ReportWire

Tag: sales tax

  • Study questions whether Detroit sales tax is worth it – Detroit Metro Times

    [ad_1]

    Detroiters already pay one of the highest tax rates in the state. 

    Is the city ready for another tax hike?

    A new analysis from the Citizens Research Council of Michigan examined the potential impact of a 1% sales and use tax in Detroit and found that the revenue may be too limited to justify the steps needed to adopt it.

    The tax could generate between $42 and $72 million a year, but that is only 5% or less of the city’s budget, the report states.  

    The 59-page report, “Evaluating a Local-Option Sales Tax Policy for Detroit,” was produced at the request of the Detroit City Council’s Legislative Policy Division, which asked the nonpartisan research group to examine “innovative ways to increase city revenues” without “placing an undue burden on its residents.”

    The Citizens Research Council says the revenue from a local tax would be limited, and the barriers to adopt it would be significant. 

    “While the path to adopting a local sales tax option for Michigan’s local governments is daunting,” the report argues that broader access to local taxes could improve the fiscal health of large cities and counties.

    Detroit already has multiple local taxes, including a city income tax, casino wagering taxes, and utility surcharges, in addition to county and state levies.

    “Because of the layering of all these taxes, many of which are levied at the highest (or among the highest) rates in the state, Detroit residents are among the highest taxed in the state,” the report states. 

    Even estimating what Detroit could raise is complicated, the report says, because Michigan does not track sales tax collections by city and because visitor spending is hard to measure. 

    The Citizens Research Council used two main approaches. One relies on household retail spending estimates. Detroiters spend $16,727 per household on retail goods, which would translate to about $167 per household under a 1% tax. Multiplied across 253,207 households, that comes to $42.4 million annually. 

    The other approach attempts to capture a wider range of taxable activity beyond retail goods. Under that approach, the Citizens Research Council estimates that a local sales tax of 1% could raise nearly $72 million annually. 

    Even if Detroit’s leaders decided the money is worth it, the report says a local sales tax would require major state action first.

    “Authorizing a local sales tax in Michigan will require amending the state Constitution, adopting state statutes authorizing local sales and use taxes, the local governing body to enact an ordinance, and voter approval of a new tax,” the report states.

    Because so many purchases now happen online, the report says a local sales tax would probably need to be collected and managed at the state level.

    Madhu Anderson, the report’s author and a senior research associate for local affairs at the Citizens Research Council, said that the path of adopting a local sales tax “is daunting” and that the research suggests it “may be better suited to be levied at the county or regional levels to maximize potential revenue and minimize potential economic disruptions.”

    The report says the city is working to raise service levels in the years following bankruptcy, while also planning for major obligations ahead.

    “The City of Detroit is reviewing potential local option taxes to raise city revenues to improve city services and address needs it anticipates in the future,” the report states, citing efforts to put services “on par with surrounding communities,” make pension payments that are again “a city responsibility after a 10-year hiatus,” and “capture economic benefits from growth in visitor activity downtown.”

    The Citizens Research Council notes that the state’s municipal finance structure relies heavily on property taxes that are limited by state law. The report points out that local governments in Michigan have “few options to levy local taxes,” which can be especially punishing in communities with weaker tax bases.

    For now, the report does not urge Detroit to race toward a ballot proposal to raise the sales tax. It leaves city and state leaders to decide whether an additional $42 million to $72 million a year is worth pursuing a constitutional amendment, new statutes, a local ordinance, and a citywide vote, while also trying to avoid pushing residents and shoppers to lower tax areas.


    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • How much will it cost me + 5 other things to know about 2025 transit tax proposal

    [ad_1]

    The curated articles on the 2025 transit tax proposal in Mecklenburg County highlight key things voters should know about a 1% sales tax increase. Common themes include examining the potential economic impact, addressing transit infrastructure needs, and differing views on the proposal’s fairness.

    The Charlotte Observer’s reporters have spent the past few months reporting on potential impacts of the referendum, which asks voters whether they support a 1% increase in the local sales tax to fund road, rail, and bus projects.

    Supporters argue it addresses congestion and long-term infrastructure needs. Opponents view the tax as regressive and potential accelerant of gentrification risks. Charlotte-area leaders have polarized opinions. Some back the tax, stating it improves transit while others criticize it for increasing costs.

    The Charlotte light rail travels atop a mural behind Optimist Hall in Charlotte By TRACY KIMBALL

    NO. 1: WILL MECKLENBURG TRANSPORTATION TAX INCREASE FOOD PRICES? HOW PROPOSAL AFFECTS YOU

    The proposal could increase Mecklenburg’s sales tax rate from 7.25% to 8.25%, which doesn’t apply universally to all purchased goods. | Published July 21, 2025 | Read Full Story by Mary Ramsey



    Voters line up early to cast their ballot on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. By TRACY KIMBALL

    NO. 2: MECKLENBURG COUNTY NEARING HISTORIC SALES TAX VOTE. HOW HAVE PAST ELECTIONS GONE?

    Referendums like the one poised to appear on Mecklenburg County ballots this November faced mixed reactions from voters in recent decades. | Published August 6, 2025 | Read Full Story by Mary Ramsey



    The Lynx Blue Line Parkwood Station in Charlotte, N.C., on Wednesday, September 10, 2025. By KHADEJEH NIKOUYEH

    NO. 3: WILL CHARLOTTE LIGHT RAIL STABBING HURT TRANSPORTATION REFERENDUM’S CHANCES?

    A murder that captured national attention could affect Charlotte’s efforts to overhaul its transportation system because the multibillion-dollar plan is now in voters’ hands, a political expert says. | Published September 16, 2025 | Read Full Story by Mary Ramsey



    The Blue Line train moves through South End in Charlotte. By Jeff Siner

    NO. 4: COULD CHARLOTTE TRANSPORTATION REFERENDUM PRICE PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR HOUSES?

    Greg Jarrell says has seen “an enormous wave of money” crash into west Charlotte in recent years. | Published September 22, 2025 | Read Full Story by Nick Sullivan



    A plan to revamp the Charlotte region’s transportation system with billions in road, rail and bus projects funded by a sales tax increase hinges on voters’ decisions in the upcoming election. By JEFF SINER

    NO. 5: CHARLOTTE AREA ROLLS TOWARD HISTORIC TRANSIT VOTE. IS THERE 2ND CHANCE IF IT FAILS?

    A plan to revamp the Charlotte region’s transportation system with billions of dollars for road, rail and bus projects would be in jeopardy if Mecklenburg residents vote down a sales tax increase to fund it this November. | Published October 16, 2025 | Read Full Story by Mary Ramsey


    No image found
    A plan to revamp the Charlotte region’s transportation system with billions in road, rail and bus projects funded by a sales tax increase hinges on voters’ decisions in the upcoming election. By JEFF SINER

    NO. 6: LIST: WHO’S SUPPORTING, OPPOSING MECKLENBURG’S 1% TRANSPORTATION TAX PROPOSAL

    Charlotte-area leaders and organizations have staked out positions for or against Mecklenburg’s transportation tax referendum. | Published October 28, 2025 | Read Full Story by Mary Ramsey

    The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Denver brewery closed, seized due to unpaid taxes

    [ad_1]

    A Denver brewery known as a hub for the Latino community closed suddenly this week after city officials seized the property’s assets due to unpaid back taxes.

    Raíces Brewing Co. in Lincoln Park owed $98,703 in sales and personal property taxes, according to a distraint warrant issued by the city. The business closed on Wednesday when the warrant was issued.

    Brewery CEO José Beteta was not immediately available to comment on the circumstances, but a detailed goodbye note on Raíces’ website states the company had been working with the city for about a year to establish a payment plan for the taxes. The company blamed “a series of unexpected charges” issued by the city that it said are related to what’s called a business personal property tax. That’s essentially a tax on whatever assets a business owns.

    The note alleged that Raices had “never received prior billing notices” and that all invoices dating back to 2019 “arrived together in 2024, already including years of interest and penalties — despite our lack of prior information.”

    However, city spokesperson Laura Swartz said in a statement that the personal property taxes owed only amounted to $10,765, or about 10% of the business’s total outstanding balance. Raices owed nearly $69,000 in sales tax and about $30,000 for penalties and interest, she said.

    “It’s unfortunate that this situation has gotten to this point. We want Denver’s businesses to succeed and that means offering the best customer service we can to them,” Swartz said. “Before issuing a warrant, we attempt to reach the business by phone, mail, email, and in person to both collect the sales tax and ensure they can continue to operate. As Raices has noted, the city has attempted to work with them for years, including on a payment plan that was not fulfilled.”

    [ad_2]

    Tiney Ricciardi

    Source link

  • U.K. Public Borrowing Estimate Cut by $4 Billion Over Tax Data Error

    [ad_1]

    The U.K.’s troubled statistics office cut its estimate for net government borrowing by 3 billion pounds ($4.03 billion), a further setback for the agency that has faced criticism from the Bank of England and lawmakers.

    The Office for National Statistics said the U.K. government’s tax authority, HM Revenue and Customs, informed it of an error in value-added tax receipts data it supplied to the data agency.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Ed Frankl

    Source link

  • Do you pay GST/HST when you build or renovate a house? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    There are some unique considerations when you build or substantially renovate a home that are important for anyone considering it. And there may even be rebates available that can put money back into your pocket.

    Is it a substantial renovation?

    The concept of a so-called substantial renovation is important for residential real estate and sales tax implications. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers a home to be substantially renovated if 90% or more of the building that existed prior to the work started was renovated to some degree. This percentage is based on the interior area of the building. 

    The CRA gives several examples of substantial renovations:

    • A house has 10 rooms. Eight of the rooms are completely gutted and rebuilt. Of the remaining two rooms, the flooring in Bedroom A is replaced and the flooring and one wall are replaced in Bedroom B. Including these two bedrooms, over 90% of the total wall and floor space in the house is removed or replaced.
    • A 5,000-square-foot house is undergoing renovations. In one room measuring 250 square feet, there are no renovations. In another room measuring 200 square feet, the renovations carried out do not meet the “removed or replaced” test. The remaining 4,550 square feet of the house do, however, meet this test.
    • Douglas J.’s house consists of a living room, kitchen, family room, four bedrooms, and an unfinished basement. The renovation work on this house consisted of replacing the drywall throughout the house, installing laminate flooring in the kitchen and bathroom, laying new carpet over the old tile flooring in the other rooms, and replacing the kitchen counters and cabinets.

    It matters how you use the property

    The good news is that if you build or substantially renovate a home that is your primary place of residence, there are generally no sales tax implications beyond the tax you will pay for materials and labour. However, if your construction or renovation is done with the intention to earn a profit, things can change—and there may be additional sales tax payable. 

    The CRA focuses on whether the transaction is entered into in the course of a so-called adventure or concern in the nature of trade. When the builder or renovator’s intention is to earn a profit—even if they are not a home builder—the CRA may treat them as a “builder” for sales tax purposes. 

    In this case, the subsequent sale may, in fact, be subject to GST/HST to be remitted from the sale proceeds. Taxpayers should also be cautious about moving into the house for a short period of time after construction and then selling it. The CRA could still contend that the primary intention was to build, sell, and earn a profit rather than treating the property as their principal residence. This may have sales tax consequences, as well as income tax implications for the profit that may not be protected using the principal residence exemption. 

    An important consideration if a sale is subject to GST/HST is that a buyer will not pay more for the property. As an example: if you are hoping to sell a home with comparable properties selling for $1,000,000 in Ontario where the HST rate is 13%, a buyer will only pay you $1,000,000—not $1,130,000 ($1,000,000 plus 13% HST). That means $884,956 plus 13% HST.

    Use our mortgage payment calculator

    Our calculator will help you understand what a mortgage will cost you in real terms while factoring for interest rates, amortization period, fixed or variable terms, and more.

    Available rebates

    In several circumstances, there may be GST/HST rebates available that put sales tax refunds back in your pocket. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    • You built or substantially renovated, or engaged someone else to build or renovate, a house on land that you already owned or leased to use as your primary place of residence. Some of the sales tax paid on your costs may be recoverable.
    • You converted a non-residential property into your home. Likewise, some of the sales tax paid on your costs may be recoverable.
    • You bought a new home from a builder to use as your primary place of residence. Some of the sales tax paid on the purchase may be recoverable.
    • You built, substantially renovated, or bought housing to rent to individuals as their primary place of residence for long-term residential use. Some of the sales tax paid on your costs or purchase may be recoverable.
    • You qualified for new first-time home buyer rebate of the GST on homes valued up to $1.5 million, under a rule introduced in May 2025.

    The rules are complex, and may depend on the value of the home, or the province or territory where the home is located. 

    For example, an owner-built home in Ontario may not qualify for the HST rebate on the federal portion of the sales tax if the fair market value at the time that the work is substantially completed is more than $450,000. However, the home may be eligible for a rebate of the provincial portion of the sales tax, up to $24,000 if you paid HST when you purchased the land, or $16,080 if you did not. 

    What to do if you are building or renovating a home 

    Given the complexity, it is advisable to consult a professional before starting a major build or renovation. The rules are complicated and the CRA is looking very closely at these transactions by conducting GST/HST audits. There can be province or territory-specific considerations, as well. 

    A mistake can lead to a large tax bill, along with interest and penalties.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    Read more about real estate:



    About Jason Heath, CFP


    About Jason Heath, CFP

    Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Panel urges state to offer tax breaks for ‘personalized’ firearms

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A state panel is recommending that lawmakers carve out a sales tax break for “personalized” firearms as part of broader efforts to reduce gun deaths.

    In a report, the Special Legislative Commission on Emerging Firearm Technology calls for passage of legislation that would authorize a sales tax break for purchases of firearms equipped with the new technology and set penalties for firearms sellers and gun owners who violate the proposed regulations.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96 4@>>:DD:@? 7:?5D E92E A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C>D @776C 2 D:8?:7:42?E A@DD:3:=:EJ @7 C65F4:?8 7:C62C> 244:56?ED 2?5 562E9D[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD HC@E6] “v:G6? E96 9:896C AC:46 @7 E96D6 7:C62C>D[ E96 4@>>:DD:@? C64@>>6?5D E92E E96 |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= r@FCE AFCDF6 D2=6D E2I 6I6>AE:@?D E@ 6?4@FC286 E96:C AFC492D6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>:DD:@?[ H9:49 :?4=F565 DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD[ =2H 6?7@C46>6?E @77:4:2=D 2?5 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @77:4:2=D[ C64@>>6?565 E92E E96 {68:D=2EFC6 A2DD 2 =2H 5:C64E:?8 E96 DE2E6 tI64FE:G6 ~77:46 @7 !F3=:4 $276EJ 2?5 $64FC:EJ E@ “56E6C>:?6 E96 762D:3:=:EJ 2?5 G:23:=:EJ” @7 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 2?5 DEF5J :ED 67764E:G6?6DD 😕 7@C6?D:4 :?G6DE:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm~E96C C64@>>6?52E:@?D :?4=F565 C6BF:C:?8 2== D6>:2FE@>2E:4 92?58F?D ?6H=J C68:DE6C65 😕 E96 DE2E6 36 6BF:AA65 H:E9 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 2?5 D6E A6?2=E:6D 7@C 92?58F? >2?F724EFC6CD[ 5:DEC:3FE@CD 2?5 >6C492?ED H9@ 5@ ?@E 4@>A=J]k^Am

    kAm%96 D2=6D E2I 3C62< AC@A@D2= H@? E96 DFAA@CE @7 E96 8F? :?5FDECJ C6AC6D6?E2E:G6 @? E96 4@>>:DD:@? – y2<6 |4vF:82? @7 E96 }2E:@?2= $9@@E:?8 $A@CED u@F?52E:@? x?4][ H9@ G@E65 E@ DFAA@CE E96 E2I 3C62<]k^Am

    kAm%96 A2?6=[ 9@H6G6C[ H2D =2C86=J 5:G:565 @G6C 2 AC@A@D2= E@ 4C62E6 2 D2=6D E2I 6I6>AE:@? 7@C E96 AFC492D6 @7 2 A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C> H:E9 E96 “EC256:?” @7 2 ?@?A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C>] |4vF:82? 2?5 E96 EH@ #6AF3=:42?D @? E96 4@>>:DD:@? – $6?] !6E6C sFC2?E 2?5 #6A] s@?2=5 q6CE9:2F>6[ yC] – G@E65 282:?DE E92E @AE:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@>>:DD:@?’D C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAmp >:4C@DE2>A:?86?23=65 7:C62C> 92D 2 F?:BF6 4@56 :>AC:?E65 @? :ED 7:C:?8 A:?[ DE2>A65 @?E@ 3F==6E 42CEC:586 42D:?8D 6249 E:>6 :E 😀 5:D492C865]k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 F?:BF6 :>AC:?ED :56?E:7J E96 7:C62C>’D >2<6[ >@56= 2?5 D6C:2= ?F>36C[ 2==@H:?8 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ >2E49 DA6?E 42CEC:586 42D:?8D 7@F?5 2E 2 4C:>6 D46?6 E@ E96 DA64:7:4 7:C62C>D]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D :56?E:7:42E:@? >6E9@5 >2J D6CG6 2D 2?@E96C E@@= 2?5 @AA@CEF?:EJ 7@C =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ :?G6DE:82E6[ D@=G6[ 2?5 AC@D64FE6 8F? 4C:>6D[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD HC@E6] “(:E9 2 A@D:E:G6 :56?E:7:42E:@? @7 2? xu| 4@56[ :?G6DE:82E:@?D >2J =625 5:C64E=J E@ E96 7:C62C> :?G@=G65 😕 2 4C:>6 2?5 7FCE96C 6>A@H6C =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ =:?< D6A2C2E6 4C:>6D]”k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 E649?@=@8J 😀 ?6H=J 6>6C8:?8[ 2?5 D@ 72C @?=J EH@ &]$] >2?F724EFC6CD 2C6 😕 E96 AC@46DD @7 >2<:?8 A6CD@?2=:K65 H62A@?D[ @?=J @?6 @7 H9:49 92D 366? 2AAC@G65 7@C E96 >2C<6E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@>>:DD:@?’D 7:?5:?8D] %96 A6CD@?2=:K65 H62A@?D 2=D@ 4@DE >F49 >@C6 E92? EC25:E:@?2= 7:C62C>D[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD ?@E65]k^Am

    kAm%@ 52E6[ @?=J 2 92?57F= @7 DE2E6D – :?4=F5:?8 }6H y6CD6J[ }6H *@C< 2?5 r2=:7@C?:2 – 92G6 2AAC@G65 =2HD >2?52E:?8 E92E 8F? C6E2:=6CD D6== 7:C62C>D H:E9 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J]k^Am

    kAm%96 }2E:@?2= #:7=6 pDD@4:2E:@? D2JD >:4C@DE2>A:?8 😀 2? “:?4@?D:DE6?E E649?@=@8J” E92E E6DED 92G6 D9@H? “42? 36 56762E65 H:E9 4@>>@? 92?5 E@@=D 😕 F?56C 2 >:?FE6]”k^Am

    kAm“$:?46 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 42? 36 56762E65 😕 F?56C 2 >:?FE6 2?5 4C:>:?2=D 24BF:C6 8F?D 😕 2 >2??6C :?4@?D:DE6?E H:E9 E96 E96@CJ 369:?5 E96 E649?@=@8J[ E9:D 8F? 4@?EC@= >62DFC6 @?=J D6CG6D E@ 3FC56? =2H23:5:?8 8F? @H?6CD[” E96 8C@FA D2:5 😕 2 C646?E A@DE]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Denverites will vote on the mayor’s affordable housing sales tax

    Denverites will vote on the mayor’s affordable housing sales tax

    [ad_1]

    Mayor Mike Johnston’s affordable housing sales tax is headed to voters this November. 

    City Council approved a ballot measure that, if passed by voters, would dedicate $100 million a year to affordable housing using a .5 percent sales tax. Council voted 9-to-4 on Monday in favor of sending the sales tax to the voters, despite lingering concerns over a lack of detail in the ultimate plan.

    The sales tax will sunset after 40 years, a last-minute amendment passed 12-to-1 by City Council on Monday over fears of overreach and an inability to know what the housing market will look like decades in the future.

    “In the early 2000s we allowed developers to take advantage of our upcoming communities, displacing me, displacing my family, my community,” said Councilmember Serena Gonzales-Gutierrez, who voted yes on the measure. “We needed to take control of the issue long, long ago. We are trying to pick up the pieces.”

    In a statement Monday, Johnston called putting the sales tax on the ballot “an important step forward to ensuring all Denverites can live and thrive in our city.”

    “We are thrilled and grateful to see City Council officially put Affordable Denver in the voters’ hands,” Johnston said.

    Councilmembers Flor Alvidrez, Kevin Flynn, Stacie Gilmore and Amanda Sawyer voted no on the measure. They had concerns that the ballot measure, with its numerous amendments, was half-baked without a clear plan for the money.

    Gilmore said she asked the Mayor’s office to hold the plan until the spring to work out more of the details.

    “I’m still going to be a no on referring it to the ballot because I take my responsibility of good governance really seriously, and I can’t explain what this is going to look like to my constituents,” she said.

    The plan, titled Affordable Denver, was designed to create or preserve 44,000 units of income-restricted housing over the next decade.

    Johnston pitched the measure in early July. He was flanked by a who’s-who of community organizers and nonprofit leaders across the city, along with Councilmembers Shontel Lewis, Sarah Parady and Darrell Watson.

    The mayor had just under two months to convince City Council to put the measure on the ballot.

    “Denver can’t afford to wait,” Johnston said when announcing the campaign.

    His hope is the tax would create affordability and prevent displacement, even as Denver’s economy grows.

    The new sales tax would build housing for teachers, waiters, firefighters, and other workers and middle-class people who have been struggling to afford the city. It would also nearly double the amount of housing Johnston pledged to create in his campaign.  

    “What we know is if we do nothing, 10 years from now, all of those Denverites will be gone,” he said. “They will have been pushed out or priced out or moved out to someplace else. And that is a future we refuse to accept.”

    And Denver really needs affordable housing.

    An annual report released last week found that overall homeless in Denver and the surrounding metro area rose by 10 percent compared to last year. 

    The sales tax would grow housing, not pay for homelessness services. But in interviews with Denverite, nonprofit leaders attributed the persistent rise in Denver’s homelessness to a continued lack of affordable housing in the area.

    Affordable housing is something voters care about as well.

    In the spring, Colorado Public Radio and other media outlets surveyed Coloradans statewide through the Voter Voices survey. Affordability is a top concern among residents of all political persuasions. 

    At its State of the City event, Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce members identified housing affordability, along with childcare, as two of the area’s greatest needs. 

    When Denverite interviewed more than 100 residents about their big concerns in the city, housing affordability topped the list. 

    And a recent bipartisan poll from the Colorado Health Foundation found that more than 70 percent of Denverites fear the lack of affordability will force them to leave Colorado. Nine in ten parents worry their children won’t be able to afford life here.

    Despite the widespread belief that Denver lacks affordable housing, not everyone has bought that Johnston’s plan is the right one. 

    Some critics have argued the tax is regressive, putting the burden of funding the new housing on working people who need their money. 

    Voters will already be deciding on a .34 percent sales tax to fund Denver Health, the city’s safety net hospital that has faced huge funding shortages in recent years.

    That’s on top of the numerous other sales tax increases Denver voters have approved in recent years, amounting to a 30 percent rise in sales taxes since 2018. One of those taxes passed in 2020 was specifically aimed at addressing homelessness.

    “How many new added fees and tax increases does it take to make us affordable?” Councilmember Kevin Flynn asked in a committee meeting last month. “That strikes me as counterintuitive. And so I wonder, where does it end?”

    Business leaders have been split on the solution. Some are eager for the government to take action and others arguing the city needs to slow down and roll out the plan with more details before taking it to the voters.

    Other Councilmembers raised concerns that Affordable Denver doesn’t have enough of the details worked out. 

    Last week, Councilmembers brought a dozen amendments to the plan. They passed eight of them, including one that would add more Council oversight over how the money is spent.

    Councilmembers passed even more amendments Monday, including a plan for how to prioritize using the funds and a compromise with the Mayor’s office to end the sales tax after 40 years.

    “At $100 million a year for 40 years, that’s $4 billion, so if we can’t solve this in a generation and a half and $4 billion, we can’t solve this,” said amCouncilmember Amanda Sawyer, who brought forth the amendment. 

    Another amendment brought by Councilmember Shotel Lewis restricts portions of the funds to housing for people making 80 percent of the area median income, or $102,650 for a family of four in 2024. 

    The change would allow for mixed-income developments with an average of 100 percent area median income, or $130,400 for a family of four. The bill also includes exemptions for homeowners and buyers making up to 120 percent of the area median income, or $156,480 for a family of four.

    That amendment passed 9 to 4, with some Councilmembers concerned that making the fund too restrictive could have unintended consequences decades in the future.

    Despite concerns about the details, a majority of Councilmembers decided the housing crisis is too dire to wait.

    Voters will make the final call on the sales tax in the Nov. 5 general election.

    That’s along with a slew of other ballot measures, including the separate .35 percent sales tax hike to fund Denver Health. Some Councilmembers said they were concerned the affordable housing sales tax could affect the passage of the Denver Health sales tax.

    Still, even the Councilmembers who voted yes on passing the measure to the voters expressed concerns about the lack of detail and quick timeline for the policy. They suggested that even if the voters approve the sales tax, more work lies ahead.

    “I will support it going to the but we have to be honest, good intention exists, but the clarity and the specificity doesn’t,” Councilmember Jamie Torres said. “I will support it. I will work to get that clarity. And if it’s not there, I’m here for three more years in this term, then I don’t think we keep this fund.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Affordable Denver sales tax heads to a City Council vote

    Affordable Denver sales tax heads to a City Council vote

    [ad_1]

    If City Council passes Mayor Mike Johnston’s affordable housing proposal, voters will decide on the new tax in November.

    Mayor Mike Johnston and supporters on the steps of the City and County building as he announces a proposed sales tax to fund affordable housing, July 8, 2024.

    Kyle Harris/Denverite

    In the coming weeks, the full City Council will debate Affordable Denver.

    That’s Mayor Mike Johnston’s proposal to raise Denver’s sales tax by .5 percent. The revenue would raise $100 million a year to fund affordable housing.

    The plan would fund the building and preservation of housing for low-income, working-class and middle-class households.

    The administration estimates it will raise sales taxes on residents by $2 a week. Items like health supplies, food and feminine hygiene supplies will be exempt from the tax.

    “Denver is the best city in America because of our people – the teachers, nurses, firefighters, and working families who built Denver into what it is today,” Mayor Johnston said in a statement. “This proposal is a critical tool to make sure those Denverites can live in the city they serve for generations to come.”

    Johnston struggled to get the Affordable Denver sales tax to a City Council vote.

    The proposal hit an early snag in July in the Council’s Safety, Housing, Education & Homelessness Committee.

    Councilmembers demanded more specifics and clarity. They raised concerns about who the proposal would — and wouldn’t — help.

    Some wanted greater support for households making less than 60 percent of the area median income.

    District 2 Councilmember Kevin Flynn asked whether Denver can actually tax its way to greater affordability.

    For the past two weeks, the Mayor’s Office, sponsoring councilmembers, the Department of Housing Stability and the Department of Finance have all been hammering out details and addressing concerns.

    Their work has been urgent since the final deadline to refer a measure to the voters is rapidly approaching.

    The council committee unanimously supported the Affordable Denver sales tax.

    On Aug. 7, the committee met again on the issue and unanimously sent the proposal to a full City Council vote.

    At-large member Serena Gonzales-Gutierrez, District 10 member Chris Hinds, Flynn, District 11 member Stacie Gilmore, District 5 member Amanda Sawyer, Council President and District 1 member Amanda Sandoval, and District 3 member Jamie Torres all voted to push the plan forward.

    “Creating more affordable housing is one of the top priorities I hear from constituents,” said Sandoval in a statement. “I’m proud to work side-by-side with my colleagues on Council to create strong, meaningful change that will make a difference in the lives of Denverites for generations to come.”

    Affordable housing continues to be a pressing concern for Denverites.

    According to the Colorado Health Foundation’s bipartisan Pulse poll, the cost of living is the dominant concern among residents.

    To push the proposal, the Johnston administration secured endorsements from more than 100 individuals and community groups. Those span from Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver to the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.

    “As a coalition of over 20 Denver Metro Area affordable housing providers working across the housing continuum from homelessness to homeownership, we at the Neighborhood Development Collaborative know that flexible funding for diverse housing needs is vital to preventing displacement and homelessness while supporting homeowners and renters,” wrote Jonathan Cappelli, executive director of Neighborhood Development Collaborative in a letter to City Council. “NDC’s member organizations support this ordinance because it can meet these needs at a scale that will make a difference.”

    What’s next?

    The full City Council will consider Affordable Denver with a first reading on Monday, Aug. 12.

    Council will likely vote on Monday, Aug. 19.

    If City Council votes in favor of the plan, it will refer the issue to voters on the Nov. 5 ballot.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Poll finds steady support for Denver’s mayor but suggests new tax increases may face skepticism

    Poll finds steady support for Denver’s mayor but suggests new tax increases may face skepticism

    [ad_1]

    Denver Mayor Mike Johnston’s popularity is holding steady after 11 months in office, according to a new poll released Wednesday, but its findings suggest a sales tax increase he’s pitching for the November ballot could face some skepticism from voters.

    Johnston remains confident in his tax proposal, unveiled Monday. It would generate an estimated $100 million a year to expand on the city’s affordable housing work, including by preserving or building tens of thousands of units affordable to people now getting priced out of the city. His own internal polling suggests two-thirds of the city would support the tax increase, he said.

    Mayor Mike Johnston, joined by members of the City Council and community leaders, announces a new sales tax proposal to expand affordable housing in Denver on the steps of the City and County Building on July 8, 2024. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)

    But the June survey of 409 registered Denver voters for the nonprofit Colorado Polling Institute found that a solid majority — 64% — believe the city’s taxes are already high. Among them, 35% said the city’s taxes were “way too high,” while 29% said they were “high but acceptable.”

    Still, it’s been rare for Denver voters to turn down tax increases, and a pollster noted that plenty of voters voiced moderate opinions on the question.

    Those responses were collected before Johnston announced his proposed 0.5% affordable housing sales tax. If the City Council gives its blessing in the weeks ahead, that new tax would share the November ballot with a new 0.34% sales tax being sought to shore up the finances of Denver Health, the city’s safety net hospital.

    If both pass, the city’s effective sales tax rate would increase from 8.81% to 9.65%, making Denver stand out along the Front Range.

    The bipartisan poll, conducted by Democratic polling organization Aspect Strategic and Republican firm New Bridge Strategy, was conducted via a mix of online and phone interviews between June 13 and 18. It has a margin of error of 4.85 percentage points.

    In good news for the mayor, the poll found 48% of voters viewed him favorably. That’s virtually flat compared to the 46% who viewed Johnston favorably in a Colorado Polling Institute poll in August, just his second month on the job.

    But the share viewing Johnston unfavorably climbed significantly, from 22% in August to 38% in June, according to the results.

    That’s due in part to rising familiarity as Johnston has been in the news, including as he’s spearheaded a new homeless strategy and responded to the migrant crisis. Just 11% of voters told pollsters they had no opinion or had never heard of the mayor in June, down from 32% in August.

    His favorability ratings in the new poll contrast with results from a Magellan Strategies survey of 1,595 Denver voters conducted in May. That poll found that 43% approved of his performance — while fully 50% disapproved. The margin of error was 2.45 percentage points.

    The survey was conducted for the council’s central office primarily to gauge support for a potential tightening of term limits. Its contract with Magellan was valued at up to $29,000, council spokesman Robert Austin said. The poll also found that the council’s approval rating was underwater, with approval at 36% and disapproval at 49%.

    Regardless of his own support levels, Johnston is banking that voters will approve his tax request in November.

    On the Colorado Polling Institute survey’s taxes question, Lori Weigel, of New Bridge Strategy, viewed the responses with some nuance. She noted that just about any voter is liable to say they pay too much in taxes, which is why the poll allowed respondents to grade the city’s tax burden by offering several options: way too high, high but acceptable, about right and lower than what one would expect.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Rubino

    Source link

  • Do I need a GST or HST number? – MoneySense

    Do I need a GST or HST number? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Why registering for GST/HST pays off

    The other excellent reason to charge GST and HST is that it pays off in dollars and cents.

    One of the great advantages of being self-employed is that when you charge these taxes, you only give the government what you charged minus the GST or HST you pay on your deductible business expenses. 

    For freelance writers like us, this is the sales tax we pay on printer paper, internet service, professional development workshops and more. The government lets us in essence deduct the sales taxes we pay on deductible expenses from the sales taxes we charge our clients. We then pocket the difference. The amount we save each year is roughly enough to pay for a trip to Europe.

    HST quick method or detailed method?

    The good news is that we don’t have to add up every bit of GST and sales tax we pay on our expenses to take advantage of this. That’s because we use the “quick method” for our calculations. 

    The government gives you two choices for paying GST and PST/HST instalments: the “detailed method” and the “quick method.” With the quick method, you simply pay 3.6% of the 5% GST you collect. In the case of provinces with HST, it’s a percentage of the HST: so, in Ontario, you only pay 8.8% to the government from the 13% you collect. 

    Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik

    The advantage of the quick method is that it’s much less work. You must only add up how much sales tax you charge your clients or customers. My spouse and I use the quick method and find it easy to do our calculations with an Excel spreadsheet. There is no need to keep a detailed account of the sales tax you pay on all the pens, paper, printer cartridges and more you claim as deductible expenses. 

    There’s another bonus to using the quick method. Governments offer a credit of an additional 1% on the first $30,000 of gross revenue. So, for example, in Ontario you pay 7.8% (instead of 8.8%) of the 13% HST you collect for that amount and pocket the other 5.2%. However, if you use the quick method, you must add the credit to your total revenue when you file your income tax return.

    The detailed method involves more work, since you must add up the GST and PST/HST you paid on each of your expenses and subtract it from the taxes you collect to determine the amount you have to pay. But this calculation method is useful if your taxable expenses are proportionately high, amounting to roughly more than 50% of your income. The advantage of the detailed method is that you don’t have to add the amount you retain to your revenue when you file your income tax return. 

    [ad_2]

    Julie Barlow

    Source link

  • Voters will decide whether to support Denver Health through increase in city’s sales tax

    Voters will decide whether to support Denver Health through increase in city’s sales tax

    [ad_1]

    Denver voters will be asked in November to consider increasing the city’s sales tax to raise $70 million a year to help stabilize Denver Health, the region’s financially ailing safety-net hospital.

    The Denver City Council voted 12-1 without discussion Monday to send the .34% sales-tax increase — which would add 34 cents to a $100 purchase — to the ballot. The city’s current sales tax is 8.81% and, if this measure is approved by voters, it will increase to 9.15%.

    Councilman Kevin Flynn, who represents District 2, cast the only dissenting vote. He previously had expressed concern about “burdening Denver taxpayers” with tax increases.

    Mayor Mike Johnston is considering asking the council to place a second sales-tax increase — one that would raise money for affordable housing — on the November ballot, administration officials told The Denver Post earlier this month.

    If voters OK the Denver Health tax increase, the health system could only use the money to expand or maintain medical care in the following categories:

    • Emergency and trauma care
    • Primary care
    • Mental health care
    • Addiction treatment and recovery services
    • Pediatric care

    There would be a cap on the administrative costs that could be drawn from the fund, as well.

    Denver Health has struggled financially since 2021 as the cost of uncompensated care rose faster than revenues, with state officials warning earlier this year that, without changes to its business operations, the hospital was at risk of deteriorating into a “death spiral.”

    The system lost about $35 million in 2022, CEO Donna Lynne told a council subcommittee at a meeting earlier this month. The hospital earned a $17 million profit in 2023, though that wasn’t enough to tackle the maintenance that it deferred in recent years, officials said.

    [ad_2]

    Meg Wingerter, Noelle Phillips

    Source link

  • Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    [ad_1]

    Dear Quentin,

    I’ve read your previous responses to letters on tipping, and my thoughts are simple: Tipping is dependent on the service given. I won’t tip at a deli counter, but I will tip more in a diner. I see no reason to tip a deli counter person on a regular basis. The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag.

    As far as restaurants go, 15% is the starting point and I will go up from that as warranted. I do tend to tip a high percentage in diners. The waitstaff there are generally fabulous, deal with lower price points and a varied clientele. I feel they also suffer from customer bias where some people seem to think it’s only a diner not a fancy restaurant.

    ‘Helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.’

    The job is the same whether my meal is $10 or $100. I try to pay in cash to ensure the waitstaff is promptly getting their tip, and to ensure that the money does indeed go to the wait staff. Are we expected to tip on a total that includes credit-card charges? What’s more, helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.

    What troubles me is that throughout the New York City metro area, tipping recommendations in restaurants are based on faulty calculations. My friends and I all agree that tips are supposed to be based on the price of the meal — that is the subtotal or pre-tax figure. Restaurants frequently encourage people to tip on the final amount. 

    A Fair Tipper

    Related: I’m sick and tired of tipping 20% every time I eat out. Is it ever OK to tip less? Or am I a cheapskate? 

    Dear Fair,

    Yes, yes, yes, and yes. 

    Yes, wait staff in diners work as hard as any restaurant worker, and they deserve whatever your optimum tip — 15% or 20% — and as much as you would tip in a white-tablecloth restaurant. Yes, consumers should not be expected to tip in a deli — unless you have a good relationship with the staff, and you tip occasionally for goodwill. If you choose to “skip” the charity donation in a pharmacy, that’s OK too. Yes, donations and tips are increasingly being conflated, and that’s not always a good thing. We should be comfortable with the charity and 100% sure that the donation is going to the charity in question. 

    And your main point: Yes, tipping on the subtotal before tax and before credit-card charges is absolutely fair, although a lot of people — especially when calculating the tip among friends — tip on the after-tax total. Why? Perhaps we don’t want to be seen splitting hairs over the tax among friends and/or in front of a service worker who has given us exemplary service. Calculating tips is often done under pressure, and no one likes to be seen as a cheapskate. I almost always tip on the total amount, knowing that the sales tax is included, primarily because I figure that extra $1 or more is going to the person who served my table.

    My colleague, MarketWatch news editor Nicole Pesce, put together a guide for how much you should tip everyone, and who you should NOT tip. She also cited three reasons why tipping has become such a note of contention, and why it appears we are tipping more: people tipped staff more during the pandemic (they were, after all, putting their health and lives at risk with their jobs); 40-year high inflation over the last 12 months has increased the cost of everything and, as such our tips rose in tandem with prices; and, finally, digital tipping appears to be ubiquitous, and people have been suffering from tipping fatigue. 

    ‘You’re not the only one: Americans are souring on tipping.’

    You’re not the only one with tipping fatigue, though: Americans are generally souring on tipping. A large majority (66%) of U.S. adults have a negative view about tipping, according to a poll released by the personal-finance site Bankrate last month. The bottom line: consumers feel they are being forced to compensate employees for low pay (41%) and they don’t appreciate all that digital guilt tipping (32%) and, as a result, they believe that tipping culture has gotten out of control (30%). Respondents also said they were confused about how much to tip (15%), but a small minority (a paltry 16%) said they would be willing to pay higher prices in lieu of tipping.

    People appear to be less generous with their tipping amounts, and they also appear to be tipping less often. What’s perhaps most surprising from Bankrate’s research is that only 65% of diners actually tip when they eat out (that’s down from 73% last year). After restaurants, people are most likely to tip barbers/hairdressers (53% of those polled) and food-delivery workers (50%). From thereon, only a minority of people say they tip taxi or rideshare drivers (New York City cabs, which give tipping options upon payment, may be an outlier here), hotel housekeepers, baristas and food-delivery workers.

    It’s important that we have this conversation about tipping because expectations and digital tipping methods are evolving all the time. On the one hand, people are facing higher prices and they are understandably feeling under pressure to tip. On the other hand, this conversation naturally overlaps with the working conditions and pay of service workers. Americans are tipping less than they did during the worst days of the pandemic. Service workers — along with medical personnel, bus and train drivers and first responders — were among the heroes of the pandemic. That is something I hope we never forget.

    “The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag,” the letter writer says.


    MarketWatch illustration

    Also read:

    ‘I respect every profession equally, but I feel like so many people look down on me for being a waitress’: Americans are tipping less. Should we step up to the plate? 

    ‘We’re very upset!’ We gave a friend $400 concert tickets and $2,000 Rangers seats, but weren’t invited to his wedding. Do we speak up?

    ‘All of these tips add up’: If a restaurant adds a 20% tip, am I obliged to pay? Should tipping not be optional? 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House GOP keeps up attacks on IRS with bill to abolish the agency | CNN Politics

    House GOP keeps up attacks on IRS with bill to abolish the agency | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]


    Washington
    CNN
     — 

    The Republican-controlled House has made the Internal Revenue Service a political target after Democrats bolstered the agency with new funding last year.

    Within the first week of the new Congress, a dozen GOP lawmakers introduced a bill that would abolish the IRS altogether and replace the entire federal tax code with a national sales tax.

    Separately, the House voted to rescind nearly $80 billion in funding for the agency that Democrats approved last year – with many top Republicans repeating the misleading claim that the money will be used to hire 87,000 auditors.

    “Instead of adding 87,000 new agents to weaponize the IRS against small business owners and middle America, this bill will eliminate the need for the department entirely by simplifying the tax code with provisions that work for the American people and encourage growth and innovation,” said Rep. Earl “Buddy” Carter, a Republican from Georgia who introduced the Fair Tax Act earlier this month.

    It’s highly unlikely that either bill will become law, given that Democrats still control the Senate. But the measures highlight how America’s two major political parties have very different strategies when it comes to addressing the embattled tax collection agency – which has seen its budget shrink by more than 15% over the past decade and has struggled to not only process returns on time but also answer taxpayers’ questions. Just 13% of phone calls were answered last year.

    Democrats have taken a different approach, making funding the IRS a priority. The Inflation Reduction Act, which passed along party lines last year, approved $80 billion for the IRS over 10 years. By using the money to crack down on tax cheats, it’s estimated that the agency could boost federal revenue by more than $124 billion over that time period.

    The Republicans’ Fair Tax Act is not a new idea. A version was first introduced in Congress in 1999. It’s never had enough support to become law, but it puts forth an appealing message to those Americans who love to hate the federal tax agency.

    It would get rid of the complicated federal tax system, doing away with the annual task of filing tax returns. Instead, the bill would replace federal taxes on individual and corporate income with a national 23% sales tax in 2025, allowing for adjustments to the rate in later years. Americans would pay Uncle Sam whenever they bought a new good or service for personal consumption.

    The bill calls for abolishing the IRS and directing states to collect the new federal tax.

    While every consumer would pay the same tax at the cash register, the bill provides for a monthly tax rebate payment, based on the poverty rate and family size. It’s meant to help offset the tax levy on low-income Americans who tend to spend a higher share of their paycheck on goods and services.

    A national sales tax appears very simple: one rate all Americans pay on new goods and services they buy.

    But some policy experts say the Fair Tax Act is more complicated than it looks.

    “Moving away from taxing income and toward taxing consumption is a step in the right direction for a pro-growth and simpler tax code,” said Garrett Watson, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, an independent tax policy nonprofit.

    But there could still be complications. First, the tax rate would likely have to be higher than 23% in order for the federal government to pull in the same amount of tax revenue that it does now. One estimate found that a tax rate of about 30% would more likely be able to generate the same amount of revenue – or 44%, if measured the way state sales taxes are typically presented.

    Second, a nationwide sales tax could leave low- and middle-income people worse off. The current tax system is progressive, meaning it takes a larger percentage of income from high-earners than low-income groups. Even with the monthly tax rebate, a national sales tax would still be less progressive.

    A 2011 independent analysis of a similar national sales tax found that, on average, most income groups would pay more tax than they did under the federal tax system at the time – except the top 5% of earners who would see a tax cut.

    Additionally, it’s hard to imagine that lawmakers would pass a bill that does not exclude some things from the sales tax, like health care costs, for example.

    “The basic income tax is simple too,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

    It’s the deductions, credits and exclusions – like for retirement savings and charitable giving – that make it complicated.

    Plus, Americans would likely have to file some paperwork to some tax collection entity in order to receive the rebate, Gleckman said. The administration cost may be less than it is now, but it wouldn’t be zero.

    Tax filing season opens Monday and National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins expects IRS services for taxpayers to improve this year – in part due to the funding increase provided by Congress.

    Since the Inflation Reduction Act was passed in August, the IRS has hired 5,000 new customer service agents. The agency has also worked to improve its technology so that taxpayers can ask questions via an automated service online, said Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo on a call with reporters last week.

    The IRS started the year with about 400,000 unprocessed paper individual returns and about 1 million unprocessed business returns. But it’s in much better shape than the prior year, when it had a backlog of 4.7 million unprocessed individual returns and 3.2 million unprocessed business returns, according to the taxpayer advocate’s annual report to Congress.

    Taxpayer service, like answering the phones and processing returns in a timely manner, has suffered as the IRS’ budget has shrunk.

    The Covid-19 pandemic brought even more challenges for the IRS. It was tasked with administering several rounds of stimulus payments to millions of Americans with a lot of its staff working from home. This caused long delays for many taxpayers who filed a paper return. The IRS is starting to implement a scanning system so that returns filed by paper can quickly be made digital. Previously, paper returns had to be entered manually into the agency’s computer system.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 10 Unique Ways to Save on Back-to-School Shopping: LearningRx Offers a Full List at LearningRxblog.com

    10 Unique Ways to Save on Back-to-School Shopping: LearningRx Offers a Full List at LearningRxblog.com

    [ad_1]

    LearningRx offers unique ways to save during back to school shopping on their blog.
    One-on-one brain training company LearningRx is sharing a list of 10 unique ways to save on back-to-school shopping.

    Press Release


    Aug 8, 2016

    ​​​​​​One-on-one brain training company LearningRx is sharing a list of 10 unique ways to save on back-to-school shopping. Here are a few from the list:

    Add Honey, the Chrome extension. Honey adds a new button to your checkout page at any of more than 100 stores, including Amazon, Kohl’s and Sears. With a simple click, Honey will search the web and apply the best coupon code(s) or deal to save you money on your purchase. As Time magazine says, “It’s basically free money.” You can also earn cash back. Just shop at any of thousands of stores that support the Honey extension and if there’s a cash back offer, the Honey button will appear at checkout. Just click the “Activate Cash Bonus” before you finish your purchase.

    “It’s basically free money”

    Time Magazine

    • Download a price comparison app. Free apps like Shop Savvy let you scan a barcode or search for a product to find out which of 40,000+ stores has the best price. You can even create a shopping list and Shop Savvy will automatically watch the items on your list for the lowest prices. SnipSnap lets you snap a photo of a product in order to get coupons, mobile rebates, best prices and price-match opportunities.

    Shop on a sales tax holiday. Nearly 20 states now offer anywhere from two to seven days of tax-free shopping on certain items. For example, in Texas, May 28-30 and August 5-7 were the tax-free days to shop in 2016. Specifically, during the August three-day holiday, you could purchase clothing, footwear, school supplies and backpacks for elementary and secondary students without paying sales tax. Those savings can really help a tight budget!

    To see the full list, visit: http://www.learningrxblog.com/2016/08/03/

    LearningRx, headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado, is the largest one-on-one brain training organization in the world. With 80 Centers in the U.S., and locations in 40 countries around the globe, LearningRx has helped more than 95,000 individuals and families sharpen their cognitive skills to help them think faster, learn easier, and perform better. Their on-site programs partner every client with a personal brain trainer to keep clients engaged, accountable, and on-task — a key advantage over online-only brain exercises. Their pioneering methods have been used in clinical settings for 35 years and have been verified as beneficial in peer-reviewed research papers and journals. To learn more about LearningRx research results, programs, and their 9.6 out of 10 client satisfaction rating visit http://www.learningrx.com/.    

    Source: LearningRx

    [ad_2]

    Source link