ReportWire

Tag: social media

  • Spanish Feminist Targeted by AI Fakes Wants Stricter Online Regulations

    [ad_1]

    MADRID, Feb 27 (Reuters) – A Spanish ⁠women’s ⁠rights activist who suffered online ⁠abuse, including AI-generated fake nude images, said the government’s pledge ​to regulate social media does not go far enough, calling for anonymous accounts to ‌be made traceable to end ‌impunity for digital violence.

    As Europe’s push to rein in U.S.-based tech giants ⁠is shifting ⁠from fines and takedown notices to stiffer measures, Madrid wants to ​impose a ban on under-16s accessing social media and criminal liability for platform executives who fail to remove illegal or hateful content.

    France, Greece and Poland are weighing similar measures ​after Australia became the first country to block social media for children under ⁠16 ⁠in December. 

    Carla Galeote, a ⁠25-year-old lawyer ​and prominent online feminist commentator, told Reuters governments were reacting only now because ​digital violence had become ⁠impossible to ignore, although the problem predated AI. 

    “Social media isn’t new – and the violence is brutal, systematic, 24/7,” Galeote said. “What hit me hardest wasn’t the deepfake, it was going to the police and being told it wasn’t even a crime.”

    She ⁠dismissed plans to ban children from social media as “paternalistic”, arguing all users, regardless ⁠of age, need protection from digital abuse.

    Spain’s proposed law has sparked backlash from tech company executives, who accuse Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of threatening free speech. Galeote, however, believes regulation and freedom of expression can coexist.

    “It’s impossible to think that a man on the street could shout that they’ll rape you and nothing happens, but that’s what we’re seeing online,” she said. 

    Instead of imposing easily absorbable fines, Galeote advocated barring platforms ⁠from major markets, like the European Union, for repeated violations. 

    While defending pseudonymous online use, Galeote emphasized the need for traceable identities behind all accounts. 

    “Call yourself ‘PeppaPig88’ if you want – fine. But there has to be a ​real identity behind that account,” she said.

    (Reporting by David Latona; Editing ​by Aislinn Laing and Andrei Khalip)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • “I wanted to be on it all the time,” plaintiff says in landmark social media addiction trial

    [ad_1]

    A young woman who is battling against social media giants took the stand Thursday to testify about her experience using the platforms as she was growing up, saying she was on social media “all day long” as a child.

    The now 20-year-old, who has been identified in court documents as KGM, says her early use of social media addicted her to the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta and YouTube are the two remaining defendants in the case, which TikTok and Snap have settled.

    The case, along with two others, has been selected as a bellwether trial, meaning its outcome could impact how thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies are likely to play out.

    Early social media user

    KGM, or Kaley, as her lawyers have called her during the trial, started using YouTube at age 6 and Instagram at age 9.

    Kaley took the stand wearing a pink floral dress and a beige cardigan and said she was “very nervous” after her attorney, Mark Lanier, asked how she was doing Thursday morning.

    Lanier displayed childhood photos of Kaley and her family and asked about positive memories from her upbringing in a quiet cul-de-sac in Chico, California. She spoke of themed birthday parties, trips to Six Flags and her mom’s consistent efforts to make her childhood special.

    Still, Kaley’s relationship with her mother was challenging at times. Kaley said most of their arguments were over the use of her phone.

    Both the defendants and the plaintiff have pointed to a turbulent home life for Kaley. Her attorneys say she was preyed upon as a vulnerable user, but attorneys representing Meta and Google-owned YouTube have argued Kaley turned to their platforms as a coping mechanism or a means of escaping her mental health struggles.

    When asked about claims that her mother had hit her, abused her and neglected her, Kaley said “she wasn’t perfect, but she was trying her best,” and clarified that she doesn’t think she would label her mother’s past actions as abuse or neglect today. Kaley, who works as a personal shopper at Walmart, still lives with her mother in the home she grew up in.

    “It made me look popular”

    As a child, Kaley set up multiple accounts on both Instagram and YouTube so she could like and comment on her posts. She said she would also “buy” likes through a platform where she could like other people’s photos and get a slew of likes in return. “It made me look popular,” she said.

    Kaley was asked specifically about the features the plaintiffs argue are deliberately designed to be addictive, including notifications. Those notifications on both Instagram and YouTube gave her a “rush,” she said. She would receive them throughout the day and would go to the bathroom during school to check them — something she still does.

    Kaley said while she uses YouTube less often now, she believes she was previously addicted to it. “Anytime I tried to set limits for myself, it wouldn’t work and I just couldn’t get off,” she said.

    Filters on Instagram, specifically those that could change a person’s cosmetic appearance, have also loomed large in the case and were also a constant fixture of Kaley’s use. Lanier and his colleagues unfurled a nearly 35-foot-long canvas banner with photos Kaley has posted on Instagram. She said “almost all” of the photos had a filter on them.

    The jury was also shown Instagram posts and YouTube videos Kaley posted as a child and young teen. One video that tapped into the popular trend at the time, sharing a nighttime routine, showed a young Kaley scrolling on her phone, showering and taking off makeup and then returning to her phone to go on Instagram. Another video showed her saying she was “crying tears of joy” after surpassing 100 YouTube subscribers — but then she quickly turned to her looks, apologizing for her “ugly appearance.”

    “I look so fat in this shirt,” the young Kaley says in the video.

    Meta highlights mental health struggles

    Meta has argued that Kaley faced significant challenges before she ever used social media. The company’s lawyer, Paul Schmidt, said earlier this month that the core question in the case is whether the platforms were a substantial factor in Kayley’s mental health struggles. 

    During opening arguments, he spent much of his time going through the plaintiff’s health records, emphasizing that she had experienced many difficult circumstances in her childhood, including emotional abuse, body image issues and bullying.

    Kaley said she did not experience the negative feelings associated with her body dysmorphia diagnosis before she began using social media and filters.

    Kaley was asked about her peak Instagram usage, which exceeded 16 hours one day. “I just felt like I wanted to be on it all the time, and if I wasn’t on it, I felt like I was going to miss out on something,” she said.

    When she tried to stop using the platforms, she said she was often unsuccessful.

    “Every single day, I was on it all day long,” she said.

    Therapist’s testimony

    Victoria Burke, a former therapist Kaley worked with in 2019, testified on Wednesday, and Burke said her social media and her sense of self “were closely related,” adding that what was happening on the platforms could “make or break her mood.”

    Burke’s treatment of Kaley lasted about six months and that period took place seven years ago.

    The case has been the subject of intense interest among both advocacy groups lobbying for enhanced child safety protections and the tech world alike, with high-profile testimony from the head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

    During Zuckerberg’s testimony, when he was asked if people tend to use something more if it’s addictive, he said “I’m not sure what to say to that.”

    “I don’t think that applies here,” he continued. He said he believes in the “basic assumption” that “if something is valuable, people will use it more because it’s useful to them.” Mosseri also said he didn’t believe people could become clinically addicted to social media platforms.

    The case is expected to continue for several weeks, with a ruling potentially shaping the outcome of a slew of similar lawsuits against social media companies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Video: The A.I. Videos on Kids’ YouTube Feeds

    [ad_1]

    new video loaded: The A.I. Videos on Kids’ YouTube Feeds

    The YouTube algorithm is pushing bizarre, often nonsensical A.I.-generated videos targeting children. Our video journalist Arijeta Lajka explains why experts say that these videos could affect their cognitive development, and how parents can identify this type of content.

    By Arijeta Lajka, Christina Shaman, Melanie Bencosme, June Kim and Luke Piotrowski

    February 26, 2026

    [ad_2]

    Arijeta Lajka, Christina Shaman, Melanie Bencosme, June Kim and Luke Piotrowski

    Source link

  • Instagram to alert parents when teens search for info on suicide or self-harm

    [ad_1]

    Meta-owned Instagram will soon alert parents if their teenage child uses the app to search for content related to suicide or self-harm, the technology company’s latest effort to shore up safety features as it faces heat over how social media impacts young people. 

    Meta said that, starting next week, parents who use Instagram’s supervision tools will get a message — either via email, text or WhatsApp, as well as through an in-app notification — if a teen repeatedly searches for certain terms related to self-harm or suicide within a short time span. 

    The company said the message will inform parents that teens repeatedly searched for suicide or self-harm content and offer resources on how to approach sensitive conversations around mental health.

    “The vast majority of teens do not try to search for suicide and self-harm content on Instagram, and when they do, our policy is to block these searches, instead directing them to resources and helplines that can offer support,” the company said Thursday in a news release.

    Meta did not specify how many searches will prompt a parental alert, noting only that “we chose a threshold that requires a few searches within a short period of time, while still erring on the side of caution.”

    The new safeguard will initially roll out in the U.S., the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada before being deployed in other regions later this year, according to Meta. 

    In October of last year, Meta also introduced age-based content restrictions that block users under 18 from seeing search results for certain terms, such as “alcohol” or “gore.” At the time, Meta said it already shielded teens from search results related to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders.

    Meta and YouTube trial

    Meta’s new safety features come amid an ongoing trial in Los Angeles over whether its platforms, along with Alphabet-owned YouTube, are deliberately designed to addict young users. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg last week faced questioning about Instagram’s young users and Meta’s efforts to boost engagement.

    Instagram specifies that users must be at least 13 years old to sign up for its app. At trial, however, Zuckerberg conceded that the rule is hard to enforce because users sometimes lie about their age. To verify users’ age, Instagram asks them to submit details such as their birthday, photo identification and a video.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Reddit hit with $20 million UK data privacy fine over child safety failings

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Britain’s data privacy watchdog slapped online forum Reddit on Tuesday with a fine worth nearly $20 million for failures involving children’s personal information.

    The Information Commissioner’s Office said it issued the penalty worth 14.5 million pounds ($19.5 million) because the failures resulted in the platform using children’s data “unlawfully.”

    “Children under 13 had their personal information collected and used in ways they could not understand, consent to or control. That left them potentially exposed to content they should not have seen,” said Information Commissioner John Edwards. “This is unacceptable and has resulted in today’s fine.”

    The U.K. privacy regulator has been escalating scrutiny of online platforms over child safety. Earlier this month it hit MediaLab, owner of image-sharing site Imgur, with a 247,590 pound fine over similar failures and it has also been investigating TikTok since last year.

    The watchdog took issue with Reddit’s age verification measures. It said that even though the platform doesn’t allow children under 13 to use its service, it didn’t have any way to check the ages of its users before July 2025.

    Edwards said online platforms that are likely to be accessed by children are responsible for protecting them by making sure they’re not exposed to any risks “through the way their data is used.” They can do this with “effective age assurance measures,” he said.

    Reddit rolled out age verification measures in July 2025 in order for users to access mature content, including asking them to declare their age when setting up an account.

    But the watchdog said “self-declaration” is easy to bypass and that it told Reddit it would continue to monitor the platform’s handling of children’s data.

    Reddit said it would appeal the decision.

    “Reddit doesn’t require users to share information about their identities, regardless of age, because we are deeply committed to their privacy and safety,” the company said in a statement. “The ICO’s insistence that we collect more private information on every UK user is counterintuitive and at odds with our strong belief in our users’ online privacy and safety.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Reddit hit with £14.47m fine over children’s privacy failures – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    The UK’s data protection watchdog has issued a £14.47 million fine to Reddit for failing to protect the personal information of children.

    An investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), published on February 24, 2026, revealed that despite Reddit’s own terms of service prohibiting under-13s, the company lacked any robust age assurance mechanisms to enforce this rule until mid-2025.

    This meant the platform had no lawful basis for collecting and using the personal information of hundreds of thousands of UK children.

    A critical component of the ICO’s enforcement action was Reddit’s failure to carry out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) before January 2025. Under UK law, companies must assess and mitigate risks to children before launching services likely to be accessed by them.

    The ICO noted that children under 13 were essentially “hidden in plain sight” on the platform, having their data used in ways they could not understand or control.

    While Reddit introduced new age assurance measures in July 2025, including age verification for mature content, the regulator remains critical of the platform’s continued reliance on self-declaration for new accounts. The ICO warned that simply asking a user to type in their age is a method that is “easy to bypass” and does not meet the standard of protection required for high-risk platforms.

    “It’s concerning that a company the size of Reddit failed in its legal duty to protect the personal information of UK children,” said John Edwards, UK Information Commissioner. “Companies have a responsibility to ensure children are not exposed to risks through the way their data is used. To do this, they need to be confident they know the age of their users.”

    The record fine follows a similar penalty recently issued to MediaLab and is part of a broader crackdown on social media and video-sharing sites. The ICO confirmed it will continue to monitor Reddit’s updated controls and encouraged the wider tech industry to shift away from “self-declaration” models in favour of more robust, effective age assurance technology.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Social media can be addictive even for adults, but there are ways to cut back

    [ad_1]

    Social media addiction has been compared to casinos, opioids and cigarettes.

    While there’s some debate among experts about the line between overuse and addiction, and whether social media can cause the latter, there is no doubt that many people feel like they can’t escape the pull of Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and other platforms.

    The companies that designed your favorite apps have an incentive to keep you glued to them so they can serve up ads that make them billions of dollars in revenue. Resisting the pull of the endless scroll, the dopamine hits from short-form videos and the ego boost and validation that come from likes and positive interactions, can seem like an unfair fight. For some people, “rage-bait,” gloomy news and arguing with internet strangers also have an irresistible draw.

    Much of the concern around social media addiction has focused on children. But adults are also susceptible to using social media so much that it starts affecting their day-to-day lives.

    Dr. Anna Lembke, a psychiatrist and the medical director of addiction medicine at Stanford University’s School of Medicine, defines addiction as “the continued compulsive use of a substance or behavior despite harm to self or others.”

    During her testimony at a landmark social media harms trial in Los Angeles, Lembke said that what makes social media platforms so addictive is the “24/7, really limitless, frictionless access” people have to them.

    Some researchers question whether addiction is the appropriate term to describe heavy use of social media, arguing that a person must be experiencing identifiable symptoms. These include strong, sometimes uncontrollable urges and withdrawal to qualify as addiction.

    Social media addiction is not recognized as an official disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which is the standard reference psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners use to assess and treat patients. That’s partly because there is no widespread consensus on what constitutes social media addiction and whether underlying mental health issues contribute to problematic use.

    But just because there is no official agreement on the issue doesn’t mean excessive social media use can’t be harmful, some experts say.

    “For me, the biggest signpost is how does the person feel about the ‘amount,’ and how viewing it makes them feel,” said Dr. Laurel Williams, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Baylor College of Medicine. “If what they discover is they view it so much that they are missing out on other things they may enjoy or things that they need to attend to, this is problematic use. Additionally, if you leave feeling overwhelmed, drained, sad, anxious, angry regularly, this use is not good for you.”

    In other words, is your use of social media affecting other parts of your life? Are you putting off chores, work, hobbies or time with friends and family? Have you tried to cut back your time but realized you were unable to? Do you feel bad about your social media use?

    Ofir Turel, a professor of information systems management at the University of Melbourne who has studied social media use for years, said there was “no agreement” over the term social media addiction, and he doesn’t “expect agreement soon.”

    “It’s obvious that we have an issue,” Turel said. “You don’t have to call it an addiction, but there is an issue and we need, as a society, to start thinking about it.”

    Before setting limits on scrolling, it’s helpful to understand how social media feeds and advertising work to draw in users, Williams said.

    “Think of social media as a company trying to get you to stay with them and buy something — have the mindset that this is information that I don’t need to act on and may not be true,” she added. “Get alternate sources of information. Always understand the more you see something, anyone can start to believe it is true.”

    Ian A. Anderson, a postdoctoral scholar at California Institute of Technology, suggests making small, meaningful changes to stop you from opening your social media app of choice. Moving the app’s place on your phone or turning off notifications are “light touch interventions,” but more involved options, like not bringing your phone into the bedroom or other places where you tend to use it, could also help, Anderson said.

    Tech tools can also help to cut back on tech overuse. Both iPhones and Android devices have onboard controls to help regulate screen time.

    Apple’s Screen Time controls are found in the iPhone’s settings menu. Users can set overall Downtime, which shuts off all phone activity during a set period of their choice.

    The controls also let users put a blanket restriction on certain categories of apps, such as social, games or entertainment or zero in on a specific app, by limiting the time that can be spent on it.

    The downside is that the limits aren’t hard to get around. It’s more of a nudge than a red line that you can’t cross. If you try to open an app with a limit, you’ll get a screen menu offering one more minute, a reminder after 15 minutes, or to completely ignore it.

    If a light touch isn’t working, more drastic steps might be necessary. Some users swear by turning their phones to gray-scale to make it less appealing to dopamine-seeking brains. On iPhones, adjust the color filter in your settings. For Android, turn on Bedtime Mode or tweak the color correction setting. Downgrading to a simpler phone, such as an old-school flip phone, could also help curb social media compulsions.

    Some startups, figuring that people might prefer a tangible barrier, offer hardware solutions that introduce physical friction between you and an app. Unpluq, for instance, is a yellow tag that you have to hold up to your phone in order to access blocked apps. Brick and Blok are two different products that work along the same lines — they’re squarish pieces of plastic that you have to tap or scan with your phone to unlock an app.

    If that’s not enough of an obstacle, you could stash away your phone entirely. There are various phone lockboxes and cases available, some of them designed so parents can lock up their teenagers’ phones when they’re supposed to be sleeping, but there’s no rule that says only teenagers can use them.

    Yondr, which makes portable phone locking pouches used at concerts or in schools, also sells a home phone box.

    If all else fails, it may be a good idea to look for deeper reasons for feeling addicted to social media. Maybe it’s a symptom of underlying problems like anxiety, stress, loneliness, depression or low self-esteem. If you think that’s the case, it could be worth exploring therapy that is becoming more widely available.

    “For people struggling to stay away — see if you can get a friend group to collaborate with you on it. Make it a group effort. Just don’t post about it! The more spaces become phone free, the more we may see a lessened desire to be ‘on,’” Williams said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • X Really Is Pulling Users to the Right

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photo: Getty Images

    After buying Twitter, Elon Musk rebuilt it to his own specifications and preferences. This resulted in an environment we may gently call friendlier to the discussion and promotion of right-wing politics. The goal motivated his purchase and subsequent management and product decisions, and people who still use the platform will agree, in a narrow sense, that its character has changed. From the left: Elon Musk turned Twitter into 4chan for government officials and tech workers. From the right: Elon Musk killed Twitter, created X, and saved civilization.

    This obvious and very public transformation has remained a subject of dispute for a few reasons. For one, it has been a gradual process, a slow accumulation of user migrations, changes to the platform’s policies and features, and the evolution of new dominant communities alongside older declining ones. This makes its progress hard to track. For another, as an environment for intra-elite communication, signaling, and coordination, it has been pretty resilient — at the very least, a lot of powerful people still produce newsworthy material there — meaning a lot of people who are unsympathetic or uninterested in its new direction have nonetheless found reasons to stick around. Everyone with exposure to X knows it has changed, but it’s harder to say how much and with what results.

    At The Argument, Lakshya Jain brought some data to the discussion, conducting a large national survey segmented by respondents’ preferred online news sources. The results were pretty stark:

    As an example, even though ICE’s net favorability rating is at -26 percentage points with all voters, it’s almost break-even with people who get their news from Twitter. Compare that to other social media platforms like Reddit and TikTok, where over 70% of voters viewed the agency unfavorably.

    In the survey, conducted in January, X users were the only group in which a majority, just barely over 50 percent, expressed “strong” or “somewhat” approval of Donald Trump. His approval was significantly lower among consumers of news from “podcasts and YouTube,” local television, and even Facebook. Among people reading “newspapers or news websites,” browsing Reddit, watching broadcast television or scrolling TikTok or Instagram to keep up with current events, the numbers were, as Jain described them, “catastrophic.” He noted, “If you’re largely getting your news from Twitter, you might not even know that Trump is unpopular, because you wouldn’t even see a lot of the backlash.”

    Last week, in a study published in Nature, a group of researchers attempted to answer a sensible follow-up question: So what? People organize around news sources that flatter their beliefs, and in a fragmented news environment, you would expect different attitudes to be associated with venues that have developed a clear partisan identity. Well, it turns out that the engine of Musk’s X — its algorithmic “For You” page — is an ideological ratchet:

    In addition to promoting entertainment, X’s feed algorithm tends to push more conservative content to users’ feeds. Seven weeks of exposure to such content in 2023 shifted users’ political opinions in a more conservative direction, particularly with regard to policy priorities, perceptions of the criminal investigations into Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. The effect is asymmetric: switching the algorithm on influenced political views, but switching it off did not reverse users’ perspectives on policy priorities or current political issues.

    The effect was surprisingly pronounced considering the comparatively less insane conditions on the platform, and across politics in general, in 2023. In the space of a couple of months, users consuming X’s algorithmic feeds were both “4.7 percentage points more likely to prioritize policy issues considered important by Republicans” and “5.2 percentage points less likely to reduce their X usage.” Taken together, these analyses offer a bit of data to support the notion that X has become a place that both attracts more conservatives and pushes them further to the right, resulting in an X-obsessed administration that often uses the bizarre language of Zoomer fascists when posting online.

    They also support the argument that increasingly algorithmic platforms — on which feeds centered around user-to-user connections have been either crowded out or replaced by feeds that serve posts based on prediction and user feedback — are a force for ideological persuasion. This is intuitive if you imagine algorithmic recommendations as automated editorial processes or perhaps like targeted ad networks. They’re going to end up promoting something or being manipulated to that end. Fears of algorithmic persuasion are widely held and have been consequential. After the 2016 election, Mark Zuckerberg was forced to confront the question, posed by many in the media, of whether Facebook might have swayed the outcome. More recently, lawmakers’ fear that TikTok’s algorithm was promoting Chinese propaganda, or vilifying Israel, helped prompt a legal ban and forced sale.

    In the past, though, the concern about algorithmic persuasion — What is Facebook doing to the nation’s elderly voters? Is TikTok radicalizing the kids against capitalism? — has often been an elite obsession, in which people who think of themselves as unusually informed and savvy worry about the manipulation of the masses by machines dumber than they are but smarter than everyone else. This was a particularly popular theory on Twitter itself, which, more than any other platform, was built to feel like a simulation of the public discourse and attracted people who felt entitled to be a part of it. The Muskification of Twitter into X — the MAGA platform of choice, where Musk’s tweets and the platform’s recommendations are unavoidable and the house chatbot is an outspoken rightist — may also be influencing the elites who still use it. Could it be happening to you, too? Are you … sure?

    [ad_2]

    John Herrman

    Source link

  • Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg’s team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial

    [ad_1]


    A California judge admonished members of Mark Zuckerberg’s team for wearing Ray Ban-Meta AI glasses, which are equipped with a camera, as they entered a Los Angeles courtroom on Wednesday for a landmark trial over the impact of social media on children.

    “The judge upbraided the Meta team and said if you guys have recorded anything, you have to dispose of it or I will hold you in contempt,” Jacob Ward, a technology journalist and the host of the Rip Current Podcast, told CBS News, calling the incident  “an extraordinary misstep” by Meta. 

    It’s unclear if Zuckerberg’s team had the glasses on inside the courtroom or how long they were wearing them. Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The use of recording devices and cameras is generally banned in Los Angeles County Superior Court. 

    “Judicial officers have the discretion to place limitations on video recording and photography in their courtroom,” a Superior Court of Los Angeles County spokesperson told CBS News, citing local and state rules.

    Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who is presiding over the trial, also ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned.

    “This is very serious,” she said. The court did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment.

    Meta’s glasses, retail for between $299 and $799, are equipped with a camera that can take photos and record video.

    Zuckerberg was in court to testify as part of a trial over whether Meta and Alphabet-owned YouTube deliberately designed their social media platforms to encourage compulsive usage by young people. 

    The plaintiff behind the suit, identified only by her initials “KGM,” alleges that using social media from a young age caused her to become addicted and harmed her mental health.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Discord over Discord triggers surge for alternative TeamSpeak – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    Instant messaging and social media platform Discord continues to face significant user backlash after announcing its age verification measures. 

    A growing wave of defections has seen competitors, including TeamSpeak, struggle with server overloads as thousands of users flee from Discord to avoid new mandatory protocols.

    The migration follows the platform’s refusal to reverse plans to verify the age of its entire user base. TeamSpeak recently reported that the sheer volume of new arrivals has caused capacity issues, a trend mirrored by other alternatives such as Stoat.

    While these platforms are finding humour in the situation through online memes, the underlying cause for the exodus is rooted in serious privacy and safety concerns.

    Controversy over age checks

    The core of the dispute lies in how Discord intends to confirm user ages. Under the new system, users may be required to provide official government identification or undergo facial recognition scans.

    While Discord claims an “age inference system” will allow many adults to bypass these steps based on account activity and device data, the safety net is not guaranteed. If the automated system fails, the requirement for sensitive personal data becomes mandatory.

    This requirement has sparked widespread alarm, particularly following a major security breach last October when the IDs of 70,000 users were leaked to hackers.

    Also, while originally the company assured users that video selfies submitted for facial age estimation would “never leave a user’s device,” according to Eurogamer  British users have recently discovered a quiet update which reveals that some may now be funnelled through a different vendor, Persona, where verification data will actually leave their phone.

    Beyond external hacking threats, there is a deep-seated fear regarding how the data will be used by Discord itself. Content creators and advocacy groups have highlighted that many marginalized individuals use Discord as a safe haven to discuss topics they cannot safely navigate in the physical world.  There are mounting concerns that this data could be shared with, or seized by, state and federal agencies.

    Popular creators have pointed to recent instances of government agencies requesting data on political activists as proof that these fears are not unfounded. As one user noted, the possibility of tech companies sharing data with authorities for political or federal benefit is no longer “far-fetched.”

    For those who rely on the internet for anonymity and safety, the move to platforms like TeamSpeak, which currently lack such rigorous requirements, is seen as a necessary step to protect their security.

    Discord age verification data in the UK will leave phone, report claims


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Zuckerberg defends social media platforms at landmark trial

    [ad_1]


    Zuckerberg defends social media platforms at landmark trial – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified Wednesday in a civil case over social media addiction allegations that skyrocketing social media use shows how people value the sites and it’s not a strategy to keep users addicted. Jo Ling Kent reports.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Zohran Mamdani, the Everywhere Mayor

    [ad_1]

    I thought of Boorstin on a Thursday afternoon early this month, as City Hall reporters trooped into the Blue Room, the traditional site of mayoral press conferences. Half the room’s seats had been cordoned off. A staffer directed members of the press to the right, then clarified—“Stage right,” i.e., the left. At the front of the room, next to the main lectern, stood a second lectern approximately half as high. We waited for an unseen curtain to rise.

    The Mayor’s public schedule had promised a “child care announcement” with the New York City Public Schools chancellor, Kamar Samuels. The announcement turned out to be that the city was releasing an R.F.I. “Like so many of you, the first time I saw it, I said, ‘What is an R.F.I.?’ ” Samuels told the assembled press. “Well, it is a request for information.” The city was putting out a call for providers interested in participating in its new 2-K and established 3-K programs, something that, in the case of the latter, had not happened in the past five years. (“Today, we say, ‘No more,’ ” Mamdani said.) This worthy, if dry, news offered a pretext for the afternoon’s real show: watching as the Mayor joshed amiably with his other guests, four pre-K students from District Two.

    Julian Shapiro-Barnum, who runs a web series called “Recess Therapy,” on which he interviews small children for his 3.2 million followers on Instagram, was seated in the front row of the press area. Reporters were instructed to confine themselves to on-topic questions, but Shapiro-Barnum was allowed to interpret this expansively. “Do any of you have a favorite farm animal, or aquarium animal?” he asked the intermittently on-message group gathered around the short lectern.

    “My favorite one is a gold snake that can move and it has gold eyes and it has a long tail, a super, super-duper tail, and it can snap cars and crash the cars,” a boy with shaggy blond hair said.

    “And, Mr. Mamdani—”

    “It’s also the golden snake,” the Mayor said. He then delivered a précis on the 3-K and pre-K application process and encouraged parents to submit applications by February 27th.

    Shapiro-Barnum posted a video of the exchange two days later, followed by a companion video a few days after that, reminding parents about the deadline. If different in form, these were not far removed in tone from the videos the Mayor’s office itself releases, bouncy and uncowed by any risk of sounding corny. For a spot promoting public bathroom access, Mamdani washed his hands in a Harlem park men’s room; for a video about municipal finance, he explained the rudiments of the city’s “incredibly confusing” budget process. (“What can I say? We’re perfectionists. And bound by the reforms of the nineteen-seventies fiscal crisis.”) His droll explanatory mode calls to mind the “Hamilton” era of educational entertainment for adults—a twenty-tens wave of earnest pop-culture optimism that New York magazine once termed “Obamacore.” But if do-gooder didacticism has worn thin in the context of, say, a streaming series (think of Aziz Ansari diligently explaining why sexism is bad on “Master of None”), it has now found a more appropriate home. If anyone’s entitled to a cheerful, dorky P.S.A., surely it’s the city government.

    Mamdani’s approach seems intended to project a new relationship between New Yorkers and City Hall, one that relies on insistently personal terms and emphasizes care and communication. (In the time since the new administration took over the official mayoral social-media channels, Instagram posts regularly inspire engagement orders of magnitude greater than they did under Eric Adams, despite the former mayor’s rivetingly weird presence.) The P.S.A.s, the social-media posts, and the special guest appearances constitute a parasocial civic bond—and, maybe, something more. In a culture even more media-saturated than the one Boorstin described, I have at times wondered whether such pseudo-events might come back around to being real. Creating wide awareness and participation is essential to a universal program like 3-K; if an onslaught of cute videos inspires sufficient public engagement, will it be fair to say that cute videos were instrumental to that program’s success? After all, before “performative” became a buzzword meaning “only doing something for show,” it meant, essentially, the opposite: saying or doing something that actually changes reality.

    [ad_2]

    Molly Fischer

    Source link

  • Despite Trump Attacks Against Europe, Americans Flocked to France in 2025

    [ad_1]

    PARIS, Feb 19 (Reuters) – Despite growing animosity ⁠between ⁠U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration ⁠and the French government, Americans flocked to the country in ​2025, with U.S. visits rising 17% on the previous year, the French tourism ministry said on ‌Thursday.

    The jump in U.S. visitors is ‌also notable as it came despite a weaker dollar, with the greenback falling ⁠more than ⁠10% against the euro in 2025 after years of a highly beneficial ​exchange rate for Americans visiting the eurozone.

    More than 5 million Americans came to France in 2025, part of a record 102 million foreign tourists during the year, Tourism Minister Serge Papin said. ​One hundred million foreigners visited in 2024, when Paris hosted the Olympics.

    Tourists also spent ⁠9% ⁠extra in 2025 – 77.5 ⁠billion euros ($91.34 billion) – ​as they splurged on more upmarket hotels, he said.

    “France is a great tourist destination. ​Let’s be proud of ⁠it and, above all, let’s remain so,” Papin said. “France continues to attract, lure and make the entire world dream.”

    The jump in U.S. tourists suggests many Americans are nonplussed by Trump’s worsening relations with Europe.

    Since taking office, Trump and his team have escalated trade tension with ⁠the EU, threatened to annex Greenland, clashed with European governments over the Russia-Ukraine ⁠war and criticised EU digital regulation.

    It remains to be seen if the U.S. visitor surge will continue.

    The European Travel Commission said on Wednesday it expected U.S. visits to the continent to drop in 2026, in what would be the first sign of a slowdown in the post-pandemic boom in American travel to Europe, driven by a strong U.S. dollar and economic resilience in North America.

    The commission said it expected the fall in U.S. visitors to be compensated by a ⁠rise in Chinese and Indian tourists who should push up international arrivals by 6.2% in 2026.

    The French tourism ministry said early 2026 flight booking data from countries such as Mexico and China was encouraging, but did not disclose comparable ​U.S. data.

    (Reporting by Inti Landauro; Additional reporting by Corina Pons ​and Joanna Plucinska; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Mark Zuckerberg questioned on Meta’s under-13 users and usage goals in landmark social media trial

    [ad_1]

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg faced questioning in a Los Angeles courtroom on Wednesday about Instagram’s under-13 users and Meta’s efforts to boost engagement, as a trial examines whether the company knowingly offered an addictive and harmful product to children and teens.

    The landmark trial against Meta and YouTube kicked off in late January. It centers on allegations brought by a plaintiff identified as “KGM,” who claims that using social media from a young age caused her to become addicted and harmed her mental health.

    KGM, who is now 20 years old, alleges that Facebook, Instagram and YouTube — with their recommendation algorithms and infinite scrolling — are designed to be addictive. 

    In the courtroom on Wednesday, Zuckerberg faced questions from KGM’s lawyer Mark Lanier over Meta’s policy for allowing children under 13 to access Instagram. KGM started using Instagram at 9 years old, according to Lanier.

    Zuckerberg said users under 13 are not allowed on the platform, but added that it is a difficult rule to enforce because there are “a meaningful number of people who lie about their age to use our services.”

    Lanier also pressed Zuckerberg about whether one of the company’s goals is to increase the time users spend on Instagram. Zuckerberg said Meta uses time spent on the app as a proxy to measure its performance against competitors like TikTok.

    “It’s different than us trying to just increase time,” he said. “Just us trying to see how we’re stacking up in the industry.”

    Zuckerberg also addressed Instagram’s beauty filters, which Meta temporarily shut down after concerns surfaced that they changed people’s appearance in a way that seemed to promote plastic surgery. Zuckerberg said the company decided to allow beauty filters in support of free expression, but said that “we shouldn’t create them ourselves or recommend them.”

    This marks the first time Zuckerberg is defending his company before a jury, although he has previously testified before Congress regarding youth safety on Meta’s platforms. 

    Trial carries implications for similar cases 

    The outcome of the lawsuit could shape how thousands of similar cases brought against social media giants play out. TikTok and Snapchat were originally part of the lawsuit, but they settled before the trial started. 

    Some experts have drawn comparisons between the social media trial and the tobacco industry lawsuits of the 1990s, which sought to hold companies accountable for their products and how they were marketed.

    “A trial like this one will hopefully uncover the disconnect between what companies say publicly to drive up business and engagement and what is actually going on behind the scenes,” UCLA law professor and tech justice attorney Melodi Dinçer told CBS News senior business and technology correspondent Jo Ling Kent.

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives at Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb. 18, 2026.

    Patrick T. Fallon /AFP via Getty Images


    Prior to Zuckerberg’s testimony, Meta told CBS News that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and that it is committed to supporting young people who use its platforms. The company also claims that KGM faced mental health struggles before she used social media. 

    A spokesperson from Google, the parent company of YouTube, also denied the allegations, calling them “simply not true.”

    Zuckerberg’s appearance in the LA courtroom follows that of Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri, who testified in the trial last week. While on the stand, Mosseri said he does not believe people can be clinically addicted to social media platforms, instead referring to what he calls “problematic use,” when people spend more time on Instagram than they feel good about.

    Prosecutors also pressed Mosseri over whether Instagram is prioritizing growth and profit over safety. In response, Mosseri said Instagram makes “less money from teens than from any other demographic on the app,” adding that teens don’t tend to click on ads.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mark Zuckerberg faces intense questioning in social media addiction trial

    [ad_1]


    Mark Zuckerberg faces intense questioning in social media addiction trial – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Mark Zuckerberg took the stand on Wednesday to fight off allegations that Instagram was intentionally designed to be addictive, especially to kids. Jo Ling Kent was in the courtroom and has more on the landmark trial.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Mark Zuckerberg testifies in social media addiction trial that Meta just wants Instagram to be ‘useful’

    [ad_1]

    Mark Zuckerberg took the stand Wednesday in a high-profile jury trial over social media addiction. In an appearance that was described by NBC News as “combative,” the Facebook founder reportedly said that Meta’s goal was to make Instagram “useful” not increase the time users are spending in the app.

    On the stand, Zuckerberg was questioned about a company document that said improving engagement was among “company goals,” according to CNBC. But Zuckerberg claimed that the company had “made the conscious decision to move away from those goals, focusing instead on utility,” according to The Associated Press. “If something is valuable, people will use it more because it’s useful to them,” he said.

    The trial stems from a lawsuit brought by a California woman identified as “KGM” in court documents. The now 20-year-old alleges that she was harmed as a child by addictive features in Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok. TikTok and Snap opted to settle before the case went to trial.

    Zuckerberg was also asked about previous public statements, including his remarks on Joe Rogan’s podcast last year that he can’t be fired by Meta’s board because he controls a majority of the voting power. According to The New York Times, Zuckerberg accused the plaintiffs’ lawyer of “mischaracterizing” his past comments more than a dozen times.

    Zuckerberg’s appearance in court also apparently prompted the judge to warn people in the courtroom not to record the proceedings using AI glasses. As CNBC notes, members of Zuckerberg’s entourage were spotted wearing Meta’s smart glasses as the CEO was escorted into the courthouse. It’s unclear if anyone was actually using the glasses in court, but legal affairs journalist Meghann Cuniff reported that the judge was particularly concerned about the possibility of jurors being recorded or subjected to facial recognition. (Meta’s smart glasses do not currently have native facial recognition abilities, but recent reports suggest the company is considering adding such features.)

    The Los Angeles trial has been closely watched not just because it marked a rare in-court appearance for Zuckerberg. It’s among the first of several cases where Meta will face allegations that its platforms have harmed children. In this case and in a separate proceeding in New Mexico, Meta’s lawyers have cast doubt on the idea that social media should be considered a real addiction. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri previously testified in the same Los Angeles trial that Instagram isn’t “clinically addictive.”

    [ad_2]

    Karissa Bell

    Source link

  • WNBA’s Sophie Cunningham Trashes Los Angeles: ‘They All Look the Same’

    [ad_1]

    Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham is back with more takes on United States cities, and this time, Los Angeles is the target.

    Cunningham, 29, took to TikTok amid an offseason trip to California where she unloaded on the people of the city.

    “So, I promise you I’m not being judgmental because I think there’s a place for legit everyone, and some people thrive in different areas. I don’t think I’m an LA girl,” she said in the video posted on Saturday, February 14. “Like, at all. It’s just weird. People don’t dance. People don’t even like, say, ‘Hi.’ They have no personalities. They have no personalities, and they all look the same. It’s weird. Please tell me that’s not weird.”

    She continued, “All these personalities you see on like Instagram and TikTok, all these famous influencers, I like how they found a space where they can feel like themselves and gain confidence online, but if you can’t speak to people or look people in the eye, like in person … is that not weird? Am I weird? I mean, I know I’m weird, but like, people get so used to talking into their phones.”


    Related: Redefining Beauty: Stars Paving the Way for a New Era of Self-Confidence

    Us Weekly is celebrating the stars who are changing the conversation when it comes to body
standards. “Body image and body positivity have become major buzzwords and part of the cultural conversation,” Lexie Kite, Ph.D. and coauthor of More Than a Body: Your Body Is an Instrument, Not an Ornament, tells Us in the latest issue […]

    “Talk to someone in person,” she concluded. “And look like yourself. Ugh.”

    Naturally, Cunningham’s comments drew a mixed reaction.

    “I’m from San Diego. Wouldn’t go to LA, as you’re spot on. Different culture,” one fan wrote, causing Cunningham to reply, “like are you for real 😳”

    “Very much for real,” the follower replied. “Different culture, different social economic zone. Very expensive to go out. I find it a little “plastic.”

    A ja Wilson Admits She Was Bothered By Caitlin Clark Mania Let s Not Lose History 2202008305 2189478227


    Related: Why WNBA MVP A’ja Wilson Was Bothered by the Hype Around Caitlin Clark

    Four-time WNBA MVP A’ja Wilson was never cheering against Caitlin Clark. She has, however, taken issue with the false and racially divisive narrative that followed the Indiana Fever superstar to the pros in 2024. “It wasn’t a hit at me, because I’m going to do me regardless,” Wilson, 29, told Time in a story published […]

    Another fan, however, suggested that Cunningham shouldn’t “hang out with the all stars and influencers. That has nothing to do with LA.”

    Cunningham memorably drew criticism last summer after the WNBA announced Detroit and Cleveland as expansion franchises. At the time, she told reporters she didn’t “know how excited [players] are to be going to Detroit or Cincinnati,” confusing the two Ohio cities.

    After officials in both cities pushed back, Cunningham clarified her comments in a media availability, praising Detroit and Cleveland for their roles in helping the league grow in its infancy. (Detroit was home to the Shock, who are now the Dallas Wings, while Cleveland had the Rockers.)

    “All I was getting at is, like, [Nashville’s] Broadway, the off-court lifestyle, and so I think that is intriguing,” she said. “That’s all I was getting at. I’m thankful for what they’ve done, for our history of the sport.”

    Cunningham also called out a popular criticism of each upcoming WNBA franchise, which also includes teams in Toronto, Portland and Philadelphia — they are all NBA markets.

    “I think it’d be fun to kind of get some teams outside the NBA market,” she said. “I do think there is a benefit when you do have an NBA team. But that’s all I was getting at. I think people misread that situation. I would never speak down upon middle-class, blue-collar working people. That’s where I come from. I’m from Missouri. I get I’m in Indiana, and that’s kind of why I’m hinting at, Broadway sounds fun. All that I was saying.”

    [ad_2]

    Russell Steinberg

    Source link

  • Mark Zuckerberg set to testify in watershed social media trial

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — LOS ANGELES (AP) — Mark Zuckerberg will testify in an unprecedented social media trial that questions whether Meta’s platforms deliberately addict and harm children.

    Meta’s CEO is expected to answer tough questions on Wednesday from attorneys representing a now 20-year-old woman identified by the initials KGM, who claims her early use of social media addicted her to the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta Platforms and Google’s YouTube are the two remaining defendants in the case, which TikTok and Snap have settled.

    Zuckerberg has testified in other trials and answered questions from Congress about youth safety on Meta’s platforms, and he apologized to families at that hearing whose lives had been upended by tragedies they believed were because of social media. This trial, though, marks the first time Zuckerberg will answer similar questions in front of a jury. and, again, bereaved parents are expected to be in the limited courtroom seats available to the public.

    The case, along with two others, has been selected as a bellwether trial, meaning its outcome could impact how thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies would play out.

    A Meta spokesperson said the company strongly disagrees with the allegations in the lawsuit and said they are “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.”

    One of Meta’s attorneys, Paul Schmidt, said in his opening statement that the company is not disputing that KGM experienced mental health struggles, but rather that Instagram played a substantial factor in those struggles. He pointed to medical records that showed a turbulent home life, and both he and an attorney representing YouTube argue she turned to their platforms as a coping mechanism or a means of escaping her mental health struggles.

    Zuckerberg’s testimony comes a week after that of Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta’s Instagram, who said in the courtroom that he disagrees with the idea that people can be clinically addicted to social media platforms. Mosseri maintained that Instagram works hard to protect young people using the service, and said it’s “not good for the company, over the long run, to make decisions that profit for us but are poor for people’s well-being.”

    Much of Mosseri’s questioning from the plaintiff’s lawyer, Mark Lanier, centered on cosmetic filters on Instagram that changed people’s appearance — a topic that Lanier is sure to revisit with Zuckerberg. He is also expected to face questions about Instagram’s algorithm, the infinite nature of Meta’ feeds and other features the plaintiffs argue are designed to get users hooked.

    Meta is also facing a separate trial in New Mexico that began last week.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meta’s own research found parental supervision doesn’t really help curb teens’ compulsive social media use | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    An internal research study at Meta dubbed “Project MYST” created in partnership with the University of Chicago, found that parental supervision and controls — such as time limits and restricted access — had little impact on kids’ compulsive use of social media. The study also found that kids who experienced stressful life events were more likely to lack the ability to moderate their social media use appropriately.

    This was one of the notable claims revealed during testimony at the social media addiction trial that began last week in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is identified by her initials “KGM” or her first name, “Kaley.” She, along with her mother and others joining the case, is accusing social media companies of creating “addictive and dangerous” products that led the young users to suffer anxiety, depression, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and more.

    The case is now one of several landmark trials that will take place this year, which accuse social media companies of harming children. The results of these lawsuits will impact these companies’ approach to their younger users and could prompt regulators to take further action.

    In this case, the plaintiff sued Meta, YouTube, ByteDance (TikTok), and Snap, but the latter two companies had settled their claims before the trial’s start.

    In the jury trial now underway in L.A., Kaley’s lawyer, Mark Lanier, brought up an internal study at Meta, which he said found evidence that Meta knew of, yet didn’t publicize, these specific harms.

    In Project MYST, which stands for the Meta and Youth Social Emotional Trends survey, Meta’s research concluded that “parental and household factors have little association with teens’ reported levels of attentiveness to their social media use.”

    Or, in other words, even when parents try to control their children’s social media use, either by using parental controls or even just household rules and supervision, it doesn’t impact whether or not the child will overuse social media or use it compulsively. The study was based on a survey of 1,000 teens and their parents about their social media use.

    The study also noted that both parents and teens agreed on this front, saying “there is no association between either parental reports or teen reports of parental supervision, and teens’ survey measures of attentiveness or capability.”

    If the study’s findings are accurate, that would mean that the use of things like the built-in parental controls in the Instagram app or the time limits on smartphones wouldn’t necessarily help teens become less inclined to overuse social media, the plaintiff’s lawyer argued. As the original complaint alleges, teens are being exploited by social media products, whose defects include algorithmic feeds designed to keep users scrolling, intermittent variable rewards that manipulate dopamine delivery, incessant notifications, deficient tools for parental controls, and more.

    During his testimony, Instagram head Adam Mosseri claimed not to be familiar with Meta’s Project MYST, even though a document seemed to indicate he had given his approval to move forward with the study.

    “We do a lot of research projects,” Mosseri said, after claiming he couldn’t remember anything specific about MYST beyond its name.

    However, the plaintiff’s lawyer pointed to this study as an example of why social media companies should be held accountable for their alleged harms, not the parents. He noted that Kaley’s mother, for example, had tried to stop her daughter’s social media addiction and use, even taking her phone away at times.

    What’s more, the study found that teens who had a greater number of adverse life experiences — like those dealing with alcoholic parents, harassment at school, or other issues — reported less attentiveness over their social media use. That means that kids facing trauma in their real lives were more at risk of addiction, the lawyer argued.

    On the stand, Mosseri seemed to partially agree with this finding, saying, “There’s a variety of reasons this can be the case. One I’ve heard often is that people use Instagram as a way to escape from a more difficult reality.” Meta is careful not to label any sort of overuse as addiction; instead, Mosseri stated that the company uses the term “problematic use” to refer to someone “spending more time on Instagram than they feel good about.”

    Lawyers for Meta, meanwhile, pushed the idea that the study was more narrowly focused on understanding if teens felt they were using social media too much, not whether or not they were actually addicted. They also generally aimed to put more of the responsibility on parents and the realities of life as the catalyst for kids like Kaley’s negative emotional states, not companies’ social media products.

    For instance, Meta’s lawyers pointed to Kaley being a child of divorced parents, with an abusive father, and facing bullying at school.

    How the jury will interpret the findings of studies like Project MYST and others, along with the testimonies from both sides, remains to be seen. Mosseri did note, however, that MYST’s findings had not been published publicly, and no warnings were ever issued to teens or parents as a result of the research.

    Meta has been asked for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Perez

    Source link

  • German Social Democrat Paper Adds to Calls for Social Media Curbs for Children

    [ad_1]

    BERLIN, Feb 16 (Reuters) – A group of German centre-left ⁠Social ⁠Democrats has joined their conservative ⁠coalition partners in calling for restrictions on social media access ​for children, proposing a formal ban for those under 14.

    There has been a growing discussion ‌in Germany of the potential negative ‌effects of social media on children and pressure for the country to follow ⁠the example ⁠of Australia in curbing access to social media platforms including Facebook ​META.O, Snapchat SNAP.N, TikTok and YouTube GOOGL.O. 

    “We can no longer avoid clear rules and restrictions,” Social Democrat party (SPD) leader Lars Klingbeil, who serves as Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s deputy, told the weekly ​Der Spiegel. “Protecting young people from the flood of hatred and violence on social media ⁠is ⁠a top priority.”

    A discussion ⁠paper, signed ​by a group of SPD lawmakers and state politicians, calls for platforms to block ​access for children under 14 ⁠and to create special “youth versions” for those aged 14-16 – without algorithm-driven feeds, personalised content, or functions including endless scrolling or autoplay.

    It also proposes making opt-outs for algorithmic recommendations systems as the default for all users over 16 years.

    The paper follows a similar ⁠proposal from Merz’s conservatives, calling for a ban for under-16s, which is set to be ⁠discussed at their party conference this week.

    Pressure from both parties in the coalition makes it increasingly likely that the federal government will push for restrictions. However, under Germany’s federal system, media regulation is a state‑level responsibility and the states must negotiate with each other to agree consistent nationwide rules.

    Last year, Australia became the first country to ban the use of social media platforms by children under 16, prompting a growing number of countries in Europe to consider ⁠similar measures. Scrutiny has intensified further after Elon Musk’s flagship AI chatbot Grok was found to be generating nonconsensual sexualised images.

    In Germany, the government last year appointed a special commission to look into protecting young people from potential ​harm online. The commission is expected to report later this year.

    (Reporting ​by James Mackenzie, editing by Andrei Khalip)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link