ReportWire

Tag: Somali

  • Trump wrong that 92% of Minnesota Somalis don’t work

    [ad_1]

    It was a reunion of sorts as former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino relaunched his podcast and brought in the man who tapped him for the federal job — President Donald Trump — for an interview.

    Bongino and Trump talked about a variety of issues, including Minnesota, where Trump’s administration has sent some 3,000 immigration enforcement officers, prompting a backlash, especially after the deadly shootings of two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

    Minneapolis, the focus of the enforcement effort, is home to many Somalis, most of whom are U.S. citizens, either by birth or naturalization. 

    During the interview with Bongino, Trump referred to Somali immigrants in Minnesota.

    “These are people that don’t work,” Trump said. “These are people that are just not an asset to our society, to put it mildly. And we’ve got to get them out. … Ninety-two percent don’t work. They have an unbelievable corrupt system of welfare. You know, many of them drive Mercedes Benzes. They had nothing when they came over.”

    Federal data shows that Somalis are poorer, on average, than other Minnesotans. But the notion that 92% of them don’t work is unfounded; official government data shows far lower percentages.

    White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson did not provide support for the 92% figure. “Aliens who come to our country, complain about how much they hate America, fail to contribute to our economy, rip off Americans, and refuse to assimilate into our society should not be here,” she said.

    Statistics for Somalis in Minnesota

    The immigration enforcement buildup came after Trump criticized a spate of fraud cases involving Somalis in Minnesota, which have been prosecuted under former President Joe Biden and Trump. Since 2022, federal prosecutors have charged about 98 people with defrauding the federal government. The majority have been convicted; many cases are pending.

    There are about 108,000 Somalis in Minnesota, representing roughly 2% of the state’s population. Most Somalis came to the state in the 1990s, fleeing civil war in their home country. Some came as refugees — an immigration category for those fleeing persecution — while others were sponsored by family members or moved from other states. 

    Census Bureau data from 2024 estimates that for Somalis in Minnesota, the labor force participation rate — that is, the share of the population 16 and older that is either working or looking for work — is about 72%. That means that about 28% of the Minnesota Somali population is not employed and not looking for work — less than one-third of the 92% share Trump cited.

    The rate of labor force participation is higher for Somalis than it is for Minnesotans overall. In December 2025, Minnesota’s overall labor force participation rate was 68%; that would make the non-working rate about 32%, or four percentage points higher than for Somalis.

    The Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that favors low immigration levels, produced a December report that details demographics of the Somali community in Minnesota using Census data. 

    The report found significant economic and social challenges, including that 52% of children in Somali immigrant homes in Minnesota live in poverty, compared with 8% of children in homes headed by U.S.-born people. It also found that about 39% of working-age Somalis have no high school diploma, compared with 5% of U.S. natives, and that half of working-age Somalis who have lived in the U.S. for at least 10 years cannot speak English “very well.”

    But the report found that when it comes to employment, Somalis in Minnesota measure up relatively well.

    “Somali joblessness is not as common as one would predict based on their population’s low education level,” the report said. “Employment is therefore a bright spot in the data for Somalis, relatively speaking.”

    The report’s author, resident scholar Jason Richwine, told PolitiFact he suspects Trump’s 92% figure results from “a common misunderstanding about welfare and work.”

    Richwine said his research found that about 9 of every 10 Somali immigrant households with children receive means-tested, anti-poverty benefits — but that doesn’t mean that 90%, or 92%, don’t work. That’s because most welfare programs are available to workers, including food stamps and Medicaid.

    Richwine said the economic challenge associated with Somali immigration “isn’t so much that they don’t work. Rather, it’s that their marketable skills are in many cases insufficient to raise their families out of poverty. As a consequence, they use a lot of welfare.”

    Our ruling

    Trump said that among Somalis in Minnesota, “92% of them don’t work.”

    The most recent data shows that about 28% of Somalis in Minnesota aren’t working — a far lower number than Trump’s 92%, and a smaller rate than for Minnesotans overall.

    About 9 in 10 Somalis receive some form of public assistance, but these programs typically allow low-wage workers to participate; receiving public benefits does not mean someone isn’t working.

    We rate the statement Pants on Fire!

    RELATED: Trump leaders say Minnesota officials withhold detained immigrants from ICE. Is that true?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why is ICE in Minneapolis? JD Vance wrong on reason

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security surged 3,000 federal immigration agents to Minnesota — a state more than a thousand miles from the southern border that’s not known for having a sizable population of immigrants in the U.S. illegally — calling it the largest such operation ever. Many people have wondered: Why Minnesota?

    Vice President JD Vance, who visited Minneapolis on Jan. 22 to defend federal immigration enforcement, gave a misleading answer.

    “Right now, we’re focused on Minneapolis because that’s where we have the highest concentration of people who have violated our immigration laws, and that’s also, frankly, where we see the most assault of our law enforcement officers,” Vance said during a press conference.

    The vice president’s visit to Minneapolis came after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot Renee Good on Jan. 7 but before a Border Patrol agent fatally shot Alex Pretti on Jan. 24. Both were U.S. citizens.

    PolitiFact asked spokespersons for the White House and Homeland Security for Vance’s evidence about Minneapolis having the “highest concentration of people who have violated our immigration laws” and received no response. (We did not examine data on assault of officers by jurisdiction.)

    Dozens of other U.S. metro areas have a higher concentration of immigrants in the U.S. illegally compared with the Minneapolis metro area. 

    Immigrant populations by metro area 

    There are about 130,000 immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally in Minnesota, according to 2023 Pew Research Center data, the most recent year available.

    They represent about 2% of the state’s population and about 1% of the unauthorized population nationwide

    The Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan group, estimated a slightly smaller number for Minnesota of about 100,000 immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

    Government officials and nonpartisan groups that track immigration data do not have data showing the number of immigrants the U.S. illegally exclusively in the city of Minneapolis. Instead, they use metro area data; Pew Research Center uses a 15-county area that includes Minneapolis and St. Paul.

    Jeffrey Passel, a Pew Research Center demographer, said the overall U.S. population of immigrants in the country illegally was probably slightly larger in 2025 than the 2023 data reflects, but there was not a large influx in the Minneapolis metro area.

    Pew estimated about 90,000 unauthorized immigrants in the Minneapolis metro area. Dozens of other metro areas have larger numbers, Passel said.

    Immigrants in the country illegally represent about 2.4% of the Minneapolis metro area’s population. That’s smaller than the 4.1% nationally, Passel said. In major metro areas such as Miami and Houston, the share of immigrants in the U.S. illegally was at least four times as big as the share in Minneapolis. Metro areas such as Provo, Utah; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Hartford, Connecticut; and Tulsa, Oklahoma, had higher percentages than the Minneapolis metro area.

    Somalis are a small percentage of the Minnesota population

    President Donald Trump has said the Minnesota focus is because of a fraud scandal involving dozens of Somalis. Somalis represent about 2% of Minnesota’s population. Somalis came to Minnesota starting in the 1990s fleeing a civil war, some as refugees while others were sponsored by family members or moved from other states. Most are U.S. citizens, either through naturalization or birth.

    Since 2022, federal prosecutors have charged about 98 people with defrauding the federal government. The majority have been convicted while many cases remain pending.

    Our ruling

    Vance said, “Right now we’re focused on Minneapolis because that’s where we have the highest concentration of people who have violated our immigration laws.” 

    Vance provided no evidence to back up his statement.

    Immigrants in the country illegally represent about 2.4% of the Minneapolis metro area’s population. Dozens of metro areas have larger numbers of immigrants in the U.S. illegally than the Minneapolis metro area, including smaller metro areas across the country. 

    We rate this statement False. 

    Chief Correspondent Louis Jacobson contributed to this fact-check.

    RELATED: In Context: What did Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey say about police fighting ICE?

    RELATED: Fact-check: Trump officials’ statements about Alex Pretti’s fatal shooting by Border Patrol agent

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. Tim Walz distorts his role in fraud investigation

    [ad_1]

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz recently faced questions about a state fraud scandal involving Somalis that spawned a feud between him and President Donald Trump.

    The scandal, outlined in a Nov. 29 article in The New York Times, centered on a nonprofit called Feeding Our Future that received federal funding to feed low-income children. NBC’s “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker asked Walz, the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee, on Nov. 30 about the schemes mentioned in the article that involved people convicted in Minnesota for stealing taxpayer money during the pandemic. 

    Welker asked Walz: “Do you take responsibility for failing to stop this fraud in your state?” 

    The governor replied, “Well, certainly, I take responsibility for putting people in jail. Governors don’t get to just talk theoretically. We have to solve problems.” 

    His statement gives the impression that state officials were on the front lines of prosecuting historic fraud. That’s not what happened. Federal prosecutors led the investigations and brought the charges.

    We asked Walz for evidence the governor was responsible for convictions.

    “Prosecutions don’t materialize out of thin air,” Walz spokesperson Claire Lancaster said. 

    State officials cited Minnesota agencies’ work, including by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, whose laboratory provided forensic testing on evidence. Jen Longaecker, a Minnesota Department of Public Safety spokesperson, pointed to the bureau’s role in identifying fingerprints on a gift bag used in a Feeding Our Future juror bribery scheme. But that case was an offshoot of the initial fraud investigation.

    Trump cited the scandal as a reason to end Temporary Protected Status for Somalis in Minnesota, writing Nov. 21 on Truth Social, “Somali gangs are terrorizing the people of that great State, and BILLIONS of Dollars are missing.” 

    Temporary Protected Status is for people from certain countries experiencing war, natural disasters or epidemics and protects them from deportation. There are about 700 Somalis in the U.S. with TPS, many in Minnesota. Immigration lawyers said it isn’t possible to take away the status state by state. 

    Before Trump vowed to do that, the TPS program for Somalis across the U.S. was already set to expire in March 2026

    An estimated 100,000 people who identify as Somali live in Minnesota and the majority are U.S. citizens. Many came to the state in the 1990s fleeing a civil war. 

    Trump appeared to be reacting to a recent report from a conservative activist that said Somalis stole the money to use it for terrorism. That claim, which has circulated since 2018, lacks evidence.

    Federal authorities took the lead

    In February 2021, the FBI notified the Minnesota Department of Education about kickback allegations involving Feeding Our Future and allegations the group wasn’t providing meals as it said it had. Two months later, the education department notified the FBI that it believed some meal sites were submitting fraudulent documents and inflating the number of children receiving meals. 

    Prosecutors said defendants stole $250 million in federal money and spent it on international vacations, real estate, jewelry and luxury cars. 

    Then-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland called it “the largest pandemic relief fraud scheme.”

    Feeding Our Future employees recruited people and entities to open sites to feed children, creating shell companies to launder the money. The group existed before the pandemic. But amid COVID-19 school shutdowns, the federal government lifted some requirements about where children could get meals, and afterward the number of meals Feeding Our Future said it served soared. Prosecutors said the defendants exploited those changes and created false documentation such as fake attendance rosters listing how many people had been fed, significantly inflating the numbers. 

    Some state employees raised red flags about the organization, and early in the pandemic, questioned its growth. Then Feeding Our Families sued the state, and a judge told the state it had “a real problem not reimbursing at this stage of the game.” But the judge did not rule on the matter in an April 2021 hearing, and the state resumed paying Feeding Our Future. 

    Walz sought in 2022 to blame the judge for the resumed payments, prompting the judge to issue a statement that the governor was wrong, and the education department had resumed the payments on its own, not because of an order from him, the Minnesota Reformer reported in 2022.

    Federal prosecutors announced in September 2022 criminal charges against 47 defendants — a number that eventually grew to 78.

    Federal officials largely cited the investigative work of federal offices, although they said the state education department cooperated.

    Most of the defendants were of Somali descent. More than 50 people have pleaded guilty while others were convicted at trial, including Feeding Our Future founder Aimee Bock, who is not Somali. 

    Did the state play a role? 

    We found scant mention of state agencies in stories about the investigation dating to 2022. In January 2022, the Minnesota Star Tribune reported the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension was working on the investigation along with federal offices, but news accounts largely cited the federal law enforcement work.

    The FBI had to build its case from scratch, the Star Tribune found, obtaining records from hundreds of bank accounts. The newspaper wrote in 2022 that state and federal records showed that “Minnesota officials provided federal authorities with little or no evidence” that Feeding Our Future misappropriated government money. 

    The Minnesota Reformer and the Star Tribune have reported that state officials could have done more to stop or investigate fraud. 

    The state legislative auditor found in 2024 that the education department provided inadequate oversight and “could have taken more decisive action sooner.”

    Mark Osler, a law professor at University of St. Thomas in Minneapolis, told PolitiFact it makes sense that federal authorities led the case given the complexity, involvement of federal money and potential for conflicts of interest for state officials.

    Osler, a former federal prosecutor, said the state should have detected the fraud earlier.

    “The underlying issue isn’t really punishing people later, it is detecting the fraud before it became so large and stopping it,” he said. 

    Recent Minnesota fraud cases

    During the “Meet the Press” interview, Welker mentioned $1 billion in fraud, a cumulative figure spanning many fraud cases, including more recent ones. 

    Acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson told local ABC affiliate KSTP-TV in July that he expects the scope of fraud will exceed $1 billion when investigators complete their findings.

    In September, federal prosecutors charged defendants in schemes misusing housing funding and money to provide services for people with autism spectrum disorder.

    State Bureau of Criminal Apprehension agents continue to work with federal investigators on those cases, Longaecker said.

    Our ruling

    Walz said he took “responsibility for putting people in jail” in the Minnesota fraud scandal.

    The work of federal investigators and prosecutors — not state officials — led to dozens of convictions in the Feeding Our Future scandal. 

    Reporting by media organizations in the state showed that Minnesota officials provided little or no evidence to federal investigators, who had to build a case from scratch, and that the state could have done more to aid the investigation. 

    We rate this statement False.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At least 32 killed after suicide bombers target Somali capital

    At least 32 killed after suicide bombers target Somali capital

    [ad_1]

    At least 32 people have been killed and dozens injured in a suicide attack at a beach restaurant in the Somali capital Mogadishu on Friday, state media SONNA reported Saturday. Six members of the Somali militant group al-Shabaab targeted the restaurant at the Beach View Hotel using a suicide bomb, according to SONNA.”Security forces neutralized” five of the attackers who carried out the attack on Lido Beach, SONNA reported. It’s unclear if the sixth attacker has been killed as well.Al-Shabaab has claimed responsibility for the attack, saying they were targeting Somali officials and officers, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, which tracks online activity of extremist organizations.This is a developing story and will be updated.

    At least 32 people have been killed and dozens injured in a suicide attack at a beach restaurant in the Somali capital Mogadishu on Friday, state media SONNA reported Saturday.

    Six members of the Somali militant group al-Shabaab targeted the restaurant at the Beach View Hotel using a suicide bomb, according to SONNA.

    “Security forces neutralized” five of the attackers who carried out the attack on Lido Beach, SONNA reported. It’s unclear if the sixth attacker has been killed as well.

    Al-Shabaab has claimed responsibility for the attack, saying they were targeting Somali officials and officers, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, which tracks online activity of extremist organizations.

    This is a developing story and will be updated.

    [ad_2]

    Source link