ReportWire

Tag: special election

  • Is Texas turning blue? What a Democratic upset means — and doesn’t | Opinion

    Democrat Taylor Rehmet meets with supporters at his watch party at Nickel City in Fort Worth on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. Rehmet is headed for a runoff for the District 9 Senate seat.

    Democrat Taylor Rehmet meets with supporters at his watch party at Nickel City in Fort Worth on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. Rehmet is headed for a runoff for the District 9 Senate seat.

    edearman@star-telegram.com

    AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.

    Read our AI Policy.


    • Democrats won a surprise Tarrant County race, signaling new competitiveness in Texas.
    • Taylor Rehmet’s win relied on turnout and special-election quirks, not a statewide shift.
    • Republicans can regroup with resources and infrastructure, blunting Democrats statewide.

    Lightning finally struck Saturday for Texas Democrats.

    But you know the old saying about it hitting the same place twice.

    The party won a state Senate seat that should not have even been competitive, based on all the usual factors in politics. Taylor Rehmet, a previously unknown first-time candidate, stared down everyone from the president to the prevailing powers in Tarrant County politics. Republican Leigh Wambsganss had advantages in demographics, campaign resources and high-level connections that seemed sure to yield a comfortable win.

    All eyes in politics will gawk at Texas for a while. And they should. It’s well understood that Tarrant County is a bellwether for the state. If one of the largest Republican-dominated counties in the country is newly competitive, that changes political calculations from the courthouse and the statehouse to the White House.

    But is Rehmet’s victory replicable? It doesn’t matter much who the state senator is in District 9 for the next year. He’ll fill out an unexpired term for a stretch when the Legislature won’t even meet.

    What everyone wants to know is if Rehmet’s accomplishment can carry over to other races, perhaps for Congress or even statewide offices, where Republicans are on a 30-year winning streak.

    Tarrant County Democrats worked hard to take advantage of an unexpected opportunity. They displayed the acumen and effort required to overcome decades in the wilderness. They also caught almost every possible break in an unusual set of circumstances. Consider:

    Strong turnout. Democratic voters, seething at President Donald Trump and his Texas allies, turned out strongly for a special election, usually a sleepy affair. Rehmet managed a solid, if not spectacular, fundraising haul. He exercised a sound strategy and impressive message discipline, talking about meat-and-potato issues at the top of voters’ minds: Jobs and wages, inflation, and health care access and costs.

    Special election circumstances and luck. Rehmet got lucky. Wambsganss was weakened in the first round of voting when former Southlake Mayor John Huffman peeled off some of the GOP vote. Saturday’s runoff was the only contest on most ballots, allowing for a focused effort.

    Weird timing. What’s this about a January election? With campaigns for the March 3 primary also underway, voters were confused. Wambsganss, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Tarrant Republican leaders had to shout from the rooftops that this wasn’t the primary and voters needed to turn out on a cold Saturday.

    November ballot will be different for Texas Republicans

    Such factors won’t be at play in November. Prominent Republicans will be all over the ballot, led by an unbeatable Gov. Greg Abbott and his nine-figure campaign war chest. Democrats have a few primaries to settle and don’t know yet which, if any, of their candidates can run like Rehmet.

    Plus, Republicans will learn the lessons of this loss. They didn’t come to dominate the state by accident. It took years of planning, building campaign infrastructure and honing strong messages. It’s not the kind of thing that Democrats can match in nine months.

    Energized Democrats nationwide will pour money into the possibility of winning Texas. They’ve done so several times with less reason to hope than Rehmet’s victory provides. If they merely send tens of millions of dollars for the party’s U.S. Senate nominee to spend on TV and digital ads, that won’t do it.

    Rehmet didn’t win because he could saturate air waves, social media feeds and mailboxes. The party needs an infrastructure to help do that regularly and provide a framework for reliable voter turnout. Even if Democratic candidates aren’t up to snuff this year, it may be an opportunity to build the ship for better choices to pilot in 2028 and beyond.

    How Leigh Wambsganss lost Texas Senate runoff

    There’s also this: Wambsganss was far from the ideal candidate for this moment.

    Republicans selected a standard-bearer laden down with political baggage. Wambsganss was weighed down by her leadership in a far-right Christian conservative movement through a political committee that spent years targeting school board races. That kind of local activity won’t get much attention on the Sunday news shows, but it came to a head last year, when Keller school board members badly overreached with their attempt to split the district in half. Plenty of voters remembered.

    Republican Leigh Wambsganss speaks to supporters at Niki’s Italian Bistro in North Richland Hills after she advanced to a runoff for the District 9 Senate seat on Nov. 4, 2025. She was joined by District Attorney Phil Sorrells and District Clerk Tom Wilder.
    Republican Leigh Wambsganss speaks to supporters at Niki’s Italian Bistro in North Richland Hills after she advanced to a runoff for the District 9 Senate seat on Nov. 4, 2025. She was joined by District Attorney Phil Sorrells and District Clerk Tom Wilder. Eleanor Dearman edearman@star-telegram.com

    Wambsganss was MAGA to the point of absurdity, embracing nationalist cartoon character Steve Bannon, a former Trump aide. She tried to coast on her endorsement from Trump, likely engineered by Patrick without the president knowing much about Wambsganss or the race.

    She ran on issues that have worked for Texas Republicans for years: Cut property taxes, defend gun rights, secure the border and protect women and girls on gender issues.

    The problem is that GOP voters feel as if those wins are banked. “Maintain the status quo” isn’t much of a slogan. Independents, meanwhile, are worried more about their checkbooks than school library books.

    When the race changed, Wambsganss didn’t adjust well enough. She painted Rehmet as a dangerous liberal, highlighting stances of his that haven’t gotten much attention. By then, though, his identity was better established than most Texas Democratic candidates.

    In closing days, Wambsganss’ message was less about why she would be a good senator and more of a direct partisan appeal, warning local Republicans of the caliber of disaster indicated by a Democratic upset in their community.

    She even compared the race to the Alamo. Setting aside the faux pas of using that sacred battle to measure a run-of-the-mill legislative election, Wambsganss seemed to forget how that chapter in Texas history went.

    It ended up being a rallying point, and perhaps this will similarly lead Texas Republicans to stave off the most serious sustained barrage from Democrats in a long while.

    But the Alamo battle itself? It was a loss.

    Do you have an opinion on this topic? Tell us!

    We love to hear from Texans with opinions on the news — and to publish those views in the Opinion section.

    • Letters should be no more than 150 words.

    • Writers should submit letters only once every 30 days.

    • Include your name, address (including city of residence), phone number and email address, so we can contact you if we have questions.

    You can submit a letter to the editor two ways:

    • Email letters@star-telegram.com (preferred).

    • Fill out this online form.

    Please note: Letters will be edited for style and clarity. Publication is not guaranteed. The best letters are focused on one topic.

    Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Ryan J. Rusak is opinion editor of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. He grew up in Benbrook and is a TCU graduate. He spent more than 15 years as a political journalist, overseeing coverage of four presidential elections and several sessions of the Texas Legislature. He writes about Fort Worth/Tarrant County politics and government, along with Texas and national politics, education, social and cultural issues, and occasionally sports, music and pop culture. Rusak, who lives in east Fort Worth, was recently named Star Opinion Writer of the Year for 2024 by Texas Managing Editors, a news industry group.

    Ryan J. Rusak

    Source link

  • Virginia voter guide: Another special election ahead in Fairfax County to replace a longtime delegate – WTOP News

    Voters in part of Fairfax County will soon head to the polls to fill an open seat vacated by Mark Sickles in Virginia’s House of Delegates for District 17.

    Voters in part of Fairfax County will soon head to the polls to fill an open seat in Virginia’s House of Delegates for District 17.

    Early voting opens Saturday and the special election will be held Jan. 20 to find a replacement for Democratic Del. Mark Sickles.

    It’s one of a series of special elections triggered by sporadic appointments to Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet, including an upcoming contest that will take place in another part of Fairfax County and Fairfax City.

    The candidates on the ballot in District 17 are Democrat Garrett McGuire and Republican Chris Cardiff.

    Cardiff previously worked as the chief operating officer at a data analytics company with a focus on political campaigns.

    According to his LinkedIn, McGuire worked as a legislative assistant in the Virginia House of Delegates and served with several local nonprofits.

    McGuire has been endorsed by the district’s outgoing representative.

    After more than 20 years in the Virginia General Assembly, Sickles is leaving his seat behind to join Spanberger’s cabinet as the secretary of finance.

    Following Sickles’ appointment, each party had about a week to nominate a candidate for the special election. McGuire won the Democratic nomination during a firehouse primary last month and Republicans selected McGuire as their nominee.

    Outside of Sickles’ departure, a handful of sitting lawmakers are resigning from the Virginia General Assembly to join Spanberger’s administration.

    The contest on Jan. 20 will be the second special election in Fairfax County this month.

    Voters are also headed to the polls Jan. 13 to fill an open seat vacated by District 11 Del. David Bulova. That same day, voters in parts of Prince William and Stafford counties will elect a new delegate to replace Del. Candi Mundon King, who represents District 23.

    Dates at a glance

    • Early in-person voting: Jan. 10 through Jan. 17
    • Deadline to register or update voter registration: Jan. 13
    • Deadline to request mail-in or absentee ballot: Jan. 9
    • Election Day: Jan. 20

    Early voting

    There will be two locations offering early voting from Jan. 10 through Jan. 17.

    Early voting will be held at the Fairfax County Government Center:

    • On weekdays, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    • On Saturday, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    And ballots can be cast at the at the Franconia Governmental Center:

    • On weekdays, from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m.
    • On Saturday, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Check in with your local registrar’s office for more information on voting early.

    Voting on Election Day

    Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. for in-person voting on Jan. 20.

    There’s a tool on Fairfax County’s website to show you where to vote.

    Curbside voting is available to people who are 65 or older, or those with disabilities.

    Voters needs to bring a valid ID to the polls. If you happen to forget, you can sign an ID confirmation statement or vote with a provisional ballot.

    To get your provisional ballot counted, you have until noon on Jan. 23 to bring a copy of your ID to the local electoral board or sign a confirmation statement.

    list of acceptable forms of ID is available online.

    Vote by mail

    Virginians don’t have much time left to request a mail-in ballot. The deadline to request an absentee ballot is Jan. 9.

    To be tallied, absentee ballots have to be postmarked on or before the special election, and received by Jan. 23.

    Outside of mailing those absentee ballots, voters can also bring them to a drop-off location. Check in with your city or county elections office for information about drop boxes and their locations.

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • Virginia Democrats overperform in double election victory

    Democrats have retained two seats in Virginia’s General Assembly after winning a pair of special elections by significant margins on Tuesday night. 

    Democrat Mike Jones defeated Republican John Thomas to win the election in Virginia Senate District 15, a seat vacated by state senator Ghazala Hashmi last year.

    Charlie Schmidt, a community activist and former attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, defeated Republican Richard Stonage to win in House District 77, the seat Jones vacated to run for state Senate.

    Jones won 69.84 percent of the vote and Schmidt won 79.39 percent, according to unofficial results from the Virginia Department of Elections as of early Wednesday.

    This is a developing story. More to follow.

    Source link

  • Virginia voter guide: Special election to fill open seats in Virginia General Assembly – WTOP News

    Virginia is holding a special election to fill two open seats in the House of Delegates, vacated by lawmakers who are destined for Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet.

    A special election is set for Jan. 13 to fill two open seats in Virginia’s House of Delegates, vacated by delegates destined for Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet.

    The special election is taking place in two Northern Virginia districts that include parts of Fairfax, Prince William and Stafford counties, as well as Fairfax City.

    The results of the upcoming special election will bring some new faces to Richmond. None of the candidates running have prior experience serving in Virginia’s General Assembly.

    Both districts are considered to be Democratic strongholds and the open seats are currently occupied by Democratic lawmakers, according to the Virginia Public Access Project.

    In District 11, Democrat Gretchen Bulova is facing off against Republican Adam Wise.

    In nearby District 23, Democrat Margaret Franklin and Republican nominee Verndell Robinson are running for the open seat.

    Dates at a glance

    • Early in-person voting: Jan. 3 through Jan. 10
    • Deadline to register or update voter registration: Jan. 6
    • Deadline to request mail-in or absentee ballot: Friday, Jan. 2
    • Election Day: Jan. 13

    Early voting

    Early voting will be held for one week, from Jan. 3 through Jan. 10 at 5 p.m.

    These are the Fairfax County early voting locations:

    • The Fairfax County Government Center is open Monday to Friday for early voting, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., according to the county government. On Saturdays, polls are open 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    • The Jim Scott Community Center is also open for early voting Monday to Friday, from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. It’s also open 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays.

    In Fairfax City, voters can cast a ballot early at city hall from these times:

    • Voting is open at Fairfax City Hall, Monday to Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. It’s also open on Saturdays from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    These are the early voting locations in Prince William County:

    • Office of Elections on Lee Avenue
    • A.J. Ferlazzo Building in Woodbridge
    • ​​​​​​​Dumfries Community Center

    All three locations in Prince William County are open for early voting from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on weekdays, with hours extended until 7 p.m. for Wednesday. On Saturdays, voting is open to 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Voting is also open Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Stafford County is also offering early voting:

    • Polls are open Monday to Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the general registrar’s office located at 124 Old Potomac Church Road. On Saturdays, early voting is available from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Get in touch with your local registrar’s office for more information on where to vote early.

    Voting on Election Day

    Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. for in-person voting on Jan. 13.

    Voters who are 65 or older, or those with disabilities, have the option of voting curbside.

    Anyone hoping to vote needs to bring a valid ID. If you happen to forget, you can sign an ID confirmation statement or vote with a provisional ballot.

    To get your provisional ballot counted, you have until noon on Jan. 16 to bring a copy of your ID to the local electoral board or sign a confirmation statement.

    list of acceptable forms of ID is available online.

    Vote by mail

    Friday is the deadline to request a mail-in ballot. Virginians can request an absentee ballot online.

    Those ballots have to be postmarked on or before Jan. 13 and received by Jan. 16.

    Outside of mailing those absentee ballots, voters can also bring them to a drop-off location. Check in with your city or county elections office for information about drop boxes and their locations.

    Who’s on the ballot?

    District 11

    Democrat Gretchen Bulova is vying to succeed her husband, Del. David Bulova, in District 11.

    The longtime delegate was appointed by Spanberger to serve as the secretary of natural and historic resources.

    Gretchen Bulova is running against Wise, the Republican nominee, for a shot at representing voters in Fairfax City and parts of Fairfax County.

    Wise, a Fairfax native, is resurrecting his platform from when he challenged David Bulova in 2025. He’s a firearms instructor and self-defense teacher.

    Gretchen Bulova has served as the chair of the Fairfax County 250th Commission since 2021 and the county’s history commission for years.

    District 23

    There’s a second open seat up for grabs on Jan. 13 over in District 23, where Del. Candi Mundon King is stepping away to serve as the next secretary of the Commonwealth.

    Margaret Franklin, the Prince William County supervisor, hopes to maintain a Democratic hold in the district, which includes parts of both Prince William and Stafford counties.

    She’s facing off against Republican nominee Verndell Robinson, a real estate agent and Navy veteran, according to a local GOP committee.

    The Democratic nominees in the upcoming special election were selected last month in firehouse primaries — contests run by the party, not the state. But the Republican committees in District 11 and District 23 nominated candidates without holding caucuses.

    Meanwhile, a second special election will be held later in January in a different part of Fairfax County. Democrat Garrett McGuire and Republican Chris Cardiff are competing to fill an open seat in District 17 on Jan. 20.

    Del. Mark Sickles, who represents District 17, was tapped to serve as Virginia’s next secretary of finance.

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • Democrat Renee Hardman wins Iowa state Senate seat, blocking GOP from reclaiming a supermajority

    Democrat Renee Hardman was elected to the Iowa state Senate on Tuesday in a year-end special election, denying Republicans from reclaiming two-thirds control of the chamber.Hardman bested Republican Lucas Loftin by an overwhelming margin to win a seat representing parts of the Des Moines suburbs. The seat became vacant after the Oct. 6 death of state Sen. Claire Celsi, a Democrat.Hardman, the CEO of nonprofit Lutheran Services of Iowa and a member of the West Des Moines City Council, becomes the first Black woman elected to the 50-member Senate.“I want to recognize that while my name was the one on the ballot, this race was never just about me,” Hardman told a room of supporters in West Des Moines after declaring victory.Her win is latest in a string of special election victories for Iowa Democrats, who flipped two Senate seats this year to break up a supermajority that had allowed Republicans to easily confirm GOP Gov. Kim Reynolds’ appointments to state agencies and commissions.Democrat Mike Zimmer first flipped a seat in January, winning a district that had strongly favored Republican President Donald Trump in the 2024 election. In August, Democrat Catelin Drey handily defeated her GOP opponent in the Republican stronghold of northwestern Iowa, giving Democrats 17 seats to Republicans’ 33. Celsi’s death brought that down to 16.Republicans would have regained two-thirds control with a Loftin victory Tuesday. Without a supermajority, the party will need to get support from at least one Democrat to approve Reynolds’ nominees. The GOP still has significant majorities in both legislative chambers.Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, called Hardman’s victory “a major check on Republican power.”“With the last special election of the year now decided, one thing is clear: 2025 was the year of Democratic victories and overperformance, and Democrats are on track for big midterm elections,” Martin said.In November the party handily won governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey and the mayoral election in New York City. Democrats held onto a Kentucky state Senate seat this month in a special election. And while Republican Matt Van Epps won a Tennessee special election for a U.S. House seat, the relatively slim margin of victory gave Democrats hope for next year’s midterms. Democrats nationally need to net three U.S. House seats in 2026 to reclaim the majority and impede Trump’s agenda.Iowa GOP Chairman Jeff Kaufmann applauded Loftin and his supporters for putting up a fight in a district he described as “so blue.” Democrats outnumber Republicans in the district by about 3,300 voters, or 37% to 30%.“Although we fell short this time, the Republican Party of Iowa remains laser-focused on expanding our majorities in the Iowa Legislature and keeping Iowa ruby-red,” Kaufmann said.The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee pledged Tuesday to help defend the party’s gains in Iowa and prevent the return of a GOP supermajority next year.

    Democrat Renee Hardman was elected to the Iowa state Senate on Tuesday in a year-end special election, denying Republicans from reclaiming two-thirds control of the chamber.

    Hardman bested Republican Lucas Loftin by an overwhelming margin to win a seat representing parts of the Des Moines suburbs. The seat became vacant after the Oct. 6 death of state Sen. Claire Celsi, a Democrat.

    Hardman, the CEO of nonprofit Lutheran Services of Iowa and a member of the West Des Moines City Council, becomes the first Black woman elected to the 50-member Senate.

    “I want to recognize that while my name was the one on the ballot, this race was never just about me,” Hardman told a room of supporters in West Des Moines after declaring victory.

    Her win is latest in a string of special election victories for Iowa Democrats, who flipped two Senate seats this year to break up a supermajority that had allowed Republicans to easily confirm GOP Gov. Kim Reynolds’ appointments to state agencies and commissions.

    Democrat Mike Zimmer first flipped a seat in January, winning a district that had strongly favored Republican President Donald Trump in the 2024 election. In August, Democrat Catelin Drey handily defeated her GOP opponent in the Republican stronghold of northwestern Iowa, giving Democrats 17 seats to Republicans’ 33. Celsi’s death brought that down to 16.

    Republicans would have regained two-thirds control with a Loftin victory Tuesday. Without a supermajority, the party will need to get support from at least one Democrat to approve Reynolds’ nominees. The GOP still has significant majorities in both legislative chambers.

    Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, called Hardman’s victory “a major check on Republican power.”

    “With the last special election of the year now decided, one thing is clear: 2025 was the year of Democratic victories and overperformance, and Democrats are on track for big midterm elections,” Martin said.

    In November the party handily won governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey and the mayoral election in New York City. Democrats held onto a Kentucky state Senate seat this month in a special election. And while Republican Matt Van Epps won a Tennessee special election for a U.S. House seat, the relatively slim margin of victory gave Democrats hope for next year’s midterms. Democrats nationally need to net three U.S. House seats in 2026 to reclaim the majority and impede Trump’s agenda.

    Iowa GOP Chairman Jeff Kaufmann applauded Loftin and his supporters for putting up a fight in a district he described as “so blue.” Democrats outnumber Republicans in the district by about 3,300 voters, or 37% to 30%.

    “Although we fell short this time, the Republican Party of Iowa remains laser-focused on expanding our majorities in the Iowa Legislature and keeping Iowa ruby-red,” Kaufmann said.

    The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee pledged Tuesday to help defend the party’s gains in Iowa and prevent the return of a GOP supermajority next year.

    Source link

  • Garrett McGuire named winner of Virginia’s firehouse primary for House District 17 seat – WTOP News

    The Fairfax County Democratic Committee announced Sunday that the winner of Virginia’s firehouse primary for the House District 17 seat is Garrett McGuire.

    The Fairfax County Democratic Committee announced Sunday that the winner of Virginia’s firehouse primary for the House District 17 seat is Garrett McGuire.

    A total of 2,356 votes were tallied in the race to fill the Fairfax County seat. Garrett McGuire clinched the race with 801 votes.

    In a social media post, McGuire said he was “honored and grateful to be the Democratic nominee for House District 17.”

    “Thank you to everyone who voted, volunteered, and believed in this campaign,” he said. “I’m ready to get to work for Fairfax County and build on a strong legacy of service.”

    McGuire was trailed in the vote tally by Joy McManus’ 747 votes, Carla Bustillos’ 537 and Russell Brooks’ 271.

    “This contest, which drew four candidates, was made possible by nearly 100 volunteers who mobilized in under a week’s notice and during the busy holiday season to ensure voters could be heard,” read a statement issued by the Fairfax County Democratic Committee.

    McGuire served as the chair of the Board of United Community nonprofit and the chair of the Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board. According to his website, McGuire’s top priorities for the role include strengthening schools, supporting economic growth and lowering costs for families.

    McGuire will now face the Republican nominee in a special election set for Jan. 20.

    Virginia Republicans say they’ll canvas Monday for their contender.

    The late December primary was triggered in Northern Virginia after Del. Mark Sickles announced he was resigning from his posting in order to serve under Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet. Sickles will serve as the Commonwealth’s next secretary of finance.

    Sickles has served in the House of Delegates since 2004 and ranks as the second-highest Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

    WTOP’s Ciara Wells and Gaby Arancibia contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Will Vitka

    Source link

  • Candidates announced in Fairfax Co.’s Sunday firehouse primary for House District 17 seat – WTOP News

    Four candidates for the 17th House of Delegates District in a Fairfax County, Virginia, firehouse primary have been chosen.

    Four candidates have officially been chosen to face off in Sunday’s firehouse primary to fill the vacant seat for the 17th House of Delegates District in Fairfax County, Virginia.

    The selected candidates are Russell Brooks, Garrett McGuire, Carla Bustillos and Joy McManus. They will appear on the ballot in that order.

    Voting will be held Sunday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at three polling locations in Alexandria and Springfield. Voters can also register on the Fairfax Democrats website by 5 p.m. Saturday to vote online.

    The late December primary was triggered in Northern Virginia after Del. Mark Sickles announced he was resigning from his posting earlier this week in order to serve under Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet. Sickles will serve as the Commonwealth’s next secretary of finance.

    Sickles has served in the House of Delegates since 2004 and ranks as the second-highest Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

    Who are the candidates?

    Brooks is a retired public servant who spent over two decades with the U.S. Department of State. According to his website, his top priorities for the role include affordability, health care, education and defending democracy.

    McGuire served as the chair of the Board of United Community nonprofit and the chair of the Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board. According to his website, his top priorities for the role include strengthening schools, supporting economic growth and lowering costs for families.

    Bustillos is currently the president of the Latino Caucus of the Democratic Party of Virginia and is a small-business owner. Her campaign priorities include expanding Northern Virginia transportation funding, defending protections for federal workers and supporting local businesses, according to her website.

    McManus is a longtime teacher at Fairfax County Public Schools and gun violence prevention advocate as the head of Virginia Moms Demand Action. Her top campaign priorities include affordability, public safety and fighting for reproductive rights.

    Where can you vote in person?

    In-person voting locations for the primary will be held at three locations:

    • Franconia Governmental Center — 6121 Franconia Road, Alexandria
    • Fairfield by Marriott Inn & Suites Alexandria — 6421 Richmond Highway, Alexandria
    • Hotel Belvoir Springfield — 6550 Loisdale Road, Springfield

    WTOP’s Gaby Arancibia contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Ciara Wells

    Source link

  • Fairfax Co. prepares for firehouse primary Sunday as voters look to elect new House District 17 delegate – WTOP News

    Voters in Fairfax County, Virginia, will soon be hitting the polls in 2026 to elect a new delegate to fill the House District 17 seat left open by departing Del. Mark Sickles.

    Voters in Fairfax County, Virginia, will soon be hitting the polls in 2026 to elect a new delegate to fill the House District 17 seat left open by departing Del. Mark Sickles.

    Residents were officially given notice of a call to caucus in a Wednesday announcement by the Fairfax County Democratic Committee.

    Candidate filing opens to the public Friday, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., with a list of candidates in ballot order expected to be released shortly thereafter.

    A firehouse primary is scheduled for Sunday, Dec. 28 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Voters will be required to sign a pledge beforehand and provide state-issued identification.

    In-person voting locations for the primary will be held at three locations:

    • Franconia Governmental Center
      6121 Franconia Rd, Alexandria
    • Fairfield by Marriott Inn & Suites Alexandria
      6421 Richmond Hwy, Alexandria
    • Hotel Belvoir Springfield
      6550 Loisdale Rd, Springfield

    Both provisional and curbside voting will be available at all caucus locations, according to officials. Anyone seeking to cast their ballots online is required to preregister first. Preregistration runs until Dec. 27 at 5 p.m.

    The special election date for Fairfax residents is set for Jan. 20, 2026.

    The late December primary was triggered in Northern Virginia after Sickles announced he was resigning from his posting earlier this week in order to serve under Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger’s cabinet. Sickles will serve as the Commonwealth’s next secretary of finance.

    Sickles served in the House of Delegates since 2004 and ranks as the second-highest Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

    In announcing his resignation, the longtime Democrat said he was looking forward to working in Spanberger’s “historic” cabinet, adding that he is “very enthusiastic” about the change.

    “I will miss the House of Delegates and its work, but the friendships I have made over the years will last a lifetime,” he said.

    Sickles’ cabinet appointment follows the similar nominations of Dels. David Bulova and Candi Mundon, who served Virginia’s District 11 and 23, respectively. Special elections for Bulova and Mundon’s delegate postings will be held Jan. 13.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Gaby Arancibia

    Source link

  • Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    California voters have one big ballot measure to consider this year. Here’s what you need to know about Proposition 50 and how it would impact the state. What is Proposition 50? If passed, it would change California’s congressional district map. Normally the map is drawn by an independent commission, but state Democrats drew *** new map to try and get more members of their party elected to Congress. It’s *** direct response to Texas changing their congressional maps in favor of electing more Republicans. *** yes vote would support changing the maps. The congressional districts will get redrawn in *** way that spreads out likely Democratic voters into areas that are normally solved Republican spots. *** no vote would keep the current maps in place. What are people saying about Prop 50? Well, supporters say it is *** crucial step in keeping President Trump’s power in check and counter his push to get other states to redraw their maps. Governor Gavin Newsom is behind this move. Because Republicans hold the majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives, supporters of this measure say it would limit President Trump and his ability to pass items on his agenda. Opponents who are mostly members of the Republican Party say this is just *** power grab by the Democratic Party that would undermine *** fair election. 5 districts are likely to change from red to blue if Proposition 50 passes. District 1, currently represented by Doug LaMalfa. District 3 is represented by Kevin Kiley. District 22 is represented by David Valadaa. District 41 is currently held by Ken Calver. Lastly, District 48, which is held by Darrell Issa. Election day is November 4th, and ballots have already been mailed out. They must be returned or mailed in by that date for your vote to count.

    Special Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    See updates on Election Day.

    Updated: 12:01 AM PST Nov 4, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Election Day has arrived for the special election. On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.(Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot. We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results. What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot. Here’s how to track your ballot. Here’s a look at early voter turnout across the state.Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.Find out how to check here.Still need to learn more about Prop 50? Here’s everything to know.For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California. For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Election Day has arrived for the special election.

    On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.

    (Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)

    Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.

    All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot.

    We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results.

    What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.

    While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot.

    Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.

    Still need to learn more about Prop 50?

    For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California.

    For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Voter turnout exceeds expectations in California’s Prop. 50 special election

    Early voter turnout is exceeding expectations in California’s Nov. 4 special election over redrawing the state’s congressional districts, a Democratic-led effort to counter Republican attempts to keep Congress under GOP control.

    “We’re seeing some pretty extraordinary numbers of early votes that have already been cast, people sending back in their ballots,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a livestream with former President Obama on Wednesday.

    More than 3.4 million mail ballots have been returned as of Wednesday, with votes from Democrats outpacing ballots from Republicans and Californians registered as not having a party preference, according to a ballot tracker run by Democratic strategist Paul Mitchell. Mitchell is deeply involved in the Democratic effort, and drafted the proposed congressional districts on the Nov. 4 special election ballot.

    That’s roughly the same number of ballots returned by this time in the White House contest between then-Vice President Kamala Harris and then-former President Trump in 2024, notable because turnout during presidential elections is higher than in other years.

    About a million more ballots had been turned in by this point in the unsuccessful 2021 attempt to recall Newsom, but that was during the COVID pandemic.

    This year’s turnout is also especially significant because Proposition 50 is about the esoteric topic of redistricting. Redrawing congressional districts is usually a once-a-decade process that takes place after the U.S. census to account for population shifts.

    California’s 52 congressional districts currently are crafted by a voter-approved independent commission, but Newsom and other California Democrats decided to ask voters to allow a rare mid-decade partisan gerrymandering to blunt Trump’s efforts in GOP-led states to boost his party’s numbers in the House.

    Obama, who has endorsed Proposition 50 and stars in a television ad supporting the effort, on Wednesday said the ballot measure will affect the entire country.

    “There’s a broader principle at stake that has to do with whether or not our democracy can be manipulated by those who are already in power to entrench themselves further,” Obama said. “Or, whether we’re going to have a system that allows the people to decide who’s going to represent them.”

    About 51% of the ballots that have been returned to date are from registered Democrats, while 28% are from registered Republicans and 21% are from voters who do not express a party preference.

    It’s unknown how these voters cast their ballots, but the Democratic advantage appears to give an edge to supporters of Proposition 50, which needs to be passed by a simple majority to be enacted. About 19.6 million ballots — roughly 85% of those mailed to California voters — are outstanding, though not all are expected to be returned.

    The current trend of returned ballots at this point shows Democrats having a small edge over Republicans compared with their share of the California electorate. According to the latest state voter registration report, Democrats account for 45% of California’s registered voters, while Republicans total 25% and “no party preference” voters make up 23%. Californians belonging to other parties make up the remainder.

    Mitchell added that another interesting data point is that the mail ballots continue to flow in.

    “Usually you see a lull after the first wave — if you don’t mail in your ballot in the first week, it’s going to be sitting on the counter for a while,” Mitchell said. But ballots continue to arrive, possibly encouraged by the “No Kings” protests on Saturday, he said.

    A spokesperson for the pro-Proposition 50 campaign said they are taking nothing for granted.

    “With millions of ballots still to be cast, we will keep pushing to make sure every Californian understands what’s at stake and turns out to vote yes on Nov. 4th to stop Trump’s power grab,” said spokesperson Hannah Milgrom.

    Some Republican leaders have expressed concerns that the GOP early vote may be suppressed by Trump’s past criticism about mail balloting, inaccuracies in the voter guide sent to the state’s 23 million voters and conspiracy theories about the ballot envelope design.

    “While ballot initiatives are nonpartisan, many Republicans tend to hold on to their ballots until in-person voting begins,” said Ellie Hockenbury, an advisor to the “No on Prop 50 — Stop Sacramento’s Power Grab” campaign committee. “As this next phase starts — and with nearly two weeks until Election Day — we expect already high turnout to continue rising to defeat Proposition 50 and stop Gavin Newsom’s partisan power grab.”

    Amy Thoma, a spokesperson for the other major group opposing the proposition, said the data show that the voters who have returned ballots so far are not representative of the California electorate.

    “Special elections tend to be more partisan, older and whiter than general elections, which is one of the reasons we’ve been concerned about the speed with which the politicians pushed this through,” she said.

    Seema Mehta, Dakota Smith

    Source link

  • 99 stolen special election ballots found in Sacramento County homeless encampment, officials say

    Dozens of stolen, unvoted ballots for the special election on Proposition 50 were found in a Sacramento County homeless encampment on Wednesday, according to the sheriff’s office. Sgt. Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, said deputies were in the area of Elder Creek and Mayhew roads to clean up a camp in the area when they found 99 ballots and other election-related materials among a large amount of other mail.”Obviously saw the urgency, grabbed all those items first, got the ballots and stuff returned to the voter registration,” Gandhi said.He said deputies secured the ballots and election mail and returned them to the Sacramento County Department of Voter Registration and Elections. He confirmed to KCRA 3 that the ballots were voided.”They won’t count for anything,” Gandhi said.The county’s Department of Voter Registration and Elections stated that new ballots will be sent to affected voters on Thursday.The sheriff’s office said the camp was vacant when deputies arrived, and no arrests have been made in connection with the stolen ballots. Investigators are now working to identify those responsible for the theft.”It’s a big deal and it’s an undertaking. So, this is something that will work in conjunction with the post office as well,” Gandhi said. “It’s going to take a lot of backtracking.”Any California voter who has not received their ballot is urged to contact their county elections office to have their ballot reissued.Gandhi said the goal is to protect the integrity of every vote.”Whether it’s mail-in or some other method, make sure you’re taking the steps to track it and making sure your vote counts,” he said.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Dozens of stolen, unvoted ballots for the special election on Proposition 50 were found in a Sacramento County homeless encampment on Wednesday, according to the sheriff’s office.

    Sgt. Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, said deputies were in the area of Elder Creek and Mayhew roads to clean up a camp in the area when they found 99 ballots and other election-related materials among a large amount of other mail.

    “Obviously saw the urgency, grabbed all those items first, got the ballots and stuff returned to the voter registration,” Gandhi said.

    He said deputies secured the ballots and election mail and returned them to the Sacramento County Department of Voter Registration and Elections.

    He confirmed to KCRA 3 that the ballots were voided.

    “They won’t count for anything,” Gandhi said.

    The county’s Department of Voter Registration and Elections stated that new ballots will be sent to affected voters on Thursday.

    The sheriff’s office said the camp was vacant when deputies arrived, and no arrests have been made in connection with the stolen ballots. Investigators are now working to identify those responsible for the theft.

    “It’s a big deal and it’s an undertaking. So, this is something that will work in conjunction with the post office as well,” Gandhi said. “It’s going to take a lot of backtracking.”

    Any California voter who has not received their ballot is urged to contact their county elections office to have their ballot reissued.

    Gandhi said the goal is to protect the integrity of every vote.

    “Whether it’s mail-in or some other method, make sure you’re taking the steps to track it and making sure your vote counts,” he said.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Democrat XP Lee wins Minnesota House special election to replace assassinated leader

    Democrat Xp Lee won a special election Tuesday to fill the Minnesota House seat of a top Democratic leader who was assassinated.

    Rep. Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, held the seat until her death in June.

    Lee is a former Brooklyn Park City Council member. He defeated Republican real estate agent Ruth Bittner in the heavily Democratic district.

    Lee’s win restores a 67-67 tie in the House, and it preserves a power-sharing deal that existed for most of the 2025 legislative session, after the 2024 elections cost House Democrats their majority.

    Former House Speaker Hortman brokered that agreement, which ended Democrats’ three-week boycott. Under the deal, she agreed to end her six-year tenure as speaker and let Republican Lisa Demuth take the position. Hortman then took the title speaker emerita. Most legislative committees became evenly split between Republican and Democratic members, with co-chairs from each party.

    The tie in the House meant some level of bipartisan agreement was required to pass anything in this year’s session.

    In an indication of the national interest in the race, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said Lee’s “commitment to expanding access to education, affordable health care, and good-paying jobs honors the legacy” of Hortman.

    “Across Minnesota, our hearts are still broken by the horrific assassination that stole Melissa and her husband Mark,” Martin, who formerly chaired the state Democratic Party, said in a statement. “Political violence is a scourge that has taken far too many lives. Enough is enough. It must end now. And in every case, each of us has a responsibility to condemn and reject political violence wherever it rears its head.”

    The election to replace Hortman takes place about three months after she and her husband were gunned down in their home by a man impersonating a police officer in Brooklyn Park, a suburb northwest of Minneapolis. Another legislator and his wife also were shot but survived.

    Vance Boelter, 57, faces federal and state murder, attempted murder and other charges in the June 14 attacks.

    Tuesday’s special election also follows another act of political violence, the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah last Wednesday. The shootings have been a concern among voters in the district — and for both candidates.

    Lee said he wants to calm the “charged atmosphere” in the wake of Kirk’s death.

    Bittner said the violence briefly gave her pause about running for office, but she concluded that “there’s no way to solve this problem if we shrink back in fear.”

    Lee, a former Brooklyn Park City Council member, easily won a three-way Democratic primary in August. Bittner, a real estate agent, was the sole Republican on the primary ballot for the seat in the heavily Democratic district.

    Two more special elections will be held Nov. 4 in a pair of Minnesota Senate districts.

    One is to fill the seat vacated by Democratic Sen. Nicole Mitchell, of the St. Paul suburb of Woodbury. She resigned in July after she was convicted of burglarizing her estranged stepmother’s home. The other is for the seat of Republican Sen. Bruce Anderson, of the Minneapolis exurb of Buffalo, who died in July.

    Given that the districts are heavily Democratic and heavily Republican, respectively, control of the Senate isn’t expected to change. But the Democratic candidate for Mitchell’s seat is state Rep. Amanda Hemmingsen-Jaeger, of Woodbury. If she wins, the governor will have to call another special election to fill her House seat.

    Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.

    Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW

    Source link

  • LIVE RESULTS: Walkinshaw wins special election for US House seat representing Fairfax – WTOP News

    Polls close at 7 p.m. in the City of Fairfax and Fairfax County, Virginia, in a special election to fill the U.S. House seat of the late Gerry Connolly.

    Democrat James Walkinshaw will be the newest member of Congress, winning a special election in Virginia’s 11th Congressional District to replace Gerry Connolly, who had held the U.S. House seat representing the City of Fairfax and much of Fairfax County since 2009 and died in May.

    Walkinshaw served as Connolly’s chief of staff and is serving his second term as the Braddock District supervisor on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors. Connolly endorsed Walkinshaw as his successor before his death.

    Walkinshaw beat out Republican candidate Stewart Whitson, a former FBI special agent and Army veteran. The Associated Press called the race at 7:36 p.m., 36 minutes after polls closed.

    As of that time, Walkinshaw had earned nearly 75% of the vote to Whitson’s 25%. Approximately 37% of the vote had been counted, according to the AP.

    His campaign also raised far more than Whitson’s, totaling over $1 million, compared to Whitson’s $224,469, according to the Virginia Public Access Project.

    “What stands out the most for me about this election result is that it is in line with the wide margin that the late Rep. Gerry Connolly won by in 2024,” WTOP Capitol Hill Correspondent Mitchell Miller said.

    Connolly was reelected in 2024 by close to a two-to-one margin.

    “This result should be encouraging to Democrats, who needed a big win to indicate that they are energized heading into the 2026 mid-term elections,” Miller said.

    The victory for Democrats means they now hold 213 seats in the House of Representatives, while Republicans hold 219. Miller cautioned that Democrats should not read too much into Tuesday’s victory, as Walkinshaw was heavily favored to win the race in the deep-blue district that Kamala Harris also won in the 2024 presidential election, with 65.4% of the vote.

    Walkinshaw patterns his politics after his predecessor as a “pragmatic progressive.”

    As a Fairfax County supervisor, he’s led efforts to ban guns from libraries and rec centers, improve pay and benefits for working families, extend tax relief to seniors and military families, and fight climate change, according to his campaign.

    As he prepares to be sworn in as a member of Congress, Walkinshaw said he’s ready to challenge the Department of Government Efficiency and President Donald Trump’s mission to shrink the federal workforce.

    “I want to take on the Trump agenda. I want to end DOGE and I want to deliver results for our community, as I did when I was Gerry Connolly’s chief of staff, as I have on the board of supervisors,” Walkinshaw told WTOP.

    He said going through this special election process has had its challenges.

    “It’s been a whirlwind,” Walkinshaw said. “It obviously started with a very hard loss of a close friend in Gerry Connolly. We had a sprint to the primary, a 10-way primary. So we sprinted to that, and now we’ve sprinted to this special election. But I’ve enjoyed most every minute of it, had the opportunity to meet thousands and thousands of folks here in the 11th District, and talk about their experiences and their challenges and their hopes and their dreams.”

    As of 3 p.m., approximately 20% of the district’s voters had turned out to vote, with nearly 11% of them voting early and just under 9% voting Tuesday. During the last election for the 11th District seat that didn’t coincide with a presidential election, more than 55% of registered voters in the district cast a ballot.

    Special elections traditionally have lower turnout.

    This is a developing story and will be updated.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Thomas Robertson

    Source link

  • Padilla sidesteps questions about a possible run for governor, says he is focused on redistricting

    U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) on Wednesday brushed aside questions about whether he might jump into California’s 2026 governor’s race but declined to rule out the idea.

    Padilla instead said he was wholly focused on promoting the special election in November when voters will be asked to redraw California’s congressional districts to counter efforts by President Trump and other GOP leaders to keep Republicans in control of Congress.

    “I’m focused and I’d encourage everybody to focus on this Nov. 4 special election,” Padilla said during an interview at a political summit in Sacramento sponsored by Politico.

    The 52-year-old added that the effort to redraw congressional districts, championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in response to similar efforts in GOP-led states, is not solely about the arcane process known as redistricting.

    “My Republican colleagues and especially the White House know how unpopular and damaging what they’re doing is, from gutting Medicare, nutrition assistance programs, really all these other areas of budget cuts to underwrite tax breaks for billionaires,” Padilla said. “So their only hope of staying in power beyond next November is to rig the system.”

    In recent days, Padilla’s name has emerged as a possible candidate to replace Newsom, who cannot run for another term. The field is unsettled, with independent polling conducted after former Vice President Kamala Harris opted not to run for governor showing large numbers of voters are undecided and with no clear front-runner.

    Padilla pointed to his more than quarter-century history of serving Californians at every level of government when asked what might be appealing about the job.

    “I love California, right?” he said. “And I’ve had the privilege and the honor of serving in so many different capacities.”

    In 1999, the then-26-year-old was elected to the Los Angeles City Council. At the time, the MIT grad still lived with his parents — a Mexican-born housekeeper and a short-order cook — in Pacoima.

    Padilla continued his steady climb through the state’s political ranks in the decades that followed, serving in the state Senate and as California secretary of state. Newsom appointed him to fill Harris’ Senate seat in 2020, making him the first Latino to represent California in the Senate, and Padilla was elected to fill a full term in 2022. His current Senate term doesn’t end until 2029, meaning he wouldn’t have to risk his seat to run for governor.

    Seema Mehta, Julia Wick

    Source link

  • California to take on Newsom-backed redistricting plan today

    California’s contentious new congressional maps, championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, easily advanced in the state Assembly on Thursday, setting up for final passage in the Senate before landing on Newsom’s desk.

    The new map would shift five of California’s Republican U.S. House seats to be more favorable to Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections.

    The measure passed the Assembly on Thursday with 57 legislators voting in favor and 20 against, and now heads to the state Senate. If the measure is successful, Californians would then vote on a constitutional amendment for the new boundaries during a special election on Nov. 4.

    That election is likely to be expensive and unpredictable given how quickly the effort has come together and how little time there is between the legislature’s actions and voters starting to have their say.

    California’s legislative votes are happening just one day after Texas state representatives passed a GOP-backed congressional map on Wednesday at the request of President Trump, following a weekslong standoff in which Democratic lawmakers left Texas to delay a vote. These new Texas maps could help secure five additional GOP-leaning seats during the upcoming midterm elections. Republicans in the state have been adamant the Texas changes are fair, while Texas Democrats have already signaled the maps will be challenged in court.

    Shortly after the Texas House passed the maps, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom posted “It’s on” on social media. When Texas first launched its redistricting effort, Newsom had vowed to redraw the Golden State’s congressional districts to counter the Lone Star State’s plan and neutralize any potential GOP gains.

    Newsom — who is widely seen as a possible 2028 presidential contender — sarcastically congratulated Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott on X, saying, “you will now go down in history as one of Donald Trump’s most loyal lapdogs. Shredding our nation’s founding principles. What a legacy.”

    Although California Republicans have denounced the redistricting plan as a “tit-for-tat strategy,” the state’s Democrats on Thursday touted that the effort is different from Texas since it will be ultimately approved by the state’s voters.

    “In California, we will do whatever it takes to ensure that voters, not Donald Trump, will decide the direction of this country,” said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. “This is a proud moment in the history of this assembly. Californians, we believe in freedom. We will not let our political system be hijacked by authoritarianism, and today, we give every Californian the power to say no. To say no to Donald Trump’s power grab and yes to our people, to our state and to our democracy.”

    Although Newsom and California Democrats had previously insisted redistricting would only move forward if GOP-led states such as Texas, Florida, Indiana or others continued with their maps, that language was struck from Thursday’s measure shortly before the Assembly voted on it.

    President Trump late Wednesday congratulated Texas Republicans for advancing the new maps, writing on social media that “Everything Passed, on our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself.” He also encouraged GOP-led Indiana and Florida to take on redistricting.

    The relatively rare mid-decade redistricting gambit comes as both parties prepare to face off in 2026 and has major implications nationwide. Republicans have a narrow majority at the moment, and Democrats winning back three seats in the 2026 midterms could be enough to flip control of the chamber if the lines used in the 2024 election were still in place. Redistricting in red states could change that dynamic significantly however, and with it the impact of the final two years on Mr. Trump’s second term in office.

    Texas and California are the two biggest redistricting battlegrounds, but Mr. Trump has pushed similar efforts in GOP-led Indiana and Florida, and New York Democrats have floated redrawing their House map. The Republican-led state of Missouri could also try and redraw a Democratic district in the coming weeks, and new maps are also expected in Ohio, where a redraw brought about by state law could impact some of the red state’s Democratic members of Congress.

    Earlier this week, former President Barack Obama acknowledged that he was not a fan of partisan gerrymandering but he backed Newsom’s redistricting plan anyway at a fundraiser in Martha’s Vineyard and on social media, calling it a “smart, measured approach.”

    Less than 24 hours before  California’s scheduled vote, Newsom joined a press call with Democratic party leaders, urging support for his state’s redistricting effort.

    “This is about taking back our country,” Newsom told reporters. “This is about the Democratic Party now punching back forcefully and very intentionally.

    A draft congressional map unveiled by California Democrats late last week would heavily impact five of the state’s nine Republican U.S. House members. It would redraw Reps. Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley’s Northern California districts, tweak Rep. David Valadao’s district in the Central Valley and rearrange parts of densely populated Southern California, impacting Reps. Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa. And some more competitive Democrat-held districts could be tilted further from the GOP.

    There’s no guarantee that Democrats will win in all five newly recast districts.

    Democrats hold large majorities in both chambers of California’s state legislature. But some legal hurdles still lie ahead, and Republicans in the state have pushed back against the redistricting plans.

    Unlike Texas, California has an independent redistricting commission that was created by voters earlier this century. To overhaul the current congressional map, a constitutional amendment would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in California’s Assembly and Senate and be approved by voters in the fast-moving fall election.

    On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court denied a GOP attempt to stop the mid-cycle redistricting. California Republicans had legally challenged Democrats’ efforts, claiming the state’s constitution gives Californians the right to review new legislation for 30 days. But Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said they “failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time.”

    The GOP legislators who filed the legal challenge told CBS News the ruling is “not the end of this fight,” vowing to keep fighting the redistricting plan in the courts.

    In a phone interview with CBS News on Wednesday, California Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, a Republican, condemned Newsom’s redistricting efforts.

    “This whole process is illegal from the beginning and violates the current California Constitution,” Jones said. “The voters spoke with a loud voice in 2008 and 2010 that they were taking this process out of the politicians’ hands and putting the responsibility into an independent commission.”

    Democrats faced a flurry of questions from Republican lawmakers during hearings this week on the alleged lack of transparency in the drafting of these maps and the financial implications of the Nov. 4 special election.

    “If we’re talking about the cost of a special election versus the cost of our democracy or the cost that Californians are already paying to subsidize this corrupt administration, those costs seem well worth paying at this moment,” said Democratic state Assemblyman Isaac G. Bryan.

    Democratic lawmakers and Newsom have repeatedly emphasized that these redistricting efforts would not get rid of the independent commission and that the new maps he’s hoping to put in place will be the lines used through the 2030 election. The commission would go back to drawing the state’s congressional maps after the 2030 census, according to Newsom, who says this is only being done as a response to Mr. Trump and Texas’ redistricting.

    That notion was rejected by Jones, who said: “Growing up, I was taught two wrongs don’t make a right, so no, it is not justified.”

    Hurricane Erin bringing coastal flooding to New York as it churns off East Coast

    Energy prices climbing twice as fast as inflation in U.S.

    PS5, Nintendo Switch get price hikes after Trump tariffs, other tech products likely to follow

    Source link

  • Obama endorses redrawing California congressional districts to counter Trump

    Former President Obama endorsed California Democrats’ plans to redraw congressional districts if Texas or another Republican-led state does so to increase the GOP’s chances of maintaining control of Congress after next year’s midterm election.

    Obama said that while he opposes partisan gerrymandering, Republicans in Texas acting at President Trump’s behest have forced Democrats’ hand.

    If Democrats “don’t respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy,” he said at a fundraiser Tuesday in Martha’s Vineyard that was first reported by the Associated Press on Wednesday.

    “I wanted just a fair fight between Republicans and Democrats based on who’s got better ideas, and take it to the voters and see what happens,” Obama said, “… but we cannot unilaterally allow one of the two major parties to rig the game. And California is one of the states that has the capacity to offset a large state like Texas.”

    Redistricting typically only occurs once a decade, after the census, to account for population shifts. In 2010, Californians voted to create an independent redistricting commission to end partisan gerrymandering. California’s 52 congressional districts were last redrawn in 2021.

    Earlier this summer, Trump urged Texas leaders to redraw its congressional boundaries to increase the number of Republicans in Congress. Led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, California Democrats responded and proposed redrawing the state’s district lines and putting the matter before voters in a special election in November.

    The issue came to a head this week, with Texas lawmakers expected to vote on their new districts on Wednesday, and California legislators expected to vote on Thursday to call the special election.

    Obama called Newsom’s approach “responsible,” because the matter will ultimately be decided by voters, and if approved, would only go into effect if Texas or another state embarks on a mid-decade redistricting, and line-drawing would revert to the independent commission after the 2030 census.

    “I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time,” Obama said.

    Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • To counter Texas, California lawmakers take up plan to redraw congressional districts

    California Democrats on Monday kicked off the process to redraw the state’s congressional districts, an extraordinary action they said was necessary to neutralize efforts by President Trump and Texas Republicans to increase the number of GOP lawmakers in Congress.

    If approved by state lawmakers this week, Californians will vote on the ballot measure, labeled Proposition 50, in a special election in November.

    At a news conference unveiling the legislation, Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) said they agreed with Gov. Gavin Newsom that California must respond to Trump’s efforts to “rig” the 2026 midterms by working to reduced by half the number of Republicans in the state’s 52-member congressional delegation.

    They said doing so is essential to stymieing the president’s far-right agenda.

    “I want to make one thing very clear, I’m not happy to be here. We didn’t choose this fight. We don’t want this fight,” said Assemblymember Marc Berman (D-Menlo Park). “But with our democracy on the line, we cannot run away from this fight, and when the dust settles on election day, we will win.”

    Republicans accused Democrats of trying to subvert the will of the voters, who passed independent redistricting 15 years ago, for their own partisan goals.

    “The citizens seized back control of the power from the politicians in 2010,” said Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego), flanked by GOP legislators and signs in the Capitol rotunda that said, “Rigged map” and “Defend fair elections.”

    “Let me be very clear,” DeMaio said. “Gavin Newsom and other politicians have been lying in wait, with emphasis on lying … to seize back control.”

    After Trump urged Texas to redraw its congressional districts to add five new GOP members to Congress, Newsom and California Democrats began calling to temporarily reconfigure the current congressional district boundaries, which were drawn by the voter-approved independent redistricting commission in 2021.

    Other states are also now considering redrawing their congressional districts, escalating the political battle over control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Congressional districts are typically reconfigured once every decade after the U.S. census.

    Newsom, other Democratic lawmakers and labor leaders launched a campaign supporting the redrawing of California’s congressional districts on Thursday, and proposed maps were sent to state legislative leaders on Friday.

    The measures that lawmakers will take up this week would:

    • Give Californians the power to amend the state Constitution and approve new maps, drawn by Democrats, that would be in place for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 congressional elections, if any GOP-led states approve their own maps.
    • Provide funding for the November special election.
    • Return the state to a voter-approved independent redistricting commission to redraw congressional districts after the 2030 census.

    Whereas Texas and several other GOP-led states are considering an unusual mid-decade redistricting to keep the Republican Party’s hold on Congress, Ohio is an anomaly. If its congressional districts are not approved on a bipartisan basis, they are valid for only two general elections and can then be redrawn.

    McGuire said California would go forward if Ohio does.

    “The state of Ohio has made it clear that they are wanting to be able to proceed. They’re one of the few states in the United States of America that actually allow for … mid-decade redistricting,” he said. “We firmly believe that they should cool it, pull back, because if they do, so will California.”

    Republicans responded by calling for a federal investigation into the California Democratic redistricting plan, and vowed to file multiple lawsuits in state and federal court, including two this week.

    “We’re going to litigate this every step of the way, but we believe that this will also be rejected at the ballot box, in the court of public opinion,” DeMaio said.

    He also called for a 10-year ban on holding elected office for state legislators who vote in support of calling the special election, although he did not say how he would try to do that.

    McGuire dismissed the criticism and threats of legal action, saying the Republicans were more concerned about political self-preservation than the will of California voters or the rule of law.

    “California Republicans are now clutching their pearls because of self-interest. Not one California Republican spoke up in the Legislature, in the House, when Texas made the decision to be able to eliminate five historically Black and brown congressional districts. Not one,” he said. “What I would say: Spend more time on the problem. The problem is Donald Trump.”

    Seema Mehta, Laura J. Nelson

    Source link

  • Crowded field files to replace former Prince George’s County Council Member Mel Franklin – WTOP News

    Crowded field files to replace former Prince George’s County Council Member Mel Franklin – WTOP News

    At least 13 people – nine Democrats and four Republicans – had filed a certificate of candidacy by Friday’s deadline.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    A crowded field of candidates is lining up to fill the vacant at-large seat on the Prince George’s County Council, with just one month until the primary in the special election.

    At least 13 people – nine Democrats and four Republicans – had filed a certificate of candidacy by Friday’s deadline.

    According to the Maryland State Board of Elections website, the Democratic candidates include County Council Chair Jolene Ivey, state Del. Marvin E. Holmes Jr., former Del. Angela M. Angel, Bowie Mayor Tim Adams, Tamara Davis Brown, Gabriel Njinimbot, Keisha D. Lewis, Judy Mickens-Murray and Leo Bachi Eyombo.

    The state board also reported that Republicans Kamita Gray, Michael Riker, Isaac Toyos and Jonathan White had filed for the seat.

    All the candidates will run in a special primary election scheduled for Aug. 6, with early voting to run from July 31 to Aug. 5. The winner would run in the Nov. 5 general election, the same day as the presidential election.

    They are running to replace former at-large County Council Member Mel Franklin (D), who abruptly resigned on June 14 after serving 14 years on the council. Less than a week later, charging documents were filed against Franklin for multiple counts in what authorities said was a campaign theft scheme that involved more than $133,000 from his campaign account.

    The winner of this fall’s special election would serve the remaining two years of Franklin’s term.

    Belinda Queen, a community activist and former Prince George’s school board member, said the county might have to pay for another special election, depending on who wins.

    An Ivey victory would require an election to fill her current seat representing the county’s District 5, an area that includes Bladensburg, Cheverly and Glenarden. Ivey has another two years on her four-year term. Other county elected officials have been mentioned as possible candidates, but none were on state or county lists as of Friday evening.

    “The taxpayers will have to pay for that,” Queen said. “I get why all of them are running … to see about wanting to serve in a larger position.”

    She believes most voters will support Ivey, who’s already known in the county with her position on the council.

    Ivey’s campaign has already mailed fliers to Democratic voters that include a family portrait with her husband, Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-4th) and their children, a summary of her legislative work and an endorsement from former County Executive Rushern L. Baker III.

    Meanwhile, Queen, who isn’t supporting any candidate, offered advice for all the candidates.

    “The most objective way to get your voice out there is to go in the grocery store and meet the people. That’s the best thing to do,” Queen said.

    The other known candidates include:

    Holmes, who has served as a state delegate for more than 20 years. He’s one of the leading voices on housing topics as chair of the Housing and Real Property Subcommittee on the House Environment and Transportation Committee.

    Adams, who became Bowie’s first Black mayor in 2019. He’s also the owner of a multimillion-dollar company in the county called Systems Applications & Technologies Inc. (SA-TECH).

    Davis Brown, an attorney and community activist, ran in the May 2022 Democratic primary for the District 26 legislative seat against state Sen. C. Anthony Muse (D). She lost by 345 votes.

    Angel, a former state delegate, sought a vacant House seat in December to represent legislative District 25.

    Mickens-Murray is a former school board member who was appointed in 2021. State law passed a year later removed all four appointed members starting this month and will make the body a fully elected board to represent nine districts.

    Njinimbot, an entrepreneur, ran an unsuccessful congressional campaign in this year’s May primary against Ivey.  He came in second place, but only garnered 4,366, or 5.5%, of the vote.

    Bachi Eyombo sought the at-large seat two years ago in the Democratic primary election. So did White, an Air Force veteran who’s now running as a registered Republican.

    Riker is a retired Prince George’s County Police officer.

    Toyos did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

    The state Board of Elections updated the list of candidates at 9:22 p.m. Friday with Lewis and Gray, but no information was immediately available on them.

    Kate Corliss

    Source link

  • Two Candidates Try To Take Over Mayor John Whitmire’s Senate Seat…Twice?

    Two Candidates Try To Take Over Mayor John Whitmire’s Senate Seat…Twice?

    The race to succeed Houston Mayor John Whitmire’s seat in the Texas Senate started at the bottom of the ballot during the March primaries but has now moved to the top of most Houston-area voter’s tickets.

    State Representative Jarvis Johnson and emergency room nurse Molly Cook are going head-to-head in Saturday’s special election to represent Senate District 15 for the remainder of Whitmire’s current term, which runs through the end of the year.

    These two Democratic candidates came out as the lead contenders against four other challengers in March, forcing them into a run-off that will take place later this month.

    Johnson came out with 36.1 percent of the total vote to Cook’s 20.6 percent. According to Nancy Sims, a University of Houston political science lecturer, whoever wins to take over temporarily until the next election will largely depend on turnout.

    Sims describes the type of voter coming out to the polls to cast their ballot in the special election as the habitual voter. This individual knows who they want to vote for, who these candidates are, and what they stand for.

    “Nothing that’s happened previously should impact this election because there’s such a small number of voters that they’re well aware of the candidates,” Sims said. “So, any previous campaigning probably goes out the window.”

    Cook and Johnson’s top legislative priorities intersect with one another and many other Democratic candidates: the expansion of Medicaid, access to reproductive rights and increased funding for public education — among others.

    However, they differ in their approach to passing measures that embody these efforts, largely because of their backgrounds. Throughout the campaign trail, Johnson has referenced that his status as a seasoned politician —  having served as a representative since 2016 and a Houston City Council member before that — would help him have the relationships to get the job done.

    Cook countered that her experience as a grassroots organizer and healthcare professional would allow her to advocate for the community when it matters, not compromise, and breathe life into a legislative body she says needs it.

    In the weeks before the special election, Cook went on the offensive against her opponent. She called into question his voting record, exclaiming to attendees at a debate hosted by the Bayou Blue Democrats that he had disappointed his constituency despite both being on the same side.

    “If somebody’s running on their experience, their experience deserves to be examined,” Cook said. “If somebody has let us down, which I think my opponent has let us down in Austin a few times, then you need to take a critical look at that experience before you walk into the booth.”

    During the April debate, Cook took issue with votes Johnson missed and votes he took, such as approving House Bill 3924 in 2021, which she said chipped away at the Affordable Care Act.

    Johnson combated Cook’s claims, explaining that the votes he did not participate in fell during the 2021 quorum break Democrats took to in response to a restrictive Republican-backed law that banned 24-hour voting and curbside voting.

    In a separate conversation with the Houston Press, Johnson said that he was the co-author of the bill to expand postpartum Medicaid coverage. He questioned why he would want to restrict healthcare access if he helped write legislation that increased it.

    Cook had also said Johnson missed a vote that would’ve protected medication abortions. He said his opponent misrepresented his votes. He said his opponent misrepresented his votes, as there have been bills that lawmakers amended to mitigate the harm the legislation could have caused as initially drafted.

    “When you talk about being an effective lawmaker, there are often times when you have to find common ground or find some compromise,” Johnson said. “When you look at bills by which we’ve had to amend to try to mitigate some of the harm that we think is being done. So we’ll amend those bills and add something to it, and I think that is what my compromise is.”

    “I can vote for the amendment. But if I vote against the bill, guess what? I’ll never be able to amend another bill in the future because I’m going to let you put an amendment on my bill, and then you vote for your amendment, and then you vote against my bill. Why would I let you do that again?” he added. “It’s politics. You have to compromise, especially when you’re in the minority party.”

    Cook has also criticized Johnson’s funding stream. Most notably, the Charter Schools Now political action committee, which she said has ties to the American Federation of Children. This super PAC is funded by Trump donors such as Texas oil tycoon Tim Dunn and pro-voucher advocates like former American Federation of Children chair and U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos.

    Johnson received roughly $110,000 from the Charter Schools Now PAC.

    “[She’s] trying to say that people who gave me money who are pro-voucher makes me pro-voucher? When I’m the very voice that has fought against vouchers?” Johnson said. “If somebody donates money to me, it does not mean I am going to be a yes man, or I am going to do everything they say to do.

    Johnson also uses his endorsement from the Texas American Federation of Teachers to show he is anti-voucher and pro-funding public education.

    Despite the union’s support of Johnson, Texas AFT’s website has an article condemning the Charter Schools Now PAC’s efforts to undermine public education.

    Cook said she would not take funds from PACs tied to these kinds of donors to guarantee that those voting for her could trust her. Johnson fought her over this claim, asking her if she screened with the PAC, to which she confirmed this — but argued she screened with every PAC.

    “The most important thing is that you can trust me,” Cook said. “You want somebody in that seat that you trust to say the right things, to vote the right way, to not take dark, Republican money and to show up over and over again.”

    The final opportunity for voters to turn up to the polls for the special election is on Election Day, Saturday, May 4. Whoever wins the race will serve in place of Whitmire until the end of December.

    Despite the victory, Cook and Jarvis will face off again on Tuesday, May 28, to secure the Democratic nomination against the sole Republican candidate, investor Joseph Trahan.

    “You kind of have to take an eraser to March when you’re at 1 percent voter turnout, anything can happen,” Sims said.

    Sims recalled a similar House race from several years back between former representative Anna Eastman and Penny Morales Shaw (D-148). Eastman got elected in a special session and served a brief stint before Shaw beat her in the Democratic primary.

    “You could see that situation repeat itself here like Cook could win this Saturday, but Johnson could win in three weeks,” she added.

    Faith Bugenhagen

    Source link

  • How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t

    How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t

    Updated at 9:13 a.m. ET on February 28, 2024

    Near the end of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments about whether Colorado could exclude former President Donald Trump from its ballot as an insurrectionist, the attorney representing voters from the state offered a warning to the justices—one evoking the January 6 riot that had set the case in motion.

    By this point in the hearing, the justices had made clear that they didn’t like the idea of allowing a single state to kick Trump out of the presidential race, and they didn’t appear comfortable with the Court doing so either. Sensing that Trump would likely stay on the ballot, the attorney, Jason Murray, said that if the Supreme Court didn’t resolve the question of Trump’s eligibility, “it could come back with a vengeance”—after the election, when Congress meets once again to count and certify the votes of the Electoral College.

    Murray and other legal scholars say that, absent clear guidance from the Supreme Court, a Trump win could lead to a constitutional crisis in Congress. Democrats would have to choose between confirming a winner many of them believe is ineligible and defying the will of voters who elected him. Their choice could be decisive: As their victory in a House special election in New York last week demonstrated, Democrats have a serious chance of winning a majority in Congress in November, even if Trump recaptures the presidency on the same day. If that happens, they could have the votes to prevent him from taking office.

    In interviews, senior House Democrats would not commit to certifying a Trump win, saying they would do so only if the Supreme Court affirms his eligibility. But during oral arguments, liberal and conservative justices alike seemed inclined to dodge the question of his eligibility altogether and throw the decision to Congress.

    “That would be a colossal disaster,” Representative Adam Schiff of California told me. “We already had one horrendous January 6. We don’t need another.”

    The justices could conclude definitively that Trump is eligible to serve another term as president. The Fourteenth Amendment bars people who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding office, but it does not define those terms. Trump has not been convicted of fomenting an insurrection, nor do any of his 91 indictments charge him with that particular crime. But in early 2021, every House Democrat (along with 10 Republicans) voted to impeach Trump for “incitement of insurrection,” and a significant majority of those lawmakers will still be in Congress next year.

    If the Court deems Trump eligible, even a few of his most fervent Democratic critics told me they would vote for certification should he win. “I’m going to follow the law,” Representative Eric Swalwell of California told me. “I would not object out of protest of how the Supreme Court comes down. It would be doing what I didn’t like about the January 6 Republicans.” Schiff, who served on the committee that investigated Trump’s role in the Capitol riot, believes that the Supreme Court should rule that Trump is disqualified. But if the Court deems Trump eligible, Schiff said, he wouldn’t object to a Trump victory.

    What if the Court declines to answer? “I don’t want to get into the chaos hypothetical,” Schiff told me. Nor did Representative Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, who served in the party leadership for two decades. “I think he’s an insurrectionist,” he said of Trump. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who would become speaker if Democrats retake the House, did not respond to questions sent to his office.

    Even as Democrats left open the possibility of challenging a Trump win, they shuddered at its potential repercussions. For three years they have attacked the 147 Republicans—including a majority of the party’s House conference—who voted to overturn President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory. More recently they’ve criticized top congressional Republicans such as Representative Elise Stefanik, the House GOP conference chair, for refusing to commit to certifying a Biden win.

    The choice that Democrats would face if Trump won without a definitive ruling on his eligibility was almost too fraught for Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland to contemplate. He told me he didn’t know how he’d vote in that scenario. As we spoke about what might happen, he recalled the brutality of January 6. “There was blood all over the Capitol in the hypothetical you posit,” Raskin, who served on the January 6 committee with Schiff, told me.

    Theoretically, the House and Senate could act before the election by passing a law that defines the meaning of “insurrection” in the Fourteenth Amendment and establishes a process to determine whether a candidate is barred from holding a particular office, including the presidency. But such a bill would have to get through the Republican-controlled House, whose leaders have all endorsed Trump’s candidacy. “There’s absolutely no chance in the world,” Representative Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who also served on the January 6 committee, told me.

    In late 2022, Congress did enact reforms to the Electoral Count Act. That bill raised the threshold for objecting to a state’s slate of electors, and it clarified that the vice president, in presiding over the opening of Electoral College ballots, has no real power to affect the outcome of the election. But it did not address the question of insurrection.

    As Republicans are fond of pointing out, Democrats have objected to the certification of each GOP presidential winner since 2000. None of those challenges went anywhere, and they were all premised on disputing the outcome or legitimacy of the election itself. Contesting a presidential election by claiming that the winner is ineligible, however, has no precedent. “It’s very murky,” Lofgren said. She believes that Trump is “clearly ineligible,” but acknowledged that “there’s no procedure, per se, for challenging on this basis.”

    In an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, a trio of legal scholars—Edward Foley, Benjamin Ginsberg, and Richard Hasen—warned the justices that if they did not rule on Trump’s eligibility, “it is a certainty” that members of Congress would seek to disqualify him on January 6, 2025. I asked Lofgren whether she would be one of those lawmakers. “I might be.”

    (After this article was published, Lofgren issued a statement to “clarify” her position. “I would consider objecting to the electoral vote certification under the Electoral Count Act if the Supreme Court rules that the 14th Amendment required such action despite the Electoral Count Act,” she said. “I am not considering objecting prior to the Supreme Court issuing its decision and if the decision provides that path legally.”)

    The scholars also warned that serious political instability and violence could ensue. That possibility was on Raskin’s mind, too. He conceded that the threat of violence could influence what Democrats do if Trump wins. But, Raskin added, it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”

    Russell Berman

    Source link