once, tried to count my chews. The biggest difference I felt, though, wasn’t fullness or more satisfaction; I just kind of hated the way that my mushy food lingered in my mouth.

    Maybe if I’d stuck with slow eating, I would have lost some gassiness, choking risk, or weight—but also, I think, some joy. There’s something to speed-eating that can be plain old fun, akin to the rush of zooming down an empty highway in a red sports car. If I have just an hour-ish (or, knowing me, less) of eating each day, I’d prefer to relish every brisk, indecorous bite.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link