ReportWire

Tag: russia

  • Donald Trump Says ‘I Don’t Need International Law’ In Quest For World Dominance: ‘Only’ THIS ‘Can Stop Me’ – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Well, this is concerning…

    Donald Trump is once again serving up a quote that sounds less like a presidential soundbite and more like a rejected line from a supervillain origin movie. And yes, it’s as alarming as it is headline-ready.

    Related: Jimmy Kimmel THANKS Donald Trump?! Whoa!

    In a new interview with the New York Times that has everyone clutching their pearls, Trump made it clear that pesky little things like international laws, rules, and norms are more of a suggestion than an actual obstacle. When discussing his ever-expanding vision for American dominance on Thursday, he casually dropped this gem:

    “I don’t need international law. I’m not looking to hurt people.”

    Oh, okay! If you say so! Nothing says reassuring like dismissing international law in the same breath as claiming you’ll only have benevolent intentions… Yeah, tell that to the multiple civilians who’ve been killed of late..

    When the Times tried to gently nudge him back toward reality by pointing out that, yes, laws do apply, Trump doubled down with a rhetorical shrug that could be heard around the globe:

    “It depends what your definition of international law is.”

    WHAT?!

    Because definitions are so subjective, right? Gravity, laws, facts: all vibes-based, apparently. Sheesh…

    But wait, it gets better. According to Trump, there is exactly one thing holding him back from full-on global supremacy. And no, it’s not Congress, the courts, or literally the rest of the world. It’s this:

    “My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”

    Take a moment, y’all. Breathe. Scream into a pillow if needed.

    This interview lands just days after US forces under Trump’s direction seized Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores during strikes on the city of Caracas before shipping them off to face narco terrorism charges. Venezuela may have an interim leader now, but Trump has been boasting America is basically running the show.

    Related: Trump Makes Rare Melania Marriage Confession — Reveals What She ‘Hates’ About Him!

    And why stop there? Greenland is still on his wishlist, too. To that end, Trump explained to the Times on Thursday that being allies with Denmark simply isn’t enough. He wants full ownership of the land mass. In his own words:

    “Because that’s what I feel is psychologically needed for success. I think that ownership gives you a thing that you can’t do with, you’re talking about a lease or a treaty. Ownership gives you things and elements that you can’t get from just signing a document.”

    Add this to past musings about Colombia, Cuba, Iran, and Mexico, and suddenly this feels less like foreign policy and more like a Monopoly board where someone flipped the table.

    Buckle up, y’all. Apparently the only thing between us and Trump’s global takeover is… Trump. Yikes.

    [Image via MEGA/WENN]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • Trump greenlights Russian sanctions bill, paving way for 500% tariff on countries supporting Moscow: Graham

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Sen. Lindsey Graham announced Wednesday that President Donald Trump has approved a Russian sanctions bill designed to pressure Moscow to end its war with Ukraine.

    Graham revealed the development in a post on X, describing it as a pivotal shift in the U.S. approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. 

    “After a very productive meeting today with President Trump on a variety of issues, he greenlit the bipartisan Russia sanctions bill that I have been working on for months with Senator Blumenthal and many others,” Graham said. 

    “This will be well-timed, as Ukraine is making concessions for peace and Putin is all talk, continuing to kill the innocent.”

    TRUMP TOUTS ‘TREMENDOUS PROGRESS’ BUT SAYS HE’LL MEET PUTIN AND ZELENSKYY ‘ONLY WHEN’ PEACE DEAL IS FINAL

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol July 31, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

    According to the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, the bipartisan legislation is designed to grant Trump sweeping, almost unprecedented, authority to economically isolate Russia and penalize major global economies that continue to trade with Moscow and finance its war against Ukraine.

    Most notably, the bill would require the United States to impose a 500% tariff on all goods imported from any country that continues to purchase Russian oil, petroleum products or uranium. The measure would effectively squeeze Russia financially while deterring foreign governments from undermining U.S. sanctions.

    TRUMP CASTS MADURO’S OUSTER AS ‘SMART’ MOVE AS RUSSIA, CHINA ENTER THE FRAY

    President Donald Trump

    President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting at the White House Oct. 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “This bill will allow President Trump to punish those countries who buy cheap Russian oil fueling Putin’s war machine,” Graham said.

    “This bill would give President Trump tremendous leverage against countries like China, India and Brazil to incentivize them to stop buying the cheap Russian oil that provides the financing for Putin’s bloodbath against Ukraine.”

    Graham said voting could take place as early as next week and that he is looking forward to a strong bipartisan vote.

    US MILITARY SEIZES TWO SANCTIONED TANKERS IN ATLANTIC OCEAN

    Bella 1

    The vessel tanker Bella 1 was spotted in Singapore Strait after U.S. officials say the U.S. Coast Guard pursued an oil tanker in international waters near Venezuela. (Hakon Rimmereid/via Reuters)

    The move on the Russian sanctions bill follows another sharp escalation in America’s clampdown on Moscow. Earlier Wednesday, U.S. forces reportedly seized an oil tanker attempting to transport sanctioned Venezuelan oil to Russia.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Graham publicly celebrated the seizure in another post on X, describing it as part of a broader winning streak of U.S. intervention aimed at Venezuela and Cuba. 

    In the post, he also took aim at critics such as Sen. Rand Paul, who has opposed the bill, arguing that it would damage America’s trade relations with much of the world.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. military seizes Venezuela-linked oil tanker in the North Atlantic, officials say

    [ad_1]


    The U.S. carried out an operation Wednesday to seize the Marinera, a Venezuela-linked oil tanker formerly known as Bella-1, officials said.

    The U.S. European Command confirmed the seizure, saying the tanker was seized in the North Atlantic for violations of U.S. sanctions, and pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court after being tracked by USCGC Munro.

    The U.S. has been following the tanker since last month, CBS News first reported on Monday. The pursuit began during a pressure campaign on former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who was captured by U.S. forces last weekend. Two other oil tankers were seized by the U.S. last month.

    The Marinera — which has historically carried Venezuelan crude oil and was sanctioned by the Treasury Department — was previously flagged out of Panama. Like other tankers that were seized, it was sanctioned by U.S. authorities for its prior involvement in Iranian oil trading. It is now sailing under the Russian flag.

    A Russian submarine and other naval vessels had been deployed to escort the tanker as the U.S. followed it, two U.S. officials confirmed to CBS News on Tuesday.

    Reuters first reported that the seizure was underway on Wednesday.

    File photo: The vessel tanker Bella 1 at Singapore Strait in a picture taken from social media on March 18, 2025.

    Hakon Rimmereid/via REUTERS


    The Russian Maritime Register of Shipping lists the tanker as being ported out of Sochi, off the western coast of the Black Sea. The New York Times reported that the Russian government officially had asked the U.S. to stop all attempts to interdict the ship.  

    The two officials familiar with the Marinera seizure plans said earlier this week that the U.S. would rather seize the ship than sink it and that the operation could be similar to the one conducted last month when U.S. Marines and special operation forces working with the U.S. Coast Guard seized The Skipper, a large crude oil tanker flagged out of Guyana, after the vessel had left port in Venezuela.

    Ships like the Marinera and The Skipper are part of a so-called shadow fleet of ships that illegally transport oil from sanctioned nations like Russia, Iran and Venezuela.   

    Maduro has rejected U.S. allegations about how the vessels are being used and accuses the U.S. of plundering Venezuelan resources under the cover of law enforcement. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Re-Elected President of Central African Republic Invites Russia’s Putin to Visit, TASS Says

    [ad_1]

    MOSCOW, Jan 7 (Reuters) – The ‌newly ​re-elected president of ‌the Central African Republic, Faustin-Archange Touadera, ​has invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to visit ‍his country, Russian state ​news agency TASS reported on ​Wednesday.

    Moscow ⁠has become a key ally of Touadera in recent years, with CAR in 2018 becoming the first West and Central African nation to ‌bring in Russia’s Wagner mercenaries as the chronically ​unstable ‌nation sought to fend ‍off ⁠several rebel groups.

    Touadera, in power since 2016, won a third term in office, provisional results showed this week, securing an outright majority in the presidential election held on December 28.

    In ​a video interview with TASS, Touadera called Putin a “great leader” and said the Kremlin chief was “very attentive” to relations with Bangui.

    Commenting on preliminary election results showing Touadera in the lead, the Wagner Group wrote on its Telegram channel: “We have no doubt that the chosen course of maintaining ​order and peace will prevail.”

    Touadera’s victory is likely to further Russia’s interests in the country, including in gold and diamond ​mining.

    (Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Lucy PapachristouEditing by Andrew Osborn)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Russia Sends Submarine to Escort Tanker the US Tried to Seize off Venezuela, WSJ Reports

    [ad_1]

    Jan ‌6 (Reuters) – ​Russia has ‌deployed a ​submarine ‍and ​other ​naval vessels ⁠to escort an aging ‌oil tanker, Bella ​1, ‌the ‍Wall Street Journal ⁠reported on Tuesday , ​citing a U.S. official.

    Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

    (Reporting by Bipasha ​Dey in Bengaluru; Editing ​by Tom Hogue)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Trump says the US ‘needs’ Greenland for Arctic security. Here’s why

    [ad_1]

    Location, location, location: Greenland’s key position above the Arctic Circle makes the world’s largest island a key part of security strategy in the High North. But for whom?Increasing international tensions, global warming and the changing world economy have put Greenland at the heart of the debate over global trade and security, and U.S. President Donald Trump wants to make sure his country controls this mineral-rich country that guards the Arctic and North Atlantic approaches to North America.Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, a longtime U.S. ally that has rejected Trump’s overtures. Greenland’s own government also opposes U.S. designs on the island, saying the people of Greenland will decide their own future. The island, 80% of which lies above the Arctic Circle, is home to about 56,000 mostly Inuit people who until now have been largely ignored by the rest of the world.Here’s why Greenland is strategically important to Arctic security: Greenland sits off the northeastern coast of Canada, with more than two-thirds of its territory lying within the Arctic Circle. That has made it crucial to the defense of North America since World War II, when the U.S. occupied Greenland to ensure it didn’t fall into the hands of Nazi Germany and to protect crucial North Atlantic shipping lanes.Following the Cold War, the Arctic was largely an area of international cooperation. But climate change is thinning the Arctic ice, promising to create a northwest passage for international trade and reigniting competition with Russia, China and other countries over access to the region’s mineral resources.Video below: Stephen Miller says ‘obviously Greenland should be part of the United States’ Greenland is also a rich source of the so-called rare earth minerals that are a key component of mobile phones, computers, batteries and other gadgets that are expected to power the world’s economy in the coming decades.That has attracted the interest of the U.S. and other Western powers as they try to ease China’s dominance of the market for these critical minerals.Development of Greenland’s mineral resources is challenging because of the island’s harsh climate, while strict environmental controls have proved an additional bulwark against potential investors. The U.S. Department of Defense operates the remote Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, which was built after the U.S. and Denmark signed the Defense of Greenland Treaty in 1951. It supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance operations for the U.S. and NATO.Greenland also guards part of what is known as the GIUK (Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom) Gap, where NATO monitors Russian naval movements in the North Atlantic. Denmark is moving to strengthen its military presence around Greenland and in the wider North Atlantic. Last year, the government announced a roughly 14.6 billion kroner ($2.3 billion) agreement with parties including the governments of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, another self-governing territory of Denmark, to “improve capabilities for surveillance and maintaining sovereignty in the region.” The plan includes three new Arctic naval vessels, two additional long-range surveillance drones and satellite capacity.Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command is headquartered in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, and tasked with the “surveillance, assertion of sovereignty and military defense of Greenland and the Faroe Islands,” according to its website. It has smaller satellite stations across the island.The Sirius Dog Sled Patrol, an elite Danish naval unit that conducts long-range reconnaissance and enforces Danish sovereignty in the Arctic wilderness, is also stationed in Greenland. In 2018, China declared itself a “near-Arctic state” in an effort to gain more influence in the region. China has also announced plans to build a “Polar Silk Road” as part of its global Belt and Road Initiative, which has created economic links with countries around the world.Then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected China’s move, saying: “Do we want the Arctic Ocean to transform into a new South China Sea, fraught with militarization and competing territorial claims?”Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Russia is worried about NATO’s activities in the Arctic and will respond by strengthening its military capability in the polar region. European leaders’ concerns were heightened following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Stefanie Dazio in Berlin contributed to this report.

    Location, location, location: Greenland’s key position above the Arctic Circle makes the world’s largest island a key part of security strategy in the High North. But for whom?

    Increasing international tensions, global warming and the changing world economy have put Greenland at the heart of the debate over global trade and security, and U.S. President Donald Trump wants to make sure his country controls this mineral-rich country that guards the Arctic and North Atlantic approaches to North America.

    Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, a longtime U.S. ally that has rejected Trump’s overtures. Greenland’s own government also opposes U.S. designs on the island, saying the people of Greenland will decide their own future.

    The island, 80% of which lies above the Arctic Circle, is home to about 56,000 mostly Inuit people who until now have been largely ignored by the rest of the world.

    Here’s why Greenland is strategically important to Arctic security:

    Greenland sits off the northeastern coast of Canada, with more than two-thirds of its territory lying within the Arctic Circle. That has made it crucial to the defense of North America since World War II, when the U.S. occupied Greenland to ensure it didn’t fall into the hands of Nazi Germany and to protect crucial North Atlantic shipping lanes.

    Following the Cold War, the Arctic was largely an area of international cooperation. But climate change is thinning the Arctic ice, promising to create a northwest passage for international trade and reigniting competition with Russia, China and other countries over access to the region’s mineral resources.

    Video below: Stephen Miller says ‘obviously Greenland should be part of the United States’


    Greenland is also a rich source of the so-called rare earth minerals that are a key component of mobile phones, computers, batteries and other gadgets that are expected to power the world’s economy in the coming decades.

    That has attracted the interest of the U.S. and other Western powers as they try to ease China’s dominance of the market for these critical minerals.

    Development of Greenland’s mineral resources is challenging because of the island’s harsh climate, while strict environmental controls have proved an additional bulwark against potential investors.

    The U.S. Department of Defense operates the remote Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, which was built after the U.S. and Denmark signed the Defense of Greenland Treaty in 1951. It supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance operations for the U.S. and NATO.

    Greenland also guards part of what is known as the GIUK (Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom) Gap, where NATO monitors Russian naval movements in the North Atlantic.

    Denmark is moving to strengthen its military presence around Greenland and in the wider North Atlantic. Last year, the government announced a roughly 14.6 billion kroner ($2.3 billion) agreement with parties including the governments of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, another self-governing territory of Denmark, to “improve capabilities for surveillance and maintaining sovereignty in the region.”

    The plan includes three new Arctic naval vessels, two additional long-range surveillance drones and satellite capacity.

    Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command is headquartered in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, and tasked with the “surveillance, assertion of sovereignty and military defense of Greenland and the Faroe Islands,” according to its website. It has smaller satellite stations across the island.

    The Sirius Dog Sled Patrol, an elite Danish naval unit that conducts long-range reconnaissance and enforces Danish sovereignty in the Arctic wilderness, is also stationed in Greenland.

    In 2018, China declared itself a “near-Arctic state” in an effort to gain more influence in the region. China has also announced plans to build a “Polar Silk Road” as part of its global Belt and Road Initiative, which has created economic links with countries around the world.

    Then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected China’s move, saying: “Do we want the Arctic Ocean to transform into a new South China Sea, fraught with militarization and competing territorial claims?”

    Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Russia is worried about NATO’s activities in the Arctic and will respond by strengthening its military capability in the polar region. European leaders’ concerns were heightened following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    Stefanie Dazio in Berlin contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian family brings abandoned graves back to life

    [ad_1]

    Fearful that memories of the deceased could fade away, Natalia Kornilova and her family have made it their mission to bring Russia’s old cemeteries back to life, one gravestone at a time.

    Waves of post-Soviet emigration and a rapidly ageing population have left Russia with thousands of abandoned graves, many overgrown and covered with grime.

    Kornilova and her family have posted videos of them cleaning headstones that have racked up hundreds of thousands of views — but they say they are not motivated by the money.

    “As long as people are remembered, they are alive. And the graves we tidy up — those people are remembered,” Natalia told AFP.

    Every weekend, the family cleans abandoned graves in their hometown of Domodedovo, south of Moscow, meticulously scrubbing the headstones to reveal their inscriptions and the photographs sometimes attached to them.

    Natalia’s son Pavel has started accounts on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok where he posts before-and-after videos of the family cleaning graves.

    “At first, a headstone will be absolutely grimy. You can’t see the name, the surname, the dates, nothing at all. And after our cleaning, as if by magic, the names appear, and sometimes even images,” the 28-year-old told AFP, pointing to a drawing of a weeping baby rabbit etched onto an infant’s tomb.

    “We don’t take any money for this. No one pays us, and we don’t know the relatives of those buried there,” he stressed.

    But followers make small donations to buy plastic flowers that Pavel’s grandmother Lida places on the cleaned graves.

    Videos on the family’s YouTube channel, named “Babushka Lida” (Grandmother Lida), have clocked up hundreds of thousands of views.

    Their content has inspired others to take up grave cleaning, Pavel told AFP.

    “They’re even ready to clean up abandoned graves near their relatives’ plots in different cities across Russia and even around the world.”

    – ‘No-one left to come’ –

    “Unfortunately, many graves have been neglected,” Pavel said.

    “It’s not even because the relatives don’t want to come. Many may have moved to other cities or countries. And these are burials from the ’70s, ’60s — their closest relatives, their children, may already be elderly too, or perhaps have passed away, and there’s simply no one left to come.”

    In Russia, a country that spans 17 million square kilometres (more than six million square miles), people often move huge distances for a new job or family reasons.

    Nearly 11 million Russians have moved abroad since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, while close to a million left after Russia began its military offensive on Ukraine in 2022, according to estimates.

    The Russian diaspora ranks third in the world after India and Mexico, according to UN data.

    “The country is very large,” said Natalia Kornilova, whose family live across the world.

    But Russia can feel like a small place sometimes.

    “Once we accidentally came across a grave. It was our neighbours!” Natalia said.

    “We knew for sure they had no one left and no one to visit. And that’s exactly where it all began: we went there, cleaned up, and realised the scope of work was enormous.”

    Several private companies offer grave maintenance services, with prices ranging from 3,000 rubles ($40) to in excess of 16,000 rubles.

    Natalia and her sons do it for free.

    In the 1990s, a black market for cemetery plots flourished in Russia.

    Cemetery administrations illegally sold abandoned graves. The old headstones would be removed and other people buried there, she said.

    The family’s efforts help prevent this, the 55-year-old told AFP.

    “And it really feels like people start to smile when we’ve finished,” she added.

    “We look at the photographs, and it seems the people smile back.”

    vvl-cad/tw/mjw

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cuba faces uncertain future after US topples Venezuelan leader Maduro

    [ad_1]

    Cuban officials on Monday lowered flags before dawn to mourn 32 security officers they say were killed in the U.S. weekend strike in Venezuela, the island nation’s closest ally, as residents here wonder what the capture of President Nicolás Maduro means for their future.The two governments are so close that Cuban soldiers and security agents were often the Venezuelan president’s bodyguards, and Venezuela’s petroleum has kept the economically ailing island limping along for years. Cuban authorities over the weekend said the 32 had been killed in the surprise attack “after fierce resistance in direct combat against the attackers, or as a result of the bombing of the facilities.”Related video above: What happens next: Venezuela’s future after U.S. capture of MaduroThe Trump administration has warned outright that toppling Maduro will help advance another decades-long goal: Dealing a blow to the Cuban government. Severing Cuba from Venezuela could have disastrous consequences for its leaders, who on Saturday called for the international community to stand up to “state terrorism.”On Saturday, Trump said the ailing Cuban economy will be further battered by Maduro’s ouster.“It’s going down,” Trump said of Cuba. “It’s going down for the count.” Loss of key supporterMany observers say Cuba, an island of about 10 million people, exerted a remarkable degree of influence over Venezuela, an oil-rich nation with three times as many people. At the same time, Cubans have long been tormented by constant blackouts and shortages of basic foods. And after the attack, they woke to the once-unimaginable possibility of an even grimmer future.“I can’t talk. I have no words,” 75-year-old Berta Luz Sierra Molina said as she sobbed and placed a hand over her face.Even though 63-year-old Regina Méndez is too old to join the Cuban military, she said that “we have to stand strong.”“Give me a rifle, and I’ll go fight,” Méndez said.Maduro’s government was shipping an average of 35,000 barrels of oil daily over the last three months, about a quarter of total demand, said Jorge Piñón, a Cuban energy expert at the University of Texas at Austin Energy Institute.“The question to which we don’t have an answer, which is critical: Is the U.S. going to allow Venezuela to continue supplying Cuba with oil?” he said.Piñón noted that Mexico once supplied Cuba with 22,000 barrels of oil a day before it dropped to 7,000 barrels after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Mexico City in early September.“I don’t see Mexico jumping in right now,” Piñón said. “The U.S. government would go bonkers.”Ricardo Torres, a Cuban economist at American University in Washington, said that “blackouts have been significant, and that is with Venezuela still sending some oil.”“Imagine a future now in the short term losing that,” he said. “It’s a catastrophe.”Piñón noted that Cuba doesn’t have the money to buy oil on the international market.“The only ally that they have left out there with oil is Russia,” he said, noting that it sends Cuba about 2 million barrels a year.“Russia has the capability to fill the gap. Do they have the political commitment, or the political desire to do so? I don’t know,” he said.Torres also questioned whether Russia would extend a hand.“Meddling with Cuba could jeopardize your negotiation with the U.S. around Ukraine. Why would you do it? Ukraine is far more important,” he said.Torres said Cuba should open its doors to the private sector and market and reduce its public sector, moves that could help prompt China to step in and help Cuba.“Do they have an alternative? I don’t think they do,” he said.Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industryOn Monday, Trump told NBC News in an interview that the U.S. government could reimburse oil companies making investments in Venezuela to maintain and increase oil production in that country.He suggested that the necessary rebuilding of the country’s neglected infrastructure for extracting and shipping oil could happen in less than 18 months.“I think we can do it in less time than that, but it’ll be a lot of money,” Trump said. “A tremendous amount of money will have to be spent and the oil companies will spend it, and then they’ll get reimbursed by us or through revenue.”It still remains unclear how quickly the investment could occur given the uncertainties about Venezuela’s political stability and the billions of dollars needed to be spent.Venezuela produces on average about 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, down from the 3.5 million barrels a day produced in 1999 before a government takeover of the majority of oil interests and a mix of corruption, mismanagement and U.S. economic sanctions led output to fall.___Coto reported from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Associated Press reporters Milexsy Durán in Havana, Isabel DeBre in Buenos Aires and Joshua Boak in Washington, D.C., contributed.

    Cuban officials on Monday lowered flags before dawn to mourn 32 security officers they say were killed in the U.S. weekend strike in Venezuela, the island nation’s closest ally, as residents here wonder what the capture of President Nicolás Maduro means for their future.

    The two governments are so close that Cuban soldiers and security agents were often the Venezuelan president’s bodyguards, and Venezuela’s petroleum has kept the economically ailing island limping along for years. Cuban authorities over the weekend said the 32 had been killed in the surprise attack “after fierce resistance in direct combat against the attackers, or as a result of the bombing of the facilities.”

    Related video above: What happens next: Venezuela’s future after U.S. capture of Maduro

    The Trump administration has warned outright that toppling Maduro will help advance another decades-long goal: Dealing a blow to the Cuban government. Severing Cuba from Venezuela could have disastrous consequences for its leaders, who on Saturday called for the international community to stand up to “state terrorism.”

    On Saturday, Trump said the ailing Cuban economy will be further battered by Maduro’s ouster.

    “It’s going down,” Trump said of Cuba. “It’s going down for the count.”

    Loss of key supporter

    Many observers say Cuba, an island of about 10 million people, exerted a remarkable degree of influence over Venezuela, an oil-rich nation with three times as many people. At the same time, Cubans have long been tormented by constant blackouts and shortages of basic foods. And after the attack, they woke to the once-unimaginable possibility of an even grimmer future.

    “I can’t talk. I have no words,” 75-year-old Berta Luz Sierra Molina said as she sobbed and placed a hand over her face.

    Even though 63-year-old Regina Méndez is too old to join the Cuban military, she said that “we have to stand strong.”

    “Give me a rifle, and I’ll go fight,” Méndez said.

    Maduro’s government was shipping an average of 35,000 barrels of oil daily over the last three months, about a quarter of total demand, said Jorge Piñón, a Cuban energy expert at the University of Texas at Austin Energy Institute.

    “The question to which we don’t have an answer, which is critical: Is the U.S. going to allow Venezuela to continue supplying Cuba with oil?” he said.

    Piñón noted that Mexico once supplied Cuba with 22,000 barrels of oil a day before it dropped to 7,000 barrels after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Mexico City in early September.

    “I don’t see Mexico jumping in right now,” Piñón said. “The U.S. government would go bonkers.”

    Ricardo Torres, a Cuban economist at American University in Washington, said that “blackouts have been significant, and that is with Venezuela still sending some oil.”

    “Imagine a future now in the short term losing that,” he said. “It’s a catastrophe.”

    Piñón noted that Cuba doesn’t have the money to buy oil on the international market.

    “The only ally that they have left out there with oil is Russia,” he said, noting that it sends Cuba about 2 million barrels a year.

    “Russia has the capability to fill the gap. Do they have the political commitment, or the political desire to do so? I don’t know,” he said.

    Torres also questioned whether Russia would extend a hand.

    “Meddling with Cuba could jeopardize your negotiation with the U.S. around Ukraine. Why would you do it? Ukraine is far more important,” he said.

    Torres said Cuba should open its doors to the private sector and market and reduce its public sector, moves that could help prompt China to step in and help Cuba.

    “Do they have an alternative? I don’t think they do,” he said.

    Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industry

    On Monday, Trump told NBC News in an interview that the U.S. government could reimburse oil companies making investments in Venezuela to maintain and increase oil production in that country.

    He suggested that the necessary rebuilding of the country’s neglected infrastructure for extracting and shipping oil could happen in less than 18 months.

    “I think we can do it in less time than that, but it’ll be a lot of money,” Trump said. “A tremendous amount of money will have to be spent and the oil companies will spend it, and then they’ll get reimbursed by us or through revenue.”

    It still remains unclear how quickly the investment could occur given the uncertainties about Venezuela’s political stability and the billions of dollars needed to be spent.

    Venezuela produces on average about 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, down from the 3.5 million barrels a day produced in 1999 before a government takeover of the majority of oil interests and a mix of corruption, mismanagement and U.S. economic sanctions led output to fall.

    ___

    Coto reported from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Associated Press reporters Milexsy Durán in Havana, Isabel DeBre in Buenos Aires and Joshua Boak in Washington, D.C., contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Polar bear attacks and injures 3 family members in Russia

    [ad_1]


    Three members of a family, including a child, were injured by a polar bear in a rare attack in the far north of Siberia, Russian officials said Monday.

    Local police “received a report of a polar bear injuring people 40 kilometers (25 miles) from the village of Nosok” at a fishing spot, the regional interior ministry said on Telegram.

    Nosok is in the Krasnoyarsk region inside the Arctic Circle.

    “Three citizens, born in 1983, 2015 and 2006 have been injured in the polar bear attack,” the ministry said.

    The family was evacuated to safety and given immediate assistance.

    The ministry did not say how serious their injuries were but said one person may require hospitalization.

    Polar bear attacks on humans are considered extremely rare but experts say shrinking sea ice caused by global warming is pushing them to approach inhabited areas in search of food. Arctic temperatures are increasing at over double the global rate since 2006, according to a NOAA report released last month.

    In August 2024, a pair of polar bears attacked and killed a worker at a remote government radar site in the Canadian Arctic. Four months after that, a man was seriously injured as he tried to protect his wife from a polar bear attack in Northern Ontario, Canada.

    In 2023, a polar bear killed a woman and her young son in Wales, Alaska, just below the Arctic Circle. That marked the first fatal polar bear attack in 30 years in Alaska, the only U.S. state that is home to the animals.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • German Minister: Protection of Greenland Will Be Discussed Within NATO if Needed

    [ad_1]

    LONDON, Jan 5 (Reuters) – German Foreign ‌Minister ​Johann Wadephul said ‌on Monday that Greenland belonged to Denmark ​and that the NATO alliance could discuss strengthening its ‍protection if necessary.

    Wadephul was ​speaking after U.S. President Donald Trump made ​renewed threats ⁠to take over Greenland, a prospect that alarmed NATO allies and has taken on a new urgency after Trump followed through on threats to topple Venezuelan leader ‌Nicolas Maduro.

    Trump has repeatedly said he wants to ​take over ‌Greenland, an ambition first ‍voiced ⁠in 2019 during his first presidency.

    On Sunday, he told The Atlantic magazine in an interview: “We do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defence.”

    Speaking to reporters in Lithuania, Wadephul said Germany had questions about Maduro’s removal ​and stressed the Venezuelan people should determine their country’s future in free and fair elections, after Trump said the U.S. would run the country.

    On Greenland, Wadephul stressed it was part of Denmark.

    “And since Denmark is a member of NATO, Greenland will, in principle, also be subject to NATO defence,” he said.

    “And if there are further requirements ​to strengthen defence efforts concerning Greenland, then we will have to discuss this within the framework of the alliance.”

    He did not elaborate on the ​nature of those discussions.

    (Reporting by Matthias Williams, editing by Miranda Murray)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • GORDON SONDLAND: Trump’s realpolitik may be the only way to end the Ukraine war

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    For three years, the Washington foreign policy establishment has insisted that there is only one acceptable outcome in Ukraine: total victory over Russia achieved through relentless military aid, indefinite financial support, and escalation readiness regardless of the risks. But strategy and morality are not always the same thing — and real leadership demands confronting reality as it exists, not as we wish it to be.

    I write this not as an academic or pundit, but as someone who worked at the center of this conflict. As U.S. ambassador to the European Union during the first Trump administration, President Donald Trump tasked me with bringing Europe into alignment—truly into alignment—behind Ukraine. 

    That meant ending the EU’s habitual double-game: proclaiming solidarity with Kyiv while enriching Moscow through energy purchases and dragging its feet on serious sanctions. I saw firsthand how Europe’s hesitation and transactional approach sent Moscow exactly the wrong message. It told President Vladimir Putin the West was divided, unserious and ultimately unwilling to sacrifice comfort for principle. That perception was part of his calculus.

    PUTIN VOWS VICTORY IN UKRAINE IN NEW YEAR’S ADDRESS AMID TRUMP-BACKED PEACE TALKS

    The uncomfortable truth is that the United States is closer to strategic exhaustion than our rhetoric admits. Europe’s defense industries remain underbuilt. American stockpiles are finite. And while Russia has paid a staggering price, it has not collapsed, surrendered, or reversed course. Worse, every escalation increases the probability of something unthinkable: a desperate Kremlin resorting to tactical nuclear weapons. That would not be “just another step” on the escalatory ladder; it would fundamentally shatter global stability.

    Against that background, the Trump administration’s instinct to seek a quasi-business resolution is not weakness. It is classic realpolitik—recognition that the job of American leadership is to maximize U.S. security, economic leverage, and strategic flexibility while minimizing existential risk.

    Business leaders know what Washington too often does not: the perfect deal rarely exists. The question is not whether we can achieve a morally pure resolution; it is whether we can lock in outcomes that are measurably better for American interests—and for Ukraine—than a perpetual, bleeding stalemate.

    A negotiated settlement, backed by enforceable conditions and leverage, could do precisely that.

    First, a settlement can provide Ukraine with a bespoke security guarantee—credible enough to deter renewed aggression but structured to avoid NATO Article 5 entanglement. This isn’t a vague promise; it is a contract with clear performance terms. The U.S. guarantee would stand as long as Russia adheres to its commitments. But if Russia violates the agreement, the snapback provisions would trigger instantly—not months later, not after diplomatic waffling—immediately unlocking full-scale U.S. and NATO support for Ukraine, including offensive weapons, advanced air defense, training, and intelligence integration.

    President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shake hands at a news conference following a meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club on December 28, 2025, in Palm Beach, Florida. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

    TRUMP PUSHES PEACE IN EUROPE, PRESSURE IN THE AMERICAS — INSIDE THE TWO-FRONT GAMBLE

    Just as important, the consequences of Russian cheating would be explicit, not theoretical:

    If Moscow breaks the deal, the United States would reserve the option to openly back Ukraine in retaking every inch of territory—up to and including restoration to its pre-2014 borders. Moscow would know this going in. Deterrence works best when penalties are unmistakable.

    And crucially, this would all be public. No more pretending, hedging, or quiet back-channel shipments. The world—and Russia—would know that renewed aggression automatically and lawfully unleashes overwhelming Western support, with the U.S. leading confidently and unapologetically. That clarity is a deterrent in itself.

    ZELENSKYY SAYS PEACE DEAL IS CLOSE AFTER TRUMP MEETING BUT TERRITORY REMAINS STICKING POINT

    Equally important, this structure protects U.S. sovereignty in the agreement. If Ukraine violates its obligations, the American guarantee becomes void at our sole discretion. Not a bureaucratic process. Not a committee vote. The United States decides. That means Ukraine has every incentive to maintain discipline and treat the arrangement not as a blank check, but as a powerful partnership grounded in responsibility.

    Second, a negotiated deal can generate tangible U.S. economic advantage. Ukraine holds minerals and rare earths essential to American industry, national security, and technological supremacy. China knows this. Russia knows this. Only Washington’s old guard pretends resource control is not strategic policy. A structured agreement ensuring privileged U.S. access strengthens manufacturing, energy resilience, and economic security.

    Trump and Zelenskyy

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy listens to U.S. President Donald Trump, after Trump said that Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed willingness to help Ukraine “succeed,” during a press conference at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, in Palm Beach, Florida, on December 28, 2025.  (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

    Third, a settlement can wedge open the relationship between Moscow and Beijing. Right now, the war has pushed Russia completely into China’s arms. That alignment is bad for the United States and for global balance. A disciplined settlement begins unwinding that dependency. America doesn’t need friendship with Moscow; it needs leverage over it. Realpolitik is about advantage, not affection.

    PUTIN REJECTS KEY PARTS OF US PEACE PLAN AS KREMLIN OFFICIAL WARNS EUROPE FACES NEW WAR RISK: REPORT

    Fourth, a deal can compartmentalize strategic theaters. If Russia insists on regional influence, the U.S. can demand reciprocal space in our hemisphere—particularly in Venezuela, narcotics interdiction, and energy-linked criminal networks—reducing adversarial reach in the Americas.

    Critics will scream “Munich.” They always do. But Adolf Hitler was leading a rising ideological empire bent on global conquest. Russia is a demographically and economically declining power seeking regional positioning. Brutal, yes—but not irrational. Mature powers negotiate with rivals when negotiations produce superior outcomes.

    Others claim any deal rewards aggression. That assumes deterrence is binary—victory or failure. In reality, deterrence is layered.

    UKRAINE–RUSSIA AT A CROSSROADS: HOW THE WAR EVOLVED IN 2025 AND WHAT COMES NEXT

    A settlement that leaves Russia bloodied, sanctioned, strategically constrained, and facing automatic, overwhelming Western military escalation—potentially including U.S. support for Ukraine restoring its 2013 borders — if it cheats is not a reward. It is a warning carved into treaty stone.

    Meanwhile, the humanitarian and financial realities matter. Endless war means endless dead Ukrainians, shattered cities, and endless U.S. taxpayer exposure with no defined victory condition. That may thrill think tanks that never fight wars, but it is not serious governance.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

    Most importantly, a business-style settlement introduces accountability—currently absent from Washington’s “as long as it takes” mantra. Under a structured deal, compliance is measurable. Triggers are automatic. Support is not improvised—it is guaranteed. Enforcement is not theoretical—it is built in. And unlike today, America would no longer need to whisper its involvement. It would act openly, decisively, and with treaty authority.

    The alternative? A forever-war with rising nuclear risk, continued strategic drift, and deepening alignment between Russia and China. That is not strategy. It is inertia dressed as courage.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Realpolitik does not abandon values. It protects them intelligently. A disciplined, enforceable settlement—with clear snapback provisions benefiting both the U.S. and Ukraine; explicit authority to openly arm Ukraine and potentially support full territorial restoration if Russia cheats; and a guarantee revocable at America’s sole discretion if Ukraine violates terms—is not capitulation.

    It is strategic control.

    In geopolitics, as in business, the strongest player is not the one who insists on endless confrontation. It is the one who knows when to fight—and when to close the deal.

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM GORDON SONDLAND

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Says He Doesn’t Believe Ukraine Struck Putin Residence

    [ad_1]

    ABOARD AIR FORCE ‌ONE, ​Jan 4 (Reuters) – U.S. ‌President Donald Trump said ​he did not believe that an ‍alleged Ukrainian strike ​on President Vladimir ​Putin’s ⁠residence took place as claimed by Russia.

    “I don’t believe that strike happened,” Trump told reporters on Sunday aboard Air ‌Force One en route back to ​Washington, ‌D.C., from Florida. “There ‍is ⁠something that happened fairly nearby, but had nothing to do with this.”

    Moscow accused Kyiv on Monday of trying to strike a residence of Putin ​in Russia’s northern Novgorod region with 91 long-range attack drones, and said Russia would review its negotiating position in ongoing talks with the U.S. on ending the Ukraine war.

    Ukraine and Western countries have disputed Russia’s ​account of the alleged attempted strike.

    (Reporting by Gram Slattery aboard Air Force One and Lawrence ​Delevingne in Boston; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Russian Politicians Say Trump Strike on Venezuela Unlawful, Destabilising

    [ad_1]

    MOSCOW, Jan 4 (Reuters) – Russia’s Security Council deputy chairman ‌Dmitry ​Medvedev and a senior lawmaker said ‌over the weekend that U.S. President Donald Trump’s actions in Venezuela ​were unlawful and destabilising, while portraying them as a blunt assertion of U.S. interests.

    The comments followed Trump’s ‍statement that the United States struck ​Venezuela and that Maduro and his wife were captured and taken out of the country, ​prompting international ⁠reaction and calls for urgent UN discussions.

    Medvedev told TASS on Sunday that Trump’s behaviour was illegal but internally coherent because it pursued U.S. interests.

    “It must be acknowledged that, despite the obvious unlawfulness of Trump’s behaviour, one cannot deny a certain consistency in his actions. He and his ‌team defend their country’s national interests quite harshly,” Medvedev was quoted as saying.

    Medvedev said ​Latin America ‌was viewed as the ‍United States’ “backyard” and ⁠suggested Trump was seeking leverage over Venezuela’s oil supplies.

    “Uncle Sam’s main motivation has always been simple: other people’s supplies,” Medvedev said, according to TASS.

    He added that if such an operation were carried out against a stronger country, it would be seen as an act of war.

    Alexei Pushkov, a Russian senator who chairs a Federation Council commission on information policy, said the operation and Trump’s rhetoric might prove ​less effective than their dramatic impact.

    “One cannot deny that Trump’s actions and especially his statements are striking. Their effectiveness is another matter,” Pushkov said on the Telegram messaging app.

    He compared the episode to what he called premature U.S. declarations of victory in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, arguing that initial “triumphs” later turned into defeat or prolonged crises.

    Pushkov said the United States, by attacking Venezuela and seizing its president, had violated norms and “alarmed the whole world,” returning it to “the wild imperialism of the 19th century” and reviving a Wild West right to act at will in the Western Hemisphere.

    “But what ​will the final result be? Will this ‘triumph’ not turn into a catastrophe?” he said.

    Russia has long maintained close ties with Venezuela, spanning energy cooperation, military links and high-level political contacts, and Moscow has backed Caracas diplomatically for years as both countries seek ​to deepen trade and investment.

    (Reporting and writing by Vladimir Soldatkin and Lidia Kelly; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Stephen Coates)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Report: How Nations Are Reshaping Global Finance with Crypto

    [ad_1]

    TRM’s report shows crypto is now embedded in state economic and security planning, not treated as a fringe asset.

    A new report by blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs has revealed that governments around the world are no longer standing on the sidelines of crypto markets, with states from North Korea to Singapore actively putting blockchain networks to work as part of their national financial strategies.

    However, there’s a divide between how authoritarian and democratic governments use digital assets, and this, per the report, is turning crypto into a quiet but powerful force in global finance and geopolitics.

    Crypto Moves From Market Experiment to State Tool

    According to TRM, blockchain’s borderless design allows countries to move value outside traditional systems built around the U.S. dollar, SWIFT, and correspondent banking, with authoritarian regimes leaning heavily on this feature.

    North Korea stands out as the most aggressive example. The firm linked the country’s cyber units to exchange, DeFi, and bridge hacks worth billions of dollars, including the high-profile Bybit breach in February 2025.

    Investigators traced how stolen funds were routed through mixers, shifted across blockchains, converted into stablecoins, and eventually cashed out through over-the-counter brokers in Asia. Those proceeds, TRM said, flow back into Pyongyang’s missile and nuclear programs.

    Russia, for its part, has taken a different route since facing sweeping sanctions following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. While digital assets have not replaced traditional finance, TRM’s data shows they now play a supporting role in cross-border settlements with partners such as Iran, fundraising for pro-Russian groups, and large-scale mining operations that turn cheap energy into foreign currency.

    Meanwhile, Iran legalized Bitcoin mining in 2019 and, according to the report, has been using domestically mined BTC to pay for imports while bypassing payment restrictions.

    You may also like:

    A Split Path for Crypto’s Future

    Not all state use of crypto is adversarial. The study portrayed democratic governments as focusing on oversight, transparency, and market stability.

    In the U.S. and Europe, for instance, agencies are now relying on blockchain analytics to trace ransomware payments, enforce sanctions, and support cross-border investigations. Europe’s MiCA framework, now in force, requires strict licensing and monitoring for crypto firms, while U.S. regulators are still refining digital asset rules through bodies such as FinCEN and OFAC.

    Asia offers a more collaborative model, with Singapore’s Monetary Authority working closely with private firms on compliance technology, while Japan has strengthened exchange supervision following past hacks.

    Additionally, many central banks in the region are testing government-issued digital currencies and tokenized reserves, borrowing ideas from public blockchains while keeping tight state control.

    The contrast is stark. Where North Korea uses crypto to dodge restrictions and fund weapons, countries like Singapore and those in the EU have applied similar tools to modernize payments and supervision. TRM argued that the difference comes down to visibility and enforcement. Public blockchains record every transaction, but only strong analytics and cooperation can turn that data into accountability.

    As crypto markets continue to mature, the report suggests this divide will widen. Authoritarian states are likely to keep probing digital assets for workarounds, while democratic governments will push for rules that tie innovation to oversight.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

    SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

    [ad_2]

    Wayne Jones

    Source link

  • To ‘run’ Venezuela, Trump presses existing regime to kneel

    [ad_1]

    Top officials in the Trump administration clarified their position on “running” Venezuela after seizing its president, Nicolás Maduro, over the weekend, pressuring the regime that remains in power there Sunday to acquiesce to U.S. demands on oil access and drug enforcement, or else face further military action.

    Their goal appears to be the establishment of a pliant vassal state in Caracas that keeps the current government — led by Maduro for more than a decade — largely in place, but finally defers to the whims of Washington after turning away from the United States for a quarter century.

    It leaves little room for the ascendance of Venezuela’s democratic opposition, which won the country’s last national election, according to the State Department, European capitals and international monitoring bodies.

    Trump and his top aides said they would try to work with Maduro’s handpicked vice president and current interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, to run the country and its oil sector “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” offering no time frame for proposed elections.

    Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem underscored the strategy in a series of interviews Sunday morning.

    “If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,” Trump told the Atlantic, referring to Rodríguez. “Rebuilding there and regime change, anything you want to call it, is better than what you have right now. Can’t get any worse.”

    Rubio said that a U.S. naval quarantine of Venezuelan oil tankers would continue unless and until Rodríguez begins cooperating with the U.S. administration, referring to the blockade — and the lingering threat of additional military action from the fleet off Venezuela’s coast — as “leverage” over the remnants of Maduro’s regime.

    “That’s the sort of control the president is pointing to when he says that,” Rubio told CBS News. “We continue with that quarantine, and we expect to see that there will be changes — not just in the way the oil industry is run for the benefit of the people, but also so that they stop the drug trafficking.”

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told CNN that he had been in touch with the administration since the Saturday night operation that snatched Maduro and his wife from their bedroom, whisking them away to New York to face criminal charges.

    Trump’s vow to “run” the country, Cotton said, “means the new leaders of Venezuela need to meet our demands.”

    “Delcy Rodríguez, and the other ministers in Venezuela, understand now what the U.S. military is capable of,” Cotton said, while adding: “It is a fact that she and other indicted and sanctioned individuals are in Venezuela. They have control of the military and security forces. We have to deal with that fact. But that does not make them the legitimate leaders.”

    “What we want is a future Venezuelan government that will be pro-American, that will contribute to stability, order and prosperity, not only in Venezuela but in our own backyard. That probably needs to include new elections,” Cotton added.

    Whether Rodríguez will cooperate with the administration is an open question.

    Trump said Saturday that she seemed amenable to making “Venezuela great again” in a conversation with Rubio. But the interim president delivered a speech hours later demanding Maduro’s return, and vowing that Venezuela would “never again be a colony of any empire.”

    The developments have concerned senior figures in Venezuela’s democratic opposition, led by Maria Corina Machado, last year’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and Edmundo González Urrutia, the opposition candidate who won the 2024 presidential election that was ultimately stolen by Maduro.

    In his Saturday news conference, Trump dismissed Machado, saying that the revered opposition leader was “a very nice woman,” but “doesn’t have the respect within the country” to lead.

    Elliott Abrams, Trump’s special envoy to Venezuela in his first term, said he was skeptical that Rodríguez — an acolyte of Hugo Chávez and avowed supporter of Chavismo throughout the Maduro era — would betray the cause.

    “The insult to Machado was bizarre, unfair — and simply ignorant,” Abrams told The Times. “Who told him that there was no respect for her?”

    Maduro was booked in New York and flown by night over the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where he is in federal custody at a notorious facility that has housed other famous inmates, including Sean “Diddy” Combs, Ghislaine Maxwell, Bernie Madoff and Sam Bankman-Fried.

    He is expected to be arraigned on federal charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices as soon as Monday.

    While few in Washington lamented Maduro’s ouster, Democratic lawmakers criticized the operation as another act of regime change by a Republican president that could have violated international law.

    “The invasion of Venezuela has nothing to do with American security. Venezuela is not a security threat to the U.S.,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut. “This is about making Trump’s oil industry and Wall Street friends rich. Trump’s foreign policy — the Middle East, Russia, Venezuela — is fundamentally corrupt.”

    In their Saturday news conference, and in subsequent interviews, Trump and Rubio said that targeting Venezuela was in part about reestablishing U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere, reasserting the philosophy of President James Monroe as China and Russia work to enhance their presence in the region. The Trump administration’s national security strategy, published last month, previewed a renewed focus on Latin America after the region faced neglect from Washington over decades.

    Trump left unclear whether his military actions in the region would end in Caracas, a longstanding U.S. adversary, or if he is willing to turn the U.S. armed forces on America’s allies.

    In his interview with the Atlantic, Trump suggested that “individual countries” would be addressed on a case-by-case basis. On Saturday, he reiterated a threat to the president of Colombia, a major non-NATO ally, to “watch his ass,” over an ongoing dispute about Bogota’s cooperation on drug enforcement.

    On Sunday morning, the United Nations Security Council was called for an urgent meeting to discuss the legality of the U.S. operation inside Venezuela.

    It was not Russia or China — permanent members of the council and longstanding competitors — who called the session, nor France, whose government has questioned whether the operation violated international law, but Colombia, a non-permanent member who joined the council less than a week ago.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • Russia, China and Iran condemn U.S. action in Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    Russia, China and Iran have all publicly condemned the U.S. action in Venezuela. CBS News producer Leigh Kiniry has the latest.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Latvia PM Says Baltic Sea Optical Cable Has Been Damaged

    [ad_1]

    VILNIUS, Jan 4 (Reuters) – An ‌optical ​cable belonging ‌to a private company has been ​damaged in the Baltic Sea, Latvia’s ‍Prime Minister Evika Silina ​said in a statement ​on ⁠Sunday, adding that the circumstances of the incident were under investigation.

    The cable connects Lithuania and Latvia, and it was not ‌immediately clear what had caused the incident, ​Lithuania’s ‌National Crisis Management ‍Centre said ⁠in a separate statement.

    The Baltic Sea region is on high alert after a string of power cable, telecom link and gas pipeline outages since Russia ​invaded Ukraine in 2022, and the NATO military alliance has boosted its presence with frigates, aircraft and naval drones.

    The latest incident is made public five days after Finnish police seized a cargo vessel en route from Russia to Israel on suspicion ​of sabotaging an undersea telecoms cable running from Helsinki across the Gulf of Finland to Estonia.

    (Reporting by Andrius ​Sytas, editing by Terje Solsvik and Gwladys Fouche)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Turkey’s Erdogan Says He Will Discuss Ukraine, Gaza With Trump on Monday

    [ad_1]

    ANKARA, Jan ‌2 (Reuters) – ​Turkish President ‌Tayyip Erdogan said ​he would ‍have a phone ​call ​with ⁠U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday to discuss peace efforts ‌between Ukraine and ​Russia as ‌well ‍as issues surrounding ⁠Gaza.

    Speaking to reporters in Istanbul on Friday, Erdogan also ​said Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan will attend a meeting of the “Coalition of the Willing”, a group of nations backing Ukraine, ​in Paris in coming days.

    (Reporting by Huseyin Hayatsever; ​Editing by Jonathan Spicer )

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Russia and Ukraine Trade Allegations of Civilian Attacks on New Year’s Day

    [ad_1]

    KYIV, Jan 1 (Reuters) – Russia and Ukraine accused each other of targeting civilians over the New ‌Year, ​with Moscow reporting a deadly strike on a hotel in ‌territory it occupies in southern Ukraine while Kyiv said there had been another broad attack on its power supplies.

    The reports ​coincide with intensive talks aimed at bringing an end to the nearly four-year-old war, overseen by U.S. President Donald Trump. Both countries have said the other is doing all it can to influence ‍his views and shape the outcome.

    “On New Year, ​Russia deliberately brings war. Over 200 attack drones were launched onto Ukraine in the night,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on Telegram, saying energy infrastructure in seven regions across Ukraine had ​been targeted.

    Russia accused Ukraine ⁠of killing at least 24 people, including a child, in a drone strike on a hotel and cafe where civilians were seeing in the New Year in a Russian-controlled part of the Kherson region in southern Ukraine.

    Ukraine’s military, which has accused Russia of killing many civilians in its own attacks on Ukrainian cities, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Zelenskiy said that Russia’s holiday season attacks showed Ukraine could not afford delays in air defence supplies.

    “(Our) allies have the names of equipment which we ‌are lacking. We expect that everything agreed with the United States at the end of December for our defence will arrive on time,” he said, without ​clarifying further.

    RUSSIANS ‌ALLEGE ‘WAR CRIME’

    Vladimir Saldo, the Russian-installed governor ‍of the region, said three Ukrainian drones ⁠had hit the celebrations in Khorly, a coastal village, in what he said was a “deliberate strike” against civilians. He said that many people had been burnt alive.

    Russia’s Foreign Ministry said that as well as the 24 dead, 50 people had been injured, including six minors who were being treated in hospital.

    “There is no doubt that the attack was planned in advance, with drones deliberately targeting areas where civilians had gathered to celebrate New Year’s Eve,” the ministry said in a statement, calling the attack a “war crime”.

    On Monday, Moscow accused Kyiv of trying to strike a residence of President Vladimir Putin. Ukrainian and European officials have said the incident did not happen and U.S. security officials were also reported to have found that Ukraine did not target the residence. ​Russia said on Thursday it would send Washington proof.

    Reuters was not able to immediately verify the reported Kherson region attack or photographs of what Saldo’s press service said was the aftermath on Thursday.

    The images showed at least one dead body was visible beneath a white sheet. The building showed signs that a fire had raged and there were what looked like blood stains on the ground. Russia’s TASS news agency published video showing drone fragments, some with Ukrainian writing on them.

    Ukrainian officials regularly report civilian deaths from Russian air attacks, including in the Ukrainian-held city of Kherson, which lies near the front line.

    The Ukrainian governor of Kherson region, Oleksandr Prokudin, said that one man had been killed and an 87-year-old woman injured in attacks on the city on Thursday, posting a video showing the woman’s badly damaged apartment.

    Ukraine’s deputy prime minister Oleksiy Kuleba said rail facilities had been attacked in three regions, including a locomotive depot and a station in the frontline region of Sumy.

    The Russian defence ministry said on Thursday its strikes had hit military targets, as well as energy infrastructure ​which it claimed was being used to support Ukraine’s military.

    In a separate report, Russia-appointed Saldo said later that a five-year-old child had been killed and three more people injured in a Ukrainian drone strike on a car near Tarasivka, another coastal village, close to Khorly. He did not provide evidence.

    Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, told TASS that those who carried out the hotel attack and their commanders should be targeted.

    Kherson is one of four regions ​in Ukraine which Russia claimed as its own in 2022, a move Kyiv and most Western countries denounced as an illegal land grab.

    (Reporting by Max Hunder and Reuters bureaux; writing by Philippa Fletcher; editing by Ros Russell)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Russia Says It Will Give U.S. Proof of Attempted Ukrainian Strike on Putin Residence

    [ad_1]

    MOSCOW, Jan 1 (Reuters) – Russia said on Thursday ‌it ​had extracted and decoded ‌a file from a Ukrainian drone downed earlier this ​week that it said shows it had been targeting a Russian presidential residence and ‍that it would hand ​over the relevant information to the United States.

    Moscow accused Kyiv on Monday ​of ⁠trying to strike a residence of President Vladimir Putin in Russia’s northern Novgorod region with 91 long-range attack drones. It said Russia would review its negotiating position in ongoing talks with the U.S. on ending the Ukraine war.

    Ukraine ‌and Western countries have disputed Russia’s account of the alleged attempted ​strike.

    In a ‌statement posted on Telegram ‍on ⁠Thursday, Russia’s Defence Ministry said: “Decryption of routing data revealed that the final target of the Ukrainian drone attack on December 29, 2025, was a facility at the Russian Presidential Residence in the Novgorod region.”

    “These materials will be transferred to the American side through the established channels,” it added.

    The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday ​that U.S. national security officials had found Ukraine did not target Putin or one of his residences in a drone strike. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

    U.S. President Donald Trump initially expressed sympathy for the Russian charge, telling reporters on Monday that Putin had informed him of the alleged incident and that he was “very angry” about it.

    By Wednesday, Trump appeared more sceptical, sharing on social media a New York Post editorial accusing Russia of blocking peace ​in Ukraine.

    Ukraine has denied carrying out such an attack and described the accusation as part of a Russian disinformation campaign meant to drive a wedge between Kyiv and Washington after a weekend meeting ​between Trump and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

    (Reporting by Reuters, Writing by Felix LightEditing by Gareth Jones)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link