ReportWire

Tag: single-family rental

  • HAR: Strong rental demand likely to persist in 2026, despite easing affordability for homebuyers – Houston Agent Magazine

    [ad_1]

    Single-family rental demand remained strong at the end of 2025, according to the December/Full-Year 2025 Rental Market Update from the Houston Association of REALTORS®.

    Leases of single-family rentals leapt 9.4% year over year in December, with 3,283 leases signed. At the same time, new listings jumped 21.2% year over year with 5,486 SFRs added to the MLS, providing a plethora of single-family options for Houston renters. Amid increased inventory, the typical SFR stayed on the market for 48 days, up one week from December 2024.

    For the full year, renters signed 47,292 leases, up 6.2% from 2024. The total dollar value increased 6.9% to over $110 million.

    Lease prices were relatively flat throughout the year, with the average declining 0.8% year over year to $2,245 in December. That was nearly $20 cheaper than December 2024 and marked the sixth-straight month of statistically unchanged prices.

    “A growing supply of rental properties gave renters more flexibility in 2025, while steady demand kept leasing activity moving at a healthy pace without putting upward pressure on prices,” said HAR Chair Theresa Hill. “Even as interest rates ease, rental demand is expected to remain strong this year.”

    For townhome and condominium rentals, leasing activity in 2025 stuttered compared to 2024 but increased annually in December. Houston renters signed leases for 7,171 condos and townhomes in 2025, down 3.9% year over year, but leased 518 in December, up 11.2% from December 2024. Days on market increased from 49 days to 51 days.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Marek

    Source link

  • Investors are buying up Texas’ attached single-family homes – Houston Agent Magazine

    [ad_1]

    As prices cool for attached homes in Texas, real estate investors are taking advantage of the discounts, according to a Cotality analysis.

    Investors accounted for 39.5% of all attached-home sales in 2025, compared to 31.8% for detached homes. That’s much more significant than the national investor share of 30.5% for attached-homes sales.

    And while attached-home prices are declining in Texas, rents are growing: Nationwide, rents increased 1.58% from 2024 to 2025 while prices stayed flat. In Texas, rents increased 2.56% during the same time period while prices dipped 4.03%.

    “The trend is clear,” Cotality analyst Brian Lopez wrote. “Investor behavior is responding directly to where value has emerged fastest. Attached inventory is now priced to move, and capital is moving with it.”

    Lopez called that trend a “yield play”:

    “The purchase price is shrinking while rent is expanding,” he said. “Investors are capitalizing on a unique window to acquire assets at 2022 prices but lease them at 2025 rates. That means stronger yields on new acquisitions and a higher return profile across both short-term cash flow and longer-term upside.”

    Cotality predicts Texas’ attached-home price trend will begin to curb early this year. The company projects 3.2% annual growth through 2030 — making now an ideal time to jump into the market as an investor.

    As rent growth continues to outpace property values, Lopez said, Texas could serve as a model for similar markets elsewhere in the country, including Florida, Arizona and the Carolinas, where attached-home prices are softening as supply catches up with demand and affordability remains strained for prospective first-time buyers.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Marek

    Source link

  • Trump’s proposed ban on institutional home ownership raises more questions than answers  – Houston Agent Magazine

    [ad_1]

    President Trump’s pledge to ban large investment firms from buying single-family homes dinged the stock prices of some of the biggest institutional landlords, but the impact it would have on the housing affordability crisis is debatable. 

    Observers noted that major investors like Blackstone, Invitations Homes and American Homes 4 Rent own only about 1% of the single-family homes in the United States, and their holdings are concentrated in the South and Sunbelt, so the impact on overall U.S. home prices would vary widely by geography. Additionally, in the markets with relatively high concentrations of institutional ownership, home prices are already declining. 

    “The administration’s proposed ban on large institutional investors buying single-family homes aims to curb Wall Street’s role in housing, but evidence shows little connection between institutional ownership and affordability,” Jonathan Miller, president and CEO of property appraisal firm Miller Samuel, wrote in his HousingNotes blog. 

    “Their holdings are concentrated mostly in the South and Sunbelt, where inventory is relatively high and home prices have actually fallen, undermining claims that these investors drive housing costs higher. With most investor-owned homes held by small, local landlords, the proposed restriction is unlikely to meaningfully improve affordability or housing supply.” 

    Nevertheless, others expressed optimism that a ban would indeed have an impact in markets with high levels of institutional ownership.  

    “Because the Dallas–Fort Worth market has long been a hotspot for institutional ownership, any new restrictions from the Trump administration would likely be felt here sooner and more acutely than in markets with lower investor activity,” said Todd Luong of REMAX DFW Associates. “In many price ranges, especially entry-level and mid-priced homes, buyers have been competing against all-cash offers from large investment groups. Reducing that competition could give local buyers a better chance to secure a home with less pressure and more favorable pricing.”   

    Details about the ban have been scarce, and many questions remain. In a post on his Truth Social site announcing the proposed ban, Trump said, “I am immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes, and I will be calling on Congress to codify it. People live in homes, not corporations.” 

    He added that he would provide more information on the proposal when he speaks at the upcoming World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in two weeks. 

    In a subsequent post, Trump said he would instruct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to use a purported $200 million in cash holdings to purchase mortgage bonds to bring mortgage rates down. 

    Timing of that proposal is everything, according to Victor Kuznetsov, managing director and co-founder of Imperial Fund Asset Management. 

    “In the short term, expect mortgage rates to level tighter than 2025 averages, but investment bank researchers tend to agree that most of these [mortgage-backed security] purchases have already been priced into rates, so the timing of the [government-sponsored enterprises’] MBS purchases will be important,” Kuznetsov said. “Will the GSEs purchase $200 [billion] over 2026’s calendar year, spreading out the tightening effects over a full year? Details on deployment timing have been sparse so far.”   

    According to the housing blog ResiClub, the most significant questions about the ban include: 

    • What constitutes an “institutional investor”? 
    • Would the investors be required to sell existing properties, or would they just be prohibited from purchasing additional ones? 
    • Would the ban apply to existing properties scattered throughout a market, or also to build-to-rent development? 
    • What would happen to existing tenants if the owners were forced to sell their homes? 

    In the end, industry observers agree that the ban would have a limited effect on overall housing affordability, and the key to bringing down costs is by increasing inventory. 

    “The first thing to do is build more housing starting now,” Miller said. 

    [ad_2]

    John Yellig

    Source link