ReportWire

Tag: role

  • Golden Globes 2026: The complete winners list

    Globes never say die!

    Five years after a Times investigation dulled the shine of the glitzy Hollywood affair, the 83rd Golden Globe Awards, airing Sunday, will cap off a multi-day series of events and tributes now dubbed “Golden Week.” It appears neither controversy nor potential conflicts of interest have been enough to keep this party down.

    Comedian Nikki Glaser, who delivered a good time as the emcee of the 2025 awards, has once again been tapped to host the star-studded ceremony. Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” and Joachim Trier’s “Sentimental Value” are among the top film nominees, notching nine and eight nods each, respectively. On the television side, “The White Lotus” and “Adolescence” earned the most nominations with six and five nods apiece, respectively.

    Actors Helen Mirren and Sarah Jessica Parker were already honored during Thursday’s “Golden Eve” special. Mirren, whose prolific career has included portraying a number of British monarchs, was presented the Cecil B. DeMille Award, while Parker, of “Sex and the City” fame, received the Carol Burnett Award.

    The live 2026 Golden Globes telecast kicks off at 5 p.m. on CBS and Paramount+.

    (This story will be updated.)

    Film

    Motion picture — drama
    “Sinners”
    “It Was Just an Accident”
    “Sentimental Value”
    “Frankenstein”
    “Hamnet”
    “The Secret Agent”

    Motion picture — musical or comedy
    “One Battle After Another”
    “No Other Choice”
    “Marty Supreme”
    “Blue Moon”
    “Bugonia”
    “Nouvelle Vague”

    Motion picture — animated
    “Arco”
    “Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba Infinity Castle”
    “Elio”
    “KPop Demon Hunters”
    “Little Amélie or the Character of Rain”
    “Zootopia 2”

    Cinematic and box office achievement
    “Avatar: Fire and Ash”
    “F1”
    “KPop Demon Hunters”
    “Sinners”
    “Weapons”
    “Wicked: For Good”
    “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning”
    “Zootopia 2”

    Motion picture — non-English language
    “It Was Just an Accident”
    “No Other Choice”
    “The Secret Agent”
    “Sentimental Value”
    “Sirât”
    “The Voice of Hind Rajab”

    Performance by a female actor in a motion picture — drama
    Jessie Buckley, “Hamnet”
    Jennifer Lawrence, “Die My Love”
    Renate Reinsve, “Sentimental Value”
    Tessa Thompson, “Hedda”
    Julia Roberts, “After the Hunt”
    Eva Victor, “Sorry, Baby”

    Performance by a male actor in a motion picture — drama
    Joel Edgerton, “Train Dreams”
    Oscar Isaac, “Frankenstein”
    Dwayne Johnson, “The Smashing Machine”
    Michael B. Jordan, “Sinners”
    Wagner Moura, “The Secret Agent”
    Jeremy Allen White, “Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere”

    Performance by a female actor in a motion picture — musical or comedy
    Rose Byrne, “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You”
    Cynthia Erivo, “Wicked: For Good”
    Kate Hudson, “Song Sung Blue”
    Chase Infiniti, “One Battle After Another”
    Amanda Seyfried, “The Testament of Ann Lee”
    Emma Stone, “Bugonia”

    Performance by a male actor in a motion picture — musical or comedy
    Timothée Chalamet, “Marty Supreme”
    George Clooney, “Jay Kelly”
    Leonardo DiCaprio, “One Battle After Another”
    Ethan Hawke, “Blue Moon”
    Lee Byung-hun, “No Other Choice”
    Jesse Plemons, “Bugonia”

    Performance by a female actor in a supporting role in any motion picture
    Emily Blunt, “The Smashing Machine”
    Elle Fanning, “Sentimental Value”
    Ariana Grande, “Wicked: For Good”
    Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, “Sentimental Value”
    Amy Madigan, “Weapons”
    Teyana Taylor, “One Battle After Another”

    Performance by a male actor in a supporting role in any motion picture
    Benicio Del Toro, “One Battle After Another”
    Jacob Elordi, “Frankenstein”
    Paul Mescal, “Hamnet”
    Sean Penn, “One Battle After Another”
    Adam Sandler, “Jay Kelly”
    Stellan Skarsgård, “Sentimental Value”

    Director
    Paul Thomas Anderson, “One Battle After Another”
    Ryan Coogler, “Sinners”
    Guillermo del Toro, “Frankenstein”
    Jafar Panahi, “It Was Just an Accident”
    Joachim Trier, “Sentimental Value”
    Chloé Zhao, “Hamnet”

    Screenplay
    Paul Thomas Anderson, “One Battle After Another”
    Ronald Bronstein and Josh Safdie, “Marty Supreme”
    Ryan Coogler, “Sinners”
    Jafar Panahi, “It Was Just an Accident”
    Joachim Trier and Eskil Vogt, “Sentimental Value”
    Maggie O’Farrell and Chloé Zhao, “Hamnet”

    Original score
    Alexandre Desplat, “Frankenstein”
    Ludwig Göransson, “Sinners”
    Jonny Greenwood, “One Battle After Another”
    Kangding Ray, “Sirât”
    Max Richter, “Hamnet”
    Hans Zimmer, “F1”

    Original song
    “Dream as One” (“Avatar: Fire and Ash”)
    Music and lyrics by Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, Simon Franglen

    “Golden” (“KPop Demon Hunters”)
    Music by Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo, Park Hong Jun
    Lyrics by Kim Eun-jae (EJAE), Mark Sonnenblick

    “I Lied to You” (“Sinners”)
    Music and lyrics by Raphael Saadiq, Ludwig Göransson

    “No Place Like Home” (“Wicked: For Good”)
    Music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz

    “The Girl in the Bubble” (“Wicked: For Good”)
    Music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz

    “Train Dreams” (“Train Dreams”)
    Music by Nick Cave, Bryce Dessner
    Lyrics by Nick Cave

    Television

    Television series — drama
    “The Pitt”
    “Severance”
    “The Diplomat”
    “Pluribus”
    “Slow Horses”
    “The White Lotus”

    Television series — musical or comedy
    “Abbott Elementary”
    “Hacks”
    “Nobody Wants This”
    “The Studio”
    “The Bear”
    “Only Murders in the Building”

    Television limited series, anthology series or motion picture made for television
    “Adolescence”
    “All Her Fault”
    “The Beast in Me”
    “Black Mirror”
    “Dying for Sex”
    “The Girlfriend”

    Performance by a female actor in a television series — drama
    Kathy Bates, “Matlock”
    Britt Lower, “Severance”
    Helen Mirren, “MobLand”
    Bella Ramsey, “The Last of Us”
    Keri Russell, “The Diplomat”
    Rhea Seehorn, “Pluribus”

    Performance by a male actor in a television series — drama
    Sterling K. Brown, “Paradise”
    Diego Luna, “Andor”
    Gary Oldman, “Slow Horses”
    Mark Ruffalo, “Task”
    Adam Scott, “Severance”
    Noah Wyle, “The Pitt”

    Performance by a female actor in a television series — musical or comedy
    Kristen Bell, “Nobody Wants This”
    Ayo Edebiri, “The Bear”
    Selena Gomez, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Natasha Lyonne, “Poker Face”
    Jenna Ortega, “Wednesday”
    Jean Smart, “Hacks”

    Performance by a male actor in a television series — musical or comedy
    Adam Brody, “Nobody Wants This”
    Steve Martin, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Glen Powell, “Chad Powers”
    Seth Rogen, “The Studio”
    Martin Short, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Jeremy Allen White, “The Bear”

    Performance by a female actor in a limited series, anthology series, or a motion picture made for television
    Claire Danes, “The Beast in Me”
    Rashida Jones, “Black Mirror”
    Amanda Seyfried, “Long Bright River”
    Sarah Snook, “All Her Fault”
    Michelle Williams, “Dying for Sex”
    Robin Wright, “The Girlfriend”

    Performance by a male actor in a limited series, anthology series, or a motion picture made for television
    Jacob Elordi, “The Narrow Road to the Deep North”
    Paul Giamatti, “Black Mirror”
    Stephen Graham, “Adolescence”
    Charlie Hunnam, “Monster: The Ed Gein Story”
    Jude Law, “Black Rabbit”
    Matthew Rhys, “The Beast in Me”

    Performance by a female actor in a supporting role on television
    Carrie Coon, “The White Lotus”
    Erin Doherty, “Adolescence”
    Hannah Einbinder, “Hacks”
    Catherine O’Hara, “The Studio”
    Parker Posey, “The White Lotus”
    Aimee Lou Wood, “The White Lotus”

    Performance by a male actor in a supporting role on television
    Owen Cooper, “Adolescence”
    Billy Crudup, “The Morning Show”
    Walton Goggins, “The White Lotus”
    Jason Isaacs, “The White Lotus”
    Tramell Tillman, “Severance”
    Ashley Walters, “Adolescence”

    Performance in stand-up comedy on television
    “Bill Maher: Is Anyone Else Seeing This?”
    “Brett Goldstein: The Second Best Night of Your Life”
    “Kevin Hart: Acting My Age”
    “Sarah Silverman: PostMortem”
    “Kumail Nanjiani: Night Thoughts”
    “Ricky Gervais: Mortality”

    Podcasts

    Podcast
    “Call Her Daddy”
    “Good Hang With Amy Poehler”
    “SmartLess”
    “Up First”
    “Armchair Expert With Dax Shepard”
    “The Mel Robbins Podcast”

    Tracy Brown

    Source link

  • Peter Greene, character actor known for role as the iconic villain in ‘Pulp Fiction,’ has died

    Peter Greene, character actor known for role as the iconic villain in ‘Pulp Fiction,’ has died

    Updated: 9:38 AM EST Dec 13, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Peter Greene, a character actor best known for his role as the iconic villain Zed in “Pulp Fiction,” has died. He was 60.He died in his home in New York City, his manager, Gregg Edwards, confirmed on Friday. His cause of death was not immediately released.”He was just a terrific guy,” said Edwards. “Arguably one of the greatest character actors on the planet; Has worked with everybody.”Born in Montclair, New Jersey, Greene landed some of his first leading roles in “Laws of Gravity” in 1992 and “Clean, Shaven” in 1993, according to IMDb.In 1994, he played the memorable villain in Quentin Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction.” That same year, he played another leading villain opposite Jim Carrey and Cameron Diaz in “The Mask.”Greene was working on two projects when he died, including a documentary about the federal government’s withdrawal of funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to Edwards.”We’ve been friends for over a decade,” said Edwards. “Just the nicest man.”

    Peter Greene, a character actor best known for his role as the iconic villain Zed in “Pulp Fiction,” has died. He was 60.

    He died in his home in New York City, his manager, Gregg Edwards, confirmed on Friday. His cause of death was not immediately released.

    “He was just a terrific guy,” said Edwards. “Arguably one of the greatest character actors on the planet; Has worked with everybody.”

    Born in Montclair, New Jersey, Greene landed some of his first leading roles in “Laws of Gravity” in 1992 and “Clean, Shaven” in 1993, according to IMDb.

    In 1994, he played the memorable villain in Quentin Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction.” That same year, he played another leading villain opposite Jim Carrey and Cameron Diaz in “The Mask.”

    Greene was working on two projects when he died, including a documentary about the federal government’s withdrawal of funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to Edwards.

    “We’ve been friends for over a decade,” said Edwards. “Just the nicest man.”

    Source link

  • Cheney to be honored during funeral at Washington National Cathedral

    Past presidents and politicians of both parties will gather Thursday in Washington, D.C., for former Vice President Dick Cheney’s funeral.Neither President Donald Trump nor Vice President JD Vance were invited to Cheney’s funeral, according to a source familiar with the matter.Cheney will receive full military honors at the memorial service, which is expected to be a bipartisan who’s who of Washington dignitaries.More than 1,000 guests are expected at the invitation-only funeral Thursday morning at Washington’s National Cathedral — including all four living former vice presidents and two former presidents.Former Presidents George W. Bush and Joe Biden will pay their respects, along with former Vice Presidents Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, Al Gore and Dan Quayle. There are also expected to be a number of Supreme Court Justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan. A large number of past and present Cabinet members from both Republican and Democratic administrations will also attend, as well as congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle.Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi is expected to attend along with Senate Majority Leader John Thune and former leader Mitch McConnell.CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. Axios was first to report that Trump was not invited to the funeral.The funeral’s guest list itself is a nod to a time when Washington was not so polarized and politicians from both sides of the aisle paid their respects when a dignitary passed away.Cheney’s funeral will be held at 11 a.m. ET. Speakers will include Bush, Cheney’s daughter former Rep. Liz Cheney and some of his grandchildren.Cheney, who served as Bush’s vice president from 2001 to 2009, died on November 3 at the age of 84. Prior to being elected vice president, Cheney served as defense secretary, White House chief of staff and as a congressman representing Wyoming.He was considered one of the most powerful and influential vice presidents in history, but his role as the architect of the Iraq War saw him leave office deeply unpopular and cemented a polarizing legacy.While official Washington funerals usually include invites to the White House, excluding Trump should not be a surprise.Cheney was a lifetime hardline conservative who endorsed Trump’s 2016 campaign. But he spent the last years of his life speaking out against Trump, particularly after his daughter then-Rep. Liz Cheney drew the president’s ire for her prominent role in a congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol.In 2022, Cheney described Trump as a coward and said no one was a “greater threat to our republic.”Trump has not publicly expressed his condolences or commented on Cheney’s death.The White House offered a muted reaction after Cheney’s death with press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters that Trump was “aware” the former vice president had died and noting that flags had been lowered to half-staff.Honorary pallbearers at Cheney’s funeral will include members of his Secret Service detail; his former chiefs of staff, David Addington and Scooter Libby; and photographer David Hume Kennerly.On one of the last pages of the service leaflet is a quote from the writer and naturalist John Muir, saying: “The mountains are calling and I must go.”

    Past presidents and politicians of both parties will gather Thursday in Washington, D.C., for former Vice President Dick Cheney’s funeral.

    Neither President Donald Trump nor Vice President JD Vance were invited to Cheney’s funeral, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    Cheney will receive full military honors at the memorial service, which is expected to be a bipartisan who’s who of Washington dignitaries.

    More than 1,000 guests are expected at the invitation-only funeral Thursday morning at Washington’s National Cathedral — including all four living former vice presidents and two former presidents.

    Former Presidents George W. Bush and Joe Biden will pay their respects, along with former Vice Presidents Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, Al Gore and Dan Quayle. There are also expected to be a number of Supreme Court Justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan. A large number of past and present Cabinet members from both Republican and Democratic administrations will also attend, as well as congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle.

    Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi is expected to attend along with Senate Majority Leader John Thune and former leader Mitch McConnell.

    CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. Axios was first to report that Trump was not invited to the funeral.

    The funeral’s guest list itself is a nod to a time when Washington was not so polarized and politicians from both sides of the aisle paid their respects when a dignitary passed away.

    Cheney’s funeral will be held at 11 a.m. ET. Speakers will include Bush, Cheney’s daughter former Rep. Liz Cheney and some of his grandchildren.

    Cheney, who served as Bush’s vice president from 2001 to 2009, died on November 3 at the age of 84. Prior to being elected vice president, Cheney served as defense secretary, White House chief of staff and as a congressman representing Wyoming.

    He was considered one of the most powerful and influential vice presidents in history, but his role as the architect of the Iraq War saw him leave office deeply unpopular and cemented a polarizing legacy.

    While official Washington funerals usually include invites to the White House, excluding Trump should not be a surprise.

    Cheney was a lifetime hardline conservative who endorsed Trump’s 2016 campaign. But he spent the last years of his life speaking out against Trump, particularly after his daughter then-Rep. Liz Cheney drew the president’s ire for her prominent role in a congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol.

    In 2022, Cheney described Trump as a coward and said no one was a “greater threat to our republic.”

    Trump has not publicly expressed his condolences or commented on Cheney’s death.

    The White House offered a muted reaction after Cheney’s death with press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters that Trump was “aware” the former vice president had died and noting that flags had been lowered to half-staff.

    Honorary pallbearers at Cheney’s funeral will include members of his Secret Service detail; his former chiefs of staff, David Addington and Scooter Libby; and photographer David Hume Kennerly.

    On one of the last pages of the service leaflet is a quote from the writer and naturalist John Muir, saying: “The mountains are calling and I must go.”

    Source link

  • Woman appointed Archbishop of Canterbury in a historic first for the Church of England

    Sarah Mullally was on Friday appointed as the new Archbishop of Canterbury, becoming the spiritual leader of 85 million Anglicans worldwide and the first woman to hold the role in its 1,400-year history.Mullally, 63, was made Bishop of London in 2018 – the Church of England’s third most senior bishop after the archbishops of Canterbury and York. Before her ordination, Mullally worked as a nurse at hospitals in London, going on to serve as Chief Nursing Officer for England.“As I respond to the call of Christ to this new ministry, I do so in the same spirit of service to God and to others that has motivated me since I first came to faith as a teenager,” Mullally said.“At every stage of that journey, through my nursing career and Christian ministry, I have learned to listen deeply – to people and to God’s gentle prompting – to seek to bring people together to find hope and healing.”The Archbishop-Designate for years led the Church of England’s process exploring questions of marriage and sexuality and was supportive of the move to allow ministers to offer blessings to same-sex couples in churches. She is renowned as a strong administrator who has worked to modernize the running of her London diocese while playing a leading role in the church’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Mullally’s elevation to archbishop was only possible due to reforms under Justin Welby, the former leader, who allowed women to be consecrated as bishops a decade ago.The role of Archbishop of Canterbury has been vacant for almost a year after Welby resigned in November 2024 over his failure to report prolific child abuser John Smyth, who was accused of attacking dozens of boys, including those he met at Christian camps, in the 1970s and 1980s.A damning independent report found that by 2013 the Church of England “knew, at the highest level,” about Smyth’s abuse, including Welby, who became archbishop that year.Welby’s resignation, according to church historian Diarmaid MacCulloch, was “historic and without exact precedent in the 1,427-year history of Archbishops of Canterbury” given no previous archbishop had stepped down to accusations of negligence over sexual abuse.The Archbishop of Canterbury is the most public face of an institution that has struggled to stay relevant in a more secular nation. The archbishop is often called on to speak at significant national moments, presiding over major royal events, including the recent coronation of King Charles.Candidates for the Archbishop of Canterbury are chosen by the Crown Nominations Commission, a body chaired by Jonathan Evans, the former head of MI5, Britain’s domestic security service. The commission, comprising 17 voting members, decide on a preferred candidate, to whom Prime Minister Keir Starmer then gives his assent.It is, however, King Charles, the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, who formally appoints the archbishop. The British monarch’s role dates to when King Henry VIII broke away from the authority of the pope and declared himself head of the new church.In July, Evans had said he wanted to avoid a list of candidates “all of whom are white, Oxbridge, male and come from the southeast of England.” He said there was “a desire for somebody who can give genuine spiritual leadership and direction to the church,” and who can “speak authoritatively and graciously with a Christian voice into the affairs of the nation.”Announcing Mullally’s appointment, Evans thanked the members of the public who shared their views on the direction of the church in a public consultation earlier this year. “I shall be praying for Bishop Sarah as she prepares to take up this new ministry in the coming months,” he said.Mullally will now preside over a church fighting to reclaim relevance and trust. She will lead efforts to address declining numbers of church goers, including reaching younger people, and address financial challenges.Mullally will be installed officially in a service at Canterbury Cathedral in March 2026, becoming the 106th archbishop since Saint Augustine arrived in Kent from Rome in 597.

    Sarah Mullally was on Friday appointed as the new Archbishop of Canterbury, becoming the spiritual leader of 85 million Anglicans worldwide and the first woman to hold the role in its 1,400-year history.

    Mullally, 63, was made Bishop of London in 2018 – the Church of England’s third most senior bishop after the archbishops of Canterbury and York. Before her ordination, Mullally worked as a nurse at hospitals in London, going on to serve as Chief Nursing Officer for England.

    “As I respond to the call of Christ to this new ministry, I do so in the same spirit of service to God and to others that has motivated me since I first came to faith as a teenager,” Mullally said.

    “At every stage of that journey, through my nursing career and Christian ministry, I have learned to listen deeply – to people and to God’s gentle prompting – to seek to bring people together to find hope and healing.”

    The Archbishop-Designate for years led the Church of England’s process exploring questions of marriage and sexuality and was supportive of the move to allow ministers to offer blessings to same-sex couples in churches. She is renowned as a strong administrator who has worked to modernize the running of her London diocese while playing a leading role in the church’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Mullally’s elevation to archbishop was only possible due to reforms under Justin Welby, the former leader, who allowed women to be consecrated as bishops a decade ago.

    The role of Archbishop of Canterbury has been vacant for almost a year after Welby resigned in November 2024 over his failure to report prolific child abuser John Smyth, who was accused of attacking dozens of boys, including those he met at Christian camps, in the 1970s and 1980s.

    A damning independent report found that by 2013 the Church of England “knew, at the highest level,” about Smyth’s abuse, including Welby, who became archbishop that year.

    Welby’s resignation, according to church historian Diarmaid MacCulloch, was “historic and without exact precedent in the 1,427-year history of Archbishops of Canterbury” given no previous archbishop had stepped down to accusations of negligence over sexual abuse.

    The Archbishop of Canterbury is the most public face of an institution that has struggled to stay relevant in a more secular nation. The archbishop is often called on to speak at significant national moments, presiding over major royal events, including the recent coronation of King Charles.

    Candidates for the Archbishop of Canterbury are chosen by the Crown Nominations Commission, a body chaired by Jonathan Evans, the former head of MI5, Britain’s domestic security service. The commission, comprising 17 voting members, decide on a preferred candidate, to whom Prime Minister Keir Starmer then gives his assent.

    It is, however, King Charles, the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, who formally appoints the archbishop. The British monarch’s role dates to when King Henry VIII broke away from the authority of the pope and declared himself head of the new church.

    In July, Evans had said he wanted to avoid a list of candidates “all of whom are white, Oxbridge, male and come from the southeast of England.” He said there was “a desire for somebody who can give genuine spiritual leadership and direction to the church,” and who can “speak authoritatively and graciously with a Christian voice into the affairs of the nation.”

    Announcing Mullally’s appointment, Evans thanked the members of the public who shared their views on the direction of the church in a public consultation earlier this year. “I shall be praying for Bishop Sarah as she prepares to take up this new ministry in the coming months,” he said.

    Mullally will now preside over a church fighting to reclaim relevance and trust. She will lead efforts to address declining numbers of church goers, including reaching younger people, and address financial challenges.

    Mullally will be installed officially in a service at Canterbury Cathedral in March 2026, becoming the 106th archbishop since Saint Augustine arrived in Kent from Rome in 597.

    Source link

  • Sacramento city leaders announce Maraskeshia Smith as next city manager

    Sacramento city leaders announce Maraskeshia Smith as next city manager

    So good morning and thank you all for being here today. So standing before you today, I am filled with deep gratitude and humility as I accept the honor of serving as the next city manager for the city of Sacramento. This moment marks not only *** milestone in my professional career, but *** commitment in city leadership built on countless hours of engagement, collaboration, placemaking, and innovation. I want to begin by expressing my appreciation to Mayor McCarthy, Council member Jennings, chair of the personnel Committee, and every member of this esteemed council. Your selection for me in this role reflects tremendous trust, and I am truly moved by your confidence in my ability to serve this community. Please know that your faith in me is not taken lightly. I pledge to honor it with integrity, transparency, and unwavering dedication. I also want to extend my appreciation to interim city manager Lanny Milstein. Laney, your leadership during this transitional period has been exemplary. You answered the call to serve with grace, fortitude, and purpose, guiding the organization through change and uncertainty. Your steady hand and commitment preserve the city’s focus and unity. And you laid the foundation for *** smooth transition and I just wanna say thank you. Most importantly, I want to recognize the phenomenal employees of the city. You are the heartbeat of the city of Sacramento. Every day through your hard work, creativity and passion, you make it possible to deliver exceptional services to our residents, whether it’s repairing roads, supporting families, ensuring public safety, or nurturing our parks and green spaces. Your efforts are the foundation on which the city is built, and I look forward to working alongside you. To our residents, business owners, and volunteers, your commitment to Sacramento is the driving force behind the city. You inspire us to seek better solutions, more inclusive policies, and *** stronger sense of community. I am deeply committed to improving the lives of our residents and the prosperity of the entire community. Your voice matters. Your engagement is essential to the success of our city. To our community members and regional partners, I offer my full commitment to collaboration. Challenges such as homelessness, housing, economic development, and transportation do not exist in isolation. They demand that we come together, pooling our resources, strengths, knowledge to amplify *** greater impact. I promised to break down silos, build bridges between departments across neighborhoods and with neighboring jurisdictions. Only through true partnership can we unlock the full potential of the Sacramento region. Up on my official start date, the city manager’s office in close coordination with this governing body, we will begin scheduling *** series of listening sessions. These gatherings will be designed for you, our residents, business owners, and community members so I can listen and learn and connect with you directly. I wanna hear your priorities, your concerns, and your aspirations for Sacramento. City employees, you will receive that same invitation. I want to understand your remarkable work and how you’re laying the foundation to drive innovation, solve complex problems, and deliver essential services. Please know that your insights are invaluable. So in closing, I just wanna be clear, this is not just *** job for me. This is *** calling. I step into this role with humility, honor, and *** deep sense of responsibility. I am ready to serve this community, steward its resources and help guide its future. This is *** moment of opportunity, *** chance for us to all come together, dream boldly and continue to build *** city that reflects the best of who we are. Thank you, counsel.

    Sacramento city leaders announce Maraskeshia Smith as next city manager

    Updated: 9:44 AM PDT Sep 30, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Maraskeshia Smith will become Sacramento’s new city manager after a months-long nationwide search. She will become the first Black woman to serve in the role. Mayor Kevin McCarty and city council members announced Smith’s appointment at a news conference Tuesday at the SAFE Credit Union and Convention Center, saying she’ll begin her job on Jan. 5. Smith most recently served as the city manager of Santa Rosa, and also has experience working as Deputy Director and Director of Public Works in Cincinnati, Assistant City Administrator in Oakland, and Deputy City Manager in Stockton.”This is not just a job for me,” Smith said. “This is a calling.”City officials launched a search for a new city manager position after deciding not to extend Howard Chan’s contract. However, he took on a role as assistant city manager a day before his contract was set to expire.In January, the city council appointed Leyne Milstein as interim city manager as it continued its search for a permanent position. Milstein will now return as assistant city manager. While Sacramento has a mayor as an elected official, the city manager oversees more of the daily operations and is appointed by the city council. When Chan was city manager, he had a take-home salary of $400,000, one of the highest salaries for the role in the state of California. However, the State Controller’s Office in 2023 reported he earned nearly $600,000 with a vacation payout.Under the role he assumed as assistant city manager, Chan’s salary is nearly $341,000 a year, the highest posted salary for that position.Milstein’s salary as interim was $352,000. The city states that nearly 100 people applied for city manager, and the final interviews were held earlier in September. McCarty and Councilmembers Karina Talamantes and Rick Jennings described Smith as the top candidate among those who were interviewed. Prior to the news conference, the city council will held a closed-door session where the new city manager was officially “considered,” according to a news release from the city. Officials also planned to hold a “priority and goal setting workshop” following the end of the news conference.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Maraskeshia Smith will become Sacramento’s new city manager after a months-long nationwide search. She will become the first Black woman to serve in the role.

    Mayor Kevin McCarty and city council members announced Smith’s appointment at a news conference Tuesday at the SAFE Credit Union and Convention Center, saying she’ll begin her job on Jan. 5.

    This content is imported from YouTube.
    You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    Smith most recently served as the city manager of Santa Rosa, and also has experience working as Deputy Director and Director of Public Works in Cincinnati, Assistant City Administrator in Oakland, and Deputy City Manager in Stockton.

    “This is not just a job for me,” Smith said. “This is a calling.”

    City officials launched a search for a new city manager position after deciding not to extend Howard Chan’s contract. However, he took on a role as assistant city manager a day before his contract was set to expire.

    In January, the city council appointed Leyne Milstein as interim city manager as it continued its search for a permanent position. Milstein will now return as assistant city manager.

    While Sacramento has a mayor as an elected official, the city manager oversees more of the daily operations and is appointed by the city council. When Chan was city manager, he had a take-home salary of $400,000, one of the highest salaries for the role in the state of California. However, the State Controller’s Office in 2023 reported he earned nearly $600,000 with a vacation payout.

    Under the role he assumed as assistant city manager, Chan’s salary is nearly $341,000 a year, the highest posted salary for that position.

    Milstein’s salary as interim was $352,000.

    The city states that nearly 100 people applied for city manager, and the final interviews were held earlier in September.

    McCarty and Councilmembers Karina Talamantes and Rick Jennings described Smith as the top candidate among those who were interviewed.

    Prior to the news conference, the city council will held a closed-door session where the new city manager was officially “considered,” according to a news release from the city. Officials also planned to hold a “priority and goal setting workshop” following the end of the news conference.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Stockton votes to have an independent investigation regarding Wild N’ Out event

    The Stockton City Council on Tuesday voted 4-3 to launch an independent investigation into the vice mayor’s involvement with a Wild ‘N Out event. Over the past two months, several arguments have broken out at Stockton City Council meetings, and city leaders have called for at least three investigations into ongoing issues. See a timeline of some of the events that have taken place here. Residents in Stockton have made it loud and clear that they want the infighting to stop and for city council members to get back to business, but some officials argue they must investigate whether funds are being misused.Tuesday night’s council meeting was again filled with multiple residents asking for accountability during public comment. Under the microscope is the comedy/music tour Wild ‘N Out that had a live show at the Adventist Health Arena in May.The show was almost canceled because of some financial troubles, so the city paid $50,000 from a risk mitigation fund to keep the event in Stockton.There have also been concerns raised about Vice Mayor Jason Lee’s role in the show. He helped bring the event to the city and performed in the show.Lee says the money was taken from a fund meant to support events like this, that he wasn’t involved in the city approving the funds, and he didn’t get paid for the event.The mayor of Stockton placed the issue on the agenda for Tuesday’s city council meeting.It’s being recommended that an independent investigation be launched to look into the recent event contracting of the Wild ‘N Out show and to figure out if any violations occurred.There will also be a discussion over a separate investigation into DEI funding and who will oversee it. Vice Mayor Lee wants the state to audit how the interim city manager spent money. Lee claims the money was used to hire a consultant to help the city manager transition into his new role.”I’m going to use the voice that my constituents gave me to advocate for my district,” said Lee during a tense exchange with the mayor during the meeting.Mayor Christina Fugazi says there was no funding specifically earmarked for DEI.It’s still unclear how much the independent investigation will cost the city.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    The Stockton City Council on Tuesday voted 4-3 to launch an independent investigation into the vice mayor’s involvement with a Wild ‘N Out event.

    Over the past two months, several arguments have broken out at Stockton City Council meetings, and city leaders have called for at least three investigations into ongoing issues.

    Residents in Stockton have made it loud and clear that they want the infighting to stop and for city council members to get back to business, but some officials argue they must investigate whether funds are being misused.

    Tuesday night’s council meeting was again filled with multiple residents asking for accountability during public comment.

    Under the microscope is the comedy/music tour Wild ‘N Out that had a live show at the Adventist Health Arena in May.

    The show was almost canceled because of some financial troubles, so the city paid $50,000 from a risk mitigation fund to keep the event in Stockton.

    There have also been concerns raised about Vice Mayor Jason Lee’s role in the show. He helped bring the event to the city and performed in the show.

    Lee says the money was taken from a fund meant to support events like this, that he wasn’t involved in the city approving the funds, and he didn’t get paid for the event.

    The mayor of Stockton placed the issue on the agenda for Tuesday’s city council meeting.

    It’s being recommended that an independent investigation be launched to look into the recent event contracting of the Wild ‘N Out show and to figure out if any violations occurred.

    There will also be a discussion over a separate investigation into DEI funding and who will oversee it.

    Vice Mayor Lee wants the state to audit how the interim city manager spent money.

    Lee claims the money was used to hire a consultant to help the city manager transition into his new role.

    “I’m going to use the voice that my constituents gave me to advocate for my district,” said Lee during a tense exchange with the mayor during the meeting.

    Mayor Christina Fugazi says there was no funding specifically earmarked for DEI.

    It’s still unclear how much the independent investigation will cost the city.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Alice Soper: Rugby’s next evolution is happening with Black Ferns’ revelation

    Source link

  • Trump names himself chair of L.A. Olympics task force, sees role for military during Games

    In past Olympic Games held on American soil, sitting presidents have served in passive, ceremonial roles. President Trump may have other plans.

    An executive order signed by Trump on Tuesday names him chair of a White House task force on the 2028 Games in Los Angeles, viewed by the president as “a premier opportunity to showcase American exceptionalism,” according to a White House statement. Trump, the administration said, “is taking every opportunity to showcase American greatness on the world stage.”

    At the White House, speaking in front of banners adding the presidential seal to the logo for LA28, Trump said he would send the military back to Los Angeles if he so chose in order to protect the Games. In June, Trump sent the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city amid widespread immigration enforcement actions, despite widespread condemnation from Mayor Karen Bass and other local officials.

    “We’ll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe, including using our National Guard or military, OK?” he said. “I will use the National Guard or the military. This is going to be so safe. If we have to.”

    Trump’s executive order establishes a task force led by him and Vice President JD Vance to steer federal coordination for the Games. The task force will work with federal, state and local partners on security and transportation, according to the White House.

    Those roles have been fairly standard for the federal government in past U.S.-hosted Olympic Games. But Trump’s news conference could present questions about whether a president with a penchant for showmanship might assume an unusually active role in planning the Olympics, set to take place in the twilight of his final term.

    There is ample precedent for military and National Guard forces providing security support during U.S.-hosted Olympic Games. But coming on the heels of the recent military deployment to Los Angeles, Trump’s comments may prove contentious.

    French President Emmanuel Macron was a key figure in preparations for last year’s Paris Games, including expressing his vocal support for the ambitious Olympic opening ceremony plan to parade athletes down the Seine River on boats. Many officials were concerned about potential threats along the 3.7-mile stretch, but authorities responded by increasing security measures that included up to 45,000 police officers and 10,000 soldiers.

    The task force, to be housed within the Department of Homeland Security, will “assist in the planning and implementation of visa processing and credentialing programs for foreign athletes, coaches, officials, and media personnel,” the executive order said. City officials have expressed concern that the president’s border policies could deter international visitors and complicate visa processing for Olympic teams.

    Tensions with L.A.

    More concentrated involvement from Trump could spell further strain with Los Angeles city officials, who sought to make nice in the wake of devastating January fires, but have fiercely bucked Trump’s recent immigration offensive. Trump swiped at Bass during his remarks on Tuesday, calling her “not very competent” and criticizing the pace of city permitting for fire rebuilding.

    “We’ve had a productive working relationship with the federal government since Los Angeles was awarded the Games in 2017 and we will continue preparing with all partners to host the best Games in history – Games that will benefit the entire nation for decades to come,” Bass spokesperson Zach Seidl said.

    Known for her coalition-building skills, Bass is not, by nature, a public brawler. In the aftermath of the Palisades fire, she appeared determined to preserve her fragile relationship with the president — and the billions of dollars of federal aid her city was depending on — responding diplomatically even as he publicly attacked her.

    But that determined cordiality crumbled when masked immigration agents and military personnel descended on the city. With troops stationed in the city and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal authorities arresting undocumented immigrants at courthouses, car washes and Home Depot parking lots, Bass took on Trump forcefully.

    At news conferences and in interviews, she accused the president of waging “an all-out assault on Los Angeles,” inciting chaos and fear and using the city as “a test case for an extremist agenda.”

    Casey Wasserman, chairman of LA28, attended the White House event, thanking Trump for “leaning in” to planning for an Olympics that was awarded to Los Angeles during his first term.

    “You’ve been supportive and helpful every step of the way,” Wasserman said, noting that the Games would amount to hosting seven Super Bowls a day for 30 days. “With the creation of this task force, we’ve unlocked the opportunity to level up our planning and deliver the largest, and yes, greatest Games for our nation, ever.”

    Wasserman will also have a delicate political balancing act, managing a Games in a deep-blue city with a famously mercurial Republican president in office.

    President Trump holds a full set of medals from the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles during Tuesday’s event at which he announced an executive order regarding federal involvement in the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

    (Julia Demaree Nikhinson / Associated Press)

    A Hollywood scion and sports and entertainment mogul, Wasserman has long been a prominent Democratic donor known for his close relationship with the Clintons.

    But in recent months he has diversified his giving, with hefty donations to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and House Speaker Mike Johnson’s leadership fund. Wasserman has publicly praised Trump’s commitment to the Games and traveled to Mar-a-Lago in January to meet with the incoming president.

    Presidents have long played a role in the Games. In 1984, Ronald Reagan formally opened the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, becoming the first American president to do so. Reagan attended several Olympic events, but repeatedly emphasized the federal government’s role was focused on security, according to the White House Historical Assn.

    The Olympic Charter requires the host country’s head of state to officially open the Games, but before Reagan, the duty had been fulfilled by local political leaders or vice presidents representing the president.

    Ever-tightening security

    The federal government has historically provided significant funding when the Games are hosted on U.S. soil, with financial support going toward both security and infrastructure.

    Leading up to the 1996 Games in Atlanta, the federal government spent $227 million on security and transportation, playing “very much a junior partner” to the Olympic Committee, then-Vice President Al Gore said at the time. Still, a bombing at the Centennial Olympic Park during the Games that summer shook the security establishment.

    The 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City were the first Games to be classified as a “National Special Security Event,” the government’s highest security rating for any event that designates the U.S. Secret Service as the lead agency for implementing security. That standard has remained in place for U.S.-held Olympic Games ever since. The Secret Service will also lead security coordination for the 2028 Games.

    The federal government was particularly involved in the Salt Lake City Games, which were held just months after the 9/11 attacks.

    Los Angeles leaders are actively involved in the security planning, and are currently in negotiations with LA28 for the use of the city’s police, traffic officers, and other employees during the Olympics and Paralympics.

    Security, trash removal, traffic control, paramedics and more will be needed during the 17-day Olympics and the two-week Paralympics the following month.

    Under the 2021 Games agreement between LA28 and the city, LA28 must reimburse Los Angeles for any services that go beyond what the city would provide on a normal day. The two parties must agree by Oct. 1, 2025, on “enhanced services” — additional city services needed for the Games, beyond that normal level — and determine rates, repayment timelines, audit rights and other processes.

    Overtime for Los Angeles police officers, and any other major expenses, would be acutely felt by a city government that recently closed a nearly $1-billion budget deficit, in part by slowing police hiring.

    Wilner reported from Washington, Wick and Nguyen from Los Angeles. Times staff writer Dakota Smith contributed to this report.

    Michael Wilner, Julia Wick, Thuc Nhi Nguyen

    Source link

  • Newsom signs formal apology for California’s role in slavery

    Newsom signs formal apology for California’s role in slavery

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a formal apology for California’s role in slavery and legacy of racism against Black people as part of a series of reparations bills he approved Thursday.

    “The State of California accepts responsibility for the role we played in promoting, facilitating, and permitting the institution of slavery, as well as its enduring legacy of persistent racial disparities,” Newsom said in a statement. “Building on decades of work, California is now taking another important step forward in recognizing the grave injustices of the past — and making amends for the harms caused.”

    Though California banned slavery in its 1849 Constitution, the state had no laws that made it a crime to keep someone enslaved or require that they be freed, which allowed slavery to continue. A disproportionate representation of white Southerners with pro-slavery views also held office in the Legislature, state court system and in its congressional delegation.

    Assembly Bill 3089, which requires the state to issue a formal apology, also mandates that the California install a plaque memorializing the apology in the state Capitol. Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), who introduced the bill, called it a “monumental achievement.”

    “Healing can only begin with an apology,” Jones-Sawyer said in a statement. “The State of California acknowledges its past actions and is taking this bold step to correct them, recognizing its role in hindering the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness for Black individuals through racially motivated punitive laws.”

    Despite the bill signings, advocates for reparations have criticized the governor and Democratic lawmakers for making meager progress on its “first in the nation” effort to study, propose and adopt remedies to atone for slavery that began in 2020.

    After a state task force spent two years developing recommendations for the Legislature, the California Legislative Black Caucus announced a package of priority bills in January focused largely on enacting policy changes in education, healthcare and criminal justice, while omitting cash payments in light of the state’s financial troubles.

    Advocates for reparations have criticized Newsom and Democratic lawmakers for making meager progress on the issue.

    (Laurel Rosenhall / Los Angeles Times)

    Newsom also signed bills to provide new oversight of book bans in California prisons, require that grocery stores and pharmacies give written notice at least 45 days before closing, expand a state law prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyle to include youth sports and to try to increase and track participation in career training education among Black and low-income students, among other legislation.

    But the governor took heat when the Legislature refused to take up other bills for a vote that would have created a California American Freedmen Affairs Agency and established a Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice to pay for and carry out reparations policies approved by lawmakers.

    A day before signing the legislation issuing a formal apology, Newsom vetoed two other reparations bills. One sought to begin the process of reversing racially motivated land and property seizures under the Freedman Affairs agency that lawmakers declined to approve. The other would have expanded Medi-Cal coverage, pending federal approval, to include benefits for medically supported food and nutrition.

    “This bill would result in significant and ongoing general fund costs for the Medi-Cal program that are not included in the budget,” Newsom wrote in his veto statement.

    Taryn Luna

    Source link

  • David DePape convicted of five state charges in hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    David DePape convicted of five state charges in hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    David DePape, the conspiracy theorist who attacked Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, with a hammer and plotted to interrogate the former House speaker on video, was convicted Friday of state charges related to the assault.

    A jury found DePape guilty of five felony counts in state court, according to several news outlets. The charges resulted from an attack that investigators described as the beginning of a planned “rampage” to go after high-profile targets, including actor Tom Hanks and Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    He was convicted of imprisonment, residential burglary, threatening a family member of a public official, attempting to sway a witness and aggravated kidnapping. The verdict comes seven months after he was found guilty of federal charges in the attack.

    DePape’s social media accounts, and interviews with friends and former co-workers, detail how he began to descend into baseless right-wing conspiracy theories. He wrote blog posts about several discredited conspiracy theories, including those popularly known as “Pizzagate” and “QAnon,” which posited large sexual abuse rings run by Hollywood and Democratic Party figures.

    San Francisco Assistant Dist. Atty. Phoebe Maffei argued during the trial that DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi because of her role as House speaker at the time, making her second in line for the presidency, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. She was not home during the break-in.

    “We haven’t seen anybody make a plan to break into the home of one of our national leaders, hold hostage and nearly kill that person’s spouse,” Maffei told jurors, according to the Chronicle. “Thankfully this is unusual. But it’s what happened.”

    In November, DePape was convicted in federal court of attempting to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and assaulting her husband. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

    Attorneys with the San Francisco public defender’s office, which represented DePape, successfully sought to have several charges against him dismissed in the state case, arguing that they were similar to those he had been convicted of in federal court.

    In response, San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Harry Dorfman tossed out the counts of attempted murder, elder abuse and assault with a deadly weapon. Defense attorneys argued that the state’s double jeopardy law prohibits defendants from being tried more than once on the same crime.

    In his closing arguments, Public Defender Adam Lipson argued that his client might be guilty of false imprisonment, residential burglary and attempting to sway a witness. But, he told jurors, DePape should not be convicted of aggravated kidnapping and threatening a family member of a public official, the Chronicle reported.

    Lipson reportedly argued that DePape’s threats were not specific to Pelosi’s role as House speaker, but rather to find and reach other targets.

    Conspiracy theories continued to play a role as the state trial came to a close this week.

    On Tuesday, Dorfman barred DePape’s former partner from the courtroom and second floor of the building, the Associated Press reported. The decision came after Gypsy Taub, a nudism activist, handed out fliers outside the courtroom with links to her website, which promotes a series of conspiracy theories.

    The day Dorfman kicked her out of the second floor, the address for Taub’s website was spotted on a wall and on a toilet paper dispenser in a women’s bathroom at the courthouse.

    Dorfman accused Taub of “trying to corruptly influence one or more jury members” and instructed bailiffs to escort her out.

    Salvador Hernandez

    Source link

  • PG&E penalized $45 million in Dixie fire settlement with CPUC

    PG&E penalized $45 million in Dixie fire settlement with CPUC

    Pacific Gas & Electric Company will be penalized $45 million for its involvement in one of the largest and most destructive wildfires in California history under a settlement reached recently between the utility and state regulators.

    The Dixie fire, which burned nearly 1 million acres and destroyed more than 1,300 homes, ignited July 13, 2021, after a Douglas fir tree fell and struck energized conductors owned and operated by PG&E. The blaze became the first known wildfire to burn from one side of the Sierra Nevada to the other.

    The California Public Utilities Commission announced the settlement Thursday and said the penalty includes $40 million in shareholder funding for an initiative to transition some of the utility’s hard-copy records to electronic records.

    The initiative “will support public safety by enabling more accurate recording of information and immediate awareness of the condition of PG&E’s assets, thereby improving the timeliness of inspections and preventive maintenance, and assisting the CPUC in conducting future audits and investigations,” the regulatory agency said.

    PG&E will also pay $2.5 million in fines to the California General Fund and $2.5 million to tribes affected by the Dixie fire. PG&E will distribute those payments to the Greenville Rancheria and Maidu Summit Consortium, a nonprofit representing a number of Mountain Maidu tribes and organizations, the CPUC said.

    Flames from the Dixie fire crest a forested hill

    (Noah Berger / Associated Press)

    The settlement was reached under a relatively new enforcement tool known as an administrative consent order, which was established in 2020 to “better serve Californians through streamlined enforcement actions” in lieu of a more formal investigation, according to the CPUC.

    In its own report submitted to the agency soon after the Dixie fire started, PG&E said a worker responded to an outage in the Feather River Canyon area of Plumas County around 7 a.m. that day, but that he was not able to reach the site until after 4:30 p.m. Once there, he found found two blown fuses and a tree leaning into a power line conductor. A fire was burning at the base of the tree, which soon grew out of control.

    PG&E officials on Thursday said the utility accepts that a tree falling onto their power line caused the fire, but it denies any fault or negligence.

    “PG&E believes we acted as a prudent operator. There is no evidence that PG&E consciously and willfully disregarded a known risk with regard to the ignition of the Dixie fire. We followed the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requirements when inspecting, maintaining and operating our system,” read a statement from the agency.

    “We share our regulators’ commitment to improve safety,” the statement said.

    The utility said it will not request rate recovery for the settlement expenses — meaning the costs will not affect customers. However, “the agreement does not preclude PG&E from receiving cost recovery for costs related to the fire, including from the state’s Wildfire Fund.”

    In this long exposure photo, embers light up hillsides as the Dixie fire burns near Milford.

    In this long exposure photo, embers light up hillsides as the Dixie fire burns near Milford in Lassen County, Calif., on Aug. 17, 2021.

    (Noah Berger / Associated Press)

    It is not the first time PG&E has been held accountable for its connection to a California wildfire. In recent years, the electric company reached a $150-million settlement with the CPUC for its role in the Zogg fire, which killed four people, and a $125-million settlement for its role in the 2019 Kincade fire, among other agreements.

    In 2019, PG&E filed for bankruptcy protection to shield itself from tens of billions of dollars in potential liabilities due to its role in previous state blazes. It emerged from bankruptcy in 2020 with officials promising improvements, including plans to bury 10,000 miles of power lines in high-risk areas where strong winds, downed trees and other factors can lead to fires. Only about 600 miles have been buried so far, officials told The Times in November.

    Last year, PG&E avoided criminal prosecution for the Dixie fire as part of a separate settlement agreement with six Northern California counties in which it admitted no wrongdoing. The utility agreed to pay about $55 million over five years in civil penalties, among other terms.

    The CPUC’s five-member committee approved the settlement agreement in a meeting Thursday. Commission President Alice Busching Reynolds noted that “it’s not the only action taken by us or by other government agencies with respect to the fire. “

    “When taken as a whole, and viewed in light of the broader circumstances, I do support this negotiated settlement agreement and its related resolution,” she said.

    Busching Reynolds said PG&E has since instituted a power line safety program to detect problems on distribution lines — such as fallen trees — which then de-energizes the lines. Unfortunately, she said, “this program was not in place to prevent the Dixie fire.”

    The fire, which was contained on Oct. 21, 2021, cost the state $637 million to suppress, CPUC officials said. It was the second-largest wildfire on record in the state.

    Hayley Smith

    Source link

  • 'I must be better than Trump': Why California's elections chief is keeping the former president on the ballot

    'I must be better than Trump': Why California's elections chief is keeping the former president on the ballot

    California Secretary of State Shirley Weber is resisting pressure from within the Democratic party to remove Donald Trump from the March statewide primary ballot due to his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol — arguing that, unlike the former Republican president, she feels obligated to follow the law.

    Weber said she finds Trump’s “behavior and his actions, not just as a former president, but as a citizen of the United States, to be abhorrent and disturbing and an attack on democracy.”

    “But at the same time, if I believe in this democracy that is there, I have to basically continue to abide by the rule of law, and for me not to do that, then I am no better than Trump,” Weber told The Times on Friday. “And I must be better than Trump.”

    Weber said attorneys in her office have been working for months with the California attorney general’s office and lawyers for local cities and counties to determine whether there was any legal ground to remove Trump from the March 5 primary ballot due to his role in the Capitol insurrection after his loss in the 2020 presidential election. She said the California Constitution does not give her clear authority to take action and leaves the decision to the courts.

    Weber was put in the hot seat after Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis sent her a letter Dec. 20 imploring her, the state elections chief, to “explore every legal option to remove former President Donald Trump from California’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.” The letter drew mixed opinions among Democrats.

    Weber responded a few days later, stating her commitment to place the sanctity of the electoral process over “partisan politics.”

    “I’m not sure why the lieutenant governor says, ‘Use every means possible,’ because we have been doing that,” Weber said Friday. “I haven’t shared that information with her, because she hasn’t asked me.”

    Trump critics have filed legal actions to force the secretary of state to remove him from the ballot, but none have succeeded, Weber said. Her office is closely monitoring any potential action from the U.S. Supreme Court.

    This isn’t the first time Democrats have tried to keep Trump off the ballot in California. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a 2019 law to require candidates to disclose their tax returns in order to appear on the presidential primary ballot, a requirement that was shot down by the California Supreme Court.

    Newsom agrees with Weber

    In a rare rebuke of the lieutenant governor, Newsom criticized the assertion that Trump should be removed from the ballot.

    “There is no doubt that Donald Trump is a threat to our liberties and even to our democracy, but in California, we defeat candidates we don’t like at the polls,” Newsom said last week. “Everything else is a political distraction.”

    Kounalakis is running to succeed Newsom in California’s 2026 gubernatorial election, and her letter to Weber was largely seen as a way to score political points among Democratic voters.

    “In my conversations with some political consultants in recent days, there’s unanimous agreement that sending the letter was heavy-handed and unlikely to provide her with any significant political benefit,” said Darry Sragow, a veteran Democratic strategist.

    Sragow said “long-standing political rules of engagement” suggest that such matters need to be adjudicated in the courts, and blatant efforts to intervene can come off as tone-deaf.

    A bad precedent

    Weber made the case that public trust in the voting process is more crucial than ever, and she wants to set “the correct precedent for future action.”

    “If you do the loosey-goosey kind of interpretation and implementation, then you open us up as a state and a nation for all of us being vulnerable simply because we have an opinion and a point of view,” Weber said.

    Close to a third of Republicans say they have a little or no confidence that votes in the Republican presidential primary and caucuses will be counted correctly, according to a recent poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. That follows years of false claims by Trump that the 2020 presidential election was stolen by President Biden.

    Weber said that barring Trump from California’s ballot could be perceived as purely political and embolden his base, and feeds his effort to undermine Democratic institutions.

    “I’m very conscious of that it’s not about me, and I know what I would do, but when I’m gone, what would somebody else do? And what could they do?” Weber said. “I don’t want to open a door that is too ugly and that puts everybody at risk,” she said.

    While Kounalakis said “the Constitution is clear” on the issue, it’s not so simple.

    Kounalakis and other state Democrats who support removing Trump from the race point to his role in provoking the Capitol riot and a section of the Constitution that bans from office those who “engaged in insurrection.”

    For some Trump critics, Weber’s approach was viewed as too passive, while others applauded her for allowing the traditional route to take its course.

    The decision ultimately will be up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which appears destined to review decisions in other states on Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 ballot, said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. The high court will have to decide if Trump is eligible under a clause in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that prohibits officials from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” or “given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

    It’s unclear if the amendment applies to presidential candidates and if Trump’s role in the Jan. 6 insurrection meets that constitutional threshold.

    “It is not going to be for the main election official in Colorado or California to decide. It is a straightforward question about the U.S. Constitution, and the Supreme Court is going to have to decide for the whole country,” Chemerinsky said.

    It’s a decision that the constitutional law expert hopes is made quickly, as the November election looms.

    “I think the longer it goes, the worse it is for the country,” he said.

    What other states are doing

    Lawsuits seeking to remove Trump from the ballot have been filed in dozens of states, with mixed results.

    Maine and Colorado have moved to bar Trump from their ballots. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellow, a Democrat, said Trump violated the Constitution’s insurrectionist ban. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled the same, in a case the state’s Republican Party has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Supreme courts in Michigan and Minnesota, however, are allowing Trump to stay on the ballot, at least in the March primary, and are leaving the door open for challenges in the November general election.

    States are working with a patchwork of procedural laws to navigate the issue, and not all have equal weight in the matter, said Jessica Levinson, a constitutional law professor at Loyola Law School.

    In deep-blue California, where Biden won 64% of the vote against Trump in 2020, it may not be worth the “political thicket” for state officials to intervene, Levinson said.

    “What Weber is aware of is the fact that to bar [Trump] would be viewed as democracy-limiting or anti-democratic,” she said. “Some would argue that, politically, the benefit here is very small, because we know what the outcome will be in California.”

    Times Staff Writer Jeong Park contributed to this report.

    Taryn Luna, Mackenzie Mays

    Source link

  • How Mayim Bialik Lost Her Role as the Main Host of ‘Jeopardy!’

    How Mayim Bialik Lost Her Role as the Main Host of ‘Jeopardy!’

    It was the middle of August 2021, and a swift union seemed to make sense. A week and a half earlier, Mike Richards, the executive producer of Jeopardy!, had been named the successor to longtime host Alex Trebek. Then, amid a storm of bad press and having filmed just five episodes as host, Richards abruptly stepped down. Production screeched to a halt with the season premiere mere weeks away. Already, a full day of taping had been canceled at the last minute, with more tapings the following week likely to meet the same fate. Sony needed episodes in the can and, just as important, something to quiet the worst press cycle in Jeopardy!’s history.

    The answer appeared obvious: Mayim Bialik. The actor, after all, had just been announced as Richards’s backup—the host of occasional prime-time specials on ABC and yet-to-be-announced spinoffs, while Richards would take the more prominent role as the host of the daily syndicated edition. So when Bialik, waiting in the hospital while her boyfriend was having hip replacement surgery, told her agent to reach out to Sony, the studio was only too eager to put a deal together to get Bialik to host the daily show as soon as possible.

    “From the hospital waiting room, I said to my agent, ‘Please ask how we can help,’” Bialik recalled to Glamour later. “That’s literally what I said. I don’t want to seem opportunistic, but I’m part of this family now.”

    Almost two and a half years later, her role in that family has changed. On December 15, Bialik wrote in a statement that she had been informed by Sony that she would “no longer be hosting the syndicated version of Jeopardy!Jeopardy! confirmed to The Ringer that Bialik is under contract until the end of the season with a one-year option remaining. With several months of taping remaining this season, Bialik was informed that her option would not be picked up.

    The development has ushered in a series of reports looking into Sony’s concerns about Bialik and her performance as a host. According to a source close to production, Bialik was ultimately outshined in the role by Ken Jennings, the storied Jeopardy! contestant who was initially brought in to cohost only as a stopgap measure, filling in while Bialik was busy filming the Fox sitcom Call Me Kat, and who will now host the entirety of the syndicated show. But the reason for the change likely goes beyond that. So where did it all go wrong? And what does it mean for Jeopardy! moving forward?


    When Bialik was named a host of Jeopardy!, the selection fit a certain obvious logic. The actor was widely known for her roles on the sitcoms Blossom and The Big Bang Theory, and she had drawn praise for a two-week stint guest hosting the quiz show after Trebek’s 2020 death. She also holds a PhD in neuroscience, brainy laurels that fit well with Jeopardy!’s brand. After Richards stepped down, first as host and then as executive producer, on the heels of reporting by The Ringer and other outlets that sparked concerns about his past and the integrity of the host search, she seemed like a natural choice to fill the void and bring stability.

    Yet in some ways, Bialik made for an uneasy cultural fit. In his nearly 40 years on the job, Trebek crafted an image as more than just staid and reliable; publicly, he was also stringently apolitical. He spoke of voting for both Democrats and Republicans and generally avoided sharing his opinion on anything spicier than his preferred tipple (chardonnay). In recent years, Jeopardy! leadership has doubled down on that reputation, presenting the show as a safe harbor of impartiality in turbulent modern times where facts alone are what matter.

    Bialik’s ascent at the show, then, represented a departure from those norms. Long an avid user of social media, Bialik has written and spoken extensively about her life and beliefs. After her hiring, a slew of controversies resurfaced, among them her promotion of a dubious brain health supplement called Neuriva, her 2017 New York Times op-ed about the #MeToo movement that many interpreted as victim blaming and for which Bialik later apologized, and her advocacy for a range of controversial parenting techniques, including delaying or withholding some vaccinations for children. Bialik has said that she is not anti-vaccine while also stating in 2020 that “we give way too many vaccines.”

    Bialik has not shied away from weighing in on contentious subjects, telling Bill Maher recently about her distaste for cancel culture. At times, she has invoked Jeopardy! along the way. In October, she filmed an Instagram Reel with the Israeli actor Noa Tishby in which Bialik, who has written at length about her Jewish faith and Israel, riffed on her game-show duties while discussing the crisis in Gaza. “The free world is in jeopardy, but this time it’s not a game,” she said, before reading Tishby a series of Jeopardy!-style prompts. In a video published the day before Bialik announced her departure from the syndicated show, Bialik and Tishby again deployed a game-show format to make statements about the Israel-Hamas war. “You might be an antisemite if you think that the solution to what is going on in the Middle East is that the Jews should just go back to where they came from,” Bialik said. “The Jews are the indigenous people of the land of Israel,” Tishby added as Bialik nodded beside her, “so there’s nowhere to go back to.” A Sony official said that while the studio was aware of the videos, they had no impact on the decision not to retain Bialik on the syndicated show.

    Then there’s the matter of her absence from the entirety of the current season of Jeopardy!, which began airing in September. In May, Bialik announced that she would cease hosting Jeopardy! in solidarity with the Writers Guild of America, which was on strike. “There’s a lot of complexity to this, but my general statement is always that I come from a union family,” she said later. “While it’s not for me to personally judge anyone else’s decision, for me, I am a union supporter—pretty much all unions and what they fight for.”

    Sources close to the show say this stand was not exactly what it seemed. Jeopardy! and other game shows are guided by a distinct set of union provisions known as the Network Television Code, meaning that while Jeopardy!’s writers are members of the WGA and thus were part of the strike—many were prominent figures on picket lines in Los Angeles and New York—the rest of the staff and crew were not. SAG-AFTRA—which began its own strike in July and of which Bialik and Jennings are both members—explicitly advises non-striking members to continue to work per the terms of their contracts; to do otherwise can weaken the union’s negotiating power because it indicates that members might not follow the letter of the contract.

    There was also a semi-recent precedent at Jeopardy!: During the 2007-08 writers strike, Trebek hosted throughout the work stoppage. Both then and during this year’s strike, the quiz show used only clues written before the writers decamped. (The Network Television Code is governed by its own contract, which runs through June 2024.)

    Bialik’s move, however, left many decrying Jennings as a scab and criticizing Jeopardy! for taping at all. The actor Wil Wheaton, a friend of Bialik’s who she said was the first to predict she would get the Jeopardy! job, slammed Jennings in a widely discussed Facebook post in which he wrote, “Your privilege may protect you right now, but we will *never* forget.”

    On December 18, Puck’s Matthew Belloni reported that Bialik’s decision to step back from hosting during the writers strike left Jeopardy! executive producer Michael Davies and Sony executive vice president of game shows Suzanne Prete “furious.” The WGA strike concluded in September, with SAG-AFTRA following in November, and Bialik still did not return to the show.


    Issues persisted around Bialik’s performance in the studio, too. Part of that may have stemmed from her personal disconnect from Jeopardy!, about which she was up-front. She has written in the past about not watching any television and said that she learned of the opportunity to guest host only when her son saw buzz about the host search online. She seemed mystified by the level of scrutiny that the show, and, by extension, the host, received: “Like, who knew that people were so passionate about who hosts Jeopardy!?” she said shortly after taking on the series.

    Her apparent unfamiliarity with the show’s rhythms and lore rankled some longtime fans. Complaints at times verged on petty: Viewers griped that she referred to the show’s first round as “single Jeopardy!,” a phrase Trebek himself used occasionally, and piled on about her propensity to laugh during exchanges with contestants—a charge that smacked of misogyny to some. Other viewers, however, pointed to more fundamental issues. Throughout her time as host, Bialik was criticized for noticeable pauses after contestants delivered responses, with Bialik sometimes going silent for a conspicuous beat before issuing a verdict. Less charitable observers took this as an indication of a lack of familiarity with the show’s material such that she needed to wait for offstage judges to decide if an unexpected answer was correct. Tellingly, it was Jennings and not Bialik who was tapped to host last year’s Tournament of Champions and this spring’s Masters contest—high-stakes competitions with more difficult material where mistakes by the host could have much more serious, and costly, consequences for players.

    Bialik said that she suspected she would be reduced to tears if she were a contestant. “People ask if I know all that stuff, and I’m like, ‘No. No,’” she said. “Answering things like that under pressure with a timer is not gonna happen for me. It’s hard!”

    The self-effacement presented a stark divergence from both Trebek, who perfected the art of always seeming to know more than the contestants, and Jennings, who won a record 74 games as a contestant in 2004.

    Criticism of Bialik, often via comparison to Jennings, reached such a fever pitch that the moderators of the fan-run Jeopardy! subreddit stepped in to ban most anti-Bialik rhetoric. “Nitpicking even the smallest little mannerisms, as has frequently and ongoingly been the case with Mayim—it drags the community down and is not welcome,” a moderator wrote. Plenty of complaints still got through, however: After Call Me Kat, which was reportedly the primary obstacle to the actor’s ability to host more episodes of Jeopardy!, was canceled this May, one user wrote, “I’ve never been so upset about a show that I’ve never watched being canceled.” The comment attracted nearly 700 upvotes, making it one of the subreddit’s top three comments of 2023, according to the forum’s official year in review.

    Other incidents widened the chasm between Bialik and Jeopardy!’s vocal online community of superfans. Last year, she said on multiple occasions that fans had criticized her for reusing an outfit on the show. Not only was there no clear evidence that she had taken a social media walloping over the jacket in question—recent posts featuring the jacket on both her and Jeopardy!’s Instagram accounts did not appear to have any comments criticizing the repetition—but some fans wondered if she was lashing out at Lilly Nelson, a viewer who has attracted a loyal following and seemingly the blessing of Jeopardy!, which ran a feature on her online, for her rigorous cataloging of contestant and host garb alike.

    Still, Bialik had plenty of fans, and ratings—sky-high, with Jeopardy! generally leading all shows in syndication—fluctuated little between the two hosts’ time at the lectern. This month, filmmaker Jim Jarmusch declared Bialik his favorite Jeopardy! host ever. (“w apologies to Alex T,” he wrote.) The staff was also fond of her, with reports of her surprise delivery of cupcakes for the crew early in her hosting tenure leaked immediately to the Daily Mail.


    Jennings’s surpassing of Bialik to become the full-time host of the syndicated edition represents a stunning reversal of fates for the pair. At the outset of Jennings’s time hosting Jeopardy!, detractors criticized him for a lack of showbiz polish. Bialik’s decades of experience on camera, meanwhile, gave her an advantage in even small matters: her comfort with a teleprompter, for example, which Jennings spurned as an homage to the prompter-resistant Trebek, a decision that left him vulnerable to needing to re-tape segments.

    Bialik spent her first months on the syndicated show on a media tour in which she made clear that she wanted the full-time job for good: “I’d give up my first child to host Jeopardy! forever,” she professed in Newsweek. Jennings struck a different note in his interviews at the time. “You’re not going to see me in the papers talking about how important it is that I ended up hosting,” he told USA Today. To CNN, he said he was “not particularly ambitious” enough to want the permanent gig.

    That dynamic seemed to be reflected internally early on, when it was clear that Bialik’s reworked deal with Sony afforded her a superior position within the show. Throughout the 2021-22 season, Bialik was introduced in her episodes as “the host of Jeopardy!,” while Jennings was welcomed with the phrase “now hosting Jeopardy!”—seeming to emphasize that he was lower in the host pecking order. Davies, who came aboard as executive producer in the wake of Richards’s exit, eventually confirmed that the difference was because of Bialik’s contract, which stipulated that she was, in Davies’s phrasing, “the host of Jeopardy!,” while Jennings was merely a guest host. By the next season, however, both Bialik and Jennings had signed new deals with Sony that left them both billed simply as “host.”

    With Bialik sidelined for the bulk of this year, Jennings had a third season of hosting reps to himself. Jennings has been widely praised for improving his onstage performance, and he has developed a persona that has traces of Trebek’s signature sarcasm as well as a bubbly eagerness to share additional factoids that you might expect from a trivia champion. That growth was noted within Sony, too: Many Jeopardy! staff members came to believe that Jennings had become the technically superior host, according to a source close to production, who says that Jennings’s improvement was the key factor that spelled the end for Bialik.

    TMZ reported on December 20 that the extended period with a single host further helped convince Sony executives that the dual-host model was inferior. Critically, Jennings also filled in on Celebrity Jeopardy! in prime time—an assignment that would otherwise have gone to Bialik—and thrived, producing ratings on par with or exceeding those obtained by Bialik last year.

    Jennings has had his own rocky moments, most notably when a series of his tweets including ableist comments reemerged in late 2020; he apologized for the “unartful and insensitive” messages. But he has by and large avoided controversy during his time as host. He is helped by the perception that he is Trebek’s natural heir, by dint of both his own history as a contestant and his ties to Trebek, who prepped Jennings over the phone to fill in for him shortly before his death; Trebek’s wife left a pair of his cuff links for the newbie host when Jennings arrived to tape his first episodes.


    Bialik may yet return: A statement by Jeopardy! released on December 15 left open the possibility for Bialik to still host prime-time episodes in the future. Davies has spoken at length about his plans to expand the Jeopardy! franchise and said last year that the growth would necessitate “multiple hosts to represent the entire audience, to represent the entire country, in order to take this franchise forward.” (Davies has suggested that it was his decision “to bring Ken in and have Ken be a second host along with Mayim”; it is perhaps not coincidental that the TMZ report also contained the tidbit that Bialik “didn’t always agree with production decisions … including the hiring of executive producer Michael Davies.”)

    TMZ further reported that while Sony executives would like to maintain a relationship with Bialik, “Mayim made it clear it was all or nothing. As a result, we’re told Sony brass declined.” Even the public announcements of Bialik’s exit point to a rift: Jeopardy! did not publish its own statement until an hour after Bialik posted hers, and it wrote that “Mayim Bialik has announced that she will no longer be hosting the syndicated version of Jeopardy!,” suggesting that the actor may have acted unilaterally in making a final decision.

    No matter how the rest of this unfolds, there is a certain irony to the way that the hire brought in to steady the ship made her own dramatic splash at Jeopardy! In the three years since Trebek’s death, the quiz show has at times felt doomed to cycle through recurring controversies. But this time, Jeopardy! finally looks to be in a position to get what it’s been palpably chasing all this time: just the right level of nerdy steadiness. As Jennings put it this week in reference to Trebek’s tenure, “I look forward to 37 more years of doing it, when I’ll be a very, very old man.”

    Claire McNear

    Source link

  • Rogue Trader’s role-playing embraces the brutality and freedom of Warhammer 40K

    Rogue Trader’s role-playing embraces the brutality and freedom of Warhammer 40K

    “In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war.” That’s the tagline of Warhammer 40,000, one of the most over-the-top and brutal sci-fi settings around. But even in a merciless, brutal dystopia that grinds its people into dust, some get to enjoy being on the top of the food chain. Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader is about the perils and pleasures of being atop that particular hierarchy.

    Rogue Traders in 40K are freelance explorers, scouting the far frontiers of the Imperium of Man. It’s a risky career, but it comes with luxurious rewards: agency, freedom, power, and a giant flagship. As the player, I explore a system of the Imperium with a loyal crew of companions, making impactful choices and determining the fate of those around me.

    Rogue Trader is a computer role-playing game in the vein of Baldur’s Gate 3 or Pillars of Eternity. I create my custom protagonist, determining stats and bonuses based on my backstory, home world, and so on. I’m then thrust into a high-pressure job interview as a potential heir to a Rogue Trader aboard her flagship. Little do we know that there’s a coup in the works, and traitors aboard the ship. After a deadly struggle against heretics and demons, I ascend to the position of Rogue Trader. I’m the captain now, and I get to decide how to run my ship.

    Image: Owlcat Games

    This is a vast game, with tons of features you’d expect from a CRPG — companions (each with their own narrative paths and conversation trees), top-down strategic combat, and branching choices that impact the world around you. I get to make choices all day — in fact, that’s part of the gig of a Rogue Trader. Some are more important than others; whenever I get to specific points in the story, I can choose from one of three major paths. Dogmatic choices exult the God-Emperor and loathe the mutant and the witch, the Heretical options pursue corruptive power, and the Ionoclast path is the closest thing we have to modern-day “good guy” morality.

    After the events of the tutorial, my beautiful voidship is run down and my staff is struggling. As the newly anointed Rogue Trader, I have to trek around the various planets of the Koronus Expanse to get a new Navigator, fix my ship up, and avoid any major diplomatic incidents with the locals. My voidship is the size of a modern city; I’m as much a governor as a captain, and I have to manage the ship, its cargo, and its many occupants.

    In the process of getting back on my feet, I uncover a nefarious cult and a deep conspiracy. It’s not an easy job, but I’m blessed with a handful of companions from the Imperium to help me out. I can call on them to unlock doors or perform other environmental checks, but they come most in handy in combat.

    When I meet opposition, it’s deeply satisfying to control my troops in a turn-based battle. Each fight takes place on a grid; it’s very similar to Baldur’s Gate 3 or even XCOM 2. Some positions provide cover, while others are out in the open. Friendly fire is also a very real concern. An arc of auto-fire from a bolter, or a Navigator’s third eye opening, can harm friend as well as foe. My Rogue Trader is a sniper, and she would be lost without her Senechal taking the front lines. There’s a lot of firepower at my disposal, and it’s mostly quite satisfying to use — even if I occasionally shred my poor Senechal with a devastating AOE.

    A Rogue Trader and his companions are mid-combat, which shows the grid-based movement and cover systems of the new CRPG from Owlcat Games.

    Image: Owlcat Games

    I can chat with the companions between battles, learning more about their pasts. Most of them have deep and dark secrets I can uncover with a little time or patience, and they have fascinating stories to tell. Abelard, my Senechal, is a guy who sucks morally but will back me to the absolute hilt. I grew to love hearing about his days in the Imperial Navy, and he was the one guy I felt like I could trust. Augusta, a Sister of Battle, starts as a one-note zealot, but cracks form in that facade when I learn about her past and doubts. Cassia and Pasqal both represent two sub-factions in 40K, and they have lots to share about the Navigators and Tech-Priests.

    My absolute favorite companion is Marazhai Aezyrraesh, a dark space elf who feeds off the suffering of sentient beings. He’s cruel, depraved, and an absolute hoot. Yes, he may flay a few too many people for my tastes, but he’s the best companion to bring to a party.

    In the grand scheme of things, this is one of the most complete and detailed explorations of the 40K universe you can find. The game is an homage to the Warhammer 40K RPGs from Fantasy Flight Games, including Rogue Trader and Dark Heresy. I spent years as a teenager and young adult poring over these sourcebooks (which Rogue Trader is inspired by), learning more about the tiny details of life in the Imperium. Developer Owlcat Games has paid the same attention to every detail of the Koronus Expanse. I delve into ancient facilities staffed by tech-priests of the Machine God, the hostile xenos city of Commorragh, or massive cities built to honor the God-Emperor of Mankind.

    I love the characters, the environments, the writing, the lore, and the flow of battles. But I have concerns with the game’s pacing. By the end of the first chapter, I had leveled up 16 times. Each level offered marginal rewards, like being able to move slightly farther during the character’s turn in combat or having a higher parry chance when being attacked. A slow drip-feed system means each level feels less important, and even though I’m growing stronger, I don’t get that sense of long-term satisfaction.

    A nefarious room for scientific experiments, with gurneys and green lighting, in the world of Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader

    Image: Owlcat Games

    It’s especially frustrating to hit a roadblock like the one at the end of Act 1, where an incredibly tough boss rolls out of nowhere and spanks my crew — and I can’t leave to go grind experience somewhere else. I eventually found out a way to cheese the fight by focusing on my melee fighters’ positioning, but it took far too long banging my head against the wall. The victory tasted like ash in my mouth after all that frustration.

    Voidship combat is another aspect that feels clunky and frustrating. Like the squad-based skirmishes, naval encounters are also turn-based, where positioning is ultra important. Space naval battles should feel tense, but instead, I’m mostly annoyed at having to continually rotate my ship and set up my zones of attack. I wish I could delegate these annoyances to my Senechal — to delegate the duties of character leveling and ship combat, the better to appreciate all of the things Rogue Trader is doing so well.

    Rogue Trader is a dense, vast game, and much of it has clearly been crafted with love for the expansive lore of the 40K canon. While there are small annoyances and clunky features along the way, the political intrigue, cast of characters, and moral choices have me hooked. For 40K fans, this is a rare treat — a game that digs past the heroic facade of bolters and battles and taps into the grimdark dystopia that makes this particular sci-fi setting so damn compelling.

    Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader will be released on Dec. 7 on Windows PC. The game was reviewed using a pre-release download code provided by Owlcat Games. Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. You can find additional information about Polygon’s ethics policy here.

    Cass Marshall

    Source link