ReportWire

Tag: ripley

  • ‘Ripley,’ ‘Fallout,’ ‘Fargo’ and ‘Oppenheimer’ Take Top Honors at Location Managers Guild Awards

    ‘Ripley,’ ‘Fallout,’ ‘Fargo’ and ‘Oppenheimer’ Take Top Honors at Location Managers Guild Awards

    [ad_1]

    Emmy contenders “Fallout,” “Fargo” and “Ripley” were among the winners at the 11th annual Location Managers Guild International Awards, presented Saturday at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts in Beverly Hills.

    Additionally, motion picture awards went to Best Picture Oscar recipient “Oppenheimer,” which was filmed throughout New Mexico, and “Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning – Part 1,” filmed in Norway, Italy and in the U.K.

    “Fallout” was lensed in Utah, New York and Namibia; “Fargo,” in Alberta, Canada; and “Ripley,” in Italy. “Toyota: “Present from the Past,” filmed in Washington State, topped the commercial category.

    Film in Iceland received the Outstanding Film Commission Award, on the strength of its support for “True Detective: Night Country.”

    Also during the ceremony, which was hosted by actress and producer Rachael Harris (“Suits,” “Diary of a Wimpy Kid,” “The Hangover”), several previously-announced awards were handed out. David Shepheard, vp of Martini Film Studios, presented the Lifetime Achievement Award to supervising location manager Sue Quinn, known for her work on the “Fantastic Beasts,” “Harry Potter” and “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchises.

    The Trailblazer Award was given to location manager Bill Bowling, known for his work on films such as “Jupiter Ascending” and “Cloud Atlas.” Location Guide commercial director Clara Le presented.

    The Motion Picture & Television Fund was bestowed with the Guild’s Humanitarian Award, recognizing the MPTF’s commitment to health and social services to the entertainment community. The award was presented by Camilla Belle (“Law and Order”) and accepted behalf of the MPTF by the Fund’s director of community social services Jennifer Jorge.

    Additional presenters included Helena-Alexis Seymour (“Chronicles of Jessica Wu”), Kate Linder (“Young and the Restless”), Doug Jones (“The Shape of Water”), 10-time Olympic swimming medalist Gary Hall Jr.; and AFCI executive director Jaclyn Philpott.

    The list of competitive winners follows:

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A PERIOD TELEVISION SERIES

    “Fallout”

    Paul Kramer, Chris Arena, Mandi Dillin / LMGI, David Park / LMGI, Paul van der Ploeg

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A CONTEMPORARY TELEVISION SERIES

    “Fargo” Season 5

    Mohammad Qazzaz / LMGI, Luke Antosz / LMGI

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A TV SERIAL PROGRAM, ANTHOLOGY, MOW OR LIMITED SERIES

    “Ripley”

    Robin Melville / LMGI, Giuseppe Nardi / LMGI, Fabio Ferrante, Shane Haden

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A PERIOD FEATURE FILM

    “Oppenheimer”

    Justin Duncan /LMGI, Dennis Muscari, Patty Carey-Perazzo, T.C. Townsen

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A CONTEMPORARY FEATURE FILM

    “Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning – Part 1”

    David Campbell-Bell, Enrico Latella / LMGI, Jonas Fylling Christiansen, Niall O’Shea, Ben Firminger

    OUTSTANDING FILM COMMISSION

    Film in Iceland

    “True Detective: Night Country”

    OUTSTANDING LOCATIONS IN A COMMERCIAL

    Toyota: “Present from the Past”

    Mark Freid / LMGI, Paul Riordan / LMGI

    (Pictured: “Ripley”)

    [ad_2]

    Carolyn Giardina

    Source link

  • Alien: Romulus: The Kotaku Review

    Alien: Romulus: The Kotaku Review

    [ad_1]

    Good or bad taste is difficult to define, but easy to point out, and Alien: Romulus, from Uruguayan director Fede Álvarez (who famously delivered a fantastic Evil Dead flick over a decade ago), offers a bizarre mix of both. It’s clear that Álvarez wants to hearken back to the analog, tactile sci-fi vibes of the original Alien flicks, with plenty of satisfyingly twisty knobs and low-fi computer screens that will delight any old-school fan. And with a great, young cast that includes Civil War’s Cailee Spaeny and The Last of Us’ Isabela Merced, Romulus feels like it’s courting both the original Alien lovers and a younger, fresher group of potential fans. And it’s fast, too—the two-hour run-time flies by without any filler, and a perfectly paced build-up results in a third act that will have your heart pumping almost the entire time.

    But the massive weak point in Romulus’ hull is its reliance on winks, nods, and nostalgia—including one poor-taste cameo that made me cringe every time the character was on-screen. Though I think any casual Alien fan will enjoy the film and miss many of the Easter eggs, there are some egregious references throughout that had my eyes rolling around in my head. Nostalgia is a helluva drug.

    Alien: Romulus looks damn good

    Álvarez reportedly told the 2024 San Diego Comic-Con crowd that seeing Romulus didn’t require prior knowledge of other Alien films, and that “member berries cannot be the full meal” (a reference to a South Park joke about nostalgia), but I’m not so sure that’s true. From the moment Romulus opens, there are references aplenty—the opening shot shows the wreckage of the Nostromo, the ship from the first film, floating in the empty vacuum of space, for Engineer’s sake.

    Though after that, Álvarez swiftly (and smartly) turns the attention to Alien: Romulus’ cast of young adults, who live and work in a dreary, depressing mining colony called Jackson’s Star where it’s always raining and everyone is always sick. Rain Carradine (Spaeny) and her “brother” Andy (David Jonsson), a damaged Weyland-Yutani synthetic reprogrammed by Rain’s late father to protect her at all costs, live a life of indentured servitude—Rain is forced to work in the hopes that she’ll earn enough hours to leave Jackson’s Star and head to Yvaga II, a terraformed planet that’s less miserable.

    After a Weyland-Yutani employee denies Rain’s request to go off-planet, she jumps at the chance to change her fate: A ragtag bunch of teenagers (and her friends) discover a “Weyu” ship drifting in the planet’s atmosphere, and they want to fly up and steal its crypods so they can venture out to Yvaga themselves. The problem? They need Andy, who can access all of the ship’s systems, even though his strange gait and stammer indicate that he isn’t in perfect working condition.

    The alien sneers.

    Image: 20th Century Studios

    Andy and Rain’s relationship is the beating heart of Romulus, played to perfection by Spaeny and Jonsson—from the moment his big, sad eyes appear on screen, I know Andy is going to break my heart. Andy’s affinity for puns, which he struggles to get out due to his stammer, endears you to him within moments, and Rain’s good-natured annoyance at his bad jokes further defines their lovely relationship. Romulus tries to fill out the rest of its character tropes like previous Alien films, with a crass and rude British guy, his grim, no-nonsense partner, a kind-hearted heartthrob, and a sweet (and newly pregnant) best friend, and the young actors all play them well, even if their characters aren’t fully fleshed out. But Rain and Andy? I’d die for them.

    Visually, Romulus is as close to perfect as a sci-fi horror flick can get. When the shuttle carrying the teens up to the derelict Weyu ship (which is actually a decommissioned outpost, and, as you might suspect, full of facehuggers) soars upward into the planet’s upper atmosphere, the visual effects dazzle: rain pelts the hull, lightning flashes all around it, and strange, red-orange veins of light run through the clouds. When it bursts through the cloud cover, Rain sees the planet’s sun for the first time ever, and I feel a similar stirring of awe in my gut.

    Romulus truly is beautiful, from the cinematography to the set design to the way the iconic xenomorphs look. Álvarez impressively and effectively plays with color, light, and texture (wispy gray smoke, white-hot steam, tar-black blood), and the pitch-perfect mix of practical and digital effects blends iconic Alien iconography with impressive, modern tech. And then there’s the digitally recreated elephant in the room.

    Romulus and references

    As I mentioned, there are a lot of Easter eggs in Alien: Romulus. The decommissioned outpost (split into two massive sections called Remus and Romulus) is powered by a computer called MU/TH/UR 9000, a newer version of the one running the Nostromo in 1979’s Alien. When one of the motley crew members bullies and denigrates Andy, he stammers back a quote from Aliens, saying he prefers the term “artificial human” just like Bishop told Ripley back then. The outpost’s door mechanisms are the same ones from 2014 survival horror game Alien: Isolation. Hell, even the original xenomorph, the one Ripley blows out of the Nostromo airlock, haunts Romulus—its corpse is suspended from the ceiling in the derelict ship, its acid blood having burnt through several floors and destroyed the place.

    But the most egregious Easter egg is a rotten one: a digitally recreated Ian Holm, who played a secret synthetic in the original film that was placed on the Nostromo by Weyland-Yutani to help further the company’s attempts to secure humanity’s fate in the stars by any means necessary. The digital avatar of Holm, who passed away in 2020, looks bad and uncanny almost every time it’s on screen, and the fact that the damaged robot (who goes by Rook in Romulus) is just a torso perpetually leaking the synthetic’s iconic white diagnostic fluid makes it even worse. His appearance is so bizarre and unnecessary (and so prevalent, as Rook has a ton of screen time), that it sours so much of what makes Romulus enjoyable.

    Rain wields a proto pulse rifle.

    Image: 20th Century Studios

    From the moment Rook is introduced, I watch the rest of Romulus with my eyes narrowed suspiciously, waiting for another Easter egg to (perhaps unintentionally, perhaps not) puncture the fourth wall and boop me on the nose with a “see what I did there?” Thankfully, the cast’s incredible acting and the film’s perfectly paced action effectively distract me from my fear of another reference lurking down a dark corridor. There are several truly gruesome scenes—acid burning off fingers, a facehugger artificially pumping someone’s lungs while attached to them, the gnarly cracking of ribs and spines, and a few brand-new takes on the iconic chest bursting scene—that will delight body horror fans. And all of this action is propelled forward by Spaeny and Jonsson, the latter of whom does such an impressive 180 with his character that it leaves me speechless. Romulus also adds a bit more lore to the franchise, specifically around a certain stage in the xenomorph’s evolution, that gives Álvarez an excuse to put a giant, wet, undulating vagina in the film, just as H.R. Giger intended.

    But just when I’ve forgotten about the torso of Holm lurking in a dimly lit corner, when I’ve just been delighted by a zero-G action sequence that involves floating, spiraling acid blood Rain and Andy must avoid while suspended in mid-air, when I realize that Álvarez almost perfectly times the outpost’s countdown timer until it will collide with the planet’s icy ring to the runtime of the film, Romulus comes back around to the references. The proto pulse rifles from Aliens, Rook spouting an exact quote Holm uttered in Alien, Spaeny in her cryo-undies wielding a gun just like Ripley, Andy stammering “get away from her you bitch,” a human/xeno hybrid that makes your skin crawl, a face-to-face moment just like the meme.

    Thankfully, Romulus ends strong, with an emotionally powerful, deliciously disgusting final scene with a jump-scare that almost made me pee myself. I just wish that it had the confidence to stand on its own a bit more, rather than deliver nods and recycled lines on a silver platter with a wry smile. Though, whether you’re a fan of the franchise or not, I believe Alien: Romulus is worth a watch—maybe some fans will adore the references, and those who know nothing about Ridley Scott’s legendary sci-fi universe can remain blissfully unaware and just enjoy a well-paced, well-shot, well-acted romp. It’s a win-win in that regard.

    .

    [ad_2]

    Alyssa Mercante

    Source link

  • An Ode to Star Trek’s Undershirt Moments

    An Ode to Star Trek’s Undershirt Moments

    [ad_1]

    This week, Star Trek: Prodigy dropped the first trailer for its second season, and it’s full of all the sort of good Star Trek action you’d want—even more so if, like me, you’re a Voyager fan. But as a Voyager fan, there was one shot in particular that called to me: Admiral Janeway, her uniform jacket removed, down to her high-waisted pants and a grey, Starfleet-issue tank top.

    This is a ludicrous thing to have your attention drawn to, but being a Star Trek fan often involves having reactions and emotions about ludicrous things. And yet, here I was: tank top Janeway? Oh man, shit’s about to go down. To me, that’s “Macrocosm” Janeway, Ripley-ing her way through giant virus bugs on the compromised Voyager. It’s “Year of Hell” Janeway, hobbling through Krenim space as her ship and crew are picked apart around her.

    Sometimes the situations surrounding stripped-down Star Trek moments aren’t dire at all; we’ve seen people rocking the look casually, on hot planets, while working on something particularly strenuous. What, exactly, Starfleet officers wore under their black and division-color-accented uniforms from TNG onwards has always been in flux—there’s long-sleeved undershirts, vests like Janeway’s, t-shirts, all with varying design differences—but regardless of what was under them, regardless of the Trek show or the character, every time you saw them, it felt like you were witnessing something vulnerable, something revealing.

    We’re so used to the way the Starfleet uniforms look—and the situations they’re almost always worn in—that they become this symbol of professionalism-under-pressure that encapsulates Star Trek’s love of competence porn. You’re wearing that uniform on the bridge, you’re wearing it under fire, you’re wearing it at the bar, you’re wearing it on away missions, you’re wearing it knee-deep in isolinear chips working on some panel in the ass end of a Jeffries tube. No matter the situation, arguably no matter how impractical, a Starfleet officer does their job in that uniform, looking like a Starfleet officer. So when you strip away layers of that uniform, out of necessity or out of casual circumstance, you’re stripping away the layers of that mythos around it and revealing something about the person underneath.

    Screenshot: Paramount

    Think about the dishevelled look Sisko has by the end of “In the Pale Moonlight”, where, in the interstitial scenes set in the present, he increasingly undresses layers of his uniform until he’s in an unbuttoned vest and his command undershirt is zipped down to reveal his chest, embodying his reflection of the moral sacrifices he’s made over the course of the episode. Or how Picard in First Contact, the direr the situation gets, strips down further until he’s in nothing in his vest and trousers by the time he’s squaring off with the Borg Queen. The rare times we actually saw one of our heroes either in a situation casual enough to not warrant their full uniform, or stressful enough that they felt like they had to strip away parts of it, are somehow burned into your minds as significant—like they are for me when I see Janeway in that tank top, like it’s a different mode or form of her.

    It’s such a small, but clever bit of visual storytelling in Star Trek that doesn’t often come up all that much—but when it does, it hits something primal in your Trek-loving brain to draw attention to its significance.


    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • Three Shows Not to Miss Before the Onslaught of the Summer Shows

    Three Shows Not to Miss Before the Onslaught of the Summer Shows

    [ad_1]


    The year has already treated us to some incredible television shows, and the summer rush is about to begin. In June, we can expect big-ticket shows like House of the Dragon, The Boys, The Bear and a new Star Wars show to dominate the scene. However, let’s not forget the smaller shows currently on air. These hidden gems might not have the same hype, but they offer unique and refreshing content that deserves our attention.

    There are three shows that need to be watched before the summer rush of huge shows. The shows are Netflix’s The Talented Mr. Ripley adaption Ripley, Park Chan-Wook’s The Sympathizer on Max and the Max comedy Hacks, returning for its third season.

    This trio of shows features some of the best TV of the year. One of the best and most interesting dramas available right now, a Vietnam War show helmed by a master filmmaker, and one of the best comedies of the past few years having its best season yet. These three shows are worth the time commitment as they are all three some of the year’s best series.


    Ripley

    Ripley is a neo-noir thriller that is based on the 1955 novel The Talented Mr. Ripley. The iconic 1999 movie that starred Matt Damon, Jude Law, Gwyneth Paltrow and Philip Seymour Hoffman is the most well-known and well-regarded adaption of the work. The basic story is about a young con artist who inserts himself into the lives of wealthy and beautiful people. The Netflix series’ story is no different, but stylistically, it differentiates itself and, as a result, becomes one of the best and most compelling shows of the year.

    Andrew Scott stars as Tom Ripley, a down-on-his-luck con man living in 1950s New York. He gets an invitation and job to do in Italy, where he must find and bring home a former acquaintance at the behest of his family. The series also stars Dakota Fanning and Johnny Flynn, who plays Marge Sherwood, and Dickie Greenleaf, respectively. The show looks incredible. From the first episode showcasing the black and white, gritty New York City to the pristine beaches of the coast of Italy, the direction is top-notch. Andrew Scott delivers a complex and fascinating performance that goes along with the noir vibes of the series. Ripley is one of the jewels of the year so far and one of Netflix’s best shows currently streaming.


    The Sympathizer

    The idea of master Korean filmmaker Park Chan-Wook stepping into the world of television is very intriguing. Couple that with the fact that he wants to helm a series about the Vietnam War and the fall of Saigon. Now add in the fact that Robert Downey Jr. is tapped to play several different characters representing the US intelligence infrastructure and America’s violent and antagonistic foreign policy, and you have The Sympathizer.

    The Sympathizer is a historical drama based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel of the same name written by Viet Thanh Nguyen. The series follows Hoa Xuande as The Captain, a policeman in Northern Vietnam who is a communist spy who, toward the end of the war, is forced to flee and continue his spy work in the United States. Park Chan-Wook directs the first three episodes with an incredible sense of style that most films dream they could conjure. Downey Jr. is giving an incredible but polarizing performance. Though he only directed three episodes, Chan-Wook’s imprint is strong, and the following directors continue the show’s visual excellence. The Sympathizer is a fascinating TV show that more people need to watch.

    Hacks

    Hacks is magically back after a long hiatus. Many fans assumed, through the turbulence at Warner Bros. and the whole HBO-Max confusion and mass cancellation of shows, that Hacks was lost in the shuffle. Good news, the show has returned for its third season, and it might be its finest effort yet. The show, whose premise is an odd couple comedy pitting an older comedian with a millennial counterpart, was always considered a jewel on HBO Max. It got good reviews and award recognition, and it feels fortunate that it is back.

    Jean Smart’s Deborah Vance and Hannah Einbinder’s Ava are back, and their whole dynamic has changed, which makes for a fresh return to something that feels very comforting and familiar. Einbinder and Smart are joined again by their fantastic supporting cast, including Carl Clemons-Hopkins, Paul W. Downs (who is also one of the show’s creators), Megan Stahlter and Kaitlin Olsen. The show continues to be about how two different women on their comedy journeys use the medium to evolve as people, but it has somehow upped the ante in its third season. The show’s second season ended on a high note, but the third season is even better and is begging to be checked out as soon as possible.

    [ad_2]

    Jamil David

    Source link

  • Apple Gets Into the Franchise Business, the Penultimate Episode of ‘Shogun,’ and ‘Ripley’ Episodes 4 and 5

    Apple Gets Into the Franchise Business, the Penultimate Episode of ‘Shogun,’ and ‘Ripley’ Episodes 4 and 5

    [ad_1]

    Chris and Andy talk about the news that Apple TV will be making a For All Mankind spinoff called Star City, and adapting another one of Mick Herron’s novels (author of Slow Horses) for a show starring Emma Thompson (1:00). Then, they talk about an article in Harper’s that looks at the role private equity firms have played in the TV industry over the past decade (13:38), before discussing the penultimate episode of Shogun (29:07) and Episodes 4 and 5 of Ripley (59:09).

    Read the Harper’s piece here.

    Hosts: Chris Ryan and Andy Greenwald
    Producer: Kaya McMullen

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / RSS

    [ad_2]

    Chris Ryan

    Source link

  • Andrew Scott Thinks Tom Ripley’s Sexuality Is Murky

    Andrew Scott Thinks Tom Ripley’s Sexuality Is Murky

    [ad_1]

    As a lover of the 1999 film The Talented Mr. Ripley, Andrew Scott had a few questions before agreeing to star in Oscar winner Steve Zaillian‘s macabre mini-series based on Patricia Highsmith’s classic novel. “One of my first questions was, ‘Why do this?’” Scott recalled while appearing as a guest on Still Watching.  Thankfully, Zaillian was prepared for Scott’s query.

    “Zaillian was very clear about the kind of vision that he had for this version of the story,” Scott said. That’s not to say that Zaillian had all the answers from the jump. “He didn’t immediately say that he wanted to do it in black and white, but that sort of emerged. He mentioned aging up the characters—I’m older than the actors who played the character before in previous iterations of this story. You gotta bring your your own stuff to it or else it’s pretty pointless to me.”

    What they brought became the moody period piece Ripley, which has remained on Netflix’s top ten list since it premiered April 4. In Scott’s capable hands, Tom Ripley, memorably portrayed by Matt Damon in Anthony Minghella’s 1999 film, becomes a colder and more calculating con artist, willing to do whatever it takes to get away with the murder of dilettante Dickie Greenleaf (Johnny Flynn) and evade capture in Italy.  

    “I think what’s fascinating and enduring about this character is that he’s sort of like water,” Scott says of the elusive Tom. “There’s a fluidity to him that we can’t quite put our finger on. For that reason, he holds a sort of power over us.”

    Below, Scott chats with Still Watching about the murkiness within Tom, doing Ripley drag, and pulling off those complicated murder sequences. 

    In Ripley, I really felt the striver in Tom: the class consciousness, his desire to enter a new station in life. How much were you thinking about politics and class?

    Andrew Scott: For me, the story is so much about somebody who hasn’t been given access to the beautiful things in life, even though he’s deeply talented. We say he’s a con artist, but he’s nevertheless an artist. We see him at work and how unobserved he is and how dismissed he is by society. The only way he has to survive is by defrauding people, by turning to crime. That’s not obviously an excuse for him, but, you know, you look for ways to advocate for the character. And then he’s submerged into this society where people who have half the talent that he has are given access to all the beautiful things in the world. They could call themselves artists—they have everything at their disposal—and a sort of rage begins to emerge within him. 

    There is a notion of class and morality, and also about sexuality as well. I think there’s a kind of murkiness to Tom’s sexuality, whether it’s envy or lust or love or obsession. Something about the “Dickiness” of Dickie gets him obsessed in some way, and he wants what he has. 

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link

  • WrestleMania Weekend Recap: Big Takeaways, Why We Love Wrestling, and Why Cody Rhodes Is a Grrreat Guy. Plus, Rhea Ripley Has Beef With Troy.

    WrestleMania Weekend Recap: Big Takeaways, Why We Love Wrestling, and Why Cody Rhodes Is a Grrreat Guy. Plus, Rhea Ripley Has Beef With Troy.

    [ad_1]

    Back in their home studios following an unforgettable weekend in Philadelphia, Rosenberg and SGG are ready to react to what some are calling the greatest WrestleMania of all time. Here’s what to expect today:

    • Intro (00:00)
    • Troy the Goy has a confession to make (07:41)
    • An update on the Cheap Heat T-shirts (12:18)
    • Why Rhea Ripley has an issue with Troy (14:58)
    • Where this year’s WrestleMania ranks among the all-time shows (21:56)
    • The Undertaker instead of Stone Cold Steve Austin (27:18)?
    • Rosenberg’s takeaways from hanging out with Cody Rhodes (31:59)
    • The second-best thing to happen this weekend (40:22)
    • Damien Priest cashing in (44:22)
    • Mailbag (56:38)

    And guess what? The video of last week’s LIVE Cheap Heat drops on Rosenberg’s YouTube channel soon. For other updates from the podcast, please follow @cheapheatpod on Instagram, as well as @rosenbergradio, @statguygreg, @thediperstein, and @troy_farkas.

    Hosts: Peter Rosenberg and Greg Hyde
    Producer: Troy Farkas

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / RSS

    [ad_2]

    Peter Rosenberg

    Source link

  • The Flying-By-the-Seat-of-His-Pants Mr. Ripley

    The Flying-By-the-Seat-of-His-Pants Mr. Ripley

    [ad_1]

    From the outset of Steven Zaillian’s adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s seminal work, The Talented Mr. Ripley, it’s pretty clear why the title of the series was altered to the plain and simple Ripley. That is to say, because this version of Tom Ripley (Andrew Scott) hardly seems talented at all (or deft, or graceful, for that matter). In fact, he seems like a middling criminal at best and a bumbling con man at worst. This, of course, is a far cry from the onscreen version of Ripley that Matt Damon made the most famous in Anthony Minghella’s 1999 adaptation. In this edition, Tom comes across as someone with slightly more finesse. Someone who knows how to better wield good fortune in his favor. Scott’s interpretation of the character, however, is much more blundering (fittingly enough, Highsmith does have a novel called The Blunderer). 

    This is something instantly detectable in the first few minutes of Ripley, with Tom incompetently dragging a body down the stairwell of his apartment building. Elsewhere, compared to Damon’s Ripley, Scott’s is one with no vibrancy or aspirations. This is partially due to the age difference between Damon and Scott when each played Ripley. The former was twenty-eight when The Talented Mr. Ripley was filmed, while the latter is forty-seven. It makes for a much more wizened Ripley in this regard. And that’s something to note in terms of Damon’s Ripley being more aspirational. Not only is it obvious that he wants to be a pianist (in fact, one of his gigs is what allows him to encounter Herbert Greenleaf [James Rebhorn] in the first place), but it’s also made clear that he works a number of legitimate jobs to help pay the rent. Scott’s Ripley appears to have given up on that waste of time long ago, relying solely on his various scams to get by. In addition to some help from a previously unmentioned Aunt Dottie (Cristina Fondi), who goes to the dentist for teeth extractions to give him a few extra dollars here and there. 

    But it’s evident that Ripley’s tricks and schemes are running dry, with one bank already immediately onto his forged signature in the first episode, “A Hard Man to Find.” It’s the realization that it’s all getting too difficult in New York that leads him to go back to the business card of Herbert Greenleaf (Kenneth Lonergan), given to him by the private detective named Alvin McCarron (Bokeem Woodbine) hired to find him. For whatever reason, Herbert is convinced that Tom is an old friend of Dickie’s (Johnny Flynn) who can convince him to come back to America after years spent bumming around Europe. At present, his whereabouts are in Atrani. A real place on the Amalfi Coast in contrast to The Talented Mr. Ripley’s fictional Mongibello (an overt stand-in for Positano). Game to do anything that involves leaving New York (arguably the only sign of his intelligence), Ripley departs for Italy. 

    While he plays it closer to the vest than Damon’s Ripley (that one going so far as to outright tell Dickie when he asks, “Everybody should have one talent. What’s yours?”: “Forging signatures, telling lies, impersonating practically anybody”), he’s still a little too transparent when it comes to his covetousness of the privileged man’s lifestyle. In contrast, Damon’s Ripley appears more enamored of Dickie himself, this accented by an effective montage of the two bonding as friends, rounded out by a super homoerotic joint performance of “My Funny Valentine.”

    Highsmith being gay herself, the frequent subtext between the characters in her novels is alive and well here. And it is the jocular ribbing between Jude Law’s Dickie and Damon’s Ripley that perhaps makes their potential for a homoerotic rapport more believable. Dickie is, indeed, much rougher around the edges in Law’s hands. Not only a philandering cad, but also someone blunt enough to joke in front of Tom, “Such little class, Marge. Does this guy know anything?” Enough to “get by,” as it is said. Enough to successfully kill a man and assume his identity. 

    In many ways, it’s also easier to kill Law’s Dickie in that he’s much more of a boor. The type of man so careless with people’s feelings that he ends up prompting one local woman’s suicide (she got pregnant with his child and he wouldn’t give her the money for an abortion). The type of man who provokes Tom on the boat in San Remo with his cruel assessments (including “You can be quite boring” and “You can be a leech”)  until Tom’s true inner freak show finally unleashes. It’s here, too, that the differences between Damon’s “cooler,” more competent Ripley shines through in that, unlike Scott’s Ripley, he’s not too daft to understand how to more rapidly sink a boat after killing Dickie on it. Incidentally, just before Damon’s Ripley kills Dickie, he remarks, “The funny thing is, I’m not pretending to be somebody else and you are.”

    It is in this sense, too, that viewers are given an understanding that Damon’s Ripley was far more overtly in love with Dickie, while abhorring the phoniness (Holden Caulfield-style) of those in his privileged circumstances. In truth, it appears to genuinely pain Damon’s Tom to kill Dickie, opting to lay with his body for a while afterward as the boat sloshes back and forth. Scott’s Ripley, instead, is more in love with Dickie’s money, even if not his friends. Freddie Miles (Philip Seymour Hoffman) included. The Freddie of Ripley (played by Eliot Sumner), however, is slightly less brutish…if for no other reason than he’s British and not American. He’s also much more direct about accusing Tom of taking over Dickie’s life. But Tom is quick to the kill, and does it in a manner less messy than Scott’s Ripley, who drags the body about in such a way as to leave traces of blood everywhere. Worse still, he simply leaves Freddie’s corpse in the front seat of his car rather than taking it out and making it look more like some kind of car accident.

    While both Ripleys rely on improvisation to execute whatever their schemes of the moment are, the manner in which Damon’s Ripley speaks is generally more confident and quick to the draw, which makes him far more believable and, frankly, less smack-worthy than Scott’s version. 

    Indeed, there are so many more moments during Ripley when one wants to scream at the character for being so stupid and slow in his actions. It is only in the final episode, “Narcissus,” that we start to see something resembling Ripley actually hitting his pathological lying stride. And, in the same way that Damon’s Ripley talks about Dickie as a cover for talking about himself, Scott’s Ripley tells the private detective, “He wondered if he would ever be good at anything. Everything about him was an act. He knew he was…supremely untalented.” And yes, Scott’s Ripley is definitely that, whereas Damon’s Ripley can at least play the piano and keep all of his lies straight. Even though, as he admits to his eventual gay companion, Peter (Jack Davenport), he’s had to lock away a lot of his past in order to cope. Which is why, when Peter asks how Dickie could live with himself if he murdered Freddie, Ripley answers, “Whatever you do, however terrible, however hurtful, it all makes sense, doesn’t it? In your head. You never meet anyone who thinks they’re a bad person.”

    Ripley certainly doesn’t. Neither version of him—the one in color or the one in black and white. And yes, Zaillian’s decision to enlist Robert Elswit for the B&W cinematography becomes almost more interesting to watch than Ripley himself. While there are any number of reasons for the choice to avoid color, some might posit that the ongoing thread of Caravaggio is a factor (initially mentioned by Dickie as being a man on the run for murder, and who did some of his best work as a fugitive). After all, what’s better for reflecting the chiaroscuro of the maestro’s paintings than black and white? The stark duality of these colors—being at opposite sides of the spectrum—also mirrors the dynamic between Tom and Dickie. 

    With Ripley, Zaillian has created a different version entirely of the man many came to know best not through Highsmith’s novel, but through Damon’s portrayal. Alas, even with so much more time to develop Ripley as a character within the span of eight episodes, it’s ironic that, naturally, we still don’t really know him at all. For it’s impossible to “know” a cipher. Someone so mutable and, therefore, as Marge (Dakota Fanning) puts it, “vague.” Granted, not so vague that he can’t still read as flying by the seat of his stolen pants when it comes to executing his so-called strategies. However, in the ultimate defense of Scott’s Ripley, he does actually speak some Italian. Call it a testament to his “quick study” nature.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Does Tom Ripley Get Caught in Ripley For Killing Dickie? The Inspector’s Expression Says It All

    Does Tom Ripley Get Caught in Ripley For Killing Dickie? The Inspector’s Expression Says It All

    [ad_1]

    Spoilers ahead for Netflix‘s Ripley. It’s a mystery that hasn’t been truly solved for decades. Here’s if Tom Ripley gets caught in Ripley for killing Dickie in the new Netflix series.

    The eight-episode show depicts Tom Ripley as a grifter scraping by in early 1960s New York, is hired by a wealthy man to travel to Italy to try to convince his vagabond son to return home. Tom’s acceptance of the job is the first step into a complex life of deceit, fraud, and murder. The drama series is based on Patricia Highsmith’s bestselling Tom Ripley novels.

    “People have a lot of preconceptions about Tom Ripley,” Andrew Scott said about his character to Netflix’s Tudum. “So it’s my job, I suppose in some ways, to ignore all that and try to create our own particular version of it.”

    Tom Ripley takes up the job to convince Dickie Greenleaf to come back home from Italy but ends up becoming obsessed with his lifestyle to the point of mimicking and assuming the identity of Dickie’s life with his girlfriend Marge Sherwood. Tom Ripley jumps through various ways to con his way through life, but can he escape the woes of his own flaws and even murder?

    Does Tom Ripley Get Caught in Ripley For Killing Dickie?

    In a way, yes but also no. After harsh consideration, Tom goes back to using his original identity after using Dickie’s for quite a while. Tom then has a tough time with paranoia and turns himself to the police when he returns to Venice as he thinks they would suspect him to be a person of interest. He also fends off suspicion from Marge and Dickie’s father.

    Tom puts up a disguise to Inspector Ravini and after a lot of manipulating, the Inspector proposes that Dickie actually killed himself, leaving Tom Ripley to be free. Upon the last scene of the series, Inspector Ravini receives a copy of Marge’s book My Atrani which includes a dedication to Dickie. “for Richard Greenleaf with whom I shared my waking dream,” the note read. Right below is picture of Dickie—the real Dickie Greenleaf. Inspector Ravini closely examines the picture, and realizes it’s not the Dickie Greenleaf that he interview.

    So in the end, Tom Ripley walks free from all the crimes he has committed. But will the paranoia eventually end?

    How did Tom Ripley kill Dickie?

    Tom Ripley strikes Dickie with an oar on the boat until he’s dead and bleeding. The conman then shuffles through Dickie’s belongings and intricately discards his body.

    “Tom comes in and has these ideas about the depth of their friendship versus the connection that Dickie and Marge have,” Johnny Flynn, who plays Dickie told Netflix Tudum. “He wants something more. He wants to be him, and he doesn’t know what to do with that.” 

    Ripley returns to mainland Italy and takes over Dickie’s identity, and skillfully dodges ways in which he could get caught by the Italian police. In the process, Tom ends up killing Freddie Miles, a friend of Dickie’s who got too suspicious of Tom. He disposes of his body outside of Rome and eventually goes back to his old identity.

    Ripley is now available to stream on Netflix.

    [ad_2]

    Lea Veloso

    Source link