Tag: root cause analysis

Why “Best Supplements” Searches Fail: Functional Lab Testing Works
[ad_1]
Are you tired of Googling “best supplements for thyroid” or “top supplements for gut health” only to find conflicting advice that leaves your clients with mediocre results? You’re not alone. The supplement industry has created a prescription drug mentality that’s keeping even well-intentioned practitioners stuck in a symptom-chasing cycle that rarely delivers the transformative outcomes clients desperately need.

If you’ve ever wondered why your supplement protocols work sometimes but fail other times, or why your clients seem to plateau despite following “evidence-based” recommendations, this article will revolutionize how you think about supplementation. We’ll explore why the traditional approach falls short and introduce you to the “Test, Don’t Guess” methodology that’s helping over 5,000 Functional Diagnostic Nutrition (FDN) practitioners worldwide achieve consistent, life-changing results for their clients.

The Fatal Flaw in Modern Supplement Protocols

Most health practitioners, even in the functional medicine space, are still thinking like conventional doctors when it comes to supplements. They’ve simply replaced prescription drugs with “natural” alternatives, but the underlying philosophy remains the same: find a pill for the ill.

This approach treats supplements as “nature times 100” – more concentrated than food but less potent than pharmaceuticals. While this seems logical, it creates a fundamental problem: you’re still treating symptoms instead of addressing the root cause imbalances that create those symptoms in the first place.

When a client searches “best magnesium for sleep” or you recommend “adaptogenic herbs for adrenal fatigue,” you’re operating from the same symptom-focused mindset that keeps clients dependent on interventions rather than restoring their body’s natural ability to function optimally.

Why Clients Demand the “Magic Bullet” Approach

Your clients come to you expecting quick fixes because that’s what our healthcare system has trained them to expect. They don’t want to hear about lifestyle modifications, stress management, or comprehensive testing. They want you to tell them exactly which supplement will eliminate their brain fog, balance their hormones, or fix their digestion.

As practitioners, we often accommodate this expectation because we want to provide value and see our clients improve quickly. But this well-intentioned approach actually undermines long-term healing and creates the exact same dependency cycle that functional medicine was supposed to solve.

The FDN Revolution: Three Phases That Change Everything

Functional Diagnostic Nutrition has developed a different approach that honors both the client’s need for immediate relief and the practitioner’s commitment to lasting transformation. Instead of guessing which supplements might help, FDN practitioners use comprehensive lab testing to identify exactly where function has been lost, then support the body’s natural healing intelligence.

Phase 1: Relief Care (Intelligent Allopathy)

FDN practitioners do provide symptom relief, but we call it “intelligent allopathy” because it’s strategic, temporary, and always paired with deeper corrective work.

Relief care ensures clients can sleep, have regular bowel movements, and manage pain while the real healing work begins. This isn’t where we stop; it’s where we start. This phase builds trust and buys time for the more comprehensive protocol work ahead.

Examples of Relief Care:
- Sleep support for the insomniac who hasn’t slept through the night in months
- Digestive enzymes for the client with severe bloating after every meal
- Anti-inflammatory support for someone in chronic pain
Phase 2: Corrective Care (The Real Work)

This is where FDN practitioners excel and where most other approaches fail. Instead of continuing symptom management indefinitely, we use comprehensive lab data to identify and correct the underlying imbalances creating symptoms.

The corrective phase addresses all five pillars of the DRESS protocol:
- Diet: Personalized nutrition based on individual metabolic needs and lab findings
- Rest: Optimizing sleep and recovery based on cortisol patterns and stress load
- Exercise: Right-sizing movement based on adrenal function and energy reserves
- Stress Reduction: Addressing physical, mental-emotional, and environmental stressors
- Supplementation: Targeted nutrients to restore function in under-performing systems
The key difference: Instead of supplementing for symptoms, we supplement to restore measured imbalances in foundational body systems. If someone’s detoxification pathways are overwhelmed, we support those systems. If their immune system is overactive, we work to modulate that response. If their sex hormones are depleted because cortisol has been stealing their building blocks, we address the stress response first.

Phase 3: Maintenance Care (Substitution Strategy)

Once lab values normalize and symptoms resolve, clients transition to maintenance protocols that account for the realities of modern life. This isn’t about maintaining dependency on supplements, but recognizing that our current environment has some unavoidable gaps.

Modern soil depletion means food doesn’t contain the nutrient density it did 100 years ago. Environmental toxin exposure requires ongoing detoxification support that wasn’t necessary historically. Maintenance protocols substitute for these environmental deficiencies while allowing clients to reduce their overall supplement burden significantly.

Why Individual Lab Testing Changes Everything

Two clients come to you with identical symptoms: fatigue, weight gain, brain fog, and irritability. Traditional approaches would recommend similar supplement protocols, maybe some B vitamins, adaptogens, and omega-3s.

But what if Client A’s labs show depleted sex hormones, optimal cortisol, and excellent detoxification capacity, while Client B shows normal sex hormones, dysregulated cortisol patterns, and severely impaired liver function?

Client A might benefit from targeted hormone support and stress reduction techniques, while Client B needs adrenal support and detoxification protocols. The same symptoms, completely different root causes, requiring entirely different interventions.

This is why FDN practitioners run comprehensive foundational lab panels on every client, regardless of their presenting symptoms or health conditions. We test:
- Cortisol and DHEA patterns to assess stress response and recovery capacity
- Sex hormone production and metabolism to understand reproductive system function
- Digestive markers to evaluate nutrient absorption and gut barrier integrity
- Detoxification pathways to assess toxic load and elimination capacity
- Immune system function to identify over- or under-activity
Real-World Case Example: When Partial Testing Fails

Consider Sarah, a 42-year-old client with severe irritability that’s affecting her marriage and work relationships. A hormone-focused practitioner might run a DUTCH test, see low progesterone and estrogen, and recommend bioidentical hormone replacement.

This approach might provide some improvement, but it misses crucial pieces of Sarah’s health puzzle:

What comprehensive testing revealed:
- Severely impaired detoxification pathways causing toxic buildup in tissues
- Overactive immune system creating systemic inflammation
- Gut dysbiosis preventing proper nutrient absorption
- Chronic infections creating additional immune burden
Sarah’s irritability wasn’t just a hormone issue. It was the result of multiple system imbalances that hormone replacement alone couldn’t address. By supporting her detoxification capacity, modulating her immune response, and healing her gut, her hormones began to balance naturally, and her irritability resolved completely.

This is the power of comprehensive testing and systems-based supplementation.

The Bio-Individuality Factor Most Practitioners Miss

Even when practitioners move beyond symptom-based supplementing, they often miss the crucial element of bio-individuality. Not every client tolerates magnesium glycinate the same way. Not every person with “adrenal fatigue” responds well to the same adaptogenic herbs.

FDN practitioners introduce supplements one at a time, monitoring client responses carefully, and adjusting dosing, timing, or formulations based on individual tolerance and results. We never assume that what works for one client will work for another, even with identical lab findings.

This attention to individual response prevents the common scenario where clients suffer through supplement side effects because they think they’re supposed to “push through” negative reactions, a mindset that unfortunately carries over from conventional medicine’s approach to medication side effects.

Moving Beyond the Supplement-Centric Mindset

The biggest mindset shift for practitioners transitioning to this approach is understanding that the body’s healing intelligence is far superior to any practitioner’s clinical knowledge. Our job isn’t to force specific outcomes through targeted supplementation, but to remove obstacles and provide resources so the body can restore balance naturally.

When we supplement based on measured imbalances rather than symptoms or conditions, we’re essentially giving the body more “money” to spend on healing priorities. The body then allocates these resources exactly where they’re needed most, which is often different from where we think they should go.

This requires practitioners to trust the process and resist the urge to micromanage every symptom with a specific supplement.

The Questions That Transform Your Practice

Instead of asking “What’s the best supplement for sleep?” or “What’s the best protocol for Hashimoto’s?”, FDN practitioners ask:
- What do this client’s labs reveal about their individual pattern of metabolic chaos?
- Which foundational systems are under-functioning and need support?
- Which systems are over-functioning and need modulation?
- How can I restore balance to this unique individual’s physiology?
- What obstacles are preventing this person’s body from healing itself?
This shift from condition-focused to individual-focused supplementation is what allows FDN practitioners to achieve consistent results across diverse client populations and health challenges.

Why FDN Practitioners Don’t Treat Conditions

In the FDN methodology, we don’t treat anything specifically. We would never go to the model of “this person has Hashimoto’s, so I’m going to figure out what the best supplements for Hashimoto’s are” because this person’s Hashimoto’s might be caused by an immune system imbalance, thyroid resource depletion, or any number of other root cause factors.

Instead of trying to guess why this person has Hashimoto’s, we look at the labs, see where function has been lost, and recommend supplementation accordingly. By addressing these underlying stressors, we give the body the resources it needs to restore balance, and often the Hashimoto’s symptoms naturally resolve as normal function returns.

Building Confidence Through Data, Not Guesswork

Many practitioners lack confidence in their supplement recommendations because they’re essentially guessing based on symptoms and hoping for the best. When you have comprehensive lab data showing exactly where imbalances exist, supplement selection becomes straightforward and logical.

You’re no longer wondering why some clients improve while others don’t. You’re not second-guessing your protocols or constantly changing approaches based on the latest research or trends. You have objective data guiding your decisions, which creates confidence in both you and your clients.

The Business Impact of Getting Supplementation Right

Practitioners using this approach report several business benefits:
- Higher client retention because results are more predictable and sustainable
- More referrals because clients experience genuine transformation rather than symptom management
- Premium pricing justified by comprehensive testing and individualized protocols
- Professional confidence that comes from using data rather than guesswork
- Reduced liability from evidence-based rather than experimental approaches
When clients achieve lasting results, they become your biggest advocates, creating the kind of referral-based practice that provides true professional and financial freedom.

The One Change That Would Transform Every Practice

If there’s one thing that could transform every practitioner’s supplement approach overnight, it would be this: stop asking “What’s the best supplement for X condition?” and start asking “What’s the best supplement for this individual client?”

The questions practitioners should be asking are:
- What is this client’s unique health history?
- What challenges do they face in their daily life?
- What do their comprehensive lab results reveal?
- What obstacles do they need to overcome?
- What is their specific pattern of metabolic chaos?
This shift from condition-based to individual-based supplementation is the foundation of successful functional health practice.

Your Next Steps: From Symptom-Chasing to Root-Cause Resolution

If you’re ready to move beyond the “best supplements for X condition” mindset and start delivering the kind of transformative results your clients are paying for, start with these steps:
1. Stop supplementing for symptoms and start investigating underlying causes
2. Implement comprehensive lab testing to identify individual patterns of dysfunction
3. Learn proper lab interpretation to understand what the data is really telling you
4. Develop systems-based protocols that address root causes rather than isolated symptoms
5. Monitor and adjust based on individual client responses rather than generic protocols
Transform Your Practice with Functional Lab Training

The supplement approach we’ve outlined in this article is just one component of comprehensive functional health training. FDN practitioners learn to interpret 70+ different functional lab tests, create personalized protocols using the DRESS framework, and build thriving practices based on consistent client results through our Medical Director Program (MDP), which provides lab access even for unlicensed practitioners.

If you’re ready to stop guessing and start getting reliable results for every client, regardless of their health challenges, our next free training workshop will show you exactly how successful practitioners are using functional lab testing to transform their practices and their clients’ lives.

The days of symptom-chasing and hoping your protocols work are over. It’s time to embrace the “Test, Don’t Guess” methodology that’s revolutionizing functional health practice worldwide.

Ready to learn the functional lab interpretation skills that will transform your practice? Join our free workshop to discover how to identify the root causes behind your clients’ symptoms and create personalized protocols that deliver consistent, lasting results. Register for your free spot and start building the confidence and expertise that sets true health professionals apart.

Want to connect with other practitioners making this transition? Join our community of over 5,000 functional health professionals worldwide who are committed to data-driven, client-centered care that actually works.
[ad_2]

Elizabeth Gaines

Source link
September 15, 2025
Why Functional Lab Testing Beats Generic Supplement Protocols
[ad_1]
How functional lab testing reveals why condition-based supplement protocols fail—and what actually works

The Facebook Group Question That Reveals Everything Wrong with Supplement Protocols

You’ve seen it dozens of times. A practitioner posts in a Facebook group: “What are the best supplements for Hashimoto’s?” or “Client has constipation…what should I recommend?”

Within hours, the comments exploded with conflicting advice. One person swears by selenium and iodine. Another warns against iodine completely. Someone else recommends a thyroid glandular. The original poster gets more confused than when they started.

Here’s what’s really happening: Everyone’s treating supplements like prescription drugs. And that’s the problem.

In conventional medicine, you diagnose a condition and prescribe a drug to manage symptoms. The drug is “nature times a thousand”—highly concentrated to overpower the symptom. When practitioners move to functional health, they naturally reach for supplements as the closest equivalent: “nature times a hundred.”

But we’re still asking the wrong question.

Instead of “What supplement for Hashimoto’s?” we should ask: “What do this person’s labs show about where function has been lost?”

That simple shift changes everything.

Why the “Pill for the ill” Mindset Doesn’t Work in Functional Health

Let’s be honest about what’s happening when clients come to see you. They’re frustrated with conventional medicine, but they still want the quick fix. It’s way easier to ask for a supplement for thyroid symptoms than to examine stress levels, sleep patterns, or that nightly glass of wine.

Think about it from their perspective:
- “I have thyroid symptoms. What supplement fixes that?”
- “I’m constipated. What pill makes me poop?”
- “I can’t sleep. What herb knocks me out?”
They don’t want to spend months unpacking where they’re carrying stress (and we’re all carrying too much stress). They don’t want to hear about sitting too long, drinking too much coffee, or examining whether they actually like their job.

And as practitioners, we respond to this because we want to help. We want to provide value and see our clients improve. When they expect progress to look like symptom relief, we start thinking like symptom relievers.

The problem? This turns us into supplement-prescribing machines instead of a source of dysfunction detectives.

How FDN Approaches Supplementation Differently

Here’s where Functional Diagnostic Nutrition® takes a completely different approach. We absolutely care about symptoms—people need to be sleeping, pooping, and out of pain. But symptoms are just our starting point, not our end goal.

Phase 1: Relief Care (Yes, We Do “Intelligent Allopathy”)

We call this first phase “intelligent allopathy,” and it’s exactly what it sounds like—the supplement for the symptom. But here’s the key difference: this is where we START, not where we STOP.

If someone can’t sleep, they need sleep support now. If they’re backed up for days, they need elimination help immediately. If they’re in chronic pain, we need to address that first.

Why? Because you can’t do the deep corrective work if someone is suffering. Relief care buys trust and gets people functional enough to engage in real healing.

Phase 2: Corrective Care (The Real Work)

Once basic function is restored, we move into corrective care. This is where we address the root cause imbalances that the labs revealed.

This phase uses our DRESS protocol:

Diet: Getting rid of the soda, fast food, processed junk, and chemicals. Coming back to organic whole foods that work for your specific metabolism.

Rest: Not just sleeping at night, but taking breaks during the day. Getting unfiltered sunlight in your eyes. Feeling sun on your skin. Reconnecting to natural cycles.

Exercise: Finding the sweet spot where movement puts money in the bank instead of taking it out. Not under-exercising, not over-exercising.

Stress Reduction: This is where all the juice is. Physical stressors like sitting too long, too much coffee, old injuries that won’t heal. Mental-emotional stuff like job satisfaction, relationship quality, financial stress. Environmental factors like what you’re putting on your body, what you’re storing food in, air and water quality.

Supplementation: Here’s where we use supplements to stimulate systems we’ve measured to be under-functioning and support systems that are over-functioning.

If your sex hormones are completely underfunded but your immune system is in overdrive, that’s corrective phase work. We’re bringing in targeted supplementation to help balance things out.

Phase 3: Maintenance (The Long Game)

After the corrective phase achieves the health goals, we transition to maintenance. This might mean backing off on diet restrictions, reducing intensive supplementation, maybe adding back some foods that were problematic before.

But here’s the reality: our environment has some permanent holes that even perfect health can’t overcome. Our soils don’t have the nutrients they used to have. We’re dealing with chemical exposures our grandparents never faced.

So maintenance supplementation is about substitution—replacing what the environment no longer provides and supporting systems that are constantly under assault.

The Bio-Individuality Problem with Generic Protocols

Here’s what everyone misses when they ask “What’s the best supplement for Hashimoto’s?”

Not all Hashimoto’s is the same.

One person’s Hashimoto’s might be driven by an immune system imbalance. Another person’s thyroid stepped back because it doesn’t have enough resources to run all the body systems at 100%.

If you just supplement based on the diagnosis, you’re going to miss this completely.

And here’s the other thing: everyone’s body is different. Their cells communicate differently. Their bodies like certain things and hate others. If you supplement according to their condition or symptoms, you miss this bio-individuality entirely.

I’ve seen clients have terrible reactions to supplements that were “perfect for their condition.” Or they feel worse and think they should just push through because that’s what the internet said would happen.

We introduce supplements one at a time. We want feedback: “This supplement makes me feel great” or “This one gives me headaches.” Then we can adjust—different dose, different timing, take a break, try something else entirely.

The Lab-First Approach: What We Actually Measure

In FDN, we don’t run labs based on symptoms. We run the same foundational labs on everyone because we want to see across the board where systems are struggling.

Cortisol: Are we making enough? Too much? At the right times of day?

DHEA: This counterbalances cortisol. Cortisol breaks us down for quick energy; DHEA builds us back up when we’re resting. If DHEA isn’t present in large enough quantities, we’re catabolic by definition.

Sex hormones: Are they all low—totally exhausted bank accounts? Low in some places but high in others? Are the pathways kinked like a garden hose?

Immune system: Is it overperforming or underperforming? Both create problems, just different ones.

Digestion: Even if you’re eating the best food in the world, can you actually use it?

Detoxification: If you’re not detoxing properly, you’re storing toxins instead of releasing them. And detoxing isn’t something you “do”—it’s something your body does naturally when it has enough resources and a clear exit strategy.

Real Example: Why Single Lab Panels Miss the Big Picture

Let me give you a perfect example of why running just one type of lab leads to incomplete solutions.

Say I’m a “hormone girl” (which I am—I love looking at hormone tests). A client comes in reporting irritability. I run hormones, see that sex hormones are low, and think, “Ah, makes sense. Low hormones can make you irritable. Let’s get some bioidenticals in there.”

But what if I’m completely missing that:
- Detox is impaired, so toxins are being stored in fat, brain, and bone, spilling into the bloodstream (definitely makes you irritable)
- The immune system is overperforming, everyone’s on a hair trigger, promoting inflammation
- There are underlying gut infections disrupting digestion, so she can’t actually use the protein she’s eating to make neurotransmitters
- All the hormone pathways are twisted up and blocked
I could supplement based on just the hormone test and see some results. But it would be a fraction of what’s possible if I measured all the foundational systems and supplemented accordingly.

The Body Knows Better Than We Do

Here’s something fundamental that FDN practitioners understand: the body has its own agenda, and that agenda matters more than ours.

I might have ideas about what the client needs. The client definitely has ideas about what they need. But the body knows more than both of us about where to spend newly available resources.

Think of body systems like bank accounts. Some are overdrawn and in debt. Others are wildly overspending by stealing from other accounts. Others are just underfunded.

Our job is to put money back in the right bank accounts in the right amounts. Then we get out of the way and let the body spend that money where it knows it needs to go.

When we direct through supplementation—”I’m going to supplement for Hashimoto’s” or “I’m going to supplement for this symptom”—we’re taking away the body’s agency in how it spends those resources.

The body knows way better than we do. That’s our commitment as practitioners.

What Practitioners Should Stop Doing Tomorrow

If I could wave a magic wand, I’d eliminate this question: “What’s the best supplement for [condition/symptom]?”

I see it constantly in Facebook groups:
- “Best supplement for dry skin?”
- “What should I give for eczema?”
- “Client can’t sleep, what works?”
This is just the prescription drug mindset applied to natural medicine. It’s still symptom suppression instead of root cause resolution.

The Question That Changes Everything

Instead of “What’s the best supplement for constipation?” ask:

“What’s the best supplement for this specific client who has this health history, these daily challenges, these lab results, this presentation of metabolic dysfunction, and these particular obstacles to healing?”

That’s the question that acknowledges the complexity of human health and the necessity of individualized protocols.

This client who can’t poop—do they have low stomach acid? Dysbiosis? Dehydration? Magnesium deficiency? Stress-induced gut shutdown? Medication side effects? All of the above?

You can’t know without measuring. And you can’t create an effective protocol without that information.

Why This Matters for Your Practice

When you base recommendations on objective lab data instead of symptom guessing, several things happen:

You feel confident explaining to clients why they need specific support and can adjust protocols based on measurable changes.

Clients trust the process because they see the science behind your recommendations, even when healing takes time.

You get better results because you’re addressing root causes instead of chasing symptoms.

You can charge appropriately for advanced diagnostic services that other practitioners can’t provide.

You build a referral-based practice because clients experience real transformation and tell everyone about it.

Getting Started with Lab-Based Protocols

The shift from symptom-based to lab-based supplementation requires proper training. You need to understand how to:
- Access functional labs without medical licensing
- Interpret complex lab panels accurately
- Design safe and effective individualized protocols
- Monitor progress objectively
- Adjust recommendations based on client responses
But the payoff is enormous. Instead of being another practitioner asking “What supplement for X?” you become the practitioner who always knows what to do next because you have the data to guide your decisions.

Your clients deserve more than generic supplement recommendations based on their diagnosis. They deserve protocols designed specifically for their unique biochemical needs.

And you deserve the confidence that comes from knowing your recommendations are based on solid data, not internet searches and Facebook group guesswork.

The practitioners who master lab-based protocols today will be the ones leading the industry tomorrow. The question is: are you ready to stop guessing and start testing?
[ad_2]

Elizabeth Gaines

Source link
September 9, 2025
The Functional Lab Testing Revolution

[ad_1]

An inside look at FDN’s “Test, Don’t Guess” approach and why graduates are building six-figure practices

The functional health space is full of practitioners promising to “get to the root cause.” Yet clients often find themselves bouncing from one protocol to the next, spending thousands with little to show for it.

Reed Davis has a different story. After 10 years running “thousands of labs on thousands of people” in clinical practice, he noticed something: some clients got dramatically better while others didn’t. The pattern wasn’t random—it was methodical.

That observation became the foundation for Functional Diagnostic Nutrition® (FDN), which has now trained over 5,000 practitioners worldwide.

From Clinical Frustration to Clear Methodology

Davis’s original mission was straightforward: “My job when I first started was to find out why someone was ill versus just treating or managing their symptoms. In other words, what are the underlying causes and conditions so that they could heal themselves?”

Those 10 years of hands-on work revealed crucial patterns. “I ran thousands of labs on thousands of people, and with great mentorship, made my own observations about who got better and who didn’t, and developed a methodology from that.”

The breakthrough came when Davis realized the broader impact possible: “Finally after 10 years, I realized the greater impact that would occur if I could teach other practitioners the model, the methodology.”

His mission crystallized: “To educate people and practitioners how to get well and stay well so that they in turn may educate others.”

What “Test, Don’t Guess” Really Means

FDN’s signature phrase goes deeper than just running lab tests. Davis explains the problem with how most practitioners approach testing:

“A lot of people say, ‘well, I already test. Yeah, I run tests too.’ But they’re guessing which tests to run based on symptoms.”

This creates what he calls a “sounds like method.” If symptoms sound like thyroid issues, they run thyroid tests. If it sounds like digestive problems, they test the gut.

“So they’re using a sounds like method to determine which test to run. And so therefore, they’re not getting as comprehensive an assessment.”

The result? “They’ll think they found the problem and treat the paper and hope the person does better. But if the person appears with new complaints… they’ll run another test. So now you’re on a new cycle of test, treat the paper, test, treat the paper, test, treat the paper.”

FDN takes the opposite approach: “We insist on trying to identify multiple healing opportunities in the testing phase.” Instead of chasing symptoms, practitioners look for causal factors that might be “very far upstream, very far removed from where the symptoms occur.”

But running multiple tests isn’t enough. “You have to also observe how those causal factors are affecting each other, creating a state of multiple metabolic chaos. And so that’s more or less our job—to sort out metabolic chaos by looking for multiple causal factors and healing opportunities.”

How FDN Differs From Other Programs

When prospects compare FDN to popular programs, Davis draws clear distinctions:

“What we teach is how to get the data that will actually drive an individualized program versus a generic program.”

He breaks down the competition: “These programs teach general protocols. They have a hundred diets, and I’m not sure how they determine which diet for which person. And most of them are more of a coaching… active listening and motivational strategies and ways of getting people to do what their doctor’s telling them to do.”

“Neither one is even close to FDN in terms of running the labs, getting the data, and truly identifying the healing opportunities that an individual needs to know about.”

The focus on what Davis calls “bioindividuality and metabolic individuality” drives everything: “The FDN protocols have an effect on every cell, tissue, organ, and system simultaneously, so people simply are getting well.”

Built on Practical Experience, Not Theory

Davis emphasizes that FDN is “taught based on practicalities, based on methodology” rather than academic theory. The methodology “was developed over a 10-year period in an office observing who got better and who didn’t.”

“We’re teaching you practical, step-by-step methodology that does work, and it starts with yourself and working on yourself,” he explains. Students complete the program with personal experience using the protocols they’ll recommend to clients.

The structure reflects this hands-on approach: “It’s a self-paced course where you work on yourself as part of the learning process with lots of one-on-one mentorship.”

The Six-Figure Claim: Confidence Based on Results

Davis makes a bold statement about graduate earning potential: “We believe if you’re not earning 6-figures in your first 6-12 months, you’re doing something wrong.”

His confidence comes from repeated success stories: “I am very confident in it, because I’ve seen people do it over and over and over again, and I’ve personally done it.”

In fact, he suggests the potential is higher: “The six figures should be actually multiple six figures. So I can teach you how to make a hundred thousand dollars, which is six figures every three months.”

This earning potential reflects the value FDN practitioners provide through data-driven results. Davis teaches what he calls “a model of working part-time and doing multiple six figures in business… working from your own hours, working your own hours from anywhere that you have an internet connection.”

What Separates Successful Graduates from Struggling Ones

Not every graduate achieves the same results. Davis attributes the difference to mindset and approach:

“I think their personal point of view and self-worth and self-awareness and maturity and ability to handle… ability to face challenges and their ability to confront issues. And it’s all, for me, it’s all about self awareness and self development.”

Struggling practitioners often get “caught up in what they can’t do” instead of taking action. His advice is direct: “Just go out and apply the principles, go out and get a customer, help that customer, and learn from that and get another customer, and another customer, and another customer.”

He notes that struggling practitioners get hung up on structure and logistics instead of helping people: “People that get hung up on all of the structure, the legal entities and these kind of things… aren’t getting it. They’re really, you just need one customer to start doing some good in the world, and you’ll have some revenue from that.”

Building a Waiting List Practice

Successful FDN practitioners understand that a waiting list practice requires professional boundaries. Davis explains:

“A waiting list practice means you pace yourself and tell people that they have to wait and make an appointment. You create some exclusivity around your availability.”

Practically, this means never saying “call me anytime” because “if you say, call me anytime, it means you have nothing to do. You’re not busy and you’re not creating any kind of responsibility anywhere.”

Instead: “You say, my hours are Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday from one to five. How does next Wednesday at one sound to you? That creates some availability… that you’re a professional and that you have hours.”

The key is limiting appointments: “You’re only going to have nine appointments a week. Nine appointments a week, maybe 10, but anything over that, and you could get burnt out. And so you only want to have nine or 10 appointments per week. So those are exclusive and that’s your availability.”

Open Enrollment Philosophy

Despite the program’s $12,997 price point, Davis maintains an inclusive enrollment approach. When asked why FDN accepts almost anyone, he responds:

“Why would I turn anyone away? Is the better question. Why would I turn away a mother of three who just wants to learn to take care of herself and her kids? Why would I turn her away? The answer is there’s no good reason.”

Some students enroll “to learn the methodology for their own health and their families. And if that’s all they do with the education, work on themselves and their families, that’s worth the price of admission.”

But the ideal candidate is someone who “already has the clientele that they could tap into and uplevel their services, get better results, increase their reputation, and increase the revenue by adding these additional FDN services.”

The most successful? “The person who’s upleveling their skills can graduate and typically has more success than someone coming from a different background.”

Justifying the Investment

When prospects hesitate at the $12,997 cost, Davis puts it in perspective:

“It’s an investment that will have a return on investment, ROI, in a very short period of time. One can get their tuition back… with very few paying clients.”

He contrasts it with traditional education: “The only thing one could compare it to fairly would be a two to three year post-grad education. So a master’s or even PhD. We’ve had it compared to master’s programs that cost $60,000 and take a couple years out of your life.”

“I can teach you in 10 months what it took me 10 years to develop. And that’s remarkable. That is the bargain, if I’ve ever heard of one.”

What Graduates Discover

During postgraduate interviews, Davis consistently hears something that surprises him:

“They all seem pretty thankful that they could even learn it, like there’s nothing available to them anywhere, and they are just amazed that they didn’t have to go to college for six years or eight years.”

The revelation for many? “That there is a methodology, that there is a way that they too can help others. It really blows their minds, first of all that the labs are available and the interpretations that they’ve learned… that they can now go out and do it and help others.”

Many tell Davis that “FDN was the answer that they’d been searching for” and that it “ended that cycle of trial and error.”

Future Vision and Core Values

Looking ahead, Davis has ambitious but clear goals: “We’d like to see in the next three, five years, 25,000 FDN practitioners, certified and out in the world doing the good work.”

He’s equally clear about what FDN should never become. His biggest concern? Over-regulation: “I wouldn’t want it to become too regulated such as vocational institutional requirements. I want to keep it open to anyone that’s willing to learn and practice it on oneself or on others professionally.”

This reflects his broader philosophy: “We want to keep the handcuffs off of people.”

The Bottom Line

Davis sums up FDN: “FDN is a methodology and way of thinking that uses functional lab work—the data from functional lab work—to identify healing opportunities so people can deal with the true underlying causes and conditions, what’s really wrong, instead of just treating the symptoms or managing the symptoms.”

After more than a decade of training practitioners, Davis has built something specific: a methodology grounded in clinical experience that consistently produces results for both practitioners and clients.

For health professionals tired of guessing and ready for a data-driven system, that’s not just education—it’s career transformation.

[ad_2]

brenda.hernandez

Source link

August 14, 2025
6Sigma.us Brings in 2018 With Extensive Training Schedule

[ad_1]

Press Release
–

updated: Dec 7, 2017

Austin, Texas, December 7, 2017 (Newswire.com)
–
With the Lean Six Sigma profession growing by leaps and bounds in the last several years, the need for certified Six Sigma professionals is at an all-time high. To fill the demand, leading training provider 6Sigma.us is announcing a full schedule of classes for 2018.

6Sigma.us is currently offering classes in Orlando, Dallas, San Francisco, and several other cities across the country in January 2018. From training and certification for Green and Black Belt to new online offerings in Root Cause Analysis, classes meet a wide variety of professional needs and training environments.

“In addition to our regularly scheduled classes, we’re thrilled to be bringing other online options for those who seek them.”

Peter Peterka, Founder and CEO of Global Six Sigma LLP

Six Sigma is a methodology used to improve business processes by utilizing data and statistical analysis, and has gained significant importance in the business world since its start in the 1980s. The methodology helps save money, reduce errors, and improve customer satisfaction across an organization.

The schedule for 2018 offers classes across the country, providing extensive training, exams, and live projects to meet the specific belt requirements. “In addition to our regularly scheduled classes, we’re thrilled to be bringing other online options for those who seek them,” said Peter Peterka, founder and CEO of Global Six Sigma LLP.

6sigma.us was the first Six Sigma provider to offer the first two weeks of the Green and Black Belt together, allowing for students of both levels to attend training together, improving internal synergy and collaboration while also providing greater organizational flexibility.

About 6Sigma.us

6Sigma.us, a division of Global Six Sigma LLP, is a leading provider of Lean Six Sigma training, providing instruction to individuals and companies. Instructors and mentors bring 10 to 30 years of real world, hands-on experience implementing Lean and Six Sigma. The company provides a wide range of flexible, modular standard programs, including classroom, online, onsite, and blended training options.

Source: Global Six Sigma LLP

[ad_2]

Source link

December 7, 2017
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Training Classes Open in Phoenix
[ad_1]
Press Release
•

updated: Sep 7, 2017

Leading Six Sigma Training Provider 6sigma.us Meets Increasing Demand for RCA Training
AUSTIN, Texas, September 7, 2017 (Newswire.com)
–
Bringing their industry-leading training curriculum to the business world, leading Six Sigma training provider 6sigma.us is opening enrollment for their Root Cause Analysis (RCA) training class in Phoenix, Arizona coming up in December 2017.

Tailored for individuals, teams, and organizations that want to implement an operating system for structured problem-solving, the RCA concepts taught in the class will help students identify certain concepts seen in real-world situations, such as:

An online RCA training program is currently in the works and will be launching next month.

Peter Peterka, CEO/Founder, Global Six Sigma LP

How many problems are encountered each year? How many seem to recur?

How many have unknown cause? How many have known cause?

Is a team created to solve them? Does the team use a structured process?

Other topics addressed include the 8D Roadmap, Situation Appraisal, Cause-Effect Mapping Methods, and Risk Analysis Tools. The training lasts three days and students will be able to complete a project following the 8D Roadmap and use the methods learned to solve a problem with an unknown cause.

Peter Peterka, founder and CEO of Global Six Sigma LP, sees the demand for Root Cause Analysis training and is planning to bring more RCA instruction to the schedule. “An online RCA training program is currently in the works and will be launching next month,” he said.

Online Minitab Essentials training is also available for students. Visit 6sigma.us for more information.

Source: Global Six Sigma LP
[ad_2]

Source link
September 7, 2017