ReportWire

Tag: sexism

  • The image-based sexual abuse announcement is meaningless nonsense. Here’s why

    The image-based sexual abuse announcement is meaningless nonsense. Here’s why

    For survivors of IBSA, this empty announcement is a slap in the face. Many survivors, including myself, have experienced firsthand how difficult it is to get justice for these types of offences. Despite the existing laws, the criminal justice system often fails to take these cases seriously. The process is confusing, support services are lacking, and police often don’t take survivors seriously.

    In response to this announcement, many survivors have voiced their frustrations, with some even writing an open letter to the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology (DSIT). The consensus is clear: this announcement is not an improvement. It does nothing to address the systemic failures in the handling of image-based sexual abuse. It offers no additional protections, no better support services, and no new tools for survivors to pursue justice. This isn’t a meaningful change—it’s lip service.

    If the government truly cared about tackling IBSA and making the internet a safer place for women and girls, it would go beyond announcing meaningless administrative changes and address the core issues that allow these abuses to continue.

    First, there needs to be significant investment in survivor support. Legal aid, counselling services, and survivor advocacy are all woefully underfunded.

    Second, the government should focus on prevention. Educational campaigns about consent, respect, and the consequences of IBSA should be rolled out across schools and online platforms. Media literacy programs are crucial to raising awareness and helping individuals, particularly young people, understand the harmful effects of sharing non-consensual images.

    The UK government’s announcement about reclassifying IBSA as a priority offence is awful, as someone who has experienced IBSA and seen the devastating effects it has on women, I’m saddened and angry that it’s being used as lip service. It is a routine administrative procedure being spun as a significant new measure, designed to boost public perception without delivering any real change.

    Survivors of image-based sexual abuse deserve far better than this. If the government truly wants to tackle online abuse, it needs to go beyond PR stunts and take meaningful action—by providing more support for survivors, and focusing on preventing these offences in the first place.


    Find out more about GLAMOUR’s campaign in partnership with the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW), Not Your Porn and Professor Clare McGlynn, demanding that the government introduces a dedicated, comprehensive Image-Based Abuse law to protect women and girls.

    Revenge Porn Helpline provides advice, guidance and support to victims of intimate image-based abuse over the age of 18 who live in the UK. You can call them on 0345 6000 459.

    Patsy Stevenson

    Source link

  • Noel Gallagher’s daughter won’t take you being sexist about Oasis

    Noel Gallagher’s daughter won’t take you being sexist about Oasis

    The band Oasis is finally back together now that Noel Gallagher and his brother Liam Gallagher have stopped fighting. Anyone who cares at all about music has, at some point in their lives, heard their song “Wonderwall.” If you watched Lost, you 100% heard it.

    That isn’t stopping guys online from being weird about who can and cannot get tickets to see Oasis back in action. I have seen multiple versions of this same bad joke. Men on social media are so upset over the idea of a young woman getting a ticket to go see Oasis when they can’t. Oh no, how will you survive? In the words of the younger generation, “Cope.”

    The TikTok states, “Imagine waiting 15 years for Oasis to re-form only to lose out on tickets to Chloe, 20, Fiat 500 driver, from Stockport who just wants to hear Wonderwall live.”

    Anaïs Gallagher, Noel’s daughter, isn’t here for the misogyny, though. She took to calling these men out in comments and I love it so much: “One thing I won’t stand for is the ageism and the misogyny around people getting tickets. Sorry if a 19-year-old girl in a pink cowboy hat wants to be there, I will have my friendship bracelets ready.”

    As if that wasn’t scorching enough, she made sure to put another man in his place (according to The Guardian), writing “Babe, it’s Oasis. They have 21m listeners monthly on Spotify … everyone fucking loves Oasis! What do you mean everyone suddenly loves them? Everyone has always loved them. They are one of the most famous bands in the whole entire world.”

    What next? You’ll be sexist about the Beatles reuniting?

    Look, Oasis was one of the biggest bands of the ’90s and still remains an iconic band. Everyone loves them. You are not unique for liking an Oasis song. There is a whole meme about how much we all love listening to “Wonderwall.” So why do you, a probably single white man, think you deserve to see Oasis more than someone who is younger than you or a woman?

    If anything, I’d now make it known that women have the first pick of seats at an Oasis concert because if anyone was blasting “Champagne Supernova” in 2014, it was women. Me, actually. It was me.

    My point is that this mindset that young women can’t possibly love something that men love is a tale as old as time, and it almost is never accurate. You know how many times I’ve worn a band shirt and said a song that a man questioning me about it didn’t even know? Men think they’re the number one fans of everything, but all they are is boring and predictable.

    I hope that Anaïs Gallagher has the best day and girl, if you want to exchange friendship bracelets, I would love to.


    The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy

    Rachel Leishman

    Source link

  • ‘The Young Wife’ Director Tayarisha Poe And Star Kiersey Clemons Talk About Their Magically Melanated Unconventional Marriage Movie

    ‘The Young Wife’ Director Tayarisha Poe And Star Kiersey Clemons Talk About Their Magically Melanated Unconventional Marriage Movie

    We recently had the chance to speak with director/writer of one of the most visually stunning projects we’ve seen recently, The Young Wife, along with the film’s star Kiersey Clemons. Poe is known for her work on Selah and the Spades and “The Twilight Zone.”

    Source: Courtesy / Republic Pictures

    The film is about a young couple who take a unique approach to their wedding day. The film finds Clemons’ character Celestina preparing for her unconventional wedding with her soulmate River. With a storm threatening to unleash around them, Celestina awaits River’s arrival while doing her best to survive the chaos and expectations of their family and friends as all the elements come together to intensify her spiraling panic.

    The film also stars Leon Bridges, Kelly Marie Tran, Michaela Watkins with Sheryl Lee Ralph and Judith Light.

    “I love love,” Tayarisha Poe told BOSSIP. “I just love watching people be in love together. I don’t like that now, it’s like there’s a pressure to make every wedding like a three day long experience, as opposed to just like — I love this new thing of like ‘Let’s have a brunch wedding and then go home. Like let me go about my day!’ I love a backyard wedding. I just love ceremony.”

    “I like when you’re celebrating the two people but not making up for the fact that the bride wasn’t the homecoming queen,” Kiersey Clemons interjected.

    “I think a lot of people who got had to have gone through the process of getting married have expressed that to me and when I went through one, I found that weddings are very much for other people, more so than just for the people getting married, which is honestly like totally chill when you go into it with that mindset,” Poe continued. “I also think that when you when you approach it with that mindset there’s something really potentially powerful that can come out of it and this idea of weddings being about a community marrying another community as opposed to two individuals being like narcissists and in love with themselves.”

    'The Young Wife' production stills

    Source: Courtesy / Republic Pictures

    One of the film’s most impactful scenes occurs between Clemons’ Celestina and Judith Light’s character Cookie, who is River’s grandmother. Cookie tells Celly that marriage is when a woman has to kind of break herself into bite sized pieces. We asked Tayarisha Poe about how the message reflects the reality of marriage for many women.

    “As a woman I find that it feels like there’s not even freedom within freedom to really choose what you want to do,” Poe told Bossip. “In choosing to get married to a man it feels like, ‘Oh my God am I really gonna like get married to a man? And then like that’s what I’m gonna do? I’m gonna like be at home with my child?’ I do those things because I love those people and those are the people in my life and it makes me happy and it brings me joy and it feels contrary to the ideas of freedom that I thought would feel free. I think that maybe I’m just pushing back against people telling us what to do and maybe freedom for us as women means being able to choose what we want without the pressure of society saying that you choosing that means you have to now do XY and Z.”

    'The Young Wife' writer/director Tayarisha Poe

    Source: Courtesy / Republic Pictures

    “I was just blown away when I read the script and I remember my agent talking about it, and she’s like, ‘There’s this movie! There’s this movie! I’m so excited about this movie! You gotta do this!’” Clemons recalled. “I was reading the script understanding why. This story that can feel really melancholy and has this like misty kind of coldness. I get why it would make someone like her feel excited and happy. I obviously saw the lookbook, the deck or whatever before I read the script and I was already a fan of Tayarisha and I was just so excited to seeing all of the the colors and it just reminded me of like the ocean and jellyfish and then to take that feeling and those visuals into reading the words, it was exciting and I cried and I laughed and I really felt like I was Celestina and like I was on the precipice of being this tornado that was going to destroy everything in my path.”

    Kiersey Clemons in 'The Young Wife' production stills

    Source: Courtesy / Republic Pictures

    THE YOUNG WIFE is currently available on digital

    Janeé Bolden

    Source link

  • Katie Couric SLAMS Her Former Today Co-Host Bryant Gumbel! Damn!! – Perez Hilton

    Katie Couric SLAMS Her Former Today Co-Host Bryant Gumbel! Damn!! – Perez Hilton

    Katie Couric hasn’t forgotten how Bryant Gumbel allegedly treated her on Today.

    In an interview with Bill Maher for his Club Random Podcast posted on Sunday, the journalist opened up about the old days of hosting Today with Bryant — both the highs and the lows. While she admitted that he was a “talent,” a “seamless broadcaster,” and “eloquent,” she remembers him as “a guy’s guy.” You know, the type that wasn’t particularly understanding of women.

    Related: Whoopi Goldberg Has Had ENOUGH Of Travis Kelce! Watch Her Go Off!

    She recalled a time in the early ’90s when she had her first baby and Bryant was apparently less than understanding about her maternity leave:

    “He got mad at me because I was doing something on maternity leave and he was giving me endless s**t for taking, like, a month or two off. I was having my first baby. And he was like, ‘Why don’t you just drop it in the field and come back to work right away,’ or something.”

    WTF! All that fuss for just a month or two?? Jeez…

    The 67-year-old continued:

    “No, he was kidding, but he was giving me a lot — he was goofing on me but giving me a lot of s**t, but it was sort of emblematic of an incredibly sexist attitude.”

    Sounds like it… We mean come on, dude! What the hell?! See her full interview (below):

    The two co-anchored Today from 1991 until 1997 when Bryant left. Katie shares daughters Elinor, 32, and Caroline, 28, with her late ex-husband Jay Monahan. Thoughts, Perezcious readers?? We know the “drop it in the field” comment is a joke, but the sexism around it ain’t cool!! What do U think?! Let us know in the comments below…

    [Images via Club Random Podcast, NBC, & CBS/YouTube]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • Sexual shaming impacts all women – here's how we can eradicate it

    Sexual shaming impacts all women – here's how we can eradicate it

    Fox Weber says: “A young woman can be labelled as inappropriate for showing too much of herself — for being too desirable — and older women can be shamed for having sexual wants, the whole ‘mutton dressed as lamb’ concept. And yet it’s nearly impossible to get it right, to be respectable and still sexually honest, in a sense. When women don’t desire their partners sexually, there can be so much shame, and guilt. There’s pressure to be satisfied and satisfying, and admitting disappointment about sex, even to oneself, can be daunting.”

    It’s not getting better, either: “Slut shaming is still hugely prevalent. Sadly, the whole mother, Madonna whore complex is still rampant in our attitudes. When a woman becomes a mother, she’s not supposed to prioritise sexual pleasure, or even have a sexual identity in a certain way. Not if she wants to be a ‘good’ mother. And going the other way, when someone is maternal and nurturing and domestic, she may be loveable but less desirable, less exciting, to the person in a relationship with her. Women with young children still get in a lot of trouble if they dare step out of their role of what they’re supposed to be. And overly sacrificial mothers lose a sense of sexual visibility.”

    Shallcross echoes this, telling me: “It can manifest as shaming women for the number of sexual partners she has, using the word ‘slut’ in order to shame and holding stigmatising views of sex workers.  It can also manifest as ‘what were you wearing?’ type questions in response to sexual assault.  As such, it places blame on women and girls who are victims of sexual violence instead of laying blame at the door of male perpetrators.”

    The dangers of sexual shaming

    We spoke to Katie Salmon, the ex-Love Island contestant who later became a top 1% creator on Only Fans and now works with Red Umbrella, a charity supporting sex workers, about what she’s learned about the dangers of sexual shaming throughout her career. “The threat of sexual shaming can force girls and women to live in fear of bullying, rejection and low self-esteem,” she says. “It encourages a culture of misogyny, which can increase instances of violence and crimes to against women and girls.”

    As an OnlyFans creator, Salmon encountered abusive sexual shaming constantly. “A lot of men can get nasty when you don’t give them what they want or for the price they want,” she says. “This perceived shame around sex can also deter people in sex work or experiencing sexual exploitation from reaching out for help and reporting instances of violence and crimes against them through fear of being humiliated or ‘outed.’”

    How can we combat sexual shaming?

    According to Salmon, there is hope — and we can all play a part in stopping sexual shaming in its tracks.

    Normalise talking about it

    “Sex is a natural part of life but by breaking down the stigmatisation around sex and sexuality, is to feel empowered and confident to talk about sex — everyone has a right to feel safe and comfortable. Educating yourself on what’s ‘normal’ and what can be seen as a ‘red flag’ can equip you with the tools to ask for support, help or advice and assert your boundaries,” she says.

    Listen without judgement

    Judgement is often the first step in shaming. “When someone confides in you or opens up about their personal experiences with you, listen without judgment,” Salmon suggests. “Just as you would want to feel validated and supported, as does that person.”

    Start with the inner work – remember you don’t deserve shame

    We should also all do our own internal work to ensure that we aren’t shaming ourselves about our sex lives. “Nothing heals without you examining the shame and guilt and with that practising self-compassion — it’s trusting that we are worthy, replacing that shame with love and acceptance,” she says.

    Journaling

    Another useful practice is simply keeping a journal.

    “I know from my mental health struggles and looking at ways to help, journalling was one to combat anxiety and guilt,” says Salmon. “To take the intrusive thoughts flooding our mind and make sense of the possible trauma that has happened to understand your thoughts more clearly.”

    Chloe Laws

    Source link

  • Open Thread: What Are Your Thoughts About Being “Basic”? – Corporette.com

    Open Thread: What Are Your Thoughts About Being “Basic”? – Corporette.com

    This post may contain affiliate links and Corporette® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Do you consider yourself “basic” — and are you OK with that? What are your thoughts in general about the idea and phrase?

    It’s November, which means besides falling leaves and football, it’s PSL Season. Has a drink ever been so maligned? (I dunno, maybe Mountain Dew? Four Loko? Kombucha?) More than the actual drink prompting eye-rolling, though, the target is usually the women who love it. They’re seen as …”basic.”

    Readers, what do you think? Is “basic” just a harmless way to describe a particular sort of (white, middle- to upper-class) woman? Is it sexist? Are you proudly basic (or semi-basic?) yourself, and craving a PSL at this very moment? (My favorite Starbucks drink is a boring old hot chocolate with “real” milk, personally.)

    (Note that, like a lot of slang that’s become popular among white people, “basic” has its origins in Black / hip hop culture, though its meaning has evolved. Also worth a read.)

    {related: what trend are you totally sick of?}

    Definitions of What it Means to Be Basic

    To get us on the same page when we chat about the word basic, here’s an extremely popular definition of “basic bitch” on Urban Dictionary:

    Someone who is unflinchingly upholding of the status quo and stereotypes of their gender without even realizing it. She engages in typical, unoriginal behaviors, modes of dress, speech, and likes. She is tragically/laughably unaware of her utter lack of specialness and intrigue. She believers herself to be unique, fly, amazing, and a complete catch, when really she is boring, painfully normal, and par. She believes her experiences to be crazy, wild, and different or somehow more special than everything that everybody else is doing, when really, almost everyone is doing or has done the exact same thing.

    Yes, the terms “basic” and “basic bitch” have been around for years — they’re much older than current negative labels for women, like “pick-me,” which as a 40-something, I’m not totally clear on — but we’ve never discussed basic-ness. Though we’ve talked about trends, frump, and other judgments on style, basic also encompasses the woman herself.

    {open thread: what are you a snob about?}

    One good counterpoint to poking fun at women for being basic comes, surprisingly, from College Humor, with “Defender of the Basic” (video slightly NSFW). (On the flipside, four years earlier they made “How To Tell if You’re a Basic Bitch.”)

    So, popular stuff is popular. And it’s fun to be excited about stuff you like, even if millions of other people do too! (Finally, when it comes to stereotypes, why aren’t IPA-drinking, The Witcher-watching, or fantasy-football-playing white dudes labeled as basic?)

    Readers, do tell: What are your “basic” favorites? (And attention, pumpkin-spice fans: Check out PSL-lover April’s posts over on CorporetteMoms about PSL-themed body wash and baby items!)

    Stock photo via Pexels / Nathan J. Hilton.

    Kate Antoniades

    Source link

  • Fans telling Madonna to ‘grow up’ and ‘act her age’ on her Celebration tour is not OK

    Fans telling Madonna to ‘grow up’ and ‘act her age’ on her Celebration tour is not OK

    This isn’t even the first time that Madonna has faced scrutiny over her performance in the context of her age. After her appearance at the 2023 Grammys, many critics flocked to the Internet to air their unsolicited opinions. “Madonna looks good for her age … if her age is a 2,700-year-old vampire who eats babies and small animals alive,” one posted.

    A Madonna fan did admittedly hit back at the time with a perfect response: “The negative comments here are so predictable. Most of them come from people who are scared of getting older and insignificant themselves.”

    The singer has been fielding these comments about her age for too long, just like many women in (and out) of the public eye, aged over the age of 40 or so. Back in 2016, she hit out at an unknown critic about “acting her age”.

    “How do I know I’m still acting my age?” she wrote. “Because it’s MY age and it’s MY life and all of you women hating bigots need to sit down and try to understand why you feel the need to limit me with you down fear of what you aren’t familiar with.

    “The fact that people actually believe a woman is not allowed to express her sexuality and be adventurous past a certain age is proof that we still live in an ageist and sexist society,” she posted on Instagram.

    In a 2021 interview, Madonna spoke out about not thinking about age when she performs. “I don’t even think about my age, to tell you the truth. I just keep going,” she said. “Even when I performed almost my entire tour in agony, I had no cartilage left in my right hip, and everyone kept saying, ‘You gotta stop, you gotta stop.’ I said, ‘I will not stop. I will go until the wheels fall off.’”

    To infantalise Madonna in this way by telling her to act more like other women her age just feels like misogynstic.

    Kevin Mazur

    So if she’s not thinking about her age, why is everyone else?

    There are multiple issues at play here – one is the disturbing link many draw between age and sexuality. When a woman gets older, she is shamed for her sexuality. She’s told to “act her age” and curb that side of herself, particularly in public. Secondly, fans seem to be claiming some kind of ownership over Madonna’s body and behaviour, wanting her to act the way they think is “age appropriate” to them. Both of these issues stink of misogyny over a woman’s choices and a misplaced assumption that we own Madonna’s body, actions or performances.

    Perhaps the star’s “fans” and critics would do well to concentrate on respecting her energy, commitment and talent – instead of focusing on her age and how she should be acting in response to it.

    Charley Ross

    Source link

  • It’s been a month since the Russell Brand allegations became public. This is how women in comedy are feeling…

    It’s been a month since the Russell Brand allegations became public. This is how women in comedy are feeling…

    Do you think the comedy circuit has a misogyny problem? Are there environmental factors specific to comedy that make it worse?

    I think there’s two parts to this. Comedy historically has been so misogynistic, and people have been able to get away with abuse against women through comedy and joking. And then what happens is, when a woman calls that out, they’re accused of being a boring,feminist snowflake. It’s a really good way to silence women, because in comedy you’re made to feel like you have to be like, fun and like down with it, and never offended I’ve done shows before where I was about to go on stage, and the man in front of me was making really bad rape jokes. I was like, now I have to go on stag? So, I think there’s that one part, which is the actual comedy in itself being misogynistic, which is changing, obviously, but still taking quite a long time.

    And then in terms of industry wise, most industries are still misogynistic. There are so few industries that aren’t. So, I think in that sense, it’s still systemically run by a few powerful men who get to decide who gets to go and what panel shows. I don’t think women are respected as much in comedy as men are. I don’t think men find women as funny as they should. I think men in comedy are really afraid of finding women funny, because then they think that they’re going to lose work, if women are funnier than them.

    Can you tell me about any personal experiences of misogyny you’ve faced in the comedy industry?

    I’m very lucky because I’ve been able to slightly isolate myself from more traditional sides of comedy, by building my own audience, and working with women and queer comedians. I actually very rarely work with straight men. But when I was starting out, yes.

    Men would find ways to patronise me, or men who would be inappropriate  because I go on stage and have my tits out, and wear quite revealing clothes. I look hot when I’m on stage, and they think that means they can say creepy stuff to me.

    Did you hear the rumours about Russell Brand before the allegations were made public?

    Yeah, I heard [the rumours] when I started doing stand up, like six years ago.

    How do you feel about the conversations that have ignited since the Brand investigation broke?

    I wasn’t shocked [by the allegations]. But I just feel like every time something like this happens it depresses me on such a deep level, because nothing is changing. And the way that a lot of the internet responded, by denying reality and saying what they [the alleged victims] were saying wasn’t true. That affects me deeply, and sends a message to other people who have been raped not to do anything about it.

    Do you think the culture has changed within comedy in recent years?

    It’s very hard to know. We’re almost eight years on from #MeToo and not much has changed. It changes in very small ways. I think the more that men are scared of being held accountable for their behaviour, the more that their behaviour will change. They need to be afraid of doing the wrong thing, and then they will be forced into doing the right thing. But, there is an amazing support network in comedy amongst women. There are so many older women who’ve really protected me and made sure that I’m okay. Women just talk to each other more about this stuff.

    Chloe Laws

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift Went To Another Chiefs Game — And Some NFL Fans Seem Big Mad About It

    Taylor Swift Went To Another Chiefs Game — And Some NFL Fans Seem Big Mad About It

    Taylor Swift is getting her girl cooties all over the NFL.

    The pop superstar’s flavor of the moment seems to be Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, which has prompted Swift to attend two of his games.

    The first was on Sept. 24, when the Chiefs trounced the Chicago Bears. Swift’s attendance seemed to support rumors that she was dating Kelce, although neither party has publicly confirmed their relationship. Nonetheless, her mere presence at the game eclipsed the sporting event itself.

    So on Sunday, when Swift attended the Chiefs’ game against the New York Jets with a few celebrity friends in tow, including Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, all eyes — and cameras — were on Swift.

    Fully aware of Swift’s PR power, the NFL even used three photos of the “You Belong with Me” singer’s reactions during the game as its background image on its X account on Monday.

    Screenshot of the NFL’s X account as of Monday.

    Screenshot @NFL via X/Twitter.

    And although Swift’s apparent romance with a beloved Super Bowl champ does reek a bit of a publicity stunt (perhaps to distract from her previous romantic entanglement with a racist) — some of the backlash she’s received from NFL fans also reeks of sexism and far-right values.

    Media Matters found that dozens of conservative pundits have attacked Kelce for appearances in Pfzier and Bud Light ads that they interpret as a sign of his support for COVID-19 vaccines and LGBTQ+ rights. Swift’s left-leaning politics, meanwhile, have encouraged some on the right to resort to grade-school insults, flat-out criticizing her appearance and labeling Kelce a less-dominant “beta” male.

    Yet the bulk of the attacks seem to come from people who just seem annoyed that Swift is distracting from the brutal and hyper-masculine sport of football. When the Chiefs played the Jets on Sunday, the hashtag “Enough Taylor Swift” began to trend on X.

    Some social media users have even gone as far as suggesting the NFL rigged the Chiefs vs. Jets game in the Chiefs’ favor to appease Swift’s fans and boost ratings.

    Interestingly enough, right-wing commentator Tomi Lahren chimed in on X about all the “Traylor” coverage, even though she admits in the same post that she’s not even a football fan.

    Yet other social media users are calling out the right-leaning nonsense and defending Swift.

    And if you happen to be someone who is on the fence about Swift’s attendance at NFL games, there does seem to be one huge benefit:

    Source link

  • ‘Free speech’ is not an excuse for misogyny

    ‘Free speech’ is not an excuse for misogyny

    Laurence Fox has long positioned himself as a defender of free speech. The right to say whatever the hell pops into his head – consequences be damned – is one of many jagged hills that the ‘actor’ has chosen to die on. Is it a coincidence that Fox seems to exclusively use this God-given ‘right’ to incite misogyny and hatred? We think not.

    GB News has suspended Fox after he went on a misogynistic rant about political journalist Ava Evans. He appeared on Dan Wooton’s show to discuss comments made by Evans about men’s mental health before launching into a tirade about her appearance, sex appeal, and why he would ignore her in a bar.

    “Show me a single self-respecting man that would like to climb into bed with that woman ever, ever, who wasn’t an incel,” Fox said to Wooton, who was smiling along. “We need powerful, strong, amazing women who make great points for themselves. We don’t need these sorts of feminist 4.0. They’re pathetic and embarrassing. Who’d want to shag that?”

    In a statement, GB News confirmed it would be investigating Fox’s comments and “apologising formally” to Ava Evans.

    Evans tweeted that she felt “sick” about the comments, adding, “This is the sort of talk that you worry that men have about you when you’re not in the room […] There’s always a worry in the back of your mind”

    “You’d think that Laurence Fox would be defending Evans’ right to free speech – no matter how divisive – rather than spewing a litany of sexist abuse.”

    So what had Evans done to deserve such an attack? Well, she’d exercised her right to free speech by appearing on a BBC Politics Live discussion about whether there should be a government minister specifically for men’s mental health. Her stance – there should be a minister for mental health more generally – was met with some negativity on social media. She has since tweeted that she regretted her comments.

    You’d think that Fox and the rest of the free-speech brigade would be defending Evans’ right to voice her personal opinion – no matter how divisive – rather than unleashing a litany of sexist abuse.

    But, of course, for people like Fox, free speech isn’t actually about free speech. In her seminal work The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir wrote, “Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their own point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth.” And her words certainly ring true in relation to Fox: he relentlessly muddles up his subjective opinion with objective fact. Thus when he’s given a platform on the likes of GB News, he deludes himself into believing that he’s speaking the truth to the masses rather than merely spewing misogynistic tripe to other misogynists.

    In response to the backlash, Fox predictably employs reductive logic to justify his comments, stating, “If a woman wants to go on television and belittle male suicide, she is totally within her rights to do so and not apologise, just as I am totally within my rights to say that I wouldn’t want to shag a hyper offended fourth wave feminist and not apologise, just as people are totally within their rights to be offended by my stating I would run a mile in the opposite direction from women like her, should our paths cross in a bar.”

    Oh, if only that were the case, Laurence! Unfortunately – and excuse me while I go “hyper-offended fourth wave feminist” over here – no one’s words exist in a vacuum. In fact, all our words exist within a deeply patriarchal society, which is hell-bent on suppressing women’s voices while uplifting men’s. In a stonking essay about free speech and feminism, Mary Anne Franks writes that free speech, in practice, can “obscure the gendered nature of power and the particularities of women’s lived experience.” So enticed by the allure of free speech, Fox doesn’t bother to contemplate how men’s and women’s words land differently within an unequal society.

    Had a man expressed the same opinions as Evans, would Fox have lambasted their sexuality? Of course he bloody wouldn’t! Because on some sub-conscious level, he knows that free speech is for the exclusive enjoyment of white, heterosexual men. And women who dare to voice unpopular opinions – women like Ava Evans – pose a threat to this enjoyment. No wonder he’s throwing his toys out of the pram.

    For more from Glamour UK’s Lucy Morgan, follow her on Instagram @lucyalexxandra.

    Lucy Morgan

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow Shuts Down ‘Double Standard’ Women Face As They Age

    Gwyneth Paltrow Shuts Down ‘Double Standard’ Women Face As They Age

    Gwyneth Paltrow is pushing back against the “double standard” that celebrates men but devalues women as they age.

    In a new interview with British Vogue, the Goop founder, 50, made it clear that she welcomes growing older while reflecting on the “weird” cultural expectation that women should resist aging.

    “I think it’s culture’s problem. It’s not ours,” said Paltrow, who noted how women are judged more harshly for getting older than men. “As women, we want to be healthy, we want to be [aging]. This idea that we’re supposed to be frozen in time is so weird.”

    The wellness guru gave credit to stars who are “embracing” growing older, like Andie MacDowell, who stopped coloring her hair after the COVID-19 pandemic began.

    “I love it when I hear somebody like Andie MacDowell, with her beautiful grey curls, talking about embracing aging and the difference between how we handle a George Clooney [versus an aging female star],” Paltrow said.

    She added: “It’s handsome to go grey [as a man], but for women it’s like, ‘What do you plan to do about your wrinkles and your aging skin?’”

    The “Avengers” actor, who said she enjoys seeing “examples of how you can age,” encouraged women to age “how they want to do it.”

    “Some women want to address every single thing aesthetically, and some women want to be a fabulous French grandmother who doesn’t ever do anything. Everybody should be empowered to do it how they want to,” the actor declared.

    Paltrow isn’t the only star to call out sexist double standards.

    Just last week, actor Gabrielle Union slammed ageist internet trolls who criticized her for being “too old” to wear a thong bikini at age 50.

    In September 2022, Paltrow, whose Goop brand produces several anti-aging products, admitted that she’d made peace with her wrinkles.

    “I accept. I accept the marks and the loosening skin, the wrinkles. I accept my body and let go of the need to be perfect, look perfect, defy gravity, defy logic, defy humanity. I accept my humanity,” Paltrow said in a self-published essay on Goop’s website.

    Source link

  • Jennifer Lawrence Explains Real Reason For Flip-Flops At Cannes

    Jennifer Lawrence Explains Real Reason For Flip-Flops At Cannes

    Jennifer Lawrence is fessing up about what some people say was her dress-code protest at the Cannes Film Festival.

    The “Hunger Games” star, praised for wearing flip-flops in defiance of festival rules for women to wear high heels, told “Entertainment Tonight” she had no intention of protesting and just wanted to address a wardrobe malfunction.

    “I was not making a political statement, not that I wouldn’t,” she told “ET” on Thursday. “I had no idea until it like, came out that there was a whole controversy with people wearing flats, or like, walking down the red carpet barefoot. I had no clue.”

    “My shoes were a size too big,” she continued.

    Lawrence said she was unaware that Julia Roberts walked the red carpet barefoot in 2016 to defy the unspoken rules. Nor did she know that Kristen Stewart ditched her Christian Louboutins in 2018, or that Cate Blanchett would leave her stilettos at home hours after Lawrence walked the red carpet in flip-flops.

    Lawrence was attending a screening of “Bread and Roses,” a documentary about women under Taliban rule that she produced, when her flip-flops made headlines. Unfamiliar with the heels protest, she said she only wanted to take a photo — and didn’t want a repeat of past stumbles.

    Lawrence said she’s “all for making a statement,” but just wants to make those “on purpose.”

    Vianney Le Caer/Invision/Associated Press

    “I forgot to take a picture with my production team, Excellent Cadaver,” she said. “So, we had to take an Excellent Cadaver picture, and I knew I would eat shit if I went down in the shoes that were a size too big.”

    “I put on the flip-flops,” she continued. “And then everybody’s like, ‘What a statement! Wow!’”

    Lawrence famously fell at the 2013 Oscars while accepting her statue — and did it again the following year. She’s currently promoting “No Hard Feelings,” a raunchy sex comedy in which her character is hired by two worried parents to “date” their inexperienced son.

    Even with flip-flops, Lawrence stunned in a cherry red Christian Dior couture gown at Cannes.

    The star said she’s “all for making a statement,” but would prefer to do it “on purpose.”

    Source link

  • Priyanka Chopra Jonas Describes Director’s ‘Dehumanizing’ Demand To See Her Underwear

    Priyanka Chopra Jonas Describes Director’s ‘Dehumanizing’ Demand To See Her Underwear

    Priyanka Chopra Jonas said she experienced a “dehumanizing” situation while working on a movie set in her earlier days.

    In a new interview with The Zoe Report, the “Citadel” star recounted the uncomfortable time an unnamed Bollywood director demanded to see her underwear.

    She said it happened around 2002 or 2003, while she was gearing up to play a character who went undercover.

    “I’m undercover, I’m seducing the guy ― obviously that’s what girls do when they’re undercover. But I’m seducing the guy and you have to take off one piece of clothing [at a time],” she explained.

    “I wanted to layer up. The filmmaker was like, ‘No, I need to see her underwear. Otherwise why is anybody coming to watch this movie?’” she recalled.

    The actor noted that the director never said this to her directly, but gave the unsavory order to the stylist in front of her.

    “It was such a dehumanizing moment. It was a feeling of, I’m nothing else outside of how I can be used, my art is not important, what I contribute is not important,” she continued.

    Chopra Jonas explained that after two days on set, she couldn’t bear it any longer and exited the project, adding: “I just couldn’t look at [the director] every day.”

    She wound up paying the production team back with her own money to reimburse them for what they’d spent, she said.

    “I’ve learned how to protect myself by building barriers and walls,” Priyanka Chopra Jonas said of her life in the entertainment industry.

    Franco Origlia via Getty Images

    Chopra Jonas, who was a Bollywood star and crowned Miss World before she took her career to America, shared that she’s since learned how to safeguard herself in the industry.

    “I was 17 years old when I started doing this. I’ve been picked apart ― my actions, decisions have been scrutinized,” she said. “I’ve learned how to protect myself by building barriers and walls, “[but] now that I’ve done this for long enough, the lines are blurring for me. The public person and the real person are kind of becoming the same.”

    Chopra Jonas has since appeared in popular films such as 2022’s “The Matrix Revolutions” and 2017’s “Baywatch.” In March, she shared why she ultimately decided to close the curtains on her Bollywood career.

    “I had people not casting me, I had beef with people, I am not good at playing that game so I kind of was tired of the politics and I said I needed a break,” Chopra Jonas, who shares her 1-year-old daughter Malti with her husband, Nick Jonas, said on the “Armchair Expert” podcast.

    Source link

  • Hating Zach Braff and Florence Pugh’s Relationship Is Sexist

    Hating Zach Braff and Florence Pugh’s Relationship Is Sexist

    Florence Pugh has recently been the subject of much media buzz thanks to the age gap between her and her partner, Zach Braff.

    Pugh, who is 24-years-old, has been dating Scrubs star Zach Braff, who just turned 45, for nearly four years. As Pugh’s star has risen thanks to hit films like Little Women and Midsommar, media and fans alike have begun to question Braff and Pugh’s age gap. Finally, tired of all the abuse, Pugh posted the following video to her Instagram account on April 9th. Watch the video here.

    In the video, she firmly warns fans against commenting about her relationship on her posts. “I will not allow that behaviour on my page. I’m not about that. It makes me upset and sad that during this time when we really all need to be together and supporting and loving one another… a few of you decided to bully for no reason,” the star said candidly. She goes on to say that she has been working and earning money since the age of 17 and paying taxes from the age of 18 and can make her own decisions when it comes to relationships.

    “I’ll underline this fact,’ Pugh said. “I do not need you to tell me who I should and should not love and I would never in my life who they can and cannot love. It is not your place and really it has nothing to do with you. I don’t want this on my page, it’s embarrassing, it’s sad and I don’t know when cyberbullying became trendy or a points system. I don’t know why it’s a cool thing.”

    More recently, in an interview for Elle UK, the actress spoke out about the online abuse again, saying “I know that part of being in the spotlight is that people might invade your privacy and have opinions on it, but it’s bizarre that normal folk are allowed to display such hate and opinions on a part of my life that I’m not putting out there,” she said. “It’s a strange side of fame that you’re allowed to be torn apart by thousands of people even though you didn’t put that piece of you out there.” She went on to say, “I don’t want to talk about it because it’s not something I want to highlight, but my point to all this is that isn’t it odd that a stranger can totally tear apart someone’s relationship and it’s allowed?”

    While Pugh’s rebuff of cyberbullies was inspiring, the question still remains: Why do people have such an issue with Pugh and Braff’s relationship? Older male celebrities dating younger women is a tale as old as time. Think of Leonardo DiCaprio, known for dating women as much 20 years his junior, or Dennis Quaid (65) and girlfriend Laura Savoie (26). These couples don’t receive the kind of abuse Braff and Pugh have weathered, so what sets them apart? Perhaps the answer lies with Pugh’s fame. She is unquestionably the bigger star in the couple, so maybe fans’ image of who a beautiful young star should date isn’t compatible with Braff, who is cute in a non-threatening way and in no way the traditional Hollywood heart throb.

    But then why don’t people have issues with Leonardo Dicaprio dating little-known models and actresses? Well, sexism, of course. We expect a big star like Leo to date young beautiful women, and we have no issue with the age gap because we don’t feel like we know the women in the relationship; they’re just unknown, beautiful faces. Not only that, but we expect famous women to date men who are even more famous than them, in order to increase their own star power. Meanwhile, famous men can exist in their own orbit of stardom and date who they choose.

    We expect young female starlets like Pugh to date hunky heartthrobs while she’s in her prime, before she ages out of the narrow window in which women are valued in Hollywood. It makes us uncomfortable that Pugh is dating an older man who is not a massive star and not sexy in a traditional way, because it doesn’t fit with the narrative we’ve come to expect from the people we choose to bestow fame upon.

    Our response to Pugh’s relationship also reflects the way society views a woman’s personal autonomy. When Ashton Kutcher was dating much older Demi Moore, no one questioned his decision-making. But people seem to think that Pugh needs to be warned against making a mistake in dating Braff, that she isn’t capable of making her own relationship choices. Why? You guessed it: sexism. Culturally, we don’t trust women to make decisions in the same way we trust men. Not only that, but in the case of Leo and his semi-anonymous young lovers, in our eyes, the women in the relationship don’t possess the kind of personal autonomy Pugh does; we don’t know them, they’re just pieces of eye candy. Pugh, on the other hand, has become a human being in our eyes, something that isn’t automatic when we perceive women the way it is for men. But that doesn’t mean she’s free from the unfair expectations we place on all women, famous or not.

    On some level, we feel that Florence Pugh owes us a sexy, tumultuous relationship with some hot young Hollywood star. We feel that since we have decided to make her famous, to watch her movies and invest in her personal life, it is her duty to entertain us. Having a stable relationship with a 45-year-old nice-guy who doesn’t have a six pack and is known for a funny sitcom—not hit action movies—isn’t entertaining. That isn’t what we want to read about in the tabloids.

    So, summarily, while you may think that it’s anti-feminist that Pugh is dating a much older man, and you may think that commenting on her relationship is in some way proving your devotion to her, you couldn’t be more wrong. If you have a problem with Pugh dating Braff, you’re essentially saying that she can’t be trusted to make her own choices, and you’re making her relationship about you and your own prejudice, not her and her happiness.

    Just let Florence Pugh and Zach Braff be happy, okay?

    From Your Site Articles

    Related Articles Around the Web

    Brooke Ivey Johnson

    Source link

  • Clairemont Elementary School and John R. Lewis Legacy Institute Announce March on Decatur and Conversation of Understanding

    Clairemont Elementary School and John R. Lewis Legacy Institute Announce March on Decatur and Conversation of Understanding

    After the overwhelming success of the March on Clairemont during the 2022-2023 school year, Clairemont Elementary School committed to expanding efforts to include the entire Decatur community. It is with extreme excitement that the budding equity and social justice leaders at Clairemont Elementary School present March on Decatur.  On Friday, March 31, 2023, at 9:30 AM, Clairemont Elementary will lead a march from 155 Erie Avenue that will culminate on the stairs of the Decatur History Center, where those gathered will hear from dynamic community leaders and student activists. The theme for the march is “Extinguishing the Isms.”

    “We are confident that support from our school community can and will bring attention to and boldly take steps to eliminate sexism, heterosexism, ableism, and racism,” said Clairemont Elementary principal Dr. Curtis Armour. In the month leading up to the march, students will participate in an age-appropriate curriculum that focuses on each of these “isms.” At the conclusion of the experience, students will choose the social justice issue that is most meaningful to them and create chants, posters and banners that demand change.  

    Also, The Clairemont Elementary School Equity Team, PTA/DEI Committee, and the John R. Lewis Legacy Institute will host a Conversation of Understanding, an initiative to raise awareness, educate, and unite the Clairemont community. The event will take place on Wednesday, April 12, 2023, from 5:30 PM- 7 PM in the Clairemont Auditorium. The moderators for the evening will be Mr. Garry Lowe and Mrs. Chanell Huff-Cox.

    The Conversation Champions (Panelists) will tackle the rich and complex topic of diversity and inclusion by bravely sharing challenging personal experiences. They will highlight biases and stereotypes they have encountered, and how these difficult situations impacted them.  Speakers will also share practical tips on how we all can act in a more inclusive manner. “We will also emphasize allyship among our residents. More specifically, identifying opportunities to be an effective ally, explaining what allyship looks like on a day-to-day basis and highlighting the positive impact that allies can have on under-represented communities,” said JRLLI Executive Director Jerrick Lewis.  

    The John R. Lewis Legacy Institute, Inc. (JRLLI) is a nonprofit organization comprised of members of Congressmen Lewis’ immediate family, whose mission is to promote diversity, support civil rights education, and engage in community service projects, including but not limited to Social Justice, Equity in Education, and Health Awareness, enabling future generations to continue the legacy of good and necessary trouble.  

    Source: John R. Lewis Legacy Institute

    Source link

  • Fox News Wins for Worst Midterm Election Take: ‘These Women Just Went Crazy’

    Fox News Wins for Worst Midterm Election Take: ‘These Women Just Went Crazy’

    Via Twitter/Kat Abu/Fox News

    Content warning for ableism and misogyny.

    Yesterday’s midterm elections have turned into an overwhelming victory for Democrats across the country. Slavery of the incarcerated was outlawed in four more states including Alabama, Oregon, Tennessee, and Vermont. Abortion referendums overwhelmingly reinforced protections for women and pregnant people’s right to choose. John Fetterman won in a landslide against Dr. Oz.

    This of course, has Republicans scratching their heads about how they could have lost so badly. Could it be because of their out-of-touch policies that are radically more right than the general population? Could it be because of election deniers who act like spoiled children outright denying reality?

    Well, one Fox News correspondent has come up with the worst reason Republicans lost the midterms: “These women just went crazy.”

    Jim Messina, who is a Democrat and a former Obama campaign manager, attributed the democrats winning over Republicans and Independents, due to women ‘going crazy’ over abortion rights. Which is about the most sexist and ableist way he could have put it.

    Women voters are not the Bacchae, they are not ‘crazy’ or ‘hysterical’ or any other sexist term meant to devalue women’s emotions or opinions. They’re rightfully furious or fearful for their safety.

    Even more hilariously, Messina quickly walked back his comments.

    Thankfully, no one is buying his excuses for the sexist language.

    Unfortunately, this does speak to a larger problem in both the Democratic and Republican parties. Instead of seeing these elections as a wake-up call for what voters are demanding, they see this as a fluke. A temporary moment of fervor that will pass.

    But it’s a movement that is picking up momentum, and one that will not go away quietly.

    And honestly, I could see “these women went crazy” being on a shirt at the next abortion rights rally, alongside all the “Nevertheless, she persisted” badges of honor.

    (image: Twitter)

    The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Kimberly Terasaki

    Source link

  • Stevie Case vs. the World: A Pioneering Gamer Opens Up About Industry Sexism

    Stevie Case vs. the World: A Pioneering Gamer Opens Up About Industry Sexism

    According to Case, a disturbing incident provided yet another reminder of her vulnerability as a woman in the male-dominated world of gaming.

    Since moving to Dallas, Case had become friends with an older guy in the industry who helped her navigate the nascent business and plan her career. But the man was “always just skirting the edge of inappropriate in a way that felt uncomfortable,” she says, making comments about how easily he could fall in love with her, despite the fact that he was married. He frequently told her to lose weight because it would help her image.

    Mindful of his power and influence, Case tried to shrug it off. One afternoon, Case alleges, he took her for lunch at his usual spot to talk business and strategy. Afterward, they headed out to his car so he could drive her home. Once the doors were shut, the mood changed. He asked her to pull down her pants, she says, and show him her vagina. He “commanded me, ‘Show me what you’ve got. I want to see it,’” Case says. “He just would not let up,” she says.

    As she sat frozen, she says, she thought, “If I’m not the cool girl who goes along, what am I going to give up? Am I going to be on the outside? That was my fear. It felt like one thing on this continuum of constantly being expected to expose myself or otherwise be on display. I just thought that’s how the world was. The story I told myself was: I’m strong and I am a survivor and I just do what I have to do.” So she did, pulling down her pants in the car in silence as he watched. “He didn’t touch me but I definitely felt, like, trapped,” she says, “It just felt like he was sort of leering at me.” Then she pulled her pants back up and said she had to go.

    In July 1997, Case scored her biggest win yet: a job as a game tester at Romero’s new studio, Ion Storm. With a multimillion-dollar publishing deal from Eidos, the British behemoth behind the best-selling Tomb Raider franchise, Romero had made it to the top of the industry, and downtown Dallas. Ion leased the 22,500-square-foot, glass-ceilinged penthouse of the Texas Commerce Building, and transformed it into what a press release called “the Willy Wonka Chocolate Factory of Gaming!” When Case stepped out of the emerald-green elevator doors onto the penthouse floor, she felt more like Dorothy entering Oz. As clouds floated above the glass ceiling, she passed vintage arcade games, a movie theater, a custom deathmatching arena with big shiny screens, and a snack room stacked with Bawls soda, Milk Duds, and Cup-O-Noodles. Throughout the maze of corrugated steel cubicles, at every oversized monitor, were her people: gamers, dozens of them. Though she was outnumbered by guys as usual, she felt as much a part of their team as ever. “I thought it was fucking awesome,” she says.

    But as the sun overhead turned to darkness, a harsher reality set in. With nearly 100 employees, millions spent on renovations, and no game release in sight, Romero’s team was working 12-hour days, six days a week. That explained the sleeping bags and pillows under the desks, which I saw myself when I was there profiling Romero for Salon. Case returned with a packed suitcase and camped under her desk for two weeks. She felt determined to prove herself, and land her dream job as a game designer.

    But the pressure kept building. For a year, Romero had been endlessly touting Daikatana’s impending release. This included a notorious ad in major gaming magazines that warned, “John Romero’s About to Make You His Bitch.” Romero’s spokesperson said he disavowed the ad at the time, saying it wasn’t his idea and that he regrets not preventing it. But the damage was done. It wasn’t the misogyny of the ad that bothered gamers so much. It was the macho posturing about an increasingly delayed game that was starting to feel like vaporware. The man who’d perfected the art of trash-talking in gaming now found himself being savaged by the gaming bloggers and press.

    Just before Thanksgiving 1998, Case and few others took Romero to P.F. Chang’s for an intervention of sorts. “We heard a rumor that your entire Daikatana team is going to leave tomorrow,” Case told him. The next day, they did—a devastating blow that made the haters hate even harder. But it had one silver lining: Case got promoted to a job designing levels for the game. “I was ecstatic,” she says. “I felt like this brotherhood of designers had accepted me.”

    Romero was interested in more than her design skills. Amid all the strife inside the company, they’d grown close. Both were gamers at heart, and both were familiar with life under siege. He was 31 now, with a newborn daughter, but his troubles at work spilled into tensions at home, and he and his wife soon separated.

    One night, he and Stevie went to dinner. “We were sitting on a curb after eating dinner or something, having some wine, and he kissed me,” she says. “That was it.” Case and Romero tried to keep their relationship secret at work while they raced to get Daikatana out the door. “He was supersmart, hilarious, goofy,” Case says, “The whole thing that made him a gamer—the intelligence, and the wit, and the playfulness—that was just so fun. I felt like it was somebody that got me very deeply, good and bad. Everything about who I was.”

    Their bond grew stronger in the face of mounting adversity. In January 1999, as I later reported in Masters of Doom, the Dallas Observer published a scathing exposé of Ion Storm’s work culture drawn from leaked internal emails. “The place where the ‘designer’s vision is king’ has turned into a toxic mix of prima donnas and personality cults,” the article declared. Then, in April, it emerged that the Columbine High School shooters had been avid fans of Doom. A national uproar over violent video games ensued.

    By the time Case and Romero showed up to that year’s Electronic Entertainment Expo, the annual gaming convention in Los Angeles, the baggy-jeaned KillCreek of before was no longer. Standing arm in arm with Romero, in his black leather pants, mesh black shirt, and long silver chain, Case had completed her transition from corn-fed tomboy to video-game vixen. Dressed in a tight baby-blue shirt and black pants, she’d dyed her hair blonde, dropped 50 pounds, and surgically enlarged her breasts. To the hordes of autograph-seeking fans at the expo, Romero and Case had become gaming’s It couple.

    David Kushner

    Source link

  • Sallie Krawcheck: ‘Women are in worse financial shape today than they were in the depths of the pandemic’

    Sallie Krawcheck: ‘Women are in worse financial shape today than they were in the depths of the pandemic’

    This summer I was at a gathering in the weeks after the Supreme Court decision striking down Roe v Wade. A senior executive from one of the country’s largest corporations was asked about his company’s reproductive rights benefits. As is befitting of his company’s size and stature, he sketched out, with some pride, its top-of-the-line health care benefits. He went on to describe how pleased–and relieved–his senior leadership team was when they confirmed that their health insurance already covered travel for medical procedures. This means that it covers travel from states that restrict reproductive rights to those that provide abortions.

    He was pleased because the travel provisions were in place, yes. He was also pleased because it meant his company did not have to take any action in those immediately post-Roe days. Instead of having to “make a statement,” they could keep their proverbial corporate head down and not risk “becoming part of the story.”

    Crisis averted. Sigh of relief.

    Except maybe not. Because sometimes remaining silent is not a bullet dodged, but rather a cost postponed.

    And the cost, in this case, can be many of the women who work for–or buy from, or invest in–your company.

    Women cannot afford to stay where they do not have support

    Ellevest recently introduced its proprietary Ellevest Women’s Financial Health Index. The index is the first-of-its-kind, quantitative measure of the financial health of women in the U.S. It includes inputs like the gender pay gap, the availability of paid family leave, inflation, and women’s representation in government and corporate leadership. Also included is a measure of reproductive rights, given that they have a fundamental financial impact on women and their families.

    This year, the index has been declining rapidly, in part due to restrictions on reproductive rights for women, as well as the increase in inflation and the tanking of consumer confidence, indicating that the financial health of women in the U.S. has also been heading south. In fact, by the index’s measure, women are in worse financial shape today than they were in the depths of the pandemic.

    We also shared the results of our second annual Ellevest Financial Wellness Survey. It is perhaps not surprising that this survey showed that more than half of women–and more than 60% of millennial and Gen Z women–said that the overturning of Roe v. Wade has had a significant impact on their mental health.

    But make no mistake: They are also making the connection to their pocketbooks. Millennial women rank the restriction of reproductive rights as one of their top five financial worries. For Gen Z women, it featured in second place behind inflation–interestingly, though perhaps not surprisingly, a tie with climate change. And lest you write this off as youthful “wokeness,” climate change was a top-five financial worry for women across all age demographics.

    There are three main takeaways for corporate executives:

    Silence can cost you women employees

    Women report that they want to work at companies whose values align with theirs: Some 44% of women say they would look to leave an employer whose views on reproductive rights do not align with their own. That also goes for 56% of millennial women, 53% of Latinas, and 45% of Black women.

    So how are women reacting to this rapidly shifting landscape? Well, they’re sending their resumes out. That’s right: A full 55% are looking for a new job. And 38% report that they are saving money so they can leave their job.

    This could hurt.

    Silence can also cost you women customers

    But the economic cost of your company’s silence may not stop there. It can hit the revenue line: 59% of women–and two-thirds of younger women–say it’s important for them to invest and spend with companies that stand for reproductive rights. In other words, they may in fact want you to “become part of the story.”

    That could hurt even more.

    Companies are focusing on men’s top financial priority

    A final insight for corporate leaders, from the survey: The Ellevest survey revealed that men’s top financial priority is growing their retirement savings. Fair enough. And here your corporate benefit plans–with their heavy emphasis on 401(k)s–tend to be on target.

    Women’s top financial priority? “Supporting my family.” And understandably so, given that our society expects women to shoulder a disproportionate share of the family care responsibilities. This feels particularly acute, coming out of a pandemic in which women were the social safety net, and given ongoing economic uncertainty.

    Corporate benefits plans are supposed to help… well, not so much. Only 5% of the country’s lowest paid workers, most of whom are women of color, had access to paid parental leave in 2020. And even among the nation’s top 10% of earners, it’s only 36%. Not to mention flexible work policies, child, and family care support, and so on. It’s another version of silence on an issue that matters to every woman–in this case, her primary financial priority.

    So, corporate executives: Just as your women employees and customers may misinterpret your silence, don’t let her current silence lull you.

    Sallie Krawcheck is the CEO and co-founder of Ellevest, the wealthtech company built by women, for women. Previously, she led Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney, and Citi Private as CEO and was CFO of Citi.

    The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

    More must-read commentary published by Fortune:

    Sign up for the Fortune Features email list so you don’t miss our biggest features, exclusive interviews, and investigations.

    Sallie Krawcheck

    Source link

  • New Documentary From Cinema Libre Studio Examines Rising Hate Crimes in Trump’s America

    New Documentary From Cinema Libre Studio Examines Rising Hate Crimes in Trump’s America

    Press Release



    updated: Dec 19, 2017

    Winner of the Award of Merit at indieFEST Film Awards and Best Political Documentary at Atlanta Docufest, THE UNAMERICAN STRUGGLE documentary is the first examination of the rise in hate crimes and bigoted rhetoric since the election of Donald J. Trump.

    Last month, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that hate crimes had increased by nearly 5% since 2015 in their annual Incidents of Hate report. The report recorded that 5,818 “single-bias” incidents occurred, in which one or more offense types, or incidents, were motivated by the same bias. Of those, 59.2% were motivated by a racial, ethnic and/or ancestry bias; 19.7% by a religious bias; 17.7% by a sexual orientation bias; and 3.3% by a gender identity, disability or gender bias.

    There are two sides to bigotry. There are those who openly oppose it, and then those who foster it. People who stay silent in the face of this bigotry provide quiet support for it.

    Ric Osuna, Director, The UnAmerican Struggle

    For activists on the front line of the identity politics movement, this rise in hate crimes is not a surprise, and many of them feel the numbers are underreported.

    Featuring Heidi Beirich and Naomi Tsu of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Angeles Valenciano of the National Diversity Council, Edward Ahmed Mitchell, Executive Director of the Georgia Chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Sir Maejor Page, President of Greater Atlanta Black Lives Matter, the film finds a consistent and resounding increase in hate crimes across the board, and subsequently, the fears of minority communities.

    The Trump White House last week acted to ban the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using the words ‘vulnerable, entitlement, diversity, transgender, fetus, evidence-based, and science-based’ in their 2018 budget documents, preventing the agency from accurately describing the needs of some of the country’s most vulnerable people.

    Director Osuna, who is of Mexican-American heritage and whose Mexican father served in Vietnam, says, “There are two sides to bigotry. There are those who openly oppose it, and then those who foster it. People who stay silent in the face of this bigotry provide quiet support for it. Bigotry unchecked ushers in greater abuses to civil rights, as evident through the recent attacks on the free press, the cornerstone of American democracy. ”

    Source: Cinema Libre Studio

    Source link