ReportWire

Tag: school board meeting

  • Beloved Arlington elementary school will permanently close, board decides

    [ad_1]

    The Arlington ISD Board of Trustees began conversations about closing the East Arlington Blanton Elementary School on Jan. 8, 2026.

    The Arlington ISD Board of Trustees began conversations about closing the East Arlington Blanton Elementary School on Jan. 8, 2026.

    Courtesy of Arlington ISD

    After an hours-long meeting on Tuesday night, the Arlington ISD Board of Trustees unanimously voted to permanently close Blanton Elementary School in east Arlington, a primarily Hispanic school that has faced declining enrollment, failing grades from the Texas Education Agency, and aging infrastructure.

    “If we don’t make this decision now, the state of Texas will make it for us — and that decision would not just affect Blanton,” board president Justin Chapa said to the small group of parents and community members who still remained in their seats after 10 p.m. on Tuesday.

    Chapa said the decision was one of the hardest that he has ever had to make as the board’s president.

    The decision came roughly a week after Arlington ISD officials met with parents to discuss the possible closure of Blanton. The move comes as the school has received failing grades from TEA for three straight years. Under Texas state law, if a school receives failing grades for five years in a row, a state commissioner must close the school or appoint a board of managers to oversee the entire district.

    Arlington ISD officials, they said, want to avoid that outcome.

    Several Blanton parents, some who were former students, had signed up hours earlier to speak against the closure at the meeting.

    “I feel like we don’t have an option, like this is already a decision,” Mariela Torres, whose son attends Blanton, told the board during the public-comment section of the meeting. “I’m here to speak up for everyone, even the custodians, and the staff members in the kitchen.”

    After hearing those public comments, the board heard a presentation from Arlington ISD officials including deputy superintendent Jennifer Collins and superintendent Matt Smith.

    Collins rehashed details from previous presentations, explaining that Blanton’s 69-year-old campus needs significant repairs, and said that the school’s declining enrollment is expected to drop even further.

    Kelly Horn, Arlington ISD assistant superintendent of facility services, gave the board a presentation detailing the repairs needed at the school, including a new roof and windows, signs of cracking in the masonry, stormwater drainage concerns, and a completely new cafeteria, gym, and storm shelter. According to Horn, it would cost roughly $34.8 million to repair the school.

    Most school buildings are built for a 50-year life cycle, Horn said — meaning Blanton is 20 years past its prime.

    District officials also provided an updated map of school zones, breakdowns of where students would be relocated, and potential class sizes at the new schools. Blanton’s students would be distributed between four nearby elementary schools — Burgin, Crow, Goodman, and Swift.

    Three of the schools — Burgin, Crow, and Goodman — have bilingual programs, district officials said. Bilingual Blanton students automatically zoned to Swift Elementary would attend Crow for its bilingual program.

    All current staff will be offered a reassignment in the district for the 2026-2027 school year, and Blanton staff will be eligible for the district’s internal transfer process.

    After that presentation, the Board of Trustees took up the proposal for discussion before their vote.

    “This is a tough decision, not just for the adults in the room, but for the very people that we represent, the children of this community,” said board member Larry Mike.

    Board member Brooklyn Richardson asked her colleagues to especially consider special-needs students who walk to school. Taking a new route to a new school, or riding the school bus, may simply be a non-starter for those students, Richardson said.

    “Thank you for being kind, during this process, to our families,” Richardson told the district officials. “You gave us data, you gave us the opportunity to have a conversation and dialogue, and now you’re giving us a choice.”

    After several hours of presentations and public comments, Chapa moved to bring the decision to a vote, saying he supported the administration’s recommendation to close the school.

    “This hits close to home to me because this is the part of town that I grew up in,” Chapa said.

    Chapa explained that he would much rather wait to get money to replace or improve Blanton — but with the TEA staring down the district, administration officials just don’t have that kind of time.

    Blanton will close at the end of the school year, officials confirmed at the meeting, and a majority of the campus will be demolished.

    Emily Holshouser

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Emily Holshouser is a local news reporter at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Holshouser

    Source link

  • Sacramento parents, students protest replacement of teacher over carpet removal

    [ad_1]

    Nearly 100 parents and students gathered at Thursday’s Sacramento City Unified School District board meeting to protest the removal of Jeanine Rupert, a sixth-grade teacher at Phoebe A. Hearst Elementary School.The removal comes after an incident at the end of last school year, when Rupert and her students removed old carpeting from her classroom, which may have contained asbestos. “She was removed from the classroom without due process, without cause. And secretly!” James Frazee, a parent at the meeting, said. “This was done on a Friday before a three-day weekend, and told she can’t show up. And this is allegedly over pulling up carpet.”Parents and students spoke in support of Rupert, describing her as an incredible teacher and role model.”I think it’s a horrible loss for our school to lose her,” one student said.”Mrs. Rupert has been the leader. She’s been an absolute joy to the school,” a parent added. “She’s been somebody who’s constantly helping our students, not just in the classroom, but outside the classroom.”Another student expressed deep admiration for their teacher.”I personally think that Mrs. Rupert was just one of the most magical teachers, maybe in the history of the world,” they said.The district claims Rupert was removed after the carpet was taken out, but stated: “The District’s fact-gathering and investigation into the matter were just completed earlier this week. The determination was made that none of the asbestos tiles underneath the classroom carpet had been damaged when students were present. The removal of the carpet did not cause a disturbance that would cause exposure to asbestos.Nonetheless, now that the investigation is complete, District staff will begin the process of reaching out to individual families to reassure them of their student’s safety and provide any necessary support.”Rupert’s father attended the meeting, sharing that his daughter has been devastated by her removal. “She tried to get it replaced for five years, and she decided to take it on her own. She’s torn up. She’s given her life to Phoebe Hearst,” said Tim O’Brien, Rupert’s father.Many families are confused by the district’s handling of the situation. “It blows the mind to think that somebody would be removed for something like that. She has a track record of excellence in the classroom,” one parent said.”I can’t believe that she’s getting fired for one carpet. That doesn’t make any sense to me,” a student added.Community members organized quickly after the district changed Thursday night’s meeting time. Organizers were expected to give public comment at 6 p.m.”It was around 4 o’clock when it was supposed to be at 5,” one attendee said.”It was a complete lack of transparency because it was unclear when we were supposed to be able to come and speak,” another person at the meeting added.The district stated that Rupert was not fired and remains employed, but parents reported receiving an email from Principal Brooke Fahey indicating she has been replaced by another teacher set to start on Sept. 8. The district says, “Mrs. Rupert will be teaching at a different school this year.” KCRA posed multiple follow-up questions to the district regarding the situation, including where Rupert will be teaching, and has yet to hear back. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Nearly 100 parents and students gathered at Thursday’s Sacramento City Unified School District board meeting to protest the removal of Jeanine Rupert, a sixth-grade teacher at Phoebe A. Hearst Elementary School.

    The removal comes after an incident at the end of last school year, when Rupert and her students removed old carpeting from her classroom, which may have contained asbestos.

    “She was removed from the classroom without due process, without cause. And secretly!” James Frazee, a parent at the meeting, said. “This was done on a Friday before a three-day weekend, and told she can’t show up. And this is allegedly over pulling up carpet.”

    Parents and students spoke in support of Rupert, describing her as an incredible teacher and role model.

    “I think it’s a horrible loss for our school to lose her,” one student said.

    “Mrs. Rupert has been the leader. She’s been an absolute joy to the school,” a parent added. “She’s been somebody who’s constantly helping our students, not just in the classroom, but outside the classroom.”

    Another student expressed deep admiration for their teacher.

    “I personally think that Mrs. Rupert was just one of the most magical teachers, maybe in the history of the world,” they said.

    The district claims Rupert was removed after the carpet was taken out, but stated:

    “The District’s fact-gathering and investigation into the matter were just completed earlier this week. The determination was made that none of the asbestos tiles underneath the classroom carpet had been damaged when students were present. The removal of the carpet did not cause a disturbance that would cause exposure to asbestos.

    Nonetheless, now that the investigation is complete, District staff will begin the process of reaching out to individual families to reassure them of their student’s safety and provide any necessary support.”

    Rupert’s father attended the meeting, sharing that his daughter has been devastated by her removal.

    “She tried to get it replaced for five years, and she decided to take it on her own. She’s torn up. She’s given her life to Phoebe Hearst,” said Tim O’Brien, Rupert’s father.

    Many families are confused by the district’s handling of the situation.

    “It blows the mind to think that somebody would be removed for something like that. She has a track record of excellence in the classroom,” one parent said.

    “I can’t believe that she’s getting fired for one carpet. That doesn’t make any sense to me,” a student added.

    Community members organized quickly after the district changed Thursday night’s meeting time. Organizers were expected to give public comment at 6 p.m.

    “It was around 4 o’clock when it was supposed to be at 5,” one attendee said.

    “It was a complete lack of transparency because it was unclear when we were supposed to be able to come and speak,” another person at the meeting added.

    The district stated that Rupert was not fired and remains employed, but parents reported receiving an email from Principal Brooke Fahey indicating she has been replaced by another teacher set to start on Sept. 8.

    The district says, “Mrs. Rupert will be teaching at a different school this year.”

    KCRA posed multiple follow-up questions to the district regarding the situation, including where Rupert will be teaching, and has yet to hear back.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fairfax Co. adds weapons detection screenings at school board meetings – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Community members attending school board meetings in Fairfax County, Virginia, will be screened for weapons as part of a safety initiative from the school system. 

    Parents, students, staff and other community members attending school board meetings in Fairfax County, Virginia, will be screened for weapons as part of a new safety initiative from the school system.

    Fairfax County Public Schools added the new layer of security at the start of the school year, according to a news release from the school system.

    The school system is asking anyone attending the meetings to come early to budget time for the screening. Doors open at 6:30 p.m. for meetings.

    The school system already uses the OpenGate weapons detection system in many high schools and plans to roll it out to all middle and high schools.

    It’s similar to the systems used at sporting events or concerts.

    The same items restricted in schools will apply to school board meetings. Among those items are guns, knives, explosive devices, ammunition, starter guns, paintball guns, pellet guns, blades, brass knuckles, mace and similar devices. Objects that look like weapons aren’t allowed.

    There are some items that are OK to bring inside, but may set off the system. Those items include three-ring binders, laptops, metal eyeglass cases, umbrellas and metallic pencil cases.

    The school system warned bringing one of those items could slow down the screening process.

    In recent years, school board meetings in the U.S. have involved divisive debates that at times turned into physical altercations.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • Some Fairfax Co. community members call for overhaul to sex education lessons – WTOP News

    Some Fairfax Co. community members call for overhaul to sex education lessons – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Some parents and community members are calling for an overhaul of Fairfax County Public Schools’ sex education curriculum, about a month after the committee that works on it presented its latest recommendations to the school board.

    Some parents and community members are calling for an overhaul of Fairfax County Public Schools’ sex education curriculum, about a month after the committee that works on it presented its latest recommendations to the school board.

    During the public comment portion of Thursday’s school board meeting, several speakers called for the Family Life Education lessons to be more inclusive, and, in some cases, urged school leaders to consider making them coed.

    The comments come weeks after the FLE Curriculum Advisory Committee presented its latest recommendations to school staff. While they don’t mention coed instruction in the latest iteration, it was included in the committee’s recommendations in previous years.

    “The Family Life Education Curriculum in Fairfax County Public Schools is not yet comprehensive sexuality education,” community member Robert Rigby said. “We need to begin at first principles and develop a program that meets the needs of children. That is, we need to start over.”

    Christina McCormick, who said she’s a Fairfax County parent, told the board that sex education concepts should be inclusive of all gender and sexual identities.

    “Our LGBTQ youth are already experiencing bullying and stigma,” McCormick said. “Separating them by gender for sex-ed furthers this and completely ignores the existence of students who identify outside of the binary, and further perpetuates heteronormativity.”

    In its latest series of recommendations, the committee, which is made up of teachers, students, health department members and school board appointees, recommended a series of objectives and descriptive statements tied to setting personal boundaries for high schoolers, and revised objectives tied to puberty and reproductive systems in fourth through seventh grades.

    Curriculum development is ongoing through the next school year, according to school board documents, and full implementation of the changes could come in the 2025-26 school year. The community review period ended June 10, and the topic is listed as a school board action item at the upcoming June 27 meeting.

    For elementary schoolers, the committee is recommending exploring teaching gender identity and a more inclusive overall curriculum. At Thursday’s meeting, Vanessa Hall, with the group FCPS Pride, said the district’s family life education curriculum is “about three decades old.”

    “Interim changes have been beneficial but cannot address deficiencies at the core of the curriculum developed in a previous century when gay marriage was illegal, and meant nearly all our students and staff were in the closet,” Hall said.

    After the committee initially unveiled recommendations for certain coed sex education lessons, the school system launched a survey to gather public opinion. About 85% of people who responded to the survey opposed the proposal to put girls and boys in the same classroom for certain sex education lessons. Over 2,600 responses were collected.

    Critics of coed lessons argue they’d make kids uncomfortable, and, as a result, they wouldn’t ask important questions. Advocates say they can create an inclusive environment and normalize conversations about reproduction and puberty.

    At the meeting, one speaker said the proposal was “overwhelmingly opposed by parents, students and employees.”

    Parents can opt their student out of certain family life education lessons.

    More information about the school district’s Family Life Education curriculum is available online.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gelman

    Source link