ReportWire

Tag: Rotterdam Film Festival

  • ‘Moonglow’ Review: An Elegantly Crafted if Dramatically Sluggish Film Noir Throwback from the Philippines

    [ad_1]

    It’s easy to be allured by writer-director Isabel Sandoval’s new feature, Moonglow, which has the filmmaker returning to her native Philippines for a vintage crime story filled with passion, murder, blackmail, bribery and bullets, even if the latter only go flying at the very end. Elegantly lensed and colorfully designed, this film noir time capsule has shades of both Chinatown and In the Mood for Love, setting an impossible romance against the corrupt backdrop of Ferdinand Marcos’ dictatorship circa 1979.

    As intriguing as all that sounds, and as lovely as the movie looks, Moonglow is less easy to watch than it is to admire. Slow-burn to a fault, with story twists we see coming a long time before they happen, it lacks the suspense any good thriller needs, while laconic performances don’t exactly keep viewers on the edge of their seats. Premiering in competition at Rotterdam, the film confirms Sandoval’s eye for graceful visual storytelling; perhaps next time she can raise the tension level a few notches.

    Moonglow

    The Bottom Line

    A slow-burn crime romance with more ambience than suspense.

    Venue: International Film Festival Rotterdam (Big Screen Competition)
    Cast: Isabel Sandoval, Arjo Atayde, Dennis Marasigan, Paolo O’Hara, Bombi Plata, Agot Isidro
    Director-screenwriter: Isabel Sandoval

    1 hour 48 minutes

    The director, who grew up in the Philippines but was educated in the U.S., made waves in 2019 when her third feature, Lingua Franca, became the first movie by a trans filmmaker of color to play a major section in Venice. She’s since helmed episodes of TV series like Under the Banner of Heaven, Tell Me Lies and The Summer I Turned Pretty, while continuing to write, direct and/or star in short films on the side.

    Sandoval is both behind and in front of the camera in Moonglow, playing a scheming if ultimately tenderhearted femme fatale with the classic film noir name of Dahlia. In the first scene, we see her roaming Manila on a quiet tropical night, slipping into an empty house and robbing a safe like an expert cat burglar. Later, Dahlia returns to working for local police chief Bernal (Dennis Marasigan), who we learn is the victim of her crime.

    That early twist means the audience is already way ahead of the cops, who spend more than half the movie trying to pinpoint the culprit. To do so, Bernal enlists his nephew, Charlie (Arjo Atayde), a lawyer who’s been working in America and has come home to take care of his ailing father. Constant flashbacks to a night twelve years earlier reveal that Dahlia and Charlie have a romantic past, which flares up again when the latter’s investigation tosses him back into the sights of the woman he loved.

    If movies like Out of the Past or Double Indemnity come to mind, that seems to be very much intended. Sandoval was clearly inspired by such crime classics, as well as by the swooning star-crossed lovers captured so stylishly by Wong Kar-wai. Moonglow channels some of the sultry, smoky atmosphere of those films, with Isaac Banks’ shadowy cinematography turning Manila into a colorful setting for all the double-crossings and back-stabbings, as well as a few heavy glances between the two leads.

    Where the film falters is in its plodding rhythm and clunky dialogue, much of which is delivered too flatly by actors who don’t exactly steal their scenes. There are times in which Moonglow feels like an amateur production, even if the craft level remains high and Sandoval’s earnestness in capturing the genre’s essence feels admirable. But her movie piques our interest rather than grabbing us by the throat the way a good crime flick should.

    Very much like in Chinatown, Dahlia’s initial robbery eventually opens up a can of worms that exposes citywide corruption, including a scandal in which arson was used to clear slums for new real estate developments. The way Sandoval rolls her country’s troubled past into a genre plot recalls another recent tropical thriller, Kleber Mendonça Filho’s The Secret Agent, although Moonglow lacks the retro artiness of that movie.

    What it does have is plenty of old-school ambience, as well as a narrative that never once brings up gender. Unlike Lingua Franca, a love story in which Sandoval’s trans identity was also a major plot point, her Dahlia is simply another fatally flawed film noir heroine — one in a long line of silver screen femme fatales played by the likes of Joan Crawford or Rita Hayworth. Moonglow may be a loving if clumsy homage to great works of the past; the fact that it defies gender norms is clearly a nod to the future.  

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Mintzer

    Source link

  • ‘Green Border’ Wins Rotterdam Audience Award

    ‘Green Border’ Wins Rotterdam Audience Award

    [ad_1]

    Green Border, Agnieszka Holland’s harrowing tale of refugees caught in the wooded boundary between Belarus and Poland, won the Audience Award at this year’s Rotterdam Film Festival, which wrapped up Sunday.

    Japanese director Tanaka Toshihiko won Rotterdam’s coveted Tiger Award for best competition film for his debut Rei, a drama exploring human relationships made almost entirely with a cast and crew of mostly nonprofessionals and students. The Iranian drama The Old Bachelor from director Oktay Baraheni won Rotterdam’s VPRO Big Screen Award.

    The FIPRESCI Award, handed out by international film critics, went to Kiss Wagon from the Indian director Midhun Murali.

    Judged by the audience’s response, Rotterdam 2024 was a resounding success, with the festival reporting more than a quarter of a million viewers over its 11-day program, which included the screening of 424 films and artist discussions with the likes of Oscar contender Sandra Hüller (Anatomy of a Fall), Italian directing veteran Marco Bellocchio (The Traitor) and pop music legend Debbie Harry.

    “This edition we saw with great pleasure how our discoveries found their audiences,” said Rotterdam festival director Vanja Kaludjercic. “From the joy of our opening night to the excitement of welcoming superstars and cinematic giants, to witnessing the blossoming of future greats like the Tiger Award winner, there was a special atmosphere at the festival this edition. We take pride in making a program that foregrounds the unexpected and unique — and that challenges and enriches…. As we look ahead, we see that our ideas and aspirations connect strongly with the audience, strengthening us for the years to come.”

    [ad_2]

    Scott Roxborough

    Source link

  • ‘Natatorium’ Review: Icelandic Drama Peers Into Family Dysfunction Through an Artful, Horror-Tinged Prism

    ‘Natatorium’ Review: Icelandic Drama Peers Into Family Dysfunction Through an Artful, Horror-Tinged Prism

    [ad_1]

    When, in the opening minutes of Natatorium, a fresh-faced teen arrives at a blocky modernist showplace of a house, it seems she’s checking in to a swanky Airbnb. But the well-appointed dwelling, where an oppressively dark glacial blue predominates, turns out to be the unwholesome home of the grandparents she hasn’t seen in years. Estrangement and silence are the guiding principles within this hermetically sealed universe, which, as the title of Helena Stefánsdóttir’s drama indicates, contains an indoor swimming pool. “Don’t go into the basement” would be a handy subtitle. Not that the upper floors offer much refuge.

    In a movie that ultimately centers on a trinity of female kin at cross-purposes — visiting Lilja, her formidable grandmother and moderately rebellious aunt — the 18-year-old outsider is the catalyst for the revelations and unraveling to come. Traveling from her island home, Lilja (Ilmur María Arnarsdóttir) arrives in the city by bus, cello in tow, to stay with the relatives she barely knows while she goes through the audition process for a performance troupe. (After a brief sequence of exterior shots, there’s no sense of the surrounding world once the story kicks in.)

    Natatorium

    The Bottom Line

    An effective fusion of restrained and bonkers.

    Venue: International Film Festival Rotterdam (Bright Future)
    Cast: Ilmur María Arnarsdóttir, Elin Petersdottir, Stefanía Berndsen
    Director-screenwriter: Helena Stefánsdóttir

    1 hour 46 minutes

    Her arrival sets off alarm bells in a range of keys and registers. Lilja’s father, Magnús (Arnar Dan Kristjánsson), not seen until late in the proceedings, calls his younger sister Vala (Stefanía Berndsen) to ask her to keep an eye on Lilja. In a measure of the familial warmth among this bunch, Vala’s greeting is not “Hello” but “Why are you calling me?” He’s hoping she might lure his daughter away from the home of Áróra (Elin Petersdottir) and Grímur (Valur Freyr Einarsson). His reasons for concern are unspoken — but it soon becomes clear that nobody in this small clan says much of anything in direct terms when talking around the subject is an option.

    Not least among the talked-around subjects are two of Áróra and Grímur’s children: a girl who died years earlier, very young, and bedridden 28-year-old Kalli (Jónas Alfred Birkisson), Vala’s twin and the centerpiece of Áróra’s project in depravity. He’s a fey Jesus figure wasting away in a room that suggests medical care but offers none, filled with flotsam and jetsam and the record books Áróra keeps of vital signs. He’s the first thing she insists on showing Lilja upon her arrival, like a science project of which she’s proud. It takes an outsider, Magnús’ girlfriend Irèna (Kristín Pétursdóttir), to break the spell, at least for a second, when she asks the obvious question: Why isn’t he in a hospital?

    With distinctive lips and hooded eyes that recall Charlotte Rampling, Petersdottir (whose screen credits include, at the other end of the spectrum, Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga) inhabits the role of Áróra with quiet menace. Áróra is the sort who, without irony or humor, tells her husband to “use your words.” The woman’s a twisted mother superior eyeing prey, and there’s a pseudo-Christian element to the rituals she devises of baptism and penance (read: torture). Grímur, as warm and homey as she is frosty, watches with mild alarm as she guides the newly arrived Lilja in some sort of prayer. He’s the nurturing cook in the household, keeping the madness fed, and, like many a willfully blind enabler, he sleeps blissfully.

    In response to Áróra’s hushed, harsh religion, there are gestures of pagan rebuttal: the crown of flowers the wilting Kalli sometimes wears, the real remedies of the thriving apothecary Vala owns. But, wracked with guilt over her twin’s fate, Vala is defiant only to a point. She drinks and looks the other way most of the time, parroting the party line that “he has weak lungs.”

    So too does everyone agree that the pool in the basement has been empty for years, even if they haven’t ventured downstairs to look. They might as well be regurgitating headlines about a far-off place. Lilja, though, discovers the truth soon after she arrives, and perhaps at her peril.

    The water theme percolates ominously through the striking production design by Snorri Freyr Hilmarsson, which uses a cold palette and pebbled glass, among other elements, to create a kind of streamlined baroque. The pool itself occupies a space somewhere between haute décor and nightmare. With sinuous moves and mounting foreboding, Kerttu Hakkarainen’s camerawork creeps through the secrets-laden house, abetted by Jacob Groth’s score, and a bit of Schubert, in conveying entwined moods of mournfulness and suspense.

    With only three shorts to her credit, writer-director Stefánsdóttir has made an impressive first feature, assembling a superb cast and a strong roster behind the camera. Her screenplay (partly inspired by the short story “Swim” from Celeste Ramos’ self-published collection Women in Strange Places) might have benefited from more concision and fewer narrative elements, but there’s a compelling translucency to the movie’s water symbolism. Here are people caught up in an element most of them refuse to see. The elaborate costume Lilja dons for her audition is that of a naiad (and where she chooses to hang it in the house suggests the upheaval to come). When her childhood friend and romantic interest, David (Stormur Jón Kormákur Baltasarsson), visits her, he enters via a window, after the rest of the household is asleep, an innocent sneaking into an inhospitable morass.

    Late in the drama, Magnús utters a devastating line to his sister. Having escaped his parents’ sphere of influence and built his life on a nearby island, he will maybe be the one to tear down the pretense of civility and expose the truth. (The shot of him and Vala dutifully blowing up balloons for a family celebration is priceless.) But after hearing his sister’s heartfelt take on what they’ve been through, he retreats: “I’m sorry to hear that you perceive it like that,” he tells her, like any bureaucrat humoring a courageous and inconvenient protester.

    Individual scenes and moments in Natatorium might be exasperating, or make you wonder why all these people are lying to themselves and one another, but the cumulative effect is potent, its implications significant. At once elegant and bizarre, this is, sadly, a universal story of self-protective silence and fear, and the monsters who sometimes lead us, whether the group in question is a family, a business or an electorate.

    [ad_2]

    Sheri Linden

    Source link

  • Mexico’s Santiago Mohar Volkow Talks Madcap Rotterdam Title  ‘A History of Love & War’: ‘Comedy Is Always Challenging Because It’s Constantly Risking Ridicule’

    Mexico’s Santiago Mohar Volkow Talks Madcap Rotterdam Title  ‘A History of Love & War’: ‘Comedy Is Always Challenging Because It’s Constantly Risking Ridicule’

    [ad_1]

    Far-out cineaste Santiago Mohar Volkow (“Los Muertos”) will deliver his fourth feature “A History of Love & War” (“Una Historia de Amor y de Guerra”) to audiences at the 53rd edition of the International Film Festival Rotterdam. 

    A viscally ludicrous examination of Mexico’s colonial history and the duplicitous nature of high-wealth, the film screens as part of the Harbor strand, dedicated to a wide range of contemporary narratives.

    The plot opens on insufferably spoilt and corrupt real estate mogul Pepe Sanzhez Campo (Andrew Leland Rogers) as his mega-mall development plans roil on and an engagement offer to his affluent love interest Constanza (Lucía Gómez Robledo) proves a success.

    When militant forces challenge his land rights and an otherwise cliche bachelor party turns sour after his fiancé’s lover Teo (Darío Yazbek Bernal) sets off a rip-roaring tide change, Pepe’s left with a reckoning that derails his privileged future. 

    Providing a satiating laugh through grand depravity and betrayal, the project manages dastardly whimsy, Pepe eventually becoming an emblem of the country’s brutal past, a tool used to examine residual disparity. 

    “A History of Love & War” was produced by Mohar Volkow, Santiago de la Paz Nicolau, Santiago Dosal, Jonathan David and Juan Sarquis at Mexico City production outfits Nómadas (“Sísifos”), Laredo 17 (“Natural”) and Edge Films (“Modo Avião”). Executive production credits go to Alejandro Quintero, Juan Simons, García Rulfo, Yazbek Bernal and Leland Rogers. 

    Manuel García Rulfo (“The Lincoln Lawyer”), Aldo Escalante (“Club De Cuervos”), Mónica del Carmen (“Leap Year”), Florencia Ríos (“The Darkest Days of Us”), Santiago Espejo (“VGLY”), Sharon Kleinberg and Sophie Gómez (“Monarca”) round out the elite cast, with special appearances by Hernán del Riego (“Juana Inés”), Patricia Bernal (“Pobre Rico, Pobre”) and Teresa Sánchez (“Dos Estaciones”).

    Ahead of the film’s public debut on Jan.31, Mohar Volkow spoke with Variety about the project.

    Mexico acts as the perfect canvas for your bold and vibrant stylistic choices, at once stuck in the past and keenly modern. Its no doubt that aesthetics are an important part of your cinematic world. Can you speak to coming into your own stylistically? 

    Most of the films and directors I love the most have strong baroque styles. I guess that when one finally gets the chance to make a film, it’s natural to do something you would enjoy as a part of the audience. I’m bored and fed up with the suffocating limitations of the current naturalism that characterizes most of contemporary cinema, especially in Mexico, where it’s often difficult to tell one film from another. 

    It’s almost counterintuitive to mimic this international style to fit our stories when our history and culture is so intrinsically baroque. I like to think that this playful engagement with form, breaking away from the imperatives of conventional realism, will also be more appealing to a broader audience that’s normally quite isolated from so-called art house cinema. 

    The lifestyle of the rich and famous lends itself effortlessly to the absurdity you capture in your projects and you discuss privilege and class hierarchies in many of your films. What’s so attractive about examining the struggles of the proletariat, the vice of the bourgeois? 

    The rampant inequality one becomes accustomed to living in Mexico is a completely absurd reality that becomes even stranger when we also keep in mind that we no longer see it as an anomaly. This strange dynamic between a world that makes no sense, and a sensibility that somehow manages to find a logic within, is the key experience of Mexico, it’s very difficult to understand yet we live with it everyday. Making a movie that happens in this place will inevitably lead, at least on a personal level, to an attempt at explanation, to understand a little bit more of why things are as they are. 

    A History of Love & War
    Credit: Guillermo Del Hoyo

    What is the most challenging aspect of working within a comedy and satire framework to explore weighty social topics and why is the final product often so brilliant when well-executed?

    Comedy is always challenging because it’s constantly risking ridicule; when it’s done within subject matter that’s current and sensible for a contemporary audience, there’s an aggregate risk of cruelty that we try to avoid naturally. But, sometimes, what may seem like cruelty is actually a form of revelation, and when that is achieved, I believe something truly great is brought to light. 

    There are also the social and political aspects of dealing with events and subjects that can ignite some sort of backlash, something that becomes more distressing as the size of films gets bigger. Producers, studios and platforms have to deal with these sorts of issues all the time and there really isn’t an easy way out of it because there’s so much money involved, but there’s no doubt that it has an effect on movies being less bold and risky, both in subject and form. 

    Fortunately, this is a small picture and we really had total freedom to do and say what we wanted. I’m not surprised about the mixed reception it’s gotten, even in its short life before the actual premiere. I don’t think anyone can make a film today and not expect some sort of rejection, so it’s important to take criticism critically and accept that, in some cases, rejection and division are actually compliments. 

    You use the poignant words of James Baldwin to open the film: People are trapped in history, and history in them.” How did you incorporate that sentiment into the project?

    Baldwin’s phrase is absolutely brutal and true. Even if I read it in another context, the essay in which I found it bears almost no relation to the movie’s plot, it’s such a beautiful and poetic definition of what our political existence is that it holds up no matter where you put it. It rings true when we think of ourselves in the historical context of our countries or even families – so I just thought about that when I was writing the script, trying to understand the characters not only as the agents of their story, but little walking representations of the traumas of our history.

    [ad_2]

    John Hopewell

    Source link