ReportWire

Tag: Sabotage

  • The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of song in ad

    The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of song in ad

    [ad_1]

    The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of ‘Sabotage’ song in ad

    The Beastie Boys are suing the parent company of Chili’s in a case that accuses the chain restaurant of running an advertisement that used the hip-hop trio’s smash hit “Sabotage” without permission. The rap group, in a federal case filed Wednesday in New York, alleged Brinker International created a Chili’s ad that used significant portions of “Sabotage” and ripped off the song’s music video. Brinker International did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The court filings did not list an attorney for Brinker.Debuting in 1994, “Sabotage” became a huge hit for The Beastie Boys, and its accompanying music video, where the group’s three members donned wigs, fake mustaches and sunglasses in a parody of 1970s crime television shows, is one of the most recognizable in the genre. The lawsuit accused Brinker of creating a Chili’s social media ad in 2022 that used parts of the song alongside a video of three people wearing 1970’s-style disguises stealing ingredients from a Chili’s restaurant. The case was filed by surviving Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz and Michael Diamond, along with the executor of the estate of Adam Yauch, a band member who died of cancer in 2012. Yauch, in his will, specifically barred the use of his music in advertisements. The Beastie Boys in 2014 won $1.7 million in a copyright violation case against the maker of Monster Energy drink for the company’s unauthorized use of one of the group’s songs.

    The Beastie Boys are suing the parent company of Chili’s in a case that accuses the chain restaurant of running an advertisement that used the hip-hop trio’s smash hit “Sabotage” without permission.

    The rap group, in a federal case filed Wednesday in New York, alleged Brinker International created a Chili’s ad that used significant portions of “Sabotage” and ripped off the song’s music video.

    Brinker International did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The court filings did not list an attorney for Brinker.

    Debuting in 1994, “Sabotage” became a huge hit for The Beastie Boys, and its accompanying music video, where the group’s three members donned wigs, fake mustaches and sunglasses in a parody of 1970s crime television shows, is one of the most recognizable in the genre.

    The lawsuit accused Brinker of creating a Chili’s social media ad in 2022 that used parts of the song alongside a video of three people wearing 1970’s-style disguises stealing ingredients from a Chili’s restaurant.

    The case was filed by surviving Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz and Michael Diamond, along with the executor of the estate of Adam Yauch, a band member who died of cancer in 2012. Yauch, in his will, specifically barred the use of his music in advertisements.

    The Beastie Boys in 2014 won $1.7 million in a copyright violation case against the maker of Monster Energy drink for the company’s unauthorized use of one of the group’s songs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of song in ad

    The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of song in ad

    [ad_1]

    The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of ‘Sabotage’ song in ad

    The Beastie Boys are suing the parent company of Chili’s in a case that accuses the chain restaurant of running an advertisement that used the hip-hop trio’s smash hit “Sabotage” without permission. The rap group, in a federal case filed Wednesday in New York, alleged Brinker International created a Chili’s ad that used significant portions of “Sabotage” and ripped off the song’s music video. Brinker International did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The court filings did not list an attorney for Brinker.Debuting in 1994, “Sabotage” became a huge hit for The Beastie Boys, and its accompanying music video, where the group’s three members donned wigs, fake mustaches and sunglasses in a parody of 1970s crime television shows, is one of the most recognizable in the genre. The lawsuit accused Brinker of creating a Chili’s social media ad in 2022 that used parts of the song alongside a video of three people wearing 1970’s-style disguises stealing ingredients from a Chili’s restaurant. The case was filed by surviving Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz and Michael Diamond, along with the executor of the estate of Adam Yauch, a band member who died of cancer in 2012. Yauch, in his will, specifically barred the use of his music in advertisements. The Beastie Boys in 2014 won $1.7 million in a copyright violation case against the maker of Monster Energy drink for the company’s unauthorized use of one of the group’s songs.

    The Beastie Boys are suing the parent company of Chili’s in a case that accuses the chain restaurant of running an advertisement that used the hip-hop trio’s smash hit “Sabotage” without permission.

    The rap group, in a federal case filed Wednesday in New York, alleged Brinker International created a Chili’s ad that used significant portions of “Sabotage” and ripped off the song’s music video.

    Brinker International did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The court filings did not list an attorney for Brinker.

    Debuting in 1994, “Sabotage” became a huge hit for The Beastie Boys, and its accompanying music video, where the group’s three members donned wigs, fake mustaches and sunglasses in a parody of 1970s crime television shows, is one of the most recognizable in the genre.

    The lawsuit accused Brinker of creating a Chili’s social media ad in 2022 that used parts of the song alongside a video of three people wearing 1970’s-style disguises stealing ingredients from a Chili’s restaurant.

    The case was filed by surviving Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz and Michael Diamond, along with the executor of the estate of Adam Yauch, a band member who died of cancer in 2012. Yauch, in his will, specifically barred the use of his music in advertisements.

    The Beastie Boys in 2014 won $1.7 million in a copyright violation case against the maker of Monster Energy drink for the company’s unauthorized use of one of the group’s songs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 5 Pieces of Bad Advice That Could Derail Your Business | Entrepreneur

    5 Pieces of Bad Advice That Could Derail Your Business | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    It is reported that nine out of ten startups fail. That’s a staggering, frightening and depressing 90%. Yet, while the reasons for this are many, even though the number is high, don’t let it discourage you. Most people who get into business are misguided by well-meaning advice that sets them up to fail.

    As a serial entrepreneur and CEO of Builderall, an all-in-one marketing platform that has supported over 2 million companies, I’ve seen thousands of well-intentioned entrepreneurs set themselves up for failure by following common myths and bad advice. They hear success stories from companies like Uber and try to model their business the same way. But what worked for a mega-funded startup won’t work for a small business.

    I once sat in the audience while a dynamic speaker explained how Zillow had achieved its amazing growth over the years. Her talk was compelling, insightful and full of actionable insights. While the audience sat there captivated and taking notes, I could already see them dreaming about what they could do with all their newfound business success.

    Then it hit me.

    None of this advice would work for the business owners in this room. The advice was excellent — but it was excellent for Zillow, a venture-backed company with $87 million in funding. Perhaps more importantly, a company that has recorded a net loss in income each year since 2012, including a loss of $528 million in 2021.

    None of it applied to the entrepreneurs and small business owners in the room who couldn’t afford to burn hundreds of millions in capital to fuel rapid experiments and blitzscaling.

    Over the past ten years, I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been approached by wide-eyed entrepreneurs in that same position. They were excited about some great advice they had recently heard from a reputable source, and I just knew that it would spell disaster for their business.

    In this article, I’ll share the top pieces of bad small business advice I often hear and what you should do instead if you want to set your company up for sustainable growth.

    Related: 25 Entrepreneurs Share the Worst Advice They Ever Received

    1. Bad advice: Raise money to start your business

    Raising startup capital seems like an essential rite of passage for any new entrepreneur. But here’s the reality — you probably don’t need it. In fact, it can sink you.

    One of the biggest myths is that you need outside funding to start and grow a business. I’ve started multiple successful companies with $0 of outside capital. Too often, entrepreneurs think they need hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to launch their ideas. But here’s the reality — raising capital doesn’t make financial sense for all businesses.

    The venture capitalist business model requires massive returns — in some cases, as high as 100 times their investment. Most investors can’t back a company aiming for $50 million in value because, realistically, they could never get the return on investment that they seek.

    Because VC investors require their return on investment to be so high, by asking for VC money, you’re signaling that you plan to build a business that will meet their exit expectations.

    There are tons of great businesses that generate between $10 to $50 million per year — and they make their owners very rich. Just understand that a profitable, $20 million per year business isn’t aligned with VC goals and can set you up for failure.

    Additionally, when you take startup capital, you’re committing to a journey that will continue to dilute your ownership while you strive for the potentially unattainable billionaire unicorn status. Your chances of building wealth are statistically much higher if you create a profitable small business that generates significant free cash flow while you retain majority ownership.

    The right approach is to validate your assumptions and business model with the least amount of resources possible. If you put the same amount of effort into bootstrapping that you would put into fundraising, it will likely pay off in the long run. Also, you can always raise money later — once you have proven product-market fit and a path to scale.

    2. Bad advice: Split the business 50/50 with a cofounder

    Don’t get me wrong, a strong business partner can be invaluable, but structuring your partnership correctly is critical. Novice entrepreneurs often think bringing on a “cofounder” means splitting everything 50/50.

    However, not all contributions are created equal. Before signing any partnership agreements, evaluate what each person brings to the table across criteria like the original business idea, startup capital, industry expertise, marketing abilities, etc. Then, allocate equity and roles accordingly.

    I’ve seen lopsided splits like 85/15% work fine when properly structured. Having the right partner is fantastic, but avoid leaving equity and control on the table by defaulting to equal splits.

    Deciding how to split equity can be uncomfortable, but if you’re not comfortable working through this with your cofounder, you may have bigger problems. Having this difficult conversation now may give you some insight into how you’ll work through difficult situations in the future.

    Related: How to Write a Business Plan

    3. Bad advice: Create a formal business plan

    Writing a beautifully crafted, 30-page business plan is part of the fun for many entrepreneurs. It’s where you let your dreams of target audience and sales projections run wild. But in reality, those lengthy documents are rarely useful. You don’t need to write a novel; you just need to be able to communicate the business clearly.

    Rather than getting bogged down in lengthy pages of written content, create a simple deck with 8 to 10 slides that cover the core elements: Problem to be solved, target customers, your solution, business model, go-to-market strategy and key financial projections. This should be enough to convey the critical information needed to evaluate, refine and communicate your business.

    Keep in mind that this document should change over time. There is no such thing as a bulletproof business plan, so as you learn more about the market, you can continue to revise and expand on your original.

    4. Bad advice: Focus on your product first

    Even though this is number four on the list, it’s probably the one I see most often. Most founders love thinking about their product and telling everyone they meet about it. They spend months (sometimes even years) designing how it looks, how it will work, and what it will feel like, all before a potential customer has even had the chance to use it.

    They want to make sure it’s perfect before they release it to the public. This is a massive mistake.

    We all know the famous line from the movie Field of Dreams, “If you build it, he will come.” But this Hollywood-crafted platitude shouldn’t be applied to the world of business today. In fact, focusing too much on your product in the early days is likely a waste of time. Most companies that reach $10 million a year in revenue are selling a product substantially different from what they started with.

    Instead of worrying about your product, focus on the problem you are trying to solve and the audience you are solving it for. One framework I’ve used for working through this is the Jobs to be Done theory by the late Havard professor Clay Christensen. In it, we are encouraged to look less at our product and hone in on what the customer hopes to accomplish by using our product. The theory states, “When we buy a product, we essentially “hire” it to help us do a job. If it does the job well, the next time we’re confronted with the same job, we tend to hire that product again.”

    5. Bad advice: Hire a C-level or exec assistant as your first hire

    Our final myth is about who your first hires should be.

    Too often, the advice is to hire a C-level team member. If you’re a non-technical founder, the advice is to hire a CTO; if you’re on the tech side, the advice is to hire a CMO. The problem with hiring for this role is that C-level employees are usually great at strategy and managing teams of people. This is useless when you’re just starting out, and there is no team to manage.

    What I’ve seen to be successful in the early stages is hiring someone who is hungry to work, hands-on and passionate about the business. In the early days of a business, one passionate developer who spends his days writing code is much more effective than a CTO managing a small team of devs. And it will save you tons of money. On the growth side, a jack-of-all-trades marketer who can write copy, create ads and jump on a sales call will bring more value for the money than a CMO who needs to hire a full team or an agency to accomplish the same tasks.

    Conversely, I see a lot of advice that says to work with an executive assistant or chief of staff as your first hire. In theory, this frees you up to focus on business growth.

    However, in those early days, you need every dollar to go towards impacting growth and revenue directly. Hiring administrative support roles early on creates more costs without driving revenue. As the founder, you may need to wear many hats in the beginning. But adding team members that don’t contribute to the bottom line can become a financial drain when you’re least equipped to handle it.

    Instead, your first hires should directly generate revenue — whether it’s sales, marketing or development. These roles will provide a positive ROI from day one. I like to hire people better than me at critical functions to grow the business, even if I’m really good at it myself. That way, they not only pay for themselves but accelerate top-line revenue faster than I could alone.

    Adding “doers” who just cost money before “makers” who drive revenue is a common rookie mistake. Prioritize hiring people who directly impact growth, revenue and cash flow from day one.

    Final thoughts

    The path to small business success isn’t following generic advice — it’s rigorously testing assumptions and then focusing limited resources on what will have the greatest impact based on your unique business model and goals. With the right strategic foundation in place, you can build a profitable, sustainable company without chasing arbitrary startup milestones. These lessons from my experience help you avoid some of the most common pitfalls I see derail countless entrepreneurs.

    [ad_2]

    Pedro Sostre

    Source link

  • Sweden: Traces of explosives found at Baltic Sea pipelines

    Sweden: Traces of explosives found at Baltic Sea pipelines

    [ad_1]

    HELSINKI — Investigators found traces of explosives at the Baltic Sea site where two natural pipelines were damaged in an act of “gross sabotage,” the prosecutor leading Sweden’s preliminary investigation said Friday.

    Mats Ljungqvist of the Swedish Prosecution Authority said the investigators carefully documented the area where the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines ruptured in September, causing significant methane leaks. The parallel undersea pipelines run from Russia to Germany.

    “Analysis carried out shows traces of explosives on several of the foreign objects that were found” at the site, Ljungqvist said in a statement.

    The prosecution authority said the preliminary investigation was “very complex and comprehensive” and further scrutiny would show whether anyone could be charged “with suspicion of crime.”

    Investigators in Sweden, Denmark and Germany are looking into what happened. Danish officials confirmed in October that there was extensive damage to the pipelines caused by “powerful explosions.”

    The leaks, which stopped after several days, occurred in international waters but within the exclusive economic zones of Denmark and Sweden. Investigators have not given indications of whom they think might be responsible but reported earlier that the blasts were likely to have involved several hundred pounds of explosives.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday it was “very important to find those who are behind the explosion.”

    Sweden’s findings of “a sabotage act or a terrorist act — you can call it whatever you like” confirm “the information that the Russian side has had,” Peskov said. Moscow needs to wait for a full damage assessment to decide whether to repair the pipelines, he said.

    Nord Stream 1 carried Russian gas to Germany until Moscow cut off supplies at the end of August. Nord Stream 2 never entered service as Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine in February.

    The governments of Denmark, Germany and Sweden have refrained from speculating over who may be behind the sabotage, saying only that there’s no sufficient proof yet to identify the perpetrator.

    But some Nordic and other European media outlets have pointed a finger of blame on Moscow, hosting military experts suggesting that Russia has all the resources to carry out such a precise attack requiring careful advance planning.

    Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, said late September it was “very obvious” who was responsible of the pipeline sabotage, suggesting Russia’s involvement.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused the West of blowing up the pipelines and singled out the United States as profiting from attacks on Europe’s energy infrastructure.

    Earlier this week, Germany marked the completion of port facilities for the first of five planned liquefied natural gas terminals it is scrambling to get running as it replaces the Russian pipeline gas that once accounted for more than half its supplies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fears over Russian threat to Norway’s energy infrastructure

    Fears over Russian threat to Norway’s energy infrastructure

    [ad_1]

    STAVANGER, Norway (AP) — Norwegian oil and gas workers normally don’t see anything more threatening than North Sea waves crashing against the steel legs of their offshore platforms. But lately they have noticed a more troubling sight: unidentified drones buzzing in the skies overhead.

    With Norway replacing Russia as Europe’s main source of natural gas, military experts suspect the unmanned aircraft are Moscow’s doings. They list espionage, sabotage and intimidation as possible motives for the drone flights.

    The Norwegian government has sent warships, coastguard vessels and fighter jets to patrol around the offshore facilities. Norway’s national guard stationed soldiers around onshore refineries that also were buzzed by drones.

    Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has invited the navies of NATO allies Britain, France and Germany to help address what could be more than a Norwegian problem.

    Precious little of the offshore oil that provides vast income for Norway is used by the country’s 5.4 million inhabitants. Instead, it powers much of Europe. Natural gas is another commodity of continental significance.

    “The value of Norwegian gas to Europe has never been higher,” Ståle Ulriksen, a researcher at the Royal Norwegian Naval Academy, said. “As a strategic target for sabotage, Norwegian gas pipelines are probably the highest value target in Europe.”

    Closures of airports, and evacuations of an oil refinery and a gas terminal last week due to drone sightings caused huge disruptions. But with winter approaching in Europe, there is worry the drones may portend a bigger threat to the 9,000 kilometers (5,600 miles) of gas pipelines that spider from Norway’s sea platforms to terminals in Britain and mainland Europe.

    Since the start of the war in Ukraine in late February, European Union countries have scrambled to replace their Russian gas imports with shipments from Norway. The suspected sabotage of the Nordstream I and II pipelines in the Baltic Sea last month happened a day before Norway opened a new Baltic pipeline to Poland.

    Amund Revheim, who heads the North Sea and environment group for Norway’s South West Police force, said his team interviewed more than 70 offshore workers who have spotted drones near their facilities.

    “The working thesis is that they are controlled from vessels or submarines nearby,” Revheim said.

    Winged drones have a longer range, but investigators considered credible a sighting of a helicopter-style bladed model near the Sleipner platform, located in a North Sea gas field 250 kilometers (150 miles) from the coast.

    Norwegian police have worked closely with military investigators who are analyzing marine traffic. Some platform operators have reported seeing Russian-flagged research vessels in close vicinity. Revheim said no pattern has been established from legal marine traffic and he is concerned about causing unnecessary, disruptive worry for workers.

    But Ulriksen, of the naval academy, said the distinction between Russian civilian and military ships is narrow and the reported research vessels could fairly be described as “spy ships.”

    The arrest of at least seven Russian nationals caught either carrying or illegally flying drones over Norwegian territory has raised tensions. On Wednesday, the same day a drone sighting grounded planes in Bergen, Norway’s second-biggest city, the Norwegian Police Security Service took over the case from local officers.

    “We have taken over the investigation because it is our job to investigate espionage and enforce sanction rules against Russia,” Martin Bernsen, an official with the service known by the Norwegian acronym PST. He said the “sabotage or possible mapping” of energy infrastructure was an ongoing concern.

    Støre, the prime minister, warned that Norway would take action against foreign intelligence agencies. “It is not acceptable for foreign intelligence to fly drones over Norwegian airports. Russians are not allowed to fly drones in Norway,” he said.

    Russia’s Embassy in Oslo hit back Thursday, claiming that Norway was experiencing a form of “psychosis” causing “paranoia.”

    Naval academy researcher thinks that is probably part of the plan.

    “Several of the drones have been flown with their lights on,” he said. “They are supposed to be observed. I think it is an attempt to intimidate Norway and the West.”

    The wider concern is that they are part of a hybrid strategy to both intimidate and gather information on vital infrastructure, which could later be targeted for sabotage in a potential strike against the West.

    “I do not believe we are heading for a conventional war with Russia,” Ulriksen said. “But a hybrid war … I think we are already in it.”

    ___

    Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine: https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • West rejects Putin’s claim it sabotaged Baltic gas pipelines

    West rejects Putin’s claim it sabotaged Baltic gas pipelines

    [ad_1]

    COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday accused the West of sabotaging Russia-built natural gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea to Germany, a charge vehemently denied by the United States and its allies. Nordic nations said the undersea blasts that damaged the pipelines this week and have led to huge methane leaks involved several hundred pounds of explosives.

    The claim by Putin came ahead of an emergency meeting Friday at the U.N. Security Council in New York on the attacks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, and as Norwegian researchers published a map projecting that a huge plume of methane from the damaged pipelines will travel over large swaths of the Nordic region.

    Speaking Friday in Moscow at a ceremony to annex four regions of Ukraine into Russia, Putin claimed that “Anglo-Saxons” in the West have turned from imposing sanctions on Russia to “terror attacks,” sabotaging the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in what he described as an attempt to “destroy the European energy infrastructure.”

    He added that “those who profit from it have done it,” without naming a specific country.

    In Washington, U.S. President Joe Biden dismissed Putin’s pipeline claims as outlandish.

    “It was a deliberate act of sabotage. And now the Russians are pumping out disinformation and lies. We will work with our allies to get to the bottom (of) precisely what happened,” Biden promised, adding that divers would be sent down to inspect the pipelines. “Just don’t listen to what Putin’s saying. What he’s saying we know is not true.”

    U.S. officials said the Putin claim was trying to shift attention from his annexation Friday of parts of Ukraine.

    “We’re not going to let Russia’s disinformation distract us or the world from its transparently fraudulent attempt to annex sovereign Ukrainian territory,” White House National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said Friday.

    Moscow says it wants a thorough international probe to assess the damage to the pipelines, which were filled with gas but not supplying it to Europe. Putin’s spokesman has said “it looks like a terror attack, probably conducted on a state level.”

    European nations, which have been reeling under soaring energy prices caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have noted that it is Russia, not Europe, that benefits from chaos in the energy markets and spiking prices for energy.

    The U.S. has long opposed to the two pipelines and had repeatedly urged Germany to halt them, saying they increased Europe’s energy dependence on Russia and decreased its security. Since the war in Ukraine began in February, Russia has cut back supplies of natural gas sent to Europe to heat homes, generate electricity and run factories. European leaders have accused Putin of using “energy blackmail” to divide them in their strong support for Ukraine.

    Russia stopped gas flows through the 1,224-kilometer (760-mile) long Nord Stream 1 earlier this month, blaming technical problems, while the parallel Nord Stream 2 pipeline had never opened.

    Denmark and Sweden, meanwhile, said Friday that the explosions that rocked the Baltic Sea ahead of the huge methane leaks from the pipelines “probably corresponded to an explosive load of several hundred kilos (pounds).”

    The leaks occurred in international waters and ”have caused plumes of gas rising to the surface,” the two Scandinavian countries wrote in a letter to the United Nations.

    NATO has warned it would retaliate for any attacks on the critical infrastructure of its 30 member countries and joined other Western officials in citing sabotage as the likely cause of damage. Denmark is a NATO member, and Sweden is in the process of joining the military alliance. Both say the pipelines were deliberately attacked.

    At the U.N., Russia is a permanent member of the Security Council while neither Sweden or Denmark will be represented at the meeting Friday as they are not members.

    The Integrated Carbon Observation System, a European research alliance, said “an enormous amount of methane gas has been released into the atmosphere” from the damaged pipelines, about the amount of a whole year’s methane emissions for a city the size of Paris or a country like Denmark.

    “We assume the wind on the leak area blew the methane emissions north to the Finnish archipelago, then (the emissions) bend toward Sweden and Norway,” said Stephen Platt, a professor with the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, part of the group.

    The data was gathered from ground-based observations in Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Experts say these methane levels aren’t dangerous to public health but are a potent source of global warming.

    The suspected sabotage has produced two methane leaks off Sweden, including a large one above Nord Stream 1 and a smaller one above Nord Stream 2, and two leaks off Denmark.

    The Nord Stream 2 leak “has diminished, but is still ongoing,” the Swedish coast guard said, increasing its warnings for ships to stay 7 nautical miles (13 kilometers, 8 miles) from the blast areas.

    Nordic seismologists recorded explosions preceding the leaks. A first explosion was recorded early Monday southeast of the Danish island of Bornholm. A second, stronger blast northeast of the island hit that night and was equivalent to a magnitude-2.3 earthquake.

    Denmark and Sweden also said they were worried about the blasts’ “possible impact on the maritime life in the Baltic Sea.”

    Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said she would travel to London to discuss the gas leaks with British Prime Minister Liz Truss. She then will travel to Brussels to raise the issue with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and European Council President Charles Michel.

    The attacks on the pipelines have prompted energy companies and European governments to beef up security around energy infrastructure.

    The fear of further damage to Europe’s energy infrastructure has added pressure on natural gas prices, which are already high and have caused widespread economic pain across the continent.

    Authorities in Norway, a major oil and gas producer, have reported at least six drone sightings near offshore installations in the North Sea, prompting the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway to “urge increased vigilance.” Danish newspaper Ekstra Bladet said a drone was spotted Wednesday near a Danish offshore oil and gas installation in the North Sea.

    Sweden has also stepped up security around its three nuclear power plants.

    ———

    Follow all AP stories about climate change issues at https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment and stories about the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine.

    ———

    This story has been corrected to show that gas was not flowing now to Europe through the Nord Stream 1 or 2 pipelines.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Live Updates: Russia-Ukraine War

    Live Updates: Russia-Ukraine War

    [ad_1]

    KYIV, Ukraine — STOCKHOLM — A fourth leak to the Nord Stream pipelines conveying natural gas from Russia to Germany has been reported off southern Sweden.

    Earlier, three leaks had been reported on the two underwater pipelines. Seismologists detected two explosions were detected before reports of the leaks which officials believe were “deliberate actions.”

    Some experts have said Russia is likely to blame for any sabotage — it directly benefits from higher energy prices and economic anxiety across Europe.

    Sweden’s coast guards told Swedish news agency TT on Thursday that the fourth leak was off Sweden. All the leaks are in international waters.

    ———

    KEY DEVELOPMENTS:

    — Russia poised to annex occupied Ukrain e after sham vote

    — US: Focus new Russia sanctions on oil revenue, arms supplies

    — Europe ramps up energy security after suspected sabotage

    — Moscow tries to draft fleeing Russian men at the borders

    ———

    OTHER DEVELOPMENTS:

    KYIV — Authorities say Russian missile fire targeted the eastern Ukrainian city of Dnipro overnight, killing at least three people and wounded five others.

    Valentyn Reznichenko, the governor of the wider Dnipropetrovsk region, said fire damaged homes, a market, cars, buses and electrical lines.

    ——

    KYIV — Authorities say the hometown of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has again been targeted by Russian missile fire.

    Ukrainian military officials said Thursday a Russian Kh-59 missile struck Kryvyi Rih on Wednesday night. The Russian fire struck a grain depot while others were shot down.

    Kryvyi Rih is some 350 kilometers (215 miles) southeast of Kyiv.

    ——

    KYIV — The Ukrainian military says it is sending undertrained fighters to the battle front as it tries to reinforce its positions in the eastern Ukrainian city of Lyman.

    The Ukrainian military’s general staff said Thursday that of seven Russian tanks sent to Lyman recently, Russian troops crashed two of them on the way there.

    It also said troops manning the tanks did not undergo training on how to use the vehicle’s weapons.

    The Ukrainian military did not elaborate on how it knew about the tank unit’s condition. But Ukraine’s intelligence services have played purportedly intercepted phone calls of Russian troops complaining about their conditions on the front line.

    ——

    KYIV — Britain’s military says the number of Russian military-age men fleeing the country likely exceeds the number of forces Moscow used to initially invade Ukraine in February.

    The British Defense Ministry made the estimate in its daily intelligence briefing Thursday amid a Russian push to mobilize more troops to replenish losses its forces have suffered in Ukraine.

    The ministry said those who are financially better off and better educated are over-represented amongst those attempting to leave Russia.

    It added that the economic impact from the call-up as a result of a loss of labor in combination with a ‘brain drain’ “is likely to become increasingly difficult.”

    ——

    KYIV — A Washington-based think tank says Ukrainian soldiers continue to advance around a key northeastern city occupied by Russian forces and may soon encircle it entirely.

    The Institute for the Study of War, citing Russian reports, said Thursday that Ukrainian forces have taken more villages around Lyman, a city some 160 kilometers (100 miles) southeast of Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city.

    Lyman had been a key node in Russia’s front-line operations in the region before Ukrainian forces retook vast swathes of territory in the northeast earlier this month.

    The institute said a possible collapse of the Lyman pocket would allow Ukrainian troops to “threaten Russian positions along the western Luhansk” region.

    The institute suggested additional Russian losses would further erode morale amid a call-up of hundreds of thousands of men — the country’s first since World War II.

    — Follow the AP’s coverage of the war at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

    [ad_2]

    Source link