[ad_1]
Arm Stock Is Rising Again. The Shares Are More Popular Than Tesla or Apple.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Nvidia Stock’s Losing Streak Keeps Going. What Happened to Wall Street’s Darling?
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Investors in index funds have been well rewarded by a high concentration in the largest technology companies over the past decade. But there are also continuing warnings about the risk of such heavy concentrations, even in index funds that track the S&P 500. Solutions are offered to limit this risk, but if you expect Big Tech to continue to drive the broad market returns over the coming years, why not make an even more focused bet?
Comparisons of three index-fund approaches highlight how successful concentration in the “Magnificent Seven” has been.
The Magnificent Seven are Apple Inc.
AAPL,
Microsoft Corp.
MSFT,
Nvidia Corp.
NVDA,
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL,
GOOG,
Tesla Inc.
TSLA,
and Meta Platforms Inc.
META,
We have listed them in the order of their concentration within the Invesco S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY,
which tracks the S&P 500
SPX.
The U.S. benchmark index is weighted by market capitalization, as is the Nasdaq Composite Index
COMP
and the Russell indexes.
SPY is 27.6% concentrated in the Magnificent Seven. One way to play the same group of 500 stocks but eliminate concentration risk is to take an equal-weighted approach to the index, which has worked well for certain long periods. But here, we’re focusing on how well the concentrated strategy has worked.
Let’s take a look at the group’s concentration in three popular index approaches, then look at long-term performance and consider what happened in 2022 as rising interest rates helped crush the tech sector.
Here are the portfolio weightings for the Magnificent Seven in SPY, along with those of the Invesco QQQ Trust
QQQ,
which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
NDX
and the Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
XLG
:
| Company | Ticker | % of SPY | % of QQQ | % of XLG |
| Apple Inc. |
AAPL, |
7.05% | 10.85% | 12.46% |
| Microsoft Cor. |
MSFT, |
6.65% | 9.53% | 11.76% |
| Amazon.com Inc. |
AMZN, |
3.30% | 5.50% | 5.84% |
| Nvidia Corp. |
NVDA, |
3.02% | 4.44% | 5.33% |
| Alphabet Inc. Class A |
GOOGL, |
2.17% | 3.12% | 3.83% |
| Alphabet Inc. Class C |
GOOG, |
1.88% | 3.11% | 3.32% |
| Tesla Inc. |
TSLA, |
1.79% | 3.10% | 3.17% |
| Meta Platforms Inc. Class A |
META, |
1.77% | 3.60% | 3.12% |
| Totals | 27.63% | 43.25% | 48.83% | |
| Sources: Invesco Ltd., State Street Corp. | ||||
The same group of seven companies (eight stocks with two common share classes for Alphabet) is at the top of each exchange-traded fund’s portfolio, although the top seven for QQQ aren’t in the same order as those for SPY and XLG. QQQ’s weighting was changed recently as the underlying Nasdaq-100 underwent a “special rebalancing” last month.
Here’s a five-year chart comparing the performance of the three approaches. All returns in this article include reinvested dividends.
QQQ has been the clear winner for five years, but it is also worth noting how well XLG has performed when compared with SPY. This “top 50” approach to the S&P 500 incorporates many stocks that aren’t listed on the Nasdaq and therefore cannot be included in QQQ, which itself is made up of the largest 100 nonfinancial companies in the full Nasdaq Composite Index
COMP,
Examples of stocks held by XLG that aren’t held by QQQ include such non-tech stalwarts as Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
BRK.B,
Johnson & Johnson
JNJ,
Procter & Gamble Co.
PG,
Home Depot Inc.
HD,
and Nike Inc.
NKE,
Now let’s go deeper into long-term performance. First, here are the total returns for various time periods:
| ETF | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | 15 Years | 20 Years |
|
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY |
40% | 69% | 223% | 370% | 531% |
|
Invesco QQQ Trust QQQ |
41% | 113% | 430% | 882% | 1,158% |
|
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF XLG |
41% | 85% | 262% | 404% | N/A |
| Source: FactSet | |||||
Click on the tickers for more about each ETF, company or index.
There is no 20-year return for XLG because this ETF was established in 2005.
For five years and longer, QQQ has been the runaway leader, but for 5, 10 and 15 years, XLG has also beaten SPY handily, with broader industry exposure.
Something else to consider is that during 2022, when SPY was down 18.2%, XLG fell 24.3% and QQQ dropped 32.6%.
For disciplined long-term investors, the tech pain of 2022 may not seem to have been a small price to pay for outperformance. And it may have been easier to take the pounding when holding SPY or even XLG that year.
Here’s a look at the average annual returns for the three ETFs:
| ETF | 3 years | 5 years | 10 years | 15 years | 20 years |
|
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY |
11.8% | 11.0% | 12.4% | 10.9% | 9.6% |
|
Invesco QQQ Trust QQQ |
12.0% | 16.3% | 18.2% | 16.4% | 13.5% |
|
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF XLG |
12.2% | 13.1% | 13.7% | 11.4% | N/A |
| Source: FactSet | |||||
So the question remains — do you believe that the largest technology companies will continue to lead the stock market for the next decade at least? If so, a more concentrated index approach may be for you, provided you can withstand the urge to sell into a declining market, such as the one we experienced last year.
Here is something else to keep in mind. In a note to clients on Monday, Doug Peta, the chief U.S. investment strategist at BCA, made a fascinating point: “The only novel development is that all the heaviest hitters now hail from Tech and Tech-adjacent sectors and are therefore more prone to move together than they were at the end of 2004, when the seven largest stocks came from six different sectors. “
Nothing lasts forever. Peta continued by suggesting that investors who are tired of big tech taking all the glory “need only wait.”
“[I]f history is any guide, their time at the top of the capitalization scale will be short,” he wrote.
Don’t miss: These four Dow stocks take top prizes for dividend growth
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Hong Kong
CNN
—
President Joe Biden is in Vietnam for a visit intended to deepen economic ties between Washington and Hanoi as part of efforts to reduce America’s reliance on China.
The former foes have formally upgraded diplomatic ties to a “comprehensive strategic partnership,” a symbolic yet highly important move that experts say will solidify trust between the nations as America seeks an ally in Asia to counteract political tensions with China and advance its ambitions for key technologies, such as chipmaking.
Companies from Apple (AAPL) to Intel (INTC) have already pushed deeper into the country to diversify their supply chains, maxing out many Vietnamese factories and helping fuel an economic expansion that continues to defy a global slowdown.
On Monday, the White House announced a “landmark deal” between Boeing and Vietnam Airlines worth $7.8 billion, which is expected to support more than 30,000 jobs in the United States. Reuters has reported that the carrier will buy 50 Boeing 737 Max jets.
Biden’s visit, which followed the G20 summit in India, is the first by a US president to Vietnam since Donald Trump’s 2019 trip. He has met with Vietnamese General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong and other leaders to “promote the growth of a technology-focused” Vietnamese economy, as well as discuss ways to improve stability in the region, according to the White House.
In recent years, their trade has already soared under an existing partnership agreed in 2013, so the elevation in relations is “just catching up with the reality that already exists,” Ted Osius, president of the US-ASEAN Business Council and a former US ambassador to Vietnam, told CNN.
The United States imported nearly $127.5 billion in goods from Vietnam in 2022, compared with $101.9 billion in 2021 and $79.6 billion in 2020, according to US government data.
Last year, Vietnam became America’s eighth largest trading partner, rising from 10th place two years earlier.
The two sides have been moving closer as US officials, particularly Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, have repeatedly pointed to the importance of “friend-shoring.”
The practice refers to the movement of supply chains toward allies in part to shield businesses from political friction.
“Rather than being highly reliant on countries where we have geopolitical tensions and can’t count on ongoing, reliable supplies, we need to really diversify our group of suppliers,” she said in a speech last year at the Atlantic Council think tank.
Those tensions add to a litany of pressures, including rising labor costs and an uncertain operating environment that have already made corporations think twice about how much business they do in China, which is still considered the factory of the world.
But increasingly, it has competition. During the US-China trade war, which started in 2018, businesses of all sizes began moving manufacturing to emerging markets such as Vietnam and India over tariffs.
After the pandemic broke out, corporations were increasingly forced to consider strategies known as “China plus one,” which meant spreading out production hubs as a way to reduce reliance on a sole manufacturing base.
The latest exodus could cost China dearly: In a 2022 report, Rabobank estimated that as many as 28 million Chinese jobs directly relied on exports to the West and could leave the country as a result of “friend-shoring.”
Some 300,000 of those jobs, focused on low-tech manufacturing, are expected to move to Vietnam from China, analysts wrote.
From an industrial perspective, the country has been booming for years, said Michael Every, a Rabobank global strategist who authored the report. Relatively lower wages and a youthful population have provided Vietnam with a solid workforce and consumer base, bolstering the case to invest in the nation of 97 million people.

But companies hoping to make the switch may already be too late, as some factories are so stretched, customers must wait, he said.
Alicia García-Herrero, chief economist at Natixis, pointed to what she called “overheating,” saying demand for manufacturing in Vietnam has outstripped supply in some cases.
“Too many companies [are] going to Vietnam,” she told CNN.
Vietnam enjoyed an advantage, as it was first in the region to build up supply chain capabilities “for many, many sectors” years ago, she explained.
Shortly after Biden landed in Vietnam on Sunday, the White House announced a new semiconductor partnership.
“The United States recognizes Vietnam’s potential to play a critical role in building resilient semiconductor supply chains, particularly to expand capacity in reliable partners where it cannot be re-shored to the United State,” it said in a statement.
The semiconductor industry has emerged as a key source of tension in US-China relations. Beijing and Washington are both racing to boost their prowess in the sector, and each side has recently enacted export controls aimed at limiting the other’s capacity.
The United States needs a trusted partner for its supply of chips, and Vietnam can do just that, Osius said.
Intel sees it that way. The California-based chipmaker has committed $1.5 billion to a sprawling campus located just outside Ho Chi Minh City, which it says will be its largest single assembly and test facility in the world.
Osius expects more investments in the field to follow as Washington shores up ties with Hanoi.
“The significance of Vietnam in that supply chain will increase,” he predicted. “We’re going to see an acceleration when it comes to collaboration in tech.”
The International Monetary Fund projects Vietnam’s growth will slow to 5.8% from 8% last year as it copes with less overseas demand for its exports.
But that compares favorably with a global growth forecast of 3%, and is noticeably faster many of the world’s major economies, such as the United States, China and the eurozone.
“As the rest of Asia underwhelms, Vietnam will still be one of the fastest growing economies,” Natixis said in a recent research note.
That’s compelling for corporations looking for bright spots in an otherwise gloomy environment.
Such interest was noted in March, when the US-ASEAN Business Council led its biggest-ever business mission to Vietnam. The delegation consisted of 52 American firms, including corporate heavyweights such as Netflix (NFLX) and Boeing (BA).
Of course, companies still have reservations over factors such as Vietnamese tech regulations, which they fear could include limits on the “transfer of data across borders, or too many rules requiring data localization,” according to Osius.
In some cases, businesses are also concerned by how the country’s infrastructure still pales in comparison to a longtime trade powerhouse like China’s.
For example, “there isn’t a sufficient port capacity for some of the goods to be exported as quickly as companies want them to be moved,” Osius said.
Politically, Vietnam shares many similarities to China in that it is an authoritarian one-party state that tolerates little dissent.
But overall, businesses simply want an easy way to hedge their bets.
Vietnam is an obvious choice, because it’s a cheap alternative to manufacturing in China, said García-Herrero.
For various sectors, transitioning isn’t difficult, because many Chinese suppliers also moved there because of US tariffs, she explained. “It’s the most similar because you have the same providers as in China.”
The Biden administration, too, will likely be keen to secure that alternative.
“It’s quite clear that they’re trying to set up a series of foreign policy victories ahead of 2024 [by] signing a strategic comprehensive partnership with Vietnam,” said Every, the Rabobank analyst.
— CNN’s Kyle Feldscher, Jeremy Diamond and Kevin Liptak contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Nvidia Corp.’s revenue doubled while its cost of goods barely crept up, so there must be something fishy, right? A company is using their Nvidia graphics processing chips as collateral for billions in loans — that doesn’t sound right, does it?
As Nvidia NVDA shares fell 3.1% to close at $470.61 on Wednesday, Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon must have been hearing from clients all day who were worried after reading the most recent conspiracy theory on why Nvidia’s 222% year-to-date stock gain must somehow be fixed.
“Recently…
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
U.S. stock futures pointed higher on Friday, ahead of data that could show a slowing pace of hiring, which would reassure investors that the Federal Reserve won’t take interest rates much higher.
On Thursday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA
fell 168 points, or 0.48%, to 34722, the S&P 500
SPX
declined 7 points, or 0.16%, to 4508, while the Nasdaq Composite
COMP
gained 16 points, or 0.11%, to 14035.
Ahead of Friday’s barrage of heavy-hitting economic data, U.S. stocks saw modest pressure, as inflation data was largely benign but jobless claims dented an emerging picture of an economic slowdown. Dollar General’s
DG,
profit warning, however, pointed to a consumer under pressure.
Friday will see the release of nonfarm payrolls data at 8:30 a.m. Eastern, with expectations that 170,000 jobs were created in August. That would be the weakest showing since Dec. 2020, a month that saw 268,000 jobs lost.
“There have been indicators that the U.S. jobs market is finally starting to lose some of its tightness, and if the NFP print confirms this trend, it will be one less thing for the FOMC to worry about given labor market resilience has long been a source of inflationary pressure,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.
There’s also the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index, as well as monthly auto sales, that will get released. Thursday’s after hours releases saw mixed responses, with Dell Technologies
DELL,
stock rallying but Broadcom shares
AVGO,
wilting after results.
In China, August Caixin manufacturing PMI came in above expectations, rising to 51, a level that indicates improving conditions, as the country also lowered down-payment requirements on homes. The Hong Kong market was shut over storm-related concerns.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
U.S. stock futures jump early Thursday as sparking Nvidia results boost risk appetite.
On Wednesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA
rose 184 points, or 0.54%, to 34473, the S&P 500
SPX
increased 48 points, or 1.1%, to 4436, and the Nasdaq Composite
COMP
gained 215 points, or 1.59%, to 13721.
Well-received earnings from AI chipmaker Nvidia
NVDA,
has triggered a bout of risk-on activity across markets. Futures indicate the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 will open up 1.4% as Nvidia’s stock jumps 8% in premarket action.
“The market expectations were sky-high, the results went to the moon,” said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. “The Nvidia news has [had] a boosting effect on technology stocks…by confirming that all the talk around the AI-craze was not empty, after all.”
Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, agreed: “Nvidia smashing the forecast ceiling has also lifted the mood elsewhere.”
Shares of Palantir Technologies
PLTR,
Advanced Micro Devices
AMD,
and OpenAI investor Microsoft
MSFT,
rose in premarket action.
Dow Jones Industrial Average futures underperformed as shares in Boeing
BA,
fell nearly 2% on news of a defect identified on the 737 Max aircraft.
Falling implied borrowing costs were also helping the mood Thursday. The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yield, which earlier this week hit a near 16-year peak of 4.36% has pulled back to 4.178% after survey’s of economic activity in Europe and the U.S., released Wednesday, suggested a deteriorating global economy.
“The rally in U.S. stocks and the retreat of Treasury yields followed underwhelming economic reports as the market fell back into the ‘bad news is a good’ mode,” said Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management.
“But encouragingly for equity investors, the weaker U.S. data lens more weight to the argument for the Federal Reserve to pause its interest rate hikes,” Innes added.
With that in mind traders will have an eye on the Jackson Hole economic policy symposium, which begins Thursday, and which on Friday is expected to deliver a speech by Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
U.S. economic updates set for release on Thursday include the weekly initial jobless claims and durable goods orders for July, both due at 8;30 a.m. Eastern.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
“‘You could ask who is really running the show? Jerome Powell or Jensen Huang? Amazingly, it may not be Powell, but Jensen Huang who is driving Fed expectations.’”
Those are the words of Ben Emons, a senior portfolio manager and the head of fixed income at NewEdge Wealth in New York, who identifies reasons why artificial-intelligence leader Nvidia Corp.
NVDA,
is demonstrating central-bank-like powers.
It starts with the idea that the Santa Clara, California-based chip designer — which reports fiscal second-quarter earnings on Wednesday — acts as a bellwether for AI-capital expenditures that are likely to boost productivity across the U.S. economy. And in the bond market, a surge of AI-related expectations is translating into higher real yields, which reflect inflation-adjusted growth in gross domestic product and productivity, he said.
Read: Nvidia’s stock snaps losing streak and sits 1% below record close as earnings optimism builds
Higher real yields in the U.S. are a key reason why 10-
BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
and 30-year Treasury yields
BX:TMUBMUSD30Y
climbed to multi-year highs through Monday. Real yields, as measured by rates of Treasury inflation-protected securities, offer a glimpse of how the market expects the U.S. to perform when inflation isn’t a factor.
Read: Rise in Treasury yields is almost entirely due to one factor, strategist says
“The bigger macro story behind Nvidia as the bellwether of artificial intelligence is the role it plays in the economy, which is proving to be stronger than anyone thought it would be,” Emons said via phone on Tuesday. “People connect AI to productivity and productivity leads to growth, and to some extent this is impacting interest-rate expectations today.”
Amid growing anticipation over Nvidia’s upcoming earnings announcement and Friday’s speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell in Jackson Hole, Wyo., “the probability of a rate hike is creeping higher,” the senior portfolio manager wrote in a note this week. “With each additional dollar increase of NVDA EPS estimates, the probability of a hike by November goes up. NVDA is gaining Fed-like power.”
Need to Know: Nvidia may be the AI stock for now, but here are the picks for later, says Goldman Sachs
A chart provided by Emons shows how the median estimate of analysts for Nvidia’s earnings-per-share in the fiscal second quarter has been rising alongside the market-implied probabilities of a November Fed rate hike.
In addition, the yield on one of Nvidia’s own corporate bonds, issued in 2020 and maturing in April 2040, has been rising in relation to the 10-year TIPS or real yield “because of the company’s broader effect on the economy,” Emons said.
As University of Pennsylvania Wharton School finance professor Jeremy Siegel explained in a separate interview with MarketWatch, real interest rates track real growth. Improving productivity and stronger growth “mean the Fed won’t be able to cut rates as much as it would otherwise be able to.”
On Tuesday, Treasury yields finished mixed, while Nvidia’s shares closed down by 2.8%, as traders and investors await the company’s earnings report on Wednesday followed two days later by Powell’s remarks.
Analysts expect Powell to address what’s known as the real neutral rate of interest — or the inflation-adjusted level which is likely to prevail when the economy is operating at full strength and price gains are stable — as a way of justifying the higher-for-longer theme in U.S. interest rates.
See also: How higher-for-longer rates are playing out as 10-year yield hits 15-year high
[ad_2]