ReportWire

Tag: Robert Hunter Biden

  • Hunter Biden revives lawsuit against Fox News over explicit images used in streaming series

    Hunter Biden revives lawsuit against Fox News over explicit images used in streaming series

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Hunter Biden has revived a lawsuit that accuses Fox News of illegally publishing explicit images of him as part of a streaming series.

    The president’s son first sued Fox in New York in July over images used in the Fox Nation series “The Trial of Hunter Biden,” a “mock trial” of Hunter Biden on charges he has not faced. He dropped the suit without explanation three weeks later, the same day President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.

    On Tuesday, Hunter Biden filed a largely identical suit in state court in Manhattan, again arguing that the dissemination of intimate images without his consent violates New York’s so-called revenge porn law. The new suit adds one current Fox executive one former executive as named defendants.

    Biden’s attorney, Tina Glandian, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on why the suit was revived.

    In a filing Tuesday, Fox asked that the case be moved to federal court. The company issued a statement describing the second suit as “once again devoid of any merit.”

    “The core complaint stems from a 2022 streaming program that Mr. Biden did not complain about until sending a letter in late April 2024,” the statement said. “The program was removed within days of that letter, in an abundance of caution, but Hunter Biden is a public figure who has been the subject of multiple investigations and is now a convicted felon.”

    Biden was convicted in July of three felony firearms charges related to the purchase of a revolver in 2018. The six-part Fox Nation series depicted a dramatized court proceeding on different, fictional charges.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden pleads guilty in tax case, hours after jury selection for trial was to begin

    Hunter Biden pleads guilty in tax case, hours after jury selection for trial was to begin

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, arrives at court for his trial on tax evasion in Los Angeles on Sept. 5, 2024.

    Ringo Chiu | AFP | Getty Images

    Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to all nine counts in his criminal tax case in Los Angeles federal court on Thursday afternoon, hours after jury selection was due to begin for a trial of the son of President Joe Biden.

    Biden’s sentencing was scheduled for Dec. 16.

    The plea came after prosecutors strongly opposed Biden’s surprise offer earlier in the day to enter a special plea — known as an Alford plea — that would allow him to maintain that he believed he was innocent but concede that prosecutors had enough evidence to convict him at trial.

    If the Alford plea had been accepted by U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, Biden would have been convicted of the charges.

    The plea that Biden ended up making to Scarsi is an “open plea,” or one done without a plea deal with prosecutors, which might have included a reduction in the number of criminal counts he faced and an agreement on the likely terms of his sentencing.

    Biden, 54, was charged in the case with three felony counts and six misdemeanors related to failing to pay at least $1.4 million in federal taxes between 2016 and 2019.

    He was accused of deducting money that he paid to sex workers on his taxes as a business expense and of spending “millions of dollars on an extravagant lifestyle rather than paying his tax bills,” according to an indictment.

    “Mr. Biden will agree that the elements of each offense have been satisfied,” Biden’s lawyer Abbe Lowell told Scarsi after returning from a recess following arguments over the proposed Alford plea.

    When Scarsi asked special counsel Leo Wise, the prosecutor, if that was sufficient, Wise said he would prefer that Biden admit his actions as alleged in an indictment.

    “Will Mr. Biden agree that that is the truth? Because the truth matters,” Wise said. “He should have to say that the facts are true!”

    Lowell then argued that was not required under the law.

    “He just has to agree to the elements,” Lowell said. “I know Mr. Wise would like Mr. Biden to say, ‘and in addition, I was a really bad person when I did this,’ but that’s not what the law requires.”

    Scarsi said, “So we’re going to take an open plea from Mr. Biden. And I will ask if you committed conduct that satisfies element in the indictment.”

    Wise then began reading the 56-page indictment out loud in court. That reading took almost 90 minutes to complete.

     In June, Biden was found guilty after trial in another case where he was accused of crimes related to his purchase of a handgun in 2018 while being a user and addict of crack cocaine.

    He is awaiting sentencing in that case, which was tried in U.S. District Court in Delaware.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    On Thursday morning in Los Angeles federal court, more than 100 potential jurors assembled for jury selection in Biden’s tax case.

    But Biden’s lawyer Lowell surprised prosecutors and others in the court when he told Scarsi, “There is no reason to proceed with jury selection as Mr. Biden intends to change his plea.”

    Lowell told Scarsi there was “no agreement” with prosecutors about Biden’s planned Alford plea. But the lawyer said there is no requirement for such an agreement.

    “The law is very clear. If the defendant satisfies rule 11b, the court is required to accept the plea,” Lowell said.”

    Lowell also said, “I don’t think we would agree under conventional plea circumstances.”

    Wise, the special counsel, told Scarsi, “This is the first we’ve heard of this.” Wise asked for time to discuss the proposed change of plea privately.

    “I think this can be resolved today,” Lowell said. “It doesn’t need days.”

    After a recess, Wise told the judge, “I want to make it crystal clear: The U.S. opposes an Alford plea.”

    “We will not under any circumstances accept an Alford plea,” said Wise. “It’s not in the public interest, it’s contrary to the rule of law and we think it’s an injustice.”

    Hunter Biden is not innocent. Hunter Biden is guilty,” said Wise.

    “We were as shocked as anyone else,” the prosecutor said about the proposed Alford plea.

    He said the prosecution is not in a position to evaluate that plea offer Thursday.

    “There’s no way to rush this at this point. And it shouldn’t be rushed,” Wise said. 

    Under Department of Justice guidelines, federal prosecutors “may not consent” to an Alford plea “except in the most unusual circumstances and only after the Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, or a higher Departmental official, has approved a written request.”

    Lowell told Scarsi that Biden is not asking for special treatment, noting that “people all over the U.S.” take Alford pleas.

    “He is asking for the same rights as others,” Lowell said. “He is willing to say that the government has put forth sufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. … I don’t know why the government wants to punt.”

    Scarsi called another recess after hearing the arguments and telling attorneys, “I haven’t seen a case that tells me I have to accept an Alford plea.”

    But the judge also said, “Assuming I have the opportunity to reject an Alford plea, why shouldn’t I?”

    “I need a reason why I accept or reject a plea,” Scarsi said. 

    After that recess, Biden returned to the courtroom, where Lowell said he would enter his open guilty plea, dropping the suggestion of an Alford plea.

    President Biden, as he left the White House earlier Thursday to travel to Wisconsin, ignored shouted questions from reporters about his son’s plan to change his original not-guilty plea in the case.

    This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden enters surprise guilty plea to avoid tax trial months after his gun conviction

    Hunter Biden enters surprise guilty plea to avoid tax trial months after his gun conviction

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, pleaded guilty Thursday to federal tax charges, a surprise move meant to spare his family another painful and embarrassing criminal trial after his gun case conviction just months ago.

    Hunter Biden’s decision to plead guilty to misdemeanor and felony charges without the benefits of a deal with prosecutors caps a long-running saga over his legal woes that have cast a shadow over his father’s political career. It came hours after jury selection was supposed to begin in the case accusing him of failing to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes.

    The president’s son was already facing potential prison time after his June conviction on felony gun charges in a trial that aired unflattering and salacious details about his struggles with a crack cocaine addiction. The tax trial was expected to showcase more potentially lurid evidence as well as details about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings, which Republicans have seized on to try to paint the Biden family as corrupt.

    “I will not subject my family to more pain, more invasions of privacy and needless embarrassment,” Hunter Biden said in an emailed statement after he entered his plea. “For all I have put them through over the years, I can spare them this, and so I have decided to plead guilty.”

    Although President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the 2024 presidential election muted the potential political implications of the tax case, the trial was expected to carry a heavy emotional toll for the president in the final months of his five-decade political career.

    “Hunter put his family first today, and it was a brave and loving thing for him to do,” defense attorney Abbe Lowell told reporters outside the federal courthouse in Los Angeles.

    Hunter Biden, 54, quickly responded “guilty” as the judge read out each of the nine counts. He showed no emotion as he walked out the courthouse holding his wife’s hand. He ignored questions shouted at him by reporters before climbing into an SUV and driving off.

    The charges carry up to 17 years behind bars, but federal sentencing guidelines are likely to call for a much shorter sentence. He faces up to $1.35 million in fines. Sentencing is set for Dec. 16 in front of U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, who was nominated to the bench by former President Donald Trump.

    He faces sentencing in the Delaware case on Nov. 13 — the week after the general election. Those charges are punishable by up to 25 years in prison, though he is likely to get far less time or avoid prison entirely.

    More than 100 potential jurors had been brought to the courthouse Thursday to begin the process of picking the panel to hear the case alleging a four-year scheme to avoid paying taxes while spending wildly on things like strippers, luxury hotels and exotic cars.

    Prosecutors were caught off guard when Hunter Biden’s lawyer told the judge Thursday morning that Hunter wanted to enter what’s known as an Alford plea, under which a defendant maintains their innocence but acknowledges prosecutors have enough evidence to secure a conviction.

    Special counsel David Weiss’ team objected to such a plea, telling the judge that Hunter Biden “is not entitled to plead guilty on special terms that apply only to him.”

    “Hunter Biden is not innocent. Hunter Biden is guilty,” prosecutor Leo Wise said.

    After a break in the hearing, Hunter Biden’s lawyers said he had decided to plead guilty to all nine charges.

    Last year, it had looked like he was going to be spared prison time under a deal with prosecutors that would have allowed him to plead guilty to misdemeanor tax offenses. Prosecutors would have recommended two years of probation and he would have escaped prosecution on a felony gun charge as long he stayed out of trouble for two years.

    But the agreement imploded after a judge questioned unusual aspects of it, and Hunter Biden was subsequently indicted in the two cases. The defense has accused special counsel Weiss of caving to political pressure to indict the president’s son after Trump and other Republicans blasted what they described as a “sweetheart deal.”

    The indictment brought last year grew out of an investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes that began in 2018 under the Trump administration. Hunter Biden confirmed the existence of the investigation in December 2020 — the month after his father won the election — saying he learned about it for the first time the previous day.

    Prosecutors alleged that Hunter Biden lived lavishly while flouting the tax law, spending his cash on things like strippers and luxury hotels — “in short, everything but his taxes.”

    The charges in both the gun and tax cases stemmed from a period in Hunter Biden’s life in which he struggled with drug and alcohol abuse before becoming sober in 2019. His lawyers had been expected to argue that his substance abuse struggles affected his decision-making and judgment, so he could not have acted “willfully,” or with intention to break the tax law.

    “As I have stated, addiction is not an excuse, but it is an explanation for some of my failures at issue in this case,” Hunter Biden said in a statement. “When I was addicted, I wasn’t thinking about my taxes, I was thinking about surviving. But the jury would never have heard that or know that I had paid every penny of my back taxes including penalties.”

    His decision to plead guilty came after the judge issued some unfavorable pre-trial rulings for the defense, including rejecting a proposed defense expert lined up to testify about addiction. Scarsi had also placed some restrictions on what jurors would be allowed to hear about the traumatic events that Hunter Biden’s family, friends and attorneys say led to his drug addiction.

    Hunter Biden’s attorneys had asked Scarsi to also limit prosecutors from highlighting details of his expenses that they say amount to a “character assassination,” including payments made to strippers or pornographic websites.

    Prosecutors had also planned to introduce evidence about Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, including his work for a Romanian businessman who prosecutors said in court papers sought to “influence U.S. government policy” while Joe Biden was vice president.

    ___

    Lauer reported from Philadelphia. AP writer Zeke Miller contributed from Washington.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden was hired by Romanian businessman trying to ‘influence’ US agencies, prosecutors say

    Hunter Biden was hired by Romanian businessman trying to ‘influence’ US agencies, prosecutors say

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Hunter Biden was hired by a Romanian businessman accused of corruption who was trying to “influence U.S. government policy” during Joe Biden’s term as vice president, prosecutors said in court papers Wednesday.

    Special counsel David Weiss’ team said Hunter Biden’s business associate will testify at the upcoming federal tax trial of the president’s son about the arrangement with the executive, Gabriel Popoviciu, who was facing criminal investigation at the time in Romania.

    The allegations are likely to bring a fresh wave of criticism of Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings, which have been the center of Republicans’ investigations into the president’s family. Hunter Biden has blasted Republican inquiries into his family’s business affairs as politically motivated, and has insisted he never involved his father in his business.

    An attorney for Hunter Biden didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

    Prosecutors plan to introduce evidence that Hunter Biden and his business associate “received compensation from a foreign principal who was attempting to influence U.S. policy and public opinion,” according to the filing. Popoviciu wanted U.S. government agencies to probe the Romanian bribery investigation he was facing in the hopes that would end his legal trouble, according to prosecutors.

    Popoviciu is identified only in court papers as G.P., but the details line up with information released in the congressional investigation and media reporting about Hunter Biden’s legal work in Romania.

    Popoviciu was sentenced to seven years in prison in 2017 after being convicted of real estate fraud. He denied any wrongdoing. An attorney who previously represented Popoviciu didn’t immediately respond to a phone message Wednesday.

    Prosecutors say Hunter Biden agreed with his business associate to help Popoviciu fight the criminal charges against him. But prosecutors say they were concerned that “lobbying work might cause political ramifications” for Joe Biden, so the arrangement was structured in a way that “concealed the true nature of the work” for Popoviciu, prosecutors allege.

    Hunter Biden’s business associate and Popoviciu signed an agreement to make it look like Popoviciu’s payments were for “management services to real estate prosperities in Romania.” However, prosecutors said, “That was not actually what G.P. was paying for.”

    In fact, Popoviciu and Hunter’s business associate agreed that they would be paid for their work to “attempt to influence U.S. government agencies to investigate the Romanian investigation,” prosecutors said. Hunter Biden’s business associate was paid more than $3 million, which was split with Hunter and another business partner, prosecutors say.

    The claims were made in court papers as prosecutors responded to a request by Hunter Biden’s legal team to bar from his upcoming trial any reference to allegations of improper political influence that have dogged the president’s son for years. While Republicans’ investigation has raised ethical questions, no evidence has emerged that the president acted corruptly or accepted bribes in his current role or his previous office as vice president.

    Hunter Biden’s lawyers have said in court papers that he has been “the target of politically motivated attacks and conspiracy theories” about his foreign business dealings. But they noted he “has never been charged with any crime relating to these unfounded allegations, and the Special Counsel should thus be precluded from even raising such issues at trial.”

    Hunter Biden’s trial set to begin next month in Los Angeles centers on charges that he failed to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes over four years during a period in which he has acknowledged struggling with a drug addiction.

    Prosecutors say they won’t introduce any evidence that Hunter Biden was directly paid by a foreign government “or evidence that the defendant received compensation for actions taken by his father that impacted national or international politics.”

    Still, prosecutors say what Hunter Biden agreed to do for Popoviciu is relevant at trial because it “demonstrates his state and mind and intent” during the years he’s accused of failing to pay his taxes.

    “It is also evidence that the defendant’s actions do not reflect someone with a diminished capacity, given that he agreed to attempt to influence U.S. public policy and receive millions of dollars” in the agreement with his business associate, prosecutors wrote.

    The tax trial comes months after Hunter Biden was convicted of three felony charges over the purchase of a gun in 2018. Prosecutors argued that the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs.

    He could face up to 25 years in prison at sentencing set for Nov. 13 in Wilmington, Delaware, but as a first-time offender he is likely to get far less time or avoid prison entirely.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Latest: FBI chemist testifies that cocaine identified in powder on pouch that held gun

    The Latest: FBI chemist testifies that cocaine identified in powder on pouch that held gun

    [ad_1]

    WILMINGTON, Del. – The Latest on Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial (all times local):

    Prosecutor Leo Wise handed FBI chemist Jason Brewer a leather pouch in which Hunter Biden’s sister-in-law and former lover Hallie Biden put the gun before tossing it in a trash can outside an upscale grocery store near her home 11 days after he bought it.

    Brewer said he tested the pouch to determine whether there was any trace of drugs or drug residue.

    “I found a minimal amount of white powder, or off-white powder,” Brewer said. The powder was found on the interior flap and in the bottom of the pouch.

    Brewer said he tested the powder with a chemical solution and gas chromatography.

    “Did you reach a conclusion about the substance you tested?” Wise asked.

    “Cocaine was identified within the residual white powder that I sampled,” Brewer said.

    On cross-examination, defense attorney David Kolansky noted the amount of residue Brewer tested was “minimal.” He also noted that Brewer tested the pouch in October 2023, five years after the pouch was recovered by police who were called after Hallie Biden threw it in the trash can.

    Kolasnky also noted that the tests Brewer did don’t indicate when the drug residue got on the pouch or how it got there.

    Currently:

    — Back from France, the first lady attends Hunter Biden’s gun trial. Prosecution has 2 more witnesses

    Here’s the latest:

    COURT RESUMES WITH FBI CHEMIST ON WITNESS STAND

    The fifth day of Hunter Biden’s gun trial in Delaware began Friday with prosecutors calling an FBI forensic chemist examiner to the witness stand.

    Prosecutor Leo Wise is questioning Jason Brewer, who is an expert in analyzing controlled substances.

    Hunter Biden is charged with falsely denying he was a drug user or addict when he bought a gun at a Wilmington gun store in October 2018.

    FIRST LADY JILL BIDEN ARRIVES AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR SON’S TRIAL

    First lady Jill Biden has arrived at the courthouse for son Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial.

    She left France on Thursday evening where she was attending D-Day events with President Joe Biden. She’ll return to France for a state dinner.

    2 MORE PROSECUTION WITNESSES EXPECTED IN HUNTER BIDEN’S TRIAL

    Federal prosecutors are wrapping up their gun case in Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial with two more witnesses expected Friday in their effort to prove to jurors the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun purchase form when he said he wasn’t “an unlawful user of, or addicted to” drugs.

    Prosecutors are still planning to call a drug expert and an FBI chemist, capping a week that has been largely dedicated to highlighting the seriousness of his drug problem through highly personal and sometimes salacious testimony.

    Hunter Biden been charged with three felonies: lying to a federally licensed gun dealer, making a false claim on the application by saying he was not a drug user and illegally having the gun for 11 days.

    HIGHLIGHTS FROM DAY 3 OF TESTIMONY: BEAU BIDEN’S WIDOW SAID SHE THREW GUN INTO TRASH CAN

    The widow of Hunter Biden’s brother told jurors in his federal gun trial Thursday about the moment she found the revolver in his truck, describing how she put it into a leather pouch, stuffed it into a shopping bag and tossed it in a trash can outside a market near her home.

    “I panicked, and I wanted to get rid of them,” she testified about finding the gun and ammunition in the vehicle’s console in October 2018. “I didn’t want him to hurt himself, and I didn’t want my kids to find it and hurt themselves.”

    The purchase of the Colt revolver by Hunter Biden — and Hallie Biden’s frenzied disposal of it — are the fulcrum of the case against him.

    HUNTER BIDEN’S OTHER TRIAL

    Hunter Biden was supposed to have avoided prosecution in the gun case altogether, but a deal with prosecutors fell apart last year.

    He was subsequently indicted on three felony gun charges. He also faces a trial scheduled for September on felony charges alleging he failed to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes over four years.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Back from France, the first lady attends Hunter Biden’s gun trial as prosecution wraps up

    Back from France, the first lady attends Hunter Biden’s gun trial as prosecution wraps up

    [ad_1]

    WILMINGTON, Del. – Federal prosecutors aimed to wrap up their gun case against Hunter Biden on Friday with two final witnesses in their effort to prove that the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun purchase form when he said he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs.

    Prosecutors called an FBI forensic chemist, Jason Brewer, who tested a residue found on the leather pouch that contained Hunter Biden’s gun. It came back positive for cocaine, though the amount was minimal, he told jurors. His testimony is capping a week that has been largely dedicated to highlighting the seriousness of Hunter Biden’s drug problem through highly personal and often revealing testimony.

    Jurors heard Thursday from Hunter Biden’s his ex-wife and a former girlfriend who testified about his habitual crack use and their failed efforts to help him get clean. They saw images of the president’s son bare-chested and disheveled in a filthy room, and half-naked holding crack pipes. And they watched video of his crack cocaine weighed on a scale.

    Prosecutor say the evidence is necessary to prove that Hunter, 54, was in the throes of addiction when he bought the gun and therefore lied when he checked “no” on the form that asked whether he was “an unlawful user of, or addicted to” drugs.

    His attorney, Abbe Lowell, has argued Hunter did not think of himself as an “addict” when he bought the gun and did not intend to deceive anyone.

    Meanwhile, President Joe Biden worked to walk the line between president and father, telling ABC in an interview that he would accept the jury’s verdict and ruling out a pardon for his son. Earlier this week, he issued a statement saying: “I am the President, but I am also a Dad. Jill and I love our son, and we are so proud of the man he is today.”

    Biden is in France this week for D-Day anniversary events. First lady Jill Biden, who attended court most of the week, flew from France Thursday to be at the trial again Friday before she will return to France for a state dinner.

    Hunter Biden been charged with three felonies: lying to a federally licensed gun dealer, making a false claim on the application by saying he was not a drug user and illegally having the gun for 11 days.

    He has pleaded not guilty. He had hoped to resolve the gun case and another separate tax case in California with a plea deal last year, the result of a yearslong investigation into his business dealings. The deal had him pleading guilty to lower-level charges that would have resolved both cases and spared him the spectacle of a trial so close to the 2024 election. It fell apart after Judge Maryellen Noreika questioned unusual aspects of the proposed agreement and the lawyers couldn’t resolve them.

    Hunter Biden said he got charged because the Justice Department bowed to pressure from Republicans who argued the Democratic president’s son was getting special treatment, and who have escalated their attacks on the criminal justice system since Donald Trump’s recent conviction in New York City in a hush money case.

    Lowell said he would call the president’s brother James as a witness, but it’s unclear yet whether Hunter Biden will testify.

    But jurors have already heard his voice. Prosecutors have played lengthy audio excerpts in court of his 2021 memoir “Beautiful Things,” in which he writes about his lifelong addiction issues and spiraling descent after death of his brother Beau in 2015. The book, written after he got sober, covers the period he had the gun but doesn’t mention it specifically.

    Lowell has said Hunter Biden’s state of mind was different when he wrote the book than when he purchased the gun, when he didn’t believe he had an addiction. He pointed out to jurors that some of the questions on the firearms transaction record are in the present tense, such as “are you an unlawful user of or addicted to” drugs.

    And he’s suggested Hunter Biden might have felt he had a drinking problem at the time, but not a drug problem. Alcohol abuse doesn’t preclude a gun purchase.

    The reason law enforcement raised any questions about the revolver is because Hallie Biden, Beau’s widow, found it unloaded in Hunter’s truck on Oct. 23, 2018, panicked and tossed it into a garbage can at a nearby market. She testified about the episode Thursday.

    She told jurors she considered hiding the gun but thought her kids might find it, so she decided to throw it away.

    “I realize it was a stupid idea now, but I was panicking,” she said. “I didn’t want him to hurt himself, and I didn’t want my kids to find it and hurt themselves.”

    Hallie Biden, who had a brief romantic relationship with Hunter after Beau died, testified that from the time Hunter returned to Delaware from a 2018 trip to California until she threw his gun away, she did not see him using drugs. That time period included the day he bought the weapon.

    But much of her testimony focused on Oct. 23, 2018 — 11 days after he bought it. Hunter was staying with her and seemed exhausted. Asked by the prosecutor if it appeared that Hunter was using drugs around then, she said, “He could have been.”

    As Hunter slept in her home, Hallie Biden went to check his car. She said she was hoping to help him get or stay sober, free of both alcohol and cocaine. She said she found the remnants of crack cocaine and drug paraphernalia. She also found the gun Hunter purchased in a box with a broken lock that kept it from fully closing. There was ammunition too.

    She put in a leather pouch put the pouch in a bag and tossed it into in the trash can at Janssen’s Market. He noticed it missing and asked her whether she had taken it.

    “Are you insane?” he texted. He told her to go back to the market to look for it.

    Surveillance footage played for jurors showed her digging around in the trash can for the gun, but it wasn’t there. She asked store officials if someone had taken out the trash. Hallie testified Hunter told her to file a police report because the gun was registered in his name. She called the police while she was still at the store.

    Officers located the man who inadvertently took the gun along with other recyclables from the trash and retrieved it. The case was eventually closed because of lack of cooperation from Hunter Biden, who was considered the victim.

    Jurors also heard from the officers who handled the case, from the man who found the gun and from the store clerk who sold Hunter the revolver.

    If convicted, Hunter Biden faces up to 25 years in prison, though first-time offenders do not get anywhere near the maximum, and it’s unclear whether the judge would give him time behind bars.

    He also faces a separate trial in September on charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes.

    ___

    This story’s headline has been corrected to show the prosecution, not the defense, has 2 more witnesses.

    ___

    Long reported from Washington.

    ___

    Follow the AP’s coverage of Hunter Biden at https://apnews.com/hub/hunter-biden.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Randall Chase, Michael Kunzelman, Colleen Long And Claudia Lauer, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Jury selection is beginning in gun case against President Joe Biden’s son

    Jury selection is beginning in gun case against President Joe Biden’s son

    [ad_1]

    WILMINGTON, Del. – Jury selection is to begin Monday in the federal gun case against President Joe Biden’s son after a deal with prosecutors fell apart that would have avoided the spectacle of a trial so close to the 2024 election.

    Hunter Biden, who spent the weekend with his father, has been charged with three felonies stemming from a 2018 firearm purchase when he was, according to his memoir, in the throes of a crack addiction. He has been accused of lying to a federally licensed gun dealer, making a false claim on the application used to screen firearms applicants when he said he was not a drug user, and illegally having the gun for 11 days.

    He has pleaded not guilty and has argued he’s being unfairly targeted by the Justice Department, after Republicans decried the now-defunct deal as special treatment.

    The trial comes just four days after Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felonies in New York City after a jury found him guilty of a scheme to cover up a hush money payment to a porn actor to fend off damage to his 2016 presidential campaign. The two criminal cases are not related, but their proximity underscores how the criminal courtroom has taken center stage during the 2024 campaign.

    Hunter Biden is also facing a separate trial in California in September on charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes. Both cases were to have been resolved through a deal with prosecutors last July, the culmination of a years-long investigation into his business dealings.

    But Judge Maryellen Noreika questioned some unusual aspects of the deal that included a proposed guilty plea to misdemeanor offenses to resolve the tax crimes and a “diversion agreement” on the gun charge, which meant as long as he stayed out of trouble for two years the case would be dismissed. The lawyers squabbled over the agreement, could not come to a resolution and the deal fell apart. Attorney General Merrick Garland then appointed the top investigator as a special counsel in August, and a month later Hunter Biden was indicted.

    This trial isn’t about Hunter Biden’s foreign business affairs — which Republicans have seized on without evidence to try to paint the Biden family as corrupt. But it will excavate some of Hunter Biden’s darkest moments and put them on display.

    The president’s allies are worried about the toll the trial may take on the elder Biden, who’s long been concerned about the well-being and sobriety of his only living son and who must now watch as those painful past mistakes are publicly scrutinized. He’s also protective; Hunter Biden was with his father all weekend before the case began, biking with his dad, and attending church together.

    Biden, in a last minute switch in plans, shifted from his Rehoboth Beach home back to his Wilmington compound on Sunday evening. Boarding the helicopter on Sunday was the only time the president was seen publicly without his son all weekend.

    Allies are also worried the trial could become a distraction as the president tries to campaign under anemic poll numbers and as he is preparing for an upcoming presidential debate while the proceedings play out.

    Prosecutors are hoping to show he was in the throes of addiction when he bought the gun – and therefore lied on the forms. They have said they’re planning to use as evidence Hunter Biden’s published memoir, and they may also introduce contents from a laptop that he left at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. The contents made their way to Republicans in 2020 and were publicly leaked, revealing embarrassing and personal photos where he’s often nude and doing drugs and highly personal messages where he asks dealers about scores.

    The judge will ask a group of prospective jurors a series of questions to determine whether they can serve impartially on the jury, including whether they have donated to political campaigns or run for political office. She will ask whether their views about the 2024 presidential campaign prevent them from being impartial.

    She’s also going to ask whether prospective jurors believe Hunter Biden is being prosecuted because his father is the president. Also, she’ll ask about firearms purchasing and addiction issues, including: “Do you believe someone who is addicted to drugs should not be charged with a crime?”

    The case against Hunter Biden stems from a period where, by his own public admission, he was addicted to crack. His descent into drugs and alcohol followed the 2015 death of his brother Beau Biden from cancer. He bought and owned a gun for 11 days in October 2018, and indicated on the gun purchase form that he was not using drugs.

    Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty in both cases, and his attorneys have suggested they may argue he didn’t see himself as an addict when prosecutors say he checked “no” to the question on the form. They’ll also attack the credibility of the gun store owner.

    Prosecutors, meanwhile, are also planning to call as witnesses Hunter Biden’s ex-wife and his brother’s widow Hallie, with whom he became romantically involved.

    If he were to be convicted, he could face up to 25 years in prison, though first-time offenders do not get anywhere near the maximum and it is unclear whether the judge would actually give him time behind bars if he were convicted.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Randall Chase, Claudia Lauer, Michael Kunzelman And Colleen Long, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden’s years of personal grief and public missteps are focus of House impeachment probe

    Hunter Biden’s years of personal grief and public missteps are focus of House impeachment probe

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON – As his father stood in the Rose Garden at the White House in the fall of 2015 and announced he would not run for president, Hunter Biden was facing his own crossroads.

    It was a deeply emotional and traumatic time for Joe Biden and his close-knit family, still reeling from the death of his oldest son, Beau, that spring, as Donald Trump was making his unexpected entry into U.S. presidential politics.

    In deciding to forgo a White House run, then-Vice President Biden was preparing to enter private life for the first time in his long political career, potentially teaching or launching a policy center. Hunter, who had recently agreed to a lucrative position on the board of Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, was working to stay sober, mend his marriage and rebuild from devastating grief.

    “As horrible as I feel, I have a feeling of real purpose,” he said after his brother’s funeral.

    It would not last for long. Hunter Biden descended quickly into a Christmas-time relapse in his battle with addiction, his father watched Democrats hand over the White House to Trump after the 2016 election and the family that had built a political legacy in Washington drifted uneasily to an uncertain new chapter.

    This fragile period — playing out over several years of very public missteps and private misfortunes — in the business, political and personal life of Hunter Biden and his family is the focus of the U.S. House’s long-running, Republican-led Biden impeachment inquiry.

    Hunter Biden is expected Wednesday to appear behind closed doors for a private deposition with the House committees leading the probe, apparently eager to fight back against allegations of influence peddling of the family “brand” in his business dealings.

    It’s a high-profile moment for the president’s son, but also for the impeachment inquiry itself, which has found scant direct evidence of wrongdoing by the president despite months of probing. Even some Republican lawmakers are backing away from impeaching Joe Biden.

    This account of Hunter Biden and his family during this period is drawn from publicly available material, including transcripts of congressional hearing interviews and his memoir — a page-turning account of a family in turmoil and the grip of drug addiction.

    At times, it all reads like a movie — a camera crew has documented some of Hunter Biden’s visits to Capitol Hill. His lawyer and friend, the Hollywood attorney Kevin Morris, testified in his interview with the House committees that the footage is being made for legal purposes, and any commercial movie-making has not been decided.

    “When I first met Hunter, he was emerging from the lowest point in his life,” Morris testified last month, detailing some $5 million in loans he has made since their meeting in 2019 to help pay rent, a car loan, security and other needs for the client he now considers a brother.

    A Yale-educated lawyer, Hunter never expected to practice high-powered corporate law. He had met his first wife in college at a Jesuit volunteer program, and only after facing down $160,000 in student loans, a mortgage and their growing young family did he realize, “I had to make money.”

    But when his father joined the Obama presidential ticket in 2008, Hunter Biden was forced to abruptly change course, dropping his firm’s lobbying clients over political concerns and launching a consulting firm.

    “My world was upended,” he wrote in his memoir. “I had to find new work.”

    In 2014, Hunter Biden received an enticing offer to serve on the board of Burisma, the Ukrainian energy firm, that offered a steady check at a time when his work was slipping as he helped care for Beau. It involved global travel — one board meeting was in Norway, another in Monte Carlo.

    “Did I make a mistake by taking a seat on the board of Ukrainian gas company? No.” he writes in his memoir. “Would I do it again? No.”

    Burisma would become a central counter-argument to Trump’s first impeachment in 2019 after Trump disclosed that summer he had asked for “a favor” during a phone call with the new Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    House Democrats impeached Trump after showing his administration had withheld U.S.-approved military aid to Ukraine, which was needed at the time to counter Russian aggression, all while pressuring Zelenskyy to dig up dirt on Joe Biden, a political rival in the 2020 election. Trump was acquitted by the Senate.

    At the time, Trump’s team led by attorney Rudy Giuliani floated a counter theory that it was Joe Biden who was corrupted by actions he took, including the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor, allegedly to favor his son’s work on the Burisma board.

    Those claims, which became central to the House GOP’s decision to investigate the Bidens, unraveled largely because the Obama administration and other Western countries made no secret of wanting the prosecutor fired as part of an effort to clean up corruption in Ukraine.

    The Burisma claims were further upended this month with the arrest of Alexander Smirnov, an FBI informant who had claimed executives associated with Burisma paid $5 million each to Joe and Hunter Biden during that period. Federal prosecutors say Smirnov’s allegation was a lie.

    The charges against Smirnov were filed by Justice Department special counsel David Weiss, who has separately charged Hunter Biden with firearm and tax violations.

    While Hunter Biden’s five years at Burisma once figured prominently in the House investigation, the Republicans have veered to other aspects of his business career, interviewing a half-dozen associates including the president’s brother, Jim Biden, for potential links to Joe Biden.

    In the most explicit testimony, Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, testified two weeks ago that what the Bidens were selling was “the brand” — meaning Joe Biden.

    Bobulinksi has been making his claims for years, including voluntarily to the FBI and at a press conference ahead of the second Trump-Biden presidential debate in 2020. He produced for the committee emails and text messages he claims back up his interactions with the Biden family.

    Chief among them is a 2017 email in which another associate suggested an equity stake breakdown for the firm Hunter Biden, Bobulinksi and others were starting with a Chinese energy conglomerate. It proposed the equity would be split to include 10% “held for H for the big guy” — with a question mark at the end — an apparent reference to Joe Biden.

    But testifying before the committees, another business associate involved, Rob Walker dismissed the proposal as “bullshit.”

    “Nobody responded to this email. I don’t think people took it seriously,” Walker testified. “There is no point where Joe Biden was a part of anything we were doing.”

    The deal never happened.

    The allegations go on, as the committees probe bank records, wire transfers and other aspects of Hunter Biden’s business dealings searching for links to his father.

    Hunter Biden is remarried now, a father again to a young son, Beau, and working on his sobriety and his paintings. Morris, an avid art enthusiast, testified he has purchased various pieces for more than $875,000.

    The Biden impeachment inquiry is lumbering along, coming against the backdrop of the 2024 presidential election, in which Biden and Trump are potentially heading toward a rematch, and Russia’s continued threat to the U.S. political process.

    Russia intervened in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections in favor of Trump, according to the findings of the U.S. intelligence community and the Justice Department, and did so again in 2020.

    While Trump has pushed Republicans to impeach Biden, the House GOP leadership has not said whether they will go through with it.

    The chairman of the House Oversight Committee James Comer says he will “continue to follow the facts” intending to “propose legislation to reform federal ethics laws and to determine whether articles of impeachment are warranted.”

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Lisa Mascaro, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Judge denies Hunter Biden video court hearing on gun charges

    Judge denies Hunter Biden video court hearing on gun charges

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden (R), son of U.S. President Joe Biden, leaves the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building in Wilmington, Delaware, on July 26, 2023.

    Ryan Collerd | AFP | Getty Images

    A federal judge on Wednesday denied a request by Hunter Biden to have his first court appearance on felony firearm charges be conducted remotely via video conference.

    Judge Christopher Burke ordered the son of President Joe Biden to appear in person at 10 a.m. ET Tuesday for his arraignment in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Delaware.

    “Any other defendant would be required to attend his or her initial appearance in person. So too here,” the judge wrote in a two-page order in favor of prosecutors, who objected to a video conference hearing for Hunter Biden.

    Burke wrote that he agreed with both Biden’s lawyer and prosecutors that the 53-year-old California resident “should not receive special treatment in this matter.”

    “Although initial appearances in criminal matters are often short in duration, our Court has always considered them to be important,” Burke wrote.

    He noted that in 12 years on the federal bench, he “cannot recall ever having conducted an initial appearance other than in person” outside of the Covid-19 pandemic.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Biden last week was indicted on three criminal counts related to his possession of a firearm while being an unlawful drug user.

    His lawyer Abbe Lowell in a filing Tuesday argued that a virtual court appearance would avoid an “unnecessary burden on government resources and the disruption to the courthouse and downtown areas” of Wilmington that would result from his client’s Secret Service protection.

    Lowell wrote that Biden will plead not guilty to the charges during his appearance, “and there is no reason why he cannot utter those two words by video conference.”

    Biden “is not seeking any special treatment in making this request,” the defense lawyer wrote.

    Prosecutors on Wednesday urged Burke to hold Biden’s arraignment in person, arguing that he “should be treated no differently” than other defendants.

    Department of Justice special counsel David Weiss in that filing noted that the court’s pandemic-related order authorizing virtual proceedings expired in June 2022.

    Since then, defendants’ first court appearances are “almost always held in-person,” Weiss wrote.

    The court hearing will be Biden’s first since late July when an expected plea deal between him and Weiss’ office on criminal tax charges fell apart under scrutiny from another judge.

    Biden ended up pleading not guilty to those tax charges — a move that threw into dispute a separate agreement that would have allowed him to escape prosecution for a gun-related charge if he stayed out of trouble for two years.

    Weiss in his filing Wednesday wrote, “Although the government anticipates this proceeding should be straightforward since the parties have not reached an agreement to resolve this matter, we believe an in-person proceeding may be more conducive to addressing any unforeseen issues that arise.

    Biden, who has suffered from drug addiction for years, is charged with two counts of lying about his illegal drug use in connection with his purchase of a Colt Cobra revolver. 

    The third count accuses him of possession of a firearm by a person who is an unlawful drug user.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden not asking for ‘special treatment’ in gun case court appearance, lawyer says

    Hunter Biden not asking for ‘special treatment’ in gun case court appearance, lawyer says

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, arrives at federal court to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of willfully failing to pay income taxes, Wilmington, Delaware, July 26, 2023.

    Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

    Hunter Biden will plead not guilty during his initial court appearance for three federal felony gun charges, his attorney said Tuesday as he denied that the son of President Joe Biden is asking for “special treatment” at his first court appearance in the case.

    Hunter’s lawyer Abbe Lowell revealed that planned plea as he asked a judge to hold the court appearance by video conference instead of in person at U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Delaware.

    Biden, who lives in California, “will waive reading of the indictment, which is merely a few pages and could easily be read at a video conference,” Lowell wrote in a two-page letter to Judge Christopher Burke.

    “Mr. Biden also will enter a plea of not guilty, and there is no reason why he cannot utter those two words by video conference,” Lowell wrote.

    The court appearance has not yet been scheduled.

    Biden, 53, was indicted last week on three criminal counts related to his possession of a firearm while being an unlawful drug user.

    Biden, who has been open about his substance abuse struggles, is charged with two counts of lying about his illegal drug use in connection with his purchase of a Colt Cobra revolver. The third count accuses him of possession of a firearm by a person who is an unlawful drug user.

    Lowell wrote in Tuesday’s letter that Biden was “not seeking any special treatment” by requesting the video conference for his first appearance in court on the charges.

    Conducting the court hearing via video would “minimize an unnecessary burden on government resources and the disruption to the courthouse and downtown areas” in Wilmington from Secret Service agents accompanying Biden, Lowell argued.

    “Without getting into specifics, numerous agents and vehicles are required for what would have to be a two-day event (for a proceeding that may be very short in duration),” the attorney wrote.

    Federal prosecutors oppose Biden’s bid for a virtual appearance, the judge noted in a court order Monday that directed them to respond by Wednesday.

    Lowell’s letter called prosecutors’ opposition “puzzling,” arguing that he was making a “common-sense request in seeking a video appearance.

    Biden in late July pleaded not guilty to separate misdemeanor charges of failing to pay federal taxes on more than $1.5 million in annual income in 2017 and 2018.

    He had intended to plead guilty to those charges, but his deal with prosecutors fell apart in court under scrutiny from a judge.

    Biden also expected to enter into a pretrial diversion agreement on a gun-related crime at that time that could have seen him avoid being criminally charged with a firearm count if he complied with the deal’s conditions for two years.

    After the plea deal on the tax charges collapsed, U.S. Attorney David Weiss said that the gun charge diversion agreement had been withdrawn.

    But Lowell argues that the deal took effect and thus bars Biden from being charged with the gun crimes. Lowell also has said the charges are unconstitutional as a result of a 2022 Supreme Court ruling knocking down a New York gun law. All six conservatives on the Supreme Court, three of whom were appointed by former President Donald Trump, voted in favor of that decision.

    Lowell noted in a court filing earlier this month that Biden “has been following and will continue to follow the conditions of that Agreement.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Republicans are furious about Hunter Biden special counsel

    House Republicans are furious about Hunter Biden special counsel

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks to reporters before the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) at the U.S. Capitol on July 14, 2023 in Washington, DC.

    Alex Wong | Getty Images

    WASHINGTON — After more than two years of demanding that the Justice Department appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden, Republicans in Congress finally got their wish on Friday. And they were furious.

    Reactions from the GOP began pouring in within minutes of Attorney General Merrick Garland’s announcement on Friday of a special counsel to oversee the criminal investigation of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

    If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted shortly after the announcement.

    McCarthy said the decision to appoint David Weiss, a federal prosecutor in Delaware who was assigned by former President Donald Trump to lead the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, “cannot be used to obstruct congressional investigations or whitewash the Biden family corruption.”

    Special counsels occupy a unique position within the legal system. They traditionally operate outside of the Justice Department’s chain of command and the congressional oversight that accompanies it. Special counsels are required to produce final reports on the results of their investigations for the attorney general, but they are not required to keep Congress or the Justice Department updated on the status of their work.

    The appointment of the special counsel came as Republicans in Congress ramp up political attacks and investigations of the Biden family ahead of the 2024 election. Republicans argued that a special counsel probe would effectively draw a curtain around evidence they are seeking.

    The plea agreement called for Biden to plead guilty to two counts of failing to pay his taxes in return for prosecutors recommending a sentence of probation and the dismissal of a separate gun charge in two years. The deal was scrapped earlier this month after a judge determined the agreements contained “some atypical provisions.”

    “The fix is in,” said a PAC backing former President Donald Trump, Make America Great Again Inc.

    “David Weiss cut Hunter Biden an unprecedented plea deal that attempted to give Joe Biden’s corrupt son blanket immunity,” MAGA Inc. Spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.

    “Now, Merrick Garland expects us to trust Weiss to be the Special Counsel that finally brings Hunter Biden to justice,” said Leavitt.

    A White House spokesperson referred CNBC to the Justice Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee jointly looking into the federal probe of the younger Biden’s taxes, also accused the DOJ of a “Biden family coverup.”

    “Let’s be clear what today’s move is really about,” Comer said in a statement. “The Biden Justice Department is trying to stonewall congressional oversight as we have presented evidence to the American people.”

    A spokesman for Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the House Judiciary Committee chairman who has taken the lead on investigating the federal probe of Hunter Biden, said Weiss “can’t be trusted.

    “This is just a new way to whitewash the Biden family’s corruption,” said Russell Dye, a spokesman for Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the House Judiciary Committee chairman who has taken the lead on investigating the federal probe of Hunter Biden.

    Dye said the committee still expects the Justice Department to fully cooperate with Republicans’ investigation into Hunter Biden’s plea deal, “including not interfering with the 11 transcribed interviews” that have been requested.

    Moreover, Weiss’ previous offer to appear before the committee this fall is still presumed to be valid, said Dye. As of Friday, the panel had not received anything from DOJ “indicating it is no longer willing to do so.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Twitter execs deny pressure to block Hunter Biden story

    Ex-Twitter execs deny pressure to block Hunter Biden story

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Twitter executives conceded Wednesday they made a mistake by blocking a story about Hunter Biden, the president’s son, from the social media platform in the run-up to the 2020 election, but adamantly denied Republican assertions they were pressured by Democrats and law enforcement to suppress the story.

    “The decisions here aren’t straightforward, and hindsight is 20/20,” Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of trust and safety, testified to Congress. “It isn’t obvious what the right response is to a suspected, but not confirmed, cyberattack by another government on a presidential election.”

    He added, “Twitter erred in this case because we wanted to avoid repeating the mistakes of 2016.”

    The three former executives appeared before the House Oversight and Accountability Committee to testify for the first time about the company’s decision to initially block from Twitter a New York Post article in October 2020 about the contents of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden.

    Emboldened by Twitter’s new leadership in billionaire Elon Musk — whom they see as more sympathetic to conservatives than the company’s previous administration — Republicans used the hearing to push a long-standing and unproven theory that social media companies including Twitter are biased against them.

    Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer said the hearing is the panel’s “first step in examining the coordination between the federal government and Big Tech to restrict protected speech and interfere in the democratic process.”

    The hearing continues a years-long trend of GOP leaders calling tech company leaders to testify about alleged political bias. Democrats, meanwhile, have pressed the companies on the spread of hate speech and misinformation on their platforms.

    The witnesses Republicans subpoenaed were Roth, Vijaya Gadde, Twitter’s former chief legal officer, and James Baker, the company’s former deputy general counsel.

    Democrats brought a witness of their own, Anika Collier Navaroli, a former employee with Twitter’s content moderation team. She testified last year to the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot about Twitter’s preferential treatment of Donald Trump until it banned the then-president from the site two years ago.

    The White House criticized congressional Republicans for staging “a bizarre political stunt,” hours after Biden’s State of the Union address where he detailed bipartisan progress in his first two years in office.

    “This appears to be the latest effort by the House Republican majority’s most extreme MAGA members to question and relitigate the outcome of the 2020 election,” White House spokesperson Ian Sams said in a statement Wednesday. “This is not what the American people want their leaders to work on.”

    The New York Post reported weeks before the 2020 presidential election that it had received from Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, a copy of a hard drive from a laptop that Hunter Biden had dropped off 18 months earlier at a Delaware computer repair shop and never retrieved. Twitter blocked people from sharing links to the story for several days.

    “You exercised an amazing amount of clout and power over the entire American electorate by even holding (this story) hostage for 24 hours and then reversing your policy,” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., said to the panel of witnesses.

    Months later, Twitter’s then-CEO, Jack Dorsey, called the company’s communications around the Post article “not great.” He added that blocking the article’s URL with “zero context” around why it was blocked was “unacceptable.”

    The newspaper story was greeted at the time with skepticism due to questions about the laptop’s origins, including Giuliani’s involvement, and because top officials in the Trump administration had already warned that Russia was working to denigrate Joe Biden before the White House election.

    The Kremlin interfered in the 2016 race by hacking Democratic emails that were subsequently leaked, and fears that Russia would meddle again in the 2020 race were widespread across Washington.

    Just last week, lawyers for the younger Biden asked the Justice Department to investigate people who say they accessed his personal data. But they did not acknowledge that the data came from a laptop Hunter Biden is purported to have dropped off at a computer repair shop.

    The issue was also reignited recently after Musk took over Twitter as CEO and began to release a slew of company information to independent journalists, what he has called the “Twitter Files.”

    The documents and data largely show internal debates among employees over the decision to temporarily censor links to the Hunter Biden story. The tweet threads lacked substantial evidence of a targeted influence campaign from Democrats or the FBI, which has denied any involvement in Twitter’s decision-making.

    Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., called the hearing a “fishing expedition” seeking to reheat bogus allegations claiming Biden somehow influenced his son’s business dealings in Ukraine.

    Nonetheless, Republicans including Comer, R-Ky., have used the Post story, which has not been independently verified by The Associated Press, as the basis for what they claim is another example of the Biden family’s “influence peddling.”

    One of Wednesday’s witnesses, Baker, has been a frequent target of Republican scrutiny.

    Baker was the FBI’s general counsel during the opening of two of the bureau’s most consequential investigations in history: the Hillary Clinton investigation and a separate inquiry into potential coordination between Russia and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Republicans have long criticized the FBI’s handling of both investigations.

    Baker denied any wrongdoing during his two years at Twitter and said that despite disagreeing with the decision to block links to the Post story, “I believe that the public record reveals that my client acted in a manner that was fully consistent with the First Amendment.”

    There has been no evidence that Twitter’s platform is biased against conservatives; studies have found the opposite when it comes to conservative media in particular. But the issue continues to preoccupy GOP members of congress.

    And some experts said questions around government influence on Big Tech’s content moderation are legitimate.

    “Despite how I would change how some of the members ask their questions, there should be more insight into this stuff. There should be more transparency,” said Katie Harbath, a fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center who served as Facebook’s former public policy director.

    She added, “There’s still a lot more hearings and sides to the story that we need to hear from, particularly the government and the FBI.”

    ___

    Ortutay reported from Oakland, Calif. Associated Press writers Eric Tucker and Frank Bajak contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link