ReportWire

Tag: Specialty Retailing

  • Instacart reportedly puts off its long-anticipated IPO

    Instacart reportedly puts off its long-anticipated IPO

    [ad_1]

    Grocery-delivery company Instacart Inc. is delaying its long-awaited initial public offering because of poor market conditions, according to news reports Thursday.

    The New York Times first reported Thursday that the San Francisco-based company has halted its IPO plans, and is awaiting more favorable conditions. Later Thursday night, the Wall Street Journal confirmed the report, citing a memo from Instagram CEO Fidji Simo saying an IPO will be “highly unlikely” this year.

    The IPO market has been severely curtailed this year following a record-setting 2021, as the stock market has slid amid high inflation and recession fears. As of September, the number of U.S. IPOs was down 79% year over year, with total proceeds down 95%, according to Renaissance data.

    According to the Times, Instacart had intended to start the IPO process this week by releasing some financial information, but decided not to, for now, due to market volatility.

    The Journal reported that the IPO had received positive feedback from potential investors, but executives came away with the message that the market will not support a tech IPO at this time.

    “Our business has never been stronger,” Instacart said in a statement Thursday. “In Q3, our revenue grew more than 40% year-over-year, and our net income and adjusted EBITDA more than doubled from Q2. We remain focused on building for the long term, and we are excited about the opportunity ahead.” 

    Instacart confidentially filed for its IPO in May. The company has been one of the more anticipated potential IPOs for years. In July, Instacart cut its estimated valuation for the second time in four months, to $15 billion, nearly 40% less than its previous valuation of $24 billion.

    Last month, the Wall Street Journal reported Instacart didn’t plan on raising much capital in its IPO, instead having most of its listing come from the sale of employees’ shares — a move that could greatly benefit current employees.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Consumers pay 14.1% more on average for pumpkin-spice products

    Consumers pay 14.1% more on average for pumpkin-spice products

    [ad_1]

    We may be paying a price for our pumpkin-spice cravings.

    A new study from the MagnifyMoney.com website has found that retailers routinely charge more for pumpkin-spice items than for the standard versions of those same products — in fact, a lot more. On average, the pumpkin-spice “tax,” as MagnifyMoney.com dubs it, is 14.1%.

    That’s a significant increase from 2020, which was the last time MagnifyMoney looked at the pumpkin-spice pricing differential. At that time, the “tax” was 8.8%.

    “I think companies are finding it’s a great way to capitalize on a seasonal trend,” said Ismat Mangla, executive editor of MagnifyMoney.com. “As long as consumers are willing to pay for it, they can take advantage of it.” MagnifyMoney.com, which is owned by LendingTree, offers information on how to manage and grow your money.

    Craig Agranoff, a Florida-based marketing expert, put it this way: “It’s Retailing 101.”

    Some retailers really push the pumpkin-spice upcharge to the upper limits, the 2022 study noted. A case in point: Trader Joe’s, the supermarket chain beloved for its low prices, charges 161.1% more for its Pumpkin Spiced Teeny Tiny Pretzels than for its Honey Wheat Pretzel Sticks. The retailer also charges 49.9% more for its Pumpkin Spice Hummus than for its Mediterranean Style Hummus.

    And what about Starbucks
    SBUX,
    -1.60%    ,
    the coffee chain that made pumpkin spice a household favorite? The study found that it levies an 18.3% “tax” on its ever-popular Pumpkin Spice Latte (or PSL), with a standard 16-ounce latte running $5.45 and the PSL costing $6.45.

    Trader Joe’s and Starbucks didn’t respond to a MarketWatch request for comment.

    Agranoff said consumers are probably willing to pay more for pumpkin-spice products without complaining because the products are not considered essentials. By contrast, consumers tend to be very sensitive when it comes to price increases on items they need to buy on a regular basis, such as milk or gasoline.

    Still, not every retailer is asking consumers to shell out more for pumpkin-spice products. Target
    TGT,
    -1.28%
    charged less for several items versus the standard ones, the MagnifyMoney.com study found. One example: A bag of Pepperidge Farm Milano pumpkin-spice cookies was 14.3% cheaper than the traditional Milano cookies at Target.

    Regardless of whether the price is higher or lower, Mangla of MagnifyMoney.com isn’t one to buy these products. “Personally, I’m over pumpkin spice,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kroger and Albertsons Say Their Merger Will Cut Prices. Their Shares Are Tumbling.

    Kroger and Albertsons Say Their Merger Will Cut Prices. Their Shares Are Tumbling.

    [ad_1]

    With inflation still an untamed threat, Friday’s announced merger of the grocers


    Kroger


    and


    Albertsons


    will spur debate about whether the consolidation will raise food prices, or lower them.

    The Biden administration’s antitrust regulators are scrutinizing mergers more closely than did predecessors, and an old argument against combinations is that they lead to price-gouging.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford stock is now a ‘sell’ at UBS as an oversupply problem looms

    Ford stock is now a ‘sell’ at UBS as an oversupply problem looms

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Ford Motor Co. were hit hard Monday by UBS analyst Patrick Hummel’s recommendation that investors sell, as the auto industry is facing a worrisome U-turn from undersupply to oversupply.

    Hummel also cut his ratings on several other global auto makers, including General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -5.59%    ,
    saying that as a recession concerns grow, “demand destruction is no longer a vague risk.”

    In addition to all of the data suggesting the economy is slowing, Hummel said growing U.S. dealer inventories, weak used-car pricing, used-car dealer profit warnings and signs indicating deteriorating orders and shorter delivery times make him more cautious on the overall auto industry.

    Don’t miss: CarMax stock suffered biggest selloff since the year 2000, as inflation, low consumer confidence lead to big profit miss.

    “We think it will only take 3-6 months for the auto industry to end up in oversupply, which will put an abrupt end to a 3-year phase of unprecedented OEM [original equipment manufacturer] pricing power and margins,” Hummel wrote in a note to clients.

    As part of his negative industry outlook, he cut his rating on Ford
    F,
    -7.38%
    to sell from neutral and his stock price target to $10 from $13, with the new target implying about 11% downside from current levels.

    Ford’s stock sank 7.6% in morning trading. It was trading up just 0.6% month to date, after plunging 26.5% in September to suffer its worst monthly performance since it plummeted 30.6% during pandemic-stricken March 2020.

    Hummel noted that Ford has already warned about having more vehicles in inventory than expected, and above payments to suppliers running about $1 billion higher than projected, so he sees little margin left for negative surprises in terms of fourth-quarter deliveries and supply costs.

    Hummel cut his 2023 adjusted earnings-per-share estimate by 61% to 52 cents a share, to reflect a $6.5 billion drop in price and sales mix. The compares with the current 2023 FactSet EPS consensus of $1.87.

    “This sounds very negative, but Ford gains $19 billion in price alone since the beginning of 2020,” Hummel wrote.

    Also read: Ford again raises price of F-150 Lightning electric pickup.

    Read more: Ford September sales fall as drop in trucks offsets near tripling in EVs.

    Meanwhile, GM’s stock dove 6.9% in morning trading toward a three-month low, and shares have shed 2.5% so far this month after tumbling 16% last month.

    Hummel downgraded GM to neutral from buy, and dropped his price target by 32%, to $38 from $56.

    The rating remains above Ford’s, because unlike its rival, Hummel noted that GM has had “no hiccups” in its third-quarter production schedule and therefore a “solid” quarterly report is expected. However, the downgrade reflects the fact that GM is “not immune” to a downturn in the industry.

    Separately, Hummel also cut his stock-price target on Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.16%
    to $350 from $367, saying that following a third-quarter volume report that was below expectations, it will be “more challenging” for the electric-vehicle maker to meet its 2022 delivery growth target.

    However, Hummel reiterated his buy rating on Tesla, as he believes the EV maker is best positioned to use pricing as the tool to fill its factories.

    “Overall, the recession outlook should result in moderately lower margins for Tesla than previously expected, but we’re highly confident that by keeping the top line [revenue] momentum, Tesla will even widen the gap vs. competitors in terms of profitability,” Hummel wrote.

    Ford’s stock has fallen 3% over the past three months, while GM shares have lost 3.1% and Tesla’s stock has dropped 11.8%. In comparison, the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -1.08%
    has declined 7.5% the past three months.

    Among other auto makers, he also downgraded both Renault SA
    RNO,
    +2.41%

    RNLSY,
    +1.17%
    and Volkswagen AG
    VOW,
    -3.29%
    to neutral from buy. He also downgraded auto parts makers Continental AG
    CON,
    +0.10%
    and Faurecia SE
    EO,
    -3.77%

    FURCF,
    -3.67%
    to neutral from buy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Poshmark to be bought by South Korean internet company Naver in $1.2 billion deal

    Poshmark to be bought by South Korean internet company Naver in $1.2 billion deal

    [ad_1]

    Online secondhand-fashion marketplace Poshmark Inc. has agreed to be bought by South Korean internet company Naver in a $1.2 billion deal, the companies announced Monday, a move that executives said would help both brands expand internationally.

    Shares of Poshmark
    POSH,
    -0.64%
    jumped 11.8% in after-hours trading on the news.

    Under the terms of the deal, Naver
    035420,
    -8.79%
    will acquire Poshmark’s outstanding shares for $17.90 in cash, representing a 15% upside to Poshmark’s Monday closing price of $15.57. The transaction is set to close by the first quarter of next year, pending Poshmark shareholders’ approval.

    Poshmark went public in late 2020, pricing shares at $42 a share, and ended its first day of trading at more than $100 a share, but has never approached those heights again. It last traded for more than the acquisition price Naver has agreed to pay late last year.

    For more: Five things to know about Poshmark

    In a statement, executives from both companies talked up the potential to combine Naver’s array of search, e-commerce, AI and social-media technology with Poshmark’s social and shopping platforms. Poshmark, the companies said, would also embark on a bigger international expansion strategy, including into other markets in Asia, in the “medium-term.”

    They also talked about the potential for the combined company to save around $30 million annually within two years after the deal’s closing through “rationalization of public company costs” and higher operating leverage, along with the potential for more than 20% yearly sales growth by harnessing Naver’s advertising resources.

    Naver, which runs large search and e-commerce platforms, said the move would broaden its e-commerce platform, bring younger users into the company’s fold and allow it to “capitalize on the global online fashion re-commerce and sustainable economy opportunity.”

    “Naver’s leading technology in search, AI recommendation and e-commerce tools will help power the next phase of Poshmark’s global growth,” Choi Soo-Yeon, Naver’s chief executive, said in a statement, which also said that Naver hosted a large number of digital content creators in Korea.

    Naver owns companies like Wattpad, a social-media platform, and runs Webtoon, a site for digital comics, along with a metaverse platform called Zepeto, and also has joint ownership of an internet service group in Japan. Naver said its online community in Korea consists of more than 36 million monthly users, who use its search engine and other services. 

    Poshmark Chief Executive Manish Chandra said the deal would also give Poshmark opportunities to grow. 

    “Longer term, as part of Naver, we will benefit from their financial resources, significant technology capabilities, and leading presence across Asia to expand our platform, elevate our product and user experiences, and enter new and large markets,” he said in the statement.  

    Naver said the acquisition would also help give it a bigger foothold in the U.S. And it said the deal would allow it to broaden the appeal of so-called live-stream shopping.

    “Live-stream shopping is a key driver of e-commerce in China and Korea (and increasingly in the U.S.) today, allowing shoppers to buy products in real-time through live video broadcasts, enabling greater insights and more clarity around purchasing decisions,” the statement said.

    Once the deal closes, Poshmark will be a standalone subsidiary of Naver, with the same management team, brand and headquarters in Redwood City, Calif., the companies revealed.

    At the close of Monday’s trading, shares of Poshmark were down around 9% year-to-date. The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +2.59%    ,
    by comparison, has slid 23% over that time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • H&M profit drops after Russia exit costs

    H&M profit drops after Russia exit costs

    [ad_1]

    Sweden’s Hennes & Mauritz AB said Thursday that net profit for its third quarter fell significantly after it booked a one-time cost related to the winding down of its Russian operations, and that it will start a cost and efficiency program.

    The company
    HM.B,
    -3.17%
    posted a net profit of 531 million Swedish kronor ($47.4 million) for the fiscal quarter ended Aug. 31, compared with SEK4.69 billion a year earlier. Analysts polled by FactSet had expected a net profit of SEK2.17 billion.

    Sales were SEK57.45 billion compared with SEK55.59 billion a year earlier. Analysts polled by FactSet had expected sales of SEK57.45 billion.

    The company said it has booked a one-time cost of SEK2.10 billion, related to the winding down of Russian operations, hitting the result for the quarter.

    The cost and efficiency program is expected to result in annual savings of around SEK2 billion.

    “The third quarter has largely been impacted by our decision to pause sales and then wind down the business in Russia. This has had a significant effect on our sales and profitability, which explains half of the decrease in profits compared with the third quarter last year,” Chief Executive Helena Helmersson said.

    Write to Kyle Morris at kyle.morris@dowjones.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link