[ad_1]
Trump’s peace plan is a path to freedom and stability for the strip’s oppressed residents.
[ad_2]
Moumen Al-Natour
Source link
[ad_1]
Trump’s peace plan is a path to freedom and stability for the strip’s oppressed residents.
[ad_2]
Moumen Al-Natour
Source link
[ad_1]
Gerry Baker is Editor at Large of The Wall Street Journal. His weekly column for the editorial page, “Free Expression,” appears in The Wall Street Journal each Tuesday. Mr. Baker is also host of “WSJ at Large with Gerry Baker,” a weekly news and current affairs interview show on the Fox Business Network, and the weekly WSJ Opinion podcast “Free Expression” where he speaks with some of the world’s leading writers, influencers and thinkers about a variety of subjects.
Mr. Baker previously served as Editor in Chief of The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones from 2013-2018. Prior to that, Mr. Baker was Deputy Editor in Chief of The Wall Street Journal from 2009-2013. He has been a journalist for more than 30 years, writing and broadcasting for some of the world’s most famous news organizations, including his tenure at The Financial Times, The Times of London, and The BBC.
He was educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford University, where he graduated in 1983 with a 1st Class Honors Degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics.
[ad_2]
Gerard Baker
Source link
[ad_1]
The suit jacket and pants that won the princess over were designed by Bella Freud, who also hosts the popular fashion podcast Fashion Neurosis. Indeed, the look has several elements that are hallmarks of the royal’s signature style: A British brand, impeccable tailoring, and a meaningful pattern, the Prince of Wales check, also known as Glen Plaid.
Among the reasons that might have led Kate to reintroduce the outfit so soon, other than to give it another spin before sending it to the cleaners as ordinary women would, might be the effort to shift public focus from the clothes she wears to the work she does. Without a new look to analyze, the RAF pilots she visited and the aircrafts she toured could take the spotlight.
But the royal had not counted on meeting the local princesses, young children whose families live on and around the base. The crowd of tots had donned their best dresses to meet the princess. “Where is my dress? If I had known…” she exclaimed, as she stopped to chat with a particularly elegant little group, according to reports in the British press.
“I’m sorry I didn’t wear my dress today. Thank you for coming to see me,” she told one of her little admirers.
Originally published in Vanity Fair France.
[ad_2]
Giorgia Olivieri
Source link
[ad_1]
LONDON—Sarah Mullally was named as the next Archbishop of Canterbury, the spiritual head of the Anglican Church, on Friday, making her its first female leader in its nearly 500-year history. She replaces Justin Welby, who stepped down last year after a report concluded he didn’t do enough to bring a child abuser to justice.
The 63-year-old is a former cancer nurse who joined the Anglican Church as a priest in 2001. In 2018, she became bishop of London, which is the third-highest role in the Church of England, becoming the first woman to hold such a senior role. Women were first ordained Anglican priests in England in 1994, and the first female bishop appointments followed in 2014. Mullally had previously served as the U.K. government’s chief nursing officer, advising the government on nursing matters. She says she became a Christian aged 16. She is married with two children.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
Max Colchester
Source link
[ad_1]
I have a few questions for the foreign governments that approved “ A Palestinian State for Hamas” (Review & Outlook, Sept. 23). What is its capital city? Can Christians and Jews freely practice their religion there? Can women divorce, own property, vote, run for office, get abortions? Will elections be regularly held? Will gay marriage be allowed? Finally, do all citizens of the “state” have the right to kidnap, rape, torture and murder Jews?
The Jewish people are celebrating the New Year of 5786—many of them, living in the state their foes want to wipe off the map. Meanwhile, Hamas refuses to release hostages kidnapped almost two years ago. Useful idiots in the U.K., Australia, France and elsewhere reward them for their intransigence. Recognition of this supposed state is an affront to decency, morality and common sense.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2][ad_1]
Following New York and London, Milan will take its turn at trendsetting as the biggest designers unveil their spring-summer 2026 collections at the city’s annual fall Fashion Week. The event will see several anticipated debuts, starting with Demna’s first collection as artistic director of Gucci.
The house opened Milan Fashion Week with a screening of The Tiger, a film celebrating the Balenciaga defector’s first collection, La Famiglia, which was unveiled to everyone’s surprise a few hours earlier on social media. Directed by Spike Jonze and Halina Reijn, the short film stars Demi Moore as a Gucci heiress on the verge of a breakdown, joined by Edward Norton, Keke Palmer and Kendall Jenner. Its Hollywood-worthy cast gave the evening the feel of a world premiere.
Stars packed the Palazzo Mezzanotte including, Gwyneth Paltrow, Valeria Golino, Anna Wintour, Alex Consani, Anna Ferzetti, Isabella Ferrari, and Jin from the group BTS. The pieces from La Famiglia, available from midnight yesterday evening in ten hand-picked Gucci boutiques, were already being worn by Paltrow (a monogrammed satin suit), Serena Williams (a black mermaid dress with feathers), and Lila Moss (a crocodile miniskirt and matching boots). Moore caused a sensation in a shimmering gold dress with a long train and a dazzling open back. The collection, made up of thirty-seven silhouettes, summons the house’s signatures—reinvented stripes, leather jackets worn on bare skin, larger-than-life feather coats, and unashamed sensuality—and Demna also didn’t skimp on nods to the house’s Tom Ford era in the 1990s. The Georgian designer also took the opportunity to present a brand new Gucci trunk.
As we know, Fashion Week is not only a showcase for the biggest names in fashion: it is also an irresistible showcase for celebrities, who crowd into the front rows of the most high-profile shows. Their attendance is a spectacle within the spectacle, much to the delight of fans and curious onlookers gathered in front of the most glamorous venues. On this first day, Alberta Ferretti gathered around her show a choice cast including Rocío Muñoz Morales, Cristina Marino, and Olivia Palermo.
On the third day of Milan Fashion Week, the sun was shining on the stars who illuminated the first fashion shows of the day. This time around, the standout was David Beckham—an ambassador for Boss, who was highly anticipated as a front row guest after he announced his arrival in Milan with a post on Instagram.
Dressed in an elegant brown suit, the footballer captured attention alongside Aaron Pierre, Meghann Fahy, Fai Khadra and many other well-known faces. Max Mara opened Fashion Week’s third day, gathering celebrities like Paz Vega, Anna Ferzetti, Derek Blasberg, Maude Apatow, and many others. At Prada, we could see Kerry Washington, Bendetta Porcaroli, Emma Chamberlain, Carey Mulligan, Felicity Jones, and Elodie.
Below, find all the stars at Milan Fashion Week so far—day by day, fashion show by fashion show.
[ad_2]
Laura Scafati
Source link
[ad_1]
Dubbed the “Celebrity Cup,” the Princess of Monaco Cup golf tournament brings together 18 teams of athletes and celebrities to raise funds for the Princess Charlène of Monaco Foundation, Princess Charlène of Monaco‘s eponymous philanthropic organization. This year, as was the case in 2021 and 2023, the Cup ended with the symbolic shot from the 19th hole at the Place du Casino in Monte-Carlo and offering the opportunity to take a swing in front of one of the world’s most iconic buildings. Neither Charlène, nor Prince Albert, wanted to miss the opportunity to do so last night at the tournament’s closing party. Albert of Monaco took off his navy blue blazer with the family crest embroidered on it to perform his swing under the watchful eye of the princess.
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Charlène added a layer of difficulty, performing her swing while wearing pointed-toe Jimmy Choo high heels, coordinating with her delicate white lace Elie Saab gown. She had the look customized by opting to remove the long sleeves on the original design sent down the runway.
Princess Charlene of Monaco attends the 4th Princess of Monaco Cup on September 16, 2025 in Monaco.SC Pool – Corbis/Getty Images
With her hair tied back in a low bun with loose, wavy tendrils and displayed her discreet, sparkling earrings, Princess Charlène exemplified minimalist bridal style, serving up elegance without skimping on the romance.
The morning of the tournament, the princess visited a hospital maternity ward accompanied by the Red Cross of Monaco, while Prince Albert spent the morning playing golf at the tournament. The competition was first held in 2019, where it raised 330,000 euros for charity.
On Monday, Charlène dedicated the whole day to charitable causes. In the morning she received two checks for her foundation, and in the afternoon she attended an event for a photo book, the proceeds of which will help fund anti-drowning and animal care initiatives through her namesake charity and Monaco’s SPCA.
Originally published in Vanity Fair Spain.
[ad_2]
Marta Martínez Tato
Source link
[ad_1]
Nikolaos of Greece and Chrysi Vardinogianni live very discreetly in Athens, and rarely make public appearances. The son of Constantine of Greece is dedicated to the world of photography and last February, shortly after his wedding to the wealthy Greek heiress, he presented some of his photographic work at the Tsoukala Stefanidou Gallery as part of NOMAD 2025 in St. Moritz.
“Through his work, Prince Nikolaos continues to explore the dialogue between nature, abstraction, and perception, inviting viewers into a world where materiality and emotion merge seamlessly,” the gallery said in a release.
The prince has a public profile on Instagram, where he shares photos and messages celebrating important days, like March 25, when Greek Independence Day is celebrated. “Happy Greek Independence Day! On this important day, we honor our national heritage with pride, gratitude and hope for a better future,” he wrote last year in the caption of a video of his country’s flag.
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
His wife, too, is rarely seen at public events. She made her debut alongside the Greek royal family last April at an event of the Association of Athenians, one of the oldest and most important institutions in Athens, which celebrated the 130th anniversary of its foundation. She toured the Association with her husband, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law Paolo, then enjoyed the presentation of the Association’s Gold Medals to three distinguished personalities of the city by members of the royal family.
Nikolaos of Greece and Chrysi Vardinogianni were married on February 7, 2025 at the Church of St. Nicholas of Rangava, the oldest temple in Athens. Queen Sofia and the Infantas Elena and Cristina attended the family event as a few of the approximately 100 invited friends and family members.
Originally published in Vanity Fair Spain.
[ad_2]
Nuria Hernández
Source link
[ad_1]
About two years in, “there was so much interest from the Southern men’s stores, particularly, saying, ‘Look, I’m selling your belts well, but, you know, I could really sell a Clemson or a Georgia or University of Texas belt very, very well,’” Carter recalls.
They built a book of business, proving that selling belts was a cinch, and went back to the schools for the licenses. Colleges, Greek organizations, professional sports franchises, bands, and more gave permission for the company to commit their emblems to needlepoint.
Now Smathers & Branson offers not only belts, which can be customized with a multitude of emblems, but also embroidered key tags, hats, leather can coolers, and more. Though Bowdoin didn’t have a Greek system, the pair liken their college living situation to a frat house, touting the belts’ appeal amongst golfers, campus dwellers, and more, with tales of men showing off their belt collections.
Branson recalls “watching [the belt trend] explode at the University of Georgia and Texas,” to name just two schools. “It’s just mind-blowing, the next level of enthusiasm and passion there is for the college experience everywhere.”
Though needlepoint belts remain an eye-catching niche accessory, their prevalence in the preppy-leaning sartorial displays of campus bros is unsurprising, Articles of Interest podcast host and creator Avery Trufelman tells VF. Trufelman produced a full season of her show around the idea of prep, attributing the style’s prevalence to its being a “sweet spot in the American dream.” In the US, there’s no formal class system, no monarchy. Dressing preppy, a trend that Trufelman says evolved from the casual style of Princeton students who would play tennis and then—gasp!—stay in their tennis clothes, rather than spiff up, is an accessible way to signal social rank, whether real or aspirational, and belonging.
Trufelman points to a certain IYKYK aspect of classic preppy brands, like J. Press, which never displays logos and instead may use a school’s colors in an article of clothing, for instance, as a sort of dog whistle for other alums to pick up on. The Smathers & Branson cofounders, too, call out that their pieces show the wearer’s choice of emblems, rather than any brand logo of their own, allowing the company to be both a golf brand and a tailgating brand, for example.
Young women preparing for sorority recruitment are often advised to incorporate personal pieces into their looks to help them stand out; similarly, Trufelman points to items like the belts as a social bridge.
“That’s the fundamental thing about preppiness: It’s an institutional look. It’s about belonging,” she says. “Even if you don’t belong, it’s a way to look like you belong. It’s a way to look like you went to these schools. It’s a way to look like you go to these clubs.”
And though Smathers & Branson belts aren’t necessarily made by a college girlfriend, they are hand-stitched and heirloom-quality. Branson shows off a key tag that he’s carried for some 20 years, featuring a stitched depiction of a golden retriever, the breed of his childhood dog. “This is a sample, I think, from one of the first batches that we did,” he says. “It has been really loved.”
The idea that a young man may be able to inherit his father’s needlepoint belt the same way he might wear a luxury watch passed down to him is part of the company’s success with the preppy set.
“The men’s space that we operate in doesn’t change [in the same way as] high-end women’s fashion,” Carter says. “Some of our best-selling patterns, like American flags or dogs, although we do change them from year to year, they don’t change that dramatically. I think that’s the same thing kind of within frat life, and then collegiate stuff, the game-day clothes, they don’t change necessarily.”
“It’s a classic, traditional men’s look that evolves,” Branson adds. “The shape of a khaki pant changes, the fit the guys are wearing different years changes, but the same basic look is consistent. While I don’t think of ourselves as, like, a Greek business necessarily, we fit into that as an element of what that customer, that demographic, has probably worn since the ’60s.”
[ad_2]
Kase Wickman
Source link
[ad_1]
By hosting an unprecedented short-notice summit with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky and key European leaders on Monday, President Trump significantly raised the prospects for ending Russia’s three-and-a-half-year-long war against Ukraine. The vibe at the opening was affable and positive. The participants genuinely looked determined to work out compromises that only a few weeks ago appeared illusory. It was a good sign for long-term Euro-Atlantic security cooperation in the face of challenges that, in Trump’s words, we have not faced since World War II. Toward the end, Trump’s call to Moscow brought a follow-up U.S.-Ukraine-Russia summit within reach.
But the rising expectations also reveal formidable obstacles on the path to peace. As the world’s leaders were heading to Washington, Putin’s forces unleashed 182 infantry assaults, 152 massive glide bombs, more than 5,100 artillery rounds and 5,000 kamikaze drones on Ukraine’s defenses and 140 long-range drones and four Iskander ballistic missiles on Ukraine’s cities. The attacks claimed at least 10 civilian lives, including a small child. This is how Russia attacks Ukraine daily, signaling disrespect for Trump’s diplomacy.
The Monday summit also revealed that Putin’s ostensible concession at the Alaska summit to agree to international security guarantees for Ukraine is a poisoned chalice. On the surface, it seemed like a breakthrough toward compromise. The White House summit participants jumped on it and put the guarantees at the center of discussions.
And yet there has been no agreement, and the world has more questions than answers. How could the Ukrainian armed forces be strengthened to deter Russia? Who would pay? How could Russia be prevented from rebuilding its Black Sea Fleet and blocking Ukrainian grain exports? What troop deployments would be needed? Who would put boots on the ground in Ukraine? What kind of guarantees should match what kind of territorial concessions?
Such questions are fraught with complex debates. Between the U.S. and Europe. Within Europe. Within the Trump administration. Within Ukraine. And all of that even before having to negotiate the issue with the Kremlin. The net outcome of the past week’s diplomatic huddles will be Putin buying time for his aggression as Washington abstains from sanctions hoping for peace.
Disingenuously, in exchange for this poisoned chalice of a concession, Putin demanded that Ukraine should cede not only lands currently under Russia’s illegal military occupation but also a large piece of the Donetsk province still under Kyiv’s control. That area is home to 300,000 people and is a major defense stronghold. Controlling it would give Russia a springboard to deeper attacks targeting big cities and threatening to bring Ukraine to its knees.
Putin’s offer also threatens to tear apart Ukraine’s society. In my tracking poll with Ukraine’s Academy of Sciences Institute of Sociology completed in early August, close to half of 567 respondents want Ukraine to reassert control over all of its internationally recognized territories, including the Crimean peninsula illegally annexed in 2014. Only 20% would be content with freezing the conflict along the current front lines. The option of ceding territories to Russia still under Kyiv control is so outrageous that it was not included in the survey. Eighty percent of Ukrainians continue to have faith in Ukraine’s victory and to see democracy and free speech — core values Putin would take away — as vital for Ukraine’s future.
Getting Ukrainian society right is important for Trump’s peace effort to succeed. Discounting Ukrainians’ commitment to freedom and independence has a lot to do with where we are now. Putin launched the all-out invasion in February 2022 expecting Ukrainians to embrace Russian rule. Then-President Biden assessed that Ukrainians would fold quickly and delayed major military assistance to Kyiv.
Misjudging Ukrainians now would most likely result in a rejection of peace proposals and possibly a political crisis there, inviting more aggression from Moscow while empowering more dogged resistance to the invasion, with a long, bloody war grinding on.
Thankfully, Trump has the capacity to keep the peace process on track. First, he can amplify two critically important messages he articulated at the Monday summit: U.S. willingness to back up Ukraine’s security guarantees and to continue to sell weapons to Ukraine if no peace deal is reached. Second, he can use his superb skills at strategic ambiguity and pivot back to threats of leveraging our submarine power and of imposing secondary sanctions on countries trading with Russia. Third, he can drop a hint he’d back up the Senate’s bipartisan Supporting Ukraine Act of 2025, which would provide military assistance to Ukraine over two years from confiscated Russian assets, the U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal proceeds and investment in America’s military modernization.
The Monday summit makes the urgency of these and similar moves glaringly clear.
Mikhail Alexseev, a professor of international relations at San Diego State University, is the author of “Without Warning: Threat Assessment, Intelligence, and Global Struggle” and principal investigator of the multiyear “War, Democracy and Society” survey in Ukraine.
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
The recent summit between Trump, Zelenskyy, and European leaders represents a significant breakthrough that has substantially raised the prospects for ending Russia’s prolonged war against Ukraine. The author emphasizes that participants appeared genuinely determined to work out compromises that seemed impossible just weeks earlier, marking a positive development for Euro-Atlantic security cooperation in the face of challenges not seen since World War II.
Putin’s offer of international security guarantees for Ukraine constitutes a deceptive “poisoned chalice” that appears promising on the surface but creates more problems than solutions. The author argues that this ostensible concession has generated complex debates about military strengthening, funding, territorial deployments, and guarantee structures without providing clear answers, ultimately allowing Putin to buy time for continued aggression while Washington abstains from sanctions.
Putin’s territorial demands are fundamentally outrageous and threaten Ukraine’s social fabric, as the author notes that surveys show nearly half of Ukrainians want complete territorial restoration while only 20% would accept freezing current front lines. The author contends that ceding additional territories currently under Kyiv’s control would provide Russia with strategic springboards for deeper attacks and potentially bring Ukraine to its knees.
Trump possesses the strategic capacity to maintain momentum in the peace process through amplifying U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s security guarantees, utilizing strategic ambiguity regarding military threats, and supporting bipartisan legislation that would provide sustained military assistance through confiscated Russian assets and defense modernization investments.
Trump’s approach to Putin diplomacy has been criticized as counterproductive, with concerns that his warm reception of the Russian leader constituted a major public relations victory for the Kremlin dictator that was particularly painful for Ukrainians to witness[1]. Critics argue that Trump’s treatment gave Putin undeserved legitimacy on the international stage during ongoing aggression.
Analysis suggests that Trump’s negotiation strategy fundamentally misunderstands Putin’s objectives, with observers noting that while Trump appears to view peace negotiations as a geopolitical real estate transaction, Putin is not merely fighting for Ukrainian land but for Ukraine itself[1]. This perspective challenges the assumption that territorial concessions could satisfy Russian ambitions.
Military and diplomatic experts advocate for increased pressure on Russia rather than accommodation, arguing that Russian rejection of NATO troop deployments in Ukraine and resistance to agreed policy steps demonstrates the need to make Putin’s war more costly through additional sanctions on the Russian economy and advanced weapons supplies to Ukraine[1]. These voices contend that Putin’s opposition to current proposals underscores the necessity of making continued warfare harder for Russia to sustain.
[ad_2]
Mikhail Alexseev
Source link
[ad_1]
Three years after Kate Middleton and Prince William swapped their Kensington Palace residence for a main home on the Windsor Home Park estate, the family is moving again. Along with children Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, the Prince and Princess of Wales will soon leave their current abode of Adelaide Cottage for the nearby Forest Lodge, located in the Windsor Great Park.
The couple moved to Adelaide Cottage in 2022, motivated by a desire to escape the spotlight of Kensington Palace and to be closer to Queen Elizabeth’s Windsor Castle home.
“William and Kate have been talking to their close friends about leaving Kensington Palace, where they feel very overlooked,” a source told Vanity Fair nearly a year before the couple’s move. “It will remain their official London base, but they prefer being in the countryside and the commute to London would be very easy.”
While the four-bedroom cottage the couple settled on reportedly wasn’t their dream home, it appeared to be the best option at the time. “Finding a way to make Adelaide Cottage work seems to be the best and only option,” a source said at the time of their move. “There are issues with all the other houses, so Adelaide will be the favorite.”
But soon after the family started to unpack, things changed again. Queen Elizabeth died, just as Kate Middleton and Prince William landed in the dwelling. “It was not exactly the settling-in period they had hoped for,” a source said of that period in the Waleses’ lives.
Instead, that move preceded a few years of unexpected struggle. After the obligations of the Queen’s funeral, the young family was thrust into preparations for the coronation of King Charles III. Less than a year later, the king went public with his diagnosis of cancer, while unbeknownst to the world until a bombshell announcement in March 2024, Kate Middleton was also undergoing treatment for an undisclosed form of the disease.
Middleton announced that she was officially in remission earlier this year, while the king’s treatments are reportedly ongoing, both factors that likely impacted the Walses’ latest decision to move. (Less of a factor, it seems, is a recent security breach near their current home, nor a similar incursion the year before.)
Their home-to-be, the 328-year-old Forest Lodge, is currently undergoing minor renovations, the Independent reports, noting that “the royal couple are understood to be paying for the move and renovations themselves, avoiding any extra cost to the taxpayer.” According to planning applications filed in June with the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, changes to the eight-bedroom structure include “new doors and windows, stripping out internal walls, renovated ceilings and new floors.”
The residence, which the king owns as part of the Crown Estate, was last renovated in 2001, records show, after which it was available to rent for £15,000 per month. The family plans to move into their new home in the near future, a Kensington Palace spokesperson confirms, saying “The Wales family will move house later this year.”
[ad_2]
Eve Batey
Source link
[ad_1]
Future Design School’s 2025 Future of Education Report calls on educators and parents to take urgent action to help students build cognitive stamina and emotional resilience.
TORONTO, April 15, 2025 (Newswire.com)
–
Students today are struggling to persevere through even modest adversity – and the consequences for learning and life are profound. According to a new global report from Future Design School, young people’s ability to stay focused, think critically, and push through challenges is being systematically eroded by the instant gratification and addictive nature of platforms like TikTok.
Drawing on insights from schools across Canada and The United States, the 2025 Future of Education Report reveals a troubling resilience crisis in schools across North America. The research highlights how shortened attention spans, overstimulation, and declining emotional regulation are undermining student success – and offers practical, research-backed strategies for rebuilding grit, attention, and stamina in learners of all ages.
“We are watching a generation of students struggle to engage with deep learning because their brains are being rewired by constant dopamine hits,” said Sandra Nagy, Managing Director of Future Design School. “This isn’t about banning technology. It’s about understanding its impact – and responding with urgency to support young people in developing the tools they need to thrive.”
The report outlines actionable interventions for school leaders, teachers, and families – from curriculum redesign and instructional strategies to home routines and digital wellness practices – aimed at protecting and restoring students’ ability to focus, reflect, and bounce back from setbacks.
Key findings from the report include:
Over 70% of educators report that students struggle to concentrate for more than 10 minutes at a time.
Students exposed to short-form media for more than 2 hours daily score significantly lower on tasks requiring critical thinking.
Schools that implemented structured resilience programs saw marked improvements in academic persistence and emotional regulation.
The 2025 Future of Education Report is a must-read for educators, parents, and policymakers seeking to understand and address one of the most pressing issues facing the next generation.
Download the full report and explore tools for schools and families at:
https://bit.ly/fds-futureofed2025
About Future Design School
Future Design School, named one of North America’s most innovative companies by Fast Company magazine, and one of the Top 100 Inspiring Workplaces in North America, partners with K12 schools, districts and higher education leaders in more than 65 countries worldwide to support effective and long term education transformation.
Learn more at https://futuredesignschool.com
About Sandra Nagy (Managing Director at Future Design School)
Sandra Nagy is an experienced educator and consultant with over 25 years of experience. She has worked at organizations including Accenture, Pearson Education, and The Learning Partnership and holds a Master’s in Education from Harvard University. Sandra is currently leading the Education Practice at Future Design School.
Contact Information
Vivian Phillips
Marketing Manager
vivian@futuredesignschool.com
1-800-975-5631
Source: Sarah Prevette
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
In a world that rewards short-term thinking and instant gratification, staying true to a long-term mission is becoming increasingly rare. In this personal reflection, I share the challenges and rewards of dedicating 15 years to The Emotion Machine, and why fighting the temptation of rapid success is key to building something truly meaningful and lasting.
When I first started this website in 2009, I told myself it was a lifelong project that I could continue to build on until the day I died. Fifteen years later, I still stubbornly hold onto this belief, but I underestimated the difficulty of this commitment.
Our current society does not reward long-term thinking. We are taught to live in the moment, take what is right in front of you, and indulge in what is comfortable and convenient; not in what is meaningful, but hard.
This short-term attitude has taken over all of our society from business to politics to relationships.
It’s rare to see someone think on a long timeline, especially 10, 20, 50, or 100 years into the future. In many ways, our brains aren’t wired to think on this scale; but we’re capable of doing it, and developing real foresight and concern about the future is a necessary ingredient to almost all human greatness.
But who is really thinking about the future today?
Companies focus on their daily stock prices and quarterly earnings, politicians focus on their election seasons, new relationships are just one swipe away on a dating app, and modern work has become increasingly focused on gigs and temporary contracts.
Today, it’s rare to see anyone committed to anything for over 10 years, whether it’s a career, a relationship, a creative hobby, or a personal goal.
It’s not completely our faults. Our current world incentives this short-term thinking by promoting hedonism (“give pleasure now”), materialism (“money is the most important thing”), and nihilism (“nothing really matters because eventually I’ll die.”)
All of these beliefs and attitudes come together to create an epidemic of shortsightedness and selfishness, which ultimately lead to a lack of real meaning and purpose. This is not just an individual problem, but a systemic problem that permeates our society and institutions on almost every level.
Our society lacks long-term vision and it manifests itself in countless ways. One example I know from firsthand experience is short-term thinking within the online creator “self help” spaces.
As someone who has been writing and sharing content for over a decade, I’ve seen thousands of other websites, blogs, and social media accounts come and go. Many of them get really hyped up on some version of “become your own boss” or “I’m going to be an influencer”-type mindset, and then give up after a couple months of disappointment.
One fundamental problem is they weren’t ever emotionally invested in what they were building. Their work wasn’t driven by a long-term vision or deep-seated convictions, they were solely interested in what they perceived as an easy and convenient way to get popular or make money.
Once again, materialism shows its weakness. Money can be a bad motivator – even a destructive one – when it clashes with certain goals that require you to think beyond a mere trader mindset to achieve. If you are only motivated by money, then you are at the whims of money. If you are motivated by something deeper, then it takes more than money (or lack of) to stop you.
This same attitude reveals itself within a lot of startup and tech companies. Many of today’s entrepreneurs start new companies or new projects just so they can sell it to a bigger corporation in a couple years. They don’t build things from cradle-to-grave anymore. They don’t care about creative ownership of their projects, or what happens to what they’ve built when it reaches the marketplace, they just see these projects as vehicles for quick bucks and rapid exits.
Over the years I’ve had many opportunities to abandon the mission of this website for quick personal gain, but I chose not to.
I’ve rejected numerous money-making opportunities because I felt they jeopardized the integrity of the website, from paid sponsorships, to SEO backlinks, to advertisements, to having tempting offers to buy the website outright.
In theory, I could sell this website overnight and it would be a massive financial relief to me, especially as costs of living increase and more people experience economic hardship and debt-based living.
These are difficult temptations I wrestle with. This world incentives short-term thinking and immediate rewards. I have to remind myself on a daily basis what my core values are.
I imagine my life if I sold this website. Sure, it takes care of financial problems and it gives me more free time. I definitely have other goals and passions that I could put more energy into like music or screenwriting, but it’s also walking away from fifteen years of blood, sweat, and tears. That’s an emotional investment that is hard to rebuild with anything.
Most importantly, there’s more work to do. I still have hundreds of ideas and drafts for future articles that I need to write and publish. There’s still more to say – and I feel like I’d be doing a disservice to the world if I didn’t say it.
I look around the self help space today and believe my work still adds something special and valuable.
Fifteen years isn’t that long compared to the timescale I’m thinking on.
All of the content on this site is designed to be evergreen, so someone can read an article a hundred years into the future and still take something valuable from it. In contrast, the majority of content on the internet that is focused on news, pop culture, or current events is barely relevant after a week.
From an intergenerational perspective, The Emotion Machine could be a website that exists long after my death if I can find someone to pass it down to as a successor at some point. I would love for it to be an ongoing project. Our tagline is “Self Improvement in the 21st Century” so I’m at least thinking on a one hundred year scale. I’ll have to remember to update that in 2100.
To be completely honest, I’m proud of the work accomplished here so far, even when I feel it isn’t fully appreciated. This site has a vast library of articles, quizzes, and worksheets, and while I find that most people (including monthly members) don’t fully take advantage of these resources, I know they stand on their own as evergreen education for whomever is willing to learn.
This article is a declaration to myself more than anything. It’s been a tough year so far and I needed to remind myself what really matters to me and why I invest my energy in the things I do. People like you also help keep me going, especially those that join and support this work. Thank you.
Enter your email to stay updated on new articles in self improvement:
[ad_2]
Steven Handel
Source link

[ad_1]
There are no shortage of reasons for women to feel shame in our over-exposed, image-obsessed world: We’re shamed for being too fat and too thin, for being too sexual or not sexually available enough. Women are shamed for choosing not to have children and the choices we make when we do. We’re penalized for being too aggressive in the workplace at the same time “lean in” culture suggests we’re not assertive enough.
Unsurprisingly, living in a modern epidemic of shame has taken a considerable toll on our mental health. Girls today are especially in crisis. A 2023 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found that teenage girls are presenting unprecedented levels of depression and suicidality. Though the isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic was a factor, the results echoed previous surveys and reports that began prior to the coronavirus pandemic. A 2020 study by the CDC, for example, reported that, between 2007 and 2018, the national suicide rate among youth aged 10 to 24 increased 54%. A separate 2020 CDC report found that high-school-aged girls, particularly Black girls and LGBTQ youth, had the highest increase in suicide attempts compared to other demographics. Of the more than 17,000 US high school students surveyed in the fall of 2021, more than half of the girls reported persistent hopelessness—double that of the boys. Most concerning, the surveys revealed that one in three seriously considered suicide, and one in ten attempted it. A 2021 study from the Archives of Suicide Research reveals that girls with comorbidity are at the greatest risk: Girls with ADHD, for example, are three to four times more likely to attempt suicide than girls without this diagnosis.
Read More: Teen Girls Are Facing a Mental Health Epidemic. We’re Doing Nothing About It
I have spent my writing career cataloging the ways shame is weaponized against girls and women to keep us from achieving our goals and knowing our worth— inspired, in part, by my own experience with the subject. In the 2010s, after the New York Post brought my past as a former stripper and sex worker to light, the Department of Education seized upon an old blog post I had written about my views on sex work to support their fabrication that I was unfit to teach kids. Their efforts had its intended effect: I felt ashamed, and I ultimately resigned.
I know from my story, as well as the experiences of the hundreds of other women I later interviewed on the subject, how unspoken shame can turn into unbearable feelings of loneliness, despair, and rage. Rage with nowhere to go gets directed at the self as depression, self- hatred, and self-destructive acts. Without intervention, girls and women who experience high levels of shame can suffer negative effects for the rest of their lives: cognitive defects, depression, dissociative symptoms, troubled sexual development, self-mutilation, abnormal stress-hormone responses, physical illness, psychiatric diagnosis—the list goes on. For the sake of our health, we need to reconcile ourselves with our shame and to do that, it helps to understand where all this shame comes from.
Freud described shame as an anxiety or an impending sense of harm. When a person feels shame, the brain reacts as if facing a physical danger. The prefrontal cortex activates and triggers a cascade of stress hormones, just as it would if we were facing a threat. And, in some sense, we are: shame—a fear of a rejection—threatens us on a primitive level, signaling that we have deviated from those around us and triggering our fear of abandonment.
Shame is then a natural part of individuation as well as a by-product of our cultural backgrounds and upbringings. When parents punish, friends pressure, doctors warn, or teachers reward, we get the message of who, what, and how we’re supposed to be. These messages are organized by gender—what is expected of us as girls and women, or as boys and men.
Like all girls, I learned the rules early, and for the most part I followed them: Be good. Be sweet. Be flirty, but not too flirty. Be sexy, but don’t be a slut. Don’t be fat, or too thin. Go to the gym, but don’t get “bulky.” Shave your body. Cover your blemishes. Cover your body, but don’t be a prude. Smile more. Be cool. Reflect men’s interests, but remain feminine. Be assertive, but don’t be a bitch. Speak up, lean in. Be demure. You’re not hungry, you’ll just have a salad. Deny your appetite. Suppress your needs. Deny yourself the sexual pleasure men take for granted. Make yourself just sexually available enough until motherhood when you become invisible. You were just a container all along.
Before this, we’re told that our body is a temple, a thing of value. A woman’s body, we’re taught, is a source of power and capital even as we’re warned we ought to never take advantage of that. To do so—that is, to trade sex for money—is literally a crime.
My choice to trade sex for cash was complicated. My decision to become public and the way I did it, naive. I did not anticipate that I’d become the victim of mass media humiliation that would ultimately cost me my career. I felt a lot of self-blame, and shame. I was made to feel anomalous, but I am not unique. It’s not just women with experiences in the sex trades: What were you wearing? Had you been drinking? What were you doing there that night? At some point, all women are asked to account for themselves, to justify our choices, and to take responsibility even for the injustices done to us.
I wrote myself out of the hell of secrecy and into the body of the woman I am today, and for that, I have no regrets. We all have stories—and telling those stories is reparative. Even as it makes me vulnerable to judgment, I talk about shame. I tell and retell my story. Each time, I see myself in a new, if not shameless, then shame-less light. This is how recovery begins: learning to feel every feeling, seize our power without fear, and share our true selves.
Sometimes healing from shame starts alone, in a journal. Sometimes it comes from finding a just-right friend. Sometimes it starts by leaving home and finding a larger, wider community—at college, in a new city, or with a new group or identity. Regardless, there is peace in knowing that we can heal, and I’m heartened to see more and more women and girls who are taking these necessary steps, especially in a climate where it has never felt more urgent. When we confront our shame—when we begin to understand it as an adaptive strategy that impacts us all—we help decondition ourselves and its ability weigh us down. It liberates us, and in doing so becomes a radical, feminist act, flipping the script on shame as a not a weapon, but as a source of strength.
I’m now a mom; my own daughter is four years old. I’m actively working to break the cycle with her and take shame out of my own personal parenting toolbox. As Kristin Gallant and Deena Margolin, co-creators of Big Little Feelings, have said, “Fear is a terrible teacher.” Shaming our children won’t help them do better next time—just as it didn’t help us when we were kids. Instead, it will trigger a trauma response that will erode their self-worth and make them more likely to shame themselves and others in turn.
Instead, I want to give my daughter the tools to move through shame in a world that I know will try to shame her at every opportunity. Tools like self-confidence, resourcefulness, and a strong sense of who she is and what she believes in.
I know I can’t protect her from shame entirely. That’s not realistic. Rather, I want to give her what it took me many long, painful years to learn: the ability to bounce back from shame when I feel it, and the resilience to come out stronger on the other side.
From SHAME ON YOU: How to Be a Woman in the Age of Mortification by Melissa Petro, published by Putnam, an imprint of Penguin Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House, LLC. Copyright (c) 2024 by Melissa Petro.
[ad_2]
Melissa Petro
Source link