ReportWire

Tag: Securities fraud

  • Fintech CEO and Forbes 30 Under 30 alum has been charged for alleged fraud | TechCrunch

    By now, the Forbes 30 Under 30 list has become more than a little notorious for the amount of entrants who go on to be charged with fraud. Notable alumni include FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, Frank CEO Charlie Javice, Joanna Smith-Griffin, founder of the AI startup AllHere Education, and “pharma bro” Martin Shkreli, among others. Now, another member of the list has been hit with federal charges.

    Gökçe Güven, a 26-year-old Turkish national and the founder and CEO of fintech startup Kalder, was charged last week with alleged securities fraud, wire fraud, visa fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

    The New York-based fintech startup — which uses the “Turn Your Rewards into [a] Revenue Engine” tagline — says it can help companies create and monetize individual rewards programs. The company was founded in 2022, and offers participating firms the opportunity to earn ongoing revenue streams via partner affiliate sales, Axios previously reported.

    Güven was featured in last year’s Forbes 30 Under 30 list. The magazine notes in the writeup that Güven’s clients included major chocolatier Godiva and the International Air Transport Association, the trade organization that represents a majority of the world’s airlines. Kalder also claims to have enjoyed the backing of a number of prominent VC firms.

    The U.S. Department of Justice alleges that, during Kalder’s seed round in April of 2024, Güven managed to raise $7 million from more than a dozen investors after presenting a pitch deck that was rife with false information.

    According to the government, Kalder’s pitch deck claimed that there were 26 brands “using Kalder” and another 53 brands in “live freemium.” However, officials say that, in reality, Kalder had, in many cases, only been offering heavily discounted pilot programs to many of those companies. Other brands “had no agreement with Kalder whatsoever—not even for free services,” officials said in a press release announcing the indictment. The pitch deck also “falsely reported that Kalder’s recurring revenue had steadily grown month over month since February 2023 and that by March 2024, Kalder had reached $1.2 million in annual recurring revenue.” 

    The government also accuses Güven of having kept two separate sets of financial books. One of those sets included “false and inflated numbers,” and was presented to investors or potential investors to hide the “true financial condition of the company,” the government claims. The DOJ also alleges that Güven used lies about Kalder as well as forged documents to obtain a category of visa reserved for individuals of “extraordinary ability,” that would allow her to live and work in the United States.

    Techcrunch event

    Boston, MA
    |
    June 23, 2026

    TechCrunch reached out to Güven through her personal website. The CEO said that she would be sharing a statement about the charges on Tuesday.

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • Digital bank Revolut slams Meta over approach to scams, says tech giant should compensate victims

    Digital bank Revolut slams Meta over approach to scams, says tech giant should compensate victims

    Revolut CEO, Nikolay Storonsky (L) and Meta CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.

    Reuters

    British financial technology firm Revolut on Thursday criticized Facebook parent company Meta over its approach to tackling fraud, saying the U.S. tech giant should directly compensate people who fall victim to scams via its social media platforms.

    A day after Meta announced a partnership with U.K. banks NatWest and Metro Bank on a data-sharing framework designed to help prevent customers from falling prey to fraud schemes, Revolut said the pact “falls woefully short of what’s required to tackle fraud globally.”

    In a statement, Woody Malouf, Revolut’s head of financial crime, said that Meta’s plans to tackle financial fraud on its platforms amount to “baby steps, when what the industry really needs is giant leaps forward.”

    “These platforms share no responsibility in reimbursing victims, and so they have no incentive to do anything about it. A commitment to data sharing, albeit needed, simply isn’t good enough,” Malouf added.

    CNBC has contacted Meta for comment.

    New payment industry reforms will come into force in the U.K. on Oct. 7 that require banks and payment firms to issue victims of so-called authorized push payment (APP) fraud a maximum compensation of £85,000 ($111,000).

    Britain’s Payments System Regulator had previously recommended a £415,000 maximum compensation amount for fraud victims, but backed down following backlash from banks and payment firms.

    Revolut’s Malouf said that, while his company is on board with steps the U.K. government is taking to combat fraud, Meta and other social media platforms should do their part to financially compensate those who fall victim to fraud as a result of scams originating on their sites.

    The fintech firm published a report Thursday alleging that 62% of user-reported fraud on its online banking platform originated from Meta, down from 64% last year.

    Facebook was the most common source of all scams reported by Revolut users, accounting for 39% of fraud, while WhatsApp was the second-highest source of such events with an 18% share, the bank said in its “Consumer Security and Financial Crime Report.

    Source link

  • Cryptocurrency ‘pig butchering’ scam wrecks Kansas bank, sends ex-CEO to prison for 24 years

    Cryptocurrency ‘pig butchering’ scam wrecks Kansas bank, sends ex-CEO to prison for 24 years

    The former CEO of a small Kansas bank was sentenced to more than 24 years in prison for looting the bank of $47 million — which he sent to cryptocurrency wallets controlled by scammers who had duped him in a “pig butchering” scheme that appealed to his greed, federal prosecutors said.

    The massive embezzlement by ex-CEO Shan Hanes in a series of wire transfers over just eight weeks last year led to the collapse and FDIC takeover of Heartland Tri-State Bank in Elkhart, one of only five U.S. banks that failed in 2023.

    Hanes, 53, also swindled funds from a local church and investment club — and a daughter’s college savings account — to transfer money, purportedly to buy cryptocurrency as the scammers insisted they needed more funds to unlock the supposed returns on his investments, according to records from U.S. District Court in Wichita, Kansas.

    But Hanes never realized any profit, and lost all of the money he stole, as a result of the scam.

    Judge John Broomes on Monday sentenced Hanes to 293 months in prison — 29 months more than what prosecutors requested after he pleaded guilty in May to a single count of embezzlement by a bank officer.

    During the sentencing hearing, “I called his actions ‘pure evil,’ ” said Brian Mitchell, who for years was Hanes’ next-door neighbor in Elkhart, a town of 2,000 or so people in southwestern Kansas, north of the Oklahoma panhandle.

    Mitchell, whose farm and movie theater chain businesses banked at Heartland Tri-State, said there were around 30 shareholders in the bank who attended Hanes’ sentencing, more than a year after their stock value was wiped out in the failure.

    “There were people who lost 70, 80% of their retirement” as a result of Hanes’ actions, Mitchell told CNBC on Wednesday in a phone interview.

    One local woman is “struggling to afford a nursing home” for her 93-year-old mother, while another woman “can’t retire” now because of the crime, Mitchell said.

    Mitchell, who was not a shareholder but who belonged to the investment club victimized by the CEO, said Hanes showed little, if any, remorse for his actions, despite hearing victims tell the judge about the effects of his crime.

    “Shan was facing the judge, and he just looked over his left shoulder for a second, and didn’t make eye contact, and said, ‘Sorry,’ ” Mitchell recalled, describing the scene in the courtroom.

    “And that was it.”

    But Hanes had a look of “absolute shock” on his face when Broomes imposed the stiff sentence and ordered the former bank chief taken into custody immediately, Mitchell said.

    Mitchell said that for years he considered Hanes a “good guy,” who like other people in Elkhart pitched in to help others in the small community when they needed help, and preached at his local church. Hanes also testified several times before Congress about community banking.

    But prosecutors and bank regulators said that Hanes, who has three daughters with his school teacher wife, began stealing after being targeted in a pig-butchering scheme in late 2022.

    That scheme was described in a court filing as “a scammer convincing a victim (a pig) to invest in supposedly legitimate virtual currency investment opportunities and then steals the victim’s money — butchering the pig.”

    Hanes, who had served on the board of the American Bankers Association, and been chairman of the Kansas Bankers Association, in December 2022 began making transactions to buy cryptocurrency, which “appeared to be precipitated by communication with an unidentified co-conspirator on the electronic messaging app ‘WhatsApp,’ ” prosecutors wrote in a court filing.

    “To date, the true identity of the co-conspirator, or conspirators, remain unknown,” the filing notes.

    Hanes initially used personal funds to buy crypto, but in early 20233 he stole $40,000 from Elkhart Church of Christ and $10,000 from the Santa Fe Investment Club, according to prosecutors and a defense filing.

    He also used $60,000 taken from a daughter’s college fund, and nearly $1 million in stock from the Elkhart Financial Corporation, his lawyer said in a filing.

    In May 2023, he began to make wire transfers from Heartland Tri-State Bank to accounts controlled by scammers, at first with a $5,000 transfer.

    Two weeks later, on May 30, Hanes wired $1.5 million and a day after that, he sent another transfer of the same amount the following day, filings show.

    Three days later he directed two wire transfers totaling $6.7 million to be sent by the bank to the crypto wallet, and a whopping $10 million less than two weeks later, and another $3.3 million days afterward.

    Hanes told bank employees to execute the wire transfers, and “made many misrepresentations to various people” to get access to the funds so they could be transferred, prosecutors wrote. Heartland Tri-State employees circumvented the bank’s own wire policy and daily limits to approve Hanes’ wire transfers, according to a report by the Office of the Inspector General of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    “We believe that the CEO’s dominant role in the bank and prominent role in the community contributed to a reluctance on the part of Heartland employees to question or report the alleged fraudulent activities earlier,” that report said.

    Prosecutors wrote that the series of 11 wire transfers from Hanes to the scammer “illustrate a common pattern” in pig-butchering schemes.

    “First, there is an initial ‘investment’ followed by another transaction required to secure or guarantee those funds,” prosecutors wrote. “Further ‘investments’ may be made, but always require another need for funds, to guarantee or unfreeze the earlier transfers. This pattern is clearly represented in the defendant’s embezzlement.”

    Mitchell confirmed that to CNBC, saying that he got a call from Hanes at 7:40 a.m. on July 5, 2023.

    “He said, ‘Brian, ‘I need your help, and you’re the only guy who can help me,’ ” Mitchell recounted.

    Mitchell, who had survived prostate cancer two decades ago, said he thought Hanes was calling him to say that he had the same type of cancer.

    But when Mitchell showed up at Heartland Tri-State to meet Hanes, before the bank had officially opened to customers that morning, the CEO told him something much different — and stranger.

    “The first thing he says is, ‘Brian, I need to borrow $12 million for ten days, and I’ll give you $1 million for loaning it to me,’ ” Mitchell recalled. “I’m sitting there and I said, am I in a bank in Elkhart, Kansas, or in an alley with a loan shark in Chicago.”

    When he asked Hanes what he wanted the money for, Hanes “pulls out his phone and acts like he’s logging in and he shows me this account that has $40 million, $42 million,” Mitchell said. “He said, ‘Brian, I’ve got this money and it’s in cryptocurrency, and I need $12 million to help verify the funds.’ “

    Hanes then hold him he had been in touch with a banker in Denver named “Jim” and “another guy in Oklahoma” and they had invested in crypto held in Coinbase accounts, where they had made a lot of money, Mitchell said.

    “I told him, ‘You’re in a scam, dude. You’re in a scam,’ ” Mitchell said. “I stopped him and said, ‘Is this bank money you’re playing with?’ And he said, ‘No, Brian.’ “

    Hanes kept telling him he needed the $12 million to “activate” the funds he had already transferred to the crypto account, which he said was in Hong Kong, Mitchell recalled.

    “I said, ‘Get on a plane, go to Hong Kong, hire an interpreter, and go get a bank check’ ” for the funds supposedly held there, Mitchell said. “Then I said, ‘I’m not going to loan you the money.’ I said, ‘You’re in a scam, walk away.’”

    But later that same day, after Mitchell rebuffed his entreaties, Hanes had bank employees wire $8 million to the scammers’ accounts, prosecutors said in a court filing.

    Two days after that, Hanes had employees wire the scammers another $4.4 million.

    In the meantime, Mitchell, who was unaware of those transfers during that period, said that after meeting with the CEO he was worried that Hanes would get access to customers’ deposits at the bank and transfer the $12 million that he had asked for.

    “We kept checking our lines of credit,” Mitchell said.

    “The next week, I was in the bank, and one of the employees caught me, she just looked so stressed,” Mitchell said. The woman told him that Hanes had wired money out of the bank.

    “I said, ‘Don’t say another word to me… I’ve got to talk to a board member,’” Mitchell said.

    “And I talked to a board member that night, and he went to talk to an attorney that night,” Mitchell recalled.

    Hanes was fired within days.

    About two weeks later, on July 28, 2023, Heartland Tri-State was closed by the Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner was taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

    Shareholders were wiped out, but depositors did not lose any money, as Dream First Bank, National Association, of Syracuse, Kansas, assumed all deposits.

    Heartland Tri-State had nearly $140 million in total assets and $130 million in total deposits as of the prior March.

    Word quickly spread that a scam had led to the bank’s failure, but Hanes’ involvement in it did not come to light for months.

    Hanes remained uncharged until last February when federal prosecutors accused him of embezzlement. He was separately charged in Morton County, Kansas, state court in a 28-count complaint related to looting the bank.

    Hanes was under house arrest until his sentencing in federal court this week.

    “I talked to him last month when he was out mowing his yard,” Mitchell said.

    Hanes, who had traveled at one point to Perth, Australia while being scammed to try to recover the funds he transferred, told Mitchell that he believed there had been a way to recover the money up to the point he was arrested.

    Source link

  • US Accuses Famed Short-Seller Andrew Left of Securities Fraud

    US Accuses Famed Short-Seller Andrew Left of Securities Fraud

    (Bloomberg) — US authorities accused famed short-seller Andrew Left of committing fraud through stock trades, social media posts and research reports — their biggest move yet in a yearslong crackdown against traders who tout their bearish bets.

    Most Read from Bloomberg

    The Securities and Exchange Commission alleged Friday that Left used his firm, Citron, to generate about $20 million in profits from illegal trading involving almost two dozen companies. The Justice Department also announced a criminal case against Left, accusing him of securities fraud and allegedly lying to investigators about compensation from hedge funds.

    The cases against Left stem from a wide-ranging US effort to examine relationships between hedge funds and skeptical researchers. The probes have rattled the industry for three years as investigators have sought information on dozens of money managers and activists, as well as transactions involving more than 50 stocks.

    According to the SEC, Left would use social media or television appearances to make recommendations about a stock, on which he had short or long positions, sometimes giving a target price at which he thought the stock would trade. The Justice Department said Left would create a false perception that his public comments on a stock were in line with his trading activity.

    “Left knowingly exploited his ability to move stock prices by targeting stocks popular with retail investors and posting recommendations on social media to manipulate the market and make fast, easy money,” the Justice Department said in its statement.

    James Spertus, a lawyer for Left, said in an email that the government’s case was “defective” and his client had no duty to disclose his personal trading intentions. Spertus said that the information Left published was “truthful information” which is needed for markets to be efficient.

    “The DOJ and the SEC threaten the integrity of the securities markets and put the health of our financial system at risk by trying to silence a publisher of truthful information who also trades in the securities he writes about,” said Spertus.

    Stock Trades

    Left, according to prosecutors, would also quickly close positions after releasing a research report or making comments. That would let him take advantage of short-term price movements.

    According to the SEC, Left’s misconduct touched stocks including Tesla Inc., Roku Inc., American Airlines Group Inc. and Nvidia Corp.

    “This fraudulent practice deceived investors and allowed Left to use his Citron Research reports and tweets as catalysts from which he could derive short-term profits,” the SEC alleged in the complaint.

    The mere appearance of research from a prominent bear can send a stock into a tailspin before the market has time to debate its merit — which can be especially hard on small investors who can’t react quickly. Companies and shareholders have increasingly cried foul, prompting US congressional hearings.

    Left profited from his advance knowledge that he was about to trigger movements in the market, according to the Justice Department indictment. For the his strategy to work, Left knew that investors needed to believe that the recommendations and positions he set forth were sincerely maintained, and not just vehicles for him to personally profit, prosecutors said.

    ‘Candy From a Baby’

    The SEC alleges Left bragged to colleagues that some of his statements caused retail investors to trade the way he wanted them to and that it was like taking “candy from a baby.”

    The SEC’s lawsuit documents dozens of social media posts, reports and comments from Left from March 2018 through December 2020.

    Left was charged in an indictment in federal court in California with one count of engaging in a securities fraud scheme, 17 counts of securities fraud and making false statements to federal investigators. If convicted, he could face more than 25 years in prison.

    Prosecutors claim that Left lied to law enforcement by stating that his firm never exchanged compensation with a hedge fund. US authorities allege Left received more than $1 million from two hedge funds.

    –With assistance from Katherine Burton.

    (Updates with Left lawyer’s comment in sixth and seventh paragraphs.)

    Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

    ©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

    Source link

  • A Silicon Valley executive had $400,000 stolen by cybercriminals while buying a home. Here’s her warning

    A Silicon Valley executive had $400,000 stolen by cybercriminals while buying a home. Here’s her warning

    Real estate, with its large transaction sizes and frequent use of bank wires, has proven to be an especially lucrative target for cybercriminals.

    Source link

  • How thousands of Americans got caught in fintech’s false promise and lost access to bank accounts

    How thousands of Americans got caught in fintech’s false promise and lost access to bank accounts

    Natasha Craft, a 25-year-old FedEx driver from Mishawaka, Indiana. She has been locked out of her Yotta banking account since May 11.

    Courtesy: Natasha Craft

    When Natasha Craft first got a Yotta banking account in 2021, she loved using it so much she told her friends to sign up.

    The app made saving money fun and easy, and Craft, a now 25-year-old FedEx driver from Mishawaka, Indiana, was busy getting her financial life in order and planning a wedding. Craft had her wages deposited directly into a Yotta account and used the startup’s debit card to pay for all her expenses.

    The app — which gamifies personal finance with weekly sweepstakes and other flashy features — even occasionally covered some of her transactions.

    “There were times I would go buy something and get that purchase for free,” Craft told CNBC.

    Today, her entire life savings — $7,006 — is locked up in a complicated dispute playing out in bankruptcy court, online forums like Reddit and regulatory channels. And Yotta, an array of other startups and their banks have been caught in a moment of reckoning for the fintech industry.

    For customers, fintech promised the best of both worlds: The innovation, ease of use and fun of the newest apps combined with the safety of government-backed accounts held at real banks.

    The startups prominently displayed protections afforded by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., lending credibility to their novel offerings. After all, since its 1934 inception, no depositor “has ever lost a penny of FDIC-insured deposits,” according to the agency’s website.

    But the widening fallout over the collapse of a fintech middleman called Synapse has revealed that promise of safety as a mirage.

    Starting May 11, more than 100,000 Americans with $265 million in deposits were locked out of their accounts. Roughly 85,000 of those customers were at Yotta alone, according to the startup’s co-founder, Adam Moelis.

    CNBC reached out to fintech customers whose lives have been upended by the Synapse debacle.

    They come from all walks and stages of life, from Craft, the Indiana FedEx driver; to the owner of a chain of preschools in Oakland, California; a talent analyst for Disney living in New York City; and a computer engineer in Santa Barbara, California. A high school teacher in Maryland. A parent in Bristol, Connecticut, who opened an account for his daughter. A social worker in Seattle saving up for dental work after Adderall abuse ruined her teeth.

    ‘A reckoning underway’

    Since Yotta, like most popular fintech apps, wasn’t itself a bank, it relied on partner institutions including Tennessee-based Evolve Bank & Trust to offer checking accounts and debit cards. In between Yotta and Evolve was a crucial middleman, Synapse, keeping track of balances and monitoring fraud.

    Founded in 2014 by a first-time entrepreneur named Sankaet Pathak, Synapse was a player in the “banking-as-a-service” segment alongside companies like Unit and Synctera. Synapse helped customer-facing startups like Yotta quickly access the rails of the regulated banking industry.

    It had contracts with 100 fintech companies and 10 million end users, according to an April court filing.

    Until recently, the BaaS model was a growth engine that seemed to benefit everybody. Instead of spending years and millions of dollars trying to acquire or become banks, startups got quick access to essential services they needed to offer. The small banks that catered to them got a source of deposits in a time dominated by giants like JPMorgan Chase.

    But in May, Synapse, in the throes of bankruptcy, turned off a critical system that Yotta’s bank used to process transactions. In doing so, it threw thousands of Americans into financial limbo, and a growing segment of the fintech industry into turmoil.

    “There is a reckoning underway that involves questions about the banking-as-a-service model,” said Michele Alt, a former lawyer for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and a current partner at consulting firm Klaros Group. She believes the Synapse failure will prove to be an “aberration,” she added.

    The most popular finance apps in the country, including Block’s Cash App, PayPal and Chime, partner with banks instead of owning them. They account for 60% of all new fintech account openings, according to data provider Curinos. Block and PayPal are publicly traded; Chime is expected to launch an IPO next year.

    Block, PayPal and Chime didn’t provide comment for this article.

    ‘Deal directly with a bank’

    While industry experts say those firms have far more robust ledgering and daily reconciliation abilities than Synapse, they may still be riskier than direct bank relationships, especially for those relying on them as a primary account.

    “If it’s your spending money, you need to be dealing directly with a bank,” Scott Sanborn, CEO of LendingClub, told CNBC. “Otherwise, how do you, as a consumer, know if the conditions are met to get FDIC coverage?”

    Sanborn knows both sides of the fintech divide: LendingClub started as a fintech lender that partnered with banks until it bought Boston-based Radius in early 2020 for $185 million, eventually becoming a fully regulated bank.

    Scott Sanborn, LendingClub CEO

    Getty Images

    Sanborn said acquiring Radius Bank opened his eyes to the risks of the “banking-as-a-service” space. Regulators focus not on Synapse and other middlemen, but on the banks they partner with, expecting them to monitor risks and prevent fraud and money laundering, he said.

    But many of the tiny banks running BaaS businesses like Radius simply don’t have the personnel or resources to do the job properly, Sanborn said. He shuttered most of the lender’s fintech business as soon as he could, he says.

    “We are one of those people who said, ‘Something bad is going to happen,’” Sanborn said.

    A spokeswoman for the Financial Technology Association, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group representing large players including Block, PayPal and Chime, said in a statement that it is “inaccurate to claim that banks are the only trusted actors in financial services.”

    “Consumers and small businesses trust fintech companies to better meet their needs and provide more accessible, affordable, and secure services than incumbent providers,” the spokeswoman said.

    “Established fintech companies are well-regulated and work with partner banks to build strong compliance programs that protect consumer funds,” she said. Furthermore, regulators ought to take a “risk-based approach” to supervising fintech-bank partnerships, she added.

    The implications of the Synapse disaster may be far-reaching. Regulators have already been moving to punish the banks that provide services to fintechs, and that will undoubtedly continue. Evolve itself was reprimanded by the Federal Reserve last month for failing to properly manage its fintech partnerships.

    In a post-Synapse update, the FDIC made it clear that the failure of nonbanks won’t trigger FDIC insurance, and that even when fintechs partner with banks, customers may not have their deposits covered.

    The FDIC’s exact language about whether fintech customers are eligible for coverage: “The short answer is: it depends.”

    FDIC safety net

    While their circumstances all differed vastly, each of the customers CNBC spoke to for this story had one thing in common: They thought the FDIC backing of Evolve meant that their funds were safe.

    “For us, it just felt like they were a bank,” the Oakland preschool owner said of her fintech provider, a tuition processor called Curacubby. “You’d tell them what to bill, they bill it. They’d communicate with parents, and we get the money.”

    The 62-year-old business owner, who asked CNBC to withhold her name because she didn’t want to alarm employees and parents of her schools, said she’s taken out loans and tapped credit lines after $236,287 in tuition was frozen in May.

    Now, the prospect of selling her business and retiring in a few years seems much further out.

    “I’m assuming I probably won’t see that money,” she said, “And if I do, how long is it going to take?”

    When Rick Davies, a 46-year-old lead engineer for a men’s clothing company that owns online brands including Taylor Stitch, signed up for an account with crypto app Juno, he says he “distinctly remembers” being comforted by seeing the FDIC logo of Evolve.

    “It was front and center on their website,” Davies said. “They made it clear that it was Evolve doing the banking, which I knew as a fintech provider. The whole package seemed legit to me.”

    He’s now had roughly $10,000 frozen for weeks, and says he’s become enraged that the FDIC hasn’t helped customers yet.

    For Davies, the situation is even more baffling after regulators swiftly took action to seize Silicon Valley Bank last year, protecting uninsured depositors including tech investors and wealthy families in the process. His employer banked with SVB, which collapsed after clients withdrew deposits en masse, so he saw how fast action by regulators can head off distress.

    “The dichotomy between the FDIC stepping in extremely quickly for San Francisco-based tech companies and their impotence in the face of this similar, more consumer-oriented situation is infuriating,” Davies said.

    The key difference with SVB is that none of the banks linked with Synapse have failed, and because of that, the regulator hasn’t moved to help impacted users.

    Consumers can be forgiven for not understanding the nuance of FDIC protection, said Alt, the former OCC lawyer.

    “What consumers understood was, ‘This is as safe as money in the bank,’” Alt said. “But the FDIC insurance isn’t a pot of money to generally make people whole, it is there to make depositors of a failed bank whole.”

    Waiting for their money

    For the customers involved in the Synapse mess, the worst-case scenario is playing out.

    While some customers have had funds released in recent weeks, most are still waiting. Those later in line may never see a full payout: There is a shortfall of up to $96 million in funds that are owed to customers, according to the court-appointed bankruptcy trustee.

    That’s because of Synapse’s shoddy ledgers and its system of pooling users’ money across a network of banks in ways that make it difficult to reconstruct who is owed what, according to court filings.

    The situation is so tangled that Jelena McWilliams, a former FDIC chairman now acting as trustee over the Synapse bankruptcy, has said that finding all the customer money may be impossible.

    Despite weeks of work, there appears to be little progress toward fixing the hardest part of the Synapse mess: Users whose funds were pooled in “for benefit of,” or FBO, accounts. The technique has been used by brokerages for decades to give wealth management customers FDIC coverage on their cash, but its use in fintech is more novel.

    “If it’s in an FBO account, you don’t even know who the end customer is, you just have this giant account,” said LendingClub’s Sanborn. “You’re trusting the fintech to do the work.”

    While McWilliams has floated a partial payment to end users weeks ago, an idea that has support from Yotta co-founder Moelis and others, that hasn’t happened yet. Getting consensus from the banks has proven difficult, and the bankruptcy judge has openly mused about which regulator or body of government can force them to act.

    The case is “uncharted territory,” Judge Martin Barash said, and because depositors’ funds aren’t the property of the Synapse estate, Barash said it wasn’t clear what his court could do.

    Evolve has said in filings that it has “great pause” about making any payments until a full reconciliation happens. It has further said that Synapse ledgers show that nearly all of the deposits held for Yotta were missing, while Synapse has said that Evolve holds the funds.

    “I don’t know who’s right or who’s wrong,” Moelis told CNBC. “We know how much money came into the system, and we are certain that that’s the correct number. The money doesn’t just disappear; it has to be somewhere.”

    In the meantime, the former Synapse CEO and Evolve have had an eventful few weeks.

    Pathak, who dialed into early bankruptcy hearings while in Santorini, Greece, has since been attempting to raise funds for a new robotics startup, using marketing materials with misleading claims about its ties with automaker General Motors.

    And only days after being censured by the Federal Reserve about its management of technology partners, Evolve was attacked by Russian hackers who posted user data from an array of fintech firms, including Social Security numbers, to a dark web forum for criminals.

    For customers, it’s mostly been a waiting game.

    Craft, the Indiana FexEx driver, said she had to borrow money from her mother and grandmother for expenses. She worries about how she’ll pay for catering at her upcoming wedding.

    “We were led to believe that our money was FDIC-insured at Yotta, as it was plastered all over the website,” Craft said. “Finding out that what FDIC really means, that was the biggest punch to the gut.”

    She now has an account at Chase, the largest and most profitable American bank in history.

    With contributions from CNBC’s Gabriel Cortes.

    Source link

  • U.S. ignored evidence major U.K. bank was helping fund sanctioned Iranian groups, whistleblower says

    U.S. ignored evidence major U.K. bank was helping fund sanctioned Iranian groups, whistleblower says

    Standard Chartered Plc bank branch in Hong Kong

    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Recent documents submitted to a U.S. federal court allege that major British bank Standard Chartered helped finance sanctioned Iranian entities and terrorist groups, and that relevant evidence was ignored by American authorities.

    London-based Standard Chartered, which primarily serves clients in emerging markets, was previously punished with more than a combined $1.7 billion in fines after admitting in 2012 and 2019 to violating sanctions on Iran and other blacklisted countries.

    The bank denies it ran transactions for any organizations designated as terrorists.

    The latest court filings, provided by former Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) employee turned whistleblower Julian Knight, claim that U.S. officials lied by denying that he provided them with evidence of far greater wrongdoing by the bank. The officials then applied to dismiss his whistleblower case against the bank as “meritless” in 2019 in order to shield it, Knight alleged. He has now asked a U.S. federal court in New York to reinstate the case.

    Knight, who led a Standard Chartered transaction services unit between 2009 and 2011, was one of two whistleblowers who gave U.S. investigators confidential bank statements in 2012 and 2013. The statements documenting transactions that he says contained proof of further sanctions breaches, including violations beyond 2007, when the bank said it had stopped any dealings with Iran.

    Knight’s court filing alleges that the U.S. government committed a “colossal fraud” against the legal system by denying he had presented “damning evidence” that Standard Chartered “facilitated many billions of dollars in banking transactions for Iran, numerous international terror groups, and the front companies for those groups,” according to a report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

    Some of that evidence, the court filing says, showed that the bank’s clients included front companies for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, Palestinian militant group Hamas, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and Iran-linked entities in the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Germany and other countries. 

    The two whistleblowers alleged that U.S. authorities who investigated Standard Chartered “made false statements to a court in order to have their [Knight’s and his colleague’s] claim for a whistleblower’s reward dismissed” in 2019, the BBC reported.

    The authorities in question, including an FBI agent, said that the whistleblowers’ claims “did not lead to the discovery of any new … violations.” The court then dismissed the case as “meritless.” CNBC has contacted the U.S. Department of Justice for comment.

    The ICIJ report says Knight’s latest claim alleges that the U.S. government “lied that it had conducted ‘a lengthy, costly, and substantial investigation’ into his claims or it was “fully aware” of the transactions he had provided “and simply lied to conceal them,” adding: “The Government’s own statements support the latter scenario.”

    In response to a CNBC request for comment, a Standard Chartered spokesperson described Knight’s court filing as “another attempt to use fabricated claims against the bank, following previous unsuccessful attempts” and said that the “false allegations underpinning it have been thoroughly discredited by the U.S. authorities who undertook a comprehensive investigation into the claims and said they were ‘meritless’ and did not show any violations of U.S. sanctions.”

    Source link

  • DOJ charges Chinese national with operating ‘world’s largest botnet’ that stole $5.9 billion in Covid relief funds

    DOJ charges Chinese national with operating ‘world’s largest botnet’ that stole $5.9 billion in Covid relief funds

    The seal of the US Department of Justice in Washington, DC on March 21, 2024. 

    Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images

    A global malware network responsible for the theft of $5.9 billion in Covid relief funds and tied to other crimes like child exploitation and bomb threats has been shut down, Department of Justice officials announced Wednesday.

    The DOJ arrested 35-year-old YunHe Wang, a Chinese national who was charged with creating the “botnet,” a kind of malware that connects a network of hacked devices, which criminals can then use remotely to launch cyberattacks.

    Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray said it is “likely the world’s largest botnet ever.”

    From 2014 to 2022, Wang launched and operated the botnet, called “911 S5,” from roughly 150 servers worldwide, including some in the U.S., according to the indictment. 911 S5 hacked into over 19 million IP addresses in nearly 200 countries, about 614,000 of which were in the U.S., according to the DOJ.

    The FBI released a how-to guide for users to identify if their devices had been targets of a 911 S5 attack and if so, how to remove the malware.

    Wang allegedly sold access to the compromised IP addresses to cybercriminals and amassed at least $99 million, which he used to buy luxury cars, watches and property around the world.

    911 S5 was also used for fraud, stalking, harassment, illegal exportation of goods and other crimes, the DOJ said. In particular, the botnet targeted Covid relief programs and filed an estimated 560,000 false unemployment insurance claims, stealing $5.9 billion.

    “The conduct alleged here reads like it’s ripped from a screenplay,” said Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security.

    “What they don’t show in the movies though is the painstaking work it takes by domestic and international law enforcement, working closely with industry partners, to take down such a brazen scheme and make an arrest like this happen,” Axelrod added in his statement.

    The DOJ partnered with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies internationally to dismantle the botnet and arrest Wang.

    The arrest comes a day after Treasury Department sanctioned Wang and two others for their alleged involvement with 911 S5. Treasury also imposed sanctions on three companies that Wang owned or controlled: Spicy Code Company Limited, Tulip Biz Pattaya Group Company Limited, and Lily Suites Company Limited.

    Wang is facing a maximum 65-year prison sentence with four criminal counts: conspiracy to commit computer fraud, substantive computer fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. 

    The charges come as U.S. law enforcement agencies try to update protocols to keep up with more sophisticated cybersecurity threats.

    In recent years, the U.S. has expressed particular concern for China-backed hackers looking to subvert American infrastructure.

    In January, the FBI announced that it had dismantled the Chinese “Volt Typhoon” hacking group, which had been targeting U.S. water plants, electric grids and more.

    “Today, and literally every day, they’re actively attacking our economic security, engaging in wholesale theft of our innovation, and our personal and corporate data,” Wray said at a January hearing.

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank shares up 6% after first-quarter profit beat, investment banking recovery

    Deutsche Bank shares up 6% after first-quarter profit beat, investment banking recovery

    Deutsche Bank shares were 6% higher on Thursday afternoon after the German lender reported a 10% rise in first-quarter profit, beating expectations amid an ongoing recovery in its investment banking unit.

    Net profit attributable to shareholders was 1.275 billion euros ($1.365 billion) for the period, ahead of an aggregate analyst forecast of 1.23 billion euros for the period, according to LSEG data.

    Deutsche Bank said this was its highest first-quarter profit since 2013. It also marks the bank’s 15th straight quarterly profit.

    Group revenue rose 1% year-on-year to 7.8 billion euros, which the bank attributed to growth in commissions and fee income, along with strength in fixed income and currencies. The revenue print also came in ahead of an analyst forecast of 7.73 billion euros, according to LSEG.

    Revenues at its investment bank increased 13% to 3 billion euros, following a 9% slump through full-year 2023 which had dragged down overall profit. The performance restores the division as Deutsche Bank’s highest-earning unit on growth in financing and credit trading revenue.

    Other first-quarter highlights included:

    • Net inflows of 19 billion euros across the Private Bank and Asset Management divisions.
    • Credit loss provision was 439 million euros, down from 488 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Common equity tier one (CET1) capital ratio — a measure of bank solvency — was 13.4%, compared to 13.6% at the same time last year.

    “There’s momentum in the businesses, actually across all four businesses, and we do think it’s sustainable,” Deutsche Bank Chief Financial Officer James von Moltke told CNBC’s Annette Weisbach on Thursday.

    “We’re delivering on our commitments on costs and capital returns in the quarter.”

    Germany’s biggest lender reported net profit of 1.3 billion euros in the prior quarter and of 1.16 billion euros in the first quarter last year.

    In 2023, the bank announced it would cut 3,500 jobs over the coming years, as it targets 2.5 billion euros in operational efficiencies to boost profitability and increase shareholder returns.

    Source link

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton reaches deal to end securities fraud charges after 9 years

    Texas AG Ken Paxton reaches deal to end securities fraud charges after 9 years

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday agreed to pay nearly $300,000 in restitution under a deal to end criminal securities fraud charges that have shadowed the Republican for nearly a decade.Video above: Paxton’s attorney and prosecutor react to deal to dismiss chargesThe announcement by special prosecutors in a Houston courtroom came less than three weeks before Paxton was set to stand trial on felony charges that could have led to a prison sentence. It was the closest Paxton — who was indicted in 2015 — has ever come to trial over accusations that he duped investors in a tech startup near Dallas.Under the 18-month agreement, the special prosecutors would drop three felony counts against Paxton as long as he pays full restitution to his victims, and completes 100 hours of community service and 15 hours of legal ethics education. A former special prosecutor said the chance of a conviction was going to be “50-50.”Paxton said little during the hearing, and he avoided reporters by leaving the court through a back door.But in a statement released later Tuesday, Paxton — one of the nation’s most prominent state attorney generals, who just six months earlier was acquitted of corruption charges in an impeachment trial in the Texas Senate — remained defiant.“There will never be a conviction in this case nor am I guilty,” said Paxton, while thanking his family and supporters “for sticking by my side.” The agreement lets Paxton remain in his elected position and doesn’t affect his law license.Dan Cogdell, a Paxton’s attorney, said prosecutors would never have been able to prove their case at trial, but he conceded that it was cheaper for Paxton to accept the agreement.“Number one, the economics are actually in his favor for not going to trial. And number two, it’s a guaranteed dismissal at the end of the day,” Cogdell told reporters.Houston attorney Brian Wice, who was one of the special prosecutors, described the deal as a victory that requires Paxton to repay investors, including Byron Cook, a former GOP lawmaker who served with Paxton in the Texas Legislature, and the estate of Joel Hochberg, a South Florida businessman who died last year.Wice, who previously indicated that he would consider a pre-trial deal a “slap on the wrist,” said he and fellow prosecutor Jed Silverman reevaluated their chance of success based on evidence and witnesses.“Our primary duty is to do justice, not to convict. So, the question isn’t whether or not who won, but was justice served? And I think the answer to that is unmistakably yes,” Wice said.Kent Schaffer, who worked as a special prosecutor on the case until February and had tried to broker a similar settlement, said insufficient resources and antagonistic witnesses could have hindered the prosecutors’ case.”I didn’t think we had a bad case, but it’s 50-50. It could go either way,” said Schaffer, a Houston-based criminal defense attorney.The Cook and Hochberg families said in a statement they are “grateful that they will receive restitution in full.”Wice acknowledged the long arc of the case that shuffled between four different judges over the years, ping-ponged between courtrooms in Dallas and Houston, and was slowed by the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in 2017.The resolution of the securities fraud case furthers a dramatic reversal of political fortune for Paxton, who just a year ago appeared imperiled by the criminal case and the threat of being removed from office after his top aides reported him to the FBI.But Paxton has emerged emboldened. He waged war against dozens of GOP lawmakers who were part of the 2023 effort to impeach him, with his biggest target being state House Speaker Dade Phelan, who was forced into a May 28 runoff. He has also not ruled out a primary challenge to Republican Sen. John Cornyn in 2026.Paxton still faces legal troubles, however. A federal investigation has been probing some of the same charges presented in his impeachment and former aides who reported Paxton to the FBI are trying to make him testify in a whistleblower civil lawsuit.The securities fraud case has hung over Paxton nearly his entire time in statewide office. Yet the 61-year-old has shown political resilience time and again, winning over conservative activists, and importantly within the GOP, former President Donald Trump.Paxton had been accused of defrauding investors in a Dallas-area tech company called Servergy by not disclosing that he was being paid by the company to recruit them. He was charged with two counts of securities fraud and one count of not being registered as an investment adviser.James Spindler, a professor of business and law at the University of Texas at Austin, said it was surprising that Paxton even faced a felony prosecution. He described one of the charges — failing to register as an investment adviser — as a technical violation and said most similar cases are settled as civil lawsuits.Legal experts have said over the years that the longer the case drags on, the harder it would be for both sides.Paxton was also charged in a federal civil complaint filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over his work with Servergy. But a federal judge in March 2017 dismissed the complaint against Paxton. The person who recruited Paxton to work with Servergy, ex-company CEO William Mapp, was found liable by a jury for misleading investors and ordered to pay a civil penalty of $22,500. Mapp lost his job with Servergy and later had to work as an Uber driver to make ends meet, according to court documents.The fraud allegations were among the original 20 articles of impeachment but were set aside during the impeachment trial in the Texas Senate last year.Paxton’s political opponents, most notably Republicans, had used the fraud charges against him in elections. But Paxton has twice been reelected as attorney general since his indictment, most recently in 2022.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday agreed to pay nearly $300,000 in restitution under a deal to end criminal securities fraud charges that have shadowed the Republican for nearly a decade.

    Video above: Paxton’s attorney and prosecutor react to deal to dismiss charges

    The announcement by special prosecutors in a Houston courtroom came less than three weeks before Paxton was set to stand trial on felony charges that could have led to a prison sentence. It was the closest Paxton — who was indicted in 2015 — has ever come to trial over accusations that he duped investors in a tech startup near Dallas.

    Under the 18-month agreement, the special prosecutors would drop three felony counts against Paxton as long as he pays full restitution to his victims, and completes 100 hours of community service and 15 hours of legal ethics education. A former special prosecutor said the chance of a conviction was going to be “50-50.”

    Paxton said little during the hearing, and he avoided reporters by leaving the court through a back door.

    But in a statement released later Tuesday, Paxton — one of the nation’s most prominent state attorney generals, who just six months earlier was acquitted of corruption charges in an impeachment trial in the Texas Senate — remained defiant.

    “There will never be a conviction in this case nor am I guilty,” said Paxton, while thanking his family and supporters “for sticking by my side.” The agreement lets Paxton remain in his elected position and doesn’t affect his law license.

    Dan Cogdell, a Paxton’s attorney, said prosecutors would never have been able to prove their case at trial, but he conceded that it was cheaper for Paxton to accept the agreement.

    “Number one, the economics are actually in his favor for not going to trial. And number two, it’s a guaranteed dismissal at the end of the day,” Cogdell told reporters.

    Houston attorney Brian Wice, who was one of the special prosecutors, described the deal as a victory that requires Paxton to repay investors, including Byron Cook, a former GOP lawmaker who served with Paxton in the Texas Legislature, and the estate of Joel Hochberg, a South Florida businessman who died last year.

    Wice, who previously indicated that he would consider a pre-trial deal a “slap on the wrist,” said he and fellow prosecutor Jed Silverman reevaluated their chance of success based on evidence and witnesses.

    “Our primary duty is to do justice, not to convict. So, the question isn’t whether or not who won, but was justice served? And I think the answer to that is unmistakably yes,” Wice said.

    Kent Schaffer, who worked as a special prosecutor on the case until February and had tried to broker a similar settlement, said insufficient resources and antagonistic witnesses could have hindered the prosecutors’ case.

    “I didn’t think we had a bad case, but it’s 50-50. It could go either way,” said Schaffer, a Houston-based criminal defense attorney.

    The Cook and Hochberg families said in a statement they are “grateful that they will receive restitution in full.”

    Wice acknowledged the long arc of the case that shuffled between four different judges over the years, ping-ponged between courtrooms in Dallas and Houston, and was slowed by the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in 2017.

    The resolution of the securities fraud case furthers a dramatic reversal of political fortune for Paxton, who just a year ago appeared imperiled by the criminal case and the threat of being removed from office after his top aides reported him to the FBI.

    But Paxton has emerged emboldened. He waged war against dozens of GOP lawmakers who were part of the 2023 effort to impeach him, with his biggest target being state House Speaker Dade Phelan, who was forced into a May 28 runoff. He has also not ruled out a primary challenge to Republican Sen. John Cornyn in 2026.

    Paxton still faces legal troubles, however. A federal investigation has been probing some of the same charges presented in his impeachment and former aides who reported Paxton to the FBI are trying to make him testify in a whistleblower civil lawsuit.

    The securities fraud case has hung over Paxton nearly his entire time in statewide office. Yet the 61-year-old has shown political resilience time and again, winning over conservative activists, and importantly within the GOP, former President Donald Trump.

    Paxton had been accused of defrauding investors in a Dallas-area tech company called Servergy by not disclosing that he was being paid by the company to recruit them. He was charged with two counts of securities fraud and one count of not being registered as an investment adviser.

    James Spindler, a professor of business and law at the University of Texas at Austin, said it was surprising that Paxton even faced a felony prosecution. He described one of the charges — failing to register as an investment adviser — as a technical violation and said most similar cases are settled as civil lawsuits.

    Legal experts have said over the years that the longer the case drags on, the harder it would be for both sides.

    Paxton was also charged in a federal civil complaint filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over his work with Servergy. But a federal judge in March 2017 dismissed the complaint against Paxton. The person who recruited Paxton to work with Servergy, ex-company CEO William Mapp, was found liable by a jury for misleading investors and ordered to pay a civil penalty of $22,500. Mapp lost his job with Servergy and later had to work as an Uber driver to make ends meet, according to court documents.

    The fraud allegations were among the original 20 articles of impeachment but were set aside during the impeachment trial in the Texas Senate last year.

    Paxton’s political opponents, most notably Republicans, had used the fraud charges against him in elections. But Paxton has twice been reelected as attorney general since his indictment, most recently in 2022.

    Source link

  • Feds seek seizure of two New York apartments worth $14 million tied to former Mongolia leader in alleged mining scheme

    Feds seek seizure of two New York apartments worth $14 million tied to former Mongolia leader in alleged mining scheme

    Batbold Sukhbaatar of Mongolia addresses the Millennium Development Goals Summit at the United Nations headquarters in New York, September 22, 2010.

    Emmanuel Dunand | AFP | Getty Images

    Federal prosecutors on Tuesday sued to seize two New York City apartments worth $14 million that were allegedly bought with proceeds from a corrupt scheme involving Mongolia’s huge copper mine, a former prime minister of that nation, and his Harvard Business School graduate son.

    The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn details a total of $128 million in allegedly unlawful contracts granted by a Mongolian state-owned mining company to shell companies, which benefited then Prime Minister Sukhbaatar Batbold and his family, including his oldest son.

    “During Batbold’s tenure as Prime Minister, Erdenet Mining Corporation inserted a middleman with ties to Batbold into the relationship with [the commodity trading firm] Ocean Partners, allowing Batbold to siphon off millions of dollars for his personal use and benefit, which included the purchase of the” luxury apartments in Manhattan, the suit alleges.

    Batbold served as prime minister from 2009 through 2012. He currently is a member of the Mongolian parliament.

    Money linked to another allegedly illegal contract for $30 million from Erdernet Mining went into a bank account in the United States controlled by the eldest son, Battushig Batbold, via wire transfers referencing “car payment,” trips and travel,” “school payment,” and “interior designer payment,” the suit said.

    Batbold’s son, Battushig Batbold, a Harvard Business School graduate, is a member of the International Olympic Committee.

    Battushig Batbold also worked as a summer associate at Blackstone in 2014, and as a mining analyst at Morgan Stanley from 2009 through 2011, according to his LinkedIn page.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Orin Snyder, an attorney at the Gibson Dunn firm which is representing Sukhbaatar Batbold and Battushig Batbold, in an email statement to CNBC said, “The claims filed today echo allegations our clients defeated two years ago in courts around the world.”

    “In those cases, we proved the claims against Mr. Batbold were the product of a misinformation campaign designed to manipulate Mongolian democracy — a campaign secretly directed by Mr. Batbold’s opponents.”

    “Mr. Batbold looks forward to his day in court, when he will have the opportunity to defend himself against these unfounded claims,” the attorney said.

     CNBC has reached out to Mongolia’s United Nations mission in New York for comment on the allegations in the suit.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    Source link

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton Avoids Trial Over Securities Fraud Charges

    Texas AG Ken Paxton Avoids Trial Over Securities Fraud Charges

    Just shy of a month before his trial, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton entered into a deal with prosecutors that allows him to avoid his day in court over the nearly nine-year-long securities fraud case against him.

    The terms of the 18-month pretrial intervention agreement were laid out during a Tuesday morning hearing before Harris County District Judge Andrea Beall. They include restitution of $271,000, 100 hours of community service in Collin County, and 15 hours of legal ethics courses.

    Not only does Paxton avoid a possible criminal conviction with accompanying jail time and loss of his law license, but he admitted no guilt under this agreement.

    Special prosecutors Brian Wice and Jed Silverman will monitor Paxton. Wice noted that this differed from the typical defendant, who would be observed by a probation officer. He added that the prosecutors could terminate the agreement earlier if Paxton paid restitution sooner and abided by the conditions.

    “At the end of the day, while I think the case could be made that justice was certainly delayed, I think the agreement we reached today underscores the fact that justice was not denied to the victims in this case, to Mr. Paxton, and ultimately to the people of the state of Texas,” Wice said.

    According to Wice, Paxton will pay restitution to former state representative Bryon Cook, Cook’s wife and Joel Hochberg’s estate for their Servergy investments, the McKinney-based technology company at the center of the case.

    Wice said the difference between this pretrial intervention agreement and the one initially proposed was that the former didn’t have any of the consequential provisions, while this deal did. He added that the agreement doubled the amount of community service initially proposed and included more legal education instead of one course in securities fraud.

    click to enlarge

    Special prosecutor Brian Wice said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s community service could include work at a Collin County soup kitchen or food pantry.

    Photo by Reggie Mathalone

    Ultimately, Wice said the re-interviewing and interviewing of nearly a dozen witnesses was the game-changer that led to Tuesday’s decision.

    “As a result of that intensive interviewing and re-interviewing process, we had a sense of what these cases were and, more importantly, what these cases weren’t,” he said.

    Defense Attorney Dan Cogdell reaffirmed that the agreement between the attorney general and the state was not a plea deal, and Paxton maintained his previous not-guilty plea. Cogdell said that the charges Paxton faced would eventually be dropped per the agreement’s conditions.

    “The case will be dismissed. There will never be a conviction, and Ken Paxton—at least today—can go back and do what he should have been doing all along, which is representing the state of Texas,” Cogdell said.

    “This was a case that we believed, in fact, we knew from the beginning they couldn’t prove,” he added. “It was a case on day one that we knew they couldn’t prove, and on year nine, we still knew they couldn’t prove.”

    According to Cogdell, Paxton was the only person in history to be prosecuted criminally after he paid a $1,000 administrative fee for failing to register with the state securities regulators.

    Beall asserted that if Paxton were to violate any agreement terms, both parties would be back in the Houston courtroom. A pretrial intervention does not require the presiding judge’s approval.

    Paxton was present during proceedings, as he has been on his other court dates since the case returned to Harris County. He sat with defense attorney Philip Hilder while he signed the pages of the deal. After agreeing and saying he understood the terms of the deal, the attorney general exited the courtroom through the back door.

    click to enlarge

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks with his legal team while signing documents detailing the deal.

    Photo by Reggie Mathalone

    The news of a possible pretrial intervention agreement was reported by the Austin American Statesman ahead of Tuesday’s pretrial conference after sources close to the case discussed the possibility that prosecutors would dismiss the charges Paxton faced if he complied with the conditions of a potential deal.

    The attorney general has pleaded not guilty to two first-degree felony securities fraud charges and one third-degree felony charge. Paxton was indicted for allegedly soliciting investors in Servergy Inc. without disclosing that he was being paid to promote its stock and failing to register with state securities regulators.

    Last month, Cogdell referred to discussions regarding pretrial intervention that he would’ve accepted if offered. However, Cogdell said there were no ongoing plea negotiations, adding that Paxton never entertained the idea of pleading guilty.

    Wice had previously stated that he did not believe a pretrial intervention was a fair justice or appropriate disposition, given the facts and circumstances of this case and the defendant. He referred to the possibility as “worse than a slap on the wrist.”

    Paxton’s legal team had attempted to get the charges against the attorney general thrown out after filing a motion to get them dropped during a previous pretrial conference, citing Paxton’s constitutional right to a speedy trial.

    The case has faced yearslong delays caused by relocations from Collin County — where it originated — to Harris County, Paxton’s impeachment proceedings in the Texas Senate and the ongoing dispute regarding prosecutorial pay.

    The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals declined to take action in January on the disagreement over prosecutorial pay. Wice and former prosecutor Kent Schaffer have not received compensation for their time on the case since 2016.

    In a previous ruling, Beall indicated that she would not issue new payment orders to comply with the Collin County fee schedule because the cap it set was “wholly unreasonable” in this case. On Tuesday, Wice said the dispute is in the Houston-based First Court of Appeals.

    Without Tuesday’s agreement, Paxton would have gone to trial as scheduled on Monday, April 15. If convicted, he could have faced fines and up to 99 years in prison.

    Although this long-standing case has been resolved, Paxton is involved in additional ongoing legal challenges in Travis County over allegations by his former top deputies that he abused his office to assist real estate developer Nate Paul and at the federal level regarding his involvement in allegedly attempting to interfere with the November 2020 election.

    Faith Bugenhagen

    Source link

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton Could See Criminal Charges Against Him Dropped

    Texas AG Ken Paxton Could See Criminal Charges Against Him Dropped

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton may not see his day in trial court over the nearly nine-year-long securities fraud case against him as reports indicate that a possible resolution could involve a pre-trial diversion agreement.

    According to the Austin-American Statesman, which broke the news of the potential deal, prosecutors would dismiss the felony charges Paxton faces if he complied with the conditions.

    These could include Paxton being required to complete community service and advanced education classes and avoid violating any laws for an unspecified period. The agreement may also include restitution, which has been estimated to range from $300,000 to $400,000 among other terms. However, it would not interfere with Paxton’s law license status.

    Paxton has pleaded not guilty to the two first-degree felony securities fraud charges and one third-degree felony charge. The attorney general will likely not have to enter a plea, and the agreement will keep a possible conviction off a potential criminal record.

    If prosecutors and defense attorneys agree, the case will be resolved without requiring approval from Harris County District Judge Andrea Beall, who oversees legal proceedings.

    During a February pretrial conference, defense attorney Dan Cogdell indicated that there were discussions regarding a pretrial intervention that he would’ve accepted if offered. However, he denied any ongoing plea negotiations, saying Paxton has never entertained the idea of pleading guilty.

    The Houston Press contacted special prosecutor Brian Wice regarding the possible agreement, but Wice declined to comment via text message.

    According to reports, Cogdell said he would not comment on something that has not happened and may not occur.

    Last month, Paxton’s legal team attempted to get the charges against the attorney general thrown out after filing a motion to get them dropped, citing Paxton’s constitutional right to a speedy trial.

    The case has faced numerous delays caused by relocations from Collin County—where it originated—to Harris County, Paxton’s impeachment proceedings in the Texas Senate and disagreements over prosecutorial pay.

    The question of how much the prosecutors are going to be paid is now in the hands of the First Court of Appeals, as defense attorneys requested that the Houston-based court overturn Beall’s previous ruling. In it, Beall indicated that she would not issue new payment orders per the Collin County fee schedule because the $2,000 cap is “wholly unreasonable” given the amount of work required in this case.

    Former special prosecutor Kent Schaffer stepped away from the case in February, and Wice appointed Houston criminal defense attorney Jed Silverman to take over for Schaffer. According to Wice, a disagreement between the two prosecutors over the ultimate resolution likely led to Schaffer’s decision to withdraw from representation.

    A pretrial conference that was initially scheduled for this week was rescheduled for Tuesday, March 26, next week. If the case is still on course to go to trial, it would start on Monday, April 15.

    Paxton was indicted for allegedly soliciting investors in a McKinney-based technology company, Servergy Inc., without disclosing that the company was paying him to promote its stock and failing to register with state securities regulators. The attorney general could face fines and up to 99 years in prison if convicted.

    Although this case could be resolved, Paxton is involved in additional ongoing legal challenges in Travis County and at the federal level.

    Faith Bugenhagen

    Source link

  • Judge orders Trump company to tell financial watchdog about efforts to get appeal bonds

    Judge orders Trump company to tell financial watchdog about efforts to get appeal bonds

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump attends the Trump Organization civil fraud trial, in New York State Supreme Court in the Manhattan borough of New York City, October 25, 2023.

    Jeenah Moon | Reuters

    A judge ordered Donald Trump‘s company Thursday to inform a court-appointed financial watchdog about any efforts to obtain an appeal bond.

    Judge Arthur Engoron’s order came three days after Trump’s lawyers in an appeals court filing said it has been “impossible” so far for the former president to get such a bond for a civil business fraud case he lost.

    Trump sought the bond to prevent New York Attorney General Letitia James as early as Monday collecting on a $454 million civil fraud judgment against him as he appeals the verdict in Manhattan Supreme Court.

    His lawyers have said that more than 30 surety companies rejected writing a bond for Trump because they would not accept real estate as collateral.

    Trump has asked the appeals court to pause the judgment from taking effect without having to secure a bond. That court has yet to rule on his request.

    In his order Thursday, Engoron told the Trump Organization it must tell its financial overseer, Barbara Jones, “in advance, of any efforts to secure surety bonds.”

    Justice Arthur Engoron sits with his clerk as he presides over the civil fraud trial of former President Donald Trump and his children at New York State Supreme Court on November 13, 2023 in New York City.

    Curtis Means | Getty Images

    The company also must tell Jones about any claims the Trump Organization makes to obtain the bonds, any personal guarantees by Trump or other defendants, and any condition imposed on the company.

    That level of disclosure would well exceed what Trump has disclosed about a $91.6 million appeal bond he recently received from a Chubb insurance subsidiary to secure a civil defamation judgment in favor of the writer E. Jean Carroll.

    Jones, who is a retired federal judge, was appointed by Engoron as the financial monitor for the Trump Organization. The company has chafed under her oversight, complaining about her in filings with Engoron.

    Engoron last month ruled that Jones would remain as the monitor for three years after finding that Trump, his two adult sons, his company and two executives were civilly liable for years of fraudulently inflating Trump’s asset values for financial gain.

    Source link

  • Creditors demand Rudy Giuliani sell his $3.5 million Florida condo to pay debts

    Creditors demand Rudy Giuliani sell his $3.5 million Florida condo to pay debts

    Rudy Giuliani, the former personal lawyer for former U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. District Courthouse in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 15, 2023.

    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    Creditors want to force Rudy Giuliani to sell his $3.5 million Florida condo to help pay his significant debts, according to a court document filed on Friday.

    The former New York City mayor filed for bankruptcy protection in December, citing myriad unpaid debts including a $148 million payment to two Georgia election poll workers who he falsely claimed had tampered with the 2020 election ballots while he was serving as a lawyer for former President Donald Trump.

    In response to Friday’s filing, Giuliani’s counsel said the request to sell the Florida condo is “extremely premature.”

    “The case is still in its infancy,” said Heath Berger, partner at Berger, Fischoff, Shumer, Wexler & Goodman, LLP, who is representing Giuliani in his bankruptcy litigation.

    Giuliani has argued that he does not have the funds to pay his debts, the Friday court filing said: “According to the Debtor’s counsel, ‘there’s no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.’”

    Giuliani’s primary income comes from Social Security payments and money from his Individual Retirement Account, Berger told CNBC.

    But the court document cited various expenses Giuliani pays now to maintain his lifestyle.

    For example, Giuliani spends tens of thousands of dollars a month to maintain his Florida condo. In January, according to the document, he also racked up more than $26,200 in credit card payments on 60 Amazon transactions, with charges for Netflix, Prime Video, Kindle, Audible, Paramount+, Uber rides and more.

    “Unfortunately, like everybody else, that’s like a debit card for him,” Berger said. “We don’t believe that there’s anything out of the ordinary, outside of normal living expenses.”

    Creditors see his real estate assets as fair game to recoup what is owed. They said his “pre-war co-op” apartment on New York City’s Upper East Side is exempt since it is his primary residence.

    However, the document said, Giuliani spends “approximately 20-30% of his time in Florida” and therefore creditors claimed the $3.5 million condo must be sold.

    “It is merely a matter of when, not if, the Debtor will have to sell the Florida Condo in order to distribute the proceeds thereof to creditors,” the filing said.

    But Giuliani is in the process of selling the Manhattan apartment and is looking to relocate to his Florida residence full-time, Berger said.

    “The Manhattan property is more expensive to maintain. It’s worth more so there’ll be a greater distribution to creditors from the sale of that property,” Berger told CNBC.

    Berger added that payments related to his divorce “will be coming to a conclusion … within the next year or so.”

    Creditors also demanded that Giuliani secure homeowners insurance for his Florida and New York City residences since they are his two most valuable assets and “if anything were to happen to either of them, such loss would be a significant impediment to creditor recoveries.”

    Giuliani has claimed he cannot afford the insurance, the court document said.

    The former Trump adviser has faced a slew of legal woes for his role in trying to overturn the 2020 election results, all of which have helped land him in bankruptcy court. His bankruptcy filing from December estimated that he has between $1 million and $10 million worth of assets and nearly $152 million to pay off, including what is owed to the IRS and law firms.

    Source link

  • Criminal sentencing of Binance founder CZ postponed to late April

    Criminal sentencing of Binance founder CZ postponed to late April


    Changpeng Zhao, founder and CEO of Binance, attends the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris on June 16, 2022.

    Benoit Tessier | Reuters

    The criminal sentencing of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao on a money laundering rule charge has been postponed until April 30, according to a notice Monday in Seattle federal court.

    That docket entry did not explain what would be a two-month delay in sentencing Zhao, a Canadian national widely known as “CZ” who is free on a $175 million release bond in the United States.

    Zhao’s lawyer, William Burck, declined to comment when asked about the postponement. CNBC has asked the Department of Justice about the delay.

    Federal sentencing guidelines suggest a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison for Zhao, but prosecutors reportedly have considered asking for a harsher sentence.

    Zhao pleaded guilty on Nov. 21 to a charge of failure to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program at Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. As part of that plea, he agreed to step down as Binance’s chief executive officer and to pay a $50 million fine.

    Binance at the same time agreed to pay $4.3 billion in fines and restitution as part of its guilty plea to conspiracy to conduct an unlicensed money-transmitting business, conducting such a business and violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    “Binance was allowing illicit actors to transact freely, supporting activities from child sexual abuse to illegal narcotics to terrorism,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen when the company and Zhao pleaded guilty.

    Zhao originally was scheduled to be sentenced on Feb. 23.

    The judge in Zhao’s case in early December rejected his request to be able to travel to his home in the United Arab Emirates before he is sentenced.

    U.S. District Judge Richard Jones cited Zhao’s “enormous wealth” and lack of ties to the United States in finding he was a flight risk.

    Jones in late December rejected another bid by Zhao to travel to the U.A.E. Zhao in his new application had said he wanted to travel home for the “hospitalization and surgery” of a person in his life.

    He had offered to post his equity in Binance as security for his return.



    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank smashes profit estimates and boosts shareholder returns

    Deutsche Bank smashes profit estimates and boosts shareholder returns


    Deutsche Bank on Thursday smashed fourth-quarter earnings expectations, reporting net profit of 1.3 billion euros ($1.4 billion) and announcing a further 1.6 billion euros in shareholder returns for 2024.

    The quarterly net profit figure marked an almost 30% fall from the same quarter a year ago but was significantly higher than the 785.61 million euros expected by analysts. It follows net profit of 1.031 billion euros for the previous quarter and 1.8 billion euros for the same period last year.

    Shares were 4.6% higher in morning trade in Europe.

    The German lender also announced plans to hike share buybacks and dividends by 50%, returning a total of 1.6 billion euros to shareholders.

    Deutsche said it is planning an additional share buyback of 675 million euros, which it aims to complete in the first half of the year. This follows 450 million euros of repurchases in 2023. It also plans to recommend 900 million euros in shareholder dividends for 2023 at its Annual General Meeting in May.

    For the year as a whole, the bank reported 4.2 billion euros in net income attributable to shareholders — beating expectations of 3.685 billion euros expected by analysts.

    “Pre-tax profit at 5.7 billion is at a high, we grew year-on-year despite some items that in this year created some noise, but what’s really exciting is the momentum we see in the business,” Deutsche Bank CFO James von Moltke told CNBC on Thursday.

    “We had a 10% year-on-year growth in our investment bank in the fourth quarter, and admittedly in a year that was still retracing the very strong performances of 2021 and 22, so 9% down for the full year, but we see momentum especially now going into ’24 in origination advisory and very strong, I think consistent, performance in our FIC [fixed income and currencies] franchise.”

    As part of a 2.5 billion euro operational efficiency program, Deutsche Bank said it expects to cut 3,500 jobs, mainly in “non-client-facing areas.”

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    hide content

    Deutsche Bank shares

    As of the end of 2023, savings either realized or expected from completed measures under the efficiency program grew to 1.3 billion euros, the bank estimated. The program’s goal is to reduce the quarterly run-rate of adjusted costs to 5 billion euros, with total costs falling to around 20 billion in 2025.

    In a statement Thursday, Sewing said the bank’s 2023 performance “underlines the strength of our Global Hausbank strategy as we help our clients navigate an uncertain environment.”

    “We have achieved our highest profit before tax in 16 years, delivered growth well ahead of target and maintained our focus on cost discipline while investing in key areas,” Sewing said.

    “Our strong capital generation enables us to accelerate distributions to shareholders. This gives us firm confidence that we will deliver on our 2025 targets.”

    Other fourth-quarter highlights included:

    • Net revenues grew 5% year-on-year to 6.7 billion euros, bringing the annual total to 28.9 billion.
    • Net inflows of 18 billion euros across the Private Bank and Asset Management divisions.
    • Credit loss provision was 488 million euros, compared to 351 million in the same period of 2022.
    • Common equity tier one (CET1) capital ratio — a measure of bank solvency — was 13.7% at the end of 2023, compared to 13.4% at the end of the previous year.

    Amid concerns about bank profitability and reports that the German government is considering a sale of some of its company holdings, including its 15% stake in Commerzbank, Deutsche has emerged as the subject of merger speculation in recent months.

    However, CEO Christian Sewing told CNBC at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland that acquisitions were not a “priority” for Germany’s largest bank.

    Correction: This article has been updated to reflect that Deutsche Bank’s results were released on Thursday.



    Source link

  • Man pleads guilty in $1 billion scheme to dodge money laundering rules in New York

    Man pleads guilty in $1 billion scheme to dodge money laundering rules in New York


    Las Vegas Review-journal | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

    A man described as an “experienced anti-money laundering specialist” pleaded guilty on Wednesday to illegally funneling more than $1 billion in lucrative, high-risk transactions through small financial institutions, the U.S. Department of Justice said.

    The massive transfer, which included hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign jurisdictions, occurred without proper oversight and without any Suspicious Activity Reports being filed, as the law requires, the DOJ said.

    The man, 56-year-old Gyanendra Asre of Greenwich, Connecticut, pleaded guilty in Brooklyn federal court to one count of failing to maintain an anti-money laundering program in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act.

    He faces up to 10 years in prison when he is sentenced May 3.

    A lawyer for Asre did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, meanwhile, on Wednesday assessed a $100,000 civil penalty on Asre and banned him from participating in any financial institution’s affairs for five years.

    “Asre was an experienced anti-money laundering specialist well-versed in the Bank Secrecy Act’s provisions and deliberately ignored these protections, exposing financial institutions to the risk of illicit criminal activity,” U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said in a press release.

    The scheme occurred from 2014 to 2016, when Asre was a member of the supervisory board of the New York State Employees Federal Credit Union, which the DOJ called a “small, unsophisticated” financial institution.

    He had previously been employed as a senior vice president at a domestic bank, and was “experienced in international banking and trained in anti-money laundering compliance and procedures,” the DOJ said.

    Asre “represented to the NYSEFCU that he and his businesses would conduct appropriate anti-money laundering oversight as required by the Bank Secrecy Act,” according to the DOJ.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Based on that, the NYSEFCU allowed Asre to conduct high-risk transactions, and he subsequently steered more than $1 billion through it and other entities.

    Some of that money allegedly came from Mexican banks, which are not named in an indictment in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn.

    But “contrary to his representations, Asre willfully failed to implement and maintain an anti-money laundering program at the NYSEFCU,” the DOJ said.

    “This failure caused the NYSEFCU to process the high-risk transactions without appropriate oversight and without ever filing a single Suspicious Activity Report, as required by law,” according to the DOJ.

    The National Credit Union Administration liquidated the NYSEFCU in October 2017 after finding “significant deficiencies” in the credit union’s regulatory compliance, according to FinCEN’s consent order with Asre.

    Asre’s actions “were a major contributing factor to the dissolution” of the credit union, the consent order said.

    Erin Keegan, the acting special agent-in-charge at the Department of Homeland Security’s investigative division in New York, said Asre was specifically trained in the right procedures and “took advantage of a small New York financial institution.”

    “I commend HSI New York and our law enforcement partners for their dedication to ensuring vitally integral regulations — the foundation of our banking system — are upheld,” Keegan said.

    CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:



    Source link

  • New York sues Citibank for alleged failure to reimburse fraud victims

    New York sues Citibank for alleged failure to reimburse fraud victims


    A Citibank branch in the central business district of Singapore on Feb. 12, 2018.

    Ore Huiying | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    New York Attorney General Letitia James on Tuesday sued Citibank for allegedly failing to protect and reimburse victims of electronic fraud.

    The suit claims that Citi does not have strong protections in place to prevent unauthorized account takeovers, misleads victims of fraud and illegally denies reimbursements, according to a release. The attorney general’s office said the alleged failure on Citi’s part has cost New York account holders millions of dollars, and in some cases, their entire life savings.

    “Banks are supposed to be the safest place to keep money, yet Citi’s negligence has allowed scammers to steal millions of dollars from hardworking people,” James said in a statement. “Many New Yorkers rely on online banking to pay bills or save for big milestones, and if a bank cannot secure its customers’ accounts, they are failing in their most basic duty.”

    Citigroup, the parent company of Citibank, has struggled with risk management and controls in the past. Former executives have said the bank — the product of decades of mergers that created a patchwork of technology systems — underinvested in its infrastructure. That was evident when Citigroup accidentally sent almost $900 million to Revlon’s lenders in 2020.

    Later that year, banking regulators fined Citigroup $400 million and ordered the firm to improve its risk management systems. Since taking over in 2021, CEO Jane Fraser has pushed to improve the bank’s technology and appease regulators.

    The New York lawsuit includes specific people who had thousands of dollars stolen from their accounts and said the bank did not reimburse them.

    In a statement, Citi said the bank “works extremely hard” to prevent threats and assist customers who become victims of fraud.

    “Banks are not required to make customers whole when those customers follow criminals’ instructions and banks can see no indication the customers are being deceived. However, given the industry-wide surge in wire fraud during the last several years, we’ve taken proactive steps to safeguard our clients’ accounts with leading security protocols, intuitive fraud prevention tools, clear insights about the latest scams, and driving client awareness and education,” the company said in a statement. “Our actions have reduced client wire fraud losses significantly, and we remain committed to investing in fraud prevention measures to help our clients secure their accounts against emerging threats.”

    James alleged in the lawsuit that Citi must reimburse victims of fraud under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:



    Source link

  • Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani raises less than $1 million from 13 donors in legal defense fund

    Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani raises less than $1 million from 13 donors in legal defense fund

    Rudy Giuliani was able to raise less than $1 million from just 13 donors, among them his friends and a group of former President Donald Trump‘s allies, to help pay off his legal fees as he faces a $146 million defamation judgment and a criminal prosecution, a new Federal Election Commission filing reviewed by CNBC shows.

    Giuliani’s political action committee raised just over $727,000 from August through December, according to the FEC filing Thursday. His son Andrew Giuliani, who is helping run the PAC, did not return a request for comment on the haul.

    The single biggest donation came from a Corona del Mar, California, woman named Caryn Borland, who donated $300,000, more than 40% of the total donations to Giuliani, the filing shows.

    Borland, who also is known as Caryn Hildenbrand, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Last year, the Caryn L Hildenbrand Living Trust donated $1 million to a legal defense fund for Trump, which also was the single largest donation to that fund, which had raised $1.6 million, according to a disclosure filed to the Internal Revenue Service.

    Hildenbrand and her husband Michael, who donated more than $1 million in campaign-related contributions to Trump’ 2020 reelection bid, have shared memes and social media posts about the QAnon conspiracy theory according to The New York Times. The newspaper last month also reported that Trump’s vice president, Mike Pence, had once canceled a fundraiser with the couple because of their QAnon posts.

    Though the Giuliani PAC misspells Caryn Borland’s first name on their filing as “Garyn,” the address matches that of the mailing address listed on the IRS filing for the donation made to Trump’s defense fund.

    His PAC has spent over $500,000 on his legal fees so far and had $180,000 on hand entering 2024.

    The attorney is facing a litany of legal and financial struggles as a result of his work for Trump trying to reverse Trump’s loss in the 2020 election to President Joe Biden.

    In August, Giuliani, Trump and more than a dozen other defendants were criminally charged in Georgia state court with racketeering related to efforts to reverse Trump’s 2020 election loss in the state. He also is being sued for defamation by the voting machine manufacturers Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic.

    In December, a federal court jury in Washington, D.C., found Giuliani liable for $146 million in damages for defaming two Georgia election workers whom he falsely accused of ballot fraud in 2020.

    A week later, Giuliani filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing that judgment, and money he owes various law firms and attorneys.

    A court filing shows that Giuliani owes more than $1.3 million to the law firm Davidoff Hutcher & Citron. The lawyer Robert Costello sued Giuliani in September for $1.36 million in unpaid legal fees dating to 2019.

    Giuliani had planned to raise some of his legal defense money at two of Trump’s properties, Andrew Giuliani previously said.

    Donors were asked to each give $100,000 to the PAC to get access to a September event at Trump’s golf course in Bedminster, which featured a discussion between him and Giuliani.

    But just three people are listed on the filing as giving $100,000 or more to the PAC.

    One of them was Elizabeth Ailes, the widow of former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, according to the filing.

    “Yes, I gave Rudy $100,000 for his legal defense PAC and I was happy to do so,” Elizabeth Ailes told CNBC.

    “I am upset by the way Rudy has been persecuted and I believe it’s important to push back against a politicized judicial system,” Ailes said.

    She called Giuliani a “friend” and noted that as mayor he had officiated at her wedding to Roger Ailes.

    Roger Ailes resigned from Fox News in 2016 after being accused by current and former Fox News employees of sexual harassment. Settlements based on those accusations reportedly cost Fox’s parent company millions of dollars.

    Before he was ousted from Fox, Roger Ailes’ conservative news network tried to bolster Trump’s candidacy in 2016.

    “They were friends for a very long time, way before Fox News,” Elizabeth Ailes told Newsmax last May. The only other person closest to Roger [besides Elizabeth] is Donald Trump.”

    Other Trump backers gave less to Giuliani.

    Businessman and longtime Trump supporter, Lewis Topper, gave $25,000 to the PAC, according to the filing.

    And the real estate investment firm Probity International, which is run by Trump donor Robert Zarnegin, gave $35,000 to the Giuliani PAC.

    Arnold Gumowitz, a veteran real estate executive, gave $50,000 to the PAC. He also donated to Andrew Giuliani’s failed gubernatorial run.

    Matthew Martorano, who donated $5,000 to the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee last year, gave $100,000 to the Giuliani committee.

    Martorano could not be reached for comment.

    Source link