ReportWire

Tag: ron desantis

  • ‘Threatens women’s safety’: State agency targets Florida abortion rights amendment

    ‘Threatens women’s safety’: State agency targets Florida abortion rights amendment

    [ad_1]

    The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration launched a webpage Thursday bashing the proposed state constitutional amendment to restore abortion access beyond six weeks, prompting Florida Democrats to call out the use of state funds against the measure.

    The agency’s secretary, Jason Weida, wrote on X that the page is meant to “combat lies and disinformation surrounding Florida’s abortion laws.” However, the page states that Amendment 4 “threatens to expose women and children to health risks.”

    “The Florida Legislature will lose the ability to protect basic, common-sense health care regulations due to these open-ended arbitrary terms,” the webpage declares.

    Florida Democrats responded that the webpage violates Florida statutes barring state employees from using their authority to interfere with an election.

    “This anti-Amendment 4 website from AHCA is bullshit. Ron and his buddies know they’re losing, and they’re willing to do anything — including breaking the law — to rig the results in their favor,” Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried wrote in a statement.

    “Using state agency resources for campaign purposes is illegal, and we’re looking into any and all recourses to take this website down,” she added.

    Near the bottom of the page, the agency highlights funding Floridians Protecting Freedom, the sponsors of the amendment, received from organizations outside Florida. AHCA includes additional arguments against Amendment 4, mimicking thoughts Gov. Ron DeSantis has expressed, including that the language of the abortion-rights measure is too vague.

    The agency’s webpage includes a list of laws and regulations that supposedly would be at risk if Amendment 4 passes, such as sanitation standards and use of anesthesia.

    'Threatens women's safety': State agency targets Florida abortion rights amendment

    Screenshot via floridahealthfinder.com/FloridaCares

    Florida Department of State looking into Amendment 4 signatures

    With just 60 days until the election, the DeSantis administration is ramping up its campaign against the effort to protect abortion access in the state constitution. On Wednesday, the Tampa Bay Times broke the news that the Florida Department of State is reviewing 36,000 signatures among the 1 million collected to place Amendment 4 on the ballot.

    The state decided to conduct the review looking for fraud seven months after Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd certified the signatures.

    In August, the Florida Supreme Court allowed the state to include language on the November ballot asserting that the amendment could lead to expensive litigation and public funding of abortions through Medicaid. Aides to DeSantis and Republican legislative leaders sat on an estimating conference and insisted upon including that language in defiance of precedent.

    Democratic Rep. Ashley Gantt of Miami-Dade County told the Phoenix she was shocked and infuriated by the webpage.

    “This is completely anti-democratic behavior. This is insanity. And when people talk about ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ and that’s dystopian and it’s so far off, this is how it starts,” Gantt said. “It starts like this, and this people are emboldened and continue to be emboldened.”

    This was not the only controversy from AHCA on Thursday. A broadcast report from WCJB stated that a source within the agency had provided documents disclosing that the whistleblower of the administration’s plan to place golf courses and hotels in state parks had resigned from AHCA in January 2022 after being accused of sending harassing messages to a co-worker he had been in a relationship with.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jackie Llanos, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • Florida Democrats call for investigation into state parks development plans

    Florida Democrats call for investigation into state parks development plans

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Shutterstock

    Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Hobe Sound

    Five Democratic members of Congress are calling on Gov. Ron DeSantis to order an independent investigation into what (if any) state procedures were violated in his administration’s state parks scheme, and which private groups lobbied for and stood to benefit had the plan gone through.

    The move came a week after DeSantis shut down the proposal by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to add golf courses, pickleball courts, and lodging options to nine state parks amid nearly universal opposition from the public.

    “Your proposal was quietly rushed into a public hearing process and timed to a summer travel period when residents were less likely to attend. It is also still not clear who is behind the plan. Given this destructive, veiled affront, the public is owed peace of mind, honesty, and transparency,” reads a portion of the letter from U.S. representatives Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Kathy Castor, Maxwell Frost, Darren Soto, and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick.

    “Similar schemes were floated by your predecessor, current U.S. Sen. Rick Scott, who quickly jettisoned them due to overwhelming opposition. It would be political malfeasance to be ignorant of the massive public outcry over former Gov. Scott’s failed attempt to misuse Florida’s parks. So, it appears this plan’s success relied on hiding it from our citizens. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s bid to bypass public input necessitates formal investigation.”

    The letter goes on to ask that the governor release all public records regarding the plan, called the “2024-2025 Great Outdoors Initiative,” as well as start a formal investigation “immediately.”

    Unlike many other controversial proposals unveiled in the 5-1/2 years of DeSantis’ rule in Tallahassee, Republicans joined Democrats in sharing their outrage over the plan almost immediately after it was reported late last month.

    Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson, Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, and Panhandle-area Congressman Matt Gaetz all expressed criticism of the proposal. And protests broke out among members of the public throughout the state.

    Whistleblower

    Meanwhile, James Gaddis, a former employee of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection who was fired last weekend after it was learned that he had leaked the plan, is still dealing with the aftermath.

    He’s become a hero to some environmentalists, and his GoFundMe page. created to support himself financially after he was terminated from his $49,000 job, is thriving.

    The fund was at $221,145 as of Thursday afternoon.

    However, Gaddis was also dealing on Thursday with a broadcast report that he had resigned from another state job “in lieu of termination’ in January 2022 after a relationship with a co-worker resulted in him being accused of sending harassing messages to her. The TV station said a “source in AHCA shared documents” detailing the matter.

    Gaddis told the Palm Beach Post that the release of the records was a “somewhat expected hit piece, irrelevant to anything involving state parks.”

    A request for comment by the governor’s office was not immediately returned.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Mitch Perry, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • Floridians balk at DeSantis administration plan to build golf courses at state parks

    Floridians balk at DeSantis administration plan to build golf courses at state parks

    [ad_1]

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — The golf course is not a threatened species in the Sunshine State — but the Florida scrub-jay is.

    And advocates are warning that life for the small blue and gray birds and many other imperiled species could get much harder if Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration follows through on a proposal to build golf courses, pickleball courts and 350-room hotels at state parks from Miami to the Panhandle.

    State parks “are the last strongholds for a lot of wildlife in rapidly urbanizing communities in Florida,” said Julie Wraithmell, executive director of Audubon Florida.

    “They have an outsized importance — not just to wildlife but also as places where Floridians and visitors can continue to see what Florida was like,” she said. “It’s the best of Florida.”

    DeSantis has enjoyed rock solid support from the Republicans who dominate state politics. It has been rare for DeSantis to get pushback on anything from GOP lawmakers, and he has a reputation for seeking vengeance when they do.

    But it appears a political line in the sand is being drawn after DeSantis’ administration announced plans this week to carve out golf courses and pickleball courts in Florida’s beloved state parks.

    Unlike the issues of abortion, LGBTQ rights, race and guns that have divided voters, state parks apparently hold a place in the hearts of Floridians regardless of party. The state park system has received national recognition for years, and people are resistant to change the protected lands they enjoy.

    The proposal announced by Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection to build new sports facilities, hotels and glamping sites at nine state parks across Florida has drawn a wave of opposition, not just from nature lovers and birdwatchers but also from members of DeSantis’ Cabinet, a Republican member of Congress and conservative state lawmakers. That includes outgoing Republican Senate President Kathleen Passidomo.

    “Our vision (for state parks) did not contemplate the addition of golf courses and hotels, which in my view are not in-line with the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of nature,” Passidomo posted on X. “From what I know at this time, the proposal should not move forward in its current form.”

    A spokesperson for DeSantis defended the plans — which are not final — and touted the administration’s investments in protecting and conserving the state’s natural resources.

    “Teddy Roosevelt believed that public parks were for the benefit and enjoyment of the people, and we agree with him,” press secretary Jeremy Redfern said. “But it’s high time we made public lands more accessible to the public.”

    The Department of Environmental Protection did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press.

    All of the parks slated for development are located near heavily visited tourist destinations, including Miami, Tampa, Panama City and St. Augustine.

    Florida’s state park system is a bastion of wildness in a state where vast stretches of sugar sand beaches and mangrove forests have long given way to condos, motels and strip mall souvenir shops.

    Advocates say places like Topsail Hill Preserve State Park near Destin are literal beacons on a hill — the preserve is known for its 25-foot high sand dunes that tower over a stretch of the Panhandle known for its spring break destinations and military installations.

    Eric Draper, a former head of the Florida Park Service, said Topsail is one of the last undeveloped stretches of Florida’s Gulf Coast.

    In that part of the state, Draper said, “you can stand on the beach, you look right, you look left, and you just see a lot of condos and developments and houses. But this is one place that you can stand and look for three miles and not see any development.”

    Under the new plans, Topsail would get up to four new pickleball courts, a disc golf course and a new hotel with a capacity of up to 350 rooms — a scale of development that Draper said is more in line with a conference center than a quiet beach retreat.

    Another proposal is for a golf complex at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Martin County on the state’s southeast coast north of West Palm Beach. Building the golf courses would entail removing a boardwalk and observation tower as well as relocating the residences and offices of park staff, as well as existing cabins for visitors.

    A change.org petition targeting the would-be golf complex at Jonathan Dickinson had netted more than 60,000 signatures as of Thursday afternoon.

    It is not the first time a Republican administration has raised the idea of leveraging more revenue from state parks by providing golf, lodging and other attractions. But past ideas were quickly dropped after public opposition.

    In 2015, then-Gov. Rick Scott’s administration floated plans to allow cattle farmers to graze their herds and loggers to harvest timber from park lands.

    Legendary former professional golfer Jack Nicklaus has long lobbied state officials to underwrite his push to build golf courses in state parks, efforts that fizzled following public pushback.

    Wraithmell, the head of Audubon Florida, said she hopes state officials will listen to the Floridians who plan to pack public meetings next week to weigh in on the proposals.

    “Absolutely there is demand for more people to enjoy state parks,” she said. “The solution is not to try to cram as many people into a park as we can …. The solution is to create more state parks.”

    ___

    This story was first published on Aug. 22, 2024. It was updated on Aug. 23, 2024, to correct that there are nine state parks included in the proposal, not eight.

    ___ Associated Press reporter Brendan Farrington in Tallahassee contributed to this story.

    ___

    Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GoFundMe for Florida whistleblower fired after leaking DeSantis’ state park plans reaches over $200K

    GoFundMe for Florida whistleblower fired after leaking DeSantis’ state park plans reaches over $200K

    [ad_1]

    More than $200,000 poured in this week for a former Florida Department of Environmental Protection employee who was fired because he released information about a proposal to add golf courses and resort-style lodges at state parks.

    The GoFundMe page set up by the former employee, James Gaddis, had drawn more than 5,300 contributions by Thursday morning. Many people made anonymous contributions to the single father who worked for the state for 12 years.

    Gaddis worked the past two years as a cartographer, mapping Florida’s mosaic of conservation lands, especially state parks, at an annual salary of $49,346.

    Gaddis wrote on his GoFundMe page he knew “sounding the alarm was a risky move,” but that in making the plans public, “I saw myself as a public servant first and felt that it was the only ethical thing to do.”

    “I was directed to create nine maps depicting shocking and destructive infrastructure proposals, while keeping quiet as they were pushed through an accelerated and under-the-radar public engagement process,” Gaddis wrote.

    Gaddis initially shared documents about the department’s “Great Outdoors Initiative” with the Tampa Bay Times. He told the Times his decision to release the plans stemmed from rushed secrecy of the proposal and potential environmental destruction.

    Gaddis set a goal of $10,000 with the GoFundMe page.

    A Department of Environmental Protection spokeswoman said this week the agency doesn’t comment on personnel matters.

    After the information got out, the parks proposal faced a bipartisan backlash. The state last week backtracked on the initiative, and Gov. Ron DeSantis sought to distance himself from the proposal.

    DeSantis said information was “leaked” to a “left wing group to try to create a narrative” against the proposal, which included golf courses at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Martin County and lodges of up to 350 rooms at Anastasia State Park in St. Johns County and Topsail Hill Preserve State Park in Walton County.

    DeSantis also said the proposal was “half-baked” and “not ready for prime time,” before saying he was “totally fine to just do nothing and do no improvements, if that’s what the general public wants.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jim Turner, the News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    [ad_1]

    Office of Governor Ron DeSantis, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square)

    The state of Florida is suing the Biden-Harris administration to obtain information on how many illegal foreign nationals convicted of violent crimes who served time in prison were released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    “Historically, when illegal aliens were brought to the U.S. to be prosecuted for their crimes, it was well understood that the aliens would be deported once they have served their sentence,” Florida’s lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Ashley Moody, states. “That was until the Biden-Harris Administration implemented their shockingly irresponsible immigration policy, pushing unknown numbers of dangerous criminals straight from federal prison into our communities and causing chaos, anarchy, and crime.”

    RELATED: Illegal Immigrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    The lawsuit was filed after Florida received no response to a Freedom of Information Act request it submitted in March seeking information about criminal illegal foreign nationals allegedly being released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    It was filed in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Fort Myers Division and names U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Prisons as defendants.

    “In addition to flat out refusing to secure the border, reports indicate that President Biden and failed Border Czar Kamala Harris refuse to deport dangerous illegal immigrant prisoners into our communities once they are released from prison,” Moody said. “This administration has made it clear they will not turn over documents showing this dangerous and unlawful scheme in a timely manner. Now, American cities are suffering in a very public way. I will not stand idly by and allow this dereliction of duty.”

    When filing the FOIA request in March, she said, “The Biden administration has full knowledge that prisoners from other countries are making their way into the United States through our wide-open border. Now, we are demanding to know reasons why the Biden administration is releasing criminal illegal aliens in U.S. prisons directly into the interior, rather than deporting them back to their country of origin,” saying, “the American people deserve to know.”

    The complaint states the administration is “unlawfully withholding records” and by doing so, harming Florida by “continuously denying Florida access to documents that it has a legal right to.” It also states the harm is irreparable until ICE is compelled to follow the law. The lawsuit asks the court to order the defendants to respond to Florida’s request and cover attorney fees.

    RELATED: California Legislature Allows ‘Undocumented’ Immigrants to Get Free $150K Home Down Payments

    In the complaint, Moody also alludes to the different processes followed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air & Marine Operations, Border Patrol, and U.S. Coast Guard officials when apprehending an illegal border crosser at a land border versus at sea.

    Unlike those illegally entering at the southwest or northern borders by land, who are largely processed into the U.S. instead of for removal, when apprehended at sea, most illegal foreign nationals are repatriated to their country of origin, The Center Square has reported.

    U.S. Coast Guard 7th District in South Florida crews continue to interdict and repatriate foreign nationals attempting to illegally enter the U.S. off the coast of Florida, including a record number under the Biden-Harris administration, The Center Square has reported.

    According to Coast Guard records, in six months from Oct. 1, 2022, to May 17, 2023, for example, crews interdicted or encountered 6,679 Cubans and 4,473 Haitians, The Center Square previously reported.

    By comparison, crews apprehended 838 Cubans in fiscal 2021, 49 in fiscal 2020, 313 in fiscal 2019 and 259 in fiscal 2018, The Center Square reported.

    These numbers exclude interdiction efforts of Miami Sector Border Patrol agents, also exclusively reported on by The Center Square.

    RELATED: American Dream Out of Reach? Only 10% Polled Said They Can Afford to Buy a Home

    Critics argue if the policies implemented at sea, off the coast of Florida, or on Florida shores were implemented at U.S. northern and southwest land borders, potentially millions of illegal foreign nationals would have been processed for removal instead of being released into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge several years into the future.

    Those apprehended by federal and local officials on the Florida coast after they illegally arrived by sea, who didn’t legally arrive at ports of entry with any immigration claim, are primarily processed for removal and “are generally not eligible to claim asylum or to appear before an immigration judge,” Moody notes.

    Under the Biden-Harris administration, “criminal aliens [are brought] to the United States [by the federal government] so the aliens can be prosecuted consistent with federal law and serve time in prison. But everyone has always assumed – in both Democrat and Republican Administrations – that such aliens would be deported the moment they finished their criminal sentence,” she said. “Otherwise, the decision to bring a criminal to the United States for prosecution results in a benefit to that alien in the form of the right to permanently remain in the United States.

    “For the first time in history, however, the Biden-Harris Administration has abandoned that practice … In other words, as things stand, asylum seekers caught on the high seas have been returned to their home country without even seeing an immigration judge, while drug traffickers and other serious criminals brought to the United States only for the purpose of serving prison time are being released straight into our communities to wreak havoc on our citizenry.”

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Florida Law and Order Priorities Highlighted by Governor DeSantis, AG Moody, Sheriff Judd

    Florida Law and Order Priorities Highlighted by Governor DeSantis, AG Moody, Sheriff Judd

    [ad_1]

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis highlighted law and order priorities, including protecting from fentanyl and illegal drugs, and curbing illegal immigration, with Attorney General Ashley Moody, Sheriff Grady Judd, and others in law enforcement.

    Last year, Governor DeSantis signed legislation establishing the State Assistance for Fentanyl Eradication (SAFE) grant program, which provides law enforcement with the funding needed to conduct large-scale drug operations across the state, including many in Central Florida.

    Florida has also enacted a suite of legislation to crack down on crime, curb illegal immigration, increase penalties for drug and human traffickers, and recruit law enforcement officers to the state.

    And when two state attorneys refused to carry out the duties of their positions and enforce the law, Governor DeSantis removed them from office.

    “Leadership matters,” said Republican Governor Ron DeSantis. “Law and order is maintained when leaders insist on enforcing the law. Florida has enacted legislation to combat crime, recruited police officers from all over the country, refused to allow cities to defund the police, and—when necessary—removed rogue state attorneys who refused to enforce the law.”

    “Florida is a law-and-order state, and through proactive leadership and diligent law enforcement efforts we continue to prosper, break tourism records and lead in new business formations,” said Attorney General Ashley Moody. “This is due in large part to the brave men and women in law enforcement, and we will always work to ensure they are supported by Florida leadership.”

    In 2023, the Governor approved $20 million in funding for Florida’s SAFE program administered by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. This state-funded grant has allowed local law enforcement agencies to effectively fight against drug trafficking and get hundreds of pounds of deadly drugs off our streets.

    “I commend Governor DeSantis and the Florida legislature for their support of law enforcement in Florida,” said Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd. “We are a law and order state, and proud of it. Because of this, our communities are thriving. Florida is a safe place to live, work, and play.”

    Examples of Florida being a law and order state from SAFE grant success stories include:

    • In January 2024, the Polk County Sheriffs Office utilized SAFE to arrest 11 suspects trafficking in fentanyl and cocaine, seizing 30 pounds of cocaine and nearly 8 pounds of fentanyl.
    • In March 2024, Santa Rosa County and Escambia County Sheriffs’ offices, working alongside the DEA, seized 3 grams of fentanyl, marijuana, prescription pills, and several handguns.
    • In April 2024, FDLE operations in conjunction with Sheriffs’ Offices in Seminole County and Palm Beach County resulted in arrests of nearly 40 drug traffickers.
    • In April 2024, officers in the Fort Myers region successfully seized nearly 4kg of cocaine, 90g of fentanyl, 69g of MDMA, 375g of marijuana, two AR-15 weapons, and more than $60,000 in currency.
    • In July 2024, FDLE Pensacola, Santa Rosa County and Okaloosa County Sheriff’s offices, Fort Walton Beach Police Department, FHP, and the DEA announced the arrest of 19 drug traffickers facing charges including trafficking in cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, conspiracy to distribute, and racketeering.
    • In August 2024, a SAFE-funded investigation dismantled a drug trafficking operation in St. Petersburg which was responsible for manufacturing hundreds of doses of fentanyl daily throughout Polk County, specifically in Lakeland.
      • Officers confiscated 10.7 kilos of fentanyl, along with cocaine, oxycodone, marijuana, 3 illegal firearms, and over $500,000 in cash.

    “Florida is a national model in eradicating drugs from our communities and taking criminals off the street,” said Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Executive Director Dave Kerner. “In every corner of this great state, you will find State Troopers and local law enforcement working together to interdict drugs and arrest those who profit off of it. Instead of being demonized, Governor DeSantis celebrates the dangerous work our law enforcement officers do every day, and our men and women in law enforcement deeply appreciate that.”

    In total, SAFE funds have resulted in over 650 arrests and the seizure of more than 145 pounds of fentanyl, 220 pounds of cocaine, and 60,000 fentanyl pills – numbers officials say show Florida is a law and order state.

    “Thanks to Governor Ron DeSantis and his leadership, Florida’s law enforcement officers have arrested hundreds of dangerous drug traffickers and taken fentanyl and other deadly drugs off our streets,” said Florida Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Mark Glass. “Florida is a national role model and stands in stark contrast to crime-plagued blue states.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DeSantis halts ‘half-baked’ Florida state park development plans after public, political backlash

    DeSantis halts ‘half-baked’ Florida state park development plans after public, political backlash

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday called a proposal to build pickleball courts, lodges, and golf courses in Florida State Parks released by the Department of Environmental Protection last week “half-baked,” saying, “If we do nothing, that’s fine with me.”

    The Great Outdoors Initiative to Increase Public Access” at Florida state parks includes building 350-room lodges, pickleball courts, and disc-golf courses, but now it is “back to the drawing board,” the governor said after receiving enough pushback that the public hearings for the plans have been postponed.

    The plan has drawn outrage and scorn across the political spectrum, most notably from two in the independently elected Florida Cabinet, Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson and Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, both Republicans who help manage state lands along with DeSantis.

    The fourth Cabinet member, Attorney General Ashley Moody, doesn’t appear to have commented, although she attended the news conference. We’ve asked her office for comment but haven’t head back yet.

    “They’re going back to the drawing board; talk to your local communities,” DeSantis said when asked about the matter during a news conference on crime and drugs in Winter Haven. “Here’s the thing. I’d rather not spend any money on this, right? I mean, if people don’t want improvements, then don’t do it.”

    DeSantis said he had not approved the plan, although his Department of Environmental Protection announced it. “I never saw that,” he said.

    The governor said the department will go back and listen to Floridians about the parks and that nothing will be done this year.

    “A lot of that stuff was just half baked, and it was not ready for prime time.”

    The plans were leaked, DeSantis said.

    “But this was done intentionally, given to a very left-wing group to try to create a narrative that somehow, you know, the state park is going to become a big parking lot or something like that,” DeSantis said. “That’s obviously a phony narrative. Was never true to begin with.”

    ‘Always the victim’

    Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried posted to X following DeSantis’ comments.

    “For once can’t he just say, ‘I am an a–hole and I take full responsibility.’ Nope, not Ron Desantis. Always the victim,” she posted.

    Rep. Anna Eskamani, a Democrat representing part of Orange County, said that without the backlash, the governor would not have stopped the plans.

    “Advocacy works — and in typical Governor Ron DeSantis fashion, he blames people around him versus taking responsibility for a series of terrible plans that his administration stated were submitted in ‘good faith,’” Eskamani said in a prepared statement following DeSantis’ news conference.

    Organizations and individuals have rallied against the plans by coordinating protests at state parks and the Department of Environmental Protection headquarters, including dozens who gathered at Honeymoon Island State Park in Dunedin.

    “I am grateful to the grassroots organizations and to everyday people who organized and protested against these terrible proposals,” Eskamani said. “I also demand answers so that we can learn who these obscure groups that submitted these plans are and where their money comes from. These answers are critical to preventing something like this from happening again.”

    If the public suggests improvements to public parks, “We’re not going to take away green space,” DeSantis said, adding again, “If we do nothing, then that’s fine with me.”

    Governor Ron DeSantis fashion, he blames people around him versus taking responsibility for a series of terrible plans that his administration stated were submitted in ‘good faith,’” Eskamani said in a prepared statement following DeSantis’ news conference.

    Organizations and individuals have rallied against the plans by coordinating protests at state parks and the Department of Environmental Protection headquarters, including dozens who gathered at Honeymoon Island State Park in Dunedin.

    “I am grateful to the grassroots organizations and to everyday people who organized and protested against these terrible proposals,” Eskamani said. “I also demand answers so that we can learn who these obscure groups that submitted these plans are and where their money comes from. These answers are critical to preventing something like this from happening again.”

    If the public suggests improvements to public parks, “We’re not going to take away green space,” DeSantis said, adding again, “If we do nothing, then that’s fine with me.”

    Meeting with a charity

    Part of the plans included a collaboration between the state of Florida and Folds of Honor, a charity for families of veterans, to build three golf courses at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Martin County.

    The organization interested in building the courses rescinded its initial proposal amid the backlash.

    The proposed golf courses at the Hobe Sound park, a former military base, ostensibly were intended to raise money for scholarships for families of military and first responders who have been injured or killed — an idea DeSantis said he admired for its military ties and increased options for affordable golfing in the state.

    “And so, it’s not going to work in a state park, and it may not work anywhere in Florida, where you’re getting new land and kind of doing it. But what I think they could potentially do is take some of the existing courses that have been run down or abandoned, raise a bunch of money, make it something nice, and then use that to help military and first responders,” DeSantis said.

    In April, the governor met with the founder of the nonprofit. During the meeting, the two discussed “potentially doing something in the state of Florida,” he said.

    “They were going to honor the Tuskegee Airmen with a facility, and they were kind of in the stages of developing some ideas along the lines and then helping the military families and helping the families of first responders,” DeSantis said.

    Despite the proposal for the courses, DeSantis said the government is “not getting into the golf course business in the state of Florida.”

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jay Waagmeester, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • Florida’s definition of ‘religion’ is too narrow, says Satanic Temple

    Florida’s definition of ‘religion’ is too narrow, says Satanic Temple

    [ad_1]

    The DeSantis administration, in encouraging introduction of religious chaplains into Florida’s public schools, has published a definition of “religion” that appears to exclude world faiths with millions of followers.

    The Florida Department of Education’s model policy to guide school principals interested in implementing the optional program defines both religion and the qualifications needed to serve as chaplains.

    “Florida welcomes only legitimate and officially authorized chaplains to become volunteers at their local schools and to provide students with morally sound guidance,” Education Commissioner Manny Diaz Jr. said in a news release announcing the policy last week.

    The policy appears to be aimed at The Satanic Temple, an organization whose founders have said is intended to counter government efforts to inject Christianity into government operations by espousing beliefs considered repugnant to it, in defense of the separation of church and state.

    The policy “defines religion too narrowly in a way that not only excludes Satanists, but Buddhists, Humanists, Jains, Confucianists, and many others,” said Lucien Greaves, a spokesperson for the temple, in an email to the Phoenix.

    “It is a clear encroachment of religion into public schools, with the clear intention of advancing a specific viewpoint,” said Greaves (a pseudonym he adopts for his temple work).

    “It’s divisive, it is legally unsound (and will not survive its forthcoming lawsuits that the Florida taxpayer will finance), and it is born of cheap political grandstanding without any real concern for the children in Florida public schools.”

    During a Board of Education meeting Wednesday, Diaz encouraged schools interested in implementing the program to use the model policy “to ensure that credible chaplains can volunteer in Florida schools.”

    The policy defines a chaplain as “an individual who is officially authorized by the leadership of a religion under the religion’s governing principles to conduct religious exercises.”

    It defines religion as “an organized group led, supervised, or counseled by a hierarchy of teachers, clergy, sages, or priests that (1) acknowledges the existence of and worships a supernatural entity or entities that possesses power over the natural world, (2) regularly engages in some form of ceremony, ritual, or protocol, and (3) whose religious beliefs impose moral duties independent of the believer’s self-interest.”

    The program, authorized by HB 931, went into effect in July and allows schools to authorize religious figures to offer counseling on campus. Participating schools would publish lists of volunteers available “to provide support, services, and programs to students as assigned by the district school board or charter school governing board,” the legislation says.

    The law allows public districts and public charters to partake in the program, but does not require it and, in districts that do, parents must approve a student visiting with a chaplain.

    Statute and model policy

    The statute places one requirement for chaplains to meet: Pass a level 2 criminal background check, a fingerprint-based review of disqualifying offenses for people in positions of responsibility or trust.

    Opponents of the program told the Phoenix that’s not enough to protect children.

    The model policy, if a school chooses to use it, places the burden on a principal to ensure applying chaplains meet minimum requirements, including:

    • A chaplain “not be disqualified following a background screening.”
    • Be affiliated with a group within the school district.
    • Possess a bachelor’s degree and a graduate degree in counseling or theology or have seven years of chaplain experience.
    • Have at least two years of chaplain experience with a local group.
    • Must signify they will not “teach or encourage students to behave contrary to any of Florida’s state academic standards” and show a “sincere desire” to enhance student welfare.

    “A principal may deny the application of any individual to become a volunteer chaplain if the principal determines that the individual is not applying to fulfill the program’s purpose or the applicant’s participation will be contrary to the pedagogical interests of the school and the chaplaincy program,” the model policy states.

    Greaves said the policy “flies in the face of all standing First Amendment precedent and basic respect for religious pluralism and liberty.”

    “Now we see even more clearly the disingenuous intentions of policymakers who simultaneously portray the chaplaincy program as uninterested in proselytizing, while also insisting that chaplains hold only to certain specific beliefs that have nothing to do with counseling and could only be relevant to proselytizing,” Greaves said.

    The organization’s website says: “The mission of The Satanic Temple is to encourage benevolence and empathy, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and undertake noble pursuits.”

    Greaves told The New York Times that he doesn’t believe in a literal Satan any more than he does a literal God.

    Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the bill in April, addressing already looming concerns about involvement by The Satanic Temple.

    “Some have said that if you do a school chaplain program that, somehow, you’re going to have satanists running around in all our schools,” DeSantis said during the bill-signing ceremony in Kissimmee.

    “We’re not playing those games in Florida. That is not a religion. That is not qualified to be able to participate in this. So, we’re going to be using common sense when it comes to this. You don’t have to worry about it.”

    “We strongly encourage school districts to move forward with their chaplaincy programs,” Bryan Griffin, the governor’s communications director, posted to X.

    “The State of Florida and the Florida Department of Education will stand with and support school districts who implement the program. To further this goal, The Department of Education has recently released a model policy for districts to adopt in implementation of the chaplaincy program.”

    ‘Extremely problematic’

    In an interview with the Phoenix last month, before the model policy was announced, Kara Gross, the ACLU of Florida’s legislative director and senior policy counsel, said the program “creates an environment that is ripe for religious coercion and indoctrination of students.”

    After the model policy was announced, Gross emphasized those concerns.

    “The government-proposed ‘model policy’ further demonstrates that the true intent behind this law is to advance certain religious viewpoints that are favored by the Governor in our public schools and to exclude other religious viewpoints that the Governor disfavors,” Gross said in a news release.

    She said the model policy is “extremely problematic and raises several constitutional concerns.”

    “It is very concerning that the government-proposed ‘model policy’ seeks to define religion for Floridians,” Gross said.

    “This is the opposite of religious freedom. Additionally, it creates arbitrary requirements that would open up school districts to potential liability for excluding certain religious viewpoints and promoting others.”

    The newest member of the Broward County School Board, Rebecca Thompson, said during a Wednesday call with reporters said she is “very against” the chaplain program, saying she does not think there is enough structure.

    “But my main concern as a mental health professional, as the only one on our board, once I get placed there, is that these people don’t have training, so they’re not mental health professional-training that you go years to understand how to see the signs that someone might be suicidal, see the signs that someone’s getting abused,” Thompson said.

    “So we are sending unqualified people into our school to harm our students. … And we are putting our students at harm for another cultural war message that DeSantis is pushing.”

    Sarah Leonardi, representing Broward County’s district three, said during that same call that the program will not give students what they need.

    “We are in a youth mental health crisis, and this is, again, another distraction, another culture war issue, and it’s also not giving kids what they need. What parents and what educators want are real solutions to the mental health crisis and, unfortunately, that’s not what the Legislature is bringing to the table,” Leonardi said.

    One organization against voluntary chaplains, The Council of Florida Churches, previously advised districts considering implementing the program to instead hire more certified counselors or psychiatrists or, at the very least, consult with public stakeholders on a feasibility study or something similar to gauge the interests and desires of the community.

    Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United, an organization dedicated to the separation of church and state, encouraged school boards to not pick up the program.

    “The policy permits chaplains to provide ‘spiritual guidance’ to students, but that is not the role of public school officials. Public schools are not Sunday schools, and people of faith along with the nonreligious all have a stake in keeping church and state separate,” Laser said in a news release.

    “Religious freedom means students and their parents — not politicians or public school officials — get to decide if, when, and how to engage with religion. Florida’s public-school boards should refuse to implement this, or any, policy on public school chaplains.”

    The chaplain program has not received much interest from Florida districts, although the Osceola County School Board recently scheduled a vote on the topic. However, the district later dropped the matter following a statement of interest in participating from “Ministers of Satan,” the Tallahassee Democrat reported.

    Jackie Llanos contributed to this report.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jay Waagmeester, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • ‘Unnecessary development’: Florida Republicans take aim at DeSantis plan to develop state parks

    ‘Unnecessary development’: Florida Republicans take aim at DeSantis plan to develop state parks

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Anastasia State Park/Facebook

    Some Republican lawmakers are criticizing a controversial proposal to add lodges, pickleball courts and golf at state parks, as Gov. Ron DeSantis’ office on Thursday defended the idea of making the sites “more visitor-friendly.”

    The Florida Department of Environmental Protection this week announced the proposal, dubbed the “Great Outdoors Initiative,” and said eight meetings will be held Tuesday to review management plans for nine parks, from Miami-Dade County to the Panhandle.

    Environmental groups quickly criticized the initiative and were joined Thursday by Republican lawmakers including Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, who is a chief proponent of creating a statewide wildlife corridor.

    “We have worked hard to improve our state parks with the goal of protecting and preserving natural habitats, and enhancing access to passive recreational activities like hiking, biking, or canoeing,” Passidomo, R-Naples, said on the social-media site X. “Our vision did not contemplate the addition of golf courses and hotels, which in my view are not in-line with the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of nature. I am open to other ideas, but from what I know at this time, the proposal should not move forward in its current form.”

    Sen. Jay Trumbull, a Panama City Republican whose Northwest Florida district includes three of the targeted state parks, called the proposal “unnecessary development.”

    The initiative proposes a lodge of up to 350 rooms, along with four pickleball courts and a disc golf course at Topsail Hill Preserve State Park in Walton County. Plans for Camp Helen State Park in Bay County and Grayton Beach State Park in Walton County each include the addition of 10 cabins. Camp Helen State Park could also get a “glamping” area. Glamping is essentially a combination of the words glamorous and camping.

    “I stand in strong opposition to the proposed expansion of state parks to include golf courses and associated facilities in our state parks, particularly in Camp Helen, Topsail Hill Preserve and Grayton Beach State Parks, which have been targeted in the initial expansion and hold a place of enormous importance to our district,” Trumbull posted. “Our state parks should not be in the business of competing with private enterprise to provide lodging or other commercial amenities.”

    But DeSantis spokesman Jeremy Redfern said “multiple phases” of public discussion will be held to get feedback. He said the proposed changes might not all be approved and that the Department of Environmental Protection is looking at ways to make parks “more visitor-friendly.”

    “Teddy Roosevelt believed that public parks were for the benefit and enjoyment of the people, and we agree with him,” Redfern said in a statement. “No administration has done more than we have to conserve Florida’s natural resources, grow conservation lands, and keep our environment pristine. But it’s high time we made public lands more accessible to the public.”

    DeSantis, an avid golfer, touted his environmental record Thursday during an appearance in Titusville.

    “We have done more in our tenure, in terms of Everglades restoration, in terms of improving water quality — what we’re doing with the Indian River Lagoon, nobody’s done. It’s historic,” DeSantis said. “We also (have) done things to help beach renourishment. All these different things. And we have this massive increase in conservation, and we have this massive Florida Wildlife Corridor that we’ve created in the center part of our state, which was never done before.”

    But groups such as 1000 Friends of Florida, Friends of the Everglades and Vote Water implored members to voice opposition to the proposal and attend the meetings Tuesday.

    Rep. Adam Anderson, R-Palm Harbor, issued a statement that said a proposal to add up to four pickleball courts to Honeymoon Island State Park in Pinellas County “is not just foolhardy — it’s wrong.”

    “These acts could aggravate ongoing environmental challenges, harm our vulnerable coastlines and estuaries, and increase the likelihood of red tide events along the Gulf (of Mexico),” Anderson said.

    Republican Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson expressed a need to be careful about “building infrastructure in state parks.”

    Also, Nicklaus Companies, a golf-course design firm that was involved when a similar proposal was briefly put before the Legislature in 2011, sought to distance itself from the new plan.

    “Nicklaus Companies and Nicklaus Design only learned of these proposed changes to our state parks through news reports and have no involvement in any current proposals,” Nicklaus Companies said in a statement. “A prior proposal put forth by legislators in 2011 was abandoned in the face of understandable environmental and community concerns. In any event, such concerns should be addressed in an open and public process.”

    The state proposal calls for a golf course at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Martin County.

    The initiative also proposes 10 additional cabins, four pickleball courts and a disc golf course at Oleta River State Park in Miami-Dade County; a lodge with up to 350 rooms at Anastasia State Park in St. Johns County; four pickleball courts at Dr. Von D. Mizell-Eula Johnson State Park in Broward County; and a disc golf course and up to four pickleball courts at Hillsborough River State Park in Hillsborough County.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jim Turner, the News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • Here’s when and how you can push back on plans to develop Florida State Parks

    Here’s when and how you can push back on plans to develop Florida State Parks

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Shutterstock

    Hillsborough River State Park

    The Florida Department of Environmental Protection went on damage control Thursday to defend its decision to only give the public six days to prepare to give public comment about the DeSantis administration’s plan to consider developing nine state parks.

    The developments announced Wednesday in the “2024-25 Great Outdoors Initiative” include up to four pickleball courts and a disc golf course at Hillsborough River State Park, and up to four pickleball courts at Honeymoon Island State Park.

    Elsewhere in Florida, the proposed development is even more drastic. In part, the state has proposed:

    • A 350-room hotel, pickleball courts and disc golf at Anastasia State Park in St. Johns County
    • Cabins or glamping at Camp Helen State Park near Panama City Beach
    • Pickleball courts at Dr. Von D. Mizell-Eula Johnson State Park in Hollywood
    • The removal of the iconic observation tower at Martin County’s Jonathan Dickinson State Park, where the state also wants to build three golf courses
    • A disc golf course and four pickleball courts, plus cabins and “glamping” at Miami-Dade County’s Oleta River State Park
    • A 350-room “lodge” along with four pickleball courts and a disc golf course at Topsail Hill Preserve State Park, plus cabins, four pickleball courts and a disc golf course at Grayton Beach State Park in Walton County

    The Florida Springs Council has pushed back on the state giving citizens just a week’s notice ahead of DEP meetings across the state set for Tuesday, Aug. 27.

    What’s more, the meetings — listed at the bottom of this post — are all happening at the same time on the same day.

    A former director of Florida’s state parks even told reporters Max Chesnes and Romy Ellenbogen that the DEP might be operating outside of the legal process and the park systems’ own manual as it moves to update park management plans. “This appears to be something that has been planned in secret,” added Eric Draper, who ran the parks between 2017-2021.

    Although it’s not clear how much these developments would cost or who would win the contracts to develop Florida’s state parks, the grassroots organization VoteWater has questioned whether or not developers are whispering in the governor’s ear.

    As Craig Pittman noted, DeSantis’ communications director, Bryan Griffin, wouldn’t answer reporters’ questions about the rushed public input process and only went to Twitter to call the plans “an exciting new initiative.”

    Florida Master Naturalist and activist Ryan Worthington went on his Instagram page (@the_fl_excursionist) to share the dates, times and locations of each meeting, listed below.

    The in-person-only meetings to discuss proposed development at Florida’s state parks are all on Tuesday, Aug. 27, from 3 to 4 p.m. local time. (Some of the parks are in the Panhandle.)

    The Springs Council has encouraged anyone who cannot making a meeting to send an email to their state representative, urging them “to take a strong position and to show up and stand with their communities at the DEP meetings.”

    Public meeting details:

    • Hillsborough River State Park Jimmie B. Keel Regional Library, 2902 W. Bearss Ave., Tampa
    • Honeymoon Island The District, 11141 U.S. Hwy 9 N, Suite 204, Clearwater
    • Anastasia State Park First Coast Technical College, The Character Counts Conference Center, Building C, 2980 Collins Ave., St. Augustine
    • Camp Helen State Park Lyndell Conference Center, 423 Lyndell Lane, Panama City Beach
    • Dr. Von D. Mizell-Eula Johnson State Park Lecture Hall at Downtown Event Center, 416 NE First St., Fort Lauderdale (Building C—2nd Floor, enter at Main Entrance B – clearly marked on outside of building)
      Jonathan Dickinson State Park The Flagler of Stuart, 201 SW Flagler Ave., River Room, Stuart
    • Oleta River State Park Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, Kovens Conference Center, Room 114, 3000 NE 151 St., North Miami
    • Topsail Hill Preserve State Park and Grayton Beach State Park Watercolor Inn & Resort 34 Goldenrod Circle, Santa Rosa Beach

    This story first appeared in our sister publication Creative Loafing Tampa Bay.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Ray Roa

    Source link

  • ‘People don’t go to Florida state parks to play golf’: DeSantis’ development plan includes hotels, pickleball, glamping

    ‘People don’t go to Florida state parks to play golf’: DeSantis’ development plan includes hotels, pickleball, glamping

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Shutterstock

    One proposal talks of building three golf courses at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Hobe Sound.

    When Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Caddyshack, was majoring in history at Yale, I bet he heard someone quote that famous saying by philosopher George Santayana: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

    Yet our Ivy League-educated chief executive failed to learn from a couple of the worst mistakes of former Gov. Rick Scott’s b-b-bumpy eight years in office. Now he’s trying to repeat them both — and to rush these idiotic errors through before too many people find out and object.

    As I write this, I am looking at a bunch of internal documents from the Florida Department of Environmental Playtime — er, I mean “Protection.” These documents describe proposed changes to nine of our award-winning state parks which, I am told, have been ordered to be implemented by the governor’s office.

    The worst one talks of building not one, not two, but THREE golf courses at Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Hobe Sound. There are plans at the other parks for big motels and pickleball courts and disc golf courses, all of which run completely counter to what our state parks are all about.

    At Jonathan Dickinson, “rare environments such as coastal sand hills, upland lakes, and scrub forests as well as the pristine Loxahatchee River make this park a unique spot to explore on land or by water,” the park’s website says.

    I should also point out that the park includes the home of Trapper Nelson, the legendary Wild Man of the Loxahatchee. If Trapper Nelson were around today, he’d track down the blockheads who came up with this ridiculous plan and tan their hides with a canoe paddle.

    People don’t go to Florida state parks to play golf. They’re not venturing into an inspiring natural treasure to spend time in a place that’s maintained with sprinklers, mowers, fertilizer, and pesticides (which are likely to pollute the Loxahatchee).

    They go to the parks to get away from artificial settings like that. They go to see what’s left of the real Florida. That’s the park system’s motto: “Experience the Real Florida!”

    I sent the Dickinson document to Clay Henderson, who literally wrote the book on Florida’s protected places (“Forces of Nature,” buy four copies and give three to your friends).

    “There are 28 golf courses in Martin County,” he told me. “Why would we need to carve up a beautiful and protected natural area for another golf course? It goes against every management principle that has made the Florida State Park system the best in the country.”

    Watch the birdies

    Florida’s state parks are one of the glories of this place we call home. Our 175 parks span nearly 800,000 acres where you can hike, fish, swim, bike, canoe, kayak, watch wildlife, or simply gaze in open-mouthed awe at your surroundings.

    The Florida park system has won national awards four times. That’s three more than any other state.

    There’s a procedure for making changes to the parks. The first step is to amend the park’s unit management plan. The internal DEP documents I’m looking at are labeled “Unit Management Plan Amendments” for each park. Here’s what it says for Jonathan Dickinson:

    “This concept proposes development of an 18-hole golf course and a separate 9-hole golf course between the Brightline intercity rail and U.S. Highway 1 transportation corridors and the development of a second 18-hole golf course in the northeastern portion of the park on the westside of the Brightline rail corridor. The concept includes a supporting clubhouse and ancillary facilities.”

    Building these unnatural additions to the park, it says, would require “the relocation and re-development of existing park support facilities including staff residences, a training center, and the DRP District 5 office complex.”

    They’d also have to move the Hobe Mountain observation tower, the document says.

    The tower allows park visitors to hike to the top of an ancient sand dune that stands 86 feet above sea level. There’s a boardwalk leading up to the tower, which rises an additional 27 feet from the dune.

    But suuuure, we could just move that darn tower any old place!

    I called Eric Draper, who was director of the Florida Park Service from 2017 to 2021. When I told him what was in the works, he was stunned.

    “The observation tower at Jonathan Dickinson State Park is one of the most beautiful places in the world,” Draper said. “It’s the ideal place to see the whole park.”

    Dickinson’s a delight for avid birders, he told me, because it’s the southernmost spot to find the rare Florida scrub jay and it’s also where the brown-headed nuthatch was reintroduced into the wild.

    But Duffer DeSantis prefers a different kind of birdie.

    Lodging a complaint

    The documents call for drastic changes at other beloved parks.

    One proposes building a 350-room lodge at Topsail Hill Preserve State Park in Santa Rosa Beach. Another calls for a 350-room lodge at Anastasia State Park in St. Augustine.

    “Lodge” is a code word for “cheesy motel with rustic décor.”

    Topsail is one of the most beautiful beach parks I’ve ever seen. It’s named for its soaring dunes. They’re so tall that, from offshore, they look like the sails from a ship.

    “Those same white quartz dunes are responsible for a rare coastal ecosystem of freshwater dune lakes that teem with aquatic wildlife,” the park’s website says. “Walkers will pass through old-growth pine forests, sandy scrubland, dunes, and wetlands, where they may see some of the 13 imperiled species that find refuge here.”

    Building a 350-room motel in Topsail Hill would be like using a Sharpie to “improve” the “Mona Lisa.” It’s an insult to the very idea of that park.

    Like a lot of special places in Florida, it just barely escaped being torn up by developers. They were promising a project called “Emerald City,” just like Dorothy’s destination, but with luxurious homes, hotels, golf courses, an amusement park, and an airport.

    Fortunately for the real Florida, these plans were backed by a shaky pair of savings-and-loans. In 1991, more than a dozen indictments for fraud terminated the trip to Emerald City, and the state wound up with the land.

    As for Anastasia, it has “more than 1,600 acres of unspoiled beaches, tidal marshes, maritime hammocks, and ancient sand dunes,” according to the park website. “Abundant wading birds hunt for food along Salt Run, including colorful roseate spoonbills. Osprey and eagles rule the skies. … As an extra bonus, the park’s 139 campsites are just a short stroll from the beach.”

    Considering all those campsites, why build 350 motel rooms in the maritime hammocks? Perhaps the better question is: Why does DeSantis want to do ANY of this destructive stuff? I’d like to lodge a complaint with him about these two lodges.

    But wait, there’s more!

    The most popular park

    One of the documents is for Honeymoon Island State Park near Dunedin.

    In the 1960s, a developer envisioned turning the island into a dredge-and fill subdivision with housing for 16,000. Fortunately, his plans ran into practical difficulties, his permit expired, and, in 1974, Florida began buying up the property. The park opened in 1981.

    There’s no camping there. When the park closes at sunset, it empties out. Yet people flock to this park during daylight, drawn by its breathtaking beauty and by the swimming, fishing, hiking, paddling, and bird-watching opportunities.

    Despite (or because of) the fact that it’s closed to campers, Honeymoon Island is the most popular park in the entire system, drawing more than 1 million people a year. Yet the DEP document calls for adding four pickleball courts to Honeymoon Island.

    Pickleball! I know the sport is popular now, but c’mon. Nobody’s going to Honeymoon Island to play pickleball.

    It’s not like you need MORE incentives to attract visitors there, much less one that would interfere with efforts to maintain the park’s ecological character.

    Before proposing this dimwitted idea, DeSantis (who’s from Dunedin) should have asked his predecessor what happened when he tried to make alterations to Honeymoon Island and other parks.

    Like Scott’s more popular doppelganger, Lord Voldemort, it turned really ugly.

    Déjà vu all over again

    The first time I met Rick Scott was shortly after he became governor in 2011. His DEP had proposed a major change in Honeymoon Island. Not only would they allow camping there, they’d make spaces for recreational vehicles, so I wanted to ask him about that.

    Letting in RVs would mean adding new roads, restrooms, bathhouses, playgrounds, electric connections, grills, and other amenities that would take away some of the natural areas. There were similar plans for parks at Wakulla Springs, DeLeon Springs, and Fanning Springs.

    “The reason we have parks is so people will use them,” Scott told me, sounding as if he’d never been to one (I suspect he hadn’t).

    The DEP held a public hearing in Dunedin. Roughly 1,000 people showed up, and 999 were fiercely opposed. Someone from the Florida Native Plant Society vowed to lie in front of the bulldozers, and there was talk of forming a human chain to block any RVs.

    Scott backed down. Honeymoon Island was saved, thanks to people who regarded Honeymoon Island as THEIR park and Scott’s efforts to change it as a personal affront.

    But Scott wasn’t done messing with the parks. At his direction, two legislators introduced bills that would require the DEP to hire Jack Nicklaus — a Scott supporter — to build golf courses in state parks in every region of the state, thus creating a Jack Nicklaus Golf Trail.

    The House version specifically named one park to get a Nicklaus course: Jonathan Dickinson. Both bills said the courses “may include a hotel,” which would be eligible for liquor licenses, and they’d be exempt from any city or county regulations.

    Nicklaus’ lobbyist told me the Golden Bear himself came up with this dopey idea during a chat with Scott about boosting Florida tourism. He promised to waive his usual $2.5 million design fee for the Dickinson course and settle for just $625,000 per course for the other four. Such a deal for the taxpayers!

    Scott endorsed the plan. No one else did. Newspaper columnists derided it as “the worst idea ever.” Environmental groups howled in outrage. Even Arnold Palmer mocked the knuckleheaded Nicklaus Trail.

    Just one week after the bills were introduced, the shell-shocked legislators withdrew them. Everyone assumed that was the last we’d hear of such foolishness.

    Then word got out over the weekend that, despite what happened last time, DeSantis wants to act like Steely Dan and do it again. One of the people spreading the dire news was Dana Bryan, now retired, who spent 30 years in the Florida Park Service, most of it as chief biologist.

    “This is being kept secret,” he told me. “Not even the managers of the parks involved knew about it.”

    When Sarah Gledhill of the Florida Wildlife Federation heard the news, she told me she asked, “Is this April Fool’s Day?” And Julie Wraithmell of Audubon Florida told me her first thought was, “Really? Again? Floridians were horrified when this came up last time.”

    Beyond the environmental consequences, Grant Gelhardt of the Florida Sierra Club saw economic concerns too: “Why should the state go into competition with private enterprise?”

    All of them have alerted their members to be ready to fight this. There isn’t much time.

    “I think the governor’s office and the DEP got their hands caught in the cookie jar and the only way they think they can get any traction is to rush it through,” Wraithmell said.

    Rush to judgment

    A number of reporters (I was one) contacted the DEP on Monday to ask some variation of, “What the Florida are y’all thinking?”

    In response, the DEP issued a “put on a happy face” press release that promised wrecking these parks “will work to expand public access, increase outdoor activities, and provide new lodging options.”

    The DEP is calling this their “Great Outdoors Initiative to Increase Public Access, Recreation, and Lodging at Florida State Parks.” That’s too much of a mouthful to make a good acronym. Instead, I’m calling it CRAP, which stands for “Creative Ruination of A lot of Parks.”

    The press release is remarkably vague. One crucial point it fails to mention: There will be ONE date for nearly simultaneous, in-person public meetings on all nine of these park proposals. The big day is next Tuesday, Aug. 27, from 3 to 4 p.m., which means there’s little time to organize opposition.

    “They are scrambling to rationalize these proposed changes,” Draper told me.

    I hear the DEP has been ordered to play pre-recorded presentations at each of the meetings, then record the public feedback without answering questions, which will definitely soothe all the upset people who are sure to show up demanding answers.

    DeSantis’ uncommunicative communications director, Bryan Griffin, wouldn’t answer reporters’ questions about this weirdly rushed process, but on X (formerly Twitter) he called it “an exciting new initiative.”

    I bet everyone who objects to this “exciting new initiative” has already begun bombarding DeSantis and his DEP with calls, letters, and emails telling them not to Rick (Scott) Roll our precious parks.

    If DeSantis wants to play golf, he should stick to that golf simulator he was given by a big developer. Let us fans of the real Florida continue to enjoy it in its natural state. Otherwise, he better look out for a visit from the ghost of Trapper Nelson.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Craig Pittman

    Source link

  • Florida Supreme Court OKs ‘impact statement’ on costs of abortion amendment

    Florida Supreme Court OKs ‘impact statement’ on costs of abortion amendment

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo by Matt Keller Lehman

    The Yes on 4 rally and March at Lake Eola Park

    In a defeat for supporters of a proposal aimed at enshrining abortion rights in the state Constitution, the Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday cleared the way for a revised “financial impact statement” to appear on the November ballot.

    Financial impact statements, which usually draw little attention, provide estimated effects of proposed constitutional amendments on government revenues and the state budget. But the revised statement for the abortion amendment has drawn controversy because Floridians Protecting Freedom, a political committee backing the proposed amendment, contends it is politicized and misleading.

    The committee filed a lawsuit alleging that House Speaker Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, and House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, lacked the power to direct a panel of economists, known as the Financial Impact Estimating Conference, to revise the statement. The legislative leaders made the move amid legal wrangling after a circuit judge’s decision that an initial statement needed to be rewritten.

    But Wednesday’s 6-1 ruling authored by Chief Justice Carlos Muñiz, rejected the committee’s arguments.

    Representatives of Floridians Protecting Freedom “actively participated in the estimating conference process that they now challenge, without questioning or objecting to the conference’s authority to issue a revised financial impact statement on its own initiative. For that basic reason, the petitioners waived or forfeited any reasonable claim to extraordinary relief from this court,” the chief justice wrote in the opinion joined by Justices Charles Canady, John Couriel, Jamie Grosshans and Meredith Sasso. Justice Renatha Francis agreed and wrote a concurring opinion. Justice Jorge Labarga dissented.

    Backers of the proposed amendment, which will appear on the ballot as Amendment 4, said Wednesday the revised statement is “deceptive and designed to “deliberately confuse voters.”

    “Despite today’s decision, a ‘yes’ on Amendment 4 still means getting politicians out of our exam rooms so that women are free to make their own health care decisions with their doctors,” Lauren Brenzel, director of the political committee, said in a statement.

    The Financial Impact Estimating Conference released an initial statement about the proposed amendment in November 2023. But legal wrangling about the statement began after an April 1 Supreme Court decision that broke with decades of judicial precedent and allowed a 2023 law to take effect that prevented abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

    Floridians Protecting Freedom filed a lawsuit on April 5 arguing that the November financial-impact statement needed to be revised because it was outdated after the Supreme Court ruling. Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooper agreed in June and ordered the Financial Impact Estimating Conference to draft a new version.

    Amid a state appeal of Cooper’s ruling, Passidomo and Renner directed the conference to meet. The conference held three meetings in July before issuing the revised version, with the controversial changes driven by economists representing Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state House.

    Supporters of the amendment “never questioned” the panel’s authority to “voluntarily adopt” a revised statement, Muniz wrote Wednesday.

    “Instead, they actively participated in every step of the revision process without objection. They offered oral and written presentations at each of the estimating conference’s three July meetings, thoroughly and forcefully advocating their position on what the revised financial impact statement should say,” he added.

    The ruling denied a request that the court order another impact statement “without expressing any views on the substantive legality of the revised statement itself.”

    But Labarga, one of two justices on the seven-member court who was not appointed by DeSantis, said the court should decide “the legitimate questions” raised in the lawsuit about whether the legislative leaders had the authority to order a revised statement.

    “As the majority describes, this case involves an extremely fluid procedural history … It is not an overstatement to say that the circumstances of this case are quite convoluted,” Labarga wrote, noting the timeline leading up to Wednesday’s decision. “All of these circumstances led to a legal quagmire, one that does not lend itself to today’s outcome. This case, involving unique facts, untested legal issues, and a time-sensitive matter of statewide importance, calls for more.”

    The revised statement that will appear on the ballot says, in part, that there is “uncertainty about whether the amendment will require the state to subsidize abortions with public funds. Litigation to resolve those and other uncertainties will result in additional costs to the state government and state courts that will negatively impact the state budget. An increase in abortions may negatively affect the growth of state and local revenues over time. Because the fiscal impact of increased abortions on state and local revenues and costs cannot be estimated with precision, the total impact of the proposed amendment is indeterminate.”

    Critics of Amendment 4, including DeSantis, contend that it would do away with the state’s abortion restrictions except a previous amendment that required parental notification before minors can receive abortions. DeSantis’ chief of staff, James Uthmeier, is heading two political committees gathering millions of dollars to fight the abortion measure and another proposed constitutional amendment that would allow adults to use recreational marijuana.

    Lawyers for the American Civil Liberty Union of Florida called Wednesday’s ruling a “direct affront to the rights of Florida voters, who deserve accurate and lawful information” when deciding on constitutional amendments.

    “The politicization of these financial impact statements erodes public trust in our institutions and threatens the integrity of every future ballot measure. The implications of this decision are dire — the court has effectively granted the state unchecked authority to manipulate voter information without any meaningful oversight, setting the stage for future abuses of power where state officials can sidestep the courts and the law with impunity,” Michelle Morton, staff attorney for the ACLU of Florida, said in a statement.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Dara Kam, News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • DeSantis official criticizes Florida’s Amendment 3 for not including ‘home-grow’

    DeSantis official criticizes Florida’s Amendment 3 for not including ‘home-grow’

    [ad_1]

    Ron DeSantis has made it clear that he opposes Amendment 3, the proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot this fall in Florida to legalize recreational use of cannabis for adults 21 and older.

    But a member of his staff offered a novel argument to oppose the measure on social media on Tuesday: that the measure does not allow for “home grow,” or the ability for individuals to grow their own supply of marijuana.

    “So here’s the thing: Amendment 3 would create a monopoly on recreational,” Christina Pushaw wrote on X. “It also doesn’t allow home growing. Why is it that other states that have passed recreational marijuana also allow individuals to home grow, but Florida’s Amendment 3 specifically does NOT? It’s not about ‘freedom,’ it’s corporate greed.”

    Of the 24 states that have legalized the adult-use marijuana market, only three maintain criminal prohibitions on home cultivation, according to the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). A number of cannabis activists have called for allowing home grow ever since medical marijuana was approved by voters in Florida in 2016, and some have complained that Amendment 3 wouldn’t allow that.

    The Libertarian Party of Florida endorsed Amendment 3 last month, but in a statement said that while it “is a commendable advance, it does not go far enough.”

    “We must continue to advocate for the right to homegrown cannabis, allowing Floridians to cultivate their own plants for personal use,” said Matthew Johnson, the party’s vice chair and communications committee chair.

    Kim Rivers, CEO of Trulieve, the biggest marijuana company in Florida, which has spent more than $60 million to try to get Amendment 3 passed, responded to Pushaw on X by saying, “Great news — it looks like @GovRonDeSantis supports home grow in Florida per his spokesperson!”

    Rivers went on to say that particular provision could not be included due to a Florida Constitution provision permitting only a single subject to be mentioned in the text of the amendment — a fact she said DeSantis and his team are aware of.

    “[T]his is absolutely something we can support via implementation in the legislature and with the Governors support we can get it done!” she added.

    When other individuals chimed in and criticized Trulieve for allegedly opposing legalization of home-grown cannabis in Florida because it would hurt the company’s own bottom line, Rivers insisted that wasn’t the case.

    “We have supported home grow in every market we do business is,” she wrote on X. “We sell clones in those markets that allow it. In Florida we have carried petitions and contributed to home grow amendments. We see it as a market expansion not a challenge!”

    The single-subject rule

    This is what Article XI, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution says regarding the single-subject rule:

    “The power to propose the revision or amendment of any portion or portions of this constitution by initiative is reserved to the people, provided that, any such revision or amendment, except for those limiting the power of government to raise revenue, shall embrace but one subject and matter directly connected therewith.”

    “It seems to me that the DeSantis administration is really reaching deep in their playbook and coming up short,” said Chris Cano, executive director of the Suncoast Chapter of NORML. “I’ve heard that talking point [by critics] long before DeSantis even chose to inject himself into the whole Amendment 3 and hemp industry battle.”

    Cano referred to the fact that hemp companies, grateful for DeSantis’ veto of a bill that would have influenced their industry, have begun contributing financially to efforts to bring down Amendment 3.

    “For those in the hemp industry against Amendment 3, that has been a frequent talking point,” he said, adding, “It’s an ignorant one because of Florida’s single-subject rule makes amendments what they are. It’s just a red herring we’ve heard since the amendment qualified via the Florida Supreme Court.”

    In 2018, Tampa adult club entrepreneur Joe Redner filed a lawsuit in state court arguing he should be able to grow marijuana to obtain a sufficient quality of specific cannabinoids that he needed to treat his diagnosis of stage 4 lung cancer, according to court documents.

    A Leon County circuit judge ruled that he should be able to do so, but the Florida Department of Health appealed to the First District Court of Appeal, which blocked the circuit judge’s ruling from taking effect. The Florida Supreme Court declined to take the case up in November 2019.

    Morgan Hill, a spokesperson for Smart & Safe, the political committee advocating for the passage of Amendment 3, said she has heard questions not only about home grown from individuals curious about why it wasn’t included in the ballot language, but also for the retroactive decriminalization of possession of cannabis.

    “It’s because the Florida requirements are different than they are in other states for ballot measures,” she said. “Our position has been the same from the beginning. You should ask the governor’s team and Christina what she thinks.”

    Money fight

    Keep Florida Clean, a political committee formed to oppose Amendment 3, has raised more than $12 million to date, with most of that coming from Miami hedge fund billionaire Ken Griffin. Gov. DeSantis’ Florida Freedom Fund PAC as well as the Republican Party of Florida are also raising money to oppose the measure.

    Amendment 3 needs 60% support from the voting public to become the law. While several polls have shown the measure drawing beyond that threshold, a Florida Atlantic University survey published last week showed it getting 56%, a majority but not the margin needed for victory.

    Pushaw previously worked as a spokesperson for the governor’s office. After leaving to work on his presidential campaign last year, she now is listed in state records as a senior management analyst in the executive office of the governor.

    The Phoenix reached out to the governor’s press office for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Mitch Perry, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • Florida College Fills Dumpster Full Of Gender Studies Books For Disposal

    Florida College Fills Dumpster Full Of Gender Studies Books For Disposal

    [ad_1]

    When hundreds of books got hauled away in a dumpster from the library of the New College of Florida on Thursday, the tiny liberal arts college with a governing board dominated by appointees of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis once again found itself at the center of the state’s culture wars.

    “We abolished the gender studies program. Now we’re throwing out the trash,” Christopher Rufo, a DeSantis appointee to the Sarasota college’s governing board, posted Friday on X, formerly Twitter.

    The American Civil Liberties Union, meanwhile, condemned the college for “a brazen act of censorship.”

    “These actions are nothing short of a cultural purge, reminiscent of some of history’s darkest times, where regimes sought to control thought by burning books and erasing knowledge,” Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACU of Florida, said in a statement.

    Both sides were responding to accounts spread through social media that officials at the campus of roughly 700 students had sent a large collection of books from the college’s recently shuttered gender studies program to a local landfill.

    But a statement by New College administrators said people were confusing two different batches of books. It said volumes taken away by dumpster came from a routine culling of the main library’s collection, largely to get rid of old and damaged books. Books related to gender studies, it said, were also placed outside the library and “were later claimed by individuals planning to donate the books locally.”

    FILE – A student goes through books before they are sent to the landfill on the New College of Florida campus in Sarasota, Fla., Thursday, Aug. 15, 2024. (Steven Walker/Sarasota Herald-Tribune via AP)

    A student who alerted classmates to the book dumping told The Associated Press that she saw two large boxes filled with books Thursday at the campus’ student-run Gender and Diversity Center, located in a building where staff were busy moving furniture, repainting and otherwise preparing for students to return to campus next week.

    Natalia Benavides said those boxes got moved to the library parking lot near the dumpster, but fellow students and activists responding to her alert managed to save most of the Gender and Diversity Center’s books before they got thrown away.

    “Primarily what was in the dumpster were library books — they were stamped with ‘discard’ and they were bound so that you knew they were from the library,” said Benavides, a fourth-year student. “They seemed to be of every topic under the sun: art history books, books on aesthetics, psychology books.”

    It’s not surprising that discarding books would trigger controversy at New College. Known for decades as a progressive school with a prominent LGBTQ+ community, the campus became a target for DeSantis and as war on “woke.” In early 2023, the governor overhauled the college’s Board of Trustees by installing a majority of conservative members.

    The new trustees promptly fired the college president and replaced her with a Republican politician. Several other administrators also lost their jobs. The board dismantled the office of diversity and equity and a year ago voted to shut down the campus’ gender studies program.

    “Every couple of months, they have destroyed some part of this campus whether it is physical spaces or our books,” said Amy Reid, the professor who led the college’s gender studies program and now plans a yearlong leave of absence.

    Reid said she believes books were removed from the Gender and Diversity Center, a student-run office that was independent of the academic gender studies program, because it’s also being shuttered. She said the center’s sign was also taken down and that it had housed more than two boxes of books, many of which she suspects ended up in the trash.

    “Was I surprised that this happened?” Reid said. “No, because we’ve seen an effort to refashion this campus and make it unwelcoming.”

    New College’s statement said only that books “associated with the discontinued Gender Studies program” had been removed from a room “that is being repurposed.” A college spokesman, Nate March, declined to to answer further questions.

    Zander Moricz, who leads a group of student activists called the SEE Alliance, said books from the Gender and Diversity Center that were nearly thrown out included volumes on slavery, a collection of Jewish stories and three copies of the Bible.

    Campus police prevented students from retrieving books from the dumpster, he said, which was loaded onto a truck that members of his group followed to a local landfill.

    “The vast majority of the books were 100% readable and in good condition,” Moricz said.

    The American Library Association encourages academic libraries to cull books in poor physical condition or no longer deemed accurate or relevant — though its guidelines say books should never be removed because they’re controversial.

    Association spokesperson Jean Hodges said it’s up to individual libraries what to do with removed books.

    “Donation, recycling, resale, and disposal all fall within normal practice,” Hodges said by email.

    Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DeSantis appoints ‘pro-life’ radiologist to the Florida Board of Medicine

    DeSantis appoints ‘pro-life’ radiologist to the Florida Board of Medicine

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    photo via the Governor’s Office

    As abortion rights advocates in Florida step up their campaign for a November ballot measure that would strengthen abortion rights in Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis once again on Friday showed residents exactly which side he’s on.

    Gov. DeSantis, who launched his own political committee this year in part to help defeat the abortion rights ballot measure, appointed to the Florida Board of Medicine on Friday Steven Christie, a local radiologist, attorney and author of a book titled Speaking for the Unborn: 30-Second Pro-Life Rebuttals to Pro-Life Arguments.

    The Florida Board of Medicine is a 15-member board of Governor appointees established to “ensure that every physician practicing in this state meets minimum requirements for safe practice,” according to its website. Twelve of the members must be licensed physicians in good standing, while the other three must be state residents who have never been licensed as a healthcare practitioner. All appointments are subject to approval by the Florida Senate, which is dominated by Republican lawmakers who approved the state’s six-week abortion ban before it was signed into law.

    Christie, the local radiologist newly appointed by DeSantis, is also scheduled as a featured speaker at the upcoming “Culture of Life Conference” being presented by the Catholic Charities of Central Florida in October. The CCCF is a ministry of the Diocese of Orlando that, according to state campaign finance records, has donated at least $50,000 to a political committee created to advocate against Florida’s abortion rights measure, which will appear on the ballot this fall as Amendment 4.

    If approved by more than 60 percent of Florida voters, the measure would add to the Florida Constitution that “no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.” Viability is generally interpreted by medical practitioners as roughly 24 weeks of gestation, or pregnancy.

    The political committee funded in part by Catholic Charities, dubbed Florida Voters Against Extremism, is one of four political committees that have been created in an effort to defeat Amendment 4, which is being led by a political committee bankrolled by liberal organizations that support abortion access, including reproductive healthcare provider Planned Parenthood, the Tides Foundation (a progressive nonprofit), the American Civil Liberties Union and wealthy philanthropists, as well as an extensive list of individual donors who have contributed anywhere from $5 to $25.

    Catholic Charities is a faith-based nonprofit organization that, granted, does more than explicitly oppose abortion rights and offer “post-abortive healing.” The nonprofit also runs community-based housing, health and social assistance programs that are often funded in part by state or local government money.

    Some of the local chapters in the state, including chapters in St. Petersburg, Boynton Beach and Palm Beach, also run state-funded anti-abortion programs that aim to convince pregnant people not to seek out abortion services, luring pregnant people into their “clinics” with free pregnancy tests, sonograms or free items for babies like diapers.

    The Florida Pregnancy Care Network, a state-funded “alternatives to abortion” program, gave Catholic Charities-run programs a total of $410,000 in 2022, according to the nonprofit’s latest tax filing. Altogether, the state allocates millions of taxpayer dollars to such programs each year. Many don’t even have medical professionals on staff. Most, if not all, do not have a state medical license, meaning they are not bound by HIPAA privacy laws. 

    Dr. Steven Christie specializes in oncology and body imaging, according to Catholic Charities, and claims to be “pro-science.” “There is overwhelming scientific consensus that life begins at conception,” Dr. Christie wrote, in a blog post for the St. Paul Center, a faith-based nonprofit research and educational institute, even though the concept of “life at conception” is largely viewed as a philosophical or religious concept rather than one based in scientific fact.

    “The court said that when life begins is up to whoever is running your state — whether they are wrong or not, or you agree with them or not,” Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California-Davis, told NPR after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

    Christie was appointed to the board Friday along with Dr. “J” Matthew Knight, a dermatologist and founder of the Knight Dermatology Institute; Dr. Scot Ackerman, medical director of the Ackerman Cancer; and Dr. Hector Vila, the managing partner and anesthesiologist at Pediatric Dental Anesthesia Associates.

    Vila formerly served on the Board of Medicine under former Gov. Rick Scott’s administration, and was reappointed by DeSantis to the board in 2019. Ahead of his reappointment that year, Vila argued in support of a restrictive abortion-related law in an appeals court case between the state and a Gainesville abortion clinic. The latter challenged the state over a law that requires patients obtaining an abortion procedure to schedule two separate appointments with an abortion provider that includes a minimum 24-hour waiting period between appointments.

    Vila argued at the same that a less-than-24-hour waiting period between appointments for an abortion procedure “would fall below the acceptable medical standard of care.” Critics of the law have described it as unnecessarily restrictive and a barrier to care, especially as the state further limits abortion access.

    The Florida Board of Medicine has been criticized in the recent past for advancing rules on prohibiting gender-affirming care for transgender youth, which state lawmakers and DeSantis later codified into law before a federal judge struck the ban down as unconstitutional. In 2022, the board and DeSantis faced criticism after DeSantis was caught appointing two new members to the board who support conversion therapy for trans and gender-nonconforming children and oppose gender-affirming care.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Florida revamps lawsuit challenging firearms dealer ‘loopholes,’ cites low turnout at gun shows

    Florida revamps lawsuit challenging firearms dealer ‘loopholes,’ cites low turnout at gun shows

    [ad_1]

    Florida this week revamped a lawsuit that challenges a new federal rule requiring more gun sellers to be licensed and run background checks on buyers, in part pointing to lower attendance at gun shows.

    Lawyers for the state raised the gun-show issue because they said the rule is reducing tax revenue from purchases of admission tickets. Biden administration attorneys last month argued that an initial version of the lawsuit should be dismissed because the state had not shown legal standing — an issue that lost tax revenue could address.

    The revised lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court in Tampa, said the state’s “asserted injury — lost tax revenue — is clear and ongoing.”

    “Ordinarily, gun shows in Florida during the summer months of June, July and August enjoy high attendance rates — often hosting thousands of people at a single show,” lawyers in Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office wrote. “But since the challenged rule went into effect on May 20, attendance at these summer gun shows across the state has decreased precipitously. In some parts of Florida, total attendance at such shows have dropped by as much as 50 percent, costing the state revenue from the 6 percent sales tax it would have earned on each admission ticket.”

    Moody filed the initial version of the lawsuit May 1, shortly after the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives finalized the rule. The rule is an outgrowth of a 2022 federal law, known as the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, that made changes to the longstanding background-check system.

    When the rule was finalized, the Biden administration said it was designed to close “loopholes” in the system that requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks. An overview posted on the White House website said “a growing number of unlicensed sellers continue to sell firearms for profit to complete strangers they meet at gun shows and online marketplaces, which has been a critical gap in the background check laws.”

    In part, the rule changed a definition of being “engaged in the business” as a firearms dealer who needs to be licensed, according to a motion filed last month by U.S. Department of Justice attorneys seeking to dismiss the initial version of the lawsuit. The revised definition applies to a “person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business to predominantly earn a profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms. The term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of the person’s personal collection of firearms.”

    Justice Department attorneys argued in the motion that the definition closely tracks the 2022 law. But Florida contends the rule violates what is known as the federal Administrative Procedure Act, saying in the revised lawsuit that the “Biden Administration now seeks to exploit the minor changes to federal law enacted in the BSCA (Bipartisan Safer Communities Act) to implement President Biden’s preferred policies by executive fiat.”

    While most states rely on the FBI to conduct background checks, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement handles checks in Florida.

    In both the initial and revised versions of its lawsuit, the state’s attorneys argued that the rule would force the FDLE to conduct more background checks, requiring more resources. But in trying to show Florida has legal standing, the revised lawsuit added the gun-show tax issue issue and said the rule could pressure the state to change background-check laws.

    The revised lawsuit said Florida has “enacted a statute in reliance on the status quo, and defendants have disrupted that status quo through implementation of an unlawful regulation.”

    But in the motion to dismiss the initial version of the lawsuit, Justice Department attorneys said Florida “has made the voluntary decision to add a layer of bureaucracy” and, as a result, does not have standing to challenge the rule.

    “The Federal Bureau of Investigation operates the federal firearms background check system and offers full background check services to states for free,” the motion said. “The majority of states rely on the FBI to conduct background checks, and those states incur no costs or burdens relating to background checks. The federal government has not forced Florida to conduct background checks; Florida has voluntarily taken on that burden.”

    After the revised lawsuit was filed, U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on Tuesday issued an order that said the motion to dismiss the initial version was moot.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • DeSantis calls for investigation into former University of Florida President Ben Sasse’s ‘exorbitant spending’

    DeSantis calls for investigation into former University of Florida President Ben Sasse’s ‘exorbitant spending’

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Ron DeSantis’ office and state Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis on Thursday raised the possibility of looking into spending under former University of Florida president Ben Sasse.

    “We take the stewardship of state funds very seriously and have already been in discussions with leadership at the university and with the (state university system’s) Board of Governors to look into the matter,” DeSantis spokesman Bryan Griffin said in a statement.

    Earlier in the day, Patronis offered support for an audit.

    “Reports of (the university’s) exorbitant spending by Ben Sasse’s office are concerning,” Patronis posted online. “As my agency can investigate fraud, waste and abuse, @FLDFS (the Florida Department of Financial Services) will reach out to @FLBOG (the university system Board of Governors) to offer auditing support. BOG should investigate this issue to ensure tuition and tax dollars are being properly used.”

    On Monday, the Independent Florida Alligator student newspaper reported Sasse more than tripled his office’s spending to $17.3 million when compared to his predecessor.

    The costs included hiring several of his former U.S. Senate staffers, including two who were allowed to work remotely from the Washington, D.C., area. Sasse was a Nebraska senator before getting hired for the UF job. Travel costs for Sasse’s office also jumped from $28,000 to $633,000 in one year, according to the student newspaper.

    Sasse, who had been at UF less than two years, abruptly resigned in July, citing his wife’s health.

    Former President Kent Fuchs will lead the school on an interim basis. The Board of Governors did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • Round 2 of US Rep. Gaetz vs. former Speaker McCarthy plays out in Florida GOP primary

    Round 2 of US Rep. Gaetz vs. former Speaker McCarthy plays out in Florida GOP primary

    [ad_1]

    PENSACOLA, Fla. (AP) — The Republican primary for Florida’s 1st Congressional district is like a rematch between Rep. Matt Gaetz and the man he toppled, former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

    No, McCarthy isn’t on the ballot. But a political committee he controls has spent about $3 million attacking Gaetz with claims he paid a minor for sex and used illicit drugs, while also promoting Gaetz’ opponent, former Navy pilot Aaron Dimmock.

    It might not be money well spent this election cycle — Gaetz has easily fought off primary opponents since his election to Congress from one of Florida’s most conservative districts. But Gaetz, ahead of Tuesday’s primary, is getting a taste of what he’ll face if he runs for governor in two years when Gov. Ron DeSantis has to leave office after two terms.

    “Kevin McCarthy explicitly said that the reason he’s spending millions to trash me here was to impair some future run for governor. I’ve said many times, I’m not making any plans to run for governor. I like the job I have,” Gaetz said recently after a campaign stop in Pensacola.

    The race has become particularly brutal, with McCarthy’s PAC running ads saying that “witnesses” say he had sex with a 17-year-old escort during a trip to the Bahamas with a donor and other supporters. “Our daughters are never safe with the real Matt Gaetz,” an announcer says as the ad closes.

    Gaetz led a group of eight far-right members of Congress to oust McCarthy last year, plunging the House into weeks of chaos as it sought to replace the fallen speaker. Gaetz isn’t the only one of the eight targeted by McCarthy, who gave up his California seat after losing the speaker’s chair. South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace also survived a primary against a McCarthy-backed opponent.

    The House Ethics Committee has a long-running investigation into Gaetz’s behavior. The Department of Justice also looked into allegations about the Bahamas trip. No criminal charges have been filed and Gaetz steadfastly maintains his innocence.

    McCarthy has said Gaetz led the effort to oust him because McCarthy refused to squash the ethics investigation.

    “Matt Gaetz wanted to leverage me to stop an ethics complaint that started four years prior. Illegal. I’m not going to do it,” McCarthy recently said on “Real Time with Bill Maher.”

    Gaetz and his supporters paint Dimmock as a McCarthy-picked carpetbagger who moved from Missouri just to challenge Gaetz. But Dimmock says he’s never met McCarthy and never spoken to him about the race. And while he did recently move from Missouri and still works remotely as a state employee, he said he simply returned to an area where he first had ties 28 years ago when he attended Navy flight school.

    “My mom, my brother both live here. My aunt and uncle live here. Three of our four children were born here,” Dimmock said.

    The reason he decided to challenge Gaetz, he said, is because no other Republican stepped forward and he knew the primary was the only chance to defeat the congressman. The winner will face Democrat Gay Valimont in November, but the conservative district tends to vote overwhelmingly Republican in general elections.

    “I thought a person of character and integrity needed to enter the race. No local or state current office holder was willing to do that,” Dimmock said. “There’s no way in the world this human being that has demonstrated repeated behaviors over time was going to get a free pass.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    While Gaetz has his loyal followers, Dimmock says other Republicans are embarrassed by his behavior and the ethics allegations. Gaetz has made a national name for himself by inflaming liberals with partisan rhetoric and for unwavering support for former President Donald Trump.

    Dimmock acknowledges defeating Gaetz will be a challenge in a district where his family is politically powerful. Gaetz’ father is former Senate President Don Gaetz and they younger Gaetz was an influential state representative previously.

    But, he said, voters appreciate his presence in the race.

    “They say, ‘Thank you so very much for running and giving us an alternative. He’s been an embarrassment so much that we absolutely need someone else in there. How can we help your campaign,” Dimmock said. “Now how many? Who knows. But we’ll see.”

    Gaetz doesn’t seemed worried.

    “I’ve faced an unprecedented barrage of negative advertising funded by Kevin McCarthy,” Gaetz said. “I’ll be outspent more than three-to-one, but I’m going to win it better than two-to-one because the folks in Washington and California and Missouri don’t quite understand the connection I have with the people of northwest Florida,” Gaetz said.

    Much like Trump, the congressman’s loyal followers don’t care about the allegations made against him.

    “Dimmock is funded by McCarthy and it’s just dirty politics. Gaetz is just talking about the issues,” said Jill Torkelson, 61, sporting a Make America Great Again hat at his Pensacola campaign event. “There’s definitely a blood feud there. I just don’t trust McCarthy as far as I can throw him.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida Democrats urge DeSantis to participate in federal food assistance program for kids

    Florida Democrats urge DeSantis to participate in federal food assistance program for kids

    [ad_1]

    Florida House Democrats sent a letter to Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday pressing him to apply for a federal program that would provide food assistance to low-income kids next summer.

    The Sunshine State was one of 13 states that passed up millions in federal funds for the summer EBT program that gave low-income families $120 for school-aged children this year, according to States Newsroom’s D.C. Bureau.

    Pressure from parents, anti-hunger and child advocacy groups, and now Democrats keeps mounting on Florida to notify the federal government that it plans to participate in the program next year as the Aug. 15 deadline approaches.

    “Florida has an opportunity to correct the egregious error made by DeSantis in 2024 when he decided to politicize food insecurity,” House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell wrote in a press release on Tuesday.

    “Floridians have had to suffer through political stunt after political stunt by this governor while they’re trying to address their affordability crisis. Struggling families can’t eat political stunts and don’t deserve to suffer the consequences imposed by the governor’s limited view of freedom. In a state that purportedly prioritizes parental rights, Gov. DeSantis must allow Floridians the freedom to access the federal benefits their tax dollars paid for.”

    The USDA estimates that more than 2 million children in Florida would get around $258.9 million in federal aid through the program. Florida would only have to fund half of the administrative costs to distribute the benefits, which adds up to $13 million.

    Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Diane Rado for questions: [email protected]. Follow Florida Phoenix on Facebook and Twitter.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Jackie Llanos, Florida Phoenix

    Source link

  • Trump expects Florida’s abortion amendment to pass, but won’t say how he’ll vote

    Trump expects Florida’s abortion amendment to pass, but won’t say how he’ll vote

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump expects Florida voters to back a November ballot proposal that would put abortion rights in the state Constitution, but he didn’t say how he will vote.

    Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, said Thursday he’ll hold a future news conference to announce his position on what will appear on the ballot as Amendment 4.

    “Florida does have a vote coming up on that, and I think probably the vote will go in a little more liberal way than people thought,” Trump said during a news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach.

    The U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned the decades-old Roe v. Wade decision that ensured abortion access. The proposed Florida constitutional amendment would need support of 60 percent of voters to pass.

    A poll released last week by the University of North Florida’s Public Opinion Research Lab found 69 percent of likely voters favored the amendment.

    The Floridians Protecting Freedom political committee started the ballot initiative last year after the Republican-controlled Legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis approved a law that prevents women from having abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

    DeSantis and other state Republican leaders oppose the proposed constitutional amendment, which is backed by Democratic leaders.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    News Service of Florida

    Source link