ReportWire

Tag: santa clara county politics

  • Investigation into removal of superintendent reveals misuse of public funds, Santa Clara County Office of Ed says

    [ad_1]

    At a contentious meeting Wednesday night, the Santa Clara County Office of Education’s board delivered the results of a lengthy investigation into an alleged misuse of public funds by the county’s former superintendent of schools — but conflicting claims by county office of education leaders made it clear that many questions still swirl around the findings.

    They come more than a year after former Superintendent Mary Ann Dewan was unexpectedly removed from her position in a 4-2 vote; the action was classified as “without cause.” The board declined to expand on the reasoning for Dewan’s mysterious removal for months, but says now the decision stemmed from her handling of several complaints regarding the county’s Head Start program, which helps low-income children under the age of five access critical resources.

    The report did not cite specific examples of wrongdoing, or include the names of the two law firms that conducted the independent review. But it contained 14 findings, including that under Dewan’s leadership, the Santa Clara County Office of Education misused public funds and violated several board policies, that the county superintendent’s segregated account was used to redirect grant funding for unrelated purposes and that public dollars were used for legal expenses and investigations of the board of education.

    A federal audit released earlier this year said the county office of education misused more than $135,370 in federal Head Start funds under Dewan, an error the board called a failed cover-up and an intentional effort to undermine the board’s authority — but which Dewan said was a communication error.

    The county office of education said Wednesday that the board and staff were not aware of any charges being filed by law enforcement or the district attorney’s office.

    The report’s summarized findings presented Wednesday were written by board counsel and the board’s governance committee — comprised of board president Maimona Afzal Berta, vice president Victoria Chon and trustee Jessica Speiser as well as current county superintendent David Toston — the board’s legal counsel said Wednesday and the findings stemmed from multiple investigations and reports conducted in the last two years.

    The report’s findings also said several office of education contracts were awarded in a manner that suggested personal favoritism and that “ethical safeguards” were ignored, with several county office of education employees allegedly using “public resources” to show support for their superior.

    In a statement Wednesday, Dewan condemned the board’s findings, calling them “meritless, malicious and baseless attacks unsupported by any evidence.”

    “I have no knowledge of any wrongdoing and fulfilled all of my duties with integrity and within the statutory framework of my role,” Dewan said. “This pattern of public attacks, mischaracterizations and personal targeting is harmful to the institution and discourages talented educators from serving our students.”

    Dewan also pointed out that whether appointed by the board — in the case of Santa Clara County — or elected by the community, a county superintendent has independent authority under the law to enter into agreements and contracts. She also said that employees, like all individuals, have First Amendment rights and the board’s effort to frame employee free speech as misconduct is troubling.

    At Wednesday’s meeting, a handful of community members and head start staff expressed their gratitude to the board for investigating the misuse of funds and Dewan’s “unethical” requests.

    “The findings are astonishing but not surprising given that I and Head Start staff have been saying this for the last two years,” said Mercedes Hill, a Head Start office specialist within the county office of education.

    But Riju Krishna, the president of the Association of County Educators — a group of local teachers unions — pointed out that the amount of improperly misused funding alleged in the investigation’s findings “cannot possibly be the work of one single superintendent” in a system that requires multiple checks and balances, and called on the current county superintendent Toston to implement significant policy reform.

    “What is your plan…to rebuild the school oversight, repair the damage and ensure that this never happens again?” Krishna asked. “How will you repair this harm?”

    The board of education presented several suggested policy changes in response to the investigation’s findings Wednesday in an effort to prevent the misuse of funds from reoccurring.

    But Tara Sreekrishnan, who said she was speaking as an individual member of the board and not on behalf of the board itself, expressed concerns about the proposed board policy changes, which she said centralizes authority in the board president, restricts speech, reduces transparency and moves the county office of education toward “punitive, politically motivated governance.”

    She also expressed deep concerns about the investigation’s findings.

    “The findings raise broad and serious concerns but they are presented without evidence or specific examples, which makes it difficult for the public trustees or any oversight agency to fully evaluate them,” Sreekrishnan said in a statement Wednesday.

    The report’s findings come amid several other investigations into the county office of education and board over the last year, which have pointed to an alleged history of tension between the county office of education leadership and board members and found that the board failed to follow its own management policies.

    Several other former county office of education leaders came to the defense of Dewan Wednesday, including former board president Claudia Rossi and former trustee Kathleen King.

    “Countless public dollars have been poured into this two-year witch hunt and still not a shred of evidence of wrongdoing has been produced,” Rossi said in a statement Wednesday.

    But current board member Don Rocha cautioned the community that in his more than 30 years of public service, he’s never seen an agency as unconcerned with serving community interests as the Santa Clara County Office of Education was under Dewan.

    “The evidence speaks for itself unless you choose to look the other way,” Rocha said.

    [ad_2]

    Molly Gibbs

    Source link

  • Letters: Let’s invest in the Bay Area’s greatest asset: nature

    [ad_1]

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    Invest in Bay Area’s
    greatest asset: Nature

    Re: “Bay Area needs unity to solve its problems” (Page A9, Aug. 17).

    I second Russell Hancock’s recent call for bold regional leadership in this period of “federal ruckus.” As climate impacts intensify, California must act now to build climate resilience for tomorrow — and for future generations.

    [ad_2]

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • In rare exchange, Santa Clara County child welfare leaders endure epic takedown from Supervisor Arenas

    In rare exchange, Santa Clara County child welfare leaders endure epic takedown from Supervisor Arenas

    [ad_1]

    SAN JOSE — Santa Clara County Supervisor Sylvia Arenas had had enough.

    She listened quietly during Tuesday’s board meeting as leaders of the county’s child welfare agency breezed through a slide show about the progress they’ve made trying to reform the agency since last year’s fentanyl overdose death of baby Phoenix Castro, a 3-month-old they’d refused to remove from her drug abusing father.

    She waited for Damion Wright, the head of the Department of Family and Children’s Services, to mention a damning new report from the California Department of Social Services — a follow up to a similarly scathing report a year ago — that spelled out how the state was still “deeply concerned about the risks to child safety.”

    Wright never mentioned it. So Arenas, who’d spent her career working in child dependency court before joining the board in 2023, delivered a blistering 20-minute takedown, demanding accountability from Wright, his boss Dan Little — who now leads the county’s Department of Social Services — and his boss, County Executive James Williams. Their leadership and policies left children in dangerous homes, Arenas said, and she demanded to know what they’re doing to change that.

    “I do want an answer. Damion? Dan? What are you doing? James, what are you doing?” she asked from the dais, looking down on Wright and Little who slouched in their seats. “How are we mitigating the impacts of this extreme ‘family preservation’ framework that put our children at risk? That created a death in our community? That continues to impact Brown and Black children? What is it that you’re doing?”

    When Little started to respond that he would answer the same way he did during a board meeting nine months ago, Arenas interrupted.

    “I would really appreciate for you to say something slightly different than you did in December,” she said. “It was really disappointing.”

    The tense interchange between an elected supervisor and hired staff during a public meeting was extraordinary, with Arenas’ voice nearly trembling with anger at times, and her three targets shrinking in awkward silences. Board of Supervisors meetings are usually staid affairs that often seem interminable to members of the public who might show up to listen. If there is disagreement, it is usually wrapped in polite platitudes that ends in thank yous.

    But Arenas upended those norms Tuesday.

    The meeting came nearly a year after the Mercury News revealed how the county’s family preservation policies — championed by Dan Little in 2021 — appeared to trump child safety in Baby Phoenix’s death, despite red flags raised by social workers. This news organization also uncovered the original state report from February 2023 that found the County Counsel’s office often overrode decisions by social workers to remove children from unsafe homes. Little had kept that state report secret from the board of supervisors until the night before this paper was set to publish it.

    After neither Little nor Wright mentioned the second state report from July in their presentation, Arenas made it clear Tuesday she had little confidence in the agency’s leadership, transparency or commitment to child safety above all else.

    That July state report criticized the county agency for failing to follow up on whether families who were able to keep their children after reports of abuse or neglect were actually completing the voluntary county programs intended to improve their parenting. From July 2022 through March 2024, state investigators found that safety plans were not developed or monitored in 55 percent of cases where there were safety concerns in the home. No formal protocols were in place for social workers to follow when families didn’t follow through on their parenting programs, and there were no formal processes to assess whether a temporary caregiver was appropriate.

    After Little told Arenas that “we want to make sure that every decision we make for every child is the right decision for that child,” she interrupted again.

    “But it wasn’t, Dan. So I’m asking you, what are you doing in order to correct your leadership, to make sure that the systems don’t fall back where they were, that created, that compromised, the well being of our children?”

    When Little tried to answer, saying they’re following “policies and practices,” she cut him off.

    “I’m asking you to be accountable,” she said.

    “You were in charge, Dan. How about acknowledging that to our community? How about acknowledging that we made a mistake in our system? Are you going to apologize to each and every child that you put at risk that didn’t have a safety plan?”

    The board meeting was livestreamed and recorded. Alex Lesniak, a county social worker and union steward, watched it twice Wednesday.

    “I literally cried, in a positive way, because it’s like somebody finally gets it and sees what we have all been trying to flag, before Phoenix’s death,” Lesniak said. “Someone is actually asking those people who made those choices and implemented those policies to account for what they are going to do differently so this never happens again.”

    The board of supervisors has the power to remove Williams. There seems to be little interest among the rest of the 5-member board, however, to do so. Only Williams has the authority to fire Little or Wright — another possibility that appears to have little traction.

    Nonetheless, Arenas — with the support of the board — demanded in a motion that Wright and Little write a “personal reflection” on their leadership, how it failed vulnerable children, and what they are doing to improve it.

    “I really want this to be your own personal reflection about your own role in this fiasco that we’re in right now,” she said.

    She became especially animated when she brought up the state report from July, asking why neither Little nor Wright mentioned it. No answer came for a deadly 10 seconds. Williams finally piped up, agreeing that “it would make sense” to add the state’s findings and recommendations to the agency’s work plan going forward.

    Arenas fired back.

    “The system works as well as the people who run it,” Arenas said. “And sometimes we have to ask a question whether we have the right people on the bus to actually carry out the work.”

    [ad_2]

    Julia Prodis Sulek

    Source link