ReportWire

Tag: social media

  • Social media platforms removed 4.7 million accounts after Australia ban for children

    [ad_1]

    WELLINGTON, New Zealand — Social media companies have revoked access to about 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to children in Australia since the country banned use of the platforms by those under 16, officials said.

    “We stared down everybody who said it couldn’t be done, some of the most powerful and rich companies in the world and their supporters,” communications minister Anika Wells told reporters on Friday. “Now Australian parents can be confident that their kids can have their childhoods back.”

    The figures, reported to Australia’s government by 10 social media platforms, were the first to show the scale of the landmark ban since it was enacted in December over fears about the effects of harmful online environments on young people. The law provoked fraught debates in Australia about technology use, privacy, child safety and mental health and has prompted other countries to consider similar measures.

    Under Australian law, Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube and Twitch face fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($33.2 million) if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove the accounts of Australian children younger than 16. Messaging services such as WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger are exempt.

    To verify age, platforms can either request copies of identification documents, use a third party to apply age estimation technology to an account holder’s face, or make inferences from data already available such has how long an account has been held.

    About 2.5 million Australians are aged between 8 and 15, said the country’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, and past estimates suggested 84% of 8- to 12-year-olds held social media accounts. It was not known how many accounts were held across the 10 platforms but Inman Grant said the figure of 4.7 million “deactivated or restricted” was encouraging.

    “We’re preventing predatory social media companies from accessing our children,” Inman Grant said.

    The 10 biggest companies covered by the ban were compliant with it and had reported removal figures to Australia’s regulator on time, the commissioner said. She added that social media companies were expected to shift their efforts from enforcing the ban to preventing children from creating new accounts or otherwise circumventing the prohibition.

    Australian officials didn’t break the figures down by platform. But Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads, said this week that by the day after the ban came into effect it had removed nearly 550,000 accounts belonging to users understood to be under 16.

    In the blog post divulging the figures, Meta criticized the ban and said smaller platforms where the ban doesn’t apply might not prioritize safety. The company also noted browsing platforms would still present content to children based on algorithms — a concern that led to the ban’s enactment.

    The law was widely popular among parents and child safety campaigners. Online privacy advocates and some groups representing teenagers opposed it, with the latter citing the support found in online spaces by vulnerable young people or those geographically isolated in Australia’s sprawling rural areas.

    Some said they had managed to fool age assessing technologies or were helped by parents or older siblings to circumvent the ban.

    Since Australia began debating the measures in 2024, other countries have considered following suit. Denmark’s government is among them, saying in November that it had planned to implement a social media ban for children under 15.

    “The fact that in spite of some skepticism out there, it’s working and being replicated now around the world, is something that is a source of Australian pride,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Friday.

    Opposition lawmakers have suggested that young people have circumvented the ban easily or are migrating to other apps that are less scrutinized than the largest platforms. Inman Grant said Friday that data seen by her office showed a spike in downloads of alternative apps when the ban was enacted but not a spike in usage.

    “There is no real long-term trends yet that we can say but we’re engaging,” she said.

    Meanwhile, she said, the regulator she heads planned to introduce “world-leading AI companion and chatbot restrictions in March.” She didn’t disclose further details.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk backtracks on Grok AI image rules following global backlash – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    In a move that signals a significant retreat for the tech billionaire, Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has announced it will restrict its Grok AI model from generating “undressed” images of real people.

    The update prevents users from editing photos of real individuals to appear in bikinis, underwear, or revealing attire, but only in territories where such content is illegal.

    The policy shift follows a week of intense international pressure. Governments in Malaysia and Indonesia were the first to ban the tool after reports surfaced of users creating explicit, non-consensual deepfakes.

    Simultaneously, the UK government and California’s top prosecutor launched inquiries into the platform, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for immediate safeguards to prevent the spread of sexualized AI imagery.

    The move marks a notable U-turn for Musk. Only days ago, the billionaire dismissed concerns as an “assault on free speech,” even mocking critics by posting AI-generated images of Sir Keir Starmer wearing a bikini. However, facing the threat of heavy fines and regional bans, Musk appears to have softened his absolute stance.

    Writing on X, Musk clarified that while the platform will “geoblock” certain capabilities to comply with local laws, the tool’s ‘Not Safe For Work’ (NSFW) settings will still allow for “upper body nudity of imaginary adult humans” in regions like the United States. “That is the de facto standard in America,” Musk stated. “This will vary in other regions according to the laws on a country-by-country basis.”

    The UK government claimed “vindication” following the announcement, though regulator Ofcom warned that its investigation into whether X broke online safety laws remains ongoing. To further mitigate abuse, X confirmed that image-editing features will remain restricted to paid subscribers, a move intended to ensure accountability for those who violate the law.

    While the “geofencing” of these features satisfies some legal requirements, critics argue the patchwork approach highlights the ongoing tension between Musk’s “free speech absolutism” and the global demand for AI regulation.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Complaint by Miami Beach mayor’s office led to police visit over Facebook comment

    [ad_1]

    It was the office of Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner that flagged a resident’s Facebook comment to police before officers showed up at the resident’s home, officials said Tuesday evening.

    On Monday, Miami Beach police detectives paid Raquel Pacheco a visit to ask about a critical comment that had been left under one of Meiner’s Facebook posts.

    Miami Beach police spokesman Christopher Bess confirmed in an email that the complaint came from the mayor’s office. Bess did not provide additional details, including whether the complaint came from Meiner himself or from his staff and whether the mayor’s office asked police to take any particular action.

    Bess said police chose not to initiate a criminal investigation after briefly speaking with Pacheco on Monday afternoon.

    Meiner and his chief of staff did not respond to a request for comment.

    READ MORE: Miami Beach resident posted online about the mayor. Police showed up at her door

    On Monday afternoon, two officers went to the South Beach home of Pacheco — an outspoken critic of Meiner who previously ran for the Miami Beach City Commission and Florida Senate — to ask her about a Facebook comment in which she claimed that Meiner “consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians.”

    The comment was in response to a post from Meiner saying Miami Beach is “a safe haven for everyone.”

    The police department’s action, Bess said, was taken “in light of recent national concerns regarding antisemitism, and out of an abundance of caution.”

    “As a precautionary measure, Intelligence Unit detectives conducted a brief, consensual encounter to ensure there was no immediate threat to the safety of the elected official or the community,” Bess said. “The encounter was conducted in a professional manner and concluded without incident.”

    He added: “The Miami Beach Police Department remains committed to safeguarding public officials, residents, and visitors, while also respecting constitutional rights, including freedom of expression.”

    Meiner, who is Jewish, has not explicitly called for the death of Palestinians. Pacheco told the Herald she was referring to statements the mayor has made in support of Israel and its war in Gaza.

    A social media post from Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner on Jan. 6, 2026.
    A social media post from Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner on Jan. 6, 2026. Facebook

    Raquel Pacheco commented on Meiner’s post.
    Raquel Pacheco commented on Meiner’s post. Facebook

    Pacheco recorded her interaction with officers and shared the video on social media. In it, detectives told her that they were trying to prevent “someone else getting agitated or agreeing with the statement” and advised her to “refrain from posting things like that because that can get something incited.”

    Pacheco later told the Herald she saw the police visit as an “intimidation tactic” and an attack on her First Amendment rights. Pacheco has engaged an attorney but has not yet taken legal action.

    On Tuesday evening, the Herald shared with Pacheco and her attorney details of the police department’s statement and its confirmation that Meiner’s office flagged the Facebook comment to police.

    “The mayor really needs to grow some thicker skin here,” Pacheco said. “He’s weaponizing the police department against private citizens. This is an abuse of power.”

    Pacheco’s attorney, Miriam Haskell of the nonprofit Community Justice Project, said the police statement failed to reassure her that the visit wasn’t a reaction to the “content” of Pacheco’s Facebook comment — a reference to First Amendment law that limits government’s ability to restrict speech based on viewpoint.

    Haskell also questioned the police department’s characterization of the encounter as an assessment for an “immediate threat,” given that officers indicated to Pacheco that they were concerned about how someone else might react after reading Pacheco’s comment.

    “That gives me pause as to what their real motivations are,” she said.

    The incident is the latest in a series of examples demonstrating that Meiner “doesn’t believe that free speech should be protected on Miami Beach,” Haskell said.

    Meiner has previously attempted to cancel the lease of O Cinema for showing a documentary about the West Bank and pushed to enact limits on protests by pro-Palestinian activists that are the subject of an ongoing lawsuit against the city.

    Pacheco’s experience raises a troubling question, Haskell added, about whether other Miami Beach residents may have been subject to similar scrutiny.

    “Who else’s doors are they knocking on?” Haskell said.

    Aaron Leibowitz

    Miami Herald

    Aaron Leibowitz covers the city of Miami Beach for the Miami Herald, where he has worked as a local government reporter since 2019. He was part of a team that won a 2022 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the collapse of the Champlain Towers South condo building in Surfside. He is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School’s Toni Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism.

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Leibowitz

    Source link

  • Mother of one of Elon Musk’s kids says AI chatbot Grok generated sexual deepfake images of her

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok is facing intense criticism, accused of allowing X users to generate sexually explicit images of real women and children. One of the alleged victims is Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk’s children. She said she discovered people used Grok to generate and publish sexualized deepfake images without her permission and share them on X. Musk has not responded to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI Pushback: Governments Eye Action on Political Ads, Deepfakes

    [ad_1]

    New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wants to ban AI-generated images from state politics. Canada may restrict “deepfakes” after the uproar over Grok “undressing” photos. New Jersey restricts phone use in schools. Vermont beer-makers are struggling.

    As we mention here regularly, Decision Points primarily focuses on national and international news. But we also occasionally deliver a roundup of local, regional or under-the-radar news with a political dimension – something unusual or interesting, or that may illustrate a broader trend.

    Our guiding principle is that the definition of politics includes how a society organizes itself to allocate finite or scarce resources, manage internal disagreements and blunt external threats.

    Here’s this week’s look around.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    New York May Ban AI in Political Campaigns

    Hochul, a Democrat, said Sunday that she wants to forbid sharing AI-generated images of people, including candidates, without their consent in the 90 days before an election, the New York Times reported.

    It’s not academic. The Times noted that, in last year’s New York mayoral race, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s campaign released an AI video showing Zohran Mamdani, who went on to win that contest, eating rice with his hands. “It also suggested that his supporters were criminals who beat their wives, sold drugs and drove drunk.”

    Other states, like Texas and Minnesota, have similar bans.

    The question is whether such limitations will pass constitutional muster. Wouldn’t freedom of speech extend to caricaturing political candidates?

    Canada May Criminalize Sexual Deepfakes

    Evan Solomon, Canada’s minister of artificial intelligence and digital innovation, said on the hellscape formerly known as Twitter over the weekend that our northern neighbor may take action to rein in sexualized deepfake images and videos.

    “Deepfake sexual abuse is violence,” Solomon said. “We must protect Canadians, especially women and young people, from exploitation. Platforms and AI developers have a duty to prevent this harm.”

    How? By amending Canada’s criminal code to list deepfakes among the “intimate images” that it’s illegal to publish.

    This was also not academic. It came after the controversy that erupted when users of Elon Musk’s Grok AI used that module to digitally undress people (mostly women), putting them in tiny bikinis and striking sexual poses.

    Jersey Swipes Left on Cell Phones in School

    New Jersey has joined a phalanx of states that restrict the use of cell phones during the school day, the Associated Press reported.

    A law just signed by Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy “specifically requires the prohibition of non-academic uses of internet-connected devices – including phones – during the school day.”

    Nearly 20 states have enacted similar restrictions during the school day. It looks like one of the last issues in American politics to have wide bipartisan support.

    Vermont Can’t Beer This Craft Brewery Slowdown

    If you have read my work for a while, you know that I bang on about how local news can actually be national or international news. And so it is with this Seven Days report out of my home state of Vermont about struggling craft brewers.

    Against the backdrop of the final days of state brewery Simple Roots, we hear about “the latest casualties in an industry-wide slowdown that’s claimed more than 800 craft breweries around the country in the past two years.” There’s the national angle.

    How about the international dimension? “Tourism is down in Burlington, and the whole state has seen a sharp decrease in Canadian visitors since President Donald Trump took office last year.”

    If you are more of a “the pint’s half full” sort of person, consider that Vermont had fewer than 25 breweries in 2011 and today boasts 77 – “the highest number of breweries per capita in the country,” per Seven Days.

    Don’t pour one out for the industry just yet.

    [ad_2]

    Olivier Knox

    Source link

  • Meta names Dina Powell McCormick, a former Trump adviser, as president and vice chairman

    [ad_1]

    Facebook owner Meta has named Dina Powell McCormick, a former Trump administration adviser and longtime finance executive, as president and vice chairman of the tech giant.

    Powell McCormick previously served on Meta’s board of directors — where, the company notes, she was “deeply engaged” in accelerating its artificial intelligence push across platforms. In her new management role, Meta says Powell McCormick will help guide its overall strategy, including the execution of multi-billion-dollar investments.

    The news, announced Monday, quickly gained the applause of President Trump. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, the Republican president said the move was a “great choice” by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg — and noted that Powell McCormick had “served the Trump Administration with strength and distinction.”

    Zuckerberg said in a statement that Powell McCormick’s experience in global finance, “combined with her deep relationships around the world,” made her “uniquely suited to help Meta” in its future growth.

    Powell McCormick is a veteran of two presidential administrations and the Republican National Committee. She worked as a national security adviser at the start of Mr. Trump’s first term, and also held roles in the White House and the Secretary of State’s office under President George W. Bush. 

    She is married to Sen. David McCormick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, who served in high-level positions in the Commerce and Treasury departments under Bush, before he joined hedge fund Bridgewater Associates and rose to become CEO.

    And Powell McCormick has a long background in finance. She spent 16 years in senior leadership at Goldman Sachs, but was most recently vice chair, president and head of global client services at merchant bank BDT & MSD Partners. She’s also held a handful of other corporate board positions — including at oil giant Exxon Mobil.

    According to a securities filing, Powell McCormick had previously resigned from Meta’s board in December, eight months after joining as a director.

    The addition of Powell McCormick to Meta’s management team arrived amid wider efforts from California-based Meta to boost its ties with Mr. Trump, who was once banned from Facebook. Like other powerful tech CEOs, Zuckerberg has dined with the president at the White House and doubled down on U.S. investment promises worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Last year, the company also appointed Ultimate Fighting Championship CEO Dana White to its board, another familiar figure in Mr. Trump’s orbit.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.K. says ban on Elon Musk’s X platform “on the table” over Grok AI sexualized images

    [ad_1]

    London — U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Thursday that he wants “all options to be on the table,” including a potential ban on Elon Musk’s X platform in Britain, over the use of its artificial intelligence tool Grok to generate sexualized images of people without their consent. 

    Starmer’s remarks come as Musk’s platform faces scrutiny from regulators across the globe over Grok’s image editing tool, which has allowed users to create digitally altered, sexualized photos of real people, including minors.

    “This is disgraceful, it’s disgusting and it’s not to be tolerated. X has got to get a grip of this,” Starmer said in an interview with a U.K. radio station. “It’s unlawful. We’re not going to tolerate it. I’ve asked for all options to be on the table.”

    A source in Starmer’s office reiterated to CBS News on Friday that “nothing is off the table” when it comes to regulating X in Britain.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer leaves his 10 Downing Street residence to attend a weekly question and answer session in the British Parliament, Jan. 7, 2026, in London, England.

    Carl Court/Getty


    CBS News has verified that Grok fulfilled user requests asking it to edit images of women to show them in bikinis or little clothing, including prominent public figures such as first lady Melania Trump.

    Last week, Grok, a chatbot developed by Musk’s company xAI, acknowledged “lapses in safeguards” that allowed users to generate digitally altered, sexualized photos of minors.

    Grok told users that as of Friday, access to its image generation tool was limited “to paying subscribers” of its user verification service. Paying subscribers have to provide their credit card and personal details to the company, which could dissuade some people from using the service, especially if they had intended to use Grok’s AI tool to create illegal images of minors.

    xAI responded to a CBS News request for comment to criticism of Grok’s image generation tool and steps it had taken to limit access to it on Friday, by saying: “Legacy media lies.”

    Addressing reporters on Friday morning, a U.K. government spokesperson called the move to limit access to Grok’s image editing tool to paying users “insulting” to victims of misogyny and sexual violence, saying it, “simply turns an AI feature that allows the creation of unlawful images into a premium service.” 

    Under the U.K. Online Safety Act, sharing intimate images without consent on social media is a criminal offense, and social media companies are required to proactively remove such content, as well as prevent it from appearing in the first place.

    If they fail to do so, the companies can face hefty fines or, in last resort cases, face what would effectively be a ban by Britain’s independent media regulator Ofcom. Ofcom can compel payment providers, advertisers and internet service providers to stop working with a site, preventing it from generating money or being accessed from the U.K.

    In a post shared Monday on its own X account, Ofcom said it was “aware of serious concerns raised about a feature on Grok on X that produces undressed images of people and sexualised images of children.”

    “We have made urgent contact with X and xAI to understand what steps they have taken to comply with their legal duties to protect users in the UK. Based on their response we will undertake a swift assessment to determine whether there are potential compliance issues that warrant investigation,” Ofcom said. 

    Musk’s platform has faced scrutiny from governments around the world, including the European Union and the U.S. Congress, over Grok AI’s digital alteration of real images.

    On Wednesday, Republican Senator Ted Cruz said in a post on X that “many of the recent AI-generated posts are unacceptable and a clear violation of my legislation — now law — the Take It Down Act, as well as X’s terms and conditions.”

    “These unlawful images pose a serious threat to victims’ privacy and dignity. They should be taken down and guardrails should be put in place,” Cruz said, adding that he was encouraged by steps taken by X to remove unlawful images.

    On Thursday, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, threatened to sanction the U.K. government if Starmer moved to ban X in the U.K. 

    “If Starmer is successful in banning @X in Britain, I will move forward with legislation that is currently being drafted to sanction not only Starmer, but Britain as a whole,” Paulina Luna said in a post on her own X account. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Social media users shared wrong photo of woman killed by ICE

    [ad_1]

    After an immigration officer fatally shot Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on Jan. 7, social media users started posting images they said showed the woman. But in the midst of the breaking news, users misidentified her. 

    The photo shows a short-haired woman wearing red lipstick, eyeliner and a green sweater, and some users said she was the 37-year-old killed when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot into her vehicle. 

    “This is Renee Nicole Good, a dedicated wife and mother who was killed by Donald Trump’s ICE thugs today,” reads an X post with over 600,000 views. “RETWEET to honor Good’s memory.”

    Other users made similar claims on X, Facebook, Threads and Instagram

    Federal, state and local officials have given conflicting narratives of the shooting, but the woman in that photo isn’t Good. 

    Doing a reverse image search, we found the photo in a 2020 Facebook post from the English department at Old Dominion University, where Good went to college in Norfolk, Virginia. 

    The post congratulated the winners and honorable mentions of the Academy of American Poets 2020 Old Dominion University College Poetry Prize

    The department shared photos of multiple students in the post, including one of Good, who was among the winners. The post identified her as Renee Macklin, which was her name at the time. But social media users shared another image of another woman recognized in the post. The university identified this person in the photo’s caption as another woman. 

    (Screenshot of a photo of Good on the Facebook page of the English department where she went to college.)

    PolitiFact reviewed multiple other photos of Good shared by local and national media outlets and none show the short-haired woman in the image circulating online. 

    The claims that this person is Good are False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok picked by FIFA as video content partner at 2026 World Cup

    [ad_1]

    GENEVA — GENEVA (AP) — TikTok was picked by FIFA as the first “preferred platform” for video content on social media at a men’s World Cup, the soccer body said Thursday.

    The World Cup tie-in will see creators get special access at the 48-nation tournament being co-hosted in 16 cities — 11 in the United States, three in Mexico and two in Canada — from June 11 to July 19.

    FIFA said World Cup broadcast rights holders can livestream parts of the 104 games at a dedicated hub on the TikTok app, which has more than 170 million users in the U.S.

    “Additionally, a wide group of creators will receive the opportunity to use and co-create FIFA archival footage,” it said.

    FIFA did not state the value of the deal, or details of any tender process and rival bidders. YouTube had a low-level sponsor deal that included access for creators at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.

    What kind of live content can be streamed this year, at a tournament where commercial partners’ exclusive rights are fiercely protected, also was not specified by FIFA.

    TikTok’s partnership with MLS and Apple TV led to the platform carrying footage from cameras dedicated just to following soccer great Lionel Messi playing in games for Inter Miami.

    FIFA promised fans would be taken “behind the curtain and closer to the action than ever before,” its secretary general Mattias Grafström said.

    TikTok’s in-app World Cup hub also will give fans “participation incentives” like custom stickers, filters and gamification features.

    TikTok GamePlan turns fandom into measurable business results for our sports partners, with fans being 42% more likely to tune in to live matches after watching sports content on TikTok,” said its global head of content, James Stafford.

    TikTok became the world’s most downloaded phone app while also under threat of being shut down in the United States as a national security threat.

    In December, TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance agreed to form a U.S. joint venture with investors Oracle, Silver Lake and MGX. That deal is scheduled to be sealed later this month.

    ___

    AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK government cracks down on cyberflashing with heavy fines for tech giants – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share

    The dating app Bumble has launched Private Detector, an AI-powered feature that automatically detects and blurs nudity in images sent within chat

    As of today (January 8th, 2026), the UK government has officially designated “cyberflashing” as a “priority offence” under the Online Safety Act, shifting the legal burden from victims to the tech companies themselves.

    Cyberflashing is the act of sending unsolicited sexual images (commonly referred to as ‘dick pics’) via social media, dating apps, Bluetooth, or data-sharing services. While the act was first criminalized in 2022, carrying a penalty of up to two years in prison for perpetrators, this new update to the law targets the platforms that facilitate the abuse.

    Under the new regulations, firms that fail to implement preventative measures could be fined up to 10% of their global annual revenue or face being blocked entirely in the UK.

    The move comes as a response to the staggering prevalence of digital harassment. Statistics show that one in three teenage girls and 40% of women aged 18 to 34 have been targeted by unsolicited sexual images. By making it a priority offence, the government is requiring tech firms to use proactive technology to stop these images before they ever reach a user’s inbox.

    Technology Secretary Liz Kendall stated that the government is “turning up the heat” on tech firms to ensure the internet is a space where women and girls can thrive. Jess Phillips, Minister for Safeguarding, added that the responsibility must lie with companies to block content rather than expecting women to “endure” the abuse.

    Some platforms have already begun to adapt. The dating app Bumble has pioneered the use of “Private Detector,” an AI-powered tool that automatically blurs suspected nudity. The recipient is then given the choice to view, block, or report the image.

    Ofcom is now set to consult on new codes of practice that will dictate the specific technical steps platforms must take. The crackdown is part of a broader government mission to halve violence against women and girls, signalling an end to the “lawless” era of the digital world.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • EU Commission Has Ordered X to Retain All Grok Documents Until End 2026, Spokesperson Says

    [ad_1]

    BRUSSELS, Jan 8 (Reuters) – ‌The ​European Commission ‌has ordered Elon ​Musk’s social media site ‍X to retain ​all internal ​documents ⁠and data relating to its built-in artificial intelligence chatbot, Grok, until the end ‌of 2026, a commission spokesperson ​said ‌on Thursday.

    The European ‍Commission ⁠said on Monday that the images of undressed women and children being shared across X ​were unlawful and appalling, joining a growing chorus of officials across the world who have condemned the surge in nonconsensual imagery on the platform.

    “We take this very ​seriously,” Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told reporters on Thursday.

    (Reporting by Louise ​Breusch Rasmussen, editing by Bart Meijer)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani Defends Tenant Official Facing Backlash for ‘White Supremacy’ Posts

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is standing behind a newly-appointed housing official as she faces backlash for years-old social media posts, including messages that called for the seizure of private property and linked homeownership to white supremacy.

    Cea Weaver, a longtime tenant activist, was tapped by the Democrat last week to serve as executive director of the Mayor’s Office to Protect Tenants. The mayor has vowed to expand and empower the office to take “unprecedented” steps against negligent landlords.

    The posts, which were circulated on social media in recent days by critics of Mamdani, included calls to treat private property as a “collective good” and to “impoverish the (asterisk)white(asterisk) middle class.” A tweet sent in 2017 described homeownership as “a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as ‘wealth building public policy.’”

    Eric Adams, the city’s former mayor and a fellow Democrat, said the remarks showed “extreme privilege and total detachment from reality.”

    Asked about the controversy on Wednesday, Mamdani did not address the substance of Weaver’s posts but defended her record of “standing up for tenants across the city and state.”

    Weaver said in an interview with a local TV station that some of the messages were “regretful” and “not something I would say today.”

    “I want to make sure that everybody has a safe and affordable place to live, whether they rent or own, and that is something I’m laser-focused on in this new role,” she added.

    The discussion comes after Mamdani last month accepted the resignation of another official, Catherine Almonte Da Costa, after the Anti-Defamation League shared social media posts she made over a decade ago that featured antisemitic tropes.

    While Mamdani had said he was unaware of Da Costa’s messages, Weaver’s past social media posts were known to the administration, according to a mayoral spokesperson, Dora Pekec.

    As leader of the city’s tenant protection office, she would play a key role in achieving one of Mamdani’s most polarizing campaign pledges: identifying negligent landlords and forcing them to negotiate the sale of their properties to the city if they are unable to pay fines for violations.

    The “public stewardship” proposal has drawn consternation from landlord groups and skepticism from others in city government.

    But the early days of his administration have brought signs that the new mayor is not backing off on the idea.

    In a press conference immediately following his inauguration last week, Mamdani said the city would take “precedent-setting” action against the owner of a Brooklyn apartment building that owed the city money and was currently in bankruptcy proceedings.

    He then announced Weaver’s appointment, drawing loud cheers from the members of a tenants union gathered in the building’s lobby.

    “It is going to be challenging,” Weaver acknowledged. “New York is home to some of the most valuable real estate in the world. Everything about New York politics is about that fact.”

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • US Appeals Court Appears Skeptical of Meta, Social Media Companies’ Bid to Cut off Addiction Lawsuits

    [ad_1]

    Jan 6 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday appeared inclined ‌to ​allow lawsuits alleging major social media platforms were ‌designed to be addictive for young users to proceed, as several judges questioned whether it was too early ​to consider whether the companies are immune from such claims.

    Facebook and Instagram parent Meta Platforms and other social media companies urged a three-judge panel of the 9th ‍U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse rulings ​forcing them to face more than 2,200 lawsuits. 

    The companies, which also include Snapchat and parent Snap Inc., YouTube and parent Alphabet Inc. and TikTok and parent ​ByteDance, argue that ⁠a federal law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 shields them from liability stemming from what is posted on their sites, including allegations they failed to warn the public about the addictive nature of their platforms.

    Filed by states, municipalities, school districts and individuals, the lawsuits allege that social media has contributed to a wave of depression, anxiety and body image issues in children, creating a mental health emergency ‌among American youth in recent years.

    The cases, which have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, seek damages, ​penalties ‌and restitution from the companies. The ‍companies are appealing Rogers’ orders in ⁠2023 and 2024 that largely allowed the litigation to move forward. 

    An attorney for Meta, which led the companies’ appeal, faced skeptical questions from all three of the judges on the panel, who questioned whether it was appropriate for the appeals court to weigh in at this early stage in the case, as Meta was requesting. Most appeals come after a court has made a conclusive, final decision in a case, the judges said.

    Meta attorney James Rouhandeh responded that Rogers’ orders were conclusive because they force Meta to defend against the litigation.

    “It would be an enormous thing to require defendants to have to defend these types of suits,” especially when they ​are precluded by Section 230, Rouhandeh said.

    Circuit Judge Jacqueline Nguyen, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, said Rogers had indicated in her orders that she was open to considering the companies’ argument that they are shielded from liability later in the litigation.

    All three of the judges also questioned Meta’s argument that Section 230 provides the companies with immunity from all lawsuits.

    The plaintiffs argued that Section 230 doesn’t cover the claims in the lawsuits because it only protects against liability related to content published by third parties on the websites.

    “Here our complaints are about features that they can remedy without looking at any third party content at all,” Shannon Stevenson, the solicitor general of Colorado who is representing the states that have sued, told the panel.

    Meta’s argument that Section 230 shields the company from all the plaintiffs’ claims isn’t borne out in the statute’s language, Nguyen told Rouhandeh.

    “When Congress wants to give immunity from suit, ​it knows how to say that,” Nguyen said.

    Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, an appointee of President Donald Trump, and U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation, who was appointed by Republican former President George W. Bush, were also on the panel.  

    The case is People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms Inc, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. ​24-7032.

    For Meta: James Rouhandeh of Davis Polk

    For the individual plaintiffs, school districts and municipalities: Jennifer Bennett of Gupta Wessler

    For the attorneys general: Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson 

    (Reporting by Diana Novak Jones)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Country singer Zach Bryan has married Samantha Leonard

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Here’s to a lifetime of pink skies: The irreverent country singer Zach Bryan is married.

    Bryan, 29, confirmed the news in an Instagram post shared Thursday. Beneath a photo of him holding his bride, Samantha Leonard, 28, he wrote the caption, “tougher than the rest,” a reference to the Bruce Springsteen song of the same name. In the next slide of the two-frame carousel, Bryan shared a short clip of him covering the song.

    It is unclear when the couple started dating or got engaged. Rumors of their relationship hit social media in August, when Leonard posted a picture of the pair embracing on a boat on her official Instagram account.

    Bryan shared a tribute to Leonard on his Instagram account a few months later, in October, writing, “Today is your birthday and I love you, Samantha Marie. To the only woman who can hike six miles in Chanel flats, skydive over the alps and catch a bigger fish than me all in the same day,” he wrote. “Hope your day was as graceful as you are.”

    A representative for Bryan confirmed the marriage but did not provide additional comment.

    Bryan’s 2023 self-titled album debuted at No. 1 on the all-genre Billboard 200. At the time, the trade publication reported that the release moved 200,000 units in its first week. His duet with Kacey Musgraves from the album “I Remember Everything” earned Bryan his sole No. 1 hit. AP named the collaboration one of the year’s best songs.

    His last album, 2024’s “The Great American Bar Scene” peaked at No. 2.

    Bryan is scheduled to release his sixth studio album, “With Heaven On Top,” next Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Instagram chief: AI is so ubiquitous ‘it will be more practical to fingerprint real media than fake media’

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret that AI-generated content took over our social media feeds in 2025. Now, Instagram’s top exec Adam Mosseri has made it clear that he expects AI content to overtake non-AI imagery and the significant implications that shift has for its creators and photographers.

    Mosseri shared the thoughts in a lengthy post about the broader trends he expects to shape Instagram in 2026. And he offered a notably candid assessment on how AI is upending the platform. “Everything that made creators matter—the ability to be real, to connect, to have a voice that couldn’t be faked—is now suddenly accessible to anyone with the right tools,” he wrote. “The feeds are starting to fill up with synthetic everything.”

    But Mosseri doesn’t seem particularly concerned by this shift. He says that there is “a lot of amazing AI content” and that the platform may need to rethink its approach to labeling such imagery by “fingerprinting real media, not just chasing fake.”

    From Mosseri (emphasis his):

    Social media platforms are going to come under increasing pressure to identify and label AI-generated content as such. All the major platforms will do good work identifying AI content, but they will get worse at it over time as AI gets better at imitating reality. There is already a growing number of people who believe, as I do, that it will be more practical to fingerprint real media than fake media. Camera manufacturers could cryptographically sign images at capture, creating a chain of custody.

    On some level, it’s easy to understand how this seems like a more practical approach for Meta. As we’ve previously reported, technologies that are meant to identify AI content, like watermarks, have proved unreliable at best. They are easy to remove and even easier to ignore altogether. Meta’s own labels are far from clear and the company, which has spent tens of billions of dollars on AI this year alone, has admitted it can’t reliably detect AI-generated or manipulated content on its platform.

    That Mosseri is so readily admitting defeat on this issue, though, is telling. AI slop has won. And when it comes to helping Instagram’s 3 billion users understand what is real, that should largely be someone else’s problem, not Meta’s. Camera makers — presumably phone makers and actual camera manufacturers — should come up with their own system that sure sounds a lot like watermarking to “to verify authenticity at capture.” Mosseri offers few details about how this would work or be implemented at the scale required to make it feasible.

    Mosseri also doesn’t really address the fact that this is likely to alienate the many photographers and other Instagram creators who have already grown frustrated with the app. The exec regularly fields complaints from the group who want to know why Instagram’s algorithm doesn’t consistently surface their posts to their on followers.

    But Mosseri suggests those complaints stem from an outdated vision of what Instagram even is. The feed of “polished” square images, he says, “is dead.” Camera companies, in his estimation, are “are betting on the wrong aesthetic” by trying to “make everyone look like a professional photographer from the past.” Instead, he says that more “raw” and “unflattering” images will be how creators can prove they are real, and not AI. In a world where Instagram has more AI content than not, creators should prioritize images and videos that intentionally make them look bad.

    [ad_2]

    Karissa Bell

    Source link

  • Meta buys startup Manus in latest move to advance its artificial intelligence efforts

    [ad_1]

    DETROIT — Meta is buying artificial intelligence startup Manus, as the owner of Facebook and Instagram continues an aggressive push to amp up AI offerings across its platforms.

    The California tech giant declined to disclose financial details of the acquisition. But The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta closed the deal at more than $2 billion.

    Manus, a Singapore-based platform with some Chinese roots, launched its first “general-purpose” AI agent earlier this year. The platform offers paid subscriptions for customers to use this technology for research, coding and other tasks.

    “Manus is already serving the daily needs of millions of users and businesses worldwide,” Meta said in a Monday announcement, adding that it plans to scale this service — as Manus will “deliver general-purpose agents across our consumer and business products, including in Meta AI.”

    Xiao Hong, CEO of Manus, added that joining Meta will allow the platform to “build on a stronger, more sustainable foundation without changing how Manus works or how decisions are made.” Manus confirmed that it would continue to sell and operate subscriptions through its own app and website.

    The platform has grown rapidly over the past year. Earlier this month, Manus announced that it had crossed the $100 million mark in annual recurring revenue, just eight months after launching.

    Some of Manus’ initial financial backers reportedly included China’s Tencent Holdings, ZhenFund and HSG. And the company that first launched the platform — Butterfly Effect, which also operates under the name monica.im, which was founded in China before moving to Singapore.

    A Meta spokesperson confirmed on Tuesday that there would be “no continuing Chinese ownership interests in Manus AI” following its transaction, and that the platform would also discontinue its services and operations in China. Manus reiterated that it would continue to operate in Singapore, where most of its employees are based.

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been pushing to revive its commercial AI efforts as the company faces tough competition from rivals such as Google and OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT. In June, the company made a $14.3 billion investment in AI data company Scale and recruited its CEO Alexandr Wang to help lead a team developing “superintelligence” at the tech giant.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Social media comment has some local business owners cutting ties with Shop Local Raleigh

    [ad_1]

    A Facebook comment in an online networking group is causing a stir among some of Raleigh’s small business owners. 

    On Dec. 20, an anonymous commenter in a local networking group on Facebook responded to a post by a parent asking for advice regarding her transgender son. 

    “There’s no such thing as a transgender son. Blessings to
    you, but the sooner you help your son realize this, the more successful he
    (maybe a she) will be,” the anonymous comment read.

    Gigi Stephenson is an administrator of the group. She said
    someone flagged the comment for review. As an admin on the page, Stephenson
    said she could see that the anonymous comment was made by Jennifer Martin, the executive director of the Greater Raleigh Merchant’s Association. 

    Martin has been with the GRMA, which does business
    as Shop Local Raleigh, since 2010. The organization presents many local events
    each year including Falling for Local at Dix Park, the Raleigh Food Truck Rodeo
    Series, the Raleigh Christmas Parade and the annual Brewgaloo craft beer
    festival

    “We’ve had a pretty loud and open stance on you will not be
    able to hide behind anonymous commenting or posts that we feel you are a danger
    to the community,” Stephenson told WRAL on Monday. “This is something that the
    community deserves to know. They’re spending money with this organization.”

    Martin’s post got the attention of other local business
    owners, including Be Like Missy’s Erica Vogel, who made a social media post of her own announcing her business would be stepping away from Shop Local Raleigh and
    Brewgaloo in light of the comment.

    “Being that it was her, I felt really torn because I’ve been
    a big supporter of her and of Shop Local Raleigh for at least five years, and
    I’ve encouraged a ton of my small business-owning friends to join and be a part
    of the community, “ Vogel told WRAL. “I always looked at what she did as
    inclusive and promoting small business, but to see such an ugly and hateful
    comment happen, it made me feel really conflicted.”

    Vogel said Martin emailed her following her post – not
    denying that she made the comment – but correcting her title which was
    incorrectly listed as the owner of Shop Local Raleigh and Brewgaloo.

    “I
    am always open to conversation and work hard to be welcoming and supportive of
    all small businesses in our community. Because your post
    references businesses I do not own, I’m asking that it be removed. If not, we
    will need to have our attorney formally request its removal,” Martin wrote in the email, which Vogel shared with WRAL. “I
    hope we can resolve this quickly and respectfully.”

    The comment prompted a Change.org petition
    calling for Martin to be held accountable.

    “This should include a formal apology, mandatory sensitivity
    training, financial support for one of our local organizations who provide
    direct aid to trans youth and any other corrective actions deemed appropriate
    by SLR. Every person, regardless of their gender identity should feel seen and
    supported by the communities they belong to,” the petition reads. It has gotten
    more than 500 signatures.

    The Night Market Company also posted on Facebook that it
    would not be participating in Shop Local Raleigh events due to the comment.

    Stephenson said she would like to see “education come from
    this.”

    She said she would like to see Martin “really take some time to think about this comment
    and how it affects the people in her community, the very community that has
    carried this nonprofit, and the people who show up at these event.”

    WRAL has reached out to Martin but has not heard back. Several GRMA board members told WRAL they had no comment. 

    Shop Local Raleigh posted on the group’s Facebook page on Monday afternoon:

    “The Board of Directors of the Greater Raleigh Merchants Association (Shop Local Raleigh) is aware of concerns surrounding a recent, personal, social media comment made by our Executive Director. The Board is currently addressing the matter. The comment made does not reflect those of the organization. Shop Local Raleigh is dedicated to a culture of diversity, inclusion and respect.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This is ‘brain rot,’ a slang term with something to it

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — You grab your phone and in that first swipe, you see someone traveling the world. Why aren’t you on vacation? Swipe again, and someone is living off the grid. Wow, shouldn’t you get rid of your laptop? Swipe once more, and a tech CEO is telling you how AI is going to optimize your hustle.

    Does it feel like your brain is rotting away?

    If it seems as though social media and online content are dragging you around instead of enriching your daily life, you probably relate to Tiziana Bucec, a content creator in Berlin whose social media posts combat a slang term that’s widely used online: “brain rot.”

    “I’m making this series because I’m tired of feeling like social media makes us dumber, more anxious and less aware,” she said in her first anti-brain rot video, which then became a series on how social media use impacts the brain and how to moderate use.

    Brain rot isn’t a scientific term. It has come to refer to content that might be funny nonsense, Bucec said. Think Skibidi Toilet or 6-7. But it has evolved into a popular way to complain that excessive use of social media has decreased critical thinking and attention span.

    While there’s not much scientific research on brain rot and its possible effects, we can use knowledge about the brain and addiction to infer some possibilities, said Dr. Costantino Iadecola, Anne Parrish Titzell Professor of Neurology at Weill Cornell Medicine and director and chair of the Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute.

    The mechanisms that keep you mindlessly scrolling may be similar to those behind addictions such as drug and alcohol use or gambling. In teens diagnosed with internet addiction, past research has found disrupted signaling between brain regions important for controlling attention, working memory and more. It’s reasonable to expect that the amount of time people spend mindlessly engaging with low-quality content, or brain rot, can have detrimental effects, Iadecola said.

    What makes content low quality?

    The main culprit of brain rot is low-quality content, which often refers to short-term videos, like those funny cat compilations or that teen doing a viral dance, said Dr. Nidhi Gupta, a pediatric endocrinologist in Franklin, Tennessee, and author of “Calm the Noise: Why Adults Must Escape Digital Addiction to Save the Next Generation.”

    “Our attention spans are finite, and when we have so much content competing for our attention span, something essential is going to be missed, whether it is health, whether it is work, relationships or sleep,” Gupta said. “We download that low-quality digital media, that digital noise, into our brain space.”

    Short-form content, whether it’s watching someone try on outfits or prank their partner, is designed to give you a big hit of dopamine, the neurotransmitter responsible for reward and motivation, and get you to keep coming back, Iadecola said.

    Often, but not always, that content isn’t helping the viewer learn, grow or develop, he added.

    Watching a lot of it can prime a brain to expect frequent and explosive bursts of excitement, which can make longer and more deeply engaging forms of media feel boring and inadequate, Gupta said.

    Not just a kid problem

    Iadecola is most concerned for kids when it comes to brain rot, he said.

    As with other addictions, there are ways to address excessive social media use and change a bad habit throughout your life, he added. But young children who are glued to a device, rather than running around on a playground learning to interact with people, may be missing key milestones.

    As children develop, they need a lot of different experiences to form a brain that can learn and develop productively, including emotional, social and facial cues, Iadecola said.

    Spending so much time with short-form content is “kind of fast pacing and not really teaching you something that may be useful in the long term, which will eventually affect your ability to learn, and so you’re going to be at a disadvantage,” he noted.

    But helping children have a healthy relationship with social media also can mean examining how adults use it, too.

    “Screen addiction is not a kid problem anymore. It is a human problem,” Gupta said.

    “We as human beings are being role models for kids,” she added. “When we are reaching for our phone while driving, we are silently sending a message in the back seat toward children that it’s OK to do this. So, when they get behind the wheel, they are likely to follow suit.”

    Modeling behavior for children is often more effective than lecturing them about what they should –– or should not –– be doing, Gupta added.

    Can you still tune it out?

    If you’re worried about compilations, fan edits and other lower-quality content, it can be tempting to try to ban it from your feeds and those of the kids you may have in your life. That might not be the answer, though.

    When teens use the term brain rot, it’s an acknowledgment that they are letting their minds not be utilized fully, which is easy to bristle at, said Dr. Lisa Damour, a clinical psychologist in Ohio and author of “The Emotional Lives of Teenagers: Raising Connected, Capable and Compassionate Adolescents.”

    But many of today’s teens are doing more work in school than earlier generations, and every generation has had their ways to disengage that adults in their lives might not have preferred, she added.

    “I myself watched a ton of ‘Gilligan’s Island,’” Damour said. “As long as kids are accomplishing the things they need to, being good citizens all around, they absolutely deserve some mindless leisure.”

    Want to set limits?

    Social media can have benefits for adults, so the goal shouldn’t be complete elimination for everyone, said Dr. Gloria Mark, a professor of informatics at the University of California, Irvine, who studies how digital media affects our lives.

    “Set limits if you’re such a person that goes down rabbit holes (and) can spend hours on social media,” she said.

    Limits can look like setting up a daily time slot to check in with your social media platforms that happens right before something you have to do so you can’t keep scrolling without end, Gupta said.

    In addition to limits, deleting the applications and only accessing social media through a browser may also help moderate social media use –– and the potential brain rot, she added. Using it that way puts more effort between you and a scroll, and a browser version is usually less set up to be addictive than an application, she said.

    “Willpower does not work,” Gupta said. “Environmental changes matter more.”

    Need a little more motivation to cut down? Now is the time to formulate New Year’s resolutions, and you can start by reducing your consumption or making a plan to set limits come January.

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Holcombe and CNN

    Source link

  • WATCH: WTOP’s most viral videos of 2025 – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    As we wrap up 2025, let’s look back at the moments our staff caught on camera that drew the eyes of millions.

    In our series “2025 in Review,” WTOP takes a look back at some of 2025’s most memorable or impactful stories that happened in the D.C. area. Listen on air, or read and watch them online.

    This year has been full of viral moments — from the funny, to the emotional, to the just plain weird.

    As we wrap up 2025, let’s look back at the moments WTOP staff caught on camera that drew the eyes of millions.

    #5: Federal workers at Virginia town hall say they are angry, scared and fed up

    Shortly after Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency began dramatically slashing the federal workforce, hundreds of federal workers spoke out at a town hall in Northern Virginia. WTOP’s Kyle Cooper reported on their emotional testimonies.

     

    #4: D.C.’s first phone-free bar opens on H Street

    Hush Harbor on H Street in Northeast D.C. says it’s the first phone-free bar in the nation’s capital. WTOP’s Jimmy Alexander visited the bar and spoke with Rock Harbor, who made a name for himself on Gordon Ramsay’s “Hell’s Kitchen” show.

    His video sparked a conversation on multiple social media platforms about the relationship people have with their phone and each other. You can read his full report here.

    #3: Bystanders help car occupants out of Silver Spring flash flood

    Extreme rainfall hit much of the D.C. region in July, causing flash flooding that caused some to be trapped in their homes or cars. WTOP Traffic Reporter Dave Dildine was on his way home when he saw some men helping two strangers — and their dinner — escape from their trapped car. Dildine captured the moment on camera and wrote about the flooding here.

    #2: Fairfax County McDonald’s has a 21 and over entrance policy

    One McDonald’s in Alexandria drew attention in May when its owner chose to limit in-person dining to adults over the age of 21. The store’s management cited “repeated incidents of student violence” on a sign taped to the front door. The full story from WTOP’s Heather Gustafson can be found here.

    #1: Bags and other items discarded on the street outside Trump inauguration

    Tens of thousands of supporters of President Donald Trump flocked to Capitol One Arena for his inauguration on Jan. 20. At the last minute, officials announced bags would not be permitted inside the stadium.

    Thousands of attendees decided to leave their bags outside the stadium, and people passing by took the opportunity to rifle through their belongings. WTOP’s Matt Kaufax captured the moment that has since been viewed over five million times. You can read our full inauguration coverage here.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Kay Perkins

    Source link

  • How to Get the Most Out of Paid Social in 2026

    [ad_1]

    Where should you spend your paid social dollars in 2026? It’s a simple question with a complicated answer.

    There’s no one-size-fits-all strategy in the world of paid social, according to Blake Anderson, founder of the AI app studio 10x, who uses Meta and TikTok to advertise the viral apps he creates.

    It’s all too common for marketers to hear a peer say, “Oh, my god, Reddit, for example, just started performing so well for us,” he says; then they’ll try running ads there only to find that they don’t land the same.

    That’s why Anderson recommends that founders looking to boost their brand awareness and convert customers through paid social channels “test everything under the sun and lean into what works.”

    Ryan Schuster, the director of paid search and social at media agency Exverus by Brainlabs, exemplifies this strategy. While working with clients such as Premier Protein, Theralogix supplements, and New Belgium Brewing, Schuster says he typically puts 60 percent of their paid social budget toward Meta and 30 percent toward TikTok. Then, he either spends the remaining 10 percent on Reddit “or some sort of other test-and-learn” channel.

    Each platform has different strengths

    Anderson and Schuster both say that Meta beats out other platforms in terms of its return on ad spend. TikTok, meanwhile, is great at building brand awareness and offers a wider array of ad placement options. “You can serve your ads along top-trending content, or be the first ad that opens up, or the first video, as soon as the user launches the app,” Schuster says.

    If you’re marketing a product that requires education or has a strong community behind it, on the other hand, you should check out Reddit, according to Schuster. He says he likes the platform because it allows his agency to “contextually align our brands with really interesting conversations, helpful articles—everything that lives in Reddit.”

    [ad_2]

    Annabel Burba

    Source link