ReportWire

Tag: safety concerns

  • How much federal money could MBTA lose following White House’s threat?

    [ad_1]

    The clock is ticking for the MBTA to respond to the Trump administration after it threatened to pull federal transportation funds over safety concerns.

    The letter sent by U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy last Thursday requested written safety reports within the next two weeks.

    It called out transit systems in Boston and Chicago – two cities the department said allow cashless bail, “which allows deranged criminals to repeatedly terrorize public spaces.”

    The federal government is now asking for information about actions being taken to deter crime, stop fare evasion, and provide a clean environment for riders.

    Their request also asks for a summary of all sources of funds received for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 relating to safety and security.

    “I do think this is messaging that’s designed to feed into an anti-city, anti-transit narrative,” said Jim Aloisi, former Massachusetts Secretary of Transportation.

    Aloisi pointed out that the day-to-day operations on the T are not funded at all by the federal government.

    The T does receive federal funds to support capital projects, including station upgrades and service expansions.

    The MBTA’s itemized budgets show that MBTA received about $10.2 million in fiscal year 2023, $31.3 million in fiscal year 2024 and has $191 million coming in fiscal year 2025.

    “What the federal government is threatening to do by withholding capital money is hurt everyday people who rely on the T,” said Aloisi.

    U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said that if the agency does not respond within two weeks, it could face federal dollars being withheld.

    The letter did not cite specific statistics surrounding crime on the T but did mention crime concerns at South Station and two recent incidents involving passengers allegedly attacked or shoved on MBTA buses.

    “I think safety is a concern,” said MBTA rider Judy Stitt.

    MBTA riders Boston 25 News spoke with shared different opinions about safety concerns on the MBTA.

    “I go to South Station. I go to Quincy. I feel safe because nobody bothers me,” said another commuter named Judy.

    Boston 25 News reached out to the MBTA Tuesday afternoon to ask if it’s responded yet to the federal government’s request.

    We’re still waiting to hear back, but MBTA General Manager Phil Eng said last week he will cooperate with the federal government’s request for more information.

    MBTA Transit Police Superintendent Richard Sullivan said last month that serious crime rates at South Station are extremely low and that crime reports are down 16% compared to last year.

    Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

    Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Safety concerns grow over e-bikes and scooters on UNF Campus ahead of safety meeting

    [ad_1]

    With the growing popularity of electric scooters, e-bikes, and skateboards among students, safety is becoming a top priority at the University of North Florida.

    UNF students told Action News Jax that the speed of these devices on shared walkways is creating safety concerns — especially as pedestrians and fast-moving riders try to navigate the same space.

    >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<<

    Students told us the concern comes from sharing the same walkways — while someone may be walking at 2 miles per hour, an electric skateboard or e-bike can reach speeds of up to 30 miles per hour.

    Some students said they’ve had close calls.

    “I think they go way too fast in between people,” said UNF student Thomas Quinlan.

    “They kind of annoy me because I almost got hit by them running on the bridge,” added student Kelly-Jane Adams.

    To address these concerns, representatives from UNF Police, AAA, and UF Health are holding a safety-focused news conference Thursday morning on campus. The goal: raise awareness and promote safer habits as part of AAA’s ongoing media tour.

    [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks],

    Although there haven’t been any reported incidents on the UNF campus so far, university leaders said now is the best time to act.

    While there haven’t been any incidents on the UNF campus, school leaders say that’s exactly why now is the best time to educate students.

    The AAA initiative focuses on reducing crashes through education, improved infrastructure, and behavior changes — particularly as micromobility devices become more common among young adults for commuting.

    Many students said they support the effort.

    “If that keeps people from being injured, then that’s great,” said Quinlan.

    UNF students said educational meetings like this are needed.

    The safety event is scheduled for Thursday at 10 a.m. at the University of North Florida.

    [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]

    Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US agency raises safety concerns on Ford SUV fuel leak recall

    US agency raises safety concerns on Ford SUV fuel leak recall

    [ad_1]

    By David Shepardson

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. auto safety agency said on Thursday it has “significant safety concerns” over Ford Motor’s recall of more than 42,000 SUVs over concerns fuel leaks could lead to an engine fire.

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said last month it was investigating the adequacy and safety consequences of Ford’s proposed recall remedy for 2022-2023 model year Bronco Sport and 2022 Ford Escape SUVs with 1.5L engines.

    The No. 2 U.S. automaker said a fuel injector may crack and leak fuel, which could cause an underhood fire.

    Ford has proposed an engine control software update and installation of a drain. It is not proposing to replace the fuel injectors that could crack.

    In a letter to Ford made public on Thursday, NHTSA said Ford’s plan “does not address the root cause of the issue and does not proactively call for the replacement of defective fuel injectors prior to their failure,” adding that the agency has “identified significant safety concerns.”

    NHTSA is asking Ford to answer extensive questions about the recall by June 21, including how it settled on the remedy.

    Ford reiterated on Friday that it is working with NHTSA to support the agency’s investigation.

    Ford said last month is aware of five underhood fires on 1.5L Escape and Bronco Sport vehicles in the new recall population, but that it had no reports of accidents or injuries tied to the issue.

    The software update will detect a pressure drop in the fuel rail, providing a “seek service” message to the driver and disabling the high-pressure fuel pump, reducing engine power output and lowering temperatures of possible ignition sources.

    In 2022, Ford recalled nearly 522,000 2020-2023 Ford Escape and 2021-2023 Ford Bronco Sport for the same issue with the same remedy, NHTSA said.

    Ford told NHTSA in late 2022 it had 54 reports alleging underhood fires in 2020-2022 Bronco Sport and Escape vehicles, equipped with the 1.5L engine in North America, along with reports of four injuries in two incidents.

    (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Toby Chopra, Kirsten Donovan)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Caffeine’s Dirty Little Secret

    Caffeine’s Dirty Little Secret

    [ad_1]

    On Tuesday, curiosity finally got the best of me. How potent could Panera’s Charged Lemonades really be? Within minutes of my first sip of the hyper-caffeinated drink in its strawberry-lemon-mint flavor, I understood why memes have likened it to an illicit drug. My vision sharpened; sweat slicked my palms.

    Laced with more caffeine than a typical energy drink, Panera’s Charged Lemonade has been implicated in two wrongful-death lawsuits since it was introduced in 2022. Though both customers who died had health issues that made them sensitive to caffeine, a third lawsuit this month alleges that the lemonade gave an otherwise healthy 27-year-old lasting heart problems. Following the second death, Panera denied that the drink was the cause, but in light of the lawsuits it has added warnings about the drink, reduced its caffeine content, and removed the option for customers to serve themselves.

    All the attention on Panera’s Charged Lemonade has resurfaced an age-old question: How much caffeine is too much? You won’t find a simple answer anywhere. Caffeine consumption is widely considered to be beneficial because it mostly is—boosting alertness, productivity, and even mood. But there is a point when guzzling caffeine tips over into uncomfortable, possibly unhealthy territory. The problem is that defining this point in discrete terms is virtually impossible. In the era of extreme caffeine, this is a dangerous way to live.

    Most people don’t have to worry about dying after drinking Charged Lemonade. The effects, though uncomfortable, usually seem to be minor. After drinking half of mine, I was so wired that I couldn’t make sense of the thoughts ricocheting around my brain for the next few hours. Caffeine routinely leads to jitteriness, nervousness, sweating, insomnia, and rapid heartbeat. If mild, such symptoms can be well worth the benefits.

    But consuming too much caffeine can have serious health impacts. High doses—more than 1,000 milligrams a day—can result in a state of intoxication known as caffeinism. The symptoms can be severe: People can “develop seizures and life-threatening irregularities of the heartbeat,” and some die, David Juurlink, a toxicology professor at the University of Toronto who also works at the Ontario Poison Centre, told me. “It’s one of the dirty little secrets, I’m afraid, of caffeine.” Juurlink said he occasionally gets calls about people, typically high-school or college students, who have ingested multiple caffeine pills on a dare or in a suicide attempt.

    You’re unlikely to ingest that much caffeine from beverages alone, yet the increasing availability of highly caffeinated products makes it more of a possibility than ever before. Besides Panera’s Charged Lemonade, dozens of energy drinks contain similar amounts of caffeine, and some come in candy-inspired flavors such as Bubblicious and Sour Patch Kids. Less potent but highly snackable products include caffeinated coffee cubes, energy chews, marshmallows, mints, ice pops, and even vapes. Consumed quickly and in rapid succession, these foods can lead to potentially toxic caffeine intake “because your body hasn’t had time to tell you to stop,” Jennifer Temple, a professor at the University of Buffalo who studies caffeine use, told me.

    More than ever, we need a way to track our caffeine consumption, but we don’t seem to have any good options. In all of the lawsuits against Panera, the basic argument is this: Had the company more adequately warned customers of the drink’s caffeine content, perhaps no one would have been hurt. But most of us just aren’t used to thinking about caffeine in numerical terms the way we do with calories and alcohol by volume (ABV). Caffeine intake is generally something that’s not measured but experienced: I know, for example, that a double espresso from the office coffee machine will give me the shakes. But even though I knew how much caffeine is in a Charged Lemonade, I had no idea how much of it I could drink before having the same reaction.

    The FDA does have a recommended daily caffeine limit of 400 milligrams, the equivalent of about four or five cups of coffee. “Based on the relevant science and information available,” a spokesperson told me, consuming that much each day “does not raise safety concerns” for most adults, except for people who are pregnant or nursing, or have concerns related to their health conditions or the medication they take. The agency, however, doesn’t require food labels to note caffeine content, though some companies include that information voluntarily.

    But the numbers are helpful only up to a point. The FDA’s daily recommendation is a “rough guideline” that can’t be used as a universal standard, because “it’s not safe for everybody,” Temple said. For one person, 237 milligrams could mean a trip to the hospital; for another, that would just be breakfast. The effect of a given caffeine dose “varies tremendously from person to person based upon their historical pattern of use and also their genetics,” Juurlink told me.

    Although people generally aren’t aware of the amounts of caffeine they consume, they tend to develop a good sense of how much they can handle, Temple said. But usually, this knowledge is product-specific; when trying a new caffeine product, the effect can be hard to predict. Part of the problem is that the amount of caffeine in products varies dramatically, even among drinks that may seem similar: A 12-ounce Americano from McDonald’s contains 71 milligrams of caffeine, but the same drink at Starbucks contains 150 milligrams. The caffeine in popular energy drinks ranges from 75 milligrams (Ocean Spray Cran-Energy) to 316 milligrams (Redline Xtreme), according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

    Contrast this with alcohol, which tends to be served in conventional units regardless of brand: a can of beer, a glass of wine, or a shot of liquor, all of which have roughly the same ability to intoxicate. Having a standard unit to gauge consumption isn’t foolproof—consuming too much alcohol is still far too easy—but it is nevertheless helpful for thinking about how much you’re ingesting, as well as the differences between beverages. Without such a metric for caffeine, consuming new beverages takes on a daredevil quality. Sipping the Charged Lemonade felt like venturing into the Wild West of caffeine.

    The reason we aren’t good at thinking about caffeine is that historically, we’ve never really had to think that hard about it. Sure, one too many espressos might have occasionally put someone over the edge, but caffeine was consumed and sold in amounts that didn’t require as much thought or caution. “A generation ago, you didn’t have all these energy drinks,” so people didn’t grow up learning about safe caffeine consumption the way they may have done for alcohol, Darin Detwiler, an food-policy expert at Northeastern University, told me.

    Compounding the concern is the fact that energy drinks are popular with kids, who are more susceptible to caffeine’s effects because they’re smaller. Kids tend to drink even more when drinks are labeled as highly caffeinated, Temple said, and the fact that they contain huge amounts of sugar to mask the bitter taste of caffeine adds to their appeal. Last year, a child reportedly went into cardiac arrest after drinking a can of Prime Energy—prompting Senator Chuck Schumer to call on the FDA to investigate its “eye-popping caffeine content.”

    Nothing else in our daily diet is quite like caffeine. Certainly people swear by it, and its benefits are clear: Research shows that it can improve cognitive performance, speed up reaction time, and boost logical reasoning, and it may even reduce the risk of Parkinson’s, diabetes, liver disease, and cancer. But for a substance so ubiquitous that it’s called the most widely used drug in the world, our grasp of how to maximize its benefits is feeble at best. Even the most seasoned coffee drinkers sometimes unintentionally get too wired; as new, more highly caffeinated products become available, instances of caffeine drinkers overdoing it will probably become more common. Perhaps the best we can do is learn how much of each drink we can handle, one super-charged sip at a time.

    [ad_2]

    Yasmin Tayag

    Source link