ReportWire

Tag: San Sebastian International Film Festival

  • Andrew Garfield Is Back: ‘We Live in Time’ Star Talks Returning to Spotlight, His Own Grief and Who He Wants to Work With Next: “Where Do I Begin?”

    Andrew Garfield Is Back: ‘We Live in Time’ Star Talks Returning to Spotlight, His Own Grief and Who He Wants to Work With Next: “Where Do I Begin?”

    Welcome back, Andrew Garfield. You’ve been missed.

    The British star has done it all: shooting webs, making musicals — you name it. Over the last few years, however, he’s felt it right to take a break from the spotlight. Now, with We Live in Time set to close the San Sebastian Film Festival on Saturday, the Oscar nominee makes his grand return to the screen.

    Garfield has dabbled in recent years with, for example, TV miniseries Under the Banner of Heaven in 2022. And who could forget his iconic appearance in Spider-Man: No Way Home?

    This year, the star confirms to The Hollywood Reporter that he is ready to make a comeback. “I feel looser, I feel less precious, I feel more joyful,” the 41-year-old says. He has been surfing and eating his way around the Spanish coastal town over the last week, spending time with old high-school friends: “I’ve been a proper tourist.”

    On Saturday, he won’t be a tourist. He’ll be on the red carpet with hundreds of cameras pointed at him, Florence Pugh on his arm. The two lead John Crowley’s We Live in Time, a south London-set romantic drama about an up-and-coming chef and a recent divorcée who fall in love. As they meander their way through life — and even welcome a child — they learn to cherish their time together when a late-stage cancer diagnosis rocks the happy home they’ve built.

    The film is penned by Nick Payne, who Garfield admits was a big draw for him boarding the project. The actor found the “Hugh Grant, Richard Curtis vibrational archetype” of the movie rather charming. It also, he says, has been something of a healing experience after losing his own mother to cancer in 2019. “Every species of every living thing on this earth has lost a mother. Young dinosaurs were losing their mothers,” he says. “So in terms of my own personal experience, yeah, it felt like a very simple act of healing for myself, and hopefully healing for an audience.”

    It isn’t the only feature Garfield’s been working on. The Magic Faraway Tree, with Claire Foy and Nicola Coughlan, is on his schedule, and Luca Guadagnino‘s After the Hunt, alongside Julia Roberts and Ayo Edebiri, is also set to mark a huge moment in his career.

    Garfield spoke to THR about why it felt like the right time to come back into the film fold with We Live in Time, what audiences might be surprised to know about his co-star Pugh and the 28 — yes, twenty-eight — actors he named when asked who he would love to work with next: “I did a screen test with Ryan Gosling 20 years ago and ever since then, I wanted to do something with him. He’s very inspiring to me.”

    What came first with We Live in Time? Was it Nick’s script? Was it John, or Florence?

    It was all very, very hot on the heels of each other. I guess it was John first, in a way, because John was the the script bearer and I wanted to work with John again, since Boy A (2007), for a long time. And then when I saw it was Nick Payne as the writer of the script, that was an immediate, exciting prospect. I love his writing. I think he writes so sensitively and full of humor and heart, an amazing balance of things. I think it’s a hard needle to thread. And then it was me reading that with John’s directing in mind, and going, “Oh yeah, this could really be something quite beautiful.”

    And then it was Florence, which was kind of a vital ingredient. Any two actors that did Constellations (2012) for Nick or this film, it would require a certain courage. Obviously Florence is just very inherently right for the part. It requires a level of depth, a level of rawness, vulnerability, and, I don’t know, a lightness of touch — but also an ability to go to the depths of the soul of the character. And very few actors can do that.

    So it was all of those things, which kind of annoyingly brought me out of my sabbatical that I was taking but in fact, I’m realizing as I speak about it 1727545989, it felt very much part of my little break I was taking. It felt like I could continue the sabbatical while making the film. So this was just a wonderfully timed thing where I read the script and was like, “Oh, this is the inside of my heart right now.” And what a gift to be able to actually put all that to good use and create out of it.

    Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield in ‘We Live in Time’.

    Courtesy of TIFF

    Why did this rom-com-drama feel like the right moment in your career to re-enter the spotlight?

    I wasn’t looking for a romantic drama. I wasn’t really looking for anything and it just kind of arrived. It was just the right themes, the right expression of where I am at, personally, being kind of midlife at 41. Whenever I say that to people, they’re like, ‘No! It’s not midlife.’ But I think that’s just death denialism. I’d be lucky if I lived to 80. I’d be so grateful to live that long. So I feel this moment of standing in the middle of my life — looking back, looking forward, looking at where I am — and trying to identify and feel what actually matters, where I want to be, how I want to be, where I want to put my diminishing time and energy. To make sure I can get to the end of my life and say, “Well, I did my best with what I was given.”

    It just happened to be a romantic drama. And of course, a romantic drama is going to have life and death and love and risk-taking and courage and terror and mortality and dread and joy and exuberance and longing. This film is so full of longing. I watched it with an audience for the first time in Toronto [at the film fesitval], and it was a few quiet moments that really struck me about it quite beautifully and profoundly. It was like, “Oh, these are just two people that want to live.” It’s very simple. They want to live. They’re not asking for a lot. They’re not asking for the most extraordinary life. They’re not asking for anything unreasonable. They are simply asking, like all of us, to survive and to be here and to be able to be together while being here and try to make meaning out of their lives. That’s all I think any of us can can hope to ask for.

    Are you firmly out of your sabbatical now?

    [Laughs.] I think so. Yeah, I think I’m excited to work again in a different way. I feel looser, I feel less precious. I feel more joyful. I feel more aware. I feel established enough as a person in the world, as an actor within myself and within the world. I know myself well enough now to feel more enjoyment… I’m still a headcase — when I’m on a set, I’m like a dog with a bone and get taken over by some weird spirit that is never satisfied — but that’s never going to change, and I don’t want it to, but within that, I can feel a lot more pleasure and a lot more enjoyment, play and freedom.

    I know that you and Florence have both spoken quite candidly about this film and how it ties quite intimately to your own experiences of grief and cancer. I don’t know if you’d be comfortable talking about why it was important to portray this on the big screen.

    Thank you for asking sensitively. I appreciate that. Yeah, I’m not special in that regard. It’s garden variety in a way. And in my processing of my grief, one of the most healing and reassuring, soothing moments I’ve had, is realizing that this has been the way it’s been since time immemorial. Sons have been losing their mothers, daughters have been losing their mothers [since the beginning of time]. We’re lucky if it’s that way around, rather than the other. And of course, countless parents lose their children in one way or another too, I can’t even imagine what that must feel like. But I don’t have to imagine what the other way feels like. And it’s so wonderful to know how how ordinary the experience is in terms of how universal it is, while it is still so very, very truly, uniquely extraordinary to the individual.

    So there’s something beautiful [about it]. There’s just lots of grace. And maybe I seek grace out. I don’t know. I naturally tend to. The only way to true joy, actually, is through terrible loss and acceptance of reality as it is, not as we think it should be. There’s so many moments, of course, that I’ve had in the last five years of saying, “Well, she shouldn’t have died. My mother shouldn’t have died so young, and she shouldn’t have died in suffering, and she shouldn’t, she shouldn’t, shouldn’t, shouldn’t.” It’s so arrogant of me. It’s so egotistical of me when I’m in those moments. And it’s human. I’m not shaming myself for it. It’s a human response, because it it doesn’t make sense, it feels unjust, it feels unfair. And then you take all those troubles to the ocean or the moon or the woods. And I believe that the moon, the ocean and the woods would all say the same thing, which is, “Yeah, I get it, dude.” Every species of every living thing on this earth has lost a mother. Young dinosaurs were losing their mothers. So in terms of my own personal experience, yeah, it felt like a very simple act of healing for myself, and hopefully healing for an audience.

    Is that something that you want audiences to feel, coming away from watching We Live in Time?

    I know it’s saying the most obvious thing, but when we go to a concert altogether or when we go to the theater, something about the collective experience helps us to feel less alone in our pain and less alone in our joys and less alone in our lives generally. So it felt like, “Oh no, this is part of what I’m on this earth to do. I love working with a group of people on something that matters. I love working with a group of people where we all get to bring our own woundedness to it and our own fragility to it, and see each other in our fragility and our woundedness, and say: “Me too.” Healing collectively is a privilege.

    I don’t get to comment on how people respond, or how I want them to respond. I guess what I would want is for them to come in open hearted. Because I think we, as a culture, have been conditioned and led towards a more calcified, hardened state. And it makes sense, because the world is so divided and uncertain and full of trepidation and fear right now, and violence and ugliness. And we have such access to it at the drop of a hat. Right? We’re all terrified of being open hearted. We’re all terrified of saying the wrong thing. We’re all terrified of feeling the wrong thing, thinking the wrong thing, being inherently wrong in some way. But I think people that come and see this will, on some level, whether it’s conscious or unconscious, want that calcification to be cracked open.

    I also want to talk about the Britishness of this film.

    Very British, yeah. In the sex, in the food…

    It feels very Richard Curtis. Can you speak to being on a London set and acting with a fellow Brit?

    It was joyful. I haven’t had a chance to do it very often. Just being able to stay at my house is so nice and Florence being able to go for a run around Battersea before work. It’s heavenly. All these liminal spaces of locations that we were shooting on — petrol stations, NHS hospital waiting areas. You know, turnpikes, A-roads, traffic jams — like heaven. It’s the text we live in every day. To be able to honor that, and to live in that as these characters was really, really joyful. And the snacks, the Celebrations, the Jaffa Cakes and the digestives and the tea in the bath. To be able to lean into that Hugh Grant, Richard Curtis as you say, vibration archetype was just … yeah. And one of my favorite of his films is About Time with Domhnall [Gleeson] and Rachel [McAdams]. That film holds a very special place in my heart for multiple reasons. So when this came along, I was like, it’s About Time, but maybe a little more dramatic. They’re kind of related in some way.

    Do you have a favourite pub in Herne Hill?

    [Laughs.] Herne Hill is not my hood.

    What is your hood?

    I’m not revealing that! It’s northwest London.

    Do you have any recommendations there?

    There’s The Stag [pub] which is great, by Hampstead train station. Primrose Hill has the best bagel shop in London right now — It’s Bagels.

    I’ve been. It’s really good.

    It’s a little hyped up right now, but it lives up to the hype. It’s really good. Like, I have their merch and everything. I really, really love bagels.

    Before we digress further, let’s talk about Florence. Had you met her before this project? What was it like building a rapport that so effortlessly translates into onscreen chemistry?

    We had never met. I had been a long admirer of her work, since Lady Macbeth (2016). When John and I were talking about ideas for Almut [Pugh’s character] — because I came on first — Florence was top of the list. I’d been wanting to work with her for a long time, and it turned out she had also wanted to work with me, and it was fortuitous that our schedules matched up. And she was dying to make a film like this as well.

    But obviously starting out with a mutual respect for each other as actors was good. But then there’s a whole big question mark of: are we going to enjoy each other’s company? Are we going to even like each other? Are we going to dislike each other? Are we going to find each other problematic in any way? With a script like this, we have to travel to the most intimate places. At one point, I have to have my head right by her backside while she’s on all fours in a petrol station, naked. That’s scary for anyone to do, let alone the woman in that scenario. And that’s just one example of the kind of the intimacy that we would have to feel safe going to with each other. And it wouldn’t be possible if we didn’t feel safe.

    It was very, very easy to do that with Florence, and I think she would say the same with me. I’m so grateful for that, because I don’t think we would have a film that works without that.

    Florence Pugh, Andrew Garfield

    Is there anything that surprised you about Florence, or can you share some sort of insight into her inner workings that maybe people wouldn’t know?

    Oh, that’s a good question. I mean, a surprise I’m not sure, because I didn’t have any expectations. I was very, very pleasantly, like, grateful about how much of a professional she is in terms of the basic stuff — a lot of people don’t see as the basic stuff, like being on time, being ready, being prepared.

    She’s someone who wants everyone to feel included. Whether you’re on set with the crew or on a night out or at a dinner party, she wants everyone to feel like they’re part of the gang. She doesn’t want anyone to feel left out. She’s very, very aware of people’s feelings around a table. And I think that was something that I found really touching and moving about her. And she really, really cares about the work. She really, really is devoted to her work as an actor.

    You’ve done so much in your career. You’ve done the period pieces, you’ve done the rom-coms, you’ve done Spider-Man, the superhero stuff. You’ve done a biopic with Tick, Tick… Boom! I know you have The Magic Faraway Tree coming up and After the Hunt with Luca Guadagnino. What can you tell us about what’s on the horizon?

    I’d like to get back to the kind of origins of making home movies with my dad, or making home movies with my high school friends, who were just in San Sebastian with me. We were reminiscing about the [fact] we had a production company called Budget Productions, which is “budget” but in a French pronunciation, like boo-shay. And, led by our friends Ben and David Morris, we would make genre films. Like we would just do handy cam, stop and start editing, in-camera, James Bond rip-offs when we were very drunk and very high, when we were 15 or 16. In between skateboarding sessions.

    So it’s coming back a little bit to to that first impulse of like, we’re playing and we’re making something that is just joyful and fun. I was able to bring that to Tick, Tick… Boom! for sure. And then these last two [The Magic Faraway Tree and After the Hunt], even though they’re very, very different tonally and process-wise — one’s a big, sweet family fantasy film, and the other is a very serious, grown-up drama — it was still very, very playful. Luca is a very playful director. Luca’s like pure imagination and freedom. His creativity is this free, radical, sublime thing. And then Ben Gregor, our director on Faraway Tree, and everyone involved in that process, including Simon Farnaby, the writer, and all the actors, it was just this very playful experience. I’m really excited about both of them being in the world. I feel reinvigorated towards that feeling of putting on plays with my cousins and our best friends for our families over Christmas time or whatever. That’s what it feels like again.

    I want to see a Budget Production.

    [Laughs.] Let me see if I can… I don’t know. They’re definitely out there. I don’t know whether they’re suitable for public consumption.

    It’s great to hear that it was fun working with Luca. Have you seen Queer?

    He’s been trying to get me in for a screening. He’s only shown me one blowjob scene, which I thought was so genuinely beautiful, like it was such a beautiful love scene between Daniel [Craig] and Drew [Starkey] and it’s just so tender and full of longing. And obviously, graphic in certain ways. But I just thought, “Oh, I’m gonna love this film.” He’s such a sensualist and a humanist and in touch with his own longing.

    Is there a genre of film or TV Show that you haven’t done that really appeals to you?

    I’m considering all these things right now. I would love to make a film or a show or something that has the feeling of the stuff that I was brought up on, like ’90s, early 2000s. Amblin Entertainment, adventure, swashbuckling, Indiana Jones-style. Humorous, dramatic, romantic — a big crowd-pleasing epic adventure. That would be really, really fun to do. I was [also] thinking about great like films of Fatal Attraction, Unfaithful, Adrian Lyne. Like an erotic thriller.

    Like Queer?

    Kind of like Queer. Or Babygirl. But from what I understand young people want less sex on their screens! It probably makes sense because they’ve been exposed to so much insane, graphic pornography, accessible at the click of a switch that they’re like: “No more.” So eroticism has been killed somehow, because of the overtaking of pornography. Anyway, I don’t know. I want to go do theater again, do something on stage again. I don’t know. I’m very, very grateful. I also want to help. I think maybe the focus is more as well towards helping others get to where they want to get to. I don’t know what that looks like exactly, but I feel like I’m in a position that I can be a mentor to other actors and filmmakers and assist in that way. That feels like a good way to spend my time. It’s all up for grabs. Midlife is not so bad.

    Midlife sounds great. Okay, who would you love to work with or act alongside next?

    My God. Where do I begin? Jesus Christ. Older generation actors like Meryl [Streep]. I’ve been in a film with Meryl, but I’ve never worked with Meryl. Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Dustin Hoffman, Daniel Day Lewis, if he ever decides to work again. Robert Duval, Gene Hackman. I got the opportunity to work with Robert Redford and Philip Seymour Hoffman and Vincent D’Onofrio, Linda Emond, Sally Field. These are the people that I feel are the custodians of that deep dive of acting. There are other people, of course, in my generation and younger. I just saw Colman Domingo in Sing Sing — one of my favorite films of all time at this point.

    I got to work with Zendaya [in Spider-Man: No Way Home], who is just wonderful. I would love to work with her again. I want to work with my friends. I’ve never worked with Eddie Redmayne or Charlie Cox or Tom Sturridge. Cillian [Murphy]. I did a screen test with Cillian once and Ben Whishaw, which was very exciting. There are certain people in the younger generation that I find really exciting as well. Obviously, Timothee Chalamet is just incredible. And Austin Butler is great. I’d love to work again with my friend Laura Dern. It’s really, really endless. I was so happy to get to work briefly with Ayo [Edebiri in After the Hunt], who I love, and got to do some real work with Julia [Roberts], which was a heavenly thing.

    And Tom Hanks. That’s part of my dream as well. I would love to work with Will Ferrell, who I got to meet recently. Steve Carell. Ryan Gosling I would love to work with. I did a screen test with Ryan 20 years ago and ever since then, I wanted to do something with him. He’s very inspiring to me.

    And how is it closing San Sebastian with We Live in Time?

    It’s such a gorgeous festival, and it’s such a nice time. I came out at the beginning of the festival and, because I had a break, I brought two friends out from high school. I had always wanted to come and eat here and surf, so that’s what I did. I came out early and I ate and I surfed, and I was hanging with my old buddies, and we were just rambling around and cycling about and and eating our way through this city and drinking a little bit too. It was really, really beautiful. I managed to see three films. I saw Anora and and I saw Hard Truths which was incredible. I’ve really enjoyed being here with the backdrop of the festival. It’s a beautiful city, and I got to go to Bilbao yesterday, to the Guggenheim — holy shit. So I’ve been a proper tourist. I love being a tourist. I love a city break and and just walking, getting lost and finding the nooks and crannies of a place. So yeah, it’s been a beautiful time, and the reception from people has been really lovely. I’m excited to see how people respond to the film tomorrow.

    A super quick question to end on. Did you know your TikTok fans absolutely love that scene from The Social Network? Where you smash the laptop and say: “Sorry, my Prada’s at the cleaners! Along with my hoodie and my fuck you flip-flops, you pretentious douchebag.”

    [Laughs] It’s passion. It’s justice. I guess people on TikTok like justice, and they like outraged, righteous indignation and someone searching for justice — where Eduardo Saverin is in that moment. And I think they probably subliminally like seeing technology being smashed too.

    We Live in Time closes the San Sebastian Film Festival on Sept. 28 and releases in U.S. theaters on Oct. 11.

    Lily Ford

    Source link

  • “Hollywood Needs Johnny Depp”: ‘Modi’ Cast Urge the Industry to Love Their Director Again

    “Hollywood Needs Johnny Depp”: ‘Modi’ Cast Urge the Industry to Love Their Director Again

    Johnny Depp has had, it’s fair to say, a rocky few years in Hollywood.

    After a public divorce and subsequent defamation trial involving ex-wife Amber Heard — claims of domestic violence and extensive abuse erupting from both parties — he is dipping a toe back in the film waters with Modi — Three Days on the Wing of Madness.

    Depp’s second directorial feature, Modi follows a few days in the life of Italian artist Amedeo Modigliani. Riccardo Scamarcio stars in the titular role alongside Antonia Desplat, Al Pacino and Stephen Graham. Backdropped by Paris in the middle of World War II, the film focuses on the painter and sculptor as he grapples with his artistic freedom, pride and class-based snobbery while searching for recognition.

    It was, Depp revealed at the movie’s press conference Tuesday, Al Pacino who urged the actor — or in this case, director — to take it on. “When Pacino speaks, you must listen,” the Pirates of the Caribbean star told the room of reporters at the San Sebastian Film Festival.

    The film is receiving its world premiere on the Spanish coast with Depp and his cast putting on a united front. “Let’s celebrate Johnny and this movie,” Scamarcio tells The Hollywood Reporter. His co-star, Antonia Desplat, adds: “People need to move on.”

    Depp likened his bumpy life to Modigliani’s at the press conference. “I’m sure we can say that I’ve been through a number of things here and there. Maybe yours didn’t turn into a soap opera,” he said, referencing the trial. “I mean, literally, televised.”

    His cast are nothing but complimentary — and that’s an understatement. They describe him as full of love and “a fatherly figure,” who has “heart and trust.” Below, Scamarcio and Desplat speak candidly about what it is to be on a Depp set, while the film’s supporting cast — Bruno Gouery, Luisa Ranieri, and Ryan McParland — weigh in too. “He’s the nicest, the kindness, the sweetest man I’ve ever worked with in my life,” Scamarcio says. “The industry, I think, should be very careful.”

    Congratulations on this film and being here in San Sebastian. Can I start by asking what drew you to this project?

    ANTONIA DESPLAT I was sent the script to be considered for Beatrice’s part [Beatrice Hastings, a British poet and literary critic, was Modigliani’s partner for two years], and when I read the script, I hadn’t read a script that felt so uncensored in forever. And it felt like a very intriguing woman. I was also very knowledgeable on Modigliani because I grew up in Montparnasse, and I was very close to that world. And the fact that Johnny Depp was directing, the fact that Mr. Scamarcio was the lead, it felt incredibly exciting. So I taped because I was like, “They need to see how much I want this part.” And then I had a Zoom with Johnny, waited for two weeks, had a screen test, and then had another Zoom where he announced that I got the part. It felt like a huge moment.

    RYAN MCPARLAND It was an incredible opportunity, I think, to play something so far removed from me and my existence growing up in Ireland, and I thought it would really challenge me as well. And of course, the opportunity to work with Johnny Depp and be in a film with Al Pacino, these guys I looked up to as a kid.

    BRUNO GOUERY Being directed by Johnny Depp with this fantastic cast, it was such a great opportunity. I have to say that [playing] Maurice Utrillo, a French painter very famous in Paris, for me, obviously it resonates a lot. I love paintings, I love art.

    LUISA RANIERI Johnny and Al Pacino, even if we don’t have a scene together, it’s a big honor to be in this insane movie with all the actors attached. Riccardo, too, we’ve known each other for several years, but we’ve never worked together.

    Johnny Depp on the set of ‘Modi.’

    ‘Modi’/DDA

    RICCARDO SCAMARCIO It was a crazy thing because I had this Zoom call with Johnny and I was driving on the highway, so I had to stop. It was 9, 10 o’clock at night, and so the first meeting I had with Johnny was at a gas station. And while we were having this conversation, he realized that there was something strange behind me, like oil for cars… And he said, “Where are you?” and I say, “I’m at the gas station, I’m sorry Johnny, but I was driving down with my daughter, it was a little bit difficult…” and someone else was there, I think Stephen [Graham] or one of the producers and he said: “That’s our man.” [Laughs.] So we met, then we saw each other in London. But for me, Modigliani is very important because my mother, she’s a painter. So I grew up with this big book on Modigliani and my mother told me, because I was very, very young, that I was obsessed with this book. I still have it, with broken pages. I knew I had to be a part of this incredible project.

    That’s almost like fate, you having that book.

    SCAMARCIO It was exactly that. It’s very strange. And I always grew up thinking that I wanted to buy a Modigliani one day. Impossible, because the last one to sell, five months ago, sold for $170 million.

    DESPLAT It’s amazing, because we both have these… in French, we say underground rivers, which is when things are meant to be. I lived at 54 Rue de Montpernasse, which was [Romanian sculptor Constantin] Brâncuși’s and [French-American sculptor Jacques] Lipschitz’s studio. Modigliani wrote a postcard to Brâncuși to our address and we have a copy of it. We’ve had that in our house my whole life. And then Beatrice, it varies in certain books, but she either lived at 53 or 55 Rue de Montpernasse, and I was at 54.

    So it’s safe to say working with Johnny Depp was a huge pull for you all on this?

    SCAMARCIO It is very, very safe to say.

    DESPLAT He’s the best actor of our century.

    SCARMARCIO He has heart and trust, which is, I think, the most important things for an actor. They need to feel this trust from the director. It’s critical. And it’s very strange because [Depp] puts you in a position where you feel free to deliver whatever you want but then he drives you with very smart and precise indications. It’s fantastic, because you feel free, but safe.

    DESPLAT Also, Johnny is a definition of an artist. He’s a painter, he’s a musician, he’s an actor, he’s a director. And like [Scamarcio] said, he has a heart, which brings sensitivity and he refuses to be boxed. He refuses to go into the conformity of things, so he’s fully uncensored. Being directed by someone who’s just doesn’t — excuse my French — give a shit about other people’s opinion, and who’s just going to do things for the art and for the love of it and the passion of it, is just completely enthralling.

    Was it peculiar reconciling Johnny Depp the actor with Johnny Depp the director?

    DESPLAT I first had 10 minutes where I needed to get my fandom out in our first Zoom meeting, and tell him how much I admire him. He calls me kiddo, and he just felt like a very fatherly figure that was going to guide us very gently and carefully into the world. But I think each character Johnny has played has a part of him. He does imitations of characters and people all the time, and so you see all these different characters that he’s played over the years come alive as he’s directing us and demonstrates what he wants, sometimes just when he’s speaking about it, because he gets passionate. So I think the director and the actor just merged into one thing.

    McParland, Scamarcio, Ranieri, and Gouery in ‘Modi’.

    Modi Production Ltd

    Do you have any tidbits or memories from set that would give audiences insight into Johnny Depp as a director?

    DESPLAT [Laughs.] There’s a scene in the cemetery that is the definition of how he allows things to happen.

    SCAMARCIO When we are running and we just went crazy, and in one take, which is the one in the movie, [Antonia] falls — and she was never supposed to end up on the floor. Instead of stopping the scene, I go and say, “Are you okay?,” we kept going, and it was fantastic. And Johnny, he loved it.

    DESPLAT He calls it “movie magic.”

    SCAMARCIO That’s what he’s looking for: accidents.

    DESPLAT And of course, we had the whole crew and Johnny was going [whispering]: “Is she okay? Is she okay? Is she okay? Can we keep going?” Obviously we didn’t hear that, but we heard about it later on. And he came out and was like, “This is movie magic!”

    GOURERY I have to say that I don’t work with many directors who give me the possibility to show my fantasies and give me such confidence.

    MCPARLAND It was deeply collaborative. He really, really encouraged us to take risks with the work and with the performances.

    A lot of people will view this as as Johnny’s big return, in lots of ways, to Hollywood after some instability these last few years. Do you think that he deserves a second chance?

    DESPLAT Yeah. People need to move on.

    SCAMARCIO Second chance? Why? I think Hollywood needs Johnny Depp, an artist of that kind. It’s very important for Hollywood and for cinema in general. And yeah, it’s a very controversial thing but at the end of this process, can you imagine how such a big sufferance there is behind these things? When you feel attacked by a world, why? And actually, you’re a good man. He’s the nicest, the kindest, the sweetest man I’ve ever worked with in my life. The industry, I think, should be very careful, because artists are very, very fragile. It’s not easy to just arrive. Of course, there are privileges, but at the same time, it’s a difficult job.

    DESPLAT And he’s a human being.

    SCAMARCIO Yeah, we need humanity. That’s what we need. So let’s celebrate Johnny and this movie, which is about another artist that, let’s not forget, died with no money, was terribly sick. [Modigliani] was punched by the police the day before he died, which increases sickness, and five months ago, his painting has been sold for $170 million. Shall we learn something from those things? I think we should. We should be careful. I’ve done another movie about another painter called Caravaggio, who has been canceled for years by the church and is from the 1600s. So this cancel culture, it’s something that comes from a very long time ago.

    DESPLAT Exactly.

    MCPARLAND I think whatever Johnny decides to do with the rest of his career, his life, is up to him. I personally can only speak about my experience working with him and getting to know him. He’s an incredibly kind, down to earth, humble, extremely humble human being. He looked after us and protected us and took care of us. The work was always most important. There was nothing else going on. To have the freedom to explore and to experiment and to improvise, it could be one of the greatest acting experiences I may ever have the pleasure of being part of.

    Riccardo, Antonia — had you two met before you worked on Modi? Because you were such a convincing couple. Your chemistry was amazing.

    SCAMARCIO We just met in Budapest, a week before we started shooting. [It’s good] you believe in us as a couple.

    DESPLAT I think we bounce off each other very well. And I think Johnny created a very safe playground for us too, and he was very collaborative.

    SCAMARCIO And she speaks a perfect Italian.

    DESPLAT It was a very collaborative process, and I think Johnny allowed us to take part in rewriting the scenes with him so that they felt more truthful to each of our characters, to bring in ideas and research that we had done. So it felt like a very collaborative effort and we just had fun doing it.

    Antonia Desplat as Beatrice in ‘Modi – Three Days on the Wing of Madness.’

    This is a film about art, about pride, about snobbery. What else is Modi honoring, what is its message?

    SCAMARCIO Well, for me, the most important thing is that this movie established that it is very important to be an artist, but also to be a man. I would say, beyond that, for an artist, there is something that can’t be for sale. A private dimension of you, your soul. It’s very important to create and if you sell that… you will be contaminated forever. So there is this message that no matter how powerful you are, how much money you have, there is the reason we do this job.

    DESPLAT I think for me, we should take away from the film the freedom that those characters have, because we live in a world where art is censored all the time. But art is supposed to be provocative, it’s supposed to be exciting. And I think if we start controlling art, we just lose the soul, we lose the freedom of it. And I think with this film, because it’s not a biopic, we’re just sort of zooming in on three days of an artist, you get to experience and witness the freedom that these characters had. They were all revolutionaries, these four characters, and they were artists struggling to be recognized, which I think speaks to everybody nowadays too, but it’s taking away the freedom of art. Art needs to be free. Otherwise it can’t exist.

    GOUERY It’s all about, I think, the freedom of creation. It’s unbelievable for me to think that those painters at the beginning…. They never sell the paintings! And they’re continuing all the same. It’s very strange. I don’t know. If I, as an actor, if no one casted me, I think I would change [careers].

    MCPARLAND Yeah, perseverance.

    Johnny isn’t the only big name you worked with on this film. You all got to work with Al Pacino. Can you speak a little bit about about that experience?

    DESPLAT Can I just say how great the scene is?

    SCAMARCIO We went to Los Angeles to shoot that scene, and Johnny wanted to rewrite the scene. And so we had two days to shoot the scene, but actually one day he was rewriting so me and Al were chilling out, home alone. “Okay, well, we’re not gonna work today.” So basically [Depp] rewrote the scene completely. And the second day, like an hour from when we were supposed to start shooting, I’ve received this brand new scene, completely new, which from 15 pages became 27 and the page 28 was: “More dialogue to come…” I said, “This is a joke.” [Laughs.] I’m not English, not American, I’m 100 percent Italian, so English is not my language, but I said to myself: “If Johnny thinks that I can make it… He’s not worried. Well, I’m gonna make it.” I learned this scene in one hour, and it was wonderful. It was incredible. Al is such a generous and incredible man, very humble, very sweet with me, he helped me a lot. So it’s an honor, of course. I’ve been very lucky to be protected by these two incredible human beings and immense artists.

    DESPLAT He’s just the sweetest man alive, he’s not at all pretentious. You know, sometimes, when you meet your idols, there can be a time where you’re disappointed. But he was so sweet. He just wanted ice cream.

    GOUERY I tell you the truth, when I saw the scene [with Pacino], it was better than what I imagined.

    Are you excited to be here in San Sebastian for the festival?

    SCAMARCIO [Claps hands excitedly.]

    RANIEIRI It’s so welcoming, so beautiful to be here. It was incredible arriving. All the world came out to say hello.

    DESPLAT This festival feels very authentic. It feels like it’s about the actual films, whereas I think sometimes you can get lost in all the glitz of other festivals. To show the movie, this is the best place to appreciate the art of filmmaking. So it’s very exciting!

    Lily Ford

    Source link

  • ‘Mamífera’ Director Liliana Torres on the Stigma of “Non-Maternity” and Why Catalan Film Is Better Than Ever

    ‘Mamífera’ Director Liliana Torres on the Stigma of “Non-Maternity” and Why Catalan Film Is Better Than Ever

    This year, 22 Catalan productions have been selected for the 72nd San Sebastian Film Festival, highlighting just how much the region’s film industry is booming.

    Among them is Mamífera, directed by Liliana Torres. The Barcelona-born filmmaker wanted to tackle the subject of “non-maternity” — a woman’s decision not to have children — in response to a stigma she has felt personally.

    Torres’ project, screening in San Sebastian this week, follows Lola (played by Maria Rodríguez Soto) and Bruno (Enric Auquer), two 40-something-year-olds in a happy relationship. As Lola watches her friends and family obsess over either their own children or having children, she is shocked to find herself pregnant and unhappy about it. Everyone around her is so connected to the experience of motherhood, Lola grapples with the idea that something is wrong with her.

    The film offers a poignant commentary on the societal pressure placed on women to surrender to what Torres says is falsely described as “instinct.” The movie is also a celebration of Catalan as a language and Catalonia as a region  — the Catalan government is, after all, year-on-year investing more money in film and television, with an estimated budget of around €50 million ($54.5 million) in 2024.

    Torres spoke to The Hollywood Reporter on the Spanish coast about addressing “non-maternity” and why Catalan film is currently at its best — especially for female filmmakers.

    Congratulations on such a thought-provoking film. How did Mamífera come to be, and why did you want to make a movie on this subject?

    For me, it was an ongoing subject. Since I was a child, I already knew I didn’t want to have children. So when I was my 20s, most people were telling me, “Oh, no, that’s not what you think, it’s because you’re so young.” And then when I was in my 40s, people were telling me: “You will regret it.” So it’s a subject that has accompanied me for my whole life, and Mamífera is for me, a way to create a little bit of justice. Because all my references of women who didn’t want to be a mother used to be secondary characters, very stereotypical, very cliché, the typical woman who lives alone and doesn’t like children or the woman who has a very high-status work, so she has no time — but she’s doing such a great job that we forgive them. And that wasn’t real to me. It’s like, I have to have a reason to not want to be a mother. Why do I have to have a reason? I don’t. That’s my reason. And if I want to do something very superficial, trivial, with my life, I’m allowed to! That was the main reason for me making this movie, because I think we were lacking that reflection for us, to unstigmatize these women.

    And this stigma, is it something that you think is specific to Spain?

    No. For me, it’s global. It transcends every country. It has to do with the traditional point of view, over women — the patriarchy which puts motherhood in the center of our lives, as if that’s what makes our lives worth it. The other options seem futile for the patriarchy. You know, what is a woman without children meant to do with her life? It seems to be the question: what is she planning to do? It’s suspicious somehow, and it also pulls us outside from domesticity for a long time. We don’t have to be raising children, which normally takes women away from their professions.

    This word, “non-maternity,” that is used to describe the film’s plot, I’ve not seen it before.

    We have so many terms regarding not having children. Child-free sounds to me like if I was a slave of a child and childless sounds like I’m lacking something. There is also a technical, biological term in Catalonia for that, but we don’t use it very much in the conversation. It means “never put an egg.” But for me, non-maternity [is suitable].

    There’s a few elements in Mamífera I want to ask about. Lola sees her friends who so desperately want kids — or already have them — and sees something wrong with her own mind and body. So this pressure comes from there, too.

    I still think it has to do with the patriarchy, and specifically in the way that they have taught us for a long time that motherhood is an instinct. So you think, if motherhood is an instinct, what is wrong with me? Biologically, there has to be something wrong with me. That was a question that came up for me for a long time before I started studying. And I went through many books, and [French philosopher and feminist] Simone de Beauvoir helped me a lot with this idea of motherhood. I read a lot of books that said motherhood wasn’t an instinct, it was just a social construction.

    Even if you’re a mother, it’s your decision.

    And I want to ask about the support Lola gets from her partner, Bruno. She acknowledges that becoming a parent can be a lot easier for men. Or at least an easier decision. So was writing Bruno as supportive as he was important?

    I wanted to have a couple that [was] really in love. They have been in a relationship for a long time, they have discussed not having children. And for me, the idea to have a supportive partner was very important. Because on one hand, I wanted to say that you can get on very well with your partner and have a beautiful relationship, but that doesn’t make you desire children. And even if that desires arose, like in Mamífera, there is a reason. And even Bruno is very progressive and is never imposing his desire, always asking and also offering: “I change my work” and everything. Still, there is something physical to motherhood that you cannot escape. So even if he offers all of that, Lola knows that she will have to quit a lot of people in her life that she really likes, and that’s a fact that you cannot escape.

    Maria and Enric put in fantastic performances. Great chemistry and I so believed them as a couple. You must have been very pleased with how it turned out.

    They are very good friends in real life, so that helped us a lot. And they are very good actors. I was so grateful. Both are really professional and they really had a lot of fun while rehearsing and reading the script and talking about the topic. Also, they are very different. For example, Maria got into Lola very fast with the humor and irony and also being caring but very assertive. For Enric, he was very used to playing men from a male perspective. There were many times he would start talking with Lola from a point of testosterone, like arguing. And she would say, “No, no, no, you’re not discussing, you’re just talking at her.” And he was like, “Okay. I get it. We can talk about this.” He was learning something from Bruno’s character.

    I want to ask about filming in Catalan, representing Catalonia and where Catalonian film’s place is in the industry?

    Catalan productions are going really well, most of all, in terms of authorship. We have a lot of women who are writing. So you have [Barcelona native filmmaker] Carla Simón, who won at the Berlin Film Festival last year.

    We have a lot of names and writers that are going international, out of Spain, and winning prizes and position in Catalan, which for us is very important, because keeping the language, keeping the culture, it gets tricky sometimes. Because you have to dub the movies so they will release in many Spanish cinemas. That is something that really sucks. Because it should be easier. We are in Spain, we should have subtitles.

    Why do they insist on dubbing?

    I think it is because exhibitors are always afraid to put a movie with subtitles in Spain, because people will automatically discard a movie because they’re lazy, they don’t want to read. And it also has to do with the dominant culture. They treat Catalans and the Basque Country country like separate cultures inside Spain.

    Would you say that Catalonian film is at its best at the moment, in terms of production? There are 22 Catalan productions at San Sebastian this year.

    In terms of authorship, for sure. The amount of productions, yeah, a good amount.

    How important is it that Catalonia is represented on the big screen for you as someone from Catalonia?

    Of course it’s important because it has to do with our culture, but it’s also important because there is a big movement in Catalan with women directors. In this sense, for us, it’s very important because we are slowly reaching equality and I’m very happy that all these friends around me are getting prizes and debuting in the principal sections of festivals. I think it’s a very huge moment in Catalonia. I’m so grateful. We are well-supported by the government.

    Finally, what would you like to make a film about next? Is there anything on the horizon?

    I’m working on a script now. It has to do with two topics that are very close to me. One is menopause, which I got very early on in my life and is something that is not talked about in public discussion. It changes your life even more than puberty — it’s more radical mentally, physically. But I’m linking that with climate change in a specific region of Catalonia, in which we have overexploitation of the resources: water, air pollution, deforestation, due to the factory farms of pork, mainly. So I’m linking this together in one character, one landscape.

    Lily Ford

    Source link

  • San Sebastian: How Audrey Diwan’s ‘Emmanuelle’ Helped Noémie Merlant Rediscover Her Libido

    San Sebastian: How Audrey Diwan’s ‘Emmanuelle’ Helped Noémie Merlant Rediscover Her Libido

    Noémie Merlant found she had a lot in common with her character in Emmanuelle.

    Her involvement in Audrey Diwan‘s new film, in the titular role, was so influential that she says it helped her re-examine her own relationship with female pleasure. “Like Emmanuelle, I was completely disconnected with my body,” the French actress tells The Hollywood Reporter.

    With its world premiere opening the San Sebastian Film Festival Friday night, Emmanuelle has received buzz for its graphic content. Diwan’s movie, starring Naomi Watts (Mullholland DriveBirdman), Will Sharpe (The White Lotus) and Jamie Campbell Bower (Stranger Things), is inspired by Emmanuelle Arsan’s erotic novel — and this eroticism certainly helms the project.

    Emmanuelle focuses on a woman on a business trip to Hong Kong working with a luxury hotel group. Searching for a lost pleasure, she seeks her arousal in experiences with some of the hotel’s guests. One of them, Kei (Sharpe), seems to constantly elude her.

    Merlant’s performance is subtle. She plays a robotic woman attempting to exercise her autonomy over her own sex life and instead, finds a connection that requires no physical intimacy at all. Below, with answers edited for brevity and clarity, Merlant discusses with THR what she first thought upon reading the script, being inspired by France’s #MeToo movement, and why, if Merlant was a footballer, Cate Blanchett would be her Diego Maradona.

    First of all, I want to say congratulations on your film.

    Thank you so much.

    What was going through your head when you first read that script?

    When I first read the script, I thought: “Oh, I’m going to read a script that explores the feminine pleasure, and right now I just need that.” Because like Emmanuelle, I was completely disconnected from my body. After the #MeToo movement, I started to think about all these years where I am doing things just to give pleasure to others. I was like, okay, I know that I’m not really happy, that I don’t really have a libido. Why? As a woman who is already 30 years old, I don’t really share eroticism or orgasms with people. And there is sadness in this. In the script, that is there.

    She takes the risk. Emmanuelle, who is like a robot and doesn’t get pleasure… She has the power of independency. But she’s alone. She can handle her life, but sometimes she’s in this luxury hotel where she has to always think, to spy on the others, to make sure everybody gets what they want quickly. I had a strong connection with her. And at the end, she says what she wants and when she wants it: “Can you put your hand here? I want this. Can you change the rhythm?”

    Did you find then that playing Emmanuelle helped you explore your own sexuality and your own relationship with that eroticism?

    For me, doing Emmanuelle, it was an exploration. It broke something – I feel more comfortable, more free, even just saying what I want out loud. So I can start living a new life of exploration, of my desires.

    Were you daunted by the graphic nature of a lot of the scenes, or was it exciting? I wondered if you were at all nervous about shooting a film that some actors would deem so vulnerable.

    I’m just vulnerable about being good, to be at the right place in the scene and to give emotion. I don’t feel vulnerable when exposing my body in sex scenes. When there is a respectful environment and strong ideas and a space of respect and consideration offered to me, I can go really far, as far as I want. And that’s what happened in this movie. So I was not scared at all, I was excited. It was, “Oh, this is the best for an actress. I have Audrey Diwan with a fabulous vision, I have a crew that knows what they’re doing.” We had a lot of rehearsals with the actors, with an intimacy coach to think about what we do.

    After the #MeToo movement, there are a lot of people who say, “Oh, now with intimacy coaches, we can’t do anything anymore.” I think it’s just a little group of people. Yes, maybe they feel they have less freedom, but for the rest of us, there is more freedom. Audrey once said and I feel the same, that when there is space, a big collaboration between people and even an intimacy coach, we go way further. There are way more surprises because you have more people who give ideas.

    I want to ask about the #MeToo movement. Its emergence came from the U.S. but the next country after that to be driving this movement is France, especially at the moment. Audrey said this film is an exploration of eroticism in the post-#MeToo era. What message is she putting out there with Emmanuelle?

    Before any message, I think she wants it to be an experience of sensations. We’ve been fed so many images of sex, of nudity, of pornography, but in this patriarchal gaze completely dominated by violence. So she was trying to do a movie where we ask ourselves, “Is there still space for erotism and sensations in [women’s] lives?” She tries to make us take the time. Because erotism and sensation, I think, can grow when you are in the present moment. But to get to this place, it takes time. Same with the female orgasm. It takes time.

    Just because it’s a feminist movie, doesn’t mean it’s not for a man, [Diwan] says. We hope that with this movie, when you see that she gets pleasure, the men can also get pleasure. Like all the movies we’ve seen about men, we were watching them, and sometimes we had emotions. So it should be the same in the opposite way. I think she also wants to say that consent is exciting. They work together. No one is forced. Everybody listens to each other. And you can feel excitement through this.

    One of the focal points of the film is this amazing connection that you and Will Sharpe, playing Kei, have. I love how it develops and how it actually subverted my expectations in a lot of ways at the end of the film. I wonder how you viewed their connection.

    For me, he was like a ghost sometimes. But I liked that he was a mystery, because most of the time it’s the woman who is the mystery in movies. I like the mirror between them, both are disconnected and don’t get pleasure. I like that you can still have a strong relation with someone without having sex. It’s not an obligation. This is the story I told myself with Kei: You represent, for me, the man who doesn’t fit the dominant dynamic of the male gaze. They will not have get pleasure if the woman doesn’t. He is also looking for equality and a real connection. It takes time for him, maybe at the end, after, he will have it again. But he is listening to her. I found it very poetic.

    With something like Portrait of a Lady on Fire, I feel like you’ve become a real champion in film for the female gaze. How important was that to you, and how important is a film like Emmanuelle after decades of cinematic experiences for men?

    It’s essential, in my life, to try give more space to women. And to work on this, not only for women but for all the people who don’t have faith in this world. Because you have to find sense in life. So for me, it makes sense and it makes things much more surprising and exciting.

    How was it on set? You had Will, Naomi Watts, Jamie Campbell Bower. So many Brits. Do you hope to do more English language projects in future?

    I would love to because I love this language. There are more opportunities because more movies are made in English. So, of course, you have more possibilities of crazy stuff, working with amazing directors and actors that you admire. I would love to work in different languages.

    Is there any language in particular that you would love to do a film in?

    Japanese or Korean.

    Why?

    Because I watch a lot of movies in Japanese and Korean, and I love the language, the culture.

    You must have loved shooting in Hong Kong.

    Yes! It’s amazing. I thought I would not like Hong Kong, and I loved it.

    How come you thought you wouldn’t like it?

    I don’t know. Because I felt that it was just too much. But actually, there is beaches, there is space with nature, the people are so nice.

    You’ve worked with so many amazing people. Is there anyone on your list, a director or actor, who you would love to work alongside?

    I love Yorgos Lanthimos. I love Phoebe Waller-Bridge. I love Nicole Kidman, Jane Campion, Justine Triet.

    I wanted to ask about about working on Tár with Cate [Blanchett], who receives her Donostia Award at this year’s San Sebastian Film Festival. How was it working with her?

    It was fabulous. For me, she is Maradona if I was a footballer. I had the chance to meet an absolutely phenomenal actress. I could watch her so many times because I was the assistant in [Tár]. So I could just stand there and watch how she does the scenes, how much she gives with love to this job. There is something magical, because some people ask me, but how is she so good? There is a lot of things, but also there is something just magic that you can’t explain. She is so nice. I remember there was one scene we shot in one angle and we had to hug, and she was trying to hide her head to make sure I was the one on camera. It was very cute.

    That is very cute. And last question, which is simply: What’s on the horizon for you?

    My movie, The Balconettes, is out soon. Then there is the Pietro Marcello film [Duse] which will be out soon. There are two more movies I can’t say anything about. [Points.] That’s my agent. [Laughs.]

    Read THR’s review of Emannuelle here. Neon has been announced to be circling U.S. distribution rights. Emmanuelle will get its theatrical release in France on Sept. 25 by Pathé.

    Lily Ford

    Source link