ReportWire

Tag: Scott Bessent

  • Federal Reserve cuts key rate yet Powell says future reductions are not locked in

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve cut its key interest rate Wednesday for a second time this year as it seeks to shore up economic growth and hiring, even as inflation stays elevated.

    But Fed Chair Jerome Powell also cautioned that further rate cuts weren’t guaranteed, citing the government shutdown’s interruption of economic reports and sharp divisions among 19 Fed officials who participate in the central bank’s interest-rate deliberations.

    Speaking to reporters after the Fed announced its rate decision, Powell said there were “strongly differing views about how to proceed in December” at its next meeting and a further reduction in the benchmark rate is not “a foregone conclusion — far from it.”

    The rate cut — a quarter of a point — brings the Fed’s key rate down to about 3.9%, from about 4.1%. The central bank had cranked its rate to roughly 5.3% in 2023 and 2024 to combat the biggest inflation spike in four decades before implementing three cuts last year. Lower rates could, over time, reduce borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards, as well as for business loans.

    The move comes amid a fraught time for the central bank, with hiring sluggish and yet inflation stuck above the Fed’s 2% target. Compounding its challenges, the central bank is navigating without the economic signposts it typically relies on from the government, including monthly reports on jobs, inflation, and consumer spending, which have been suspended because of the government shutdown.

    Financial markets largely expected another rate reduction in December, and stock prices dropped after Powell’s comments, with the S&P 500 nearly unchanged and the Dow Jones Industrial Average closing slightly lower.

    “Powell poured cold water on the idea that the Fed was on autopilot for a December cut,” said Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities. “Instead, they’ll have to wait for economic data to confirm that a rate cut is actually needed.”

    Powell was asked about the impact of the government shutdown, which began on Oct. 1 and has interrupted the distribution of economic data. Powell said the Fed does have access to some data that give it “a picture of what’s going on.” He added that, “If there were a significant or material change in the economy, one way or another, I think we’d pick that up through this.”

    But the Fed chair did acknowledge that the limited data could cause officials to proceed more cautiously heading into its next meeting in mid-December.

    “There’s a possibility that it would make sense to be more cautious about moving (on rates). I’m not committing to that, I’m just saying it’s certainly a possibility that you would say ‘we really can’t see, so let’s slow down.’”

    The Fed typically raises its short term rate to combat inflation, while it cuts rates to encourage borrowing and spending and shore up hiring. Right now it sees risks of both slowing hiring and rising inflation, so it is reducing borrowing costs to support the job market, while still keeping rates high enough to avoid stimulating the economy so much that it worsens inflation.

    Yet Powell suggested the Fed increasingly sees inflation as less of a threat. He noted that excluding the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, inflation is “not so far from our 2% goal.” Inflation has slowed in apartment rents and for many services, such as car insurance. A report released last week showed that inflation remains elevated but isn’t accelerating.

    The government recalled employees to produce the report, despite the shutdown, because it was used to calculate the cost of living adjustment for Social Security.

    At the same time, the economy could be rebounding from a sluggish first half, which could improve job growth in the coming months, Powell said. That would make rate cuts less necessary.

    “For some part of the committee, it’s time to maybe take a step back and see if whether there really are downside risks to the labor market,” Powell said. “Or see whether in fact that the stronger growth that we’re seeing is real.”

    Two of the 12 officials who vote on the Fed’s rate decisions dissented Wednesday, but in different directions. Jeffrey Schmid, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, voted against the move because he preferred no change to the Fed’s rate. Schmid has previously expressed concern that inflation remains too high.

    Fed governor Stephen Miran dissented for the second straight meeting in favor of a half-point cut. Miran was appointed by President Donald Trump just before the central bank’s last meeting in September.

    Trump has repeatedly attacked Powell for not reducing borrowing costs more quickly. In South Korea early Wednesday he repeated his criticisms of the Fed chair.

    “He’s out of there in another couple of months,” Trump said. Powell’s term ends in May. On Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed the administration is considering five people to replace Powell, and will decide by the end of this year.

    The Fed also said Wednesday that it would stop reducing the size of its massive securities holdings, which it accumulated during the pandemic and after the 2008-2009 Great Recession. The change, to take effect Dec. 1, could over time slightly reduce longer-term interest rates on things like mortgages but won’t have much overall impact on consumer borrowing costs.

    Without government data, the economy is harder to track, Powell said. September’s jobs report, scheduled to be released three weeks ago, is still postponed. This month’s hiring figures, to be released Nov. 7, will likely be delayed and may be less comprehensive when finally released. And the White House said last week that October’s inflation report may never be issued at all.

    Before the government shutdown cut off the flow of data, monthly hiring gains had weakened to an average of just 29,000 a month for the previous three months, according to the Labor Department’s data. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.3% in August from 4.2% in July.

    More recently, several large corporations have announced sweeping layoffs, including UPS, Amazon, and Target, which threatens to boost the unemployment rate if it continues. Powell said the Fed is watching the layoff announcements “very carefully.”

    ___

    Associated Press Writer Alex Veiga in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Has inflation eased under Trump? It depends on the measure

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump says he’s improved Americans’ lives when it comes to the economy and inflation, two areas that polls show are top of mind for voters.

    “Energy costs are way down,” Trump told service members on the USS George Washington in Japan on Oct. 28. “Gasoline prices are way down. Grocery prices are way down. We have a little problem with beef. We’re gonna get that down very quickly. But the prices are way down. … Inflation has been defeated.”

    He also said at a lunch in South Korea the next day, “We’re down to a very low rate of inflation, 2.7%,” calling it “almost a perfect number.” It’s actually 3%.

    Two days earlier, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also touted the administration’s progress on inflation.

    “When we came in, it was ‘egg-flation, egg-flation, egg-flation,’” Bessent said Oct. 26 on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “You know, egg prices are down. Gasoline prices are down. Overall, the inflation since President Trump has come in has come down.”

    On eggs and gasoline, Bessent has a point. Since December 2024, the month before Trump entered office, the price of eggs has fallen. And since the week of Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration, the price of gasoline has declined from $3.11 to $3.03 a gallon. (Trump was less accurate: Energy, especially electricity, is up, as are groceries. Trump was correct that prices of both ground beef and steaks are up.) 

    But it’s possible to find particular items with falling prices even as inflation as a whole rises. Is Bessent right that inflation “has come down” overall?

    It depends on what metric you use. The most basic overall measure of inflation is steady, or even up a little bit, depending on the time frame. But an inflation measure that excludes volatile food and energy costs is down slightly.

    The White House did not respond to an inquiry for this article.

    The most basic measure shows that overall inflation hasn’t fallen

    We first turned to the consumer price index, a widely tracked metric from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. While the federal government has paused calculating some key economic statistics during the ongoing shutdown, it still reported the consumer price index for September in order to produce an annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security.

    When economists study inflation, they typically look at the change in the consumer price index compared with one year earlier. Using this metric, inflation isn’t down under Trump.

    During Trump’s first three full months in office — February, March and April — the year-over-year inflation rate fell each month. It began rising in May, June, July and September. (Inflation remained steady in August, but it didn’t fall.)

    By September, the year-over-year inflation rate was 3% — right where it started in January (when Joe Biden turned over the presidency to Trump) and slightly higher than the 2.9% rate in December 2024, Biden’s last full month in office. The current 3% rate is higher than it was during the final six months of Biden’s term.

    Either way, by this metric, inflation did not come down under Trump. The upward pattern of the most recent data points are worrisome, said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum.

    After 40-year-high levels of inflation in 2022 under Biden, the Federal Reserve “had engineered a remarkably successful path to return to 2 percent, which has been disrupted by, especially, Trump’s tariffs,” Holtz-Eakin said. “Now, inflation is at 3 percent and rising. I expect it to keep rising.”

    Calculating inflation beyond food and energy does show a modest drop

    To better grasp what’s going on with inflation, economists sometimes prefer to strip out the volatile sectors of food and energy. When those are removed from the analysis, Bessent has a point: Inflation has eased under Trump, at least modestly.

    The inflation rate minus food and energy was 3% year over year in September — lower than either December 2024 (3.2%) or January 2025 (3.3%).

    Under Trump, wages are outpacing inflation

    Price increases matter most to people when their wages aren’t keeping up. 

    During virtually all of Biden’s term, wages failed to keep pace with inflation. 

    Trump has a more positive story to tell so far: On his watch, wages are rising faster than prices, compared with their January levels.

    However, it’s still early in Trump’s tenure, cautioned the free-market oriented Private Enterprise Research Center at Texas A&M University. 

    The comparative data on inflation and wages isn’t “all that telling about where we might find ourselves in the coming months,” the center wrote Sept. 22. “The first seven months of a 48-month term in office is much too short to render judgement.” The center also said Trump’s tariff policies could reverse some of these trends.

    Our ruling

    Bessent said, “Overall, the inflation since President Trump has come in has come down.”

    Overall, year-over-year inflation has risen modestly to 3% on Trump’s watch, compared with 2.9% in Biden’s last full month in office. After stripping out volatile food and energy prices, which economists often do to analyze price patterns, the inflation rate has declined modestly under Trump, from 3.2% in Biden’s last full month in office to 3% now under Trump.

    Wages have outpaced inflation under Trump, although economists warn that his tariff policies could put that achievement at risk.

    The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details, so we rate it Half True.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Everyone is doing well’: President Trump praises economy amid layoffs, potential SNAP crisis

    [ad_1]

    ‘Everyone is doing well’: President Trump praises economy amid layoffs, potential SNAP crisis

    President Trump promotes economic prosperity during his visit to Japan, while layoffs and a federal shutdown threaten millions back in the U.S.

    Updated: 3:03 PM PDT Oct 28, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    President Donald Trump is promoting Japanese companies investing $550 billion in the United States while visiting the East Asian country. The president said the funds would be “at my direction” as part of a trade framework secured with Japan. The president also boasted about the U.S. economy, despite contrasting economic challenges.”Well, everyone in our country is now doing well. My first term, we built the greatest economy in the history of the world. We had an economy like nobody has seen before now. We’re doing it again, but this time, actually, it’s going to be much bigger, much stronger,” Trump said.The president highlighted the stock market reaching all-time highs, but economists point to other indicators that tell a different story. Amazon announced it is cutting 14,000 jobs, UPS is eliminating roughly 48,000 positions and closing more than 90 buildings as part of a turnaround plan, and Target, Ford, and GM have also announced layoffs amid slowing demand. Additionally, the federal government shutdown threatens food aid benefits for more than 40 million Americans as soon as Nov. 1, and September’s CPI data showed prices are rising again just as the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates to support the economy.”I don’t really understand the optimism to be perfectly honest, and I’m a very optimistic, very little of a ‘doomer’ person. We’ve had seven months in a row of contractions and manufacturing output. The labor market cooled to such an extent that it forced the Fed to cut rates in September,” said Jai Kedia from the Cato Institute.President Trump is preparing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping amid the ongoing U.S.–China trade war. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the two countries have reached a “very successful framework” ahead of their summit, covering tariffs, rare-earth exports and large U.S. agricultural purchases.Meanwhile, 26 states and Washington, D.C., are suing the USDA, arguing the agency has contingency funds that could be used to maintain SNAP benefits during the shutdown. In a memo, the USDA stated that those funds can only be used for a natural disaster or other emergency, not to operate during a shutdown, and placed the blame on Senate Democrats, saying, “We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats. Continue to hold out for the Far-Left wing of the party or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive timely WIC and SNAP allotments.” The states argue the law requires the USDA to issue benefits as long as money is available.It comes after another failed vote occurred today in the Senate. A federal judge in San Francisco has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from firing federal workers during the government shutdown. This move comes as a lawsuit challenges recent job cuts in education, health, and other areas.For more coverage from the Washington News Bureau here:

    President Donald Trump is promoting Japanese companies investing $550 billion in the United States while visiting the East Asian country. The president said the funds would be “at my direction” as part of a trade framework secured with Japan.

    The president also boasted about the U.S. economy, despite contrasting economic challenges.

    “Well, everyone in our country is now doing well. My first term, we built the greatest economy in the history of the world. We had an economy like nobody has seen before now. We’re doing it again, but this time, actually, it’s going to be much bigger, much stronger,” Trump said.

    The president highlighted the stock market reaching all-time highs, but economists point to other indicators that tell a different story.

    Amazon announced it is cutting 14,000 jobs, UPS is eliminating roughly 48,000 positions and closing more than 90 buildings as part of a turnaround plan, and Target, Ford, and GM have also announced layoffs amid slowing demand.

    Additionally, the federal government shutdown threatens food aid benefits for more than 40 million Americans as soon as Nov. 1, and September’s CPI data showed prices are rising again just as the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates to support the economy.

    “I don’t really understand the optimism to be perfectly honest, and I’m a very optimistic, very little of a ‘doomer’ person. We’ve had seven months in a row of contractions and manufacturing output. The labor market cooled to such an extent that it forced the Fed to cut rates in September,” said Jai Kedia from the Cato Institute.

    President Trump is preparing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping amid the ongoing U.S.–China trade war. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the two countries have reached a “very successful framework” ahead of their summit, covering tariffs, rare-earth exports and large U.S. agricultural purchases.

    Meanwhile, 26 states and Washington, D.C., are suing the USDA, arguing the agency has contingency funds that could be used to maintain SNAP benefits during the shutdown.

    In a memo, the USDA stated that those funds can only be used for a natural disaster or other emergency, not to operate during a shutdown, and placed the blame on Senate Democrats, saying, “We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats. Continue to hold out for the Far-Left wing of the party or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive timely WIC and SNAP allotments.”

    The states argue the law requires the USDA to issue benefits as long as money is available.

    It comes after another failed vote occurred today in the Senate. A federal judge in San Francisco has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from firing federal workers during the government shutdown. This move comes as a lawsuit challenges recent job cuts in education, health, and other areas.

    For more coverage from the Washington News Bureau here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 10/26: Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan

    [ad_1]

    This week on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan, amid President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s trip to Asia, Bessent joins to discuss the Chinese tariffs, the TikTok deal and the government shutdown at home. Plus. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries joins to discuss the government shutdown.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump and Xi will ‘consummate’ TikTok deal on Thursday, treasury secretary says | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    The United States and China are ready to move forward on a TikTok deal, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

    Bessent had already said last month that the two countries reached a “framework” on a deal during discussions in Madrid, and President Donald Trump subsequently signed an executive order to facilitate the transaction.

    In a Sunday morning appearance on CBS’ Face the Nation, Bessent said the U.S. and China have reached “a final deal on TikTok.”

    “We reached one in Madrid, and I believe that as of today, all the details are ironed out, and that will be for the two leaders to consummate that transaction on Thursday in Korea,” Bessent said. He declined to discuss the details of the agreement, but added, “My remit was to get the Chinese to agree to approve the transaction, and I believe we successfully accomplished that over the past two days.”

    Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline of a law that requires TikTok’s owner ByteDance to sell the app or see it banned in the United States. 

    Under the terms of his executive order, TikTok’s U.S. operations — including its recommendation algorithm, source code, and content moderation — will come under the control of a new board of directors, with Oracle becoming responsible for security operations.

    Oracle (led by Trump ally Larry Ellison), Fox Corp (owner of Fox News), Andreessen Horowitz, and Silver Lake Management have been reported as investors in the new joint venture, with Fox’s participation seemingly confirmed by Trump.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    Bessent made today’s comments from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where Chinese and American trade negotiators also said they had reached a framework for an agreement over tariffs and other trade issues.

    U.S. trade negotiator Jamieson Greer told reporters that rare earth minerals were covered in the discussion, though he did not specify how. (Chinese has said it will tighten export controls on those minerals, which are critical to the manufacture of semiconductors and other tech products.)

    “We talked about extending the truce, we talked about rare earths, of course, we talked about all kinds of topics,” Greer said.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Ha

    Source link

  • Exclusive | The U.S. Is Trying to Drive a Wedge Between Argentina and China

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON—The Trump administration is pushing officials in Argentina to limit China’s influence over the distressed South American nation at the same time the U.S. and Wall Street banks are working on a $40 billion lifeline for Buenos Aires.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has spoken in recent weeks with Luis Caputo, Argentina’s economic minister, about curbing China’s ability to access the country’s resources, including critical minerals. In addition, they have discussed granting the U.S. expanded access to the country’s uranium supply, according to people with knowledge of the conversations.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Brian Schwartz

    Source link

  • Opinion | About Trump’s Foreign Investment Funds

    [ad_1]

    President Trump moves so fast and announces so much that it’s hard to sort the real from the hype. Cases in point are the invest-in-America promises that foreign governments have made as part of Mr. Trump’s trade deals. They’re so large they’re unlikely to happen, and they raise serious questions about American governance and the power of the purse.

    Mr. Trump heads to South Korea later this month for the annual APEC meetings, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says the Administration is “about to finish up” negotiations over Seoul’s promise to invest some $350 billion in the U.S. In return Mr. Trump cut his tariff on South Korea to 15% from 25%. Japan has also agreed to cut the U.S. a $550 billion check in return for a tariff reduction.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    The Editorial Board

    Source link

  • Slowdown in US hiring suggests economy still needs rate cuts, Fed’s Powell says

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A sharp slowdown in hiring poses a growing risk to the U.S. economy, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Tuesday, a sign that the Fed will likely cut its key interest rate twice more this year.

    Powell said in a speech in Philadelphia that despite the federal government shutdown cutting off official economic data, “the outlook for employment and inflation does not appear to have changed much since our September meeting,” when the Fed reduced its key rate for the first time this year.

    Fed officials at that meeting also forecast that the central bank would reduce its rate twice more this year and once in 2026. Lower rates from the Fed could reduce borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and business loans. Powell spoke before a meeting of the National Association of Business Economics.

    Powell reiterated a message he first delivered after the September meeting, when he signaled that the Fed is slightly more worried about the job market than its other congressional mandate, which is to keep prices stable. Tariffs have lifted the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation to 2.9%, he said, but outside the duties there aren’t “broader inflationary pressures” that will keep prices high.

    “Rising downside risks to employment have shifted our assessment of the balance of risks,” he said.

    Economists said Powell’s remarks solidified expectations for further rate cuts, starting at its next meeting Oct. 28-29.

    “While there was little doubt the (Fed) was angled to cut rates at its next meeting, today’s remarks were strong confirmation of that expectation,” Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients.

    Powell also said that the central bank may soon stop shrinking its roughly $6.6 trillion balance sheet. The Fed has been allowing roughly $40 billion of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities to mature each month without replacing them.

    “We may approach that point in coming months,” Powell said.

    The shift could slightly lower borrowing costs over time. Economists at BMO Capital Markets estimated that the yields on Treasury securities ticked down slightly after Powell’s remarks.

    Separately, Powell spent most of his speech defending the Fed’s practice of buying longer-term Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities in 2020 and 2021, which were intended to lower longer-term interest rates and support the economy during the pandemic.

    Yet those purchases have come under a torrent of criticism from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, as well as some of the candidates floated by the Trump administration to replace Powell when his term as Chair ends next May.

    Bessent said in an extended critique published earlier this year that the huge purchases of bonds during the pandemic worsened inequality by boosting the stock market, without providing noticeable benefits to the economy.

    Other critics have long argued that the Fed kept implementing the purchases for too long, keeping interest rates low even as inflation began to spike in late 2021. The Fed beginning in 2021 stopped the purchases and then sharply boosted borrowing costs to combat inflation.

    “With the clarity of hindsight, we could have—and perhaps should have—stopped asset purchases sooner,” Powell said. “Our real-time decisions were intended to serve as insurance against downside risk.”

    Yet Powell said that moving earlier would not have prevented the COVID-era inflation spike: “Stopping sooner could have made some difference, but not likely enough to fundamentally alter the trajectory of the economy.”

    Powell also said the purchases were intended to avoid a breakdown in the market for Treasury securities, which could have sent interest rates much higher.

    The Fed chair also addressed a move by a bipartisan group of senators to stop the central bank from paying interest on the cash reserves banks park at the Fed. A measure to prevent the Fed from doing so was defeated in the Senate last week by the lopsided vote of 83-14.

    Still, it garnered support from both parties, including Republican senators Rand Paul from Kentucky and Ted Cruz from Texas, as well as Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

    Powell said that without the ability to pay interest on reserves, the Fed “would lose control over rates” and wouldn’t be able to carry out its mission. The Fed lifts the short-term interest rate it controls when it wants to cool borrowing and spending and slow inflation, while it cuts the rate to encourage borrowing, growth, and hiring.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Opinion | Allies United Against China on Rare Earths

    [ad_1]

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday he plans to coordinate with allies to counter China’s weaponization of rare-earth minerals. It’s the right move, though he might find it easier to rally the world if President Trump weren’t also hitting our allies with unprovoked unilateral tariffs.

    Mr. Bessent earlier in the week accused Beijing of pointing “a bazooka at the supply chains and the industrial base of the entire free world,” by threatening global export controls on products that contain even minuscule amounts of Chinese rare earths. He’s right. China has a stranglehold on these minerals, and it’s a serious problem.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    The Editorial Board

    Source link

  • Why the Supreme Court may choose to uphold Trump’s tariffs: ‘It would be incredibly disruptive to unscramble those eggs’ | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    When the Supreme Court hears arguments on November 5 in President Donald Trump’s tariff case, the justices won’t just be weighing a constitutional question—they’ll be deciding the fate of billions of dollars in global commerce. 

    The case, which challenges Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under emergency powers, has become a defining moment for business leaders navigating a volatile trade landscape already reshaped by uncertainty, inflation, and geopolitical rivalry. 

    As former Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar noted at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women conference, the Supreme Court now faces a “hard question” about whether to disrupt a sitting president’s signature economic policy after it has already reshaped the global trade landscape. 

    “Even if the tariffs had never been able to take effect, now that they have come in and changed the status quo, the court might ultimately really have pause and concern before disrupting the President’s economic policy in this way,” she told Fortune’s Michal Lev-Ram.

    The potential economic fallout from reversing Trump’s tariff policy may ultimately guide the Court’s hand. “The government is coming to court and saying, ‘We would have to unwind billions or trillions of dollars. It could bankrupt our nation,’” Prelogar added. “It would be incredibly disruptive to try to scramble those eggs,” referring to the billions of dollars already collected and distributed under the policy.

    Tariff controversy

    Trump’s move to impose 10% reciprocal tariffs on all imports—rising to as high as 50% for major trading partners—under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) marked one of the most aggressive uses of executive trade authority in U.S. history. His administration has since reportedly collected $158 billion in tariffs, arguing that striking them down would “impossible to ever recover” and destabilize ongoing trade negotiations. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated that if the top court goes against the administration, the U.S. “would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs, which would be terrible for the Treasury,” in an interview with NBC.

    Lower courts have disagreed, ruling that Trump overstepped his statutory and constitutional bounds. In three separate opinions, federal judges concluded that IEEPA does not authorize the president to unilaterally impose what amounts to a massive tax on imports. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 7–4 decision, said plainly that “absent a valid delegation by Congress, the President has no authority to impose taxes,” emphasizing that tariffs—long considered a congressional power—require clear legislative authorization.

    If the Court strikes down the tariffs, companies could see immediate relief in import costs—but the economic ripple effects would be complex. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that overturning the tariffs would wipe out $2.8 trillion in projected government revenue through 2035, potentially forcing cuts or higher borrowing costs that could squeeze businesses elsewhere. 

    ‘Almost a coin toss’

    Currently, U.S. consumers and businesses are feeling the weight of tariffs most, according to a report by Goldman Sachs. The analysis estimated U.S. consumers are shouldering up to 55% of the costs stemming from Trump’s tariffs, even though the president has repeatedly claimed that the tariffs on imports exclusively tax foreign enterprises. Goldman’s research also found that U.S. businesses pay 22% of the cost of the tariffs, while foreign exporters contribute only 18% of the cost. 

    While Wall Street might initially celebrate tariff relief especially in heavily impacted sectors, broader uncertainty around U.S. trade policy could linger, especially as Trump has signaled he would pivot to other legal authorities, like Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, to reimpose tariffs on specific industries should the Court not rule in his favor.

    Even if the law is on the challengers’ side, the pragmatic economic and executive power concerns, according to Prelogar, make the case’s outcome “almost a coin toss.” Trade and legal experts previously predicted between a 70-80% chance the high court would rule against the Trump administration and expect a decision by the end of the year. According to them, the justices may not follow traditional ideological divides.

    Whether Trump’s tariffs survive or fall, one outcome is certain: the decision will redefine how executives plan in an era where law and economics collide. The Court’s ruling, expected by year’s end, will either restore Congress’s trade prerogatives, or confirm that the president’s emergency powers can reach deep into the heart of global commerce. 

    [ad_2]

    Lily Mae Lazarus

    Source link

  • An ‘IRS CEO’ now exists, and Social Security Administrator Frank Bisignano is the first to fill the position | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano was named to the newly created position of CEO of the IRS on Monday, making him the latest member of the Trump administration to be put in charge of multiple federal agencies.

    As IRS CEO, Bisignano will report to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who currently serves as acting commissioner of the IRS, the Treasury Department says. It is unclear whether Bisignano’s newly created role at the IRS will require Senate confirmation.

    The Treasury Department said in a statement that Bisignano will be responsible for overseeing all day-to-day IRS operations while also continuing to serve in his role as commissioner of the Social Security Administration.

    Bessent said in a statement that the IRS and SSA “share many of the same technological and customer service goals. This makes Mr. Bisignano a natural choice for this role.”

    The move to install Bisignano at the IRS adds another layer to the leadership shuffling that has occurred at the agency since the beginning of Trump’s term. Bessent was named acting commissioner in August after Trump removed former U.S. Rep Billy Long from the role less than two months after his confirmation, and made him ambassador to Iceland.

    The four acting commissioners who preceded Long in the job included one who resigned over a deal between the IRS and the Department of Homeland Security to share immigrants’ tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and another whose appointment led to a fight between former Trump adviser Elon Musk and Bessent.

    With two day jobs, Bisignano joins a number of other Trump administration officials to wear multiple hats, including Bessent, Marco Rubio, Sean Duffy, Jamieson Greer and Russell Vought.

    IRS and Social Security advocates expressed concern about the new appointment.

    Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and Disability Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, pointed to Bisignano being named to a position that appears to avoid Congressional approval.

    “If the Trump Admin asked for the Senate’s advice & consent, would they really want the same person running the government’s biggest program AND overseeing the implementation of the extraordinarily complex new tax law?” she said on the Bluesky social media app.

    And Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, an advocacy group for SSA recipients and future retirees, said Bisignano’s “divided attention will create a bottleneck that makes the inevitable problems that arise even harder to correct. Never in Social Security’s 90-year history has a commissioner held a second job. Bisiginano’s new role will leave a leadership vacuum at the top of the agency, especially since the Republican Senate hasn’t even confirmed a deputy commissioner.”

    Bisignano has served as chair of Fiserv, a payments and financial services tech firm, since 2020. He is a onetime defender of corporate policies to protect LGBTQ+ people from discrimination.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Fatima Hussein, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Wall Street’s Mr. Fix-It Tapped to Be the First IRS CEO

    [ad_1]

    Once again, the Internal Revenue Service has a new sheriff in town.

    Longtime banking executive and current commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration Frank Bisignano is joining the IRS as its first-ever CEO, according to a Monday announcement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

    Bisignano, whose most recent private sector post was president and CEO of payments processor Fiserv, is also colloquially known as Wall Street’s Mr. Fix-It given his decades of experience of troubleshooting problems throughout multiple large banks. (Bisignano oversaw J.P. Morgan’s mortgage business in the mid-2000’s and was tasked with turning it around after the 2008 financial crisis.) 

    “Frank is a businessman with an exceptional track record of driving growth and efficiency in the private and now public sector,” Bessent, who also serves as IRS Acting Commissioner, said in a statement. Even with Bisignano joining, Bessent will remain as Commissioner.

    The IRS will “sharpen” its focus on collections, Bessent said, in addition to homing in on privacy and customer service. It’s no secret that interfacing with the IRS is unpleasant. Just Google “IRS paper backlog” for a taste of what the agency is grappling with. 

    That’s something the Trump administration is looking to tackle: In August, Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia shared he’ll be working with the government as a so-called Chief Design Officer. His first project? Improving the online presence of the IRS.

    There’s just one thing: Bisignano already has a cabinet-level role in the Trump Administration as commissioner of the Social Security Administration. He accepted that role at the start of Trump’s term.

    Which begs the question: How much can Bisignano really dedicate to the agency if he already has his hands full with the Social Security Administration?

    While the Trump administration is trying to downplay the overlap (Bessent acknowledged that both agencies “share many of the same technological and customer service goals,”) not everyone’s convinced. 

    Brian Bernhardt, a partner at Fox Rothschild who focuses on federal tax litigation, says without a full-time IRS Commissioner, the agency will “suffer from poor morale,” and also struggle to keep up with the current filing season, as well as the next one.

    “He, like Secretary Bessent will not be able to give the IRS what it needs — a full-time Commissioner focused on all of the day to day needs of the IRS,” Bernhardt says. “While Mr. Bisignano’s business background, and his other service in the administration, indicates he may tend to favor business interests, that’s not a change from Secretary Bessent, the other acting IRS leadership during this administration, or the policies of this administration.” 

    The IRS has suffered from rapid leadership changes and an absence of clear direction. Seven people served as commissioner from January to August, and if the agency is ever going to dig itself out from under its backlog, its new CEO will have to stick around long enough to steady the ship.

    [ad_2]

    Melissa Angell

    Source link

  • Trump considers massive bailout of at least $10 billion for American farmers hurt by his trade war

    [ad_1]

    Washington (CNN) — American farmers are having a tough year, in no small part because of President Donald Trump’s trade war. Now, the White House is gearing up to extend them a multi-billion-dollar bailout, sources tell CNN.

    Surging costs and foreign retaliation from tariffs have hurt the US agriculture industry — as have immigration-related labor shortages and plummeting commodity prices. Farm production expenses are estimated to reach $467.4 billion in 2025, according to the Agriculture Department, up $12 billion from last year.

    Farm bankruptcies rose in the first half of the year to the highest level since 2021, according to US courts data.

    Trump’s policies have exacerbated those woes, from the deportation of the industry’s key migrant workforce to renewed trade tensions between the United States and China. And for traditional American crops, such as soybeans, the situation has grown particularly precarious.

    “There’s no doubt that the farm economy is in a significant challenge right now, especially our row croppers,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters Tuesday. “So not just soybeans, although I think they’re probably the top of the list, but corn, wheat, sorghum, cotton, et cetera.”

    Indeed, the US soybean industry has become the poster child of the farm economy’s plight in the first year of Trump’s second term. The president recognizes these problems, White House officials tells CNN, and has increased pressure on his administration to address them urgently.

    Over the past few weeks, the White House has held a series of interagency meetings with the Departments of Agriculture and Treasury as they attempt to finalize a relief package for US farmers, the sources said. Discussions over the best way to aid the agriculture industry are ongoing, the officials said, but they have zeroed in on two options.

    “There are a lot of levers we can use to help ease the pain they are feeling,” one of the officials told CNN. One idea, floated publicly by Trump as recently as Wednesday, is to give farmers a percentage of the income the United States is receiving from the administration’s tariffs on goods being imported into the country.

    “We’ve made so much money on Tariffs, that we are going to take a small portion of that money, and help our Farmers. I WILL NEVER LET OUR FARMERS DOWN!” Trump wrote on social media this week. The other is tapping into a “slush fund,” as the officials described it, at the Department of Agriculture.

    The Trump administration also dipped into the fund, known as Emergency Commodity Assistance Program (ECAP), in March to similarly provide assistance to farmers. USDA at the time issued $10 billion in direct payments to eligible agricultural producers of eligible commodities for the 2024 crop year.

    The administration has also discussed implementing a combination of the two, depending on where they can most quickly pull the funds from, one White House official said. The current range of aid they are looking to offer ranges from $10 billion to $14 billion.

    “The final figure will depend on how much farmers need and the amount of tariff revenue coming in,” the official told CNN.

    Trump himself as privately been applying pressure on his team to ensure that American farmers, many of whom the Trump administration credit for helping the president win the November 2024 election, are protected. But the other reason they are making the agriculture industry such a priority, officials say, is because the Trump administration views protecting farmers as a national security issue.

    “We need to grow our own food. We can’t rely on imports from other countries, that poses a problem for national security. And right now, the government is subsidizing a lot of that process,” one Trump administration official argued.

    US soybean industry in crisis

    An issue complicating the Trump administration’s goals revolve around soybeans — America’s largest agricultural export, valued at more than $24 billion in 2024, according to USDA data.

    Last year, about half of those exports went to China, but since May, that’s dropped down to zero as a result of an effective embargo China has placed on US soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on the country. China has implemented 20% tariffs on US soybeans, making the crop from other countries significantly more attractive.

    That couldn’t come at worse time for soybean farmers, with the harvest season in full swing and some farms reporting strong yields. And their luck might not change anytime soon, with Beijing ramping up its reliance on South America — inadvertently aided the US Treasury’s financial lifeline provided to Argentina in recent weeks.

    A combine harvester during a soybean harvest at a farm outside St. Peter, Minnesota. Credit: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    Last week, the Trump administration said it would arrange a $20 billion lifeline to Argentina’s central bank, which would exchange US dollars for pesos to help stabilize Argentina’s financial market. Argentina also temporarily scrapped export taxes on grains to help stabilize the peso, but China didn’t waste any time.

    Beijing purchased “at least 10 cargoes of Argentine soybeans,” according to a report from Reuters. Brazil has also helped meet China’s demand for soybeans, with both countries announcing a pact in July to deepen agricultural trade ties.

    As a result, America’s hobbled soybean industry is calling on the Trump administration to finish its trade negotiations with China.

    “US soybean farmers have been clear for months: the administration needs to secure a trade deal with China. China is the world’s largest soybean customer and typically our top export market,” American Soybean Association President Caleb Ragland said last week in a statement.

    Pressure on Trump

    Many farmers say time is of the essence as they start to bring in this year’s crop.

    “We’re always hopeful that those negotiations are moving forward, but yet with harvest here, patience may be running thin,” one Indiana farmer told CNN, describing the industry’s many challenges, which also include the deportation of key workers.

    Trump has heard the calls for action.

    On Wednesday, Trump blamed China for the pain soybean farmers are facing, arguing Beijing is refusing to buy soybeans for negotiating purposes amid the two countries’ tariff dispute. He added that he plans to make soybeans “a major topic of discussion” when he meets face-to-face with China’s President Xi Jinping in South Korea next month.

    Part of the reason Trump has given the issue so much attention, White House officials say, is because Rollins has forced the issue with not only the president, but also one of his closest advisers: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

    On Tuesday, a photo of Bessent’s phone captured by the Associated Press went viral, showing a text from a contact named “BR,” presumed to be Rollins. Her messages illustrated panic within the Trump administration over the soybean industry’s woes, which worsened over the Argentina ordeal.

    During this “time of uncertainty” for farmers and ranchers, Rollins said that she is in “constant communication” with the White House and partners across the government. Rollins also called Trump’s idea of temporarily giving tariff revenue to farmers “a very elegant solution.”

    “To this moment of uncertainty, the ability to offset any payments to the farmers through potential tariff revenue is really where the president wants us to head, and that’s what we’re looking at,” she added.

    [ad_2]

    Alayna Treene, Bryan Mena and CNN

    Source link

  • Bessent met with BlackRock’s Rieder as search for next Fed chair continues, source says

    [ad_1]

    By Andrea Shalal

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met with BlackRock Inc executive Rick Rieder in New York on Friday, as the Trump administration continued its search for a new chair for the Federal Reserve, a source familiar with the matter said.

    Bessent has now spoken with four of the 11 candidates on the administration’s list of candidates to replace Fed chair Jerome Powell, whose term expires in May, the source said.

    Bloomberg first reported Bessent’s meeting with Rieder, BlackRock’s CIO of fixed income, and called him a rising contender for the post. The two met for two hours and discussed monetary policy, the Fed’s organizational structure and regulatory policy, it said.

    U.S. President Donald Trump had told reporters at the White House a week ago that his short list for the job included his aide Kevin Hassett, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and current Fed Governor Christopher Waller.

    At the time, Trump said he had eyed Bessent for the job, but the Treasury secretary declined.

    Bessent has said he will meet with the candidates to whittle down the list and present Trump with a list of top contenders.

    TRUMP HAS RAILED AGAINST POWELL

    Trump has made clear he intends to install a Fed leader more aligned with his push for rapid interest-rate cuts after months of railing against Powell for being “too late” to lower interest rates and bring down borrowing costs.

    Powell’s Fed has kept rates on hold all year on concern that Trump’s tariffs could reignite inflation, although his concerns have shifted recently to focus more on the slowing labor market.

    The U.S. Senate is slated to vote on Monday to confirm White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran to the Fed, which starts a two-day meeting Tuesday at which it is expected to cut its policy rate by a quarter of a percentage point. Miran will retain his White House job, but take an unpaid leave while at the Fed.

    Miran would replace Adriana Kugler, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden and resigned as Fed governor last month.

    Trump has sought to fire another Fed governor appointed by Biden, Lisa Cook, but that move has been blocked for now by a federal judge.

    (Reporting by Andrea Shalal; editing by Edward Tobin)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump news at a glance: Bessent says markets not worried by Fed interference as Lagarde warns of ‘danger’

    [ad_1]

    US treasury secretary Scott Bessent talks about the independence of the Federal Reserve in an interview with Fox News.Photograph: Jacquelyn Martin/AP

    US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has said the Federal Reserve is and should be independent but that it had “made a lot of mistakes”, as he defended Donald Trump’s right to fire the central bank governor Lisa Cook.

    The president has criticised the Fed and its chair, Jerome Powell, for months for not lowering interest rates. Independent central banks are widely seen as crucial to a stable global financial system. Bessent also rejected the idea that markets were disturbed by the Trump administration’s actions. “S&P’s at a new high and bond yields are fine, so we haven’t seen anything yet,” he said.

    Bessent’s comments come as Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank (ECB), said Trump undermining the independence of the world’s most powerful central bank could pose a “very serious danger” for the world economy.

    Lagarde, who was France’s finance minister until 2011 before leaving to run the International Monetary Fund, said it would be “very difficult” for Trump to take control of Fed decision-making on interest rates, but such a scenario would be highly dangerous.

    “If US monetary policy were no longer independent and instead dependent on the dictates of this or that person, then I believe that the effect on the balance of the American economy could – as a result of the effects this would have around the world – be very worrying, because it is the largest economy in the world,” she said, according to remarks reported by Reuters.

    Read the full story

    Guatemala is ready and willing to receive about 150 unaccompanied children of all ages each week from the US, the country’s president has said, a day after a US federal judge halted the deportation of 10 Guatemalan children.

    Those children had already boarded a plane when a court responded to an emergency appeal on Sunday. They were later returned to the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

    On Monday, Guatemala’s president, Bernardo Arévalo, told journalists that his government had been coordinating with the US to receive the unaccompanied minors.

    Read the full story

    Nine former officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have said that Robert F Kennedy Jr’s leadership of the US health and human services department is “unlike anything our country has ever experienced” and “unacceptable”. They also warned that Kennedy’s leadership “should alarm every American, regardless of political leanings”.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unlikely allies: Trump, Pelosi and the push to ban congressional stock trading

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    It’s rare to find areas of agreement between President Donald Trump and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. But they’re both supporting a congressional bill that will ban members of Congress and their households from trading stocks. 

    The legislation, which cleared its committee of jurisdiction in late July, has broad bipartisan support and will help root out public corruption while restoring Americans’ confidence in Congress.

    Common sense would suggest that Congress shouldn’t be actively trading stocks and bonds while they’re holding office. And 86% of those surveyed in 2023 as part of a University of Maryland study favored a ban on congressional stock trading, with Republicans and Democrats showing nearly identical levels of support.

    President Donald Trump and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

    As Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized in an Aug. 14 interview, the credibility of the House and Senate is at stake when members trade individual stocks. He highlighted the “eye-popping returns” some members have earned, noting that “every hedge fund would be jealous of them.”

    WHAT FED MUST DO NOW AFTER JEROME POWELL’S JACKSON HOLE EPIPHANY

    From the perspective of a Treasury official, this issue goes beyond ethics. It touches the integrity of our financial system. 

    Markets rely on trust, transparency and a level playing field. When members of Congress trade stocks with access to information or influence that ordinary investors don’t have, it undermines public confidence in both government and the economy. 

    Treasury leadership has a vested interest in ensuring that policy is made to serve the public good, not to generate personal profit, because the credibility of the United States as a financial steward depends on it.

    In addition to President Trump and Pelosi, there are several other unlikely bedfellows in Congress supporting the ban. They include liberals like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and conservatives like Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo. Notably, both Mike Johnson, R-La., the House speaker, and Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the minority leader, support the ban.  

    ARE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TARIFFS ACTUALLY WORKING?

    Pelosi’s support for the legislation is noteworthy given her families’ well-documented history with stock trading. Last year, her husband, Paul, made headlines by selling between $500,000 and $1 million worth of Visa shares just a few weeks before the Justice Department brought a civil antitrust suit against the company. The transaction led to speculation that Paul Pelosi may have been tipped off by his wife, or contacts in the Biden administration, about the likelihood of a filing against Visa. 

    Filed just six weeks before the presidential election, the Visa suit’s monopoly claim was undermined by a simple fact: the network faces robust competition from other debit card companies, as well as newer payment networks such as Zelle and Venmo. But as the legal process unfolds, the issue of congressional stock trading remains. And the volume of activity is breathtaking. 

    Last year, 120 members of Congress made more than 9,400 trades, according to Capitol Trades, a platform that tracks market trading by U.S. elected officials. The performance by some of the members suggests they should move to Wall Street. The top 10 – six Republicans and four Democrats – all had returns exceeding 70%, according to another platform, Unusual Whales. And this was in a year when the S&P 500 only returned 25%. 

    There is destined to be even more trading this year. Through Aug. 19, there had already been nearly 9,200 trades, involving more than $395 million.   

    I HAD TO LEAVE CALIFORNIA TO SAVE MY BUSINESS. NOW THERE’S HOPE

    Is this trading influencing public policy? It’s hard to know, definitively. But a few years ago, the New York Times examined trades made by members of Congress from 2019 through 2021. The paper reported that there were 97 senators or representatives “who reported trades by themselves or immediate family members in stocks or other financial assets that intersected with the work of committees on which they serve.”

    In one instance, a California congressman disclosed that his wife sold Boeing shares on March 5, 2020. That was just one day before a committee he was a member of issued a report criticizing the company in connection with two fatal crashes of its 737 Max jet.  

    It’s rare for members of Congress to be prosecuted for market trading, but not unheard of. In 2019, a congressman from New York, Chris Collins, resigned after pleading guilty to having shared confidential company information with his son and lying about it to federal agents. He was sentenced to 26 months in prison (and later pardoned by President Trump).

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

    Stock trading by members of Congress, and the suspicion that activity engenders, contributes to distrust in government. Last year, a Pew survey found that just 2% of Americans believed the federal government would do what is right “just about always” and just 21% said, “most of the time.” That distrust is unhealthy for the country’s democracy, whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, and makes it more difficult for either party to move its agenda forward. 

    Banning members of Congress from trading stocks would help restore trust in the federal government. A ban would also be an opportunity for members of both parties to come together in support of a measure that will benefit the entire country. That can’t happen soon enough. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says Intel agreed to give the government 10% of the chipmaker. ‘We do a lot of deals like that. I’ll do more of them’

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump said Friday that American chipmaker Intel had agreed to give the U.S. government a 10% stake, worth roughly $10 billion.

    “They’ve had some bad management over the years, and they got lost. I said, ‘I think you should pay us 10% of your company,’ and they said yes. That’s about $10 billion. I don’t get it; this comes to the United States of America,” he said at a press conference with reporters in the Oval Office.

    Intel was previously allocated about $11 billion in grants to build out manufacturing in the U.S. under the CHIPS and Science Act passed by Congress during the Biden administration.

    Under the new agreement with Trump, the government will take equity in return for the grant money allocated to Intel through the CHIPS Act, the New York Times reported. The government will not be involved in company governance or claim a board seat, according to the Times.

    Intel shares jumped 5.5%.

    A spokesperson for Intel declined to comment to Fortune. The White House did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

    Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick previously outlined plans for the U.S. government to receive equity in return for the CHIPS Act cash grants Intel has received.

    “We should get an equity stake for our money, so we’ll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration,” Lutnick told CNBC earlier this week.

    Trump claimed the agreement came after a conversation with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, whom he previously called on to resign in a post on his social media website, Truth Social.

    Trump said Friday he called for Tan’s ouster because of a letter Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) sent to Intel’s chairman, expressing concern about Tan’s ties to Chinese companies. Following Trump’s post, Tan traveled to Washington for a meeting with Trump last week.

    “He walked in wanting to keep his job, and he ended up giving us $10 billion for the American people,” Trump said Friday.

    The Intel agreement comes as the Trump administration has shown a recent willingness to take a more interventionist role with U.S. companies. As a condition of the merger between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel, the administration demanded that it name a board member to the combined entity and secure a “golden share,” giving it veto power over company decisions. 

    The U.S. also recently reached a revenue-sharing agreement with chipmakers Nvidia and AMD, giving the government 15% of sales generated through AI chip sales in China as part of its terms for granting export licenses to the companies. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week similar agreements could be expanded to other industries.

    Some Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), have criticized Trump’s plan for the U.S. government to take a stake in Intel. 

    “If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn’t the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism? Terrible idea,” Paul wrote Wednesday in a post on X.

    Still, Trump was undeterred by the criticism and noted Friday that the government will continue its interventionist path as long as the agreements don’t hurt the U.S. military or security.

    “We do a lot of deals like that. I’ll do more of them,” he said.

    Introducing the 2025 Fortune Global 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in the world. Explore this year’s list.

    [ad_2]

    Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

    Source link

  • Trump says Intel CEO has an ‘amazing story’ days after calling for his resignation

    [ad_1]

    Less than a week after demanding his resignation, President Donald Trump is now calling the career of Intel’s CEO an “amazing story.”

    Shares of Intel, which slid last week after CEO Lip-Bu Tan came under fire from the U.S. president, bounced higher before the opening bell Tuesday.

    The attack from Trump came after Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan’s investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army. Cotton asked Intel if Tan had divested from the companies to eliminate any potential conflict of interest.

    Trump said on the Truth Social platform Thursday that, “The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!”

    Tan was named Intel CEO in March and it is unclear if he has divested his interests in the chip companies.

    Tan said in a message to employees that there was misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems and said that he’d “always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.”

    After a Monday meeting with Tan at the White House, Trump backed off his demand that Tan resign without hesitation.

    “I met with Mr. Lip-Bu Tan, of Intel, along with Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

    Shares of Intel gained 3.5% Tuesday

    The economic and political rivalry between the U.S. and China are increasingly focused on computer chips, AI and other digital technologies that are expected to shape future economies and military conflicts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link