ReportWire

Tag: social media

  • The Dictionary’s New Word And The Secret Language of Cannabis

    [ad_1]

    How the dictionary’s new word and the secret language of cannabis reveal modern culture trends.

    Language is always a bit of a lark, here is a peek at the dictionary’s new word and the secret language of cannabis. The dictionary recently added a new entry that’s already turning heads: “6 7”. The phrase is a popular, largely nonsensical Gen Alpha and Gen Z slang term stemming from a viral rap song and social media memes featuring NBA player LaMelo Ball. It has no fixed meaning, though some interpret it as “so-so,” and its primary purpose is to serve as an inside joke and a playful interjection in conversations to signal group membership and sometimes to playfully annoy adults.  

    For Millennials and Gen Z, it’s another shorthanded phrase floating around.  In this new lexicon, there are subtle ways younger generations talk about marijuana without saying it outright. And like 6 & 7, this generation has transformed cannabis conversation into something playful, coded, and cultural.

    RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

    For Millennials and Gen Z, cannabis isn’t just a plant—it’s a culture, complete with its own lexicon spanning playful slang, discreet references, and digital shorthand. Understanding this “hidden language” offers a window into how younger generations talk about, consume, and normalize cannabis in ways older generations never imagined.

    Take, for example, words like “green,” “sticky icky,” “dank,” or “bud,” which are part of a flexible, evolving vocabulary signaling familiarity and community. But it doesn’t stop there. Millennials and Gen Z frequently use coded terms in text messages or social media to bypass restrictions or maintain privacy, turning ordinary words like “Netflix and chill” or “herbal tea” into cheeky euphemisms for cannabis consumption. The language can be playful, ironic, or even rebellious—a reflection of a generation who grew up amid shifting legalization policies and changing cultural attitudes.

    Social media has accelerated this linguistic evolution. On platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Discord, cannabis culture thrives through memes, hashtags, and emojis serve as shorthand for both discreet communication and cultural identity. The leaf emoji 🌿 or the “420” reference often functions as a subtle nod, creating an inclusive insider language resonating with peers but might fly under the radar of older generations.

    Interestingly, Millennials are witnessing a linguistic bridge between Gen Z and older users. Whereas Boomers and Gen X primarily used straightforward terms like “marijuana” or “pot,” younger generations lean into a mix of humor, irony, and coded vocabulary. This shift reflects more than playful creativity—it signals a deeper change in cannabis normalization. Where older generations often framed cannabis in terms of legality or risk, Millennials and Gen Z describe it with nuance, culture, and even culinary flair, from “infused edibles” to “craft strains” and “microdosing.”

    RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

    The evolution of cannabis language isn’t just about words—it’s about generational perspective. For older users, cannabis conversations were private, cautious, or stigmatized. Millennials and Gen Z, by contrast, have turned their lexicon into a form of expression, identity, and community. And as the dictionary updates to capture these shifts, it marks a cultural recognition of language which has long thrived outside the mainstream.

    Cannabis has always been more than a plant—it’s a social marker, a generational signal, and now, officially, a dictionary-worthy phenomenon. The secret language Millennials and Gen Z share isn’t just clever slang—it’s a reflection of how culture, legality, and identity intersect in a world changing faster than ever.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • White House says deal to put TikTok under US ownership could be finalized in South Korea

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration has been signaling that it may have finally reached a deal with China to keep TikTok running in the U.S., with the two countries finalizing it as soon as Thursday.

    President Donald Trump is visiting South Korea, where he will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping to try to de-escalate a trade war.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday that the two leaders will “consummate that transaction on Thursday in Korea.”

    If it happens, the deal would mark the end of months of uncertainty about the fate of the popular video-sharing platform in the United States. After wide bipartisan majorities in Congress passed — and President Joe Biden signed — a law that would ban TikTok in the U.S. if it did not find a new owner in the place of China’s ByteDance, the platform was set to go dark on the law’s January deadline. For a several hours, it did. But on his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order to keep it running while his administration tries to reach an agreement for the sale of the company.

    Three more executive orders followed, as Trump, without a clear legal basis, continued to extend the deadline for a TikTok deal. The second was in April, when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership that fell apart after China backed out following Trump’s tariff announcement. The third came in June, then another in September, which Trump said would allow TikTok to continue operating in the United States in a way that meets national security concerns.

    Trump’s order was meant to enable an American-led group of investors to buy the app from China’s ByteDance, though the deal also requires China’s approval.

    However, TikTok deal is “not really a big thing for Xi Jinping,” said Bonnie Glaser, managing director of the German Marshall Fund’s Indo-Pacific program, during a media briefing Tuesday. “(China is) happy to let (Trump) declare that they have finally kept a deal. Whether or not that deal will protect the data of Americans is a big question going forward.”

    “A big question mark for the United States, of course, is whether this is consistent with U.S. law since there was a law passed by Congress,” Glaser said.

    About 43% of U.S. adults under the age of 30 say they regularly get news from TikTok, higher than any other social media app, including YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, according to a Pew Research Center report published in September.

    Americans are also more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago.

    A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren’t sure.

    Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users’ data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report.

    The TikTok recommendation algorithm — which has steered millions of users into an endless stream of video shorts — has been central in the security debate over the platform. China previously stated the algorithm must remain under Chinese control by law. But a U.S. regulation that Congress passed with bipartisan support said any divestment of TikTok must mean the platform cut ties with ByteDance.

    American officials have warned the algorithm — a complex system of rules and calculations that platforms use to deliver personalized content to your feed — is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, but no evidence has been presented by U.S. officials proving that China has attempted to do so.

    Associated Press Writer Fu Ting contributed to this story from Washington.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Is the First AI Slop President

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump, a septuagenarian known for his general avoidance of keyboards and computers, has somehow become America’s first generative AI president.

    The most infamous example of his experimentation with AI-generated videos came ahead of the No Kings protests earlier this month. In the clip, the president is decked out in full Top Gun gear, piloting a fighter jet bearing “KING TRUMP” on its side. Instead of a traditional pilot’s helmet, however, the president is wearing a literal crown, just in case the rest of the visuals were too subtle. The plane succeeds in its mission: dumping inconceivable amounts of shit upon fictionalized No Kings protesters in New York’s Times Square.

    This is just the latest AI slop Trump has posted. He’s also shared a racist depiction of House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries wearing a mustache and sombrero, a highly dystopian, bizarre “Trump Gaza” video, and more.

    You have to wonder—how do these videos end up on Trump’s official account in the first place?

    The president of the United States, I’ve learned, is at the very least capable of posting AI videos on main: According to a senior White House official, there are times when Trump will come across a video he finds particularly funny or amusing—either on Truth Social or through other unspecified channels—save it to his camera roll, and release it into the world. Most of the time, though, it’s staffers who identify a clip and gain approval for it to be posted on the president’s main account. Either way, Trump isn’t making the actual videos himself.

    The White House remains cagey as to how the fighter jet video, specifically, ended up happening, and who, exactly, hit the button to post it.

    As a general trend, it appears Trump is typing away on social media less than in his peak posting days, a former Trump campaign official tells me. He has long relied on dictation and annotated printouts, while still being prone to the more than occasional covfefe-esque typo.

    Long before his descent into the AI slop trenches, Trump saw the value in having a team manage his Twitter presence. Trump would go on to strike fear into Republican politicians and business executives with his news-making and market-moving tweets throughout his first term in office, before getting suspended from the platform after inciting the January 6 insurrection. In the social media wilderness, he founded Truth Social in October 2021.

    [ad_2]

    Jake Lahut

    Source link

  • How to Dominate the Next Social Platform, According to Duolingo’s Playbook

    [ad_1]

    It’s hard to overstate how important speed and experimentation are to finding marketing success. And that’s not just good advice for brand-building on TikTok, either. These days, if you’re fundamentally too slow and too scared, you’ll find yourself always playing catch up, basically setting your marketing budget on fire. But with the right mindset, you’ll not only earn success with TikTok audiences but also on whatever big platform comes next. 

    Just ask marketing trailblazer Duolingo, a fearless company whose social strategy was not limited to their TikTok account. While other brands either still see social media as a secondary responsibility for junior staff to run or wrap themselves in layers of rules and approvals, Duolingo moves at the speed of memes and culture. It understands that audiences aren’t waiting around for you to “align on messaging.” The proof of its approach lies in an 800+ percent increase in their market value since it began its social strategy. Forget fluffy brand awareness. That’s real business impact.

    Duolingo didn’t get billions of impressions by following old school rules of marketing. Its team felt empowered and supported to try weird stuff, see what landed, and double down fast. And if brands want to be ready for wherever the next wave takes them, it’s worth taking a few lessons on staying ahead of the curve from one of social media’s favorite brands.

    Build the right team, then get out of the way

    Most would probably point to Duolingo’s social-media team as its secret sauce. To its credit, the brand recognized that its team couldn’t be a bunch of traditional marketing veterans, so it brought together a perfect blend of social-media platform specialists so that its ideas are tailored for each audience and not composed in an environment as stale as a boardroom. Just as important, it gave that team unprecedented freedom to move intuitively—leading to a fast-moving, frictionless approach that many others should follow.

    Know thyself

    Before any brand starts posting, it needs to align deeply on who it is. This isn’t a simple voice and tone exercise, but an opportunity to go deep to uncover what’s off limits so that the rest is open territory. This approach is part of the reason Duolingo can be edgier than a typical brand. The goal is no more approvals and no more questioning—just seamlessly operating from a place where everyone on the team knows exactly what the brand is on social.

    Add personality over polish

    From the brand’s homicidal owl to its Dua Lipa jokes, the world that Duolingo built worked because it felt human, messy, and a little risky. Too often, brands spend a lot of time building robust but rigid strategies without room for experimentation. But social doesn’t work like that. It’s about posting and trying things, listening, and engaging in authentic ways. After all, people don’t connect with brands that sound like robots. They connect with brands that sound like people.

    Create a world, then live in it

    Duolingo is constantly in the comments, roasting people, replying in character, making inside jokes with its audience. It isn’t afraid to blur the line between brand and culture while actually talking back. That constant back-and-forth builds real community, allowing users to feel like they are in conversation with a friend rather than being marketed to.

    Go to the edge, then go further

    Don’t forget to double down on what works. Duolingo saw how much success was happening on its social platforms—from the tone that was created there—and it started to apply that tone elsewhere, including a high-profile Super Bowl campaign. Social is an amazing learning and testing ground that can then be replicated into other areas of the business or marketing. Be social-first in how you discover and test ideas, but then apply those ideas elsewhere.

    These are the organizational and philosophical tools that will not only keep Duolingo ahead, regardless of the platform, but also give a boost to any brand committed to building its muscles of empowerment, personality, and cultural fluency.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Mitchell

    Source link

  • TikTok’s New AI Tools Will Make It Easier for Creators to Produce Viral Content

    [ad_1]

    Be they viral dancers mimicking the moves of Taylor Swift, short-form comedians, or beauty bloggers, creators are the heart and soul of TikTok—and the social media company knows it.

    On Tuesday, the ByteDance-owned company rolled out a series of product updates focused on elevating the app’s creator experience. Announced during the TikTok US Creator Summit, an in-person gathering with more than 300 TikTok creators, the newest updates are set to help them share and make content more effectively, particularly with the help of artificial intelligence.

    Even as the internet is flooded with AI slop, TikTok is betting on the technology. TikTok’s latest product rollout is harnessing the power of AI for content creation, while boosting monetization along the way. 

    “At TikTok, we want to empower human creativity with AI-powered tools that make it easier to create, discover, and connect around original content,” the company said in a statement. “We can’t wait to see how these new tools inspire creators to bring even more great content to life.”

    TikTok’s recent rollout is not the company’s first dabble with artificial intelligence. Since 2024, TikTok’s AI creative suite, TikTok Symphony, has allowed businesses to generate content and avatars, and translate and dub videos by harnessing AI. Earlier this year, the app rolled out AI Alive, a feature that allows static photos to be transformed into short-form videos for user’s in-app stories.

    Still, the recent features are aiming to make creator’s lives easier—at least the creating part. Here’s what’s new.

    Harnessing AI for creation

    To help creators streamline the editing process, TikTok is introducing an AI-powered editing tool dubbed Smart Split. The new feature automatically reframes and clips long videos, as well as transcribes and captions longer content to be transformed into multiple TikTok-ready shorter videos.

    Now available globally on the TikTok Studio Web, the feature allows creators to upload videos longer than a minute for Smart Split to reframe the video vertically. Smart Split can also suggest video length and generate captions for the adapted video, which can then be directly to the app. For instance, a long video podcast can be easily trimmed down and edited into fragments that creators can then roll out.

    Sometimes the hardest part of producing content is not only publishing, but creating it too. TikTok’s AI Outline, which is now available for U.S. users over 18, sets out to help structure the creative process by helping users generate hooks, hashtags, video titles, and outlines based on prompts and trending topics from the app’s Creator Search Insights.

    Additionally, AI Outline divides a user’s video into six customizable parts in the creator’s style. The feature allows creators to lengthen or shorten a title, generate script ideas, and refine their hooks.

    Suggestions made by both new AI tools are set to abide by TikTok’s Community Guidelines, and videos produced using the features will undergo a moderation review prior to publishing on the app.

    Keeping it lucrative

    The company is updating its revenue share for creators by building on its existing subscription program—a Patreon-like setup that allows creators to build a pay-to-join community with exclusive content.

    The company’s announced update will make it possible for creators to get up to 90 percent of the subscriptions profit payouts. Creators with a subscription community will now receive 70 percent of revenue shares, while those meeting extra requirements can rack up an extra 20 percent monthly bonus.

    [ad_2]

    María José Gutierrez Chavez

    Source link

  • These clips don’t show Hurricane Melissa in Jamaica

    [ad_1]

    Hurricane Melissa grew to a Category 5 hurricane Oct. 27 as it neared Jamaica, but videos that social media users claim show the storm making landfall are deceiving — it wasn’t on shore yet when the videos were posted. 

    An Oct. 26 TikTok video shows footage of intense flooding, wind and property damage, and, occasionally, people screaming in English in the background. 

    “Hurricane Melissa Category 5 hits Jamaica with 160 mph winds right now,” says text on the video, which had 1.8 million views as of the afternoon of Oct. 27.

    Other users on TikTok and Threads also shared the video. 

    The Associated Press reported that Melissa could be the strongest hurricane Jamaica has experienced in decades. One advisory said the hurricane had maximum sustained winds of 160 miles per hour, as the TikTok says, but the footage in the post was taken from previous disaster events.

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    Video shows 2018 storm in Maratea, Italy

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The first clip shows high waves topping a safety wall and moving inland, but this footage isn’t from Jamaica. When doing a reverse image search, PolitiFact found the video is from a 2018 storm in the small town of Maratea, Italy. We found a newscast and a report about the storm from the Italian news outlet Potenza News24 City. Getty Images also published the same footage in 2018 about Maratea. 

    Video showing red vehicles isn’t from Jamaica

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The second clip in the TikTok that shows strong winds and two red vehicles also isn’t from Jamaica. The footage appeared in another misleading video shared in August and supposedly from Cheyenne, Wyoming. However, the earliest version of the clip online is from a June 21 TikTok post that says it was from Hurricane Erick in Ometepec, Mexico.

    Video shows storm in Veracruz, Mexico

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The clip where a palm tree falls on a gray SUV wasn’t in Jamaica either. PolitiFact found the same video shared on Facebook in May with a Spanish subtitle saying it was because of a storm in the Universidad Tecnológica del Centro de Veracruz in Veracruz, Mexico. A TikTok user also shared the footage in May, saying it was in the same Veracruz university in Mexico. 

    Video shows a storm in Oklahoma

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The footage that shows high winds and an SUV getting hit by leaves was originally shared June 5 on Facebook by Mike Morgan, Oklahoma’s News 4’s (KFOR-TV) chief meteorologist. Morgan said this was a “weaker tornado” that hit Garvin County. 

    Videos shows footage of 2018 Hurricane Michael

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The clip of strong winds and rain blowing through what looks like the entrance to a parking garage is from 2018. Dan Robinson, a storm chaser, filmed the clip during Hurricane Michael in Panama City, Florida. 

    Video shows storm in Moncalieri, Italy

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The video that shows high winds hitting a street and a white SUV parked under a roof dates back to an August 2024 Facebook post. The caption says in Italian that it is from a storm in Moncalieri, Italy, according to Google Translate. 

    Video shows flooded streets in Palermo, Italy

    (Screengrab from TikTok post.)

    The last clip of cars driving through flooded streets also isn’t from Jamaica. One of  the cars has a European Union license plate, and a reverse image search found the footage is from flooded streets in the city of Palermo, Italy, after heavy rains in June. An Italian news report shows the same video

    We rate the claim that this video shows Hurricane Melissa hitting Jamaica on Oct. 26 False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Social Media Is Telling Our Boys About Masculinity

    [ad_1]

    Common Sense Media’s recent study of over 1,000 adolescent boys (ages 11-17) across the United States revealed important information about how their identity is impacted by online exposure. The study found that their identity around masculinity, their emotional well being and their self esteem are significantly influenced by social media platforms and gaming communities. Here are some of the key findings:

    • 94% of adolescent boys use social media or play online games daily
    • 60% of them find influencers “inspirational.”
    • ¾ of them regularly see masculinity-related posts about building muscle, making money, fighting, dating and relationships, or weapons.
    • Almost 1/2 of boys believe they must follow “unwritten rules” (like not crying or showing fear) to avoid being picked on

    What is happening in teen brains

    During adolescence, boys experience a powerful surge of brain development. The prefrontal cortex—the area responsible for decision-making, impulse control, and planning—develops gradually and remains under construction into the mid-twenties, which can make emotional regulation and long-term thinking challenging. Meanwhile, the limbic system, which drives emotion, reward, and motivation, matures earlier and becomes highly sensitive to stimulation, leading boys to seek excitement, novelty, and peer approval. At the same time, the brain undergoes synaptic pruning, trimming away unused neural connections while strengthening those that are active, making habits and experiences during these years especially influential. Heightened dopamine activity amplifies pleasure from risk and reward, while fluctuating hormones intensify emotions and stress reactivity.

    Together, these changes make the adolescent boy’s brain uniquely impressionable and primed for learning—but also more vulnerable to stress, impulsivity, and social pressure—underscoring the importance of supportive relationships, consistent boundaries, and emotional guidance.

    That’s what makes exposure to this content so concerning—it’s reaching boys at such a sensitive time, when their sense of self and emotional world are forming, and it can influence how they think, act, and relate to others for years to come.

    Masculinity and showing emotion

    From early childhood, boys often hear messages like “don’t cry,” “man up,” or “toughen up,” which teach that vulnerability and emotion equal weakness. These societal norms of men not crying or showing emotion are further enforced by what social media is telling our boys. But men and boys don’t actually experience fewer emotions or less intense emotions than women. So what do they do with the emotions they experience?

    Often times males show anger since that is a “safe” emotion to show publicly. Many adolescent boys intentionally push feelings away in what we call suppression. They decide not to show their feelings because they fear:  

    • Being teased 
    • Getting picked on
    • Rejection by family or friends
    • Being seen as weak and not masculine

    Over time this can turn into repression of emotions which is an unconscious pushing down of feelings. Emotional repression can have a very negative impact on mental health and well being. What starts to happen is that the range of emotions they experience narrows, limiting emotional intelligence, a critical characteristic of a healthy relationship. This emotional restriction can limit self-understanding and make adulthood more confusing. When men can’t express their emotions, those emotions don’t vanish—they turn inward, often manifesting as stress, anger, or disconnection. The result can be loneliness, health problems, and strained relationships.

    What Can Parents Do?

    There was some good news that came out of the research study and that is that parents are adolescent boys’ first choice of support. It also showed that boys with real world relationships have better self esteem and experience less loneliness. There are specific strategies you can use to continue to support your boys and their healthy emotional development. Even if you are met with disinterest or even disdain, don’t stop doing it. They are absorbing it all.

    Emotion Coaching

    Emotion coaching is a Gottman strategy more often applied to younger children but can be adapted and used with teens. The process consists of 5 steps: 

    • Awareness of your child’s emotions
    • Recognizing your child’s expression of emotion as an opportunity for teaching and connection
    • Listening with empathy and validate your child’s feelings
    • Helping your child learn to label their emotions with words
    • Setting limits 

    While this process might look a little different with a teenager, the basic concepts hold true. Being aware of their emotions without judgment is important. Teens may not express feelings in the same way as a younger child. In fact, how teen boys express their emotions may not make any sense to us. The expression may look different than the actual emotion (for reasons previously explained). Helping teens acknowledge and label their feelings is still important. An exchange might look like this. 

    Teen son:  ‘My math teacher doesn’t explain anything, and now we’re getting tested on things I don’t understand!’

    Parent: ‘You seem really upset/frustrated by this.’ 

    Teen son: ‘Whatever’ or’ It’s fine’

    Parent: It sounds like a tough situation.

    Maybe your teen continues to engage, or maybe they don’t. These small interactions matter. You’re not taking the teacher’s side; you are empathizing with your son and validating his feelings. This matters and whether or not it’s obvious in the moment, you are being supportive and helping him develop some emotional awareness. 

    So now when big things happen, maybe someone at their high school commits suicide or there is a school shooting or he gets dumped by a girlfriend, you don’t feel completely at a loss as to how to talk about it because you employ the same strategy as when you talk about more mundane topics.

    Modeling Behavior You Want to See

    It becomes less and less effective as kids get older to tell them how to act or how to behave. What becomes exponentially more important is modeling the behavior that you want to see in them. This means showing them healthy, equitable intimate relationships. Some important components are:

    • Showing empathy
    • Sharing emotions
    • Apologizing to loved ones

    Social media sends our boys the “masculinity message”, outdated ideas about gender roles — that women belong in domestic roles, and that men’s value lies in being tall, strong, or dominant. Much of this content isn’t sought out; it’s delivered to them through algorithms that feed reinforcing messages about identity and worth. As parents we should be concerned that our sons’ developing senses of self-esteem, identity, and mental health are being shaped by these harmful narratives.

    Accepting influence

    Dr. John Gottman discovered that one of the key predictors of a successful relationship is a partner’s ability to accept influence from the other. In his research, he found that marriages were significantly more likely to succeed when husbands accepted influence from their wives — that is, when they respected their partner’s opinions, feelings, and perspectives rather than resisting or dismissing them.

    This concept becomes even more important in the context of dads raising adolescent boys. Not only will accepting influence help men have better relationships, but it will teach their sons an important skill. It will counteract the idea that ‘being a man’ is about always exerting power and control in relationships. When they can take in other people’s perspectives and opinions, it can offer them a broader view of the world. This can be incredibly helpful when it comes to their mental health and ultimately their ability to succeed in a loving relationship.

    Rituals of Connection

    Schedule built in times to talk so that there is a regular time to check in. This can serve multiple purposes. 

    1. You always have a time to connect regardless of what’s going on
    2. It becomes part of your routine and models good communication
    3. It helps reduce stress for your teen
    4. It strengthens your relationship with your child
    5. When something comes up, you might be able to avoid the  foreboding “we need to talk”

    Some ideas are:

    • Meal times
    • In the car (they’re trapped!)
    • As they are winding down for bed (sometimes it helps to talk in a dark room)

    Talk about real life situations

    There is so much going on in the world that can serve as conversation points for you and your son. Use these situations to talk to your son and help understand them better. Choose something they are already either talking about or seeing on social feeds. The idea is to be curious about how they view it and what their opinions are. Here are some starter questions:

    • What do you think about it
    • What are your friends saying
    • Are they talking about it in school
    • What kind of content are you seeing about it

    Remember: the goal is NOT to convince them or change their ideas. In fact you may want to refrain from sharing your thoughts unless you are asked. Keep in mind the teenage brain is naturally self-focused. If a teen feels that you’re trying to persuade or control their thinking, they’ll likely shut down or disengage from the conversation.

    Learn about their gaming

    For most parents gaming was not a part of their childhoods in the same way it is for many kids now. The Common Sense Media study found that ⅔ of adolescent boys are gaming on a daily basis. While there are positives related to it (feeling accepted and socially connected through these gaming interactions), there are still dangers and risks.

    Much of the potential harm is related to online multiplayer gaming especially when you are interacting with people you don’t know and may not be who they say they are. It is reasonable to not allow this aspect of gaming for your adolescent son until they are young adults and in a less vulnerable position. Additionally not all games are created equally; games with pervasive violence are going to have more potential harm. 

    Parents play a vital role in addressing these issues and making informed choices. Talk openly with your teen and include them in the process—it helps them feel seen, respected, and responsible.

    Turn Issues Into Opportunities

    There are countless opportunities to connect with our teens, even if it doesn’t always feel that way. It’s easy to hesitate when interactions don’t bring immediate positive feedback, but our presence and guidance remain essential. We play a critical role in supporting our sons’ mental health and helping them build healthy relationships. Let’s make sure our boys learn what it truly means to be a man from their loved ones—rather than letting those lessons be shaped by AI, algorithms, or social media.

    [ad_2]

    Kendra Han

    Source link

  • The Passive Job Seeker’s Guide to LinkedIn

    [ad_1]

    Not long ago, I worked with an executive who was nervous about updating his LinkedIn profile. He worried their boss would assume they were planning to leave. I encouraged him to do it anyway.

    A funny thing happened: Their boss noticed, pulled them aside, and asked why they were refreshing their profile. Instead of leading to suspicion, it sparked a conversation about their value to the company. Within weeks, he got a raise.

    That experience taught me an important lesson: Updating your LinkedIn profile is not a red flag. It is smart professional branding. And sometimes, it can even work in your favor.

    You might be happy in your current job, not desperate to leave. But you might be curious about what else is out there, always open to something better. That is where being a passive job seeker comes in, and LinkedIn is the perfect tool for it.

    The #OpenToWork mistake

    If you are passively looking, avoid the green #OpenToWork banner. That signal is loud, public, and sends a message of urgency. It can even make you look less valuable, and it will almost certainly alert your coworkers and boss. Not a good idea.

    Instead, use LinkedIn’s private “Open to New Opportunities” setting. You turn it on by clicking the “Open To” button and selecting “Finding a New Job.”

    Pro tip: Only recruiters and HR professionals at other companies see it. Recruiters at your current company will not. This lets you quietly rank higher in recruiter searches without raising a flag internally.

    What to focus your profile on

    Beyond signaling your availability, your profile should look very similar to someone who is unemployed or actively searching. The difference is in tone and presentation.

    • Photo: Professional, clear, approachable. Same rules apply.
    • Headline: Describe what you do and the value you bring. Do not just list a job title and company. Think of this as your personality multiplier.
    • About section: Write it as if a recruiter has a job description in front of them. You want them to say, “This person is already doing exactly what we need.” Highlight responsibilities and results that align with your target roles. Always quantify your work, team size, budgets, and revenue impact. When numbers are small, use percentages.
    • Experience: Keep it clean and consistent. Use logos, quantify results, and explain lesser-known companies in a sentence.

    Pro tip: People want what they cannot have. When a recruiter reaches out about a new role, make sure they know you are open to listening but not in a rush to jump. That positioning puts you in control during negotiations and often leads to stronger offers.

    Why passive looking matters

    Some of the best career opportunities come when you are not actively looking. By keeping your LinkedIn profile recruiter-friendly, you put yourself in position to be tapped on the shoulder for roles that are a better fit or a level up.

    The reality is that recruiters are always searching, even if you are not. If you quietly make it easier for them to find you, you may never have to pound the pavement for your next role.

    [ad_2]

    Steven Perlman

    Source link

  • Highlights from Gavin Newsom’s “Sunday Morning” interview: Proposition 50, opposing Trump, and 2028

    [ad_1]

    In an exclusive interview with Robert Costa for “CBS Sunday Morning,” California Governor Gavin Newsom described the Democrats’ redistricting in his state as an effort to ensure “the future of this republic” – and a necessary measure to counter President Trump’s push to expand Republican gains in the U.S. House and secure its narrow majority.  

    The vote on Proposition 50 this November 4 was just one of the issues the Democrat discussed, including his own plans for the 2028 election.

    Proposition 50

    Newsom has been stumping across his state advocating for redistricting, in response to President Trump’s redistricting push in Republican-controlled states, like Texas.

    Rather than gerrymander districts in the state legislature, as Texas did, California is putting a ballot initiative, Proposition 50, before the voters on November 4 in order to allow for redistricting in next year’s midterm election.

    If Proposition 50 succeeds next week, Democrats will change the boundaries of U.S. House districts in California, making it easier for their party to win up to five more seats. (The state currently has 43 U.S. House seats held by Democrats, and 9 by Republicans.)

    Newsom is framing the effort as something about more than California’s Congressional delegation, but about oversight of the Trump administration. “I think it’s about our democracy,” he said. “It’s about the future of this republic. I think it’s about, you know, what the founding fathers lived and died for, this notion of the rule of law, and not the rule of Don. This rule of popular sovereignty fundamentally, of co-equal branches of government, system of checks and balances.

    Newsom believes that if his party takes back control of the House and replaces Republican Speaker Mike Johnson with a Democrat, the Trump presidency will effectively be over. “[Trump’s] presidency de facto ends, if we are successful, we the people are successful, in taking back the House,” he said. “You’ll have rebalanced the system. Co-equal branch of government begins to assert itself. It appears again.”

    But he fears what may happen if Democrats do not gain control in the House: “If you have a Speaker Johnson, we may have a third-term of President Trump, I really believe that,” a nod to Mr. Trump’s public musing about seeking a third term despite the U.S. Constitution limiting presidents to two terms in office.  

    Trump’s military deployments

    Newsom has fought Mr. Trump’s deployment of federal agents in California – from Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in Los Angeles, to the threat of federalized National Guard troops in San Francisco and the Bay Area (which the president later pulled back). In fact, the state has filed 43 lawsuits against the Trump administration since Inauguration Day.

    Costa asked, “What’s it’s like being the governor of the state of California, and not knowing, day-to-day, if the federal government’s going to be sending agents or not to your state?”

    “It’s a hell of a way to govern,” Newsom replied. “I mean, we’re just governing just profound uncertainty, the sort of tectonic plates that we’re familiar with out here on the West Coast, but on the nature of our politics. I’ve said this – may not be a sort of prudent thing to say about a President of the United States – but I mean, he’s an invasive species.”

    “For California?”

    “For the country. For the world,” Newsom said. “He’s a wrecking ball. Not just the symbolism and substance of the East Wing; he’s wrecking alliances, truth, trust, tradition, institutions.”

    He also rejected suggestions that ICE agents are needed in California because of what the White House called “third-world insurrection riots on American soil.”

    “California cooperates as it relates to criminals,” he said. “We continue to cooperate out of our state penitentiary system hundreds of people every month that we coordinate with ICE to go after the ‘worst of the worst.’ That’s not what this is about, and everybody knows it. You don’t just randomly show up at a car wash and tell me it’s about the ‘worst of the worst.’ You don’t randomly show up at the showrooms or the parking lots of every Home Depot.”

    Podcasting as a means to understand Trump supporters

    Newsom isn’t just opposing Mr. Trump; he’s also trying to understand the MAGA movement. His podcast, “This Is Gavin Newsom,” not only welcomes figures on his side of the political aisle, but also the president’s allies, from Steve Bannon and Newt Gingrich to the late Charlie Kirk.

    Newsom said his own son has reminded him about paying attention to other voices. “We’ve got a crisis in this country besides the crisis that we’ve discussed around the future of this republic,” he said. “We also have a crisis with masculinity and men. Men are struggling. … I mean, suicide rates are off the chart, dropout rates, suspension rates, loneliness, despair, depths of despair. It’s a serious crisis, what’s going on in this country.

    “Democrats haven’t focused on that issue. And I’m very proud of the work, substantive work we’re doing in this, but I’ve also been using the podcast to highlight that.”

    Mocking Trump on social media

    The governor also uses satire to tweak the president, aping Mr. Trump’s prolific use of social media. Newsom’s communications team regularly parodies President Trump’s use of all-caps and AI-generated images, even signing off, “THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. — GCN”

    Gavin Newsom’s social media presence mocks that of President Trump.

    CBS News


    Newsom has said that his social-media posts are driven by both his desire to add a sense of humor to politics, and to challenge President Trump by using Trump-style tactics. 

    2028 plans

    This past July, “Sunday Morning” spent a day following Newsom across South Carolina, a key state in the 2028 presidential race. Newsom worked the crowds, shaking hands and even pulling espresso shots at a coffee bar.

    Newsom’s visit sparked interest among those at his events and in political circles that he might be mulling his own White House bid.

    “I’m looking forward to who presents themselves in 2028 and who meets that moment. And that’s the question for the American people. They’ll make that determination,” Newsom said in the interview this past week.

    Costa asked, “Is it fair to say after the 2026 midterms, you’re going to give it serious thought?”

    “Yeah. I’d be lying otherwise. I’d just be lying. And I’m – I can’t do that.”

    He said it would be important for a candidate to impart to voters exactly why they are running. “Nietzsche said, ‘If you have a compelling why, you can endure any how.’ And so, I think the biggest challenge for anyone who runs for any office is people see right through you if you don’t have that why. You’re doing it for the wrong reasons.”

    “When I saw you slinging shots behind the coffee bar, I thought, ‘This guy might run for president.’” Costa said.

    Newsom, who as a child was diagnosed with dyslexia, said, “The idea that a guy who got 960 on his SAT, that still struggles to read scripts, that was always in the back of the classroom – the idea that you even throw that out is, in and of itself, extraordinary,” he laughed. “Who the hell knows?”

         
    Story produced by Ed Forgotson and John Goodwin. Editor: Chad Cardin.

        
    See also: 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Social Media Might Not Be Rotting Our Brains as Much as We Think, Twin Study Finds

    [ad_1]

    A new study out this week might complicate the narrative over social media’s supposed draining effects on our mental health. It showed only a small correlation between social media use and poorer well-being—one that’s likely explained in part by our genes.

    Researchers in the Netherlands examined data from thousands of twins. They found small associations between using social media more and having worse mental health, but also that these associations were often influenced by shared genetic factors. The findings suggest that social media may not be as universally harmful to our psychological well-being as commonly believed, the researchers say.

    “Our research helps move the conversation away from simplistic claims that social media is either ‘good’ or ‘bad’ for everyone,” said lead author Selim Sametoglu, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, in a statement from the institute. “We show that the effects are modest, and more importantly, at least partly shaped by individual genetic differences.”

    The clarity of twin research

    Twins are very valuable in science. Since they’re so genetically and often environmentally alike, it makes it easier for scientists to isolate the effects of people’s genetics on a specific trait, condition, or health outcome. If identical twins are more similar to each other in a particular way than are fraternal twins or siblings, for instance, then their genes are likely a big reason for that similarity.

    In this new study, the researchers analyzed data from the Netherlands Twin Register, a long-running project keeping track of the mental and physical health of twins born in the area. As part of the project, twins and their families are asked various questions about their lives, including how often they use social media.

    All told, they studied more than 6,000 twins, both identical and fraternal. For social media use, they counted the time spent browsing and posting on popular platforms like Facebook and Snapchat, outside of related activities like playing video games. They also tracked various measures of well-being, including whether people reported having anxiety and depression symptoms.

    As with previous research on the topic, they found modest links between increased social media use and negative outcomes related to well-being. But upon closer inspection, a person’s genes seemed to play a big part in driving this link. People genetically inclined to spend more time on social media, for instance, might also be more genetically inclined to experience poorer mental health as a result of that time. The researchers estimated that genetics alone could account for 72% of the variation in how often people used social media.

    Notably, they also found people with better well-being tended to browse a greater variety of social media platforms, whereas people with worse well-being tended to post more frequently across a smaller group of social media sites. And while most potential associations were mildly negative or non-existent, the researchers did find that higher social media use was associated with a greater sense of flourishing in their lives (someone feeling flourished might report being highly engaged and interested in their daily activities, as an example).

    The team’s findings were published earlier this June in the journal Behavior Genetics.

    What to think about your social media time

    The authors say their work should add more nuance to the discussion over the purported harms of social media, and they further argue that broad actions to curtail social media use could be counterproductive in their own right.

    “We shouldn’t let headlines like ‘social media is toxic’ distract us from what really matters: each person’s unique background and current state of life. Simply blaming social media use, or restricting access to platforms, won’t solve our well-being and mental health challenges. Instead, we need to focus on the individual—because genes, context, and support all matter,” Sametoglu said.

    Personally, I’m of the mind that, like most things in life, a little moderation goes a long way. So while it’s good to know that my time on Reddit probably isn’t rotting my brain (too much), I’m still going to take regular breaks from doom-scrolling just the same.

    [ad_2]

    Ed Cara

    Source link

  • Trail Blazers coach Chauncey Billups charged in Mafia-backed poker scheme

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncey Billups and Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier were arrested Thursday along with more than 30 other people accused of participating in schemes involving illegal sports betting and rigged poker games backed by the Mafia, authorities said.

    Rozier is accused of participating in an illegal sports betting scheme using private insider NBA information, officials said. Billups, a Denver native who starred for the Nuggets during a long playing career, is charged in a separate indictment alleging a wide-ranging scheme to rig underground poker games that were backed by Mafia families, authorities said.

    Both men face money laundering and wire fraud conspiracy charges and were expected to make initial court appearances later Thursday.

    In the first case, six defendants are accused of participating in an insider sports betting conspiracy that exploited confidential information about NBA athletes and teams, said Joseph Nocella, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. He called it “one of the most brazen sports corruption schemes since online sports betting became widely legalized in the United States.”

    The second case involves 31 defendants in a nationwide scheme to rig illegal poker games, Nocella said. The defendants include former professional athletes accused of using technology to steal millions of dollars in underground poker games in the New York area that were backed by Mafia families, he said.

    “My message to the defendants who’ve been rounded up today is this: Your winning streak has ended. Your luck has run out,” Nocella said.

    A message seeking comment was left Thursday morning with Billups. A message was also left with Rozier’s lawyer, Jim Trusty. Trusty previously told ESPN that Rozier was told that an initial investigation determined he did nothing wrong after he met with NBA and FBI officials in 2023, the sports network reported.

    In the sports betting scheme, players sometimes altered their performance or took themselves out of games early, New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said. In one instance, Rozier, while playing for the Hornets, told people he was planning to leave the game early with a “supposed injury,” allowing them to place wagers that raked in thousands of dollars, Tisch said.

    The indictment of Rozier and others says there are nine unnamed co-conspirators, including a Florida resident who was an NBA player, an Oregon resident who was an NBA player from about 1997 to 2014 and an NBA coach since at least 2021, as well as a relative of Rozier. Billups played in the NBA from 1997 to 2014 and currently resides in Portland as the Trail Blazers’ head coach.

    Rozier and other defendants “had access to private information known by NBA players or NBA coaches” that was likely to affect the outcome of games or players’ performances and provided that information to other co-conspirators in exchange for either a flat fee or a share of betting profits, the indictment says.

    The NBA placed Billups and Rozier on immediate leave Thursday and released a statement: “We are in the process of reviewing the federal indictments announced today. Terry Rozier and Chauncey Billups are being placed on immediate leave from their teams, and we will continue to cooperate with the relevant authorities. We take these allegations with the utmost seriousness, and the integrity of our game remains our top priority.”

    Rozier was in uniform as the Heat played the Magic on Wednesday evening in Orlando, Florida, in the season opener for both teams, though he did not play in the game. He was taken into custody in Orlando early Thursday morning. The team did not immediately comment on the arrest.

    The case was brought by the U.S. attorney’s office in Brooklyn that previously prosecuted ex-NBA player Jontay Porter. The former Toronto Raptors center pleaded guilty to charges that he withdrew early from games, claiming illness or injury, so that those in the know could win big by betting on him to underperform expectations.

    Billups was inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame last year. The five-time All-Star and three-time All-NBA point guard led the Detroit Pistons to their third league title in 2004 as NBA Finals MVP.

    The Denver-born phenom graduated from George Washington High School and played basketball at CU before being selected with the No. 3 overall pick in the 1997 NBA draft by the Boston Celtics.  Known as Mr. Big Shot nationally and the King of Park Hill locally in Denver, Billups also played for Toronto, Denver, Minnesota, the New York Knicks and the Los Angeles Clippers. Billups won the Joe Dumars Trophy, the NBA’s sportsmanship award, in 2009 while playing for his hometown Nuggets.

    The 49-year-old Billups is in his fifth season as Portland’s coach, compiling a 117-212 record. The Trail Blazers opened the season Wednesday night at home with a 118-114 loss to Minnesota. Billups’ brother, Rodney, is currently the Nuggets’ director of player development and an assistant coach on David Adelman’s staff.

    A game involving Rozier that has been in question was a matchup between the Hornets and the New Orleans Pelicans on March 23, 2023. Rozier played the first 9 minutes and 36 seconds of that game — and not only did not return that night, citing a foot issue, but did not play again that season. Charlotte had eight games remaining and was not in playoff contention, so it did not seem particularly unusual that Rozier was shut down for the season’s final games.

    In that game, Rozier finished with five points, four rebounds and two assists in that opening period — a productive quarter but well below his usual total output for a full game.

    Posts still online from March 23, 2023, show that some bettors were furious with sportsbooks that evening when it became evident that Rozier was not going to return to the Charlotte-New Orleans game after the first quarter, with many turning to social media to say that something “shady” had gone on regarding the prop bets involving his stats for that night.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • EU accuses Meta and TikTok of breaching transparency rules

    [ad_1]

    BRUSSELS — The European Union on Friday said Meta and TitTok had breached their transparency obligations after an investigation that could result in billions of dollars in fines.

    The inquiry found both companies had violated the Digital Services Act, the EU’s trailblazing digital rule book that imposes a set of strict requirements designed to keep internet users safe online, including making it easier to report counterfeit or unsafe goods or flag harmful or illegal content like hate speech, as well as a ban on ads targeted at children.

    “We are making sure platforms are accountable for their services, as ensured by EU law, towards users and society,” said Henna Virkunnen, the EU’s executive vice president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy in a post on X. ““Our democracies depend on trust. That means platforms must empower users, respect their rights, and open their systems to scrutiny. The DSA makes this a duty, not a choice.”

    The 27-nation bloc launched investigations in 2024 into both Meta and TikTok. They found that the companies did not allow easy access to data for researchers. They also found that Meta’s Instagram and Facebook did not make it easy for users to flag illegal content and effectively challenge moderation decisions. “Allowing researchers access to platforms’ data is an essential transparency obligation under the DSA, as it provides public scrutiny into the potential impact of platforms on our physical and mental health,” according to a statement by the European Commission, the EU’s executive body. The inquiry found both Facebook and Instagram deployed “dark patterns” or deceptive interface designs for its protocol for flagging malicious content like child sex abuse or terrorist content. That led to a kind of obfuscation, with the Commission saying it was “confusing and dissuading” and “may therefore be ineffective.”

    Meta spokesperson Ben Walters said the company disagrees with the findings but would continue to negotiate with the EU over compliance. “We have introduced changes to our content reporting options, appeals process, and data access tools since the DSA came into force and are confident that these solutions match what is required under the law in the EU,” he said. TikTok said Friday that it would review the findings but said that the transparency obligations of the DSA conflict with the EU’s strict privacy rules, the General Data Protection Regulation. “If it is not possible to fully comply with both, we urge regulators to provide clarity on how these obligations should be reconciled,” said Paolo Ganino, a spokesperson for TikTok.

    Meta and TikTok can now file a response to the inquiry. Ultimately, the EU could fine the companies up to 6% of their annual profits — which could be in the billions.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Dunning-Kruger Effect Has Been Cited for 26 Years, but Most People Still Misunderstand It

    [ad_1]

    Few psychological rules have as high a public profile as the Dunning-Kruger effect. Way back in 1999, David Dunning and Justin Kruger showed that the people who were least competent at a given task were also the most confident in their abilities. Meanwhile, the most skilled are the most unsure.

    In the 26 years since Dunning and Kruger published their landmark paper, scientists have debated the details of the findings. But the public has run with it. It’s not hard to see why. A theory that states the dumbest among are often the loudest and most overconfident seems to explain so much about modern life.

    Plus, it’s a handy grenade to throw in a social-media fight. Search “Dunning-Kruger Effect” online and you’ll find huge numbers of people labeling those they disagree as obvious cases of the effect in action.

    It’s a satisfying way to dunk on your opponents. But there’s one big problem with using the Dunning-Kruger as a weapon in this way. David Dunning himself insists it’s a misunderstanding. 

    You probably misuse the Dunning-Kruger Effect

    On a recent episode of the ZME Science podcast, host Corey Powell sums up the popular understanding of the Dunning-Kruger effect this way: “Stupid people don’t know they’re stupid.” Is that a correct understanding of the theory that bears his name, he asked David Dunning. 

    As pleasant as it might be to write off those you disagree with as hopelessly dim and deluded, the Dunning-Kruger effect isn’t actually about anyone’s general intelligence, Dunning explained. It’s about what happens when you gain just a little knowledge in a particular domain.

    When you first start learning a bit about a particular subject, you’re highly likely to overestimate your understanding. That applies to all of us, not just those with less than sky-high IQ scores

    “It’s not about general stupidity. It’s about each and every one of us, sooner or later,” he says. “We each have an array of expertise, and we each have an array of places we shouldn’t be stepping into, thinking we know just as much as the experts.” 

    A warning, not an insult 

    Dunking on others’ oblivious idiocy, as tempting as it can be, isn’t actually the takeaway message of the Dunning-Kruger effect according to Dunning. Instead, it’s to be mindful of your own overconfidence, especially in areas where you don’t have deep domain expertise. 

    The point isn’t to help you spot others’ stupidity. It’s to alert you to the constant potential for your own. Or as Dunning puts it: “Our ignorance is an everyday companion that we will all carry for the rest of our lives.” 

    That might seem bleak, but Dunning actually sounds pretty upbeat in the interview. How can that be? Because, he says, while there’s no way to outrun the human tendency towards overconfidence, there are steps you can take to guard against it. 

    7 ways to avoid falling prey to the Dunning-Kruger effect 

    The podcast discussion doesn’t delve deeply into how to do that. But elsewhere, Dunning and other psychologists have offered plenty of suggestions: 

    • Lean on feedback. “A lot of the issues or problems we get into, we get into because we’re doing it all by ourselves,” Dunning told Vox. “If we consult, chat, schmooze with other people, often we learn things or get different perspectives that can be quite helpful.” Stress test your ideas and knowledge by talking to other people.  
    • Imagine the worst-case scenario. “Ask yourself where you could be wrong if the decision is an important one. Or how can your plans end up in disaster? Think that through—it matters,” Dunning suggests.
    • Think in probabilities. Citing the work of fellow psychologist Philip Tetlock, Dunning observes that people who think “in terms of probabilities tend to do much better in forecasting and anticipating what is going to happen in the world than people who think in certainties.” So don’t ask, “Will X happen?” but instead, “What’s the probability X will happen?”
    • Apply the 10-Percent Principle. Psychologist Adam Grant agrees that being smart and educated doesn’t protect you from overconfidence. In fact, it can make it more likely. His solution is the 10-Percent Principle: “Be 10 percent more skeptical of people you agree with—and 10 percent more charitable to people you disagree with.”  
    • Know when to trust your gut. Dunning believes slower decisions are usually better decisions. But according to the late Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, you can trust your gut in situations that meet three conditions: the area you are looking at is actually predictable (so yes to chess, no to the stock market), you have a lot of practice, and you have received firm, fast feedback in the past. 
    • Approach problems like a scientist. Scientists are trained to look for evidence to disprove their hypotheses, which acts as a brake on the Dunning-Kruger effect. But you don’t have to be a scientist to think like one. Grant also suggests more of us should “look for reasons why you might be wrong, not just reasons why you must be right” and approach questions with curiosity rather than a desire to prove ourselves right
    • Practice saying “I don’t know.” Research (and titans of industry) say intellectual humility boosts both IQ and EQ. It also helps you avoid overconfidence, so Dunning suggests practicing saying “I don’t know.” MIT’s Hal Gregersen advises asking yourself, “What will I be wrong about today?” each morning. It will act as a healthy reminder that you are just as likely to fall prey to the Dunning-Kruger effect as anyone. 

    News flash: You’re overconfident too 

    The Dunning-Kruger effect has been a frequently invoked term for nearly three decades. That doesn’t mean most people understand it correctly. It often gets used as a clever way to call those you disagree with dumb. But according to one of the authors of the original study, a better use of the effect is as a reminder that we’re all prone to stupidity. 

    If you remember that tendency, you’re far more likely to correct for it. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Stillman

    Source link

  • New Zealand Parliament to Debate Teen Social Media Ban

    [ad_1]

    SYDNEY (Reuters) -A bill to restrict social media for children under 16 will be introduced in the New Zealand parliament, officials said on Thursday, building momentum for parliament’s efforts to prevent young people from being harmed while online.

    The proposed legislation will require social media platforms to conduct an age verification process, similar to Australia’s world-first teen social media ban law passed in 2024.

    A member’s bill submitted in May by ruling National Party lawmaker Catherine Wedd to restrict children using social media was selected on Thursday to be introduced in the parliament.

    The bill has received support from National Party members but its coalition partners have not confirmed whether they will support the bill.

    Members’ bills can be introduced by any lawmaker not in the cabinet and are selected after a ceremonial lottery.

    It is not immediately clear when the bill will be introduced in the parliament.

    A New Zealand parliamentary committee has been looking at the impact of social media harm on young people and the roles that government, business, and society should play in addressing those harms. A report is due in early 2026, according to a statement from the committee last week.

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has been raising concerns about harms to mental health from the overuse of social media among young teens, including misinformation, bullying and harmful depictions of body image.

    Civil-liberties organisation PILLAR said the bill would not protect children online, and instead would create serious privacy risks and restrict online freedom for New Zealanders.

    “Aligning with international efforts may sound responsible, but it is lazy policymaking,” PILLAR Executive Director Nathan Seiuli said in a statement.

    (Reporting by Renju Jose in Sydney; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Tinder Launches Mandatory Facial Verification to Weed Out Bots and Scammers

    [ad_1]

    On Wednesday, Tinder announced that it is rolling out a mandatory facial verification tool for new users in the US to help combat the spread of fake profiles and weed out “bad actors.”

    Tinder claims its mandatory facial integration feature, called Face Check, is a first for a major dating app. During the sign-up process, new members complete a “liveness check” by taking a short video selfie within the app. The procedure collects and stores an encrypted map of information about the shape of the user’s face. “We don’t store a picture of your face, it’s not photo recognition, it’s data points about the shape of your face that are turned into a mathematical hash,” says Yoel Roth, head of Trust and Safety for Match Group, which owns Tinder. Tinder then uses that “hash” to check whether a new sign-up matches an account that already exists on Tinder.

    Face Check is currently available to users in California, which will be followed by Texas and other states.

    In a news release, Roth said the measure “sets a new benchmark for trust and safety across the dating industry” and “it helps tackle one of the hardest problems online, knowing whether someone is real … while adding meaningful obstacles that are difficult for bad actors to circumvent.”

    The company defines “bad actors” as accounts that engage in deceptive behavior, including spamming, scamming, and bots. Currently 98 percent of the content moderation actions on Tinder address fake accounts, scamming, and spam. “There is a significant volume of the overall trust and safety work we do on Tinder that is focused on this challenge.”

    Roth says it is a “meaningful improvement in our ability to address scaled abuse. You can get new phone numbers, new email addresses, new devices—you can’t really get a new face.”

    The company is aware that asking new members to scan their faces might be seen as a privacy issue, but “theoretically, if somebody were to get access to every single one of these hashes that’s been created, there isn’t really anything they could do.”

    The app’s previous verification methods were voluntary. Members, depending on their jurisdiction, could opt to verify their profiles through a selfie or ID process. Other dating apps like Bumble also use facial recognition software to let daters verify their authenticity, but on a voluntary basis.

    When asked what the app plans to do about the fake profiles that already exist, given Face Check applies only to new users, Roth says the tech is most effective in curbing “the biggest issue that we’re concerned with, which is the bulk creation of new accounts.”

    [ad_2]

    Jason Parham

    Source link

  • Reddit sues over ‘industrial-scale’ scraping of user comments

    [ad_1]

    Social media platform Reddit sued the artificial intelligence company Perplexity AI and three other entities on Wednesday, alleging their involvement in an “industrial-scale, unlawful” economy to “scrape” the comments of millions of Reddit users for commercial gain.

    Reddit’s lawsuit in a New York federal court takes aim at San Francisco-based Perplexity, maker of an AI chatbot and “answer engine” that competes with Google, ChatGPT and others in online search.

    Also named in the lawsuit are Lithuanian data-scraping company Oxylabs UAB, a web domain called AWMProxy that Reddit describes as a “former Russian botnet,” and Texas-based startup SerpApi.

    It’s the second such lawsuit from Reddit since it sued another major AI company, Anthropic, in June.

    But the lawsuit filed Wednesday is different in the way that it confronts not just an AI company but the lesser-known services the AI industry relies on to acquire online writings needed to train AI chatbots.

    “Scrapers bypass technological protections to steal data, then sell it to clients hungry for training material. Reddit is a prime target because it’s one of the largest and most dynamic collections of human conversation ever created,” said Ben Lee, Reddit’s chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday.

    Perplexity said it has not yet received the lawsuit but “will always fight vigorously for users’ rights to freely and fairly access public knowledge. Our approach remains principled and responsible as we provide factual answers with accurate AI, and we will not tolerate threats against openness and the public interest.”

    Oxylabs and SerpAPI didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday. AWMProxy could not immediately be reached for comment.

    Reddit compares the companies it is suing to “would-be bank robbers” who can’t get into the bank vault, so they break into the armored truck instead. The lawsuit alleges they are evading Reddit’s own anti-scraping measures while also ”circumventing Google’s controls and scraping Reddit content directly from Google’s search engine results.”

    Lee said that because they’re unable to scrape Reddit directly, “they mask their identities, hide their locations, and disguise their web scrapers to steal Reddit content from Google Search. Perplexity is a willing customer of at least one of these scrapers, choosing to buy stolen data rather than enter into a lawful agreement with Reddit itself.”

    Much like its lawsuit against Anthropic, maker of the chatbot Claude, Reddit claims that Perplexity has accessed Reddit’s content despite being asked not to do so.

    Reddit made a similar argument in its lawsuit against Anthropic. That case was initially filed in California Superior Court but was later moved to federal court and has a hearing scheduled for January.

    Along with digitized books and news articles, websites such as Wikipedia and Reddit are deep troves of written materials that can help teach an AI assistant the patterns of human language.

    Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies that are paying to be able to train their AI systems on the public commentary of Reddit’s more than 100 million daily users.

    The licensing deals helped the 20-year-old online platform raise money ahead of its Wall Street debut as a publicly traded company last year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This Open Source Robot Brain Thinks in 3D

    [ad_1]

    European roboticists today released a powerful open-source artificial intelligence model that acts as a brain for industrial robots—helping them grasp and manipulate things with new dexterity.

    The new model, SPEAR-1, was developed by researchers at the Institute for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Technology (INSAIT) in Bulgaria. It may help other researchers and startups build and experiment with smarter hardware for factories and warehouses.

    Just as open source language models have made it possible for researchers and companies to experiment with generative AI, Martin Vechev, a computer scientist at INSIAT and ETH Zurich, says SPEAR-1 should help roboticists to experiment and iterate rapidly. “Open-weight models are crucial for advancing embodied AI,” Vechev told WIRED ahead of the release.

    SPEAR-1 differs from existing robot foundation models in that it incorporates 3D data into its training mix. This gives the model an enhanced understanding of the physical world, making it easier to understand how objects move through physical space.

    Robot foundation models are generally built on top of vision language models (VLMs) which have a broad but limited grasp of the physical world because training tends to come from labeled 2D images. “Our approach tackles the mismatch between the 3D space the robot operates in and the knowledge of the VLM that forms the core of the robotic foundation model,” Vechev says.

    SPEAR-1 is roughly as capable as commercial foundation models designed to operate robots, when measured on RoboArena, a benchmark that tests a model’s ability to get a robot to do things like squeeze a ketchup bottle, close a drawer, and staple pieces of paper together.

    The race to make robots smarter already has billions of dollars riding on it. The commercial potential of generally capable robots has spawned well-funded startups including Skild and Generalist besides Physical Intelligence. SPEAR-1 is almost as good as Pi-0.5 from Physical Intelligence, a billion-dollar startup founded by an all-star team of robotics researchers.

    SPEAR-1 suggests that the quest to build more intelligent robots may involve both closed models like those from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, as well as open source variants like Llama, DeepSeek, and Qwen.

    Robot intelligence is still in its infancy, though. It is possible to train an AI model to operate a robot arm so that it can reliably pick certain objects from a table. In practice, however, the model will need to be retrained from scratch if a different kind of robot arm is used or if the object or the environment are altered.

    [ad_2]

    Will Knight

    Source link

  • Dutch Police Detain Man Over Threats to Far-Right Politician Wilders Ahead of Election

    [ad_1]

    AMSTERDAM (Reuters) -The Dutch public prosecutor’s office said on Wednesday that police had detained a 25-year-old man for questioning after he had issued violent threats against politicians in a livestreamed, widely shared TikTok.

    The suspect specifically named far-right politician Geert Wilders in the video.

    In the clip, he said he would go to parliament “with an axe” and that “heads will roll,” adding that he “might (start) with Geertje,” a nickname for Wilders.

    After questioning, the suspect had been released, the prosecutor’s office said, pending a decision on whether he would be prosecuted.

    The incident comes a week before the Netherlands heads to the polls, with elections scheduled for next Wednesday.

    (Reporting by Charlotte Van Campenhout; Editing by Toby Chopra)

    Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • How to Protect Your Company From the Worst Effects of Social Media

    [ad_1]

    For years, public handwringing about the impact of social media on the minds and lives countless millions of teen users has dominated conversations about this increasingly prominent communications medium. Plenty of research suggests it can do real damage, and sites like Instagram have been forced to take steps that try to limit the harm the apps do. But it’s not just teens using social media, and a new report explores its use at work and its impact on the productivity. Its conclusions may prompt you to rethink if and exactly how you allow your staff to doomscroll through Pinterest, Instagram, TikTok and their ilk during office hours.

    The report, from the Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations, tried to work out which type of social media content caused the most upset in the office environment and how social content changed worker’s moods — potentially reducing their productivity — in separate experiments that returned very similar answers, industry news site HRDive notes.

    Firstly, if people were watching “attractive” social media content while at work—material like clothing fits — as well as typical family-life posts, workers’ moods shifted to feeling more confident and boosted ability to tackle their work tasks. But if they watched difficult materials, like politically charged posts or even “rage bait” content, workers were more anxious afterwards and were more likely to seek their own space away from colleagues — potentially damaging productivity and team working ability. 

    At this point you may be slapping your forehead and muttering about how this is all just common sense.

    But it is important, if only for the following reason: the report cites earlier research that showed around 77 percent of U.S. workers regularly consume social media during work hours. That’s nearly eight in 10 people in your workforce, which means the type of content they’re consuming is going to impact your company’s productivity. 

    The authors said their study “offers a practical contribution by providing a more balanced view of the benefits and/or drawbacks of employees participating in social media throughout their workdays.”

    They suggest that the study can provide a toolbox for “leaders and employees as to when and how to use social media as a motivational tool.” One simple example of this, they suggest, is that a manager could “support employees’ use of social media as a daily work break.” You may even think of it as the Insta-equivalent of a sneaky smoke break, for example. The fact that you’ve given explicit permission is also a boon, because it shows you understand the fascination of social media, and you’re not punishing people for slacking off work for a handful of minutes.

    The researchers go further though, and say that if you “directly encourage employees to focus on posts that they perceive as attractive or family-oriented because of their uplifting qualities” you may even be able to “enhance work productivity.” Admittedly you’d be fighting against human urges to watch different content, and the various apps’ algorithms which generally only care about keeping users watching, no matter the content.

    But it may be worth a try — especially if you tell them to proactively avoid contentious content during work hours to avoid productivity problems. If team tasks are on the agenda that day, tell your staff to leave watching social content until later, since that could lead to emotional withdrawal and weaken overall results.

    This may give savvy leaders some useful tips on how to keep employee distraction down, and maybe even keep workforce motivation up.

    But there’s another issue that may be taking over the average worker’s urge to watch endless TikTok reels: AI. AI tools can be fascinating, fun and distracting — just as they can be useful in the workplace. But a new report shows that the emerging issue of AI “workslop,” where AI tools spit out reams of partly useful, partly distracting material that ends up leaving people to pick out the signal from the noise, may be much worse than you think. It also suggests that much of this material really is being generated by the average worker noodling around on generative AI apps.

    So maybe it’s time to have a talk with your workforce about the distracting power of both social media and AI. 

    [ad_2]

    Kit Eaton

    Source link

  • Instagram accounts pushing graphic, violent content to millions, CBS News investigation finds

    [ad_1]

    Warning: Some subject matter is disturbing. Instagram users around the world opened the app one day back in February and saw their feeds suddenly filled with graphic, violent videos. Its parent company, Meta, called it an “error” that’s now been fixed. But a CBS News investigation finds that violent content remains pervasive on Instagram reels. CBS News’ Ash-har Quraishi and Chris Hacker report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link