[ad_1]
EBay to cut about 500 jobs or roughly 4% of workforce
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Why earnings season is one of the most important times for stock investors
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Coronavirus Update: New York City scraps public-sector-worker vaccine mandate
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
BP reports 4Q underlying replacement cost of $4.8 billion, just shy of forecasts
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Turkey’s lira hit a record low and its stock market tumbled on Monday after a major earthquake killed nearly 1,500 people and wounded thousands of others in the country, piling on further economic hardship in a region already grappling with economic instability and geopolitical turmoil. Another 700 deaths have been reported in Syria, according to Reuters.
The Turkish lira
USDTRY,
fell to a record low of 18.83 against a strong dollar on Monday, while the country’s major stock index, the Turkey ISE National 100
XU100,
— which tracks the performance of 100 companies selected from the National Market, real estate investment trusts and venture capital investment trusts listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange — tumbled 1.4%.
The iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
TUR,
which tracks several dozen Turkish equities, slumped 1.9%.
Also see: 7.8-magnitude quake kills more than 1,900, knocks down buildings in southeast Turkey and Syria
At least 1,498 people were killed and 8,533 people were injured in Turkey when a magnitude 7.8 earthquake struck central Turkey and northwest Syria early Monday morning, followed by another large quake in the afternoon, according to Yunus Sezer, the head of Turkey’s Disaster and Emergency Management Agency.
The U.S. Geological Survey estimated on Monday that there was a high probability that the economic losses from the initial earthquake could top $1 billion.
The ICE U.S. Dollar Index
DXY,
a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, jumped 0.7% on Monday.
See: Oil prices look to extend last week’s slide
Oil futures traded lower as of Monday morning despite news reports that Turkey has halted crude-oil flows to its export terminal in Ceyhan. Turkish pipeline operator BOTAS said there was no damage on main pipelines which carry crude oil from Iraq and Azerbaijan to Turkey, according to Reuters.
Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government has stopped shipments through the pipeline which runs from Iraq’s northern Kirkuk fields to Ceyhan, the region’s ministry of natural resources said on Monday.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Coronavirus Update: California drops COVID-19 vaccine requirement for students
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
News flash: We may be in a new bull market.
That’s the good news. The not-so-good news is that the recent rally may have gotten ahead of itself and a pullback would be health-restoring to the bull market.
Read: Jobs report shows blowout 517,000 gain in U.S. employment in January
The…
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
“‘Cash used to be trashy. Cash is pretty attractive now. It’s attractive in relation to bonds. It’s actually attractive in relation to stocks.’”
Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio no longer thinks “cash is trash.” In fact, just the opposite.
Over the past year, cash has become “pretty attractive” relative to both stocks and bonds, the famed hedge-fund manager said during a Thursday interview with CNBC.
While bonds might offer investors a higher yield, swollen public-sector debts in the U.S., Europe and Japan and negative real yields have made debt securities less appealing, Dalio said.
That’s a notable shift from last May, when Dalio said that cash was still “trash” but that stocks were “trashier” as the 2022 market meltdown got underway. Dalio offered an update in October, when he tweeted that he had changed his mind about cash and now viewed it as “about neutral.”
Dalio has become closely associated with the “cash is trash” line after using it in several interviews dating back to at least 2019. Back then, rock-bottom interest rates were bolstering valuations of both stocks and bonds.
During the cable-news interview, Dalio offered some criticisms of bitcoin
BTCUSD,
which, like stocks, has rebounded since the start of the year.
“I think you’re going to see the development of coins that you haven’t seen that will be attractive, viable coins … [but] I don’t think bitcoin is it,” he said.
The billionaire recently stepped back from day-to-day management at Bridgewater Associates, the pioneering hedge fund that he built into the world’s largest in terms of assets under management.
Bridgewater announced on Thursday that the firm had promoted Karen Karniol-Tambour to the position of co–chief investment officer alongside Bob Prince and Greg Jensen.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Do you want the good news about the Federal Reserve and its chairman Jerome Powell, the other good news…or the bad news?
Let’s start with the first bit of good news. Powell and his fellow Fed committee members just hiked short-term interest rates another 0.25 percentage points to 4.75%, which means retirees and other savers are getting the best savings rates in a generation. You can even lock in that 4.75% interest rate for as long as five years through some bank CDs. Maybe even better, you can lock in interest rates of inflation (whatever it works out to be) plus 1.6% a year for three years, and inflation (ditto) plus nearly 1.5% a year for 25 years, through inflation-protected Treasury bonds. (Your correspondent owns some of these long-term TIPS bonds—more on that below.)
The second bit of good news is that, according to Wall Street, Powell has just announced that happy days are here again.
The S&P 500
SPX,
jumped 1% due to the Fed announcement and Powell’s press conference. The more volatile Russell 2000
RUT,
small cap index and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite
COMP,
both jumped 2%. Even bitcoin
BTCUSD,
rose 2%. Traders started penciling in an end to Federal Reserve interest rate hikes and even cuts. The money markets now give a 60% chance that by the fall Fed rates will be lower than they are now.
It feels like it’s 2019 all over again.
Now the slightly less good news. None of this Wall Street euphoria seemed to reflect what Powell actually said during his press conference.
Powell predicted more pain ahead, warned that he would rather raise interest rates too high for too long than risk cutting them too quickly, and said it was very unlikely interest rates would be cut any time this year. He made it very clear that he was going to err on the side of being too hawkish than risk being too dovish.
Actual quote, in response to a press question: “I continue to think that it is very difficult to manage the risk of doing too little and finding out in 6 or 12 months that we actually were close but didn’t get the job done, inflation springs back, and we have to go back in and now you really do have to worry about expectations getting unanchored and that kind of thing. This is a very difficult risk to manage. Whereas…of course, we have no incentive and no desire to overtighten, but if we feel that we’ve gone too far and inflation is coming down faster than we expect we have tools that would work on that.” (My italics.)
If that isn’t “I would much rather raise too much for too long than risk cutting too early,” it sure sounded like it.
Powell added: “Restoring price stability is essential…it is our job to restore price stability and achieve 2% inflation for the benefit of the American public…and we are strongly resolved that we will complete this task.”
Meanwhile, Powell said that so far inflation had really only started to come down in the goods sector. It had not even begun in the area of “non-housing services,” and these made up about half of the entire basket of consumer prices he’s watching. He predicts “ongoing increases” of interest rates even from current levels.
And so long as the economy performs in line with current forecasts for the rest of the year, he said, “it will not be appropriate to cut rates this year, to loosen policy this year.”
Watching the Wall Street reaction to Powell’s comments, I was left scratching my head and thinking of the Marx Brothers. With my apologies to Chico: Who you gonna believe, me or your own ears?
Meanwhile, on long-term TIPS: Those of us who buy 20 or 30 year inflation-protected Treasury bonds are currently securing a guaranteed long-term interest rate of 1.4% to 1.5% a year plus inflation, whatever that works out to be. At times in the past you could have locked in a much better long-term return, even from TIPS bonds. But by the standards of the past decade these rates are a gimme. Up until a year ago these rates were actually negative.
Using data from New York University’s Stern business school I ran some numbers. In a nutshell: Based on average Treasury bond rates and inflation since the World War II, current TIPS yields look reasonable if not spectacular. TIPS bonds themselves have only existed since the late 1990s, but regular (non-inflation-adjusted) Treasury bonds of course go back much further. Since 1945, someone owning regular 10 Year Treasurys has ended up earning, on average, about inflation plus 1.5% to 1.6% a year.
But Joachim Klement, a trustee of the CFA Institute Research Foundation and strategist at investment company Liberum, says the world is changing. Long-term interest rates are falling, he argues. This isn’t a recent thing: According to Bank of England research it’s been going on for eight centuries.
“Real yields of 1.5% today are very attractive,” he tells me. “We know that real yields are in a centuries’ long secular decline because markets become more efficient and real growth is declining due to demographics and other factors. That means that every year real yields drop a little bit more and the average over the next 10 or 30 years is likely to be lower than 1.5%. Looking ahead, TIPS are priced as a bargain right now and they provide secure income, 100% protected against inflation and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.”
Meanwhile the bond markets are simultaneously betting that Jerome Powell will win his fight against inflation, while refusing to believe him when he says he will do whatever it takes.
Make of that what you will. Not having to care too much about what the bond market says is yet another reason why I generally prefer inflation-protected Treasury bonds to the regular kind.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
UBS Group AG on Tuesday reported a surprise rise in fourth-quarter profit as its wealth-management arm attracted billions in new client money, offsetting a slump at its investment bank amid macroeconomic headwinds.
The Swiss bank
UBS,
UBSG,
reported a net profit of $1.65 billion in the three months to the end of December, up from $1.35 billion for the same period a year earlier.
Revenue was $8.03 billion compared with $8.71 billion in the fourth quarter of 2021.
It meant the Zurich-based bank beat 4Q estimates of net profit of $1.28 billion and revenue at $7.98 billion, according to analysts’ consensus provided by the company.
UBS said it took on $23.3 billion in net new fee-generating assets at its key wealth-management business in the quarter, at a time when its local rival Credit Suisse Group AG had struggled with client withdrawals.
Profit before tax at wealth management jumped 88% to $1.06 billion, it added.
It also attracted $25 billion in net new money at its asset-management business, UBS said.
But at its investment bank, profit before tax tumbled to around $100 million, down 84%, as dealmaking slumped.
The bank cited persistent inflation, rapid central bank tightening, the Ukraine war, and geopolitical tensions that affected asset-pricing levels and investor sentiment in the year.
“While the macroeconomic outlook remains uncertain, our operational resilience, capital strength and capital generation put us in a great position to serve our clients, fund growth and deliver strong capital returns to shareholders,” Chief Executive Ralph Hamers said.
Its common equity tier 1 ratio, a measure of financial strength, at the end of December was 14.2%, down from 14.4% at the third quarter.
The company said it would propose a dividend of $0.55 for 2022, a 10% year-on-year increase.
The lender added that it would remain committed to a progressive dividend and expects to repurchase more than $5 billion of shares in 2023, after $5.6 billion in 2022.
Write to Ed Frankl at edward.frankl@dowjones.com
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Let’s get ready to rumble.
The Federal Reserve and investors appear to be locked in what one veteran market watcher has described as an epic game of “chicken.” What Fed Chair Jerome Powell says Wednesday could determine the winner.
Here’s the conflict. Fed policy makers have steadily insisted that the fed-funds rate, now at 4.25% to 4.5%, must rise above 5% and, importantly, stay there as the central bank attempts to bring inflation back to its 2% target. Fed-funds futures, however, show money-market traders aren’t fully convinced the rate will top 5%. Perhaps more galling to Fed officials, traders expect the central bank to deliver cuts by year-end.
Stock-market investors have also bought into the latter policy “pivot” scenario, fueling a January surge for beaten down technology and growth stocks, which are particularly interest rate-sensitive. Treasury bonds have rallied, pulling down yields across the curve. And the U.S. dollar has weakened.
To some market watchers, investors now appear way too big for their breeches. They expect Powell to attempt to take them down a peg or two.
How so? Look for Powell to be “unambiguously hawkish,” when he holds a news conference following the conclusion of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, said Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.
“Hawkish” is market lingo used to describe a central banker sounding tough on inflation and less worried about economic growth.
In Powell’s case, that would likely mean emphasizing that the labor market remains significantly out of balance, calling for a significant reduction in job openings that will require monetary policy to remain restrictive for a long period, Torres said.
If Powell sounds sufficiently hawkish, “financial conditions will tighten up quickly,” Torres said, in a phone interview. Treasury yields “would rise, tech would drop and the dollar would rise after a message like that.” If not, then expect the tech and Treasury rally to continue and the dollar to get softer.
Indeed, it’s a loosening of financial conditions that’s seen trying Powell’s patience. Looser conditions are represented by a tightening of credit spreads, lower borrowing costs, and higher stock prices that contribute to speculative activity and increased risk taking, which helps fuel inflation. It also helps weaken the dollar, contributes to inflation through higher import costs, Torres said, noting that indexes measuring financial conditions have fallen for 14 straight weeks.
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, fred.stlouisfed.org
Powell and the Fed have certainly expressed concerns about the potential for loose financial conditions to undercut their inflation-fighting efforts.
The minutes of the Fed’s December meeting. released in early January, contained this attention-grabbing line: “Participants noted that, because monetary policy worked importantly through financial markets, an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.”
That was taken by some investors as a sign that the Fed wasn’t eager to see a sustained stock market rally and might even be inclined to punish financial markets if conditions loosened too far.
Read: The Fed delivered a message to the stock market: Big rallies will prolong pain
If that interpretation is correct, it underlines the notion that the Fed “put” — the central bank’s seemingly longstanding willingness to respond to a plunging market with a loosening of policy — is largely kaput.
The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite logged its fourth straight weekly rise last week, up 4.3% to end Friday at its highest since Sept. 14. The S&P 500
SPX,
advanced 2.5% to log its highest settlement since Dec. 2, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
rose 1.8%.
Meanwhile, the Fed is almost universally expected to deliver a 25 basis point rate increase on Wednesday. That is a downshift from the series of outsize 75 and 50 basis point hikes it delivered over the course of 2022.
See: Fed set to deliver quarter-point rate increase along with ‘one last hawkish sting in the tail’
Data showing U.S. inflation continues to slow after peaking at a roughly four-decade high last summer alongside expectations for a much weaker, and potentially recessionary, economy in 2023 have stoked bets the Fed won’t be as aggressive as advertised. But a pickup in gasoline and food prices could make for a bounce in January inflation readings, he said, which would give Powell another cudgel to beat back market expectations for easier policy in future meetings.
Torres sees the setup heading into this week’s Fed meeting as similar to the run-up to Powell’s speech at an annual central banking symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last August, in which he delivered a blunt message that the fight against inflation meant economic pain ahead. That spelled doom for what proved to be another of 2023’s many bear-market rallies, starting a slide that took stocks to their lows for the year in October.
But some question how frustrated policy makers really are with the current backdrop.
Sure, financial conditions have loosened in recent weeks, but they remain far tighter than they were a year ago before the Fed embarked on its aggressive tightening campaign, said Kelsey Berro, portfolio manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, in a phone interview.
“So from a holistic perspective, the Fed feels they are getting policy more restrictive,” she said, as evidenced, for example, by the significant rise in mortgage rates over the past year.
Still, it’s likely the Fed’s message this week will continue to emphasize that the recent slowing in inflation isn’t enough to declare victory and that further hikes are in the pipeline, Berro said.
For investors and traders, the focus will be on whether Powell continues to emphasize that the biggest risk is the Fed doing too little on the inflation front or shifts to a message that acknowledges the possibility the Fed could overdo it and sink the economy, Berro said.
She expects Powell to eventually deliver that message, but this week’s news conference is probably too early. The Fed won’t update the so-called dot plot, a compilation of forecasts by individual policy makers, or its staff economic forecasts until its March meeting.
That could prove to be a disappointment for investors hoping for a decisive showdown this week.
“Unfortunately, this is the kind of meeting that could end up being anticlimactic,” Berro said.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Let’s get ready to rumble.
The Federal Reserve and investors appear to be locked in what one veteran market watcher has described as an epic game of “chicken.” What Fed Chair Jerome Powell says Wednesday could determine the winner.
Here’s the conflict. Fed policy makers have steadily insisted that the fed-funds rate, now at 4.25% to 4.5%, must rise above 5% and, importantly, stay there as the central bank attempts to bring inflation back to its 2% target. Fed-funds futures, however, show money-market traders aren’t fully convinced the rate will top 5%. Perhaps more galling to Fed officials, traders expect the central bank to deliver cuts by year-end.
Stock-market investors have also bought into the latter policy “pivot” scenario, fueling a January surge for beaten down technology and growth stocks, which are particularly interest rate-sensitive. Treasury bonds have rallied, pulling down yields across the curve. And the U.S. dollar has weakened.
To some market watchers, investors now appear way too big for their breeches. They expect Powell to attempt to take them down a peg or two.
How so? Look for Powell to be “unambiguously hawkish,” when he holds a news conference following the conclusion of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, said Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.
“Hawkish” is market lingo used to describe a central banker sounding tough on inflation and less worried about economic growth.
In Powell’s case, that would likely mean emphasizing that the labor market remains significantly out of balance, calling for a significant reduction in job openings that will require monetary policy to remain restrictive for a long period, Torres said.
If Powell sounds sufficiently hawkish, “financial conditions will tighten up quickly,” Torres said, in a phone interview. Treasury yields “would rise, tech would drop and the dollar would rise after a message like that.” If not, then expect the tech and Treasury rally to continue and the dollar to get softer.
Indeed, it’s a loosening of financial conditions that’s seen trying Powell’s patience. Looser conditions are represented by a tightening of credit spreads, lower borrowing costs, and higher stock prices that contribute to speculative activity and increased risk taking, which helps fuel inflation. It also helps weaken the dollar, contributes to inflation through higher import costs, Torres said, noting that indexes measuring financial conditions have fallen for 14 straight weeks.
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, fred.stlouisfed.org
Powell and the Fed have certainly expressed concerns about the potential for loose financial conditions to undercut their inflation-fighting efforts.
The minutes of the Fed’s December meeting. released in early January, contained this attention-grabbing line: “Participants noted that, because monetary policy worked importantly through financial markets, an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.”
That was taken by some investors as a sign that the Fed wasn’t eager to see a sustained stock market rally and might even be inclined to punish financial markets if conditions loosened too far.
Read: The Fed delivered a message to the stock market: Big rallies will prolong pain
If that interpretation is correct, it underlines the notion that the Fed “put” — the central bank’s seemingly longstanding willingness to respond to a plunging market with a loosening of policy — is largely kaput.
The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite logged its fourth straight weekly rise last week, up 4.3% to end Friday at its highest since Sept. 14. The S&P 500
SPX,
advanced 2.5% to log its highest settlement since Dec. 2, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
rose 1.8%.
Meanwhile, the Fed is almost universally expected to deliver a 25 basis point rate increase on Wednesday. That is a downshift from the series of outsize 75 and 50 basis point hikes it delivered over the course of 2022.
See: Fed set to deliver quarter-point rate increase along with ‘one last hawkish sting in the tail’
Data showing U.S. inflation continues to slow after peaking at a roughly four-decade high last summer alongside expectations for a much weaker, and potentially recessionary, economy in 2023 have stoked bets the Fed won’t be as aggressive as advertised. But a pickup in gasoline and food prices could make for a bounce in January inflation readings, he said, which would give Powell another cudgel to beat back market expectations for easier policy in future meetings.
Torres sees the setup heading into this week’s Fed meeting as similar to the run-up to Powell’s speech at an annual central banking symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last August, in which he delivered a blunt message that the fight against inflation meant economic pain ahead. That spelled doom for what proved to be another of 2023’s many bear-market rallies, starting a slide that took stocks to their lows for the year in October.
But some question how frustrated policy makers really are with the current backdrop.
Sure, financial conditions have loosened in recent weeks, but they remain far tighter than they were a year ago before the Fed embarked on its aggressive tightening campaign, said Kelsey Berro, portfolio manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, in a phone interview.
“So from a holistic perspective, the Fed feels they are getting policy more restrictive,” she said, as evidenced, for example, by the significant rise in mortgage rates over the past year.
Still, it’s likely the Fed’s message this week will continue to emphasize that the recent slowing in inflation isn’t enough to declare victory and that further hikes are in the pipeline, Berro said.
For investors and traders, the focus will be on whether Powell continues to emphasize that the biggest risk is the Fed doing too little on the inflation front or shifts to a message that acknowledges the possibility the Fed could overdo it and sink the economy, Berro said.
She expects Powell to eventually deliver that message, but this week’s news conference is probably too early. The Fed won’t update the so-called dot plot, a compilation of forecasts by individual policy makers, or its staff economic forecasts until its March meeting.
That could prove to be a disappointment for investors hoping for a decisive showdown this week.
“Unfortunately, this is the kind of meeting that could end up being anticlimactic,” Berro said.
[ad_2]