ReportWire

Tag: school boundaries

  • Why Fairfax County’s school system is taking on its first boundary review in decades – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Fairfax County Public Schools has been working on its first comprehensive boundary review in decades, a step school leaders expect will help ease overcrowding in some places.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the first in a three-part series focused on Fairfax County Public Schools’ vote on new school boundaries, the district’s first boundary revision in 40 years. Part one focuses on what led school officials to the decision to redraw its boundaries. 

    Fairfax County Public Schools has been working on its first comprehensive boundary review in decades, a step school leaders expect will help ease overcrowding in some places and reduce circumstances that lead to kids at the same elementary schools attending different middle and high schools.

    The process has been ongoing for over a year, and the district hired the group Thru Consulting to lead the effort. In 2024, the school board updated a policy to mandate the superintendent review school boundaries across the county every five years.

    After months of community meetings and public hearings, the school board is scheduled to vote on Superintendent Michelle Reid’s recommendations Thursday.

    “It’s kind of like magnets on a board,” School Board Chair Sandy Anderson told WTOP. “So if you move one group of kids, then you create a problem somewhere else. And that’s kind of been what’s happening overall. What I’m hoping that we could have done with it, what I feel like we did do with this process, is move the minimal number of children possible in order to even out enrollment.”

    Broadly, school boundaries are used to determine which residential addresses are zoned to attend a specific set of schools.

    School Board Member Melanie Meren said while some changes have been made to school boundaries in the Northern Virginia suburb in the past, they weren’t comprehensive. They were administrative in nature, Meren said, suggesting that someone could call the superintendent or a school board member to discuss a boundary change, and “it just created a lot of inconsistency.”

    During the summer of 2025, the school board made another policy change, allowing students in high school the option to remain at their current school, even if the boundary changes. There is flexibility for some elementary and middle school kids, too.

    However, Meren said, students choosing to stay at their current school won’t get transportation, “because there’s a different process for that.”

    The boundary review was necessary, Anderson told WTOP, because there are some Fairfax County schools that are over capacity or have a higher membership next to other schools without those constraints.

    “And there are really budgetary implications that happen when you have a school that is either over or under capacity,” Anderson said, adding the changes will let division leaders determine where there are opportunities to expand programs.

    In making decisions about school boundaries, division leaders, based on school board policy, have to consider access to programming, enrollment and capacity, proximity to school and transportation.

    Currently, 42 schools serve as “split feeders” — elementary schools that feed into multiple middle or high schools and middle schools that feed into multiple high schools. And over 20 schools have “attendance islands,” which the county defines as a geographic area assigned to a school, even though it is not directly connected to that school’s boundary.

    Reid previously said her recommended plan would reduce those scenarios. The original proposal would have impacted about 2,200 kids, but the one the board will vote on impacts about 1,700.

    Nicole Meade, president of the Herndon Middle School PTA, said it’s surprising it’s taken so long for a full boundary review.

    “Forty years seems like a really, really long time, and it’s way overdue,” Meade said.

    Willow Rosenthal, a junior at Justice High School, said she first learned about the review process before winter break. She overheard discussions at the bus stop and spoke to her parents about it.

    “We were all kind of anxious, worried,” Rosenthal said. “We were like, ‘Oh, we really hope we go to the school we’ve been going to for the past couple years now.”

    At a public hearing on Jan. 10, Tamara O’Neil said for the last 18 months, “our families and most importantly, students, have lived with uncertainty and stress caused by this convoluted and disruptive boundary process. Children have worried about where they will attend school. Families have hesitated to make plans, and we are finally relieved that we are almost at the end of this process.”

    Meanwhile, Anderson, the school board chair, said while community members often recommend increasing capacity at schools to meet growing needs, “we can’t build our way out of this problem.”

    In the context of boundary reviews, Meren said demographic details cannot be used as part of the process, and often, people bring up the impact boundary changes can have on property values.

    “The school board and the school system are not responsible for property values,” Meren said. “We don’t look at that data as part of this work.”

    Maryland’s largest school system, Montgomery County Public Schools, is looking at some of its boundaries, too.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gelman

    Source link

  • Prince William Co. School Board discusses new boundary planning process – WTOP News

    Prince William Co. School Board discusses new boundary planning process – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The Prince William County School Board is considering changes to the division’s boundary planning process following a Sept. 18 presentation from the school division.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.

    The Prince William County School Board is considering changes to the division’s boundary planning process following a Sept. 18 presentation from the school division.

    The changes come after the school division enlisted outside consultant National Demographics Corporation to conduct a review of the policy.

    The division and National Demographics Corporation co-hosted a virtual town hall on the proposed changes at the end of August, where roughly 50 attendees learned about the changes.

    Community members would have multiple options for input, including town hall meetings, parent focus groups, outreach to traditionally underrepresented families and involving school principals.

    The proposal also includes changes to the policy criteria the division should consider when setting or changing boundaries.

    “We’ve gone from a very general and kind of haphazard list that’s in the current policy to these four categories that are defined in much more definition in the regulation,” Johnson said.

    The refined categories are as follows:

    1. Optimize capacity — schools will be no more than 5% over capacity and no more than 20% under capacity

    2. Student demographics — demographics of affected schools and neighborhoods should be considered

    3. Local geography — considers proximity to school, walkability/transportation patterns, topography, minimize splitting neighborhoods, feeder patterns, contiguity

    4. Student stability — try to avoid student school reassignments when possible

    Under the proposed plans, the process for redistricting would be triggered by either the opening or closing of a school or by the board’s initiative following a capacity study report or other report to the board.

    Occoquan School Board member Richard Jessie said it was important that both the School Board and principals are involved early in the process, something recommended by the consultants.

    “ … because in the past, what happened, we were involved at the end, and then there are some things that we wanted to do. But it was sort of awkward, because the committee had already voted on it,” Jessie said.

    Potomac School Board member Justin Wilk expressed concern about overcrowding at Covington Harper Elementary School, which currently has eight trailers.

    Overcrowding at the school and other schools in the surrounding area has been a concern for Wilk and his constituents.

    Wilk said he wanted options in the proposed policy changes that address what he called “inefficiencies related to the capacity management of Covington Harper elementary.”

    Woodbridge District School Board member Loree Williams shared many of the same concerns as Wilk, primarily because changes in the Potomac District could have an impact on Woodbridge District schools.

    “When you change a boundary to an existing school, it can affect a lot more than just the surrounding schools,” Williams said. “I have landlocked schools, we’re already overcrowded, they’re Title One schools, my buildings are some of the oldest … we’re already starting to have a problem before we even vote on the new boundary process.”

    Jennifer Wall, the Gainesville District member, said she liked the focus on maximizing capacity utilization and the flexible approach to priorities when making boundary planning decisions rather than a stricter, hierarchical approach.

    While Wall said she likes the incorporation of principals and more community engagement, she said she was concerned it could become “fraught with politics,” with community members lobbying principals to get their way.

    “I am concerned a little bit that the focus groups could get unwieldy if we get too many and they’re too big,” Wall said.

    In response to the concerns shared by School Board members, Superintendent LaTanya McDade stepped in, noting the policy changes the division put together are all based on feedback from the board and stakeholders.

    “If there’s anything, any adjustments that the board would like to make, then the team is ready and willing to do that,” McDade said.

    The superintendent cautioned against delaying making changes any further, as the division is required to update the policy every five years.

    School Board Chairman Dr. Babur Lateef echoed McDade’s comments, telling his fellow board members they will have time to give further feedback to the division on the policy before the board takes an official vote on the policy, expected Oct. 2.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Small

    Source link