ReportWire

Tag: screen style

  • The “Poor Things” Costume Designer on Taking Fashion Risks with Emma Stone

    The “Poor Things” Costume Designer on Taking Fashion Risks with Emma Stone

    Poor Things” Costume designer Holly Waddington is no stranger to period piece creation. Having worked on films such as “Lady Macbeth” and TV shows like “The Great,” Waddington’s affinity for historical dress is readily apparent. So, when the opportunity arose to bring the surrealist Victorian world of Yorgos Lanthimos’ “Poor Things” to life, the costume designer was more than ready to embark on the wild ride.

    “I was invited into the project because I had worked with Tony McNamara who had written ‘The Favorite.’ He’d also written ‘The Great,’ in which I designed the costumes for the pilot episode, so I built this relationship with Tony and he introduced me to Yorgos,” Waddington told POPSUGAR. “I’m a huge fan of Yorgos’ work and also of Tony’s work, so for me, as soon as I was called about, it was just an absolute no-brainer really that I would want to work on it.”

    Based on the 1992 novel by Alasdair Gray, the film adaption follows the story of Bella Baxter, played by Emma Stone, a Victorian woman brought back to life in a Frankenstein-like manner by unconventional scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter, played by William Dafoe. Eager to discover herself and the world, Bella embarks on a journey with the smarmy-slick lawyer Duncan Wedderburn, played by Mark Ruffalo, as she experiences life and develops from a doe-eyed childlike mind to that of a fully formed woman, who comes to realize her purpose and potential.

    That would be the biggest challenge of my job on the project: to find a way to tell her story through clothes through the choices of fabrics, and shapes, and how it was put together to describe the narrative arc and her journey from being a child in a woman’s body to having full mental capacity and being a fully formed woman.

    The challenge for Waddington was to convey Bella’s journey, as she grows both mentally and physically, through her clothing choices while finding the balance between the film’s historical backdrop and its fanciful world. “It wasn’t completely obvious from the beginning how we would approach it or design [Bella’s looks],” explained Waddington, who recently hosted an exhibition of the film’s costumes at the ASU Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising in Los Angeles. “I think when I first read it, I definitely had this sense that Bella Baxter would need to be in a state of half dress a lot of the time. That was something that I remember thinking from the get go — that she shouldn’t always be properly dressed.” She continued, “That would be the biggest challenge of my job on the project: to find a way to tell her story through clothes through the choices of fabrics, and shapes, and how it was put together to describe the narrative arc and her journey from being a child in a woman’s body to having full mental capacity and being a fully formed woman.” The end result: a fun house film, which features distorted fisheye lens shots and hops between black and white and vibrant colorful scenes, with a surrealist stage-like theatrical production and larger than life costumes.

    From collaborating with Stone on bold costumes, blasting Whitney Houston in a rush to make a wedding dress, and not to mention, Ruffalo’s corset, it’s clear that “Poor Things” was more than just another set, it was a one-of-a-kind experience. Below, read more about Waddington’s “Poor Things” journey and how she was able to bring her unconventional design concepts for an even more unconventional film to life.

    This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

    POPSUGAR: You’re known for your work on period pieces, so how was this Victorian-era film different from other projects you’ve worked on?

    Holly Waddington: I am a big fan of historical clothes. I am really fascinated by them. That’s why I’m a costume designer. I’m also really interested in stories, and storytelling, and character, so this is why I do this job. At the beginning of the project, Yorgos and I, we threw out lots and lots of ideas, many, many ideas, but I think at the beginning, Yorgos felt that she should be really properly dressed..in elegant, sophisticated ladies’ clothes, and that would seem really incongruous and strange in the physicality of her being this child in a woman’s body, but I think I always wanted to play with these ideas of deconstruction. It felt really right that [Bella] would be unraveled in her clothes.

    I have my own children, and they’re still quite young, and I see a lot of kids at playgroups and at playdates and things, and I just have this feeling that they’re always very hard to keep looking smart. Let’s say you dress a child to go to a smart occasion, I don’t know, a wedding or something. They don’t stay neat for very long. They’re very free in their bodies, and their bodies are very out of control, and they play. Just with my own kids, I’d notice that even when I try and dress them properly, within a couple of hours, they usually have bits missing, or they’ve added a bit of fancy dress. Often they’re very dressed at the top, but they often take their pants off or they’re walking…that was the quality that I wanted to get into those costumes.

    PS: There are a few times where you do see Bella in full Victorian dress, especially towards the end when she returns home to London. Were you trying to illustrate that journey of how she dresses at the beginning to how she dresses at the end?

    HW: I’ve never done a costume plot like Bella Baxter’s, so I had this big massive book. It was like an A3 ring binder, and in each page, each scene had a drawing and notes. Plotting how that would shift was really quite mental taxing for me. It shifted all the time, and it shifted based on conversations with Emma as well and with Yorgos. For example, when she steps out into the streets of Lisbon just in a pair of pants…because she wouldn’t think to add the skirts. So I was playing with all of those ideas, and then I wanted to try and find that quality when you see children dressing in their mother’s wardrobes.

    It’s a bit incongruous and odd, the shoes are too big, and their lipstick is a bit smeared, and everything’s a bit of a mess. I wanted to find that quality. There’s that look that she wears when she’s on the cruise ship, and she’s wearing a pink petticoat, and then she often wears those little fill in things that the Victorians would’ve worn to fill in a gap between the neck and the chest. She wears them just as things on their own with pieces like a big evening cape. That costume isn’t very beautiful. It’s a bit odd. It’s an odd mishmash of things, and that was what I was playing with. I was playing them with them in my own mind, but then with Emma Stone herself, she would get very involved in that.

    Emma Stone in POOR THINGS. Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2023 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.
    Searchlight Pictures

    PS: There’s quite a bit of sex and nudity in the film. How did those more sexual scenes affect or inspire your design process?

    HW: I think I knew that she was going to be nude a lot from the get go. It was made really clear to me that I wasn’t really designing the clothes around the sex scenes because I knew that most of the time, we were going to see a lot of her body. When I first read “Poor Things,” I thought, “Oh, we’ll recycle loads of clothes. She’ll have this quite small wardrobe that will go with her everywhere,” and I didn’t think it was going to be such a big job, but the thing was that once I got into it, I realized that the clothes needed to keep taking different turns to grow with her. Things like that big, silky, quilted evening dressing gown that she wears in the house, her seersucker pants, and little childlike pajamas, those all needed to have disappeared by the time we got to the brothel.

    I had to plot very carefully what she would wear for those lineups — when the women in the brothel have to line up for the men, and then one of them gets picked out, I knew that we would see her having sex in [the brother clothes], but I designed this bodice, and I made one for each of the girls, out of this bolt of wool floral fabric that had latex poured all over it. It had this skin-like quality, and that piece of fabric informed the whole look of the brothel. I wanted the brothel clothes not to look like normal fetish or sex clothes really.

    PS: Talk to me about the design process for the brothel costumes — it wasn’t like anything you would typically see or imagine.

    HW: The brothel was maybe mainly a whole new wardrobe. There were a few bits that we’d seen before like the kiwi colored dressing gown she wears on the cruise ship but I designed a set of brothel clothes for all the girls working there. I also got rid of the corset. We didn’t have any corsets in there. I wanted to celebrate the body by making, first of all, the palette, the colors of human skin. All the colors that the girls wear come from the palette of skin tones that you get with all different races together. I think Yorgos really wanted to have a really diverse group of women. So, I wanted it to be about skin really and also to be a celebration of their bodies, rather than to be about the corset and things that we just know really well. We really know about the typical suspenders and corsets and things we’ve seen. It’s an opportunity to do something else. Then I made these bodices with the huge sleeves out of this rubbery wool and then cut out holes for their breasts. Then it was less about restricting their bodies and more about displaying them.

    PS: I will say I loved Mark Ruffalo’s costumes too. I think I even saw him in a little waist corset at one point?

    HW: He’s the only principal apart from Mrs. Swiney (Kathryn Hunter) that wore a corset. Yorgos and I had committed early on that we would not be putting Bella in a corset. It would just be something that would be ridiculous to try and corset this untethered person. Conceptually, it was all wrong to use a corset, but we thought it was quite funny that Mark Ruffalo’s character, Duncan, who is a bit vain and quite into his own image, could be corseted.

    Emma Stone and Mark Ruffalo in POOR THINGS. Photo by Atsushi Nishijima. Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2023 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.Emma Stone and Mark Ruffalo in POOR THINGS. Photo by Atsushi Nishijima. Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2023 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.
    Searchlight Pictures

    PS: Is there a look you’re most proud of or a design you were most excited to see come together?

    HW: I really, really loved the look that she wears in the house towards the beginning. She’s got these little crinkly knickers on and a big huge, thick silk bodice that looks like something that belongs to a doll. Then she has this strange bustle, like a lobster tail that’s all puffy. That’s probably the look that I feel most defines what I was trying to do with “Poor Things.” I also really like that costume that she wears on the cruise ship when she sees the slum. I love that it is so big, the sleeves, and she looks quite clown-like in that. I don’t necessarily love it because I would want to wear it myself, but I was pleased with that moment. I also like the yellow shorts with the blue jacket from Lisbon as well.

    PS: What were some favorite moments you had working on the set? What made you love being a part of this film?

    HW: I really enjoyed the moment when the brothel came together. That was a really good moment for me because the reality of doing the job is it’s all very rushed. It’s working under great pressure to get everything done and “Poor Things” took us through lots of different worlds. There were lots of costumes to make, and we were all really working in a very pressurized way. You are working to these deadlines, and then the deadline just changes, and then there’s another deadline, and another one.

    The wedding was also a big deadline for us — and the wedding dress was a whole piece of work. For Jo, who was the cutter and her team of Hungarian costume makers, it was like delivering the impossible because I wanted these sleeves to feel like balloons that were helium balloons that were holding up in the air, but then I didn’t want anything really cluttering up. I didn’t want to see any structure in them. So for them, it was a nightmare.

    The story that Jo told me was they agreed that they all liked Whitney Houston and that was the motivator. They were up until 3:00 in the morning listening to Whitney Houston, trying to stitch these tiny tubes to these little bits of hat netting. It was all potentially going a bit wrong. Then I just remember delivering this dress to Emma in her trailer on the day of the wedding scene and thinking, “Oh no, is it going to work,” and she loved it. She just loved it. I think it was her favorite costume in the film. You get the moments when you think, “Oh, what a relief.”

    PS: What was it like working with Emma Stone on this project?

    HW: I hadn’t worked with her before — it was a real ride. She was incredibly generous, very clever — really interested in the ideas, not really at all concerned with her own appearance, and willing to take risks. It was really refreshing. She was a dream and very playful. A class act. As long as she agreed with the idea, she would fully embrace it, and embody it, and really frankly could wear anything.

    Other costume designers would have interpreted this story in another way, and she would’ve looked brilliant in those things as well. She just can wear anything really. I think that made for a very good doll-like aesthetic for this. And with that black hair, I mean, I couldn’t have imagined her with this black hair. It worked on her. Also that hair then meant that I could be stronger with the costumes.

    Morgan M. Evans

    Source link

  • The “Poor Things” Costume Designer on Taking Fashion Risks with Emma Stone – POPSUGAR Australia

    The “Poor Things” Costume Designer on Taking Fashion Risks with Emma Stone – POPSUGAR Australia

    Image Source: Searchlight Pictures

    Poor Things” Costume designer Holly Waddington is no stranger to period piece creation. Having worked on films such as “Lady Macbeth” and TV shows like “The Great,” Waddington’s affinity for historical dress is readily apparent. So, when the opportunity arose to bring the surrealist Victorian world of Yorgos Lanthimos’ “Poor Things” to life, the costume designer was more than ready to embark on the wild ride.

    “I was invited into the project because I had worked with Tony McNamara who had written ‘The Favorite.’ He’d also written ‘The Great,’ in which I designed the costumes for the pilot episode, so I built this relationship with Tony and he introduced me to Yorgos,” Waddington told POPSUGAR. “I’m a huge fan of Yorgos’ work and also of Tony’s work, so for me, as soon as I was called about, it was just an absolute no-brainer really that I would want to work on it.”

    Based on the 1992 novel by Alasdair Gray, the film adaption follows the story of Bella Baxter, played by Emma Stone, a Victorian woman brought back to life in a Frankenstein-like manner by unconventional scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter, played by William Dafoe. Eager to discover herself and the world, Bella embarks on a journey with the smarmy-slick lawyer Duncan Wedderburn, played by Mark Ruffalo, as she experiences life and develops from a doe-eyed childlike mind to that of a fully formed woman, who comes to realize her purpose and potential.

    That would be the biggest challenge of my job on the project: to find a way to tell her story through clothes through the choices of fabrics, and shapes, and how it was put together to describe the narrative arc and her journey from being a child in a woman’s body to having full mental capacity and being a fully formed woman.

    The challenge for Waddington was to convey Bella’s journey, as she grows both mentally and physically, through her clothing choices while finding the balance between the film’s historical backdrop and its fanciful world. “It wasn’t completely obvious from the beginning how we would approach it or design [Bella’s looks],” explained Waddington, who recently hosted an exhibition of the film’s costumes at the ASU Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising in Los Angeles. “I think when I first read it, I definitely had this sense that Bella Baxter would need to be in a state of half dress a lot of the time. That was something that I remember thinking from the get go – that she shouldn’t always be properly dressed.” She continued, “That would be the biggest challenge of my job on the project: to find a way to tell her story through clothes through the choices of fabrics, and shapes, and how it was put together to describe the narrative arc and her journey from being a child in a woman’s body to having full mental capacity and being a fully formed woman.” The end result: a fun house film, which features distorted fisheye lens shots and hops between black and white and vibrant colorful scenes, with a surrealist stage-like theatrical production and larger than life costumes.

    From collaborating with Stone on bold costumes, blasting Whitney Houston in a rush to make a wedding dress, and not to mention, Ruffalo’s corset, it’s clear that “Poor Things” was more than just another set, it was a one-of-a-kind experience. Below, read more about Waddington’s “Poor Things” journey and how she was able to bring her unconventional design concepts for an even more unconventional film to life.

    This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

    POPSUGAR: You’re known for your work on period pieces, so how was this Victorian-era film different from other projects you’ve worked on?

    Holly Waddington: I am a big fan of historical clothes. I am really fascinated by them. That’s why I’m a costume designer. I’m also really interested in stories, and storytelling, and character, so this is why I do this job. At the beginning of the project, Yorgos and I, we threw out lots and lots of ideas, many, many ideas, but I think at the beginning, Yorgos felt that she should be really properly dressed..in elegant, sophisticated ladies’ clothes, and that would seem really incongruous and strange in the physicality of her being this child in a woman’s body, but I think I always wanted to play with these ideas of deconstruction. It felt really right that [Bella] would be unraveled in her clothes.

    I have my own children, and they’re still quite young, and I see a lot of kids at playgroups and at playdates and things, and I just have this feeling that they’re always very hard to keep looking smart. Let’s say you dress a child to go to a smart occasion, I don’t know, a wedding or something. They don’t stay neat for very long. They’re very free in their bodies, and their bodies are very out of control, and they play. Just with my own kids, I’d notice that even when I try and dress them properly, within a couple of hours, they usually have bits missing, or they’ve added a bit of fancy dress. Often they’re very dressed at the top, but they often take their pants off or they’re walking…that was the quality that I wanted to get into those costumes.

    PS: There are a few times where you do see Bella in full Victorian dress, especially towards the end when she returns home to London. Were you trying to illustrate that journey of how she dresses at the beginning to how she dresses at the end?

    HW: I’ve never done a costume plot like Bella Baxter’s, so I had this big massive book. It was like an A3 ring binder, and in each page, each scene had a drawing and notes. Plotting how that would shift was really quite mental taxing for me. It shifted all the time, and it shifted based on conversations with Emma as well and with Yorgos. For example, when she steps out into the streets of Lisbon just in a pair of pants…because she wouldn’t think to add the skirts. So I was playing with all of those ideas, and then I wanted to try and find that quality when you see children dressing in their mother’s wardrobes.

    It’s a bit incongruous and odd, the shoes are too big, and their lipstick is a bit smeared, and everything’s a bit of a mess. I wanted to find that quality. There’s that look that she wears when she’s on the cruise ship, and she’s wearing a pink petticoat, and then she often wears those little fill in things that the Victorians would’ve worn to fill in a gap between the neck and the chest. She wears them just as things on their own with pieces like a big evening cape. That costume isn’t very beautiful. It’s a bit odd. It’s an odd mishmash of things, and that was what I was playing with. I was playing them with them in my own mind, but then with Emma Stone herself, she would get very involved in that.

    Image Source: Searchlight Pictures

    PS: There’s quite a bit of sex and nudity in the film. How did those more sexual scenes affect or inspire your design process?

    HW: I think I knew that she was going to be nude a lot from the get go. It was made really clear to me that I wasn’t really designing the clothes around the sex scenes because I knew that most of the time, we were going to see a lot of her body. When I first read “Poor Things,” I thought, “Oh, we’ll recycle loads of clothes. She’ll have this quite small wardrobe that will go with her everywhere,” and I didn’t think it was going to be such a big job, but the thing was that once I got into it, I realized that the clothes needed to keep taking different turns to grow with her. Things like that big, silky, quilted evening dressing gown that she wears in the house, her seersucker pants, and little childlike pajamas, those all needed to have disappeared by the time we got to the brothel.

    I had to plot very carefully what she would wear for those lineups – when the women in the brothel have to line up for the men, and then one of them gets picked out, I knew that we would see her having sex in [the brother clothes], but I designed this bodice, and I made one for each of the girls, out of this bolt of wool floral fabric that had latex poured all over it. It had this skin-like quality, and that piece of fabric informed the whole look of the brothel. I wanted the brothel clothes not to look like normal fetish or sex clothes really.

    PS: Talk to me about the design process for the brothel costumes – it wasn’t like anything you would typically see or imagine.

    HW: The brothel was maybe mainly a whole new wardrobe. There were a few bits that we’d seen before like the kiwi colored dressing gown she wears on the cruise ship but I designed a set of brothel clothes for all the girls working there. I also got rid of the corset. We didn’t have any corsets in there. I wanted to celebrate the body by making, first of all, the palette, the colors of human skin. All the colors that the girls wear come from the palette of skin tones that you get with all different races together. I think Yorgos really wanted to have a really diverse group of women. So, I wanted it to be about skin really and also to be a celebration of their bodies, rather than to be about the corset and things that we just know really well. We really know about the typical suspenders and corsets and things we’ve seen. It’s an opportunity to do something else. Then I made these bodices with the huge sleeves out of this rubbery wool and then cut out holes for their breasts. Then it was less about restricting their bodies and more about displaying them.

    PS: I will say I loved Mark Ruffalo’s costumes too. I think I even saw him in a little waist corset at one point?

    HW: He’s the only principal apart from Mrs. Swiney (Kathryn Hunter) that wore a corset. Yorgos and I had committed early on that we would not be putting Bella in a corset. It would just be something that would be ridiculous to try and corset this untethered person. Conceptually, it was all wrong to use a corset, but we thought it was quite funny that Mark Ruffalo’s character, Duncan, who is a bit vain and quite into his own image, could be corseted.

    Image Source: Searchlight Pictures

    PS: Is there a look you’re most proud of or a design you were most excited to see come together?

    HW: I really, really loved the look that she wears in the house towards the beginning. She’s got these little crinkly knickers on and a big huge, thick silk bodice that looks like something that belongs to a doll. Then she has this strange bustle, like a lobster tail that’s all puffy. That’s probably the look that I feel most defines what I was trying to do with “Poor Things.” I also really like that costume that she wears on the cruise ship when she sees the slum. I love that it is so big, the sleeves, and she looks quite clown-like in that. I don’t necessarily love it because I would want to wear it myself, but I was pleased with that moment. I also like the yellow shorts with the blue jacket from Lisbon as well.

    PS: What were some favorite moments you had working on the set? What made you love being a part of this film?

    HW: I really enjoyed the moment when the brothel came together. That was a really good moment for me because the reality of doing the job is it’s all very rushed. It’s working under great pressure to get everything done and “Poor Things” took us through lots of different worlds. There were lots of costumes to make, and we were all really working in a very pressurized way. You are working to these deadlines, and then the deadline just changes, and then there’s another deadline, and another one.

    The wedding was also a big deadline for us – and the wedding dress was a whole piece of work. For Jo, who was the cutter and her team of Hungarian costume makers, it was like delivering the impossible because I wanted these sleeves to feel like balloons that were helium balloons that were holding up in the air, but then I didn’t want anything really cluttering up. I didn’t want to see any structure in them. So for them, it was a nightmare.

    The story that Jo told me was they agreed that they all liked Whitney Houston and that was the motivator. They were up until 3:00 in the morning listening to Whitney Houston, trying to stitch these tiny tubes to these little bits of hat netting. It was all potentially going a bit wrong. Then I just remember delivering this dress to Emma in her trailer on the day of the wedding scene and thinking, “Oh no, is it going to work,” and she loved it. She just loved it. I think it was her favorite costume in the film. You get the moments when you think, “Oh, what a relief.”

    PS: What was it like working with Emma Stone on this project?

    HW: I hadn’t worked with her before – it was a real ride. She was incredibly generous, very clever – really interested in the ideas, not really at all concerned with her own appearance, and willing to take risks. It was really refreshing. She was a dream and very playful. A class act. As long as she agreed with the idea, she would fully embrace it, and embody it, and really frankly could wear anything.

    Other costume designers would have interpreted this story in another way, and she would’ve looked brilliant in those things as well. She just can wear anything really. I think that made for a very good doll-like aesthetic for this. And with that black hair, I mean, I couldn’t have imagined her with this black hair. It worked on her. Also that hair then meant that I could be stronger with the costumes.

    Related: Behind Zac Efron and Jeremy Allen White’s Transformations in “The Iron Claw”

    Morgan m. evans

    Source link

  • The “Selling Sunset” Cast Defends Their Over-the-Top Office Outfits

    The “Selling Sunset” Cast Defends Their Over-the-Top Office Outfits

    With each season of Netflix’s “Selling Sunset,” the cast’s wardrobes grow bolder and more memorable. Now, on Season 7, the cast doesn’t fail to deliver when it comes to over-the-top fashion, from Chelsea Lazkani to Chrishell Stause. The “Selling Sunset” outfits are famously dressy — think 7-inch heels worn to open houses — and sometimes they’re even borderline outrageous (namely, Lazkani’s viral vagina purse).

    In fact, Lazkani put it best when it comes to styling her memorable looks for the show. “When you’re on a cast with a number of ladies and you all have different body types, you’ve got to know what your best assets are,” she told POPSUGAR, adding: “I’m not 5’9″ like the rest of the girls, I’m 5’5″, but you may think that I’m a lot taller than I am because I show off the parts of me that are flattering. I think everything is about angles and knowing what works for you.”

    It’s safe to say the rest of the women on the cast — including Heather Rae El Moussa and Mary Fitzgerald — all abide by that rule. Keep reading for everything to know about the “Selling Sunset” outfits.

    Where does the “Selling Sunset” cast get their outfits? Does the “Selling Sunset” cast wear their own clothes?

    While most castmates simply shop their own closet, Emma Hernan did collaborate with creative consultant Kendall Finzer for her wardrobe of thigh-high slits and monochrome suit sets.

    In season 5, former castmate Christine Quinn worked with stylist Kat Gosik on her eye-catching looks. (In May 2023, Quinn alleged that “Selling Sunset” producers pressured the cast to adhere to a revealing dress code. Netflix, Lionsgate, and Done and Done Productions did not immediately respond to POPSUGAR’s request for comment.)

    Does the “Selling Sunset” cast actually dress like that?

    Yes, the “Selling Sunset” cast dresses the same in real life, whether they’re going to the office at The Oppenheim Group for a meeting or hosting an open house. “Anything can be office wear these days,” says Chrishell Stause. “Add a blazer to that cute dress and you are ready to go.” Likewise, traditional office wear simply isn’t Lazkani’s aesthetic of choice. “I don’t actually feel comfortable in those tailored suit pants that women traditionally wear in business settings, so I choose not to wear them,” she said. “I prefer to wear a cute dress and a blazer.”

    Ahead, the women of “Selling Sunset” break down their personal style philosophies for POPSUGAR. Keep scrolling to read our exclusive interviews and to see outfits from the best seasons of “Selling Sunset.”

    Sarah Wasilak

    Source link

  • Allison Williams Is Still Taking Style Cues From Her Onscreen Rival, M3GAN

    Allison Williams Is Still Taking Style Cues From Her Onscreen Rival, M3GAN

    Allison Williams served horror-movie haute couture during a stroll through New York City on Oct. 25. Following the viral success of director Gerard Johnstone’s “M3gan,” in which Williams plays the malevolent doll’s rival, fans have been taking style cues from the fashionable AI robot. In the film, M3GAN unleashes her vengeance on dozens of unsuspecting victims, and she does it all in patent-leather Mary Janes and a peplum silhouette. After months of filming, her chic sense of style appears to have rubbed off on Williams, and something about the preppy ensemble has us envisioning a whole collection of M3GAN-inspired outfits.

    Putting a M3GAN-core twist on some of our favorite fall fashion trends, Williams stepped out in a Brunello Cucinelli Giacca double-breasted leather blazer, which retails for $8,400, layered over a white button-up shirt and a sequin necktie. She styled the brown leather blazer with a plaid miniskirt, sheer tights, and pointed-toe pumps in a rich chocolate shade. Even her manicure reflected the autumnal tones.

    For those who haven’t had the pleasure of watching the comedy-infused horror film, “M3GAN” closely follows the eponymous AI robot as she attempts to pick off the human race one by one. Even as she’s coaxing her next victim into the forest to meet their unfortunate end, the doll manages to keep her peplum coat and hand-polished shoes looking pristine. As a children’s plaything, she is lethal; but as a horror-movie fashion idol, M3GAN’s wardrobe is a lesson in the power of simplicity, which Williams has executed perfectly.

    Falling heavily in line with the traditional prep and school-girl aesthetics, M3GAN-core is all about attention to detail. From an artful pair of tinted sunglasses to a set of leather driving gloves that beg the question “Can M3GAN drive?,” the AI doll’s wardrobe is stacked with luxe accessories. Like the carefully curated pieces that round out M3GAN’s costumes, Williams’s sleek heels and shimmering necktie feel purposeful in their styling and invoke the idea that — dangerous AI bot or not — a quality coat never goes out of style.

    Admire Williams’s “M3GAN”-inspired ensemble from all angles ahead, and see more of our favorite “M3GAN-core” looks here.

    Chanel Vargas

    Source link

  • Meghan Markle Is Still Taking Style Cues From Her “Suits” Character

    Meghan Markle Is Still Taking Style Cues From Her “Suits” Character

    As its streaming resurgence proves, “Suits” is a stellar show with its own merits — epic one-liners, a quick-witted and equally attractive cast of characters, and of course, the suits. It’s also the legal drama that introduced many of us to Meghan Markle, as well as her character Rachel Zane‘s fabulous corporate fashion. While each Pearson Specter Litt lawyer has style worth admiring, Zane’s in particular is striking, as much of her wardrobe mirrors Markle’s ensembles in real life.

    Markle’s style has certainly evolved since she left the series in 2011, but remnants of her preppy “Suits” costumes remain present today. As both a working royal and private citizen, she embraced her now-signature styling cues like tonal dressing, a preppy pencil skirt combo, and affinity for a crisp button-down.

    While her sartorial choices leaned more neutral and conservative while a royal — she’s since spoken about sticking to muted tones like camel, beige, and white to avoid drawing attention to herself — her looks have been consistent. Even as she’s adopted a more casual wardrobe living in California, the mom of two still has her go-to outfit formulas, perhaps influenced by her days as the paralegal-turned-attorney she played on “Suits.”

    In fact, recent rewatches of the show had us wondering whether Markle snagged a few pieces from Zane’s closet when she moved to the UK and back to California. Among the many similarities, the former actor and her character both love a casual yet elevated look, usually consisting of a loose dress shirt and expert tailoring.

    “Meghan and I loved Rachel’s clothes,” “Suits” costume designer Jolie Andreatta said in an interview with Harper’s Bazaar UK back in 2018. “We’d always say that, if we could, we would live in Rachel’s clothes.” While she might not be living in Zane’s exact pieces, it’s safe to say Markle may have drawn fashion inspiration from her character.

    From chic monochrome outfits to double-breasted silhouettes, take a look at the key pieces and outfit formulas that define both the duchess and Zane’s wardrobes.

    Yerin Kim

    Source link

  • Everything to Know About the Engagement Rings on “Love Is Blind”

    Everything to Know About the Engagement Rings on “Love Is Blind”

    If you’re a fan of Netflix’s “Love Is Blind,” then you may be curious about the engagement rings, which are either chosen on set or brought in (Kyle Abrams presented his mom’s ring to Shaina Hurley during season two, for example).

    Knowing that on “The Bachelor” and “The Bachelorette,” the jewelry is entirely provided by Neil Lane, you have to wonder how much shopping the men on “LIB” could possibly be getting done outside of the pods while they’re holed up from the outside world.

    What’s more, if you’re looking closely, you may notice similarities in some of the women’s engagement rings. In fact, in season one, it appeared Lauren Speed, Jessica Batten, and Amber Pike wore identical rings following their proposals.

    According to Netflix, all the men are presented with dozens of rings to choose from, unless they brought their own. “Whatever they choose, we pay for. Whatever we pay for, they keep, regardless of engagement ending,” a representative told POPSUGAR. And even though you might recognize similar elements on some designs — like diamond carat size, band embellishment, and setting — no two styles are exactly the same.

    Netflix even shared that in season two, the men proposing discussed their choices together, so the rings felt unique to each recipient. Of course, there are fans who have tweeted that they believe the women should be able to choose their preferred style before heading into the pods. That became a major issue in season two, when Mallory Zapata ended up with a silver ring picked by Salvador Perez, instead of her preferred choice of gold. Perhaps the producers will find a way for both contestants to join the ring-selection process in future seasons.

    In the meantime, keep reading for everything to know about the “Love Is Blind” engagement rings, including the similarities, the payment, and the process by which they’re chosen.

    — Additional reporting by Naomi Parris

    Sarah Wasilak

    Source link

  • Why Barbie Trades Chanel For Birkenstock, According to the Movie’s Costume Designer

    Why Barbie Trades Chanel For Birkenstock, According to the Movie’s Costume Designer

    The anticipation for the “Barbie” movie wardrobe has been at an all-time high, cinematically speaking. The movie has become a jumping-off point for the Barbiecore fashion trend and plenty of merch from designer collaborations. For costume designer Jacqueline Durran (2017’s “Beauty and the Beast” and 2019’s “Little Women”), that could feel like serious pressure. The workload was an impressive feat to take on, especially since her team only had 11 weeks to make the looks — and they continued creating while filming progressed.

    Durran drew inspiration from a range of sources, including iconic Barbie dolls from the ’80s and pastels that nod to the French Riviera in the ’50s and ’60s. She also tapped Chanel to loan extra pieces for Margot Robbie’s Stereotypical Barbie character. “It was one of my main intentions in the costuming of the movie to reference as many Mattel historic Barbie costumes as I could,” Durran tells POPSUGAR.

    “One of the things about Barbie is that she’s always accessorized, and Chanel makes fantastic accessories.”

    Alongside Robbie, Durran had plenty of actors to dress, including Ryan Gosling, who came up with his own idea for Ken’s logofied underwear; Simu Liu, who represents the confident “Kenergy” Gosling’s up against; Issa Rae, whose sets are purposefully presidential-turned-leisurely; and Kate McKinnon, who looks like every doll you’ve ever destroyed as the eccentric Weird Barbie.

    The “Barbie” movie outfits are visually stunning, to be sure, but they also serve as a plot device. The dichotomy between Robbie’s Barbie heels and her Birkenstocks, for example, speaks to the contrast between the idyllic Barbieland and the real world. Her yellow dress in the last scene also points to her transformation from a Barbie doll to a human. “For Barbie Margot, at that moment, she’s really becoming human, so the idea was that her dress was much softer than her previous looks,” Durran says. “It’s a bias-cut dress, which means that it drapes, and none of Barbie’s previous clothes have ever draped.”

    Ahead, Durran takes POPSUGAR through her experience costuming the “Barbie” movie cast and shares the symbolism behind key outfits.

    Sarah Wasilak

    Source link