ReportWire

Tag: Revolution Wind

  • Lawmakers demand answers on offshore wind projects

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators are demanding answers from the Trump administration about the “national security threats” it cited in the decision to scuttle several multibillion-dollar offshore wind projects.

    In a letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey demanded a sit-down meeting with the agencies to review “recently completed classified reports” behind the “national security risks” the Trump administration cited in its decision to halt construction of the offshore wind projects.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“pD >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD H9@ 2C6 23=6 E@ G:6H 4=2DD:7:65 :?7@C>2E:@? 3J E96 G:CEF6 @7 @FC A@D:E:@?D – 2?5 H9@ C6AC6D6?E 2 DE2E6 2?5 H@C<6CD 92C>65 3J E9:D 564:D:@? – H6 C6BF6DE 2446DD E@ E96D6 4=2DD:7:65 C6A@CED[” E96J HC@E6] “%96D6 AFCA@CE65 =62D6 A2FD6D H:== 92G6 E96 67764E @7 AFEE:?8 p>6C:42?D @FE @7 H@C<[ 56DE23:=:K:?8 @FC 6?6C8J 8C:5[ 2?5 42FD:?8 6=64EC:4:EJ AC:46D E@ D@2C 5FC:?8 E96 6IA6?D:G6 9@>6 962E:?8 D62D@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E 2??@F?465 |@?52J E92E :E 😀 92=E:?8 7656C2= =62D6D 7@C =2C86D42=6 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED 4FCC6?E=J F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@?[ H9:49 :?4=F56D ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 `[ #6G@=FE:@? (:?5 @77 E96 |2DD249FD6EED 4@2DE[ r@2DE2= ‘:C8:?:2 ~77D9@C6 (:?5[ $F?C:D6 (:?5 2?5 E96 t>A:C6 (:?5 ` AC@;64E 😕 }6H *@C<]k^Am

    kAmx?E6C:@C $64C6E2CJ s@F8 qFC8F> 4:E65 F?DA64:7:65 ?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ C:D:ED 7@C E96 AC@;64ED[ 3FE D2:5 E96 >@G6 😀 2:>65 2E “AC@E64E:?8” E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J ;@:?65 76==@H s6>@4C2E:4 8@G6C?@CD @7 }6H *@C<[ |2DD249FD6EED[ r@??64E:4FE 2?5 #9@56 xD=2?5 😕 :DDF:?8 2 DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 E96 >@G6 H:== 4@DE E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D[ 5C:G6 FA E96 4@DE @7 6?6C8J 2?5 D6E324< E96 C68:@?’D 4=:>2E6 492?86 8@2=D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2??@F?46>6?E J6DE6C52J A2FD:?8 @77D9@C6 H:?5 =62D6D 😀 :ED =2E6DE 68C68:@FD 2EE24< @? 4=62? 6?6C8J 2?5 :E =2?5D =:<6 2 =F>A @7 5:CEJ 4@2= 7@C E96 9@=:52J D62D@? 7@C p>6C:42? H@C<6CD[ 4@?DF>6CD[ 2?5 :?G6DE@CD[” E96J HC@E6] “!2FD:?8 24E:G6 =62D6D[ 6DA64:2==J 7@C 4@>A=6E65 2?5 ?62C=J 4@>A=6E65 AC@;64ED[ 567:6D =@8:4[ H:== 9FCE @FC 3:5 7@C 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46[ H:== 5C:G6 FA 4@DED 7@C p>6C:42 C2E6A2J6CD[ 2?5 H:== >2<6 FD =@D6 E9@FD2?5D @7 8@@5A2J:?8 ;@3D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 8@G6C?@CD D2:5 E96 DE2E6D 2C6 “H@C<:?8 92C5 E@ 3F:=5 >@C6 6?6C8J E@ >66E C:D:?8 56>2?5 2?5 =@H6C 4@DED” 2?5 E96 H:?5 AC@;64ED F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@? 92G6 “4C62E65 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D 2?5 :?;64E65 3:==:@?D 😕 64@?@>:4 24E:G:EJ :?E@ @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D]”k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 32D6=6DD[ C64<=6DD 2?5 6CC2E:4 24E:@? 7C@> E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 x?E6C:@C H:== 2=D@ :?;64E 7FCE96C F?46CE2:?EJ :?E@ E96 >2C<6ED[ >2<:?8 :E 92C56C 7@C DE2E6D 2?5 AC:G2E6 4@>A2?:6D E@ D64FC6 7:?2?4:?8 7@C AF3=:4 H@C6 56DA:E6 92G:?8 8@?6 E9C@F89 2== E96 ?646DD2CJ =@42= 2?5 7656C2= 2AAC@G2= AC@46DD6D[” E96J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E’D 5:C64E:G6 4@>6D EH@ H66A @C56C E92E 92=E65 D6G6C2= @77D9@C6 H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2=@?8 E96 pE=2?E:4 r@2DE 7C@> |2:?6 E@ }6H y6CD6J]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D G@H65 E@ 6?5 7656C2= DFAA@CE 7@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 2?5 @E96C 4=62? 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2D 96 7@4FD6D @? 3@@DE:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= AC@5F4E:@? 2D A2CE @7 3C@256C 677@CED E@ :>AC@G6 E96 ?2E:@?’D 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ E96 AC6D:56?E 5:C64E65 E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 42?46= Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C 86EE:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 A=2?D E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 AC@;64E @77 |2CE92’D ‘:?6J2C5 😀 23@FE d_T 4@>A=6E6] %96 AC@;64E 42==D 7@C ea EFC3:?6D 42A23=6 @7 D6?5:?8 FA E@ c__ >682H2EED E@ E96 C68:@?2= 6=64EC:4 8C:5] |62H9:=6[ E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 2?@E96C AC@;64E – $@FE9 r@2DE (:?5 – H@F=5 A@H6C @G6C ` >:==:@? 9@>6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 4C62E6 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D]k^Am

    kAm(:?5 AC@G:56D 23@FE `_T @7 E96 6=64EC:4:EJ 86?6C2E65 😕 E96 &]$][ >2<:?8 :E E96 ?2E:@?’D =2C86DE D@FC46 @7 C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 7656C2= 52E2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • New England offshore wind project in Trump’s crosshairs

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Trump administration is signaling that it will likely cancel a federal permit for a regional offshore wind project, drawing a rebuke from state leaders and environmentalists who said such a decision would set back the state’s climate change goals and cost thousands of good-paying jobs.

    The U.S. Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said in a new court filing last week that it is reconsidering federal approval of Avangrid’s New England Wind 1 project. The 719-megawatt project called for generating enough electricity to power more than 400,000 homes in the state.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 7656C2= 286?4J’D 4@FCE 7:=:?8 4@>6D 😕 C6DA@?D6 E@ 2 =2HDF:E 7:=65 3J prz 7@C (92=6D[ 2 }2?EF4<6E32D65 8C@FA @AA@D65 E@ @77D9@C6 H:?5[ H9:49 DF65 E96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E E@ @G6CEFC? E96 A6C>:E :DDF65 E@ }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5[ 2C8F:?8 E96 AC@;64E E9C62E6?D E96 4C:E:42==J 6?52?86C65 }@CE9 pE=2?E:4 C:89E H92=6]k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 286?4J’D >@G6 E@ <:== E96 DE2E6’D 7:CDE @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64E 5C6H 4C:E:4:D> 7C@> v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J[ H9@ D2:5 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 2?@E96C AC@;64E – $@FE9 r@2DE (:?5 – H@F=5 A@H6C >@C6 E92? ` >:==:@? 9@>6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 4C62E6 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D]k^Am

    kAm“w2G:?8 2=C625J F?56C8@?6 J62CD @7 6IA6CE C6G:6H[ E96D6 AC@;64ED 2C6 AC:>65 E@ =@H6C 4@DED 2?5 :>AC@G6 C6=:23:=:EJ[” w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E %9FCD52J] “%96C6 😀 23D@=FE6=J ?@ ?665 7@C E96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? E@ C6@A6? A6C>:EE:?8 AC@46DD6D 2?5 56?J ;@3D[ :?G6DE>6?E 2?5 6?6C8J E@ E96 DE2E6D]”k^Am

    kAm$6?D] t=:K236E9 (2CC6? 2?5 t5 |2C<6J :DDF65 2 ;@:?E DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 :7 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 42?46=D }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 `[ :E “H:== 36 <:==:?8 F?:@? ;@3D[ C2:D:?8 6?6C8J 4@DED[ 9FCE:?8 8C:5 C6=:23:=:EJ[ 2?5 F?56C>:?:?8 p>6C:42? 4@>A6E:E:G6?6DD]”k^Am

    kAm“%96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 ` AC@;64E 8@E 2 8C66? =:89E 7C@> E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[ 3FE E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @?=J H2?ED E@ E9C@H FA DE@A D:8?D 2?5 DA665 3F>AD E@ AC6G6?E E96 4@?DECF4E:@? @7 277@C523=6[ p>6C:42?>256 6?6C8J[” E96J D2:5] “%CF>A 2?5 9:D 423:?6E ?665 E@ 6?5 E96:C H2C @? p>6C:42? 6?6C8J 2?5 ;@3D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? C646?E=J 42?46=65 Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C C646:G:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm%C2?DA@CE2E:@? $64C6E2CJ $62? sF77J D2:5 E96 286?4J 😀 “AC:@C:E:K:?8 C62= :?7C2DECF4EFC6 :>AC@G6>6?ED @G6C 72?E2DJ H:?5 AC@;64ED E92E 4@DE >F49 2?5 @776C =:EE=6[” 255:?8 E92E E96 7F?5:?8 H:== 36 C65:C64E65 E@ FA8C256 A@CED 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED 2:>65 2E “C6DE@C:?8 p>6C:42’D >2C:E:>6 5@>:?2?46 2?5 AC6G6?E:?8 H2DE6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 Sb__ >:==:@? $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2=[ 2 A2CE?6CD9:A 36EH66? rC@H=6J (:?5 $6CG:46D[ $2=6> 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r=62? t?6C8J r6?E6C[ 42==D 7@C C656G6=@A:?8 2 ca24C6 D:E6 7@C>6C=J @44FA:65 3J 2 4@2= 2?5 @:=7:C65 A@H6C A=2?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2?D 42== 7@C FD:?8 E96 D:E6 2D 2 DE28:?8 2C62 7@C 2DD6>3=:?8 2?5 EC2?DA@CE:?8 H:?5 EFC3:?6 4@>A@?6?ED E@ }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C @77D9@C6 H:?5 72C>D]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 2? 6I64FE:G6 @C56C D9@CE=J 27E6C E2<:?8 @77:46 😕 y2?F2CJ[ 564=2C:?8 2? 6?6C8J “DE2E6 @7 6>6C86?4J” 2?5 E6>A@C2C:=J A2FD:?8 =62D6D 2?5 A6C>:ED 7@C H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED] w:D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 😀 7@4FD65 @? AC@>@E:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= 6?6C8J D@FC46D @G6C C6?6H23=6D]k^Am

    kAmt2C=:6C E9:D >@?E9[ E96 qFC62F @7 ~462? t?6C8J |2?286>6?E 92=E65 4@?DECF4E:@? @? #6G@=FE:@? (:?5[ 2 ?62C=J 4@>A=6E6 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64E ?62C #9@56 xD=2?5]k^Am

    kAm(@C< H2D DE@AA65 2=D@ @? t>A:C6 (:?5[ 2 }6H *@C< @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64E[ 3FE =2E6C C6DF>65 27E6C }6H *@C< $6?] r9F4< $49F>6C 2?5 v@G] z2E9J w@49F=[ 3@E9 s6>@4C2ED[ :?E6CG6?65]k^Am

    kAm}:4< zC2<@77[ 2 D6?:@C 2EE@C?6J 2E E96 r@?D6CG2E:@? {2H u@F?52E:@?[ D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 677@CED E@ <:== @77D9@C6 H:?5 😀 “D23@E28:?8 @FC 6?6C8J 7FEFC6—8FEE:?8 2 G:E2= D@FC46 @7 C6=:23=6 =@42=[ 4=62? A@H6C 2?5 H62<6?:?8 @FC 23:=:EJ E@ >66E 8C@H:?8 6?6C8J 56>2?5D[ 2== E@ D6CG6 E96 :?E6C6DED @7 E96 7@DD:= 7F6= :?5FDECJ]”k^Am

    kAmx? |2J[ pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36== 2?5 `e @E96C s6>@4C2ED 492==6?865 E96 2FE9@C:EJ @7 !C6D:56?E %CF>A E@ 6?7@C46 2 y2?] a_ 6I64FE:G6 @C56C E92E 92=E65 H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2=@?8 E96 t2DE r@2DE 7C@> |2:?6 E@ }6H y6CD6J]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 92D D6E 2 8@2= E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6 😀 H@C<:?8 H:E9 #9@56 xD=2?5 @? E9C66 AC@;64ED E@E2=:?8 a[efg >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5[ H9:49 :?4=F56D E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 a AC@;64E] (96? 4@>A=6E65[ E96 H:?5 EFC3:?6D H:== 36 42A23=6 @7 AC@G:5:?8 6?@F89 6=64EC:4:EJ E@ A@H6C >@C6 E92? `]c >:==:@? 9@>6D]k^Am

    kAmxE’D 2=D@ A2CE @7 E96 !@H6C &A }6H t?8=2?5 :?:E:2E:G6 H:E9 r@??64E:4FE[ |2:?6[ }6H w2>AD9:C6[ #9@56 xD=2?5 2?5 ‘6C>@?E 2?5 D6G6C2= FE:=:E:6D – H9:49 42==D 7@C 6IA2?5:?8 :?E6C4@??64E:@? A@:?ED 7@C F?56CD62 423=6D E92E H:== 6G6?EF2==J 3C:?8 A@H6C 7C@> @77D9@C6 H:?5 EFC3:?6D E@ E96 C68:@?2= 8C:5]k^Am

    kAm%H@ >2;@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 56G6=@A6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED – r@>>@?H62=E9 (:?5 2?5 $96== 2?5 ~462? (:?5D }@CE9 p>6C:42 – E6C>:?2E65 E96:C A@H6C AFC492D6 28C66>6?ED H:E9 E96 DE2E6’D FE:=:E:6D 😕 a_ab[ 4:E:?8 DFAA=J 492:? :DDF6D 2?5 @E96C 4@?46C?D E92E 92G6 >256 :E E@@ 5:77:4F=E E@ 7:?2?46 E96 AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DOT pulls plug on funding for Salem wind project

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Gov. Maura Healey and other state leaders are blasting the Trump administration for clawing back $33.8 million in federal funding for a Salem project to support offshore wind development, saying the move jeopardizes hundreds of jobs and the state’s climate change goals.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation on Friday canceled $679 million in federal funding for a dozen infrastructure projects that would support offshore wind, saying the plans “were not aligned with the goals and priorities of the administration.”


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C D64FC:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 86EE:?8 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm“(2DE67F=[ H:?5 AC@;64ED 2C6 FD:?8 C6D@FC46D E92E 4@F=5 @E96CH:D6 8@ E@H2C5D C6G:E2=:K:?8 p>6C:42’D >2C:E:>6 :?5FDECJ[” %C2?DA@CE2E:@? $64C6E2CJ $62? sF77J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%92?A[ H6 2C6 AC:@C:E:K:?8 C62= :?7C2DECF4EFC6 :>AC@G6>6?ED @G6C 72?E2DJ H:?5 AC@;64ED E92E 4@DE >F49 2?5 @776C =:EE=6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 s~% D2:5 E96 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 H:== 36 C65:C64E65 E@ FA8C256 A@CED 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED 2:>65 2E “C6DE@C:?8 p>6C:42’D >2C:E:>6 5@>:?2?46 2?5 AC6G6?E:?8 H2DE6]”k^Am

    kAmqFE w62=6J 42==65 E96 564:D:@? E@ AF== 324< E96 7F?5D 7C@> E96 $2=6> E6C>:?2= AC@;64E 2 “D=2A 😕 E96 7246” E@ E96 6DE:>2E65 g__ H@C<6CD H9@ 4@F=5 =@D6 E96:C ;@3D :7 E96 AC@;64E 😀 D4C2AA65] $96 D2:5 :E 2=D@ ;6@A2C5:K6D 2?J 7FEFC6 ;@3D E:65 E@ E96 724:=:EJ 2?5 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@5F4E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 😀 ?@E9:?8 H2DE67F= 23@FE E9:D AC@;64E[ H9:49 92D 366? DFAA@CE65 3J 3@E9 2 s6>@4C2E:4 2?5 #6AF3=:42? 8@G6C?@C[” w62=6J[ 2 s6>@4C2E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96 C62= H2DE6 96C6 😀 E96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 42?46=:?8 E6?D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 7@C 2 AC@;64E E92E 😀 2=C625J F?56CH2J E@ :?4C62D6 @FC 6?6C8J DFAA=J 2?5 DFAA@CE 9F?5C65D @7 H@C<6CD 2?5 E96:C 72>:=:6D]”k^Am

    kAm|2?J @7 E96 AC@;64ED 27764E65 3J E96 7F?5:?8 42?46==2E:@? 2C6 DE28:?8 2C62D E92E H@F=5 36 FD65 E@ 3F:=5 @77D9@C6 H:?5 EFC3:?6D] ~E96C DE2E6D :>A24E65 :?4=F565 r2=:7@C?:2[ ‘:C8:?:2[ }6H *@C< 2?5 }6H y6CD6J] %96 =2C86DE 8C2?E 42?46=65 H2D 7@C E96 wF>3@=5E q2J ~77D9@C6 (:?5 😕 r2=:7@C?:2[ H:E9 23@FE Scaf >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= DFAA@CE H:E95C2H?]k^Am

    kAm“x? F?=2H7F==J 2?5 D6?D6=6DD=J 4FEE:?8 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 E@ @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED[ %CF>A ;FDE D:8?65 2 562E9 H2CC2?E 7@C E9@FD2?5D @7 F?:@? ;@3D ?2E:@?H:56 2?5 8F2C2?E665 E92E 72>:=:6D’ 6?6C8J 3:==D H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ D@4C2E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 Sb__ >:==:@? $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2=[ 2 A2CE?6CD9:A 36EH66? rC@H=6J (:?5 $6CG:46D[ $2=6> 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r=62? t?6C8J r6?E6C[ 42==D 7@C C656G6=@A:?8 2 ca24C6 D:E6 7@C>6C=J @44FA:65 3J 2 4@2= 2?5 @:=7:C65 A@H6C A=2?E] %96 D:E6 H@F=5 D6CG6 2D 2 DE28:?8 2C62 7@C 2DD6>3=:?8 2?5 EC2?DA@CE:?8 H:?5 EFC3:?6 4@>A@?6?ED E@ @77D9@C6 H:?5 72C>D]k^Am

    kAmxE H2D?’E :>>65:2E6=J 4=62C H92E E96 :>A24E @7 E96 7F?5:?8 4FED H@F=5 36 @? E96 AC@;64E[ H9:49 3C@<6 8C@F?5 =2DE pF8FDE H:E9 A=2?D E@ 36 4@>A=6E65 3J a_af] p rC@H=6J DA@<6DA6CD@? 5:5?’E :>>65:2E6=J C6DA@?5 E@ 2 C6BF6DE 7@C 4@>>6?E]k^Am

    kAmx? yF=J[ $2=6> |2J@C s@>:?:4< !2?82==@ 2?5 E96 E6C>:?2= AC@;64E’D 56G6=@A6CD 925 6IAC6DD65 4@?7:56?46 E92E 4@?DECF4E:@? H@F=5 AC@4665 56DA:E6 %CF>A’D 677@CED E@ D4FEE=6 E96 @77D9@C6 H:?5 :?5FDECJ]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D AF3=:4=J C2:=65 282:?DE H:?5 72C>D 2D “3:C5<:==:?8 >@?DEC@D:E:6D” 2?5 D:8?65 2? 6I64FE:G6 @C56C D9@CE=J 27E6C E2<:?8 @77:46 y2?F2CJ[ 564=2C:?8 2? 6?6C8J “DE2E6 @7 6>6C86?4J” 2?5 E6>A@C2C:=J A2FD:?8 =62D6D 2?5 A6C>:ED 7@C H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED] w:D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 😀 7@4FD65 @? AC@>@E:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= 6?6C8J D@FC46D @G6C C6?6H23=6D]k^Am

    kAmt2C=:6C E9:D >@?E9[ E96 qFC62F @7 ~462? t?6C8J |2?286>6?E 92=E65 4@?DECF4E:@? @? #6G@=FE:@? (:?5[ 2 ?62C=J 4@>A=6E6 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64E ?62C #9@56 xD=2?5]k^Am

    kAm(@C< H2D DE@AA65 2=D@ @? t>A:C6 (:?5[ 2 }6H *@C< @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64E[ 3FE =2E6C C6DF>65 27E6C }6H *@C< $6?] r9F4< $49F>6C 2?5 v@G] z2E9J w@49F=[ 3@E9 s6>@4C2ED[ :?E6CG6?65]k^Am

    kAmx? |2J[ pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36== 2?5 `e @E96C s6>@4C2ED 492==6?865 E96 2FE9@C:EJ @7 !C6D:56?E %CF>A E@ 6?7@C46 2 y2?] a_ 6I64FE:G6 @C56C E92E 92=E65 H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2=@?8 E96 t2DE r@2DE 7C@> |2:?6 E@ }6H y6CD6J]k^Am

    kAm%96 pvD D2:5 %CF>A’D 564:D:@? E@ :?567:?:E6=J A2FD6 7656C2= H:?56?6C8J 2AAC@G2=D 😀 “F?=2H7F=” 2?5 42==65 @? 2 7656C2= ;F586 E@ 3=@4< E96 @C56C 2?5 C6DE@C6 A6C>:ED 7@C E96 AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • States vow to fight Trump official’s stop-work order on offshore wind farm

    [ad_1]

    The Democratic governors of Rhode Island and Connecticut promised on Saturday to fight a Trump administration order halting work on a nearly complete wind farm off their coasts that was expected to be operational next year.

    The Revolution Wind project was about 80% complete, with 45 of its 65 turbines already installed, according to the Danish wind farm developer Ørsted, when the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management sent the firm a letter on Friday ordering it to “halt all ongoing activities”.

    “In particular, BOEM is seeking to address concerns related to the protection of national security interests in the United States,” wrote Matt Giacona, the agency’s acting director, adding that Ørsted “may not resume activities” until the agency has completed a review of the project.

    Giacona said that the project, which had already cleared years of federal and state reviews, now needs to be re-examined in light of Donald Trump’s order, on the first day of his second term, to consider “terminating or amending any existing wind energy leases”.

    Giacona, whose prior work as a lobbyist for the offshore oil industry alarmed consumer advocates, also said that the review was necessary to “address concerns related to the protection of national security interests of the United States”. He did not specify what those national security concerns are.

    Rhode Island’s governor, Dan McKee, criticized the stop-work order and said he and Connecticut’s governor, Ned Lamont, “will pursue every avenue to reverse the decision to halt work on Revolution Wind”, which was “just steps away from powering more than 350,000 homes”.

    Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, connected the decision to Trump’s reported pitch last year to oil industry executives to trade $1bn in campaign donations for regulatory favors. “When the oil industry showed up at Mar-a-Lago with a set of demands in exchange for a $1 billion of campaign support for Trump, this is what they were asking for: the destruction of clean energy in America,” Murpy said in a statement.

    “This is a story of corruption, plain and simple. President Trump has sold our country out to big corporations with the oil and gas industry at the top of the list,” the senator added. “I will work with my colleagues and Governor Lamont to pursue all legal paths to get this project back on track.”

    Since returning to office, Trump has taken sweeping actions to prioritize fossil fuels and hinder renewable energy projects. Throughout his time in public office, Trump has repeatedly brought up his visceral hatred for wind power, apparently prompted by his belief that offshore turbines spoil the views at his golf courses, and his embrace of the bizarre theory that “the noise causes cancer”.

    Trump recently called wind and solar power “THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!” in a social media post and vowed not to approve wind or “farmer destroying Solar” projects.

    Rhode Island’s attorney general, Peter Neronha, said in a statement on Saturday that, without the Revolution Wind project, the state’s Act on Climate law, which aims to use renewable energy to battle global warming, “is dead in the water”.

    Scientists agree that nations need to rapidly embrace renewable energy to stave off the worst effects of climate change, including extreme heat and drought; larger, more intense wildfires and supercharged hurricanes, typhoons and rainstorms that lead to catastrophic flooding.

    Construction on Revolution Wind began in 2023, and the project was expected to be fully operational next year. Ørsted says it is evaluating the financial impact of stopping construction and considering legal proceedings.

    Revolution Wind is located more than 15 miles (24km) south of the Rhode Island coast, 32 miles (51km) south-east of the Connecticut coast and 12 miles (19km) south-west of Martha’s Vineyard. Rhode Island is already home to one offshore wind farm, the five-turbine Block Island Wind Farm.

    Revolution Wind was expected to be Rhode Island and Connecticut’s first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, capable of powering more than 350,000 homes. The densely populated states have minimal space available for land-based energy projects, which is why the offshore wind project is considered crucial for the states to meet their climate goals.

    Related: BP agrees to sell US onshore wind business as it shifts back to oil

    Wind power is the largest source of renewable energy in the US and provides about 10% of the electricity generated in the nation.

    Green Oceans, a non-profit that opposes the offshore wind industry, and sued in federal court last year to stop the 83,798-acre (33,912-hectare) Revolution Wind project on environmental grounds, applauded the decision. “We are grateful that the Trump Administration and the federal government are taking meaningful action to preserve the fragile ocean environment off the coasts of Rhode Island and Massachusetts,” the non-profit said in a statement.

    This is the second major offshore wind project the Trump White House has halted. Work was previously stopped on Empire Wind, a New York offshore wind project, but construction was allowed to resume after New York’s governor, Kathy Hochul, and senator Chuck Schumer intervened.

    “This administration has it exactly backwards. It’s trying to prop up clunky, polluting coal plants while doing all it can to halt the fastest growing energy sources of the future – solar and wind power,” Kit Kennedy, managing director for the power division at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, every American is paying the price for these misguided decisions.”

    The Associated Press contributed reporting

    [ad_2]

    Source link