ReportWire

Tag: single

  • Prison for man who shot three people in Auckland CBD, including Jay-Jay Feeney’s brother – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Prison for man who shot three people in Auckland CBD, including Jay-Jay Feeney’s brother – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Poull Andersen and two others were injured in the shooting on Fort St, Auckland, in March 2022. Photo / Supplied

    A man with gang ties who wounded three people with a single shot from a homemade firearm outside a central Auckland kebab shop – including business owner Poull Andersen, the brother of well-known radio personality Jay-Jay Feeney – has been sentenced to prison.

    The defendant, now 20 and with continuing interim name suppression, appeared before Judge Kathryn Maxwell in Auckland District Court this morning as she mused over his unusually substantive criminal history for someone so young.

    He has spent some of his time since the March 5, 2022, shooting remanded in a maximum security jail cell, where he has at times spent 23 hours per day in lockdown.

    “You have to take some responsibility, though, of course, for that difficulty on remand,” the judge said, blaming the difficult conditions on “how you are acting in prison”.

    The defendant was ordered to serve a sentence of five years and seven months for three counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm with a firearm and a concurrent six-month sentence for receiving $1700 worth of stolen goods as the result of an unrelated road rage incident.

    He was 18 when arrested last year for the shooting, which took place around 2am on a Saturday on central Auckland’s Fort St, where some businesses catering to the nightclub scene remained open.

    Court documents state the teen…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • New Harris Poll Survey Finds America’s Singles Are Happy, Fulfilled, and Seeking Dates, Not Mates

    New Harris Poll Survey Finds America’s Singles Are Happy, Fulfilled, and Seeking Dates, Not Mates

    New survey from Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice finds most single people enjoy time and freedom for personal growth, friendships

    Rom-coms, Hallmark movies and even Valentine’s cards may need a rewrite: Most single people say they don’t need a mate for their life story to have a happy ending. That’s according to “Singles in America Survey,” the latest research from The Harris Poll, Thought Leadership Practice, released today.  

    Among other findings: Whether to expect a man to pick up the check on Valentine’s Day; what Americans have in common with penguins, dogs and cats; what singles prefer: cleaning toilets or going on online dates.

    The poll was conducted in late January 2023 using a nationally representative sample of 2,004 U.S. adults. Its central finding is that most single people actually like being single – they’re happy to be pursuing their own passions, they feel more in control of their finances, and they’re tired of society and media saying otherwise. 

    “Our perceptions of single Americans need to be reexamined,” says Libby Rodney, futurist and chief strategy officer at The Harris Poll. “We need to shift the dialogue from something society needs to fix, like in your standard rom-com, to something many people are finding fulfilling and are doing by choice.”

    Census data shows that roughly half of Americans are single. The Harris Poll research found that 56% of single respondents don’t want to change that status, saying that the statement “I am not looking for a relationship” best describes them. That result is strong across generations, selected by 35% of Gen Z and 30% of Boomer respondents. 

    Why do they feel that way? The Harris Poll survey suggests that singles are happier and more fulfilled. Nearly half of American singles (48%) agreed that “Singlehood is the most meaningful, authentic and fulfilling way of life.” And when asked for details, they provided many reasons why: 

    • Having more time to pursue my interests and passions (cited by 86% of singles)
    • Focusing more on my personal growth (84%)
    • Having more time and energy to devote to friendships (82%)
    • Not worrying about a partner’s debt or financial obligations (81%)
    • Having more time to grow and develop my career (79%)

    Single life fosters financial independence  but costs more

    Indeed, financial and career issues played a large role in singles’ preferences. American singles strongly agreed that flying solo helps them financially – but that government policies also hurt them. 

    Seven out of 10 (71%) singles agreed “being single taught me how to work with my money really well,” and nearly as many (68%) say that they “feel financially empowered and more in control by being single.” Six out of 10 (59%) say they don’t plan to ever merge their finances with a partner.

    However, people recognize that the single life can be more expensive – and they’re not happy about it. Strong majorities of singles “dislike paying more taxes than married couples” (74%) and “paying more for healthcare and social benefits than married couples” (68%). 

    And all Americans, single and in relationships, see that as a problem: Three-quarters (76%) recognize that it “can be more affordable to be in a relationship” because of cost-sharing and tax policies, and just as many (79%) say the government should “offer more tax breaks for single people.”

    That may be a sign of a growing realization by all Americans, both single and those in relationships, that the single life can be a rewarding one – and that single life gets a raw deal from the media. 

    • Eight in 10 Americans (79%) say “You don’t need to get married to have a happy and fulfilling life.”
    • Two-thirds (68%) say they believe “the stigma of being single is gradually diminishing.”
    • Two-thirds (68%) also say “I’m tired of media and advertising showing a false idealistic image that being in a relationship is the only way to live a happy life.” 

    Not only are most singles uninterested in finding a partner, they’re being more cost-conscious about dating, saying they’ve made or would be open to making changes due to rising inflation:

    • 69%: choosing an activity, like going for a hike, over going out for dinner or drinks
    • 55%: hosting a first date at home 
    • 50%: cutting back or eliminating gift-giving
    • 50%: filtering their potential dates to “only financially secure candidates”

    While 44% say they’ve tried or would be willing to go on a virtual date in order to reduce expenses, many singles would do almost anything other than an online date:

    • 44% of Gen Z “would rather clean the toilet than go another online date”
    • 30% of Gen Z “would rather walk across hot coals than go on another online date”
    • 22% of Millennials “would rather have their tooth pulled than go on another online date.”

    For Gen Z and Millennial singles wondering if they need to buy a gift for a Valentine’s Day date, the poll results offer guidance on how to tell if you’re in a relationship. For example, both groups say attending a party together is just dating, while attending a family holiday event is being in a relationship. 

    But the groups differ on the significance of “middle ground” activities: For Gen Z, meeting friends, parents, or posting a couple’s picture on social media is just dating – but to Millennials, all of those are relationship territory.   

    Preferred relationship style varies by generation

    Finally, the poll examines just what types of relationships singles may seek and found generational differences there as well. About half of all people see themselves as penguins – one mate for life. Roughly equal shares saw themselves as birds (19% want a partner but are free to explore) and dogs (16% want to experience as many partners as possible), while 11% saw themselves as cats, indifferent to partners, who may come and go.

    Some differences, as expected, appear age-related – two-thirds (66%) of Boomers choose “penguin” (one mate for life), compared to 40% of Gen Z. Others, though, are more surprising: One in five Gen Zs went with “cat” (indifferent, allow partners to come and go), almost twice as many as the other four groups (9% to 11%). And one in four Millennials (24%) prefers a dog’s life, wanting to experience as many partners as possible, far more often than the other groups (9% to 18%). 

    One possible reason: it’s just hard to find the right person. Nearly eight in 10 of all respondents said that “finding the right partner is harder than finding the right job.”

    Rodney says single people are showing us the need to rethink how society sees and values personal relationships.

    “It’s worth noting that being single isn’t void of anything,” she said. “There is a spectrum of deep and meaningful relationships single people are involved in, and it’s important to recognize the richness of their relationship choices.”

    To learn more about The Harris Poll for Thought Leadership and the Singles in America poll, visit this link

    About the Singles in America Survey

    This survey was conducted online within the U.S. by The Harris Poll from Jan. 20 to 22, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 2,004 U.S. adults. This research includes 700 singles and 1,262 of those who are not, as well as 181 Gen Z (ages 18-25), 611 Millennials (ages 26-41), 522 Gen X (ages 42-57), and 655 Boomers (ages 58 and older).

    About Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice

    Building on 50+ years of experience pulsing societal opinion, we design research that is credible, creative, and culturally relevant. Our practice drives thought leadership and unearths trends for today’s biggest brands. We are focused on helping our clients get ahead of what’s next.

    Source: The Harris Poll

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Say “Yes” for Sapphire this Giving Tuesday

    Austin Pets Alive! | Say “Yes” for Sapphire this Giving Tuesday

    Nov 29, 2021

    At Austin Pets Alive!, we never hesitate to treat any companion animal that trots, limps, or must be carried through our doors.

    Because of your generous support, we have been able to save nearly 100,000 lives in the last 10 years. One of those lives is Sapphire. We see tragic cases every single day, and Sapphire is no exception.

    Living as a stray, Sapphire was struck by a car. A bystander alerted the city and she was brought to the city shelter, Austin Animal Center. She was bleeding, writhing in pain from nerve damage and bruised ribs — and pregnant. But when the city asked us to take over, our clinic staff did the ultrasound and made the heartbreaking discovery of no fetal heartbeats.

    Determined to save Sapphire, our clinic gave her pain medication and she was stable. Unfortunately, her front left leg likely won’t heal with the nerve damage so it will have to be amputated in the coming weeks.

    At most shelters, dogs with injuries like Sapphire’s would immediately be euthanized but together with you, we believe all pets deserve a chance to recover and live long healthy lives.

    You can support pets like Sapphire every single day by giving today. With every gift matched up to $100K until December 31st, your gift today has TWICE the impact for pets in need.

    “When Sapphire came to us, she was in a lot of pain. Walking to the end of the corner and back was a big deal for her,” said her foster Anne.

    Before moving to America, Anne heard of Austin’s No Kill status and knew she needed to foster. She began fostering in January 2019 and adopted her “foster fail,” Luna.

    “Nothing deters me,” said Anne. “It’s just the right thing to do. I don’t have a lot of people here because of the pandemic, all of my family is overseas. This can be my adoptive family right here. I mean, who doesn’t fall in love with that face?”

    Because of animal lovers like Anne, we know that fostering is the future of APA!. The more pets we can get into homes, the more critical cases we can treat on campus. Together with you, we can strive towards a future where we save more pets than ever. Will you consider making a gift to help further APA!’s future?

    Today, Sapphire is all play! You would never guess this gem has nerve damage. Currently Sapphire is on a special surgery list for amputation. Regardless of whether Sapphire has three legs or four, we are determined to give her the best life possible. Until then, she’ll be hanging with her foster mom Anne and foster sister Luna.

    “Her spirit never falters,” Anne said. “I just hope she finds a really good family who’s going to love her unconditionally.”

    As we enter into this season of giving, your active support allows us to say “yes” to every pet that needs us. With so many companion animals in need, your gift today instantly affects thousands of pets nationwide. Together with you, we can end needless euthanasia across our state and our country.

    With gratitude and eyes on the future,

    P.S. Together with you, we can give gems like Sapphire twice the chance at a healthy and happy life with all gifts being matched up to $100K, until December 31st. Don’t wait!

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Ready for Resolution

    Austin Pets Alive! | Ready for Resolution

    Oct 14, 2021

    Thanks to the dedication of you and our fellow supporters, we can confirm that an item regarding Austin Pets Alive!’s resolution will be on the Austin City Council agenda on Thursday, November 4.

    As soon as we have the draft resolution language to share, we will reach out to update you and ask you to take one more final action to help advocate on our behalf.

    At stake are the details of how we will be required to operate far into the future:

    • the number and types of animals we pull from the Austin Animal Center to keep our work in alignment with our mission,
    • the ability to use any facility we operate, at our own cost, for animals from any location,
    • and how Austin’s No Kill achievement will be sustained by both Austin city staff and APA!.

    History has trained us to know that this meeting and resolution will not just sail through and be easy. We need to count on you to rally alongside us to keep No Kill in the heart of Austin. Our work to save at risk pets is a direct reflection of our community values and we are endlessly grateful to each of you for advocating for our place in Austin.

    While critical to our future in the heart of Austin, we would be remiss if we didn’t say that the enormous time and effort negotiating for this resolution competes with fundraising for our daily lifesaving work. While the city has a taxpayer-funded budget and thus does not need to fundraise, every single dollar we use for every single animal we save (even from Austin Animal Center) is fundraised. To make a gift to support our continued lifesaving, please click here.

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | We Need Government Animal Services That Work

    Austin Pets Alive! | We Need Government Animal Services That Work

    Oct 06, 2021

    There is one day left before we know whether the city council has taken action on our APA! Resolution by adding it to the next city council meeting agenda.

    What keeps rising to the top of criticism of our resolution from council offices is that they don’t understand why Austin Pets Alive! should be allowed to help communities outside of the greater Austin metro area. They see and hear about animals having long lengths of stay at Austin Animal Center(AAC) and the kennels being overcrowded there. Some believe that Austin Pets Alive!’s primary function, in addition to keeping Austin a No Kill City, should be to relieve the pressure at Austin Animal Center for the city staff. Some also believe that Austin Pets Alive!’s practice of helping animals outside of Austin is actually causing the overcrowding at Austin Animal Center.

    The problem with this line of thinking is that “relieving pressure” is not something the City of Austin compensates APA! to do nor is it in line with our mission. APA! has used the Town Lake Animal Center for the last 10 years to keep Austin No Kill by pulling animals from Austin Animal Center who will die if we don’t. The city council has awarded Austin Animal Center with enough funding to relieve their own pressure.

    So then why is Austin Animal Center constantly crowded?

    It’s because Austin city leadership has given little credence to research and data that clearly shows that Austin has, and has always had, more than enough adopters to take in every single animal at Austin Animal Center AND to adopt every single animal that gets help from APA!, Austin Humane Society and the hundreds of rescue groups who take in animals from across the state.

    We believe that the reason that credence is not given is that it is much easier to say “there are not enough adopters,” which implies that increasing adoptions is outside the control of the shelter director and reinforces poor performance.

    We believe it is incumbent on us as shelter professionals, and we include Austin Animal Center leadership in that, to look at data when making any decision. We thought, but now realize we might be wrong, that the city manager and the city council also used data to drive decisions. If AAC leadership, and city council members, did that, they would be able to say “I see a problem with too many animals living at AAC at one time” and then connect that to the thought of “what can I do to make this better”. We have said it before but it’s worth repeating: adoptions don’t just happen. They are the result of resources, time, and strategic planning to ensure that the animals housed at AAC are getting opportunities to meet people and to be seen.

    To put it in perspective, over the last five years, the city has increased Austin Animal Center’s budget by $1M per year. Tellingly, every single category of programming has benefited from that increased funding EXCEPT “Pet Placement/ Pet Outcomes” which actually fell by 30% in budgeted monies. Why isn’t anyone in leadership, at any level, examining and correcting that instead of strongarming APA! into making up for it?

    Austin Pets Alive! has never been interested in being the City of Austin’s “overflow” for a system that lacks oversight, lacks critical thinking, and continues to make poor decisions and we are standing by our mission to save lives.

    As individual citizens and as a private nonprofit, we have asked and asked for the government animal shelter to be run well because it is critically important to Austin’s animals and to APA!. That has not worked. We hope this final attempt to wake up our city council will work and we, in partnership with the City of Austin, can finally focus on forward momentum. To keep the support strong through this final day of city council consideration, please keep emailing to express your support for the APA! resolution.

    Even if you already have sent an email, we need to keep the message top of mind. Thank you!

    Source link