ReportWire

Tag: SB 1070

  • GOP sends possibly unconstitutional border bill to the November ballot

    GOP sends possibly unconstitutional border bill to the November ballot

    [ad_1]

    Arizona voters will get a chance to decide whether the state should have the ability to enforce immigration law after Republicans in the state legislature OK’d sending a proposal to the November ballot that seeks to grant local police officers and state judges the power to arrest and deport migrants.   But there are numerous constitutional questions about the proposal, which the GOP majority in the state House of Representatives approved on Tuesday…

    [ad_2]

    Gloria Rebecca Gomez | Arizona Mirror

    Source link

  • Katie Hobbs kills controversial border bill with first veto of 2024

    Katie Hobbs kills controversial border bill with first veto of 2024

    [ad_1]

    The Veto Queen is back.

    After a record-shattering 143 vetoes in 2023, Gov. Katie Hobbs dusted off her veto stamp on Monday and delivered her first rejection of a bill in 2024.

    The victim? Senate Bill 1231. The Republican-controlled House was so enamored with the bill that it suspended its rules on Wednesday and rushed it to a 31-28 vote a week after its 16-13-1 approval in the Senate.

    Hobbs greeted the legislation with a veto.

    “The bill does not secure our border, will be harmful for communities and businesses in our state, and burdensome for law enforcement personnel and the state judicial system,” Hobbs said in her veto statement.

    “Further, this bill presents significant constitutional concerns and would be certain to mire the State in costly and protracted legislation,” she added.

    SB 1231 — titled the “Arizona Border Invasion Act” — allowed local police to arrest migrants suspected of crossing into the state at places other than ports of entry and charge them with a misdemeanor. A first offense carried a jail sentence of up to six months. The bill also shielded law enforcement from civil liabilities

    On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily halted a nearly identical new law in Texas that also empowered local police to arrest people suspected of crossing the border illegally.

    SB 1231 is one of three measures targeting immigration that Republicans are pushing through the legislature. House Bill 2821 is similar to SB 1231, while House Concurrent Resolution 2060 is a ballot measure that would bar undocumented immigrants from obtaining many taxpayer-funded social benefits.

    The measures have come under sharp criticism — even from some Republicans — who contend they are an escalation of the state GOP’s war on immigrants without permanent legal status.

    In a video statement on Monday, Hobbs dismissed the bills as an effort to “score cheap political points.”

    ‘Blatantly unconstitutional and extreme’

    Republicans blasted Hobbs’ veto, while progressive groups, including the ACLU, praised her action.

    State Sen. Janae Shamp, SB 1231’s sponsor, said in a statement from Senate Republicans that the veto “was a slap in the face” to law enforcement.

    “The Legislature did its job to protect our citizens, but Governor Hobbs failed to do hers,” Shamp said. “Vetoing the Arizona Border Invasion Act is a prime example of the chaos Hobbs is unleashing in our state while perpetuating this open border crisis as Biden’s accomplice.”

    The ACLU of Arizona praised Hobbs for her veto.

    “SB 1231 was a blatantly unconstitutional and extreme anti-immigrant measure that would have sent Arizona back to a time when racial profiling ran rampant, and the state’s reputation and economy took a brutal blow,” said Noah Schramm, border policy strategist for the ACLU of Arizona.

    “SB 1231 has no place in Arizona where immigrants are our friends, family and neighbors; but rather than protecting Arizona communities, extremist lawmakers are only concerned with inciting hateful divisions,” Schramm added.

    Living United for Change in Arizona, a political organization known colloquially as LUCHA, said the veto was a blow to the “Republicans’ hate-filled agenda.”

    “SB 1231 doesn’t solve the humanitarian crisis at the border, and it would have inflicted tremendous harm to Arizona communities,” Alejandra Gomez, LUCHA’s executive director, said Monday in a prepared statement. “While Republicans have abandoned morality and democratic principles, today is a reflection of the power of democracy and the power of people when they come together to fight against racism, hate and just plain bad policy.”

    Here are all the bills Katie Hobbs vetoed in 2024 (so far)

    Will Hobbs break her own veto record? She’s off to a slow start. In 2024, her first veto didn’t happen until March 4. By that point in 2023, Hobbs notched 15 vetoes on her way to 143 for the year.

    Senate Bill 1231: Local arrests of migrants

    Hobbs’ vetoed the bill on March 4. The measure allowed local police to arrest non-U.S. citizens suspected of illegally crossing the border between Arizona and Mexico even though border enforcement is a federal issue. “This bill presents significant constitutional concerns and would be certain to mire the State in costly and protracted legislation,” Hobbs said in her veto letter.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Hennie

    Source link

  • Republican Hispanic leader denounces Arizona GOP’s immigration bill

    Republican Hispanic leader denounces Arizona GOP’s immigration bill

    [ad_1]

    It’s déjà vu for Latino business leaders, who warn that a controversial new effort by Republicans to target undocumented immigrants would weaken Arizona’s economy — just as an infamous 2010 “show me your papers” law brought an economic blow and national shame to the state.

    Republicans in the Arizona State Legislature have been working to put a measure on the November ballot that would require local governments to check a person’s immigration status before they could access public health care, housing assistance or employment programs.

    House Concurrent Resolution 2060 is being guided through the Capitol’s chambers by House Speaker Ben Toma, the powerful Republican lawmaker running for a Valley Congressional seat in a crowded, difficult race. It awaits a vote in the Senate after the House approved the bill on Feb. 22 in a 31-28 vote. If voters approve it in November, undocumented immigrants will be barred from obtaining many taxpayer-funded social benefits, starting in 2026.

    Mónica Villalobos, CEO of the Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and a registered Republican, predicted that the bill would weaken economic growth.

    “Bad policies like these do not strengthen Arizona law. Instead, it restricts the ability of Arizona businesses to thrive, especially when we have a workforce shortage,” Villalobos said during a press conference Monday.

    Toma, during a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Feb. 19, said the bill is designed to make sure “Arizona taxpayers do not bear the financial burden of paying for the federal government’s failure to control illegal immigration at the border.”

    But the irony is that undocumented immigrants are Arizona taxpayers. The nonpartisan American Immigration Council found that, in 2021, undocumented immigrants in Arizona paid $647.9 million in state, local and federal taxes.

    The bill would also require contract workers paid over $600 a year to be cleared for employment through E-Verify, the system provided by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration, which Villalobos said would create “burdensome red tape for all involved as we experience labor shortages.”

    While escalating the GOP’s war on immigrants without permanent legal status, the measure would do nothing to step up border enforcement.

    Republicans are also pushing two bills likely to be vetoed by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. House Bill 2821 and Senate Bill 1231 empower local law enforcement to enforce immigration policies, a responsibility that has long been reserved for the federal government. The House passed HB 2821 on Feb. 22; it now awaits action in the Senate. SB 1231 passed the Senate on Feb. 21. On Wednesday, the House suspended its rules and passed the bill 31-28, sending it to Hobbs.

    “Every Arizonan is frustrated by the federal government’s failure to secure our border,” Hobbs said in a Monday statement. “But passing job-killing, anti-business bills that demonize our communities is not the solution. Instead of securing our border, these bills will simply raise costs, hurt our farmers, put Arizona entrepreneurs out of business and destroy jobs for countless working-class Arizonans.”

    The controversial immigration bills come as Republicans in Washington, D.C., have rejected a bipartisan Senate bill that would provide $20 billion in funding for the border. The bill died after former President Donald Trump asked Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives to kill it so President Joe Biden wouldn’t look strong on border enforcement.

    Hobbs said Toma’s bill was “meant to score political points.”

    click to enlarge

    Democratic lawmakers held signs opposing HCR 2060, which would escalate the GOP’s war on undocumented people, during a press conference on Monday.

    TJ L’Heureux

    Show me your papers, one more time

    The recent bills have suddenly resurrected the story of SB 1070, a 2010 law that became synonymous with racial hatred of immigrants, made Arizona a laughingstock, sparked boycotts, led to heightened racial profiling, set off a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against the state, stirred fear in Latino communities and unintentionally birthed a progressive grassroots movement that helped elect Democratic politicians statewide.

    The bill’s sponsor, Russell Pearce, earned the “Best Death of a Racist” award in 2023 from Phoenix New Times.

    It’s difficult to estimate the total economic impact the law had or track how many people and businesses decided to boycott the state. A 2010 study reported that Arizona’s economy lost at least $434 million in direct spending from conference cancellations in the first year alone. Libertarian think tank Cato Institute argued in 2012 that the law “caused significant economic harm.”

    “States bear much of the cost of unauthorized immigration, but in Arizona’s rush to find a state solution, it damaged its own economy,” the Cato report said. It also made note of the law’s negative impact on the labor market, which hindered Arizona construction and farming.

    Villalobos criticized the new Toma immigration bill as anti-business.

    “This is a huge departure from the basic tenets of the Republican Party, which is business first and being able to secure a safe business environment that can thrive,” Villalobos told New Times. “It’s completely antithetical to the party’s position historically.”

    click to enlarge Woman speaks at podium with two men looking on from behind.

    Alejandra Gomez, executive director of LUCHA, rallied against HCR 2060 on Monday at the Arizona Capitol.

    TJ L’Heureux

    ‘This is a great battle ahead’

    Most Democrats see the bill as a weak political offering to the Republican Party’s anti-immigrant base.

    “I think this shows that our Republican colleagues are desperate to maintain power,” state Sen. Anna Hernandez, a Phoenix Democrat, told New Times. “But also, how fiscally irresponsible is something like this? For a party that preaches fiscal smartness, I think this is another example that they are not in tune with what being fiscally responsible for the entire state means.”

    Several Latino business owners spoke at the Monday press conference, highlighting that small businesses are the backbone of America and agreeing that the law would have a negative impact.

    “For many years, Arizona had to navigate away from the dark days of SB 1070,” Villalobos said. “Painstakingly, Arizona has repaired its image as open for business.”

    Living United for Change in Arizona, a political organization known colloquially as LUCHA, was created in the aftermath of SB 1070. It now sees itself as poised for a second battle over policies that bring harm to vulnerable community members in the name of fixing the immigration crisis.

    LUCHA’s existence is also illustrative of the larger political organizing machine that was created after SB 1070. About half of the Democrats’ caucus is now Latino and several of them cite SB 1070 as the moment they wanted to get involved in politics. With Democrats knocking on the door of gaining the majority in both chambers come November, the post-SB 1070 organizing machine may be able to capitalize on the controversial law as evidence for the need to vote.

    Alejandra Gomez, executive director of LUCHA, said at the press conference she was “deeply saddened” to watch the state relive the mistakes of SB 1070.

    “I was here for the pain and the aftermath of our economy, of what the devastation was to our families,” Gomez added. “But we are not the Arizona of 2010. This coalition is a powerful coalition.”

    Joe Garcia, executive director of community advocacy nonprofit Chicanos Por La Causa Action Fund, said he’s ready for the fight.

    “This is a great battle ahead. We are hoping we can stop it before it becomes a war,” Garcia said. “A war not only on the Latino community and vulnerable populations, but also a war on Arizona’s economy.”

    [ad_2]

    TJ L’Heureux

    Source link

  • Arizona Republicans pass new generation of ‘show me your papers’ laws

    Arizona Republicans pass new generation of ‘show me your papers’ laws

    [ad_1]

    Republicans in the Arizona House passed a bill to put a controversial immigration measure on the ballot in November that would require local governments to check a person’s immigration status before providing access to public health care, housing assistance and employment programs.

    Both chambers also passed identical versions of an immigration bill that is expected to be vetoed by Gov. Katie Hobbs once they reach her desk.

    House Concurrent Resolution 2060 is the brainchild of House Speaker Ben Toma, who is running for a Valley Congressional seat in a crowded race. The House approved the bill on Thursday in a 31-28 vote, and it now goes to the Senate, which is likely to pass it. If voters approve it in November, undocumented immigrants would be barred from obtaining many taxpayer-funded social benefits starting in 2026.

    The bill is designed to ensure “Arizona taxpayers do not bear the financial burden of paying for the federal government’s failure to control illegal immigration at the border,” Toma said Monday during a House Appropriations Committee hearing.

    The irony of the proposed law is that undocumented immigrants are Arizona taxpayers. The nonpartisan American Immigration Council found that in 2021, undocumented immigrants in Arizona paid $647.9 million in state, local and federal taxes. Despite helping fund government programs, undocumented families would not be allowed to benefit from them, even if they have lived in the state for decades.

    Opponents of the initiative criticized Republican lawmakers for trying to bypass Hobbs. They also noted that the law could have a negative impact on the economy and would increase anti-immigrant sentiment in the same way the infamous SB 1070 law did after the legislature passed it in 2010.

    “Anti-immigrant laws like SB 1070, like HCR 2060, do nothing but negatively affect our labor market, cause national disgrace and lead to heightened discrimination of people of color,” said Lena Avalos, policy director at Living United for Change in Arizona (LUCHA) during a House Appropriations Committee hearing for the bill on Monday.

    Though the initiative would further marginalize undocumented immigrants in Arizona, it’s worth noting that it would make no changes to immigration enforcement or border security.

    click to enlarge

    Gov. Katie Hobbs is likely to veto Republican legislation that targets undocumented immigrants.

    Elias Weiss

    Bills make it state crime to cross the border

    Republicans in both chambers also approved legislation — House Bill 2821 and Senate Bill 1231 — that allow state and local officials to enforce immigration policy, even though that enforcement is the responsibility of the federal government. The measures, which also protect protect law enforcement from civil liabilities, are modeled after a recent, highly controversial Texas law that critics say will lead to more policing with less accountability.

    Jennifer Holder, an attorney for the House Rules Committee told lawmakers on Monday that many of the provisions in HB 2821 were likely to be deemed unconstitutional.

    Still, Republicans are willing to take their chances. “Frankly, I think this Supreme Court will back the protection of the borders of the United States,” said state Sen. John Kavanagh, a Scottsdale Republican.

    The House voted to pass HB 2821 in a 31-28 vote on Thursday. SB 1231 passed on Wednesday in a 16-13 vote in the Senate. The bills now go to the other chamber for consideration. Also Thursday, the House passed HB 2748 — which is similar to HB 2821 and SB 1231 — in a 31-28 vote. Hobbs is expected to veto the bills if they reach her.

    “We know the outcome of this. It will be promptly vetoed,” said state Rep. Marcelino Quiñonez, a Phoenix Democrat. “In the interest of saving us all time, I would ask all of my members on the other side who are in support of this to not bring these things up.”

    During debate in the House, Republicans lamented a lack of action from the federal government to slow the surge of migrants entering the country, a statement with which many Democrats agreed.

    The criticism comes after top Republicans in Washington, D.C., rejected a bipartisan Senate bill that provided $20 billion in funding for the border after former President Donald Trump asked them to ensure the bill’s demise and not give President Joe Biden a political win.

    “Congress finally has the strongest immigration reform bill that we’ve seen,” said state Rep. Lorena Austin, a Mesa Democrat. “The ink is barely dry on this bipartisan bill, an agreement that would provide resources that the border needs but has been cast aside because Republicans are refusing to take action on the issue they say they care about the most.”

    In 2023, the southern border saw a record number of migrant encounters, though January encounters in Arizona were far lower than each of the previous three months.

    State Rep. Joseph Chaplik, a Scottsdale Republican, is the sponsor of HB 2748 and a co-sponsor of HB 2821. “I stand for legal immigration, but we as a country cannot sustain this kind of volume coming through our border,” Chaplik said Wednesday.

    He also spoke at length about immigrants entering the country, insinuating that the U.S. is being overrun by enemies of the state and criminals.

    Chaplik mentioned Raad Almansoori, who was arrested this week at Scottsdale Fashion Square. Police say he stabbed two women in the Valley after killing another in New York City. Chaplik cited Almansoori as an example of the criminals entering the country illegally.

    “Recently, in Scottsdale, they arrested a gentleman, Raad Almansoori, who murdered a woman in New York allegedly. He just got picked up. Hours before the arrest, he attacked an employee in a bathroom in McDonald’s in Surprise. He stabbed a woman in another stall three times in the neck. And the police say he’s suspected of stabbing another woman at a robbery with a knife,” Chaplik said. “This is what’s coming across our border.”

    Yet Almansoori is an American citizen who was born in Arizona, according to police documents.

    click to enlarge Former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce

    Former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce sponsored SB 1070, which opened the door to racial profiling of Latinos when it became state law in 2010.

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    ‘I remember the fear in my mother’s eyes’

    Opponents of the bills have taken to collectively calling them “SB 1070 2.0,” a reference to the infamous “show me your papers” bill that was signed into law in 2010 and allowed local and state law enforcement to crack down on illegal immigration, creating a culture of fear in Latino communities. The law sparked boycotts and had a detrimental economic impact on Arizona, which became a national disgrace before three of the bill’s four provisions were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012.

    The bill’s sponsor, Russell Pearce, earned Phoenix New Times’ 2023 “Best Death of a Racist” award.

    Alejandra Gomez is the executive director of LUCHA, a progressive Latino advocacy group that was founded in the wake of SB 1070. She called the bills racist and divisive in a press release.

    “Speaker Ben Toma and Republicans are launching an assault against the diverse fabric of Arizona by targeting immigrant communities, and dismissing their contributions to the state’s culture, and economy,” Gomez said. “Speaker Toma is choosing politics over the welfare of Arizona, just to score political points or for a fundraising pitch. Playing politics with Arizona’s economy and threatening families is not what Arizonans do, and should be unequivocally rejected.”

    During debate on the bill, state Sen. Rosanna Gabaldón recalled the oppressive aftermath of SB 1070. “Within 12 months, I was pulled over more than 10 times by law enforcement,” she said.

    She also told a story about her mother, an immigrant who became an American citizen.

    “My mother would carry her passport with her because she was so afraid that someone was going to stop her and ask her questions. My mom, who worked very, very hard to become an American citizen and was proud when she became an American citizen, is being stopped by law enforcement,” an emotional Gabaldón said.

    Gabaldón added that she told her mother to put her hands on the dashboard of the car and not give officers a reason to do anything to her.

    “I remember the fear in my mother’s eyes. This is gonna begin again,” Gabaldón said.

    Several Democratic lawmakers also cited SB 1070 as a primary reason for getting active in politics and government and noted the law fueled a progressive movement.

    “I probably wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for SB 1070,” said state Sen. Juan Mendez during a vote on one of the bills.

    “I think sometimes my colleagues on the other side of the aisle underestimate the consequences to their seats,” said state Sen. Anna Hernandez, a Phoenix Democrat. “This bill is going to mobilize the new wave behind that, and there’s going to be a whole new generation of activists, of youth, of immigrants, that are going to get involved.”

    Hernandez also spoke directly to her Republican colleagues.

    “So in the future, when you wonder when Arizona starts voting more and more Democrats into office at every level of government, remember that it is going to be tied to SB 1231 and policy like it,” Hernandez said.

    With the 2024 election approaching, HCR 2060 could be on the ballot along with a measure allowing the state to vote on enshrining reproductive freedom in the Arizona Constitution.

    [ad_2]

    TJ L’Heureux

    Source link