ReportWire

Tag: Scott Peterson

  • What to know: The Scott Peterson murder case timeline

    What to know: The Scott Peterson murder case timeline

    [ad_1]

    Convicted killer Scott Peterson is making another bid to get a whole new trial — this time, with new lawyers who say they plan to present critical, previously-overlooked evidence.

    It’s the latest bend in the road for Peterson’s long journey through the justice system, which started more than twenty years ago. In 2004, a jury convicted him of killing his wife and their unborn son, and several months later, a judge sentenced him to death. Here’s what’s happened so far in the case that had the world’s attention focused on a courtroom in Redwood City — starting back where it all began, almost 100 miles away in Modesto.

    December 2002: Laci Peterson is reported missing

    Laci Peterson was reported missing on Christmas Eve, 2002. She was eight months pregnant with a baby boy. She and Scott had planned to name their son Connor.

    Scott Peterson said everything seemed fine when he left their house that morning. Prosecutors say he told a neighbor he was going to play golf. But that’s not where he went. Instead, he drove to the Berkeley Marina, almost 90 miles away, where he later told police he went fishing in a little aluminum boat he’d recently purchased — one his family never even knew he had.

    The search for Laci began. But a month later, the story took an unexpected turn.

    January 2003: Amber Frey speaks out

    “Scott told me he was not married,” she said to a room full of journalists. “We did have a romantic relationship.”

    The woman speaking was Amber Frey, a massage therapist living in Fresno, who’d said she’d been quite in love with her new boyfriend Scott Peterson before finding out he was actually married and expecting a baby.

    Prosecutors say Peterson told Frey he’d “lost” his wife, and would be spending his first Christmas alone — even though, at the time of that conversation, Laci was still very much alive.

    March 2003: Police rule it a homicide

    By March, police had classified the missing persons case of Laci Peterson as a homicide investigation, and began executing search warrants on the Petersons’ property. Scott Peterson, still front and center in the effort to bring Laci home, began to feel growing pressure from the public and the media.

    April 2003: Bodies found in the Bay

    “The body is an adult female,” a police spokesman told reporters in a late night press conference.

    It was at Richmond’s Point Isabel, just a few miles from where Scott Peterson went fishing, that the bodies of Laci and her unborn son had washed ashore. The two bodies were found separately, a mile apart, in gruesome condition.

    April 2003: Peterson arrested

    After identifying the bodies, police went looking for Scott Peterson. They found him near San Diego, with bleached hair and a goatee, carrying a huge pile of cash. Police took him into custody, and drove with him for ten hours back to Modesto, where he was booked into jail.

    At his arraignment, Peterson pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder, and then hired Mark Geragos, a defense lawyer with a long list of celebrity clients.

    January 2004: Change of venue

    Even before a jury was selected, the case had already gotten so much attention that a judge in Stanislaus County ruled Peterson couldn’t get a fair trial in his hometown. There was nonstop national news coverage, primetime TV specials, and even a made-for-TV movie.

    The judge ordered the case moved to San Mateo County, where Peterson would stand trial at the courthouse in Redwood City.

    February 2004: Lifetime movie

    In February, a feature-length movie, “The Perfect Husband: The Laci Peterson Story” made its debut on Lifetime TV. It was a ripped-from-the-headlines crime film starring Dean Cain as Scott Peterson. The film re-enacted press conferences and recorded phone calls word-for-word, and featured “missing” posters with Laci’s real photo on them.

    June 2004: Trial begins

    For five months, Scott Peterson’s murder trial played out to a packed courtroom.

    Over the course of the trial, two jurors were thrown out for misconduct, and a third left over arguments in the jury room. One of the replacement jurors was Richelle Nice, who became known as the Strawberry Shortcake juror for her crimson-dyed hair and accompanying pink outfits.

    November 2004: Peterson is found guilty

    On November 12, the verdict was read in court. The jury found Peterson guilty of first-degree murder in the death of his wife Laci, and second-degree murder in the death of his baby son, Connor.

    March 2005: Sentenced to death

    In March, by the jury’s unanimous recommendation, Peterson was sentenced to death — even though police never found a crime scene or a murder weapon. He was sent to San Quentin, where his story could’ve ended on California’s infamous death row. But it didn’t. 

    Instead, 16 years later, Peterson was brought back to that very same courthouse in Redwood City.

    December 2021: Moved off death row

    The California Supreme Court agreed to hear Peterson’s appeal, and decided that the judge in his murder trial had overstepped his authority by excluding jurors who said they were against to the death penalty. The high court ruled that the judge had no right to pre-screen jurors in that way.

    In the midst of the lingering COVID-19 pandemic, Peterson was brought into court wearing a turquoise N95 mask and a red jail uniform, with his hands shackled to his waist. No longer condemned to death by execution, he appeared calm and in good spirits as he was re-sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

    December 2022: Appeal for a new trial

    A year later, Peterson’s next appeal centered around the Strawberry Shortcake juror, Richelle Nice — who it turns out wasn’t fully honest in jury selection.

    On a questionnaire for prospective jurors, Nice didn’t disclose that she’d recently filed a restraining order against someone who threatened her while she was pregnant — a fact that could have disqualified her from serving on the jury.

    A judge heard the case, but ruled that Nice’s failure to disclose her ongoing legal matter wasn’t enough to get Peterson a new trial.

    March 2024: New evidence?

    That brings us back to the present day, when a 51-year-old Scott Peterson, with long hair pulled back in a ponytail, appeared remotely before a judge in Redwood City from a room inside Mule Creek State Prison, outside Sacramento.

    “Good morning, Mr. Peterson, can you both see and hear the proceeding, sir?” asked Judge Elizabeth Hill.

    “Yes, Your Honor, I can, thank you,” Peterson replied.

    Along with some of the same prosecutors who tried his original case, there were new lawyers in the courtroom for this hearing. Peterson’s new defense team comes from the Los Angeles Innocence Project, a two-year-old nonprofit that’s independent from the national Innocence Project, and works with the forensic science institute at Cal State L.A.

    “We are eager to get our investigation underway,” said Paula Mitchell, the L.A. Innocence Project’s director, speaking to Judge Hill from the defense table.

    Peterson’s new lawyers are hoping to re-try his case by finding new evidence — especially DNA evidence from challenging samples for which the technology to obtain an accurate DNA sequence has improved since Peterson’s original conviction.

    They asked Judge Hill for access to perform DNA testing on material from a burned-out van with what appeared to be a bloody mattress inside, found after a burglary near the Petersons’ house. They also asked to test numerous items of clothing and debris that surfaced along with the bodies.

    “The defense was entitled to this at the time of trial,” Mitchell argued in court.

    But so far, the only new DNA test the court has agreed to allow is a single piece of duct tape that was found on Laci Peterson’s pants during the autopsy.

    All this time, Scott Peterson has maintained he’s innocent. But this latest effort could be his last chance to show there’s reasonable doubt about whether he’s guilty.

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Bloom

    Source link

  • Could Scott Peterson go free? Innocence projects help exonerate hundreds of inmates

    Could Scott Peterson go free? Innocence projects help exonerate hundreds of inmates

    [ad_1]

    (FOX40.COM) — Modesto resident Scott Peterson was supposed to spend the rest of his life in prison for the 2002 murder of his wife and unborn child, however, that sentence could soon change if an advocacy group has its way.  
    Video Above: Scott Peterson’s lawyers asking for new DNA testing

    Peterson’s case caught national attention after his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, went missing on Christmas Eve 2002. Four months later, the bodies of Laci Peterson and their infant son, Connor, washed up to a Bay Area shore. Scott Peterson was convicted in 2004 for their murders and sentenced to death – which was later changed to life in prison.

    For over 20 years, Scott Peterson has maintained his innocence and in January 2024 his case was picked up by the Los Angeles Innocence Project, a group that defends inmates it believes to be wrongfully imprisoned. The group suggests that DNA evidence, suspicious activity in the area when Laci went missing, and the likelihood of another suspect, could exonerate the convicted killer.

    Scott Peterson was convicted in 2024 based on “overwhelming” circumstantial evidence and although he has been incarcerated for decades, innocence groups have been successful in getting hundreds of convictions overturned with the help of DNA testing.

    Scott Peterson is seen on a live video feed from Mule Creek State Prison on March 12, 2024.

    Here are some inmates who got out of jail after receiving support from groups like LAIP:

    Los Angeles Innocence Project

    After 38 years behind bars for a robbery-homicide and sexual assault in Inglewood, the Los Angeles Innocence Project reported that DNA evidence exonerated Maurice Hastings. Hastings was convicted in the 1980s and released in 2022 with the help of LAIP.

    In Hasting’s case, LAIP argued that DNA from the scene was never tested – similar to how the group said crucial evidence from Peterson’s case has not been examined.

    “I have been incarcerated for over fifteen years for a murder that I did not commit,” LAIP said Hastings wrote to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office in 2000. “The most compelling of the evidence that has not as of yet been examined is the DNA evidence which will conclusively show that I was not the person involved with the deceased at the time of the crime.”

    After DNA testing was performed, the specimen led to a convicted sex offender and Hastings was subsequently released from prison after nearly four decades served.

    The Exoneration Project

    The Exoneration Project has helped close to 200 people prove their innocence and be freed from incarceration, according to its website. Some clients who were exonerated include Frank Drew, who spent 24 years in prison for homicide; Harold Staten who was incarcerated for 38 years for arson and murder; and Darien Harris who was reportedly convicted for a fatal shooting at a gas station after a blind eyewitness’ testimony. He was incarcerated for 12 years before the sentence was thrown out.

    Equal Justice Initiative

    The Equal Justice Initiative is committed to ending mass incarceration and excessive punishment in the United States, according to its website. It aims to challenge racial and economic injustice, and to protect basic human rights “for the most vulnerable people in American society.”

    One of the most notable cases is Marsha Colbey who was wrongfully convicted of capital murder in 2007 and sentenced to life after she reportedly gave birth to a stillborn baby.

    Colbey went into premature labor and unexpectedly delivered a stillborn baby while at home alone. Her efforts to revive the child were unsuccessful, and she buried him in a marked grave near her home, according to EJI. Initial forensic reports stated the baby was born alive which led to a murder charge, but four years later, new testing showed evidence of life was inconclusive. She was released from prison in 2012.

    Innocence Project

    The Innocence Project, not to be confused with the Los Angeles Innocence Project, has been successful in freeing nearly 300 inmates since its inception in 1992.

    Clients include Kirk Bloodsworth, who was reportedly the first person in the U.S. to be exonerated from death row. He was wrongfully convicted of the assault and murder of a 9-year-old girl in 1993 but released nine years later through DNA evidence.

    Steven Avery was also an Innocent Project client, who inspired the Netflix documentary series, “Making a Murder.” Avery was convicted in 1985 for sexual assault and attempted murder. He was exonerated in 2003 through DNA evidence – but only remained free for two years.

    After filing a $36M lawsuit and attempting to expose corruption in local law enforcement, he was charged with murder. Avery’s case has been controversial, and his legal team continues to advocate for his innocence.

    [ad_2]

    Veronica Catlin

    Source link

  • TIMELINE: How the Laci Peterson case unfolded

    TIMELINE: How the Laci Peterson case unfolded

    [ad_1]

    MODESTO, Calif. (KGO) — For more than 20 years, the investigation into the murders of Laci Peterson and her unborn son has been lingering in the courts.

    The bodies of Laci Peterson and her son’s fetus were found more than four months after their disappearance in the San Francisco Bay in 2003. She was 27.

    Police soon arrested her husband Scott Peterson following months of probing which uncovered he was having an affair before Laci Peterson’s death. Scott Peterson, who was convicted in their deaths, has maintained his innocence and been appealing the decision.

    Here is a timeline of the events surrounding the investigation.

    In this April 21, 2003 file photo Sarah Kellison stands in front of a memorial for Laci Peterson outside the house Laci shared with her husband Scott Peterson in Modesto, Calif.

    AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File

    Dec. 24, 2002

    Laci Peterson’s stepfather and Scott Peterson both filed reports with the police that she was missing. Laci Peterson was eight months pregnant at the time with the couple’s son, Connor.

    Late December 2002 to March 2003

    Scott Peterson, who was 30 at the time, is eyed as a suspect after it was revealed he was having an affair with Amber Frey, a massage therapist, at the time of his wife’s disappearance.

    Scott Peterson admitted to the affair and said he and his wife were having marital problems but he denied harming her or killing her.

    He and Laci Peterson’s family drift apart as the community continues to search for her.

    Scott Peterson stands in a command center where volunteers pick up leaflets as the search for his wife, Laci Peterson, continues Sunday, Jan. 19, 2003, in Los Angeles.

    Scott Peterson stands in a command center where volunteers pick up leaflets as the search for his wife, Laci Peterson, continues Sunday, Jan. 19, 2003, in Los Angeles.

    AP Photo/Ann Johansson

    April 14, 2003

    The decomposed body of a woman that had a missing head and limbs was found washed ashore in San Francisco Bay, one day after the decomposed body of a fetus was found nearby.

    April 18, 2003

    DNA from the corpses matched Laci Peterson and her unborn son. Police arrested Scott Peterson, the same day.

    Investigators allege he had dyed his hair, and had $15,000 in cash, his brother’s ID card and multiple cell phones.

    Defense attorney Mark J. Geragos is seen with client Scott Peterson in Stanislaus Superior Court during a hearing Friday, May 2, 2003, in Modesto, Calif.

    Defense attorney Mark J. Geragos is seen with client Scott Peterson in Stanislaus Superior Court during a hearing Friday, May 2, 2003, in Modesto, Calif.

    AP Photo/Al Golub, pool

    April 21, 2003

    Scott Peterson was arraigned on first-degree murder in the death of his wife and second-degree murder in the death of their unborn son. He pleads not guilty.

    Dec. 19, 2003

    Sharon and Dennis Rocha, Laci Peterson’s parents, filed a wrongful death suit against Scott Peterson.

    June 1, 2004- Nov. 3, 2004

    Scott Peterson’s criminal trial lasts for five months and includes numerous witnesses including Frey, who testified that he told her he wasn’t married. Peterson’s defense team contended prosecutors are using circumstantial evidence and their client is innocent.

    Nov. 12, 2004

    The jury found Scott Peterson guilty on both of his murder charges. Deliberations were delayed after one of the jurors, Fran Gorman, was dismissed when it was discovered she was doing research into the case. She is replaced by an alternative juror, Richelle Nice.

    Dec. 13, 2004

    The jury unanimously recommended that Scott Peterson be sentenced to death.

    Scott Peterson is seen during a hearing, Wednesday morning, Jan. 14, 2004, at the Stanislaus County Superior Court in Modesto, Calif.

    Scott Peterson is seen during a hearing, Wednesday morning, Jan. 14, 2004, at the Stanislaus County Superior Court in Modesto, Calif.

    AP Photo/Bart Ah You, Pool

    March 16, 2005

    Judge Alfred Delucchi sentenced Scott Peterson to death via lethal injection. During the hearing, Laci Peterson’s family members delivered emotional victim-impact statements berating Scott Peterson. He does not give any statement.

    April 30, 2009

    Laci Peterson’s family dropped their wrongful death suit.

    July 15, 2012

    Scott Peterson’s attorneys filed an appeal of his conviction with a 423-page brief that makes several arguments that their client did not have a fair trial. Among the contentions was the attention, a lack of direct evidence of the crime and the judge’s exclusion of prospective jurors who opposed the death penalty affected the trial.

    Nov. 24, 2015

    Scott Peterson files a second appeal which includes the same allegations as the previous filing but also contended that Richelle Nice failed to disclose that she was once allegedly threatened by her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend while pregnant.

    Scott Peterson, (right) with a fellow inmate is seen during a tour of North Segregation of death row at San Quentin State Prison on December 29, 2015, in San Quentin, Calif.

    Scott Peterson, (right) with a fellow inmate is seen during a tour of North Segregation of death row at San Quentin State Prison on December 29, 2015, in San Quentin, Calif.

    Photo By Michael Macor/The San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

    Aug. 24, 2020

    The California Supreme Court overturned the death penalty sentence.

    The court noted, “The trial court made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection that, under long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent, undermined Peterson’s right to an impartial jury at the penalty phase.”

    However, the court upheld the conviction.

    Oct. 14, 2020

    The California Supreme Court ordered a review of Scott Peterson’s conviction and sent the case back to San Mateo County Superior Court to reexamine and determine if it should be overturned.

    Dec. 8, 2021

    Scott Peterson was resentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

    Scott Peterson is seen during a hearing at the San Mateo County Superior Court in Redwood City, Calif., Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2021.

    Scott Peterson is seen during a hearing at the San Mateo County Superior Court in Redwood City, Calif., Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2021.

    Andy Alfaro/The Modesto Bee via AP, Pool

    Dec. 20, 2022

    Following months of hearings, arguments and briefs, Judge Anne-Christine Massullo denied Scott Peterson’s request for a new trial.

    The judge concluded that Nice’s “responses were not motivated by pre-existing or improper bias against Petitioner, but instead were the result of a combination of good faith misunderstanding of the questions and sloppiness in answering.”

    Jan. 18, 2024

    The LA Innocence Project took up the case. In a court filing, the group says it seeks new evidence from the case.

    Take a look at the latest stories and videos about Scott Peterson here.

    Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    KGO

    Source link

  • Scott Peterson murder case returns to court; LA Innocence Project focusing on DNA evidence

    Scott Peterson murder case returns to court; LA Innocence Project focusing on DNA evidence

    [ad_1]

    REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (KGO) — Convicted murderer Scott Peterson appeared virtually before a San Mateo County judge Tuesday as part of his effort to get a new trial.

    He was back in court in Redwood City as the Los Angeles Innocence Project takes up his case.

    Peterson was convicted in 2004 of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son Conner in 2002.

    Now, the Innocence Project says newly-discovered evidence supports Peterson’s claims of innocence.

    RELATED: Judge grants Scott Peterson status hearing after LA Innocence Project filings

    Future court dates for Peterson were set during Tuesday’s status hearing as the Los Angeles Innocence Project is attempting to exonerate him.

    Peterson showed up in court in Redwood City virtually from Mule Creek State Prison, where he’s serving a life sentence.

    He wore a blue collared prison shirt, slicked-back hair, and what looked like a ponytail or man bun.

    He smiled when asked if he could hear them over the Zoom.

    VIDEO: Former investigator says key evidence wasn’t properly investigated in Scott Peterson case

    In an exclusive interview with ABC News, a former California Fire official says key evidence wasn’t properly investigated in Scott Peterson case

    In the courtroom, the Los Angeles Innocence Project said they wanted evidence as soon as possible and that there were deficiencies in the evidence provided to the defense at the time of trial.

    They say Peterson’s been waiting 20 years to get some of the audio recordings and police reports.

    But the state explained they need more time.

    The LA Innocence Project is focusing on a burglary in a home across the street from the Peterson’s home and claims from witnesses that they saw the burglars speaking with Laci.

    TIMELINE: How the Laci Peterson case unfolded

    “What if he’s not guilty OK, what if he had an affair and was a crappy husband, but what if he didn’t kill her,” legal analyst Paula Canny said. “What if that van shows it’s Laci’s DNA? Two things happen, 20 years of his life or 23 years of his life is gone. His family has bankrupted itself trying to exonerate him and Laci and Connor’s killers have walked free for 20 years. So think about that.”

    Future court dates were set for April and May as Peterson said he prefers to continue to show up virtually.

    Peterson’s half-brother Joe and his wife Janey, who is the family spokesperson, were at the hearing but didn’t talk on camera.

    If you’re on the ABC7 News app, click here to watch live

    Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Gloria Rodríguez

    Source link

  • Scott Peterson back in court with support from the LA Innocence Project

    Scott Peterson back in court with support from the LA Innocence Project

    [ad_1]

    Scott Peterson returned to a courtroom by Zoom on Tuesday in the latest development since being convicted nearly 20 years ago of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn child on Christmas Eve in 2002.Peterson’s death sentence was overturned in 2020 but he’s still serving a life sentence while maintaining his innocence and hoping for a new trial.Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Innocence Project took up Peterson’s case, requesting to look at some of the evidence used in his trial.The group filed motions in the case for a post-conviction discovery, sealed court records, DNA testing and exhibits in support of the DNA testing.Items mentioned in the court documents include cloth from a mattress booked into evidence by police that was recovered from an orange van that was set on fire in the Peterson neighborhood. They also want to examine items recovered at a home near the Peterson’s residence that had been burglarized.All of this was around the time that Laci Peterson disappeared in December of 2002.Tuesday’s brief status conference hearing focused on scheduling future hearings. A hearing on a motion to seal proceedings will take place on April 16. Another hearing on the DNA motions was scheduled for May 29. Another hearing about discovery proceedings will take place on July 15. Peterson will attend each of the hearings by Zoom from Mule Creek State Prison.Scott Peterson was found guilty in a San Mateo Court after the remains of Laci and her unborn son Conner were found in the San Francisco Bay in 2003.Peterson told investigators he had gone to fish in Berkeley, a few miles from where the remains ended up surfacing.In December, Peterson’s request for a new murder trial was denied. Peterson alleged the resulting trial that gripped the world was tainted by a rogue juror who lied about her own history of abuse to get on the panel that initially sent him to death row.Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo found there was not evidence to support the defense claim that Juror No. 7, Richelle Nice, committed misconduct during jury selection.

    Scott Peterson returned to a courtroom by Zoom on Tuesday in the latest development since being convicted nearly 20 years ago of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn child on Christmas Eve in 2002.

    Peterson’s death sentence was overturned in 2020 but he’s still serving a life sentence while maintaining his innocence and hoping for a new trial.

    Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Innocence Project took up Peterson’s case, requesting to look at some of the evidence used in his trial.

    The group filed motions in the case for a post-conviction discovery, sealed court records, DNA testing and exhibits in support of the DNA testing.

    Items mentioned in the court documents include cloth from a mattress booked into evidence by police that was recovered from an orange van that was set on fire in the Peterson neighborhood. They also want to examine items recovered at a home near the Peterson’s residence that had been burglarized.

    All of this was around the time that Laci Peterson disappeared in December of 2002.

    Tuesday’s brief status conference hearing focused on scheduling future hearings. A hearing on a motion to seal proceedings will take place on April 16. Another hearing on the DNA motions was scheduled for May 29. Another hearing about discovery proceedings will take place on July 15. Peterson will attend each of the hearings by Zoom from Mule Creek State Prison.

    Scott Peterson was found guilty in a San Mateo Court after the remains of Laci and her unborn son Conner were found in the San Francisco Bay in 2003.

    Peterson told investigators he had gone to fish in Berkeley, a few miles from where the remains ended up surfacing.

    In December, Peterson’s request for a new murder trial was denied. Peterson alleged the resulting trial that gripped the world was tainted by a rogue juror who lied about her own history of abuse to get on the panel that initially sent him to death row.

    Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo found there was not evidence to support the defense claim that Juror No. 7, Richelle Nice, committed misconduct during jury selection.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Scott Peterson returns to court with support from the LA Innocence Project

    Scott Peterson returns to court with support from the LA Innocence Project

    [ad_1]

    Scott Peterson returned to a courtroom by Zoom on Tuesday in the latest development since being convicted nearly 20 years ago of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn child on Christmas Eve in 2002. Peterson’s death sentence was overturned in 2020, but he’s still serving a life sentence while maintaining his innocence and hoping for a new trial. Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Innocence Project took up Peterson’s case, requesting to look at some of the evidence used in his trial. The group filed motions in the case for a post-conviction discovery, sealed court records, DNA testing and exhibits in support of the DNA testing.Items mentioned in the court documents include cloth from a mattress booked into evidence by police that was recovered from an orange van that was set on fire in the Peterson neighborhood. They also want to examine items recovered at a home near the Peterson’s residence that had been burglarized. All of this was around the time that Laci Peterson disappeared in December of 2002. Tuesday’s brief status conference hearing focused on scheduling future hearings. A hearing on a motion to seal proceedings will take place on April 16. Another hearing on the DNA motions was scheduled for May 29. Another hearing about discovery proceedings will take place on July 15. Peterson will attend each of the hearings by Zoom from Mule Creek State Prison. Scott Peterson was found guilty in a San Mateo Court after the remains of Laci and her unborn son Conner were found in the San Francisco Bay in 2003. Peterson told investigators he had gone to fish in Berkeley, a few miles from where the remains ended up surfacing. In December, Peterson’s request for a new murder trial was denied. Peterson alleged the resulting trial that gripped the world was tainted by a rogue juror who lied about her own history of abuse to get on the panel that initially sent him to death row.Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo found there was no evidence to support the defense claim that Juror No. 7, Richelle Nice, committed misconduct during jury selection.

    Scott Peterson returned to a courtroom by Zoom on Tuesday in the latest development since being convicted nearly 20 years ago of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn child on Christmas Eve in 2002.

    Peterson’s death sentence was overturned in 2020, but he’s still serving a life sentence while maintaining his innocence and hoping for a new trial.

    Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Innocence Project took up Peterson’s case, requesting to look at some of the evidence used in his trial.

    The group filed motions in the case for a post-conviction discovery, sealed court records, DNA testing and exhibits in support of the DNA testing.

    Items mentioned in the court documents include cloth from a mattress booked into evidence by police that was recovered from an orange van that was set on fire in the Peterson neighborhood. They also want to examine items recovered at a home near the Peterson’s residence that had been burglarized.

    All of this was around the time that Laci Peterson disappeared in December of 2002.

    Tuesday’s brief status conference hearing focused on scheduling future hearings. A hearing on a motion to seal proceedings will take place on April 16. Another hearing on the DNA motions was scheduled for May 29. Another hearing about discovery proceedings will take place on July 15. Peterson will attend each of the hearings by Zoom from Mule Creek State Prison.

    Scott Peterson was found guilty in a San Mateo Court after the remains of Laci and her unborn son Conner were found in the San Francisco Bay in 2003.

    Peterson told investigators he had gone to fish in Berkeley, a few miles from where the remains ended up surfacing.

    In December, Peterson’s request for a new murder trial was denied. Peterson alleged the resulting trial that gripped the world was tainted by a rogue juror who lied about her own history of abuse to get on the panel that initially sent him to death row.

    Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo found there was no evidence to support the defense claim that Juror No. 7, Richelle Nice, committed misconduct during jury selection.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Scott Peterson case back to courtroom after LA Innocence Project takes it on

    Scott Peterson case back to courtroom after LA Innocence Project takes it on

    [ad_1]

    Scott Peterson, the Modesto man convicted 20 years ago of killing his wife and unborn child, has a status hearing in Redwood City Tuesday. 

    This is after the Los Angeles Innocence Project decided to take up his case in January. Four motions were filed in San Mateo County Superior Court claiming that new evidence now supports Scott’s claim of innocence.

    “They have exonerated many people throughout the years by using up-to-date DNA technology and other forensic information and they’re going to bring that expertise to Scott Peterson’s case,” said legal analyst, Steven Clark. “The Innocence Project is going to start from the ground up and they’re going to look at the case as to whether there’s any alternative theories as to what happened to Laci and Conner Peterson.”

    He said that among the things attorneys will be focused on, is a van that was burned near Laci’s home. 

    “What they want to do is go through that van with a fine tooth comb and analyze whether any DNA was there from Laci Peterson,” said Clark. “That will be a very big deal.”

    He said they’ll also focus on the burglary that occurred across the street from Laci’s home, and they’ll want to talk to witnesses. 

    Scott told investigators he left the morning of Christmas Eve in 2002 to fish in Berkeley. The remains of Laci and their unborn son surfaced months later a few miles from where Scott said he was fishing. 

    Clark says the key in this case for the Los Angeles Innocence Project will be –  can they establish that Laci may have still been alive when Scott went fishing?

    As far as Tuesday, Clark says the court will likely set a timetable. 

    “So that all the information is made available to the Innocence Project and that they can get their forensic teams in to actually do the testing,” said Clark. “And then it’ll be up to the prosecution to review that information and to see whether there’s any merit to it.”

    He also says it’ll likely take many months to draw any significant conclusions as to whether Scott will get a new trial. But he says this is Scott’s last and best hope for a new trial. 

    Scott will not be at court in person. He will appear via live stream from Mule Creek State Prison in Amador County.

    [ad_2]

    Jocelyn Moran

    Source link

  • LA Innocence Project takes on Scott Peterson’s murder case as he seeks new DNA test

    LA Innocence Project takes on Scott Peterson’s murder case as he seeks new DNA test

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles Innocence Project taking Scott Peterson case


    Los Angeles Innocence Project taking Scott Peterson case

    00:34

    The Los Angeles Innocence Project announced Thursday that it is taking up the Scott Peterson murder case as the convicted killer seeks new DNA testing. 

    Pat Harris, Peterson’s attorney, announced the news in a statement.

    “We are very excited to have the incredibly talented attorneys from the LA Innocence Project lend their considerable expertise to helping prove Scott’s innocence,” Harris said.

    Peterson was convicted in 2004 for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. He was sentenced to death in 2005.  

    The LA Innocence Project works to exonerate those wrongly convicted through forensic and other scientific evidence. 

    The organization said it “is investigating his claim of actual innocence” but had no further comment. In documents filed with the San Mateo Superior Court, the nonprofit requested prosecutors and law enforcement hand over evidence that was available during the trial. 

    Additionally, lawyers with the LAIP stated that Peterson had an active petition for the writ of Habeas Corpus, which is a legal challenge to a prior criminal conviction. The motion was filed in conjunction with Peterson’s motion for DNA testing to prove his innocence. 

    “Mr. Peterson respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and direct the People provide the requested discovery so that further investigation into the claims set forth in the pending Petition can be conducted,” The LA Innocence Project’s lawyers wrote in the court documents.

    innocence-project.jpg
    The Los Angeles Innocence Project submitted this motion to San Mateo County Court earlier this week. 

    In August 2020, the California Supreme Court reversed the death sentence after finding that jurors were erroneously dismissed, partly because they expressed objections to the death penalty on a questionnaire. He was resentenced in 2021 to life without parole.

    Peterson’s attorney said at the time of the 2021 resentencing that his client has shown no remorse because he’s not guilty. 

    Peterson was uniformly described as a loving husband and expectant father, Harris said, until it became public that he was having an affair with Amber Frey at the time of his wife’s disappearance.

    Then, “he quickly became the most hated man in America,” Harris said in 2021.

    Prosecutors said Peterson took his wife’s body from their Modesto home on Christmas Eve 2002 and dumped her from his fishing boat into the San Francisco Bay, where they washed ashore in April 2003.

    Peterson admitted he was fishing on the day his wife disappeared. He had researched ocean currents, bought a boat without telling anyone, and could not explain what type of fish he was trying to catch that day.

    Also, in the weeks after Laci disappeared, he sold his wife’s car, looked into selling their house, and turned the baby nursery into a storage room.

    Peterson was eventually arrested after Frey, a massage therapist living in Fresno, told police that they had begun dating a month before his wife’s death, but that he had told her his wife was dead.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man Convicted Of Killing Kristin Smart Sentenced To 25 Years To Life

    Man Convicted Of Killing Kristin Smart Sentenced To 25 Years To Life

    [ad_1]

    His sentence marks a close to a nearly 27-year mystery. A September 2019 podcast called “Your Own Backyard” looked into Smart’s then-unsolved disappearance, placing the tragedy back into the public eye.

    Smart, a 19-year-old first-year student at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, was last seen as she walked home from an off-campus party in May 1996 with Flores, a fellow student. Initially, Flores was considered a “person of interest” in the case. Investigators had questioned him and searched his dorm.

    But it wasn’t until the case was revived in 2021 that Flores became a “prime suspect” and was placed under arrest.

    Flores’ attorney attempted to convince jurors that another then-Cal Poly student, Scott Peterson — who years after leaving college was convicted of first- and second-degree murder in the death of his wife and their unborn child, a case that gripped national attention— was responsible for Smart’s murder.

    Prosecutors accused Flores’ father, Ruben Flores, of helping Paul Flores hide Smart’s body, but a jury ultimately found his father not guilty.

    Paul Flores’ attorney did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link